| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | What’s the thinking on Scott Galloway?Lol.. I replied to the topic at hand, acknowledged the opposite point of view when discussing contrarian (to current views) things, cited a source when I quoted specific numbers and assumed that the concept of natural selection and happiness in later years of parents versus childless people were either common knowledge or a simple google search away to not require one. If you have an issue with anything I said though, you could have contested the point or asked for a source instead replying cond… | /r/ExRedPill | 18/08/25 09:18 PM |
| -3 | What’s the thinking on Scott Galloway?"I contribute nothing intellectual to conversations but hurl ad hominem attacks at people who do." | /r/ExRedPill | 18/08/25 06:03 PM |
| -1 | What’s the thinking on Scott Galloway?Im pretty sure the entire general tone of that response was both objective and detatched, and I'm a bit surprised you found that offensive or gross.. But I also love these topics so here's my 2 cents: I assume that we can generally agree that from an evolutionary perspective, females, (of most species) have a much higher percentage-wise ability to reproduce, while males need to compete for selection by females for the same oppportunity. As a result, vastly more females contributed their genes to… | /r/ExRedPill | 18/08/25 08:46 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter