TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HextorFreebish Archive

View 3 posts and 117 comments by HextorFreebish on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

When you say it with an umlaut I picture a short man with a handlebar mustache and a towel wrapped around his waist frantically fleeing in circles from the meaty practiced hands of an enraged white-clad masseuse in a turkish bath.
/r/MensRights24/03/10 03:10 PM
1

An elf vigilante wouldn't be called vigilante. He'd be a damned feather-capped terrorist. Vigilantes represent the mob, the majority. They are the tyrrany of the majority in manifest form, treading over the rule of law to enforce their will. Republics have historically degenerated in one of two ways. They can fall from the ballot box to the cash-box, a fascist state where monied interest and government power collude, or they can fall from multi-cameral checks and balances to straight democracy, …
/r/MensRights23/03/10 10:00 PM
4

the head of the Feminoteka foundation, Joanna Piotrowska rhetorically asked: I wonder if this would be equally funny if it were changed to 'I check the penises of my workers on my own'." Kinda. Actually, yeah. Or maybe, "We employ 1000 men in Krakow, and we dutifully check all our Poles for penile cancer."
/r/MensRights23/03/10 02:28 PM
13

To answer the question of why male characters are showing up in movies and TV who don't project traits of social dominance, financial stability or romantic appeal, Jessica Grose says that men have not "re-tooled." She says that the ideal of the American Man, set by such movies as Don Draper in Mad Men and Tom Hanks' HBO series The Pacific. And today's men, not living up to this gold standard, opt out or give up trying to achieve according to yesteryear's standards of accomplishment. I see in her…
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:31 PM
9

I think folks in here often give short shrift to the notion of not letting boys have spiderman bedsheets and giving them fairy princess bedsheets instead to protect them from harmful messages about masculinity. If that's the fingers-in-ears approach to sexuality issues that you're referring to, then I'll agree with you. Also, I slept with your mom. If you downvote this, that basically provides evidence to back up my statement.
/r/MensRights15/03/10 07:56 PM
1

Better to keep it legal. Pull up on Christmas Eve in a black van with ten opera singers in tuxedos and sing Carl Orff's Carmina Burana. Pour salt over a black candle, light it, and leave it on her doorstep.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 01:35 PM
2

The creepy thing about going into a black hole is that as you approach, you see a black circle where the stars used to be ahead of you. The stars around the growing circle warp into a white ring, an expanding white ring getting brighter and brighter. It reminds me of the movie The Ring. Being put down into an obliette where the last thing you see is a ring of light.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 01:08 PM
135

You should have her raise her voice with each response that she gives in a conversation like this one: "Pedophile? You mean like one of those guys who really likes his wife's feet? He likes my feet okay I suppose... " "No, I mean-" "Oh, you mean foot doctor? Why should my husband not be a stay-at-home dad if he's a foot doctor? Because of the long hours? I don't get it" "Uh, forget it." "OH OKAY NOW I UNDERSTAND. YOU WERE COMPARING MY HUSBAND TO A MAN WHO MOLESTS CHILDREN! PRAY TELL, WHAT LENT M…
/r/MensRights01/03/10 07:48 PM
1

I am so right, and I'll go over it point by point. Source? Pubmed: Why men matter: mating patterns drive evolution of human lifespan. Chimps live up to 60 years in captivity, 35 to 40 in the wild. Bonobos live about 50 years in captivity, and presumably less in the wild. I'm not necessarily suggesting that our paleolithic ancestors predominantly had harem mating patterns. In fact, the evidence does tend to point to the opposite for at least a small part of our history, and monogamy for much of i…
/r/MensRights17/02/10 02:05 PM
1

I disagree. Older dudes with a lot of resources getting it on with young women are believed to be the genetic basis for humanity's long lifespan compared to other apes. As it so happens, that genetic basis doesn't live on the Y chromosome. So both men and women live longer. But because of other physical factors, that advantage appears to result in longer actual lifespans in women than men. In every other large mammal you can list, the females die of old age by a very simple formula. Their last o…
/r/MensRights16/02/10 07:01 PM
1

Well, aside from all the cultural things, the fact is men and women are physically different. For one thing, estrogen seems to help with immune response in the elderly. For another, men are bigger, and things like arteries don't scale well. A man has all these extra pounds of body mass engaging in cellular metabolism and creating a build-up of cholestorols that cannot be broken down, and this creates dangerous blockages faster in a bigger person. The cholesterols go from indigestible intracellul…
/r/MensRights16/02/10 06:50 PM
1

I like it.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 03:30 PM
1

www.hurleymustgo.com has good material. also www.whyjudgelittle.com
/r/MensRights22/01/10 05:13 PM
2

Well, your analogy would work if a woman's vagina just accidentally happened to fall upon some man's dick Hey, don't laugh. 45 percent of all accidents happen in the home.
/r/MensRights14/12/09 04:13 PM
1

There was one of those for accidental child injuries that started off with some America's Funniest Home Videos music with canned laughter as children slipped and fell, and then the music got dark and statistics of child injury were shown on the screen. Maybe some canned laughter as the women in the office slap Phil Hartman from NewsRadio, fading to Phil's body being removed from his home after his wife murdered him. Laughs for that, too. Oh, Phil, we hardly knew you.
/r/MensRights09/12/09 01:29 PM
11

Feminists are commenting on the article, condemning its gender bias. They are saying she should be punished for hitting Tiger, just like a man would be punished for hitting a cheating wife.
/r/MensRights02/12/09 07:48 PM
13

It's a Suzanne Researched This training video. There was a point in the housing bubble where buyers really, REALLY could not afford a more expensive house. But they could get a loan approved for one. So the broker after a commission had to identify how to make that happen. The answer was to enlist the wife into coercing the husband into overconsumption. Target's ad agency seems to be thinking along similar lines. The recession means holiday shoppers, mostly women, are going to be told by their h…
/r/MensRights02/12/09 06:06 PM
1

As long as I've been in this reddit, I've never seen celticson judge celticson's analysis to be incorrect. Just ask him, he'll tell you it's true.
/r/MensRights30/11/09 09:36 PM
4

There should be PSA commercials about self-screening: Screen fades in to a man's cupped hand. "How can a single tablespoon of olive oil save your life?" The man rubs it over his index and middle finger with his other hand and then the hand moves off-screen. "The answer to this probing question might surprise you." "Yipe!" "Prostate cancer self-screening can save eleventy-million men's lives a year. So check it out. Right now. Go to the kitchen and get the olive oil. Yes, now." The star goes acro…
/r/MensRights11/11/09 08:32 PM
1

That would be one heck of a troll brigade, if they made r/MensRights into their own little r/GoneWild. I shudder to think.
/r/MensRights11/11/09 08:25 PM
6

Her claims are becoming inflated now that things are heating up.
/r/MensRights21/10/09 02:36 PM
1

The demographics on that are what they don't like to talk about, though.
/r/MensRights15/10/09 02:58 PM
4

Code Lavender. I'm on to your anti-male shaming tactics, buddy.
/r/MensRights07/10/09 03:59 PM
6

my wife has a sewing room with all sorts of stuff that I find girly in it. If I put up, say, a hunting trophy in this room I think she would be irritated. I never really thought about it until now. Are you telling me that she is a man-hater and exhibiting gender-based disdain because of this? Because that doesn't sound like my wife at all. You see, I don't see that room as a bold pink flag waving in my face, humiliating me with the man-hating notion of feminine space existing unsubjugated by mas…
/r/MensRights05/10/09 02:16 PM
3

and my point is that if a woman is in the situation I described, it's obviously all her fault as well, for picking a guy like that for a relationship. She shouldn't be with that guy, sucks to be her and all that. But that doesn't change the fact that the woman cave is a symptom of her being bullied, not man-hatred. Similarly a man-cave is a symptom of a man being bullied, not misogyny.
/r/MensRights05/10/09 01:30 PM
5

Yeah, who needs to do this no girls allowed thing. How about the whole house decorated with wood paneling and stuffed ducks and deer antlers, and if your wife wants to do some apple cinammon wreath thing she can do that in the den. And even if you think her needlepoint thing her mother made for her should come down so you could put up the vintage Pulp Fiction poster from your second date you'll bite your tongue and not nag her. I mean it's fine if she wants one room for stuff that's all about he…
/r/MensRights05/10/09 12:52 PM
2

how can this question go to make what it is for working through the reasoning behind always taking up the cause of opening the discussion on doing for what the look like
/r/MensRights24/09/09 05:38 PM
3

Sometimes it's like you say. Sometimes not. Last week I was taking my dogs and walking towards the front door as an attractive woman was leaving carrying her injured cat. She was walking about six feet from the access road to the interstate highway. A beat up car with two young men slowed down as it passed her and the passenger leaned out and yelled with cupped hands "HEY NICE PUSSY! CAN I PET IT!" She cringed for a moment and kept walking for her car. Her animal companion, who she could love an…
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:20 PM
21

Now we all know that men and women commit domestic violence on each other. What I want to point out is the invisibility of male victims. If a man is badly injured, particularly on his genitals, then that warrants a quick laugh in the mainstream media, but that's it. What I find interesting is that in the comments, people are not sympathetic of the woman at all, like the police clearly were. They know women do this stuff too and it is despicable. But they haven't reached the point where they cons…
/r/MensRights28/07/09 03:41 PM
2

Jerry Springer fanfiction. Yeah, it can happen like that. I've seen episodes of Cops where the officer arresting a drunk guy with a knifewound on his forearm defensively explains to the camera that it's his job to arrest the more physically imposing party. As in, the one that was backing fearfully away from the knife.
/r/MensRights27/07/09 05:46 PM
0

or was rmosler saying he saw childbirth several times, and there was meconium involved?
/r/MensRights10/07/09 03:33 PM
2

It is difficult to read the same content repeated over and over when the author keeps repeating the same content. When I write I don't repeat the same content.
/r/MensRights10/07/09 02:43 PM
13

Nobody is really interested in a woman committed a crime story. What I did found interesting was the other story about the Ontario justice system. The one they didn't print. The judge accepted a joint recommendation from [Stephanie] Heyens and prosecutor Meghan Scott for a suspended sentence, 12 months probation and restitution of $1,500 This case was prosecuted by Assistant Crown Attorney Meghan Scott. The Crown Attorney in downtown Toronto is Christine McGoey. She has 3 Deputy Crown Attorneys,…
/r/MensRights02/06/09 05:15 PM
1

and I nursed two kids in public Way to go! Putting up with the crap people give mothers over breastfeeding in public is a pain. But it is so much better. Beneficial effects of breast milk in the neonatal intensive care unit on the developmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months of age. Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1), Vohr, Betty. PMID: 16818526 excerpt of results: Children in the breast milk group were more likely to have a Bayley Mental Development Index > or = 85, higher …
/r/MensRights05/03/09 05:57 PM
1

Here is a fellow asking around for a battered mens' shelter last August. He is in San Francisco and asking for where he can refer a friend who has a "large and angry wife". And everybody in enlightened San Fran takes the opportunity to pipe in with "it's really you who needs to go to a men's shelter, isn't it, Dave?" Touching, really. I would have told him about the nearest shelters that would take his friend, in San Diego and Lancaster. My concern with starting a men's shelter is that first of …
/r/MensRights20/02/09 02:54 PM
3

It's obvious to us now how unfair this was to men in New Jersey. I think that in those days they probably would have answered that because there were more bachelors than unmarried women, and because women received proposals but did not make them, that the pressure of public policy would be ineffective in persuading them to marry. In fact, they would say that young women needed no persuasion, whether or not this was always true. The article mentioned that there were 9957 more unmarried German men…
/r/MensRights09/02/09 09:00 PM
1

I'm hardly that important. Perhaps you'd be happier sharing your opinions with the world on a blog. That way, you could delete comments on your posts that were contradictory to your opinions and made more sense. You could own your own little parcel of the Internet. Rather than consider me personally as being the problem, why don't you consider the possibility that when you bring your opinions to the public square and they are soundly refuted, that you should either up your game and express your …
/r/MensRights09/02/09 03:50 PM
2

Co-counseling is peer-to-peer psychotherapy. Like Napster. RC (Re-evaluation Counseling) was started by Harvey Jackins in the 60s, and is now led by his son Tim. Harvey apparently had his origin somewhere in Dianetics, though he dropped that. But he retained his anti-psychiatry opinions and some of the authoritarian leanings of Scientology. Also consistent with dianetics, he believed that almost all people experienced sexual abuse as children and that these experiences were suppressed. So all th…
/r/MensRights09/02/09 03:07 PM
1

I'm not sure either. Maybe it has to do with gradual encroachment on our rights. When they came for women who self-immolate at service stations, I said nothing, because I was not a woman. How long until men aren't allowed to set themselves on fire at service stations?
/r/MensRights05/02/09 10:06 PM
2

I had never heard of scandanavian black metal. I'll look into it.
/r/MensRights05/02/09 10:02 PM
4

I'm all for individual freedom from rigid expectations. And I'm glad to hear that you enjoy CrimeThInc's art. But no, I do not hold a high regard for this poster within the context of an expression of childrens' desire to be free. Boys want to be free to run and poke frogs with sticks. I know, because I have boys. They want to play with easy-bake ovens, too. When they're toddlers. I know because I have boys, and I do not indoctrinate them on what to play with. Boys want to matter to other boys. …
/r/MensRights05/02/09 09:35 PM
2

He's taking the suit to county court because a higher court refused to take the case. He's screwed. County court is about how well-connected you are.
/r/MensRights05/02/09 08:50 PM
6

Can a boy not be sensitive without being feminine? There is a Scandanavian tradition of masculine sensitivity. Its underpinnings are similar to the traditional Celtic notions of emotion and the ability to evoke emotion as a masculine source of power. I once read in a mythology class in college about a Celt's interpretation of Hercules, which mystified the Greeks at the time. They depicted him as having piercings in his tongue attached to chains that extended to men's earrings behind him. A Celt …
/r/MensRights05/02/09 05:50 PM
4

Here you go.
/r/MensRights05/02/09 05:22 PM
11

I too am turned off by this. But I also don't like the CrimeThInc one, either. The CrimeThInc is the old chestnut that feminism helps men and boys because it takes off the pressure on boys to be always strong and rough and tumble. Which is all fine in theory, like communism in that way. In practice it's utter bullshit. In practice it is about educators enforcing a heavy-handed dual-gender role for girls and a loser male role for boys. What do I mean by this? I mean that girls are expected to com…
/r/MensRights05/02/09 05:08 PM
3

a little more than suspiciously so.
/r/MensRights04/02/09 10:59 PM
1

no I hadn't personally heard of this. Maybe when I'm a little older I'll start see this sort of thing. Here's hoping I don't.
/r/MensRights29/01/09 12:01 AM
1

I have to wonder how many women would say that they would like to be able to stoop to doing this before the moment that they decide to do it. Like the commercial goes, "Nobody says they want to be a junkie when they grow up." And yet there are junkies. The difference between junkies and others is they never really had a plan, or they did have it but their dreams were shattered and hope died and they thought hey why not? Most of those women probably were seeking affection, attention, and security…
/r/MensRights28/01/09 11:01 PM
2

I like the fact that bills being debated in congress are all online now. However, it would be even better if they had a version control system. This would make it easier for legislators, because their staff could just diff the bill to pick out the relevant parts that a committee changed. Also, it would increase accountability a whole lot. If they kept seeing the same legislator with a cozy relationship with a lobbyist coming up on objectionable riders in the versioning system, there would be gre…
/r/MensRights28/01/09 04:19 PM
6

I haven't been able to find any comments anywhere that indicated women weren't feeling positive about the male birth-control pill. I even looked on feministing.com. Every comment from women I saw said that it would be a welcome thing. While I did find a meme on MRA sites of some women's diapproval or fear over losing control, I didn't find a single reference to this being actually expressed by an actual person. so, [citation needed] UPDATE: I kept looking for a reference, and what I found was th…
/r/MensRights28/01/09 04:08 PM
1

Well good for you, ubermench. But surely you cannot deny that having the option of having a fire extinguished in a timely fashion has market value for you? If your neighbor was a dumbass and allowed a fire to start, and the firefighters showed up and demanded 30 grand to put it out, or didn't show up at all, his raging inferno of a house could easily burn yours down whether you liked it or not. And being tough enough to pull yourself together afterwards wouldn't be as cool as being that tough an…
/r/MensRights26/01/09 02:49 PM
5

Try this on for size, tough guy. I decided that it was time to dump my girlfriend when I figured out she was crazy and worthless. She figured I'd be coming to that conclusion, too, so she decided to lie about getting on birth control pills. My choices were to put up with a crazy bitch's abuse long enough to have a shot at custody or to split and condemn my first child to being raised by her.
/r/MensRights24/01/09 12:52 AM
1

Rape cases are notoriously hard to prove either way. But if it is summarily disproved, I think a sentence like that is warranted. And by disproved, I mean conclusive exculpatory evidence and a finding of malice on the part of the accuser, not just picking the wrong perp from a line-up. I don't see how that could act as an impediment to anybody coming forward.
/r/MensRights23/01/09 07:19 PM
1

Just to clarify, Kanin's study was in a mid-sized Midwestern college town. The rape cases in question were all of the cases for that town, not just ones involving college students. So the qualification that 50% is valid only for reported rapes on college campuses is overly stringent. It would be better to say reported in a college town. Two things that would be expected to lower this rate are being in an area that is not, shall we say, such a hotbed of infidelity as a college town, and not being…
/r/MensRights23/01/09 06:57 PM
2

Hmm... If it's a man who stayed at home, kept the house clean, did the shopping, cared for the pre-school age children, while his wife worked, is alimony reaonable? My feeling of it is he can get a job once nobody is supporting him anymore. It wouldn't be reasonable for his ex-wife to keep paying for his upkeep when he isn't cleaning their house and doing the shopping anymore. Sure he had some years out of the workforce, but here's the thing. If their roles were specialized to the point where sa…
/r/MensRights23/01/09 05:47 PM
4

I think fathers' rights in the hospital is a good softer societal issue. It used to be that husbands were not allowed in the back where their wives were in labor. This was so they wouldn't see the abhorrent practices back there. Their wives were given a drug that didn't do anything for the pain; it just prevented them from remembering anything afterwards. Now fathers are allowed in the room, but their ability to say no to the pitussin -> distressed labor -> cesarian freakshow is institutionally …
/r/MensRights23/01/09 04:48 PM
6

Misogyny in the guise of "evolutionary psychology." See Kanazawa's posts on Psychology Today. Kanazawa's The power of female choice: Why fat chicks get laid more has rather tortured logic, and I think his conclutions are wrong. The title and subject are intentionally inflammatory. It's in such poor taste that I'd never write anything like that. But showing a hatred of women? I dunno, I think it's just poor science. Talking about reproductive strategies as a way of figuring out why we are the way…
/r/MensRights23/01/09 04:29 PM
4

The report shows a higher rate of assault suffered by lesbians than straight women, and a higher rate of assault suffered by gay men than straight men. The highest results were lesbian women. However, in contradiction of the indication that women are more violent, the rate for straight women was higher than the rate for straight men. This is likely because the reporting rates are different for each of these groups. I saw another study that showed the rate at which men report to be lower, for the…
/r/MensRights22/01/09 09:37 PM
2

My own research into this doesn't jive with the 3/4 figure at all. Changes in crib regulations would not have had such a pronounced effect as they did on SIDS rates if 3/4 were actually homicides. I think a more reasonable estimate is in the 5-10% range, which is still a terrible problem. Mind you, as medical advances are made to prevent actual SIDS, that figure should rise as a proportion of cases unless something is done to prevent infanticides as well. edit: Here's a reference. This is a stud…
/r/MensRights22/01/09 04:22 PM
1

social work is a FAKE science. Whu? Social work is the state employee who shows up at the hospital for the kid covered in cigarette burns that doesn't have anybody signing in to claim him. NATURE is ALL that is necessary to INSURE a STRONG population. PERIOD. O RLY? If I appear to have committed the treasonous thoughtcrime of socialism, ponder for a moment how much you would like your local fire department to be privatized to the free market. House burning down? oh you want it put out right now?…
/r/MensRights15/01/09 09:36 PM
2

Probably quite a few, as heart attacks are a common cause of death. And it's a lot less embarrassing for the family when they're with their wives at the time.
/r/MensRights13/01/09 04:53 PM
4

Having been laid off before, I'd say being a stay-at-home dad is comparable to being a stay-at-home mom and living way out in the country. Because the average distance to the next stay-at-home dad would be about comparable, in the city. The isolation is non-trivial. And then there is the tensions. If you take your kids to the park, you're talking to other men's wives while their husbands are at work. Moms avoid you for rather the same reason that I would avoid developing a lunchtime friendship w…
/r/MensRights13/01/09 04:51 PM
3

Since social workers' pay (and teachers' pay) is set ultimately by the voters, I support these pay raises when I can. Part of the decline of male teachers is the anti-male atmosphere in schools and another part of it is that it pays so poorly that it interferes with a man's ability to attract a wife or meet her expectations. It is less glamorous to men than it was because of the descending pay and decreasing air of respectability. Also, lower pay attracts less qualified candidates. As for social…
/r/MensRights09/01/09 05:33 PM
1

Well good on you, ZuG. Thanks. And I've thought about what I said about genuine challenges to women's rights, and I think I ought to take it back. I do perceive there to be a few, though not necessarily the ones most people pay any attention to. I think the industrialization of the 20th century profoundly changed the power relationship between an individual or family and the community or nation. For men, this has been felt acutely in areas of law enforcement, or overt force from government and s…
/r/MensRights08/01/09 08:21 PM
3

Actually, feminists don't want equal rights. They want equal rights for women. And any suggestion that men have less than equal rights is taken as a vicious attack on womanhood. So expect to be demeaned. I, on the other hand, respond to claims that women do not have equal rights (in the modern world) with scepticism, but I do listen to a reasonable argument. I have daughters to raise in this world and want them to have a fair go of it. Right now the biggest hurdle to equality that women face, in…
/r/MensRights07/01/09 10:07 PM
1

It's him alright. His blog is http://allforfreedom.blogspot.com. And this is what a cult looks like.
/r/MensRights02/01/09 03:52 PM
1

They used to call it "apprenticing".
/r/MensRights25/12/08 07:37 PM
2

Chris Rock had a bit where he said that when a guy's buddy gets a really nice girlfriend, he says to himself, "Now why can't I get a girl like that?" And when a girl sees her friend get a nice boyfriend, she says to herself, "Now why can't I get that man?"
/r/MensRights20/12/08 09:37 PM
17

No, womens' suffrage is about equality. Feminism is about priviledge (equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity). Suffragettes fought for the right to have equal consequences for breaking the law, strange as that may sound, because they understood the implications of accepting the condescending assumption that they were children of an adult age. They fought for equal standing under the law and therefore the equality that comes with equal responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/12/08 10:53 PM
2

the imaginary kid must have forced her to do it.
/r/MensRights03/12/08 06:24 PM
2

o noes downmods! I'm urging for some restraint here. This statistic is indeed useful for countering misapprehensions about most child abuse being at the hands of men. However, I am apprehensive over using it to create hype that women are inherently more dangerous to children than men. I don't believe that is what it shows. All it shows is that if you are looking for child abusers, the best first place is in the demographic that is alone with children the most.
/r/MensRights21/11/08 04:32 PM
2

I also find it ironic that over 80% of yacht accidents are caused by people who make $100,000 a year or more. Boating magazines are targeted at upper-middle class and wealthy people, and yet they would appear to know the least about boating safety.
/r/MensRights21/11/08 03:34 PM
5

These people are morally on thin ice with me. I read their literature and what they do, and there were a few things that I appreciated. Such as the literature on the problem of prisoner rape in this country. Also the emphasis on young men being encouraged to not believe that they have to be dehumanized to become men. That nonsense that has been used to throw young men into the meat grinder in wars, coal mines, factories, etc since the industrial revolution is terrible. There was the rest of it t…
/r/MensRights11/11/08 08:11 PM
16

Kesi Cole, 26, tearfully expressed remorse in court. Her husband's parents said they have forgiven her. Well that's nice of them. The mother said she accepted the plea agreement but also called her daughter-in-law "manipulative," and said she had a "violent streak." You think? This is a good example of violence against men being invisible. The man was murdered and his own mother refuses to see his wife as in the wrong, just plain rotten. Her daughter-in-law has a "violent streak" rather than bei…
/r/MensRights11/11/08 03:37 PM
1

A good episode of Dirty Jobs if I ever heard one.
/r/MensRights10/11/08 03:09 PM
1

I think it's just terrible that whole families can be torn apart by something as simple as wild dogs.
/r/MensRights04/11/08 08:32 PM
2

I like the second half of this post. The first half is difficult to parse. Paragraph 5 in particular... It can be said, tongue wobbling in cheek, that the field of analytic philosophy went hyperkantian in either the pseudo-pragmatistic rejection of higher ontologies put forward by the vulgar quineans and the tangled hyperreal web of modal logic and kripkean reference theory. Analytic philosophy can forgive me for this sweeping indictment because I really belong to their camp. I do exempt Deleuze…
/r/MensRights28/10/08 09:31 PM
3

1) My pleasure. I'd like to direct you to a post from another foster family for people who are not in a postition at present to foster but would like to support foster care. If you can't foster too then this is a good read: link 2) I would urge such drug users to get vasectomies and tied tubes and adopt if they want kids. Just as I urge people with severe hereditary genetic problems or would-be mothers past a certain age and at high risk of chromosomal abnormality to do. I don't believe that Unc…
/r/MensRights27/10/08 04:09 PM
8

My foster daughter was born in prison. I have no doubt she would have been born with physical and mental handicaps if her mother hadn't spent her last several months of her pregnancy in prison. I am glad that the prison system enforced my little baby's mother's sobriety. And I do think that prison is for women too. Pregnancy should not be a get out of jail card. Quite the opposite. Going out on the street and shooting up produces brain-damaged babies that will be taken into state care and few wi…
/r/MensRights27/10/08 01:57 PM
1

Mad Men
/r/MensRights24/10/08 09:59 PM
1

and Belgians.
/r/MensRights15/10/08 04:23 PM
2

I've noticed that the ugly ones get sentences and the pretty ones get psych evals.
/r/MensRights30/09/08 02:34 PM
1

Hmmm... A stripper at a bachelorette party, upset that his customers were acting bored, brought the maid of honor onto the stage and put an object in her butt. The conservative maid of honor was outraged, but she was just trying to assert her femininity which she felt the stripper compromised. Does that sound wrong to you?
/r/MensRights10/09/08 03:00 PM
3

All kidding aside, from my reading of the article it looks like the stripper was offended when the groom-to-be left the stage after a minute, bored. And even worse, she was 39. Her feelings of humiliation led to a desire for revenge. Now what I suspect is that what happened next was a practiced routine for her. The groom often displays disinterest as a show of his commitment to his bride. At this point the disinterest spreads to the guests. The stripper's routine at that point is to renew the in…
/r/MensRights09/09/08 05:58 PM
-2

No, no, just the best man. It's not that kind of party.
/r/MensRights09/09/08 03:29 PM
-4

It was a bachelor party! (Or bucks party as they say, ah, down under.) Seriously, what did the best man think was going to happen!? The stripper has penetrated the best man at every bachelor party I've been to except two. Sheesh, get with it. Basically, if you're the best man, when you walk into the bachelor party, you need to accept the fact that there's going to be some action down under.
/r/MensRights09/09/08 02:46 PM
0

My advice could only come from my knowledge of my own state's laws. I also agree that a lawyer is the way to go. Some lawyers will do a free 1-hour consultation.
/r/MensRights05/09/08 08:02 PM
1

I'm receiving it (if by receiving it you mean $100 every six months or so)
/r/MensRights05/09/08 02:26 PM
7

Your business class is full of morons. Women are just as ruthless in business. Anyone remember Kathy Lee Gifford's garment-making sweatshops when she was supposed to be all about children? There's a term in corporate america since the 90's called "work-life balance". This means accomodation for employees to be able to take off a couple hours in the middle of the day if necessary to take a child to a doctor's appointment and so on. Most of the employees who need this work-life balance, and the av…
/r/MensRights03/09/08 08:09 PM
1

Bernays came from Freud's school of thought. He saw the subconscious mind as something full of dangerous impulses that needed to be carefully controlled. In his mind, the elite, typified by himself of course, were morally obligated to use tools such as propaganda that played upon subconscious desires to steer the commoners and shepherd them. This is part and parcel to the sort of Nietzscean Superman theme of the 1920s and 30s which played no small part in the rise of Naziism and nationalistic su…
/r/MensRights02/09/08 08:32 PM
1

O RLY?
/r/MensRights02/09/08 06:53 PM
1

I think that was so students would go off-task less. At that age, boys and girls have fewer common interests with each other. Unless of course that was how the teacher described the purpose of the seating arrangement to the class?
/r/MensRights02/09/08 04:32 PM
3

It is ironic that in accusing me of making ungrounded assumptions (which I never did), you make your own. If a man, not you, were to have your attitude, and wished to make this fascist fantasy his reality by depriving my daughter of liberty, then that man would have a well-grounded fear for his life.
/r/MensRights01/09/08 02:13 PM
5

When my daughter is old enough to marry, my son-in-law had better not have your attitude. I live in Texas, and no jury would convict.
/r/MensRights01/09/08 12:50 PM
1

again with the insightful comments. This was originally what excited me about Obama's politics. He comes from a crop of politicians that were the first to question the lines drawn by "echoes of the 60's." He has lately made some compromises and allegiances that tell me that he isn't making enacting that sort of vision a priority, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights27/08/08 09:54 PM
3

My goal is to make his life in the Internet Age difficult. When using the web, he will often have to type his name as >child's name<. And then people will assume that there was a software problem and ask him to specify his name for a form, and he will have to explain that <child's name> is in fact his name. His name is almost as good as his friend, little Bobby Tables. Actually his friend's full first name is Robert'); DROP TABLE students; -- His mom is very protective. She wants to make sure hi…
/r/MensRights25/08/08 04:05 PM
2

I do not agree. I made a lousy cashier when I was 18 because I was too smart for the job. I thought about other things and worked slowly. Cops can have IQs that are too high and cause them to not enforce dumb laws. As a result, many jurisdictions don't hire cops who are too smart. If the task is dumb, sometimes the best person qualified to do it is qualified but only just. For this particular task, maybe someone smarter would bring something extra to it, but I don't think so. I think the best of…
/r/MensRights23/08/08 01:55 AM
1

The customer didn't stand to gain any added value from having Prof. Donald Knuth answer his ad to edit some HTML for him. If there were two boxes, and one box had coins from 90 grams to 92 grams but the other box had coins from 90 - 100 grams, but the problem was that the seller would shave off any extra gold over 90 grams before selling the coin to you, which one would you pick? Personally, it wouldn't matter to me.
/r/MensRights22/08/08 08:54 PM
1

I'm re-reading what you posted before. When one limits one's search space to computer experts (as in your case) one is already looking at a cross section of the population that is highest performing in abstract reasoning. Within that group, the men perform better than the women. So what I think you are saying is that by the time people are filtered by minimum proficiency requirements, the populations that they are selected from by gender causes a measurable difference in the skewness of computer…
/r/MensRights22/08/08 08:49 PM
1

Oh, I see. So for some pedantic reason you find that the comparison isn't apt. But you do comprehend the point I am making, yes? That if you're looking for a delivery boy/girl, proofreader, webmonkey, or some other person to do something trivial, then whose gender does best at this skill on the high end is basically irrelevant, and all that matters is that the individual meets the basic proficiency requirement?
/r/MensRights22/08/08 08:36 PM
1

Now you're just being difficult. The point is it wasn't a difficult task and only required fluency. It certainly didn't require any understanding of algorithmic complexity or anything else. Either somebody meets this basic requirement thanks to past experience or they don't. And if they do, the upper end of the population is entirely irrelevant. It would be a small surprise to be this guy and see a woman ask to do it, just like it would be a small surprise to be this guy and see a guy with your …
/r/MensRights22/08/08 08:21 PM
2

You're looking at a cross section that is 0.001% of the population If this cat wanted me to improve the optimizer in his database engine, then yes, the cross section of the population that could do that would be 0.0001%. He wanted some web monkey thing or another done. Abstract reasoning is necessary for somebody to comprehend if some of their code is going to end up O(n) or O(n log n). It isn't necessary to edit some HTML. It required the relevant literacy, not reasoning.
/r/MensRights22/08/08 07:50 PM
2

This guy couldn't afford excellent help. The world record 100 meter dash has been set by men since the Olympics began. Among highest-performing runners, the men are just faster. It's a scientific fact. So if I'm a concierge at a hotel and looking to hire a page to run messages to guests, I should be immediately sceptical of female applicants, right? Because after all, the fastest women in the world aren't as fast as the fastest men. This page job pays $7/hr, and is by definition less appealing t…
/r/MensRights22/08/08 05:41 PM
2

In raw ability? Anyways, not really my point. This guy on craigslist couldn't afford the time of the highest performing men and women. He just had something simple that needed doing. If he was a dean looking for an associate professor in say, plasma physics with a strong programming background, then maybe that would be relevant. Of course, anyone who can afford the time of the highest performers really ought to take the time to read some resumes or something.
/r/MensRights22/08/08 02:56 PM
2

computer programming isn't particularly men's work, it's just work that by and large only men are interested in doing. However, when there is a woman who for her own particular reasons is interesting in doing it, there is no appreciable gender difference. I am aware of the statistics, such as the Steves/females ratio. At any large IT conference there will be more Steves in attendance than female IT professionals. However, it would be just as baseless to reject an offer from a programmer for bein…
/r/MensRights22/08/08 02:16 PM
2

Yes, we have the Jew in my country also brother. Although Kazakhstan a glorious country, it have a problem, too: economic, social, and Jew. Sometime they even shift shape to roaches and try to kill me!
/r/MensRights21/08/08 10:13 PM
4

Upmodded for Hegelian Synthesis. I'm in favor of gender-blindness where such things are possible. A few months ago, I sent an email reply to a solicitation on craigslist computer gigs for a small task. I didn't realize that The Google was still signed in under my wife's account. So this individual received an email stating that I was available to do this work from an address of the form <child's name>'s mama @ gmail dot com. After I sent it, I pondered the implausibility of getting any reply. (I…
/r/MensRights21/08/08 08:58 PM
1

sylvan got it. It's a show called Dinosaurs. It ran 91 to 95. It was noted for its similarity both to The Flinstones and The Honeymooners.
/r/MensRights20/08/08 03:26 PM
1

There was a rather amusing Saturday Night Live skit in which John Candy plays Gleason in a "lost episode" of the Honeymooners. In this skit, Alice challenges him on the fact that he has never once acted on his threats, and he loses his temper and punches her. Then he hops around whining fearfully as she lays on the floor with one leg twitching. The sense of horror and comedy together was really something. Not at all the bland amusement derived from the dinosaur family show from the 90s based on …
/r/MensRights19/08/08 04:28 PM
1

I'm in the process of adopting my stepson right now. Just signed some papers. That's where the disparity comes from. The most common form of adoption involves a mom and a dad. Stepfathers adopting children must be second most common, and more common than stepmother adoption. The other forms probably aren't particularly disposed to one gender or another.
/r/MensRights09/08/08 02:48 PM
2

Now I'm leaning back towards your 15% figure. I re-read the abstract for the study that I think is the most unbiased that I have ever seen: Steven J. C. Gaulin , Donald H. McBurney, Stephanie L. Brakeman-Wartell. (University of Pittsburgh), "Matrilateral Biases in the Investment of Aunts and Uncles: A Consequence and Measure of Paternity Uncertainty". Human Nature Volume 8, Number 2 (1997) pp. 139-151 Springerlink They did come up with figures specifically for the uncertainty on each paternal re…
/r/MensRights08/08/08 06:06 PM
2

You mean 15% of all children whose paternity is sufficiently in doubt to warrant a test. I've quoted a study that suggested a figure of about 10% of children who are not related to paternal aunts/uncles, but I now believe that actually would put the incidence at 5.1%, because there are 2 generations in which paternity fraud could have been committed (Could've been ma or grandma who misidentified a father.) The figure of 5% agrees with what a lab tech told me when his lab surveyed thousands of pe…
/r/MensRights08/08/08 03:24 PM
2

Amusing contrast, your headline compared to ABC's: "Runaway Mom Jailed on Invalidated Charges" Their headline invokes a sense that the mom must have been fleeing for her life. And how dare the authorities in one state hold her in jail when the felony kidnapping warrant issued in another was declared invalid? How cruel of them. I believe the reason that they say the warrant should never have been issued is that he never married the mother, and therefore the child is the mother's property. The fac…
/r/MensRights07/08/08 09:19 PM
2

And employee theft of mining equipment is predominantly perpetrated by men. Therefore we should not trust men to conduct mining operations unsupervised, right? No, I don't think it's reasonable to draw from this fact a characterization that women are somehow inherently more dangerous to children. The numbers do not control for the greater access and opportunity that woman victimizers have to harm children over what man victimizers have.
/r/MensRights18/07/08 04:45 PM
2

I think a good solution would be to get some restraining orders against those who issue such a challenge. In some jurisdictions, you can get those over the phone if you call after-hours, and you don't necessarily ever have to have had contact with the person. You just have to feel scared. So it shouldn't be too hard. Just ask your sister to call for you.
/r/MensRights15/07/08 12:51 PM
4

Check this out: Steven J. C. Gaulin , Donald H. McBurney, Stephanie L. Brakeman-Wartell. (University of Pittsburgh), "Matrilateral Biases in the Investment of Aunts and Uncles: A Consequence and Measure of Paternity Uncertainty". Human Nature Volume 8, Number 2 (1997) pp. 139-151 link to article A study that compared college students' DNA to their aunts and uncles found that 13%-20% of them did not have a DNA match. Unlike other studies that have tried to assess paternity mis-identification, thi…
/r/MensRights25/06/08 01:42 PM
1

He sounds dickless
/r/MensRights22/05/08 06:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter