TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hifen Archive

View 0 posts and 192 comments by Hifen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

See, this is a silly sub. We don't draft women for the same reason we don't want women firefighters.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:57 AM
-4

No one should die and obviously no one wants to go towar, jfc. This sub is clearly the lowest denominator.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:52 AM
-2

No one should have to die, but war is an inevitable part of the human experience. The fact that this sub is solely based on the "but whatabout women...." Whines, is again why no one takes it seriously. I'm sure you can ask any of those men today that were drafted if they want their wives and daughters next to them on the front line.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:24 AM
-8

Larping and Cod don't count
/r/MensRights25/02/22 05:21 AM
-16

I mean, the feminist movement you're talking about is not really present in the Ukraine, so what are you talking about? Also, women have the right not to be sexually harassed, to vote and to be treated the same in the work place without having to play the draft game with you. The draft isn't about "princples and equality", it's a last ditch effort at a nations survival. "Fuck, we told John he's not allowed to slap Erica's ass in the office any more, welp, guess we got to allow ourselves to be an…
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:13 AM
-27

I mean its an unfair but inevitable part of the human experience. But no one here is in the Ukraine or at risk of being drafted, its just a bunch of babies trying to self victimize. I guarantee the people affected this are not crying out at "feminism".
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:37 AM
1

If three seperate groups are telling you that you're the problem, you might want to focus on some inward reflection rather then blaming the woke boogeyman.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 04:43 PM
1

It's the salt Bae guy from the memesq
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 11:08 PM
1

600$ for 6 shots of JW blue?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 11:05 PM
2

Fake
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/20 07:40 AM
2

These numbers are wrong. Also this was shitty when it happened to Brenden Fraser, and it's shitty here.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 06:57 AM
2

The only person that said that was the reason was a comedian.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:35 AM
0

Why do people assume that's the reason why? Most people want it closed for hygiene purposes. I've never met a women upset the lid was down too...
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 05:35 AM
1

"Ping pong people are retarded". Everyone there fed the troll, then this sub gave them dessert.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 07:01 PM
1

Fake as shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/20 02:17 AM
2

didnt... didnt she have a big role in the hunger games??
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 06:31 AM
1

I'm under the assumption he's not working
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 09:21 PM
0

She says “can’t be,” suggesting there is no existing individual That doesn't suggest that. ex: "Can't be my husband gets off his ass and get a job" . regardless, my point doesn't really rely on whether or not there is someone in her life.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 09:17 PM
1

i guess not part-time at minimum wage, because no adult should be working that.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 05:57 PM
1

My point isn't that you are uncomfortable making that decision, I'm saying that you objectively don't have enough information to do so, and your decision is unwarranted. And what the fuck do you mean by my projection? I mean that you have built a negative image of women, or at least single mothers and you have projected it on someone who you have no information on. How about you hunt her down and figure out her true intentions and come share with the class? I'm not the one making assumptions abo…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 05:06 PM
1

All sorts of women are posted here, some entitled twats that deserve derision, and others who don't but are posted because some men are looking for the worst where it isn't because they have a chip on their shoulder.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 05:02 PM
0

Then i would say thats probably below min wage in most places, and so he wouldn't be working full time.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 04:59 PM
1

experience with types of scum sucking women. I'm saying there isn't enough information here to say that's what she is. Posting that shit on FB while you are pregnant with no baby daddy in sight tells me everything I need to know It tells you nothing. Your post tells me all i need to know that you have conclusions drawn before you actually saw this, and are looking to project. Expecting a partner to be employed is not scum sucking. Your projection kind of is.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:58 PM
-1

What's these types? Black, women, or someone that has a face book account, because there is no other identifying information for you to say "these types". Everything else you've said is based on projection.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:56 PM
-1

It is too far off base, there is nothing in this to provide any back ground information that you are drawing from. A lot of people air their grievances on social media, not just a subset of people, and they are in no way predicatable. All we have is this exchange Her: Why can't the men i date have a job Him: Ha, your a single mother, that's why. Everything else you've done is either based on her simply being a women or being black, because there is literally nothing else for you to draw a conclu…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:56 PM
-6

Requiring someone to have a job is a pretty fair standard to have. I know for a fact if a man lived by these requirements she'd probably complain about how "niggas aint shit" and "aint nobody a man these days" How do you know this for a fact and why did do you assume she would talk like that?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:24 PM
-3

how on earth did you get from that little screen shot that she doesn't have a job or plan herself? Maybe she's sick and tired of being the sole breadwinner in her relationships and taking care of someone unemployed on top of her child. Is having a job not a fair requirement to have when looking for a partner, or should all single mothers take any unemployed leach that comes along?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:06 PM
-10

1400$ isn't high maintenance though? If she came out with a list must be this tall, and make 50k a year, and have his own place, etc then yeah, high maintenance. But saying "hey, I'm sick of having to take care of unemployed men, why can't my man at least work minimum wage job anywhere* is not high maintenance. Plus she says "my" man, are we sure she's not complaining about an existing individual rather then specifying standards?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 03:04 PM
1

How does it do that?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:35 PM
-1

How do you know she doesn't have a job. Her post is asking for someone making minimum wage, seems to me she's complaining about bums that leach themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:33 PM
-1

She's asking for someone to make 8.75 an hour, i dont see that as unreasonable.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:32 PM
-12

Not really entitled though, that's full time 8.75 an hour; is it really gold digging to expect your partner to have any job?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/19 02:32 PM
1

It wasn't written for you, its written for anyone else that happens to come down this rabbit hole so there's no chance they buy in to your nonsense pedophillia apologetics.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/19 04:17 AM
0

So there is haddith of him being 53 and fucking a 9 year old? Great id love to see it ok: The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me sta…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/19 03:16 AM
1

What claim did I make is baseless? Mohammad was married much before he was an adult and definitely not 40. Sorry, you're right, I looked up the haddith, he was 53. Don't even say unbroken chain of Hadith* like you know what ur talking about goofy boy. I know what I'm talking about, I understand how the haddith works, and understand which ones are typically accepted while which ones aren't. My opinion is in line with most Sunni main line scholars. You are the one who is trying to defend a warlord…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 07:58 PM
1

I didn't discredit your link, I provided the information in YOUR link that refutes your own point. That's not what close minded means by the way. Close minded means you refuse to look at things from other point of view, ie: You refuse to look at this in the light that perhaps Mohammed did something bad. . Close minded people wouldn't see that I was using it to prove the act of marriage at young ages was common and neither Jesus nor Muhammad were having sex at that age or with people of that age.…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 03:13 PM
2

1) the "evidence" you shown was a blog post that backed up what I was showing. 2) You called me a fag, i don't need to show you shit at this point tbh.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 03:11 PM
1

>According to the Jafari school, fifteen years for boys and nine years for girls is considered as the age of majority.26 According to the Hanafi school there is a presumption that girls do not reach puberty until the age of nine and boys not until the age of twelve.27 In Islamic teaching, girls cannot therefore be deemed to have reached puberty any early than pg.40
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 02:31 PM
1

Tell me what I made up, rather then making baselss claims. Jesus married at seven You already provided me a blog post which states the opposite.... . No society put a physical age restriction in those times. Yes, again, by the link you sent me, the age was 12. Like even WIKI has it covered... In Jewish oral tradition, men cannot consent to marriage until they reach the age of majority of 13 years and one day and have undergone puberty. With no signs of puberty, they are considered minors until t…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 02:27 PM
1

Jesus probably wasn't even real tbh, and I don't think there is any documentation that he married. What do you think is made up? Romans having minimum age laws or Christians? You're just making shit up to fuel bigotry. No i'm not. If the raw facts is all it takes to cause bigortry, the problem isn't the facts. You're close minded and you can't really be bothered to look for answers. No, I'm not close minded, I'm actually very well educated on Islam and Christianity. The only close minded one is …
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 02:18 PM
2

Because these things don't exist from a vacuum, we have records of what was legally and society accepted. Look, it's just 1 thread. You can go to any 1 of the comments and leave your misinformed over emotional responses, you don' need to comment on everyone of mine. if both people have reached sexual maturity then it would be deemed permissable by everyone besides you apparently. Yes, everyone except me is ok with 9 year olds marrying adults.... stop justifying that disgusting practice. Please p…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 01:55 PM
-1

Well, the other societies actually put a physical age and practiced the rules they set out, mean while kids marrying men in Islam was pretty rampant. There's an issue with deciding "case by case". Traditionally the the Hanafi and Ja'fari both set the marriageable age (or puberty) for girls to be 9 years old. Any way, this is all moot, sources say mo hammed married a girl at 9, and contrary to your statement, this was not culturally normal for anyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 04:28 AM
9

is that your counterpoint? How come it was perfectly ok for you to come to the conclusion So did literally every man of every culture in that time. But when that's countered, all of a sudden "you needed to be back there to know it". Regardless, to answer your question, we know this because of the historical record. From the roman times pretty much onwards (atleast in western societies), 12 and up was the minimum age, and typically a 12 year old girl was married to a 14 year old boy. You weren't …
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/19 04:05 AM
26

that is absolutley not true, sex with 9 year olds was never regularly acceped. Stop romantisizing pedophillia. And wtf is your argument. "everyone had sex with kids, but also he didn't"
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/19 11:43 PM
1

Text communication does leave one imagining tone of voice. Right, and so contextually we have to resort on previous interactions with people to come to our conclusions. The fact that the vast majority of people are not entitled cunts leads me to give this the benefit of the doubt. The emojis typically also imply a less serious reading. but I always say that as preMGTOW/incel MGTOW/incel's hate women and very rarely defend them, and just typically view "foids" as sperm recepticals, i don't think …
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/19 06:03 PM
6

Misdemeanour assault is typically based on injury, what she did warranted the punishment legally speaking, there's no pp. If a man got in trouble more then this then it would be a penis punishment or whatever the converse is. He would be getting in more trouble then he should, rather then it being the case that she got off easy. That being said, if a man did what she did to a woman, chances are there would be a higher level of injury and therefore a higher level of assault.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/19 05:33 PM
2

M'eh, i think these exist on both sides
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:26 PM
2

Hell I am married. Hey, me too. Neat. The guys who wouldn't tolerate her response are the kind with self respect It's not about what someone would tolerate, it's about the assumption of what was being said here. There are entitled people out there that don't deserve the time of day. There are also people out there that are just being playful which is what i read this as, I don't see enough here to assume she litterally feels this peon is worth her time, as opposed to friendly bantering. This see…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/19 06:40 PM
-2

I would have dropped her as well. Assuming you would have event gotten a reply... The only people that believe this is cuntish are people that I don't imagine have much in the way of social experience. That was obviously playful. What we have in this thread is a bunch of cynical MGTOW-tards who start from the default position that a woman are all entitled sperm jackers only interessted in money.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/19 06:06 PM
-14

You don't talk to people much off the internet do you? Nothing in that message is entitled or "cuntish", it's playful at most.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/19 03:05 PM
-3

Jesus, what happened to this sub... A news site dedicated to pro-life views has reports an alleged negative comment made by a pro-choice advocate. Shocker... Although I don't doubt she made that comment in some sort of heated conversation, I do doubt very much there was an inch of sincerity to it. This is borderline propaganda meant to rile you up. It's meaningless....
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:50 PM
0

in hindsight "tap on the wrist" might have been a more appropriate statement. That being said, people should be able to bring up a very real issue that affects non-developed nations heavily without having to worry about someone shoehorning in another issue.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:13 AM
-1

In the context, this is in Vietnam where yes, the issue is way more worse for women than men, and the men she was talking about essentially got let go.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 11:35 PM
1

He's not stating his own beliefs. Yes he is, he's stating his belief on how he should be allowed to address clients. I think he's speaking factually too in regards to the biology -but thats not the point. The biology doesn't matter here. ( But I'm sure they are persuasive arguments on why gender and sex are not synonyms.) He's just not respecting the clients' beliefs. That's kind of the point. The department he works for expects interaction with clients to be non confrontational. This is especia…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 05:30 PM
0

You didn't make a joke, so you're either back peddling or you don't know what a joke is. (Sarcasm != joke). Just because you didn't say something clever doesn't mean joke nazis are out.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 04:25 AM
1

It depends on the nature of the professional. He was a claims accessor, and his personal beliefs on anything doesn't matter, nor does the biological reality. The department policy is to address clients as they wish to be addressed. it tramples all over freedom of speech, as well. Only to people who don't understand what free speech is. He isn't being charged. If any employee at their place of business started telling customers "God will smite you", "Gays shouldn't get married" etc, etc, they wou…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 04:12 AM
0

and that position isn't really the issue, and has nothing to do with what is being discussed. You are off topic. His position here is "it doesn't matter how you want to be addressed, in the position of a government worker I should get to address you how I want, and what is happening is his employer is saying, "no, as a representative of the government, you can leave your personal beliefs at home, and follow our policy on how to interact with clients".
/r/MensRights22/04/19 04:05 AM
3

We are talking about compelled speech "on the job". No one is stating what he can and cannot do on his own private time. That act does not force him to speak in a certain way, what that act does is allow one of the clients to sue the DWP for harassing them based on gender identity. The law in this context has nothing to do with compelling any speech. But on the job, as a representative of the government, it's policy that he treats the client in a respectful manner as deemed by the employer. This…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 10:40 PM
3

His argument is NOT the same as jordan petersons. jordan petersons argument is that the government should not be able to force language through law. That is different than firing someone for not following customer sercvice policy when dealing with clients. Freedom of speech does not protect you when you are on the job, being paid to deal with an organizations clients.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:45 PM
1

This story has nothing to do with the gender of babies, so i don't get your point? The man in the picture was told to address adult "clients" by the gender they want to be reported as when filling out claims assessment. I use the term client because he was not a medical practioner in the role we are talking about, and his boss has every right to enforce customer service standards of their choice.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:43 PM
28

The baby was in a breech position with the umbilical cord wrapped around the neck. She should have done a C-section. She performed a natural birth instead, which she performed "correctly" but resulted in the decapitation. The issue here from a medical standards point of view is not the decapitation (had the story simply been "baby sufficated" it wouldn't hit the news), but the fact that she did not identify that a c-section was necessary
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:39 PM
10

Dr. Mackerath was working in a government position where he was supposed to assess disability claims (not in the medical field). He was repeatedly told that any information on reports or in contact with clients needs to be addressed in the way the patient wants to be addressed, which regardless of your view on trans-genderism is a reasonable policy for how a government claims assessor addresses a client. He was not fired for his beliefs, but refusing to abide by department policy despite numerou…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:36 PM
1

Right, but thats not the standard we are discussing here, we are comparing her to Cosby. Cosby was't just considered to be a shitty person. There were consequences to him, and this post insinuates those consequences should extend to her.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 01:40 PM
2

yeah, my point, 1 of your 4 points mattered, being black, liberal and famous don't relate here.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 01:18 AM
4

To play devils advocate here, there's a couple key differences: 1) Drugging someone to rob them and drugging to rape someone are on two completley seperate levels on reprehensible. Lots of hip hop stars gloat about a history of theft, drug sales and minor crimes. You can't group that with rape. 2) and this is the important one, Cosby got in trouble when accusations were made against him. I would expect things to be different right now if one of those guys came forward. "Self admiting" to somethi…
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:43 PM
1

Cosby was black, liberal and famous though, like why do those three points matter?
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:40 PM
1

No, that argument does not cut both ways because we are not talking about economics, or economic freedom. If we wanted to discuss which of the two countries have more freedoms and advantages for businesses, you are absolutley right, Sweden has way more regulations then the US, and the US wins hands down. Seeing how that isn't the topic at hand and we are only discussing individual freedoms, specifically in free speech, your point is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 08:00 PM
1

It's not like it's an isolated incident. Yes, it is pretty isolated, the UK ranks higher then the US on the Freedom Index when it comes to expression and information. If this is going to be a back and forth about which countries police force wrongfully strips rights of citizens, the US will lose everytime against another western nation. People get arrested for simply protesting in front of government buildings Your talking about the US, right? and people get shot because the police went to the w…
/r/MensRights23/03/19 03:22 AM
1

i never said this doesnt happen in the EU nor did i say freedom of speech isnt important, i simply stated that all countries, america included set arbitrary cutoffs. Prividing an anecdotal one off that was such a rare occurence it made international headlines doesnt add anything to what i was saying. A store in atlantic city had a police bust because there toy guns looked to realistic, and a ladybin texas was arrested for having a store that sold dildos. Do i get to now use those as an over arch…
/r/MensRights23/03/19 02:32 AM
0

did you mean to reply to someone else, because in no way is your comment a response to mine.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 10:47 PM
2

I haven't made a straw man.... Do you know what that is? I'm not debating, I asked a question and YOU chose to reply, then avoid answering. America doesn't have free speech though, your not allowed to incite violence meaning speech is limited. But if your gonna claim what America has is freedom of speech, then many countries have it. According to the human freedom index, the US scores a 9.2 on freedom of expression and information, which is pretty good, but to say it's unique, when countries lik…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:15 PM
2

No, they are not both forms of speech. Yes they are both forms of speech, just one carries extra connotations. The Court held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action From an American perspective, it is legal speech. but your still kinda missing my point here. is considered actual violence instead of speech. BY WHO? because it's not considered that way worldwid…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 04:04 PM
4

I never said they were, so I don't understand your point? Both are however forms of speech, and would be protected if there was perfect and pure freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:14 PM
-2

Unless you have an equal voice in said government. Regardless you side stepped my point. The American government limits what you are allowed to say, to prevent the incitement of violence. Does that make you a subject?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:03 PM
2

But your not big into freedom, your big into specific components of freedom that sound nice as talking points to your politicians, like drowning out hate speech and gun laws, but very silent on actual limits of freedom like the patriot act. You are already limited with your freedom of speech because you cannot incite violence. I don't understand the justification for that arbitrary line of whats acceptable speech? Either all speech is ok, or individual societies like America needs to draw a line…
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:01 PM
1

Then where do you get to draw the line I assume you are ok with limiting free speech to incitement to violence? I never understood this American concept that not only should you decide whats right for your people (as you should) but then that should become the standard that everyone else should adopt otherwise they are oppressed.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 02:24 PM
6

You said something stupid. It was poorly recieved. That's ok, happens to the best of us. Try not to have tantrum next time and just move one. Good luck, I believe in you.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:03 PM
7

Ask my self AND congratulate my self? what a whacky sentence lol. I'm reasonably happy, I guess -i guess i'll spend my morning in an existential crisis thanks to your words. Congratulations you can repeat the definition of sarcasm, that doesn't change the fact that you confused yourself with it. Go back, reread what I said to you, and try to explain to yourself why the fact that you were being sarcastic doesn't matter. Also try and teach yourself about the context of discussion. Also, when you a…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:52 PM
7

Your response was in obvious reply to the story. Do you not fully understand sarcasm? Your statement (sarcasm accounted for) is saying "its not surprising a woman used the legal system to destroy a man" despite the fact that's not what happened in this story. So congratulations on 1) Not reading the article 2) not fully grasping sarcasm 3) Making an unrelated comment 4) We'll throw in not knowing what "splitting hairs" means as well.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:33 PM
5

He's right though, this is just a story of one neighbor yelling at another. SHE was the one charged, and at no point was he, or even officially accused. This is a tabloid story about two neighbors not getting along.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:01 PM
7

Two neighbours have a history of arguing, she says racist things and called him a sex offender one time. Now it's national news in a tabloid to stir up outrage.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:59 PM
-14

She didn't use the legal system, this was more of her "she called him a predator one time to his face as they were arguing" situation.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:58 PM
73

From the article meant he was away on business for three weeks. Before he left, I found him packing the freezer with organic ready meals and ringing round for short-term nannies to take care of our children . But I work hard, too, and that changes everything. While I love my children deeply, wiping noses, bottoms and encrusted beans off the floor doesn't inspire me in the way my work does. I'm too busy to share the chores. After a day of writing, I feel happy and complete; after a day with the c…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 09:45 PM
2

it is real, and there's more to the story,
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:24 AM
5

Well he tried to forcefully kiss another women, and was asked to leave the premises and continued trying to hook up with the women after, so, like yeah, he shouldn't have done that.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:24 AM
9

Headline leaves out what happened after It is claimed that the 36-year-old also propositioned the woman and confronted her after he was asked to leave the premises. It is also alleged that he attempted to kiss another woman on the same evening at the pub.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:23 AM
5

Headline leaves out what happened after It is claimed that the 36-year-old also propositioned the woman and confronted her after he was asked to leave the premises. It is also alleged that he attempted to kiss another woman on the same evening at the pub.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:23 AM
5

"I don't regret coming here." and She said she'd had two other children who had both died. Tells you enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 06:02 PM
1

Wait are we saying its an advantage for women that no one cares about their intellegence or future aspirations (college plans), their friends or their interests and that they are expected to be quiet and just look pretty? Because that's what this post says.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:40 PM
4

True, so why are you saying Could it be that it would make the women look like heartless harpy POSs?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 05:26 PM
8

I have no assumptions. You are the one with the assumptions. You are assuming the women are guilty. I am saying there's no information to say who is right and wrong. all doubt should be eliminated That goes both ways. Nothing warrants a death sentence. He didn't receive a death sentence, he killed himself. The article didn't event provide a link between the accusations and the suicide - people in this thread are just reading into this story what they want, because the incel cross over is stronge…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 05:12 PM
3

“feel devastated” if their assaulter or rapist died Because you jumped to rape. He might have had a few too many drinks at a christmas party and made an inappropriate comment that made someone uncomfortable. We have no scope of the issue here, and they could have just wanted a quick apology. I don't see what information you have to attack the women in this story. hat doesn’t jive is that his crime was never mentioned in the article Out of respect for the grieving children and wife, I'm sure it w…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:27 PM
31

Yeah, all they wanted was a little attention I take it you knew the man personally then? Because I don't see anything in this article giving enough information to come to the conclusion you have.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:25 PM
10

Or out of respect for a grieving family who don;t want it publisized that their dead father and husband was playing grab ass at work?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:23 PM
2

Heres another artie by the same source about an alien skull that was found, so um ... come on guys.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 12:36 PM
0

i think they are referring to the fact that the only thing mentioned in the article is "spankings" and nothing involving intercourse.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 12:32 PM
9

She says she received tapes which were videotaped by a camera in her light bulbs. I'm calling it now, she's a schizo and it's just recently started to come into fruition.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 08:00 PM
2

Such Bullshit. If I were to do that as an adult i would be in jail, but only after a bad beating from federal agent ftfy
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/18 03:21 AM
26

The reason we allow people to appeal it is to avoid the chance that an innocent person is executed. Most people would agree paying extra tax dollars to reduce the chance of murdering someone not guilty is worth it.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/18 05:38 PM
68

Because there is no 'rape' crime that van be charged. Rapes in montana are charged under assaults ie sexual or aggravated.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/18 08:35 AM
0

Well there are other posts there too which include not enough countries support paternity leave, and the such. That being said, Women are treated much worse then Men in developping nations; not every where has the same amount of equality as western nations. This is the UN Womens page, and what they post makes sense when you take it in the lens of India, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq etc.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 07:20 PM
1

Caught is they key word here, which is different then accused.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 07:39 PM
-4

The point did not go over my head. I understand why they are laughing at him. I also understand that that goes against what this sub claims to be. rights aren't conditional on not being a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 08:43 AM
-12

am/Off-Topic posts will be removed. Use self-posts for related topics, justifyin Justin's not an enemy, nor is he by any definition a radical. He just leans politically different then this sub, and that's more important then actual ideals apparently. Justify this however you want. support him to our fullest ability. Support for a cause should be conditional. That makes you a shill.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:39 AM
8

If anyone deserves to have their due process rights threatene I'm gonna stop you right there.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:35 AM
-10

So the fact that people are jumping on him without evidence means that they should be judged the same way?
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:35 AM
23

"Men are regularly falsely accused of sexual harrassement; we believe people are innocent until proven guilty; women try to get attention by making these allegations; men never get ..... oh? he's left wing -then lol I knew you couldn't trust him, i'm happy he's down a peg". Apparently most of your ideals ends at party lines -these comments drip of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:26 AM
21

What? A therapist only has one responsibility, and that is not an arbitrator of whats fair, or a moralist, or a judge. The only thing her therapist should be concerned with is her mental well being. And if he thinks she'd be better of leaving him, psychologically, then that's what he should recommend (Regardless of how shitty of an action that would be)
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:18 PM
0

To be devils advocate, don't you think more women might be interested in this field, and therefore more women apply? The exact same rational you use for the dis proportionality in STEM, why wouldnt you use it here?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 07:56 PM
12

You are getting your math and point mixed up or you've completely missed his point. The article states that 98 men were paid unfairly and 90 women were paid unfairly. All things considered the same, if there is 1000 men working there and 90 women working there, that means 9.8% of men are underpaid and 100% of women are underpaid which does show an issue. You can't use absolute values to determine things like statistics, you need to use relative values, so as the person your are replying to was s…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 08:10 PM
1

she didnt accuse a specific person in this case though
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/17 09:35 AM
-20

Wut? Everything that was reported in previous articles.. And when the state department in the US concludes that they had sufficient evidence to deport him, then you can draw a few conclusions.....
/r/MensRights16/11/17 09:22 PM
-2

You have know idea if any of what you said is true.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 09:20 PM
-14

A: She had him deported B: She was clearly just doing it for selfish reasons A:Well it's reported that the state department says he comitted serious crimes B: Hold on there... for that we need more information A little one sided isn't it?
/r/MensRights16/11/17 07:48 PM
6

well here's the reasons her lawyer passed information on to the state dept: Rutherford's lawyer informed the State Department about issues pertaining to Giersch's businesses, which led the Department to conclude that they had sufficient evidence to deport him.[17] It has been reported that the allegations involved fraud[17] or an involvement in drugs and weapons dealing in South America, considered terrorism under the Victory Act.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 07:37 PM
1

It's probably when we started using DNA in rape investigations.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:30 PM
-2

Really? A highschool girl lied and got u fired from a highschool job? This is a nothing issue, an attention craved girl and a protective parent. Not really a men's right issue.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:21 AM
23

No, I never see it as that simple, because the response usually is "I'm all for equal rights, but I think a women should still be treated like a lady"
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/15 09:04 PM
7

You're the one comparing two unrelated situations.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:47 AM
3

This is kind of a non-sequitur as these two issues are not directly or indirectly related. More importantly these two issues aren't necessarily gender specific. To demonstrate a difference in how genders are treated you would need an example of both male and female victims of the same crime being treated differently, for example male and female victims of revenge porn treated differently by the courts. To demonstrate the issue of gender in false rape reports, you would need a male and female ind…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:47 AM
0

There's no reason here to think that she thought she would get away with it because she was a women.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/15 08:23 AM
-3

Where was the pussy pass which was denied? This is just someone charged with a crime, who happens to be a women.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/15 07:37 AM
30

Well no, I think it wld be comparable to a man making a child touch his nipples, it's not fair comparing genitalia to breasts.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 06:23 AM
10

A hoax, most likely from 4chan
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:35 PM
2

Most likely they saw your comment, considered it sarcastic, then checked your comment history and found something they didn't like (such as posts in MRA) and banned your for being part of a "hate group against women".
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:21 PM
10

R/thathappened
/r/MensRights11/05/14 04:58 PM
6

Are they comparing the survival of female passengers with crew and establishing that this counts as a male vs female relationship?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:13 PM
3

It's ok guy's, no matter what i ramble about, remember I'M A SCIENTIST!! FYI, you seem to misunderstand what the null hypothesis is, it's the default position, and one that would ascribe no relationship. In this situation, the default position (the claim of no relationship) would be that Feminism has no relationship anit or pro to MensRights. FYI, I disagree with modern feminism, and i'm anti-sjw but I found your rant a "tad" nuts
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:06 PM
-1

It should have it's name changed. Imagine if a group called "white right activists" emerged, it would be incredibly looked down upon. If it were up to me, the name would be much more passive.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:51 PM
-6

So you are insinuating gender roles are a real thing then, that women and men should and do behave differently?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:14 PM
15

The definition of "contradicts each other" is not things that have "a cost". What's your point?
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:22 PM
2

Because the other gender discussion subs ban you if you disagree with the majority. Want to say this isn't a womens issue in r/feminism? Banned. Want to mention something logical and non-circle jerk in SRS? Banned. Want to point out a logic error and how someone missed the point in r/amr? Banned. Just because I disagree that this is a mens rights issue does not mean I am sympathetic to other subs. In fact the only subs that discuss gender that I actually like seem to be SRSsucks, and TIA. Sympat…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:17 AM
-8

No one was falsely accused by the sound of this article, some kid just made up a story about being attacked. Can someone tell me how this is actually a Mens rights issue?
/r/MensRights05/03/14 04:22 PM
0

Or just being wrong.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:51 AM
1

Yes they do. No where does anyone contest that. You stated that the women was not a victim, that she made a false accusation, aka: made it up. According to this article, that is not the case. Again you have argued against a different point you constructed yourself (strawman).
/r/MensRights03/01/14 11:03 PM
-1

Nice strawman. I never said he wasn't falsely accused, I said this wasn't a false rape accusation. There's a difference. You are suggesting the women made it up, and he paid the price. If you read the article you'd understand that this isn't the case, and that the wrong man was prosecuted for an actual crime that did happen.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 06:43 PM
0

No where does the article state it was false rape accusation, and even hints that the real rapist got away. Didn't read the article did we? Just shopping headlines to try and force in a MRA issue? BTW this article has nothing to do with feminism or the alleged patriarchy.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 03:03 PM
1

I disagree strongly with the modern version of feminism, but this is not a No true scottsman.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:26 AM
3

They shld both go to jail, neither one of them behaved acceptable.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:46 AM
4

And women wouldn't be attacked if they just wore shitty clothes, and terrorists wouldn't attack if we just embraced Islam, and robbers wldnt kill if we just gave them all the money, and Arabs wldnt get mad if cartoonists did draw pictures of mohammed.... your argument is a bad one.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 12:45 AM
-3

You may want to Google what the term straw man means, you are using the term wrong....
/r/MensRights24/11/13 12:17 AM
1

Quickly how can we make this sound unreasonable without using facts!?!? .... Let's somehow attach this to race....SEGREGATION......BLACK CHILDREN.....
/r/MensRights20/10/13 09:02 PM
4

People don't agree with my hateful attitude, so everybody is stupid. Obvious conspiracy.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 10:54 PM
2

So I heard about a couple girls violate the law by shop lifting the other day, this means I can go force my penis in them now right?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 10:52 PM
2

Um ok?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:47 AM
1

But they aren't limiting free speech, the person is free to say what they won't and start their own site to host that. Facebook is free to decide what they want posted on their domain, and the information they want represented. They aren't a public forum, they are a private corporation. If I went to a gay rights meeting, and started yelling "fags will burn", should they not remove me from that area? Freedom of speech is not the same as being able to say whatever you want wherever you want.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:04 PM
3

Keep in mind though that he said they were underage, we're not talking about a grown man taking advantage of someone, we're talking about kids initiating what was most likely one of their first sexual experiences. Awkward and confusing enough as it is, I don't think it's fair to assign morality to this incident. By the looks of it, both of these kids are going to develop some serious issues with their own sexuality.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:05 PM
4

Source or link? This seems like people faking convos to make a specific issue arise. Some feminist did the same thing a while ago and it got a lot of press (but she got caught, r/justiceporn)
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:05 PM
1

Did you even read the article? No one is getting away with murder, she was released awaiting trial, this is a common practice in many jurisdictions when the accused is not a risk of flight nor to re-offend. Literally nothing has happened here yet to be an issue
/r/MensRights17/09/13 11:29 PM
-1

Title misleading... she's only released awaiting trial, btw this isn't a men's rights issue
/r/MensRights14/09/13 12:44 AM
1

Did I miss something? I didn't see any anti-men sentiment in this article, for the most part I think the article was good. Women need to stop idealizing what the future is and look at the reality to make choices. As opposed to what the comments in this thread say, I didn't see any mention of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 12:09 AM
6

Would you mind posting the outcome of this issue as it unfolds, I'm seeing a lot of speculation in the rest of this thread.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:34 PM
1

Fuck, why does this sub have so many feminist posts? Men's rights =! Anti-feminism. Let the feminists have their feminism, posts should be more relevant then this.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 03:56 AM
5

It's an issue that can potentially affect men yes, but it's not a men's rights issue,.... lol, like seriously
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:31 PM
15

Um, by posting it in an MRA sub?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:29 PM
-6

Um, a lot actually. For starters we complain about women on the internet to strangers. I'm confused on how anyone could doubt that we are ultimately and solely responsible for all the justice that was done here.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:30 PM
23

I disagree. Redpillers make it so more moderate individuals have a harder time pointing out specific issues that actually need to be dealt with. Think we should have a discussion about alimony reform? To bad, because no ones going to take you seriously because the RP just started a thread about how women shouldn't be allowed to vote.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:17 PM
-5

Find me a source that says he had that risk
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:11 AM
-2

This is India though.....
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:33 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:10 PM
0

Even 10 yrs is too much, if there is no other offenses, 1 year with extended probation is more like it.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:27 AM
1

You know this is disgusting when the entire MRA disagrees with the severity of a sex offense ruling on a women.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:26 AM
5

I loathe anyone who uses a serious topic such as suicide as a soap box, to spew this shit. You have switched the conversation from the real issue to discussing the faults in something less relevant. You are disrupting this conversation.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:21 AM
11

What I don't like is people complaining about feminism and "toxic masculinity" in this thread. The high rate of male suicide is a very serious issue, and instead of being constructive, most people here seem to be looking for reasons to blame women. Disgusting. We have our fights, let them have theirs.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:10 AM
5

Is no one else a little alarmed that the police officers response was you should have kicked the shit out of her when she is restrained, and that you have her information and can find her should you want to harm her in the future? That's fucked up.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:20 PM
5

Sue her for slander, she needs to provide evidence for each alleged claim, if she can't you should be eligible for damages.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:01 AM
9

My problem isn't the child support, my problem is that they are being selective in determining his responsibilities as a father. A father should be responsible to provide for the child, but is he going to get a say in what school he goes to? An opinion in disciplining? Any influence on the kids interests? The courts are cherry picking his duties as a father and that's what I don't like. Your either a dad or not, and if the mother wants nothing to do with him, then that's what she should get.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 02:05 AM
0

Where did it say she was a repeat offender? The crime isn't comparable at all. That was also my point if you didn't cherry pick which part of my argument to reply to.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:15 PM
1

Um, never once did I say it did.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 10:18 PM
-2

2 years suspended sentence and plus those 12 months = 36 no? I don't get your point
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:58 AM
-8

I disagree, I think 19 to 14 would have the same response regardless of gender to most people, if it was 24 to 14 or something, then I think you'd start to see issues. I don't feel this particular instance is worth being upset against
/r/MensRights30/06/13 12:11 AM
-7

You seem to be looking for reasons the get upset here. 1) what ever sentence your buddy got, only matters if he is from the same jurisdiction as this girl, if not, then it's an irrelevant statement. 2) these are comparable sentences, she's looking at up to 36 months.... 3). I know plenty of guys who were 18 and dating 14 year Olds, it was wierd but didn't amount to anything, (high school seniors dating freshment). Again this means nothing, as my jurisdiction is different. 4) I don't think there …
/r/MensRights29/06/13 11:18 PM
-8

Misleading title, she was 19 when she started the relationship. They are both just kids, the sentencing seems fair to me. No where in the article did it say because she's a female...
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:49 PM
1

Can I help you?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:58 PM
1

You can go through my comment history, I argue a lot. I concede a lot. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong. Especially here, this is not a subject I'm overly interested in discussing in depth. It seems a rather delusional approach to take to a discussion. Strong following or loud minority, whatever. I really am beginning to think that you feel someone who challenges your beliefs I have no problem you challenging my beliefs, are aruge religion, and have a lot more heated conversations then…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:53 AM
1

Thats fair. I wouldn't say it is perfectly true, but I'm happy enough at leaving this at that.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:40 AM
1

Wrong men are more likely to be victims of violence Yes but i addressed this. Men are more subject to violence because they voluntarily put themselves in these situations (perform violent crimes, stand up against violent actions, war, etc). Men are more likely to get violent when drunk as well. Women are more likely to be the victims of abuse than men. Thats what my previous links cited. Overall though, yes men are more likely to get hurt. This is not due to discrimination, but rather due to our…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:56 AM
1

Feminists frequently use quotes out of context, talk about tone and (this is why I thought you were a feminist), make wild claims without evidence. Your logic: Some feminists have hair, you have hair, therefore you are a feminist. If you are going to throw something out there you need to back it up Not if it is commonly accepted. I would like to know exactly I said that was extreme? Nothing, you are leaving me to assume since you haven't made a statement. It's extreme to think white males are mo…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:36 AM
1

Where have I claimed I was a victim? Same place I claimed to be a feminist. It doesn't mean you aren't using the same tactics though. So are feminists based on their tactics or their positions, what are there tactics and how do they differentiate from the tactics of others lol. It's hilarious, becareful how you answer, you yourself are beginning to sound like an AMRA. (Check their sub, it's disgusting yes, but a) they accuse you of every thing you accused me, and b)your (MRA) attitudes seem to b…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 03:33 AM
1

Sigh, you are young yes? Not an excuse, a valid point, and let me explain why. You, I assume, are part of the MRA, an activist group by definition, which means they want to make change. This was not a scientific, nor a philosophical based discussion. If it was either of these, then yes, shame on me for making a meaningless statement. However this is not the situation. In this case I don't need to. The fact it is generally accepted does not validate my statement but it does validate my position. …
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:54 AM
1

My assertion that women suffer a most issues in our society, was stemming from the fact that issues against women are more domestic. The issues that affect them are usually in regards to their safety or their financial opportunities, whereas with men the situations we are usually discriminated against through legal persecution and financial situations (we have an easier time making money then women, but we also have an easier time losing it, if you don't understand the differences in my phrasing…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:34 AM
1

At least I have made a statement, make your statement and I will freely validate my own.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 01:01 AM
1

Lol, they? I am absolutely not a fucking feminist. I'm not self-victimizing like you though.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 12:50 AM
-1

What have you examined? You don't need to adopt accepted viewpoints of society, but when you are make a contradiction to the current norm, then burden of proof is on you. I have noticed you side stepped answering the question. Are whit males generally more discriminated against any other minority groups?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:24 PM
-1

What do I need to explain? This is generally accepted by our society, do you disagree? I sided with the MRA a little more strongly a day or 2 ago, but I can't wrap my head around the fact that most of them actually believe white males are MORE persecuted against, and have a harder time then other minorities? Lol, we. Run. The. World?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:57 PM
-1

I never stated perception = facts. You are altering my statement so you have something to argue against. This is not how it works, the general consensus of the public is that white males are the least discriminated against. This is generally accepted. I don't feel the need to back up the statement any more then I would need to validate gravity. Do you believe white men are more persecuted today in the soceity white men have built? Perhaps if you actually state an opinion rather then side steppin…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:51 PM
-1

Perception and fact are not mutually exclusive. Let me ask you this, do you believe that in western society men are more discriminated against overall than women?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 12:54 AM
-9

Of course they do, failure to admit that will always prevent the general public from sympathizing with the MRA. Men's issues usually stem from legality issues and marriage issues, both important, but don't affect us day to day. The majority of men don't feel discriminated against in their daily. Lives, women don't share this sentiment. Step back from the us vs them ideology, you'll do more harm to the movement then good.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 11:58 PM
-6

To plays devil advocate, A LOT of MRA's say some really shitty stuff, and are quite misogynistic . Women do have a harder time regarding most issues in our society. That being said there are certain issues that specifically affect men that also need to be addressed, so you are correct in saying both sides need to be dealt with. Remember though, to outsiders a group is usually represented by the vocal minority, and in the MRA's case that includes a lot of men who seem to hate women. In fairness t…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:59 PM
10

She should be entitled to something, but not from him, not his money. She should be compensated by the state for sure.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 08:01 PM
0

I think 8 is troll. Its irrelevant, the biggest harm to women are other women, behaving in this way only harms their own groups further. Facebook's policies don't affect me financially (those are the only feminist issues that concern me), Facebook can do what it wants with its policies IMO. And when some women complains about some irrelevant "gender equality" against her, i will comply, roll my eyes, smile and pat her on the head. This doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 04:40 AM
1

I think the original assessment is relatively fair, and there are reasons these behaviours are present, you can look at what our society has evolved from. Is it fair? No. But the nature doesn't care about it. Is it oversimplified? yes. But in general, men are more attracted to physical beauty, women are more attracted to a provider, this is the way it is, because back in the day, when our ancestors lived in a world devoid of luxury, where survival > love + equality this behaviour was needed. Our…
/r/MensRights26/05/13 08:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter