TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HenryCGk Archive

View 0 posts and 338 comments by HenryCGk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If she is "salaried" do you think she pays the right taxes?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 09:23 PM
1

I think it's currently assault or gbh
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:14 PM
2

I saw one of theses and twitter seemed to think that 3 people had been arrested not all men but all with something else in common so , ...
/r/MensRights21/10/24 01:07 PM
1

22 men in prison for every woman
/r/MensRights30/09/24 12:12 PM
5

I think they just like making the posters, they will never respond that would mean leaving their desks.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 07:53 PM
8

Well it shouldn't have to come up; if your compatible then you will agree on everything. /s One guesses that in practice that means agree with her on everything.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:23 PM
1

You first paragraph isn't impressive to me: the first sentence is repetition of an assertion I clearly don't agree with, and therfore unhelpful. The second suggest you did not read the first line of my first comment that you responded to. As for offence OP was told something was offensive he "so [he] decided to experiment" he was told again it was offensive. Big Woo. There's nothing wrong with offended people but don't act big shocked when you succeed. When I said use normal words I'm not really…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:46 PM
1

Sure both are fine but one is normal and the other is less normal. But if you're using the less normal form to get a rise (as OP was) or win an argument or to sound intellectual. Um well that's a choice and implicitly in rights of free association is the right to judge you for your choice.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:50 PM
1

Is it okay if you just said women? It’s not that hard.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:39 PM
1

The wrighters, who controlled what everyone said, had the Ferengi use the word 'femails' and over use the word 'female' so that the audience would find Ferrngi stilting and revolting.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:34 PM
1

You suggested we consider OPs intentions and judge him on that. Fair. I find him immature.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:51 AM
0

"I've been hearing a lot", "so I decided to experiment" You know I knew you could drive younger in the states but I didn't think 13 was old enough.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:27 AM
1

Proof_Option1386 I think provided the accurate answer. Roughly they don't care if you dehumanise men and boy's even your friends.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:23 AM
1

Most native speekers would say "she is a women" hence "its a girl".
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:49 AM
1

OP was told the Latin medical term was offensive so he used it as a "test" and was told he was being offensive again and now he is complaining on reddit. I don't think its a stretch to infer he was being an "edgy teen".
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:39 AM
1

Precisely I ment the writer are dehumanising the Ferengi
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:30 AM
-37

Your not a doctor you don't need to use ether term. I guess your free to but if you don't want people to think your terminally online a cretin, then speak with thick traditional Anglo Saxon words not thin Latin medical terms. Also this isn't a recent thing 30 years ago DS9 we're using the sort of language to dehumanise the ferengi.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:16 PM
1

I've got bad news for you and Taylor Swift.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 07:13 AM
12

The patriarchy so far as it is a thing turns out often to be gay men and unmarried women. As in those are the people in high position in the cultural institutions from which women derive standards.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 01:23 PM
1

Are you sure that you are better off being perceived as masculine. I kind of don't have time to care about people who would place limits on me.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 02:59 PM
2

"Mollify" the whole conspt is wrong. If once you pay the Danegeld you'll never get rid of the Dane.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:32 PM
1

Its not that at all. She's not making that calculation she understands of course all hypothetical men are rapists. So she's answering would she rather be SAd or take her chances with a bear. And your hearing all men are rapists. Which probably she knows not to be the case.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:21 PM
12

It's a taxi it doesn't let anyone but your group on until you get off
/r/MensRights22/03/24 09:28 PM
7

In a dickensian novel? Sure.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 02:25 PM
8

Its the right result on good legal principles (As best I can tell from what op says) But regarding DV I just want to make a point. It won't be counted as such. Stats on murder are normal based on the principle suspect/defendant (almost always the person who did the act) so this would be recorded as be done by a man known to the victim but who was neither family; freinds; romantically or sexually evolved with the victim; or known though business. (I'm not sure of the precise recordings in Austral…
/r/MensRights28/12/23 03:10 PM
3

If he's dead surely thats just murder
/r/MensRights28/12/23 03:00 PM
7

What Twitter confirmed is that the six white male creative directors are all gay. Which means their interest in women's fashion is purely academic. As the article points out we are talking about women's fashion because of the unexplainedable spending gap (I suspect even men's fashion is mostly purchased by women) They don't wear it, I don't think you will find a women who says they where it for gay men. Yet women some how as the nearest straight man a woman's purchases are your fault.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 12:44 AM
-3

I imagine the down voted guys are talking about how American women dislike intact dicks. (We have had this question before) I have a solution for that move to Europe. Or just send him to uni here. Circumcision is not common among Christians globally, even in Christian Africa rates vary massively with Uganda having only about a quarter of men circumcised dispite also having the second or third largest Anglican/Episcopal church.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 01:09 PM
1

Something something keys and locks, The wokeies are incredibly based if you translate what they say in to nomal English.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 03:37 PM
9

There was a country, I think Norway, were someone worked out both men and women where offered good parenteral leave but (some) men correctly made the calculation that taking the full amount would hold back their careers.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 04:06 PM
4

So how would the school staff feel if we made the 12 year old girls apologise for the real or imagined crimes of their mothers What about the real or imagined crimes of their fathers or grafathers? Those are the exact same fathers and grandfathers who's real or imagined (its the later) conduct the 12 year old boys are apologising for. Sexism is the dumbest ism.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 02:05 AM
3

Um the civil rights act applies to selection of patrons as well as to selection of employees.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:09 AM
1

The roman state is the longest lasting state in history 1500 years in its three main phase. When I think of the Rome state I'm very rarely thinking about the 366 to 5th century period though I understand the comparison. Normally I'm having a thought about democracy, welfare and/or patronage. Obviously there's the roads, and the law and "bread and circuses" and the walls in the UK and place names. Sometimes I am think about the inflation crisis the preceded the third century crisis. Or the way th…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 09:37 PM
0

That's how she sees all men Don't be a loser
/r/MensRights21/07/23 11:41 AM
2

As a further point the yellow line should drop imperceptibly at the first grate reform act as it took away the Parliament but not LA vote from dowagers (rich widows) who met the voting requirements.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 05:54 PM
44

So how would she tell us we should treat women who commit crimes? What about women whose mothers committed crimes? What about women whos grate grandfathers commit crimes? Yet based on the imagined crimes of the same great grandfathers how dose she think men should be treated? Sexism is the dumbest ism.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 12:02 PM
12

Then I'm of the view it was completely ridiculous for them to be dating, the should have figured this out within 6 months.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:48 PM
2

The best one and I hope they only make it for effect. Is when they tell you that the pill / inserts / what ever other nonsense messes women up and that they feel they have been lied to by doctors so we should have men get vasectomies instead. I hope they do it for effect and understand that the safe reversible birth control narrative is wrong for all humans. The three choices are: Abstinence, Be faithful, or Correctly use a condom. Anything else is not safe, sane and consensual so stop doing it …
/r/MensRights10/06/23 11:05 PM
8

Life with no hope of parole is a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. In England we get away with whole life orders by saying they are effectively 35 year tarriffs
/r/MensRights28/05/23 05:00 PM
3

You started this thread talking about births and pregnancy wich men don't do. Sorry if my language was not as precise as your; but i think your confusion is due to not be a serious person.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 08:07 AM
5

Men join the army for cash not fulfillment, women have children dispite the cost. Do you not see that.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:35 AM
1

There used to be a wrinkle in English Law that ment that because the EU is/was not bound by the court in Strasbourg our human rights act didn't apply to laws implementing European Directives, I wonder if Malta has that problem.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 05:22 PM
11

President of the EU parliament might as well be president of a debating club they have no powers to propose legislation, they suggests and veto can be trivial over ruled so they lack those powers so they lack legislative power, they also don't really have any other power. The important president's are von de Leyen and Michel. But I've never met anyone who voted for ether of them.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 05:14 PM
12

odd in the Asda case the supermarket was found to be breaching the Equality Act by paying staff the wages for the job that they were doing. Its not about equal work.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 07:58 AM
5

Babe even in New York your all dating the same guy, He (the proverbial West Elm Kalib) has been taught (by experience) that he can have a different girl tomorrow why would he put the work in to keep a single girl
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:35 AM
2

The very aim of the bill is a breach of the ECRH (A6) and there by the Scotland Act. As the noble Lord said the Scottish Government seeks to act unlawfully
/r/MensRights03/05/23 08:36 PM
2

Can I ask, assuming this is real, is the following all correct: the principle killer is Male and therefore this is "Male violence" in the views of feminists
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:29 AM
1

I think the mistake /u/Mode1961 made was not couching his criticism in the language of the dominant ideology. Of course as a committed biphobe I'm forced to agree with the women but he might have called them out on there easing language.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 09:51 AM
5

She was charged with murder and GBH on a separate occasion she was convicted of manslaughter on the first charge and GBH on the second. The mens rea for murder and GBH are the same (that is to say you don't have to intend death for murder). So its a bit odd to say the first time she intended and achieved wounding and the time she killed him she intended battery and didn't know her own strength. That said; I don't really think the lack of murder conviction affected her time behind bars as knowing…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:51 AM
3

The uk can't keep its forces in managed decline, however low it set recruitment targets; the system still cannot meet them.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 07:59 AM
0

I have some questions and mostly about first century women called Mary: But before we get to them I assume when you said Christ you meant you believe in the trinity right? Like Luke 8:1-3 or Luke 10:38-41 how are we interpreting theses Also what of the anointment? (in Luke this is 7:36-50, though Luke's account is markedly different to the other 3) Why was it the women that went to the tomb and why was a Mary crying shortly there after.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:09 AM
1

There is such a thing as common enterprise
/r/MensRights02/02/23 06:37 PM
8

Who said it was positive?
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:26 AM
-1

I'm of the abolish gender now point of view. And I'm not sure I am seeing the trasphobia you report. Theres such a think in uk law as perceptive discrimination where by when someone discriminates against you for a perceived personal characteristic, it doesn't matter if you have it. (e.g. Norfolk v Coffey) Clearly Rowling is discriminating against people she perceives to be men (It may or may not be an exempt discrimination) and I think almost everyone hates her for it even if we have different w…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 05:42 PM
3

I'm confused shes appealing a negotiated settlement, one she seems to have been the proposing party of. I'm going to file this one under media type has been advised that if she keeps the cases going at more and more expensive bars eventually she can out spend him.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:00 PM
0

What we learn here: First: Is that its still the women's and men's bathroom but: trans women are women, cis women are still women, trans men (can you guess) in practice also women wich of course mean non-binary yehp wome. (Thats not what I think (well I have a trad con on my shoulder who dose) or what I think anyone would say but it's how international feminist behave) Second: As we saw in the edit you can push the issue with intersectionals and you will win (they accept small losses because the…
/r/MensRights07/11/22 04:37 AM
2

Republicans are a minority in both houses
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:11 PM
1

Starting is a crime is not just a London thing British transport police have involved both TfL (trains in London) and National Rail coving all of England, Scotland and Wales. Though posters are less prominent on intercity rail
/r/MensRights03/10/22 12:10 PM
16

One possible reason goes as follows: We have private prosecution so CPS have to act first to prevent embarrassment.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 08:41 AM
3

The reason people put Peterson and Tate in the same box is that Tate is what you fucking get when you suppress all the other role models for men. As Peterson would say: Good Luck with that.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:58 AM
5

I'm just happy the metro feels it can call the S. 4(5)a offence "rape"
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:42 PM
24

Be aware Ontario courts have found cohabitation isn't necessary for cohabitation
/r/MensRights28/09/22 06:01 PM
3

2018, that's like 2 or 3 Prime Ministers ago
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:34 AM
7

I know I can't complain about you attitude to risk but realistically nothing ever happens to anyone and if it does happen it probably happens in a home. So like don't spend your life worrying about safe
/r/MensRights22/09/22 09:00 AM
7

ew grouse, chopping your dick to conform to the fashion American women have been told to have. Dude just come to Uni in Europe and pick a chick up here where our women aren't barbaric and therefor have the opposing taste. Dr cockʻ a gon, a pussy indeed
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:49 AM
1

I mean quite frankly I think that would be an improvement.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 12:05 PM
1

So every thing you have said I think is correct except that when you look at the statistics about 2% of rape defendants are women. I assume this is due to common purpose (aka join enterprise) with a male co defendant.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 12:04 PM
3

Women are more lightly to attribute their turam to there sex than men are. Thats not the same thing as: More trumam [that is] due to their sex (Even if that is how researchers want to report it that way.) Which is still not the same thing as More and worse trauma
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:11 AM
2

Well no because we have agreed they both have the same number of adults and there are few difference between men and women
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:53 PM
1

The US is, (in England and Wales the average number of women killed per day is less that 1, I do not suspect that is changed if you included all three UK jurisdictions and the nation of Ireland) I did not talk about Men and Boys but I have indicated in the past that the largest group killing Men and Boys in the UK "Friends / Acquaintances" - barely registers in the Woman's stats, is a group that I have a good idea who it isn't, and which I suspects includes the family of romantic partners.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 02:16 AM
3

That's just not true in the US women and Girls account for just 20% (approx.) of homicide victims (for England and Wales this is around 30%). The average number per day was 12.7 across the 3rd larges nation (The USA), not hundreds as you claimed (note also I did remove those killed by other women (etc.))
/r/MensRights28/08/22 01:05 AM
5

No it doesn't using those numbers more cases are found to be false than true. Though granted in the majority we 'dunno'.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:33 AM
7

Its against men and boys
/r/MensRights18/08/22 08:07 AM
5

I think about 40% (to 60% if you look at crime survey and research data) of what the home office calls violence against women and girls is against persons who are nether women nor girls.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 11:57 PM
2

The "how not to be raped" is mostly pointless too. (I would say design to install unwarranted fear) A very small proportion of serious sexual assault happens on the street and turning you keys in to an offensive weapon is unlikely to help but may constitute a weapons offence (please check local laws if you intend to do so).
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:21 PM
2

So I don't presume to gate keep you out but I'm going to suggest two things: The breakdown of gender is also the end of womans space . Yhis is the argument of terf like JK Rowling and Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker). The difference between terfs and wokey feminist is extremely minor. Second there is no crime of driving while black millions of women do it everyday in supposedly racist jurisdictions with no issues, theres some evidence for increase police stops for black men, nor are there larg…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:13 AM
5

Liz Truss playing both side of the culture war as usual is it just me or are Truss and Sunak the lest principled Tory MPs and is that why they won the MPs votes?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:56 AM
1

I kinda think conception to birth should be the only time that it really valid to go after the father, after that I would leave it up to the state to support which ever adults have custody of the child. Once the child is born there are Baby Moses laws in all parts of the USA mean that born children can be given up at any point, (in my own country (the UK) its a tiny bit less easy but fundamentally possible to give up a born child). And so we can tell that who ever dose have custody of the child …
/r/MensRights27/07/22 09:02 AM
1

Basically slut shaming
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:10 AM
6

I've flicked through his comments the "misogyny" he is talking about is just not accepting every feminist line uncritically.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:41 AM
1

In England and Wales we tend to trace the current doctrine Judaical discrimination (Baroness Hale's word and mine) on the basis of Gender back to Baroness Hale's Longford Lecture and the Corston Report, also named for a Baroness.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:22 PM
1

I would suggest that: 1) One you have provided no reason for your claim so we could dismiss it with out reason. 2) the way people such as the throwaway use repeal and pass makes it clear Roe is viewed as legislation. 3) under Roe and Casey we had judicial rule making 4) the words abortion and privacy are nowhere to be found in the constitution.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:44 AM
10

It is not and was not the role of the court to pass legislation.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:43 AM
11

Don't ever use the words "lawyer" or "sue" when talking with anyone you work with especially HR. Use the words "uncomfortable", "hostile", "competitor" it better conveys the message I understand how I would make a successful claim whist seeming less threatening. Of course if it doesn't resolve then you can instruct your lawyer to use words like "serve" and "claim" and "everything" Also keep a diary
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:30 PM
0

Practicing absence in response to restrictive abortion laws is based.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:44 PM
1

Responding to abortion laws with abstinence is based. Also who was she fucking before the decision, like all my guess would imply that the marriage has irretrievably broken down already.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:09 PM
2

RE: pro-choice, but only in cases with a risk of medical harm to the mother um what, (I think perhaps you should not have use clan identifiers, so you did not miss people who reject the identifier but hold the view you put after it) anyway I voted no opinion I might have voted other, not uterus no dog in that fight
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:08 PM
8

Generally no, that would be invasive, has to be the victims choice. Additional the kit only confirms the intercourse and is silent on consent.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:46 PM
10

"She shoulda kept her legs closed" Feminists: OMG HOW DARE YOU, MISOGYNIST, CHAUVINIST PIG INCEL!!!! CANCEL HIM!!!!!! Also Feminists: "He shoulda kept it in his pants" (Source 4 comments back in this chain) FTFY
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:52 PM
27

If your going to have had sex that may result in pregnancy you better have thought all that through. I kinda what to clip this, because if applied to everyone its based.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:30 AM
12

Christ do they have to come in pairs of opposites Assure / Integrate Approach / Retreat Support / Abandon Comfort / Reject Pay me Oh I get it now the author just wants work
/r/MensRights30/05/22 12:41 AM
4

Dude rough, Who divorces and amputee, and why are we trusting them with a child? Sue her for custody, property damage and loss of income. If you must simp find a better woman to do it for.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 08:38 AM
8

Kindly refrain from peering over, under, around, or indeed behind the curtain. Such scenes as thereby viewable are only deemed suitable for the most pious.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:41 PM
2

I'm sure there was a week when a whole bunch of married California directors came out as (monogamously) bisexual.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:05 PM
1

That was the damming testimony, that Asda paid "the rate for the job being done", As best I can make out, (from para 23 of the supreme court judgment) allowing that: would not promote the purpose of the legislation which was aimed at eliminating discriminatory differences between terms and conditions of employment. And Parliament could not have intended the claimant to have to show “an undefined substratum of similarity” between the terms of employment of the claimant and the comparator So subst…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:13 AM
3

We've had posts on here where the father is by hospital policy excluded from these decision. And posts where the hospital has ignored both parents.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 05:21 PM
1

I didn't even get to quality of work, I don't think you need to, Its sufficient (in my view) to focus on hours, responsibility and risk/harm. (and worry talking about quality could lead to a muddy conversation on that topic rather than hammering the other points)
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:08 PM
2

Yes they do mean sex based harassment I think they are making a lot of this line However, as all three members of the Tribunal will vouchsafe, baldness is much more prevalent in men than women form para 235 of the judgment
/r/MensRights13/05/22 12:17 AM
3

I think the mail is confused between discrimination on the basis of sex (as in gender) and sexual harassment
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:45 PM
1

Yeah that at would have been how it was reported, But like men and women do both jobs and they get paid the rate for the job which is being done. I've read a lot of the judgements in this case, and "Asda would pay the rate for the job that was being done" is the damming finding. (Employment Tribunal 2406372/2008 par 117 and 239-242, [2021] UKSC 10 par 38 - 41) It seems to me therefor that my understanding of the equities act: that you got the same pay for the same job, was wrong. I do not accept…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:03 PM
9

Yes
/r/MensRights12/05/22 07:55 AM
51

Equal work is a myth: Many men have there job and also their the handy men and also there security and also if theirs any dangerous part of the work and if there is any blame to be handed, all of this they are expected to do as extra. (Whereas an equivalent woman would be expected to find the nearest man.) In the Asda case [UKSC 2019/0039] UK judges found that a group of Men and Women working in retail could make a gender pay discrimination case based on a group of men and women undertaking back…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:10 AM
2

I don't do maths on a Sunday but I'm fairly sure the number of Ben Shapiro approved dates (i.e. the man indicates and pays but no pre marital sex occurs) is higher than the number of daily mail approved dates
/r/MensRights08/05/22 09:43 AM
10

I think so, I think that it is a percentage of US births shes using
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:38 AM
2

I'm not sure that is a traditional date sond more like, lets say an arrangement.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 07:37 PM
52

Most consumer spending is done by women, even in men's products. Hence the old spice and gillette add campaigns targeting women.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 04:14 PM
2

That's a silly take, you create the market by being prepared to pay. Now if you've found Brooke Magnanti PhD (aka Belle de Jour, Taro) [preferably paying her directly (she hand a manager in 2003 but many people do/did)], then that might have been your most ethical consumption all week, (your cloths were made in a sweat shop in Bangladesh or maybe Leister, who knows what you ate but it grow on ground that could be wild, and so on). The worry is the person you have found might not be free they mig…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 12:42 AM
3

Er because you created the demand, hair dressers wouldn't exist in a country were no one wanted a hair cut
/r/MensRights23/04/22 03:08 PM
2

No in England and Wales Women and Girls is considered gender neutral by the double speakers in the home office.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 10:54 AM
4

No, I knew that I did see it until you pointed it out and it surprised me, was all. I think it should be taken out, I don't think BTP should be indicated a single act can't be harassment. As for your last example, we are back to requiring men to look up at the ceiling because otherwise a women might think shes being stared at. I though we agreed that was an over reaction. Perhaps not.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:58 PM
2

To repeat my self no mention of intent only effect. The Act says it’s sexual harassment if the unwanted behaviour: violates your dignity creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment (this includes the digital environment, online) That is accurate except that the law says "purpose or effect" but as BTP surmise that means intent is not required I'm wondering how behavior on the underground can be repeated - It seems odd you'd meat some one over and over again c…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:08 PM
3

So I do think that my initial reaction to the poster was probably an over reaction but I think it bares mentioning as it is the effect. The equities act defines harassment according to the purpose or the effect, additionally since the Lawrence report CPS and most police forces have adopted definitions of "hate" that encourage offices to accept an accusers perspective of motivation (these definitions have be variously upheld or repudiated in UK courts but have not been widely revalued by law enfo…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 09:29 PM
6

I saw the poster on the underground the other week before the topic you linked, my experience was as follows: The tube has transverse seating so you are facing at someone, I say facing because I have been at work for 9 or 10 hours and I'm not really processing whats going on in front of my eyes is more a zombie state. And then I look up and I'm being accused of a crime. Well hopefully no one would think that but I decided to look at the ceiling for the rest of the trip. I kind of find it hard to…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:10 PM
1

British transport police the Mayor of London and the Association of Train Operating Companies (National Rail) [BTP et al] disagree with you, so please provide similar or better authority before claiming it is not the law. Exhibit A, Exhibit B The law BTP et al refer to is the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 which provides no real definition of harassment as far as I can tell case law is a reasonable person standard; so who knows. However the equities act 2010 gives us this: the conduct has t…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 07:59 PM
1

Who here thinks a single (non Rwandan) person will be removed from this country under this program. Show of hands. Its fucking daft we can no more get them out of the country before there claim fails then after it fails
/r/MensRights15/04/22 12:00 AM
3

One partner can force the divorce through for any, or no reason. I'm not sure what's happening to fault
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:50 PM
5

It seems a feminist view point is one with no introspection. (At least according to Kali, I'm not sure how much I agree)
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:08 PM
5

See here the thing having mens clubs and the WI, brownies and boy scouts. Is a level playing field. Having no gendered spaces is a level playing field. All the talk of women's spaces proves we don't have ether of these now I don't think we can turn the clocks back to when men had spaces but flipping the table with the alphabet people is an option.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 12:07 PM
2

The prisoner in England and Wales or I bet where every else you happen to be are doing something different to outside and so theres no reason why prison concerns should effect policy outside of them.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:25 AM
7

I mean, I kind of wondered if they should have protected spaces if men don't get them
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:16 AM
-1

Male and female are perfectly good adjectives but if you kneed a noun please considered men and women. I don't know the context in which you've used it so no attack but I wonder whist you asked here with so little context. tl;dr maybe the same reason this isn't /r/malesrights
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:14 PM
3

So first off the number has no bearing on victims services, indeed the fact she brought it up and the fact she lead with it is deeply troubling (as it implies she and her party believe in the illiberal principle of collective guilt). Its also wrong according to CPS prosecution data about 8% of domestic abuse defendants whist maybe 17 percent of claims in cases brought to prostitution where men. Give that crime survey data suggest that 32% of victims of domestic abuse are men we can expect the ra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/22 09:32 PM
9

Also (in fact instead) consider /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates, there not as busy as here and they have in the past had a rule banning right thinking people (I think they have softened that but still want a left wing space) reading there wiki I probably aline with them quite well https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/wiki/missionstatement#wiki_what_do_we_mean_by_left-wing.3F This page also contains at the end a section on why not Men's Lib
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:35 AM
1

I don't even think its the law but transport police and Met police don't have to convict me to mess up my day
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:22 AM
1

By sentacing everyone as a women we could close down the majority of our prisons. Whist in England and Wales there are black vs other than black sentacing (and policing) disparities, they are much smaller than male, female sentacing disparities. And we know the cause of both, for the races one we built a system that rewards cooperation and then convinced a segment of our population not to cooperate. For the gender one its a doctrine of discrimination, thats the world they use so its open discrim…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:58 AM
1

I mean the UK worked out all these "problems" in 1939. None of what you have said negates the art of the possible. I could go though each of your questions if you like, but the point is: It could be done in 1939 (with out internet) it could be done tomorrow and done better.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 11:47 PM
1

I can think of a few options: Farmers and other exempt professionals. The child's grandparents, (who might also be able to take up the exempt profession to allow the last guy to fight). Some random polish family.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:11 PM
0

Change my veiw: your exactly wrong but it doesn't matter. Feminist are quite ok with the idea that cis men should fight and that women and trans folk should be evacuate (like children). Your probably some egalitarian or MRA who thinks thats unfair. Lets say your Zelenskyy (servant of the people) Do you: Make women fight, (what if there with child) Let male citizens flee the fight causing your nation to lose and for the territory to get a Russian standard of rights. Make the men but not the women…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 05:02 PM
1

I wonder if you can explain to me how we determine work is of equal value? Because well those judges get paid a lot as do many women in my employer's top brass. Asking for a friend.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 06:14 PM
4

In the England and Wales the phrase "violence against women and girls" is a lie, its a static that includes crimes ageist men named to exclude those men from victims services and to paint them as offenders. For instance an effect of this attitude is that comparing domestic violence protections and crime survey data suggest that domestic violence against men is half (0.43) as lightly to lead to prosecution as DV against women. I also expect the crime survey data is small for men so it could be mo…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 04:27 PM
52

As the man points out that in a great many industries [thankfully not mine] even when men and women have the same job, they do not have the same job as certain responsibilities will fall to men. Meanwhile in the UK at least having different jobs does is not necessary sufficient to get different pay (even when both roles contain men and women, who could choose the better paying role) see the case of Asda [UKSC 2019/0039] And then supposed pay gap taking no account for role and in some contries (i…
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:33 PM
3

This article wrights so many women out of history, to make 2021 a breakthrough year.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:19 PM
9

This is your reminder that TERFs are the worst
/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:06 AM
8

Can we take a moment to appreciate that Putin and Russian bots are concurrently using a blood and soil argument and calling there opponents fascists/nazis. Russia has Male conscription too.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 11:27 AM
19

A thief is someone who thinks everyone steals. A karren is someone who thinks everyone complains to authorities.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:08 AM
8

If you're not willing to fight for the country, you should not be a citizen Thats why from antiquity upto really quite recently; women weren't citizens so much as the daughters, wives, or dowagers of citizens. (e.g. Edict of Caracalla 212; and Coverture last in to the 19th and 20th centuries) So bold line for feminist criticism. None the less: Service guarantees citizenship.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 10:06 PM
2

I mean I would go further and say men aren't allowed preferences (even if week) where as women get a free pass on strict standards (e.g: swipe right if you under 6'4")
/r/MensRights17/02/22 07:57 PM
1

So DNA and fingerprint hits aren't necessarily unique (whats on the database is a hash of some kind) If you collide for a crime that in fact you could not have committed due to where you where the crime scene Bio record will be more convincing that all the evidence you weren't even in the right state. So theirs a body of law on whether that's allowed or not The fact is 23 and me have your genetic code or at least enough third/fourth cousins to find you in some parts of the us that can be used.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:20 AM
3

When you use to privalge ...
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:41 PM
3

Some police forces in the us have fought and won court cases for right set a maximum level of intelligence for new recruitment.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:40 PM
12

Its lightly that the no support clause is illegal, unenforceable and severable and in that case that you sign it it will be as though you sign a piece of paper containing only the words about you giving up parental rights. Do not sign anything with out local legal advice
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:30 AM
11

And this is proof, somehow
/r/MensRights02/02/22 03:34 AM
3

Adding to this she complain about the behavior of the handful of fuckable guy in her city.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 08:19 PM
1

I'm anti criminal. And your not saying "you know she has a point on prisons". Your saying that we should adopt an absolutist policy in all of society because it would lead to about a 6% drop in sex attacks in women's prisons. And that to me, well it is special pleading, and your a feminist.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 05:44 PM
1

I'm tiring to imagine the hubris it takes to think you should make decision for regular people (even if they are ill or you think so) based on the effect to female criminals. And your not a Feminist. Like criminals who got sentence to prison as a woman in Wales, there aren't even any woman's prisons in the whole country.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 10:30 PM
2

Connect law apparently
/r/MensRights27/01/22 08:53 PM
0

Change my veiw TERFs are the worst and if only as a tactical choice we should be broadly trans accepting. See the Bower vs Brewdog case in Cardiff for a good laugh. Though I do recognize that picking sids in a feminist civil war may be less effective and much less fun than watching it from the side.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 02:35 PM
3

In Europe (I think this is Luxembourg so EU28) they can't use gender directly they have to use job title or other clues
/r/MensRights22/01/22 03:07 AM
4

Um thats not how cluster B works They're all just fine with it
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:01 AM
5

No the high paid men are over 45 and owning (at least in the UK)
/r/MensRights08/12/21 06:15 PM
2

What about Slovenian and Serbian people? Also Caucasian in this case means from the Caucasus right because in the states it means white anglo people for reasons.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 06:09 PM
4

I'm here like: wheres my ban? Am I not based enough?
/r/MensRights08/12/21 05:58 PM
19

I surprised girls don't show a gap
/r/MensRights04/12/21 12:55 PM
2

Its is English law, the interpretations act would apply and your scheme would fail
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:10 AM
14

Its the doctors job to provide all relevant information and provide advice. Not providing relevant information is malpractice but its not the doctors job or gift to make sure it is followed.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 04:23 PM
3

"Birth Parent" because apparently in 2021 (trans) men can't be mothers. /s (kind /s) I mean in context I understand what it means but I'm use to it being used in reference to adopted people for a man and a woman.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 05:41 PM
2

Cross out birth (or don't (It's up to you to decide what that means)) and then sign it, see what happens
/r/MensRights01/12/21 05:31 PM
1

Just look at the doctrine
/r/MensRights24/11/21 02:22 AM
2

Also a complete non sport here but your better at all sports. As demonstrated by the lack of men on our team.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 01:43 AM
7

From the UK it looks like this is realy a reflection on how much of a non sport netball in Austraila, As I can tell (and I'm dissagree with the blond talking head but I don't realy count talking heads as a source) the rules always said "she" but never said no boys/men and so they just rocked up as the first team with any boys in (also no girls) and asked to play, [and got a yes back] She says at one point she wants to see the best women and girls and I kinda wonder: dose she have a season ticket…
/r/MensRights14/11/21 08:33 PM
0

Like no, sir thats not clear you led with sex you repeated sex. The race thing is new (in may be in another comment but not in the post). Don't call everyone who call you out a simp, dating is neither simping nore johning and you have to be realistic about what you putting in and getting out. (You might find you prefer someone who attaches value to intimacy) Understand I am by no means saying keep dating her. (I don't think going back with someone will work out). I'm say think about how you come…
/r/MensRights25/10/21 03:16 AM
0

Did you say you broke up because you when two months with out fucking?, (as for spending, only one of you has an income) Just seems very mercenary to me Also block any one connected much more to your ex than you.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 07:58 PM
47

Oh God they put the mixed accommodation on the ground because they feel that some of there students are acceptable targets of crime. Isn't that a little bit fucked up, I think it's a little bit fucked up.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 07:07 PM
2

So I made a reply to your top comment and I think this will get asked to that too. And kinda sure do that, I'm of the believe that police brutality and trigger happyness is a problem in the US and that its not a racial as BLM think
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:37 PM
6

I'm more and more in favour of whataboutism every day, We are otherwise focused on made up issues* to which we attribute fantastical causes that require denial of the real world to make sense. And then we act as if we live in that made up land and so help no one. And we should hear it here too.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:21 PM
6

I don't know why fire departments and so opposed to people having campfires in the woods can't they just put out Forrest fires with out getting upset when you tip a hot barbecue in to dry leaves.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 02:58 PM
6

Just a question as too what is first wave Feminism in the uk. Because what it means in the USA in my view translates poorly to the UK. Your aware no doubt that the "suffragettes" broke away from the independent labour party who were campaigning for universal suffrage. In order that the suffragettes could focus on rich women's suffrage. The 1912 electorate was 7.7 million men the 1918 electorate was 13.0 million men and 8.4 million women (a 60/40 split) Adding 5.3 million men at a time when the u…
/r/MensRights03/10/21 05:06 AM
13

Wich kind of means that they can be supported out, its not clear to me that more teaching will lead to fewer rapes
/r/MensRights17/09/21 01:29 PM
8

Its more what you call guidelines than actual rules https://www.reddit.com/wiki/moddiquette Asks Please don't Ban users from subreddits in which they have not broken any rules. but that is clearly not enforced in anyway
/r/MensRights13/09/21 02:31 PM
12

Let me tell you about something called intersectionality
/r/MensRights12/09/21 03:10 PM
1

Careful doing that cohabitation doesn't require cohabitation in Ontario
/r/MensRights10/09/21 01:37 AM
16

They get rid of a lot of comment BOLA is better fun to read, Also what they were: https://removeddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/p2dk39/i_m29_was_raped_by_a_woman_f3435_and_have_to_pay/
/r/MensRights11/08/21 08:45 PM
1

Using conviction according to MOJ: Of the 34,300 defendants convicted for shoplifting, 9,600 (28%) were female. The custody rate for this offence was lower for female offenders (19%) than for males (26%). One of the key points in this Going by conviction means Police/CPS can make public interest decisions befor (also possible jury nullification). Also relivet but not here: sentence length. Also whist we are reading this document: Males maintain higher risk of personal crime than females. In 2019…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:37 PM
5

Judges in England and Wales have decided that equality is a misplace notion and instead they should use "discrimination". Lady Hale laid this out in a longford lecture "the sinners and the sinned against" she seems to think that the police, CPS, and juries placed to much emphasis on actions and not enough on which of the two genders (sinners, and sinned against) they belong to.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:56 PM
20

this is from Ontario, and the last line says that the crown (of canada) would not appeal. (Probs because: what you get a diffrent anglo-canadian judge, good luck there)
/r/MensRights05/07/21 05:48 PM
1

England and Waleshttps://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2019 The first point in the infographic A higher proportion of Males were victimes of personal crime than Females in 2019/20 If you dig in to these: men are more lightly to be victims of viloent crime; there's some indication that women are more lightly to be victimised at home than men but less lightly to be victimised in the street than men.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 06:19 PM
2

Your heading is a FDS repost
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:19 PM
2

This is so old its been wrong for about 8 or 9 years Can we have a rule about posting ancient news on this sub. It gets to be like Feminist complaining about the 50s
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:05 AM
1

The sentacing gap - in England and Wales this is due to doctrine (of open "discrimation") that the courts came up with all on the own. No one cares about crimes against men (the majority of crimes (E+W but also where you live)). And we hide anti male biases in our statistics. Treatment of boys in the education system. Stopping MGM is racist but laws to target a certain race with travel bands in the name of stopping FGM should go through on the nod.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 01:36 PM
9

It not non gender though in the Washington post databases of the 6,290 police shootings since 2015 6,011 where men (96%) https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/
/r/MensRights21/05/21 03:50 PM
2

Whats happens is at odds with your view of the law
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:55 AM
4

No, jailing the mother would mean removing her from her child and we wouldn't want that.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:45 AM
5

What if the child is born without your knowledge?
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:31 AM
0

Dose it includ successfully attempts? They don't tend to fill in surveys.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:28 AM
1

How does inflation work in child support in the USA?
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:24 AM
3

On your rapest laws I'd hope on your examples that they would be interpreted as 'Mother' including 'Father' to maintain constitutionality.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:23 AM
1

Thats got nothing to do with the headline which is about people who actually lost their job and have probably been on 0% of pay since (not counting UC and benefits) But DopeDetective going to sniff out the one peace of data that in isolation looks favourable to his pet theory.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 10:07 AM
4

On two Say you post the headline on Facebook with a note saying this is misleading. I think people will missread the headline and not even see your note I know that's not helpful but I don't know what can be done
/r/MensRights04/05/21 03:04 PM
4

I mean to say I think thats smaller than England and Wales, And thats before you take in to account that MOJ in 2015 found "under similar circumstances" the odds of imprisonment where about 88% higher for men (varying between 35% for shoplifting or theft to 267% for violence and harassment and 362% for serious drug offences) I strongly believe that if all adults were sentenced as women we could close over half of all prison space.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 05:14 PM
1

Is it only 60% in the states, and dose that take in to account rates of instant custody
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:04 AM
3

I think that if there is such a thing its been lost under a montain of bullshit
/r/MensRights14/04/21 11:19 AM
10

That last slide tho 👌
/r/MensRights03/04/21 09:53 AM
2

So, there’s a proposal before my country’s parliament to curfew men. If you point out that this is punishing all men for the actions of one police officer, they ask you if you want a cocky. It’s like no bitch I want my civil liberties you can keep your fucking cookie.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 10:37 AM
2

We got this advice (about the phone) at work today, It seems to be doing the rounds on the internet and meat space - is that right? I assume your a man as you say else were you say this sort of thing never comes from women. (We had it read by a women but I think of it coming from the system.) In London it's dumb advice thiefs on bikes (all kinds) will rip it out your hand and speed off. But hay at least any women around knew you were unaware of them, or indead any other part of your surrodings.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 11:29 PM
4

Look up female erasure, thats the beast your talking about
/r/MensRights18/03/21 01:23 AM
2

CMV: I’m all for gender erasure. What happens if the courts see a father as a woman: you know they’ll start devolving fathers rights. (e.g. its no accident the first pre-nub to be upheld in my country favoured a woman.) What happens if women are allowed to enter men’s spaces? Um what men’s spaces?
/r/MensRights08/03/21 09:29 AM
35

26-year-old man James Knight is needlessly dead /r/mensrights wants justice for him
/r/MensRights06/03/21 01:40 PM
38

Rise’s Brighton contract, worth £5.1million over seven years, will instead be split between Victim Support and Stonewater, a national social housing provider.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 12:24 PM
27

Its some what wonderful on the one hand Statistics Canada wants to show the suffering of women but on the other hand it wants to be a mature statical community that doesn't hide relevant data. Also who isn’t an internet user?
/r/MensRights24/02/21 11:20 PM
1

How long for it seemed to me to be not much difference between the options
/r/MensRights20/02/21 09:44 PM
1

What kind of women don't volunteer for this only a few hundred volunteer each year Are finish men and women not equal
/r/MensRights20/02/21 09:39 PM
1

I think that's a red herring he knows that the tribunal won't use remedy (the other inspectors in the eyes of law did nothing wrong). But also the alternative is he admits he's going to court for more than most people get paid. But also if you value equality then maybe that is the solution. If you're only solution to inequality is to raise people its hard to say you value equality it looks more like you want to maximize total good.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 06:06 PM
1

So looking at this I’m not quite sure her point it may be she wants to play her sport with boys/men it maybe she wants a test of strength between genders, or something else. Ether way it highly unlikely a list of events that are women v men is even the point. That said to add to your list: Poker Darts Online Multiplayer/2-player (e.g Call of Duty) Arial and Pole For Arial (all of this is ditto for pole) its a dance but there’s a body weight finesse aspect. In the mixed competitions more Women wi…
/r/MensRights16/02/21 02:34 AM
7

Why did I read that comment section, why? I knew I would not like it and gain nothing but still I read it
/r/MensRights15/02/21 10:37 PM
1

Yes. In England and Wales we know that there is a large justice gap with women being less lightly to get a prison sentence and getting short sentence even when they do (especially for violent and drug crimes). We also have a female offenders program aimed at reducing the use of custody on female perpetrators. Yes. People who add ‘black’ before ‘men’ don’t mean the good ones ether (I’m not black but I get the impression that that don’t make it less raciest, so same principle) I'm most interested …
/r/MensRights30/01/21 03:30 AM
25

No In england and wales theres a womans offenders program because aprently its not one sided enougth
/r/MensRights23/01/21 03:00 PM
2

Thats the issue the Council of Europe seem to have taken the view that it is. Theres very minimal acknowledgment that men have issues, it declare that it only effects men and boys who do not conform to gender roles. Then with 2 exceptions (one out of Serbia and one on news source) the statistics given follow the 3rd commandment of Feminism research [thou shalt not check if a discovered effect in women is present in men, thou shall assume they live glorious lives as kings] Theres a whole strategy…
/r/MensRights22/01/21 04:38 PM
-14

This is her experience and adding what about manly men it helps no one. My reading of this girls post is that she is winning by working hard. Which I think is a positive message for any gender. Sometimes I think we get accuesed of what aboutism unfairly but other times I see posts like this. Do you even have an example you wish to share.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 03:15 AM
1

You could use the address that is given
/r/MensRights24/12/20 10:06 AM
4

She got life (mandatory for murder in E+W) with a minimum term of 17 years (so her first parole hearing will be in 17 years) The starting point for a muder with a knife is a 25 year minimum term. So there's a balance of mitigating factors applied. Her young age will be one, we can speculate on others (I dont think sentacing remarks have been published yet or that the papers said) On the other side 10 year minimum terms are not unheard of. For murderers the average time spent before first release…
/r/MensRights23/12/20 01:05 AM
1

I kind of think that having a few tweets on twitter getting him to sign himself and his part up for unconscious bias training at the beginning of July demonstrates how little it might take to persuade sir Keir. Its a shame he seemed like he might be willing to say sensible things but now he seems as unsure, unconfident and useless as HM Government.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 11:09 PM
1

Didn't he take retraing to improve his wokeness back in the summer. Did it not sink in.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 10:14 PM
11

The suffragettes (as in the British movement) did not get what the wanted (votes for middel class women), the chartists and the labour movement got there way in representation act of 1918. Note that in 1918 Europe had just done a war, and it was seen a majority women electorate was not an expectable result so the 1918 gave all men adult (21+) the vote and women 40% of the vote by limiting the women who could vote. This 40% was sufficient to end the suffragette cause and the discrepancy was only …
/r/MensRights21/11/20 01:06 AM
11

Find any stat used by blm and cut it by gender, it will be worse.
/r/MensRights18/11/20 01:53 PM
2

Define Sex
/r/MensRights05/11/20 10:33 PM
5

So did kings The question is are Queens in history all blameless and or creditless puppets, and more widely can women ever take position of power with out being wholly reliant on there subordinates.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:10 PM
5

I mean it run of the mill there there's a lot of these with ether parent and an opposite gendered new partner disproving of parenting.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 12:50 PM
2

So theres a whole load of language problems I have with this And I'm wondering what suggests means because they don't link there source But we can't oppose finding who is and is not complying
/r/MensRights10/10/20 12:10 PM
2

Can some one find me a sourse for someone using "reverse racism" maybe I've forgotten but I don't think I've ever seen/hear the middle class white dude he's talking about use the word "reverse" Direction is their idea, maybe Richard Spencer belives in direction they have a lot in common with him.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 12:48 AM
1

Thats how I feel about The View, and Twitter feminism, and some writers in the Gardian and some writers in the Torygraph. "family needs a leader" - literally Patriarchy
/r/MensRights04/10/20 11:51 AM
2

Is he on payscale in your state. Ask him if he is payed more than his female colleagues, oh and if so what he does about it. Maybe there will more factors wich apply in his case.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 05:28 AM
8

Each Mans life Matters
/r/MensRights27/09/20 09:25 AM
1

Reading that she could still be convicted of rape under common purpose (the same way she was). It's possible (and I think not uncommon) for a case to case a review that changes things in a way that would not effect the sparking case. Papers very interesting very nice to see a feminist view on the social impacts showing its well she says problematic.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 10:17 PM
2

There's no one who thinks it's done for health reasons, they will all tell you the best reason is cosmetic. Somehow there is exactly one cosmetic surgery that amrican women do not consider barbaric.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 12:07 AM
3

I think its mad that it is common in the us and legal anywhere in western or northern Europe.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 12:02 AM
48

To be fair Essex got complaints but appears to have filed them in the bin and let OP use his powers in the gender neutral one
/r/MensRights12/09/20 07:29 AM
21

Also rule of feminists scholarship number 3 Do not measure negative impacts on men as they may prove grater than those on women. Assume that men live perfect glorious lives as kings in paradise unaffected by the troubles of earth
/r/MensRights08/09/20 09:09 PM
3

Just lock them up far mor humane
/r/MensRights29/08/20 12:48 AM
1

Its just a joke rhetoric mate.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 12:55 AM
4

Do you think there were group statistics or just the random views of some middle bureaucrat?
/r/MensRights25/08/20 06:51 PM
49

Pass the phone over: Oh my husband handels that Beep
/r/MensRights22/08/20 11:33 PM
2

You'll are stupid, everyone who disagrees with me is stupid. Very dumb By any chance do you have tiny hands and orange hair and/or orange skin?
/r/MensRights21/08/20 09:28 PM
4

So why can people say "I hate all" men but not "I hate all women" or "I hate all blacks" Cause as descried in the posted screen shot and another comment in the thread in all three case it is well understood that all dose not include “the good ones”, Further as descried in the post if you are a good one then you know it dose not apply to you and no harm done. But if it dose apply to you then as descried in the post above that's on you.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 09:00 PM
7

Its basically hidden now. You can't even read comments until you join Good
/r/MensRights20/08/20 03:49 PM
3

This was on remand, i.e. pre trial
/r/MensRights09/08/20 12:49 PM
1

Remind me why is black lives matter specifically, the criminal justic problem is common to BML and the Mens rights movement. As for what feminism dose I normaly just link this. But keeping on the criminal justice theme we have men’s victim services treating them as perps and a perp as victim strategies to women offenders and these aren’t being pushed by the MRA. (not that we shouldn’t recognise that offending is often part of a wider problem buy we should not use that fact to discriminate agains…
/r/MensRights30/07/20 09:53 PM
2

There is something really grouse about the pretending the first two items are differentiated by anything but the identity of the victim and/or perp
/r/MensRights26/07/20 10:43 PM
2

Can we have a ban on randomly posting stories from half a decade ago?
/r/MensRights20/07/20 11:30 AM
5

or she may go post this: https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/hmx6pf/cmv_we_are_entering_an_era_of_female_dominance/fxbhowe/?context=3
/r/MensRights10/07/20 01:14 AM
1

In answer to the post https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/hmx6pf/cmv_we_are_entering_an_era_of_female_dominance/ ​ That shit.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 01:01 AM
3

How do you think that sign would play at an abortion clinic?
/r/MensRights08/07/20 04:39 PM
1

In the opener to HBR talk 127 Hannah Wallen layouts that equivalent the law for England and Wales (Sexual Offences Act 2003) contains distinctions (e.g. between sections 1 and 4(4) and between sections 5 and 8(2)) exist to protect women perpetrators As of March 31 2020, the government has no plans to change this. Dispite calls to change this
/r/MensRights04/07/20 12:06 AM
1

You suggested female suffer more harassment than men. This is at least contentious. In England and Wales men & boys are more lightly to be the victim of personal crime than women & girls1. Even when limited to sexual harassments you will find many on this sub who think the difference are driven by reporting rates (with men not bothering to report or being embarrassed to report), and by definition designed to exclude female perpetrators and/or male victims. You ever get that feeling when you're a…
/r/MensRights19/06/20 06:38 AM
6

Percentage of percentages.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 10:38 AM
10

"AND" you say that as if size and strength are independent. Further rarity is not an issue when we want equal protection even for small minorities. You said it was acceptable for the police to ignore 70% of reports of domestic abuse in one direction if you see that domestic abuse is never ok, why is it ok for the police to treat it like nothing.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:46 PM
11

Would you say it's okay for a man to hit a woman if shes bigger and stronger than him?
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:03 PM
1

> At best it would have been you dropped something
/r/PussyPass22/04/20 01:07 PM
3

This is why locksmiths are key workers
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:45 PM
20

The 'Supposedly' is because she wants him to know its not by her choice
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:39 PM
3

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Did they mean women yes Is it about sports or kangaroo courts Not really and No.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 10:36 AM
74

An excellent example of title ix being applied as intended
/r/MensRights27/03/20 06:29 PM
9

But how would you feel about a boys only camp Or what about a girls only camp in an area where they are already most of the students
/r/MensRights27/03/20 06:28 PM
58

Your guilt has been determined this is merely a sentencing hearing Now what will it be death or exile I'm not saying that a system of kangaroo courts and star chambers should be abolished because one women (person) got caught in the cross fire but I am saying they should be abolished.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 02:11 AM
1

When that sub dose it I'm like they have a point there values do not align with ours
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:43 PM
4

Weirdo with a whole body
/r/MensRights02/01/20 12:41 AM
1

My understanding was that it is all hypothicated to the BBC So what infrastructure do you mean?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 06:05 PM
1

But you do have to pay it to watch ITV brodcasts or Sky Sports who get no money from the License fee
/r/MensRights24/12/19 03:09 PM
2

Any man? You refused to answer that question earlier, and well sure if all I know is that the gender I betting on the man but I'll bet on weight if I have it. But I think its ridiculous to reduce it down to gender.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 08:58 PM
1

Look I'm not trying to say that women are better fighters than men. I'm saying that many women are better fighters than me (most who are in a few years of my age). (wieght class exists for a reason) And given that is it ok for me to hit them. Oh "No" weird I thought it was just a to do with the strength differential
/r/MensRights22/12/19 12:05 PM
2

You think that all men are better fighters than the average woman?
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:50 AM
3

I'd rather fight another man my weight it would be much easier than fighting an average woman (slightly taller much hevear)
/r/MensRights22/12/19 10:39 AM
-2

My source was you but from your new source Circumcision is a religious or cultural ritual Later the world might is used to avoid making substantive claims about medical benefits
/r/MensRights21/12/19 11:34 PM
20

That the bar is it
/r/MensRights21/12/19 07:22 PM
46

It's a cosmetic surgery that should not be performed on infants You said your self the prime benefits are not upsetting the cultural sensibilities of American women
/r/MensRights21/12/19 07:21 PM
1

have you tryed using your words
/r/MensRights18/12/19 03:37 AM
6

UK(E+W): Crime survey for England and Wales Men were more likely to be victims of CSEW violent crime than women (2.3% of men compared with 1.2% of women) I make that nearly double https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/thenatureofviolentcrimeinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2018#which-groups-of-people-are-most-likely-to-be-victims-of-violent-crime
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:44 AM
1

If God cut your offspring off Your anger is not really at me, is it, you just don’t what to admit what it is at; break the cycle Every right implies a responsibility; Every opportunity, an obligation, Every possession, a duty. (John Rockefeller) If it is not clear I think parents have the duty, the obligation and responsibility to keep their child whole. (e.g. not mutilate them) Indeed, we offered the Trust to the heavens and the earth and the mountains, and they declined to bear it and feared i…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:41 AM
2

If God had not have your parents together, no hygiene is necessary for you at all. Parents' decisions affect their children, such as merely existing. With every right comes a responsibility, and everyone must choose wisely. I want to examine this comment because the first time I read it I couldn’t work out why it had been written. It seems to me to have abandon this issue of hygiene. The first sentence however uses the word but merely to be combative, I think to try touch a nerve I may have touc…
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:51 PM
12

If I cut your ear off you would not have to wash that ether. Infant MGM and FGM are cosmetic procedures
/r/MensRights05/12/19 12:33 PM
1

Just encase that was not clear when they said XY they ment people with Y chromosomes https://old.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/dmpun5/what_is_this_subs_ideology/f53ywx8/ stickied mod comment
/r/MensRights28/10/19 07:36 PM
2

Just encase that was not clear https://old.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/dmpun5/what_is_this_subs_ideology/f53ywx8/ stickied mod comment
/r/MensRights28/10/19 07:32 PM
1

Stupid Prizes for Stupid Games
/r/MensRights28/10/19 07:17 PM
1

MGM Or rather AMAB-GM
/r/MensRights05/10/19 12:38 PM
3

A few old men earn a shit ton*
/r/MensRights09/04/19 09:57 PM
4

God I love this paper web magazine I can't get past the title and sub title with out some double speak "everyone who believes in equality should give women special status"
/r/MensRights17/10/18 12:38 PM
2

their not liberals stop calling them that till they live up to the name
/r/MensRights17/10/18 12:34 PM
2

The EU is Germany and it is the parasite Government debt is typically in the country of origins currency that means when its paid out that cash only useful in that country. Greek debt payments in Euros can be spent in Germany. The Euro and EU regulations are there to make certain that othe EU states cannot compete with Germany by taking on government debt or by setting regulations for there economy. Anyway Land is much more expensive to move goods across than the ocean. There is a road link from…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/18 06:50 PM
1

I think most parts of the Hospital are single person and therefor single sex
/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:43 PM
7

It's not its a sensationalist paper, It's the paper that told use Cameron fucked a pig
/r/MensRights31/07/18 07:20 AM
2

In the UK about 40% of victims of reported "Violence against women and Girls" are Men or Boys. When 40% of reports are coming from a group whose report is so structurally discouraged you have to wonder if they are the majority.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 11:22 PM
5

in Scotland it seems to be
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:31 PM
6

This story is largely a fabrication by the journalist The study's abstract talks about all student feeling less motivated at the end of semester (Students get stressed around exam/hand-in time who knew) The study did contain the quoted words sure but in there context they mean "addition questions exist" or "can I get more funding and an research student" These sentences from the relevant section are important to understand the context For demographic variables we observed no effect of gender, ra…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 02:32 PM
1

warm fuzzy feeling Don't play stupid games. Look at your country and ask that, no they get warm fuzzy feelings when its women and children. Making policy based on warm fuzzy feelings dose not save lives.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 10:34 PM
-15

this policy has existed since the last government HPV causes more caners in women then men Changing policy in this manner or by press leads to absurd policy, and more often policy that waste money on treatments specifically for women, even if they have low to no effect*. Not play stupid game you will lose. the particular efficacy of doing this to men I can only quote advice to governments. *e.g. mammograms: the UK & US both screen earlier (younger) and more often than worthwhile
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:28 AM
-22

No the way to save the most boys lives is to to treat the cancers if they appear saving money is valuable in that it lets you do more things
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:13 AM
3

I think this is a useful campain, we have stories of cases were the woman regreted getting a man a pay cut Its nice in holywood there honist about how it works
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:25 AM
1

So this is set in the UK In the the UK were on our second woman PM and these people seem to like her about as much as they liked the first one So I don't get this obsetion with women rules in a state where the head of state; the head of goverment; the leaders of bouth houses of parliament; and the top judge are all women (That list sounds worse than it is)
/r/MensRights13/05/18 10:11 PM
1

maybe it because women queue so dam long or maybe its aspirational
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:55 AM
1

I don't have your 5% figure but the ONS spells out what its missing from it analysis
/r/MensRights15/04/18 08:26 PM
3

Please don't say it about childer No its about chooses ... (That women have and men don't have. That women take and men don't have) chooses to stay at home with the children, (or leave the office early to see the children)
/r/MensRights15/04/18 07:23 PM
1

they do its called the wage gap
/r/MensRights13/04/18 12:53 PM
1

You need to establish two things First that the person seeing it reeds it Second they don't say glass ceiling. The graph don't say why, it says what, and some whys don't fit but more than one might
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:43 PM
2

In the UK for every £1 a woman spends, men spend 66p Thats accurate it miss out all the things the wage gap dose tho. Or some here might argue only most of them
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:36 PM
1

where do you think he from? I'm at a loss
/r/MensRights09/04/18 05:53 PM
2

there's also lies by omission
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:34 AM
1

it creates a hostile learning environment?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:22 AM
1

but the old version of the world is gendered it's just gendered in Latin
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:21 AM
1

and go where? (asking for a friend)
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:20 AM
3

Criminalise an ancient practice and turn established communities into outsiders. So bring back the hunt (this paper may not be hypocritical on these examples)
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:06 AM
1

In the UK we have a Parliamentary system that has Ministers doing there job and being an MP so by definition its' a side gig to be an MP In the US that argument won't follow as well and reps to Washington are crossing a content for months [not just getting the night train every week] (though Al Gore documentary talks about Al Gore Sr working both as a rep and tobacco farmer) And in the case of Trump he holds executive office not just a legislative role, for a cabinet minister or the PM to have a…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 03:50 AM
7

Just ask "what about in this town?" on about the people they know, or about kids People say such stupid shit sometimes, and when you ask them the question in a different way they understand they realize they know the answer. They've just been fooled by misleading presentation of statistics / fact in to believe a nonsense is a scientific truth.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 11:19 PM
2

that's not as an exercise in justice, and you don't mean Nazis as in national socialists, you mean Germans as in people who happen to be born in Germany in the 1910's 1920's
/r/MensRights11/01/18 10:39 AM
9

don't care, there could be any number of reasons for her being on the team, maybe there was good reason to expect her to better, maybe they didn't care about any thing after the line up by publishing this Mike Buchanan dose nothing to advance justice for men and boys instead but delegitimise j4mb as a site interested in such pressing issues as the teams for celebrity specials of tv quiz shows
/r/MensRights04/01/18 09:13 PM
1

um the joker isn't talking about himself he's talking about the plan of the Man
/r/MensRights30/12/17 10:08 PM
1

I meant it in the abstract as in the Plan
/r/MensRights30/12/17 09:58 AM
1

I thought about doing the maths but I didn't want to, its how I found the 1790 census data But do you accept the senate, I'm wondring if you think the senate was part of the plan but the house not. Except that would make you a constitutionalist.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:26 PM
1

Yes so california has less per person
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:48 PM
1

I know the diffrence I just think that your construction is stupid and if you believed it you would talk about the sennit But to be clear in the exaple I gave both states also had 2 senators
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:44 PM
1

I think your english comprention is pore First I didn't say that 3/5 would be wose than a half, I said you would for every US congress be able to constuct (find) that 1/2. As in the second congress Rhode Island had 1 rep for its 68,825 persons (including 948 slaves) whilst Kentucky had 2 for its 73,677 (including 12,430 slaves) Oh And yes 1/2 represtion is more than 0 represtion wich is yes the amount slaves had Also sevel means a number biger than 2 (or conversly whose inverse is less than 1/2)…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:18 PM
1

It wasn't bumped down theres allways been a smallest state with two reps and a largest state with one, thats why theres a senite house so a montanan can have several times the voting power of callifonan Also noone ever hade 3/5 of a vote
/r/MensRights28/12/17 09:35 AM
2

That is a breach of mos maiorum Trudeau here shows disrespect for parliamentary process and Canadians should be worried by it
/r/MensRights05/10/17 12:10 AM
2

I think the advice you came with is better than what you have been given here, your looking at a Star Chamber your job is to inform as meany people as possible that if they are hit by a title nine complaint, then they have been found guilty and will be summon for sentencing in a court were no evidence, fact, or part or reality matters. It is therefor not worth dividing the holy from unholy, to do so is to (lightly) misinform the holy that they will always be safe.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 11:44 PM
1

Some of them are liberals, and opposes Start Chambers
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:25 PM
1

Jane Grey?
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:43 PM
1

Can we not call her defacto leader of feminists
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:20 AM
1

Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst as the "suffragette" campaigned against the suffrage movement therefor nearly all of the voting rights grated by the 1918 Representation of the People Act the interest of a few rich spinsters was not a noble goal while the real suffrage movement and independent Labour party were campaigning for all adult Britons. I hope that next year the Labour party recognizes its own work and not those who worked against them. I know that I hope in vain.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:28 PM
3

I think it would be fun to mansplain mansplain get them to work out the deviation of the most obvious synonym and tell them it makes them sound uneducated
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:16 PM
1

If you could make the argument through the 14th and 6th articles of the ECHR that quite a lot of territory in Europe
/r/MensRights24/08/17 03:28 PM
2

Human rights act 2005 and by way of such ether the 14th Article together with the 6th Article or the 12th Protocol I don't think our native discrimination law would be built for courts our constitution doesn't tend to like laws with broad scope so the other route would be to find something in the Criminal Justices Act or related legislation
/r/MensRights24/08/17 03:26 PM
-3

In allmost all cases it is opt in keep your pants on
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:08 PM
6

The history of voting rights in the UK is almost the same for men and women, with the exception that of just one of the 5 to 7 centuries over which the commoms has evolved it seems woman have had the same voting rights save that is Until 1832 voters were property holders, some of whom were women the example we normally use is a rotten bough were 2 MPs where returned by an entirely female Electorate From 1832 to 1918 it was rate payers, which for most of that period ment householders any anyone r…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:52 PM
1

Daily Mail so possibly
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:09 PM
6

He was ranked 203, but this was at the beginning of the season and he was tiped to and did lose rank and fall out the circuit he had a round of golf and two shandies to warm up, 6-1 This is also 1998, she first won one of the big 4 toulements in 1999
/r/MensRights04/08/17 12:25 PM
1

So I saw this this morning and had two thoughts 1) so what it's ~ 400 men 2) since when do they have to wear ties (not I don't think they do/did but the long parliament didn't wear ties so at some point that changed) So I look in to this and found a document on the curtsies in a document on them from the speakers office in 2016, the document implied it was from Erskine May, a document I always thought was discripte written by an official at some point, and Speaker Burcows opinions (on the import…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:57 PM
2

society at large is better off without him in it. most people don't think its OK to make that decision with out due processes of law hell in Europe most people don't think its OK to make that decision. someone else might have encouraged him to go into a bell tower and start shooting people. if she had convicted him to commit murder suicide there would be no dough of her guilt of First degree murder of the other victims this is not a case revolving around a few words it is a case revolving around…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:54 AM
1

your theory on price assumes an obscene rich populous you hint as much
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:02 AM
6

Erin Pizzey believed that good male role models were vital to give​ the boys (and girls) in her shelter any chance of breaking the cycle of generational violence and as of such male child-carers where among the first employes of chiswick women's aid. This seems to me to be obvious, Boys will become men as they do they will have to adult as men, they will have to work out what that means. Meany girls will grow up and want to marry a man in this case we hope that they pick good men, to do this the…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:36 AM
4

Next In the UK Jeremy Corbyn won leadership of HM "most loyal" Opposition with this as part of his platform
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:37 PM
1

It's called democracy you get the government you deserve
/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:31 AM
4

I'm not American so I don't want to tell you what your citizenship laws should be, but: It's a bit of a shame to have this result in a removal rather than extension of benifits It is therefore to be said that as of this case the present requirement to pass on us citizenship​ to a child (bourn overseas) of one American and one Alien is that the American parent had 5 years residence and two years after 14, regardless of marriage status and gender of the America parent If you believe this is unfit …
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:19 AM
0

That's still 100 times grater than the shop theft
/r/MensRights19/05/17 06:32 PM
1

In the us steeling a CD form a store is a crime with a ~$50 fine on the basis that its the same as steeling from a store steeling a song with a computer is 5 or 6 figures same with contract violation, with a computer contract violation is an automatic felony, your country is dumb, and for me good news as Europe is moving that way fast edit a letter
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:32 AM
1

what basis do you use/suggest?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:25 AM
1

Is that the basis for what should be legal or not? yes at least as far as I'm concerned, I don't believe in that victim-less crimes should exist, what basis do you use/suggest? Shit, why not let people walk around completely nude then? I think I'm being called a retard because I am assumed to draw an arbitrary line between acceptable and unacceptable amounts of coverage, if this is the case I would like therefor to assure you that I see no reasons not to let people walk around starkers she is hu…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 12:38 AM
0

why shes not hurting anyone
/r/MensRights13/05/17 12:52 PM
7

I have a theory that all (at least most) animators and cartoonists are red pilled and seeing how much they can point out the hypocrisy with out losing their jobs
/r/MensRights13/05/17 12:33 PM
1

It's a "SHOCKING" thing, the daily mail is shocking calling it right is missing the point. i.e. the daily mail is also the paper that said that David Cameroon poked a pork, but we believed it then.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 03:07 PM
1

I present to you the Tab It might just be that I get sent pick of articles but I've never seen one that read like it wanted me to take it seriously
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/15 12:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter