TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hiyakasudere Archive

View 0 posts and 6 comments by Hiyakasudere on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

I'm a feminist but I do agree that you can compare different types of FGM to MGM. However the one you can't compare to MGM is the ones where everything on a girls genetalia is cut off and then sealed shut with only a really small hole left to pee from, it's usually done without anaesthetic and the girl is just held down. But I agree that removing any parts of someone's genetalia is comparable it's just how it affects the individual that changes. Still wrong either way.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:58 AM
1

OK firstly I stated multiple times that America became independent in 1776, the percentage YOU gave is incorrect unless you think the male historian whose article I got the information from is wrong, meaning when America became independent it was 20-25% of the population. You widely underestimate how many white men over the age of 21 were around in 1776. Secondly, it was universally illegal for women to vote, because yes as you said in 1776 some women could vote ONLY in new Jersey. However if yo…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 07:27 PM
1

It was actually about 20-25%. All white men of age could vote in the 1820s and all white women 100 years later in 1920. Men of all races had the right to vote (some didn't due to non gendered circumstances) in 1870 however every US citizen (all women and men regardless of race and religion) had the right to vote by 1965 taking yet another 100 years for POC women to be allowed to vote compared to POC men. Of course it was made very difficult for POC's to vote because of racism.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 05:28 PM
1

For clarification, if you didn't already understand my point, in 1920 EVERY state allowed white women to vote. POC women were allowed to vote later in history. I was not fully denying your point just correcting it and showing a proper timeline.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 04:50 PM
1

The timeline I gave starts in 1776 (when America got independence) and clearly states that only property owners who were white men could vote except in new Jersey where white women who owned property could vote. It also states in multiple places that even when certain marginalised groups where allowed to the vote people would use other forms of discrimination or intimidation to prevent them from doing so. Did you even read my reply?
/r/MensRights13/06/22 04:46 PM
1

This timelines for the us but in 1776 only people (mainly white men over 21) who owned land could vote, except in new Jersey where women who owned land could vote. In 1790 only white male immigrants could become citizens. 1807 New Jersey banned women who owned land from voting and only tax-paying, white male citizens could vote. 1828 any white men of any religion could vote. 1848 Mexicans could become citizens but couldn't vote. 1856 every white male even without property can vote. 1868 former s…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 04:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter