TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HighTMale12 Archive

View 11 posts and 634 comments by HighTMale12 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
201

CMVHighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:18 PM
118

CMVHighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:37 PM
72

CMVHighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 12:30 PM
65

CMVHighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 12:59 PM
11

CMVHighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 11:37 AM
7

CMVHighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:42 AM
1

HighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 12:44 AM
1

HighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 11:47 AM
1

HighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 11:34 AM
1

HighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 12:26 PM
0

CMVHighTMale12/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:44 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:14 PM
3

Most conservatives are simping for women these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 09:16 PM
3

He is very accurate for all races of men to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 09:14 PM
5

Dave Ramsey made more money giving advice about money then actually saving money or making a business himself unrelated to financial advice lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 09:13 PM
3

Untrue
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 09:12 PM
1

MidWest and South.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 09:12 PM
3

Conservatives these days are often feminist too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 09:11 PM
3

Not whining. Speaking about low birth rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 09:09 PM
2

Who said that? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 09:09 PM
1

Most women are single now though. So "average age of first marriage" is only a subset of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:28 PM
3

There is really no value for marriage for a man unless the female earns alot more and is richer.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:27 PM
1

Id argue the "freaks" is normal among American women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:26 PM
1

Feminism always becomes radical once women get the vote
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:26 PM
1

im not worried. I figure Islam should take over.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:25 PM
1

due to low birth rates
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:24 PM
4

Yes but not close to enough to pay for single moms. 50+% of workers dont pay federal taxes now.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:24 PM
-1

Russia was a long time feminist communist country. So I figure residual effects of that still linger.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:23 PM
1

Divorce rate is only lower due to low marriage rate
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:23 PM
1

What is their marriage rate compared to college educated women 30 years ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:22 PM
2

So men clearly dont value women enough to "marry" them anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:21 PM
1

I gave them as one subset but said this is basically a universal opinion now. White women aren't only dating white men either.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:21 PM
4

Thats good. So no marriage is a good thing for the males.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:20 PM
3

Marriage rates are at all time lows. So the notion that there are all these "relationships" is false compared to any other time in known history.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:19 PM
5

I’d argue men should just avoid marriage entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:57 PM
2

Huh
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:56 PM
3

Anyone can
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:56 PM
-1

Yeah but at least feminism will be dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:56 PM
4

Or they will make so little as to avoid paying taxes like 50 percent of the country already.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:55 PM
1

So why do islamics do it well?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:55 PM
1

Don’t marry unless get top level guy is similar argument to mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:54 PM
1

Then I guess women should not want to marry at all by this logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:54 PM
3

Who says I’m opposed to that change?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:53 PM
0

And they can’t do it too?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:53 PM
1

I answered all of them. College educated women want at least 2 times the per capital normal income of a college graduate. Average height for American is 5’9. 6 foot and above is less then 15 percent. Even if we make it 20’percent, the math is still bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:53 PM
3

If men are very much interested in marrying them, why is the marriage rate at all time lows?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:41 PM
1

This guy is acting like 5/10 American women aren’t as entitled as 10/10 women. Newsflash they are
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:40 PM
0

I’d argue the 5/10 women are just as delusional and superficial in demands as 10/10 women these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:36 PM
5

What happens when 5/10 women have very high demands as well and consider themselves 10/10? This seems to be the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:35 PM
1

Yet the Islamic parts of Russia seem to have over 2 per woman birth rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:32 PM
0

Yeah bye bye west and hello Islam.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:31 PM
0

How do welfare moms afford it then and have such high birth rates?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:31 PM
1

I already spoke about welfare moms in other comments. The marriage rates are at all time lows. Just because some women eventually “settle”, doesn’t mean this issue isn’t mainstream. Also, these women become resentful after they “settle” as well hence divorce rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:26 PM
1

Yeah guess it doesn’t really matter if West dies off and Islamic culture takes over.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:23 PM
1

100 percent agree
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:22 PM
1

Can’t afford it at all or can’t afford lifestyle they want?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:21 PM
1

Shows the level of delusion in the modern female compared to Dr Phil BS. Very valuable info.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:20 PM
9

You realize these studies are done by feminists right? Ergo, the data can be correct whole conclusions will be clouded in typical feminist clap trap.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:18 PM
2

Yes women have higher demands from men then ever while they are more obese and masculine then ever. I don’t disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:16 PM
2

Or they can let other cultures take over and restore patriarchal values.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:14 PM
5

Beta male will never pay the taxes to support children that way. Ergo, that will fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:14 PM
0

Russia is a different animal then USA. I’d argue in Russia men have more of the advantage. But as I recall, birth rates are going up under Putin.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:13 PM
3

Marriage rates at at all time lows in all education levels. It’s just poor uneducated women don’t really marry at all now (they get on welfare and marry state). So comparatively college educated women marry more then poor women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:12 PM
1

Speaking about population issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:11 PM
8

Do I need to link women wanting taller men? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:10 PM
1

Both. Rich men can buy sugar babies. Hot men can sport fuck women in their early 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:08 PM
2

Yes welcome patriarchy from other men’s cultures. It does sort itself out eventually
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:07 PM
0

You might be that rare supermodel looking woman with high standards (like everyone else on the internet). However, most women are obese there days with high demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:04 PM
2

Women even in the Midwest are demanding 80k plus.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:03 PM
1

Standards for men have gone through the roof while women are more obese and masculine then ever. I think that’s a big part of the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:02 PM
0

Ok. Feminist and female entitlement is at top of list.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 02:00 PM
0

Answered it perfectly for me. Shaming language incoming with discuss of “sexism and rape” to follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 01:59 PM
3

It needs far more then its current rate. Hence bringing in immigrants.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:53 PM
3

Hence high female demands
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:53 PM
1

That doesn't explain any causation. It tries to invert the reality. Feminist studies always show that kind of stuff. Women divorce men because they don't make enough? Well its the man's fault dammit! And that "patriarchy"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:51 PM
9

You have to realize these "studies" are all published in feminist journals. Ergo, it admits women are divorcing men at higher rates if the female makes more. But the conclusions always have to blame the man or it won't get published.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:46 PM
1

So women are just not having kids because its too much work and no benefit? Then why are they still wanting men who make far more then them to marry?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:44 PM
2

Im speaking about USA
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:43 PM
-1

Thats the feminist shaming language version of it. I don't agree with the conclusions of the article just the fact that women divorce at higher rates if they earn more then husband. The article clearly shows women divorce men who make less at a far higher rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:43 PM
-4

High standards among women in terms of lifestyle leads to this. Ergo, the 100K requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:40 PM
1

I have already answered this above
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:38 PM
3

Birth rates are the lowest on record in from 2018 to 2021.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:37 PM
4

Correct
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:37 PM
0

I'd argue in their early to mid 20s, its the women rejecting marriage and doing their "party phase" I'd say by women's late 20s to 30s, its the women who are chasing after the above demands and most are unable to secure it these days. Ergo, marriage rates are at all time lows. Men are also figuring out in their 30s+ that earning 100K/year is tough and marrying a poorer female who will take their money isn't a pleasant experience. So they mostly avoid marriage with these women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:36 PM
2

Its bad if you want a population that survives with children
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:34 PM
2

I have given a link to the studies. Can you confirm any studies that show women who earn more then their husband have lower divorce rates?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:34 PM
1

This was "in person" culture in the 1990s for big cities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:30 PM
5

1) Yes and they promptly get on welfare. This would be the only population in the US that has a higher birth rate. Welfare single moms in poor communities. 2) Sure they can. Men can stand on their "own feet" without women too. Ergo, low birth rates/marriage rates. Women are pickier then ever. I 100% agree. Despite women earning more money, they demand even HIGHER salaries from their husbands. With the high level of affirmative action/low employment for men (especially high school only males), th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:29 PM
-2

Women have the lowest birth rates in history. "Maintaining" a "high lifestyle" is the likely issue since they want men who make 100K+ these days to "have children". I can agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:26 PM
0

Population As an individual, I was truly annoyed to see all the below average women (single moms, obese women, women barely earning a living, etc) demanding these traits on dating sites or match maker forums when I was dating. The question of if the woman brought anything to the market was met with blank stares.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:25 PM
0

Are you arguing women aren't picky about income demands for future husbands? https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbands
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:23 PM
7

Highest divorce rate marriages: Women who outearn men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:22 PM
9

https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbands One of many "studies" confirming women demanding men make significantly more INCLUDING women who are "better educated".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:22 PM
3

Cool story bro but anecdotal evidence doesn't negate birth rate/marriage rate data.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:21 PM
4

Actually 100K+ is not a "dime a dozen" for men in their 30s-40s. Its top 9% of total male population and about 5% or so for 30s-40s men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:21 PM
2

At what ages?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:18 PM
1

Hence the reason for the decline in marriage for men in their late 20s to 30s. Successful men are smartening up to this fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:17 PM
2

Most women are sleeping with "Chads" in their early to mid 20s and not really interested in marriage to equivalent males. The "attitudes" demanded above mostly apply to women once they hit mid to late 20s onwards when they become more "marriage" minded.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:16 PM
2

Abortion/Contraception has been mainstream since the 1960s. Yet birth/marriage rates didnt collapse until recently.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:15 PM
3

Im speaking about the society in general not my personal situation. Women are at all time low marriage rates/birth rates. That is the discussion. Proof: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/can-american-men-ever-be-happy-if-their-wives-earn-more-than-they-do-2019-04-29
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:13 PM
1

Most women who were thin would have the ability to marry a man who is in their early to mid 20s. Its women in those age groups that don't want to marry. This issue about marriage that men are avoiding is when women hit their late 20s to 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:11 PM
2

I stated at the beginning that the women are mostly delusional like the ones who call into Kevin Samuels show. Women mostly never look at it about their SMV position. They have been conditioned to just have "demands" and feel that any man who doesn't fulfill them are inferior creatures that are to be looked down upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:10 PM
2

Feminist shaming language lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:08 PM
3

That comment was edited after the fact. Read my second response.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:08 PM
1

Women avoid marrying in their early to mid 20s due to their "standards". Women regulate that market. Men regulate the market for marriage by late 20s to 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:03 PM
0

The men who get the "most pussy" are usually still the richest. Women are still demanding "hypergamy". Maybe they are marrying men below them more now due to necessity but they clearly aren't happy about it. Women who earn more then men have the HIGHEST divorce rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:02 PM
3

LOL this comes from real world women
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 12:00 PM
-1

Thats true But that occurs more for men in their 30+ years when women magically want to get married. Its women avoiding marriage in their 20s mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:59 AM
1

I actually fulfill all these traits listed above.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:58 AM
3

Women are "resentful" due to watching all the women's shows, seeing books like Lori Gottlieb having to convince women to settle and women's general discontent about men without these traits in discussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:57 AM
2

Actually most men are looking just for a thin woman in their 20s for "marriage". Men aren't "settling" and "feeling resentful" towards women in the same manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:55 AM
4

Notice the term "settle" you used. Imagine how that affects the female thoughts about her "husband" that she "settled" for?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:52 AM
4

I'd argue the female black dating culture is LESS materialistic then white female. Ergo, if its that bad among black females, imagine white females.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:51 AM
-2

Marriage rates and birth rates at all time lows
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:50 AM
2

Yet I wrote the typical female demands (especially white female who is college educated)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:49 AM
6

and men don't want to be women's meal ticket and slave.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:47 AM
3

I never wrote 6'4" 10/10 though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:46 AM
3

Thats false. By the 1990s, the popular culture with Dr Phil/Oprah/movies/TV shows were all showing men as "dogs who cheat" and women are virtuous monogamous creatures. Women were already divorcing in droves and taking ex husbands to the cleaners. The MRA/Red Pill is a logical countermovement to 1990s feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:05 AM
1

I disagree. Before online dating become prominent (mid 2000s and the more with smartphines in the 2010s), most interaction was in the "clubs and bars". Only attractive, muscular men did well in that environment. That is why the "nerdy" men flocked to online dating when it first started and it was considered for "nerds". Men who do poorly online now would do poorly in the "clubs and bars" in the 1990s.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:03 AM
3

I dont remember this culture. In the 1990s, most movies/TV showed people "hooking up" throughout college and having "fun". Marriage wasn't emphasized. Men were promoted as "dogs" who "cheated" on Oprah/Dr Phil/movies as well. Women definitely werent promoted on getting married young either. Feminism was in FULL swing by the 1990s.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 11:02 AM
1

I don't fully agree. By the 1990s (when I was in teens), there wasn't "online" dating but much of the casual dating market was "clubbing and bars". The hypergamy was INSANE at clubs with 8:1 male to female ratios (same for bars). Most men were "incels" in those days as well. Only the top 10% of men at best were consistently getting laid in these situations. Women were already getting massive affirmative action benefits and outnumbered men on college campuses as well. Women were demanding high sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 10:59 AM
6

Then I wouldn't have crushed them on MCAT scores. Are you smart enough to know what affirmative action is?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:20 PM
1

Most college women only want college men due to hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 03:59 PM
2

Its 33/66 by default in men's favor in college. Yet most men in college are not doing that great getting women. So I dont know how to explain it that well. It might be 10/90 ratio now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:28 PM
0

Thats correct. I know by grad school in the 1990s and early 2000s, the LGBT/minorities/women stuff was huge. The only stuff they didnt have were trannies yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:27 PM
4

College dispels this myth. There is about a 2:1 female to male ratio in college whereby college women ONLY want men who are college educated. Yet even in that environment, college men don't seem to be chased by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 12:40 PM
11

Decade? I remember in the 1990s getting passed over into medical school by women/minorities in NYC already.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 11:39 AM
1

100% truth right here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/21 04:49 PM
2

This is 100% the reason
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 03:01 PM
1

Must not have lived in NYC
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 06:44 PM
2

Sugar babies solve that. Plenty of "nontraditional" people are making it to top levels of corporate culture in 2021.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 03:04 PM
1

the scam is they are acting like they are obtaining top level women in their 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 05:31 PM
1

Cool story
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 01:53 PM
2

Then I guess they dont need affirmative action/quotas anymore they have been whining about for 2 generations?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 10:49 PM
1

Trust it applies plenty to females in medicine as well. Many physician women dress like hookers on the wards these days with high heels or big boots with short dresses.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 10:45 PM
3

Trust me the physician females dress like hookers on the wards these days
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 10:42 PM
2

you clearly dont work in medicine
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 07:39 PM
13

These "older" women used their sex appeal at younger ages to get promotions. When they get "older", they push for quotas/affirmative action feminist preference to make sure they continue at top positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 03:30 PM
1

Women are using sex appeal in the workplace to obtain: 1) Affirmative Action quotas 2) "Sex Harassment" to defeat competitor men who are uppity 3) Short/Skimpy clothing that would never be accepted 20+ years ago to get male bosses to give them promotions. Women are keenly aware of their sexual power and are utilizing it strongly in the workforce.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 03:27 PM
1

Cool story bro
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 09:27 PM
2

RedPill/Blackpill combo is 100% truth. Its the scammers that ruin the space.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 09:09 AM
3

TRP subreddit has been eliminated and is largely irrelevant now. Youtube is where all the "redpill" content creators are now and these grifters seem to have taken over.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 09:07 AM
1

This is all true except the "gurus" give the fantasy that "game" can overcome this. Yet all the "game" they use hasn't done much for them in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 09:05 AM
1

Yeah "GayLubeOil" was another clown when I used to rarely frequent TRP forums. Dude was just a generic gym guy that was nothing special with an average girlfriend acting like he was "super chad" and selling BS. There is no way that clown could go to any random club and "slay" pussy. I never saw real "Chads" on there to be honest but I would see "reports" that was mostly fiction writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 09:02 AM
1

No "game" that these TRP coaches sell is just "being confident", having stupid jokes, being "alpha", etc. Actual fighters or drug dealers aren't using "game".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 09:01 AM
2

It seems that TRP has regressed dramatically over the last 3 years. It is just grifters/scammers like Rich Cooper now that got into it to sell scam courses/soap. The good theorists are all gone and there has been literally no advances over the last 4 years or so. Also, if someone is coming into the TRP space now without knowledge of its history, they will only be introduced to these scammers and it will turn them off.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:59 AM
1

Name one that is "living" anything close to "alpha male" conventional red pill theory in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:57 AM
1

Yes but average looking/status men aren't "cold approaching" women with any consistency and being successful using "game". None of these "gurus" pick up women in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:55 AM
3

Show me any dude that is average in looks/status that can obtain women using "game" and "cold approaches". You think a clown like Jon Hogwood or Roosh in his prime was able to consistently pick up women on "cold approaches"?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:54 AM
1

Bro even nightclubs in the 1990s were very competitive. I dont even believe this "before online" dating stuff was some kind of panacea. The 1990s were brutal in the "clubs"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:52 AM
0

Yeah that is very true. Much of one's success and "status" are luck and genetics too. Height is genetics. Facial aesthetics is mostly genetics. Even muscle mass development often requires roids/HGH to really "stand out" from the crowd these days. Remember its not enough to have "some muscle" but you basically need to be super ripped/roided these days to really stand out for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:48 AM
1

Yeah I enjoy the Better Bachelor and Coach Greg Adams stuff However, I am concerned because they are now involved with Donovan Sharpe's scam conference. Major turn off.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:45 AM
1

Blackpill/Redpill combo is best
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:39 AM
0

Got to clean out the trash bro TRP has to have a filter mechanism if its to survive
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:38 AM
3

lol true
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:37 AM
1

Coaches can prove their teams ability though
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:37 AM
1

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 08:36 AM
4

lol we can argue that on another thread
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 12:23 AM
1

Yet all these clowns are married to single moms or older women
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 12:21 AM
2

Yet he promotes all these scammers around him
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 12:19 AM
2

Makes it tough when reddit has shut down the whole TRP subreddit. All we have left are these grifters who call themselves the "leaders" or "godfather" of Red Pill. I understand the concept of TRP though should be much better then this PUA scam stuff it has morphed into.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/21 12:03 AM
2

I read it. So what? Does that justify him selling BS conferences for 10+ year old material? Or push all those other scammers? Does this ignore the fact that he married a 35 year old woman when he was 30? Come on bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:41 PM
2

They had huge videos out there with 100K+ views on this topic as well. I am fine with TRP as long as they aren't selling scam conferences, soap or 2k/hr calls. I am not fine with dudes pretending to be PUA chads when they are married to postwall single moms, etc either.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:38 PM
3

True
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:33 PM
5

He married a 35 year old female when he was 30. So by his own logic, his SMV was going up while hers was collapsing. So it was the worst possible marriage choice for a "red pill" man to make and totally opposite of his theories.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:31 PM
11

Lets not pretend feminism hasn't been toxic and "playing games" for 2 generations now. That is why we have a red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:26 PM
12

Life in the modern western world is "toxic" especially when it comes to feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:25 PM
2

Yeah that is why blackpill is winning out over redpill now
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:24 PM
1

I can agree with this
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:24 PM
4

Im speaking about all the notable youtube red piller figures like the Rollo crew. Rollo is the "godfather" of the Red Pill as you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:23 PM
2

Doesnt sound very red pill
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:22 PM
2

Disproven how?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:21 PM
3

Im not arguing about 3-6 years ago. I think it was way better back then. There hasn't been any advances since then though in TRP and it just became PUA scammer crap. Rollo hasn't added anything new for at least 10 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 11:21 PM
2

who are they then?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 08:00 PM
3

Bro this clown Donovan Sharpe is charging 2K each for his conference now
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 07:47 PM
7

His book Rational Male is 10+ years old and he stole it mostly from sosuave forums
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 07:14 PM
3

you never heard of Rollo?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 07:00 PM
2

truth
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:55 PM
2

Yet these guys claim to run Red Pill
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:50 PM
2

bad boys are fighters or sell drugs or have another angle besides just "game"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:50 PM
6

bro Rollo pushes all the PUA stuff too
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:49 PM
3

"game" only works if you have all the other essential stuff women want its icing on the cake at best but not the cake.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:38 PM
9

"Game" only works if you have all that other stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:29 PM
2

yeah it can mean any "high status" guy in any topic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:28 PM
0

Hypergamy can be rich banker or drug dealer thug or nerdy rock star. Just anyone that women could like basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:23 PM
2

That part I agree with but that isn't what they are "selling". They are selling "game" and other mostly PUA scam stuff that they are calling Red pill including Rollo
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:22 PM
3

Yet they seem to be running the whole Red Pill online now
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:17 PM
1

Agree 100% but really can't say much since this is CMV
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:16 PM
1

For 2K, you can bang a bunch of sugar babies instead of listening to some clown like Rollo taking about hypergamy for the 1000 time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:12 PM
3

Yeah I agree but im starting to question him since he is going to these scam conferences now with Donovan Sharpe
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:11 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-_KUy8ATYg&t=433s
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:07 PM
1

Seems far more effective then "game" or spending 2k/hr talking to Rich Cooper or 2K for a Conference on Male Excellence with Donovan Sharpe
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:07 PM
5

If they claimed that are 5/10 man could become a 7/10 with working out, "game", etc. then I could believe it. If they said you get slight improvement but will never be at the level of a Chad it wouldn't sell well though. Thats why they have to lie about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:04 PM
12

Hence blackpill
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:00 PM
1

Yeah but at least if you're living it then you can sell it. Jon Hogwood telling people to "do the work" while dating 1/10 Asian women he has to pay for isn't exactly good business.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 06:00 PM
2

They identify as the leaders of the red pill
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:58 PM
2

Rollo is the "godfather" of the Red Pill though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:54 PM
8

Yes but there is only so far you can go based on genetics and luck with that stuff. That is why blackpill is far more accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:53 PM
1

You should teach at his conferences then with Donovan Sharpe
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:51 PM
0

This is purple pill debate bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:51 PM
2

Then explain all the above examples
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:51 PM
1

Well thats good to hear. Their conversion rates should be .001% at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:49 PM
14

Yeah but "Red Pill" content creators only solution is to sell scam courses and soap
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:48 PM
2

Bro watch John Anthony's video exposing MLD Its basically 1/10 Asian women and gay dudes he is hanging out with.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:47 PM
5

That is what blackpill says. Redpill claims you can use "game" and "frame" and other BS tricks to get top level women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:46 PM
3

How do we know it works if their top practitioners cant achieve anything close to their claims? How do we know blackpill isnt right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:45 PM
6

They seem to have some kind of business model since they keep selling their BS. Cooper apparently has people subbing to his scam stuff and making >6 figures from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:44 PM
33

Dating "coaches" hate the blackpill stuff because they can't sell that to unlucky men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:42 PM
-1

THey are all selling each others scam stuff Edwin Hopkins is even running a "conference" at 2K/person to teach people about "masculine excellence" that his single mom wife is running.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:41 PM
3

Yeah but all the main content creators are now PUA scammers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:40 PM
3

The term "hypergamy" can mean anything too. Its a nebulous term that Rollo stole from evolutionary psychology books and sosuave forums
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:39 PM
5

All the main content creators are now selling courses and other BS stuff. It wouldn't be so bad if it was just theory without all the selling of scam courses and "conferences"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:37 PM
2

You too bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:32 PM
7

Although much of their diagnosis is correct, their "solutions" clearly haven't worked for them. How can they sell "solutions" when they can't achieve even come close to achieving it themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:31 PM
3

You seem emotionally invested in them. Did you buy their PUA courses too bro? Its like a dude who is morbidly obese selling dieting tips. It just doesn't work bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:29 PM
2

Its spelled Shekel lol Are you Jon Hogwood bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:26 PM
15

Bro have you seen the women on his social media accounts? Where's all these "hot women" that he can get from "game"? I was expecting to see 8-10/10 supermodels that were 10 years younger then himself but instead saw 1/10 Asian women he had to pay for.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:25 PM
3

I know plenty about them. Anthony Dream Johnson, John Anthony, MGTOW Dictionary, etc have been exposing them. Why are their personal lives in direct opposition to their talk? I mean these dudes are married to older women, single moms, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/21 05:23 PM
1

I don't know how they "concluded" that. It clearly says OLDER men with women under 35 DON'T have that risk. Is there a study confirming women over 35 with men under 35 have a lower risk then women over 35 with men over 35? That is the only way I can see making that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 03:13 PM
2

Actually someone posted this gem trying to confirm men are at risk for causing "Down's syndrome in older women" but the findings actually confirmed older men with younger women have same risk as younger men with younger women. "Paternal age has an effect on Down syndrome but only in mothers 35 years old and older," write researcher Harry Fisch, MD, of the department of urology at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in New York City, and colleagues. "In younger women, in whom age was not a risk …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 11:23 AM
1

The "newer" studies only show "increased autisim risk" which is a far more nebulous disease without any clear cut genetic markets like Down's. Furthermore, there are confounding variables including: A) Autist men have children at older age. 2) Diagnosis of Autism is far higher in general in the last 15 years. The only way to determine if this is true is to have the SAME men having children in their 20s vs 40s with women in their 20s and correcting for increased autism rates in general largely du…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 10:33 AM
1

The "newer" studies only show "increased autisim risk" which is a far more nebulous disease without any clear cut genetic markets like Down's. Furthermore, there are confounding variables including: A) Autist men have children at older age. 2) Diagnosis of Autism is far higher in general in the last 15 years. The only way to determine if this is true is to have the SAME men having children in their 20s vs 40s with women in their 20s and correcting for increased autism rates in general largely du…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 10:33 AM
0

The "newer" studies only show "increased autisim risk" which is a far more nebulous disease without any clear cut genetic markets like Down's. Furthermore, there are confounding variables including: A) Autist men have children at older age. 2) Diagnosis of Autism is far higher in general in the last 15 years. The only way to determine if this is true is to have the SAME men having children in their 20s vs 40s with women in their 20s and correcting for increased autism rates in general largely du…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 10:33 AM
0

Once again: "A 2009 review prematurely concluded that the absolute risk from paternal age for genetic anomalies in offspring was low, and stated that "there is no clear association between adverse health outcome and paternal age but longitudinal studies are needed."[14]"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 10:14 AM
0

"A 2009 review prematurely concluded that the absolute risk from paternal age for genetic anomalies in offspring was low, and stated that "there is no clear association between adverse health outcome and paternal age but longitudinal studies are needed."[14]" Your own wiki quote confirms bigger studies say the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 10:14 AM
1

True but Stacy didn't have to put out in her 20s like "average" female did
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 11:01 AM
2

The problem is these "educated" women will often go to part time or stop working after they have one kid while sticking the collect and grad school debt on the husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 08:45 PM
0

Women's fertility is far more susceptible to STDs as well. As a result, women running on the CC are far less likely to bear children than younger cohorts of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 08:06 PM
1

False: 1) Never said 100%. Realistically, its like 70% for women that aren't married by 29+. This doesn't apply to women who marry young for the most part or marry their HS sweetheart. 2) That is a more tricky concept. Beta male can improve enough but why would he waste it on someone who slept around for many years while he is improving? 3) Not enough value for the male of equivalent age to marry
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 08:01 PM
0

Celebrity males as "sexiest man alive" are never young 20s
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 07:45 PM
-5

Celebrity females lose their "looks" far quicker than celebrity males. That is why the "sexist man alive" celebrity males are always >30 while females are often in their 20s. Women have become angry about this recent and try to artificially push older women/obese women as "attractive" but this really isn't the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 07:44 PM
-1

The older Clooney looks more distinguished and attractive. There is a reason the top celebrity males are all >30 years in age for looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 07:43 PM
1

What % "minority"? Also, I would figure it represents a very substantial % of women who arent married by late 20s
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 06:11 PM
0

It was powerful enough that women mostly married by 20 until the 1990s
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:53 PM
2

Not just "intimidated" but also expectations for commitment are higher since they can demand it. Average women dont have that ability with Chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:50 PM
1

Chad still has to put in work to get a Stacy. Chad has no put in minimal to no work for "average" women. Ergo, he more readily bangs average women due to no need for effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:49 PM
5

Boomers affected the cultural changes from the 1960s onwards and implemented it through institutional power from the 1990s onwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:47 PM
1

most women are liberal arts majors. Physician women who go through rigorous medical school/residency curriculum have far better "excuse" to not be married into late 20s/early 30s without them riding the CC.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:46 PM
2

Correct. The SMP is more like a govt subsidy for female imperative using the beta male's taxes to allow for this lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:40 PM
1

He can afford SBs
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:37 PM
2

It is true enough for most liberal arts "feminists" college grads that are 28+ that arent married
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:37 PM
1

Its worsened by poor lifestyle but fertility drops far earlier for females regardless of health status.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:36 PM
2

The stats bear it out. The lower on the looks scale, the more sexual partners women have.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:35 PM
1

They can't rail a 9/10 with no effort. Stacies make Chads offer relationship/commitment. "Average" women with no bargaining power will offer pussy to Chads far more easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:35 PM
1

Im in a situation where I am involved with a female 11+ years younger than me and have multiple children. Im speaking about this from an academic exercise mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:34 PM
1

I think the "Chads" are banging the majority of college women. The stats on "sexual partners" is bearing it out. Most "Chads" will bang average women if they offer pussy to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:33 PM
3

Stacies are harder to bang for ONS too. A 9-10/10 female demands commitment out of the "Chad" far more than "average" women who have no bargaining ability outside of offering fast pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:31 PM
1

There is no evidence of the later. Its only the former assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:29 PM
1

10% of men can easily bang 80% of the women during their 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:28 PM
3

The will be able to sleep with him. They just wont be able to get any type of long term relationship with him. Doesn't mean they wont try.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:27 PM
29

The boomers didn't gain institutional power until the 90s. Bill Clinton was the first boomer President.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:25 PM
1

Who said "every"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:24 PM
1

If they can't, then they should remain childless and run a harem of SBs with money.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:23 PM
1

Divorce Rates are only down because total marriage rates are down. The % of marriage divorce is still around 50% despite far less marriages
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:22 PM
3

Boomers didnt gain control of the society until the 90s. First boomer President was Clinton. Boomers ruined the society since the early 90s when they took over.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:21 PM
3

Im not sure that is even true anymore that women who marry in their 30s are doing it with their HS/Teen Boyfriends. Most women are marrying late 20s now.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:18 PM
2

Its not better for the man to marry an older woman with more "experience" sexually. Thats is NEVER true. Chad dude usually bangs hot ones but he will often dip into lower/mid tier when he gets drunk at bars/clubs/rotating harems when he feels like it. "Stacies" are far harder to bang on ONS since they have more SMP capital compared to average women. The "average" women have to throw pussy at Chad much more readily.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:17 PM
0

Most women are kindve prostitutes in some form. I agree with the relationship with a woman in 20s if man is in 30s as a good alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:09 PM
1

Cool if you want to marry post wall CC riders, more power to you bro (if you really are a bro). The stats in psychology as the another poster added confirms differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:08 PM
1

Yeah the MC collapsed the most. The UMC is somewhat down but that could represent a different demographic of more highly educated females that actually bring money/income to the table. Most women dont bring significant income/assets to the table to justify marriage with for betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:07 PM
1

Most women are hookers in one form or another. Post Wall CC rider is a more expensive hooker.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:06 PM
1

Good citation and accurate with TRP perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:05 PM
6

Actually the average age of marriage went from around 20 for females up until early 90s to about late 20s now for women. When women married young, there was no AF/BB opportunity structure. Yeah I mean Chad only bangs other Stacies and never 4s to 7s in ONS/short term flings right? LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 05:02 PM
4

The boomers set up the current paradigm when they took control of society in the 1990s. They pushed feminism, multiculturalism, LGBT, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 04:56 PM
0

The AF/BB phenomena really started around the 1990s. Most women were getting married by late teens and early 20s well into the 1990s. The really couldn't ride the CC until late 20s/30s and then marry some simp. They were marrying equivalent age men they met in HS and college up until 1990s on average. It was only since the mid 90s that women started marrying far later, fucking tons of "Chads" at clubs/bars (now off Tinder), etc. When were still able to get "simps" to marry pretty readily once th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 04:29 PM
1

Why should a beta risk half his assets/income on a female that was unreliable in the past? Its like asking to overlook credit scores for loan applications.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 04:26 PM
3

Wow women take to their 30s to become "mature" Amazing how that works. I thought women were supposed the more "mature" sex at younger ages?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 04:25 PM
1

Theres something wrong with there is a large disparity in sexual backgrounds. When a female "changes" preferences dramatically after she has gotten older/less desirable, its a red flag. Rollo is a clown. Dunno where he came from lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 04:25 PM
3

Post Wall women in their 30s never admit to the beta they are settling. They will claim they "changed and dont like badboys/fuckboys" anymore. Magically, this happens after the female is older and less desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 04:08 PM
1

Marriage is not a partnership though under current laws. Its a subsidy for the lower income/asset "partner" and an annuity on top of it if they break apart. There is no reciprocity noted in the contract either or obligations for the lower income/asset partner in the contract. No business would allow for a "partnership" like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 04:02 PM
-1

There's plenty of those posts and some of the most upvoted ones on the sugar reddit. Regardless, its a better option than a 30+ year old woman "settling"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 04:00 PM
1

Why would a guy chose to be in a relationship with a female that had sex with multiple "bad boy Chads" in her 20s when he is an accountant in his 30s? He doesn't fit that stereotype at all. Why would she be interested in him by 30s outside of money? The problem is women don't admit they are "settling" to the "beta". They usually say they have "changed", etc. Why would a female admit to "settling" when she needs the beta for financial benefit?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:57 PM
1

Actually they don't when its this type of relationship. Current marriage rates and divorce rates confirm it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:56 PM
1

The nanny can be a different person
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:48 PM
2

You are giving multiple false assumptions here including: 1) Female brings assets and income to relationship. Most of these 30+ year old women are in debt and make less than the beta. 2) Prenups are solid 3) Female doesn't stop working after having 1 kid or more. There are very few good "2 income" households where the female brings in as much as the male and contributes equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:48 PM
3

Yes if the female makes more then the male and has more assets, there is no risk in marriage to that female. Im speaking about females who have debt and less money/assets which are the good majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:46 PM
2

I dont see evidence that UMC and MC marriage rates are "stable". Marriage rates have collapsed in general and are lowest on record with lowest birth rates on record. Marriage was already gone many years ago for the low income segment. Ergo, the collapse is hitting MC hard and somewhat UMC.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:46 PM
2

Plenty of women on the Sugar Reddit talk about "falling for" their older SDs. I wouldn't ask it in that manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:45 PM
2

I never said its "all" but its significant enough in that demographic that this is the best option. Furthermore, even if the female magically became attracted to the beta when she got older, what benefit does he get from an LTR with her?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:44 PM
5

Yeah because those women who were ran through by Chads in their 20s are looking for good "company" with a "beta" in his 30s that is financially secure. Take the financial security away and see how long they stay for the "company".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:25 PM
1

Yeah because he wouldn't be paying her alimony/child support/half of assets in that situation and she would've been far younger when having his child
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:23 PM
1

The "ideal" is for a the man in his 30s to date female in 20s and have children with her. 10+ age difference would be ideal. However, surrogate/SB option is for "betas" that are unable to achieve that. Having children with post wall women is NOT a good option regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:22 PM
0

Its a worse deal if she got ran through. At least the virgin isn't "settling" for a guy because all the Chads she banged wouldnt commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:21 PM
1

Possibly then he would be a "single dad" not worse than a "single mom"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:21 PM
1

I am not "assuming" this is all women. I am specifically speaking about late 20s to 30s women who had a specific "type" of "boyfriend/fuck buddy" throughout their 20s. This type of female is probably the norm in US culture at this time though since marriage rates have collapsed and marriage is happening at older ages.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:20 PM
1

I think men who are UMC should be the most likely to employ this tactic if they are "beta" and marrying a 29+ year old woman. I can't explain why if they aren't. All I know is the marriage rates are collapsing in all demographics, so I figure some of the "simps" are catching on.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:17 PM
1

Yes I would like them to explain the value of this type of relationship compared to SBs. SBs appear far better with lower cost.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:55 PM
7

What benefit does the male get in such a relationship? He is just a financial mule for a female who isn't really sexually attracted to him after banging a ton of Chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:47 PM
2

This discussion is related to average late 20s to early 30s+ women as marriage options for the typical 30+ year old "successful beta". This doesnt apply to other relationships. If female is in early 20s and dating/relationship with man in early 20s, its totally different discussion. Male in his 30s dating female in 20s is difficult discussion too.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:47 PM
1

Ideally, he would find a female 10+ years younger for a relationship with. Outside of that, surrogate where he is a single dad or SB that is willing to do it is best option if he wants to propagate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:45 PM
1

SBs are pretty much equivalent in price and better looking mostly unless you buy super cheap hotel prostitutes that are high risk for police/pimps. Surrogate is another option if SBs aren't willing. The best option is if he can find a female 10+ years younger that is willing to have his kids but this might not be feasible for random successful beta if he is too beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:45 PM
3

Best options are: 1) Surrogate and hires nanny with sugar babies for sexual gratification 2) Female 10+ years younger that is traditional There is no good option with 30+ year old post wall women that rode the CC
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:26 PM
2

The feminists brought it to this level for the beta males. This is just about empowering beta males in a feminist dating market
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:25 PM
1

This is another good option.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:24 PM
1

I agree if he can secure a female in her 20s while in his 30s, its a better option. This is a post for betas who cant secure women in their 20s while in their 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:23 PM
1

This is the natural response to the dating market that feminists created. Currently, the female imperative is served at the expense of the beta male. This change empowers the beta male to serve his own sexual imperative like feminists ruthlessly did.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:22 PM
3

"Social obligations" were changed by feminists in the 1960s for the female imperative rather than family formation. Men need to just follow their imperative in a free for all sexual market that women created. ​ This would be best bet for betas under feminist conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:21 PM
0

Even 400 isnt that much if its 4 times/month at 1600 Man could switch them out too when he gets bored.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:19 PM
1

100% correct post
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:18 PM
10

A post wall woman who settles with a "beta" after she got banged out by "Chads" isn't much of a relationship either besides financial. So at least SBs are younger and hotter plus cheaper than half assets/income in divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:14 PM
3

Great post that succinctly explains this phenomena.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:12 PM
5

Feminist shaming language doesn't change reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:10 PM
0

She has a "connection" in the sense she likely tried to lock down dudes to get commitment using her pussy. The problem is the "Chads" she is banging had 10+ other options and only used her for pump and dump. During her peak 20s, she is more interested in riding the Chad harem in the small chance of getting him to "commit" rather then working with her looks/status equivalent male. She only comes to looks equivalent male by 30+ after her SMP has collapsed and isn't able to be on the harem anymore …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 02:09 PM
3

The "wall" isnt women not being able to get sex. The "wall" is when women can't get commitment or attention from "Chads" anymore. The "wall" is when she has to "settle" for the "beta" since her SMP has failed. Also, the argument is women of same socioeconomic class/looks dont want the equivalent male until they hit 30+ and casually sleep with men far above their station.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 01:55 PM
7

There is no "real love and affection" from a woman who slept with mostly Chads in her 20s to "settle" with a guy in her late 20s to 30s based on financial reasons and losing SMP value. The beta is clearly being used for financial reasons. What benefit does the "simp" get marrying a female that is 30+ after sleeping with many men and on the hook for half his assets/income?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 11:43 AM
3

He is out of her league in terms of looks and status.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 11:42 AM
1

Yeah the "simps" are starting to form their own harems in their 30s from these postwall women who slept around with "Chads" in their 20s that are looking to "settle down". This is a very smart and logic move on their part. Why commit to these women? Also, they should utilize the "sugar baby" market if they have acquired currency.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 11:29 AM
1

Yeah then there is no issue
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 05:10 PM
6

A female who isn't a whore that sleeps with a man so quickly and doesn't shoot outside of her league doesn't have these issues. Not that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 04:56 PM
3

My argument is that the "victims" are no better than the perpetrators.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 04:53 PM
2

The women who get "pumped and dumped" deserve it mostly
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 04:52 PM
7

Yes but they largely do this due to them attempting to shoot outside of their "league" and attempt to compensate this through sex for women or resources/emotional support for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 03:56 PM
3

Thats whats happening in the sugar dating world
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 03:26 PM
1

They are already called "sugar babies"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 02:42 PM
4

I dont see why modern feminists who make poor mothers or relationship material in general wouldn't see this as a viable option outside of "shame". Whats the difference between a hooker and "empowered feminist" who gets pumped and dumped by "Chads" during their 20s?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 02:40 PM
11

Dont see this being an issue for many modern women since they really arent relationship or mother material. What would be wrong with this for most feminists?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 02:38 PM
12

There are endless complaints from females feeling "used" by men. I am speaking about why women who feel "used" were mostly at fault for being "used"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:38 PM
2

Correct
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:37 PM
1

If a guy keeps getting used for dinners, he needs to figure out cheaper venues to take a female to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:37 PM
1

She is at fault for mostly trying to offer sex to "lockdown" a man out of her league in most cases. At best, she has sex way too quickly with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:31 PM
1

umm ok
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:24 PM
6

Yet I notice in this culture there is a constant whining in the general culture about "bad men using women for sex". Or the inverse is the incel dudes whining about being beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:24 PM
1

What
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:19 PM
2

Both parties are trying to gain something outside of their "league" mostly. They attempt to give resources/money or sex to get relationships with people who wouldn't normally do it with them. They are being "used" only because they are attempting to get a "bette deal" then they normally could get without allowing themselves to be "used".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:18 PM
1

I dont really see why you need to get married if you have kids. You can "cohabitate" in a state without common law marriage and easily take care of the kids as well as being married.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:05 PM
1

Men should never marry under the current Western system unless the female is significantly richer/higher income.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 12:51 PM
1

I agree just like its the female's fault for getting pumped and dumped without a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 12:46 PM
1

Basically woman wearing skimpy clothing, flirty, etc for a male that does favors/gives money to the man that is clearly attracted to her. She does it specifically to get stuff out of the man and then turns around where she says in disgust "I dont owe you sex" after using the man for finances/benefits/etc
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 12:10 PM
3

That is correct. An honest "good" girl wouldn't do either
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 12:07 PM
2

If women are concerned with STDs, they shouldn't have sex with partners until they get multiple testings and avoid sex for an extended period of time. It is her fault for having sex so quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 12:05 PM
0

No different than females who lead men on the illusion of sex to only get the benefits they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 11:50 AM
2

Women have caused "hook up" culture by having sex often throughout their late teens and early to mid 20s. Women would need to become more "traditional" to avoid that but they are strongly opposed to that due to "feminism" So they will continue to get hookup culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 11:43 AM
3

She can just avoid having sex with the man for many months to "vet" him properly then. Thats her problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 11:41 AM
5

Damn son you're an alpha chad
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 11:49 PM
4

Or these women remain obstinate into their late 30s and older without any standards. Many will get pump and dumped in their 20s by men far outside of their league and will eventually become spinsters when they get older and bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 05:29 PM
1

You have breakdown of the poorest vs 500K in terms of TFR? I don't see that stat
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 02:29 PM
1

The stat is only for 2011-2015. It shows a marginal increase for 500k+ compared to less than 500K for 3 or more children. However, it doesn't break it down by deciles of income. Ergo, it is very possible the "welfare" queen class has the highest amount of kids, with the "middle class" having the least and "wealthy" having more than middle class but less than "welfare" class. This is how it broke down by education levels. Furthermore, the TFR for everyone outside of "high school dropout" was belo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:36 PM
1

I found another link that somewhat explains the article but doesn't break it down with much vigor by %. "Less than 28% of 40- to 45-year-old women in a household in any income bracket below $500,000 per year have three or more children, according to data from the 2011-2015 US Census, while 31.3% of families earning more than $500,000 do." This isn't a complete statistic since the other link confirmed the lowest educated had the MOST kids, then the middle educated had the least with the MOST educ…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:33 PM
1

That link is subscription based and can't be accessed. Only one that could be accessed was education link.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:30 PM
1

You're arguing India is matriarchal?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:28 PM
1

The graph clearly shows the "high school dropout" has 2.24 TFR compared to 1.98 TFR for "advanced degree" holder. Its only the "some college" category that is the lowest in the middle category for fertility. |||| |:-|:-|:-| ||||
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:10 PM
1

The number shows the highest fertility is in the high school dropout at 2.24 TFR compared to 1.98 for "advanced degree" holder TFR. So the poorest has the most kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:08 PM
1

Which "cultures" are these? This certainly isn't Islamic nor Latino culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 12:18 PM
7

Yes you dont have to but most white women demand at least that level of lifestyle to be a SAHM
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 08:38 PM
4

https://smartasset.com/retirement/the-average-salary-by-age Its lower than that for men in 30s and 40s for men making over 100K
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 04:47 PM
19

I agree that it isnt easy to be a fully SAHM these days. Only about 5% of men in their 30s make even 6 figures. https://smartasset.com/retirement/the-average-salary-by-age
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 04:46 PM
1

Money isnt just money lol Very often it is very hard to obtain money and the man has to do physically damaging stuff to obtain it. How is that him being abused?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 04:21 PM
2

Dont know about the goat or other man thing but rest is accurate lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 01:51 PM
2

So you're arguing you can have sex with people under your employ in inferior positions without repercussions? It would be different if he was banging some random woman that wasn't involved with him on a professional level and subservient to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 01:39 PM
1

True Mexicans do it to flood USA with more Mexicans and welfare not due to liberal ideas like LGBT
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 05:49 PM
4

Yes it is Conservatives are proven to be highT while liberal men are mostly soy boys
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 05:42 PM
5

everyone is superman online brah
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 05:41 PM
0

Alpha males are conservative
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/20 05:40 PM
1

Id would argue that the majority of female physicians are obese
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:33 PM
1

FDS are 3rd wave feminists Basically their argument is they are "queens" who deserve high value men for nothing. That is straight Feminism 101
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:33 PM
1

Thats why I put the caveat for people with 6 figure income plus
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:32 PM
1

Baby oven > Modern Feminist in terms of value for men
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:31 PM
0

umm ok
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:29 PM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:28 PM
0

Men with >6 figures can select for younger/thinner women though, so prevalence of obesity among poor isn't an issue. Besides arguing that men should overlook these things due to everyone being "unique", I see no valid arguments
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:28 PM
1

yeah I dont think marriage is worth it I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:27 PM
1

1) Younger and less stressed are usually in better physical condition. That is just reality. 2) If men don't want kids or few kids, then maybe this isn't as much of an issue for them
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:26 PM
1

Funny how "equitable" split is mostly the man giving to the woman Feminism 101
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:26 PM
1

So no argument against anything I wrote except "not everyone is like that"? No true scotmans lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:25 PM
1

Feminist "scholars" never advocate differently either
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:25 PM
1

So basically men should only expect "good conversation" but nothing substantial to marry Doesn't sound like a very good bet for men to marry
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:24 PM
-1

There are plenty of our of shape physician females You clearly arent in medicine
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 01:23 PM
1

LOL i couldn't care less
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:51 PM
2

1) Women are rarely ok with a man taking extended time off from work without financial contribution (particularly successful women) 2) Women rarely stay with men if they lose a job for extended periods of time. 3) Successful women are usually even more hypergamous and thus more "gold digging" Minuses retort: 1) Things can be discussed but women's attitudes often change. They are "egalitarian" in discussion ahead of marriage but often change (especially after having 1 kid) 2) I agree 3) Discussin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:45 PM
2

1) They are older at a minimum if they get a graduate degree (necessary for 6 figures these days for many jobs). Most are under stress as well to achieve this so by extension being older/stressed people are mostly in worse shape than younger less stressed. 2) Yes so basically you have to accept a female who will have less children as part of the "deal" in most cases, which is another negative for men. Often when they have their one kid in mid 30s, they got to part time work despite having alot o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:41 PM
6

In the lower classes, women stay single and use govt resources mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:38 PM
2

Show me any feminist websites that say women should only marry men who make equal or less than themselves and split bills 50/50. Doesn't seem particularly a high priority for feminists
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:33 PM
1

I can agree with that last part That is the only situation where a man conceivably should get married
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:23 PM
1

Most of the "higher paid" women will have plenty of student loans, so their savings is negligible by the time they go to part time. Furthermore, its much more common to have feminist attitudes against cooking/cleaning/etc when "educated" LOL at you downvoting my posts too
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:20 PM
1

I already said toddler is more difficult but that is a short stage of life. I have no issue if they do 50/50 and pay for childcare.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:12 PM
0

Its "useless" if they cut to part time or stop working once they lock down the male. Its actually worse than useless since the entitlement remains. Read the argument
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:11 PM
2

Read FDS or any feminist blogging site about "high value men" and how they should support the female financially. In fact FDS and other similar feminist sites state that females should "know their worth" and demand "high value men" that support them financially. There is no discussion that she should contribute 50/50 to finances.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:10 PM
1

working is much more stressful then the others
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:05 PM
1

Yeah I found that but BLS says its 28% according to same article. So the men still earn more in at least 2:1 ratio for marriages if these stats are to be believed. Might be that men are smartening up a little and not marrying women if they earn too little (can only be hopeful)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 12:05 PM
1

GOt a link to this stat?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:57 AM
1

There is no link to that stat. Its just an assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:56 AM
1

You linked a post from someone with no link confirming their assertion. Also, their statement showed that >50% of marriages still had the man making majority of the money with only 24% of women being higher earning. I highly doubt women are even close to 24% in real life and never saw a study showing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:56 AM
1

umm ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:55 AM
2

Pretty useless unless a top musician (1/100000 chance)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:54 AM
2

Thats total BS that women aren't encouraged. They have all kinds of affirmative action courses for women to go into STEM. Women just are uncompetitive in mathematics are higher levels and are unable to form new companies. Teaching mostly special ed kindergarten is a joke compared to teaching Calculus for the gifted students. So most of the "teaching" that women do are low level subjects where they demand no standardized testing for themselves or students, etc. Nursing is the only harder career o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:53 AM
1

I never saw stats anywhere that women make as much or more than men in the good majority of marriages Got any links?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:41 AM
1

yeah except in real life this is rare that a female provides equal financial benefit to the marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:38 AM
1

This is only true potentially for a "toddler". Once the kids hit kindergarten, the man easily works far more than the female. Furthermore, most studies show men work more total hours than females. Also its paid not "payed"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:33 AM
1

The modern female won't cook/clean/emotionally support the male What value is there?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:31 AM
3

Correction: women go into easy careers with easy liberal arts degrees where they want to be paid the same as a STEM major. So the women basically mostly earn less than the men in most marriages. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:30 AM
1

Pretty much useless to any man and less than useless if you have a good amount of student debt.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:28 AM
2

She should have a job that has equal salary and split all costs 50/50 Not just "have any job"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:28 AM
2

Why should he support her financially? If she wants an ATM, go get a sugar daddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 11:25 AM
6

They are two income with the man making the vast bulk of the income Ergo, he is basically sharing his surplus income with the female in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 10:04 AM
3

Correct. Rotating sugar babies >>>> Marrying older woman
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 10:00 AM
2

Yes they should just rotate Sugar Babies at a much cheaper rate than marriage for good majority of successful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:58 AM
1

Define "equal"?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:51 AM
2

Correct. There is no value in marriage. Even feminine women can change due to the culture. The man is just placed at risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:50 AM
2

So wouldn't a man be far better served dealing with a female >10 years younger that is only a HS grad without student loans? Why should he burden himself with a feminist type "educated" female who will just stop working on his dime while doing none of the traditional female roles, slept around during her 20s, etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:47 AM
1

Plus nothing will stop them from stopping work or going part time after they have 1 kid or so. When women hit 35+, they rarely continue to work full time at a highly stressful job that makes >6 figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:31 AM
6

Its a very common view among women. Also, most women usually go part time or stop working when they man makes >6 figures even when the female is "educated"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:27 AM
1

Actually its far cheaper to just "lease" pussy through Sugar Babies then get involved in a depreciating feminist "educated" female that doesn't bring in income and only has demands/student loans. Marriage is useless for a successful male to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:26 AM
4

Yes but then its largely useless for the man. In fact, its usually a negative because the "education" makes the female far more demanding and "uppity" in terms of her "worth" coupled often with student loan debt. Essentially, the man gets an angry feminist who doesn't want do any of the convention cooking/cleaning/deference to the husband who has student loans and demands the man pays all the bills. How isnt this a far worse deal than an "uneducated" female with just a HS degree?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:25 AM
2

I think modern "education" in liberal arts fields are so useless with feminist/cultural marxist indoctrination that it would be better to find a HS only grad than a female with a grad degree in a "liberal arts" field. They mostly become angry jaded feminists with debt and demands with no benefits conferred to the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/20 09:23 AM
13

many women go into part time work or stop working once they have locked down a man who makes 6+ figures
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 10:05 PM
3

they would need to divorce immediately if that happened
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 10:04 PM
7

I would argue that even women with careers that have the POTENTIAL to make as much income as their husband (or more) are bad bets. They often cut to part time if they are able to marry a husband that makes 6 figures plus. I would argue marriage has no value to men at all in general unless the female is coming in with far more assets than the man and is "sharing" them in a joint account to compensate for income risk for the male.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 09:11 PM
1

Dunno she must be a really good actress then and having kids with the mailman behind my back lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 05:16 PM
2

Its my experience but im not speaking about it, hence the proposition I made in this discussion for men who couldn't get a younger woman to have children with as easily as I got.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 07:44 PM
2

What career benefits?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 07:43 PM
2

Im doing just fine and we have plenty in common with 3 kids already
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 07:14 PM
2

Who cares about relating to male zoomers lol Im having no issues getting younger females
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 07:13 PM
2

A younger female with low N count is better
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 05:09 PM
3

Yeah I mean if the 22 is morbidly obese feminist and 35 year old is a super slender hot model, then the 35 year old could be better. However, im speaking about averages not exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 05:08 PM
3

lol the "commonality" argument Feminism 101
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 05:08 PM
1

That statistic only gives one year instead of averaging over 5-10 year intervals. One year variance can account for any change in divorce rates by random chance. It shows marriage rates are down and divorce rates are down. It looks like divorce rates went down slightly faster than marriage rates for 2018 but that is only one year and it still is showing about a 45% divorce rate compared to 50%
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 05:06 PM
3

They are my kids. My situation isn't relevant since I have achieved significant amount of progeny with a younger female (might have more). This discussion is about men who haven't been able to do that and are offered 30+ year old CC riders as their choices only.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 05:02 PM
4

That argument is weak since its a "give and take" situation. The male is providing resources/money/income and the female is providing youth/fertility. If the female is coming to bargain at 30+ when it has declined, she can't expect to have the same currency as her 18-25 year old self.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 04:59 PM
3

Yeah plenty of trust fund liberals rioting too
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 01:14 PM
2

Yes but leftist billionaires caused this like Bill Gates, etc by outsourcing everything. How would the left fix it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 01:14 PM
4

Yes male pedestalization of women is a MAJOR problem. Just dont see how objectifying them changes that
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 01:08 PM
2

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 01:01 PM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 12:59 PM
1

I already said marriage is useless for men in general
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 12:59 PM
1

What do you do for work?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 12:59 PM
1

Women still require resources and demand husbands are richer in most cases
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/20 12:58 PM
1

Natural Chads with alot of money bang a ton of women in 20s and part of 30s. Then in late 30s or so, they get a woman in 20s to have children with mostly. They get the best of all worlds but are rare in number.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 06:49 PM
6

100% correct
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 06:46 PM
6

Why should you marry then? Women provide no value outside of children for marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 06:43 PM
5

LOL maybe get banged out but definitely want a "relationship" with a more established guy with money
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 06:06 PM
6

Truth Women treat beta male providers far worse than the men they banged in young 20s
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 05:05 PM
8

1oo% truth
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:27 PM
7

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:23 PM
14

If you read sugar dating forums, SDs are strongly opposed to platonic and SBs constantly complain they cant get platonic
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:23 PM
2

Thats inevitable and unfortunately most relationships with CC riders
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:22 PM
1

could be but that is true of all relationships with CC riders too
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:19 PM
1

There is alot of overlap with these relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:06 PM
11

Except the vast majority do Platonic relationships are very rare
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:00 PM
2

The advice is all over the place on them. Some form relationships and others try to talk them out of it. Normal stuff for age gap dating
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:56 PM
3

lol can do both
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:55 PM
5

Same situation for CC riders in their 30s
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:52 PM
11

Yeah thats true. Women will have to force men to pay them for existing since men are smartening up on the marriage front.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:51 PM
2

There's plenty of posts that discuss women getting "feelings"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:50 PM
2

PPM= pay per meet
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:47 PM
11

The reason divorce is declining is marriage is declining. I think the % of marriages that last long term are still at all time lows
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:44 PM
7

The "divorce" rates arent declining as a % of marriages. Divorce is declining because marriage is declining in general
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:43 PM
3

You'd be surprised how that could change if wanted by the older man who takes care of hmself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:42 PM
2

300-400PPM isnt that hard for man in 30s that is living bachelor lifestyle
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:39 PM
2

No, the article is saying that the mothers are usually wealthier and can live longer for women who traditionally had kids starting in 30s. The problem is that is an older stat since the vast majority of women in those days had kids in 20s and only wealthier women had kids in their 30s (usually higher paid professionals). This isn't true anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:38 PM
5

Are you saying the average 30+ CC rider is hotter than 22 year olds?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:37 PM
2

Ok I can accept that
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:36 PM
2

Yes redder is accurate
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:35 PM
4

Most have sex with them man or they are paid far less. Read sugar forum Many SBs complain they arent able to get any SDs as well. This is especially true for BBWs
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:31 PM
2

He has the ability to get sugar babies using his provider income
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:30 PM
6

Its pretty simple answer. Would you pay more for the older model? That is the choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:29 PM
5

That article clearly shows having birth in 20s is easier for females with lower pregnancy related risks for mother/kid
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:29 PM
3

40
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:27 PM
3

riding CC, taking birth control and age are big factors
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:27 PM
2

sugar babies dont have "multiple clients" usually consider the ratio of SB to SDs are 10:1
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:25 PM
3

it a "use it or lose" it difference as a female ages
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:22 PM
7

lol nice strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:22 PM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:22 PM
3

I said first kid after 30s Read it again
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:21 PM
2

there is risk for women having first kids after 30+ on many fronts
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:21 PM
6

You'd be surprised how many of them would be down after they form a "relationship" with a guy in his 30s who takes care of himself and financially
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:17 PM
4

CC behavior is women banging men in their 20s and then changing their "interests" by late 20s to 30s into more "beta" type males
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:17 PM
8

Since the females are doing the CC riding in their 20s, the natural response is men in their 30s running the "pussy" ride through SBs. My argument is that if its happening due to women in their 20s already forcing the issue, men need to respond in kind rather than becoming a beta male provider after they get older.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:16 PM
2

Women shouldnt be having kids over 30+ if they are just starting out. Women who had kids in their 20s should be fine in their 30s if its with one man
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:15 PM
3

Well jeff bezos got married before he is rich and is staying single Elon Musk seems to be doing same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:10 PM
5

Children should be had with women in their 20s that didnt ride CC
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:07 PM
29

That is correct For "beta" males, all sex is transactional. That is why many of them cant get women until their late 20s when they start accumulating money/income.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:06 PM
3

The get an account on SA and usually just offer 300-400 for a PPM Not that complicated SB to SD ratio is 10:1
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:05 PM
4

It could work for any male in his 30s making 6 figures period. Obviously, the more money he has, the more relevant this argument is unless he is a natural "Chad" that gets women easily without money.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:04 PM
3

Of course I don't approve of it and that is the reason for my CMV
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:03 PM
7

Investing time/resources into a 30+ year old woman who rode the CC to have "children" is a poor investment He should be attempting to woo his sugar baby in his 22-25 age range to have kids for him if he is interested in having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:03 PM
14

I think most women are hoping "provider" men want that. However, most "provider" men are put into that position due to social obligations (shaming) from mostly women/tradcucks which is weakening and the false notion of "providing" getting him some real "relationship of trust and love" which is also dying with the obvious high divorce rates
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:59 PM
8

All sex is openly transactional including marriage to 30+ CC rider for beta males
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:58 PM
7

Im not complaining. Im speaking about their rational response to females riding CC.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:58 PM
3

Thats total BS A man could easily do that at low 6 figures if he has no other costs as a bachelor.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:56 PM
9

Well since his "peers match" have already ran the CC, why shouldn't he do that in his 30s rather than marry one of the CC riders?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:54 PM
6

Yes if you want to define a beta male provider as some chump who just wants to give money to a CC rider without benefit, then I guess that narrow definition would suffice. To me, most beta males put in the "provider" situation dont want to be just chumps that provide for a 30+ CC rider lifestyle with nothing in return and high risk of divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:53 PM
3

There are plenty of pay per meet relationships that are no where near that costly
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:52 PM
2

They are "working" but making far less than the man in most examples
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:45 PM
4

Most women in their 30s expect a man to make 6 figures. This is the SD range
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:45 PM
11

A larger harem of younger, attractive women fulfills the male sexual imperative far more than marrying an older CC riding female
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:44 PM
7

Actually most "provider" males are under the false impression that his future CC riding wife is going to be attracted to him and loyal. There might be some shaming (mostly by women who want men to marry but also some tradcucks) to push him into "social obligations" that don't benefit him due to divorce laws but that shouldn't be a real issue for him to care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:44 PM
8

Men should put work into physique/assets/status
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:42 PM
13

They want to stay "oblivious" since it benefits their sexual strategy at the expense of beta males. Why would they want beta males to know the truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:30 PM
1

As long as women are looking to marry men with substantial assets/income in their 30s after riding the CC, the man is put into the default "provider" status. Even if only "13% are strict bread winner", the many makes the most income in the vast majority of marriages. The woman obtains disproportionate financial benefit from the man's higher income and thus is put in "provider" role by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:27 PM
2

100% correct Alimony and Splitting of Assets with Child Support with female getting custody are default positions in most states.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:19 PM
5

Correct. This is 100% the mating strategy for "provider" males in the future. I suggest they do the sugar dating stuff too to bang young, attractive women rather than settling down with 30+ CC riding woman that needs someone to "save" them now. Its far cheaper to be a sugar daddy with a harem of younger attractive women with no commitment rather than marrying some 30+ CC rider that is likely to divorce and take your stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:12 PM
13

I dont think it works for millenial women either Bluepill should never be used in modern dating period. Its not like older women arent divorce raping and cheating on provider males in droves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:07 PM
4

Almost any male that gets married in USA is put in provider role by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 01:05 PM
1

RP is correct on that
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 12:43 PM
14

Actually, most men dont want women who have slept around.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 12:04 PM
12

Thats 100% truth The guy who slept with the female quickly is clearly the higher value person from the female perspective. The man who is made to wait is less sexually attractive and used for resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 12:03 PM
2

This is 100% correct to the current situation. This exaggeration is very common among TRP beta males as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 11:03 PM
2

I'd say a small % are truly "equal" but its rare
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:46 PM
1

Its only "quicker" if you both stay together for 20+ years and she continues to work. Very often, when the male is high paid, the female starts cutting to "part time" or less within a few years. Who is there to force her to continue working? Marriage laws are not setup to hold her accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:44 PM
1

I believe this. Western men have become largely pathetic weak beta cuckholds to Western women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:20 PM
1

100% truth right here except the part it won't be "mainstream". I think the female collective already are pushing openly for quotas, affirmative action, etc. so its pretty "mainstream"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 02:09 PM
5

Correct while the children of the losing tribe are killed (the children of these women). The women are forced into harems with no rights and are made to breed for the dominant males. Somehow this "natural" state wouldn't be accepted by feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 11:44 AM
4

Yeah the concept of "natural" isn't something they are interested in when it is women are treated as property for the dominant male. The females are in harems whereby they have no rights and are breeding machines for the alpha/dominant males. Yet I never see this "natural" state being promoted by feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 11:42 AM
1

Women dont get away with it though in the sense they cant get long term commitment but only casual sex from those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 11:06 AM
2

The answer is wrong since birthrates are at all time lows in Europe. If it was so successful, why are their birth rates lower than USA? Hypergamy is more about benefits to the female lifestyle rather than children.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 10:34 AM
0

This is not correct as per the stats in Europe confirming: 1) Extremely low birth rate: far lower than USA. If relationships were far easier in Europe, birth rates wouldnt be lower than USA 2) High out of wedlock birth rates across Western Europe confirming marriage is dying there was well. 3) Plenty of extreme feminist policies in Western Europe despite less "inequality"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/20 10:30 AM
1

PUA is mostly useless
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/20 11:23 AM
1

That is why female education destroys birth rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 10:01 AM
3

Correct. I don't see this song "WAP" as anything but selling sex from a former sex worker. I don't see how it proves women are thirsty
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 09:43 AM
0

Well im happy to hear men have more ability to get kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 12:50 PM
2

1) More hours, more difficult work, overtime, etc 2) Data didn't prove your case even though you think it did
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 12:49 PM
1

you seem mad bro
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 12:49 PM
1

sounds like PUA
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 12:49 PM
2

1) Number of hours worked and type of hours are well documented. Taking time off for kids decreases progression in job progression. 2) You didn't give relevant data
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 02:31 PM
1

I agree Society forced them into monogamy for the good for the overall culture. As you can see, it collapses under the current system.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 01:16 PM
1

It was a perspective given by feminists
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 01:16 PM
1

1) Men work harder and don't take time off for kids in same way as women. 2) Women take more from services then pay into taxes. Pay gap is irrelevant. 3) I agree don't get married
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 01:15 PM
0

Semantics. Affirmative Action is basically quotas with plausible deniability.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 12:38 AM
1

1) True 2) Women are net tax takers and men are net tax payers 3) Alimony is still given 98% to women instead of men
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 12:31 AM
5

Actually feminism is far closer to fascism since it has govt control. MGTOW/TRP doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 12:30 AM
1

Gender quotas are unconstitutional huh? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/20 12:29 AM
2

LMAO You think women in 30s arent looking to get married? I hope women are against marriage too now TBH.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 09:42 PM
1

1) Affirmative action for women in academia, business, etc 2) Taxes for single moms from productive men 3) Divorce laws that make it unfair to successful men Need I go on?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 09:41 PM
1

Marriage rates
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 09:37 PM
1

Are you arguing it wasn't sold to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 09:37 PM
0

What about if I have 12M in both personal assets and inheritance while I make >600k/year with a spouse that doesn't make anything? How would I be protected in marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 09:37 PM
0

I'd say from marriage rates, its >50% of men 50 and below. They might not call themselves "MGTOW" but there is a clear marriage strike.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 09:36 PM
16

You are correct. Feminism doesn't care about men besides enslaving them. We can agree on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 09:35 PM
0

I don't see any issue in a noncommon law state. Why would it matter if you had kids with her or not from a legal standpoint?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:40 PM
0

I can agree with that Its just that feminist ideology has taken over since then among most Western females.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:32 PM
0

Bible Teaches: 1) Wife defers to Husband 2) Women should hold no authority over men Now you can chose to believe it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:21 PM
1

It is speaking to all Christian women and men in general. I have already quoted both OT and NT discussions on the subject. So you approve wives deferring to their husbands?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:09 PM
1

LOL you were just trying to quote Bible as part of your support for men serving women. Is this a serious argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:07 PM
1

Yes it does. The other quote referred to ALL women not having power or authority over men. Ergo, they shouldn't be in any authority over men in workplace, academia, etc as per Bible.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:06 PM
2

1) Yes they did. The other stuff you are saying has nothing to do with my argument. 2) Actually, most studies are now confirming the opposite. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418903/ 3) I never said anything otherwise about housework. I said total work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:05 PM
2

https://www.bible.com/bible/8/EPH.5.22-33.AMPC "For the husband is head of the wife as Christ is the Head of the church, Himself the Savior of [His] body. As the church is subject to Christ, so let wives also be subject in everything to their husbands. "
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:03 PM
2

Here's Proverbs: "The good wife (31:10–31) Verses 10–31 of the chapter are called Eshet Ḥayil (אשת חיל, woman of valor). It is a praise of the good wife, a definition of a perfect wife or "ideal woman" in the nation of Israel, who is 'an industrious housewife, a shrewd businesswoman, an enterprising trader, a generous benefactor (verse 20) and a wise teacher (verse 26).[2] This "Woman of Valor" has been described as the personification of wisdom, or in some sense as a description of a particular…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 05:02 PM
0

the Bible clearly teaches the man is the head of the household and the female is to defer to the male. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_Timothy_2:12 ""But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence".[1][2]" Need more?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:59 PM
1

studies
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:58 PM
1

8 and higher
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:44 PM
4

In the Bible, women are to serve men as well. Funny how you just notice the "work" part for men but not obligations of women serving their husbands. Feminism 101
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:44 PM
1

Nice pretending this isnt mainstream Kind've like Biden trying to pretend he isnt a socialist now lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:43 PM
0

im pretty confident women were property before civilization since "might made right" before civilization
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:21 PM
0

lol nice strawman that has nothing to do with my argument
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:20 PM
2

Men do more overall work than females in marriages when adding in work time plus household work Highest divorce rates are when women make more than men
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:19 PM
1

Yes but men arent getting affirmative action for them
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:18 PM
2

The "no true feminist" fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 04:18 PM
2

they bring in foreign labor for cheaper costs totally different issue Furthermore, women are demanding the high paid "management" jobs more than grunt programmer work. Kind've like women never fight to be plumbers, electricians, etc only CEOs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:44 PM
4

women still almost exclusively marry men who make more money/assets than themselves. Large segments of men are just going MGTOW since they dont find it to be worth the hassle now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:39 PM
2

actually thats women's demands of men
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:38 PM
1

Feminism was a prominent supporter and at the forefront of the movement. Sure there were other groups involved as well but the feminists totally supported it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:37 PM
2

most women are feminists who deny it in USA these days
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:34 PM
4

Men got benefits and responsibilities in the past Women got benefits and responsibilities in the past Feminism gave women all the benefits while giving responsibilities to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:33 PM
1

You really think men who were constantly at war with other men for women, resources, etc treated women as "equals"? You cant be serious lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:32 PM
5

ok then make your own thread
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:32 PM
1

You said the men "all had corporate wives" that supported them in other post
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:31 PM
2

1) Again, it was sold as "free love" in the 1960s. That was the "woodstock" theme. 2) I have in other posts 3) It doesn't change because women fight to keep it. https://www.palmbeachpost.com/article/20160217/NEWS/812065230
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:31 PM
1

VC make specific funds for women now. VC doesn't care if one is female or male, all they care about making money.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:29 PM
2

and women want to control men's resources while sticking beta males with the bills Misandry has its own same "roots" everywhere as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:26 PM
3

So by your argument, might makes right? Guess men should go back to keeping women as property right since "feminism isn't made to benefit men".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:23 PM
1

I've seen those "studies" from "pre civilization" times. Im speaking about after the creation of modern civilization and language some 6000 years ago or so. Unless you want to go back to hunter/gatherer times where women were basically just property and men would fight to stake claim to them as booty?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:21 PM
1

I agree TRP doesn't need feminism to be true but it was the impetus in USA for its development.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:19 PM
2

Yes women are being pushed onto tech companies invented by men due to "quotas" They mostly take non programming "diversity" roles and other BS too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:19 PM
1

umm ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:18 PM
1

That article doesn't say she supported him financially. She helped with some of the "grunt" work but he had all the ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:17 PM
2

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-how-and-why-sex-differences/201104/why-dont-women-ask-men-out-first-dates
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:15 PM
1

TRP is far closer to reality than feminist theory
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:14 PM
1

Jeff Bezos depended on his rich wife to support him?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:11 PM
0

Im speaking about general society not exceptions
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:11 PM
1

Bumble is a rip off of Tinder where female board member literally just stole the information and change it nominally to avoid lawsuit. Others I cant speak on since they seem pretty small but there are a few exceptions im sure Vast majority of tech is made by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:11 PM
2

When was that?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:10 PM
2

I never said they were "good people" and most billionaires are psychopaths. That doesn't negate that women didn't do it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:09 PM
1

Show the data of what?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:08 PM
3

They want to not believe it since it benefits women at the expense of men Most men 50 and under experience it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:08 PM
1

Zuckerberg's wife was working to support him? Sergey Brin? Larry Paige? Bill Gates? This is untrue for Google, Facebook, Microsoft, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:07 PM
6

nice way of avoiding my argument lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:06 PM
7

1) When feminism was first sold in the 1960s, the concept of "free love" for men was a HUGE selling point. The concept of a "Woodstock free love" scenario where the average male participated was a huge selling point. 2) IQ was removed from admissions due to mostly Asian/White men being most of the 130+ population whereby there was no "diversity". IQ was deemed "racist and sexist". White women actually benefit the most from affirmative action (more than minorities). https://ideas.time.com/2013/06…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 03:05 PM
4

Most feminists dont agree with it because its uncomfortable truths.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:57 PM
3

First off, this confirms that women were given opportunity in jobs well before 1960s. Second, the computer was invented by men. The "coding" in those days weren't as high level as it became later and the men outcompeted the women. Women should be able to invent their own Google, Facebook, etc right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:56 PM
1

ok? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:51 PM
3

Yes that is why most of written civilization had enforced monogamy due to stability of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:50 PM
1

TRP "theory" is just understand female sexual nature. Its as old as the Bible. The only real solution for society is early marriage virginal monogamy. That will never happen in the West, which will continue to decline with low birth rates/broken families. The only "rational" protection for men in this environment is probably MGTOW which largely means avoid legal entanglements such as marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:50 PM
0

Throughout almost all of written civilization until the 1960s or so. Sure, there were some small windows of declining civilizations (Roman decline) where this wasn't the case but for vast majority of history. In fact, Roman/Greek men were given so much power over there women during most of their histories that they could kill them or their kids. I wouldn't recommend that extreme but you aren't speaking reality overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:48 PM
2

Women dominated computers in the 80s? Which companies did they invent again?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:46 PM
1

I have 3 kids and am in a traditional relationship already where i can afford to pay for everything. How about Physician Assistant? You just cant get an art history degree and live in NYC
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:43 PM
0

I assumed you were trying to argue that only women who "drunk/drugged" were high N Count women. I read it wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:37 PM
0

Women can easily still go to nursing school/teaching/etc with a bachelor's degree by 22. A woman can easily find a man in hate late teens to early 20s while having a low N count and still afford kids in many parts of the country outside of NYC, LA, SF, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:37 PM
1

Non virginal women were shunned for most of known civilization. The vast majority of women married as virgins until recently. Being "beta bucks" in those days wasn't a large negative though since he still got a virginal bride that was young that couldn't divorce him unless extreme circumstances. He was always able to have a family with children that were his own.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:36 PM
-1

People can still have kids at younger ages in lower cost areas of USA. Most women can't "afford" it since they want to live an expensive lifestyle in high cost cities
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:34 PM
1

There was no "beta bucks" since the woman was a virgin and couldn't divorce unless extreme circumstances. "Beta bucks" only exists in modern dating culture Premarital sex "existed" but was very rare
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:29 PM
0

Thats true but a different subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:28 PM
0

Everyone could "seek" them but only one could marry. Higher tier men wouldn't marry lower tier women if they had higher tier women seeking marriage. There was also no carousel riding the top guys for 80% of women either. Women were expected to be virgins at marriage. Lower tier women were basically made to marry lower tier men when the higher tier men married the higher tier women. Ergo, everyone got someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:26 PM
0

Actually, productive financially successful men did far better under that system. They would get a virgin at a young age to have a family with and they could productively support. Under the current system, women sleep around with "bad boys" and sugar daddies during their 20s while getting "educated" mostly in BS social science subjects. Then when they hit their late 20s to 30s, they find out they can't marry the "alphas" they were banging, so then they become interested in the nice "beta success…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:25 PM
5

Hypergamy was only allowed in a monogamous marriage situation. A top male would marry a top female with pairing off. So each person would basically marry at their level. Currently, its a sexual "free for all" where 80+% of women sleep with about 10-20% of men in their 20s and then attempt marriage in their 30s. Its not equivalent in the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:19 PM
8

Actually, most people will employ their instincts but not admit doing it. They will give another "justification" for it to give plausible deniability. Who would want to have the perception of being a disloyal person that "monkey branches" when given the opportunity? Very few.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:13 PM
-1

There are a few rare exceptional fields where men get preference but this is very uncommon. OB/GYN was rumored to do that as well in medicine.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:10 PM
8

Yeah its "adapt or die" for men while giving "preferential treatment" and "coddling female whims" with govt support, academic support and business support. Feminism 101 in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:08 PM
3

Correct. I really don't much care about the "theory" when the reality is totally different. Reality > Theoretical semantics
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:05 PM
3

LGBT get preferential treatment too
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:04 PM
0

ok forget my comments then lol I might've mistakenly read it is "high N count women need to be part of drug/drinking culture". Carry on.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:02 PM
1

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:01 PM
6

Correct. Very few females will admit they are monkey branching. They will speak about "abuse" or some other claptrap.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:00 PM
1

I already gave the basic premises of the "Feminine Mystique" and how they varied from reality over the years with the evolution of third wave feminism with the demands of quotas, preference in divorce, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 02:00 PM
3

Not at mathematics and hard sciences at the higher levels. STEM at higher levels are almost all male.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:59 PM
4

Then why are women demanding quotas and preference in USA? Tell your sisters they dont need them right since they are so good at it in other countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:58 PM
8

I think your definition of "LTR" is different than mine lol Very often fuck buddies are basically called "relationship" by women to lessen the reality of the situation and not make it seem the way it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:57 PM
5

1) That is extremely rare that women ask men out, etc. You are giving exceptions. The general trend is females demanding chivalry, courting, etc including "feminists". 2) All those "studies" are just BS claptrap justifying fake quotas due to female underperformance on basic standardized exams. No one can hold down a good programmer, etc since its pure merit. The same "argument" about "sexism" can be used in female dominated professions and attitudes towards men. 3) TRP allows men to be with wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:56 PM
4

Why cant FWB be "exclusive" for a month or two?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:49 PM
3

Sure but the original implication is that only women that "drink/drug" culture have high N counts. That is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:49 PM
7

"Serial Monogamy" can include FWB type of relationships or ones where no real commitment is offered.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:48 PM
4

Yes but its not essential to drug/drink to do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:44 PM
3

Read Betty Friedan the "Feminine Mystique" and get back to me
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:43 PM
9

Correct. It was largely a "bait and switch". They feigned "equality" at the beginning but quickly switched into preferential treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:42 PM
3

Don't see the difference right? High N count is high N count. You don't need to be a bar slut to get a high N count. So the premise is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:39 PM
8

Actually, feminism is far past "equality" these days. Quotas, preferential child custody/divorce laws, etc are the norm. The "equality" it was sold on was a lie but probably well intended by academics at the beginning. Feminism was "sold" on "equality"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:37 PM
20

Serial Monogamy is another form of sex that is pretty close to "casual" as well. High N count women can come from "serial" monogamous relationships that last a month or two each (or even shorter).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:35 PM
8

So you're arguing that giving women "no fault divorce", unfair quotas, etc are "civil rights" now? Feminism "evolved" from a theoretical construct with initially noble pretenses largely by academics on a false notion. 3rd wave feminism is the "reality" on the ground and logical outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:34 PM
5

1) Ok but im speaking about the general movement among the vast majority of Western women. There are always exceptions like in everything in life. 2) How is STEM "sexist"? Its the most meritocratic field you can have. Either you get the equation right or not. Women have been uncompetitive on the standardized exams since the beginning and hence quotas were instituted. 3) TRP/MGTOW is adaptation to the feminist movement like I wrote in the post
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:32 PM
5

Self reporting about hypergamy is less than useless. Most females wont admit they will monkey branch due to hypergamy due to it making them look bad in perception. Ergo, most women will find another "excuse" to dump their old boyfriend for someone "better" that doesn't involve admitting to hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:28 PM
1

These are natural gender relation behaviors for women that are "unhinged" from responsibility while all the negative externalities are placed on men to "fix". Its basically men becoming slaves to the female ID. I think men who subscribed to feminism initially didn't understand female nature since monogamy was forced on women for most of written history.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:25 PM
5

Are you arguing that feminism wasn't sold on these premises to men? Who said "conspiracy"? I think it evolved from those initial ideas into "3rd wave" due to realities on the ground that varied from the theory. As "reality" showed women weren't competitive in STEM, AF/BB, etc, the externalities developed whereby men were basically held down with quotas, divorce laws, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:22 PM
2

Atomized is no feeling of obligation to the collective society/males for the "good of society".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 01:03 PM
2

Why would atomized women not follow hypergamous instincts then and employ AF/BB strategy? They would only go against their instincts in a society that restrained them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 12:56 PM
2

In an atomized feminized society, the vast majority of women will employ their perceived biological strategy of hypergamy ruthlessly since there is no societal constraints. Women have no loyalty to the "collective" male population in terms of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/20 12:47 PM
20

So you are trying to use "shaming" to get men to slave themselves with no benefit? Feminism 101 confirmed. Fortunately, men arent falling for this in the 50 and under crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:33 PM
14

Neither are most men. Why should non criminal men protect random women?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:28 PM
27

Are women judged for being pathologically selfish and doing nothing for random men? Why would men be judged any different than women?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:25 PM
6

I have no obligation to protect a woman from some random man. There is no "altruism" from women towards men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:11 PM
8

Its the female who tries to get the child support, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:06 PM
13

USA 2020
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:01 PM
16

women are the ones who do the divorcing mostly
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:00 PM
4

Yeah only thing worse than dating a "Trump supporter" is dating a "Hillary Supporter, Obama Supporter or Biden Supporter" Who would want to date someone that supports a feminist male hating party?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 08:00 PM
15

Also women commit far more violence against children, so maybe we should give preferential child rearing to the male.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:45 PM
8

If you get rid of men, there will be no electric/plumbing/cars or modern civilization. We would race to the bottom
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:45 PM
12

100% truth but its far worse when it comes from female to male interactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:39 PM
26

Yes but why should the average random man care about protecting average female? He gets no protection, support, etc from a random female.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:38 PM
26

Its not a random man's obligation to protect you from being robbed, raped, etc. Call the police and have them come to help.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:14 PM
40

Correct. No man should white knight for random females.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:12 PM
21

But there is no "synergy" in these relationships. It's women demanding free stuff from men with obligations for no benefit for the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 07:11 PM
0

they dont have enough appeal after 30+ for a long term relationship for men in the 30+ range that are successful instead of a few exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 01:18 PM
1

just lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 01:05 PM
4

That is why the concept of "redpill" is BS since it goes back WAY before anything called the "redpill". I was already "redpill" before there was a Rollo, Roosh or Roisy? Before them there was Tom Leykis, Eddie Murphy, etc. I think the only difference is enough baby boomer simp men didn't get divorce raped, false rape charges, etc back then. Now since its full 100% anti-male with abundant divorce rape, metooing, etc., more simp men are finally waking up to some degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 03:10 PM
2

truth
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 12:07 AM
15

Younger women are: 1) More Fertile on average 2) Less Sexual Partners on average 3) Less jaded by past relationships on average 4) Usually don't have kids/divorce/baggage on average Older women's benefits: Can't really think of any. More demanding? Usually more debt?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 05:24 PM
1

They dont need it because they have a lower sex drive
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 11:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter