TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HendriXP88 Archive

View 0 posts and 413 comments by HendriXP88 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Nobody approves of misandry but it’s still not half a problem as misogyny. That sentence is not approval. But it is excusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 05:24 AM
–

"Not all feminism"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 05:13 AM
8

That I agree with.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 08:23 PM
6

No. Every woman isn't a misandrist.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 05:29 PM
98

562 up votes!? What sub is this!?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 01:40 PM
2

An erection is an involuntary physical reaction. The fat blubbery man-looking mess could still get you hard from physical touch if everything's functioning properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 05:58 AM
0

It makes sense that when add additional factors into a decision the power of each individual factor decreases. Sure. But the same devaluation doesn't happen with men. Men value physical attraction high for STR as much as for LTR. But you are making the decision that however much physical attraction matters for an LTR is not enough. Enough for what? I don't see what about this data is "dark" or "heartbreaking". There's something unsettling about knowing that your spouse might find attractive enou…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 05:54 AM
1

The fact that he can get it up to have sex with her indicates at least a baseline of desire. Absolutely not. It indicates that he has a functioning physical reaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:03 PM
3

I understand your point and you're not wrong. But the data is actually darker than that. It shows that when assessing a LTR, a woman values other factors that she didn't value for a STR. That's completely correct. But the data shows that, while other factors matter for the LTR, physical attraction matters less. Meaning that she doesn't have to be as physical attracted to the LTR as she is for the STR.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 09:57 PM
1

Thank you so much! I'll definitely read it after the game. It's an interesting and, honestly, genuinely heartbreaking topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 07:29 PM
9

No, I don't like these studies at all. Just kidding. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886910005003?utm_source=chatgpt.com Here's a cross cultural study. It concludes that men value physical attraction while women value social status for long term relationship while both value physical attraction for short term. It basically, and very sadly, says OP made a pretty correct observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:23 PM
5

There's actually studies that points to what OPs saying. It's scary as fuck but... yeah...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 02:36 PM
1

But committing mass shooting in a mall or a school isn't highly likely linked to some form of depression or psychosis?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:19 PM
2

Trust me, I know full well what postpartum depression and psychosis looks like. So your claim is that a mother wouldn't murder her child without suffering from postpartum illness?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:16 PM
3

1: They're not my examples. 2: It's clear how?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:11 PM
2

I don't understand. One case among 20 display postpartum depression is a pattern?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:06 PM
2

What ideology? Incelnism?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:04 PM
2

Social studies as in the school subject? Or dud you mean social SCIENCE?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:42 PM
1

Are you trolling? I ask you if you know what empirical data sociologist based the conclusion that selective service was because of misogyny and your response is two opinion pieces? There isn't even a sliver of actual scientific research in your sources. What are you trying to prove exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:15 PM
1

Military service was justified by the belief that women were too weak and needed protection—classic benevolent sexism. And you have read what the "academics" base this conclusion on? And go ahead and explain how they ruled out that the reason was that society wanted to protect women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 07:44 PM
1

The issue is that what you're describing is a debate of opinion. Not a scientific discourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 07:38 PM
1

Please explain how economy is the reason 70% of all homeless people are men and suicide among men is for time higher than women. Doctors Opposing Circumcision, Intact America and NORM are three widespread organizations fighting for boys bodily autonomy. As we speak, there's a lawsuit in Colorado where the state is being charged with discrimination because they allow genital mutilation on boys. A trial that is expected to spread if successful. Tell me again how men are ambivalent to genital mutil…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 11:43 AM
1

Yeah. Can't be the genital mutilation, suicide rate, homelessness, etc. If pussy is all you have to offer, that's a you problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 05:39 AM
4

I thought I did answer your question. Is it only black boys that are falling behind in school? Is the suicide rate at an alarming rate with black men or men in general? The issue is that Harris didn't have a single reform plan that was directed at men as a group. Only subgroups. Which goes back to the original point. Being a man is not enough to be considered marginalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 09:22 PM
5

What reforms were aimed at male students as a group? Her only idea for boys and men was Opportunity Agenda for Black Men. That's it. How could she possibly do anything more than that? You don't think she knew thay the radicals would have torn her to shreds of she talked about reforms for men as a group rather than black men? You didn't address this deficiency in Trump in your previous comment either. "I'm not going to pretend that Trump or the Republicans lifts a finger to do shit about men's is…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 04:36 PM
12

Well, you actually didn't. What you pointed out is that she didn't ignore LGBTQ men or men OF COLOR, or POOR men, etc. It signals that being a man alone isn't enough to have real and urgent issues. It follows the logic of the theory of patriarchy that she subscribes to. Now, I knows that Trump didn't either so I just refer to my previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 01:23 PM
2

You're just repeating yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 01:11 PM
2

No. It's just a perspective you can't argue against.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 11:41 AM
24

But isn't that exactly the point? I'm not going to pretend that Trump or the Republicans lifts a finger to do shit about men's issues but name a platform where conservatives starts lashing out at each other because someone raised a issue thar disproportionately harms men? It's not that Harris lost because she excluded men, it's because too many on her side ignores or vilify men as a group.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 07:58 AM
2

Sure! Needs are needs. But what about wants? You like stepping on balloons. It's not deal-breaker but you enjoy it a lot. Your current partner has enthusiastically... stepped on balloons? Had his balloons stepped on? (I'm sorry! I'm really bad with metaphors!) The point is that he's done it and enjoyed with previous partners. But with you? It's just a no. He doesn't want to do it with you. Then what?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 05:39 AM
3

Great! So you agree that being "treated" as well or better as/than previous partners is import.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 04:53 AM
3

Of course. But would you say it's a valid reason to end a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 04:36 AM
1

Does it matter? Isn't the reason why the opinion changed more important?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 12:34 AM
3

The line is drawn because being too much of a people pleaser due to a need for constant validation is unhealthy and often results in over-giving which leads to resentment. I could happily give what I don't want to give to a spouse on a regular basis, but I'll inevitably become resentful for it. That doesn't mean I won't ever do something I don't want to for someone, but it just means I need to limit it to an amount I can handle without it causing resentment. Doing something for someone that I do…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 12:33 AM
2

Cuz many of us were little people pleasers that did a bunch of stuff to make the other person happy. "make the other person happy." But not your spouse? Why is the line drawn there? Or we liked things, and now we don't. How is this a thing? People doesn't just change like that. Taste develops. It doesn't naturally regress. I used to have a lot of sex in vehicles in my younger years. I don't want to do that again no matter how much the other person is in the mood. If someone broke up with me beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:10 PM
1

"Tried it once and didn't like it" is one thing. "Used to do it and liked it" is another.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:57 PM
3

The narrative is stupid. We change. There are things I liked doing when I was younger I'd never do now. And there is some stuff I didn't do before that I might be willing to try now.*) Sure we change. But at what extent and why? I genuinely can't imagine the view you have on sex that makes it reasonable to like doing something before but all of a sudden you don't like it anymore. In your scenario, it should make no difference to the current gf if you used to give oral. It should only make a diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 09:21 PM
2

No. You're ridiculing the want of being desired and downplaying the pain of being settled for and becoming the "safe option".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 06:53 PM
1

It's childish to troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:32 PM
4

It really isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:28 PM
-1

It's not about being the best fuck. It's about being desired.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:27 PM
1

No. That's not what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:20 PM
1

Let's make an example. My three ex girlfriends had different kinks. I didn't really share any if them but I enthusiastically participated in them several times. Oral sex was also a standard with all of them. My current girlfriend also has a kink. However, I reject her advances. Now I only do vanilla stuff and I don't give her oralsex either. You see the narrative?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:50 PM
3

Exactly. And you're completely missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:03 PM
1

It's not. Adhering to the double standard is. Is victim blaming something that courts generally should do in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 05:24 AM
4

Fraud does not just mean deceit. The legal definition is "intentional deception used to obtain an unfair or unlawful benefit". Extracting financial resources is fraud. Having an affair isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 05:13 AM
3

That's because the offenders rarely have the financial resources to compensate the victim and completely unrelated to the victims safety precautions before the crime. You're grasping at really thinn straws. Besides, many countries as state financed programs that financially compensate victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 04:11 AM
5

It is when it's settled in court.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 11:08 PM
3

But fraud is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 11:06 PM
6

USA doesn't have laws against fraud?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 11:06 PM
3

You don't see a difference in insurance company policy and legislation?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 11:03 PM
3

So she aspires to be just as bad as them? Well... goal achieved, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 11:02 PM
3

What on earth are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 09:53 PM
4

Then also for example there is responsibility of a father, lets not forget it. He can easily take a paternity test and be done with the issue early, and not just trust. Maybe the law should also account for that. Isn't that a bit like saying the law should account for the quality of the lock in a break in?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 09:00 PM
1

But how do you measure if employers choose not to hire a female applicant because she might get pregnant? Or how do you measure if women are asked about their family by their employers? I asked for measurable inequalities. This is on the level of hearsay.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 02:04 PM
5

I can actually understand what -Shes-A-Carnival means. What other form of measurable equality is there besides law that's not rooted in equality of outcome?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 10:12 AM
1

Like what?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 08:05 AM
5

You've never read any criticism of feminism but you still know all about the manosphere's criticism of feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 05:54 AM
-1

And by doing so, what you're saying is that to keep you around, that's what he has to do. No real conversation is as straight forward as the one you're adhering to. He might pick up on your boundary without clearly stating his own. These things happen. There's a reason phrases like "When the ring comes on, the blowjob stops" exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 11:50 PM
-1

See, here's the fine line of pressuring someone and voicing your preferences. It's always about two different perspectives. What you're saying is that you need a sexual partner to give oral otherwise you're not compatible. Which in all honesty is a fair position. But what he hear is that if he doesn't perform oral, you deem him not good enough. Which from his perspective, is the truth. Couples who aren't compatible don't last so, in a way, that actually do mean that he has to do things he isn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 10:48 PM
2

I either wouldn't or would be really uncomfortable if I did. Does that mean that "all men" is a valid argument? No. It means that I'm not unaffected by demonization.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/05/26 01:29 PM
1

Thank you. Much appreciated.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/26 03:02 PM
1

Are there sources?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/26 05:22 PM
2

Is it wrong because it's used like that ir b3cause it's incorrect?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/26 04:48 PM
1

It is?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/26 03:43 PM
3

Male circumcision needs to be taught that there is no benefit and people will be less likely to want to do it to their children. But no amount of teaching how bad it is for women will stop FGM because that's the point and intmention of FGM Nail on the head, right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:33 PM
0

But wait, circumcision isn't illegal in Australia? Are you fucking lying? https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/circumcision?utm_source=chatgpt.com
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:26 PM
3

Maybe it is just where you live but it is illegal in Australia, and only under the table doctors will do it in specific circumstances, usually cultural, such as islam or Hebrew parents. And most of the time I have witnessed in my career as a nurse it is actually the dad wanting the circumcision. Wait, I don't get it. It's illegal where you are but you've witnessed it several times in your profession?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:21 PM
3

Not if you solely value labor that was exchanged for material wealth. But that's quite a big spit in the face of every housewife who toiled in sweat for her family.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 10:08 PM
2

They treat feminine labor as invisible, taken as a given, and for those reasons it’s often paid less. This. Working class people built society. And this. Is exactly why i denounce the patriarchy theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 06:50 PM
–

Not men vs women. Not black vs poor. Not gay vs straight. It's rich against poor. Always have been. Always will.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 11:07 PM
1

Oh look! It's the crazy little AI bot!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 05:07 PM
1

Trump nor his team and followers DID NOT rush into Washington D. C. to raise bloody hell - no way. It was done by extremists like Antifa who NOBODY claims. You do know that the FBI investigated that rumor, right? They found exactly zero evidence that Antifa was involved or even present at all. What they did find, however, was that except for regular Trump supporters, the organizations that were Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and followers of QAnon. Being CHARGED with a crime is not equal to being CON…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 06:36 AM
1

Tell me ... was Melissa Horton in the same category as Charlie Kirk? Was she a COMMENTATOR at public venues? NO. And you call that "the same"? HA! Kirk had MASSIVE influence and a huge silent audience - First of all, how the fuck is that relevant? Secon of all, Melissa Hortman was he speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives. She was a politician with actual legislative power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 06:13 AM
2

🃏
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 07:34 PM
3

No, you're absolutely correct. I miss read.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 07:32 PM
3

Oh shit! I totally miss read that! Am I allowed to draw my "English is my second language" card?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 07:31 PM
2

You certainly can. Most people just dont want to. Consider, for example, a hyper-religious couple that doesnt believe in any sexual activity before marriage, even kissing and cuddling. But they are in love and engaged to be wed. It would be misleading to refer to them as platonic friends in the meantime. "Kissing and cuddling". There's the physicality that makes it non-platonic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 06:50 PM
1

And what made you think that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 05:42 PM
1

Yeah... I'm wasn't looking to feed some kind of gender war. I was just trying to show you another perspective. It seems like I'm barking up the wrong tree.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:59 PM
1

That's exactly the point. Precisely that. Do you realize how starved for affection and physical attention you have to be to take as a compliment? Even having your confidence shoot through the roof? I would also be offended and disgusted by it if I was objectified all the time, I get that. But I doubt you would be if something as basic as a compliment would be as rare as it is. Most men in their 30's remember "that one compliment" they got years and years ago. Because that's one of the few, if no…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:28 PM
1

I respect your position, I really do. I also respect that your position is shared by the vast majority of women. But men and women live very different lives. There are countless threads where men are asked about what they felt when they were hit on, cat-called, sexually objectified, etc. Hell, some even talk about sexual harassment like it was the most flattering thing. Personal experience: I got cat-called once by three older girls (probably around 25) when I was 18. Alone, late at night and I …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 03:29 PM
1

Try asking men what they'd want. The answer might surprise you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 09:16 AM
1

I answered this in your other comment. Democrats are EVIL and ignorant. And Republicans are GOOD and enlightened. This is a perfect example of the empty headed tribalism I've been talking about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 03:17 AM
1

Refusing to accept the results of the 2020 election is NOT a lack of Democratic values Yes, it is. Accepting the results of the election has been presidential praxis for decades. Trump absolutely DID NOT attempt to overturn the election. Yes, he did. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/us/politics/trump-election.html January 6 involved Democrats, the Far Right like Antifa, and other anarchists. It's one thing to say something like, "I don't agree with the election results." But it is quite a diff…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 03:16 AM
1

Do you COMPRHEND the rational for the death penalty? Yes. I also comprehend the fallibility of the legal system. Do you think it's OK to kill unborn humans? Depends on how you define OK. I think the consequences of an unwanted birth from a utilitarian perspective make it a necessity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 03:04 AM
1

They did. Several times. Look it up yourself. His name was Vance Luther Boelter. You're exposing yourself, kid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 02:54 AM
1

Abortion Death penalty Gun laws His views on health care Good enough?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/26 09:57 PM
1

So you're saying that murdering Charlie Kirk is somehow an expression of Democratic values? Your reading skills aren't very good, are they? What I'm saying is that the murder of Charlie Kirk is an attack on democratic values. Not an expression. Tell me ... just how recently has a person on the political RIGHT actually murdered someone among the opposition, or even made such an attempt? 7 months ago. I think NONE - All such murders, or even attempts, are done exclusively by those on THE LEFT. No.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/26 09:48 PM
1

"Government should get completely out of health care." My opinion? Government health care should be the only health care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/26 06:32 AM
1

Never used the phrase "an expression of Democratic values." Please read more thoroughly. The murder of Charlie Kirk is an attack on democratic values. Because, like him or not, his platform was all about debates, the foundation of a democratic system. Moreover, how is it an expression of "free speech"? Never said it's an expression of free speech. Again, read more thoroughly. And you're mixing up the values of socialists, conservatives, and others, because they are all OPPOSITES No, they aren't.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/26 09:12 PM
1

The murder of Charlie Kirk is ALL about freedom of speech and democratic values. Just as the murders of democrats Melissa Hortman and Senator John Hoffman and the assassination attempt on Donald Trump are ALL about freedom of speech and democratic values. There's a significant number of individuals who don't value or honor democratic principles and they wear every political color. They're socialists, liberals, conservatives and alt-right. Your cowardice in refusing to call out these people in yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/26 10:28 AM
1

I didn't say that it wasn't about politics. Read again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 11:00 PM
1

Supply evidence for what exactly?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 06:12 PM
1

Just another tribalistic rant and an exceptionally incorrect one at that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 12:19 AM
5

Aahh, the megaslut-couples. Fucking love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 11:36 AM
-1

How does that prove your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 11:10 PM
12

You're correct. Physical touch incorporates everything that includes touching in a physical way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 02:32 PM
0

No, I'm definitely serious. Is it the rules of the sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 03:25 AM
1

What fucking rules are we talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 07:26 PM
20

This was the most disgusting shit I've seen in a long time! Don't let them get to you, brother. No matter how they twist their logic, they're wrong.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 05:01 PM
–

This was an odd post. I'm not really sure what you're aiming for here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:06 PM
1

He said opportunity. Not option.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 10:50 AM
2

He herds cows, good hygiene for the time period, enjoys bread, fosters a slight pegging fetish, says he kind of dislikes Muslims except Bakir, Hamad and Zaina which are the only Muslims he's ever met and gets bloated from tomato soup.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:10 AM
2

Do you seriously think this is a common relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 10:13 PM
4

More hateful than charlie kirk? You're find joy in another man being gunned down. If that's not hateful, what would you call it? Who actively celebrated so many people dying that theres probably a subwiki for it? Who's death did he celebrate? Cause your article, not a wiki, mentions nothing. Thats funny. For the record. I am sorry for his daughter, but since he also wanted kids to witness public executions that seems like a great honor to his wishes, and im sorry for his wife. That she wasn't cl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 04:52 AM
6

I'm sorry for your loss. If you found joy in a man being murdered because you didn't agree with his opinions, you're far more hateful than he could ever be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 12:46 AM
6

I disagree with nearly all of his views. This being one of them. But if it speaks to you, you're free to follow it. It's just sad that you missed my point by a landslide...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 12:17 AM
2

Of course. There are those who'd call me woke for participating in this sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 02:38 PM
2

The definition doesn't mention feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 01:09 PM
1

According to Mariam-Webster: politically liberal or progressive (as in matters of racial and social justice) especially in a way that is considered unreasonable or extreme I'd say that's a rather accurate description. It's basically a rude slang for left leaning individuals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 12:54 PM
-1

Don't we all know what we're talking about when we use the term?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 10:56 AM
13

I don't give a fuck about the politics of Charlie Kirk, what I care about is that a political activist was murdered for being a political activist. Have empathy or don't, it's your right to have both. We can pretend this a right vs. left to earn some political points, but that's not what this is. This is between those who understand free speech and those who oppose that democratic value. 3 months ago, it was Melissa Hortman, this month it was Charlie Kirk. This madness will continue until we rea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 10:55 AM
3

Also, there is no such things as woke. How do you mean?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 10:43 AM
–

Well, someone has to teach you how to write.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 12:08 PM
–

*you're. But thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:13 AM
–

You spelled "I cant" wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:24 AM
1

Prove it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 08:57 PM
2

This is just bullshit and says more about your own personal view than the general one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 08:09 AM
1

Precisely my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:59 PM
1

Yes, I believe this is the other camp. I have such a hard time understanding how this feministic equity doesn't state women's inferiority. It's weird to me. do you know the court case of the us women national soccer team had and lost? Do not get me started on the USA women's soccer team. They're the most big-headed bunch I'd ever seen. I'd wish I could say it's just this generation, but that team has been the same ever since they tried to take credit for being the innovators of using 3 strikers …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:53 PM
0

To be fair, they do advocate for equality. But you need to see it from their perspective, the patriarchy theory, for it to be true. Women's disadvantages are because of lack of equality. Men's disadvantages have other, non socio political, explanations. Biological or toxic masculinity, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 12:04 PM
6

And why is it so impossible that a man can find it attractive with a low body count?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 05:03 AM
–

That's actually a fair point
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 11:51 AM
1

the partner who needs/wants less in a relationship is often viewed as the one holding more power. But aren't they, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 03:52 AM
–

cherry pick statistics to justify misandry You just accurately described most reddit in just six words.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 03:57 AM
8

I've always found it odd. "When we say that we hate men, we don't mean ALL men." Do you just lack the mental capacity to express yourself correctly?
/r/EverydayMisandry20/07/25 07:47 AM
1

Straight men can't get penetrated? We have butt's aswell, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 04:36 AM
1

Who says I haven't experienced both?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 12:50 AM
1

This really wasn't the gotcha she was going for...
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/25 11:52 AM
1

This really wasn't the gotcha she was going for...
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/25 11:51 AM
0

As a non gay man actually doesn't agree. I guess it's a personal thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 09:44 AM
1

There's a difference. But in my opinion, it's not a very big difference. Just realized that this is something I as a man can know but a woman can't to the same degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 09:42 AM
7

Kink is kink. It's fantasy. A woman with a femdom kink isn't a misandrist. Nor is a man with a maledom kink a misogynist. Misandrists don't get off to abusing men, they just avoid men. No harm. I don't know where to begin with this one... Using reddit for a study in the first place is wild lol Why? Internet culture is a part of the world.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/25 09:38 AM
3

We're talking hard pace, spanking, slight choking, dirty talk, public places, etc. Not balls and chain BDSM but perhaps BDSM-light.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 10:52 AM
4

What if it happens after like three years in to the relationship? It's not connected to depression. He just enjoyed those things before, he enjoyed doing them with you, but he just doesn't enjoy it anymore. Still asking for a friend...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 10:31 AM
3

Not lied. Just gradually changed. Perhaps he dont really know why.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 09:55 AM
2

What if his reasons is that "he's not that kind of person anymore" and he "just dont enjoy it anymore" Asking for a friend....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 09:34 AM
5

Meanwhile screaming that misandry doesn't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 08:33 AM
4

Let's problematize it a bit. Let's say he open to theese stuff in the beginning but within a year he's not anymore. Then what?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 08:26 AM
1

Let me guess, you split everything equal in your household?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 07:23 AM
3

No man is innocent of what?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 07:22 AM
6

Once a month... I guess you don't have a lawn...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 07:21 AM
3

🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 06:39 AM
1

I sincerely thank you for your explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 08:33 PM
1

The first paragraph depicts like 8 different definitions to asexuality...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 06:03 PM
1

Thank you. Got confused there. I'm curious about asexuality. How would you define it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 05:45 PM
1

Oh shit! I thought you were the one i originally asked. Asexuals may have sex with their partner? Isn't the definition of asexual a person who doesn't want sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 05:44 PM
1

Oh! So you have other romantic partners? As you're asexual I take it that you don't have sexusl partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 05:09 PM
1

That's interesting. How can you be bot asexual and polyamorous?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:26 PM
1

I also want to know this
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:24 PM
3

I've never read Bax. Do you have examples of these laws?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 03:48 PM
2

Actually, not when we're talking about radical feminism, which has grown exponentially in the last decade. Radfem seek to decenter men, as the patriarchy always center men. It quite hard, if not down right stupid, to decentre men while caring about their issues
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 05:50 AM
2

Apparently to some
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 07:22 PM
25

In the 70s, Erin Pizzey founded the largest women's shelter in the world. After 10 years of being the leading advocate for women siffering domestic violence she also started working for male victims of domestic violence. She became the target of slander campaigns (primarily from Scottish Women's Aid), harassment and death threats. She was driven out of England and later also America. So you think the human right organisations don't remember what happened to Pizzey? Imagine the backlash if any of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 12:59 PM
33

The arguments I've seen thus far is the following: 1: I'm against forced conscription of any gender. Somehow this result's in staying silence on the matter 2: This is a problem men created for themselves. 3: This is a male issue. Feminism isn't for men. They should solve it themselves. 4: There are far more and worse injustices affecting women that should be prioritized. 5: Equality is something you strive for in good times. In times of crisis, other things needs to be prioritized. (Not even kid…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 11:27 AM
1

Yeah, when personal insults start being hurled instead of arguments, it's usually a good time to stop the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 12:28 PM
1

There's a massive difference in being coached in a profession and being coached in being human being. Coaching someone into being a human being or an adult is something you do with children. Therefore, doing it with adults can definitely be infantalizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 11:32 AM
1

That's not necessarily how I interpreted his post. I do feel the word "coaching" is infantalizing in of itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 10:10 AM
4

Emotionally coaching or supporting is all good when it's needed or wanted. If it's not needed or wanted, it becomes infantilizing. I'd say that infantalizing someone is pretty abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 09:13 AM
1

Honestly? My daughter is soon turning 4 and mine is growing rapidly. I'm fighting it, but it's there.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/25 10:33 AM
6

This is one definition. If you look at Mariam-Webster, it states: "belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests" While fairly similar, they are not the same. Feminism, in contrast to other ideologies, lacks a system to weed out unwanted ideological support. There is no gl9bal organization to condemn actions in the name of the ideology that step out of line with the mov…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/25 09:21 AM
9

This is my perspective, maybe it helps. I've got two kids, none of them tested, never consider testing them and I never doubted that they would not be mine. But paternity fraud scares the living shit out of me. Not because it's common, thankfully it seems to he quite rare, but for the severity of it. If I would find out my children weren't mine, there would be nothing of me left. They are the foundation of my identity. When I'm with them, I'm their father. When working, I'm a teacher and their f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 08:57 PM
1

You can't be serious. Anecdotal evidence contains a single individual experience. It means nothing in a large-scale perspective. Drawing a generalized conclusion from anecdotal evidence is outright dangerous. Furthermore, is her conclusion that school boys don't respect female teachers based on anecdotal evidence? Or is it just a sprinkle of generalized misandry? Not to mention she’s right it’s far more women in mental health as therapists and psych nurses and social workers than men. Far more. …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 11:45 AM
1

It's not fair to draw general conclusions of a genders capability in such a way, which is why I didn't do that. The comment I responded did. "Men do poorly in school is because they are incapable of learning from women." This is an assumption that just as well can be true in the opposite. "Men insist that going into psychiatry fields is "effeminate"." Yet another baseless assumption just to blame men. My questions were in response to the comments generalization and accusation of men being incapa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 08:22 AM
2

Would you say that the court system has misandric issues because men are sentenced harder than women for the same crime?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:52 PM
6

What are these systemic issues? Societal norms?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:44 PM
7

Men can't be misandrist? Isn't sexism an umbrella term for misogyny and misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:56 PM
3

So yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:48 PM
6

What's so serious about it? People like listening to common ground? But anyway, [sure] "Findings indicated that the majority (60.5%) of respondents did not indicate a preference, while equal proportions preferred male (19.1%) and female therapists (20.4%)." Good source. I agree that female teachers probably care less about male students, but it is likely a chicken and egg situation: boy causes problem, teacher avoids boy, teacher doesn't pay as much attention to boy causing boy to want more atte…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:30 PM
8

Depending on the context of the situation, but possibly. Way more likely than a man killing a man solely because he is a man. Every murder depends on context. I'd say it's highly unlikely that you're gonna get murdered is because of your gender. No matter what your or your killers gender may be. We can't read men's mind, so if that was the case, it would still require male mental healthcare workers to add that knowledge Men can't read men's minds either. This is not a superpower we have. No, it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:54 AM
10

Well, yeah. If men get murdered by other men, then they are not getting murdered because they are men. If a woman is murdered by a man, would you consider her to be murdered because she's a woman? This one is a hard topic to discuss. I work in mental health care. We know that men do better with male mental healthcare workers. Yet, men insist that going into psychiatry fields is "effeminate". All of my Psych classes were at least 80% women. I agree that it's not depressed men's fault that they ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:00 AM
7

So you're saying that men are facing systemic misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 06:41 AM
-2

If you make a stupid comparison, you'll likely have to answer more than one person calling it out. Get used to it. Instead of having people say every difference between SAHP and slaves, you tell me how they're a like.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 06:45 PM
3

SAHP isn't only "compensated" with shelter and food. To be able to stay at home with your children is a privilege. Would I like to live a life as a SAHP? Yes. Would I like to live as a slave? No. Why? Because it's a massive fucking difference in being a SAHP and a slave! You think SAHP is comparable to being a slave? Then don't be a SAHP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 06:39 PM
0

A SAHP isn't only "compensated" with shelter and food. To be able to stay at home with your children is a privilege. Would I like to live a life as a SAHP? Yes. Would I like to live as a slave? No. Why? Because it's a massive fucking difference in being a SAHP and a slave! You think SAHP is comparable to being a slave? Then don't be a SAHP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 06:39 PM
-1

A SAHP isn't only "compensated" with shelter and food. To be able to stay at home with your children is a privilege. Would I like to live a life as a SAHP? Yes. Would I like to live as a slave? No. Why? Because it's a massive fucking difference in being a SAHP and a slave! You think SAHP is comparable to being a slave? Then don't be a SAHP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 06:38 PM
-1

A SAHP isn't only "compensated" with shelter and food. To be able to stay at home with your children is a privilege. Would I like to live a life as a SAHP? Yes. Would I like to live as a slave? No. Why? Because it's a massive fucking difference in being a SAHP and a slave! You think SAHP is comparable to being a slave? Then don't be a SAHP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 06:38 PM
0

When are we going to get past the "man bad" delusion? It's getting rather tiring.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 05:33 PM
-3

SAHP is a choice. Slavery wasn't. Just stop with this nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 05:29 PM
–

Start lobbying then.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 01:53 PM
–

I know what you're getting at and you're correct. However, your statement is also true regarding genital mutilation. Womens bodies are by law protected from this while men's bodies are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 09:36 AM
1

I'd say that the whole patriarchy theory is quite misandrist. I'd also say that what happened to Erin Pizzey, even if she's a woman, stems from misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:33 PM
1

What kind of behavior, words, actions and opinions are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:26 PM
1

What academic subject?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:22 PM
1

It’s not like there aren’t men who do the same in reverse; constantly harp on about how selfish and shallow women are… while openly talking about “leagues” and how “she just wants your money” and “she’s not attractive enough for Chad”, showing they are literally as shallow as the women they’re mad at. And you'd say that's socially accepted? Where on earth do you live?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:10 PM
–

So what you're saying is that sex is transactional when you need it to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:48 AM
–

He should but that's obvious. The question is, is sex transactional?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 08:20 AM
–

I agree. However, if a person A is withholding sex because A wants their spouse to do something, chores for example, A is making sex transactional.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 07:53 AM
–

Ever heard of the women-are-wonderful effect?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 07:34 AM
10

Dead bedroom isn't a gendered issue, yet "he" should be doing chores and emotional labor?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:43 AM
1

My girlfriend, who's a nurse, calls motorcycle riders "donors on wheels"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 12:06 PM
7

"You still have those chest pains that a doctor two years ago said were muscle cramps? You should make a new appointment next week for a second opinion." Literally last nights conversation...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 12:03 PM
1

Well... Just got permabanned. Not from the asking one but the other one. Apparently, my comment didn't represent a feministic perspective. All I did was ask how the world caters to men. Never even got an answer. They have really created an echo chamber...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 09:26 PM
7

-No periods I give you that one. -No pregnancy Also fair. It's a choice but I'll give you this one as well. -No menopause Men also have menopause. It's called andropause. -All of the benefits of having kids Absolutely not. Not even almost. In what way is this a reality? -No post partum body I got really bloated after my girlfriend was pregnant, but that might be a personal issue. I give you this one. -Majority of top paying jobs are held by men Yes, and a miniscule minority of men occupy them. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 08:44 AM
1

Why are you mad that he has security cameras?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 06:48 AM
4

They have a rule for that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 12:16 PM
9

I see your point. It has only 3 upvotes, so it's not the common view. But I also look at it in a different way. This comment contains views of women being breeding cows and men being expendable to a very serious degree. The fact that this comment isn't downvoted to hells depths or deleted for several forum rules violations says something. The fact that it's still up says even more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 11:32 AM
10

Are we not allowed to mention which forum? I don't really know the rules...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 11:22 AM
1

But except that you're a women, how is it different to FGM? You're not religious and you're not part of a culture where FGM is a tradition.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:27 AM
1

Sorry if I gave you the impression of being mad. I'm not mad. It's fair not to have an opinion on every subject. But many subjects have somewhat comparable corresponding subjects. Especially when discussing men and women. Circumcision is one of them. To have very strong opinions about one but not at all about the other because it doesn't affect you personally sounds a bit selfish. Or at least self-centered. But it's clear we don't agree, and we don't have to agree. That's the beauty of democracy…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:52 PM
1

Yes, but who misunderstands the movement? I think you and I can agree on a couple of branches that have, but can we be considered to be objective?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:37 PM
1

Yes, FGM is about control. But what the fuck do you think male circumcision is about? Esthetics? Male circumcision is also about control. Removing the tip of the penis is a physical sign of the individuals subjection to God (JHVH, Elohim or Allah). The fact that this act is performed on new born baby's controls the child to forever bear the mark of his parents' religion. is viewed by the medical community as safe when performed in a sterile environment by a professional. So the medical community…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:35 PM
1

In my opinion, feminism has gone the same route that every ideology that's gotten big enough has. It's branched off in so many directions that it's not sustainable anymore. Some say femini9d7sm is a movement for equality and that empowerment is needed in different areas for both genders. Others say feminism is a movement for equality and female empowerment is the only goal. Others say only biological women are women, others say the opposite. Some say feminism is for men and women, others say tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:43 PM
1

Listen, I'm not your enemy. This is not some kind of gotcha-attempt. I'm just trying to pick your brain by asking questions to understand your position. Try to learn. I just want to clarify that position. Too much of reddit is people bashing heads. But if feminism is about protecting and gaining women's freedom, rights and empowerment to achieve equality, how is feminism "for" men?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:17 AM
1

I agree, of course. But I don't really feel that you actually answered the question. Or you did and I didn't get it and can use some clarification.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:20 AM
1

So you don't oppose FGM because that's a personal decision in each family and you do not feel comfortable infringing on anyone's religious freedom?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:55 AM
1

What is your position on the phrase "Feminism isn't only for women"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:32 AM
15

Ever been at a bar or club where a woman “sizes” you up by sticking her hand in your front pocket then feeling your member? I have absolutely, 100%, guaranteed never had this happen to me. We go to very different bars
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 11:35 PM
1

That's a damn good answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 08:13 PM
10

Don't be ridiculous. Silencing and censoring only fuels the oppositions discontent.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/25 08:07 AM
2

You mean the retracted study?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 06:28 AM
13

No! Let it stay up! The fight against misandry will never succed through silencing. Let the forum stay up and let them scream as loud as they can. Common sense will prevail!
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/25 05:36 AM
3

And you conveniently left that that it's a generation-based study. The study studied 25 000 couples between 50 and up. You can't say men are more likely to leave their wifes when she's fallen ill. You can say that men 50÷ do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:03 AM
4

What study and whst methodology failure?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 12:06 AM
4

A number of SA and R*pe cases popped up and caused an uproar in my country. This is not an opinion. It's not even a statement. It's a description of what happened. Schools, the media and even religious organizations quite literally shamed guys over this. Should every man bear the responsibility for what other men did/do? Isn't it fair to be critical about painting all men as sexual predators? HE complained about it, at any point he condone the SA, at all. Just complained about the movement. What…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 10:23 AM
1

Really? How old are children to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 11:19 PM
1

Based on the little information we have, one redditor claims that during #Metoo a school told boys not to approach girls at clubs, bars or hobby events. Am I sure it really happened? Of course I'm not. But with my experience from my profession as a teacher, it wouldn't be the weirdest thing I've heard school personal tell pupils. This is my reason for not just automatically denying his story. What is yours? And please tell me what it is I've made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 11:08 PM
1

I think you need to explain what on earth you're talking about. Did you misstake me for OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 10:47 PM
1

We don't actually know what country this would originate from. Maybe it did? It actually doesn't seem that extreme to me that some egghead school personal would say such a thing. And I'm a teacher working at a school!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 10:38 PM
3

Not necessarily. The coverage of #Metoo was quite aggressive. I even remember accusations that were proved to be false being toned down or even ignored. Even tought the accused got punished in form off lost career opportunity or slander. Don't get me wrong, the #Metoo-movement was necessary and led to overwhelmingly good results. But all good things comes with some negative consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 08:08 PM
1

Because?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:50 PM
2

My dude, it IS fucking creepy to approach women as they're going about their day. The school literally told boys not to approach girls at clubs, bars or hobby events. These are literally places people go to socialize. No one said anything about shops.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:33 PM
5

If you have problems with the metoo movement and women having a voice against SA, yeah, you should not approach women. Whhere did he say any of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:28 PM
1

Every good thing comes with some negative consequences. Why would he lie?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:25 PM
1

What are you trying to prove? He's down. Stop kicking him already.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 06:33 AM
4

There's a word that's floating around my mind. Na... Napkin? Nanny? Narcoleptic? No... Narcissism! That's the one!
/r/EverydayMisandry10/04/25 09:42 PM
0

Can you link to the post?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/04/25 01:54 PM
5

You trolling, right? Nobody can be this dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:54 AM
-1

Sure i did. "But you're not just rephrasing OP's claims. You're adding value to them, something OP never does. OP expresses a perspective, based on personal observation, that men in a much larger degree openly express sexual behavior while women don't but do in private. Never stated that one is better than the other. Simply asking why women don't. You take this simple, maybe incorrect, observation as a criticism of women, something it never was, and respond by portraying men as underdeveloped sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 08:06 AM
1

That was interesting. I've never heard about autosexuality before. Where do you think it stems from?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:46 AM
6

So you're not sarcastic. That's good. The first comment really pissed me off.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 08:18 PM
5

I don't know if you're sarcastic or not?
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 07:59 PM
6

I'm a straight man who sat on his couch drinking water with his 7 month old son sleeping in his arms when I saw this. It's comedy. Comedy is allowed to be offensive. Now I have to go comfort and clean my son up because I accidentally spat the water at him because I laughed so hard. He's the only one who has any right to be offended by this joke. And he's sure as shit offended.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 07:58 PM
-2

I did it in the other comment. See you there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:47 PM
0

But you're not just rephrasing OP's claims. You're adding value to them, something OP never does. OP expresses a perspective, based on personal observation, that men in a much larger degree openly express sexual behavior while women don't but do in private. Never stated that one is better than the other. Simply asking why women don't. You take this simple, maybe incorrect, observation as a criticism of women, something it never was, and respond by portraying men as underdeveloped savages and wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:44 PM
2

Now you're contradicting yourself. Part of what many pop artists sell is sex, which they sell openly. But sexual behavior isn't part of public behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:28 PM
3

Roman bathhouse was commonly known as a meeting place for sexual relations, most commonly between men. This was publicly known and nothing that was hidden. Older Nordic traditions state that witnesses were present for the consummation of the marriage. I don't want to come of ass rude, but this is my subject. I've studied this and I know what I'm talking about. Which is also what paid performers are doing What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:19 PM
3

It most certainly has. The Roman Empire is a very obvious example of a society where sex was quite openly a public behavior. What's debatable is if it is now. I'd say you could make the case for it. Look at pop stars, for instance. Wouldn't you say that a part of Sabrina Carpenter or Ashnikkos' appeal is sexual? A lot of the lyrics and costumes are of sexual nature. That's public behavior if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:09 PM
-6

I know. Women good. Men bad. Not really an innovative alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:17 PM
1

Sure, but aren't they connected. Being shamed leads to feeling shame?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:18 PM
-4

Getting defensive and aggressive for someone asking a question. Maybe discussion forums ain't for you? a. Men lack the maturity, discipline, and respect to control themselves in public. b. Women do not display the same lack of self-control in public as men. Women good. Men bad. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:13 PM
3

Well, incels aren't really a movement or an ideology, but sure. Not responsible but accountable, yes. And they were held accountable for his actions. He was also publicly denounced by other incels. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/19/incels-why-jack-peterson-left-elliot-rodger So yes, the logic stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:46 PM
14

Feminist and women aren't synonyms. They are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 05:24 PM
1

You're correct. However, we're not talking about women. We're talking about followers of an ideology. In this case feminism. Feminist and women aren't the same thing. And in that case, every individual is a representative for the movement. It's fundamentally necessary to make vocal individuals who misrepresent the ideology either be set straight or to make sure that the public knows that the ideology is misrepresented.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 05:22 PM
1

We probably do, but that's a different topic. As for your last question: do we circumcise fetuses? English is my second language, apologies. My point is that circumcision is only illegal when it comes to female infants. Boys are not protected from this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:30 AM
2

Being financially obligated to a child for 18 years IS being a parent. Child support comes from the absent parent. What would you call a person paying child support if not a parent? Yes, a man is legally free to opt out of physically parenting a child but that's just one aspect of parenthood. He'll still be forced to economically parenting the child. There is no way for a man to fully opt out of parenthood. Only women do. Or the man could decide to become the parent while the woman pays child su…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 11:25 PM
2

You're correct that we're talking about different kinds of autonomy, but it's autonomy nonetheless. A woman can decide when to become a parent and a man cannot. You can talk about bodily autonomy should come before financial autonomy til the cows come home. I never said I disagree with you. However, we're not talking about what's right and wrong, we're talking about rights that are reserved to one gender. The right to choose when to become a parent is reserved for women, not for men. Just remind…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:56 PM
-1

Men can also enforce matriarchy...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:19 PM
2

Well, I am talking about parenthood. If abortion is legal, as it should be, women can decide when and with whom to be a parent. You're thereby free to reproduce when you want to and have an option to not become a parent in case of pregnancy. In case of pregnancy, a man has no right not to be a parent. This might be fair but it's not equal. If you want to talk about rights concerning bodily autonomy, we can do that too. It's illegal to circumcise a girl. It's not illegal to circumcise a boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:08 PM
1

Well twist me like a noodle and call me Tina, you're right. I stand corrected. Apologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:39 PM
1

That's called slander. Slander is punishable by law.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:29 PM
1

No one is pointing a gun at mens heads and saying work more, it is a choice. One which they can only make (most of the time) because a woman is looking after their kids. That's a fair point. But this would be a valid reason for the existence of the gap, would it not? If you work more, you're paid more. What I don't get is why the person who works more is considered privileged. This summer, I will go home on parental leave with my son. So my GF will go to work, and earn money, while I stay home w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:23 PM
1

You seem to have found a source on this? Care to share? I'd love to read it. (I rewrote this comment about 10 times trying to make it sound genuine and not like a "can you prove your bullshit"-kind of way. Still don't know if I succeeded.)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:08 PM
2

I agree hole heartedly. 100% we're on the same side. I look at what's going on with abortion rights in America in absolute horror. But the discussion was about equal rights. Do men have reproductive freedom?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:05 PM
3

There is a way of saying that there is a difference without diminishing the consequences for someone being falsely accused of rape. You didn't choose this way. By calling the consequences of a false accusation an "inconvenience " you undermine seriousness of the issue to a ridiculous level.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 06:07 PM
2

Being falsely accused of rape isn't an inconvenience. Don't be condescending.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 03:07 PM
2

It sounds like a horrible experience
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 04:51 AM
1

So asexuals can experience horniness, it's just not connected to other people?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 04:49 AM
1

If asexual isn't a total lack of libido, then what is it? (Ace is an abbreviation fir asexual?)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 12:03 AM
3

Thank you for sharing your experience. This is why I downloaded this app.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 12:01 AM
2

If you don't mind me asking, did the side effects go away when you stopped taking your meds?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 11:26 PM
4

That literally sounds like a living nightmare. I'm genuinely sorry you has to go through that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 11:17 PM
1

I'm sorry, ace? What is ace?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 10:05 PM
3

But that's my point. If libido can be medically lower, shouldn't it be possible to medically erase it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 09:49 PM
6

Are you sure? I mean, there are drugs that greatly reduce your libido. If something can be reduced it should be possible to terminate it. Just thinking out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 09:31 PM
–

I'm sorry, but ut really doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:01 PM
–

That's not the correct conclusion in that article. The correct one would be that it's unclear if hypergamy exists in modern Western culture. Some studies conclude it while others are uncertain. Read your sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 07:13 PM
–

Now I've seen you saying the same thing with the same link. Your link is a wiki-article and it really does nothing to prove your point
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 02:17 PM
1

Because you seemed defensive and you don't need to. I didn't mean to offend you by it. Sorry if I did. Please don't feel like I'm trying to get you into a gotcha argument, I'm not. I'm putting this much energy because I'm tired of the hypocrisy. Men are overrepresented in being the offenders of violent and violent crimes and it's reasonable for a woman to be wary of men she doesn't know. The logic used for this conclusion is logic and statistics and probability in relation to risk. I honestly th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 05:36 AM
1

"Being shallow: Growing up in the '90s and early 2000s, there was a strong push for men to look beyond a woman’s appearance and value her character. Songs reinforced this idea, and boys were shamed for expressing preferences. Even today, the Barbie movie speech highlighted the pressure on women to be "good enough" for everyone. Yet, men who don’t meet the idealized male standard through the female gaze are routinely shamed—by both everyday women and celebrities." I wouldn't say that he states th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 07:18 PM
1

Calm down, I didn't say it was true. I haven't even said that I think you're morally wrong in any way. I was just asking to expand your way of thinking. Men are overrepresented in being the offenders of violent crimes. That, as much as it hurts me to say it, is a justifiable reason to be wary of men. You can't blame a woman for that. Those objecting would say that it's only a fraction of men that commit violent crimes. This is true, but you never know which man you're dealing with and that's rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 06:29 PM
1

But isn't that precisely what you're saying? Toxic masculinity is a threat for women's safety, so they acknowledge toxic masculinity. Toxic femininity isn't a threat to women's safety, therefore they don't acknowledge toxic femininity?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:56 PM
1

Please show where I said men were culturally neutered by prevailing trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:52 PM
1

Again, you're condescending. Everything male is not the manosphere. I don't accuse you of being a SCUM-feminist because even if they exist, I know they are a minority and you have given me no reason for saying you are. The same goes for the manosphere horseshit. I expect the same respect in return. You must realize that there is a counterculture for every culture period. At the same time that the pornstar fashion was commercialized and bought (mainly by women), there was I flurry of documentarie…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 01:08 PM
2

"Women are better people", thus their toxicity is played down in frequency and intensity. "Women do not have power", thus they cannot be responsible for the toxicity of either gender. If you're wondering what that boom was, it was just my mind that was blown. This actually made more sense than I dare to admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:17 AM
0

Toxicity exhibited by men is a risk to their safety therefore naturally their brains will notice it and warn about it, given survival instinct. Their own toxic behaviour is not a risk to themselves so their survival instinct does not prioritise it. So you're saying women are selfish?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:15 AM
1

So if the majority of violent crimes are committed by a specific race, racism is self-protection and fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:12 AM
1

Do we have different Reddits?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:10 AM
1

Never happened. This was the height of the Playboy era, with reality shows filled with models and soft porn, Girls Gone Wild, Spring Break, etc. Never happened? I live in Europe and I can tell you that it sure happened here. We were told, "Don't judge a girl for her appearance. It's the inside that counts." This was a good thing to teach young men. But for you to just deny that it happened with "never happened" is incredibly condescending.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:07 AM
3

Men are shamed for expressing preferences. Some men express them in a judgemental and rude manor. Others express them in a non-judgemental and respectful manor but are still shamed because it's a "bad preference." You can't really mean that this doesn't happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:00 AM
0

Then what are you implying? The only "only" I see there is the last word, not the first. So women also push the narrative that men are unfit for childcare?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 09:02 PM
0

How does that argue with what I said? Seems to be in agreement. It's not an agreement. You say dating apps make signing up free for women so they can sell women to paying men. I say they do it because women won't pay money for dating apps. It's supply and demand. Not human trafficking. There was no one reason, the women were just a massive force behind it. I wouldn't say you are "misinformed", just "informed of only one of the reasons and not of others". There are always several reasons for a mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 07:15 PM
-4

Well, yeah, if the bar advertises "We sell drunk women" or makes it obvious, then they would get shut down. It's a similar reason as to why a lot of dating apps are cheaper or free for women: getting more women in gives them more male paying clients. The whole "If you didn't pay for the product, you are the product" thing. So women on dating apps are being sold by the dating app company? Isn't it more plausible that women are less interested in dating apps than men and the company makes signing …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 06:48 PM
-5

Women hitting men are seen as less serious because women are considered weak. Or that women are more valuable and therefore need more protection. Women get free drinks at bars because the bars want to sell "lots of drunk, vulnerable women" to men. This is a baseless argument. I've worked at bars and in all of them the opposite has been true. Women are trusted to be better with children because men pushed the idea that childcare is a woman's responsibility only. Agan, you're making a serious clai…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 05:06 PM
4

By saying what? By saying nothing and therefore forfeiting the discussion?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 04:43 PM
1

What scientific consensus?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:53 PM
3

But there's a difference between views and policy. Obama was very clear about his views on free health care but his policy was never to introduce free health care. JD Vans is a total asshole and a political catastrophe, but what he says and doesn't say is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:52 PM
1

That sounds like a recipe for paranoid assumptions and baseless accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:31 PM
2

Of course I can. But the important question is: is it true?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:02 PM
1

Show me statistics and I'll believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 07:47 PM
6

So I can say: JD Vance is a racist. He's going nuke Scandinavia and take all Swedish children as slaves. He hasn't openly said he'd do it. "Not yet anyway"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 07:45 PM
3

Like unaffordable housing. Systemic wealth inequality and the general living standard decline of the middle/lower classes at expense of the upper class increase. This is not the patriarchy theory. This is a result of class society. It affects both women and men. Women in the upper class gain while men in the middle/lower class lose.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 07:31 PM
1

"The trial of masculinity." More like "The trial of a deranged man with a network of men of the same nature." Why did it become so common and acceptable to hate on men? Did it come from American universities?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 04:28 PM
5

I think what he/she means is the amount of rapist among the male population. Out of all men, how many of them have committed sexual assault?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 10:28 AM
–

Why do they want to demonize The Red Pill? I'm not really a pill kind of guy. Not sure I even understand what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 05:04 PM
–

Thank you. Now I just wonder why I was so downvoted...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:35 PM
–

I think it was Peter Boghossian who said something like: "If you're not ready to change aspects of your main opinion, you're not fit to enter a discussion." But he doesn't accept the notion that gender is solely a social construct and proved that there are scientific issues within gender studies, so he's basically Hitler.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 09:37 AM
–

This is the second time in a short time I've seen this statement. It's driving me insane. Yes, Germany censored a lot of nazi shit. Did it work? Fuck no! AFD is the third biggest party and they're expected to double in size in this year's election. To say that Germany was successful in their censoring of nazi shit is just wrong. I'm not defending RP, I'm certainly not defending Tate and I don't even know what F&F is. I'm just a bit skeptical in calling RP an ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:54 AM
–

I can not agree more with your statement. 100% truth. Additionally, the general reddit user is discussing from the wrong starting point. The discussions are extremely rarely about reaching consensus or reaching a middle ground. It's rarely even about convincing the other about your opinion. It feels like it's mostly "I'm right and if you don't agree with me, you're wrong." And that is poison for a healthy discussion. It breaks my heart every time I see a thread about "what counter-arguments can …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:30 AM
–

Exactly, and they are far from the only example. In Sweden, it was socially unacceptable to criticize immigration in the 90s and those who died were labeled as racist and silenced. Today, the second largest party is The Sweden Democrats. Far-right nationalists. Same thing in Germany with ADF.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:00 AM
1

I've seen you ask the same question before in this thread and I'm curious to what you're getting at. I believe that a minority in this thread might probably be lying. Just like in any threat. So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 07:49 AM
–

I don't believe censorship is a good way to handle harmful ideologies. The issue will only be moved elsewhere. Buy in what way is red pill an ideology?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 07:03 AM
1

Does this mean it's just as wrong to tell men to get rid of toxic masculinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:16 AM
–

I've never heard the name Erin Pizzey until you mentioned it. Holy cow, what a life story! Thanks for the education.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 06:33 PM
2

Wow, dude... Do you need a hug or something? Calm down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 11:05 AM
2

Pay gap But that's not really how it works. The labor market is based on the market economy. Your best option to garner a high wage is to acquire employment in a line of work with a high turnover. Women tend to gravitate to social work like welfare, for example. Social work is fairly low valued as it doesn't create wealth. It sucks as material gain is valued more than human life but it is what it is. I don't have to like it to recognize it. A further detriment to women's wages is agreeableness. …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 10:19 PM
3

That's a damn good answer. The "bad faith" feels overused in today's climate. I see it get thrown around when someone is trying to avoid the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 03:25 PM
-1

I've seen that phrase being thrown around a lot. What does arguing 8n "bad faith" actually mean? Also, can a gotcha moment arise without logical or ideological inconsistency?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 11:23 AM
-1

This trope needs to end. The strive for equality is seriously hurt by these Quijote windmills. Pay gap The pay gap has a myriad of explanations that have nothing to do with sexism. Men and women choose different jobs and different jobs pay more. Even when you look at the pay gap for the same job, which we rarely do, there are legitimate reasons. Men spend on average around 41 hours a week at work. Women spend on average around 36 hours. Is it unreasonable that those who work more are paid more? …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:28 AM
-9

A child needs financial care so men aren't allowed to opt out of fatherhood. A country needs protecting so men are forced to be drafted. I was at home for 9 months with my firstborn. You don't think my career suffered for it? You don't think my raise didn't show that I had worked only 25% that year? Men need physical safety and legal rights. How are men getting these needs more than women? What do you mean by an equal partner? What would make your partner equal? I fully agree with your separatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 08:25 AM
3

Which is a fancy word for "talking out of ass"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:04 PM
7

You do know that men can have other struggles than with women? Or are you saying that eery homeless man is homeless because they are misogynistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 07:17 AM
3

With all due respect, you've been taught wrong. Maybe they just never confined in you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:08 AM
1

It's not my opinion. I'm trying to voice what I perceive to be TERFs criticism of the trans self-concept ( I don't know if that's an actual word. It is in my native language.) Every trans-person I have ever known, which is quite a number, has adorned themselves in traditional gender clothing with traditional gender mannerism. This criticism isn't taken out of thin air. Correct or not. I would never consider myself to be a transphobe. To each their own and as long as you don't harm yourself or ot…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 08:08 AM
1

Well I'll be damned, you're right. I was always taught that it's an umbrella term for non-hetero sexualities. I've never heard that extension. Maybe "generally creating life." I've seen more that it's about chromosomes. Of course trans people should be allowed to exist as their true self. That's not what I interpret the issue to be. The issue is what the "true self" is, what it should be equated to and what society should handle the definition. What do you mean with "in good faith"?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 06:11 AM
0

And that's the type of modern pervertesation I'm talking about. To say that feminism is about women's rights only is to say that the end goal is a matriarchy and that's just not the case.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 04:26 PM
3

I'm sad that I feel that this needs to be said...
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 03:25 PM
1

That's not what feminism is about. Feminism is about equality by advocating for women's rights. One can discuss how that is only "half the battle" butaying it's about protecting female privilege is misinterpretation of the core values of feminism. I'm dead and buried long before I let so-called "radical feminists" pervert the true purpose of the movement.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 03:22 PM
0

Really? I'm not even in the discussion and I've seen it several times. "Womanhood is not a costume", "Being a woman is more than a dress and lipstick" etc. I think you might misunderstand me. It's not TERFs who are accused of reducing woman to traditional gender roles, it's the trans movement who are. PS excuse me if I'm not updated in terminology but isn't queer an umbrella term for homo/bisexual? What does that has to do with anything?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 01:55 PM
1

Feminism is about gatekeeping female privilege?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 01:42 PM
1

How do you know this?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 12:57 PM
3

I can agree with your point of view. That seems like fair criticism of TERF. But can't they say that the trans-including feminists reduce womanhood to clothing and social expression? That it cements stereotypical gender roles and the way to be able to call yourself woman is the uphold these gender roles?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 12:56 PM
2

What do you mean?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 12:51 PM
4

So they're gatekeeping female privilege? That doesn't sound like feminism...
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 12:51 PM
2

Aren't they just acknowledging biological markers to determine gender? As in your gender is determined soly by your biology and not social expression?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 10:41 AM
–

Where was it illegal in the 90's?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 11:07 AM
1

I would actually say it is a post-racial society. At least at the beginning of it. Depending on where you set the goal, of course. If your definition of a post-racial society is that there are no racist people, you're longing for something that will NEVER happen. But I have a hard time seeing the political society as racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:48 AM
–

I wasn't speaking to you specifically. I was referring to those who say I'm boring because I enjoy comfortability more than partying. But you hit the head on the nail there! What's the point if you're not enjoying it! But what you enjoy changes through life. That's what we really mean when we say the phrase "grow up." And with kids, everything changes drastically. You basically get a new life in a little package deal. Even though it sounds a bit to hedonistic for my taste, I really got a laugh o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:32 AM
–

You sound like a person who refuses to realize that with age comes different responsibilities. If I lived my life the same way at 36 as I did at 20, people would consider an irresponsible hedonist, and they would be right! I could be irresponsible and "have my fun" at 20 because I had close to zero obligations. A small and cheap apartment and an hourly work that demanded bare minimum. I could find the cheapest plane ticket and the cheapest motel and just travel with no notice to anyone. I could …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:37 AM
2

Someone help me here. This "approaching" business, it's gotta be a cultural thing, right? I'm from Sweden and I've never in my life just walked up to a random girl going: "hey, this is my face, you like it?". I've been approached by strangers at the pub by then they've been too drunk and just obnoxious. Do people in America actually meet future relationships like this? And for further help: how the fuck dis feminism "ruin" this weird behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:17 PM
1

Who the fuck have said that women are neurotic for being concerned about their own safety? You can't just make shit up! Oh, I would definitely say it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:59 AM
5

I don't think it was purposefully left out, it's just not really important. The discussion isn't about the perpetrator, it's about the victim. I mean, if we discuss African-American murder victims, what does it ad that most of the murderers are also African-American? I'm an academic in a long-term relationship with the mother of my two children. I thought social status was only important to old-school republican conservativs but I guess you're close enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:56 AM
3

I believe the whole point of a discussion is about exchanging perspectives. The more perspectives included in the discussion the better. I believe equality can only be reached by working together. By both sexes wanting the best for both. Separatism is harmful. It breeds content and never leads forward. A gender-war is only good for sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:40 AM
4

Why do you think separatism is a good path to reach equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:02 AM
1

Where does the post state, mention or even hint that this is women's fault?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:51 AM
2

But the post wasn't even about women. Not once is it stated that this somehow is women's fault. That you see a post about men being victims of violent crimes and you interpret it as an attack on women is in your head. Have you read Don Quijote? And look at the comments in this post. We can summarize the majority of them with one sentence: "but men are also the ones who commit most violent crime so fuck them and fuck the victims too for sharing the same gender"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:49 AM
–

Well, one evil person is too many. My point is that "evil" behavior is a human trait, not only a man trait
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:04 AM
2

Everybody knows men are the overwhelming majority in violent crimes committed. But how does that disqualify the discussion about men also being the majority of victims of violent crime? And how on earth does it blame women!?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 09:22 AM
4

Yes I did. Where was I wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 06:36 AM
5

The discussion was about male victims being overrepresented in violent crime statistics. What information was ignored?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:09 AM
4

How is it misleading?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 02:00 AM
5

That's cute? Talking about victims of violent crimes is cute to you? Fucking hell, Cruella de Vil would look at your comment and say that's heartless.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:46 AM
3

I believe the point was to create a discussion about something that is too rarely talked about, men being victims of violence at a high rate. But the modern-day keyboard muppets are incapable of seeing men as anything else then offenders and predators, so it ended up being just another man bashing session.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:39 AM
16

Wait, how is this trying to blame women?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:24 AM
–

Yes, and you're reasonable in your conclusion but you're missing the point. If my goal with asking for a paternity test is to see if my spouse is cheating or not, I'm a complete moron. Even the dumbest among us would use protection. So if the test would show that i am the father, my spouse could still be cheating. Regarding infidelity, a paternity test proves nothing. If i get a negative result, that's a whole other story. I get why your first reaction would be hurt and anger but if you think ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 09:09 PM
-2

I'm not trolling and I'm not trying to be condescending. I'm just being honest. I'm sorry if it came across like something else. I didn't say your parents were evil. Wanting to protect your children is never evil. If a person is a danger to others emotional and physical well being, they are definitely evil. Doesn't matter if it's because of immaturity or conscious ignorance. Look. Teenagers are stupid. Sometimes very stupid. And because of lack of consequential thinking, other people will be hur…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:46 PM
-3

I genuinely feel sorry for you. I can understand wanting to protect your daughter but not like this. There are bad men. Of course there are. There are also bad women. But most people aren't evil. Most people are decent human beings. I hope you will learn that, the sooner the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 01:22 PM
–

I'm sorry you've gone through PPD. We've also battled PPD, it's a bloody nightmare. Lots of guys don't get tests, I'm one of them. I don't have, nor have I ever had, a flicker of doubt that my children are mine. This is not a case of personal stake for me, it's about empathy and equality. Lots of guys don't ask/demand a paternity test even though they want to because of the dogma you can read in the comments of this post. The absence of empathy is heartbreaking. And a lot of people have said the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 09:45 AM
–

Ooo
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 02:17 AM
1

But you're asking him to blindly trust you when the confirmation is so easy acquired. You outright demand it. And do you think you'd be the first fully trusting long-term relationship this has happened to? 5 years isn't really that long. No, you think your husband is certain because you're certain. You're quite solipistic in your way of thinking. If this was about testing your faithfulness there are hundreds of better ways to do so. A paternity test is a very ineffective way to test faithfulness…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 08:14 AM
1

I apologize for my lack of second language knowledge, but what do you mean with "paternity tests are at the very end of the cheating pipeline "?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:31 AM
0

But why ask that question? What are you aiming for?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:18 AM
1

There you go again! Me, me, me and I, I, I. You're making this ALL about you. Like your husband is just a side piece in YOUR life story. You're not talking about him as an equal. Trust is something you earn, it's not a default. He shouldn't blindly trust you and you shouldn't blindly trust him, that's just stupid. How many wifes and husbands trusted their cheating spouse? How many men trusted their baby's mother only to find out the child wasn't his? It's not about trust, it's about security. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:17 AM
0

Why does it need to be self-sustaining?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 12:45 AM
0

That is absolutely not what it would take and I think you know that. You're practically gaslighting the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 12:42 AM
0

What fucking question is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 12:36 AM
1

If you believe that he's asking for a paternity test to check if you're faithful, you're either dumb as a rock or you believe your man is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 12:29 AM
0

No, you see him asking for a paternity test as an accusation of infidelity because that's the only way it can be about you. But it doesn't have to be about you. Like you said, with no forewarning or reason for suspicion. But without forewarning and suspicion, maybe it's not about that? Can it actually be about something else? Let's paint a picture. Your husband has had experience with false paternities, fraudulent or not, and doesn't want to fall in that pit. Or maybe he's read/seen the stories,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 12:26 AM
1

To everyone shouting about accusations of cheating. Paternity test is a terrible way to check if your spouse is unfaithful. Even the dumbest among us use protection while cheating. This doesn't have to be about you. Everything isn't about you. A man can want/wish something that doesn't have to be about you. Your amount of solipsism you're showing is toddler-level of maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 04:35 PM
–

No, of course not. But I still don't see your connection between promiscuity and insecurity? Do you mean that promiscuous people are insecure?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 07:04 PM
–

Then what did you mean with "insecure people don't stop being insecure"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 06:07 PM
–

Lots of things. My weight for one. But why is it insecurity to prefer non- promiscuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 06:00 PM
–

Distrust? How does this have anything to do with trust?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 04:48 PM
–

But how are their own psyche a factor? I just don't really understand what you mean
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 03:45 PM
–

But what are they insecure about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 03:43 PM
–

How do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 11:27 AM
5

I get it. I genuinely do. It's hard not to be affected by what you read. But there will always be assholes, literally everywhere. I've read countless empty headed misandry on twoxchromosones, even some on askfeminist. But men and women need each other. Men's rights need women's perspective as much as it need men's perspective. Feminism needs men's perspective as much as women's perspective. We are the society. Separatism is just a fancy synonym for segregation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 04:18 PM
3

One ignorant post makes you feel that men don't care about women's issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 03:51 PM
-2

Where on earth are you reading such nonsense?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 03:21 PM
1

It was not my intention to put words in your mouth. I've read your comment again and it still sounds the same, if I'm honest. What makes you feel that men feel that women are solely responsible for men's issues? I believe questions like this comes from the perception that when men do organize, they are branded as misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:53 PM
5

So only black people should care about black issues, only gay people should care about gay issues, only elderly people should care about elderly issues, only poor people should care about poor issues, etc.? That sounds like a pretty cold society. Furthermore, your statement implies that men don't care about women's issues. That's not only false, but it's a spit in the face to every man that has and do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:35 PM
–

"Well, dinosaur bones. Bare with me here, if I may. Life, in a theological sense, is a test of our faith in God. Our faith is constantly tested in all walks of life. The Bible never speaks about any dominant animal before humans. Earth's timeline would, according to the Bible, make an era before ours impossible as the earth didn't exist before us. How can your faith in God be tested in a better way than giving you proof that the Bible is false? And as for atheism. If God existed, why would he al…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:28 AM
–

Proof of what?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:01 AM
–

I don't believe anything. I'm not saying atheism IS proof, I'm saying, considering Theodicy philosophy, atheism, in a theological theory, WOULD be. I've studied theology for years. I've educated and teached religion for even longer. I feel this is flying over your head. Look up Gottfried Leibniz.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 02:19 AM
–

No, i think you misunderstood me. Faith isn't proof of God's existence, I never said it was. I'm trying to explain the Theodicy philosophy (how can God exist if evil things happen). In this philosophy, evil acts aren't proof of God's non-existance, on the contrary. Atheism, evil according to Christianity, is in itself a proof of his existence. As it is him testing your faith by letting evil lure you from him. This is purely a theological perspective. I can't show you any proof. I don't believe G…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 01:13 AM
–

Yes, and here is where your one trick pony of a belief system hits the ground. I wasn't at that table either. Neither where any of my "bros", whatever the hell you mean by that. I come from a working class village, from a working class family with a working class history. None in my family, past or present, held any power in society. The one thing I have I common with the "bros" that built the system is my genitals. And I will not have you slander my genitals! Your arguments borders to "black pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 12:57 AM
–

Well, dinosaur bones. Bare with me here, if I may. Life, in a theological sense, is a test of our faith in God. Our faith is constantly tested in all walks of life. The Bible never speaks about any dominant animal before humans. Earth's timeline would, according to the Bible, make an era before ours impossible as the earth didn't exist before us. How can your faith in God be tested in a better way than giving you proof that the Bible is false? And as for atheism. If God existed, why would he all…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 12:40 AM
–

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 12:29 AM
–

As a matter of fact... Kind of, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 12:23 AM
–

So your point is that I deserve to die in war because the person who once decided it also had a penis?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 12:20 AM
–

It might be about control but not necessarily in the way you think. How about this: Why is it bad for a man to ask for the same certainty of paternity that a woman has?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 02:11 PM
–

Of course, but you're missing the point. A paternity test is not a good way to ensure your wife is faithful, as most people would use protection if they would have an affair. Then maybe it's not about that? It may be about something else?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 01:56 PM
–

Doesn't that tell you that it's actually about something else than accusation of cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 01:21 PM
–

So, by that logic, asking for/demanding a paternity test is i really bad way to check if your spouse is faithful?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 01:18 PM
–

Let me ask you a question. If you would cheat, would you use protection?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 12:53 PM
1

Perhaps you're right.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 01:05 PM
1

"Plenty do and they still arent listened to." - Again, what makes you think that? "I have yet to hear women complain about men nagging." - Well, you're right about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 11:32 AM
2

"The Men Are Wonderful bias plaguing this subreddit. Apparently, a man’s love life being shit can never be a self-inflicted problem." - I don't really recognize this bias. A man's issues in life can very well be self-inflicted "Guys who insist that women should stop nagging…..and then get mad when women give up nagging and just divorce." - So it's live with nagging or live alone? Are you saying that women always nag? "Guys claiming women never say what they want and women being very clear about …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 10:52 AM
7

Is that your definition of nagging? "Nagging: persistently annoying or finding fault with someone" (Merriam-Webster) This is what I call nagging
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 10:24 AM
4

Forgive me, but I don't understand your comment. I have to drive in many parts of the country?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:39 AM
7

I really don't want to disparage the physical side of childbirth, what a pregnant women goes through is staggering but this overblown view of the mortality of childbirth needs to stop. In a third-world country? Yes, there is a considerable level of danger but in the states, the mortality rate is 22,3 for every 100 000. You're at bigger risk driving a car!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:12 AM
–

You forgot to say "because..." Try again
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 01:50 PM
–

I agree. Discuss and persuade isn't shaming either. It's when you use guilt, degradation, gaslighting and humiliation that it becomes shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 12:36 AM
0

Wow. Big respect for being consistent. Cold as a bankers heart, but consistent. May I ask, who hurt you? (Please do take it as comic relief as it was intended)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 07:34 PM
-1

Are you saying the same thing to the woman who was forced to birth a child cause she was shamed by her husband and family for wanting an abortion? Or the senior citizen that was coerced to sign a deal that was never mentioned to benefit him? Or the 18-year-old old who was persuaded by a creep into doing porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 07:21 PM
–

What a D-bag comment...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 07:14 PM
5

Is it possible that reddit contains both misogyny and misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 07:10 PM
-1

You're correct, forced and shame isn't the same. However, they are connected. Shaming is a tool that can be used to force people to do something they actually don't want to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 07:08 PM
-1

No, no, no. You don't really think like that? That's an atrocious conclusion. Think about it one more time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 07:02 PM
2

I was just like you, who TF would shame someone for not getting a vasectomy. Then I just did a quick research and... Well, yeah. It actually happens. Wasn't even hard to find to be honest. If you want sources, you can tell me how to do that (I'm sorry but I'm too much of a technological idiot to know how) or just search for it. Surprised the poop ot of me...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 06:34 PM
6

I agree. However, you're arguing with people who are saying they are wrong
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 12:32 AM
8

Then what's the implication?
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/24 11:26 PM
3

What I want to say: It's only you. You need to stop seeing yourself as such a victim, even in a forum dedicated to highlighting and discussing misandry. Just because someone doesn't share your exakt view doesn't mean they are misandrist. What I'm gonna say: So it's not only me who have noticed?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/24 02:59 PM
4

Exactly no one blaims women for the Russian invasion. That's not even what this thread is about. It's about the ridiculous notion that war has a worse effect on women than men. Furthermore, I AM a feminist you goof!
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/24 01:02 PM
13

Blaming all men for Putin's decisions is like blaming all women for Ghislaine Maxwell. How can you not see this?
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/24 07:57 AM
1

And men should therefore receive higher punishment for violent crimes?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 10:24 PM
1

If what side are actively trying to oppress who?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 05:43 PM
0

Or they do see and recognize women's issues but are only looking out for their own interests, thereby risking to set women's rights and freedom decades back in time. Rightfully so by your previous logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 11:34 AM
3

Stop being so defensive, I'm just trying to understand your way of thinking. So you mean that by crime statistics, we can conclude that men as a biological gender are more prone to commit crimes?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 11:20 AM
0

So what's your take on the men who voted for Trump knowing full well what it would mean for women's issues because "it's not on men to do anything about women's issues, it's on them."?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 08:14 AM
2

So you're saying that social groups that generally have a high crime rate should get harsher punishment?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 06:20 AM
1

.0q,
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 11:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter