TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hemi_Sphere Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Hemi_Sphere on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Hahaha cultural Marxism jahahah
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/20 08:37 AM
0

And here I thought THIS was the place with the ridiculous delusions and people obsessed with the friendzone, thanks for showing me otherwise.
/r/MGTOW05/05/20 08:14 AM
0

That reply was so hilarious I had to check your post history to see if you were satire.
/r/MGTOW04/05/20 11:52 PM
0

I doubt anyone has told you that, but it's possible. Even if they did, that is a specific and uncommon kink that does not generalise to all women.
/r/MGTOW04/05/20 04:06 PM
1

You haven't looked very far then.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/05/20 12:24 PM
1

Feminists: It's ok to do things contrary to traditional gender roles. Some other women, who disagree: We don't like this example of it. Shitty straw-man, dude, clearly different groups with different ideas. Cherry-picking must be a big part of your identity, huh?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/05/20 12:21 PM
1

/r/titlegore
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/20 09:24 AM
-4

I haven't said either of those things about anyone, stop projecting other people's shitty arguments onto me. Perhaps reconsider your username "Incelvester" if you'd like more balanced responses.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 06:13 PM
0

Only a brainwashed misogynist could possibly think it's a hate group. But anti-feminism is totally not a hate group, just ignore all the hateful things said here, that's just a (very) loud minority, probably (hopefully?). And here's some science on soy; https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(10)00368-7/pdf
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 05:27 PM
0

Why do you assume the car, house, income belongs to the man? What about women who are the majority income earners in the household? You assume that women lie for attention and money, but don't you think men do the same? Aren't mothers also legally prevented from seeing their kids when fathers win custody? Do you ever even consider any of these issues from a woman's perspective? Are you friends with any women? "FEDERAL LAWS Title IX: Prohibits –> Prohibits discrimination based on sex in education…
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 05:17 PM
0

If you don't think feminism is about equality, that's because YOU choose to cherry pick the more controversial items under the umbrella of feminism are ignore the more reasonable. That's the whole job of this subreddit! Why are you here unless you want to become more biased? What's the point? Why poison yourself like that? If you use a different private definition of feminism to everyone else, it's intellectually dishonest to deliberately conflate the two definitions when it suits you.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 05:00 PM
1

Well yeah, feminism is about balancing equality between sexes, and if you're an anti-feminist, then you're anti-equality between sexes. Do as many intellectual gymnastics as you need to justify your position and pat yourself on the back, but that doesn't change what you are, just how you rationalise your view point. If you really want to improve equality between the sexes, but think that some aspects of feminism go too far, then you are a moderate feminist! You just don't like the label because,…
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 04:47 PM
0

Why do you view relationships as a zero-sum-game? Do you think the financial outcomes of a relationship are the only thing to consider? If you think marriages are so unsuccessful, why don't you also blame the men who also enter into them willingly? Unless you cite a course for "Feminist divorce courts give women everything, and usually ignore prenups" then I am not willing to grant that in this discussion. Feminist divorce courts, are just normal divorce courts, because, news-flash, feminism is …
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 04:06 PM
-4

I didn't say that there weren't things that favoured women. Of course there are. And the point of feminism is to level the balance, so of course it aims to improve these too. Being a feminist and wanting less violent crimes and homeless people are not mutually exclusive. Do fewer women die in work place accidents because companies make men take dangerous jobs? Or because men are expected to do dangerous jobs over women? That is another thing that feminism aims to rectify by calling out toxic mas…
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 03:54 PM
0

What critical analysis of the knowledge backing up the book could you possibly make when you haven't read the book, the article, or any of her other work? Anyone can write a book, but could everyone get them published and respected by experts in the field. The books and articles aren't perfect but they ADD to the discourse instead of assuming the you're already right (and always have been) and any extra discourse is unnecessary. "Just saying radical stuff with the sole purpose of offending other…
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 03:26 PM
0

Those guys were genius philosophers who revolutionised their fields. She is also a philosopher. You are an arm-chair sexist. I think I know out of the two of who is closer to Plato, Aristotle and Archimedes.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 02:57 PM
0

Hate speech is a form of violence, that's a fact. "Personally, as a MGTOW, I advocate for men to completely avoid women." Can't be a healthy life-style. Don't you think things would be easier if you didn't see women as 'other' and you could get on with them without all this vitriol? Do you think that helps you somehow? Sounds fucked up to me. By forming this echo chamber around yourself, you're only going to further isolate and 'extremify' yourself, you're only going to hear things about women t…
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 02:39 PM
1

"It cares only for raising the rights of females and that is it." That is just categorically incorrect. "If it was about equality then it would have stopped pushing for more female rights 30 years ago when women gained all the rights men had (without most of the negatives). It would have then been trying to balance rights. But modern feminism has not pushed to improve men's rights even once." Just because on-paper, women have the same rights as men, doesn't mean that women are treated as equals …
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 02:29 PM
1

"So anti-feminists, ugly men who are incapable of finding women desperate enough to wed/fuck/impregnate, want to decide what the future of humanity should be? Those cunts can’t even decide on a Fucking restaurant for date night. Incels are a fucking mess. Lmao." Fixed your post.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 02:19 PM
0

She has literally written books about it. Where must your magic moving goalposts be before you consider her a thinker?
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 02:17 PM
-1

"Until they get smacked in the face. Seriously. It is a child's instinct to push boundaries to find out where the lines are." This is exactly what you're doing though. OP asked that in the post, that wasn't in the headline. Physical threats to those that don't agree with you, is that childish?
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 02:17 PM
1

The irony of this post is so strong. This place looks like an echo-chamber to me... What thinking did you do about the article exactly? Or did you just see the screenshot and react? What exactly is not butt-hurt about sending someone to a place you know oppresses women for having a thought you don't like?
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 02:07 PM
-6

Most people would support a blend of mens rights and feminism because most people want equality. So when you say no group seems to want that, you seem to be excluding the single largest group that exists; Normal people. Most people support feminism BECAUSE it improves equality, they don't swear some alliance to the word 'feminism' and must adhere to everything that falls under its umbrella, especially fringe ideas. When you see a screenshot of someone saying they have no sympathy for a male vict…
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 01:41 PM
0

Because a feminist future IS an equal one. Feminism is about leveling a balance that has favoured men for centuries. It's not about flipping it around and putting women on top for a change. Anyone who tells you it is, is lying to you. It's propaganda. If you only look at screenshots of articles with click-baity titles, angry reactions of young naive sjws, then you're going to have an inevitably warped view of what feminism is and who feminists are. Remember, propaganda is usually made by someone…
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 12:38 PM
-12

No, they exist because of misogyny. Political misogynists, under many different names, have existed long before what we consider modern feminism. As both have co-evolved, reactionary groups have splintered off, but saying one caused the other I don't think is accurate. I don't think you know much about feminism other than feminists being angry about stuff, which, unsurprisingly, paints a pretty narrow, argumentative view of what has been one of the defining schools of thought of the last century…
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/20 12:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter