TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HobKing Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by HobKing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Exactly, thank you for clarifying
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 02:34 AM
5

Modern relative to the existence of modern humans
/r/TheRedPill18/07/17 03:21 PM
10

Eh, clothing is a modern thing. I doubt your assumptions, but I do think that using the visual stimulus of nudity as a carrot on a stick can motivate us.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/17 12:19 AM
11

Right, but ambition is only good for gaining financial security, which she didn't know he already had. Tbh I totally get where she's coming from. If this sub espouses the idea that men are to be the providers, why would the sub fault her for leaving someone who had, as yomo86 put, "no ambition and no prima facie potential"? To criticize her for that is to criticize the very basis of this sub.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 12:34 AM
50

Question about the AWALT theory: If all women are like this, then what's a "no good woman" if not just a woman? Sounds like if you reject all women like this, you might as well turn gay now because you know a priori that you won't ever find one that's different. If you believe/know all women are the same in that way, how can that characteristic be used as cause for rejection? I feel like it can't, and that TRP is more about accepting that and dealing with it. Finding out that your girl is "like …
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 01:29 AM
4

I don't think "number of scandals" is a good choice of criterion when defending Trump... the guy's on an absolute record pace. It also fundamentally undercuts your red pill standing: TRP values not giving a fuck. Scandals count against Obama because they were underreported but count for Trump because he ignores them? When Obama ignored them just the same? That's contradictory. He's coming in with a stable and growing economy (not one he needs to save, like Obama), and has a majority in Congress.…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/17 05:07 PM
22

Half black Barack Hussein Obama had everything handed to him? Trump was actually handed millions and a gigantic family business. Absurd accusation.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/17 03:43 PM
5

Wow, Putin is a manlet! I would never have guessed. I guess his PR people do a good job of limiting camera angles!
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 09:04 PM
9

The most important thing is to lift. Literally don't worry about anything else until you lift. Try r\fitness.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 05:43 PM
21

Jesus Christ. Some of you guys are obsessed with the "alpha widow," "women love being raped," etc. tropes on here. Rape can actually be traumatizing. OP, you need to get out and fuck other women... broaden your horizons. She will be there, and if you find someone else and have to move on, then so be it. If she needs years to get over this, you shouldn't feel guilty about not being able to wait that long. Perhaps someday a few years from now she will be able to have regular sex, but it sounds lik…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 05:24 PM
34

I'd never straight-up say that women don't stand up to men in sports, but all the guys knew in the back of our heads... Really? I feel like people say this all the time. That's like being afraid to say that men are taller than women. I don't think this opinion is actually, like, suppressed. It's built in. It's why there are men's and women's teams...
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 04:37 AM
1

Just because you have good reason to be angry doesn't mean you are right to become obsessed with anger and blame others for your obsession. Fundamentally, I am in full agreement with your point. I wonder how this actually affects your life, though. It's not as if you've ever lived life with a foreskin. What is the mental and physical damage you refer to? Besides the literal foreskin removal and your anger over that fact.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 03:30 PM
1

Damn, I thought you were joking. Why keep your distance? Afraid you'll be converted?
/r/TheRedPill17/12/16 01:40 AM
5

someone whom This should be "someone who." I agree with your point but similarly find it grating when the people doing the correcting have errors.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/16 06:22 PM
1

That sounds a lot more like behaviorism than organismic psychology. In any case, you're missing the point, but I can rephrase: by most accounts it means "to behave as though one has no moral compass." The point remains the same.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/16 06:35 AM
7

Eh, sociopathy actually is amoral. It's not a well-defined term but by most accounts it means to lack a moral compass, which is the same as being amoral.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/16 08:38 PM
1

Centralizing power creates a force stronger than all others that can (1) defend an area best from outsiders (because it has as much power as possible) and (2) protect people from intra-state violence (because it has more power than anyone within the state.) What is the alternative, and don't you think the centralization of power is inevitable? Centralized, organized powers are stronger than decentralized, disorganized ones.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/16 08:30 PM
4

"Go fuck yourself you eternal virgin". This one hit him hard. Yet, for some reason he still won't change. Well I could have told you that. Not surprised telling him that didn't do the trick.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 12:53 PM
3

He's also a boss in the most recent Hard Knocks episode.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 08:36 PM
2

IDGAF if I get their number, IDGAF if they want me, IDGAF if they walk off, IDGAF if I offend them or piss them off, anything positive is just a bonus to my entertainment, and I'll entertain myself no matter what they do. Right, but say you then do get a chance to close, when do you make the switch from not giving a fuck to actually being amped about getting what you wanted? I feel like a lot of cognitive dissonance would arise for me.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/16 09:01 PM
14

Regarding (3), continually using self-deprecating humor will not only erode others' respect for you but your own self-respect as well. Avoiding self-deprecating humor (except in small doses) is part of having good mental posture.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/16 10:13 PM
6

I felt hints of passive-aggression in a fair number of the assertive quotes. The "at least" in the dishes one, the "big guy" in the weights one... Solid post, though. The thrust of it is absolutely crucial.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/16 05:37 AM
3

No, there's no literal god, but that doesn't mean religious texts have no wisdom. Religious texts are fairy tales. They're stories that have lessons, no less valuable than the secular fables you were told as a kid. Understand them as such and you'll see what they have to offer. Roll the lessons around in your head, and then decide how silly they are. Some are, some aren't. But most of the ones about being prudent and wise are good advice.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/16 09:43 PM
1

All people are biased towards themselves. There are studies that show that it's literally harder to remember facts that, to put it bluntly, are bad for you. Hypersensitive, manipulative, reactionary idealogues are awful to debate with, awful to converse with, and potentially dangerous if they're after you. But asking someone for true neutrality is a big ask, despite being one that needs to be asked.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 06:29 PM
6

Is it worth it? All that trouble of putting up with her bullshit and standing strong in the face of shit tests for some sex? If it were life changing sex, that's one thing, but clearly with this dynamic you're not fucking someone you emotionally are on the same page as or can respect mentally. How much better is her pussy than your hand? Is it worth the trouble when you could be totally focused on yourself otherwise?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 12:52 AM
5

I've found that this is by far the bigger deal. You can reassure yourself and reason that it'll work the next time, but she will be beating herself up over it and feel confused and hurt. If unaddressed, i.e. if you don't tell her it's something physical to do with you that can be resolved, it can be game over.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 09:04 PM
1

Oh yes, very familiar with the term "goy," my fault!
/r/TheRedPill20/02/16 12:48 AM
2

That says that Rupert Murdoch, Ariana Huffington, and Ted Turner are all gay... ?
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 03:10 PM
2

Lol, yes, if he is the former leader that is now being bullied, he is the former alpha that is now the omega. It's not personal.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 12:54 PM
1

From what I've seen of TRP here, it isn't about getting chicks only to the extent that you need to focus on other things in order to get chicks.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 09:10 PM
2

Exactly. Mayweather is alpha in a lot of ways. Everyone in the country outside the black community hates him and he still goes out there and talks shit straight to the booing crowd. In front of the whole world. That's seriously holding frame.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 02:52 AM
-2

This guy might know some stuff, but he speaks like such a goddamn blowhard.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 08:37 PM
7

You can tell this guy's a lawyer from the moment he opens his mouth, I love it.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/14 02:27 AM
1

Men die 'cause their girl was horny the night before??? Am I understanding you correctly? What exactly is the course of events you have in mind?
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 09:47 PM
1

He sounds like a goddamn lunatic at the end. Dudes are dying 'cause their girls got horny the night before? That's utter nonsense, no?
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 06:06 PM
22

It's cringeworthy. It sounds like they wear only black and red clothes and eyeliner.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 01:46 AM
3

You guys don't see the difference between making small talk in situations where you're forced to be in close quarters with someone and "trying to start a conversation" with someone walking past you on the street?
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 08:12 PM
0

Yes, it would be hypocritical to consider a random kid a child molester and not Lena Dunham. I think the way to resolve that hypocrisy is to consider neither of them a child molester instead of both of them (unless you actually think that a seven year old that touches his/her sibling should be treated as a child molester.)
/r/TheRedPill05/11/14 12:58 AM
-6

Right. It seems a main tactic of the men's rights movement is intentionally and knowingly being ridiculous as a way to show "feminists" the ways that they're idiotic. It's all one big, "Fine, we'll follow your rules. Well this is what happens, how do you like it?" But that is never gotten to. It never gets past "act as stupid as they are." When Lena Dunham says, "You're being ridiculous," the response is, "No we're not, these are your definitions, lie in your own grave," instead of "Exactly, it'…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 03:11 AM
-2

Dude, at least get the basics down. She was 7, her sister was 1. EDIT: Anyone got a source on the vagina examining continuing until she was 17? All I can find about '17' is that Truth Revolt initially reported she was 17 and then retracted it. 'This article has been modified to correct a typo in the book excerpt incorrectly listing Dunham's age as seventeen'. (From here.)
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 02:23 AM
6

She wasn't an "artistic woman" for god's sake, she was a fucking little kid. She was a little kid. Kids do weird things sometimes. Yes, kids are not as responsible for their actions as adults. How do people here not understand that? If you hit another kid when you were little, do you think you should be arrested for assault?? The level of seemingly willful misunderstanding in this thread is ludicrous. I tend to stick up for this sub compared to everyone else, but sometimes the things people say …
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 12:04 AM
5

And Arnett really had the exact same response. OP is being biased. His expression and tone of voice said "Yeesh, you kinda don't," just like hers, but he said "Never give up" just like her, too. OP is seeing things.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 09:49 PM
4

It's just unbelievable to see a senator get lambasted when he says something to the effect of "There are degrees of rape; not all rapes are the same" and then see the same reasoning be promoted when the situation is such that it defends a woman.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 06:05 PM
8

Hope Solo's incident being in the news around the same time as these others makes it a pretty fair bellwether in my mind. This is an openly perpetuated double standard, through and through.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 05:14 AM
0

It might have been a little rude, but what doesn't add up? Is there any real reason to doubt her story?
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 12:48 AM
31

I just wouldn't want to be in a relationship with someone like that. I don't care what the sex is like. That's not someone I'd respect.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 02:45 AM
1

Don't you think the massive social pressures at a young age and onward to "be" your gender hugely impact this? I don't think you or I can claim the precision on the topic needed to be able to distinguish between (say) female engineer numbers produced by a world with just these social pressures and those produced by one with reality-awareness differences and these social pressures, because of society's variable-but-undoubtedly-massive effect on our sense of self, our interests, our habits, etc.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 12:06 PM
1

This should be in the sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 11:57 AM
-15

Do people here want to be able to say "Men are better than women" the way they perceive some people to think women are better than men, or do they want neither to be able to be said? It's blatantly inconsistent to be ok with someone saying "Men are better than women" and being outraged by someone saying "Women are better than men." It seems people are playing both sides of this issue.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 12:03 AM
0

Right, so if she doesn't do what he asks, he has to attack her, right? And it's her fault for making him attack her, just like it was with the animals, right? He didn't want to, but they made him do it? If push ever came to shove, there would be no way to maintain the illusion of scariness without abuse.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 05:54 AM
1

I can't tell if the people downvoting you are truly dumb or just too dumb to realize you're joking.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 05:17 AM
1

How do I know the men here aren't innovators in business, technology, or manufacturing that make life better for many people? That's a pretty ridiculous question. It would make no sense to assume any given person on this subreddit is that rare and special. This is besides the point, but IMO the safer bet is that the people here are definitely not "great men." The most basic commonality among visitors here is that they are struggling in some way with their relationship to society. Not that even g…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 05:03 AM
0

No reason. You should do it. I won't, I'll have my own genetic kids who share my own traits. He was asking why someone shouldn't adopt a kid from Africa, not why someone shouldn't adopt a kid. You can subsidize the r-type strategists. Americans adopting African kids is not going to affect the overall offspring production in Africa. You're not comprehending the relative sizes of these two things.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 09:07 AM
3

I'm a Physicist, I kind of know stuff. Yeah... I'm gonna have to go ahead and not come close to believing you on that one. I can only hope to god I'm right.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 08:34 AM
43

"Great men"? God damn man, give me a break. Someone like Bill Gates is a great man. People who make the world better for many others, i.e. innovators in business, technology, manufacturing, etc... are great men. Lifting weights, holding frame, spinning plates, having good sex, pushing your SO's buttons right... just wtf are you talking about. There could be some overlap in the goal attributes of red pill theory and the attributes of today's great men, but to presume that the visitors here on ave…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 08:31 AM
3

You think the hot girls of your youth were actually morally wrong in not wanting to give you a handjob? Holy entitlement. Grow up. That admittedly unfortunate circumstance was only your responsibility to change, not theirs.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 08:04 PM
6

This analogy applies equally well to men... you idiot.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/14 06:01 PM
3

And this is from earlier this week.. Dude seems like he's losing it.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 06:10 PM
1

We just need to connect, talk, and 2 hours later; WAH-LA! I'm just not sure I want to try to change who I am for anyone this dumb.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 08:57 PM
-1

I can't tell: Are people here saying, "Fuck yeah, Whoopi! Men and women should be given equal treatment, we should be able to hit back!" or are they saying "They finally admitted that men and women aren't equal. You can't avoid that biological truth forever! Men are stronger than women, and the rules should take our differences into account (i.e. men shouldn't be able to hit woman as hard because they're weaker.)" It seems like the sentiment here is a little confused.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 08:53 PM
7

PSA: There have been class action lawsuits against the makers of Accutane because it has been shown to sometimes cause Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease. Causation in any single case is unprovable, but one of my friends took Accutane in high school and then got Ulcerative Colitis, which he now lives with many years later, after being essentially perfectly healthy (before and since). I know Accutane wrecks acne, but given its significant expected side effects and potential long term illness …
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 05:35 AM
1

Why is it more OK to hook up with girls with bfs when their bfs don't do anything about it? If your girlfriend hooked up with someone who knew you guys were dating, would you respect him?
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 10:16 PM
2

It's more complicated than how "bad" the thing is. Death is worse than the following example, but I'm sure you can see that saying, "I'll slice your toes off and force-feed them to your dad if you steal my pie," would be conveying something very different than simply a toned-down version of "I'll kill you if..."
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 05:02 AM
3

Actually, no. That entire thing was the joke about tricking men into knocking them up. She didn't actually do it, nor did she indicate she would. The example joke wasn't "I see you looking like my dad," it was "My boyfriend doesn't want a baby... I see you looking like my dad." It's punctuated correctly; notice where the quotation marks are.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 04:53 AM
2

Just because it's /r/fitness doesn't mean the answer's going to be complicated. He's also asking for the optimal way to do this, which I honestly don't think anyone in this subreddit would know.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 07:46 PM
1

This is a question for /r/Fitness.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 05:55 AM
4

It did make me wonder if women being attracted to 'dominant' men is less of a hard-wired biological thing and more a result of standard human egotism. I'm not sure there's a meaningful distinction between the two.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 09:32 AM
1

Thanks for posting that Tony Robbins video, mate.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 07:06 AM
2

That's not strange. The women are talking about his high quality personal characteristics because that's what they really want: a high quality man. They want to be with someone who has what it takes to succeed. Money and status are only valuable as evidence of his ability to succeed in the future (by way of evidencing past success.) They're just making the leap from money and status to good characteristics.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 09:57 PM
2

I thought he meant civilization, because that was a relevant thing to say and because, you know, it's what he said. But don't take my word for it, /u/HalfPastTuna thought it was overdramatic, implying he read it the way I did (i.e. the way it was written) as well. It wasn't what he meant to say and it was misunderstood, so I don't think it's really out of line to say he should say it right in the future.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 05:31 AM
6

Haha, you're missing the big picture, man. I wasn't nitpicking a small part of your statement. The difference between "Civilization has always been temporary" and "Civilizations have always been temporary" is huge and is exactly what made your statement overdramatic. Don't get so wrapped up in defending yourself to the death. You wanted to make a dramatic statement, and you took it a little too far. It happens to the best of us, but if you own up to it, you'll be able to realize what your oppone…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 06:57 PM
-1

Did you go to a creationist school? Civilization hasn't ended before. Specific civilizations have ended, but civilization has not ended.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 06:05 PM
1

From a health standpoint, a 92 pound Asian girl is probably more like a 100 pound Caucasian girl, which would dip a tiny bit into the "underweight" category That's all I'm saying. They were right to look into it. They didn't realize she was actually healthy and went too far. They were dumb. My point, though, is that these mistakes by the doctors had nothing to do with the "fat movement," like OP is saying. They had to do with being idiotic in taking those weight guidelines not as guidelines at a…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 06:57 PM
2

If they had looked into it, they for sure could have determined that she was healthy. It seems that they performed cursory exams and were then for whatever reason stupidly stubborn in their hastily arrived at conclusions. That was their mistake. It wasn't their mistake to at least look into her weight, though. My point was that what is considered underweight now is the same as what was considered underweight thirty years ago (and probably more). It hasn't changed because of any "fat movement."
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 06:41 AM
-6

It's not about how they look. These were doctors. They're not seeing if they find you attractive because, hey, it's evolution. They're referring to established standards of healthy human weight that don't fluctuate without an actual reason. People being fat in America and "fat acceptance" are not things that would suggest to any medical professional anything about what a healthy weight is in humans, because it doesn't have anything to do with what a healthy weight is in humans. Do you really thi…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:24 AM
6

Oh, give me a break. This was ridiculous on the part of the medical staff at Yale, but I don't think it has anything to do with the "fat movement." It was just doctors being shortsighted and stubborn. The girls weighs 90 pounds for god's sake. It's normal that they wanted her to gain weight, it's just abnormal how stubborn they were about it.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:16 AM
1

Huh? It clearly says that it's the nice guys who are preferred in long-term relationships.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 10:05 AM
1

I can see that. It's complicated, because people take men being physically invulnerable to women (mano a mano I mean), and generalize it to men being totally invulnerable to women, so even with threats like that, you kind of jump to, "Oh, he wouldn't let her do that," even if it's a rufie that's being used and not her fists. There are some fair reasons why the statements wouldn't be treated equally, though. Drugging and raping a member of the opposite sex is typically a male thing to do. (No, I'…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:23 PM
1

Isn't it that everyone's afraid of the Beast because of the way he looks? That's obviously in no way implying that looks don't matter for men.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:55 AM
1

Gender Studies classes don't teach people to judge short men on their looks because they teach a whitewashed version of gender theory that favors women? That doesn't add up.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:53 AM
9

I think the poster is being intentionally over the top in an attempt to be funny. No one would condone that kind of statement if it were made seriously.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:50 AM
1

Fair enough. I took you to be attempting criticism, not providing food for thought. My apologies.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:16 AM
1

First off, I don't subscribe to r/mensrights, I don't associate with r/mensrights, I don't fight for men's rights, and I'm not all sanctimonious about anything. You are not talking to the idealized representative of r/mensrights that you're conjuring in your mind. Wake up, dude. Your inability to escape your assumptions looks like it's hurting your ability to think clearly. No but it served my point that it was not a convincing defense. It wasn't a defense. The person was amazed that a place whe…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:12 PM
1

The existence of groups that use "white rights" as a euphemism and a cover for the fact that they're a hate group doesn't mean that any rights group for the majority is a hate group and is labeling themselves incorrectly.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:11 PM
3

How can you say that your hypothetical white's rights group uses euphemistic, self-deluding phraseology when it's something you just made up? This was your hypothetical. If you say it's a white's rights group, it's a white's rights group. It's entirely possible for something like that to exist. Your "argument" appears to have been just an opportunity for people to convince themselves that you're right by making the inferences you hope they'd make. Only people who already agree with you are going…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:33 PM
4

What you said wasn't a counter-argument. There would be nothing wrong with a group of white people talking about their problems as white people. Why would that be a problem?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 07:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter