TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HeloisePommefume Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by HeloisePommefume on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

You did say it wasn't profitable The royals are a drain on the public funds because... Who is acting like taxes go to wipe the royal family's ass? No one in this threat has said anything about taxes. We were discussing whether or not the royal family drains public funding. The figures I've provided show that the royal family is not getting their ass wiped for free, but is actually providing funds for England as a whole.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 08:00 AM
5

This deal actually works out in favor of the government because while maintaining the royals only costs about £40m per annum, royal lands generate about £200m through tourism, agriculture, and commercial interests.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 05:35 AM
3

Girl's perspective here. I'm not sure why she swatted your hands away when you put them on her waist (maybe just trying to keeping sexual touching under her control?) but I'm pretty sure she cock blocked you because you gave up and danced with the other girl so easily.
/r/seduction23/02/12 09:54 AM
6

Yes, you should have walked her to her car.
/r/seduction28/08/11 09:03 PM
2

It was an interesting article. But most of it comes from a perspective on which men and women aren't involved in a relationship on equal terms. If you want a quality partner, you're going to have share some of the "terms" with her. The part about women being more vulnerable in relationship and needing relationships more than men is bull shit. I'm a female who has spent the greater part of her post-pubescent years single. I'm always glad when a quality man comes along who can stimulate me intelle…
/r/seduction03/06/11 05:40 AM
0

What's wrong with the HB6 you say you might get on a good day? How would you rate yourself? I definitely wouldn't rate someone at 220lbs at more than a 6 if there were a scale for guys. If you want better than a 6, make yourself better.
/r/seduction20/05/11 06:20 AM
5

Wow. As a female I hate it when guys give me lines. But this is good. Really good. I'd fall for this in a heartbeat and tell you I like to talk about history.
/r/seduction15/05/11 12:55 AM
2

I wholeheartedly second this advice. It was only the second date. It doesn't necessarily mean she has issues with orgasms or is a virgin. She just didn't want to get that intimate on the second date: she hardly knows you. If you think she's worth it, don't make her uncomfortable and slow down a little. If she's not worth the time and all you want is a fuck, then you should move on and find an easy girl.
/r/seduction02/05/11 07:20 AM
1

This statistic comes from a report on Women's labor by UNICEF done in the late 1990s. Sorry I don't remember the exact year. They frequently reuse it: http://www.unicef.org/gender/index_bigpicture.html
/r/MensRights24/02/11 07:25 AM
-1

There are only 15 female CEOs of the 500 corporations making up Forbes's Fortune 500 list. There has only ever been one female four star general. And to this day serving as the president of the United States remains entirely a male privilege.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 08:55 AM
3

I was interested in debate, and simply disagreed with one post - not with men's rights in general - and was greeted with such vitriol that I'll probably not be posting again. Maybe it's this ridiculous level of outrage that prompts people to try and get your guys' goats. If this forum was a little more rational and a little less emotional you'd have a lot more success having serious discussion and debate.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 01:19 AM
2

very reasonably stated.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 03:40 AM
0

So you think the reestablishment of western patriarchy is a good thing? It's not equal right you want then, you want men to be on top? And when you say divorce laws have helped destroy middle class America are you saying that you're anti-divorce, or just the way divorce laws favor women? Because favoring men in divorce isn't going to help the family out either. Trying to limit divorce is what we should be after.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 03:39 AM
-2

I'm not a man - and my first instinct when you talk about women having a legal advantage over men is incredulous. But when I stop and think about it, in some cases you're right: regarding child custody, alimony, and rape allegations, you're 100% right: women should not have more rights than men in these areas. I'm not sure of any others....I guess that's why I came in here hoping to learn something. But sadly, I find nothing but hyperbole and defensiveness. The three examples I listed don't mean…
/r/MensRights24/11/10 03:07 AM
0

I'll grant you the fact that men ruling over women is too simplistic and doesn't really describe the nuances of class and personal relationships. But acting like men had it worse? Because they had to be saddled with all that money earning and family supporting? Different burdens certainly, but by no means worse off than women. And wanting to pass on your genes is by no means something everyone aspires to. Maybe you've never pushed a baby out of your vagina or been the full time care giver for an…
/r/MensRights24/11/10 02:35 AM
5

I'm offended for father's rights. But I'm WAY more offended as an agnostic myself. wtf Indiana? I wonder what would happen in the case of an agnostic mother and a Christian father, if they still would have been willing to interfere?
/r/MensRights23/11/10 01:30 PM
-1

I never said that men deserve oppression. Do you have a quote? Don't put words in my mouth. You guys seem to assume that all women are the same. Men are oppressed in many ways, and I'd like to talk about it seriously, not these ridiculous examples. Alimony and false rape charges are a better start. I'm sad that feminists have made you guys so reactionary as to say that historically women have always had the advantage over men. When women couldn't own property or serve as legal witnesses? When th…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 01:04 PM
3

That is NOT what THEY are doing. You shouldn't assume that anyone who is critical is anti-man, or that they are a woman. In fact, if you look closely, this woman claims to have balls. THEY are criticizing the examples used by the original poster. And I wholeheartedly agree with THEM. The examples used the original poster were BAD and do not support the thesis that western society is facing a feminist shari'ah. You guys don't have to be so defensive. No one said men's rights are bed, again, only …
/r/MensRights23/11/10 12:44 PM
0

Also, I wanted to ad: you bring up a good point about divorce. I assume you're talking about alimony, which I abhore and is one of the things that drew me to this group. Financial responsibility for women is not be had siphoning off a man's paycheck - ESPECIALLY after a divorce. I never said anyone's pain and suffering didn't matter. I said the examples listed didn't matter. Please don't say "women like me" you're doing exactly what you warned me against doing to middle eastern cultures. And as …
/r/MensRights23/11/10 12:34 PM
0

Thanks for the welcome. You say that a lot of feminists come in here and do what I did, or say that men's rights are not important. I have never said that, nor do I believe that. Men's rights are just as important as women's rights. That's why I'm here. I'm afraid history HAS to be revised. It always has been and it always will be. It's the only way. It wouldn't be fair to not reconsider sources. Historians have biases, and they're usually not obvious to historians themselves. It takes another g…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 12:22 PM
1

I would ad one thing: IF you want to act like men have it hard, it's only fair to let historians contexualize that. I do not think any of the men in my life owe me or any women shit. But I do think that men aren't going to get anywhere with women if they are unable to admit a historical advantage. You owe women a duty to avoid thinking about men's rights outside of the context of women's rights, which I'm sure you realize is loaded issue. Of course women are going to get mad when men act like on…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 12:06 PM
1

Wow. You need to calm down. You bring up some good points. You're absolutely right that women oppress and the ways social status allows and allowed them to do so would make for a fascinating discussion if you cared to have it without all the fuck yous. Comments like this: "Wow, the education system really has gone to shit now that women are part of it" are uncalled for, and seem to say that you think women should not have been allowed in the academy? I realize that women are not simple victims i…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 11:53 AM
1

I was going off of the examples listed by the original post. I assure you I realize that you cannot lump countries and societies together just based on geographics. I just said that things still sucked for a lot of women living in patriarchal societies. I'm not naming them. I know they're out there. I'm not sure what you mean by 'fallout' of the sexual revolution that you have to deal with? Has the sexual revolution made it harder for you? Am I being naive for thinking that men aren't glad there…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 11:39 AM
-1

Of course the past was an ass hole to everybody. But males were not systematically discriminated against unless they weren't white. I don't recall hearing Hillary say that...but you're right, saying widows are the primary victims negates the greater sacrifice of dead men. Agreed.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 11:29 AM
0

I don't think I said that was a right or wrong way for anyone to talk about men's rights (that is until rabbitspade got me wound up and started making me defend myself - which I assume posters are allowed to do). I'm just saying that some better examples than the ones listed in the post that started this thread were needed. Thanks for a thoughtful response. So tell me: how do you feel that men have lost out? I've been trolling this subreddit for a month now and still feel like I'm missing someth…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 11:17 AM
1

I'm not reciting things I've heard: they're things I've seen through documents. I'm a researcher who lives in the past, and I'm sorry if it bothers men to have the past brought up: truly. But what can you do? I started out in history wanting to do women's history, but eventually moved on realizing that it could summed up with the phrase: the past was mean to girls. It's hard to get away from that. And it's going to come up when men's rights get talked about. I think I was clear that I am not loo…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 11:06 AM
-1

I did listen: as rabbitwhathisface noted, I listed for a month before I posted anything. All I was trying to do in my post was provide some perspective. I'm an historian, it's what I do. I am truly interested in men's rights, I only found fault with the examples cited by the original poster. If you'll look at my original post, it was only about women's lack of rights as they were used by the original poster to compare to men's lack of rights. Obviously it's not really possible to separate men's …
/r/MensRights23/11/10 10:55 AM
1

I'm not sure if I'm a guest because I'm new or because I'm a woman? I apologize if in any way my original post was offensive: I was merely trying to provide some perspective. If you're looking for guests who want to discuss men's rights, you're not very welcoming or willing to hear dissenting opinions, even when they're civily expressed. If you look over this thread, I think you'll see that rabbitspade's second post to me changed the tone of any civil dialogue I hoped to find here. If I've broke…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 10:43 AM
1

As for using "basic" terminology of my field, over the years I've found that when talking to people outside of the academy it usually impedes discussion because people are unfamiliar with it. If that's what you're looking for how is this: Both Revisionist and Post-Revisionist historiography document the oppression of women by socio-cultural institutions of power. As for the trolling: I hadn't posted anything yet because I hadn't been inspired to post anything until today. And I hope I didn't bre…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 10:33 AM
1

Why shouldn't I quote Virginia Woolf when the things she had to say are still relevant? The past is not "forgotten" - that is unless you're ignorant of it, which I suspect you are. And what I say is not inference, I'm a trained historian with a PhD. History is not "theoretical", it is based on documents. Prior to the 20th century these documents unequivocally show - and no trained historian would disagree with me - that social, governmental, economic, religious, familial, and cultural institutio…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 09:33 AM
1

I would argue that a "secret men's club" as you put it was in charge: made laws, governed, preached, prosecuted crime, lectured in university. Women have been left out of the business of state, out of public life. There is a tool to oppress women: being told from the time you were old enough to understand that girls don't go to school, don't learn an occupation, that too much thinking or reading is actually physically harmful to females, that a female's duty is to marry and have babies, keep a t…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 08:28 AM
-3

You are seeing "a concerted legal, moral, and social proscription of men's sexuality as disguised under the assumption that healthy, adult male sexuality is inherently dangerous and damaging to the social fabric of our lives?" to the extent that for the whole of recorded history men's sexuality has not only been prioritized before that of women, but used as an actual tool of oppression against women (and if this is something you're not willing to concede, let me know, I can elaborate in another …
/r/MensRights23/11/10 06:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter