TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hhtura Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Hhtura on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

She didn't say it was a man's fault you dumb motherfucker.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/19 10:52 PM
0

It's not to the same degree but it's the same shooting-self-in-foot tendency. The alt-right has some valid points but the base of people that are interested in it are so stupid they sprinkle on "also let's gas the jews lols" for no reason.
/r/PussyPass24/04/17 06:50 PM
1

There's literally a picture of a noose in the sidebar. This isn't effective politics. You're just going to get yourselves labeled terrorists. The antifa effect, let's call it.
/r/PussyPass24/04/17 06:09 PM
1

It's /r/anarcho_capitalism, to clarify.
/r/PussyPass24/04/17 06:09 PM
1

Some women are tougher than men This is not relevant to anything I said. "It's ok to hit men because they are tougher." This is not what I said. People like you. . .is exactly what's wrong with this society. This is rhetorical hyperbole.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/17 12:42 AM
2

A neutral observation of fact cannot be sexist, and outliers do not define the trend. You may also say it sexist to note men are taller than women, and cite the fact you know a particularly tall woman as though that were relevant. It's more acceptable to hit a man because men are more accustomed to and more apt for violent confrontation, and because people are naturally more protective of women than of men. I don't know what you're pushing here.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/17 11:40 PM
3

Violence in general is a thing to avoid. But violence against women is naturally more offensive to us because women are considered to be (and generally are) weaker or more vulnerable. Would you agree with that?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/17 11:18 PM
2

Where are you from that violence against women is not less acceptable than violence against men? I don't think I have heard of such a place, nor do I imagine such a custom is desirable.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/17 10:55 PM
1

Why are you implying that's equivalent?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/17 09:32 PM
1

So very much unlike rats, oddly.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 12:06 AM
1

Okay, so after the marriage the wife will be instructed to give a certain amount of time from the past to the father.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 07:24 PM
1

The lost income potential persists after the relationship ends, and unlike 'time' is something that can actually be transferred.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:44 PM
0

That's not a valid comparison.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 03:52 PM
-4

As the norms change so will the laws.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:38 AM
10

Literally nothing matters other than making sure the woman you liked enough to marry doesn't get money.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:47 AM
-18

for no other reason than 'we used to be married'. The reasoning is a lot more complex than that though. Women typically sacrifice a lot of income potential for the purpose of their relationships, for the understanding they're going to be supported. It'd be strange if you could be absolved of that responsibility after she's committed tens of years of her life to raising your children.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter