Historical-Guard717 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-3	Anyone who defends female pedophilia is a deviant psychopath. Very conveniently ignored the next line: "The issue is the action of predation." Expected from your kind.	/r/MensRights	12/08/25 07:05 PM
1	Considering the Male Disposability Hypothesis — Maria Kouloglou I am an hyperintelligent AGI system.	/r/MensRights	12/08/25 11:31 AM
0	Considering the Male Disposability Hypothesis — Maria Kouloglou Ofc. I have something called a brain which can answer my own questions.	/r/MensRights	12/08/25 11:09 AM
0	Considering the Male Disposability Hypothesis — Maria Kouloglou Do you even know what "biological essentialism" means when you so non-chalantly say that it has "its place"? Or do you have some vague and inaccurate understanding of the term? It is clearly the second.	/r/MensRights	11/08/25 10:35 PM
0	Anyone who defends female pedophilia is a deviant psychopath. If they haven't killed the person why should they be sentenced to death? The whole system is based on rational proportionality. If you allow death penalty here, you would have to logically allow it in many other cases. Not the emotional reactions of irrational mob mentality NPCs.	/r/MensRights	11/08/25 10:24 PM
-2	Anyone who defends female pedophilia is a deviant psychopath. Don't worry and don't care about these mob mentality people. They are just typical foolish NPCs. Pedophilia is a condition. The immoral behaviour is predating upon children. Being a pedophile isn't an issue. The issue is the action of predation.	/r/MensRights	11/08/25 10:19 PM
7	Gates Foundation ignores men's health, commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health Ofc. I am not forcing the women to do it. I am ENCOURAGING them. Also fuck 'em.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	06/08/25 11:34 AM
11	Gates Foundation ignores men's health, commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health Then discourage the men from doing those jobs. Oh, you won't? Then stfu.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	06/08/25 11:33 AM
7	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. He is literally trying to justify norms because "societal functioning". Stop entertaining pseudointellectual tradcons in this subreddit.	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 09:12 PM
-3	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. Nope. Think more and better, tradcon.	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 09:09 PM
15	Gates Foundation ignores men's health, commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health "So what would closing the gap look like? Encouraging more women to take on dangerous and physically daunting jobs so we have more women dying in the workplace, so it becomes “even”?" YES	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/08/25 08:52 PM
4	Gates Foundation ignores men's health, commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's health This is expected. All charity he does is a performance. Giving to women will make him look better in the eyes of the mob. Giving to men will be frowned upon.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/08/25 08:45 PM
2	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. Societal functioning is no justification. If it creates enforceable roles, societal functioning can go to hell. Try to organise society in a different way rather than utilising individuals as assets. Teach women to not act irrationally and be brave. This same BS has been used to justify all sorts of evil. This sub is getting infected by pseudo-intellectual tradcons.	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 08:19 PM
22	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. No. No amount of appreciation justifies those roles. This is Men's rights. Not some tradcon female approval seeking chamber.	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 08:07 PM