TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HeyZuesHChrist Archive

View 0 posts and 280 comments by HeyZuesHChrist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I understand that. You still don't have a right to not be offended in the U.S., though.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:52 PM
–

For starters, there is no such thing as a "right to not be offended." At least in the United States. You DO have the right to free speech, though.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:29 PM
5

I don't understand this logic, either. I'm a straight male. I'm not attracted to men or women who used to be men. It has nothing to do with being bigoted. Am I supposed to convince my brain to produce chemicals that make me attracted to women who used to be men? It's out of my control. If you weren't born with a vagina and you transitioned, your vagina is not going to be the same as someone who was born a woman. It's not even going to be close. And I'm not attracted to that and there is nothing …
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:30 PM
1

The offense isn't the kiss it's the fact that he said he wouldn't date a trans woman. Why is that offensive?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:25 PM
-1

I agree.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:52 PM
–

Go on Tinder and be a regular guy and try this. You'll find that it doesn't work and that they'll chastise you for saying the same stuff.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:49 PM
1

Well yes, I definitely missed that part. Sorry. :/
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:23 PM
1

She didn't do it. It's not even debatable.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 03:43 PM
1

You've not looked at this case for even one second.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 03:43 PM
–

If you believe that somebody who is intoxicated cannot consent, that she at best sexually assaulted her friend. There is zero escaping that. She was stone cold sober, and by her own admission he couldn't even look her in the eyes and fell asleep while she was assaulting him. She's a sexual predator who got away with it because she gave a sob story about feeling unwanted by guys in college.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:09 PM
8

I'm drawing the line where feminists draw the line. I'm only using their standards here. And their standards specifically state that if you are drunk you cannot consent. That means if both parties are drunk, neither can consent. If one is drunk and one is not, then the one who is drunk cannot consent. In this case, by their own standards (and Amy Shumar's standards) she raped the guy.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:42 PM
16

If your female friend called you and you showed up at her place and she could barely stand up because she was so drunk, and you were completely sober, do you honestly think it wouldn't be considered rape if you had sex with her? Of course it would be. We know consent laws, and at that point she couldn't consent to sex. A stone cold sober guy would be told he should know better. There is no difference here. He couldn't consent, she could, it's rape.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:32 PM
19

Yes, you're missing the fact that if a woman who was black out drunk and called a male friend who was sober to come over and then she was falling asleep while they were having sex it would be rape. Let's call this what it is. She was sober, according to her he couldn't even look her in the eyes he was so drunk, which means he couldn't consent. She raped him. She then tried to excuse it by saying nobody wanted to have sex with her in college so we should feel bad for her. Amy Shumar is a pile of …
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:29 PM
17

If something would blow up as a result of a power failure you don't purposely cut the power to prove your point. That's the problem with Peck in the movie and why he's the bad guy. He wasn't trying to make the city safe, he was trying to stick it to Venkman for blowing him off and insulting him earlier in the movie. It was about Peck proving he has a bigger dick than Venkman.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:54 PM
41

Peck was definitely the bad guy. He may have been right, but he wasn't concerned about the safety of the city, he was only concerned about being right. The Bill Murray character insulted him earlier in the film and blew him off, so shutting down the containment unit wasn't about trying to make the city safe, it was about sticking it to Venkman, shutting down their business, and showing him who has the power. Peck was only trying to prove he had a bigger dick than Peter Venkman.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:51 PM
2

I refuse to acknowledge that a single person thinks anything in that article is valid.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:19 PM
5

we mothers should be the ones to choose if we work or not That right there comes off as entitled. Basically, if she wants to work you hire her because she's a mum, so that entitles her to a job.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/16 06:54 PM
8

It's a hard call to make No, it's not. It's very clear that these girls conspired to make all of this stuff up. The only danger he poses is "being a player" and hurting the feelings of disgusting teenage girls who made up serious accusations that have now landed an innocent person in prison.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 02:33 PM
4

Regardless, the fact that people applaud at somebody passing a lie detector or failing one for that matter, is the real issue. There is zero evidence that they are effective or that they can measure whether somebody is telling the truth. You are just as likely to fail it while telling the truth than you are to fail it while lying and vice versa. They are a garbage test, with no accuracy, and I don't know why anybody would ever take one other than the novelty of being able to say they took one as…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/16 03:13 PM
3

Nobody is mad at Ghostbusters because they're women. They don't like this new Ghostbusters because it looks awful. Every clip I've seen looks really, really bad. Do you know what movie I loved? The Heat. It starred Melissa McCarthy and Sandra Bullock. I thought it was hilarious and I laughed my ass off. I laughed because it was FUNNY. If it's funny, or a good move, people will like it. It has nothing to do with them being women and everything to do with it looking like it's going to suck.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:26 PM
13

The women interviewed starts talking about how this guy doesn't understand women's emotional needs and shit. She doesn't realize that her emotional needs are meaningless to the guys who go to that gym. Her needs are not everyone else's problem. If she has emotional needs where she can't go to a gym with men then she can work out at home. The world doesn't owe her an understanding of her emotional needs, and frankly we don't care about them as they pertain to her using a gym.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:25 PM
10

Maybe. He once punched out an alien, so...
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/16 04:49 PM
164

Haha. Well, I mean if Jamie Foxx said it, then it MUST be true, right? This woman is an idiot if she thinks she can just cite Jamie Foxx and think he's a credible source for anything like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/16 02:41 PM
2

But 50/50 of what, exactly?
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:33 PM
32

I don't understand why DV is cause for more assets to be awarded. Depp has been married to this woman for a little over a year, so WTF does she think she's entitled to, exactly? She's really not entitled to anything. Certainly not any significant amount of the fortune Depp has worked hard to create over the past 30 years. She did absolutely NOTHING to help him earn it. She wasn't there. Maybe reimburse her for whatever fucking amount she paid to go see his movies throughout her life? That sounds…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:32 PM
11

Why would this shock anyone? Hillary believes she too should live by a separate set of rules.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:36 PM
3

She is a sick person. A truly sick person.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:44 PM
4

I just use whichever is empty because it's just a bathroom. Nobody has gendered bathrooms in their house. Same thing.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:42 PM
5

That's possible, too.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 07:10 PM
–

This entire thing was about bullying. She was only interested in bullying him. She immediately switched to "where is Egypt?" because she thought it would be more fun to make fun of him about what she thought was his lack of geography knowledge. She wanted to bully him and she lost. And her idiot friend with the flat top was there to watch the show.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 03:46 PM
1

Exactly. We don't get to change the rules when we don't like the outcome. We have a standard and if we don't meet that standard then that's the price we pay for allowing people what is supposed to be the right to be presumed innocent until PROVEN guilty. That's how it works.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:05 PM
3

Yeah, I'd like to see what they mean by coerce. Was he implying he would hurt her? Or, did he convince her without any implied threat? I mean, she's the adult here.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 08:36 PM
1

So already you are partly wrong, Kesha did gain from this and Sony released partially. Go back and read what I wrote. I've already gone over this point ad nauseam. I've already said that Sony and Dr. Luke's label have agreed to allow Kesha to record an album without Dr. Luke. This is the crux of why she won't win her case. Yes, Sony caved in this regard, but it doesn't let her out of her record contract. If she produces a record it will be under the Sony parent label and Dr. Luke's label which K…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:58 PM
1

I understand you have an opinion Yes, this is my opinion. I've heard of all of those artists (and I have music from all of them) and I understand what a preliminary injunction is. It's not good for Kesha that she lost, preliminary or not. So, I'll make this very clear. This is my opinion on the matter. Yes, I understand those artists are behind Kesha right now. However, if she loses (and I think that she will) then I think Sony and the label Dr. Luke runs will go on with business as usual. I don…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:16 PM
1

Sony might have to cave. With all the major artists who may not work with DR Luke again, it's up in the air. Well, the thing is, Kesha doesn't have to work with Dr. Luke. Nobody does. Sony doesn't have to let her out of the contract for her to avoid working with him. It's why I don't think she'll win and why I don't think Sony will cave. Sony has already told Kesha she doesn't have to work with Dr. Luke. She can make a record with no input from him. They've told Kesha this and she came back with…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 06:18 PM
2

Oh, I understand the consequences of both. I was commenting on the precedent it would set in the music industry if she were to win based on her reasoning. It would set a precedent for artists to get out of bad contracts for really flimsy reasons. At this point she's not asking to get out of her contract because she has to work with someone who she alleges assaulted her, she is asking to get because she doesn't like her contract and doesn't think she'll be successful under it. The music industry …
/r/MensRights24/02/16 06:04 PM
1

I haven't been following it that closely, to be honest. I didn't realize it was a preliminary hearing. But it WOULD be monumental for her to win this. It would set a precedent.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 05:40 PM
1

She isn't going to win. They ruled against her this past week. Sony and Dr. Luke's label provided affidavits that they said she can make her record without any input from Dr. Luke. So, she can either make a record under her current contract or she doesn't make a record. She signed the contract, and while it may have sucked, welcome to the music industry!
/r/MensRights24/02/16 04:19 PM
1

" It won't be promoted as well, so she won't make any money, and her career will be dead." To me this is Kesha saying, "I'm not really that good and my work doesn't stand on its own."
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:48 PM
3

The court ruled against her this week. She's more concerned with getting out of her record contract more than anything. Sony (the parent label) and Dr. Luke's label (that Kesha is signed to) provided affidavits that showed they already told her that she can record a new album and Dr. Luke would not be involved in any way. Her excuses as to why she still can't record the album are the flimsiest excuses I've heard in a long time. The include: Pop stars have a very short self life, I need to record…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:13 PM
3

I read some details about her case yesterday. Both Sony and Dr. Luke's label have said that she can create music and release it without the input or help from Dr. Luke. I mean, isn't that what she wanted? She didn't want to have to work with somebody who she alleges assaulted her? Based on her excuses, it seems like she wants out of her record contract more than anything else. Her excuses as to why she can't record an album on his label are the flimsiest of flimsy excuses. At this point, there i…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:06 PM
3

The guy might have had a girlfriend. He might actually be gay. Maybe he was just unattracted to her. Or not like being touched by a stranger. The answer is that your co-worker is a creep who has a problem sexually assaulting people and probably needs serious help.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:34 PM
24

"I'm sorry you're so offended by the use of the world" said in the most condescending way. Yeah, Imagine if a man said that to her. This woman is an asshole.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:14 PM
3

Those media outlets don't care that it wasn't true. True, false, built on lies, they don't care. They'll just tell you that somewhere, some woman is being raped so it doesn't matter. It's all valid.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 01:49 AM
–

After the acquittal is when you file a restraining order against this woman and bring a civil suit for emotional distress.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:51 PM
-3

Well, instead of calling for the heads of more women over every mistake to even things out, why not start treating men better and giving them the benefit of the doubt that women seem to get? That seems like a better way to "even things out." Instead of going one way, let's go the other.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:47 PM
-3

What if consequences for assholes could teach other would-be assholes not to be assholes? Sure, that would be great. But I don't think that's realistic. Yes, it might deter some people from being assholes but we'll always have assholes. That's not going to change. But even if it did stop a few people from being assholes, was it worth ruining someones life over? I really don't think so. If this situation were flip-flopped and this was a man behaving in this You're right in the backlash against hi…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:40 PM
–

If you simply Google "girl fights Uber driver" it pulls up plenty of articles on this woman now. The same will happen if you search her name. Her professional career is all but over now. The video has gone viral. She'll probably lose her residency. She'll need about a billion horse shoes worth of luck to get another one, too. She should have definitely faced consequences but this was a little harsh, wouldn't you say? The woman was a grade A asshole, but that doesn't mean her life should be ruine…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:18 PM
7

Do you think we need to teach women to not rape?
/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:44 PM
2

I have no idea what you were trying to say in your comment then.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 06:00 PM
3

Is this some sort of copypasta?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:53 PM
0

Sure, there are exceptions to the rule. There's no disputing that.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:40 PM
6

While that may be true, do you know what works even better? Just take a look at Modern Family on ABC. That show has won award after award. Everybody on the show is an idiot. It's one of the reasons I really like the show. Nobody is exempt. It makes it even more funny than the cliche that men are fat and stupid and women are beautiful and smart.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 04:41 PM
–

Does anybody else think this was a terrible move? Over 30 women accuse you of raping them and you come out and say 7 of them are liars? You either say all of them are liars or you don't say anything all. Proving that 7 of them are liars will do nothing and only implies that he did rape the others.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:04 PM
–

Well, for decades now we've seen a stark difference between how women and men are portrayed on TV. Only recently have we started to see women portrayed as anything other than perfect. It was always the same dichotomy. Women in commercials and sitcoms were always beautiful. They were smart. They were capable. The men? Fat. Stupid. Completely useless. They were the ones who always screwed up. I would always wonder, "why is this beautiful and perfect woman with this ulgy, balding, fat, bumbling idi…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:06 PM
–

I don't understand the problem. The mother signed away her parental rights and the father wants to raise the child? Again, what's the problem here?
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:52 PM
1

every person with a brain said "Told you so !" This isn't the "I told you so" moment people think it is, though. She missed a step coming off the fire truck. That kind of accident can happen to anybody, including those who passed the test with flying colors. I agree with everyone, that all candidates should be required to pass these tests no matter their gender or race, but missing a step when coming off a fire truck isn't proof that this woman is unfit to be a fire fighter. The fact that she di…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:17 PM
2

Anybody can have an accident coming off of a firetruck. Look, I'm all for making sure these candidates actually do pass these tests, but her inability to do so did not contribute to this accident. This was an accident that could happen to anybody, including those who passed the tests with flying colors. This is not the "I told you so" moment people have been looking for. I'm a 35 year old who is in good shape (and could run the 1.5 miles in under 12 minutes) and I've missed steps and fallen down…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:13 PM
5

Even the most fanatic CFB fans who dislike FSU aren't buying what Winston's accuser is selling anymore. I can't believe they're running with this. Actually, I can.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:36 PM
1

There also seems to be this sense of pride in being ignorant in America as well. It's not everyone or entire generations, but I see it often enough to notice it. Now there is nothing wrong with being ignorant of something. I don't know everything. It's the pride people seem to take in it.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 01:58 AM
8

We live in an age where everybody thinks because they have an opinion that it means that opinion should automatically be given the same weight as all others. The reality is that opinions can be, and often are, wrong or stupid. A wrong or stupid opinion should be subject to criticism and/or ridicule depending on how stupid or wrong it is. The sooner people understand this, the better.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 08:29 PM
2

"You don't have the right to take our photos" Are there really still people who are so fucking stupid (or ignorant) that they don't know how this works by now? How do people not know that being in public means you can have your picture taken or you can be filmed? EDIT - I had to stop watching this because of the insane amount of second hand embarrassment. A woman gets in his face and tells him he needs to back up because she is in her personal space.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:40 PM
1

That depends. In my brother's case she is going to get the house, which is worth many times what they had in savings.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:34 PM
2

She's going to get the house, which is worth far, far more than the savings account.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:27 AM
1

He's not. He a good person with a cheating and abusive wife.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:24 AM
7

I don't have any sympathy for the woman who cheated on my brother (with a mutual friend) and demanded he leave their house. I also wouldn't have any sympathy for the guy had the roles been reversed.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:38 PM
8

My brother's wife left him back around February/March, less than a year into their marriage. She had cheated on him and demanded he leave their house. He did leave, but he cleaned out their fairly large saving account before he did. She was the breadwinner in the relationship.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:33 PM
24

It's the same with the tired dudes who think it's cool to threaten anybody who dates their sister. I have a sister and I never even considered this. My sister is intelligent and can figure out which guys are dipshits and which are worth it. It's how she married an awesome guy this past June.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:02 PM
21

They aren't being arrested for having sex, they are being arrested for distributing child pornography. The girl isn't distributing the sex tape. So naturally she isn't going to be arrested. Come on, guys. This one isn't discrimination. This is a case of teenagers distributing pornographic images of an underage girl, which is against the law. If the girl was also distributing the tape and wasn't going to be in any trouble then I would agree.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:26 PM
1

For people who are confused about this. There are privileges that come along with being both male and female. Welcome to reality, folks!
/r/MensRights08/10/15 03:50 PM
7

That is why love messages like those in this case mean next to nothing to the case without other evidence. No, it means EVERYTHING to this case. We're talking about somebody going to prison for a long time and the very notion that how the person accusing this person of these crimes acts after the alleged crime is irrelevant is downright scary. It's very relevant.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:31 PM
10

I downvoted you because this is the same ridiculous excuse I've heard before. If a woman acts like you'd expect her to act, it's evidence she was raped. If she acts like she is in love with the guy, then it can also be evidence that she was raped. It's this idea that any way a woman acts can be used as evidence that she was raped that is the problem. In this particular case I think it's 100% clear what happened, too.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:07 PM
–

And a downvote for you, good sir.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:00 PM
10

Agreed in this instance. He's 17, which is the age of consent in most places.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:10 PM
2

The court doesn't see her as a predator. They really don't see her as much of a criminal at all.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 03:22 PM
12

I've seen this before, but it still makes me sad to watch.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 07:40 PM
3

The sex offenders registry becomes useless when it's littered with people who aren't actual sex offenders. If we keep this up there will come a day when nobody cares about it anymore because it won't be a reliable tool to determine if you're living close to somebody who might be a threat. When everyone is a sex offender, nobody is.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:46 PM
1

I'm not saying that you personally say any of those things. I'm saying I've read feminist propaganda that says both acting reasonably and unreasonably both point to rape.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 03:19 PM
-1

That's what I said. If she acts logical, it points to rape. If she acts illogical, still points to rape.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:45 PM
0

My point is that I've seen this before. I saw it recently in an article where feminists claimed that both are indications that a woman has been raped. It's an indication if she acts exactly like you would expect, in that she's outraged, afraid of her attacker, etc. I've also seen them say, in the same article, that if a woman acts like there was no rape, contacts the attackers, tries to meet up with him, is friendly with him, that it's also a sign that she was raped. Basically, any way a woman a…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:44 PM
–

but actual rape victims tend not to act very logically, so that's a plausible story. No, it's not. It's the exact kind of logic that is being used to convict men of rape at every turn. If a woman acts like she is raped after she is raped, it's rape. If a woman acts like it wasn't rape after she was raped, well women who are raped act strange after being raped, obviously. So, it's also rape. Basically, it's always rape.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 02:40 AM
5

Man, how unlucky can you be? This woman just keep getting fired for being a woman.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:24 PM
17

The fact that the law provides no way to remove responsibility in a situation like this is NOT the woman's fault And again, the fact that she can't have children is not his fault. You're simply wrong here. This woman is trying to force this guy to father a child he does not want. This isn't a case of him getting her pregnant and deciding he doesn't want a child. This is totally, and absolutely 100% avoidable. He isn't consenting to this, and a matter of fact, he went into it with the express con…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:16 PM
9

What do you expect when women typically don't face consequences in domestic violence cases when it's them abusing a man? They start to feel invincible.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:15 PM
11

You know what? I sympathize with poor guys with no social skills, bad complexion, and terrible fashion sense, too. That doesn't mean we should be forcing women to sleep with them. This would be a gross violation of the the rights of the man.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:12 PM
13

Family courts consider child support an entitlement of the child, not of the custodial parent Yet, guess who really benefits from exorbitant child support, which is what would likely be the case given that he's a wealthy executive? The mother. She'll get to live a life of luxury for the next 18 years under the guise of "child support." It's really "ex-wife support."
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:11 PM
15

Just make him not financially responsible for them. End of story. First of all, good luck with that. That's not how the law works. Their divorce was bitter due to financial reasons. This guy is a wealthy executive (see: millionaire) and this just reaks of her wanting a child to extort her ex-husband for a shitload of child support for 18 years. But if she can no longer have children otherwise That's not his problem. Why should he be forced to be the solution?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:09 PM
31

Is this woman on drugs? Your fundamental right to reproduce stops when it infringes on the fundamental rights over another. This guy has the fundamental right to chose whether or not he reproduces. This woman is a huge asshole. He's saying he does not want to reproduce with her, and the terms were clearly laid out when they froze the embryos. To be perfectly honest, it sounds like this woman wants a child to reap the benefits of 18 years of child support. Tell her it's a deal, she can reproduce …
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:05 PM
22

Damn, negative comment karma? That's...um...actually impressive.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:33 PM
3

Its also hard to miss the part where he angled in to the bar by pushing her body hard with his forearm and elbow. Essentially he completely ignored her personal space. And not in some SWJ figurative way, he made hard contact with her body and did not care that she was there. So basically it's like every crowded bar in the country. I've done this and had this done to me about a hundred times in 2014 alone. I never turned around once and mouthed off to somebody that was trying to get to the bar li…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:37 PM
22

I have two young cousins under the age of ten, both girls. I saw them this past weekend and the entire time it was like the "I hate guys" hour where they were telling anybody that would listen that boys needed to be controlled and trying to boss every guy around. I grew up with their parents (they're my cousins, too) and I've never seen them say or do anything that would lead me to believe they are teaching them this and their father's certainly wouldn't teach them this, either. I have no idea w…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:58 PM
3

I'm curious, why did you redact the usernames? I can just look at your post history to find out the usernames that you redacted. Just an observation, that's all.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:52 PM
1

What I'm suggesting is that ESPN is garbage. Actually, I'm not suggesting it. I'm saying ESPN is fucking garbage television. If you watch a garbage network don't be surprised if all you get is garbage. ESPN is no more fair than Fox News and we all know how terrible they are. They're the standard to which we can compare a horrible piece of shit network like ESPN. If you watch ESPN you're only going to walk away with a little less humanity than when you started.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:03 PM
3

Nope. It's real.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:18 PM
3

They should start with firing Ellen Pao.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:52 PM
-2

You were watching ESPN. You only have yourself to blame. You don't watch Fox News, do you?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 02:22 AM
7

It's insulting. I'm not a woman, but if I was, I certainly would be insulted by this implication.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:55 PM
21

Yes it is. But it's actually what people are saying when they say that women can't consent when they are intoxicated but men can.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:02 PM
28

You're right, this is exactly what it's saying. They don't even realize they are saying women are weak and incapable of making decisions, while men are definitely capable of making decisions, even when they drink. This article is literally saying men should be in charge of the decisions because women are not capable. They don't even realize how stupid they sound.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:37 PM
21

Why can't we just call a spade a spade? Women are weak. They can't make decisions, because they aren't capable. Men should be the ones in charge. That's what this really is.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:35 PM
4

Could you imagine if somebody at the university posted a FB or Twitter message about killing her? She would lose her goddamn mind.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:51 PM
1

Yeah, I didn't think he was one to pander to groups, either. If this is true about him then it seems I was wrong and he is not better than any other politician in this regard, which means that I really no reason to believe he's any more honest than the next guy.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 07:34 PM
1

It doesn't mean I don't like Bernie Sanders, though. If that's what he's saying it means he's pandering to those those people for political reasons. I still think he's a good candidate.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:59 PM
5

The amount of bitterness I would likely have would not be measurable by current standards.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:05 PM
12

Then Bernie Sanders is pandering to feminists and women in general. The wage gap is a myth and has been debunked a gazillion times.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:04 PM
8

She's a racist.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:17 PM
2

Do you know who writes these articles about dadbod? Women do. I never heard of it until I saw articles about it posed on Facebook, by women, written by women.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:48 AM
15

Love couldn't conquer all, but paying a lot of money for a bit fancy wedding could!
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:05 PM
–

So basically it went like this. She concealed that she won to keep the money. The husband found out later. That didn't work. She won the group lottery and then lied saying she didn't win, that she pulled out right before they won, but they gifted her the money anyway. That also didn't work. She said her husband abused her physically and emotionally. That also did not work. What excuse is next? The sun was in her eyes? Her shoe was untied?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 05:06 PM
1

Every time you wear this shirt and purposely antagonize these people you're doing nothing but validating their views that you're a shithead. It's one thing to wear the shirt, and another to antagonize them while you're wearing it.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:15 PM
4

What was the reaction of the women who were asked?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:38 PM
6

This idea that instead of improving we should simply move the finish line is absurd. It's just a ridiculous ideal that instead of becoming better we lower the bar. Are we going to ask enemies in combat to take it easy on women?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:21 PM
–

How delusional is Sarah Silverman? Silverman ended her statement by saying that people who might see an advocate having lied about a movement as a reason to question that movement’s message Yeah, Sarah, that's exactly what normal people do when the spokesperson for a movement admits to making up stories to further said movement. We start to question it. Sarah Silverman is a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:38 PM
2

Interesting. I hadn't seen that apology. Thanks!
/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:51 PM
29

I've said this before, but there is zero chance this woman is fired or anybody from RS including the author offers an apology directly to the fraternity. If they fire her it will be an admission of guilt. If they apologize it'll be the same. It doesn't matter if you think this is already a slam dunk case for the fraternity, any legal council worth their salt has advised RS to neither offer any apology to the fraternity and to keep the author on staff for now. It's why none have happened yet. You…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:52 PM
13

What could Matt have gained from the vid? Nothing? Are they friends? Have you ever done something for a friend because they asked you to and not because you got something out of it? That's how friendship works.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:55 PM
1

I said the same thing last week on why there would be no apology. Everyone argues that it already is. No, it isn't. She can't apologize. Any lawyer would tell her that.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:40 PM
10

did the other 10K people lose 200+lbs of weight and enter this race? No, but they worked hard and trained for a 10K, too. Why is just finishing this race, with help, something that deserves a key to a city? You SHOULD be able to walk 6.5 miles. I'm serious. Look, I lost 85lbs myself. I get it. I really do. However, getting in shape isn't something that I should be rewarded for. The original thread was about the WAW culture. This was an example of a woman being praised for doing something terribl…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:33 PM
8

I've never understood this mentality. I grew up playing sports. I wasn't the best but I loved to compete. I never wanted a participation trophy, although they were rare when I was young. I only wanted a trophy I earned. A participation trophy didn't mean anything, even to a young version of me. It was hollow. If I could barely finish a 10K and needed help to finish it and they tried to give me an award I can guarantee you that I'd turn it down and laugh at the very thought that I was deserving o…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 05:49 PM
–

Just look at this story from last week. http://fox2now.com/2015/03/23/louisville-police-officer-helps-inspirational-woman-finish-10k/ First, as somebody who used to be obese and is now in shape I get it. I think it's great that this woman is exercising and trying to get healthy. However, 10,000 runners ran this 10K and this woman needed help from police officers to finish. My local Fox news affiliate reported it two days in a row. They even gave this woman the key to the city. When I saw that sh…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:51 PM
2

I've been dating someone since last November. I already know that she wouldn't give a shit about an expensive ring, or really any ring at all.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:16 PM
10

Imagine if somebody was arrested for a crime, like murder, and we later found out it was a complete lie. And then imagine if we said, "well it doesn't matter if it's true because people are murdered every day and it needs to stop!" Do you know what this is called? It's a called a witch hunt. This "Jackie" story is nothing more than a modern day witch hunt were instead of burning people at the stake we just burn their reputations to the ground instead with no evidence of them being witches.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:50 PM
6

The thing is, if Rolling Stone wants to consider themselves journalists then they SHOULD fire people over this. The article lacked all journalistic integrity and was nothing more than a TMZ or worse, more like a National Inquirer article. It did not fact check anything and simply ran with a highly polarizing and sensational STORY because they knew that it would generate clicks. It's a shoot first and ask questions later approach. That's not journalism. The court of public opinion is and always w…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:44 PM
1

Well, there was no evidence and her friends that were there disputed her story. So, no only could they not corroborate her story after talking to her friends that were there, they also couldn't find a single shred of evidence that any of the story was true. There is also evidence from the fraternity that they had no party that night. There was no reason to say, "hey, it didn't happen, but we're not saying it didn't happen" other than to appease people when there is no need to do so. It feels lik…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:34 PM
6

I think they would have been fine just saying, "there's no evidence that anything happened and it will be treated as such." I really saw no need for them to have the disclaimer they had. It just seems like by saying what they did they were saying, "hey, we're not saying nothing happened" to appease people when you shouldn't have to worry about appeasing them considering there is no evidence and this woman's friends have disputed the story.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:30 PM
17

who made clear that the department’s failure to corroborate the allegations in the Rolling Story doesn’t mean that nothing traumatic happened to Jackie that night. This is a great example of of how afraid people are to even say nothing happened. They had to say that something"might" have happened or else they would have been labeled a "rape apologist."
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:39 PM
7

If she really is not a stable person that's all the more reason you need to have a restraining order placed against her.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:04 PM
-13

Well, women are 100% more likely to have me wanting to have intercourse with them than men are, so I guess they can just hang their hats on winning that one.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 05:19 PM
-15

It doesn't matter if you shame them or not, it's an antiquated and backwards way of thinking regardless.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 02:11 PM
2

Of course it helps protect the rights of the accused! They have fucking rights! You don't just lose your rights because somebody accuses you of something. We live in a civilized society!
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:20 AM
3

I'm a guy and I don't hold any political, economical, or institutional power, either. So, I guess I can't be sexist! This is great news! BTW, all women are weak and less intelligent than men. Not sexist!
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:20 PM
3

Women aren't mentally weaker. I agree. But we treat them like they are. So why not just admit that's how we treat them instead of saying they are equal but treating them like they need protected? Every time we say women can't consent when they drink but men can we are insulting women and saying they are less capable or weaker.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 02:01 AM
8

Physically weaker, I guess we could say that I don't want to stop there. If we can't start treating offenders the same no matter what gender, then let's just say out loud how we already treat women. Let's say they are weak and can't make decisions when they drink. That they can't make decisions about who to have sex with because they are weak and easily manipulated, That they can't fend off men physically because they are weak. Let's at least admit and say out loud how we treat women if we're go…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 08:35 PM
21

One of two things needs to happen. Either we need to treat all of these incidents as equal between men and women and treat these offenders exactly the same or we need to come out say that women are just weaker than men, they are victims more often because they are weaker, and that the justice system goes easy on them because they are just weaker. I've just had it with the double standard. While I don't personally believe that women are weaker, if we are going to continually insult them by treati…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:13 PM
9

One of my best friends got married last year. He owns a home and his wife moved in with him. His house was already decorated very nicely. She's added her touches, but he had zero trouble decorating his house by himself.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:04 PM
28

It doesn't help that for decades sitcoms on TV were that of a fat, stupid, slob of a man who was married to a beautiful, thin, and incredibly smart woman. The man couldn't do anything right and was always the buffoon. I always wondered, "why the fuck did this woman marry this guy? What an idiot she is." I guess it's because in that universe, every guy is a fat, idiot, slob I guess. Things are starting to turn when it comes to TV sitcoms, though. I thought the picture from Modern Family at the to…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:00 PM
2

The problem with all of this is that to many it doesn't even matter if the UVA story is true or not. You'll have countless people who will simply say, "well, it could have been true" so to them it might as well have been true. It'll be justification for many.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:48 PM
5

New guidance will be issued to all police forces and prosecutors as part of a 'toolkit' to move rape investigations into the 21st century I think they mean the 18th century.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:57 PM
4

we shouldn't declare she is guilty of a false accusation You still don't understand. Unless she can prove her claim to be true then it should be considered false by default. That's how this works.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 06:19 PM
9

You give way too much credit to the courts.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:28 AM
13

I don't see why. How many times have we read stories where a guy was completely duped into believing a kid was his by a woman who knew who full well it wasn't, and when the court was presented with proof that it wasn't the guy's kid he was still required by law to pay child support?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 07:40 PM
28

who wants to bet that the courts will rule that this guy still has to pay her child support payments?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 07:15 PM
3

First, I'm sorry this happened. Secondly, it's not your fault. You have no reason to feel feel humiliated. It doesn't matter how big you are, how physically strong you are, or how emotionally in control you are, if somebody drugs you without you knowing none of that is going to make a difference. Even if you do know they drugged you it's not going to make a difference. It wasn't your fault.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:18 PM
4

I think they just honestly think that 100% of the time the men are guilty. I agree to a degree. I think that they believe being guilty of being a male is enough to send somebody to prison. If they aren't guilty now, they might be in the future. If they aren't guilty in the future, they COULD potentially rape somebody, so why not just take care of it now?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:42 PM
3

they approve of innocent men being charged and convicted They don't see anybody as being innocent, though. That's the problem. For the people who agree with the way these campuses are dealing with these claims it doesn't matter if the guy did it or not, he's a guy so he might do in the future making him guilty anyway, so locking him up is still the preferred outcome.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:40 PM
3

Rape is like a flow chart to these people. Were you raped? -> Yes -> guilty of rape Were you raped -> No -> guilty of rape
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:37 PM
7

Protect her? Well how does she know that I'm not the one she needs protecting from? I'm a man, after all.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:40 PM
3

I'm OK. I get out of work in 20 minutes. After that I'm going to run three miles at the gym and then I'm meeting some friends for the best wings in town and some cold beers!
/r/MensRights19/11/14 08:41 PM
20

I'm about to lose my goddamn mind. How the fuck can a six year old understand sexual harassment? We've lost our fucking minds everybody. As a society we've completely collapsed into a bunch of fucking idiots who have no common sense. I hate humanity so bad.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 02:26 PM
1

Some bars I go to have restrooms that lock from the inside. They are just single toilet bathrooms. I usually don't care which one is the men's room, so whichever is open I just use. I mean, it's just a fucking bathroom.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:08 PM
1

I recommend you seek professional help. It's the same advice I'd give to a man who did the exact same thing. Your BF is in an abusive relationship. Although I think it takes courage to come here and admit this, I would not have been nearly as forgiving. And by "nearly" I mean I wouldn't have been forgiving at all. I personally would have called the police. Now, if you and your BF want to try to work through this, that's between the two of you, however you aren't going to get anywhere unless you …
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:51 PM
17

You probably aren't going to like what I'm about to say and this wasn't addressed in the article, but it's a truth I think needs to be said regarding fraternities and why guys pre-game before the parties. I went to Penn State. That's a big school. My best friend was in a fraternity there. I've been to fraternity parties. If you're a guy at a frat party, good luck getting any alcohol. I've stood in front of the bar at a frat party where the guy giving out beer just stares at you. If a girl walks …
/r/MensRights25/09/14 06:14 PM
3

Apples and oranges.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:42 PM
1

Makes sense.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:34 PM
4

The government can't shut down 4Chan for expressing their thoughts. How dumb are people?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:00 PM
2

I don't think this news is new, I think we've all known that a guy is creepy if he's unattractive. They are synonyms at this point.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 09:38 PM
2

It's impossible for me to know, thus ignorance is bliss.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:49 PM
2

I don't think it would be an acceptable tradition, no. Of course not.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:34 PM
3

We will stop Dong Watch once there’s a female president, zero wage gap, Well, there actually is no wage gap.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:33 PM
0

If people want to stop circumcising their children, go right ahead. However, I don't personally feel mutilated or anything. I have no memory of it and I don't care that my parents had it done to me.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:21 PM
–

This is one MR cause I really don't care about. I don't remember it and I enjoy sex plenty. In this case, ignorance really is bliss.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 06:25 PM
1

No girl I have ever dated has done that. That you know of. It's very possible your exes have done this and you simply don't know.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:07 PM
2

I took pictures of me and a girlfriend in the act, and the bitch shared them with her friends. WTF is definitely right! I would be furious and the relationship would be over if someone I was seeing did that to me. That is an incredible violation of privacy.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:29 PM
4

Yeah, I get that if you hooked up with someone random on the weekend you might share the details with your friends. But I can't fathom how a woman shares the details of her sex life with her boyfriend. Now I'm uncomfortable every time I see one of these women because I know they have intimate details about me I didn't want them knowing.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:16 PM
18

I will guarantee you this. If you send your GF a naked picture of you, or just your dick, she will show her girlfriends. Women share EVERY detail of their relationship with their friends. Although I never sent naked pictures to the last woman I was seeing, I made the mistake of dating someone within our social circle. Nothing was sacred. She would admit to me which mutual friends of ours immediately asked her questions about me when we started seeing each other (what I look like naked, etc) and …
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:33 PM
28

Whoopi gets it right. "Nobody should hit anybody." I honestly cringe every time I hear the Ray Rice incident talked about on sports radio. They always make it a point to say that you shouldn't hit a woman. Why can't they say, "you shouldn't hit another person?"
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:26 PM
10

I think what OP meant was that she should ask for charges to be pressed against her. Have you ever heard police ask someone if they'd like to press charges?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:30 PM
5

This woman should have her children taken away from her. She's an unfit parent. She leaves her two young children to stand there and watch her attack a man? These people that think this man was an aggressor cannot be serious.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:50 PM
18

I'll say this again, in this thread: The writer reminds us that "all men are capable of rape—even the awkward and sensitive ones." I would like to remind everyone that all women are capable of murder - even the awkward and sensitive ones.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:10 PM
3

I agree with what you said, but he didn't go through literal hell, he went through figurative hell.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:46 PM
1

all men are capable of rape All women are capable of murder. Should I walk down the street in fear, every day, that a woman is going to murder me? How insulted would your average woman be if I told them that every time I'm around them I'm a little bit uneasy because it's possible they could murder me? They'd probably think I was an asshole if I walked around all day afraid of every woman.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:42 PM
1

So instead of a 1% conviction rate you move to a 100% conviction rate no matter what. You know, makes total sense!
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:26 PM
1

If you really want to do something for your child, do NOT marry this woman because you think it's best for the kid, because it's not. It never is. Getting married because someone got pregnant is a bad idea. Kids learn how to be people by watching their parents. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being a dad to the kid without being married to his mother, this isn't 1955, it's 2014. We've long since moved past that and the only idiots still spouting that nonsense are conservatives and the bab…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:21 PM
1

Yes. She was his neighbor. The title of this thread is very misleading.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:29 PM
1

if we are going to punish these actions, the punishment needs to be applied equally. Part of me agrees but part of me doesn't. There's no use continuing to ruin people's lives (male or female) when life isn't black and white. The more we continue to have a zero tolerance policy in place the more people who will suffer from it. This woman doesn't sound like a predator to me. A 17 year old and 22 year old are, for the most part, contemporaries in life. Should she be disciplined? Absolutely. Should…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:13 PM
7

She's 22 and he's 17. And let's be honest, if you pee behind a dumpster you should NOT be considered a sex offender and I don't think this woman should, either. I understand people being upset over double standards and the like, but this time I think they got it right. Why ruin this woman's life because the law sucks a lot of the time? She isn't personally responsible for the laws and double standards being what they are.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:47 PM
3

To be honest, the kid was 17 years old. I remember at 17 I could make decisions on whether I wanted to sleep with somebody or not. Now, I know the kid wasn't an adult in the eyes of the law, but the world isn't black and white. This coach is 22 years old. 17 year olds and 22 year olds often times attend college together. These two are basically peers even though she was a coach and he is a student. I don't see why her life should be ruined over something that was consensual when in less than a y…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:45 PM
11

I read through his manifesto and he was not a normal, healthy person. He was so far off the deep end he could no longer see land.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:05 PM
9

There are medications for Asperger's? This is news to me.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:59 PM
3

It's a well understood rule that if you're around people crowd surfing at a music festival there is a good chance some of those people will end up being dropped. Stand clear if you want to avoid any chance of having a person dropped on you.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:27 PM
3

Your story is hard to follow. You keep saying you were up doing chores and things but also say you were asleep. It's also unclear which child of yours is wandering off. I have a few questions: Which child is wandering off? Are you asleep when this happens? Does your wife leave before your 8 year old goes to school? If so, is he responsible for leaving the house and getting the bus while you're asleep?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:27 PM
1

I agree. It's a strawman, but people love to use this tactic because it's easy. The host on the show was a grade A idiot.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:37 PM
2

it just means that individual recordings will be assessed with common sense before determining their legality. What a novel idea. You have to understand that common sense is a foreign term in the United States when it comes to schools at this point. School administrators don't want to make any decisions regarding anything anymore. It's why they have "zero tolerance" policies. It removes all the common sense and tried to make a world full of color black and white.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:30 PM
2

And we wonder why some kids just snap and take a gun or knife to school. These are kids and it's a reality that at times they feel like they have no recourse to stop the tormenting. They feel this way because, well, sometimes there is no way for them to make it stop. Now, I'm not trying to justify any kid going on a rampage in school with a gun or knife, but if we want to stop these things we need to look at the causes. The next time this kid is bullied, what is he going to think he can do about…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:25 PM
9

The host goes on to say she doesn't need law enforcement to inform her of consequences to her actions. Just stick your head in the sand and ignore reality. When you go forward and your reputation is dragged through the mud, instead of being prepared for it, you'll be taken by surprise! This woman really is an idiot. Look, if you're a woman and you've been raped, I encourage you to move forward with an investigation. However, you should also be aware of the road ahead of you. Do your due diligenc…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:16 PM
35

"We're in a victim blaming society. For centuries the onus has been on the victim to prove she has been raped." Yes, you are correct. If you accuse somebody of a crime it needs to be proven that they committed it. What in the world is she implying here? First, it's not victim blaming when the same standards of guilt are applied to rape as every other crime, and secondly, why would it be any different for rape? Are we supposed to assume guilt in rape cases? The host is an idiot.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:08 PM
9

This is beyond comical. "Ahh...umm...there are factors...umm...we promote...again...we're an open and transparent...administration...umm...what we're doing...umm is that we want to make sure women have...umm...equal pay...umm we have transparency." That's basically all he says when asked why the metric works in the real world to prove that there is a wage gap, but doesn't work when the same metric is applied to the White House. What a fucking dickhead.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:14 PM
15

What exactly does she call it when she can do something that would get you fired, but is considered OK because she's a woman?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:03 PM
36

Remember the Chapelle Show Rick James skit? Why would I rub my feet in his couch? Yea I rubbed my feet in his couch!
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:22 PM
2

Yeah. I mean, I don't make a ton of money, but I don't do terrible, either. However, if I based it on what I took home, and used the 3 month rule, fucking A the ring would be huge. Even if I used two months, the ring would be pretty outrageous.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:06 PM
17

Slightly snide tone?
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:05 PM
8

When did it become chivalrous to steadfastly look away and not bother to help? When you spend an entire article explaining how disgusted you are that men bother to talk to you on a flight, then bitch and moan that nobody is paying attention to your needs. Pick one. Either you want men to interact with you or you don't. Of course, what you really want is some loser to wait on you hand and foot, but to fuck off whenever you don't need any help. tl;dr - This woman wants guys to be her butler on the…
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:25 PM
16

It sounds like she more pissed off that she can't take her Louis Vuitton purse out and instead has to use her Marshall's knockoff that nobody can tell is any different.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:50 PM
11

"Where are our men? Why are they not protecting us?" Sanchez continued, her voice full of frustration. "Men are failing us. I feel as though we are not being protected." I'm so sorry that you you'll have to carry your Marshall's knockoff purse instead of your Louis Vuitton. I can't remember the last time somebody sounded so stuck up.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:47 PM
–

I actually came here to quote that. Everyone knew. All you have to do is look around. Take the Duke Lacrosse team for example. Whenever I read articles like this I always just end up shaking my head. This woman would have continued fighting the "good fight" and wouldn't have ever thought twice. The only reason she changed her mind is because the very things she has always fought for have come back to bite her in the ass. If it hadn't, she'd have never changed her mind.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 02:59 PM
-10

I am Russian. We have many woman in frontline combat in WWII. They perform very well. I don't have problem with women service. USSR was egalitarian society. Woman have equal right to join Soviet Armed Forces. Many did. Plenty volunteer. Today, many women join Armed Forces. When I read that you're Russian I started reading the rest of your post in a stereotypical Russian accent just like that, so I figured I'd translate it to how I picture you talking in my head.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 04:26 PM
1

No problem man.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 02:47 PM
1

This woman isn't crazy, she's just a terrible person who I had nothing in common with. Although after we broke up I hit the gym, lost 85lbs and she has been very jealous of it ever since.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 01:27 PM
1

Man, that feel of relief. I was with a friend in public at the time and I almost just broke down.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:02 AM
2

I'm glad she brought it up or I could have made a major mistake!
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:00 AM
11

Well, to start we were both drunk, she a lot more than me. Secondly, we were starting to fool around and she hit me with "I'm late" right as it started to escalate. We were also staying in her friends spare bedroom. When I asked how late, she said three weeks. I didn't have any protection with me and she wasn't on any kind of birth control. And yes, we had unprotected sex a number of times prior to this. And yes, I know it was incredibly stupid, there's no need to lecture me if you're reading th…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:15 PM
10

I had a girlfriend try to rape me once, too. It was about two years ago and after I told her no about a half dozen times she physically tried to get on top of me and I had to physically push her off of me. I don't even bother telling anybody about it. Not my friends or anything, because I know what their reaction would be. Since she can't physically overpower me they wouldn't care.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 05:50 PM
0

She's really attractive and she's fit.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:33 PM
1

Yeah, she loves me and our group of friends, however our group of friends is really dwindling. I'm 33 and she's 31, we're both single. Most of our friends over the years have moved on with their lives by either getting engaged/married/in an LTR or have moved away. The difference between her and I is that I've branched out and found a new social circle since our previous one isn't around anymore. She hasn't and won't really accept new people.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:41 PM
7

She's like a sister to me. She has flaws, like everybody else. I probably have far more flaws than she has. This just happens to be one of hers.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:24 PM
10

That's probably the best way to describe it. I love her like a sister, she's one of my best friends, but man are you right. It's a symptom of something else. She always finds things to simply dislike for no good reason. Just yesterday she told me she hates New Year's Eve. I asked why, and she said because of the crowds. Who the fuck hates NYE? We go to a NYE party every year with all of our friends at a friend's house. There are no crowds. Also, she hates Halloween, but for no reason. Like I sai…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:32 PM
21

Yeah, she needs somebody who is about 6'4'' or she won't be happy. To be honest, she's probably the most arbitrary person I know.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:59 PM
–

I have a friend who is 5'9'' and she wants a boyfriend badly. She's 31 years old and hasn't been taken on a date in probably 2 years or so. Can you guess what her number one deal breaker is? A guy shorter than her. The guy has to be taller than her when she's wearing six inch heels, too.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:29 PM
7

A friend of mine told me about Lulu and then she rated me. It was her idea, but I helped. My rating is all lies. If anybody who finds me on Lulu wants to sleep with my based on my Lulu rating of 9.8/10 I'll be more than happy to show them first hand why they shouldn't rely on that app for accurate ratings of guys.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 07:45 PM
4

A friend of mine rated me on Lulu. I helped her and i have like a 9.8 rating. it was her idea and it's all lies.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 07:42 PM
9

Both.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 02:34 PM
24

Who wants to bet that there is another "clerical error" in this guys future?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:51 PM
2

I would say my hair is the standard amount of awesome. It's no Barny Stinson level.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:22 PM
55

I was out at a bar last Saturday and these two women randomly told me I had "awesome hair." I notified the bar staff, the bouncers, and I called the police. When they arrived, I gave them a description of the two women and I had them file a report so that it's documented. I would have said something to the women, but I was afraid of what might have happened, I was outnumbered 2-1 in the situation. The last thing I want is to have somebody give me an innocuous compliment. I'm only kidding. I fuck…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 02:35 PM
1

I'll pass the buck on to the author of the article then.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 05:14 PM
13

Exactly. OP chose a purposely misleading title. Extranged != ex-wife.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:00 PM
0

What a misleading title. That's now what the article says. Not one bit. It advocates for equality in Florida alimony laws all around.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:59 PM
3

There's no such thing as a moral duty. Aside from that, it's two consenting adults that aren't related.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:13 PM
7

He's a pussy if he gets beat up by the girl, and a pussy if he defends himself.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 07:52 PM
1

Can I assume this does not apply to men?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:11 PM
1

Wait, what law, in the Unites States, says that women can't give consent when drunk?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:09 PM
3

For those looking for the answer to this questions, it's yes. It's OK to have sex with somebody who is drunk as long as they consent. This goes for men and women. I'm not even sure why people consider this a debatable topic.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:11 PM
1

I came here to say the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:25 PM
1

Yeah, I've heard both. One has some alliteration.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:17 PM
7

I'll take oppressive men for $600, Alex.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:15 PM
12

I'll taking "making a mountain out of an ant hill" for $1000, Alex.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:08 PM
37

This woman already has what she wants. You can already report people, but this woman wants to make an issue out of nothing. She wants them to create something that is already created, and since they won't do something they've already done, she thinks it's some sort of misogyny. This woman likes to manufacture oppression. The last thing she actually wants is equality, because then she would have nothing to get up in arms about.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 04:07 PM
2

I'm all of those things (accept I'm not rich, just middle class). I guess most people hate me.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:47 PM
128

Where in the world did you get this? Has to be satire.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:28 PM
29

I have a female friend who recently has bailed on our plans, sometimes without telling me, and just not showing up. These were plans that she initiated with me, and no showed on for one reason or another. I called her out and she told me I shouldn't take it personally. I asked her how else I should take it.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:43 PM
7

I'll tell you a story of a friend of mine from when we were in middle school. Hopefully this will unrustle your jimmies a bit. My friend got off the bus, and this girl he did not get along with kicked him in the nuts. So, he punched her in the face. Later that day her dad shows up at his house and knocks on his door. His mom answers, and this girl's dad starts going off on his mom about my friend. My friend's mom looks him in the eye, tells him she doesn't give a shit since she kicked him in the…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:15 PM
13

I don't get it, she has a history of this, and was convicted of manslaughter already. She clearly cannot be rehabilitated, and is going to kill somebody else given the chance. Why let her out of prison, she isn't remorseful in the least, as the article states? If she was capable of remorse, this wouldn't keep happening.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:47 PM
3

The woman would be a liar, and a shitty, rotten piece of garage, but a rapist she is not.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:27 PM
5

Fine. But, when I sleep with a woman, she must be on birth control pills. That is the only way I am consenting. If she lies, is not, and becomes pregnant, I did not consent, it is rape, and I am not responsible in any way, shape, or monetary form, for the child. As soon as this woman agrees to that, I'll agree to her terms.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:26 PM
13

Well, then I've been sexually assaulted no less than 6 times in my life.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:35 PM
13

It would depend on your definition of assaulted and harassed. Does a woman grabbing my ass mean I was assaulted or harassed? Does a woman physically, and forcefully trying to have have sex with me after I've said no constitute assaulted or harassed?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:54 PM
20

Depending on the definition of sexual assault, I've been sexually assaulted by a woman no less than 6 times in my life. I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:46 PM
2

Alternate headline: All sex is rape.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:03 PM
1

We can’t boil people down to numbers or statistics, or reject people based on the color of their skin. She says this, yet she rejects people for being white and male, and boils things right down to numbers and statistics, as she points out in her post many times. In the same paragraph she says: I’m happy to say that I approved nearly 90% of all female minority and 80% of all (white female applicants especially if the girls want to study math or science) while rejecting over 50% of white males th…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 12:35 PM
4

I was born in 1980, and growing up we were sent out in the neighborhood to play, unsupervised. My neighborhood was filled with kids and we all rode bikes, played sports, wandered through the woods, etc. We got hurt all the time. My parents called me Evil Knievel because I was always jumping shit on my bike, wrecking it, and coming home with all sorts of injuries, including knocking my first tooth out when I was five trying to jump a sewer on my bike. Things are different today. It seems like kid…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:20 PM
4

And furthermore, maybe SHE doesn't need a man, but the kid probably does.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:15 PM
0

I don't see how this is bad news for me, right now, as the article states. I won't be alive in 100 years, let alone 5 million. In other words, I don't care.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:35 PM
2

No means No. Yes also means no. If you have ever had sex, you're a rapist.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:59 PM
8

Oh, the old "I tried to ruin a person's life so my dad wouldn't be mad" scenario. Great.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:45 PM
8

I don't understand. Some guys want to lift weights and eat ribs, and there's a problem with that? If I missed something, please explain.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:38 PM
4

I can't wait until "Punch your girlfriend in the face until she makes sandwiches" is released for Android.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:25 PM
1

Homophobic because he said "cocksucker?" Come on, that's a huge stretch and you know it. This wasn't even the big "humiliation" the OP made it out to be.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:28 PM
1

I grew up in western PA and competed in the WPIAL myself. She didn't qualify for states, though. It's very impressive that she qualified for the WPIAL tournament, which is an extremely competitive league. I actually attend the PIAA state tournament every year in Hershey, Pa. Pennsylvania has the deepest talent in the country when it comes to wrestling, and the only state even close is Ohio. If I were a betting man, I'd say no female ever wins a state title in Pa, or even places, if they are comp…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:20 PM
2

When I was in high school my best friend's GF played varsity basketball and was one of the best girls on the team. I only played organized basketball for about 3-4 years, and didn't play past 6th grade. However, I had a hoop in my driveway and we were always, and I mean always, hooping at my house. I played his GF and I annihilated her. It wasn't even close. I wasn't even that much taller than her, either. She was about 5'5'' and I was 5'8''.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:57 PM
1

I remember hearing something along the lines of the USA women's hockey team getting trounced by a high school varsity team leading up to the last winter Olympics, and I think the US team won the silver.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:55 PM
1

I don't think of female athletes any less, just because they don't perform as highly as male athletes. I judge female athletes in the context of their sport. I don't compare them to their male counterparts. It's apples and oranges otherwise.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:47 PM
3

Female state champs on the mens team? Which state? I live in PA, and I wrestled, and I've seen girls try to wrestle guys, and guess what? It always ends the same way, with the girl getting hurt or pinned. I've seen girls taken out on stretchers at tournaments. It was always a lose-lose for the guy wrestling the girl. If you lose, you'll never hear the end of it. If you win, people make fun of you for beating up on a girl.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:39 PM
2

Let's look at the reality here. When we say men and women are equal, what we mean is that as human beings we should be afforded the same rights and opportunities in life, in general. However, we shouldn't mistake this with men and women being physically equal in general, because they are not. Men produce more testosterone and are, in general, bigger, faster, and stronger than women. That's not a criticism, it's a fact. In some species of animal, the female animals are by and large bigger and str…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:33 PM
6

OP's words: "don't ever talk to me like a fucking child again." Those were his exact words. The last time I checked, the word "fucking" is still a curse word. He spoke to a co-worker in an inappropriate manner. It makes no difference whether that person is a man or a woman. You can't talk to people like that at work if you expect to keep your job. What kind of weakling thinks that is cursing and runs and complains about it It has nothing to do with being weak, and everything to do with respect, …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:02 PM
–

You cursed at this woman and you were fired. Now, would I have fired you? No. But, I understand why you were fired and so should you. Just because other people do worse things where you work doesn't mean it's appropriate for you to say what you said to this woman, who sounds like a real pain the ass. Maybe she has gotten away with saying similar things to you, but you have to realize the reality of what happened. You can be fired for saying inappropriate things to co-workers, and what you said w…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:39 PM
4

Or those who have had to uproot their entire lives and move from the community they live in due to those lies.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:31 PM
8

Plenty of lives have been ruined by false accusations that never landed the falsely accused in jail. According to you though, "no harm-no foul", as long as nobody ends up in jail?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:22 PM
20

Growing up I had a friend who didn't tolerate girls kicking him in the nuts. I'll never forget one instance in-particular. I believe we were about 12 years old and an angry father showed up at my friends house shortly after school. He was furious. My friend's mother answered the door. The father, very angrily, explained how this woman's son had punched out his daughter after an altercation when they got off the school bus. My friend's mom looked at the angry father, explained that his daughter h…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:16 PM
16

This is from the linked article within that article: The Women’s Centre would, however, support a men’s centre on one condition, and I paraphrase: if the men used the centre to admit to their gender crimes. “Our support,” it stated on the website, “would be contingent on that centre’s mission statement, vision, and mandate. If the centre were about challenging popular conceptions about masculinity, confronting homophobia, sexism, racism, classism, and ability issues then we would definitely be t…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:11 PM
8

I work in an office where I am the only male. The woman are pretty awesome and none of them ever make any inappropriate comments about men, or really anything. Also, I keep to myself and never talk to anybody. I just wanted to show the other side of the coin.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:57 PM
2

You cannot reason with this person, or others like her. She only wants to have her views reinforced, and anything else is going to be met with "you just don't get it." She has already made up her mind in regards to this topic, and there isn't anything you can say to change her mind. This isn't just a feminist/men's rights issue. These type of people exist in every facet of life.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:35 PM
0

Whoopi said exactly what I've been saying for years. If you hit somebody, you have to expect to be hit back, no matter what gender you are. That's how the world works. Don't want punched? Don't punch somebody.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:29 PM
1

but since most men will never know the agony of wearing stiletto heels or trying to pry glitter nail polish off their toenails Who said any woman has to wear high heels or put glitter on their nails? They choose to do those things, it's not a requirement. Maybe a woman may never know the feeling of hiding a boner, but I'm not going to sit here and say I'm entitled to a healthy does of mysandry because of it.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:10 PM
3

Anne, the plaintiff in the Part 1 is a cocaine addict. It's also likely she's high in that video, because she has all the signs. EDIT - Source: Both of my brothers are cocaine addicts and have been for over a decade. I can spot an addict in seconds.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:44 PM
1

Every single time I see a woman when I'm out, I think to myself "she is either a harmless stranger, or a murderer." I don't know which she is, and it terrifies me. So, women, the next time you talk to a guy I want you to remember that maybe we don't want you to.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:55 PM
7

I remember when my last girlfriend told me she was 3 weeks late, then when I refused to sleep with her two minutes later, with no protection, she lost her fucking mind. She also tried to force me, physically, to have sex with her. Luckily, I'm about ten thousands times stronger than her.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:11 PM
10

I couldn't even read the entire thing, and not because the woman who wrote it is a feminist, it was because she is an asshole.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:59 PM
1

Yes.
/r/seduction27/07/12 12:08 PM
1

I'm the same way. I have no problem having a great time with women, making jokes, getting laughs, etc. It's the kino that is my weak point. I've always been afraid to come across as a creeper so I keep my hands to myself. Because of this I miss the kino aspect. This is a huge killer because I get to the point where kino is crucial, and because I fail to utilize it for fear of it being awkward or looking like a creeper, I don't do it and the balloon deflates. The next time I see the woman, things…
/r/seduction26/07/12 05:35 PM
1

"I'm interested in a lot of people. Sometimes I dance with those people, and sometimes I dance with people because it's fun. One, or both of those, applies here." Then, I'd move the subject to something else.
/r/seduction26/07/12 05:31 PM
2

I have a woman right now who is playing hard to get and has told me she wants me to chase her. I'm not chasing her and there has been a few weeks of contact standoff, but she finally caved and started contacting me. It's at the point where she's mine for the taking if I want. The problem is, I have lost all interest in her. There are things you can do generate interest, though. The lesson here is that if you want to play hard to get, you shouldn't play too hard to get.
/r/seduction26/07/12 05:28 PM
3

Thank goodness, I was worried that I'd never hear from you again! I'm only kidding. I've heard the David Cross bit about the word too many times I guess.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:12 PM
3

Ignorant and intolerant people are rampant in the world. It's probably six-to-one, half dozen to the other on whether it's a troll account. Either is equally as believable for me. Also, I don't think literally means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:06 PM
26

Dude. Shut up!
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:54 PM
–

The thing is, Karen is all of those things you don't want her to be called. Guys can be crazy and over emotional, too. Let's call a spade a spade here. Karen is off her fucking rocker.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:32 PM
29

I like your grandma. What I mean, is I think your grandma is wise. I don't like, like her or anything, dude.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:29 PM
1

I don't think this is true in the United States.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:21 PM
2

the man could accuse her of rape also but the university didn't say it that way. This is because your university likely does not consider it possible.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:20 PM
1

I realize that it's a fine line we walk when it comes to false accusers. I do wish there was at last a national, or state wide, false accuser registry. I mean an official one, like Megan's Law. I realize there is an unofficial one.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:26 PM
6

In this particular case, coming forward after the guy served 5 years deserves absolutely no leniency. Had she come forward before the guy was charged with a crime, or even before he was convicted, I could see some leniency. But now, after his life has been completely ruined and she collected 1.5 million? Nope. She deserves the same 10 year sentence he got, and she should serve AT LEAST 5 years of it. At least. And, she should have to pay back the 1.5 million, with interest. This woman is a compl…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 01:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter