TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HiAlert Archive

View 1 post and 72 comments by HiAlert on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

HiAlert/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 01:21 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Agree. Having a reputation as 'good to go' can easily put a woman with looks in the 5-7 range at the top table in the sex "market". In a highly charged sexual "market" (e.g. in high school or college) a high SMV male is generally not going to invest months dating a 5-7 woman with the hopes that he MIGHT get sexual access. But if you are pretty much guaranteed FULL SEXUAL ACCESS INCLUDING FULL INTERCOURSE simply by starting to date her or even just by focusing on her for a couple of hours at a pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 09:33 AM
1

Thanks for sharing your answers. By its nature, sexual intercourse is a very personal and intimate act so when a client penetrates into your body for the first time, do you feel anything (emotionally, not physically)? If you feel emotion of any type, how would you describe the range of emotions? Has what you feel changed over time? Do you let yourself cum? when working? If so, do you try to hide it? Do you ever fake it?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 05:24 PM
2

Assuming there is sex. Do you watch each other / have group sex? Do you talk about sex with your partners? IOW, is sex with G used to enhance sexuality with J? What are your partner counts before and after marriage? For both you and J? thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 11:38 AM
1

In my (male) experience with women, I've found that it's either breadth (had many partners) OR depth of experience (kinky, high sex drive, desire to try different things, etc)...usually not both. Of course, sometimes neither breadth or depth. BWT, i think the same is true for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 11:30 AM
1

I don't understand at all. What's the valuable trait that's devalued? Alpha or nice? Attractive women are exposed to loads of both types of guys and everything in between.
/r/askTRP04/10/15 09:53 AM
0

Not so sure about this. The sex industry in the US is huge and probably bigger than anywhere else in the world. Adult films (production, consumption, ubiquitous distribution), adult websites, exotic dancing, etc. All quite well established, relatively low level of legal interference, and generally well accepted in society. Comparing legal liberalism in the area of sex and sexually oriented things is complicated and overall the US is quite liberal when compared to the rest of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 03:36 PM
2

A lot of the comments here are just generic small vs big penis debate points and do not address the context of TRP. It's really simple and common sense. If you have a small cock, adopting RP can be risky. Read carefully. I'm not saying that you need a big cock for RP but that an unusually small cock creates a risk in adopting RP. It's like someone who never finished high school taking an arrogant stance in their persona that they are smarter than everyone else. Logically we all know that you don…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 01:36 PM
1

An unusually small penis negatively affects a man's SMV and since RP is at least partly about power dynamics between the sexes, a very small penis is a serious vulnerability in that view. Even if she never chooses to use this 'weapon', the fact that she has it gives her supreme power. It's a 'nuclear deterrent'.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 08:35 AM
1

With respect, this is not an interesting topic. It's already been discussed on other threads far beyond what it deserves. It's a made up joke/expression/insult based on no scientific evidence. it's merely based on the logic that a cavity will become worn and larger in diameter if a solid object thrusts into it repeatedly over time. For example, an engine cylinder will enlarge from the action of the piston over time. So why is it less commonly used in reference to married women who have a lot of …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 10:54 PM
2

Who knows? The question is too vague to stimulate focused, interesting discussion. Everyone has a different interpretation of what 'big muscles' and 'scrawny' means so it's impossible to discuss with any structure. One women doesn't say anything about women in general and you can find a woman who does truly prefer all interpretations of 'scrawny' and 'big muscles' and everything in between. I think most people already know this. What if a man says he likes 'curvy' women and not thin ones? What d…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/15 09:18 AM
5

No, sorry. I don't agree that mainstream society thinks it's 'fine' for women to go to strip clubs and sleep with the male strippers. There are many different views on strip clubs - men's and women's -but generally there is no double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 10:52 PM
1

OK but I wasn't questioning your view of the world or what you've seen, just the faulty logic you are using to draw conclusions from it. Or maybe you've just articulated it wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/15 07:18 AM
1

I see 2 main potential obstacles: 1. belief that anus is unrelated to sex - i.e. it's for shitting only and therefore it's dirty and gross and no pleasure can be derived from it. 2. belief that it will be painful to have something as large as a penis pushing up into it. 2 different problems and 2 different solutions
/r/MarriedRedPill14/09/15 03:37 PM
3

I had read a look recently called "A Billion Wicked Thoughts" which examines pornography and women's romance novels to try to understand what men and women want. There is danger in using romance novels and porn as a proxy for what men and women want. It's not a sound way to prove anything on the topic. It's the old 'chicken and egg'. Media influences people and the people influence media as to what they want but they are not necessarily aligned well when you look beneath the surface. Media has t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 12:19 PM
4

Behaving in such a way as to attract females is innate and biological in men just as it is in many animals. A man raised by wolves is still biologically wired to demonstrate/prove that he can meet a woman's needs in order to attract her as a sexual partner. While brute force may have been used in the cave man days, this does not mean that acting to attract females did not happen. Likewise, many animals that naturally use force also take measures to attract. 'Courtship', however, is the complex r…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 11:54 AM
2

Respectfully, you are way off base with this theory. I disagree for the reasons already stated by Limekill. However, your theory is also sloppy and doesn't follow clear logic. You state that there are two reasons that men call women sluts (she's annoying him unrelated to sex or he's invested in her sexual behavior). This then is supposed to lead to a conclusion that captains of industry don't call crack whores 'sluts' (presumably because they are not 'invested in her sexual behavior'). And that …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 10:44 AM
1

Fox and grapes is a poor parallel for how preferences in women develop as it's far too oversimplified. Preferences in women are always significantly influenced by experience interacting with different types of women. It's not like someone simply dissing a Ferrari because they can't afford one. I think that most people understand that when discussing preferences for women, you are talking about what works for you and that your preferences will be born out of where you've had the most successful r…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 08:20 AM
1

This is flawed. If you choose to look past the N count then you can't make a hard and fast rule about that. It's got to be case by case as it gets very complicated from there. You can't make blanket assumptions about the situation in which women have had sex with different partners based on their SMV. Women have sex and are promiscuous for different reasons and even high SMV women can have sex due to low self esteem at different points in their lives. Equally, low SMV women can have sex 'for fun…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/15 08:47 AM
1

He can't be wrong or at least he must be confident enough to take that risk. If he's wrong, he's done. that's why i suggested taking a week or two to achieve that confidence or back off of it. If the relationship is of very high value to him, then the confidence level obviously must be very high.
/r/askTRP12/09/15 02:43 PM
2

The defining feature of the whore is that she'll sleep with lots of men. I'm not saying that guys within the mainstream literally want their wives to be whores (i.e. a woman who is promiscuous and will have sex with others). You're taking the word 'whore' too literally. What I said and meant was that many men LOOK TO their wives to fill this 'need' as well as the 'madonna' need. The old adage about the 'whore in the bedroom' vs the lady in the living room or the million variations of that. They …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 02:38 PM
1

I think this question needs to be reworked recast (or perhaps better if just scrapped). it's not structured clearly and therefore does not produce interesting debate. 'Attractiveness' obviously has a lot of nuanced and esoteric aspects to it which I suppose you can broadly separate out between the physical/looks and personality. Since interesting-ness is only one small aspect of personality (others being things like sensitivity, caring, temper, abrasiveness, sense of humor, etc, etc, etc) your s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 01:26 PM
6

They are not seeking "two contradictory things in one woman".... They are dividing women into two types, and selecting one of the two types depending on their purpose. I respectfully disagree. The NEEDS are the important thing here not how the needs are satisfied. Men want/need a madonna and a whore - that's the foundation of the theory. HOW they seek to satisfy those needs will naturally differ among men but there are social constraints that cause men to try to satisfy both of these needs with …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 12:47 PM
3

No I really dont' think so. However, there is a double standard in that open misandry is much more socially acceptable. for example, commercials depicting stupid men thinking with their dicks are quite common. It's also socially acceptable for women to casually make comments about cutting a guy's dick or ball off. For example, "Ha...if my husband said that to me I'd chop his dick off!...LOL...LMFAO". Could be about anything from cheating to turning his head to look at another woman or refusing t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 10:50 AM
1

Yes, but don't approach it like this. Don't mention what evidence you have. Why? 1. you'll sound very weak, petty, jealous and silly - "I have some evidence about your little window-opening...". She will probably crack up laughing at you. Hard to respect a guy who gets off kilter because she opened a window - even if there is something sinister behind it. If i were her, I'd argue that one by making you look stupid. 2. she'll focus on refuting/explaining the specific evidence rather than addressi…
/r/askTRP12/09/15 10:30 AM
1

If her stomach was upset she could have just taken a big dump and wanted to air the place out by opening windows. She also might have been mildly embarrassed to have just been sweating on the toilet with a huge turd and therefore acting a little jumpy. The masturbation/porn comment is odd though. I would think that someone cheating would have more tendency to have a non-sexual cover story. After all, you did not 'catch' her and from my understanding of the story, you did not act suspicious about…
/r/askTRP12/09/15 10:16 AM
3

It's about being the best you can be mentally/attitude and physically. No matter who you are there's always another guy who will be stronger, better looking, sharper intellect, funnier, more charming, etc. Most guys will have at least one attributes that is strongly 'un-alpha' and many have multiple challenges - short in stature, small body that's not overcome with lifting, small dick, slow wit, etc. Clearly your challenges are more apparent and more significant but the point is that everyone ha…
/r/askTRP12/09/15 10:01 AM
1

You've already found the answer - study those leaders you really respect and who others follow without constantly challenging or threatening their power. Don't study just one but rather study a few so that you can find, in yourself, a leadership style that works for you. You've also already figured out that this is likely tied to your demeanor. Different people can pull off different styles with different reactions from colleagues. I don't think that being a joke-ster or a 'cool guy' is inherent…
/r/askTRP09/09/15 10:59 PM
1

Nobody with any social skills would ask someone what they "thought about feminism". That's what a bored, immature person would say to stir the pot and bait an argument (usually to a person they already sense would disagree with them and for whom they have no respect). If you get this question, you're already done and ain't getting any. Move on quickly. Besides, feminism is a big topic so what the heck are they really asking about? Whether you'd do the dishes in a relationship or whether you supp…
/r/askTRP09/09/15 10:34 PM
1

I don't know but getting yourself into a position where you are both equally making fun of other guys in the bar is a great play. had a friend who used this as his usual MO with girls and it usually worked great.
/r/askTRP08/09/15 04:35 PM
1

Woman A might be rated a 9/10 for one guy, but a 2/10 for a guy who'd prefer woman B. Of course, but neither of those two individual ratings may be the general SMV. A woman who is somewhat naive and needy (within the bounds where it's not a personality flaw) and a woman who is very strong and driven (again not to the extreme) could very well have exactly the same SMV even though their personalities are opposite and they will likely attract a different kind of guy. While I do believe that there i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 07:59 PM
3

I agree. Most white guys they are with probably say that to them so regardless of standard RP rules, it's far from an original idea and not sure an Asian woman would like the idea that you are attracted to her because you are 'into Asian women'. That kind of makes it feel like a fetish.
/r/askTRP06/09/15 05:58 PM
1

And I shouldn't be expected to share something I'm not comfortable with sharing. Why? So you can gawk at every incident thats ever happened in my entire life? Just because something influences you does not mean your partner has the right to know about it. My past is my past. My partner is only entitled to my present and hopefully my future. Most people both men and women find people more attractive as friends and lovers when they are comfortable with who they are. This doesn't mean someone who t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 11:15 AM
1

Stick to the bigger cities - the ones where lots of people come from other places. People who move to make opportunities for themselves in life in a strange city are less afraid of risks and are more independently minded. This does not necessarily address the attraction factor but these women are also more likely to experiment with things that may be outside of their natural preferences. They also are not surrounded by a deep and stable family and social circle who may influence her attitudes on…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 10:32 AM
1

OK I understand but respectfully disagree. SMV, by definition, is about market value, not individual value. While I certainly believe that values in the market can vary within a range as I described, there is more 'systematic' valuation as a sexual and/or romantic partner. It's not random measure, nor is it lacking in factors used for valuation. While an individual might barter a diamond ring for a hamburger if they are starving, this does not mean that you cannot put a general market value on a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 09:56 AM
3

Think of it like the value of your house. It's generally not very helpful to obsess over the precise absolute value of your home (i.e. "is it worth 400k, 410k, or 420k?"). Everyone participating in the market will have a slightly different opinion of this and it will depend on the market dynamics and context when you sell. The relative value (i.e. "what can I do to increase the value of my home") is something that you CAN productively focus on. There is obviously little precision with this as we…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 02:45 PM
1

Don't worry about a reputation as 'that pickup guy'. Negative reputations like that are gained for other reasons than just trying to pick up girls. Girls in college love a 'fun guy' when it comes to gaming and the most successful guys that I knew had the integrity to present themselves as fun for a night and a fun (and important) guy to know in general. If you can achieve status then you can get away with all kinds of pickups as girls will be craving your attention. Get weird and creepy and have…
/r/askTRP25/08/15 01:55 PM
1

It should be about the customer and his problems, not about selling your product.
/r/askTRP11/08/15 11:45 AM
1

There is no strict formula among LMS and trying to compare the relative strengths of each attribute is not productive. The Waffle House guy might bang younger women who care less about traditional notions of status and money at this point in their lives. Or he may bang older women who just want a 'boy toy'. Status means different things to different people. if he plays in a band (even if it has a very small following), he may have high status among a circle of young people in town, etc. It's eas…
/r/askTRP11/08/15 11:19 AM
2

I don't think that 'stay just the way you are' is meant to be taken literally. As advice, it's usually used to encourage someone to relax. Trying to be someone else is always a disaster and people can see through it. It doesn't mean that you should not make improvements in yourself or that one should not look at why things have not worked. A girl who is truly ready to settle down with Mr Right usually stops fucking around. I have found that women are masters at cleaning themselves out and reinve…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 08:58 AM
0

I agree. Women do get mixed 'encouragements' for different kinds of behavior. Slutty friends who drink a lot like to have company. However, I don't think it's correct to say that women generally are told to fuck their way to good relationships. In fact, the common logic that girls are taught is just the opposite and many will quickly turn into 'nice girls' when they are hunting for Mr Right or when a Mr Right appears out of nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 08:39 AM
1

No, it's worse that's it's a Chad or bunch of Chads. They represent what he hates (see my later post) and all that he envies. Chads have 'won' all his life and now they have won again (to put it in terms of the question). Chads get their power from people who think they are cool and girls who spread their legs for them. His wife affirmed their power. he might not like that someone else fucked his wife at all but it wouldn't be so bad if it was someone on 'his team'. She fucked the enemy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 02:08 PM
2

Well then it would appear that Greg isn't jealous because of Chad's past with his girlfriend, he's just jealous of Chad, period. Exactly! He thinks: "That's what I get for getting into a serious relationship. I could have been Chad if I had refused to commit to my girlfriend. I could have Chad's life." It's both. Many Gregs HATE Chads and all they represent (even if their hatred is born out of jealousy). His wife has affirmed the power of Chads by spreading her legs for them. To him, she has fel…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 02:00 PM
3

I wouldn't make too much of this 'fixation'. In HS and even in later life, everyone is jealous of everyone else and viewing guys who get laid a lot with envy is as old as the hills. I don't think it's directly relevant. But what is relevant is if the beta has had issues with these types of guys (bullying or whatever) and then finds out that his wife was banged by armies of these kinds of guys. He might have felt comforted that in the end, he 'got the girl' but then feel humiliated (again) when h…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 01:30 PM
1

you got it. In the early years he'll be naive and blind but with age comes wisdom and a better understanding of the harsh realities of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 11:52 AM
2

Makes sense, but there is a problem. The scenarios like this I have seen in life most often begin with her telling him about the relationship with Chad. What an asshole he was and how happy she is that she ended up with Greg. So most of the time guys, like Greg have a pretty good picture of the ex-relationship. And at first it's likely that Greg was happy to be her 'savior'. She may have described how Chad just pounded her and Greg knows how to make love to a woman. He'll feel good about this at…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 11:45 AM
1

I don't think this is usually about Chad and what he's doing now. He could have turned beta when he met 'the one' who knows. He could have a horrible illness. he could be donald trump. It doesn't matter. It's about what he did to your lovely little wife that you are trying to play house with now. Your wife was his fuck buddy. He knows her body inside and out. She was the instrument that he played over and over. She was just one of dozens of girls he fucked and like many Chads, he got whatever he…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 11:15 AM
1

Great post. "Nothing can compete with sex with someone you care deeply about" "Those other guys meant nothing and sex with you is on a completely different level" With most women having at least a few lovers before marriage and often at least a couple of casual encounters, we've had to create these mantras to explain sex in the context of marriage. Is there any truth to them? Well, yes and no. Married sex simply cannot compete with the heart racing and dopamine and oxytocin or whatever that flow…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 10:11 AM
1

First, I don't think it's THAT common. Relatively small differences in perceived attractiveness are often based on YOUR perception of attractiveness. Other than those already mentioned which I agree with (men's status is from more than looks, etc, etc), I have casually observed that within this phenomenon it's most often with younger couples (like teenagers). I have assumed that this is because the woman/girl has not yet gained confidence in her looks and has not yet discovered the power that lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 07:36 PM
1

I don't really understand. She does dress up frequently in lingerie but is that for times she is planning to have sex but other times it's the PJs? Saying how much you like different things on her sometimes has a way of making it appear more often. However, I think the problem is that she doesn't expect to have sex and doesn't like sleeping in tight lingerie so she is dressing for sleep, not sex. Lingerie doesn't do much for me (although i see it as a nice change rather than wanting it to be the…
/r/MarriedRedPill07/08/15 07:46 AM
1

Thanks a lot. I understand your caution. In fairness though, she sounds like the type that would throw anything in your face, whether it's related to sexuality, relationships or not. For example, if you told her you blew off math in high school, that then turns into the reason why you got passed over for the promotion. So I understand why you are in STFU mode. People are either understanding when lives are discussed or they save it all up as ammo. The people who save it up as ammo shut people of…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/08/15 09:00 PM
1

I never expected everyone to share my views on sex and I believe that was clear in my post. There is a thought process that extends from beliefs and it's important that there is consistency in actions and beliefs. TRP does hold sex for the woman as a sacred thing as far as I understand it. That's why CC riders are devalued in the theories and considered as unfit to marry. Anyway just because TRP seems to suggest this doesn't mean everyone needs to agree. By the way, those are two separate issues…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/08/15 08:02 AM
1

Reread my posts and take it in context. I was asking what the MRP "methodology" would suggest as a way to approach this. I then decide what to do in practice as nobody would follow a theory blindly. By "It would seem that the following would be appropriate" is in the context of what I understand about TRP and extending it to this situation. I never said that i wanted to hold her to account or punish her. I said that it would seem that disclosure with the man facing the reality and a level of ato…
/r/MarriedRedPill06/08/15 07:30 AM
1

With respect, you don't take time to 'formulate a response' to a bully humiliating you in the playground. You also don't try to rationalize her views on what you are fighting about when the real problem is that your LTR is humiliating you and seems to have a major problem with your manhood. If she thinks that you weren't a real man just because you accepted that he's doing his job, then what do you think she thinks about a man who is still 'formulating a response' when she basically called you a…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 07:23 PM
1

thanks for your reply. That's a good caution that the time must be right and that weaknesses in the relationship can be strained further. While I'm guilty of having a double standard when it comes to the seriousness of a woman giving herself away to a man, I do believe that your relationship with two women is an important part of your sexuality and your overall experience in relationships. Therefore, I don't believe that you can be truly close with such an important secret between you. and with …
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 06:57 PM
0

Thanks for sharing this. Part of the reason for knowing all the details (other reasons stated in various posts) is to stop living in a blissful fantasy world. Others have asked if i'm concerned that other guys were better than me. My answer to that is that I would assume she had incredibly great and incredibly bad sexual experiences with others and everything in between. Accepting that someone else was bigger and better is just one aspect facing the truth and there are many more difficult things…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 06:50 PM
1

One important belief that underlies this topic for me is the belief that a woman giving herself to a man and letting him enter her body is a very serious, important, momentous, and profound act. There is nothing more intimate that two people can share. The fact that sex is commonly a very casual act that is often entered into without any thought does not change this. Whether a woman has committed this act with one guy or 30 guys does not change the serious nature of what has been committed with …
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 06:40 PM
2

Simply put, I believe that a man needs to know who had his wife and how he had her, even if traditional logic is that this is none of his business and even if most men "really don't want to know" because they can't bear facing it. Yes, i know some of it.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 06:18 PM
2

A common theme in the responses is that I need a reason and a goal to raise this topic with my wife. Intuitively, that sounds logical. However, what if we turned it around and asked why this topic is so taboo. I understand that there are hangups and cautions and it needs to be done in the right way. I also understand that you must have a strong bond and a good level of trust or it won't work. For a man to confront these realities productively he must also be in a strong place or it will eat away…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 05:55 PM
1

To clarify, I was speaking in terms of confronting her promiscuity head on, not confronting HER about it - i.e. not being confrontational, accusatory or aggressive about it. What I mean by 'confronting it' is partly addressing it with her but also addressing (or confronting) the hard realities of it in my own mind.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 05:43 PM
0

Thanks for your balanced perspective on this. I very much agree that this is potentially risky but that connecting on this in the right way can bring benefit to the dynamic of the relationship. Any actions taken on this must be well thought out and planned so that feelings, motivations and objectives are very clearly stated. My underlying belief here is that this topic and associated feelings should be able to be discussed between two adults in a serious relationship. However, I know that this t…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 05:39 PM
1

It's not about a license plate frame. She (rightly or wrongly) views you as a wimp and she's making her point with this incident. It's not about whether or not you handled this particular problem appropriately or whether the inspection man should have let it go or whether he was interpreting the law correctly, etc. It's about her overall perception of you. You're on a playground and a bully just basically called you a 'faggot' directly in your face. Next move is yours. You did not respond so she…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/08/15 11:36 AM
0

What did she mean by "just wants to have fun"? Does that mean she just wants to have non-sexual fun with you (i.e. "just be friends") or did she mean that she wants to play the field sexually and not get involved in a relationship with you? Your conclusion that your game is over is correct. Could be a boyfriend in the picture Or just not into you. Or as I think she was trying to tell you - she doesn't want a relationship and the planned visits, etc started to feel like a relationship to her and …
/r/askTRP05/08/15 09:54 AM
1

You should have enough info after just a short time to tell. You'll hear some stories, see some pics, etc. The hard part though is not being fooled by smokescreens like "it's great to meet a guy like you -for some reason I've always ended up with the assholes who don't know how to treat a lady" or "my ex was such an insensitive jerk. so unlike you" or "you're so different from my other boyfriends". These kinds of things can encourage you to separate yourself from the guys she's always chosen and…
/r/askTRP03/08/15 07:50 AM
1

Getting your dick in her ass today should be the least of your worries. The anal sex problem is a red herring. You are headed into marriage withher and you need to concern yourself with ongoing sexual compatibility for the next several decades. You are in danger of getting into a situation of little or NO SEX (no anus, no vagina, no mouth, no hands, no nothing) as things go forward. Obviously I don't know everything about this situation but here is how it appears to me. She has major sexual hang…
/r/MarriedRedPill02/08/15 07:21 PM
2

Drinking/partying and playing around with sex is a right of passage for the average girl today just like it is for guys. I agree that PCB is 'pre-screened' for girls of a certain character and is not necessarily a good representation of society as a whole. However, the behavior at PCB is extreme and girls can still be very promiscuous even without indulging in this type of drunken 7 day orgy. Just look around any college campus. Drinking heavily at least every thurs, friday and saturday is the n…
/r/askTRP31/07/15 11:11 AM
2

Sorry but the 'on a break' thing is a very bad sign and shows a huge character flaw in her. It shows that: 1. she can live happily within a warped reality that she creates to enable her to do anything without having to answer to her own conscience. This is her way of operating. 2. she can and will manipulate reality to pave the way for her devious actions. The 'hall pass' sounds like another example of this. She is desperate to 'even the score' and 'make it right'. She cheated with 2 different c…
/r/MarriedRedPill31/07/15 09:58 AM
3

I think that taking a virgin and putting him on a porno set in a scene that is directed under the concept of the "hot porn star with the loser" is probably not a good indicator of what this guy is really like nor is it a good indicator of guys in general. But obviously many guys are shy and awkward and the awkwardness hikes up around women. Around hot women they become even more intimidated, awkward and nervous. Around a porn star when he is fucking her with the cameras rolling....well nuff said…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:50 PM
1

If the question is not as articulated in the title then I think it should be restated because I don't understand what the question is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:00 PM
1

From your post, you've said your issue is: <<I'm confused by the sheer hypocrisy on this aspect. Following your gut is good, unless you have a y chromosome. Then it's insecurity.>> There is no hypocrisy in her views but rather there is a fundamental differences in beliefs between you two with regard to multiple sex partners/promiscuity. You don't have to agree with her fundamental belief but she has acted logically and without hypocrisy. Again, she may be very WRONG but you should not be confuse…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 07:56 PM
1

I don't see her comments as being controversial at all, nor do i think there is any revelation here. I think that we can all agree that women generally like strong men and that's really all she's saying at the high level. Well society in general likes strong men and that's no revelation. A weak character and an inability to stand up for oneself and one's clan are generally negative traits by any measure. It's been that way for thousands of years. This particular female prefers her strong man to …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 06:49 PM
9

This question is flawed because women and men think very differently about sex. A woman usually doesn't think of "getting sex" as the end-game and most women don't think about just "getting sex". Even if they are after some NSA casual sex, they generally think about it in different terms than just "getting sex". So while women might recognize that just "getting sex" is easier for a female, in the context of casual sex they might also envy men because many believe that casual sex is overall easie…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 05:21 PM
1

Many men are insecure and uncomfortable with the topic of how many sex partners their partner has had. Many women are insecure and uncomfortable with the number of sex partners they've had. Many of the same people say "it doesn't matter how many sex partners a person has had". If it truly didn't matter then everyone wouldn't be so insecure, secretive, revisionist, suspicious, untruthful, defensive, cagey, etc. If it truly didn't matter then it would be easy to talk about it. It does matter to mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 04:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter