~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | So I guess all the "nerd" bashing of boys I've heard throughout my life (both real and in the media) is just a hallucinationAt my school the smart kids, both girls and boys, are usually popular because they are the more well off kids. I don't see much of this in my school and those who are picked on are picked on not because of their success in school. Then again, I don't see kids get made fun of very often at my school(as in basically never) TL;DR: Things are changing since Colombine | /r/MensRights | 06/08/13 07:35 PM |
| 15 | 15 year old boy raped. Rapist wins custody of child, and the boy is ordered to pay $25,000 in child support.Because we don't want him doing naughty things! | /r/MensRights | 14/07/13 12:16 AM |
| 4 | Reuters, we have a problemThe fundamental difference between these two only matters in the sense of why this right was even guaranteed in he Constitution. The speedy and public trial was to ensure that the government did not hold its citizens prisoners, political or otherwise( I know about the treatment of American socialists, communists, and anarchists in the early twentieth century), hence a speedy trial. But, the right to a public trial trumps that of a speedy one. The public trial right is necessary for the speedy tr… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/13 02:50 AM |
| 3 | Reuters, we have a problemNo, but the evidence simply makes it appear pretty clearly that they are guilty. It would be hard to find a way to counter this video from what I have read about it so far. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 07:28 PM |
| 35 | Reuters, we have a problemIn the case of adults, isn't the problem with keeping names of the accused private here in the United States( my country at the current at least) have to do with the Constitution. There's that whole bit which gurantees the right to a speedy and PUBLIC trial? | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 07:25 PM |
| 4 | I got mixed reviews for my article in the paper about reverse sexism. You want equality; pay the difference!I see where you're coming from, but this issue is one of simply painting with a broad brush. This does not make it right but they need to draw that arbitrary line somewhere. Why does someone suddenly become legally capable of deciding to have sex at 16(that is as long as the other person isn't a day over 18). Those are about as arbitrary as they get. They should look into providing prices on a more case by case basis. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 04:55 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter