TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hitleresque Archive

View 0 posts and 104 comments by Hitleresque on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

From the quotes both conclusions can be drawn. Which one is more positive RP-style? What conclusions? My intelligence is irrelevant in chess, if I don't know the rules of the game. That's fine, but he wasn't playing chess was he? You're assuming he was playing your version of the game of life, when he wasn't, he was playing his, and he won. Assumption as good as "he could have achieved even more if the had a wife to support him". Perhaps if he had wanted that. Most men marry because they want to…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/17 02:17 PM
1

when dealing with women having a genius level intelligence (he supposed to have 200+ IQ) is worthless without RP principles or at least basic game concepts. Irrelevant, he wasn't really interested in women or anything besides his work. It's not as if he was out getting rejected night after night at early 20th Century version of clubs. Intelligence is not worthless, it's just that the more intelligent you are the less likely you are to build your life around how many women you can sleep with, and…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/17 01:58 PM
1

I disagree about being silent in the open. His memo was sourced and non-inflammatory in every way possible, when discussing it you just need to be able to reference the facts and stick to them. Don't get emotional, that's what the opposition does, and it's their ultimate downfall. Speak your mind, back it up, and those worthy will follow.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 03:47 PM
1

Social media is far from reality. What you see on social media represents around 1% of the 1%. Not only is it an unrealistic aspiration for all but a select few, it's not even one that's going to bring you happiness in the long term. Psychologically, in terms of measurable human happiness later in life the top things that contribute to it are friends, a strong intimate relationship, children, and family. Notice a trend? Social relationships, real ones, not the fake garbage you see on social medi…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/17 11:43 AM
1

That's just a fact. It's also a fact that humanity would go extinct without women. How hard is that to grasp?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 07:11 PM
3

...whose personal survival is facilitated by men. This isn't a chicken or egg scenario, everybody needs to do their jobs and no one role is more important than the other.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:36 PM
2

Close, but not entirely true. For survival of the species' our greatest asset is good mothers. Society's greatest asset is men. Society was entirely built by and is maintained almost entirely by men.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 04:18 PM
17

From the article: "we analyzed data from four large-scale federal agency surveys conducted independently by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Bureau of Justice Statistics in 2008 through 2013." These were large robust surveys taken by federal organizations and they did meta-analysis of 5 years worth of data. Even with response bias the you're going to have a hard time arguing that their methods were poor.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:47 PM
21

Here's the study in question. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178916301446 Men report similar levels of non-consensual sex than women, and most of it is with women. Analysis of federal data confirms it.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:30 PM
4

Well, he's an active tenured professor at a pretty renowned institution. Even though academia has been infiltrated by anti-intellectuals you still find a lot exceptional minds. Having attended UofT I'm proud of what he's done, he's red-pilling younger men in the thousands.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/17 02:27 AM
7

I don't think his elephant seal analogy was poor in the context he used it. OP wasn't outlining it as a "precursor for human social behaviour", he was using it as an extreme example of sexual selection in action, specifically female mate choice and a male hierarchy.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/17 02:24 AM
1

It's a pretty poor analogue sadly. We'd need data as far back as 200 000 years, approximately the time when early humans begin to appear in the fossil record. Female mate choice is still a really good hypothesis, and it's easily observable in everyday life, so it likely plays at least some role.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/17 02:19 AM
–

unnecessary desire to demand binary conformity. What the fuck are you talking about? There are two sexes, male and female, it's the very definition of a binary trait. Gender is just an extension of that and around 99% of people conform to their birth sex. The rest are either mentally ill or retarded or both. What I'm saying is not nice, but it's the truth, and the truth is more important than ever.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:59 PM
4

Sex is important because it's an instinctual human behaviour. You can convince yourself you don't need sex all you want, but your body and your subconscious mind will still crave because it's what animals have been genetically programmed to do for hundreds of millions of years.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/17 04:19 PM
1

What sources are acceptable to you? Show me the part of the bill that indicates Healthcare will be stripped from those already covered. Even an article that outlines that part with a direct quote will do. We don't know Assad was responsible for those attacks, no investigation was done, and Assad denied it, and had nothing to gain by doing it. We don't, but I can bet the American government had the proper intelligence. If I recall correctly it wasn't even Trump's decision, it's was General Mattis…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 12:06 PM
1

Trumpcare (biggest thing) Can you cite anything that actually says it'll do anything nearly as bad as the media speculates? From what I understand nobody loses coverage if they already have it. You can't get your information from the MSM on this one. Blowing up Syrians without an investigation Lots of Syrians thanked him for finally doing something about Assad, and he did it with minimal civilian casualties. You can't let chemical attacks go unpunished. Even the NATO secretary general backed him…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:05 AM
53

I never used to give much heed to this type of thing until I listened to the second Joe Rogan podcast he was on. I have a lot more respect for christianity as a tool for shaping good men and women now.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 05:24 PM
3

Part of manning up is telling women to quiet down and let you handle things, it's not one or the other. If they don't respect that then don't reproduce with them. This is how we cast our genetic vote for the next generation.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 05:21 PM
3

From an evolutionary perspective men have always been the "chumps", though we are also the leaders. We are not intrinsically valuable, we create value through what we contribute to our tribe. In most cases that means sacrificing our needs or even ourselves for the wellbeing of others. That is, instinctually, what being a man is about. None of that really sounds like a very good deal, and in today's society it's usually not, but it's the truth. What we need to do is retake the respect and admirat…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/17 05:18 PM
3

All of what you listed is already happening. The fact that MGTOW, TRP, PUA culture etc. exists was already a clear sign of that. Dont get me wrong, it's going to get much, much worse the further we go. The only thing we can do about it is exploit it while the system starts crumbling. And by that I mean you can either use TRP to fuck all the dumb sluts this has created, or you can use it to vet them properly, find one of the few good women left and try to turn society around. Just remember AWALT …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/17 03:03 PM
1

Of course, you're right, I was speaking purely of the mentality of the anger phase. Lifting is rule number 1, even in the anger phase you need to be using that anger for something productive.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 01:58 PM
3

To be fair, it can be really hard to get out of the anger phase if you're starting essentially at rock-bottom. Before I came to TRP I was a slim, above average height, white dude with good style and facial features. On top of that I've studied evolutionary biology so it all just really made sense. Even starting with everything in my favor I found it was very easy to just let everything boil and never bother to actually take advantage of what's presented here. So I am sympathetic to the men who a…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 01:40 PM
23

Came here to say this. You can love a woman and have a healthy happy relationship, when executed well it's one of the best partnerships nature has ever produced. Applying RP principles is the best way to maintain a stable LTR , just always act accordingly and don't ignore the red flags should they start popping up.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 08:36 PM
9

Of course, I wasn't implying we're creatures of pure instinct, just that those instincts are there and we need to be aware of them so we can act accordingly.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 08:35 PM
50

She is still a product of thousands of years of evolution that determines at her core how she will act. Try hundreds of millions. Sexual selection has been shaping dimorphisms and behaviors since the dawn of sexual reproduction. At this point it's a core tenant of life, and no amount of variation in those traits can undo it.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/17 03:21 PM
6

It's an excellent podcast. They talk a lot about the pitfalls of our postmodern society, how we're in a period of chaos, what lead us here, what the end results could be. It's very interesting, not necessarily alarmist in nature, but very focused on personal improvement and how it benefits the self and society as a whole. I strongly recommend listening to it, it's 3 hours but even putting it on in the background is well worth it.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 02:36 AM
73

You should watch the latest Joe Rogan podcast with Jordan Peterson. They talk about precisely this. Those men can't compete in traditional male dominance structures so they try to play outside the system as "allies". Of course it doesn't really work, not better than the traditional method anyway.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:49 PM
12

Men rarely indicate that wealth is an equal or better source of attraction than fitness, reason being because we don't depend on women for resources, just reproduction. Perhaps medieval fat dudes were "attractive" to women, but I wouldn't expect it to work both ways. The statues of fat bitches are more likely just an indicator of their family's wealth and power of that era, not necessarily indicative that men were attracted to them.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 07:45 PM
3

Are you sure? Because OP is trying to motivate people who are in danger of becoming stagnant, bloated slobs. He's motivating people by telling them their actions and willpower have a direct influence on their wellbeing. Their strength of character can change their life. Basic TRP mantra. No, he's not. If he were, he'd have said exactly that. His entire post is nothing but inflammatory and while it may work on a select few, the overwhelming majority of fat people are just going to feel even worse…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 05:20 AM
4

Sad that you're being downvoted, everything you said was spot on. I come to trp for motivation and advice from people that have more experience or knowledge than I do. This post is not that. OP doesn't seem to understand that weight loss is a physiological process and no two people are going to be equal in that regard.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 06:28 PM
5

I mention this because the human body is incredibly complex and maybe the fat person's body is more efficient at extracting nutrients and storing it. Definitely. There are quite a few genetic markers associated with increased risk of obesity. There was a study on inuit populations that linked their increased prevalence of obesity to some of their glycolytic enzymes if I remember correctly. Living in the extreme cold means they need to be better at packing on fat. Evolutionary speaking they're op…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 12:46 AM
4

That's exactly it. Peterson himself has done interviews with a trans student and outright said that he would refer to her as 'she' as she wanted. He doesn't seem to have any problem with trans people, he just doesn't like the precedent that you can now force someone to use the "right" pronoun.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 09:50 PM
1

It definitely varies, and a lot of the time it doesn't even necessarily stem from extremism. Just as an example, I know a lot of people that oppose free speech out of ignorance of what that implies. They have the best intentions in that they just want everyone to be happy and never insulted, they just don't understand what the consequences are no matter how much you try to explain it. All of that said, it doesn't even really matter what the majority wants when the vocal minority has control of t…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 09:37 PM
2

That comes across as an unfiltered stream of consciousness but I wouldn't call it foolish ramblings. Hitler was a very disturbed man who very clearly just wanted to watch the world burn, and he's right that life will do just fine without science. It just happens to have removed us from the food chain, but his entire point seems to be that before science we would've had no idea such a thing were possible so we had to be fine with some of us being eaten back then.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 05:05 PM
4

Just given that you're on this subreddit is a huge indication that your beliefs are no longer compatible with the modern left. You might have liberal viewpoints, so do I, but "the left" has adopted an entirely new set of beliefs that contradict most classic liberal values.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 05:00 PM
14

Holy shit, this isn't even beating around the bush, this is an on the nose attempt to remove due process for anyone even so much as accused of rape. What in the fuck
/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:15 AM
1

Depends on how you define close. These are people I regularly saw and talked with in class, at parties, went to bars with, etc. We were all members of a much larger friend group. We're still all in the friend group, but they've collectively decided I'm an asshole. Are you dealing with college feminists? If not then that probably explains the difference. I can assure you they're a different breed of feminist, or at least these particular ones are. I can probably find some old screenshots of them …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:54 PM
1

We used to be friends. Now they're just people I see on facebook and around campus that think I'm human scum.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:26 PM
1

Well in my situation it was pretty clear she was asking because I was obviously inexperienced. That was before I had been introduced to the red pill but I knew deep down giving her an honest answer would turn her off but I still felt I owed her an explanation for why it wasn't the best. It seemed to work, dated her for the rest of the school year.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 04:58 PM
6

Tried it 5 times, all negative. Not a huge sample size I'll admit but it's enough to be discouraging. One of them and the most recent was a girl I was seeing at the time. That one hurt because I had feelings for this girl. It started so inocuous and it became such a shitshow. Now I've pretty much given up, I don't share my opinions on social media unless I know someone is arguing something undeniably retarded. For instance one out of the five was with a girl in my program that is just an absolut…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:03 PM
20

With your level of experience my first recommendation would be to forget the idea of getting a girlfriend in the first place. 99% of relationships fail, that's something you can learn the easy way or the hard way. I went through 5 fucking horrible ones to get to where I am now, in a happy stable LTR, and I'm not even convinced that this one is going to last. If you really insist on the LTR path, you have to be prepared for it to end and welcome it. That's your first step. In terms of actually ge…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/17 02:20 PM
3

You want people to stop flinging shit, you gotta start with you. All that will result in is shit being flung at us and only us. That'll always be the case. One of the most prominent issues with this movement is that people outside of it either don't know it exists or don't take is seriously because of censorship and feminist shit talking. That's all were seeing here, now that the movie is gaining some traction they have to shut it down, hard. I'm not even one to retaliate, but it's getting incre…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:58 PM
3

Keep his stomach full and balls empty. Granted. It doesn't matter where he gets his appetite as long as he eats at home. Be a lady in the streets and a freak in the sheets. I don't really see these as being about subservience to men. The first is interchangeable, I've heard it used for both women and men. Anyway, your point has been made.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 08:39 PM
3

I never dated a guy with the actual mentalities you are describing. I can name plenty of mottos that encourage fem subservience to men, too. Could you list some? I probably just have a selective memory but I can't think of any off the top of my head. I always got this vibe about men's rights acitivists.. like they are just like Butters in south park after he gets dumped and now he just hates women and chooses to ignore their problems as though his own problems negate theirs, when in reality he j…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 07:27 PM
5

Well of course it's not all men. The stereotype of men rolling over and playing dead after sex certainly exists for a reason, yet so does the stereotype of women becoming more and more unreceptive to their husbands sexual advances as the marriage progresses. The problem is both of our accounts are purely anecdotal. I'd need to see a survey or something potentially concrete before I actually conclude anything, though to be honest it's not a big enough issue for me to research.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 07:16 PM
2

Yeah, writings like this and all the stereotypes involved exist for a reason. Men and women are different and seek different outcomes, and that's okay. As much as sexual dimorphism serves a purpose in nature it can also be antagonistic.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 07:12 PM
7

I think women in long term relationships in general start to pull back on things like that. Once they've secured some semblance of commitment they no longer have to try. Why buy the cow when you get the milk for free and all that.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:40 PM
7

Yeah it's a real problem. I think it's been months for me. I don't really care for the most part because I know if I want one I can get it, but if I don't ask it'll never happen. Hell even when you do ask you're bound to get a funny look like "do I have to?" You gotta basically demand it.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:53 PM
5

But in sex if I don't explicitly ask to keep going he just gets up and gets dressed as soon as he's finished. That's more of a physical limitation than anything. Refractory periods are hard to overcome and they just get longer as you age. There's a mental component too where it's near impossible to get going again after. A good routine I like to use is to try get my girlfriend to cum before we even get to intercourse, that way once we start there's no pressure on me to "perform". Could try askin…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:47 PM
34

I sure was. Actually I think for boys in general growing up we never stop hearing about respecting and pleasing women. Don't hit girls, always be nice to girls, girls like nice boys. Now it's become "Happy wife happy life". While that's all generally good advice it's pretty awful that it doesn't tend to work both ways. More on topic, I like to think I'm pretty good in bed but my generosity tends to go unreciprocated unless I ask. When was the last time you gave your husband a blow job without hi…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:56 PM
12

How many times do I have to reiterate that she broke several other laws?
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:12 PM
16

Except for you know... having the legal right to drive. Also leaving the scene of an accident is you guessed it... illegal. I'm not arguing she should've been charged for murder, I'm saying she broke several other laws and should've been punished for it.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:01 PM
12

The only thing which she did wrong was fail to report the accident. That's pretty fucked up though. Should still have gotten jail time for committing negligent manslaughter for driving without a valid license and not reporting the accident afterward.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:51 PM
29

I wouldn't be so sure. I know for a fact the SCUM manifesto has a few lectures dedicated to it in a positive sense in the women and gender studies courses at U of T. I can probably even find a couple screenshots of some "acquaintances" discussing its importance.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:23 AM
8

Could you post the link to the full article? At the top of the post it said the link was included but I don't see it. Thanks
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 05:03 PM
9

Yeah, having talked with him personally he's one of the most intelligent people I've ever met, and I have a comp-sci roommate with an IQ of 145 so that's a high bar. There's something about his field, being a clinical personality psychologist, where he just understands human thought processes down to their finest details. I should really watch more of his youtube lectures.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/17 05:01 PM
13

I think he's gone about it in the right way. At the climax of his spotlight he debated a law professor and a gender studies professor, and even had to fight the biased moderator, and was generally seen as the victor even in the cucked U of T community. If the whole debacle showed me anything it's that the silent majority mostly agrees with his line of thought. He's redpilled a ton of people in terms of ridiculing the bullshit SJW narrative that swept campuses mostly unchallenged in the past few …
/r/TheRedPill06/03/17 03:19 PM
1

I think in most places they are. This is a really unfortunate case because what I think happened is the police stumbled upon a what was about to be rape. I mean, it's good that she wasn't actually raped, but it'd almost be better if the cops had gotten there just a minute later so they'd have had more evidence.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:18 AM
2

That's concerning but it's weak evidence of wrong doing. Stronger evidence would be finding his DNA on or rather in her, but it seems there wasn't evidence of anything sexual having happened.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:43 AM
1

You're right, if you follow the context I'm talking about a social problem, not a legal one. I said some women would consider this harassment, which it is not, so legally this has no relevance, which is what I've been saying from the start. As well, I said this type of thing is more up the alley of red pill stuff, a certain ideology that would find this type of behaviour predictable from women. This was never about actual criminal charges, it was about the fact that I know some women that would …
/r/MensRights04/03/17 02:15 AM
3

That's not at all my point, so nice strawman. I'm saying that if you showed this guy's comments to some women without showing them the responses or what he looks like, they'd say it's harassment, which it's not. I even said it's not really relevant in my original comment, what are you taking issue with in my comments exactly?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:25 PM
4

Sure, but you can't be certain and you shouldn't be potentially slapped with criminal charges just for having the gall to pursue someone out of your league. Imagine the inverse scenario, a fat disgusting pig of a woman hits on a hot guy, I see it every time I'm at a club, should she be charged for it? The answer is still no.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:05 PM
15

Only if you continue after it becomes clear it's unwanted. Before any interaction it's just an advance you couldn't have known the outcome to, it can't be construed as harassment unless it's repeated.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:51 PM
26

It's not a surprise, just a double standard. Any non-model could do this and a lot of women would call it sexual harassment. Still, not totally relevant, more of a red pill thing than men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:11 PM
1

I commented under the presupposition that a sexual relationship could be proved but not that the promotion was due to the relationship, I should've clarified that.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 01:01 AM
2

I'm not entirely sure that you'd have to, the conflict of interest should be reason enough to convince a jury that there's some fuckery going on.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 12:14 AM
12

You're not wrong, but even most fat women are ashamed of themselves. As much as there may be a push for them not to be (feels before reals, always) they usually still are. The fat acceptance movement is nothing more than extreme denial and deep down they all know that. It's the same with the anti-slut-shaming trend, sluts know they're not being healthy or responsible, that's why the societal hamster is in overdrive trying to protect their feelings. The hamster will run out of energy soon enough …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/17 01:40 PM
33

He'd go to jail, only men are accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:39 AM
48

It is, they just don't call it that because of the stigma. Don't worry, at this rate in 100 years marriage will be a dead institution anyway because women are becoming insufferable cunts and society is letting them. The marriage rate is dropping fast, so unless something changes they're in for a very rude awakening.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:38 AM
19

It takes two people to make a career, kids, and a life. Correct, but it only takes one to throw it away. 70% of the time it's the woman. Strange. Bottom line is if you want to maintain the lifestyle you did when you were married then you should've stayed fucking married. In my opinion this isn't even so much about money as it is about responsibility. If you can't support yourself without your partner then you don't end the partnership. There's zero accountability for women when it comes to divor…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:32 AM
2

Turns out the data is a lot harder to find than I thought. However, I did manage to find the report I mentioned. It's a report by CONSAD commissioned by the US department of labour. I still don't have a direct link to the pdf but if you google CONSAD Research Corp. "An Analysis of Reasons for the Disparity in Wages between Men and Women." January 2009. the first link there should show you the conclusion of the report. Sadly it doesn't include detailed methodology of the analysis, only the forewo…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 02:39 PM
17

The department of labour, the same place they get the faulty statistic from. Thats the worst part, the wage gap myth somehow arose despite being debunked later on in the same report. Anyway, essentially they found that there's an earnings gap wherein women make 77% yada yada... across all fields and professions, but after accounting for experience, hours worked and a ton of other factors, it shrunk to 2-5%. I don't have a direct link but if you google "department of labour wage gap" and so much …
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:04 AM
6

I can vouch for this. I know I'm late to the party but I need to vent a little. My high school career was depressing, I was a nerdy outcast that was too shy to even dare talk to girls. I was a pretty late bloomer, didn't lose my virginity until my first year of university, mostly because I started dressing well and actually talking to people. Quickly started dating a girl. Life was okay for about a year, but she was a huge slut and liked to gaslight me about it. It fucked me up mentally pretty b…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/17 02:52 PM
8

Like the tennis player who was ranked 200 overall worldwide that beat the Williams sisters back to back. Not just beat them, demolished them. Afterwards they said they "didn't expect his hits to be so hard" or something. Kek.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 12:46 AM
6

oh man, evo psych is hilarious. masculinity and femininity aren't evolutionary concepts. They certainly are when you can make qualitative observations about traits that tend to exist more on average in males or females. Sexual selection is not a consistent force, selective pressures have changed over time and will continue to do so. Of course, although much of our current psychological traits were influenced by hundreds of thousands of years. Human society did not exist as we know it for the vas…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:17 AM
3

We are both just shooting around opinions, studies on this are going to be very limited. I am aware of this study that shows that typically masculine appearance is not desirable to women and that women prefer males with lower testosterone levels: That's not what it shows though, most of the data still suggests that women prefer more masculine faces or neutral faces. "Women’s Preferences for Male Faces. In male faces, women showed evidence of nonrandom preferences in all groups (Fig. 2). Randomiz…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:16 AM
6

Men in healthy relationships can and should be able to cry too their significant other. I disagree. Evolutionary speaking men are the backbone of the species, and women are evolved to seek out the strongest, most masculine ones. A woman will lose respect for a man who cries the same way a man will lose respect for a woman who's loud, obnoxious, and aggressive. You know, less feminine. Crying is not masculine because it does nothing to solve the problem at hand. This isn't a rule so much as a gen…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:41 PM
33

Well who else would you hear it from? You won't hear it from a woman, because assuming it's true and they do lose respect for you they're not going to be forthright with that information. They'll just talk to their friends about it behind your back.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:35 PM
8

The pendulum always swings back
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:17 PM
33

Male bots are much further down the line. Think about the inherent sexual differences between men and women. Much more often than not men are the initiators and the ones taking the dominant role. This isn't going to change with the android version, the male sex bots will have to be way more complex and capable of doing thrusts from a ton of different positions, essentially taking the lead. Fembots just need to be able to strike a few poses and make noises. This is the real reason feminists are s…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 02:47 PM
3

They can't poke holes if you can explain the logical basis of the phrase. For example, they might say "Wow you're such a misogynist! Women aren't locks asshole they can open for whoever they want whenever they want!". And in a modern sense that's true, but our evolutionary background is what matters, because sexual selection has selected for women who are picky with mate choice. Women can't acquire resources alone, and this is a particularly big problem for them because they are the ones that ca…
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 06:57 PM
12

Society doesn't care about the average man. As a man you're only worth as much as you can contribute, for some that's a lot and for others it's next to nothing. Women are given implicit value for the simple evolutionary reason that the species needs them to continue. There are advantages and disadvantages for both genders, they're called tradeoffs. However, I'd argue that most of the negative tradeoffs women experience have been reduced or eliminated whereas men still experience most of theirs.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/16 05:13 PM
89

"who cares, don't be a pussy" Welcome to manhood
/r/MensRights02/11/16 03:31 PM
38

He might be a puppet. Hillary is definitely a puppet. The pendulum has swung too far left, society can't handle another democrat president who's too cucked to take hard stances on some bitter issues like islamic terror or even domestic terror from BLM. I cant say that I think Trump will make a good president, but I'll take my chances over the most corrupt politician in American history.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 02:30 PM
77

He's fucking Leo DiCaprio, he doesn't have to lift, he's practically already a god among men.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/16 01:33 AM
27

Read the sidebar material. The average daily post is just ranting from men still in the anger phase (not that it's a bad thing to vent, it just gets depressing) and rehashing of redpill theory that's already found in the sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 01:54 PM
-2

To a lot of people, yes. The very notion that there are a lot of shitty women out there is considered misogynistic to some. You don't have to be a redpiller to be on the lookout for manipulative women, but it'll help in that area and beyond.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:19 PM
-4

/r/theredpill is that-a-way for the men that are sick of this kind of shit happening. This doesn't have anything to do with rights, but protect yourselves out there fellas.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:36 PM
56

Not at all, the US and Canada have proportionally similar statistics in most areas. The only one that's not relevant here would be the requirement to register for selective service, but that has little to do with poverty anyway.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:13 PM
27

Male sexbots will have to be far more complex than female ones, since the bot will have to take the lead, whereas female ones can be basically lifeless and the spergs will still fuck them. That, and women aren't as sex crazed as men and they're attracted to different things. A sex toy isnt going to make you feel sexy or protect you and pay your bills, men are irreplaceable in that regard. Most won't be willing to buy one for just an iron penis alone.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/16 05:19 AM
44

When quality sex bots take off the interactions between men and women are going to change big time, and I for one can't wait. When women realize just how few men actually give a damn about anything more than pussy, shit is gonna hit the fan. Marriage rates will be ridiculously low, women might learn they have to put effort into their relationships to be valuable when synthetic vaginas are just as good as the real thing.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/16 12:31 AM
4

Yeah, I didn't bother mentioning child support but I know just how rigged it is. I have an aunt who's pulling 2k a month off her poor bastard of an ex. He makes good money but fuck, she never has to work another day in her life. Feeding 3 kids is no doubt expensive but it sure as fuck doesn't cost 2000 a month. Im positive that can cover all of her expenses for the month and to boot she's been leeching off her new hubby whom she also had a kid with. It's too bad because I'd love to raise a coupl…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/16 02:05 AM
224

Divorces should be simple, you go your way, I go mine. Women are equals now, if they need money they can get a job like any man has to. I won't be happy until the concept of alimony is gone entirely.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 01:46 AM
0

I don't think it's cultural, women are generally much more emotional than men and historically always have been, so it's almost definitely biological. Why we've begun rewarding and encouraging this behaviour is another thing entirely.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:47 PM
1

I was talking to both of them before I left to work some game on another group of women, I'm guessing he saw the look on her face and commented on it. It's true she could be bluffing, but I doubt it.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/16 03:25 PM
1

Why? He was just gauging her reaction because she looked jealous. Take it easy, fuck
/r/TheRedPill19/06/16 03:23 PM
1

Physiologically you can only really add ~8 lbs of lean muscle in a year. For a slow, lean bulk you shouldn't expect to add any more than a lb a month, more than that and a lot of it will be fat. This method will get you big and depending on your diet and timing (intermittent fasting) you can lean out. That said, I find it easier to bulk hard for a few months and not worry too much about fat, and then just do a cut. The first method you don't see results as fast but they're consistent, whereas wi…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 04:44 PM
3

It's not supposed to be anti-woman. I haven't looked at the rest of the chain, but what dungone and I are saying is that men tend to have better shit to do than fish for likes or hearts or whatever the fuck on social media. It means nothing to me and most other people with a full time job and hobbies. The statistics probably show the same (I can't declare this but look it up, I wager I'm right), men in general probably don't use social media as much due to lack of time and interest in meaningles…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 09:30 PM
58

Because we have better shit to do
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:34 PM
12

Men are waking up. A lot of people have said the MRM and RP don't go hand in hand but I disagree. As more men realize what modern women are like they'll be driven toward women with more traditional values. It's already happening if this article is any indication, feminism is eating itself. It's not long before men take back the respect they deserve and women realize that despite having the same oppurtunities men do they aren't actually men. Im actually grateful for this article, blaming this on …
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:25 AM
7

True, which is why you don't back down when they call you out on it. A girl once called me sexist for jokingly asking where my sandwich was. I replied "So no sandwich then?" with a shiteating grin on my face. I got my sandwich later the next day.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 08:56 PM
3

Agreed, I thought being 6'0" would enough to be considered "tall" by most women but nope. You're not tall unless you're 6'4" and towering over them.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 08:38 PM
13

It's not really racist if you're clearly joking, most women will recognize that if they're not social justice cunts.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 08:29 PM
9

If and when science ever develops something for men that is as inexpensive and effective as the pill contraceptive is for women, that number will come down drastically. Vasalgel baby, it looks promising and it's entering human trials soon. And it's non-hormonal so it won't fuck with your system. One injection is supposed to last 10 years and be reversible at any point during. It almost seems too good to be true. Once (read: if) it hits the market the birth rate in the west is going to crash. The…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/16 09:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter