TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HerpNeverDerps Archive

View 0 posts and 92 comments by HerpNeverDerps on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-16

Girl accuses long time ex-BF of rape. School finds no evidence. Girl goes on to defame man. That's a pretty lofty takeaway from a relatively new story, but okay.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:57 PM
1

How is that?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:22 PM
1

It's not so much that I think the law is perfect and entirely non-problematic; it just doesn't worry me in the context of my little anecdote because I trust my girlfriend. Not every woman is a deceptive harpy whose only aspiration in life is to fuck men over.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 11:47 PM
0

O rly? Yes, really. Have you ever even been drunk? Ever heard of a field sobriety test? at what point do you define "intoxicated"? What does my or your personal definition matter? Again, there are EXPLICIT. LEGAL. LIMITS. for what constitutes intoxication. There's nothing about it that's arbitrary or open to interpretation. Speaking of which: There are no specifics on BAC thresholds from what I've seen Even if there was a hard BAC limit HURRRR. Except it's not a strawman at all That's exactly wh…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 11:46 PM
1

In what capacity is faking sobriety possible? If you're actually drunk you'll undoubtedly exhibit some combination of shitty balance, cocky behavior (granted people can be cocky while sober), becoming less fluent in language, et cetera. You won't be able to just convincingly pretend that you're not drunk. And the definition of legal consent is not vague at all. If you're under the age of consent, you cannot consent. If you're intoxicated, you cannot consent. The specifics regarding age and BAC t…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:42 PM
0

What if someone was acting completely sober and has sex with someone... yet it turns out they are drunk That's an unreasonable scenario. If you're at a point where you can't legally consent to intercourse then I can guarantee you won't fool anyone by "acting" sober. A sober civillian has little need for a portable breathalyzer; all it takes is some rudimentary observation skills to be able to tell yourself either A) "This person is pretty tipsy. I probably shouldn't do this." or B) "This person …
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:00 PM
3

Where were teachers like this when I was growing up?! I swear to god. The fuckwits who make these comments are more infuriating than the actual story is, every time.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:21 PM
2

Fifty-five percent said they like to be tipsy That's about as ill-defined as "drunk" gets.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:12 PM
2

Anyone who think's that the man is a rapist for accepting something that someone offered. It's not an offer if the person is unaware of what's occurring or is unable to make a well-reasoned decision. Depending on how drunk they are, and how drunk you are, and how good of a judge you are on someones sobriety This is something that I believe is up for debate morally; not so much from a legal standpoint. See my response to shundread's post regarding how drunk one can be before consent becomes impos…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:57 PM
3

As NoWayHoeSay stated, it's when one is intoxicated. So it would depend on what legally classifies as intoxication in a given jurisdiction. In the U.S., for example, someone between the ages of 18 and 20 with any measurable amount of alcohol in him or her would be treated just as someone of the legal drinking age with a BAC of 0.08 or higher. And of course, BAC is irrelevant if you're under 18. Subjectively, though, it's less cut and dry than that. Some people genuinely enjoy having sex while dr…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:17 PM
4

I thought twoX was just a subreddit for females (much like oneY presumably is for males), not feminists.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:34 PM
7

So why is it the man's fault? Good lord, who's even making that argument? Of course you aren't at fault simply for being asked for sex, but if a drunk woman is begging a sober you for sex you can make the informed adult decision not to act on her demands. It's actually really freaking easy.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:15 PM
2

Because women are not invariably weaker than men are. We have more capacity to build muscle and strength due to testosterone, but the difference isn't as dramatic as you evidently think it is. An athletic woman could realistically kick a sedentary man's ass without much worry. More importantly, you don't have to specifically be either gender to implement weapons or drugs; and rapists very typically use either or both, just to ensure there's as little individual resistance against them as possibl…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:13 AM
0

Except that's exactly the kind of thing that "nice guys" do.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:26 AM
2

In a nutshell...
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:33 PM
3

I agree that pop culture (especially fucking Hollywood, holy shit) has done -- and still does -- a lot of work towards espousing the idea that being excessively chivalrous towards the girl of your dreams = She's yours. It's really one of those things that hurts everyone.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:24 PM
-5

Exactly.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:34 PM
-3

"Nice guy" has basically become a colloquialism for a guy who's not literally nice, but just tries to be to win the affection of a girl. It usually doesn't work, and the nice guy then gets unhealthily butthurt that his feelings aren't reciprocated. Ironically the term has been used to deride this type of person in both the PUA and (apparently more recently) the feminist communities, albeit for different reasons.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:34 PM
0

Speaking as a former Nice Guy, both genders are at fault here. Keeping a dude around because he bends over backwards for you without ever returning his favors (and no, "returning a favor" doesn't mean fucking him) is shitty. Friends don't take advantage of friends like that, and a friend certainly won't laugh to her girlfriends about the short leash she's got you on behind your back. The other side of the coin is that being nice to someone absolutely does not entitle you to sex. And while I usua…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:12 PM
0

I just discovered AMR today. A number of hours later I got banned because I challenged a meritless claim by Aerik that this sub is full of people who endorse raping teenage girls. Ironically enough I had read just enough of the sub's discussions in general to gain the impression that it was a place where, you know, actual discussion could sometimes occur, and where people who care about both men and women's issues had some say. Turns out it's basically SRS-Lite. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:06 AM
3

Yeah look at all the people suggesting pro-women's rights people are miserable virgins. Wait, I mean look at all the assholes who are outright calling for violence against femin... shit.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:06 AM
-2

I'm not encouraging hostility toward anyone. My point from the beginning has been that if I were gay, I'd probably be justifiably pissed if I were casually being called a faggot over an open game full of people who don't know each other, and then wondering why it could possibly be upsetting because "lol we call everyone faggot dude." I think it'd be roughly equivalent to reading an open discussion about MGM that happened to be full of women obliviously asking "well what's the big deal?" rather t…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:43 PM
-3

Why should that be the one freaking option for those people?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:24 AM
1

In a sense young boys ask for statutory rape. I think this sentence just turned my heart into solid lead.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:36 AM
1

I'm not denying that gamers get called those regardless of their race or orientation. I'm also aware that it's entirely possible for someone, in a fit of anger, to inadvertently use that word against a person who the first person genuinely didn't know was black or gay, since it can be hard to tell over voice chat alone (definitely more so than with gender). I'm saying that being white or straight grants you no authority whatsoever on how hate speech should feel when it's used against the specifi…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:24 AM
2

Listen. Calling a black guy a nigger != Calling a white guy a nigger. Calling a gay guy a faggot != Calling a straight guy a faggot. That's all there fucking is to it. I'm all for people being able to take the things shitheads scream over their mics with a grain of salt, but this "oh, I'm straight and I didn't get upset when I was called a faggot!" argument is beyond fallacious; it's motherfucking delusional.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 01:58 AM
8

Chocolate is just another snack Yeah that's how nutrition works. Also women turn into Greek gods if they curl more than five pounds.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:05 PM
2

The second quote makes a lot more sense in its full context: 4.n You are a sexist pig if you deny that society privileges women with unobstructed access to men’s bodies through both custom and law, in ways that it does not privilege men. You are a sexist pig if you use the term “rape culture” to describe men’s sexual approaches to women or society’s attitudes to women’s bodies. The criticism is toward society, yes, but it's often only towards society with regard to women's bodies. In a nutshell,…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:54 AM
3

Well don't take one of mine! I only have two left and the weekend's coming!
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:40 AM
1

I'm aware that feminists talk about rape a lot, and that many of them say some unsavory things regarding men and rape. I've read descriptions of all men as "potential rapists" (which should be utter nonsense to anyone who has two brain cells to rub together), and I've read plenty of infuriating comments from people who think a schoolboy should consider himself "lucky" for getting molested by a female teacher. None of that's relevant in regard to this article, though, because not a word of any of…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:54 AM
3

testosterone poisoning Good lord, what happened to my sides?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:49 PM
1

The irony being... what, exactly? I mean the link about MRAs and VAWA was predictably horseshit, but that wasn't really the focus of this writing. The focus was that people like Akin and Mourdock are boorish fucks who need to stop saying the things that they're saying.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 10:45 PM
30

Which is, of course, the fault of the men. Those entitled pigs.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:01 PM
1

He was a douche for being an hour late and having no apology or excuse. She was a bitch for humiliating him (potentially in front of everyone in the restaurant). The link title makes it sound like some woman is being praised by readers for beating the shit out of a boyfriend who didn't deserve it. Why is a petty revenge story between two immature people getting so much attention?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:53 PM
3

The actual class is a hugely important variable. My CS classes have 2-3 females, while my art class is probably 75-80% female.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:37 PM
0

So these guys organized and attacked this book by writing scathing reviews and downvoting the others so that their reviews would be the first ones Amazon users would see? For a book that presumably has maybe one or two chapters that discuss circumcision? Isn't this the exact kind of bullshit most of us hate reading about when feminists do it? I don't care how fucked up and unnecessary circumcision is, these guys shot themselves in the foot big-time with this tactic. Frankly they have about as mu…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:55 PM
5

Funny how the Jezebel article neglects to mention the poster that decries misogyny/racism/homophobia pretty openly. Guess they figured their sheeplike readers wouldn't be able to stay pissed off if they read something like that.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:44 PM
1

Comparing an individual man to and individual woman, you might find that the women is indeed stronger. Comparing the average man to the average women, and you'll find the average man is strong Very true. It just seems to me like society considers any one-on-one physical scuffle between a woman and a man to be automatically one-sided in the man's favor. It's a lose-lose situation because you either deserve to get your ass kicked (because "come on, man, you can't stop a girl from hitting you?") or…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 01:45 PM
1

Men aren't invariably stronger than women are. They have the potential to be, because testosterone is basically what allows us to develop muscle mass, but the difference isn't that dramatic. An athletic woman could beat the utter shit out of a couch potato trying his best to defend himself. That minor inaccuracy aside, I'm not sure why you got downvoted either. As far as I'm concerned it takes a truly weak-minded person to resort to violence in any situation barring serious self-defense. Gender …
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:01 AM
3

She threatened to get some of her White Knight friends to kick my ass. Fuck off, guy.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:07 PM
4

how men are second class Did you use the phrase "second class" while talking to her? If you did then that's where you fucked up. Explain to her that there are legitimate issues that affect men, but don't make it a contest of which gender objectively has it worse. Men and women alike need to stop pulling this shit if gender discussions are ever going to progress to actual discussion.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:01 PM
12

forced branding / facial tattoos Neat, a time traveler. What's it like having clean water and people who don't think witches are really a thing everywhere?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:48 PM
0

But don't trust what a poster says... go do the research for yourself! I wonder what counts as "research" in the context of this poster. "Welp, they were right. The SPLC says all of these things."
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:39 PM
28

This one made me laugh because it was so biologically inaccurate. ...a baby boy which are already physically stronger than baby girls As if any significant level of strength building or muscle hypertrophy isn't entirely infeasible pre-puberty. Yeah, all those virile infant boys, deadlifting their toy trucks and cranking out pull-ups on their crib mobiles like nobody's business.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:32 AM
5

UrbanDictionary is a worthless site to begin with. It's supposed to be a guide to slang and clever portmanteaus (which could totally be worth reading if you were bored enough) but instead it's full of fuckheads like these who need an outlet for their impotent passive-aggression.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:59 PM
1

That... that's literally what she wrote.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:22 PM
2

Exactly. A person can potentially do anything that isn't restricted by the laws of physics or the individual's own biology.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:15 PM
6

Why do feminists love to attach "potential" to horrible shit they only think men can do? It's like some implicit accusation that simultaneously doesn't mean a fucking thing. Sorry, sir, I'm a little concerned about the possibility of you sexually assaulting meOH YOU KNOW NOT THAT I THINK YOU'LL DEFINITELY DO IT GIVEN THE CHANCE I'M JUST SAYING LIKE POTENTIALLY YOU KNOW.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:01 AM
0

Personally, I don't give a care what kind of a penis any grown man currently has, because I am not in the business of telling people what to do with their genitals, or judging whether anyone's genitals are "right" or "wrong." Honestly, I was impressed by this, even though the article's headline and general premise are still pretty problematic themselves. I also appreciated that there was an acknowledgement that uncut men do face a sort of social stigma, living in a world were intact penises are …
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:00 PM
11

A woman can rape a man the same way a man might try to rape a woman: with drugs. Also, having an erection or even cumming does not necessarily mean that whatever is happening is consensual. I feel like this is worth pointing out because "well, he was hard, so obviously he wanted it!" is a pretty common and biologically inaccurate justification for dismissing the belief that women can rape men. It's a perfect equivalent to Todd Akin's dumbfuck idea that the female body has some evolutionary defen…
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:42 PM
5

I'm assuming he meant to say "raped by a woman." Even though the sentence remains false, it's also a lot more believable to the general public.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:25 PM
3

Sexism will not be eradicated by pretending it doesn’t exist. Numerous reiterations that gender profiling against men is totes not sexist, since you can't be sexist against men Fucking whoosh
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:29 PM
1

The Onion sums up how I feel about him pretty well.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:07 AM
3

Still, the women in the post said she's had men start having sex with her ("dozens of times") while she was asleep, which could be categorized as her having been abused. That's an interesting point. Her post had a lot of other information and opinions that can't possibly get all refuted with one short sentence though. The other woman's response was lazy at best.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 05:18 PM
5

I agree completely. If that's what he really did then he's guilty as far as I'm concerned. Still, it disturbs me how many people apparently think the accused's right to a fair trial should just go right out the window if the crime being accused of happens to be rape. And people seem to think that questioning the ethics of doing this immediately equals misogyny, which is mind-boggling. You can see it in this picture. The completely valid and relevant question of "what ever happened to 'innocent u…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:58 PM
1

I'm an advocate for equal rights and a sensitivity for gender specific issues on both side of the fence. As long as both gender rights movements continue to take aim at the other as their enemy -- both sides will be in a catch 22. I can appreciate and agree with this completely. Feminists and MRAs alike seem to spend a lot of time trying to de-legitimize very real gender-specific problems, and it really doesn't fucking get anybody anywhere. It's childish. I also understand that many people who c…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:49 PM
22

This. And to reiterate what someone else said, Destiny's Child is extremely irrelevant at this point. Who's up for rigorous analysis next, the Spice Girls?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:46 AM
7

Wild SRSer used Troll! It's not very effective...
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:31 PM
1

Jesus Christ, that headline. Such loaded, unprofessional passive-aggressive bullshit. I'm convinced that if there's some liberal alternate-universe version of Fox News, their articles look a lot like Jezebel's.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:45 AM
1

My favorite part of this subreddit is probably seeing ManhoodAcademy shitheels getting swiftly banned, or at least downvoted into oblivion.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:14 AM
1

That first one's kind of harsh, but I've got to agree that I wouldn't want to sit near a kid on a plane if I didn't have some good headphones with me.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:24 PM
2

I just saw this. I never knew that Youtube had such a pants-on-head retarded system for reporting copyright infringement. I'm shocked. 3 reports (that apparently require no substantiation whatsoever) is all it takes? Fucking really? We're talking about what is easily the single most visited and most influential site on the entire goddamned Internet, and all it takes is one drop in an ocean to fuck a user over. This is disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:02 PM
2

Honestly, the commenters are way worse than many of the writers. I enjoy reading Cracked because it has more than its fair share of interesting/hilarious writing (and because the After Hours video series is really good), but every article that mentions gender in literally any capacity gets an instant shitstorm in the comments. It's honestly painful to read, especially when drivel like "misandry isn't even a real thing" gets a 23:3 up/downvote ratio.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:30 AM
7

"Because what kind of straight man would turn down sex from a woman, amirite guys?!"
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:15 PM
2

Rape and sexual violence actually sounds like a pretty specific course subject. Granted my university has a tiny women's studies department (to my knowledge it's only available as a minor), though it could be a sociology/criminology course.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:27 PM
3

Stop posting this shit.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 06:58 PM
6

I know a male feminist who often defends the movement by suggesting that feminism's actual objective is gender equality, that feminism helps men as well as women. Every time I've ever posted a girlwriteswhat video on my Facebook he's commented on it proclaiming that the problems men face that she discusses exist in the first place because of patriarchy. It's bizarre, to say the least.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 06:52 PM
1

I was honestly pleased to see a number of people thoroughly calling her out on being an entitled, hypocritical mental gymnast. It practically felt like a reward for managing to trudge my way through all of the retarded hashtagging and outdated slang. Then I read shit like My ex-husband refused to have sex a few times. Come to find out he was cheating. Like there isn't a wealth of vital information missing from in between those two sentences. Yep, if your man isn't in the mood more than once then…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:50 PM
0

I agree with you, but I can't help but wonder what the case would be if it was a woman abandoning her husband/boyfriend to save herself. There probably wouldn't even be a story. I don't know what I'd end up doing if I was in that guy's shoes, but I would hope I'd be able to get out alive with whoever was with me, rather than selfishly bolting. Being a man has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:59 PM
6

"trollingreddit" backwards. Very clever.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:30 PM
1

Did you read a single fucking word of the article?
/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:26 PM
4

That is obviously not something that he was asking for a source on. Quit being ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:39 PM
5

yes im circumcided so I KNOW HOW THE HELL IT FEELS. When i was in this crappy community everybody HOW HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA HOW IT FEELS LIKE
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:17 PM
6

If you're going to backpedal this hard you should at least edit that post.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:06 PM
4

You literally just posted that nobody in this subreddit knows what having a circumcised penis feels like, not half an hour ago.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:02 PM
6

What in the fuck makes you think that being a circumcised man makes you a rarity? Your reading comprehension is absolutely horrible if you think this comment was some defiant "fuck you /r/MensRights, you don't know what it's like to be meeee!"
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:55 PM
10

It really infuriates me that male circumcision is so socially acceptable here in the states that you get so many shitheads, both male and female, who have the gall to try and quell a debate by telling people to "get over it." Like it's all a bunch of insignificant bickering. Like it's no big deal at all, just because we've been doing it so long. Pull that shit in a debate about gay marriage and see where it gets you.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:33 PM
1

That's a valid reason, yeah.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 06:19 AM
5

I wonder why his sentence is a year longer.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 02:22 PM
3

go to Jezebel to read their take No thanks.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:46 PM
3

Condoms = protection, so the vest analogy is perfect. Russian Roulette is more like using no protection and then pulling out at the last second.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:48 AM
5

2015, baby.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:12 AM
3

Yep. They're basically the kid who makes up insane rules mid-game so that the other kids playing are literally not allowed to win.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 04:41 PM
20

Jesus Christ, this article and most of the comments on it are mental gymnastics epitomized. Check out this gem, written in defense of a commenter who was arguing back and forth with some guy complaining about patriarchy (yawn): She's not sexist. Generally sexism is classed as power with prejudice, so you can't be sexist towards the ruling class (men) just as you can't be racist towards white people. Which isn't to say you can't have prejudice against them but it doesn't have the same structural …
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:48 AM
1

Funny how the average person's knowledge of how age of consent actually works drops straight to zero when they read a story about a grown woman molesting a young boy. Without fail you get some fratboy dipshit making comments like Oh man I wish I could have been that kid, I'd jump at that opportunity hur hur hur Like what you say matters legally when you're FOURTEEN, fucking nimrods.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:02 PM
3

So far, to my knowledge, only subreddits that violate laws have been removed How in the blue hell is this not simply further support for the notion that shit like /r/rapingwomen, /r/beatingcripples, and /r/killingwomen should be removed? I thought you guys were above defending garbage like this.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:41 PM
4

Are you joking? You're clearly either a woman or a man who has somehow gone through life without suffering a single strike to the balls. I'm gonna assume the former but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. An MMA guy might have the agility to block a nut-shot easier than some average dude, but if he gets hit he's gonna go down all the same. Being muscular isn't going to directly protect the testicles, because as you may or may not have noticed, the scrotum is just a thin layer of skin regardles…
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:01 PM
3

"Like" is a funny way to spell "literally."
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:34 PM
1

Great input, man.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:49 AM
9

Some very telling statistics in that last section. I find it interesting that the suicide rate for males in such a wide age range is significantly higher than it is for women. Does anyone have any further reading on this subject? Besides the CDC citations in OP's link, which I can't even read right now for some reason.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:02 AM
3

Have you ever actually been on Kickstarter in your entire life? The people aren't paying his rent, jackass. They're funding a documentary that he wants to make.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:54 AM
5

I love this man so much.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 11:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter