TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Historical-Mastodon9 Archive

View 2 posts and 85 comments by Historical-Mastodon9 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

You might be right. I don't know how common it is. But it doesn't seem that unreasonable or absurd to me. Imagine if her ex was literally - literally - Superman. And he instantly swept her off her feet (and presumably flew into the sky with her), and you... just can never compete with that or her attraction. Is it stupid to feel insecure about that and wonder if there are comparisons being made? I don't think so, I think it's quite a reasonable insecurity. Now it's not going to be that extreme i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:05 AM
–

Like if he was always sending his ex roses at work, but he never sent them to me, I would not care because that’s not something I want in a relationship. Even if you don't want them, wouldn't you wonder why he did that and not for you? It's weird to me man, women here seem to suggest that women never ever compare themselves to others or feel insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:31 AM
–

I really don't understand how women don't seem to be able to understand why this makes men insecure. I made it more general to try and make it comparable, because women can't really understand the sexual side of it, as men generally always want to sleep with attractive women ASAP. So they don't really know what it's like, in this way, for their boyfriend to seemingly be more attracted to his past girlfriends than they are to her. So the closest comparison I can think of is if you found out your …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:28 AM
–

It's strange that so many women respond this way. Could it potentially be as you say, that he just didn't like it? Maybe. But why discount even the slightest possibility that he just isn't treating you as well as other women? I listed non-sexual things too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:23 AM
0

You probably got married a long time ago, before dating apps massively changed the landscape. It's now very different.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:13 AM
–

i'm willing to believe that there could be many factors that go into it so that it may not simply be that one guy was less attractive or whatever. but it's also entirely possible... that that is exactly the case. do you deny even the possibility that it could just simply be that one guy was hotter and better and more attractive immediately and it would always have ended up with her sleeping with him first? and do you deny that you could ever feel insecure if you found out your boyfriend was putt…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:00 AM
–

let's say you found out your boyfriend went down on other women but doesn't like doing it for you. are you ok with this? what if it's not about sex and it's just other little things he did for others, buying them gifts/flowers/whatever, cooking for them, but not for you. still no problem? don't be obtuse
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:57 AM
2

You call it nonsensical based on what? Again, your anecdotal experience? You can't just dismiss anything you don't want to be true. How about, based on my experience, looks are what matters? Here's a question: what could I show you that would convince you? Nothing, is my guess... you've decided what you want to believe even though you haven't lived it. Based on what I read in this sub, it is 99% the men's fault. And all due to things men can control. This whole "woe is me" blackpill shit is abso…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:58 AM
8

And the reason twerpy I'm so lonely cry baby men bring this up all the time is because it reflects just how far a woman is willing to go in fantasy to avoid and deal with them. And that hurts their feelings. No. It's because these men are constantly gaslit and told it's literally only their personality that means they are alone, not their looks or anything out of their control. Obviously they're going to point out how there are lots of men far worse than them, literal psychopathic murderers, who…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:51 AM
8

Um, because huge numbers of men are absolutely starved for any attention, love, compliments and literally anything would feel amazing to them, even if it came from these women. You can't relate or empathise, I understand, because you don't know what it's like. Serial killers get far more attention than most men will ever get. I could find you studies showing women are attracted to dark triad traits in general, but you would just bat it away and claim it's because of confidence or whatever so the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:43 AM
–

I don't know, maybe, but even a 15% reduction (which will disproportionately be the Chads who can get the hottest women) would mean they'd have to start settling for less attractive men. Very common to see women complain about not being able to find 'good men' to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:25 AM
–

I am non-binary, AuDHD, prone to severe depression and process emotions in a typically masculine way, according to my therapists. I know what it's like to be mad at the world. How well do you think I've done in dating and relationships? But I'm working through my shit. It's never done, but it's much better now. I'm sorry to hear that but my point is just that (straight) women don't have to pursue men or face the obscene levels of rejection or standards that men do. Your difficulties may get you …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:20 AM
–

That is a truly vantablack level blackpill if true. I'm saying half now because 50 percent of women will be single by 2030. Why do you think this is? Presumably because men are becoming worse betabuxx as women gain on them financially. Still seems like it'd be useful to have double income though, or that most women would want children. It's hard to afford houses and stuff on one income. When you say 80+% are settling (in keeping with the OKcupid '80% of men unattractive' stat), do you mean that …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:07 AM
–

And stop acting like sex is sacred. It’s a physical act meant to feel good and release stress. You’re dramatizing it into something bigger than it actually is. Someone experimenting once doesn’t mean that person is more special than the one she chooses to build a relationship with. Just because you treat it like a handshake doesn't mean other people don't think it's a bigger deal, and you have no right to tell them to 'stop acting like it's sacred'. You are entitled to your view, many people dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:49 AM
–

It's extremely easy to say this when you haven't been in their position and had to take responsibility or put in hard work to get what you want, as women generally don't need to (at least when it comes ot dating). See also: her calling men cowards when she has never had to be as brave as the men she's criticising. It's also ironic because you're probably politically left wing and constantly blame external factors for your or women's or other group's problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:45 AM
–

What do you mean half of women? Chad is a very small percentage of men. So it'd be the overwhelming majority of women who settle for someone they're not attracted to, if that is the case. It also means that literally all women will have in effect settled eventually, because you can't keep your Chad looks forever, and at that point this guy will not be Chad OR a good provider. It's quite a depressing view, if you think almost all (and eventually all) relationships are for convenience and not genu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:32 AM
16

Idk it depends what kind of man they are, if they're blackpill then they might. See this study here: Additionally, contrary to mainstream media narratives, incels have lower standards for partners compared to non-incels and suffer from a variety of mental health issues including severe depression, anxiety, and loneliness. This is these guys but I think women have a hard time understanding just how low the standards of even average men are. While women reject 95% of men on dating apps, men right …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:17 AM
1

Hmm, well, you might actually be a psychopath or something like that. Honestly not saying that to be offensive or anything. I hope you care more for your future husband or boyfriend than you're saying here and wouldn't always act purely in your benefit even if it meant treating them terribly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:08 AM
25

all women struggling men say they'd never touch with a 10 foot pole. in fact actively encourage not to date for example single moms. These are red pill talking points, typically from men who see themselves as high value and don't have many problems. The people who struggle actually have very low standards and wouldn't reject the women you're describing. I doubt all these women were like that anyway. And there are lots of horrible men who have tons of success with women, you see examples all the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:06 AM
1

If he cheats then he cheats. What am I supposed to do about it besides end the relationship and move on to the next man? Not sure what you’re getting at with this question. It is what it is. You will think he's awful for doing it and be very angry and upset. You won't be like 'ah, this makes sense as it was in your benefit, this is fine'. Rightfully so, because it would be a horrible thing to do to someone. I don't believe you're this extremist in believing 'yes!! we're all selfish and this is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:00 AM
–

Where's your 'minimal basic empathy' for men? It shouldn't be hard to understand why men are insecure about things like this if you put yourself in their shoes and all your past partners were better than them in an important way. The risks are exaggerated and going for a 10/10 guy is not going to reduce them, in fact maybe increase them if anything given how arrogant and conceited men like that will probably be after getting their way and being worshipped for so long. If you selected based on ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:56 AM
1

Ask men to describe their ideal wife: pretty, submissive, has sex with him often, cooks, cleans, and raises his kids I think most men are normal and believe in equality and won't talk about his wife needing to be submissive or do the chores or raise his kids... he will want to raise his kids too. Pretty and having sex with him often, fine, but again that's not really selfish is it? Wanting connection sexually. And your looks, your body, is you - a man's resources are what he owns. But you ignore…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:46 AM
–

U really think most average women can sleep with male models? Yes. Men have much lower standards than women. Women swipe only on the top 5% of profiles on dating apps. They can easily sleep with men much more attractive than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:42 AM
–

You can't just dismiss things as untrue because you find them grim. Also women constantly do the 'pity party' thing over their issues here, your latest thread is one. What should people respond with, 'too bad lol stop whining'? I have empathy for women who are assaulted and don't simply tell them it's their fault or they should try harder to avoid it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:38 AM
–

You wouldn't, but every man would because they know how painful it is to be alone. In fact, women could drastically reduce their chances of being assaulted by choosing not to engage in romance at all (I'm not saying they should, just saying they could) but they don't - showing that they also value these hookups or romances over a reduced chance of assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:34 AM
1

The way in which men are 'selfish' is still desiring you, fundamentally. How you look and act is you. It's like saying someone is selfish for wanting a woman who is kind and intelligent... not really. Whereas you are wanting what the men have, not what they are. That's a big difference. I'm curious though, do you feel love for any men, does personality factor in it at all? Oh and one last question, when you get older and your looks fade, will you feel animosity towards your husband/boyfriend for…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:28 AM
1

You are literally describing them as tools in this thread and only want them for their penis. How are you different?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:21 AM
–

It's not 'stable job', it's having more money than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:15 AM
3

Why don't you think it's true? He was generous to say 'for casual sex' and not relationships in general (which is also true). Women reject the overwhelming majority of men on dating apps and find 80% of men unattractive according to the stats, and the majority of couples meet online... it's virtually impossible that women don't sleep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:12 AM
–

I don't know why you think not getting laid isn't a serious problem. It sounds trivial to you, because it was easy for you and other women to get. And clearly it mattered to you if you were promiscuous. It's also a reductive take, because it's more like 'not being able to get romance' which is incredibly important for most people, to have such a connection. It's weird how you will claim to care about beauty standards somewhere else, or even homelessness or mental health, but refuse to concede th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:09 AM
12

If I were to make some outrageous claim about how women are bad, saying almost all the women I've met did something terrible, you would inevitably not believe me or blame me for it in some way. Indeed, most women here would say it's my fault because obviously it means I'm a misogynist and provoked their behavior in some way. The standard response to men complaining about how women act on here, like expecting men to pay for dates always, is 'don't date those women then', but then you say this: I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:02 AM
3

I notice you don't respond to all the posts that show you how bad your argument is, probably because you know it. I do wonder if you are actually a man who makes these threads to make blue pill women look bad. The fact 2 million women didn't want him and his biggest crime was 'being a bit cringe and having hobbies women aren't interested in' is an incredible argument for how picky women are and how hard it is for men. No woman, even if you deliberately set out to make the most unattractive profi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 01:47 AM
1

Again, they weren't made to do those things based on their gender. But their class. The rich men didn't have to do it All men were subject to certain gender roles, even the rich ones. More first class men died on the Titanic than third class women. Let alone the poor men. Because men, no matter their class, have been subject to gender roles throughout history. You may say the people who imposed this were also largely men (though women would have contributed and shamed them too) but either way, p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 07:27 PM
–

Men weren't opressed based on their sex but class. The end result is the same, with the vast majority of men being oppressed and forced to do things that were often more horrific than what women had to deal with. At no point would a man think 'well, at least the 1% of the population doing well is mostly male, this helps me a lot and means I'm privileged'. Elite women couldn't own land and have their own money. Not true, wealthy women owned land prior to universal suffrage.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 07:14 PM
1

As expected, a standard arrogant view of someone unable to argue their points. How easy it is to just say 'educate yourself' whenever you come up against someone who disagrees, instead of having to actually think.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 07:07 PM
–

Men were way more able to own land and had the right to before women did. It was still a tiny proportion of elites who held almost all the land. In England, women got suffrage only 10 years after men did... and men got it after coming home from one of the most horrific meatgrinder wars in history that they were forced into. it's not like men were all having a great time for hundreds of years at the expense of women. Again it doesn't make sense to think of it like 'men did this', the overwhelming…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 07:03 PM
–

In my experience, feminists will say this - 'the patriarchy hurts you too' - but then immediately go back to acting as though all men are privileged and a problem and that they should shut up and not complain about their problems. Patriarchy, as is commonly used, absolutely does seem like 'men bad' most of the time. Typically, also, they want to reject the parts of it that might be seen to benefit men, while keeping the bits of it that men are expected to do for them. Ultimately, I don't think i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 06:50 PM
–

Mhm. And you know why they didn't do that? Because there were men higher than other men, and they needed territory Right. The elites oppressed both men and women to further their goals, often putting men in far more horrific situations than any woman had to deal with. And yet apparently men should be thankful for this, and our problems don't matter because of it, why? Because the elites happened to disproportionately share our gender. It doesn't make any sense. We have always been dominated by e…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 06:44 PM
–

“We gave you rights,” “We built the world,” “Men created civilization.” They suddenly want all men, including themselves, grouped together to take credit for the goo Ok, but the same is true the other way around. You can't demonize all men and diminish our problems by claiming 'we' are privileged due to the patriarchy, and then not like it when we take credit for the good things. But that's exactly what feminists do. If I speak about male problems I'm often met with 'it doesn't matter, your gend…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 06:35 PM
–

Except men largely didn't have these rights for most of history either, and were horribly oppressed too while also being forced to do horrible things like die in wars, which would continue today if WW3 broke out, as men are still forced to sign the draft. But you only see it as 'men' even if men are the ones being oppressed. Most slaves imported to the USA were also men. Feminists want to weaponize the oppression of elite landowners to everyone below them as a stick to beat men as a whole and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 06:25 PM
1

Yes, they killed innocent people in their campaigns, which some argue actually set their goals back. And they then got the vote about a decade after men did (after men were forced to fight and die in one of the most horrific wars in human history). What a privilege it has been to be a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 06:17 PM
1

Men don't. True. That's the problem. How is it a problem? Men refuse to raise their standards because they're too fucking lazy to do the corresponding work to make themselves appealing You can't raise your standards when the other side has all the power. It's like telling an employee to raise their standards in a tough job market where it's hard to get any job to pay the bills. Having to 'do the corresponding work' is advice that is only ever given to men, and not something women ever have to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 05:59 PM
1

When you stop believing this nonsense y'all will have so much more success and happiness. Why do you think it's nonsense? Just because it's bleak? It's what the stats show. Weird. And not a barometer to hold women by. Honestly sounds like men don't have standards. Yeah, we don't. And that's why it's much easier for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:40 AM
1

Ok well 80% of men are seen as unattractive by women. Men see most women as attractive. It's not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:33 AM
–

But why aren't they using them? Because of harassment or because the men aren't meeting their standards, that's what they'd claim. Not because they can't get matches - any woman on a dating app will get loads of matches.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:27 AM
–

There used to be a subreddit for such women on this site. This was its fate. Those women most likely just have high standards and couldn't attract a man who met them. Men obviously have way lower standards than women do and have to work much harder to meet the standards of women. I would date those women you know, they would not date me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:18 AM
1

I agree, but I've tried and failed to overcome it. I explored these sorts of stoic and buddhist beliefs and couldn't do it. The desire to be wanted by women is too strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:13 AM
1

I disagree. It's an infinitesimal amount compared to the number of men who are viewed this way, in any case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:11 AM
–

I know, as a man, how low our standards are. There's a reason you don't get women talking much about their lack of success, matches on dating apps and stuff. Because it's not really a problem for any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:09 AM
–

The right looks meaning looks that are found attractive by women. There are many men who are not found attractive by anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:04 AM
–

Your flair shows you disagree with this, imo naively, but clearly there are people who simply aren't wanted by anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:02 AM
1

I’ve never denied that men can’t live up to women’s standards. Men are falling behind and should probably start self improving if they want to keep up If they want to stay ahead to match the standards of women who want them to be better than they are, you mean? In any case, there's no catching up possible for many men. I guess you acknowledge this, I thought your other post about women finding lots of men attractive as implying that women aren't picky. I don’t have time or the interest in search…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 02:00 AM
–

Also I don’t really give a fuck what these guys go to. Them wasting their lives is on them If you had empathy you might. Nonetheless, they will contribute to Trump and others like him continuing to get elected. It will affect you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:54 AM
–

I can assure you it's actually the worst feeling in the world, to know you are screwed and there's nothing you can do to escape it. Even worse when people pretend it isn't the obvious reality and blame your problems on you because they believe in a fantasy where people are never held back by things they can't control.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:52 AM
–

They preach this because it gives men the illusion that they have control over their looks. If you work out, get big muscles, maybe you can go from ugly to hot. But what you have just done is confirm the views of the incel, the view that such improvement cannot help you if you are born without the right looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:50 AM
–

Who cares what dating apps show. Why would you build your self esteem based on dating apps? That's so ridiculous. How is it ridiculous? They're an important part of dating now. It's how most couples meet. Plenty of men think I'm ugly. Plenty of men don't. I don't dwell on those who find me ugly. Men aren't as selective as women, you know this. So even if some men find you ugly, you don't suffer the same consequences that men do, as we have to live up to far higher standards. You cannot understan…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:47 AM
1

You can make these generalizations, supported by statistics, for all sorts of groups in society, but if anyone did it for a group that isn't male you'd instantly have more empathy and complain about bigotry. It's ironic to talk of whining and victim complexes when you constantly post threads of that nature. If you have an autistic man and an autistic woman, equally unpleasant in their behavior or hygiene or whatever, the woman will have a dramatically easier time dating, getting friends, and so …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:43 AM
–

Of course there are guys who are gonna be considered ugly by almost everyone. We can start with genuinely disfigured men if you want, but I think it extends far beyond that. I won't go into what the dating app stats show, but they are bleak, and while it may be better irl it is still gonna be harsh.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:25 AM
1

She could find a man that she did find attractive with those same traits. Why settle for the ugly guy? Physically attractive men are also funny, kind, and financially superior. Not everyone can have the perfect man who has everything. Male sex symbols are diverse. The male sex symbols from my country are not the same as men in another. Ok, let me know how many of them are short and bald or fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:21 AM
–

Literally every single manosphere grifter is a right wing dude funded heavily by right wing political parties and billionaires. I'm not sure I believe they're funded by billionaires or political parties, this seems like a conspiracy theory. In any case, Andrew Tate for example is not an incel type, he probably mocks them. Incels certainly don't see themselves as alphas obsessed with cars and cigars or whatever. These manosphere isn’t designed to help men, no more than Trump is there to help the …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:19 AM
2

Because gay men would be far pickier, whereas heterosexual men have far lower standards. So unless you're super hot then you can't be a prostitute as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:10 AM
–

Leftism is well-aligned with incel grievance. Bluepillers will talk about incels the way hyper-capitalists talk about poor people, always blaming it on them and never admitting that things may be out of their control. If they applied the same empathy not just to the economic marketplace but also the sexual marketplace, they'd have empathy for those born genetically unlucky instead of blaming it all on them and telling them to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:05 AM
–

Where are the threads from PPD women complaining? You've never heard people saying 'where have all the good men gone?' or whining about how hard it is to find good husbands or whatever? Very common. They don't whine that they can't get anyone at all, because that is never true for a woman, but they certainly complain about not being able to find a man who lives up to their high standards. If the manosphere is so great, why are nearly are the men single or why do those single men struggle in dati…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 12:59 AM
1

What do you mean zero incentive? It's no incentive if he's a really funny, kind man? Or rich for that matter? As for what you claim on how women find different men attractive... the patterns of male sex symbols aren't really that diverse. They tend to share a bunch of similar characteristics, such as tallness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 12:56 AM
1

If you were to start a dating profile as a man, you would see that 1) you have to initiate every time, and if women ever did (on an app where this is encouraged) they will be just as boring or worse, sometimes literally starting with '.' and not even 'hey'. Despite never having to initiate, women still often complain that men don't have interesting openers, which is pretty entitled when you consider that men have to be constantly crafting them for dozens of women whilst women just wait for the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 12:41 AM
13

Sadly, people like you suffer from a just world fallacy where you can't accept that unfair things happen to people who don't deserve it, so you create a scenario where every romantically unsuccessful man must be an evil misogynist or whatever. Never mind the countless examples where people have gone on tinder and openly acted misogynistic and gotten tons of interest, or all the 'fuckboys' or whatever else in real life who have a huge amount of success with women despite their personalities due t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:48 AM
4

I don't know what you mean. What metrics? I agree that women are doing better in general in our current society, they live life on easy mode compared to men and our society is built around pleasing them and handing them things that men have to work hard for. But if we're talking about obesity, women are getting a lot fatter as well, often use drugs, and if the men have baby-mommas then, well, it takes a woman to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:00 PM
2

Anything I show will be hand waved away in some way by bluepillers. But the closest I could possibly show would be youtube videos of men asking random women 'walking outside for 20 minutes' - like this video. It doesn't help the argument of bluepillers, I can say that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:56 PM
3

A majority of men do not take care of themselves or dress well. As women we tailor our looks and put a lot of effort into our appearances. If I am expected to "look hot" why aren't men? I've seen this said a lot and it's just basically nonsense as far as I'm concerned. Men often put far more effort into looking good than women do, it takes far more work to gain muscles etc. than what women do. Women often allow themselves to get fatter and unlike men they'll be praised for it and called 'thicc' …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:53 PM
1

That's a common feminist interpretation, but realistically women haven't needed men for survival in quite a few decades and yet it has gotten far worse with the advent of dating apps. I don't believe that the women in the past would rate the vast majority of men as ugly/below average. Also, women still want what older generations wanted, money etc., on top of the increased look standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:42 PM
6

That's a common feminist interpretation, but realistically women haven't needed men for survival in quite a few decades and yet it has gotten far worse with the advent of dating apps. It is your right, but it is also a man's right to not be happy about how unless he looks like a hollywood star he'll often be considered ugly and ignored by women. That's increasingly the reality we live in and I don't know why women don't have empathy for this situation, blind to their own privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:34 PM
5

Go find someone within your league. That's precisely the problem. Women in their league do not find them attractive, because women's standards have skyrockted to absurd degrees where the vast majority of men are ugly to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:29 PM
3

Unfortunately, female standards have skyrocketed to absurd degrees where they think the vast majority of men are ugly. It is indeed unrealistic, and this will result in further lowered birth rates and single people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:28 PM
3

They obviously are though. The average man looks very different to an average woman in many different ways. For men it’s a much rarer and harder thing to achieve. This is true though, but the problem is that it wasn't always this way. Women's standards have skyrocketed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:24 PM
1

A very significant portion of relationships start on those apps. Besides, how is a man ever going to compete with the chads you admit she can have any time she wants? I don't know if you're a woman but imagine if your boyfriend had a fling with Margot Robbie in the past, wouldn't you be concerned that you might not match up?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:20 PM
6

unless you’re butt-fuck ugly There are many millions of such people in the world, and they're going to be alone for their entire lives no matter what they do. And yet people deny this and pretend it's all about personality. On top of that, what qualifies as ugly has changed massively and women are regularly shown to believe that the majority of men are below average, aka ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:14 PM
6

The problem is that women have been conditioned to have insane standards that they did not in previous generations. Imagine if someone refused to eat any food that wasn't Michelin star restaurant quality and anything less than that was considered awful. That's where women are with men. Meanwhile, men have totally normally and realistic standards. Women just can't really understand what it's like to have to deal with that, despite ironically often whining about supposedly unfair female body stand…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:09 PM
10

That's just obviously not true. In no age demographic is that the average. In any case, the same can be said for women apart from the video game thing but men maintain sensible standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:07 PM
-6

OP, are you swiping on women you don’t find attractive? If you don’t do it, why should women? Men have realistic, sensible standards. Women have now been conditioned to have insane standards where they think the majority of men are ugly. That's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:04 PM
2

It's important to make it needlessly gendered to make a point about their constant man hatred with terms like 'mansplaining' for someone being condescending etc.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:39 PM
79

If a feminist created a fiction satirising 'patriarchy' and capitalism and envisioned a society where women's bodies were mutilated at birth against their will and pieces of their body cut off to be sold to corporations for a profit so that vapid men might consume their harvested body parts, one might be forgiven for calling it overwrought, a bit too on the nose. And yet this is reality, and it's totally fine and accepted because it happens to males. Truly unbelievable, this world we live in.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:19 PM
1

No, she has a lot of empathy for women and will bend over backwards to create excuses for why everything is discrimination towards them. But for men she doesn't bother.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 11:49 PM
26

Not 'sexism' of course, only misogyny matters. Labour pledges to halve violence against women and girls, of course, because only that matters, not violence against men (despite men facing more violence). What a joke of a country the UK is.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 05:11 PM
44

Yeah. For some reason, a lot of women seem to automatically assume that if something bad happens to them, it *only* happens to them. So if someone in a video game insults them, this must be an example of widespread misogyny. But of course, every man who has played online games has been insulted a million times.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 05:09 PM
45

The author almost gets it, but gets caught up in her feminist brainrot. She admits that women are seen positively as caring and kind and people assume an evil man must be behind any wrong they do. So you might expect this article to call for less demonisation of men, right? Lol, no. She calls this, of course, misogyny. Negative view of women? Misogyny. Positive view of women? Misogyny. Positive view of men? Misogyny. Negative view of men? Believe it or not, misogyny. She ends with this: The ques…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 05:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter