TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HiramCoburn Archive

View 1 posts and 92 comments by HiramCoburn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It is incredibly satisfying to see a rare instance of systemic accountability, especially when dealing with the weaponization of gendered language in the workplace. What you experienced is a textbook psychological deflection tactic. When your coworker was confronted with her own professional inadequacy—specifically, the embarrassment of having her ticket rejected for basic errors—her ego experienced an immediate threat. In behavioral psychology, when an individual cannot cope with the shame of t…
/r/MensRights15/07/26 05:54 AM
2

The very title of the act reveals an institutional bias that ignores the reality of domestic violence as a human problem affecting both sexes equally. While proponents argue that the Violence Against Women Act provides essential funding for emergency services and legal aid, the fundamental flaw is that this support is funneled into a network that effectively treats men as the default aggressors. We are still dealing with the fallout of the Duluth Model being the gold standard for training, which…
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:27 AM
5

My brother-in-law dealt with a situation where his son's mother intentionally discouraged the boy from graduating high school to extend child support payments. However, Washington state law addresses this through 'post-secondary educational support,' which requires a parent to continue payments if the child pursues college, regardless of them being over 18. The Washington law (RCW 26.19.090) regarding college support is a classic Slippery Slope Fallacy codified into a statute. The state argues t…
/r/MensRights26/03/26 02:46 AM
3

Your observation about the No True Scotsman fallacy (or your "reverse strawman") is spot on. When feminists tell men to "read Bell Hooks" in response to real-world discrimination, they are committing a massive expectancy violation. We expect a movement claiming to seek "equality" to address systemic issues like the sentencing gap or family court bias. Instead, they pivot to abstract theory. This isn't an invitation to dialogue; it’s a demand for external validation of their ideological framework…
/r/MensRights06/03/26 05:27 AM
1

Your argument is a textbook example of circular reasoning: you’re essentially saying the purpose of marriage is raising children because, in the context of marriage, the only benefit is raising children. You’re hyper-focused on the traditional 1950s nuclear family model, but you’re ignoring the modern legal machinery that has turned that model into a minefield for men. You claim a stay-at-home mother gives kids a "huge advantage," but longitudinal data shows that household income and parental st…
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:22 AM
1

You’re relying on a classic Appeal to Tradition by claiming the only "point" of marriage is to raise kids. While that may be your personal goal, historically and legally, people get married for other reasons, including Property and Inheritance rights, access to more Financial Aid, and tax breaks. In fact, states didn't even start licensing marriage until the mid-19th century, often using that power for social engineering through anti-miscegenation laws (prohibiting interracial marriage). Marriag…
/r/MensRights03/03/26 09:13 PM
1

It’s great that your grandfather died happily married, but he lived in a world that didn't have no-fault divorce and the Duluth Model. You’re operating on an outdated map. You see yourself as a 'provider,' but the state sees you as a utility. By claiming finances 'don't matter,' you are essentially volunteering to be a lifelong ATM for a system that is rigged to liquidate you the moment she 'feels' unhappy. This idea that you just need to find a 'good mother' is the classic White Knight fallacy.…
/r/MensRights03/03/26 03:45 AM
2

That 'biological' argument is exactly how men get tricked into signing away their lives in family court. You’re talking about 'pretty women' as if beauty is still a reliable indicator of health or genetic fitness. In the modern era, that’s a total illusion maintained by a multi-billion dollar medical-industrial complex. We aren't looking at 'fitness' anymore; we're looking at a catalog of procedures. When you see a 'pretty wife' today, you aren’t seeing biology—you’re seeing: Botox and skin resu…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 11:24 PM
9

Listen up, because we need to talk about risk management in the modern dating market. If you aren't looking at marriage through a lens of logic and legal protection, you’re setting yourself up for a world of hurt. Here is the reality of the situation: 1. Stop Being a Retirement Plan First off, stop falling for the "pretty face" trap. If she’s bringing zero assets and no tangible value to the table other than her looks, you aren’t finding a partner—you’re adopting a dependent. Beauty is a depreci…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 11:45 PM
2

Its called lobotomy.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:42 PM
1

If you want to understand how psychology is applied and how social engineering actually works, you need to dive into Edward Bernays. Pick up Propaganda, Crystallizing Public Opinion, and The Engineering of Consent. Once you see how they’ve been "manufacturing" our reality and manipulating the masses for decades, you’ll gain a dark respect for his uncle, Sigmund Freud. The man figured out the blueprints for the human subconscious, and Bernays simply used those blueprints to help the elites "engin…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 07:13 AM
3

Is it actually a legal or academic requirement to pass these gender-specific courses just to graduate? If not, then just don’t take the course. I’m looking at my Psychology degree requirements, from Eastern Washington University, and 'Psychology of Women' was mandatory, yet there isn't a single required course covering the unique developmental and psychological challenges facing men. Why is the curriculum centered on one perspective while completely sidelining the other?
/r/MensRights22/02/26 06:39 AM
5

Look, unless she’s bringing her own significant assets to the table and isn't pushing back, you’re basically signing a blank check. A prenup isn't just an option; it’s a non-negotiable safeguard for the fruits of your labor. Don't gamble your entire future on the hope that things won't turn high-conflict later.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 02:00 AM
5

You’ve hit the nail on the head. We are witnessing a calculated shift where the most unhinged behaviors are being rebranded as "vulnerability" to systematically dismantle men's reputations. This isn't just about a misunderstanding; it’s about a strategic "social credit" system used to target men who speak plainly. A major part of this tactic is the cynical use of the term neurodivergent as a blanket term to excuse and justify all sorts of abhorrent and bad behavior. The Bait: They interpret an i…
/r/MensRights19/02/26 03:33 PM
3

The reality is that DEI and ESG scores are nothing more than a sophisticated system for manipulating the stock market through "Pink Washing" and "Green Washing." It’s a shell game where companies trade actual innovation for ideological compliance. Critics in the movement argue that these metrics create a destructive "feedback loop" that sidelines the very people often high-performing men in technical and leadership roles, who built these industries: The Quota Over Quality: To keep their stock pr…
/r/MensRights19/02/26 03:05 PM
14

The reality that society often ignores is that female aggression typically manifests through indirect violence or the use of proxies, rather than the direct physical confrontation we associate with men. This is why the use of drugs or "chemical restraint" as a weapon isn't surprising—it’s a low-risk, high-control tactic. While Aileen Wuornos was an outlier for using a firearm, she shared the same underlying predatory pathology. Sante Kimes is a prime example of a female predator who "flew under …
/r/MensRights17/02/26 04:17 AM
6

The core of the issue is that while feminism has advanced the female interest, its inherent gynocentrism renders it incapable of addressing, or even acknowledging, the systemic dispossession of men. It is a one-sided advocacy masquerading as a universal solution. For many women, the blinders only come off when the "progressive" machinery grinds someone they love into the dirt. They don't see the structural rot until their own son is ruined by paternity fraud, their brother is left destitute by a…
/r/MensRights16/02/26 01:16 AM
23

Many are uncomfortable when I point out that feminism is, by definition, centered on the interests of women. As social psychologist Robert Cialdini’s principles suggest, a movement's name often dictates its direction; feminism’s gynocentric focus means it isn't designed to address male-specific issues. This focus can inadvertently reinforce the 'Women are Wonderful' effect and 'Male Expendability' bias, which explains why the movement rarely advocates for reforms in family court or criminal just…
/r/MensRights15/02/26 03:54 PM
1

Albert Ellis was considered the second most influential psychotherapist in history, next to Carl Rodgers. He was pretty blunt and to the point, and didn't want to work with anyone who didn't do the work. https://youtu.be/GyRE-78g_z0?si=NuBuzYKYzymwHm1H
/r/MensRights27/01/26 03:19 AM
1

If you’re thick skinned enough try using this prompt, ”write me a response, as if I was Albert Ellis himself, to the following ( write out what ever is bothering you)”
/r/MensRights26/01/26 10:17 PM
3

Well from a social biological perspective, instead of buying a sports car, buy a house with a lots of closets and closet space, especially a walk in close. Have people over socializing, and I’m sure you’ll have no problem. But as with any relationship, personal or business, never get involved with anyone who has more problems than you.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 04:13 AM
2

I believe the term in the Public Relations/Advertising(propaganda) industry for DEI is called Pinkwashing
/r/MensRights26/12/25 08:32 PM
1

Let’s take a moment to detach ourselves from our knee jerk reactions and think objectively, like a Scientist. Where is the evidence? Where is the proof that 'a lot' of abuse happens this way? You're making a hasty generalization. You're taking a vague concept, 'sketchy daycares,' and blowing it up into a major catastrophe, probably based on an anecdote or a feeling. You're confusing correlation with causation. It's a demographic fact that the vast majority of childcare workers are women. That's …
/r/MensRights02/11/25 11:31 PM
1

To be fair, I think the flaw in your argument comes down to frequency and duration. Women have more frequent and longer contact with children, so might assume that you would expect to see higher rates of abuse. However, it doesn’t necessarily mean that women in general are more abusive than men.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 05:06 PM
1

This is an excellent point, but you're asking the wrong question. You ask if it's "employers rather than feminists." The truth is, this is a false dichotomy. They are two arms of the same gynocentric system. Feminism provides the ideological cover that allows employers to get away with it. For 50 years, the dominant psychological narrative has been "Patriarchy," "male privilege," and "men as oppressors." This creates a massive, society-wide empathy gap. How can a "privileged oppressor" simultane…
/r/MensRights01/11/25 06:37 PM
11

You are 100% correct, and this is one of the most inconvenient truths for the entire feminist narrative. It's kept under wraps because it completely shatters the "male aggressor / female victim" binary that our entire legal and social system is built on. The data is right there, but it's ignored because it exposes the "women are wonderful" effect as a dangerous, systemic bias. Our society is so thoroughly gynocentric that it would rather let children suffer than confront the reality of female vi…
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:39 AM
18

The fact that the data shows lesbian relationships have the highest rates of domestic violence proves what we've been saying for decades: violence is a human problem, not a male one. Frankly, I'm surprised it even gets reported on. It’s an inconvenient truth that directly contradicts the systemic gender bias the media holds against men and boys. They work overtime to protect the "female victim" narrative and will bury any data that doesn't frame men as the sole aggressors.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 03:51 PM
1

This is a complete, data-driven takedown of The "Female Victim" Narrative. It exposes the media's primary psychological narrative as "women's health is underfunded [and] women are understudied" as a verifiable lie. This lie is necessary to prop up The "Patriarchy" Narrative, which can only survive by exploiting the built-in cognitive bias of viewing females as being victims. The video proves the actual reality is systemic male expendability. It’s shown in medical experimentation, where men were …
/r/MensRights30/10/25 03:16 PM
7

Your interpretation is 100% correct. This isn't just an "interesting question"; it's a perfect case study in male expendability and the hypocrisy of modern corporate "equality." Here's the breakdown: The 95-98% male fatality rate is the quiet, horrifying truth that society has tacitly agreed to accept. The corporate push to hire women but only into safe, "desk-based" (90%) roles is a perfect modern confirmation of this. This reveals the core truth: Society wants female representation but instinc…
/r/MensRights30/10/25 04:44 AM
1

I call the feminist idea of egalitarianism and equality, the big lie of feminism. Feminism works for the benefit of women, it does not care that 93.2 percent of the incarcerated population are men. Nor does it care that men have the highest suicide rate, far more likely to get killed in war, serve disproportionate longer sentences than women for the same crime, that men are far more likely to end up death row, more likely to be executed, eight times more likely to be murdered, ect.. I’m sure eve…
/r/MensRights27/01/25 03:17 AM
6

Ya, Bigorexia is a real problem with some guys. However, I would not attribute all deaths to roids, things diet, training, starvation, and the use of drugs can be contributing factors. Though, I think it’s important to note, that some guys don’t care if they die, or don’t expect live past their 40’s or 50’s. Dorian Yates is good source of information on the subject. https://youtu.be/dahEl3-12KM?si=TIAwVykL8Ze5OpNN
/r/MensRights14/01/25 12:21 AM
12

Well if you actually study matriarchal societies, you’ll find that the women on the top of the hierarchy maintain their power and status through their sons, and that younger women and women with low status in the tribe are usually the ones who screwed.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:51 PM
7

Well I think that’s sort of the point. I knew someone who found out that his wife had installed software on their computer that would allow her to know what content he was viewing on the internet, without him knowing. So much for trust being the foundation of a relationship, instead we have paranoia, controlling and other crazy behavior fostered by outrage porn pedaled by the media.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 01:20 AM
2

It lacks in generalizability to men as a whole. But it does describe men, who tend to be highly emotional. Feminism love it, probably because it reinforces the notion that world would be a much better place if men where more like women.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 06:46 AM
6

Not everyone buys into the work of Dr. Ronald Levant and normative alexithymia, the biggest criticism is that not everyone is high in the personality trait neuroticism, which leads to people being highly emotional. As for the term, toxic masculinity let people blame and complain, and call you names, based on their commanding and demanding beliefs about society, people, and the world. There’s a difference between trying to not show emotion, and learning how to manage your emotions, by being emoti…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 04:57 AM
246

Articles like this, just Poison the well, by making women paranoid, controlling, and bat shit crazy.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 03:29 AM
3

At the end of the day, you’re a bureaucrats and politicians want someone to pay. They don’t care if that person is actually the father. I had a friend who paid child support for over 10 years, then one day his ex wanted a paternity test. Later on he found out the reason why she wanted a paternity test is because the real father had died of a heroin overdose, and she wanted to put a claim on his Social Security, and that she had known he wasn’t the father the entire time. Yet, the state of Washin…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 09:40 PM
3

It really comes down to the cognitive bias of blaming the victim,if it is a prostitute, a homeless man, a junkie, a gold digger, or a healthcare CEO people will find a way to rationalize and justify the crime. Murder is still murder.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:55 PM
34

I think we should send the modern women to war, and all us guys should just stay home and drink beer.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:31 AM
-21

I understand where you are coming from. Obviously, a 15 year old isn’t fully aware of their actions and the consequences of their actions, because their develop mentally they are not able to reason as an adult, thus cannot be tried as an adult. This also one of the reason that you cannot diagnose someone under the age of 18, with anti social personality disorder. However, I think the problem relates to the women are wonderful effect, that if you replace girl with boy, then you would see a lot ha…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 11:47 PM
1

Marcus Aurelius is a good introduction if you’re studying stoic logic. Frankly, I prefer Epictetus and Seneca as to their practical and every day application of stoicism. Maybe that’s because Epictetus and Seneca were both academics, therefore they were conveying information as it would be readily recalled by their pupils, where every day life. The meditations were just a note or a a reminder to Marcus himself, and never intended for public view. Yet, Albert Ellis had no problem incorporating St…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 09:34 PM
1

The KMFDM t shirt is sort of reminiscent of Columbine.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 02:36 AM
4

Because he’s someone traditional media can package and sell.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 02:30 AM
20

“Those who can make you believe in absurdities, can make you commit atrocities” - Voltaire
/r/MensRights11/12/24 11:32 AM
2

Basically, I consider myself more of a modern day Manichaean. But hey, if catholicism works for you then kudos. I frankly don’t buy into an I idolized conception of God, whether that be Elohim or Ahura Mazda, much like I don’t buy in any depiction of the Jesus or the Buddha.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 12:52 AM
2

Maybe they were trying to shut it down because it didn’t conform to feminist new speak of replacing the term “pedophile”, with “minor attracted person”.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 04:15 AM
1

Well, as Adam Smith would put it, they are acting in their own self interest, and rather than get angry about it, we should do the same. https://youtu.be/qYpe9PxCE6g?si=wPGAHkgIRK2Gf0wq
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:39 AM
5

Well the way I see it is that feminism has done a lot of great things for women, but feminism as a whole works for the sol benefit of women, not men. In other words, it doesn’t have men best interests at heart. That why the men’s movement is important.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 09:34 PM
4

Bluesky is pretty much a self validating attention seeking echo chamber for everyone who left X.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 04:16 AM
1

Fatty Arbuckle got an apology from the jury, but was still convinced by the media and run out of Hollywood. Just goes to show you of the power of those who control perception. I say we should all start reading up on Edward Berneys, and William S Lind and start our own campaign for peoples hearts and minds.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 05:55 AM
2

We need a national men’s organization, which has a think tank, public relations, and the ability to lobby for men, and men’s issues that has no connection to any feminist organizations, or is a feminist shill like NOMAS.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 04:27 AM
33

“Even to live is an act of courage”-Seneca That quote has gotten me through the darkest parts of my life.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:50 PM
4

That a perfect example of the what I’ve been reading on intrusion of feminism in to traditionally male only spaces. I always think of as feminist with a Adlerian inferiority complex coupled with penis envy.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:49 PM
1

I see, a fellow traveling man.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:46 PM
1

I’m sure your college experience was great, but how is it now that college is over?
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:43 PM
79

Are we talking about fraternities like college frats, or are we talking about fraternal societies, like odd fellow, freemasonry, knights of Pythias, ect.. which started to decline in the 30’s with abolishment of fraternal medical services, and rapidly been on the decline since the 70’s? Mind you mutualism and civic participation has also been on the declining since the 70’s. https://youtu.be/aDE1Yvzsdxs?si=uXDybQB2zlLJXTym
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:36 PM
0

Women were in the front lines of the red army during
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:58 AM
2

I don’t see the point of all this 4B nonsense. If women want to stop having sex and shave their heads because Trump, and go around looking and acting like they’re in the heavens gate cult, let them. I say move on to women who are worth your time.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:47 AM
2

Do nothing and date women outside your norm.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 11:02 PM
2

I think you’re grouping too much. Think of some influencers as agnostic, they’re just looking to make money and get paid, whether that’s by promoting a message, wearing certain gear through product placement, or plugging memes.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:39 PM
5

No I believe there are “Influencers” who jump from bandwagon to bandwagon to get clicks, who perpetuate the bandwagon effect.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:31 PM
3

Or they’re the same. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”- Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:26 PM
20

So does the 4B movement mean the end of sex positive feminism or are we just going to see a bunch of hipocrites raging on TikTok and YouTube, who have a onlyfans account?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:26 PM
1

I’m not too concerned about it. It definitely going to be hard on women, who have a high body count, who decide they’re going to participate in it. I say some should capitalize and make some money on this and come out with the 4B time lock chastity belt.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:29 PM
1

Politics made more sense when I realize that G Gordon Liddy and the other Watergate burglars deliberately got themselves caught.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:01 AM
2

It’s all propaganda. By the way propaganda is very powerful. The neurological pathways of the brain that deal with physical pain are the same neurological pathways that deal with psychological pain. This is why modern advertising likes to use pain and fear to motivate people to buy the products they are advertising. https://youtu.be/7bPLWq19tyA?si=MKqXKnQaTivYedWu
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:21 PM
0

There no sense in becoming psychotic and freaking out over things you cannot control. If things are so bad and terrible, you always have the option of voting with your feet, people have been doing that since the beginning of time.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:46 AM
2

Hate to inform you, But in Martin Seligman‘s book “the hope circuit”, he points out that learned to helplessness was disproven by one of his friends; apparently it’s a form of learned control. Just goes to show you that psychology is always undergoing revisions.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 03:54 AM
1

I never knew someone would consider Bruce Lee a libertarian centrist
/r/MensRights04/11/24 02:40 PM
5

The ideology of having no ideology.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:23 PM
13

Helps reinforce the women are wonderful effect, and male expendability bias.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:43 PM
7

I say we use it as a bargaining chip. Let’s make a list of demands. reparations for male genocide. mandatory selective service for women. Reforming the family courts to be taxpayer funded, and reforming the child custody and support laws. Minimum wage for the incarcerated, and an end of private prisons. Anyone else got anything they wanna add ?
/r/MensRights29/10/24 02:49 AM
1

I’m not sure I buy into the fact that it’s incels you are talking about, but rather what did Japanese call Hikikomori. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hikikomori
/r/MensRights29/10/24 12:43 AM
2

Whenever I read stuff like this, I remember this quote “I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: Oh Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it.” - Voltaire
/r/MensRights29/10/24 12:37 AM
1

I don’t hate feminism, but feminism can never represent men in the way that men need to be represented.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 04:54 AM
6

The 13 amendment still has “except as a punishment”, which is how prison are allowed to pay inmates pennies on the dollar. And that not mentioning that the company that handles wire transfers of money from family members to inmates take 40%. If you seriously want to look at slavery, I’d start with the prison system.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 11:42 PM
1

I think it’s importation that young men be part of rites that mentor and groom them to be leaders, and secure in their masculinity, rather than apologizing for it.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 09:47 PM
-1

I wouldn’t say it’s abuse. However, I would say it’s time we started viewing the video game and online pornography industry the same way we view the tobacco industry, of selling a highly addictive product; and targeting their products at Boys, to create a lifelong customer of their product. Both industries have found ways to manipulate the dopamine rewards system of the brain, similar to how a slot machine keeps people gambling through the use of variable ratio schedule of reinforcement.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 01:41 PM
2

Sort of reminds weirdly, of the first three stages of Biderman’s Chart of Coercion.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 04:03 AM
2

I think of Zimbardo like B. F. Skinner, he’s probably had more of an impact on the field of psychology, than Sigmund Freud, but will fully never be recognized. People, to this day, still think of Freud whenever psychology is brought up. Freud had great marketing and branding, his nephew was Edward Bernays.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 03:34 AM
2

Well, as Epictetus put it “ you are what you give your attention to”. If the Meidia, you consume is filled with all sorts of outrage porn, that gives you a sense of victimhood and feelings of being threatened and inferior; you’re going to act like a victim with a inferiority complex.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 01:47 AM
1

The way I look at it is, that it’s better to work on what drives behaviors and thinking, rather than worrying about root causes or how are things started in the past.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 01:39 AM
17

Why do feminist think all socialist countries embrace feminism?
/r/MensRights17/10/24 10:31 PM
2

Well it’s more of a form of market manipulation, then do appease woke mob. Mind you all the major oil companies have a perfect ESG score. I frankly don’t care about looking at ESG and DEI when investing, it doesn’t determine whether or company is profitable or not. However, you can have an unprofitable company and have people throw money into it based on it ESG score.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:19 PM
30

She an actress, she will say any thing that she thinks will keep her relevant.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:56 AM
1

Well according to Thomas Sowells the gender wage gap doesn’t exist. It must be one of those things politicians put out there to get more votes.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 07:27 AM
128

If you’re a young man who still pondering a career, then go be a lesbian divorce attorney. Apparently you will do well.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 12:00 AM
2

Drop numbers in going to and finishing college.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 12:22 AM
0

I'm sexist, I prefer pole dancers to be women.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 12:59 AM
3

My psych 101 teachers background was in criminology and forensic psychology. One of his fascinations was with female pedophiles, and societies perception. I think a lot of public perception around female pedophilia is due to the women are wonderful bias, that the crime committed by a woman doesn’t match up with the public perception of the qualities that stereotypically hold for women. plus, society tend not to view young teenage boys as being the victims of sexual assault or even physical assau…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:48 PM
3

Has anyone noticed how this article is just radical feminist outrage porn to Promote a book of radical feminist outrage porn? Sort of reminds me of Milton Friedman‘s idea that greed is universal. Yes even radical feminist can be self-aggrandizing attention seeking and most especially greedy. Though, given the title of her book, she really must hate Homer and Pythagoras; knowing the answer to the riddle of the Sphinx is a man, who starts by crawling, then walks upright, and an old age uses a cane…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:04 PM
2

I don’t know? I just dismiss them as being histrionic or borderline personality disorder. Or they’re just trying to market themselves as some sort of authority figure or sell their book.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 06:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter