TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Homemade_Guacamole Archive

View 5 posts and 34 comments by Homemade_Guacamole on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
63

Classic case of somebody naive getting sucked in by feminist rhetoric and not realising how genuinely dangerous these people are. Definitely. It's amazing how often it happens. What percentage of self-identified feminists do you reckon fall into the ranks of the hoodwinked? I disagree with you about the source of the problem, though. Politically left-leaning != Feminist. They've infected the left, but they are not synonymous. I think our blindspot is more for radical ideologies pushed by women. …
/r/MensRights06/09/18 01:37 PM
3

Ah shit, I hadn't seen that post before I responded here. You got me! Nice one. :)
/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:44 PM
8

I'm not sure how much I agree with your assertion that feminist countermemory (I appreciate the term) is collaboratively developed. It appears to be driven by quite a lot of top-down enforcement. For example, we see feminists gleefully correct even women's own interpretations of the world around them. It certainly is the case that lay-feminists can add to the cultural narrative - even in ways that become canon - but additions to it must follow a strictly-enforced heuristic (i.e., male oppressor,…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:45 AM
1

I think it's a bit overly simplistic to frame the political issue as one where Republicans won't work with us and Democrats will work against us. In truth, they both work against us - Democrats are just a bit more openly hostile to men as a group. Republicans are some of the biggest champions of 'law and order' policies that seek to make the criminal justice system even harsher. As you know, criminal justice reform is a huge men's issue. So, yeah, Democrats aren't for us, and to believe they are…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:57 PM
3

Edit: I know this isn't exactly what you're asking for, but it does get at reasons why there might be differential efforts to get elected to political office between the genders. I'm afraid I don't know of any proportional data regarding success rates in candidacy. Check this paper out. In case it's behind a paywall for you here is the APA-style citation. Coffe, H. (2013). Women stay local, men go national and global? Gender differences in political interest. Sex Roles, 69, 323-338. doi:10.1007/…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:02 PM
1

The rules outlined here are a move in the right direction. The administration also will explicitly allow schools to provide “supportive measures” to students who choose not to file a formal sexual- assault complaint. Does anybody know what that actually means? I get that it's vague, and that their real qualm is that these new guidelines make it harder for college women to exact the most severe punishment on those they accuse, but this should be somewhat of a silver lining to feminists. Right?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:23 AM
164

It's really amazing how consistently and predictably women are offered forgiveness and amnesty for their transgressions, and how easy it is often made for them to earn that forgiveness. This person is actually suggesting that Argento could not only rejoin, but become an important member of, the movement for the extremely low cost of acknowledging her own actions. What?
/r/MensRights30/08/18 03:57 PM
2

Thank you. It just struck such a nerve I couldn't not write about it. Plus, the only way to get better at writing is practice, so I don't regret taking the time.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 12:53 PM
1

Right, yes, that's exactly what I mean.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 04:52 AM
10

This makes me grind my teeth. It's universally acknowledged within the field that there is a huge gender disparity. Yet, when it comes time to fill out applications for graduate school - and I'm forced to write a section of my personal statement addressing my contribution to a program's diversity initiative - it would be suicide to actually point that fact out.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:35 AM
3

I really wish more academics would take up men's studies and present a different narrative than modern feminism. I have a theory about this, and I hope you will share your thoughts. I am on the long journey to becoming an academic myself, and I do not think I am alone in my desire to bring light and voice to men's issues. However, I must admit that the act of voicing that support publicly (and with my name attached to it) carries so much risk that I unfortunately don't think I can both get away …
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:26 PM
2

This article should be satire since it argues against his criticisms by providing great examples of them. Agreed. Middle class and white male are not synonyms and the connotation that they are is racist against people of colour; this idea tends to give credit to his notion that recently class has been traded for race. I know you're just stating Peterson's position here, but I want to take the opportunity to disagree with that position. I really think that Marxist notions of class struggle were r…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:25 PM
3

You're totally right. I guess I let myself call it just a leftist thing because it seems the bulk of bad press for people who give even slight attention to male issues comes from the left. But it is just a universal shitty, ideology-driven journalism thing.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:57 PM
15

I actually think Peterson's positions appeal to people just left of center who no longer feel like they are part of the left because it has gotten so extreme. I've got to say, that is exactly my position.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:56 PM
1

Yeah, you're right. That is fair.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:41 PM
17

But Peterson’s grand theory is brilliant as a political stance — one designed to weaponize the grievances of the kind of young men attracted to the alt-right. The joke is before this bit they actually summed up his political beliefs quite well which debunks all of their bullshit and then proceed to lie about him again. He's done plenty to combat the alt-right, far more than the left ever have who in my view and many others end up stoking the alt-right by treating white men especially with such b…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:32 PM
40

It is amazingly frustrating how everything becomes a zero-sum game. It's not enough for money, government assistance, and social awareness to get treated like scarce, non-renewable resources - we now have to treat empathy like there is only so much that can be doled out. Obviously that means it has to go to the groups feminists say it does. Only and always to those groups.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:26 PM
3

I agree that it is an oversimplification to assert that neo-Marxists are engaging in a conspiracy to shape the narrative, but I disagree with your point (or the point I think you're making) that Peterson does this. My impression of his ideas on this front is that neo-Marxists simply have a framework of understanding that they push for relentlessly. That means that legitimate grievances get caught up in the same sort of worldview as the more ridiculous notions, unfortunately meaning everything re…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:23 PM
4

Yeah, I hate that the types of critical journalism we get from the left often descends so far into hyperbole that it makes nuanced discussion impossible.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:14 PM
1

Yeah, fuck those guys! I'm out of fun -ists to add. :(
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:52 PM
3

Or the neurologists. Fuckin' zombies.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:51 PM
2

And those goddam nurse anesthetists.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 12:04 PM
1

I agree with you about plea deals. As far as I understand, they have only recently (since the 80s, I think?) taken hold of the judicial system, and I think the origin of their ascendence to common use was really born of a lack of resources within the judicial system. It's extortionary, but it's unfortunately a reality we need to live with and adjust to. I take your point about the relative assistance provided to poor men vs. poor women. It does seem like there is probably a spiral effect, as you…
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:05 AM
2

Thanks for pointing that out. All the sidenotes/footnotes have been there since I first published it.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 12:19 AM
1

Good point about the influence of socioeconomic status. Part of why I felt comfortable going on at length about the difference in racial demography between prison and society at large is because of the sorts of assertions we commonly hear from feminist groups (i.e., parity between specific environments and culture-wide demographics is the goal). Another reason was to make the case that racial prejudice in the criminal justice system is primarily a male issue. Do you think it's reasonable to gues…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:02 PM
1

You could be right, but I really hope not.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:45 PM
1

Oh, gotcha. I see now that I misread your quote. Either way, you're right that the punishment seems a little too lenient.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:49 AM
3

I'll give it to you that this isn't explicitly a move being made to promote men's rights. However, I do think it's important to note that there is some change Krasner will bring that could do a lot of good for men. Specifically reviving the Conviction Review Unit. I'm with you, though, I don't really feel comfortable with some of the sentence reductions he's trying to bring about. The article does mention that there will be some pushback from judges, so I suppose we'll see with time how the bala…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:33 AM
3

Yeah, I'm with you. I certainly don't agree with that policy about theft. Would the situation described in the article really only be charged as "retail theft"? I feel like there's got to be an added charge given the breaking and entering part.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:26 AM
1

I think I must have.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:46 PM
1

Care to share the list you found? As for a list of non-white privileges, I don't think this was the right place to ask.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:29 AM
2

I'm afraid your interpretation of the first sentence might be the result of an unfortunate copy-paste formatting error. I'm guessing that the word "Abstract" is the section header, but when copying and pasting the formatting got lost.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:36 PM
1

It seems like the people of Columbia (the police included) were able to push back against this.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:09 PM
49

Did anyone else notice this little gem? it's wrong to make a woman feel emasculated on what should be one of the most empowering days of her life [emphasis added] Lol. Edit: accidentally extra to's in the quote
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter