TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HollowOnTheOutside Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by HollowOnTheOutside on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/20980-as-it-was-and-ever-shall-be-now-opposes-equal-rights-for-fathers Here's a blog that has a press from the late 90s from NOW
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 09:35 PM
2

NOW has been actively advocating against fathers rights groups for decades. Your head is in the sand if you think only a fire alarm is the victim in this long battle. Ryerson university shut down a men's rights students group. Men across North America have been kicked out of universities for going against the status quo of feminist administration. Jordan Peterson and other professors have either had or nearly had their jobs removed for going against intersectionality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 07:02 PM
1

I didn't say all women feel that way, I said most of the women I've been with do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 09:21 PM
1

And it would still be much better than you know them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 07:03 PM
2

Totally agree with your latter point. To add to the first I have been met with lots of women who were just relieved by how direct I was. Women get tired of the games too. Eventually they hit 22-23 and can't stand another fuckboi and just want a chad that is going to give them a good time without mindfucking them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 04:02 PM
1

Many things used to be and still are called dating. It's not a particularly specific or useful term.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 03:55 PM
1

I don't think there is such a thing as one theory on RP. I've seen wildly different takes on my six months on this subreddit. Some have commented saying I'm the example of how RP should be. Other RPers call me delusional and think I'm easily deceived by women which are a homogeneous group of sluts by their logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 03:51 PM
1

I think this entirely depends on the women you seek and attract. I'm in higher educational and socioeconomic circles and perhaps this is why, but generally I've been the only one who's sleeping with multiple people. The women I attract just generally don't feel sexy when they sleep with more than one partner. You can continue your line of logic and tell me they're all sluts and banging hoards of men behind closed doors but we're both going to have to agree to disagree on that point because you c…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 03:49 PM
1

No, as long as they're not making a point out of bringing it up to try and get some sort of jealousy out of me. But the women I tend to date and attract aren't usually the types that do, so it's something that's only happened a handful of times.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 03:46 PM
2

The study you quote doesn't make the conclusion you do. It mentions the infrequent condom use and really makes no conclusions on one night stands. Not to mention it's a tiny observational study on one population in the UK so trying to generalize this isn't going to be useful. STI characteristics amongst populations have huge variances even in the same province in Canada nevermind between countries. I don't need the lecture on STIs. I'm a medical doctor, but if you're so worried for me I'll let y…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 03:44 PM
16

Alright I'll do my best here to explain what I think is ethical plating. When I was young like 17-19 I acted in the ways you suggested. I concealed my intentions with women and never was forthcoming about what I wanted. That changed. Ethical plating means telling women what you want and what you're not willing to sacrifice. Whenever I've entered dating relationships in the last 8 years I've been honest. I tell them I'm looking first and foremost for fun. That I'm open to something developing fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 10:16 AM
2

I'm so glad you speak for all women and have the key to unlocking the subconscious. I'll be sure to look for the release of your book in the self-help section next to 'The Secret'. Just don't forget about us lowly men when you get there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 11:01 PM
1

Yeah I somehow doubt that if I smacked a female bartender in the ass the first thought she would go to is "shit he's going to rape me." I know that because when I worked in the service industry most of my co-workers were women and they told me directly what annoyed them about unwanted actions. I understand what you're getting at but it's not even remotely applicable to the situation I originally presented here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 10:32 PM
1

I don't work there anymore it was a few years ago but no I did not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 09:20 AM
2

Isn't that anyone? I mean if I smacked a woman's ass she wouldn't like it because of the implications I made about here, especially when behind closed doors during sex it seems like that's all most women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 08:55 AM
4

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 09:45 PM
22

It bothered me. That kind of assumed privilege that because I'm a man then I must want it and like it, that they have a right to my body because they're a woman and unthreatening or gifting me their sexual interest. Sex is not impressive to me. I'm attractive, successful and intelligent. Your sexual interest and your body is not enough, so to assume that's all I need from a woman for it to be some sort of equal trade is just gross to me. I offer a lot more than just my good looks, so women shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 08:52 PM
67

Used to work as a bartender in a club and women in the club would essentially assault me on a weekly basis. Grab or smack my ass, arms etc. It definitely bothered me most of the time. Even when they were attractive I found it disrespectful because I knew if I ever did the same that the reaction would be very different.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 04:22 PM
12

Red pillers complain incessantly about women being dopey idiots that follow predictable patterns of behaviour, then they rush into this thread to basically admit that under their own ideology men are a bunch of dopey idiots that are just happy to fuck whatever is hot and attracted to them. I think it says more about the red pillers than their theory. As a chad I've been with NUMEROUS gorgeous women who wanted to be with me, and the sex paled to women who I had actual chemistry with that went bey…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 08:34 PM
11

You've never experienced chemistry and therefore it doesn't exist? What kind of argument is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 08:27 PM
2

Perhaps you'll benefit from knowing nurses have far higher divorce rates than doctors. However you seemed to have already experienced that. Maybe hold back from making sweeping generalizations about millions of people around the world based on your N of 50. https://hms.harvard.edu/news/doctors-divorce Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 04:36 PM
3

Are you a nurse? I'm a Canadian MD. Just wondering how you can possibly BS so much with such authority as to assume all doctors form a certain personality and make horrible spouses.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 04:30 PM
3

I don't think it's any revelation to anyone that men will sleep with women they wouldn't want to be seen with. I think you're trying to take the high-ground by pretending that men are dishonest about this. I don't care about any moral high-ground because I generally don't apply moral standards to evolutionary behaviour, the things men and women do en masse just are. The moral conservatism shown by red pillers is the moral high-ground, whereas generally the blue pillers will add the more social r…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 11:24 PM
17

And men commonly do this too. Behind closed doors some men might sleep with ugly women, but the reality is most young men don't want to be seen with a woman that is deemed less value. The problem is red pillers act like it's only women that do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/19 11:51 PM
2

The fact that 80% of wives who have weightloss surgery ditch their husbands is great evidence of this. That's fascinating for a host of reasons. Do you have a source for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/18 07:30 PM
5

The reality is virgins are the ones with happy marriages, not because they're religious nuts but because they're monogamous virgins when they successfully pair bond. How could you possibly know this if they never controlled for those factors? The only denialist here is you; you haven't put any second thought into what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 04:57 PM
2

Do you have sources for 2 & 4? I haven't seen many sources that report men being the majority in either situation. I've seen some that claim it is 50/50, I've seen some 60/40, and I've seen a lot argue women are overwhelmingly the victim.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:54 PM
3

In Canada women had the right to vote in 1918, non-land owning men had the right to vote in 1920.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:42 AM
2

I thought couchsurfing was used as a cheap form of hotels, staying in peoples places? What's this meet-up aspect of it?
/r/seduction22/11/14 06:46 PM
1

don't act upon those feelings and treat everybody with respect. Those feelings are the exact reason they are acted upon - an argument for free will doesn't exist in the confines of evolution and in fact is somewhat rooted out by it.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:46 PM
5

It will take even more time for evolution to remove many of the underlying feelings that are still associated with those behaviors even though the behaviors themselves are no longer a part of our society. This isn't how evolution works. Just because some behaviour is no longer advantageous doesn't mean evolution will "remove" it. In order for these vestigial structures of behaviour to go - they need to be selected out, and currently nothing is selecting to remove it.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:58 AM
9

Yeah I can't really support this. It's like replacing a baseless framework of thought with an archaic one that's just as baseless.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:05 PM
0

Very awesome indeed. My friend hired his girl friend as his secretary. That makes him a rapist then! The poster did not define the law properly. Or do they have to also calculate their birthdate, as the age difference is defined by 2x365 y difference? It would be seen from a 2x365 difference, not some magical barrier of registered age. You are aware of the difficulty for the male to verify if ID is valid and not fake? You are aware that most minors in the US have fake ID to get into bars and to …
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:08 AM
9

You've mixed this up. 12/14-17 "so long as the other person isn't in a position of authority over them (such as a boss, etc)" Applies. At age 18 the relationship is irrelevant. You can totally fuck your boss if you're 18 - it would be silly if you couldn't. Whether it's unethical business wise or how it's seen in a civil suit is a different case entirely, but it's not illegal by any means. There are of course exceptions when it comes to things like doctor-patient relationships - but these aren't…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:59 AM
20

It's a poll of only 1000 women on two very specific websites, nothing about this is scientific.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:47 PM
2

He got released from the Falcons a long time ago. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Banks_%28American_football%29) This link gets reposted every couple months.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 02:51 AM
3

So is there a happy ending in all of this?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:13 AM
0

There's plenty. Testosterone's effects have been studied for decades. Ignoring the evidence doesn't make you right.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:42 AM
0

What people are advised to do and what people actually do are way fucking different. How privileged are you that you think this is actually a common scenario? You sound like a rich white kid who needed a reason to do something in their spare time and took up feminism as a hobby. You're purposely ignorant.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:52 PM
0

I direct you to any psychology textbook ever with hosts of hundreds - thousands of studies done demonstrating that we are probably around 40% genetics and 40% our environment. Start with Personality Psychology: Domains of Knowledge About Human Nature (Larsen, Buss) Nobody accepts Tabula Rasa, it's crazy just how uneducated you are about this.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:51 PM
0

Imagine this very real scenario then. A man and woman, both working the same jobs, set aside 10% of their annual income for retirement. Assume 8% interest and 30 years of savings. BTW this is the least realistic scenario I've ever heard of.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:39 AM
0

There is essentially zero scientific evidence to support the notion that these sex biases in behavior are due to genetic differences between men and women Now I very much doubt you're a biology professor. There is GIGANTIC evidence that behavioral differences are due to genetic differences. Do you think the observable genetic differences in animals don't apply to humans? I'm sorry but you just lost all credibility. For example on another thread you said; "Much like standards of beauty are social…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:30 AM
0

But you seem to be suggesting that women, as a group, value money less than men. I don't see any good evidence for that. It's not as much that they value money less, that it is they realize they don't need to be the ones making it in order to have it. The bottom line is that you're attributing females who don't attempt to achieve highly in the employment hierarchy to some sort of discrimination - but the more obvious answer is that they don't even care to do so because women don't want to be in …
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:54 PM
3

I just took a criminal justice course this past year in which the professor - a PhD in sociology stated the 77 cents "fact". I'm not sure how you claim to have the ability to equally speak on the behalf of "Academic" feminists, as if they're some separate breed from the ones Christine and DavidByron are mentioning. I've seen multiple university lecturers state the exact stats addressed in the article, and I go to a very large university (50, 000+ enrollment) which is fully accredited and not a c…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:35 AM
3

No don't you get it? This is feminism's way of killing men! /s I'm glad this comment got voted to the top, I can recall not a few months ago where I was down voted for pointing out why childbirth was more important medically than heart disease.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter