HettGutt Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-12	Don't Ever Talk To The Police The video does not contain a single encounter with a single law enforcement officer.	/r/TheRedPill	12/02/16 02:03 AM
4	TRP ideology promotes healthy relationships while the blue pill will cause more conflict and arguments. That's an interesting idea. Though I suspect it's more of a genetic thing, and the causality is reversed. Rather than Protestantism encouraging work-orientedness, leading to capitalism, the more altruistic and less tribal groups developed a society where contracts are secure and capitalism is viable, and the Protestant work ethic came about to reinforce the (genetically) cultural norm. Capitalism arose first in England, Germany, and Denmark, spreading to Mediterranean and Eastern Europe. Maybe i…	/r/TheRedPill	09/12/15 08:06 PM
2	Woman bartender refuses to serve male patron because of what he's wearing and/or beliefs. So can he sue for $135,000 like the gay couple did because the baker refused to bake them a cake or...? Silly [white/male/straight/Christian], legal protection is only for "oppressed" groups!	/r/MensRights	18/07/15 11:11 AM
2	In one season of the Dutch version of "Survivor," the men and women were split and given their own islands. At the end of 8 days, the men had a "Cafe on the beach," while the women were stealing from each other and had not yet built a hut; the women approved of a tribe merger. The Island with Bear Grylls, Season 2.	/r/TheRedPill	11/07/15 07:28 PM
6	In one season of the Dutch version of "Survivor," the men and women were split and given their own islands. At the end of 8 days, the men had a "Cafe on the beach," while the women were stealing from each other and had not yet built a hut; the women approved of a tribe merger. Actually, the combined camps twist started on Day 1. US Survivor had already done Men vs Women twice (Seasons 6 & 9). Each time went as you would expect, until the tribes were shuffled. Also as expected, the men who ended up at the ex-female-only-tribe beach are appalled at the state of the camp. My guess is that producers came up with the combined camp twist so the women wouldn't have to be put through the laborious difficulty of having to fend for themselves. Season 9, Vanuatu, is a very good …	/r/TheRedPill	11/07/15 08:37 AM
4	RooshV slams the Red Pill You cannot trust a man to tell you the truth. You can always trust a man to act in his perceived self-interest. How do you get a man to tell you the truth? Make it be in his self-interest to do so.	/r/TheRedPill	23/05/15 12:12 AM
4	What's the deal with sluts? A field report I personally find innocence very attractive and sexy. I suspect this has a biological reason behind it. If you've got a girl who's fucked 500 different guys, chances are she fucked one of them yesterday, and 4 over the past week. If you keep her as a plate (or hell, even a girlfriend) chances are she's fucking other guys on the side. If she gets knocked up, chances are the kid ain't yours.	/r/TheRedPill	21/01/15 06:38 PM
9	How you know you've finally swallowed the red pill "Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen, and thinking what nobody has thought." - Albert Szent-Gyorgyi, discoverer of vitamin C	/r/TheRedPill	13/01/15 11:29 AM
2	What is the best way to handle the bill on a date? Pay or Split? And how do you go about it? It's great that it works for him, but game is about psychological tendencies. It's not as if failing to apply game with 100% perfection 100% of the time is a failure. Demonstrate you're a high-value male and she'll do the rest of the work for you. Think of her hamstering as having a multiplicative effect to whatever SMV you've already demonstrated: An attractive male who pays is also a provider. Consciously, her hamster tells her he's "caring." Plus. An attractive male who doesn't pay is demonst…	/r/TheRedPill	14/07/14 10:22 AM
4	Anonymous threatens to out boys involved in alleged gang rape of N.S. teen unless RCMP charges them Just World Fallacy. Check it out.	/r/MensRights	11/04/13 07:35 AM
1	This has been getting around tumblr. Thoughts? Thank you!	/r/MensRights	04/04/13 11:25 PM
8	This has been getting around tumblr. Thoughts? What if they are? Or are only men good enough to possibly be the nine "best," "most qualified" judges? When it's men occupying positions of power, the apologetics come out. Of course it's fine to have only men because men are just better; if they weren't better then it wouldn't be meritocratic and we know politics, higher education, & private industry are meritocratic a priori, so reform is bad. But as soon as women point out the ridiculousness of these claims, it's the women who "want an unfair…	/r/MensRights	04/04/13 11:17 PM
1	This has been getting around tumblr. Thoughts? Why does the race of the judges matter? It seems you're assuming that "run by whites" somehow means "run for the benefit of whites", which just isn't supported at all by the empirical evidence. Whites and blacks are biological groups, not political ones. Having a Supreme Court with say just conservatives or just liberals would be problematic in a way that a Supreme Court made up of whites would not. I'm not claiming group lacking representation is ever totally ignored, but having representatives…	/r/MensRights	04/04/13 10:35 PM
4	This has been getting around tumblr. Thoughts? The funny thing about trying to judge people based on their so-called "merit" or "qualifications" is that the things people typically interpret as signs of ability or merit are, in fact, unearned. If you serve the rich, white, establishment, you will be promoted and rewarded. Attending Harvard Law or Yale rather than SUNY or USC isn't so much a measure of intellect or legal understanding as a measure of ability to pay. Furthermore, the Supreme Court, as the highest Federal Court in the US, decid…	/r/MensRights	04/04/13 06:39 AM
7	This has been getting around tumblr. Thoughts? Just not if the nine most-qualified are all women, of course.	/r/MensRights	04/04/13 06:09 AM
1	‘Improving’ gender diversity on boards leads to a decline in corporate performance: the evidence is overwhelming. Five studies which support the argument that ‘improving’ gender diversity on boards l It can but, I doubt it would skyrocket but not to say it can't go up moderately or that noticeably in the process. Especially with the US dollar in short being the world's currency in short putting more of it out there increases the pool of it, and seeing the value of it is way down any noticeable amount of inflation can be a bad thing. You're using an outdated theory of money (supply and demand), based on the idea that there is a strict limit on the real (that is, inflation-adjusted) money supp…	/r/MensRights	29/03/13 12:52 AM
1	‘Improving’ gender diversity on boards leads to a decline in corporate performance: the evidence is overwhelming. Five studies which support the argument that ‘improving’ gender diversity on boards l For "tipped positions," it gets to be under $3/hr in some states. On top of that, low-wage positions often come with expectations (on the part of the employer) of unpaid overtime, acceptance of poor working conditions, and low job security. We can have a decent minimum wage without much inflation; it just has to come out of the billionaire owners' pockets. It's total bullshit that unemployment or inflation will skyrocket from raising the minimum wage, and it will ultimately be entirely self-defe…	/r/MensRights	28/03/13 07:27 PM
2	‘Improving’ gender diversity on boards leads to a decline in corporate performance: the evidence is overwhelming. Five studies which support the argument that ‘improving’ gender diversity on boards l Plenty of laws are bad for corporate profits, but good for society: minimum wage laws, worker protections, the rights to strike and unionize, the corporate income tax, pollution regulations, & product safety regulations. For example, study #2 found "the firm creates more value for its owners when the board has no employee directors." Well, duh. When employees have more say in how the company is run, the company sucks less exploitative of its employees. No doubt worker cooperatives have incredibl…	/r/MensRights	28/03/13 04:41 AM
0	Video: Former Radical Feminist Confronts “Women’s Studies” I always found it odd how actual fascists throw around made-up lingo like "Islamofascist" and "femofascist."	/r/MensRights	22/03/13 06:18 AM
3	Men who oppose women's rights and freedom I think it's far, far more men than most on this subreddit are willing to admit, especially because many of the old-guard MRM talking heads are fundamentally opposed to equal rights for women because they think of women as evolutionarily inferior. RockingMrE, Chapin, & Angry Harry are the more visible examples. As you delve deeper into the "manosphere," the misogynistic (and homophobic, Islamophobic, anti-left, racist, etc.) attitudes become more apparent. With each level of visibility you peel …	/r/MensRights	19/03/13 12:58 AM
6	/r/Masculism is mostly people new to this sort of thing, and could use some guidance before the feminists hijack it So men should not be allowed to be "feminine," cry in public, or share their feelings. Got it.	/r/MensRights	25/02/13 09:09 PM
0	Gender-feminist Empowerment / manufactured statistics / federal VAWA Pork First of all, it's funding, not "pork." "Pork" is an undefined, mystical, question-begging term invented by the Republican party. Second, it's not unconstitutional for the federal government to fund programs, and that includes research, aka "manufacturing statistics". It's not unconstitutional (or illegal) for the federal government to offer grants to organizations that discriminate based on sex. It is illegal for organizations who choose to receive federal/state funding to discriminate. If you'…	/r/MensRights	25/02/13 06:19 AM
3	Subliminal messaging studying for the GMAT [xpost r/wtf] God damn it! And I thought we'd finally gotten proof the cultural-Marxist crypto feminofascists were neuroprogramming children in their gubmint-funded indoctrination mills!	/r/MensRights	17/02/13 07:42 AM
-12	A woman is realizing that Feminism is destroying male-female relations. She is. Pajamas Media is a two-bit radical Republican propaganda outlet.	/r/MensRights	15/02/13 01:17 AM
1	New Hampshire Domestic Violence Bill Would Strengthen Existing Laws for Accused - of course, that's not what the headline says No, libertarians argue these exact points. If you disagree with them, you can bring it to them.	/r/MensRights	06/02/13 07:47 PM
0	New Hampshire Domestic Violence Bill Would Strengthen Existing Laws for Accused - of course, that's not what the headline says No, libertarianism says it's OK if it's "retaliatory" violence, according to the so-called Non-Agression Principle. But who decides what is retaliatory? The libertarians, of course! And, of course, defending property rights is always "retaliatory" violence, despite the fact that all property relations are initially established through violence, the threat of violence, or the threat of proxy violence. How convenient for the propertied class.	/r/MensRights	06/02/13 01:25 PM
0	Apparently "privilege week" is a thing on college campuses now. If you missed your privilege check-in on the quad yesterday you should probably expect a visit from the femistasi soon for questioning. Individualistic ideologies are based on multiple falsehoods: There are no (illegitimate) power relations other than those arbitrarily designated "state" power. Private systems of power are to be ignored or excused. (If you don't think the designation of certain claims to power as "state" rather than "private" is arbitrary, research the truck system. It was a neo-feudal or neo-slave mode of production that briefly popped up in the UK and US in which the corporation - which the worker "voluntarily…	/r/MensRights	05/02/13 07:40 PM
0	New Hampshire Domestic Violence Bill Would Strengthen Existing Laws for Accused - of course, that's not what the headline says Normally I'd say "Follow the money," but I really don't think there's a "be a dick" lobby. Some people are just plain mean. They see a homeless person or an abandoned puppy or a kid being bullied and they don't think "How can I help?" or even "That's not my problem," but "I honestly do not care about your well-being, and I would kick you if I could get away with it." Conservatism and libertarianism are very attractive modes of thought to people with that kind of antisocial personality. Or maybe …	/r/MensRights	05/02/13 07:25 PM
2	New Hampshire Domestic Violence Bill Would Strengthen Existing Laws for Accused - of course, that's not what the headline says Saying "you must see the domestic abuse happening" is kind of silly. Yes. Then why do you think Itse, a Republican, wrote it to require that the officer must witness abuse, and even then, only after being pressured, under the guise of "constitutionality?" It's never a bill to, say, require that police be gender-neutral in removing suspected abusers from the home or fund DV shelters for men or to immediately gather statements from children and neighbors, always a bill to enable abuse.	/r/MensRights	05/02/13 05:39 PM
3	Apparently "privilege week" is a thing on college campuses now. If you missed your privilege check-in on the quad yesterday you should probably expect a visit from the femistasi soon for questioning. rigid ideology based on falsehoods You mean like Libertarianism and "Objectiv"ism?	/r/MensRights	05/02/13 05:15 PM
-1	The Backlash! - Things that make you go, hmmm - February 2013: MGTOW are not opposed to marriage, but to a system that turns every woman into a prostitute and every man into a slave. It doesn't. He's greatly exaggerating in order to make a false (and offensive) analogy. If you pay lots of taxes or child support, you're a "slave." If you have sex with someone who supports you, you're a "prostitute."	/r/MensRights	30/01/13 08:25 AM
0	The Backlash! - Things that make you go, hmmm - February 2013: MGTOW are not opposed to marriage, but to a system that turns every woman into a prostitute and every man into a slave. How can he seriously claim feminists want "ideological supremacy" at the same time he howls at the idea that any person, let alone an MRA, be allowed to think that taxation or gun control or any other "progressive encroachment" is the right thing to do. Shamefully hypocritical. "All feminist politics are expressed in progressive programs." False. The Men's Rights Movement stands for individual freedom and equal rights while the Feminist Movement stands for collective servitude and ideological su…	/r/MensRights	30/01/13 08:22 AM
1	The Marxist Dialectic of the Family: Marriage 1.0 versus The Tender Years Doctrine dialectical argument dialectical manipulartion [sic] dialectically changed the property laws dialectical goals This blogger clearly has zero knowledge of the philosophy of Marxism. He picked a word at random from the Marxist vocabulary and crudely slapped it on every possible phrase, without even understanding its definition, to the point of creating nonsensical phrases and oxymorons.	/r/MensRights	27/01/13 09:10 AM
-2	Conspiracy time! CENSORED film about Swedish feminism criticizes the ruling class of feminists. But you're missing the point that it wasn't banned. SVT is public programming. The government said it violated regulations, so they dropped it. (Keep in mind that it did already air in completion.) If a foreign broadcaster wants to purchase the rights to the show and air it across the border into Sweden, they can. Swedish TV regulation is that lax. God, you MRAs and your victim mentality.	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 04:52 AM
3	Conspiracy time! CENSORED film about Swedish feminism criticizes the ruling class of feminists. This wasn't a 20/20 style news program. Think of it more like a BBC documentary miniseries, like The God Delusion or Frozen Planet. First, only channels broadcasting from within Sweden are covered by GRN's authority, which is hilariously weak regulation to start out with. So only the channels broadcast by 2 companies: TV4 Group and SVT (public programming) are regulated. SVT is the channel in question. All digital-only channels are also exempt. Second, all they can do is fine those who violate t…	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 04:46 AM
6	Conspiracy time! CENSORED film about Swedish feminism criticizes the ruling class of feminists. So Dirty Jobs wasn't cancelled, it was banned? Also, the linked web page claims, "The swedish state TV & Radio review board have banned it from ever being broadcasted again," which is the accepted definition of the word "banned" and is false.	/r/MensRights	26/01/13 01:22 AM
4	Conspiracy time! CENSORED film about Swedish feminism criticizes the ruling class of feminists. Fact check time: It wasn't censored or banned by any stretch of the imagination. The show was dropped by public broadcasting because it was found to be biased. (I agree that it is, but I don't think it's biased enough to be dropped.)	/r/MensRights	25/01/13 11:17 PM
1	A Question about distinction between Women's Rights and Feminism, and what being "anti-Feminism" really means. If "98% of the education system" wanted the "destruction of capitalism," it would have been destroyed by now, and I would be a much happier man.	/r/MensRights	21/01/13 01:34 AM
7	Why I believe it is actually misandry, not misogyny, that drives all gender inequality. I think OP thinks that's entirely a possibility (and likely.) But the point is that if one is determined to, a priori, interpret all gender inequities as due to patriarchy/misogyny, it's just as possible to reinterpret all gender inequities as due to misandry. The reality is that we live in a world of many interacting sociological, biological, and economic factors. So, sometimes, an observed difference may appear to be based on hatred of women, but actually due to economic factors, or may appear…	/r/MensRights	12/01/13 06:44 AM
2	... And I pay for condoms, will feminism buy me those? "How the economy works" is code for "orthodox economics" which is code for "libertarian/neoliberal/conservative capitalist apologetics." The idea is that by making activities more expensive, you disincentivize them, so people do them less. Similarly, by making activities cheaper, you incentivize them. So if the morning after pill (expensive) is provided at the same cost as the birth control pill (cheap), people will go for the expensive option more than they "should," which is a waste of governm…	/r/MensRights	01/01/13 08:58 PM
10	... And I pay for condoms, will feminism buy me those? Abortions are more expensive, and raising a child is even more expensive.	/r/MensRights	01/01/13 08:47 PM
4	... And I pay for condoms, will feminism buy me those? Of course. Canada. Goddamn socialists up there. In all seriousness, condoms, birth control pills (female and male), and the morning after pill should all be available for free.	/r/MensRights	01/01/13 06:40 PM
3	Gun control will affect males overwhelmingly more than females. That comparison is based on a biased sample: children under 10 are highly unlikely to be able to swim, but their exposure to guns and safety around water increase dramatically after that age. There were ~550 accidental deaths of children aged 10 or younger in backyard swimming pools in the US (in 1997) and ~175 accidental and intentional deaths of children aged 10 or younger due to guns in the US (in 1998). But once you account for the whole population, guns kill tens of thousands more than swim…	/r/MensRights	31/12/12 11:04 PM
–	Gun control will affect males overwhelmingly more than females. Guns in general are far more likely to be used against the owner or his friends & family (purposefully or accidentally) or used in a crime by the owner or stolen to be used in a crime than against a criminal threatening the owner or his family or property.	/r/MensRights	31/12/12 10:14 PM
–	Gun control will affect males overwhelmingly more than females. Gun control will protect males overwhelmingly more than females. Fixed.	/r/MensRights	31/12/12 09:00 PM
6	Gun control will affect males overwhelmingly more than females. Uh-oh. Don't say anything suggesting that gun ownership increases your chances of beng harmed by a gun, or the NRA / gun nut army will hunt you down. (Figuratively, of course.)	/r/MensRights	31/12/12 08:59 PM
2	"As a cut guy I am pissed that my dick was mutilated when I was a baby." Because I asked them years ago. Why are you so eager to assume you know the motivations of my parents better than I do?	/r/MensRights	24/12/12 02:51 AM
1	"As a cut guy I am pissed that my dick was mutilated when I was a baby." It happens whenever a group attains a collective identity, or "group consciousness." For example, gamers refuse to accept you if you don't like Zelda: Ocarina of Time because the collective loves that game. There are some issues with the Men's Rights community where disagreements are socially acceptable (whether child support should be abolished or reformed, for example) and some where they are not. If you go to a smaller segment of the group, with its own in-group identity, the demand for confo…	/r/MensRights	23/12/12 04:06 PM
–	"As a cut guy I am pissed that my dick was mutilated when I was a baby." As another circumcised man who's glad he was circumcised at birth, and as a person who doesn't simply toe the MRA party line on every issue, I'm sorry for the typical MRA hate brigade coming out and downvoting you to oblivion.	/r/MensRights	23/12/12 02:21 PM
–	"As a cut guy I am pissed that my dick was mutilated when I was a baby." I was circumcised at birth and happy about it. I won't let a bunch of bitter MRAs convince me to hate my own parents for making a reasonable healthcare decision for me. They got me vaccinated, they chose what I ate, they chose what medications I would take when I got sick, and they got me circumcised.	/r/MensRights	23/12/12 02:07 PM
1	Book Recommendation: "Is There Anything Good About Men? How Cultures Flourish by Exploiting Men" by Roy F. Baumesiter The wealthiest people on the planet are workaholics or have workaholics in their family tree that generated that revenue and about 98% of them are male. You don't need to make up fake statistics on the spot. Also, the wealthiest people are not workaholics, they are lazy. All the biggest bankers and corporate titans and CEOs, all men. And those men make the world worse off. Every banker, CEO, and financial "genius" is simply a middleman between his advisors and the management. By removing every b…	/r/MensRights	23/12/12 01:39 PM
–	Book Recommendation: "Is There Anything Good About Men? How Cultures Flourish by Exploiting Men" by Roy F. Baumesiter To make that kind of fortune, you have to be a workaholic, and workaholics are mostly men. I take issue with this. The meme that massive fortunes are amassed by the hardest-working members of society is thoroughly corrupt and inherently false. These women's husband do not work hard, if at all. They are professional owners. You don't get truly wealthy by working for others or even working for oneself. Fortunes are collections of the value stolen in the labor process. It is still true that tiny am…	/r/MensRights	22/12/12 08:47 AM
1	Connecticut congressman: “It is founded in the fantasy of testosterone laden individuals who have blood on their hands for articulating that idea.”: anti-male slurs are acceptable politics #waronmen Anecdotal evidence from some random right-wing blog. Or we could look at the facts: http://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/Abstract/1998/08000/Injuries_and_Deaths_Due_to_Firearms_in_the_Home.10.aspx "For every time a gun in the home was used in a self-defense or legally justifiable shooting, there were four unintentional shootings, seven criminal assaults or homicides, and 11 attempted or completed suicides."	/r/MensRights	22/12/12 08:17 AM
1	Connecticut congressman: “It is founded in the fantasy of testosterone laden individuals who have blood on their hands for articulating that idea.”: anti-male slurs are acceptable politics #waronmen Only in gun nuts' mythical John Wayne / Rambo hero fantasies.	/r/MensRights	22/12/12 07:29 AM
1	Connecticut congressman: “It is founded in the fantasy of testosterone laden individuals who have blood on their hands for articulating that idea.”: anti-male slurs are acceptable politics #waronmen Nancy Lanza was armed; she owned six guns, including assault weapons, and knew how to use them. A lot of good that did her.	/r/MensRights	22/12/12 07:26 AM
–	Connecticut congressman: “It is founded in the fantasy of testosterone laden individuals who have blood on their hands for articulating that idea.”: anti-male slurs are acceptable politics #waronmen Why do you despise a child's right to a safe learning environment free of murder weapons?	/r/MensRights	21/12/12 11:04 AM
–	Feminists for Rape Where do they talk about the Vagina Monologues? Incidentally, yes, one of the storis in VM is about a 16 (originally, 13) year old girl who is raped by an older woman and later calls it "a good rape" and that she was "rescued" from her sexual attraction to men.	/r/MensRights	20/12/12 08:24 AM
–	Feminists for Rape They lost me with the links on the right. "Blacks Enslaving Themselves" Racist shit. "Oliver Stone’s Untrue History" Reinforcing the very misinformation, distortions, and lies that Stone's series meant to eliminate. "We Know How to Stop School Shootings" How? Of course: more guns, let guns in school, arm the teachers, arm the kids! "Jihad Watch" ...... Just another vile right-wing trash blog hating on feminism for points with their misogynist audience, rather than any reasonable disagreement. Mo…	/r/MensRights	20/12/12 08:02 AM
–	Agent Orange and AVFM expose feminist hate at Radfem Hub. I, for one, applaud such investigative journalism Doc dropping is not "investigative journalism."	/r/MensRights	17/12/12 02:18 PM
–	Agent Orange and AVFM expose feminist hate at Radfem Hub. I, for one, applaud such investigative journalism Agreed. Doc dropping is one of those things that every decent netizen opposes, no matter who's doing it. Shame on AVfM and Paul Elam for sinking to this level.	/r/MensRights	17/12/12 02:18 PM
–	Agent Orange and AVFM expose feminist hate at Radfem Hub. I, for one, applaud such investigative journalism That's the exact same rationalization feminists use when doc-dropping MRAs: "Well, they're practicing hate speech..." "Well, we're 'holding them accountable'..." "Well, it's publicly-available information... (except when it isn't)" "Well, it's just the names... (and employers... and where they live.)" "Well, we're not responsible for what people do with the information..." "Well, they're only saying it because they can get away with it... (Like the colonial rebels in the American Revolution?)" T…	/r/MensRights	17/12/12 02:14 PM
57	Another man's life ruined. When I was a sophomore in high school (at 15), I was in a math class with seniors (17-18). The idea that a teenager could be imprisoned for having sex with a classmate is an outrageous injustice. And since the victims of these laws are mostly men (between uneven application of the law and social double standards when an older woman has sex with a young boy) no one gives a shit.	/r/MensRights	17/12/12 01:36 PM
–	Michael Moore Surprises Everyone by Using Sandy Hook Shootings to Attack Men. angry and hateful. Well, The Pigman is angry and hateful. Angry Harry is angry and hateful. Barbarosaaaa is angry and hateful. A lot of the libertarian-type MRAs, because they see a world where the left is generally on the side of facts, and knowing they're on the losing side of history, become bitter. To them, Men's Rights is nothing more than a vehicle to push male-supremacist pseudoscience, akin to the "race realists" and those who argue capitalism is "natural" because of "human nature."	/r/MensRights	16/12/12 02:51 PM
0	Democracy is More Tyrannical than Communism says Former Yugoslavian Dissident - YouTube 0bvious_Atheist is a known libertarian, vehemently anti-government, anti-democracy troll. Nothing to see here.	/r/MensRights	16/12/12 04:25 AM