TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HikuroMishiro Archive

View 0 posts and 425 comments by HikuroMishiro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Honestly gynocentrism aside, the West has become increasingly Islamophobic so I'm not sure I'd consider moving there. The UK is better than the US, but there's no guarantee in the long term it will be a safe place to live.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 05:05 AM
2

Bold of you to think that these people think, and not just blindly parrot the MSM narrative.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:51 AM
1

AI can never not be biased, AI programs don't actually 'think' so it's not some neutral entity that has just taken in information and learned/processed it. AI is programmed by people, all of which have biases. Even the information it gets fed marks a bias. Now people may attempt to make it as unbiased as possible, and fortunately it seems efforts have improved on that recently. But you can search this forum and find countless examples of AI models being biased. Telling a joke about men but refus…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:33 AM
1

While true, it is a bit narrow thinking. There is a strong link between feminism and the Democratic party, but reductive 'if x then y' reasoning is a hallmark of all the major parties. Being easily manipulated and falling for the left/right, Democrat/Republican paradigm is what got us in this mess in the first place. Now you can come to the conclusion that since the Democratic platform is openly anti-male and actively harms men by design and the Republican platform is only pro-women and only inc…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:16 AM
1

I couldn't get behind a men's rights political party. It would be great if a political party made it a major part of their platform, but politics is multifaceted and being good in one area is not enough to win my vote. What if they had a disastrous economic or foreign policies? Just take our last election. Would you have voted for the other candidate if they were otherwise the same but promised to support men's rights? While it's a platform that can swing voters, I don't think men's issues alone…
/r/MensRights19/03/25 04:02 AM
6

Historically voting was often (in a way still is) tied to military service. Women generally weren't allowed to fight in wars because it's easier for a population to rebound losing mostly men than it is losing a lot of women. Voting was a privilege given to those actually fighting for the country. Land ownership was also often granted to primarily soldiers, and over time voting became more tied to land owners. Both soldiers and land owners have more of a 'stake' in the country, so even though it …
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:40 PM
6

There have been a few serial killers that targeted women just because they were women, but despite the stereotype as far as I know that is not the case the vast majority of the time. Some predominantly preyed on women because they saw them as a softer target, but the main discrepancy I think is that people just don't care about the male victims. I've literally watched true crime podcasts where they describe the killer as an incel that must hate women when they killed a total of two women and ele…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:20 PM
6

You mean besides the fact that it's an entirely unsupported by facts, and in reality the data shows precisely the opposite?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:09 PM
9

Literally as a little kid. It was easy to determine that the girls got better treatment even in Elementary school (early 90's for me). By middle school I started to find it baffling I kept hearing about 'women's rights' and 'fighting for equality' as much as I did as I couldn't find a single right that women didn't have that men did (and I knew there were a few disadvantages for men like having to register for the draft). But I suppose it wasn't until high school that fully realized the scope of…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:05 PM
11

"Several, very powerful forces are behind the scenes " yep, you've already established that with the "while Israel" bit. You think they would allow anything on wikipedia that paints them in a bad light?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 09:50 PM
11

It's always been more common, it just wasn't considered problematic. And if you look at the ages (not that any teacher/student/minor relationship is okay) it's more often the male teachers with an 18 year old female student, whereas most of the female teacher assaults the student is 13 or under.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:31 PM
1

Since there's no such thing as real artificial intelligence, all 'ai' programs simply execute functions and regurgitate whatever data (and opinions) they've been fed. Since all humans (thus all human programmers) have their own biases it is impossible for there to be a truly unbiased ai. Programmers that are self reflective of their own biases and as a group could try to make as unbiased a model as possible (keeping in mind even including all known data sets that the data itself is already biase…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:25 AM
1

Precisely this. Doesn't matter if you are left/right/up/down, content is designed to provoke a reaction (usually a negative one). If you consume any type of media on a regular basis (doesn't matter if it's broadcast tv, social media, etc.) you are almost guaranteed to get 'radicalized' by something because there is an infinite supply of things to be outraged about it, and seeing other people acting emotionally about a subject reinforces it in our psyche.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 05:50 AM
1

Most people in the USA are also ignorant of what's going on, and none of the candidates deserve to be liked.
/r/MensRights28/10/24 08:13 AM
5

While I'm glad it's improved in a respect where it's actually aware now that women do have full (more) rights, it has laughably naive picture of America. Freedom and speech and assembly? A separation of church and state? Adhering to international human rights agreements? It's painfully clear that ChatGPT is funded by the government. Unless maybe it's stuck on some sort of Star Trek version of the US?
/r/MensRights19/10/24 02:49 AM
1

While there are many male issues, I don't think this is one of them. It may surprise you to learn that not every woman has perfect breasts either, yet the world of Hollwood doesn't reflect that. Many celebrities fit into the upper echelon of commonly perceived beauty standards, so yes above average penises would be expected just like six-pack abs even those most men don't have those either. And both men and women use body doubles, particularly for nude scenes, so if you had your choice would you…
/r/MensRights18/10/24 08:49 PM
2

This would only ever be done in cases where the accusation is provably false. The vast majority of SA accusations there is no evidence whatsoever and it comes down to he said/she said. Fortunately this isn't enough for many courts/juries so the accused (who was quite probably innocent) is let go (thus the bullshit stat of rapists that don't go to prison). Unfortunately far too many men are convicted on the word an accuser alone. There is currently no punishment for making up false accusations, t…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 04:41 AM
-1

Unfortunately this isn't a new myth, but I feel like it has been repeated on social media a lot lately. Amazing how the 'women are wonderful' effect is everywhere but healthcare. Of course they don't believe in that phenomenon, which reduces the credibility of their assertion to zero. If 95% of those people said 'Obviously the 'patriarchy' is bullshit, women aren't marginalized, and actually men get screwed a bit in our society, but with this one specific issue women are actually facing a proble…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 04:00 AM
1

It said so on Facebook, so it must be true.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:06 AM
0

These people gobble down whatever faux news and cheetoh dick feed them. They would rather all men be totally enslaved or executed before treating white christian men and brown Muslim men equally, support of men's rights only goes so far.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:10 AM
19

While it's unfortunate the dogs were also killed, it's probably the only reason she was charged. People don't typically care if a woman kills a man, but dog killers receive no leniency regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:07 AM
1

Thank you for your two cents femcel, perhaps you should go find some other place to troll?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:21 AM
9

Probably because pedophilia in general is considered a 'male' thing. A 50 year old male actor dating a 25 year old female model gets the word pedophilia thrown about (despite the fact that even if you take issue with those ages it by definition is not), whereas a 50 year old woman dating a 15 year old boy is just 'female empowerment'. It's been years since I've seen the statistic so I'm not sure where/when it was referring to, but the highest statistic of pedophilia was women with young boys, li…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 02:49 AM
22

It's basically the same argument as the wage myth. Thinking corporations will pay women less for the same jobs/work as men, but continuing to hire men even though an all female staff would apparently do wonders for their bottom line just because of sexism.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 06:58 AM
3

The technology has been out there a while. I don't know how good 'digital forensics' actually is, determining what is real or fake, but it's a job people already have. I do think though as the technology becomes more accessible, society is going to have to take better steps on handling it. The way western society is set up now, an ai fake 'confession' will be enough to get a man a life sentence/death where as a woman caught on tape admitting an accusation is false either won't be admissible in c…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 06:05 PM
1

Israel could rape and murder every single man, woman, and child in Gaza and 99% of this sub would cheer for it. Hell half would probably join in.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 04:05 AM
1

Gaza needs to flatten Israel.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 04:17 AM
0

You could have just said 'I was on Reddit', as it amounts to the same thing. But no, it's not true across the board. Men are less likely to criticize women, but women don't have the same qualms about criticizing men. White's are more likely to police other white's and reserve judgement on other ethnicities, but the same is not true about other ethnicities criticizing white's or different ethnicities.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:02 PM
2

Yep. As a fan of British media I've seen far too much of that terrible excuse for a human being.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:37 PM
2

Men spend more time away from home working than women do, so it would be a logical for men to be doing less child care than women. That being said such studies are always flawed and cannot be relied upon to give a definitive say on who is doing more childcare. Even if men are doing less, they may take it as 'during the hours that I am actually home, my wife and I do equal amounts of childcare' even though the mom is home more with the child. This is not a perception problem just a difference len…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:46 PM
1

Could just be a shitty work environment problem. Personally I've never witnessed this with men, but see it pretty often with women. I guess we all have our anecdotes.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:02 AM
7

I appreciate that it's just a question. I just gave my two cents on the matter.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:56 AM
22

Neither. Religion may define roles and such that may have pros and cons, lack of religion says... nothing on the subject obviously because it just means lack of religion. Trying to work religion into the men's rights discussion isn't really helpful and can only serve as a point of divide in my opinion.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:51 AM
-6

100% of Russian prisoners of war are tortured by the Ukraine, but since they're laundering politicians money, I mean 'the good guys', no one cares. Yay for war crimes!
/r/MensRights12/09/23 12:51 AM
41

"Now I understand girls go through a lot more trauma and danger when meeting with strangers." Citations needed. Saying 'I need to make sure you aren't a serial killer.' is a huge red flag. I have no idea what goes into 'cracking' a private instagram to see a profile, but whether that's bluff, brag, test, etc. it's entirely inappropriate. I don't date, but if I did either of these would result in an immediate end of 'relationship' to me. I wouldn't let if effect your self esteem, the problem is w…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:24 AM
-1

Is the Ukraine "the west"? Because there men have a right for free transportation to Russia where they can become war criminals and die for zelenskkky.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 06:37 AM
1

Pretty sure he's referring to the throwaway account for their hostility.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 03:33 AM
4

This post as a big 'Jews had a shit time of it in early 1940s Germany, but are we pretending that nazism was the enemy here because it's not' vibe to it.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 02:56 AM
1

Larry Elder talks about it frequently (though his focus is on black fatherlessness and admittedly it seems to be about the only issue he talks about), but despite meeting all the requirements the RNC wouldn't let him on stage.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 02:41 AM
2

This. They trade a sexual favor for literal fame and fortune and are considered victims. It's like winning the powerball, then getting your cashier arrested because you had to pay for the ticket.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:30 PM
4

I think it also needs to be pointed out that many people against female suffrage were... women. While women were more likely to have strong opinions for and against, men were more ambivalent. In Britain at least the main opposition/loudest voices against suffrage were women. Obtaining universal suffrage was more down to when the majority of women wanted the vote rather than men deciding to give it to them.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:48 PM
2

Personally I think it's better to stay away from social media/places like reddit altogether, but as someone else suggested if you want to use it and don't want to deal with the hate, using two accounts is probably the way to go. By the way from your descriptions more Americans would call you conservative rather than liberal. And while we use the term libertarian here as well, as soon as it started to become more of a mainstream thing the term (or at least the party) was hijacked and generally me…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 07:13 AM
17

Women still have more rights, because the supreme court decision simply said there's no federal right to abortion. In many states it's perfectly legal with few restrictions. Leftists literally lost their minds because some people have to drive a few hours now for an abortion.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:23 PM
8

Honestly, 100% of people should just tell their insurance companies that they are female. When everyone does it, they'll stop being discriminatory.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:52 PM
1

To be fair, all the men getting conscripted should just identify as women. If the Ukraine still conscripts them because they are still actually men, support from the blue haired woke crowd will dry up instantly. It won't actually change anything because the BCF still needs the war to do their laundry, but at least a change in public perception would be a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 11:30 PM
3

Unfortunately it does not.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 05:43 AM
1

Agreed. This miserable creature and the op are worse than the lady in the park. Pathetic how some millenials think following social standards is a federal crime.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 01:22 AM
0

It was more hyperbole then a statement of fact. Attractive guys can of course have good friends, as can attractive women. But since the subject matter was on the benefits of being attractive, I thought I'd throw in a Guardians of the Galaxy line.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 08:37 PM
0

An attractive man will certainly have an advantage over less attractive men, but it's to a lesser extent than it is with women. A handsome man probably isn't going to have an easy life or be popular on his looks alone, where as it is possible (not guaranteed obviously) for women to do so. Of course it can also be a good thing to be ugly, as Drax taught us. When you're ugly you know that people like you for who you are, beautiful people never know who to trust.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 08:25 PM
1

Probably the first Ryan Reynolds ad I've outright hated. I usually enjoy his ads and am subscribed to the YT channel, and while I didn't care for the first 'the vasectomy cocktail' this one was terrible. Can you even imagine a Hollywood actor putting out a video on Mother's Day called 'The Tubal Ligation' cocktail wherein the disparage women?
/r/MensRights16/06/23 12:29 AM
1

One of the problems with most of the studies done on which gender does the most 'domestic labor' is that they only track a handful of chores. More women still tend to do things like laundry and dishes than men, so those hours show up on the so called 'labor division'. They usually entirely leave out things like yard maintenance, fixing the garbage disposal, etc. While certainly not the case everywhere, in several first world countries men are not only putting in more hours at work, put putting i…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:42 AM
2

Perhaps you shouldn't take your personal experience and extrapolate it to an entire demographic.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 05:44 PM
1

I think that's rather demeaning to young men. While it may be true that women are more discerning of partners than men, to say outright that 17 year old males are completely non-discerning is simply ridiculous. While hormones do have an influence on behavior they don't completely override brain function.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:41 AM
1

In my opinion people saying men should cry are as bad if not worse than people saying men shouldn't cry. If you feel like crying, go for it. If you don't, don't feel obligated to because of social pressure. Almost any question dealing with 'should men do/don't...' is never going to have a universal answer. Societal expectations vary wildly as do individual opinions. Personally I don't cry, it's not a mechanism I need to process things. If a man cries every day over pretty minor things I'll proba…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:30 AM
-1

Well I am shocked, shocked I say. Not really.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 12:23 AM
33

Unfortunately people are pushing these ideas now so if/when overpopulation ever becomes a real issue (or whatever excuse for sterilization they have) the seeds will have been planted long enough it will no longer be as crazy. I'm against censorship though, so I'm not going to try and get somebody not to publish it.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 12:11 AM
3

I wouldn't summarize it as men get caught more, but that men get convicted more. I'm not really into the 'true crime' genre, but I do watch one channel on it on youtube (since I was several of the persons other channels) and the number of times where a woman is equally guilty if not more so than her male accomplices and she either gets off entirely or a slap on the wrist is... exactly as high as people here would expect (i.e. nearly 100%). Even in cases where the sole perpetrator is a woman and …
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:00 PM
2

It's already in Europe, especially western Europe. I imagine places in Asia as well, but since many Asian countries place more stock in traditional values I imagine the extent would be lesser or at least manifest differently than the US/Europe.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 12:50 AM
2

My bet is on the whole thing just being a publicity stunt.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:04 AM
3

Not to mention they can bend all they want and it's 'empowering', but if you wanted to bend something in an anti-woke way (like a 'John of Arc' play or casting Nelson Mandella as a white man) it would just be ammo for their accusations of misogyny and racism.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:51 AM
10

While it comes as no surprise whatsoever the 'researchers' are equating modern day feminism to 'women's rights', I would be quite surprised if men under 30 are actually waking up to the fact that feminism isn't about actual equality to any significant scale. No offense to any youngsters here, but the majority march lock-step to whatever the government, media, in groups, etc. say and any deviation or independent thought has disastrous consequences. If the ticktocks says eleventy billion women are…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:17 AM
7

I mean, it's typical sexist racist feminist garbage. Not only is it full of hate it's full of the usual lies. There's nothing new here, don't know why we need to link to such crappy articles. Misogyny is women's feelings getting hurt because they are being treated as equals and not special. Misandry kills men. They are not the same.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:03 AM
11

They do bring it up though. There's been a number of posts about dating apps and the like and while I don't read all of them I have seen them mention several times the gender disparity of the user base.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 07:57 PM
2

There are certainly things that are marketed to men such as fitness stuff (protein powders, gym memberships, etc.). If you browse any kind of seedier website without ad-block you find lots of ads for dating/hookup/porn/cam sites or viagra. Speaking of, on the radio I hear more ads for generic viagra alone than all other gendered products combined. Now none of this matches the amount of advertising geared towards women of course, but there's a reason for that. Women make up about 90% of the purch…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 07:52 PM
1

Indeed. At least things are equal now, I doubt the protests will come to anything. Governments may like catering to certain demographics, but they like money more.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:34 PM
3

People in that sub (and most leftists in general as far as I can tell) believe the only reason anyone could possibly oppose abortion is for religious reasons. The fact that many atheists are opposed to it (or that many religious people support it) is something they just refuse to recognize.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:27 AM
5

The retirement age for women was one year earlier than for men. Recently there was a vote to raise the retirement age for women (to be the same as men's) so the pension fund wouldn't run out of money, so now women are protesting that they are being treated equally to a man.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:01 AM
1

Why has this sexist racist feminist horseshit not been taken down yet?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:10 AM
2

Well it depends. If it's a bunch of men in the woods claiming they saw Sasquatch then they can be dismissed as a bunch of drunk fools. If some women see Sasquatch or claim they were abducted by aliens than we must conclude that Sasquatch and alien abductions are real as its the only possible reason multiple women would say the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 10:29 PM
1

Since washing away the whole kangaroo court system would be difficult and look bad for any politician, perhaps some enterprising politician that cares (about getting votes from people that actually support equality and due process) could introduce a bill about an appeal process. Anyone accused of misconduct and kicked out of their college could appeal to the third party group that has no association with the college who does its own investigation. If their investigation concludes there was not e…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 10:24 PM
2

Sympathetic to MRM would be exaggerating, but they're definitely the better option. The right has gynocentric tendencies in line with traditional gender roles, so protecting women above men, not having women in the draft, etc. is in happenstance not in line with MRM ideology. However the left is actively against men, criminalizing so much as looking at women, automatically assuming guilt of men in accusations and kicking them out of college without trial, reducing the male population down to 10%…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:54 PM
5

People like you are what's making the sub worse in my opinion. Men's rights doesn't have a party, or a color, or an economic system. But a lot of posts these days bring up such things and it seems that a number of people here care far more about propagandizing their particular political slant than men's rights. This is your first post here (I realize more people lurk than post) and its more 'other party bad' then men's rights, count me suspect. Has there been an increase in 'women hate' on this …
/r/MensRights21/09/22 08:48 PM
1

I mean, pretty much every "female lead" movie in the last decade. Take Captain Marvel for instance. People rightly pointed out flaws, then they outright said 'this movie isn't for you (men), no white male interviewers, etc. iirc they even had promotions where some theaters only sold tickets to women/let women watch it. Then when it didn't do as well as hoped (obviously it still made a lot of money as it was the last movie building up to the climax of the whole franchise, which is why they saved …
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:58 AM
1

I think it would be a good idea, but it would have to be a heavily moderated sub I think so it wouldn't be full of trolls giving crap answers. Maybe if replies had to approved or only the mods could actually answer the questions, I dunno. (I'm generally very pro free speech, I can just foresee a post like 'why do we need mra's?' with the top response a troll saying 'because we hate women' or something and making the group look bad).
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:47 AM
6

Skipped reading most of the article because of the misandry, but no boys don't need to start school later and the whole maturing later thing is nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:28 AM
0

At least there's nothing about the police taking the complaint seriously. Its incredibly stupid that people reported this to the police but stupid is the modus operandi of intolerant sexist racist liberals so it's not really surprising.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:16 AM
2

Haven't watched the show, but based on that it definitely sounds like the standards of rape. As others have pointed out lots of double standards on reactions if things happen to men or women. I may need to check the show out at some point. I was assuming it was going to be woke crap for some reason, but from what I've heard that's not really the case.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:04 AM
50

Well pretty much every sub is a gold mine for misandry as reddit is a misandristic site, but you posted a screenshot of shocking exception to the rule. Yes there were a couple if misandric comments but they were massively downvoted. I give kudos to the people on that post.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:55 AM
7

Yes and no. If you support men's rights than by any stretch you could identify yourself as an MRA as supporting men's rights is all that is relevant. By some definition (namely old and dictionary only) feminism can mean equality between men and women, and by that obscure use this would have no conflict. Unfortunately feminism, particularly the most modern take is inherently anti-male (and anti-equality) and doesn't actually fit particularly well with men's rights. It's kind of like being in a pr…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:51 AM
20

Yep, this is just another issue they're hypocrites about. They love to complain how much they have to spend, how long it takes them, etc. and blame it on the patriarchy and how 'male privilege' is not having to wear makeup. But the second you go to point out it's not men asking them to wear makeup, most men prefer them without it, etc. they screech 'WE DON'T WEAR IT FOR YOU!!!' almost like the whole complaining thing is just a gacha. It's also become a meme with them that men can't even tell whe…
/r/MensRights19/09/22 05:43 PM
16

You're welcome to do your experiments to see the results first hand, just be aware you'll probably get banned from there for posting in a mens rights forum. This may not bother you, just thought I'd let you know.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:55 AM
93

Apparently 'dominant cultures' means the groups of people that are legally discriminated against and left out of help, funding, awareness, etc.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:52 AM
8

Unfortunately we do get some people here either as trolls or people that have just gotten lost in their bitterness not treat everyone here fairly. Please don't let these people discourage you, the vast majority of the people on this forum are very supportive of girls/women posting here.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:49 AM
3

I guess it depends on your definition of technically. By some definition of feminism being 'men and women should be equal', then sure, and everyone here except for the trolls would be as well. Unfortunately the most common definitions don't usually mean that anymore. Checking dictionary.com it seems to indicate that women must actually have fewer rights, so technically all the feminists in first world countries where women don't have fewer rights aren't actually feminists either.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 09:44 AM
57

Yep, unfortunately 'schools' have just been expensive indoctrination centers for some time now.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:35 AM
54

Absolutely. It doesn't matter what gender you are, if you support men's rights than by definition you're an MRA. Of course you're free to use or not use that or any other label, what you call yourself isn't nearly as important as a viewpoint of equality. You don't really need to worry about 'doing' anything. A lot of people your age and those in the school system are very much not interested in hearing about men's rights or men's problems, so sticking your neck out in support of men can definite…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 05:17 AM
6

I don't see the problem actually. Her share of the rent is essentially a gift each month from her father. The boyfriend should look at it like it's an $800 apartment and her $400 half is being covered. I don't think the dads request is unreasonable at all and could see the same thing (though a bit less likely perhaps) with parents helping their son out and expecting his girlfriend to pay a small bit of rent. I can see a bit of initial confusion if the boyfriend just thought they were getting a d…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 03:10 AM
8

Yep, unfortunately you can tell a lot from headlines about the people involved by the words they don't use.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:12 PM
3

Sorry, I don't think this is a relevant issue here.Based on the post, the guy was the one being overly sensitive. I'm sure there's a lot of misandry in the comments and maybe someone there is making that claim, but just based off the post it has nothing like your post title.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 08:44 PM
3

Terrible that this is being downvoted. There's been quite a few decent discussions in this post with several reasonable people shooting down the few racist trolls with statistics and backing evidence. But I guess with the popularity of the post it has attracted the usual racist rabble from the rest of reddit that can't stand the idea of all lives mattering that are just downvoting since they can't debate it.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 03:13 AM
3

If anyone were to start such a company, Merit would actually be a good name for it.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 02:25 AM
21

While I appreciate the effort you're going through, personally I probably wouldn't bother. Most people don't care about facts, hell the fact that 'is misandry real' is somehow a DEBATE is very telling about the people involved. I'm not sure how the 'debate' topics are chosen, but if you can submit some try asking them if misogyny is real, or if the Holocaust happened, or if racism is real. If they say 'well, obviously, there is no need to debate this' tell them the same holds true for 'is misand…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:24 PM
1

Eh, I don't really think this is a widespread problem. Maybe it's a viral trend on the ticktocks, but in the real world I don't really see this. Not that mocking guys is okay because it's on the internet, but I just don't think we need to pay too much attention to the people that are eating tide pods.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:07 PM
8

Best of luck to them. These lawsuits need to be happening everywhere.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:31 AM
21

While some of it is fan-baiting to an extent, a lot if it just down to political propaganda. Hollywood is far left, as is feminism (and other woke movements). The elite can afford to alienate half their audience in order to prop up their message. The studio might make 50 million on a movie instead of 100 million because they put some crap in what could have been a decent movie, but the directors, CEOs, writers, etc. all are still going to get paid the same whether they include their hateful cont…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:03 AM
4

Pound in this case has nothing to do with currency though and America has called the octothorpe (#) pound sign for forever...
/r/MensRights13/09/22 01:24 AM
5

It has nothing to do with women being 'sullied', its just that women in girls are more seen as victims than boys. It doesn't matter if it's SA, children going hungry, homelessness, etc. females are seen as the victims and males are 'meh who cares'.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 01:17 AM
8

Besides talking to a lawyer/police about possible solutions, the suggestion xdzgor made about selling prints of her is worth a shot. After putting some up on ebay and making some ticketytok videos, have a mutual friend tell her about them and she is she contacts you about it. Maybe if you can't work out a deal you can at least make a few bucks off her image. Could have the proceeds go to a men's right charity too, that would probably annoy her even more.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 11:08 PM
3

I think most of the comments reflect my sentiment, I don't really care. Men are free to do such things, and these days it's actually more acceptable to wear makeup and dresses than it is to laugh at a man in makeup and dresses. Do a lot of people still think it's weird? Sure, and it's fine to think so. But if you want to wear skirts/makeup/dresses go do so, just don't freak out if you don't get the reaction you want.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 10:56 PM
5

Based.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 10:48 PM
2

That doesn't make any sense. What traits, activities, dress, etc. are masculine or feminine can vary by culture but it's certainly not 'everything a man does is masculine, everything a woman does is feminine' because that would make the words useless. A man and woman sitting watching tv doing the exact same thing, you think the man is doing it in a masculine way and the woman is doing it in a feminine way? I'll admit strictly defining what masculine is can be tricky, but I think 'anything a man …
/r/MensRights11/09/22 10:43 PM
23

Why, that's normal over there. AITH is pretty much as bad as twox or fds. Or most of reddit for that matter.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 06:00 AM
2

Yep, classic Californian liberal. Peak Obiden type.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 12:28 AM
6

What they said isn't against terms of service unfortunately.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:23 AM
1

Hopefully that's actually a good sign and not just an oversight. Even if it's just lip service, that's more than men have been getting. No surprise Labour is already pissed off about it, clearly just getting preferential treatment and not preferential treatment AND special titling in the equalities ministry is just plain misogyny.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:57 AM
6

I too will never be president, the only possible conclusion is that Americans hate men. Wait, if America hates women AND men it's almost as if her chances of being President have nothing to do with her gender at all. It might be because she's a sexist, racist, communist idiot hellbent on tearing down America instead of actually serving it. If she thinks America hates "women" and particularly "women of color" she'd probably have a heart attack if she experienced 1% of the hate white men in this c…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:10 AM
1

The reason he can get on cable news is because of the way he his/behaves, not because he's a mra just willing to get out there. By putting a guy like this (and I'm admittedly drawing on the majority consensus of others) as the voice of men's rights, it makes it easier for the majority/media/feminists to denigrate the whole men's rights movements by attacking his flaws and opinions. They wouldn't give an interview to a more reasonable men's rights perspective.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:42 AM
1

A typical liberal feminist hit piece. While she covers some of the positive aspects and legitimizes some of the issues, she smothers the article with misandry, false statistics, and word salad to paint a negative picture of the movement while maintaining the illusion of equality and neutrality.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:38 AM
1

The way most people use 'exploited' these days, I'm sure an argument could be made for the Johns to be called exploited. Personally I'd say a private transaction between two people or customer and a business neither is exploited.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:28 AM
1

Unfortunately internalized misandry is running rampant. Woke media convinces the weak minded that 'men = bad, women = victims' and typically no amount of logic can convince them otherwise because logic didn't lead them to their conclusions in the first place. They may eventually change their mind (especially if they get cheated on) but I wouldn't waste my breath on it.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 04:04 AM
5

There is exactly a 0% chance of it happening, they are actively against such things.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 03:51 AM
11

I mean, it's Google, why are you surprised. Their company motto is literally "Be evil".
/r/MensRights07/09/22 03:47 AM
6

I totally understand her frustration. I was just complaining to my boss last week that I get paid 25 million less than Jennifer Lawrence because I have a penis. He of course said this was entirely nonsensical, but he was just brushing me off because I have a penis. I tried to call JLaw to get her support on this and get an equal pay type alliance going, but her agents wouldn't put me through to her because I have a penis. Only possible explanation, not because I'm a nobody that has no business c…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 03:28 AM
3

Someone else already provided it, but you can always test it by finding some misandristic comments (not very hard on Reddit) and reporting them, they'll get back to you on saying it doesn't violate their hate standards.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:17 AM
1

Ah, after our infiltrator troll posts we're back to our regularly scheduled concern troll posts.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:13 AM
15

Indeed. I wonder if she would advocate that women under 25 shouldn't be able to vote because their brains just aren't developed enough to be making those kinds of decisions.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:32 AM
3

Fortunate he was cleared, disgusting how he was treated. I do think we need to do better in the comments though. We get feminist trolls in here and downvote them all you want but innocent until proven guilty does apply both ways. Just because he was found not guilty does not PROVE that she is guilty. In this particular case it seems to me like she had malicious intent and I wouldn't be opposed to a trial for false accusations. I support punishing false accusers and putting them on a registry, bu…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:04 AM
2

Say what? I am shocked, shocked I say at this sudden turn of events.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:28 AM
7

Did you have to click a 'I'm a white male' button to get on this forum? Weird, I have no such button, it already seems open to everyone. Wanting to hear from a certain demographic is okay, but lets not pretend the floor isn't already open or that non-white's are somehow pushed out of the discussions. I don't know where you are seeing this "white male" stuff except maybe your own bias. I'll also point out despite the "male" focal point we have a number of women mra's posting here that also throws…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:19 PM
10

Just a typical sexist racist feminist twox troll. I doubt they even went to any mra spaces (brief glance of post history, no mra boards just posting the typical reddit misandry) and received such comments, just saw other posts bashing mra's and figured she would too for the upvotes.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 08:21 PM
2

Oh goodie, instead of concern troll posts this week we get infiltrator posts designed to make the sub look bad.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:39 AM
2

World news coverage of the US, particularly in places like Australia or the UK are unfortunately pretty biased. I'd say America's coverage of other places is probably biased too, but... well American news doesn't really talk about other countries unfortunately except in a way to slant our own politics one way or the other. I think the only thing specific I've heard like that is possibly the illegal spying done on him by the Obama administration during the 2016 election, they probably want to kee…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:38 PM
1

Don't want to get too heavy into politics with good/bad things about Trump, but thought I'd clarify Trump has not been arrested. He was impeached while in office by the House, but was acquitted by the Senate so coming to nothing. This was just political gesturing and Biden will also be impeached sometime after November and also probably acquitted. The recent 'raid/documents' is more political posturing before the midterm elections and will also come to nothing, Trump has the same type of documen…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:20 PM
5

I wonder how much of it has to do with what the kids are reading and how much of it is just that schools are gynocentric. I know woke nonsense has infected our schools and some of the books that are read/available in Elementary schools are appalling, but surely much of middle and high school sticks to the classics/lets kids read what they want for book reports and such. I suppose I'm not in the effected boy group since I was reading pre-Kindergarten, but the entirety of the school system is more…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:43 AM
2

Unfortunately it would not. As others have pointed out you can look at numerous examples, Obama, Kamala Harris, Thatcher, etc. Getting a member of group x to the highest offices is not going to get group x to stop whining. Goal posts always move and there's no point in trying to appease such groups thinking it will satiate them. Now if a woman is the best candidate on the ballet, by all means vote for them, just don't think it will make feminists happy or improve things.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:28 AM
-1

"If a couple is comfortable with this dynamic then they probably shouldn't be together." Precisely, you think everyone should be just like you. "I've just been around and seen a lot, enough to form a solid opinion that goes against the "popular thinking". It only took a bit of friction for you to get in your own head and reveal your true colors: "everyone should think exactly like me", what a sad thing to say. Let's hope you don't reach a position of power with that mindset because your words ha…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 12:30 PM
1

"Alright. So then so they also allow me to like photos of women I find attractive while on a relationship with them? Most women will find that very offensive. Double standard? How about I message and comment on those women's pictures the same things other guys comment on her pictures?" If a girl is posting photos of herself on social media for positive affirmation but doesn't like it if her boyfriend likes pictures of other women, I'd say that's hypocritical. I'd say actually commenting on and m…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 03:32 AM
0

That says nothing about being drunk. She broke into his apartment while he was sleeping and raped him.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 01:13 AM
-1

Ah, you're talking about women in relationships, that is indeed different than how I was reading it (I was reading it as single men didn't like single women that other single men also liked). I would agree women in relationships absolutely shouldn't keep other men on the hook. I'd disagree a little with the social media thing. If it's purely with the intention of marketing themselves to men whilst in a relationship I'd of course disagree with that, but people like validation and I'll cut them a …
/r/MensRights27/08/22 01:00 AM
1

Much agreed for the most part. I may be misreading, but are you saying men get disgusted that a woman has options? That would be something I haven't seen, or even heard of. Men might get frustrated that a woman with so many options picks an abusive loser, or feel hopeless that such a sought after girl would ever pick them, but nothing negative about the girl herself just because other men also like her. It is true for a number of women that other women valuing a man makes him more attractive to …
/r/MensRights26/08/22 11:38 PM
-1

You're correct, and honestly it probably was enough to swing the election. You're wasting your time trying to converse with the Obiden cultists though. I don't know if it made the news over there, but the people insisting now absolutely nothing illegal, it's impossible to have any irregularities (but don't investigate), went on for four whole years about the 2016 election. From November 2016 to pretty much election night 2020 they talked about fraud, the Russians hacking the voting machines, the…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 11:27 PM
1

"Beauty is not a personality trait, and so of course if women are raised with the same socialization in the same environment, they will often have similar ideas about what is attractive." Of course. My implication was not that more conventionally attractive women are somehow different/behave differently than those more average, just that they're going to have more options/ease in dating and thus one might think because of their increased options they might be more likely to go 'Hey, I'm hot. I c…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 11:17 PM
15

Agreed. And those women flocking to the same type of guy (in many cases an asshole) is what leads so many to think that all (or at least most) guys are that way. They pick up the same type of guy at the same type of places and therefore somehow all men must be just like the ass bananas at sleazybar. What more baffles me is that it isn't just the average or below average looking women that do this. There are women that are incredibly beautiful, many of them also smart, funny. etc. the whole packa…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 10:00 PM
1

So treat all women like pieces of shit, got it.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 09:39 PM
0

It doesn't mean he did 'nothing', that's poor reading comprehension. The primary actions of the military in recent decades is not for the American people and whatever actions he took to earn such insignias no matter how brave or if some benefited, acting like Average Joe asked him to do it is a poor take and spitting on Average Joe because they don't kiss the ground he walks on is a shitty attitude. Yes he's mad because he had a trial for a crime he didn't commit (allegedly). But he's not just m…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:51 PM
0

Unfortunately if she's not in the mood for the short time you're here, then she's not in the mood. Nothing you can really say or argue to change that. While she's being cold and insensitive, you need to just disengage with her. Don't lash out or try to make her feel guilty, etc. since that is unlikely to be beneficial. Just spend your remaining time with family and friends. Since she's been on her birth control a while this may just be the new her since last you've seen her and not as a result o…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 06:36 AM
6

Yep, unfortunately that's what media/social media does. Fear sells, and feminism also has a powerful lobby. Until we start funding anti-woke media companies nothing is going to change. Just imagine hundred of episodes where a man offers to walk a woman home and she says 'actually you're more likely to be attacked on the way home than I am'. Dozens of blockbuster movies where paying for a date or something the woman mentions how the wage gap is a myth. School program materials telling girls not t…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 06:20 AM
1

Unfortunately between feminist trolls, people somewhere between feminists and mra's, and people that consider themself mra's but like... further down on their priorities, there's not a small number of people here that simply don't have men or men's rights as their primary reason for being here. I also imagine most people don't get on here every day, and most people certainly don't read every post let alone every comment, so imagine most people simply didn't see it.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 06:07 AM
1

No idea why you are being downvoted, I wondered the same thing.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 05:57 AM
2

This is just one of many reasons why sex work should be legalized. There are a myriad of problems/questions/challenges if you try to legalize it just for disabled people. What groups get to utilize such services and which don't, how often are they entitled to these services, it being discriminatory, etc. Ultimately most people are going to see little legal difference between a disabled persons need (those people were technically right, sex isn't an actual need) for sex and a 'normal' persons nee…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 05:52 AM
0

Sorry but I don't think this is a positive video to call out. While the events that happened to him (if as described) are disgusting, his feelings and anger are entirely misplaced. This is probably going to piss off some vets, but so be it I'll take the downvotes. This man in all likelihood has done nothing for 'America' in the military, he is too young for that. Our military industrial complex is far more concerned with benefiting the government and our elites, not our everyday citizens. While …
/r/MensRights26/08/22 03:45 AM
3

Reddit as a whole is a toxic cesspool, and relationship forums are definitely overflowing with misandry, so it's no surprise they paint the guy as nefarious. While generally I think you should save sleeping with someone for someone you trust and thus not need recorded consent, a girl not understanding why a guy would want that in this day and age is also a red flag. People on forums like that are unable or unwilling to see that guys wanting proof of consent is something of their creation, this d…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:45 AM
8

While major societal changes perhaps happen most quickly or are seen most apparently surrounding a major conflict, it's not the only way. Remember Rome fell not from a fell swoop of an external enemy, but a gradual breakdown of society. Likewise it's possible the current reign of feminism will eventually just fade away, though it may take 100 years or more. Regardless the end of feminism as it stands now (and so many other things) will end eventually. Time marches ever onward and the sways of hi…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:35 AM
10

It's true, and upvotes were generally for people calling out her toxicity and people were downvoting that she was in the right. Unfortunately the mods have deleted several MRA supporting comments. Asshole: Good for her, MRA's are just evil incels. MRA: MRA's just want gender equality. Mods: *deletes the MRA's comment because 'this isn't a debate sub' *.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:43 AM
4

If you scroll down a bit (near the bottom for me, but probably depends on how you have comments sorted) you'll find a copy of the original post in the comments, the auto bot posts a copy in case the original is edited.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:37 AM
8

Agreed. I had never heard of him a week ago, but I've probably seen 50 different posts made about him in this one week.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 05:59 AM
45

As full of stupid and misandry as that thread (and that op) is, there were at least a couple of good signs. Saw a post that said anyone that believes all the isms (racism, sexism, etc.) don't go both ways is delusional, and it had several upvotes. Very annoying though that people would agree that she's the asshole but then say she needs to guide the son from his misguided ways... of thinking that men deserve rights.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 05:40 AM
1

Was wondering the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 01:10 AM
0

While distinctly possible, this is a bad article to cite as their 'source' is just another article that actually says the opposite. That being said most of the article is about it being okay for women to cheat/excusing it which would have probably been a better post title/focus since they didn't back up their statistic.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:58 PM
3

I'm not sure if everything is coming from her book or statements she has said elsewhere, but "Wednesday Martin, an anthropologist and author of “Untrue,”" literally half the article is conclusions and quotes from Martin.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:32 PM
3

Good catch. Though the sourced article didn't link it's source, so we can't really compare the metrics used (well, maybe with some Googling we could find it, but I don't care that much at the moment). I'm sure there are studies that have found women cheat more, so it's interesting the NYP article is linking to something with the opposite conclusion than what they are saying. It's possible the book they are referencing backs up their statistic as it definitely sounded like a 'women cheat and that…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:08 PM
6

Definitely a hembrist campaign. I've never been to forums where people self identify as incels, but I highly doubt many let alone most feel like they are 'owed' sex. Regardless they way it's most often used these days is just as a generic insult. Disagree with a feminist? Incel. Believe in equality between men and women? Incel. Like pineapple on pizza? Incel.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:47 PM
7

I'm pro free speech and against censorship, so I'm against his ban. I don't follow or like him myself so it doesn't really effect me, but the fact that people like him get banned when there's people spreading far more hate, misandry, toxicity, etc. from 'the other side' but that's a-okay to the powers that be is just disgusting. If anything banning him will probably just make him more popular and give credence to some of the things he says.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:17 PM
9

Well schools are very gynocentric and unlikely to punish girls for the same behavior they would punish boys for. Parents are also to blame, as both mothers and fathers have a tendency to write off negative behavior by girls. If their son is being bullied by a girl at school, pulling his hair, hitting him, insulting him, etc. they just tell their kid it's because she likes him, and boys grow up thinking harassment from girls is acceptable. When both schools and parents do nothing to stop such har…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:01 PM
6

The ironic part is these same types of people will now point to the dictionary now that so many definitions have been changed/'updated'.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:55 PM
3

I suppose that's not really surprising. It seems a lot of the time the ones the media and woke mob make a big stink over are the ones that turn out to be innocent, and the ones you vaguely here rumors about but no one really covers it are the ones more likely to be guilty.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:51 PM
0

Right back at you.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:48 PM
1

They are definitely the best by a long shot, but I suppose you're just more optimistic than me. When I see parties lose I usually see them double down on the reasons why they lost in the first place and not actually adjusting policies to be in line with voters.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:21 PM
8

One, while this is (supposedly) a men's rights forum, it's foremost a reddit forum, which means woke identity politics and hate come far before men's rights for a lot of people here, thus actually voting for men's rights takes the back burner unfortunately. Secondly, voting for one party to try and adjust a second party just doesn't work that way. There's any number of reasons why one might support one party over the other, and even IF politicians recognized why people voted differently they don…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:47 PM
0

What on Earth are you talking about? Did you read the op's post? This doesn't help anyone. People like op is precisely why men's rights hasn't gotten anywhere.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:07 PM
0

You mean like your whole post was? Thinly veiled concern trolls need to fuck back off to twox, you attribute nothing to men's rights but insults and opinions of other people.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:06 PM
22

Hopefully the courts will rule with him and the 'moonlighting during work hours' is a baseless accusation. Although even if that were true, with any other groups of people lodging a formal complaint for discrimination and being fired for it would easily result in siding with the one discriminated against even if there were other factors.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 04:01 AM
32

Because at the moment the woke alphabet mafia is one of the most powerful groups. Many churches have to be affirming to LGBT these days or they literally won't survive. People that are fans of porn have no such lobby, most people aren't willing to march holding up signs 'I go to PornHub and that's okay'. Additionally the woke mob is against porn themselves, as watching two people get paid to have sex is 'denigrating to women' (but not men for some reason), and even if churches would have been ok…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:43 AM
-6

First, the hateful insulting intolerant little shits are radfems like you. Second, the mods don't just ban people for having different opinions than you.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:37 AM
2

I disagree. Younger people have less life experience and are much more prone to fall for propaganda of which feminism is one that is heavily pushed. Older men have witnessed first hand the destruction that feminism has wrought, younger men have grown up with the results but are told anything bad is because of the 'patriarchy'. I think as years go by and the young men become older men they will wake up to the lies and misandry of feminism, but there will be a whole new generation of indoctrinated…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:32 AM
4

Definitely discriminatory. Many here don't like him, I don't follow him myself (hadn't even heard of him until recently), but that's not the point. There are far FAR worse people on 'the other side' that get to spread as much misandry and hate as they like with absolutely zero consequences, men have to say positive things about women or they're not allowed to say anything at all.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 12:54 AM
5

No, I've never seen a feminist use logic.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:17 AM
10

Well this is a very free speech forum, so posts with venting/pointing out hypocrisy are usually going to be allowed if it's related enough to men's rights. However while negative is allowed, actual "hate" is not. Pointing out other forums being misandrist might be negative, but it's not really hateful. Very few posts here are actually about hating all women and if someone makes one it's either downvoted to hell or removed by the mods, often both. People often attack feminism, but this is not the…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 08:40 AM
3

As much I hate concern trolls, people answering this question seriously could actually be useful for future debates with people. Obviously women have a lot of rights men don't have and men are treated unfairly, but some actual answers (not whatever feminist drivel you'd get asking elsewhere) I think would be interesting. Someone mentioned that in places men can go topless and women can't. That may sound somewhat petty but it is an answer. Is there anything else? It does seem to be all I can thin…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 08:03 AM
1

The Nazi's were left wing, not right wing. Likewise racism is most closely associated with the left today. That being said the whole left-right scale is a largely useless and very arbitrary thing.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:50 AM
2

It depends a lot on the context. Boat sinking? I don't mind women getting rescued first. Hiring for a job? College admission? Number of bathrooms? Prioritizing women is horrendously sexist and should be stopped. Making sure more women survive is kind of built into our dna for survival reasons, but kowtowing to women is standard radlib stuff (feminism is a type of radical liberalism). I don't see anything wrong with holding the door open for a woman. Despite whatever feminist bullshit you might s…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:27 AM
1

This is very disappointing news to me. I finally just got around to watching Stranger Things and have just got to season three. I had heard it wasn't as good but didn't know that was one of the reasons.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:07 AM
3

Like the handles had burrs/people could cut themselves on them? I've heard the heavy explanation, the fact that women would often be holding children, and even fashion as when things like crinoline's were popular women really couldn't open the door to themselves, but the doors not being worked as clean is a new one to me. Do you happen to have a source (not doubting you, I just find it interesting).
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:02 AM
3

This may be the first post of yours I've actually agreed with.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:50 AM
2

Your marathon comment was a suggestion, but previously you said "one physical thing women have over men is endurance" as a statement which is what I'm questioning your source on. I agree women can meet and exceed fitness standards for the army and there are certainly women in much better physical condition than some men. I don't believe in the draft and think male requirement for selective service registration should be dropped, however things should be equal and if men have to register I think …
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:45 AM
17

Feminist trolls from places like twox have to make throwaway accounts to troll here because their echo chamber automatically bans accounts that post here.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:35 AM
1

I mean, women are capable of running marathons. As a whole though men are going to average faster times. The gaps tend to close the longer the race, I think at around 200 miles is when you might start seeing women beating men more often, but very few people run ultramarathons this long so we don't exactly have a good sample size. Not sure where you're getting your endurance thing, while women can have as much endurance as men it's certainly not an area they are dominating in.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:06 AM
2

Never have been, I discovered when I was pretty young that feminism for the most part wasn't really about equality. I learned egalitarian was actually an older term and covered more stuff so I would classify myself as that if for some reason I needed to define myself in that regard, but it seems lately they've started to fuck with that definition to so in the future if anyone asks I'll probably just use words instead of labels.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 09:36 PM
5

Very true, unfortunately those facts upset many people's feelings so we're not supposed to remember that.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:25 PM
4

This place is better than most of Reddit, but it's still filled with the woke mob that hate facts that disagree with their feelings. I'll join you in getting downvoted by adding that in addition to slave owning not being race blind (blacks, even former slaves owned slaves) it was gender blind as well. For instance in Charleston in 1850 42 percent of free blacks owned slaves, and 64 percent of those were women. So white women aren't the only women we've let off the hook.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:23 PM
1

Don't buy that from the feminist troll. Women having been judging men for thousands of years, men judging women not so much. I was alive 30 years ago and men absolutely were not abusing women. Sure you do have some assholes like you have since the dawn of humanity, but for every douche back then saying 'hey, you need a boob job' there would be 1000 women denigrating men on their looks.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 03:20 AM
1

That does check out, yes.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 03:09 AM
9

No, I have no interest in being a father and certainly wouldn't want to be spreading my genetics.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:12 AM
12

Is there any way you can switch rooms/roommates? I'd wait until you actually meet the guy but if he gives any indicators his offline persona is anything like his online persona, put in a request. I know you usually can't move just because you don't like someone, but for some matters in this case if you mention they are being racist (just don't mention it's against white people), that might prompt them to let you.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 09:29 AM
1

I like the quote, but I don't get the relevance of posting it here.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 04:11 AM
3

Ridiculous, but not surprising at all. I applaud the lady for resigning over such bigotry rather than just ignoring it.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:38 AM
5

I highly doubt there is any significant spike in men getting vasectomies. This is just another way of bringing up the subject to people already angry about it and making money through their clicks. If droves of men were actually going to get vasectomies and were in contact with journalism sites, these articles would be about their surprise that going and getting a snippity snip isn't as easy as TwoX said and their surprise they had to get their wives permission.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:28 AM
1

It doesn't. It's just another way of bringing up the subject and making money through clicks.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 03:24 AM
12

Not surprising, that is exactly their plan after all.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 02:59 AM
6

Worse than that many have sons, and raise them in a misandry environment.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 02:39 AM
8

Good for them, I hope they don't bow to cancel culture and they keep the ad playing. Some companies don't realize they're going to piss off a minority of people and pull their stuff as soon as it does, some make something slightly 'offensive' on purpose, but back down when the backlash is more than expected. Few companies sticking to their guns on things like this it seems.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:15 AM
1

I probably wouldn't respond. I don't use instagram, but if I get on pinterest I get a lot of false bigoted stuff like that. I report it, sometimes leave a comment saying it's wrong, and move on. I've also been saving a lot of things like this and plan on gender swapping/race swapping/etc. and make an account to share them to try and counter balance the bigotry, but I've never gotten around to it.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 01:47 AM
1

MSNBC says what?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 05:26 PM
2

No, just no. Put down the CNN kool-aid and go back to menslib comrade. Feminism is absolutely part of the left wing hate movements like the BLM and the Nazis. The "left" IS a bunch of hypocritical sexist haters that promote insane shit, they don't need feminism to help them with that. And the FBI has been almost exclusively used in recent years to attack right wing politics, not left wing. Things 60 years ago are not the same as they are today. As you mentioned it was a left wing President pushi…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:57 AM
14

Husband abuses wife for years. One day having enough (and after a miscarriage due to his abuse) she turns the tables and her and a friend drug him and start to abuse him. Eventually he escapes and goes to the police, but they don't believe him. They abduct him again and plan to kill him, change their minds at the last minute, he vows revenge but then gets killed. Friend reveals she killed her abusive husband too. They both go about their happy lives.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:33 AM
3

The first thing that came to mind for me is Broadchurch. While *minor spoiler alert* the boy is found dead at the beginning of the first episode, the series flashes back to his relationship/SA manipulation with an older man. It's not played for laughs and is definitely taken seriously, though obviously more of the attention is on the fact that he was killed.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 03:23 AM
1

Agreed. I also think things like peeing in public (while I'd agree as some kind of offense) and other things... you know, not sexual, should not be a sex crime and any sort of logic people use why they are and false accusations are not is horrendously flawed.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:28 AM
-1

Another concern troll post, not sure how this is so upvoted. First off, no this sub is not sliding towards hating women. People do vent and some comments could definitely be phrased better, but it is far far far from a 'hating women' sub. Second, this is a very free speech sub. The mods could police it to YOUR standard, but what if someone still isn't happy. What if someone doesn't want anything negative said about women or even feminism at all? The mods do delete some hateful comments, but due …
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:25 AM
2

While you have a point to an extent, I think it's a limited perspective. For one women (like men) have a wide variety of factors they select and aren't just one cohesive algorithm. Both women and men also had fewer options (and choice) back in the day than they do now. Also the unhappiness goes both ways. Men select partners then as the years go by tend to be as unhappy in relationships as women. I think at the end of the day humans are just complicated hopeless creatures you can't just apply lo…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:46 AM
22

Menslib could be called anything because like 99% of Reddit it's just a forum for hating men and anyone not far left.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:39 AM
8

Very strongly disagree with much of this. Your title indicates that men DO rape more, not question if, and personally I find that questionable at the least. I too would like to see 'real' statistics, but it's something that will just never happen. I agree men are less likely to report and women are more likely to report false accusations. Men may be physically stronger and more able to just grab and restrain a woman than visa versa, but this is not most types of rape (outside of prison at least)…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:43 PM
3

There are a lot, and many coming from the woke crap like Captain Marvel with the women are better than men, men are oppressive assholes, etc. . It is somehow worse though when such things are sprinkled into actual good entertainment than when the whole thing is garbage. I'll just do one example as it's the first that comes to mind. There's an episode of White Collar (excellent show) where a couple ends up abducting and holding an FBI agent and his wife at gunpoint. And the end when it's resolved…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:37 PM
3

Spike did deserve better. The rape/sexual assault scene with him and Buffy really annoyed me as while in theory it served as a plot device for him to cross a line so severely that he was compelled to get his soul back, I felt it was much more about them just wanting to punch up the drama and make a 'statement' and they screwed over his character development up to that point to do it.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 10:24 PM
103

Well that's only racist to white people, so according to the mods that course is a-okay.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 06:13 AM
16

Quite frequently. You will never see so many racial slurs than when a black man goes against the leftist narrative.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 05:44 AM
2

I don't have a problem with people fulfilling traditional gender roles if it works for both people. If you are single and looking for a partner I think it's a bit weird if you rigidly stick to a certain notions, but people are free to be selective in whatever way they want. If you're already with someone and then kind of 'change' and insist your partner does too even if they don't agree, that's a dick move on your part. For instance if you're a man and have a 'modern' relationship with both you …
/r/MensRights08/08/22 10:50 PM
1

Based to the title, but I'm less optimistic than you that society is 'chilling out', things only seem to be getting worse.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 09:54 PM
1

I don't keep up with the latest lingo, so without explanations in your post I can't really say. I would have assumed nothing, just one's a man and one's a woman, but based on the comments that for some reason isn't the case?
/r/MensRights07/08/22 09:23 PM
12

Hopefully a win here will not just strike down AA in colleges, but will start a trend in dismantling racially discriminating policies across the country. I've been pretty amazed lately after how a lifetime of not accomplishing much, SCOTUS is finally stepping up to the plate and acting like the Constitution means something again.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 09:19 PM
2

Haven't seen it yet, and personally I don't mind posts about woke/anti-men movies. FYI though, about half the active user base here is fully woke (minus the anti-male part of wokeness) and a good amount partially supportive of it, so you'll probably get more pushback on anti-woke posts than support.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 09:04 PM
1

While I agree with your point that we shouldn't only defend men if they are popular, I don't think digging in our heels to defend convicted rapists is a good strategy. I do think we need to go back to a system of innocent until PROVEN (with evidence, not 'eh, he's a man, probably guilty of something') guilty. I think we need to hold the media a lot more accountable for how they treat people accused of crimes. And I think people need to be a little more open minded not the 'well I read some headl…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:48 AM
5

You didn't do anything wrong, I'd just avoid contact with that group and you should be fine. If your boss or anyone else makes any comments later just give them a brief rational summary of what happened.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 12:45 AM
12

Things haven't always been this bad, they've been getting worse and worse over the years to arrive here. Unfortunately as 63daddy pointed out, things are just going to keep getting worse and the Depp trial isn't going to change that. Even though several major outlets admitted men could be victims and women can be wrong and was a major win, it won't be lasting. I've already seen places backtracking on that and that Depp only won because of misogyny. I hope things change for the better too, but I'…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 12:41 AM
2

No to this sexist crap.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 12:32 AM
11

Fair enough. You'll probably just have to ignore their sexism then. While it's possible to have a private conversation with her about how you found her post sexist and inaccurate, that's likely to just lead to an argument and not a recognition that she was wrong. Assuming you all can work past a disagreement like that (likely if you've been friends for 20 years) she'll probably continue to say sexist things on occasion that you'll just have to put up with.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:04 AM
1

Not missing anything, pretty spot on. I think some people on here are mistaking high school locker room talk for a general society response though. It's true that teens might high-five the quarterback when he hooks up with a cheerleader while simultaneously insulting the girl; but one that's not nearly as common as it used to be back in the day, and two how society as a whole responds is entirely different.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:53 AM
20

Not only a bunch of misandric nonsense, most of the science/studies say the opposite on those statistics. I'd post the same thing on your page but gender swapped (that we push boys into marriage, it's a great deal for women, etc.) and she how she responds. You might want to make it where only she can see it though; even if true, a reverse post on that would get a lot of negative comments from people. Ultimately even if she responds and you engage her, all the studies and evidence in the world ar…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:44 AM
9

I'm not sure what the big deal is, murdering babies is all the rage these days. Putting her in prison would restrict her bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:36 AM
2

This is a very free speech forum so you get everything anyone wants to say that's related enough. For a more positive forum you'd have to remove most topics as there's a lot more bad news than good. I'd certainly be supportive of such a sub-reddit, but as someone pointed out it would probably end up getting banned. The powers that be only allow so much controlled opposition.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 08:52 PM
1

To be fair there are a LOT of comments here about how no women will date you unless your 6'. And while that may be a common thing and a reason to call out feminists hypocrisy, if you don't fit that mold and see that comment everywhere I can see chiming in with your experience. Though it is kind of an odd post by itself and not as a direct reply to something.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 08:45 PM
2

While I agree it's too early to have solid details to be seriously ragging on this yet, its disappointing that so many people here still don't get the problem and go all 'oMgRd tHeY puT a WOMAN iN a mOvIe!!!!1'. I say we get Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, and Kevin Spacey to team up for a movie and when people complain about it promoting sexual assault just pretend they're complaining that they put a man in a movie.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 08:41 PM
4

I hate the ridiculous argument feminists make about the hours of unpaid housework women do counting towards the 'wage gap' while completely ignoring that men do just as much if not more. Besides traditional gender roles of men doing mostly the outside work and women doing mostly the inside work, most people nowadays live independently before getting married and get an idea of all the work that needs done; and once in a relationship are free to divvy up tasks in a way each couple agrees to. If mo…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:16 AM
1

Spot on. Not sure how much this has been edited since the original post as I see some people with negative comments, but I don't see any problems. If one does engage in debate with a feminist (not recommended) inevitably they'll say men's problems (if you can get them to recognize that men have problems at all) are caused by the 'patriarchy' and that more women in office would fix this, and your response is a perfectly logical way of shutting them down. Obviously logic doesn't work on feminists …
/r/MensRights03/08/22 09:20 PM
3

Not in the United States no, not sure about other countries.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:38 AM
1

I agree to an extent, but also agree with some of the dissenting comments. While missing out on young social development absolutely can (and often does) have long term negative affects, it's not guaranteed and don't necessarily last forever. It's also true this is primarily a problem for men, but as someone else pointed it out it can happen to women as well even though societal standards may be less punishing for them. For those that feel 'behind' it is possible to 'catch up' as some other peopl…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 03:09 AM
2

Well, CNN told them so, so America MUST be the worst country in the world.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 10:39 PM
3

It isn't really that hard to visit the Moon either if you make an effort. I think people are either voluntarily Earth-based by standards or lack of effort.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 10:35 PM
20

Yep, spot on. I hate the term as an insult and hate those types of stories and the harm they do. Most of the stories are either entirely fabricated or twisted so much from reality that they might as well be.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 01:27 AM
1

The government shouldn't have any involvement in marriage.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:37 AM
3

Not going to scroll through the comments on this one so this point may have already been made, but most people here are going to be from the USA/Europe and are going to look at things from a USA/Europe point of view. You may as well go to a tradesmen forum and ask if electricians make good money, then come back and say 'Well actually in Zimbabwe the only make twelve cents a day, so you all are wrong.' While one could infer that the question is referring to the entire human population as a whole,…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:49 PM
9

In places like the US women are considered a 'minority" even though they make up more of the population.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:29 PM
2

Yep, definitely using it in the sense of what it actually means now and not the dictionary definition although even that is reasonably vague to be honest.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:22 PM
0

I'm surprised this topic has this many upvotes as there's actually a pretty sizable woke crowd in this forum. They may just be more involved and definitely more down voting than the average user who skims over most topics. Wokeness is definitely a plague that needs wiped out, but there are just too many liberal nutjobs here to keep it from infringing on the forum, so it's just something we have to put up with.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:12 AM
1

I think he was just being sarcastic the person that Disney has only had 'useless' woman characters by pointing out two strong female characters and sardonically saying how 'useless' they were.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:10 PM
1

Based on his second paragraph I think he was just being sarcastic to the person that said Disney has always had 'useless' women characters.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:09 PM
5

Unfortunately I think this is something where you just have to go with the 'least bad' option. You might on the rare occasion see a Libertarian or Independent candidate say something about male issues, but very few candidates make it a primary issue.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:14 PM
-2

Offering something isn't exploiting people. If I go to the grocery store to buy junk food is the grocery store exploiting me? Some people don't have good self control when it comes to eating healthy. I suppose cashier work is a disgusting thing that should be discouraged? A lot of people aren't ultimately happy in life, and plenty of people 'earn' their money as little or less than sex work. Some people get paid millions for throwing a ball around, some people get paid millions for saying a few …
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:59 PM
-7

Nope.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:19 AM
4

I think countering campaigns like this is where MRA's can actually make some change. We may never get equal laws, but we can start organizations like that one, except we flip the genders and watch people's head explode. Imagine "Sexism starts with women so it can end with women." on a huge billboard outside a major league game. If I were rich I'd probably drop my money on things like that instead of sports cars and fancy wines.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:33 AM
5

Agreed. This stuff goes way beyond the scope of just MRA though so I'm not entirely sure its a relevant discussion. Though of course there are things like 'lets make she-Hulk stronger than Hulk even though that's not comic accurate because rawr Girl Power'. And unfortunately the comics went woke over a decade ago so the movies are free to do things that are 'comic accurate' even though said comic thing is only a few years old and contrary to decades of established comic lore.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 01:36 AM
7

I'd say still progress. In the town where I live there's a lot of little signs/flags with things like 'women are the future'. I live in a college town and the ads for it have all women with things like 'your future is here'. So I'd say the fact that it included men at all is a good thing. Even though more and more unbiased studies are showing that domestic abuse is a lot more 1:1 the fact that they have it as close as 1 in 3 compared to 1 in 4 is progress, as I've seen things where when it inclu…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 01:26 AM
0

Speaking of western/first world I can't really think of any women specific problems. Not that all women necessarily have it on easy street, but most problems either aren't gender specific (such as being victims of assault) or it's a con that has a corresponding pro that kind of cancels it out. For instance women can get hired just because they are women. So a problem a woman might have is people not being sure if she's actually qualified or if the company just needed to hire a woman, but the con…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 01:21 AM
3

I think false statistics is something that desperately needs highlighted. From an early age women are inundated with stats about how dangerous men are and how often women are attacked. Colleges are filled with bogus stats about rape. Even the wage gap which is very easily debunked is still a prevalent belief because mainstream media only pushes the false stats and social media certainly does what it can to promote it and minimize the evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 12:54 AM
1

I wouldn't try getting him to open up or address his depression directly, I'd just continue to be a good friend/coworker. You can sprinkle in an additional 'if you want to talk about anything I'm available', but generally speaking people have such serious conversations with very few people and he already has a partner he's likely shared with, more generic support is probably more helpful than a more targeted approach. Just my two cents.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:51 PM
1

Maybe all the Karen's posting in forums like twox, but a lot of women have insecurities just like men do.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:42 PM
2

I think context matters on that. If the products for women say 'tested on women' then I don't see a problem with this. If all the products say 'tested on men' then I agree with your point.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:29 PM
106

Unless the course is dedicated to busting the myth of 'angry white males' it's a disgusting bit of racism and misandry. Back in the day the 'angry black man' stereotype used to be a thing, I wonder how people would react to a college course on that.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:42 PM
3

I'm not sure why we need abortion post number 5,713 because people are too lazy to use the search function or scroll down a little, but here we go again. Abortion is nearly equally split regardless of gender. There's about as many pro-choice men as there are pro-life women, etc. etc. You live in a red state, so you're going to see more pro-life people around you. Reddit is generally speaking a leftist cesspool hate site, so you're going to see more pro-choice here. It's true that specifically on…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 11:18 PM
1

Based.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 10:21 PM
1

Going to disagree with everyone else and say 'why not?'. Honestly if you view it as a transactional relationship and nothing more but you're okay with that, then what's the problem? If you were looking for something more and figure out that she's not it and you're not okay with that sort of relationship, by all means go ahead and move on. You should probably have a conversation with her to make sure you two are on the same page, but ultimately if you are having a good time that's the important t…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 04:22 AM
1

Unfortunately many people aren't capable of nuanced thinking. The media portrays abortion as a religious vs not religious thing, so that's the only way people can think of it as. It might be nice if we got a brief 'any laws related to religion are immediately struck down' period just to get the light bulb to go off for people. Since most religions are opposed to murder, theft, rape, etc. Someone getting stabbed to death in broad daylight because it's now legal because Christians are opposed to m…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:46 AM
1

Lesbians can get pregnant though. Say two women in a relationship decide to have a kid and decide which one will carry it. They go to the sperm bank/fertility center/etc. and now one half of the couple is pregnant just as if it were a hetero couple. If the non-pregnant women decides to bail after a few months I don't really see why she should be off the hook less than if a man got a woman pregnant.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:34 AM
1

It would actually be nice if some MRA women tried this. Politicians only care about things when it personally effects them, the second one of their wallets is on the line they'll have the bill amended in a day.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:19 AM
1

Yep, been this way for a while and it is unfortunate. All we can do is be supportive of the media that doesn't do things this way, maybe make our own wholesome content, and for more equality minded candidates.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:09 AM
3

I'm assuming this is a troll post so later you can hop over to a feminist board and go 'I was raped and these incel comments said it was okay!', but I'll respond anyway. What the guy did was absolutely not okay and goes beyond creepy/pushy. That being said I wouldn't say its molestation either, and I think putting that title on him was wrong. Think of it this way, how would you feel if you found out he'd been telling people for five years that you made up a fake rape accusation against him? I kn…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:05 AM
3

Unfortunately hating men in music has been main stream for a very long time. Heck the actual majority of songs if it's a man singing about a woman/women is about how beautiful she is/how great women are, and if it's a woman singing about a man/men it's about him cheating/how terrible men are.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:39 AM
42

Glanced at it and shockingly /s most of the responses were bullshit misandry.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:27 AM
3

We get a lot of throwaway accounts on here people just make to come and troll.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 01:54 AM
16

She won't get it eventually. Or rather, she gets it but will just never admit it. She doesn't need to read posts on here to get educated, she's read them. She's been here for months and commented on a lot of topics, often asking the exact same questions as if it's the first time she's asked them. She's only here to troll, I'm not sure why people keep humoring her.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 01:47 AM
2

I don't feel sorry for her, but as someone already pointed out the situation isn't right. As amusing as it is when leftists tear themselves apart, the fact remains that their systems of hate remain in place and are still used against everyone. It would be one thing if the light bulb came on for more people in situations like this and they'd wake up, but unfortunately that is a rarity.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 05:57 AM
16

The only surprising thing here is why someone that worked there would be surprised by such actions. Liberal groups like that have been racist/woke since long before 2020, she must have known what kind of organization she was working for.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 05:26 AM
152

Disgusting, and hopefully the courts will ultimately see it that way. Also unfortunate that he pleaded guilty to crimes he didn't commit. I can understand why people take plea deals even when they are innocent because the courts aren't always going to believe an innocent defendant, but when you've already gotten two 30 year sentences you might as well stick to your guns imho. Cases like this also demonstrate that many who claim to care about women/rape clearly don't, as they'd rather railroad an…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:26 AM
7

I suppose some of it depends on context. If a single mother is just looking for a short term relationship/hooking up, dismissing virginal men does kind of make sense. But if they're wanting something longer term/a new life partner than dismissing them makes no sense as not only will virgins 'catch up' to how to please the woman quickly, they're probably going to treat her better than a guy with 'game' that has had multiple partners.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 03:02 AM
6

I'd just come out as gender fluid and start using the women's restroom. If they say anything just tell them they are being transphobic. Not sure how well this would work where you are in Europe, but in the US at least it would be a guaranteed success and you'd probably get a promotion out of it.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:09 PM
44

One thing to keep in mind is that we don't ban people here like other subs. Overly misogynistic or misandric (less so it seems though) comments can and will get removed by mods, but since people don't generally get banned there are some people on here just to cause trouble.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:32 AM
6

Of course it's sexist.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 06:13 AM
9

Welcome. Please ignore the trolls, I see at least one is already being annoying in the comments.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 06:00 AM
2

Ah, yeah. That makes sense. Best of luck either way.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:28 PM
1

I'm not sure I'd assume creepy vibes, especially if they behaved fine before one of you switched jobs. I just think most adults don't want to put much effort into maintaining friendships, particularly more casual relationships. When you work with someone it's a bit easier to put forth the effort to hang out on the weekend and play games knowing you are going to keep seeing that person regardless. When we lose that main connection and you only see that person the occasions of hanging out, its eas…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:48 PM
66

I'm no expert in background checks and how that would show up on one, but I'm willing to guess most people would care a lot more about a court finding you not guilty of any wrongdoing than a school expelling you. I assume a Fire Department probably isn't super liberal/feminist, but even if they lean that way even they are aware there's no due process to accusations in schools. Personally unless you know that they know/will find out about it, I wouldn't bring it up, though its good to have your d…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:12 AM
6

It seems a lot if not most therapists are very feminist and not well equipped to deal with male specific issues. This idea is disputed by one of the other comments, but never having gone to therapy myself or conducted my own research on them, I'm relying on the anecdotal evidence of multiple people here that have found that to be the case. I'd try to get some clarification next visit if he was just being dismissive, or if it was just him trying to get you to be more specific and delve into it. I…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:04 AM
6

Unfortunately the media/the left paints MRA's this way because if they didn't and people actually took what people have to say at face value they might realize MRA's actually have a lot of good points and that hurts the narrative they strive to create. While the culture in the West has definitely turned women (and men) into man-haters, and men do have reasons to be bitter, just keep doing what you're doing and keep in sight that just because some (most?) women are this way it's no reason to writ…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 02:39 AM
9

I have my doubts about the complete legitimacy of the post tbh. There was one very similar posted a few weeks ago, and while this is probably not an uncommon thought to people in that situation a lot of things seem too close to be coincidence. But I suppose it's possible that it's the same person and they posted their realization on multiple platforms without copy pasting. I have a reply to this somewhere from the last post, but don't really feel like searching for it or replying to it again.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:43 AM
1

Strong disagree. While I do understand your point, it has a snowball's chance in hell in happening within the next 50 years and even if it does go that way countless men will suffer in the mean time. But even if it made it to the supreme court and they chose to rule on it, all they'd strike down is suing for pregnancy in general, not making it equal. We could inform are electives we would be supportive of such legislation IF it's reworded to be gender neutral, but not until then. I doubt there's…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:41 AM
1

Eh I'd disagree with most of that, though I do agree with your final point. Nerdom has gone mainstream and generally speaking people are made less fun of now for nerdy things than we were 20 years ago. That being said, people can (and do) make fun of people for hobbies like media portraying the nerd as overweight/unhygienic/low social skills, or people on social media using neckbeard as insult if they know the person they're attacking has nerdy hobbies. But by and large society doesn't attack me…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:54 AM
2

I didn't know Stranger Things was about DnD. I've been meaning to check it out for a while, just haven't gotten around to it (don't have Netflix, so I'm not bombarded with ads for it). I may have to increase the priority on that one.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:37 AM
2

First, it seems a lot of people here didn't really read your post they just put in a copy pasted reply based on the title, so I'd take plenty of them with a grain of salt. I'd let how close of a friend you are to her dictate how you move forward. I know you're not super close friends, but if she's close enough where you see her fairly often in different places (like not just the gym) maybe bring up that you thought it was weird that she thought your comment was inappropriate and make sure there'…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:19 AM
3

Except in most places, where it's still a crime.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:41 AM
5

That is literally illegal in most places.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:35 AM
1

I've often thought about making a youtube channel where I just gender swap a bunch of different songs, but unfortunately I can't sing worth a crap. In every genre most songs are - if it's a male singer: how great/beautiful a women/all women are/how much they love their girl, and if it's a female singer: how oppressed they are/how terrible men are/men cheat. For some reason most people don't seem to realize this, but I imagine if they listened to a playlist of everything gender swapped they'd sud…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:06 AM
2

Like many issues, peoples opinions here vary wildly. I'd estimate about 80% or so would say pro choice. There's been about 500 different posts, some including polls, in the last few weeks on the issue, so you're free to dive in and see what different people have to say on the matter.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:37 PM
2

Holy crap the comments here are disgusting. You are absolutely not being unfair in keeping the baby. He already made his choice by having unprotected sex, he does not get to intimidate you into killing your child. If you were both on birth control and it was the .00001% of the time you got pregnant anyway, I could see a small amount of pressure initially, but definitely not unprotected and definitely not six months on. You need to prioritize your actual baby, not some man acting like a baby.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:54 PM
1

I have noticed lately there definitely is a toxic element in this forum. Even though this place is better than most and mods generally let you express different opinions, there's still the general reddit cesspool rabble that downvote anytime you step out of groupthink.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:33 PM
1

No, the analogy although irrelevant holds up. Not that it matters, but white-dominant cultures absolutely do write laws that discriminate against white people. Regardless, 'reverse sexism' i.e. sexism against men is just sexism, and 'reverse racism' i.e. racism against white's is again just racism.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 08:45 AM
2

I imagine less the looks and more behavior/personality. There are lots of different memes its kind of ripping off of, 'in a world full of princesses, be a batman', etc. which generally say 'in a world of x kind of woman, be a y kind of woman' and people have pointed out that basically saying 'don't be x' is kind of crappy. While I find the 'internalize misogyny' thing pretty stupid, that's how these people think so they add it on there.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:03 AM
2

That's a very unfortunate situation, and unfortunately there is no easy solution. Personally I think the whole men and emotions thing is generally misunderstood by mean and women and most people have their own take on it that doesn't necessarily match everyone else's. I don't really 'get' therapy, but studies have shown that it is useful to a number of people, so finding a way to get him to go (perhaps getting a male friend of his to suggest it) might be the best bet. If you don't phrase it as '…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 12:59 AM
3

Absolutely we should. Leftism is the driving force against rights and equality, so it is definitely not the solution. That being said I wouldn't call leftists on this forum 'infiltration'. Men's rights attracts people of all political backgrounds, and since reddit is a far left website it only makes sense there would be leftists on here. Forums like this one are an anomaly that doesn't immediately ban anyone that steps out of group think, so there are actually people that fall on the right here …
/r/MensRights10/07/22 12:32 AM
0

Agreed, but nothing we can do about it, just the state of the world right now. Hopefully the pandering overload (as there is an absolute fuck ton of it) will backfire, and girls growing up now will help get rid of all that crap when they're old enough to be making the decisions.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 09:46 PM
2

Absolutely not. In most western countries misandry is six of one, half dozen of another. Just because the pros and cons vary a little doesn't really make it better. Personally I don't know of a good country period, possibly some in eastern Europe.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:36 AM
1

I think the article highlights the real problem why drafting women is getting resistance. Its not really that Republicans value women more or think men deserve to go off and die, the powers that be have phrased this as radical left agenda that is tied into a bunch of other ideology, and so therefore it must be stopped on that merit. And unfortunately it seems they've had to explain the difference between equity and equality so many times they can't tell the difference themselves anymore. I think…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:57 AM
1

I think the article highlights the real problem why drafting women is getting resistance. Its not really that Republicans value women more or think men deserve to go off and die, the powers that be have phrased this as radical left agenda that is tied into a bunch of other ideology, and so therefore it must be stopped on that merit. And unfortunately it seems they've had to explain the difference between equity and equality so many times they can't tell the difference themselves anymore. I think…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:43 AM
10

I don't mind the idea of them, but its something that would be relevant to me that I would go to. I don't go to the gym, or clubs, or any such social place and whether it was male only or not wouldn't have any effect on me going there. That being said some men would like it, and since female only spaces are definitely allowed than its only right for male only spaces to likewise exist.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:48 AM
10

As should men. But fuck men, right? Men should just know their place and give up on being treated equally.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:33 AM
9

Women might feel safer, yes, because the media and feminists have brainwashed them into thinking that men are dangerous, savage creatures doing evil to women at every turn. They don't HAVE to though, they could try independent thought and rising above feminist programming. There are plenty of women capable of looking at men as fellow human beings and not just threats. Do you understand why men would feel safer with another male employee? Unlike with women there's actually a very real threat in f…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:15 AM
6

Unfortunately we live in in a gyno-centric society and legal system. I understand the gynecologist one and I think to be fair it is acceptable for men to ask for a male doctor as well. But hopefully the double standards (asking for a female hair is okay, asking for a male mechanic is not) are something we'll one day be free of.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:16 AM
18

Not a good answer. Some men feel safer around men, it shouldn't be acceptable for one gender and not the other.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:02 AM
1

Unfortunately that's just part of belonging to the reddit cesspool.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:50 PM
6

Broadly speaking, yes, being in most relationships these days seems to require putting up with a lot of bs. Obviously how couples get along and what their issues are vary tremendously, but generally speaking one question lies at the heart of everything. Do they make you happy? There are pros and cons that might make up the difference on whether you should leave or stay, but that immediate gut reaction to 'do they make me happy' does tell you 90% of what you need to know. Your going to know your …
/r/MensRights07/07/22 09:40 AM
6

There are a number of women on this forum and nothing to indicate its 'for men only', so while its possible if the op is new they might have that assumption, nothing in their post indicates this to me. As for the weakness thing, based on many other comments from people here this is actually a common phenomenon. I can't speak to it myself and obviously this isn't something that would apply to all women, but based on it being a common thing and the op knowing his fiance far better than us, don't t…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 09:26 AM
48

I don't think I've ever seen a father or a mother tell their daughter how to treat a future man/partner, only how the daughter should be treated in a relationship. I've rarely even seen it in television, and then only in like Victorian set stuff where the girls family is trying to marry into a wealthy family.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 09:03 AM
7

I've never understood this. In media the woman is always taking care of the helpless man, even if both are sick with the same thing. Anecdotally speaking, I have only ever seen the opposite in real life. Not to say it doesn't ever happen that way, but I've only ever seen women get pampered whilst sick, while the man may get treated okay but may just get told to suck it up. If a husband and wife are both sick, its the husband taking care of both of them. I've never actually witnessed a man say 't…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 12:44 AM
31

While it would be nice, it's never going to happen. For any type of lawsuit, you'd have to show a 'victim' and courts don't consider 'men' to be a potential victim.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 12:35 AM
2

Unfortunately that's an unpopular opinion in this sub. While some here legitimately care about men's rights because it personally affects them, in every other regard its as much a cesspool of hateful ideology as the rest of Reddit.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:19 PM
29

It's Wikipedia, don't expect things to be accurate on anything remotely related to politics or social matters.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 10:02 AM
4

Not all, but unfortunately the baby murder brigade is rather high here.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:28 AM
-2

Joy, post 501 on abortion. Yes, this is a great victory for our rights, but we don't need new posts on it every day.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 12:43 AM
2

As others have said, no. There is no point in a man going to HR over something like that unless he wants to end up on the bread line. And don't think getting a few men to speak up is going to change anything, this has been the norm for decades (for Crichton fans, Disclosure is almost 30 years old now) with no positive change in direction. I would try to record as much as possible as you can discreetly in case you need it, but if your husband likes his job I probably wouldn't go to HR even if you…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 07:51 AM
1

Not sure if this is a troll post or not, but I'll try to some relatively brief answers. "There's a common perception many MRAs etc long for the 'good old days' when men and women knew their place, women were mostly homemakers or worked as nurses, teachers etc." There's a lot of "common perceptions" about a lot of things that aren't necessarily true. For example there's a common perception feminism is about equality yet when you do the slightest scrutiny that illusion falls apart. " Of course thi…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 09:58 PM
1

Precisely.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:21 AM
4

I agree, I don't like hate speech and certainly don't engage in it myself. I was just trying to explain why the mods have chosen to take a free speech approach to moderation. Both extreme misogyny and misandry are removed, but that still leaves a lot of comments that I don't like. I'll admit sometimes I'm torn between reporting a post and 'it's free speech and 20 subcomments in, few people are going to read it anyway'.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:41 PM
2

It's as not true as the opposite claim. I know men that have gone to different doctors to get vasectomies and gotten turned down because they're not married/have no kids. However when feminists make their claim, seldom is it shot down as it was in the picture you posted. My post was just doing what they do. I didn't use a sarcasm tag or make it more obvious hyperbole because I want the 'yeah, men get to do whatever the want, but women have no bodily autonomy' crowd to see just for a split second…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:32 PM
5

Men are also denied a vasectomy for the same reason. My comment was as far from the truth as when feminists claim the exact opposite. I didn't use a sarcasm tag or make it more obvious hyperbole because I want the 'yeah, men get to do whatever the want, but women have no bodily autonomy' crowd to see just for a split second how the other side feels when feminists post their nonsensical tubes tied to vasectomy comparison. Maybe it will open a few eyes and more people will see that it's not that s…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:27 PM
5

Agreed on all points, welcome to the sub.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:15 PM
2

I certainly wouldn't oppose a law that ties the two together. Unfortunately it would never work out that way in real life. Its certainly possible for the government to give a tax break to pregnant women, but even with the IRS considering that fertilized egg a person does not mean other branches of government would consider it a person as regards to aborting it. When you have a huge bloated bureaucracy like ours they won't and often can't be consistent everywhere.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:03 PM
2

Yes. Yes. And yes.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:04 PM
0

I think its ridiculous that a woman can walk into any doctors office in this country and get her tubes tied same day no questions asked, but for a vasectomy the guy must be married, already have a kid, have the wife's written permission, and then he can be put on a three year waiting list.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:04 PM
18

More concern trolling. This thread has no chance of becoming anything like that forum because the moderation style is entirely different. On that forum you can get banned just for posting here, on this forum you can be actively against men's rights, quote false feminist statistics, and troll all day without getting censored or banned. With the free speech focused moderation, is there going to be some venting? Sure. Is this place by and large about 'being mean to women'? Absolutely not. Most post…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:55 PM
2

That was a bold assumption.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:54 AM
45

This is nothing new. While woke identity politics has entered every facet of life now, but scholarships were one of the first victims. Even 20 years ago when I graduated high school, there were plenty of scholarships for girls or non-white's, but the only form of scholarships just for boys was sports. And with many of the scholarships open to anyone 'write a 10 page essay on blah blah blah, we'll pick 5 winners out of hundred of thousands of entries' there were a lot less John Smith winners than…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:23 AM
2

No worries. I've recently started checking the New section instead of just the default Posts, and it may not have made it to the top yet. And honestly I'd rather have two posts on this subject then the 'clearly there are already 500 posts on Roe v Wade, but time for 501' problem we're having.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 02:52 AM
36

Don't sell yourself short mate, you noted the double standard and can see the problem with it, that puts you in the high percentile for brightness imo.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:39 AM
1

FYI, already a post on this.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:37 AM
5

Spot on. And while some are missing that point incidentally (i.e. that's what facebook and twitter are saying and there's where they get all their information), others (like msm) are intentionally putting it that way because being truthful hurts their points. People (often young people) often either ignore or hate the very foundation of the US. States are supposed to have a lot of sovereignty and the federal government is supposed to be mainly about a national defense with some interstate commer…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:21 AM
1

It may well be a cultural norm in your area, or it could just be very bad luck. I would add though if it's a cultural thing, it's probably less because of ethnicity than just that particular group. Native Americans in eastern Oklahoma are going to have different cultural norms than Native Americans in northern Arizona, etc. etc.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:35 PM
5

Why? Because Wikipedia is a left wing website. Left wing ideology is very hateful and opposed to equality, so obviously they're going to smear something they are against like the men's rights movement. People like to consider Wikipedia a neutral factual website for some reason, but it is very very much not the case.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:40 PM
3

The equality is actually the issue. People on the left are actively against equality, and people on the right are in theory for equality but fail the test on multiple issues by taking a gynocentric approach to things because of traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:15 PM
3

While Republicans/conservative's are certainly no friend to the men's rights movement, ultimately I'd say yes you're right. Republicans do support some anti-male measures like no equality in the draft, but ultimately they don't hate men, some just have a gynocentric approach of elevating women. Despite this they also believe in the Constitution and thus by and large support equality (just not all the time, like the draft as mentioned). Democrats/liberals actively hate men and are very opposed to…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 03:06 PM
54

I suppose Putin could counter slam Boris about his 'white privilege' and how he wouldn't have become PM without it. But I imagine Putin doesn't really care what some English potato says to the tabloids.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:40 AM
10

What do you expect from Reddit? Its a toxic cesspool and silencing dissent is normal. Some forums like this one and our mods may not care about sarcastic jokes, but that's very much the exception.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:32 AM
1

What's surprising about this? It's sexist, racist, and ageist, right out of the liberal playbook.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:24 AM
10

Comments are proof positive why men's rights will never get anywhere. People will put party politics first every time, and neither party will ever prioritize men. Congratulations for shooting yourselves in the foot.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:06 AM
0

I'd definitely agree the conservative side has some issues, I just don't think saying they're basically the same as feminists is a fair comparison.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:55 AM
2

I haven't watched that particular show, but that kind of toxicity has been going on for some time. Even the 90's( which was full of much less woke crap) popularized the bumbling doofus of a husband while the wife was smart but puts up with him for some reason. Some things seem alright in isolation, but when you look at the larger pattern you see that it adds up to a big problem. Unfortunately since such things are so common and obvious now, when I've rewatched some older shows I don't like them …
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:14 AM
6

Strong disagree. Occasionally the end results are similar I'd concede that, but the ways of thinking are opposite. Feminism is a hate group and directly believes in more rights for women/superiority. Traditional Conservatives (I hate the slang tradcons) do end up with a way of thinking that often benefits modern women, but its from a viewpoint of chivalry, women and children first, equal but different gender roles, etc. from a positive way of thinking. While this does unfortunately often put wom…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:59 AM
6

Not just sexist and racist, but politicist as well.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:09 AM
2

Commented the other day, but realized later this phrasing is very open to interpretation. People could take 'I don't support women's rights' as thinking women don't deserve the same rights as men do/thinking women should have fewer rights, while it could also be interpreted as 'I believe in equality between men's and women's rights, but don't specifically advocate for women's rights, for reasons such as they get a lot of support already. So even trolls aside, without a less ambiguous phrasing it…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:05 AM
2

There may have been some points in their rambling, but anyone that abbreviates the Constitution as 'Con'n' is an idiot probably not worth listening to.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:36 PM
9

I would strongly consider either filing a lawsuit against her and the department, or getting the name and badge number of every officer involved in the arrest and blasting them on social media (but not both, counter productive).
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:53 PM
0

Racists like Galactic don't have a good track record of making sense or being truthful.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:51 PM
1

Neither. Roe vs Wade was a supreme court ruling that said because of privacy reasons in the 14th amendment, somehow abortion was a constitutional right. It was an incredibly faulty ruling and finally thrown out as nonsensical, which means at the moment the states are free to make their own laws on the matter sense there isn't a federal law. If in the over 50 years since since Roe vs Wade, Congress ever actually passed any legislation saying people do have a right to it then we wouldn't be here. …
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:45 PM
3

Agreed. If I stab someone, that's a medical issue not a political one. There shouldn't be laws against assault or murder, no one should be regulating what I do with my body. There are some arguments for pro life and you don't have to like murders, but making it illegal robs millions of people of their choice.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:39 PM
4

The mods have a very free speech approach to moderation, they went with the opposite approach to feminist forums that immediately ban the second someone steps out of groupthink.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:54 AM
3

And women that do want to get an abortion can still get one, so the SCOTUS ruling doesn't affect the views of "pro-choice" women either.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:46 AM
4

True.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:35 AM
2

Trolls going to troll I guess.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:05 PM
1

Or simply cross state lines. People act like it will be darn near impossible to get one now, but that's just diatribe rhetoric not based on any sort of reason. If you want an abortion, you can still get one. But if other people think killing an unborn person is a bad thing and limit it in their state, leave them alone. The hateful pro-choice types are just going to end up driving more people to a pro-life stance imo.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:02 PM
23

Just going to throw out that polls like these are kind of pointless, as the forum has a number of trolls solely here to make MRA look bad. As you can see one has already voted they don't support them, and I doubt anybody here operating under good faith would take that position.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:56 PM
101

I've seen this point constantly for decades from feminists. Also see the 'if men could get pregnant there wouldn't be an abortion debate and there would be an abortion clinic on every street corner'. It's nothing to be perplexed about, if these people could actually consider things from a mans perspective or do realistic gender reversal scenarios, then they wouldn't be feminists in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:54 PM
3

It is a possible affect, but honestly I doubt it will be much of one. While there will certainly be some increase in births because its slightly more difficult to get an abortion, for the vast majority of people that were going to get an abortion anyway the fact that there used to be an abortion clinic on every street corner and now they have to drive a few hours to one is not going to be the end of the world some people are making it out to be.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:50 PM
-1

While its certainly true that many women want full support for whatever they want while ignoring mens issues or sometimes blatantly opposing them, I'd disagree that it's a 'right' that shouldn't be taken away. Many people consider a fetus an unborn person (and others don't, the main point of controversy in the whole thing), and no one has a 'right' to kill other people. Abortion is a privilege, and as such states can vary their choice on very lax to very strict regulation of based on the viewpoi…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:46 PM
3

No, it CAN be discriminatory against women because the rules of the woke or alphabet mafia are only rules when its beneficial to them. Use their own arguments or definitions against them and suddenly the rules change or don't apply. Basically they're always right and you're always wrong, no matter what.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:30 PM
2

Very disappointing, but unfortunately even somewhat sensible politicians are prone to appeasing the woke mob. At the end of the day even politicians with the best of intentions are still politicians and their main concern is with staying in office and they'll go whichever way they think is most beneficial to them.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:21 PM
3

They won't listen to that position. They narrow it down to 'the republicans' and 'feminists', because they don't want to fucking admit the democrats/liberals are way worse. And unfortunate amount of people have fallen for the woke diatribe but since men's rights issues actually personally affect them, they've actually become awake to that problem in the left's philosophy. But it's difficult to wake people up entirely, so they just dunk on conservatives because surely their side can't be wrong ab…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:19 PM
2

Not directly about the use of incel, but I almost made a post on the meta the other day to ask about the lack of moderation. The faq states they only censor in the most extreme situations and otherwise abides by allowing free speech regardless of how much most people may not like it. I love free speech and think its great that this sub takes a different approach to moderation. That being said I've noticed a few people just spewing insult after insult on here, trolls intentionally disrupting topi…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:11 PM
1

Since the op actually seems interested in every persons opinion I'll go ahead and chime in again, even though over 500 posts have been made on this topic in the last two days lol. One, the Constitution does not guarantee any right to an abortion, so reversing this decision was the correct move and it should be relegated for each state to decide. Pro-life people have a point about killing a life. Their argument that the fetus will be a person and thus has a right to live is a valid argument and t…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:56 PM
11

Because they're just trolls. You could literally make a post called 'I love women' and these people would come in and call you misogynistic incels. Unfortunately the downside of allowing free speech is dealing with such people.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:29 PM
1

Well now you're just being logical, that's beyond the scope of most redditers, even here.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:44 PM
1

If anyone is doing it I couldn't say. From what I've read at least one company did actually do it but may have quickly stopped due to backlash, but the way it was stated in the article was that it was extra time off, not letting them use regular sick time. But I haven't personally contacted such companies and gotten direct copies of policies, I'm just repeating what I've read. Regardless if anyone is or ever actually has done that doesn't really matter, my point was that such a policy would be m…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:35 PM
1

I admit I just skimmed most of those, but I'm not seeing the MRA angle. This information seems to apply equally to men and women.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:46 AM
1

Just out of curiosity, what's the harm in simply saying 'I deny any wrong doing' or the like and just keeping it at that? I get how prolonged conversations might lead them to tripping you up, or if you say 'I can prove I wasn't there that day' the accuser can just change their story, but what about a short simple denial? I assume there is a reason since most people agree its best not to say anything at all, just curious how exactly they would use that against you.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:38 AM
1

Broadly speaking I'd say no, they haven't had it worse. Which gender had it worse is one, very subjective to different situations, and two has varied tremendously in different parts of the world in different times in history. It would be a very ambitious project to scour every civilization throughout every century tallying up points for worse or better in different categories, but I think anyone with a good understanding of history pretty readily concludes that men and women have probably had to…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:41 AM
24

It does, but today's Court ruling affects men and women. Title IX only affects men, so it's not likely to get much attention.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:28 AM
1

Women aren't 'fighting for their rights' today. For starters, the abortion issue is split pretty evenly on the gender line. I could make a similar post on how men are out there fighting for their right not to have their children killed, but I won't. Being pro-choice or pro-life isn't about being a man or a woman. Abortion is a complicated issue and its fine to come down on one side or the other, but anyone phrasing the debate as '' they vs women' is just being a misandrist asshole. Second, there…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:13 AM
3

If anything the term is actually less popular now than it was a few years ago. And there is no 'correct' usage of it, its been purely meant to insult men since its inception.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:54 AM
4

Great resource, thanks for the post.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:39 AM
0

While I'm inclined to agree on a lot of your points, personally I'd rather the forum avoid posts of supporting one party or the other, or even more nebulous topics that may impact men's rights but less directly. I'd rather the forum focus on supporting individual problems rather than devolving into a more generic political forum. As it is a lot of comments (particularly on posts about the new ruling) are getting into more party lines than actually to keeping with discussing a particular issue.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:32 AM
3

While true, I think its much less of an issue than giving maternity leave but not paternity, women time off for that time of the month, etc. Pretty much any health difference issue can be made equal by giving everyone the same amount of time off and medical leave for whatever issue, but unfortunately that costs a lot of money. Doing things this way not only saves money, but gets them good press. It has the added bonus where they might be able to shift abortion issues to federal dollars where as …
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:26 AM
1

Fortunate that Florida has a decent and sensible governor. While traditional conservatives can and do take a gynocentric approach to things, at least they come from a place of good intentions (unlike the other party, that does the same thing but from a place of hate) and can actually be reasoned with instead of blind bigoted dogma.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:15 AM
5

Agreed. Neurochemistry is too complicated for most people to understand, so we've dumbed it down to 'testosterone = aggression'. Often time men and women can exhibit the same behavior, but the man will categorized as aggressive when the woman gets a more positive term.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:09 AM
3

Its "my body my choice" only when its convenient for them (or rather, the logically concluded your body your choice doesn't exist), as has been proven numerous times.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:54 AM
6

No, CNN didn't tell them to.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:38 AM
1

No, we must not. First, as many others have pointed out, this ruling didn't outlaw abortion, it kicked the issue back to the states where it belongs. The federal government admitting it doesn't have authority over something and relegating it back to the states is actually a big win for rights in general, that includes mens rights. Secondly, abortion is a complicated issue that is far from black and white. Some MRA's may be pro choice, others may be pro life. Simply being a mens rights advocate h…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:29 AM
3

People have always tried divisive tactics in order to gain power and suppress others. Men and women, blacks and whites, team Jacob and team Edward. Unfortunately mob justice has long been a thing and in pretty much every country and many have used such 'mob justice' to enact personal goals. However those numbers seem very off. I don't have my sources on hand, but the majority (around 70% if memory serves) of lynchings were actually white men. Certainly not split evenly amongst the demographics, …
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:42 AM
2

Thanks for your post. I know you're reading all the replies and trying to reply to many, so I'll try to keep mine as sort as possible (admittedly a weakness of mine though). My first comment would be to remember to take every comment (and not just here really, general life advice really) individually, and not as a reflection of any group as a whole. Even if 9/10 people here are saying the same thing; keep in mind a small amount of people use reddit, and a much smaller amount of those people post…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 06:29 AM
1

Perfect for what? What experts? If you're talking about an ideal height an average woman would look for in a mate (what most of the comments seem to be referring to), then idk. I've seen plenty of things about how many women wouldn't date someone under 6', setting dating apps to sort by over 6' only, etc. so in that regard 5'10" may not be perfect. But maybe studies show 5'10" men are the most successful in getting partners, I don't follow such things so idk.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:00 AM
1

I think a lot of other answers have gone into detail and cited information, so I'll try to keep my responses relatively brief. (I then proceeded to give a more detailed answer anyway that I decided to just delete and start over to be brief, only to ramble on slightly again lol). I will say if you think men and women deserve equal rights then you should separate yourself from feminism, and being brainwashed into thinking there is a patriarchy is but one reason why. Your experience seems to be tal…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:53 AM
1

You're misunderstanding what Inevitable is saying. He's not saying women register for the draft at 18, he's saying they can just register to vote at 18 (without having to register for the draft like men have to).
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:46 AM
1

Thanks for pointing that out. I'm actually familiar with the definitions, but I read this post really late and misread refuges for refugees, and I retract my statement. To be slightly fair to my 3 am brain, I'm from the US where we generally call both domestic violence shelters and homeless shelters just shelters. Seeing as the next slide was about shelters , the fact that England has taken in a large number of refugees in recent years and there's an ongoing conflict at the moment, I think it wa…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 09:51 PM
2

They can't explain it, at least it any logical sense. Unfortunately while some have 'wakened' to the cause of MRA because it personally effects them, this server still has a large number of woke people and all they know is regulation is good because msm tells them so.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 09:46 PM
9

Only thing I would change is to add something like 'and the real number could be even higher' after the one in twelve statistic. Pretty much everyone but mra's dismiss false accusations as something that pretty much never happens. People might see the 1/12 stat from a somewhat reputable source and believe it may be happening more than they thought, but most are likely to just file that under still a rare occurrence. Adding some kind of line to indicate the real number could be even higher than t…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:16 PM
15

Reddit is by and large a cesspool. Even forums not in any way related to feminism is full of people of such ideologies, and since people on reddit can and will go through your post history for various reasons, posting in a place such as this will definitely come up. Some forums automatically ban you for posting here, but afaik its only feminist subs.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:06 PM
3

As others have said mostly perception. An average person with a slightly open mind that's unfamiliar with the disenfranchisement of men might give something called 'mens rights activists' a passing glance, where as something called masculism would be immediately dismissed as misogynistic. And unfortunately most people don't even have that open of a mind. Even with a neutral connotation, it draws comparison to feminism and many people supportive of mens rights would not like comparison to that ki…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 07:07 AM
1

TV writers absolutely push an agenda. Besides quite likely handed templates or topics to include (and exclude) most tv writers are going to have such ideologies anyway, because anyone that doesn't have the 'right' ideologies have probably been fired.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:35 AM
3

Not my favourite of his presentations. While the slides do a good job of presenting some statistics to people unaware of the disenfranchisement of men, this doesn't hold up as well to me as some of the others I've seen. For starters, we don't need refugees. The one percent statistic is definitely worth pointing out and something that needs changed, but phrasing it as 'we need refuges' is just weird. Likewise reducing the discrepancy in performance in schools between girls and boys to 'we need he…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:15 AM
2

It might depend a little on how bad the current environment is there. Generally speaking I think an Egalitarian club is usually a better bet. Even if you primarily focus on mens issues, you are a lot less vulnerable to being shut down by the law, colleges, attacked by the media, etc. If your country isn't too far gone you might be able to get away with calling it a men's club or at the very least be able to use it as a platform to point out how screwed up a lot of things in the US and other coun…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 03:15 AM
1

I definitely wouldn't tip the waitresses at your work again, but I think punishing all waitresses for the actions of some of them is sinking to their level. I think a rule of never tipping more than 15% for waitresses will prevent people like her from getting to play their 'victim' card while at the same time not unduly punishing other waitresses a number of whom probably aren't assholes like her.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:57 AM
2

True. Some laws are meant to be biased, others aren't. I was just trying to point out in some cases just because a law is actually written a certain way, the courts who interpret the laws not uncommonly interpret them differently than the way the law is actually written,so you can't just go by what laws technically say. I suppose that might fall under enforcement and lack there of, but I think its an important distinction between courts effectively making something the law of the land (despite w…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:07 PM
2

They're not forgotten, they just don't care. Someone posted a similar question on a Discord server I'm in (Discord servers being largely a place for young people super into the alphabet mafia and with too much time on their hands tend to go overboard year round with the pride parade, but especially in June), and a mod (male) responded with the nicest possible wording of 'No one cares about mens mental health, we all aboard the pride parade baby!' I guess we should be glad mens mental health mont…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:54 PM
4

Unfortunately saw this when I accidentally clicked the main reddit page. Threads on it in different forums, all with the usual hatred for white people and men. I'm not familiar with the author, but all the bile thrown his way certainly proves his point.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:44 PM
19

What disgusting garbage, both Johnson and the article. Johnson doubles down on his bigotry talking about white fragility, saying white people think they'll get a job just because their white, and somehow SOMEHOW the only apology for saying white cis males need not apply is that it might unintentionally exclude lgbtlasdfjq+ and bipocssieh communities because they'd have to 'out' themselves to not be excluded. And the article instead of actually showing any backlash and trying to report a new stor…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:40 PM
15

Unfortunately the laws don't actually work that way. You can't discriminate based on race, gender, and identification of protected classes. Discriminating against a black person based on race is illegal, discriminating against a white person based on race is perfectly legal. Same with women and men, gay and straight, etc. While the laws as written don't actually say that, the courts have repeatedly ruled that way and have stated it applies only to protected classes. I absolutely agree customers …
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:32 PM
5

Not surprising at all, from my understanding its been a very hateful sub for some time. Which is not surprising, as Reddit itself is a cesspool. I don't use Reddit much outside of occasionally checking here and getting links to episodes on r/panelshows because it is (like most social media) effectively a hate site. I accidentally clicked on the main reddit link earlier, hadn't been on the main page in a long time so scrolled through out of curiosity. At least three twox hate posts, a few other s…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:16 PM
3

Oh look, someone can't look through the comments and make obvious conclusions. I was criticizing the post above mine (I know reddit tends to get them out of order though) by copying it entirely and gender swapping the end because they make it sound like men are the default rapists and that men don't understand consent. What fucking planet are you on that university courses are teaching that women don't understand consent and rape and that its women doing the sexual assault? Because I would like …
/r/MensRights14/06/22 06:58 PM
1

Her assault doesn't. I think he was trying to to give wider view of his background and the pressures he felt to part of the lgbt community were relevant to the situations he found himself in. That aspect of the story didn't really have anything to do with mens rights but may have been necessary for the AITA post as a whole. He could made the post in a way using phrases like 'pressure to join certain communities and take certain actions' without being specific I suppose, but not sure if that woul…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 06:50 PM
1

Been a long time since I've been in school, but iirc in one of our science classes in middle school (age around 11-14) we had a broad teaching about how reproduction worked in mammals, I assume we probably talked specifically about humans at some point but probably not for long/detailed. In high school (14-18) Health was a required course and it went into a little more detail about human reproduction and the various components, stds were mentioned but not heavily discussed. Sex itself wasn't rea…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 09:22 AM
2

A lot to unpack with this one. Unfortunately some people are going to skim by your post because of your lgbt sentiment. This subreddit is far better than most, but there's still some strong 'progressive' presence here. Firstly, no not an asshole (mostly). And yes, unfortunately a lot of LGBT crowd does have the child grooming element to it (somehow screaming they're not groomers while at the same time blatantly propagandizing children more than any other group), and your story shows one way in w…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 08:53 AM
2

To be fair if the genders were reversed, this guy would be in jail. If a 25 year old man coerced a 16 year old girl into sex, stalked her and introduced himself to her boyfriends and tells them about how he raped her when she was 10... I take it back, he probably wouldn't be in jail he'd be dead. Perhaps not all of the post was strictly mens rights relevant, but I feel like some people saw some things they didn't like about the post and solely focused on that.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:44 AM
2

I'm surprised it hasn't been shut down from the name alone. I wish you and it good luck.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:32 AM
1

What 'requests' are the 'community' making? First I think you'd have to establish what exact groups you are trying to communicate with and possibly make clear distinctions between various groups possibly with different communication goals with each. Personally I think most 'incel' groups in the dark armpits of the internet are probably 95% law enforcement trying to entice people into committing crimes and feminists posting stuff just so they can screenshot and share it 'proving' how bad men are.…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:30 AM
0

Unfortunately I think your simple question has a tiny amount of nuance to it and thus went over some people's head. That or they are so depraved they would think the situations 'starving person steals an apple' and 'person randomly tortures and murders someone for shits and giggles' are equal. They're both 'wrong', why bother distinguishing between crimes? Life in prison for both.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:42 AM
2

First off, almost no rape happens between strangers. Just want to clear up that common misconception. Almost all cases of rape involve a perpetrator who is known by the victim (date rape, significant other, friend, relative, boss or coworker, etc). That said, some partners are ok with their partner grabbing them and trying to have sex with them in their sleep and some aren’t. That’s actually a specific kink. But that should be clearly communicated between both parties ahead of time. Any time you…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:30 AM
7

Unfortunately nothing new here. While it's been standard practice to unofficially do this for some time, it's becoming mainstream to flat out say 'white men need not apply'.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:19 AM
3

Oh Em Gee wiki bot, what a bigoted statement. Woman can't be defined, you can check with the supreme court on that. And assuming a woman's gender?! With pages like that it's only a matter of time before you're taken down for being a a transphobic incel hate site.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:15 AM
1

He at least has a modicum of intelligence for recognizing it, but he's an idiot/bigot for thinking people of his attributes 'deserve' to have less opportunities. I like him as an actor, but its an important lesson in either learning to separate the art from the artist (or find a way to ignore all news about every celebrity) or just watch older stuff. Its pretty difficult to make it to peoples screens these days without towing the woke line and generally being a despicable person (even if you hav…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 10:49 PM
3

I disagree with both premises. I don't think testosterone has anything to do with violence, at least in any kind of simple matter. Even if overly aggressive men and overly aggressive women may both have elevated testosterone, the most psychotic raging female murderer is still going to have way less testosterone than a male Buddhist monk that has never hurt a fly in his life. Neural chemistry is very complicated and despite the common practice, reducing it down to 'testosterone = aggression' is s…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:32 PM
4

An interesting thought. I would say that such cosmetic things should be covered the same way whether you're a man or a woman that wants to be a man. I personally don't think they should be covered by insurance or by government programs, but if a government program lets a woman get free work done on her boobs to fulfill her image of what she thinks should be a male body, then not doing the same free work to a man who has body issues with his moobs is discriminatory in my opinion and potential gro…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:53 AM
1

Fair to blast him for things that aren't really for public disclosure and things she's also guilty of, not really no. That being said it sounds like he's dodging a bullet so its possible her doing so was the best thing that could have happened.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:41 AM
4

As a whole Reddit is a bigoted cesspool, so that isn't that surprising.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:38 AM
3

She seems to have screwed herself with the pregnancy test. If it was just a rape accusation that can be difficult to disprove, but with a pregnancy dna of the baby doesn't lie. Any potential criminal charges would be dropped once they do a dna test, but unfortunately that doesn't help with the school situation. Schools immediately support the false accuser and even once your name is 'cleared' it won't mean much to them. I'm sure there's a myriad of things to do as other have posted and provided …
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:34 AM
1

Your "friend" is an idiot if he thinks any of those are counter points to men's rights. Most cultures in history have had different gender roles for men and women. The modern take is that 'women were oppressed' when in reality both or neither were. Just because two people are treated differently doesn't mean one is superior and the other inferior, both being a man and being a woman in various cultures in history came with pros and cons. While women may have historically less access to the job ma…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 03:31 AM
1

I have, usually in the context of being overly nice to a girl I fancied. It was typically advice trying to help me out (i.e. 'if you like a girl you need to be less nice if you want any chance of her actually liking you'). Unfortunately that's just my nature.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 02:42 AM
2

To those that don't 'get it' (why do they look like hostages, why are they saying they don't need feminism, etc.) there was a trend on social media years ago (same circa these pics are likely from) of girls doing the same thing except they were signs on why they needed feminism; usually with bullshit reasons like the wage gap. Fortunately a few ladies like these that happen to not be misandristic pigs took the opposite approach, though to much less appreciation obviously.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:12 PM
3

As others have pointed out the article itself is pretty bad and the core premise is flawed. The supreme court is just reiterating the way the system works, if you fail a state appeal you don't get to introduce new evidence to a federal court. One can debate the number of appeals defendants get and people try to change the process if they feel the system needs improving, but as far as I can tell (I admit I'm no legal expert) they're just making a reasonable ruling on how the law is written.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:49 AM
3

Wasn't planning on seeing it any time soon, but now I know its probably not worth seeing at all. Thanks for the heads up.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:19 PM
3

I know this was in response to a circumcision thread but seeing as you made a separate post for this I'm going to mostly limit my response to just the generic religious freedom angle. I do think 'religious freedom' is something that fundamentally needs reevaluated. I won't speak of other countries as some are purposely theocratic, but in regards to the USA I think the intentions of the founders and the purpose in the Constitution is to prevent a state sponsored religion and to allow free worship…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 12:54 AM
0

I don't really care. For the most part discussions here are just going to echo generic abortion discussions everywhere else and have been happening for decades. Regardless of anyone's opinions on the matter, if you make abortion illegal you are removing a persons rights and bodily autonomy. If you let it be legal you are removing an unborn persons rights and bodily autonomy. Regardless of which side you support there is no 'best' answer and while it's fine to support one side or the other both s…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:37 PM
3

Was actually going to comment the same thing. The first time (and pretty much only time afaik) I had heard of a male birth control pill it was feminists going 'Oh booh hooh, men didn't want to take it because of side effects'. So I looked into it and found they had to stop the study because the side effects were very severe. In the case of female birth control the side effects are actually positive for the vast majority of women resulting in lighter periods/fewer cramps and mood swings. In a few…
/r/MensRights03/04/22 10:01 PM
1

To me, it's a shame you don't see the problem with reacting to a very mild joke with physical violence. The joke did absolutely no harm to anyone and is exactly the kind of thing you would expect at such a show (and I'm sure there were more such jokes, just no one else got up and slapped the host because of it), he had absolutely no right to do so. He didn't 'remove the source of pain', he lashed out like a child. The moment had already passed, if he had just sat there and smiled that would have…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 09:58 AM
5

Absolutely not, and quite frankly anyone that thinks Chris 'deserved it' is retarded. Chris made a very mild joke, then Will lost it and resorted to physical violence. While people point out that Jada likely prompted his behavior, they are removing his agency and ultimately he is responsible for his own actions. I try not to follow celebrities too closely as most are utter bleh personally at least politics wise, so not knowing a whole lot about Will this event definitely lowered my opinions of h…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 07:58 AM
15

Mostly a load of bollocks. It is true that women tend to be a lot more intimate with each other than men do, but that doesn't mean men are stunted or that such intimacy is a superior form of camaraderie. Speaking of, just because men aren't as 'intimate' with each other doesn't mean we lack socialization or lack bonds. Men may tend to have fewer bonds than women but they also tend to be deeper. I'm not sure how war/dire situations relates to intimacy, maybe I'm interpreting that differently than…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 07:23 AM
1

Precisely. Its a standard practice that no one really likes, but its just the way it is.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:50 PM
2

I think some people are missing its the headline, not the article, making it seem like it was his fault. The information makes it clear it wasn't his fault (and goes unnecessarily long about seatbelts imo), but most people just read headlines in the modern age and the headline in big bold letters says "Two of six teenage girls killed when trucker slammed his semitrailer into their Chevy Spark" which with that wording does seem to imply that it was his fault. The next subheadline/bulletin point s…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 11:39 PM
1

Gotcha, not how I had read that paragraph.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:32 AM
1

By only having this rule for one gender is sexist and just contributes to the rape myth culture. Plying anyone with drinks for the purpose to incapacitate is unacceptable. Your implication that men have superior judgement or that women somehow lack agency when paired with your original question is quite baffling.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 05:56 AM
10

Certainly just a meme. I think anyone that takes a serious look at the actual data can plainly see the supposed 'statistics' are way off base. Unfortunately what the truth is and what people want to believe are entirely different things and things like proof and evidence are unable to change 99.9% of peoples minds regardless of the subject matter.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 01:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter