TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Honztastic Archive

View 2 posts and 489 comments by Honztastic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

When was Tobey last in a movie? Kirsten Dunst had/has a pretty successful career. If an actress were to complain about pay and probably have a point, she would be one of them.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/21 10:06 PM
41

A bunch of 5s telling a bunch of 2s that they're all 9s and 10s. Legbeard, female assholes that want an alpha male...that's totally submissive and wrapped around their finger. Lol
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 02:16 PM
3

But that's mansplaining!
/r/MensRights01/07/21 03:16 PM
20

It's not that, it's more expensive to execute someone than life in prison simply because of automatic appeals and court costs. Sentencing someone to death should not be flippant, quick, or easy. And we have executed innocents before.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/21 11:12 PM
1

Using an example as juxtaposition is the definition of comparison, my dude.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 07:02 PM
36

I dont respect sex work. AND I think the US economy is broken. I can have more than one opinion at a time.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 11:07 PM
32

I think theyre lying to themselves and to you about the empowerment so they dont have to feel bad about it in the moment.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 11:06 PM
75

I think its a mentally unhealthy pursuit, takes zero effort, and the people Ive known in real life that do it always lament being objectified and whine about male privilege despite them paying rent with pics of their butthole. But Im also kind of a dick. I cant say if people wanted to pay me for low effort sexual objectification, I cant say I wouldnt do that. Im more upset at the broken economic system that has forced more people to debase themselves to make rent.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 09:38 PM
61

I dont respect sex workers 🤷‍♂️
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/21 09:15 PM
1

....so that money is even more valuable than the US becayse they dont have crazy stupid debts theyre saddled with
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/21 08:20 PM
9

210 is enough to pay off student debt, medical debt, large credit card debt, buy a car outright, and downpay on a house. What the hell world are you living in? Yeah, 50,000/year is a million dollar after 20 years! 210,000 is still a lot of money
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/21 05:36 PM
1

That might have been the straw that broke the camela back, but come on. She got fired for her tweeting of multiple bigoted and offensive tweets, some outright and some dogwhistles.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 07:50 PM
2

Thats the implicit argument she was making. And....Lol WHAT? She wasnt fired for her tweets, yet she was fired for her tweets? Dude, you gotta pick a lane.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:08 PM
5

Self martyr comparisons to being a Jew in Nazi Germany for......being conservative? For knocking trans people? They are NOT THE SAME. And yeah, saying separating families at the border is wrong even if accompanied by an inaccruate picture are wildly different things from comparing being a conservative to being a Jew in Nazi Germany.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:19 PM
-18

Gina Carano is a bigot and spouted off nonsense on social media constantly. She willingly put herself out on social media, repeatedly in a way that messed with the bottom line of her employer. Lets not compare her to a a guy that actually opposed Nazis in Germany as a German. Come on dude.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 06:39 AM
-1

Im literally just asking for people vertebrae not to be crushed for 8 minutes, and not to be shot in my own home while sleeping. Maybe theres a fucking middle ground dude.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 06:33 AM
1

It sounded like multiple warrants out on the owner of the car. She had two different baggies of some type of drug, and a handgun. She was wrapped up in some shit, and knew it, and was going to go to jail and a lot more shit was going to stick to her afterwards depending on a search. She knew that. She went full adrenaline, fight or flight and made stupid decisions enabled by a cop being way too lax and not controlling the scene. He got shot for it. She died because of it. None of it needed to ha…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 06:31 AM
2

Not even close to the truth.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 06:26 AM
2

No they dont. Theyre more likely to be shot because they have more volume. But its just fat, but thats stored with blood. If they actually get shot in a vital area, it is WAY worse. Fat people usually have worse overall health, which translates to less ability to endure organ shock/damage on top of the higher difficulty in treating those areas.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 06:26 AM
1

No, police brutality is for crushing someones vertebrae and taking any talkback as an opportunity to escalate force. If you cant handle being called an asshole, dont be a cop. If you cant get called an asshole without using more force, dont be a cop. Tasing a non compliant, attempting to flee isnt abuse. Yelling 2 different orders before tasing someone inside of 3 seconds because they didnt kiss your ass is abuse. Pushing an old man to the ground, causing brain damage is abuse. Shooting a sleepi…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 06:23 AM
0

Being too lax, allowing her to act too freely is likely what led to the escalation and it getting out of hand. Had he got her to step to the back of the car and not allow her in the car, placing himself between her and the door, she wouldnt have been able to get in. Or, had he been in better shape, I bet he could have out ran and out pulled her. Her decisions and death are on her, but theres a lot of fault on the cop for bungling the stop all together that allowed it that far.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 06:18 AM
0

Really? Thats the only one? Come on dude.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 06:15 AM
0

I will only say that when adrenaline kicks in, you dont think rationally. And people do dumb shit in fight or flight mode. But if you pull a gun on a cop, youre probably getting shot whether youre in the right or the wrong. And resisting arrest after multiple drugs being found while acting evasive is definitely wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 06:15 AM
151

CHOKE SLAMMED THE HAM, FAMALAM
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/21 02:21 PM
54

Its not. Gender dysmorphia was a clinical diagnosed mental disorder that was unclassified for....? Transactivists are a small fraction of transpeople, also a very small fraction of the population. They are amplified on social media, and bully empathetic social people and drive wedges into other social movements. From what Ive seen, a bunch of unnattractive, marginalized people with mental health issues demanding sexual attraction from whichever chosen group they feel entitled to, using social me…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:27 AM
3

I had a great English teacher that addressed us before starting Huck Finn. "This book is about recognizing many parts of society through and 'innocent' view, and the ubfairness of slavery and racism. Jim is a vital character and moment to learn from within this book. But I will NOT tolerate the N word." That was the jist as we did some popcorn reading. I thought that was a great take. You can be mondernly offended by worda and portrayals, but take the lessons and view the context and mirror of s…
/r/MensRights16/02/21 02:47 PM
68

Take off the vest. You look like Aladdin
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/21 02:39 PM
1

This was great up until lile an bour in and he starts talking about climate change. Instantly loses ALL credibility. Read 200 books on it....and thinks its not as drastic or distinctly accelerated by mankind. The entire scientific community right now is saying it, proving it, and freaking out about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/20 04:05 AM
29

Guys, these are fake. Actor plants. Almost every kiss cam "funny thing" is fake, done by the team/franchise.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:47 PM
19

BANGING IS NOT A JOKE, JIM. Millions of people have sex every year
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/20 04:42 PM
32

Its...a disconnect between perception and body chemistry with brain structure/chemistry. It's a disorder at best.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/20 11:32 PM
61

...which is a mental disorder. But hey what do I know.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/20 10:31 PM
0

Trying to split this issue up 8n any way undermines the core push for reform on police forces in America. This is the exavt splintering that killed OWS. You may be right. But dying on that molehole will undercut any progress at all.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 02:31 AM
22

And the funny thing is, theyre doing this to protect Joe Biden because he has a very credible accusation of sexual assault. With supporting evidence on top of history of documented inappropriate behavior.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 05:30 PM
1

Oh yes you got us on a technicality! The Earth itself as a ball of rock will go on for billions of years. Too bad we mean the damn biosphere and life as we know it. If we roll over a certain end points food sources will collapse and agriculture will shift dramatically based on climate. Enough that there WILL be mass starvation and human movement. But yeah, I guess your point about a rock still being aroun makes more sense.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:32 PM
7

The people being falsely accused ARE the victims.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 08:44 PM
-1

Because this joke is aimed only at men. The fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights09/10/19 04:47 PM
60

Back in my day we told Negro jokes. Black kid just smiled, because it's just a joke. He was one of the good ones. See how it's fucked up when you frame it with a different demographic focus?
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:49 PM
26

No. Officers giving an unlawful order do not need to be obeyed. This would get thrown out super fucking fast. Now, you can debate and consider the expediency of just following the order or risking an authority complex bully arresting you and having to go fight a small ticket in court, etc But if you think it's worth the hastle, you would absolutely win.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 09:32 PM
4

Lol, I'd just take the wide angle chair. What a dumb fucking idea. Self selection by the chair user, indeterminate of sex, would immediately go for the wider, more comfortable sit.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:11 PM
23

I know that, but has she ever admitted that? There's the anecdote of challenging any top 100 male tennis player to a match and they got creamed by an older washed up guy. But every story and anecdote I've seen from the Williams is bad sports full of themselves.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:19 PM
14

Has she really stated that?
/r/MensRights02/06/19 03:09 PM
8

I'm getting sick of a housing bubble raising the cost of rent across the nation to be untenable for an entire generation, while simulatenously not raising real wages since the 1970s. And I'm sick of being called entitled to think a person working full time should be able to live in some fucking dignity
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/19 10:20 PM
5

you damn well know what you're implying with "he slept with kids". Considering that is a turn of phrase for sex. You're purposefully using it to convey or imply he sexually molested kids and now you're backing off when people call out that he was extorted and maligned for something he did not do based on the inappropriate relationships and behavior he had based on his traumatic upbringing screwing him up. Screw you, dude
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/19 08:01 PM
1

No. Not exactly at all. The government is an impediment to corporate power. That it has been coopted is not an argument for less government and regulation, but more and better regulations that further insulate against corruption from corporations. You have an ass backwards view. It's like a speeding car killing people on the sidewalk after hitting the curb and you blaming the curb instead of the speed of the car or driver.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 09:00 AM
1

It's been subjugated by companies. If you think libertarianism would fix the issues with uber powerful corporate interests and power, you're sniffing glue.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 09:53 PM
1

A strong government enforcing competent regulation of the corporations is necessary in the era of global companies and global markets. The problem is they already conpromised and coopted the government and regulatory bodies. The answer isn't "no government" in that scenario. Just that historically, legitimacy of a government is measured by its ability to successfully use force.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 09:17 AM
1

I never got it. There are a ton of girls only and coed scouting programs. You can start your own. What is the female fixation with infiltrating every single club that they're excluded from, despite it not being for them in the slightest? We don't have a toxic masculinity problem. We have a toxic femininity problem. It's ok for boys to be boys and men to be men, and it's okay to have a male only place to learn and teach masculine values.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:24 PM
19

Historically, it's about the only rule that has proven true. Mankind is a warlike animal, and culture clashes were won by those that could physically enact their policy and choices on others. Morally, it's not acceptable nowadays. It's been the basic defining feature of government and rulers since recorded history.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:25 AM
0

In any other time Kavanaugh would have already withdrawn out of basic decorum. Don't tie that political shitshow into this.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 05:39 AM
1

Really scrubbing and cleaning is tough. Most people just half ass it though.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 12:57 AM
14

They're bracketed tournaments, so it's the same amount of men and women.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 07:03 PM
59

This isn't a mens rights thing, this is a gatekeeping entitled douche thing. No one buys this bullshit except the other entitled stay at home moms that think their job is hard.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:54 PM
1

It's literally what you said. Then you denied it. Being "dismissed" by a delusional liar just means I won and you can't come up with an actual argument to counteract fact. So you ignore it. Nevermind the literal video of a drink spiking in action. "Dismissed" indeed. Lol.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 07:31 AM
1

He says there's no such thing as roofies or date rapes or spiked drinks and I literally linked a video of a guy spiking a drink. He's using fancy talk to sway the ignorant with a bullshit argument.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:49 PM
1

blind links It's literally what you said. Moron.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:08 PM
1

Fine. His argument is delusional nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:07 PM
2

A pill well known for lowering inhibitions and making people horny and suggestible? If only there was a term for that.... like "beverage plunking" or "social event molesting". Something along those lines.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:46 PM
2

It's not a blind video. Click it. Watch it. It's literally a guy spiking a drink. It is not zero. Hell, Bill Cosby spiked drinks with qualudes for years and that's on record. There's no magical untraceablex instant roofie. But to deny that drug spikes have ever happened makes you an idiot and delusional.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:45 PM
-3

https://youtu.be/Njb9OLxXXwg There's one right here. It's not widespread, it's not common. But it's not completely made up either.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:05 AM
1

If it is a nonexistent drug and a situation that never happens, what is this video of? https://youtu.be/Njb9OLxXXwg The prevalence of spiking drinks is probably way wrong from common (mis)conception. But it is somewhere in the range of >0 and <100. Saying it has never happen and doesn't happen is stupid and wrong. Saying every party is a roofie fest waiting to drug and rape any girl that enters is also ludicrous.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:03 AM
0

I find the usernmae "bigtfatty" to be a hate symbol and representing hate. So I know have clearance to beat you up. See how stupid and dangerous that logic is?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/18 06:13 PM
3

"Trans-people are born that way." "Gender is a social construct" Pick one.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/18 04:33 PM
1

Send me your address then.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/18 02:37 AM
1

Maybe I'll punch you in the head, since you definitely need a lesson.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/18 09:23 PM
0

Maybe you'd realize physical violence shouldn't be a good metric of "teaching lessons".
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/18 04:04 AM
0

So if I punched you in the head, would it be a lesson?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/18 11:20 PM
-2

If it's cool for the police to retaliate, then it comes down to the judgment of an emotionally reactive officer on what is worthy of retaliation. A slap? Mouthing off? Not complying fast enough? Civil disobedience? Being Black in the wrong area? How many fucking incidences of police abuse do you have to see before this gets through your skull?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/18 09:31 PM
1

Then they are wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/18 09:28 PM
15

If you can't deal with this kind of stuff, you shouldn't be a cop then.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/18 06:43 PM
105

A cop that retaliates in anger is not a good cop.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/18 05:37 PM
22

Displaying it to this degree is illegal most places and in poor taste. It's good to be happy with your body. But inappropriate behavior is inappropriate. We need to bring back some damn shame to society.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 09:39 AM
1

He's not a douche for his beliefs. He's a douche for deliberately choosing to overwhelm layman witg facts and figures to strong arm his belief against strawmen and presenting it as a "fair" debate and the totally false "I'm just asking questions" crap. I believe a lot of his "change my mind" beliefs. I agree with him. But he's a douche in how he goes about it. I also think it's funny how he riles people up, deliberately with those views. But let's not be niave on how he's going about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/18 10:40 PM
4

Not really. Just people om their way back from class. He specifically remembered studies to bulldoze any common points that would be brought up. If it was an actual, prepared debate, I'd give him more credit. As it is, he's the Harvard douche in the bar from Good Will Hunting.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/18 06:10 PM
1

Same lineup, telling the same set for multiple nights. Only way to test it.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/18 07:50 AM
1

More a Bort fan, myself.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/18 07:47 AM
1

Eh, he's an ass. Preparing for a debate by taking notes and memorizing studies to drop stats on unprepared people doesn't make them stupid or his viewpoint correct. And then the smug "hey, I'm just trying to talk about an issue" is disingenuous. I appreciate the troll factor because it's hilarious watching people have meltdowns when their bs is exposed. But if a smart person that even had a few references and studies to back up their point, I think the dude would get flustered and angry. And I s…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/18 07:46 AM
9

"If" She's a definitive example of the term. And yet, people still try and defend the character. I have linked the definition, and written breakdowns of her accomplishments and "failures" compared to Luke and Anakin so many damn times...
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:32 AM
11

I wouldn't go that far. He looks cool, stands out, and does establish an aura of danger and mystery very well on very limited screen time in ESB. But he goes out like a punk in RotJ. He also is a known quantity in the universe. He didn't become the "best" bounty hunter 2 days after learning of the trade. Aside from the ridiculous blaming of mra, aside from online harassment which is not okay, people arw so oddly set on defending TLJ. The whole star wars sub has basically been in a civil war sinc…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:29 AM
1

If you can't do that, then you shouldn't be a cop.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/18 08:56 PM
1

This was not a reasonable level of force though.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/18 08:55 PM
0

And the threat of violence is lesd than the accidental deaths in a bunch pf other industries. If you can't react with the responsibility due of being an leo, you shouldn't be one. This bogeyman of violence that doesn't really exist is a literal cop out for shitty cops and the people excusing their behavior and conduct. If you're constantly interacting with felons amd dangerous people all day, everyday, and you're still more likely to be killed by a tree...youre full of crap.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/18 09:13 PM
-5

It's more dangerous being a damn logger. Give me a break.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/18 08:41 PM
7

When their job isn't being a cop. The job has a level of authority and responsibility that requires being better than "a normal person".
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/18 07:43 PM
3

Thanks. Oh I'm more than familiar with the self-referential circle of bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:56 AM
1

Thanks, I'll give it a look
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:55 AM
6

Yeah, they specifically said 1 in 4. When I googled it all the first stuff I see says 1 in 5. Is it rape? Is it sexual assault? So is this grouping vaginal rape in the same group as a whistle/catcall? And I frankly just don't trust most of the articles I'm seeing. Can't seem to find where the figure came from, and so can't even check its methodology.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:52 AM
1

In my experience, most problems are problems because the woman has an issue with something where the guy is content to let it go. If you don't agree with that, fine. Live your own life and have your own relationships.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:29 AM
23

I had some somewhat cynical advice from some older men in ny family. A relationship is about finding a woman you love and just hanging on for the ride. It seems to me that aside from a scant few truly remarkable soul mate connections, relationships for men are dealing with the neurosis of a woman. You can be happy and enjoy each other 90% of the time, but the problems usually boil down to some imagined emotional issue that she has. If you think that's different, that's fine. Just my personal obs…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:50 PM
1

That's why I pointed out that it wasn't looking at queen bees correctly.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 08:07 PM
65

There was a link on science a few weeks ago that was pushing that "queen bees" in the workplace are a myth. Of female managers, the study seemed to show they helped along and treated women lower level employees well. Can't speak to the methodology, but a queen bee isn't the manager. They're the mid and lower level employees that don't want anyone to advance beyond them. I felt like I was taking crazy pills. Did no one in that study actually know what a queen bee was? I got downvoted like crazy f…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 03:58 PM
17

It's a picture source with blatant evidence. What more could they want out of a primary source?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:46 AM
1

What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights04/04/18 04:57 AM
1

Lol thinkprogress is not the legal authority on police off duty or on, or the nature of civilian arrest. If your stupid ass reasoning is really trying to claim every cop is a rapist because of the power they have ON THE JOB as a leo, you're just crazy. An officer is not compelling the free association of friends or romantic interests with them simply from the nature of their job.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:21 AM
19

Depends on the state. Probably can't drag a non threatening person from your vehicle. But stand your ground laws absokutely apply to yourself and car with you in it. Otherwise carjackers would just be "hah loophole, you can't fight back!"
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/18 08:04 AM
1

That is absolutely false. You're just arguing for civilian arrest at this point.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 04:49 AM
2

While I agree that "bullying" is a convenient explanation to sweep the troubling causes of school shootings under the rug, fuck that stupid entitlement crap.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 06:17 PM
1

And when they aren't on the clock, they aren't an officer holding power over a private citizen freely associating ot not with them. Quit being purposefully obtuse.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:05 AM
1

If they're in custody, they are free to associate and they don't hold power over them. You're lazy and delusional.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:40 PM
1

"No but you are". You really are lazy, jesus. Social position doesn't mean shit. Police officers fucking their inmates is not okay, numbnuts. No one is advocating that. A gold digger is not be preyed on. A student and teacher is inappropriate. You're purposefully being obtuse, and you aren't even good at it. You must be one of those crazies that think all sex is rape, unless they compare their paychecks and societal standing so neither holds imaginary power over the other that they don't in a fr…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:12 AM
1

Are they in a professional relationship? Does she work for him? Is he promising career advancement for sex? Come on. This is lazy.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 10:20 PM
1

Someone who abuses their position of authority and influence to have sex.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 04:09 AM
-3

Then she's arguing the wrong point of constitutionality if that's the case. Regardless of the law, she is a predator.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 10:24 PM
4

You might be right with that example, but that would be unconstitutional on its face. The first scenario you describe. She is arguing as applied. And yet she is a teacher, which means she had authority over students in her classroom or not. So while their is a legal loophole there, it doesn't apply to her. IANAL, but agreed?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:22 PM
16

Political spectrum is closer to a ring or horseshoe. Far right wing and far left wing operate the same way.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 05:53 PM
2

In much of the country it is absolutely necessary to have a car to hold a job.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:56 AM
2

Car insurance is not a choice. It is mandatory in large swaths of the country.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:34 AM
148

That women that took like 4 hours of video walking around New York really was an eye opener. She had to walk around the bad parts, and equated people saying hello as harassment. Like seriously.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 09:38 PM
2

Attractiveness means fuck all in this. It was about sex for some, not power.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/18 01:59 PM
3

Except countries that legalized prostitution saw a decrease in sexual assaults and rapes. So that's not true at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/18 03:17 AM
0

Lol are you serious?
/r/MensRights21/12/17 06:50 AM
5

Yawn.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:00 AM
11

So all leftists are defined by a rapist narcissist? Republicans just nominated a pedophile to the Senate. Shut up. Both sides have terrible people.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 04:16 AM
3

She should resign from her job. But so should he.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:45 PM
1

Lol, the biggest Hollywood vixtims coming forward recently have been men. Terry Crews, Anthony Rapp, Corey Feldmen.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:10 AM
8

I mean a large part of the book is the inner violence inherent in man. Not men, man as in mankind. That include women.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:17 PM
6

It did. You're arguing semantics fpr the sake of arguing.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 09:33 PM
8

And I covered that point in the distinction of deciding which crime it is. But there is no contextual influence that matters after the specific crime is settled upon. It's murder or not. If it's not, it's manslaughter or not. If it's not, it's justifiable homicide or self-defense. The context of one's life or struggles or whatever dpes not matter in the slightest. What crime was committed? Are they competent to stand trial amd understood their actions? Are they guilty? That's what matters.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 06:09 PM
2

The abusive aspect is indicental to the act, it doesn't explain motive in all cases. Maybe a few, but saying "rape is about power and not sex" is kind of stupid, as I tried to show with my example.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 06:01 PM
3

So you think people fuck goats and chickens and dogs and pigs and horses for the power trip? Everyone assumes it's because they're horny and can't find a human to bury their dong in. But as soon as it's people, it's all about power?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 04:01 PM
12

Lol, justice absolutely is supposed to ignore context. Theft is theft. Murder is murder. It doesn't who it was, against whomever. The only thing contextually that matters is deciding which crime it was. Context matters for whether it was murder 1 or manslaughtet, not whether or not they are guilty of that crime. There's literally an old saying for it: "justice is blind". What a dumbass.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 03:34 AM
12

Well who needs a degree to earn a good-paying job when you're going to get a HUGE lawsuit payout.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 07:17 AM
13

"Survivor" of cyber violence. Literally celebrating not killing themselves over words. So brave.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 03:35 AM
1

I'm sure they retroactively put that the day the guy decided to get paternity and accounted for the time in court or any stalling by the mother....
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:43 PM
5

She has to show she didn't have herpes before they had sex.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 07:18 AM
5

It was a fucking plea deal. It wasn't a surprise she was getting 20 years. Is she that fucking stupid to be surprised and horrified at what she agreed to?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/17 05:09 PM
0

Ha, sure. Act aloof. Like you don't care. We both know you do. And you trying to claim reasonable moral highground this late is bullshit. All it shows is I'm right.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:40 AM
0

Ha, sure. Act aloof. Like you don't care. We both know you do. And you trying to claim reasonable moral highground this late is bullshit. All it shows is I'm right.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:17 PM
1

I in no way referencw it as WW2. I ignired your comment because it, like everything else you've said, is horrendously wrong. Again, HAVE YOU EVEN SEEN THE MOVIE? I specifically outlined all the ways she is vital to the plot, both in moving it along and resolving every issue. If you are too stupid to comprehend English, that's your problem.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:08 AM
3

Nothing is ever good enough for these people. Ever. You concede one demand, three more pop up and you didn't do the first one right.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 06:13 AM
0

How is you being fucking dumb enough to call it WW2, make it my words? You made a dumbass claim. I outlined the actions in the film. Literally nothing you have said is correct. Again, HAVE YOU EVEN WATCHED THE MOVIE?
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:51 PM
0

Where did I say they were fighting ww2? The fuck are you talking about? The general was going to make a gas attack to continue/win the war. That is the loaded bomber. He did a trial of the gas on german command. The village was unnecessary to his plans. It was done only after the village was liberated. Again, DID YOU EVEN WATCH THE FUCKING MOVIE?
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:29 PM
0

I have. I did. You're repeating the same stupid shit that shows you didn't watch the film or fundamentally don't understand plot.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:21 PM
0

She specifically is vital to his mission. She also accomplishes much more. She is necessary for every encounter except the gala. You either didn't watch the movie or you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 07:29 PM
8

There night actually be validity to arguing that a woman ruler would act purposefully aggressive and martial to quell any notions of her being weak for being a woman. Which is an easy "blame the patriarchy" excuse for any feminists that take issue woth women rulers being more responsible for war. But like all history, it is NEVER that simple. It'd be more worthwhile to examine the cause of each war and assign blame if started for shallow reasons or if a morally righteous war with deep, justified…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:14 AM
1

Considering the two Germans he was most directly influencing were going to continue the war despite the armstice, yeah, she actually did. Again, you have either not watched the movie, or you're an idiot. Get over your "righteous anger" at a woman being important in a movie for a second and try to understand what you watched. Because you clearly didn't. Steve made a noble sacrifice that saved lives and helped the war end by not shredding an armstice. Mankind conrinues to be capable of great and t…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:08 AM
1

The god is the underlying cause of thr war and it's destructive nature. Steve took out a symptom. WW took out the cause. It requires some critical thinking, but you can do it.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:35 PM
1

Unnecessary? I suppose someone else was going to fight a God and end his influence of pushing humanity into war? Or even on a more local scale, I guess someone else was going to destroy that garrison and cross no mans land. Come on, did you even watch it?
/r/MensRights06/06/17 06:03 AM
27

Which against site policy. But the admins are the same sjw dumbasses, so they only enforce the rules against stuff they don't like.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/17 11:43 PM
10

I liked the part on the problematic interpretation of diverse women into a unified feminist reality. The feminist view inaccessible to men is actually fractured among women. Young women, old women, Black women, gay women, etc. But all men are the same and incapable of having unique views of reality through their lived experience? Quite the inconsistency, eh Sandra? It comes off as a giant conspiracy of bullshit amd subterfuge to get men to listen to their feelings. For what damned purpose?
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:15 AM
6

So "he tried to seduce me" is just the female "they were asking for it".
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/17 05:41 AM
1

And we're all talking about ONE of them. If they're different as you just said, then why are you bringing up a different individual with a different age and circumstances that isn't comparable? Are you actually retarded or just trolling?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 12:15 AM
2

You just made the comparison not two comments ago. And if they aren't the same, WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU BRINGING UP A NON APPLICABLE SITUATION TO WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT? And then a bunch of lazy ad hominems to try and distract from the the shitty argument you made now that you've been called out and pushed into an indefensible position.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 10:00 PM
2

It's two different people with different ages and different rights. How are you stupid enough to claim they're the same?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 07:07 PM
2

Ha so two completely different people in different scenarios are the same now? And us all talking about one while you try to apply the opposite to that situation is the same? You're a fucking moron, sea-lioning douche.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/17 07:02 PM
11

Damn it, not every asshole is mentally ill. Being a bitch is not a medical disorder.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/17 02:29 PM
3

Because your dialog is sealioning bullshit. No one is talking about what you're talking about. If someone claims "Damn, I think rapists should go to prison" and you ask in the name of opening a discussion or just posing a question say "yeah, but how do you feel about tax fraud?" It has no damn bearing on whay we're talking about.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/17 05:19 AM
1

What he "deserves" does not enter into the equation. If he is illegal, he does not get to stay here or use American taxpayer money for whatever.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 09:31 PM
1

But illegal immigrants do not have a right to remain in the country or gain education at the cost of taxpayers. Especially once they're 18.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 09:29 PM
30

What does someone else have to do with the one illegal we ARE talking about?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 06:31 AM
198

He's an illegal immigrant and an adult. He isn't entitled to an American education in an school funded by American taxpayers.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 04:06 AM
18

And yet he supports this list, but it does not help victims. It hurts victims and creates more. It is Stockholm syndrome
/r/MensRights04/05/17 03:48 AM
971

Did you just assume her citrus?!
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/17 08:05 AM
2

Nope. Being a bitch isn't a mental illness.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 09:18 PM
216

I was really hoping they would just start kissing while she ranted to set her off even more.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 06:24 AM
212

Nothing been in that blowhole for a long while...
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 06:23 AM
6

Finally a mod of a sub making the right calls.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 06:22 AM
8

Without ctoss examination, I dount that evidence eill be admissable. You testify, or you don't. You don't get to assert your story without having it picked apart.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:48 PM
1

I can call myself the King of England. Doesn't make it true.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:27 AM
4

Then they aren't fraternities, as it would be a misnomer for a co-ed social group or order.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:20 AM
9

Fat? He's just cultivating mass, bro.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/17 11:27 AM
33

I would bet whoever wrote it meant fighting for equality is a job men need to do as well, not just females. That might be projection and wrong. But just a guess. I pick up on a lot of "men need to fight for female empowerment/superiority too!"
/r/MensRights17/02/17 02:20 AM
9

That's fucked. You're in the right, we all know it. Good luck, stand strong. Whatever. Those bitches won't win.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 06:56 AM
6

Doesn't matter. Words are not justification for physical violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 07:55 PM
1

About firefighters. That may work for general policing. But to think a "woman's perspective" or something is needed in firefighting is absurd.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 06:30 AM
1

Are you being serious?
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:32 AM
16

Who gives a shit?
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:33 PM
5

They haven't been barred. They didn't apply for the job. And then they didn't get it because women physically aren't as capable as men on average. There's always that big hoss of a woman hanging tough in "Man's world" but that's because she physically can where most can't. You're arguing a false stance with flawed reasoning. All this stuff has been stastically shown in studies, and you're in a sub where no one is going to buy this crap.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/16 08:53 PM
-2

I disagree with the hardline stance on circumcision. I'm pretty sure there a lot more serious issues that people already are open to discussion and how messed up they are. Circumcision isn't just a fight against unfair laws that rational people agree need to be changed. It's a fight against perception over a deeply personal thing that provokes syrong defensive arguing. It's wasting time, focus, and resources on a losing battle on fucking pr. Not even actually changing anything. It makes mras loo…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:00 AM
33

As is privilege. It is NEVER used constructively, only to shame and quiet and dismiss another's arguments.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:56 PM
8

Now what about all the other studies that got posted? Quit talking out your ass
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/16 12:09 AM
7

Your anecdotal observations do not trump statistical polling.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/16 08:50 PM
6

Dude, just shut up. You're being a raging douche to anyone and everyone that you disagree with.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/16 08:48 PM
62

He's probably referring to the polls of large numbers of the Muslum populace in countries like Saudi Arabia and Egypt that have clear majorities favoring things like stoning women to death for adutlery, it's ok to kill someone for leaving Islam, and eliminating the Jews. Which is far more compelling than the Muslims you know anecdotally not admitting that to you. Feel free to Google it
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/16 03:50 PM
29

Women get upset when they aren't part of the "boy's club" or being treated like one of the guys. Then they are, and get offended because they get treated like one of the guys.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:41 PM
46

Not to mention it's just extinction. They are killing all men, they're killing all future men AND women. Except for the tiny number of those crazy in vitro things where they converted an egg to sperm. But they're just angry, bitter nobodies. Probably angry because they hate thselve because they're fat or ugly or got cheated on once. It's like the redpill. But redpill seems to hate women, but refocus that on how to better themselves through aloof alpha behavior, srs externalizes all problems into…
/r/MensRights11/08/16 08:38 PM
33

She repeatedly came back to get in his face multiple times. While he was standing immediately beside or seated in his vehicle. All the confrontation and escalation was from her. Until Mr. Dipshit decided to attack their car when it's a 2 on 1 situation for him.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/16 06:47 AM
18

Saving Private Ryan is his biggest, most successful and critically acclaimed movie. If you were to pick a single movie as the best of his career, it's probably this. Philadelphia is critically acclaimed but without the box office success or as big a cultural impact. Cloud Atlas isn't even top 5. Maybe even top 10 of his movies.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:49 AM
68

Notice how she left out his biggest movie: Saving Private Ryan. You know. About men fighting and dying.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 05:35 AM
5

AND had a strong female co lead. AND the criminal boss was a strong female. Basically females in shitty movies blame the patriarchy instead of admitting they're in a shitty movie or are a shitty actor.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 12:04 AM
-11

I agree with that, as a Sanders supporter. But where does this idea that you are free to assemble and speak without anyone else being able to do the same with you? I mean disruption is a dick move, but you can't say "I have a right to free speech in this zone, but you don't. I can assemble here, but you can't." You are not free from disruption of other citizens, only from government interference or censure. That all being said, if you're going to protest, you do it outside and make it a bitch an…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 05:53 AM
2

Well you're wrong, but whatever.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:41 PM
3

Ever notice how any person that states their experience and views after living as both genders says feminism is utterly full of shit and this privilege crap is just a total bunch of bullshit? Because I have.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:17 AM
13

Did you not watch the fucking video? His little dog is being chased around by the German Shepherd that is barking. Even it's playing, it's much more aggressive than we see it being earlier in the clip. It's still a big dog, his is still small. And when he goes to try and pick up his dog this bitch comes over to start shit. You're delusional.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/15 03:23 AM
183

I liked when he point out that she switched to "social problem" because she lost the "economic problem" argument and had no way to combat what he said. Then I liked how he threw her own statement in her face. "Yeah, women graduate from college 2-1 to men, and with better degrees, and get hired more. How are they oppressed again?" Complete disconnect from reality in that feminist bullshit logic.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/15 06:20 AM
2

Judge Judy does not pay out damages or fees or anything like that. When you go on those shows, you agree to binding arbitration. They probably pay you for appearing on the show. But you are still paying whatever the ruling is with your money, even if it now includes the fee. And I doubt that they pay all the litigants as much or more than what they're on "trial" for. Here's 200 bucks and you get to be on tv. But you have to pay the ruling, and also you look like a complete fool in front of milli…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/15 10:51 AM
-21

Honestly, it just looks like an incredibly drunk person on their own being constantly fucked with by a shit ton of people. What do you really expect egging on a drunk? Them to just sit their quietly? It doesn't matter if you are drunk, your consequences have actions. But it took like 10 loud, obnoxious assholes committed effort to stay in her way, and keep annoying her to the point of being a dumb drunk bitch throwing lazy punches to allow someone to justify themselves in hitting her. Where was …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/15 09:43 AM
2

Don't use cis. It's a made up bullshit term to try and otherize the norm, which is being heterosexual. Nothing wrong with not being heterosexual, but to pretend it's not the norm is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:45 AM
1

I do, because I read the article. There are direct quotes from the barber guy saying those exact things. READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE. And once again, you'd be an idiot not to follow that route, because it has proven successful. So what you would or wouldn't do doesn't matter. It's like saying you wouldn't throw to a slot receiver if you were the QB, just after that QB wins the game with a TD pass to the slot receiver. It doesn't fucking matter what you think or how you would have done it.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 06:47 PM
5

You didn't read the article did you? They're allowed to enter, not to stay. They have significant sales from women paying. And because of that, nothing else you say has any merit to it. You simply don't know what you're talking about and are being contrary for the sake of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 09:01 AM
7

Dude, no. "Look I'm banning this demographic." They don't use his business, no lost money. It reinforces the image of what he's going for, while appealing to his key demographic. "This a man's place." It drums up "controversy" in that he is in the news, being talked about, attracting business by reinforcing 2. And the only people he's really pissing off are tumblr feminists. Being opposed by a group that universally scoffed (in that it's only taken seriously by the extremist vocal minority of th…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 07:50 AM
11

Because it's obviously a very successful business tactic...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 07:22 AM
14

Then you'd be dumb. Look at the business it's generated. He's getting talked about and putting himself on dudes' radar.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 06:23 AM
63

Bill Burr has a bit on this. Women, for whatever reason, have to get into any clubs. It doesn't matter that they have no fucking interest in whatever it is, if they're told they can't be in it they go fucking nuts. And men automatically exclude themselves from "girl's club" situations. We don't want to go into your hair salon and listen to chat about whatever fucking happened on the view. But as soon as some guys decide they want to talk about sports or something, but without any women around, s…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 06:23 AM
1

I think it's completely stupid. If you don't want to be ashamed, quit acting in ways that make you ashamed. No one can make you feel guilty or ashamed unless you agree with them. If someone tried to make me feel ashamed about my behavior and it was normal, I'd just laugh or blow them off. They're completely stupid and a means of girls trying to not feel bad about behavior they might should feel bad about. Quit trying to police other people's behavior and perceptions. Worry about how you feel abo…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 06:30 AM
1

I don't know. It's all completely made up with no basis in reality. Of course, because Disney doesn't put hints about dicks in their movies. But yeah. John Smith is circumcised "because he's American" even though he's English. And other English characters aren't. For whatever reason. It's just pure clickbait crap.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 08:31 AM
2

I just googled it. But I don't really want to link directly to it, so they don't get the views. If someone else had a mirror maybe...
/r/MensRights19/08/14 06:55 AM
8

Oh, and if anyone was curious. It's also racist. The only black prince is given an extremely long penis, almost as a joke. Some are small, some are big. But they give the black guy one that hangs down out of frame.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:39 AM
3

It means it gets a lot of play on the internet. It's popular. It's not just an extremist minority of feminists. But then again, it does a lot of clickbait bullshit as well.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:34 AM
1

Except he was actually married at the time. Do those studies take that into account or is it newly single, newly divorced men? They are not pointing to a divorce ten years ago being the cause of depression and suicide.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:29 AM
0

His ass.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:28 AM
1

And unbanned very quickly. I got it for reporting too many of OneBigCosmicDouchebag's comments. He was literally following the thread and repeatedly accusing users of being fake or brigaders simply for not cheering "Rah, rah! Let's co-opt a beloved famous person's death for our agenda! It can't possibly backfire, be insensitive, or be completely baseless and bullshit!" And with no proof about any brigading. At least insofar as accusing me of it. And frankly, in the 5-10 minutes to wait for a mod…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:27 AM
1

If I have to spell out literally everything, and how and why this is a bad idea, there's no discussion to be had anyway. There's trying to explain something to a brick wall. Don't couch this in "oh you're unreasonable for not discussing this issue". You're refusing to believe an inherently wrong thing is wrong. You're telling me to explain how 2+2=4 and getting upset when I keep counting to 4. It is UNFOUNDED. He had issues long before marital troubles. You're saying the cause came before the ef…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:53 PM
2

To consider, yes. But not to just throw out as fact. Especially since he obviously had issues going back DECADES before the divorces. Trying to co-opt his death so baselessly and so soon after his death to push an agenda will create backlash. It's transparent and people will see that it's crap.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:44 PM
2

I'm not saying don't discuss alimony. I'm not saying don't discuss male suicide. I'm not saying don't discuss the link between divorce and suicide in men. I'm saying don't blatantly try to co-opt a famous death to push those issues. It's transparent, it's unfounded. And it will piss people off. It will do less good than bringing up those issues sans Robin Williams. And I say all this clearly in my very first comment in this post.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:10 PM
-2

HOLY SHIT! The Spanish blew up the USS Maine! We better go to war.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:58 AM
0

Because pointing out that we don't know what made a man with a documented history of alcohol and drug abuse kill himself when he did it by himself, apparently with no note or anything means SRS is brigading...
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:55 AM
-6

It's like saying a drunk driver that failed to signal a turn was killed by blinkers. It's dumb.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:51 AM
1

That's pretty much exactly what the title suggests, and what OP pretty much said in her first round of defensive comments when ALL the original comments were reacting negatively to the title, the article, and then the Op's replies. Apparently there's been some influx of users here recently, and now some asshat is accusing everyone he disagrees with of being a brigader. It's not like random submissions from random subs show up in the general feed and bring users from other places sometimes /s Whi…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:49 AM
-2

Because I've been here 5 fucking years and have THOUSANDS of comments. Fucking check it dude. The last one I remember posting in this sub specifically was about pushing anti-male circumcision. I think that's one of the least important issues MRM should be pushing, and there was a flood of anti-male circumcision posts. I have commented on numerous false rape claim posts. I post advocating thinking more about rape claims and how the "rape culture" is feminist nonsense bullshit in other subs when I…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:40 AM
-3

It's not related to this sub, is the point. It's tangential at best. His suicide is the result of something we don't know of, compounded by some obviously deep-seated mental (I hesitate to say issue) that he had for a long, long time as evidenced by his alcohol and drug use. It's stretching at best to make the claim of "ALIMONY KILLED WILLIAMS" with very little upside in changing anything about alimony law or people's minds, but has HUGE potential in pissing people off by blatantly trying to ben…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:35 AM
-4

Again, I'm hostile to bad ideas that will hurt the MRM more then they will help. You're just a paranoid user seeing anti-whatevers behind every person with an opinion counter to your own. And you're really, really set on finding and cataloging every comment in this thread you don't like and calling them brigaders it looks like. That seems a lot more hostile to this sub than just a differing opinion.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:29 AM
-5

I'm not part of any brigade you dumbass. Maybe a lot of people on this sub just realize this a stupid fucking idea? 3 people means a brigade? 2 similar comments covering the whole spectrum of "this is a bad idea" and the fact that Robin Williams struggled with drugs and alcohol for a very long time mean that they're the same person. I'm pretty sure you're the fucking brigader idiot, trying to shore up whatever weirdly specific pro-use Robin Williams as a poster boy with no cause group you're a p…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:25 AM
1

Um, I post in mensrights occasionally. When I feel like I need to. Go mine the depths of my comment history if you want. It's not hard to see I'm a 5 year user. If you're really trying to make up bullshit "all the users saying this is stupid and bad are one person!" maybe you need to think harder about your idea. ANd namely that it IS stupid. HA, and literally as you post this, the user is not found. Which makes me think you made that user up, or made it and deleted in some kind of weird, overly…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:16 AM
-16

That's all good and evidenced and whatever. But Robin Williams is not a vehicle to push this agenda. No one but a very small minority will see that. By pushing this, you will ONLY piss off a huge amount of people for so blatantly trying to coopt the emotional reaction to a beloved person's death. Just because a statistically significant amount of suicides come from divorce, not alimony, does not mean Robin Williams did so because of it. Especially considering his apparent deep-seated issues go b…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:26 AM
-13

And so is not unique as the cause, and isn't the cause, of his suicide. And is completely and utterly tasteless to bring up as the cause. And besides that, I'm spelling out that this will not do anything for anyone fighting alimony. This bullshit has a very REAL chance at pissing a lot of people off at the MRM because a few idiots don't have tact or know when to pick battles. There is an extremely long shot at this making some people think harder about alimony. There a very easy chance at pissin…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:20 AM
-10

That is the first and only thing suggested in meaning by your title.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:28 AM
15

It's not like his struggles with alcoholism and drugs go back decades at all...you know, pretty much showing that his mental health issues and emotional demons go back far longer than any alimony. When you hit a low, you hit a low. Anything can trigger it. Just a boring day where your friend didn't text back quick enough or something. Fuck anyone trying to commandeer this for their own stupid agenda.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:27 AM
0

Uhhhh, fucking what? Please don't piggyback bullshit onto this. Robin Williams was a seemingly universally beloved person, whose death resonates deeply with huge groups of people. He committed suicide. I can't say from what or why, but he obviously had some serious demons he struggled with. And considering his past drug/alcohol use, those were deeply seated emotions or problems. Which makes it all the sadder for the millions he brought joy to. He did not kill himself over alimony. Do not piggyba…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:24 AM
3

Not true genetically, sure. But politically, socially and in the framework of law we are all equal. Supposedly. That is what was intended and meant to happen. It's since been warped all out of shape.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:06 AM
7

This is the exact type of equality that is meant with the twin calls of "liberty and equality" in the founding of US political theory during the revolution. Two terms that are actually almost opposed. The equality is not equality of outcome. That's communism's ideal. Equality of chance. The promise of everyone getting a fair shot. No landed gentry or class of nobles with born advantage and forced deference to them for nothing. We are all born as equals. You are free to choose your own path and s…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 09:23 AM
5

It's been on track since the 70's at least. Jimmy Carter was completely right in telling Americans to basically buckle down, be smarter, work harder. You have to give up easy things in hard times. But no one wanted to hear that then, and a 2-3 whole generations have been raised without the ability to comprehend that message.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 09:19 AM
2

"We want in your boy's clubs and be treated as an equal in every way!" "Your boy's clubs are wrong and I don't like how you treat your equals, change all your behavior to make me feel better!" That shit is annoying. Either you get special treatment and you fucking admit men and women are different and that you're a weaker sex that is too delicate for such language and behavior, or you get fake harassed and called names like how guys treat all their other male friends. Make up your fucking mind i…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 09:16 AM
0

Because I bet that's not what he did. I've known a few instances of people breaking something and saying "I barely touched it!"
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:40 PM
-1

That fact that they're wildly different in structure, makeup, mechanics, natural function does though. I don't give a fuck that vaginas are on girls. They are wholly and completely distinct and literally incomparable to the foreskin because they are vastly different in the way they work on/in the body. Their maintenance is wholly distinct and separate. No you don't shove a brush up a vagina and scrub away. But you do gently clean under the foreskin as much as exposed when pulling back until resi…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:44 AM
0

According to some bullshit quote out of context you pulled up on the internet, maybe. The vagina is an entire environment. A small mucous membrane that is NOT it's own self-contained little world with PH balances and chemical balances is not the same. AT ALL. You comparing them so cavalierly just shows how ignorant you are of them.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:30 AM
2

It is not like the interior of the vagina. It simply is not. And the two are not comparable in such a direct sense. And you fucking know it. Or you don't, and you're dumb.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:26 AM
1

Yeah and you shouldn't bend your ears to clean behind them. Are you serious? I've already said it once. NO ONE is saying to forcibly pull back the foreskin past the point of the skin's ability. But there IS some natural retractability present, and to not clean that area is just fucking stupid and unhygienic. You know the quickest way to give a baby a rash and possible skin infection? Not cleaning it's fucking skin and folds of skin.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:25 AM
0

Douching, which messes with an internal membrane's body chemistry is completely and wholly different and completely incomparable to foreskin. So just shut up with that bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:21 AM
0

What the fuck are you talking about? I'm getting this from medical advice in the form of actual doctors and textbooks.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:19 AM
1

And all the advice I've ever seen on foreskin says to gently pull back to the maximum amount the foreskin can be pulled back to clean. You don't force it no. But it always has some natural retraction, and that area must be cleaned. Or you get dick cheese.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:09 AM
4

"Have you EVER heard a doctor recommend forcing back skin folds to scrub skin clean?" Yes. All the goddamn time. Because it's a part of necessary hygiene. If you don't do that in regards to most parts of your body, you accumulate dead skin and dirt and can grow rashes. And in regards to genitals, you literally make dick cheese. Smegma is a real fucking thing. Clean your goddamned vulva or dick. And yes, it involves lifting and spreading the folds to actually clean.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:07 AM
3

It's dumb. Whatever the intent they're using it for, it's the same as the "that offends me" non-statement. All they are saying is that they're too much of a child to deal with words or topics. And you don't argue with children. You placate and dismiss them so you can actually get some work done.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 11:25 AM
3

She has some good points. But when she got to some of the broad "our species" bullshit, it was a bit much. Our species didn't become dominant because we overvalue women. We became dominant because we have a huge fucking cognitive area in our brain and invented stuff like agriculture. She could have cut this video in half and said all the useful stuff she needed to say. Probably more than half.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:42 AM
2

Nice word drops there guy. It's not pedantic at all, though. And playing victim is not pertinent. This video not only doesn't play victim, it also basically ONLY complains about women. It's the kind of shit we lambast feminism for. Playing the victim and outright blaming others without actually examining anything. Maybe if this had a study attached to it or something about how women on average do this much better in marriage or a survey of expectations or something. But no. All this is, in its e…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:12 AM
6

What does that have to do with anything? Just because something doesn't suit r/feminism, does not make it relevant to mra. That's really just a completely stupid viewpoint.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:21 PM
1

Hilarious, and Bill Burr always cuts through gender bullshit. But how is this pertinent to men's rights?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:27 AM
0

Just because my town has blah blah blah. We're talking US. And in the US, it's still has high as 70-80% circumcised depending on the study/report. Either way, pushing anti-circumcison too much will alienate a large segment of the population that might otherwise be sympathetic to MRA issues. Issues, that I add once again, are of more concern and more harm to a larger population than circumcision.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 11:53 AM
0

What's the fringe position? Pro-circumcision is not fringe in the US. It's not fringe among any demographics besides Hispanic.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 11:50 AM
-3

It's not fallacious. Then you don't know anything about it. What is this most fundamental human right? On who's authority are you claiming this? It doesn't, and you cannot possibly know that at all. So now you and MRA are the arbiters of what is and isn't the appropriate thresholds of parenting? Fuck you for even suggesting that. That's the same moralistic nonsense we slam feminism for. It's not even remotely similar to nail pulling. You're fucking stupid for even suggesting that. Yes, I'm Ameri…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 08:53 AM
-1

Let's be honest. We're talking about America here. And then there's this: The Church currently maintains a neutral position on the practice of non-religious circumcision, and has never addressed the issue of infant circumcision specifically. Then yes, the article goes on to say basically that it's not official one way or the other under the Catholic Church. I just know for a fact that my extended family, and a huge segment of the rest of a very Catholic small town circumcise because of their fai…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 08:43 AM
-2

You are completely wrong on about all of that. The MR platform does fluctuate, just like any and every platform. What the current big issue is changes, new issues are identified and brought into the fold. You're fucking delusional if you think otherwise on that. A few prominent members, or "rank and file" members, do not simply by holding a view or even a consensus view inherently make anything a MR issue. If I join a gun club and me and 2 other guys out of 50 start talking about my little pony,…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:44 AM
0

Then you're a shitty catholic for not knowing that circumcision is a continued custom from Judaism to Christianity (at least much more in Catholicism, as it is the more direct "successor" to Judaism theologically speaking). Source, my father and entire extended family is Catholic. And it's a huge extended family. Because they're catholic.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:33 AM
-9

Who is we? The MRA ultimate secret council? What is and isn't an issue is not static. And I'm trying to maybe change some minds or thoughts on this particular issue. If you don't like that, well tough titties. Dude I've been circumcised. You literally cannot tell me to my face that I have been discriminated against when I have not. All of a sudden, I have disgusting views because I don't want to push this issue so hard when there are myriad of MUCH more serious ones? FUck you. You're the other h…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:18 AM
-10

No. I don't. Because men aren't being circumcised against their will. No one is actively complaining about being circumcised, that can, besides an extremely small minority. My point is that this is such a longshot, uphill issue, that it doesn't make sense to push it. Where has all this activism got anti-circumcision? It's in the same realm as anti-vaccination. It's relegated to the counter-culture weird issues by the people that even know about it. And all that for a mayb...5%? drop in the popul…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:37 AM
-32

I keep bringing this up, and no one here seems to want to hear it. Stop pushing anti-circumcision, especially as a men's rights issue. It is still an ingrained, emotional, and religious decision in a very religiously ingrained country. You might not be religious and have a religious tradition in your family going back away that still involves de facto circumcision, but not everyone lives in Seattle. MRA has a HUGE emotional hurdle to jump to fix a "problem" that a huge majority of people don't v…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:50 AM
1

I am right by clearly and easily available evidence and fact. Find it yourself. It's like your demanding someone prove the sky is blue when you could just walk your ass outside. Seriously, dude, at this point I wouldn't do shit for you ever. HAHA< TROLZ is LOLZ. You are a pathetic cunt of a person.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 11:01 AM
1

Go away you stalker douchebag. Seriously, you deranged fuck, it's been like 2 weeks.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 10:48 AM
1

All these ever come off as is "FUCK YOU, I should get to dress like a slut but not have any of the consequences."
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:42 AM
1

Nice. But it's not even anecdotal. It's a fact. That is how SNL operates.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:21 AM
1

It happens.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:44 AM
1

Not so shamelessly, no. That's my opinion. It's perhaps unsympathetic or lacking empathy. Nothing about that view is "ignorant". I'm not saying something actually lacking knowledge like "black people can't read". This is just about definitions of what ignorant means.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:17 AM
2

It's only informed conjecture about this particular episode and host. That's a fact on how the show works as told by numerous former cast members. So why would she be any different?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:15 AM
-2

How is that ignorant? I know exactly what I'm talking about. This isn't a field of study like history where I just don't know the facts or how something works.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:55 PM
4

It's a play on the phrase "when you got it, flaunt it."
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:54 PM
3

There's nothing wrong with being content or happy with your body. But being proud of it is not really okay with her body. I could be happy and contented I was in a competition. I could be proud and bring it up...occasionally...if I won a place. But if go around shoving my 68th place ribbon in people's faces and announcing, "HEY, I got 68th position. Aren't I amazing?!" I'd come off as pretty ridiculous. It goes back to the ridiculous bent of celebrating and being proud of mediocrity or even sub-…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:58 PM
3

Yeah, I all I could think was where the fuck was this planned parenthood stuff coming from. Was there like a minor instance that happened that was somehow bastardized and warped into this concept of MRA hate planned parenthood? I don't think I recall any hate or issues at all that mra has had with them. More that women have the lion's share of health services and funding at odds with the statistics of men needing it more and stuff like planned parenthood have WAY more resources for women than me…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:50 PM
2

She probably had a lot of influence on it. From much of the SNL behind the scenes, guests sign off on what they'll be in. Obviously. A guest won't be in a skit they don't want to be in. There are easy-going hosts that will do whatever and then others that strike down any and every thing and have demands about their skits. Apparently Paris Hilton was a notoriously bitchy host that demanded this and that be off limits and that they should do a skit about this because it'll be funny or hot or whate…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:42 PM
6

It's crass and going after someone's physicality, which is part of the reason this sub is upset at the skit in question.....but after all the jokes about nudity, I googled her and the show. She is WAY too proud of her naked body for having the body she does. No one should be so cavalier about their nudity in my opinion, but doubly so if you know you don't have a great body. And then that it's her show and she's a writer I instantly jumped to she sets herself up to be naked and "desirable" on her…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:32 PM
4

Probably because everyone was like, "Who's the musical guest? The what now? Who the fuck are they? Well who's the host? Lena who? Never heard of her." I honestly had no idea who she was until the episode aired and seeing some of it and posts about it on here.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:28 PM
2

Because I read many descriptions of the skit, as well as knowing how the unfunny skits on SNL usually play out. And I've since watched it, and I'm spot on. It was unfunny. The humor in it was only from the girlfriend's lack of understanding by having English as a second level. If it was satire, it failed utterly because MRA is not widely enough known by the public for it to be obvious like if they had...say a blatantly misandrist hateful feminist. Because it failed at that it only came off as a …
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:43 AM
2

There's pushing the line to make a good point about society, like say Chris Rock or Dave Chappelle or Louis C.K. does. And then there's other stuff. Stuff that masquerades as a valid point by trying to be funny. But there's a big difference between "This people or group behaves this way, and that's kind of dumb or hypocritical as shown by my funny story" and "Ha, look at how this group acts aren't I funny and edgy?!" like the Michael Richards moment. I haven't seen this sketch, but from what I'v…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:03 AM
2

Because they're fucking hypocrites that don't understand how full of shit and morally bankrupt they are. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 07:43 AM
1

I don't know what armor you're talking about, but head, chest, and backpacks are not the problem with weight distribution. Leg armor (and hip, yes, that means swords) were the issue. Read John Keegan's the Face of Battle for great accounts of armors effects in battle during Agincourt and the Battle of Waterloo.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:24 AM
4

It'll just take one female POW being raped and brutalized by enemy forces before we realize, "Oh that's right. We wanted women off the frontlines because of this shit. Also, she's physically weaker and not as good of a soldier."
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:22 AM
5

They aren't claiming anything. THey're stating a known fact.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:52 AM
31

It doesn't matter, if those rules are discriminatory then they are liable.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:58 PM
10

She was a drunk asshole. She didn't learn shit from this.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:00 AM
2

Too bad the last line made no fucking sense. Guys, your equality is based solely on making women more equal. Hmm. Okay. That's working out well with the whole give girls more help and support systems in schools, courts, etc.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:50 PM
6

I know and have encountered plenty of men "in charge" that were viewed by everyone as huge douches. It's the same thing. People in leadership positions need to show they've earned it, or they are viewed with suspicion or distrust or dislike from people "below" them. Go to any job, literally any job, and it is like that.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:13 PM
3

Men overwhelmingly have the shitty jobs though. And the vital shitty jobs. I'm not discounting nursing (even though it's grown into a very viable job for both men and women) at all. But if you think something like nursing equivocates the role of all the backbreaking manual labor jobs that physically make society run, then you're out of your mind. Sewage, trash, electrical line work, the dangerous industrial production of anything. Metalworking, construction, destruction. MALE dominated fields of…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:34 PM
2

A 4 year period in a drastic change versus the status quo of pretty much all of other recorded history? You pick an aberration and expect me to recant the general rule of industry?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:30 PM
29

But HOW would the world function without party planners, wedding planners, interior decorators, fashion consultants and all the other completely vital jobs? The glass ceiling might have some truth to it. But the glass floor that contains all the hard, dangerous industrial jobs that keep everything running is a real fucking thing. And it certainly isn't women doing line work and fucking with the boiler.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:20 AM
8

First off, he's full of shit anyways. Scholastic achievement is not dependent on parents' education, mother or father or both dad's or both mom's or aunties or whoever the fuck their guardian is. The biggest single contributing factor is parent involvement.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 06:17 AM
6

Yeah, I would refuse to pay. Take me to jail all you want, that succubus is not getting my money.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:28 PM
8

There's a reason that pussy was divorced. Notice he didn't do the divorcing. He's a pining douche begging desperately for her to love and respect him. Except now he doesn't even care about respect. He just is begging for love. That approach has always worked in the past.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:09 PM
3

"Be a pushover pussy that waits on her hand and foot and excuse any and all shitty behavior on her part, because she's too good for you no matter what you do."
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:07 PM
-1

Can we not lump antagonistic speakers riling people up on purpose with inflammatory speech and then being surprised when somebody actually gets physical into a men's right thing? She assaulted him pretty clearly. He was also one of those traveling hate speech preachers. She got arrested. Where's the issue?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 07:21 PM
15

Because a lot of women like their victim complex as it hides all the ways they have an advantage.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:02 PM
28

"Blow cinnamon down his urethra!"
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:01 PM
-9

More like "We did it first! And better!"
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:37 PM
5

Fuck this article. One thing they got right, but it's couched in bullshit the entire article over. It assumes women can't be rapists, as it points that blame solely at men. And it's characterization of rape is not fucking rape. If a girl puts up a meek resistance at first then agrees to sex, while not liking it the whole time, but never saying a thing or having any outward signs that point to not wanting sex....THAT'S NOT FUCKING RAPE. Regretting sex is not the same as being raped. And that's on…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:34 PM
2

Call their supervisor, their chief, anyone you fucking can. Make sure it's a man. Tell him the whole fucking story. Lodge a complaint. Do not let this bullshit stand.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:54 AM
7

For half the physical ability, they should get the fuck over it. "We deserve the same prize money!" Would you be competitive at this skill level if you were suddenly a man? No? Then shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:58 PM
1

Pull the same shit. Make a list rating the women, rape jokes included. See the reaction then.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 03:41 AM
11

She's lucky that's all she got. I can without a doubt say that if someone cut off my penis, I would murder them.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:24 AM
0

But it's a lot harder to fake shit and push your agenda in hard sciences.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:28 AM
10

Racism is pretty common in liberal places.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:28 AM
5

"YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT IT'S LIKE! You can never know! Now, take my gender's relationship advice because we figured guys out long ago. I mean you guys like it when I play coy and hard to get, and say things I don't mean while constantly testing you in our relationship. Also my whole image isn't based on deception what with the push-up bra, makeup, high heels, etc etc. GOD MEN, get over yourselves!"
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:51 PM
1

So do you throw upvotes back?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:40 AM
1

That's true. I just think pointing to one video with somewhere around 10 instances of something don't prove a trend one way or the other. It's important to back up claims about genders with actual data and statistical proof. That's one of the things that separates MRA from feminism.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 09:51 PM
-2

No, just that these are video clips that were camera worthy. There are probably a bunch out there that were just as heroic but were slightly out of frame or tough to tell what is happening. This is a small sample, and the fact that they are all men should make you skeptical. It's confirmation bias to watch it and think, "oh, only men ever do heroic stuff" without looking at some actual data and statistics rather than about 10 instances.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 04:46 PM
9

Well that's kind of the point isn't it? Patriarchy is bullshit. Treating people like they have no say in their actions and are dependent on things like gender for their actions is bullshit. So we shouldn't say, "Look! MEN are heroes. Women aren't!" because that's the same argument of bullshit feminists with their "Look! MEN are rapists. Women aren't!" Treat them as individuals, because they are acting as individuals, not as men or any other classification. You can try and use this video as evide…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:56 AM
0

I know. For fuck's sake there is a gender reversed poster on the frontpage saying that regretting it later is not rape. Make up your fucking minds. It can't be ways just because you want some woman's blood.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:47 AM
-2

Well your acceptable sexual acts are not everyone's acceptable sexual acts. So that doesn't matter in the least to this conversation. What has MRA been harping on after-the-fact women's "I've been raped" claims? If you never say no or try to stop it, IT IS NOT RAPE. End of discussion. Saying I didn't want it after the scenario has passed does not constitute rape. The girl is a skank among skanks, and she didn't behave correctly. But she commit rape.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:46 AM
-4

Only if they then attempt to stop you. If you just sit there and allow it to keep happening, you're saying it's okay. And therefore NOT assault.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:43 AM
-2

Not saying yes is not the same as saying no.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:55 PM
12

BECAUSE IT ISN'T FUCKING RAPE IN ANY WAY. He didn't say no, stop, don't. He didn't try and stop her. He didn't do a damn thing to prevent it or let her know he wasn't into it. Regretting something after-the-fact is not rape.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:54 PM
1

I'd just like another table comparing the percentages of youths in prison, likelihood to run away, etc for single-father households as well. Without it, it's not telling the whole story.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:48 PM
3

I'm not much on the transcendalists, but this man has a point.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:46 AM
-1

It's not rape. He never said no or even attempted to stop her. As it is, the white girl is just a skank.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 10:34 PM
3

Good for you. Stay with it and help by giving the truth. If you can figure out who he is and his case, contact his attorney with your testimony and that there IS evidence in video form that the cops on scene didn't do anything with.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 09:02 AM
2

So like most sexual assault/rape complaints by feminists. Yes there is an actual problem that needs to be addressed. But absolutely no-fault victims is stupidly unrealistic and being made uncomfortable is not equal to actual rape.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:46 AM
2

Wait? Where is the "entitlement" that feminists are seeing through cosplay? Can someone explain the issue here for me? I am aware of cosplay, but I do not follow it or anything. So I'm not sure where the issue is coming from.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:07 PM
1

No, because being ogled or just in an uncomfortable situation is not equivalent to rape. Quit blowing this out of proportion as to reasoning. And which previous troll username did you have to abandon to switch to this one?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:59 AM
1

Yeah, but they also know/believe that other straight guys won't be checking them out. Not that gay guys do, or would, but just the fact of them being attracted to guys puts that in their head. And that is a very uncomfortable thing for some people. A lot of people. More than just me. And calling it homophobia just makes you a dismissive sexist. Seriously, this is my whole problem with this issue. Straight guys opinions and feelings are being dismissed outright as just homophobic or being a cry-b…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:57 AM
1

Not in the fucking shower. And "they do it too" is not an acceptable reason to completely dismiss a segment of the population's views. Fuck that mindset.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 01:32 PM
2

Oh Jeez, who are you quoting? Because that is just stupid.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:11 PM
2

Yeah. It's just one of those things that you don't ever really encounter, so you're still working it out when you're confronted with it.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:10 PM
1

Well that's you. It's fine if you don't care and want to shower around anyone and everyone. But some people don't. And their legitimate complaint is being dismissed outright as "homophobia". But you are right, gays see themselves (and rightfully so in many cases) as second rate citizens. But that doesn't excuse demanding and getting upset over some things they shouldn't, like this specific scenario.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:08 PM
2

Not really, and I have no doubt I'd call them by what they wanted in real-life. But when you remove yourself from that, your actual feelings come out. And I'm still not sure where I draw the line to just be like, "okay I'll call you she and her, but you're a fucking man." I've seen some documentaries and interviews and things on transpeople. I get their motivations. But I'm still unclear where at least to me, what physical definition dictates man versus woman. And at what point in a transition s…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:28 AM
0

Well that's where the pronoun use comes from. I'm still not sure what I believe he or she is. So I'm conflicted on what to use or call that person. I still consider her a guy, so my mind inserts masculine pronouns into referring to her.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:17 AM
1

It's not about control and thinking you're going to get sexually assaulted or raped, which is your implication. The "danger" is that you are a sexual object in front of someone that now has an incentive to look at you, whether they do or not. You are directly exposed to a vulnerability that the separation of lockers by gender is meant to erase. That is being thrown away just so a gay guy doesn't have to "feel different". If anything gays should be segregating themselves out of the locker room as…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:09 AM
0

Then they're fools. Obviously something like this will attract some feminist or LGBT white knight moron that doesn't know anything.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:01 AM
2

So I'm going to go shower in the women's locker room. No one's forcing those women to be there, right? You're an idiot and don't understand the complexity and sensitivity surrounding sexuality and being in a vulnerable position. And once again, racial minorities simply do not correlate with this. At all. Singled out for being a color, when that doesn't affect the situation is one thing. Singling out a group because their trait actually affects and changes the situation is entirely different. Bei…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:00 AM
1

It doesn't matter that you "know some people". And if you think teammates, and locker rooms are a place of trust, then you have no idea what you are talking about. This is not the gym at the Y. So your false dichotomy is hygiene or let someone get to sexually objectify you if they want. That's bullshit. Your right, those situations would never happen, but this one IS likely to happen and they are the SAME FUCKING SITUATION. The only reason MINE won't happen is because the victimized/objectified/…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 06:32 AM
1

Yeah, I saw that after watching Rogan's radio interview. But he raises a good point. Your muscle mass doesn't just evaporate. Your bone structure doesn't change. And as he knows, and anyone else that studies fighting knows, as well as just pure logic: bones act on leverage principles. Bigger bones, better bone structure can just physically deal out more power.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:45 AM
1

Yeah, I saw that after watching Rogan's radio interview. But he raises a good point. Your muscle mass doesn't just evaporate. Your bone structure doesn't change. And as he knows, and anyone else that studies fighting knows, as well as just pure logic: bones act on leverage principles. Bigger bones, better bone structure can just physically deal out more power.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:45 AM
0

That's completely dodging the issue. It's about trusting somebody to not take advantage of an advantageous situation when you are very vulnerable. People are uncomfortable with the situation itself, and I'm not sure just trusting someone in that situation is a good thing. They might never look at you at all, but they easily could and you couldn't stop them. Say a gay guy is showering with a bunch of straight women. I bet he'd be uncomfortable, and I bet those girls will look. But one straight gu…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:43 AM
2

Boom 2 minutes in.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:37 AM
0

Just because they believe they're something, and I'm still on the fence about how I view them, doesn't mean they get to be called what they want. Personally, if you still have male genitalia, I think you're a he, and I can refer to that person how I want. Now, as I've heard in looking at this situation, Fallon Fox no longer has male genitalia. So I can refer to Fox as a female now. Though, Joe Rogan has a point. She's not really a she. She's a guy that chopped off his junk, grew long hair and pu…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:32 AM
-1

Ah, and right into the "emasculate to try and undermine and dismiss their point" phase. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:37 AM
0

Okay, tell a friend to pants you in public. Try and find a crowd that's mostly females of your same age group. Report back.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:36 AM
0

No. Just that there is a certain amount of trust that comes in playing a team sport. And when you shower, you maintain that trust that no one's going to sexually objectify you. It's supposed to be a safe zone. A gay guy being right in the midst takes all that away.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:35 AM
0

Ah, then you don't play sports and don't have any room to talk about this situation.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:29 AM
0

So do you shower in a bathing suit? Go away you troll.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:22 AM
9

And the trust issue as well. If a guy just recently comes out as a gay guy, but you've already showered with him, there's a violation of trust there. Say a woman's gay friend helped her try bras on and then he came out as straight. Same type of thing.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:22 AM
0

At all. And gymnastics are not comparable. It is a competition to see who is in more control of their own body. Women's and men's body are built differently for different things, so a woman's control is demonstrated differently than a man's control. So women get balance and flexibility stuff, men get brute strength and balance like the pommel horse and rings.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:21 AM
14

I guess all those World Records are just privilege acting up again.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:03 PM
8

I'm liberal, and I hate this type of shit. Don't generalize. It's the only way MRA is taken seriously. You start generalizing arguments and the whole thing gets thrown away by the people you try to convince.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:02 PM
4

A conscious choice of dress that you go out into public versus being naked is completely different.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:53 PM
27

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lXUd7VxuSA That's it. Be wary, she's an obnoxious douche. And to get to the good part, you still have to listen to her.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:52 PM
10

This is the essence of sport and that women that blow up a huge shitstorm about not being able to play on this team or that don't realize. Women are almost without exclusion (you get something like horseback riding and target shooting) physically just cannot compete with men. They are outclasses in speed and strength. All their talent cannot compensate. Women just aren't good enough to compete at the highest level of sport with men, while levels below that of men can compete on the women's highe…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:01 PM
3

Jeez. That was just a beating. Now, he is now a transwoman. But is he the type of transwoman that still has his/her balls? Because regardless of estrogen, those testicles are still getting testosterone produced.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:57 PM
30

The transsexual man-to-woman thing causes a lot of issues for some reason. I can't believe people don't realize that someone formally being a man matters to people in their personal relationships. Somehow it shouldn't matter when it comes to stuff like this, or that TS women don't have to disclose that they used to be a man to sexual partners. The amount of selfishness I see from people that are supposed to be "open-minded" is astounding. I'm looking at you LGBT people. I actually got into an ar…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:54 PM
5

If it a couple hundred years, this was one of those political quotes painted on walls somewhere, I'd be happy.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:42 PM
4

Somewhere where you can be what and who you are and not worry about offending someone or treading on their sensibilities.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 08:55 PM
6

Nothing wrong in trying. I definitely make snarky and dickish comments. A lot actually. But I just realized in reading that one that it's the same stuff I've given badmouthed feminists for doing. Always room and time to try and be better.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 08:10 PM
14

When you're challenged, and your entire system is based on faulty reasoning, bullshit theories, and data that simply contradicts any claims you make, then you are always on the back foot.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:56 PM
19

I thought it was a funny comment, but it's too similar to every joke about "you must be gay" or "you're just angry you have a tiny dick" comment from feminists that I find so stupid. So I will not upvote you, for then I would be a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:52 PM
73

This is one of the things I've come to believe in how the world works. Men need a "boy's club" somewhere in their life. It can change forms throughout their life, from something like Boy Scouts or a sports team to poker night in adulthood or even the Army a few years ago. The thing is, women always want into that boy's club simply because it is a boys club. Not that they really want to be in it so much as, "I proved them wrong, GIRLS CAN DO ANYTHING". You see that in the numerous "girl plays tra…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:48 PM
2

Seriously, everything I see or indulge in mra, besides the obvious trolls are advocating that men are being discriminated against in society in a number of ways that need to be addressed. The victim complex argument is not part of it at all. It's not a zero-sum game and no one is saying and try to out victimize the other "side". Fuck everything about the deluded thinking in this article.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:38 PM
20

What pissed me off the most was the word misandry in quotes, like it's made up entirely. It's a real word describing a real viewpoint. But that little snapshot embodied the utter shit that this person was writing. How they can see the keyboard with their head up their own ass is beyond me, though.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:31 PM
5

You know what movie always bothered me? 40 Days and 40 Nights. Josh Hartnett gets raped and no one mentions it ever again. It was a non-issue.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:34 AM
5

I get what he's saying. But I do not buy into the "Victims are never in any circumstance to blame at all" bullshit mentality. Where you are, how you act, who you hang out with, and yes even sometimes what you wear can increase your chance of being raped/assaulted/mugged/WHATEVER. Dress is probably not an issue among male victims very much because think of men's fashion in all its forms. It's just hard for a man to dress "slutty" to begin with. What is the male equivalent of fishnet stockings, a …
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:33 AM
1

The hypocrisy is not lost on me, and it is infuriating.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:23 AM
0

I guess. But the only context it's ever used is that definition, besides of course bullshit feminists and other wackos trying to rewrite the definition to fit their agenda.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:06 AM
6

I don't get how people don't understand rape. It's forced sexual activity through violence, or threat of violence. Gender has nothing to do with it at all.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:07 PM
-1

No, no, no. I've spelled this out a dozen times. I'm not going to rewrite the same things over and over for you to not understand them. Read the women's suffrage example and try to COMPREHEND things. It exactly addressed your so-called "argument". I'm through with you.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:03 AM
0

Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and say begging the question and proving the question wrong with logic aren't the same. This is what typhonblue is doing, not me. Assuming something that proves her conclusion is literally begging the question. I am disproving her initial assumption on relationships with real world examples. Some men. Not all men. Men were the ones that signed the legislation and voted on it, both for and against. I was NOT saying all men opposed it.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:02 AM
0

Absolutely not. There is a difference in sociology between purposeful and unintentional racism. Most feminist think it's ALL intentional by men with their evil, icky penises. That's absurd. I'm saying that number 2 is complete and utter bullshit that ignores history, culture, and reality to fulfill it's "logic". And once again I'll use women's suffrage, as it is a concrete, real-world example that shows that 2 is wrong. First, I'm just going to use oppressed. It might have been done with keeping…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:37 AM
0

I've repeatedly addressed it. You don't seem to understand. You made a bullshit assumption about relationships that shows a lack of understanding of anyone's experience outside your own. It ignores history. It ignores present and past cultures around the world, including past American culture. It ignores the cognitive dissonance that drives some people's beliefs and actions. It ignores that not everyone has a great relationship. It ignores that a close relationship itself does not automatically …
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:28 AM
0

No I'm not. But I'm also saying that the ridiculous assumption that a man has a mother, and maybe a sister or daughter somehow prevents him being oppressive knowingly or unknowingly. Like their mother/daughter/sister couldn't possibly fit a domestic, subdued role that they view as normal and the primary role a woman should fit into in society. And then they couldn't possibly try to fit into that role. Once again I'll use the example of women's suffrage. The men pushing it in government had wives…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:14 AM
0

Which question? And I promise you, I'm not trying to beg anything. I'm trying to say how utterly simplistic, assumptive, and wrong the lady in the video's view on relationships and the nature of oppressing are.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:10 AM
0

Patriarchy theory is implying women are subservient to men in that society. Such that men and fathers (patriarchy) have the upper hand. You're trying to say that it can't be patriarchy unless there is collusion by all men to keep women down. A lot of feminists might imply that men are in collusion to keep women down. That is crazy and impossible. But a more valid approach would be that a patriarchical society keeps women down through its struture. Which is exactly what happened in Europe under t…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 07:28 PM
-1

Once again, you're showing a fundamental lack of understanding for relationships. You keep using the word intimate like every relationship is loving and close. As if kings and royalty didn't marry a royal wife that was a distant and cold relationship only brokered to produce an heir, while the king could have multiple mistresses and have the queen executed for infidelity. Let's look at just Europe. For the longest time, the Church reigned supreme. They came up with the morality of society. They …
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:23 PM
0

That's not a good argument either. That's like saying a dictator isn't an oppressor because he has to take on the responsibility of running the country. But I get what you're saying as to why Patriarchy theory is bullshit. I agree it's stupid. But they way it's being argued against in this post is the same shoddy, fallacy-driven logic that we berate feminism for. MRA has to be better than that.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:52 PM
-4

Are you kidding? All you have to do is look at Middle Eastern culture. Or colonial American culture. Or a LOT of cultures. That whole a man ruled his home type thing that existed right up until the 50's/60's. You can softly and firmly oppress someone while maintaining a close relationship. And the whole premise is faulty. The assumption is that oppression couldn't exist because they had a close, loving relationship. You can have a close relationship that isn't loving. And you don't automatically…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:10 AM
-1

She's really, really wrong in her false equivalence of oppression must be the same. That whole line of thought shows a complete lack of understanding of any societal history of DOZENS of cultures. The whole refusing to let your daughter educate herself is a fucking Western Anglo-Saxon thing that happened as recently as the late 1800s. She might have a point about other things, but that was just an astronomically wrong assertion.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:02 AM
2

Always press charges. And do go through with court. Document all your injuries. Document all the broken personal items. Get your lawyer to demand evidence of her injuries. You don't just get thrown down stairs and beaten without any mark to show for it, while you have plenty. You could have a retarded lawyer and still win against her.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 10:39 AM
-8

This is just stupid.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 02:47 AM
2

It doesn't and so is therefore carefully ignored.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 09:31 AM
1

Exactly. Well put. As long as I don't hear any more bullshit about the guns being at fault. Spoons don't make people fat.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:35 AM
2

Or cut back on guns. Too much obesity, let's blame the spoons.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:19 AM
2

When you tell and berate someone with the idea that they are an entitled, privileged person/demographic they believe and behave 2 ways: either they don't believe it and are pissed off about these accusations. Or they think, I should be entitled and privileged.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:16 AM
0

Treyvon Martin. 1 man. 1 death. And it seems that it was much closer to self-defense than anything. But the point of this statement is that men might commit bigger murder sprees, while women have killed more children by 1's and 2's overall. (though that needs a source, that's just the point I believe is trying to be made).
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:14 AM
4

Which makes sense as women skew heavily as primary caregivers. They are around more children, thus they abuse children more. Men commit more gun crimes (source? just an assumed statement) because men interact with guns more. I bet it actually breaks down pretty darn evenly. Anyone that thinks women are the "fairer" sex is probably just an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:12 AM
9

Good fucking God. 3 shots from a pump action, then an attempted carjacking. Accidental, says the Braintree Police. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:09 AM
15

I know. It pisses me off to no end when someone trots out some middle school girl that is supposedly "proof" that girls can hang in sports with men. They always fall into obscurity within the next season of play because they don't have that one freak year of her being developed more than that year of boys.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:21 AM
3

Gymnastics are designed to showcase your control of your body. So gymnastic displays are about balance and control, as well as speed, strength, agility. Men jump higher and can do more robust muscular contortions (like rings, or the parallel bars). Some gymnastics skew towards women, like balance beam. But that's because it's literally meant to showcase a natural tendency in women's bodies, whereas male gymnastics are meant to showcase the natural tendency in men's bodies. No one beats anyone el…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:19 AM
7

Wrong. Case in point: speed-walking.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:16 AM
-1

I always saw that and thought though, "as soon as I get out there and start getting physical, they might hurt me a bit with bruising or something. But I will injure them." I was playing some mild coed soccer a ways back, and am not nearly in the physical shape I was or good at long cardio as I once was. Two girls literally bounced off of me, one of them knocking the air out of themselves. I didn't even feel it.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:14 AM
1

Exactly. Women can be competitive in their own league. Take softball as an example, it's a retooling of baseball for women. You could take any JV high school team and destroy the Varsity girls softball, though.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:11 AM
-1

So now it's fucking cheating for someone to be genetically better than someone else?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:06 AM
0

It's proving your point, but losing the debate unfortunately. The same way Romney "won" the first debate. He lost. He completely lost. He misrepresented himself, recanted every view he campaigned on, and outright lied. He proved himself unreliable and a bad candidate, and proved all the criticism of him right. Yet he still "won" the debate. Sorry, that the example is so political and could be "polarizing". But only to people that don't understand facts. The same kind of "polarizing" that saying …
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:27 PM
12

And I guarantee the hypocrisy is completely lost on them.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:38 AM
2

What docsquidly said. Write it with proof to back you up. If she refuses that, go to the principle. Threaten to go to media with a local story of sex discrimination (both females refuse you because of the material) or get a parent to go ballistic on them. Whatever you do, DO NOT BACK DOWN. This is why crap like this becomes acceptable in our society. Because no one calls bullshit and presses these assholes.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:10 AM
1

Executives and administrators. Basically the classic 50's male job stereotype. Unmarried women over the age of 30. Basically women that eschew the things that traditonally depress their wage: lower hours and flexiblity because of familial obligations.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:18 PM
1

So you're saying 5 cents or 7 cents instead of 2 cents? The 2 cents I remember was from the course on inequality I had in college about a year ago. Forgive me if I don't cite that book that I sold back at the end of semester. The point is, the gender wage gap does not signify discrimination so much as other factors that split along gender lines. That last little bit? It can't just be discrimination if there are numerous jobs that women earn more than male counterparts. Which there are, look at t…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:10 PM
4

The gap is 2 cents when everything is accounted for. That's $0.02 And that doesn't show discrimination considering in many categories WOMEN EARN MORE THAN THEIR MALE COUNTERPARTS.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:21 PM
1

Well that sounds great. I've yet to meet one of those.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:07 AM
9

My problem with slut shaming is that sometimes you should be shamed for the amount of sluttiness you personally acquire. I think poorly of men who do slutty things. I think poorly of women who do slutty things. But I've only encountered male-sluts that had the honesty to own up to their actions and not hide behind bullshit quotes from a long-dead celebrity to justify what they do. And I've not met any male-sluts that got upset when you pointed it out. Or felt guilt about it. They've come to term…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:05 AM
3

Because reddit is a meta circle jerk of almost unlimited magnitude. First, it was mostly dudes that made sexist jokes for the lulz. Then enough people joined that actual misogynists joined the ranks and made the jokes because they believed them. This rightfully invoked a backlash by moderate members and the growing female population of reddit. As the population has exploded on here, now there is a misandrist population that makes those same jokes (it's relevant to say there still is a misogynist…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:01 AM
0

And the male teachers are pedophiles.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:18 PM
2

To be fair, that was the suggestion of the group that made the finding. But it probably won't get acted on.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:16 PM
3

That shit wasn't around in the 50's. And the 50's were about as "patriarchy" as it gets.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 12:22 PM
1

You're welcome. I hope it was satisfactory/illuminating. Could you clarify who exactly the group of humans and the "us" you are referring to are? Just to make sure. Pronouns are hard to keep straight after a while.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:06 AM
1

Most people have issues, women included. Men included. I'm pointing out the many flaws coming about in labeling oneself a feminist. Either they are a feminist, which means they concentrate on the needs of one gender above another. That makes them sexist. Or they haven't thought it through or understand that the label "feminist" is inherently biased in favor of one gender (sexist) which means they are either dumb, willfully ignorant, or simply jumped on an easy bandwagon. There is no way around b…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 11:57 PM
6

The nature of classification means that by being a feminist, you stress and focus on females and feminine aspects. If you really wanted equality, you'd be a humanist or egalitarian. The sheer refusal to understand or admit that logic astounds me.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:15 PM
2

It's hard to call it smear and muckraking when you're literally just saying the facts about their platform. The one they campaign on and repeat day after day to try and get elected.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:09 PM
1

It's still not "obvious". It's all still alleged at this point. Unless you want to be in the same circle as crazy ass feminists that think every male is a certified rapist.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:37 AM
4

I think it'd be easy to fight, considering he used a substantial sum to settle mutual debt, then spent a lot on kids. Not to mention, this was after they had split. And she cheated on him.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:27 AM
7

I think "privilege" and "slightly better pay at a time of horrible unsafe working conditions with warlord labor bosses" are not the same thing at all.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:07 PM
2

Yeah, but he's saying the same crap feminists do, just using a filter of race. "Their/your suffering and problems doesn't matter because I have it worse!" It just goes to show that they and him don't care about equality, only advancing their own interests, conflicting with all their rhetoric.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:29 PM
2

That doesn't mean unfair treatment is still okay. Be happy I only cut off your arms instead of killing you! That's idiotic.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:39 PM
3

So the mines firing them if they got sick and didn't show up, not providing a safe work environment, and having unreasonable hours is not an issue because they're white?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:09 PM
1

Not to be all that guy and make generalities about women. But why is it that every ugly divorce story seems to be a woman going absolutely batshit crazy/evil? They seem to threaten and be out to just hurt the ex in anyway possible. False allegations of abuse, destroying prized possessions, denying access to children. What is this shit about?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:39 AM
3

Yup. You can be misandristic or misogynistic for one action, depending on the reasoning behind it. ex. You can't hit girls because a)men are cruel and aggressive and will murder women b) women are delicate little flowers that are too weak for anything.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:33 AM
16

You mean misandrist. A misogynist would think there's either a reason to hit girls, or that you should never hit men.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:21 PM
15

Yeah, it's his fault I'm an unfaithful skank!
/r/MensRights02/07/12 10:23 PM
4

Psh, haven't sitcoms got the point across to you yet? We don't have any feelings and we somehow get a much more attractive woman to love us despite our constant failings and bumblings.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 10:22 PM
3

Can you imagine the shit storm if a list of the 10 boring, bitchy girls came out from feminists? Nevermind that a generation of men have been neutered by Mom's and sisters and the unacceptability of expressing themselves as men, but the one good archetype on this list is somehow okay to cheat on. Fuck whatever cunt came up with this, and every dumb little girl that ascribes to it. I'll be over in the corner, doing something interesting like reading a book or learning, while possessing good trait…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 10:21 PM
58

So, by that logic: if I get into a drunk driving accident and kill someone, they just committed suicide against the hood of my car.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:37 PM
6

I went to BU. This whole mess stinks of false rape society bullshit. The first guy to get accused, accused was dismissed from the team immediately. No waiting to see if it was true, no suspension. Guilty and dismissed based on allegation. The second was suspended first, then dismissed. Then a commission to see if the Hockey team was breeding some kind of terrible atmosphere that made the hockey players turn all rapey. From my understanding, the hockey team had it's own floor in one of the apartm…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 09:40 PM
1

If you have them the majority of the time ( I think you said like 60% of the time?), and even if not that much, they will eventually realize it unless they're total dunces. It might not be as soon as you'd like, but they will realize.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 10:56 AM
1

Good for you at least. I hope you make it through this mess. From all of us here and people in the real world that aren't complete idiots, fuck that bitch. You're in the right. Sometimes people need to here the simple things. If you're story is true, FUCK that bitch. She will get her comeuppance somehow, someday. Your kids will grow up and one day grasp and appreciate all your effort and sacrifice, and know their mother did terrible things that would have made them suffer just to hurt you. Good …
/r/MensRights06/06/12 09:28 AM
5

I'm not a big fan of Adam Levine's music, but I'm a big fan of him as a person. He seems to just be a cool dude.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:06 AM
4

Nope. Come on in. Just don't be like the periodic troll accounts, and think that your rights can supersede and deprive your partners of truth. Just because he might not be able to tell you were once a man, doesn't mean you get to not tell him. Whatever the female-to-male equivalent also applies. But I hope this subreddit helps you out with any problems.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 09:30 PM
1

While it might have truth, it's not that great for a lot of reasons. By that reasoning I can't just tell someone "You're being an obnoxious ass about your views, while being uncompromising, insensitive, and intolerant of others." and have it be a satisfactory answer. But it is. Sometimes "You're being offensive" is the end of it. It's not really possible to explain how or why, but they just are.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:31 AM
3

And then in a couple months, her sponsors will come back.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:20 PM
6

Ain't that the fucking truth. I hate this smug type of asshole. Someone please just hit her in the face with human shit on air or something.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:19 PM
2

Well from CaptSnaps great summary and reading the article, it's not so much about sticking it to a bunch of violent asshole protesters. Keep in mind people don't reword a law and reinterpret something incorrectly to get at the Westboro Baptist Church despite universal hate. It's about a judge in a high position, also a member of an organization strongly tied to the issue, providing the broadest interpretation possible (wrongly, at that) to try and pursue an issue she felt strongly about. Then wh…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 09:20 PM
1

It's just Judeo-Christian tradition. It's a sign of the first covenant with God. But yeah, The New Testament pretty much says everything in the Old Testament is bullshit, just be a nice guy and worship God.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:28 PM
-1

I think the real problem most people have is that it's almost tangential to anything that really affects men in an unequal way. Child custody, divorce laws, unequal responsibilities vs. decision making power during pregnancies, the growing false rape society, the larger number of rapes committed against men, and only men having to sign up for the draft are very real issues. No one remembers their circumcision. It's still a genuine toss-up as to whether circumcision even hurts/helps. At best, the…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:03 AM
1

But what matters is what You identify them as if you have sex with them. And if they have or had a penis, I'm not interested. And lying to get me into bed them, whether malevolently or through simple omission is the deepest level of wrong.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 11:04 PM
1

Good explanation by truthjusticeca. But layman's terms: the pay gap is the average yearly salary of men divided by the average yearly salary of women. Women on average make less then men, but feminists and idiots claim this is because women are intentionally being paid less. It's because for a whole range of factors, women take lower-paying jobs, work less hours, work less dangerous jobs, aren't as assertive in asking for a higher starting salary or raises, working from home, the choice to start…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 10:08 AM
4

That's one fucking thing wrong with feminism. Names betray their bias. Labeling yourself as something like this only shows you do not understand the implications of your own titles and what you say you are. If you haven't seriously thought and UNDERSTOOD that by calling yourself a feminist, YOU ARE saying you choose one gender's welfare over another, then you cannot be trusted to think other things through properly. All you did was say "superficial" and tried to discredit a fact about the nature…
/r/MensRights07/12/11 12:50 AM
7

I don't agree to that. An -ism is as simple as action from prejudice.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 06:44 PM
14

Feminism in itself is inherently biased. It's called feminism. It promotes one gender over another and seeks only the benefit women. It doesn't matter if you are an egalitarian feminist or whatever. If you identify yourself as pro- any gender instead of a strict humanist or egalitarian or the like, you are admitting you seek one gender's dominance in some form over the other. Think of the shit any guy would get if he announced he was a "masculinist". I've explained this point to a few women. And…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 05:33 PM
3

Because most of the inequality that feminists want eradicated are due, not to any actual sexism or discrimination, but because it is the fault of women themselves. Women get paid less than men, but because they take lower paying jobs and aren't as assertive in asking for raises. Etc.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 01:40 PM
3

I think it should be disclosed right away. I know if I was with any person, I'd sure want to know whether they use to be a dude. It's just an unquantifiable factor. Some people don't like anal, some do. Some people don't like oral. Some people like bondage. Some people like to know that this "vagina" was never a cock and balls. Call it homophobia or insecurity if it makes you feel better. It's like people calling you a prude or close minded just because you don't do what they want in bed.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:28 AM
6

That's the thing. To some people the body is female, the brain is damn close to femaile, but it's still a dude. It might not be fair, but that's how it works. Like asking someone "Why are boobs good?" They just are to you for some reason. Just how sleeping with someone that used to be a guy could be repulsive.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 12:37 AM
7

Even if it's true (haven't looked at any studies) it still might matter to some men. And it's not okay to not tell them.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 12:21 AM
0

I have. Lying about being raped does not possibly change your identity in someone's mind, lying by omission about being transgendered does. I can explain it, I can't comprehend it for you.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:11 PM
2

You're missing the point about your own sexual preferences and identity being respected. But that point, genetically different genders have genetically different things. I don't care how much of a woman you might identify as, or how far you've gone to make your body match your preferences, your mind and body on the inside still work differently. It changes a bit based on hormone therapy, but your brains structure and synapses don't just break down and change to the other gender. The whole men ar…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:08 PM
3

The problem with that is so many times casual sex with someone turns into maybe a little more often casual sex as fuckbuddies than it turns into a relationship.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:04 PM
1

The disclosure of rape does not possibly present a sexual identity crisis to your partner. I'm still seeing how you're utterly failing to see it's not okay to lie to a sexual partner. Being raped doesn't possibly flip the switch in a guys head that they might be gay now. If you were raped, you're still whatever you were. Yeah, it might suck. Yeah they might be too freaked out by that and end the relationship or possibility of the relationship. But it doesn't justify lying or waiting until you ca…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:56 PM
3

Part of their current self is that they used to be something else. You don't just outgrow your past.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:44 PM
-2

Well, ideally before sex you should kind of know each other. But if you're just having random sex, you're probably a shallow person to begin with. I think revealing that "Oh, by the way you essentially rubbed your dick against what used to be testicles and a dick" is not okay after the fact. Just fucking tell them before you have sex. It's not a men's right issue. It's an honesty issue. But if you don't want to tell, it just means you're a dishonest person.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:37 PM
3

That is not an okay argument to make. It doesn't matter if their sexuality is threatened. It's their sexuality to like or not. If you didn't want to sleep with a rape victim, you should ask. Because it's safe to assume women have not been raped. A transgender person not revealing this is hiding behind social convention. If it's something that needs to be concealed, it's bad and you know it. If being transgendered isn't a bad thing (which I'd bet all transgendered people would contend) than it do…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:28 PM
-3

Why would it bother you if someone told you they rubbed your toothbrush in their ass? I mean it didn't bother you and you were completely happy with brushing your teeth with what you assumed was just toothpaste. The point is that no matter how much they try, to some people being transgender still equates to being a man in their mind. It's unfair to not reveal something like that before sex.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:21 PM
-6

Book preference is different from revealing the psychological bombshell on a straight man that "You just fucked what was once a dude." Don't be pedantic.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:19 PM
-5

This isn't a fucking men's right issue. This is an honesty issue. That's a big thing to just "reveal" to your partner. Like having a kid, or an STD, or that you're in a relationship. I don't even have to explain. You're a despicable person for not revealing something like that.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:17 PM
0

They're confusing gender with the Kinsey scale and maybe gender roles. But they are NOT the same, and are fucking stupid for even thinking that.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 01:57 PM
1

How is having her daughter film it punish him or her? If anything it could be used as a deterrent to her acting up, as in "you will get this too if you're bad". But then again, you probably just think the mom wants to chop off his evil penis and this is the only way she can really get back at him and his whole gender. There are worthwhile things in men's rights, and then there's this bullshit that undermines the whole thing and makes us look like nothing but women haters.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:59 PM
2

That's a very weak grounds for "men's rights". The issue at hand is whether or not this is child abuse. It being a mother and a son is convoluting the scene to some people. Maybe a cold shower could be considered abuse, but hot sauce is nothing worse than soap on the mouth when doing something wrong. There is acceptable punishment, there is unacceptable punishment, and then there is unacceptable punishment used only because it is a boy. Pretty sure people are seeing it as a 3 when the media blew…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:49 PM
7

That's akin to soap in the mouth. Granted I think she's way too bossy and bitchy and going overboard. But honestly I think everyone involved is making a bigger deal out of a form of corpreal punishment. It's just back to kids being coddled. God forbid little Johnny's or little Susie's feelings are hurt ever. Someone please explain to me where men's rights part of this is.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 12:47 PM
7

The worst thing about men's clubs is that some women always want into what they are being denied. But they shouldn't be there, they wouldn't enjoy it and all they do is destroy the point of what the guys were trying to do. Namely, having a safe testosterone filled retreat where they can be men. Women have these, men just don't want to be in them. Women find more and more retreats and estrogen zones/clubs while men have fewer and fewer to retreat to.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:16 PM
3

"It's a mat, with different...conclusions written on it...that you can jump to."
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:47 AM
9

Well the girl that made the status update and the person that posted both did the same thing. So why don't we call it even.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 02:45 AM
4

Yeah, it used to be the other way around. Except men had to spend money on a date instead of sleeping with them. Get over it. If the system hadn't started overemphasizing female enrollment, this wouldn't be a problem at all. And out of the "20% available, only 10% is acceptable". Way to go, that's exactly what you complain about men doing. I go to one of these 60-40 schools. That 60% of girls? The attractive ones are all dating or don't like you and we're left with fatties and ugos. It's how it …
/r/MensRights16/04/11 11:50 PM
1

So a hot chick is a bitch. Big deal. Also, I don't like bitches. In the event that I somehow could hook up with you, it'd be a one and done. Because you're not worthwhile being around.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 09:57 PM
5

What the fuck is this shit? That's fucked up no matter what decade. And what gender bitches about double standards? But this is pretty irrelevant now considering its age.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:29 AM
4

So um.....what are you doing later?
/r/MensRights21/09/10 07:37 AM
2

Well as feminists have plainly stated, bitch is no longer just derogatory and no longer only applicable to women. But seriously, it gives off a strong indication of being a woman. Not to mention the overwhelming amount of teachers that are female make it a strong possibility. And from personal experience, the only teachers that ever did this kind of crap were old crotchety bitches with a chip on their shoulder. But excuse me for making an assumption.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 06:22 PM
-7

Yes. Teach that bitch a lesson for her sexism. But something better than just a revolt.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 05:22 AM
-1

Well considering it's dropped off to a 1/3 of the population from 2/3 just a few years ago, it's probably not very lucrative anymore. Calling any industry "lucrative" is something you do when you try to make it evil.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 04:33 PM
1

A professor mentioned it in a lecture last semester. I don't have access to our database at school right now, unfortunately. So I don't have access to it at the moment.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 07:46 AM
1

The problem was we took our military deterrant and pushed it upon areas that are not legally ours. We had no sovereignty and in an effort to keep our military and economy a hegemonic power, especially against Soviet Russia, we funded and then put our noses in a situation that outlasted the Soviets. But there's a reason that 9/11 was the first major non-domestic violence on U.S. soil since Pearl Harbor. That's because Switzerland has no fucking wealth to take. There's no REASON to attack them. We…
/r/MensRights17/08/10 07:11 AM
1

We all do. That's the point. The men, the women, everyone. The kindest, gentlest soul to ever walk this Earth was Mr. Rogers. And he had one of those evil penises Terry O'Neill is on about.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 04:34 AM
4

Well welcome to the real world. People are out to get you. A deterrant militaristic structure is the only thing maintaining a safe and stable life. Look at Somalia. No government, no military, no police force, no safety.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 04:33 AM
4

The entire gender discrimination thing is based off of someone misinterpreting a statistic. Average female salary divided by average male salary gets about .78. This means women on average earn 78%(or so, there's variance) of the total yearly salary of men. Not that they are being paid 78 cents on the dollar for the same job, that's bullshit, assumed, and completely wrong. Women take usually lower paying jobs and are less assertive in the workplace statistically, asking for lower starting salari…
/r/MensRights17/08/10 04:31 AM
2

I don't really like the dog analogy, but yes immaturity and self-centered. The reason is basically "I don't need no man and his evil penis". If they really loved their future child they would want to give them the best start possible. That means two parents; keep in mind just two parents. Two guys, two girls, whatever. A stable two parent household is a serious leg up on development.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 10:07 PM
5

She's right. But it's selfish and foolish to do so. It has been shown quite clearly in lots of studies that a traditional family structure; or at least 2 parents is better for the development of the child. Jumping in before you have at least a partner to help raise the child will be detrimental, and all because of her selfish "I don't need a man" attitude.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 03:22 AM
2

You do not need to be someone so poisonous to your self-esteem and psyche, and physical health if she's literally threatening to stab you and ACTUALLY hit you. Do not convince yourself you need to stay with her. That's how all abusive relationships survive: "You don't understand our relationship" "He really loves me, you just don't know". THAT kind of crap. You actually typed "I can't leaver her because she needs me more than ever..." If she needed you, she would not abuse you. Leaver her and re…
/r/MensRights14/07/10 07:49 PM
1

That was the word of my professor last semester. She (yes, a female professor said this) was kind of an aggregator in lectures. She emailed bunches of stuff she found interesting. Sorry, but I don't have just a simple source on this. It's a bunch of individual studies on different variables that misrepresent women and men's salaries.
/r/MensRights15/05/10 04:57 AM
2

When accounting for variables, the gap becomes something like 3 cents on the dollar. Try complaining about 3 cents and not come off a greedy bitch.
/r/MensRights14/05/10 09:42 PM
13

The 77 cents to the dollar exists. It's just been misrepresented. Women's combined salaries average a certain amount, as do Men's combined average salary. Comparing the two comes out to women earning 77 cents to every dollar a man makes. This is not because women are paid less than men, it's because the average salaries are different. Women are more likely to take lower paying jobs (ex. teachers, esp. elementary to say teaching at a college), less likely to ask for raises (women have been shown …
/r/MensRights14/05/10 06:49 AM
3

You know, with that amount of hate towards her, one day someone could have punched her square in the nose and nobody would have seen a thing, I bet. The look on people like this' face is priceless when you prove they aren't just totally in control. Regardless of any women's rights business or anything, this bitch deserves a kick to the baby maker and a punch to the face.
/r/MensRights06/12/09 08:25 AM
0

Good God where the hell do these people come from? Not saying blacks or gays or transgenders or anything is wrong, but those people are WRONG.
/r/MensRights20/11/09 07:34 AM
-1

Sure. Like people that are Wiccans aren't all bat-shit crazy, emotionally unstable, or some weird combination of both. It's like these goth douches, they're being different to be different. They're all conforming to the same type of non-conformity. They shop at Hot Topic so they can be different than all those stupid consumeristic idiots. We can generalize in these cases.
/r/MensRights04/11/09 04:49 AM
2

I know. I hate Toby so goddamned much.
/r/MensRights04/11/09 04:46 AM
2

Stay classy, UK.
/r/MensRights28/10/09 07:19 PM
1

Damn straight.
/r/MensRights28/09/09 10:24 PM
2

Well done Miss Woods. Or Mrs., it's all good. That's all we want, an acknowledgement that guys get treated unfairly, too. And if all this "equality" was actually striving for equality we would be a lot less pissed off and probably be on board.
/r/MensRights26/09/09 07:29 PM
3

I hate it when women ogle my balls.
/r/MensRights26/09/09 07:24 PM
3

Very true. The bad thing is that in many of the equality making laws or what have you they really are zero-sum. If you make a school better at letting girls learn, it takes away from boys and vice versa because we think differently. But the things that help women that don't take away from men should obviously be undertaken. True, many of us are pro-woman but very anti-feminist. Just like how I'm for blue-collar workers but I don't agree with unions. What they were instituted for as for the most …
/r/MensRights21/09/09 04:24 AM
7

Well then while our opinions differ you have a valid claim. But whatever group anyone claims to be a part of, they will see the most aggressive of their "enemy's" side as their normalcy and discount the extremists of their own side as just a fringe group that doesn't truly stand for their group. Christianity, atheists, blacks, whites, men's rights and feminism too. Any group. The result is we all (generalization, not literally everybody) view feminism as the fanatical anti-men bitches while you …
/r/MensRights21/09/09 04:10 AM
11

There is a lot of feminist bashing because feminists consistently overreact and refuse to even acknowledge that a group advocating men's rights needs to exist. And you did one of the things that we hate and makes us right about certain arguments. You made a throw away account to avoid punishment. Stand up and say what you want like a man. Until then you can never, and should never, be equal. And if you are spotting the bias here and can't see it in the feminism subreddits then you are functional…
/r/MensRights21/09/09 02:44 AM
7

Would the factor that women spend more time with children have anything to do with this statistic? Commuters aren't more likely to get in a crash because they're commuters, but because they drive more. Though this certainly does throw a big wrench in the "only men abuse children" assumption that is held by all too many people.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 06:40 AM
1

That argument is a slippery slope though. At what point does natural genetic deviation turn to unfair advantage? I saw a pick to-do about some 5 year old kid that is freakishly strong for his size and so people don't want him to play little league. That just seems wrong. Clearly until there is an intersex division for athletic competition (which there NEVER will be) she must be technically classified as either male or female to compete. Banning her for a birth defect is as wrong as saying handic…
/r/MensRights13/09/09 06:16 AM
1

Nicely said. Good points, all of them.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 04:17 AM
2

I meant women in a broad sense, not absolutely. But I stand by my point and think this needs to be addressed and at least admitted by some women like "yeah, a lot of us do that." Just how I know and admit that many of my fellow men are assholes that use and then discard women or otherwise treat women in cruel ways emotionally. I'm not saying all men do just like I don't mean all women act that way. But women for the most part on this point act all innocent when they are far from it. Like when I …
/r/MensRights11/09/09 03:34 AM
0

Women are so two faced on this issue. "We want a nice guy, but only after we whored it up at college, slept with utter douches, and our looks are starting to go. I want someone who will appreciate me." Just pisses me off.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 06:58 PM
3

If women would figure out that men have pussified over the last 100 years and we still have to let out aggression and testosterone in violent actions like athletics or just breaking stuff then everything would be better. Why are you spending so much time with your friends, don't you love me? You can only take so much lifetime channel before your balls make up and tell you to hurt something.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 06:56 PM
-2

Now let's go rape some bitches.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 07:08 AM
2

I saw some report somewhere that sperm actually does mellow bitchy women out. In scientific terms, it works.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 07:06 AM
0

Hear hear for AnnArchist!
/r/MensRights10/09/09 07:05 AM
5

True. Yet Feminism hasn't been about equal rights since about 1971. It has devolved into give women more rights and give them advantages while not giving any of that to men or relinquishing the positives that being a woman gives. When is the last time you heard a feminist arguing to be registered for the draft?
/r/MensRights10/09/09 07:03 AM
-4

Or not learning baseball.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 07:00 AM
1

I refuse to read any of that, the mention of that concept is that infuriating and frustrating to me. But I guess with all that natural superiority they would have been ruling the world for the last 6000 years. But they haven't because they aren't superior.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 03:10 AM
-2

NO ONE CAN BE EQUAL. They are too different. I'm not saying women should be subjugated or make less for the same amount of work. I'm saying women behave based on emotions, and that fucks up a lot of stuff. This "If women were in charge, there would be no wars" shit has got to stop. All this crap about everything being geared towards men is stupid. OF COURSE IT IS. Men set up every institution, pretty much since the dawn of humanity. Men are naturally more agressive, apt to dangerous activity, an…
/r/MensRights16/08/09 10:31 PM
7

Is it just me or is this stupid "perfect mom" at home doing literally everything around the house and to deal with the kids is bullshit? Yeah because the husband doesn't have to work over 40 hours a week at a job he hates then comes home has to mow, fix up the "men's work" and then can't sit and watch half a baseball game without being nagged. Providing for a family that never says thank you is much worse than vacuuming and then picking up the kids at school. Get stuff for dinner damnit. The guy…
/r/MensRights07/08/09 07:15 PM
3

Pregnancy is a choice. Getting a disease or PTSD is NOT. edit: makes more sense with an s in there.
/r/MensRights07/08/09 03:23 AM
5

New poll shows that this poll is bullshit. We don't take the relationship as seriously. We want three things: Fuck us, don't fuck others, be fuckable like earlier in the relationship. Shit happens when these three aren't met. edit: Very basic, but a very fundamental 3 rules for keeping a man happy and with you. I realize there are always differences and exceptions and leniency, but most men will admit that these are very true at the most basic level and pretty much need to be met. How many probl…
/r/MensRights24/07/09 06:37 PM
4

The problem is when men try and follow logical actions like signing a pre nup or preparing for any of that, women turn into tremendous thunder cunts crying about "you don't really love me" and other bullshit that they won't let you work around. Because they are illogical and run on emotion, and so complicate the simplest of situations.
/r/MensRights19/07/09 06:47 AM
0

It's for down the road sexual health. That's a very poor and revolting extrapolation you've just made. And you could argue the kid doesn't feel anything because they have no memory of the event. Basically if you don't remember something, you haven't experienced it. But that's a deeper philosophical question I've thought about. So you can't just strap that onto the argument.
/r/MensRights18/07/09 05:54 PM
-2

Did you read that? Have of those are pure crap. Stuff not understood and really just ridiculous. Pheremones are produced by chemicals in your body, not a small piece of skin downstairs. Like your armpits for instance. And foreskin actually rubs around on your penis and causes irritation and rough skin. Not the otherway around. Like recently I read the positive effects for a pill, it blocked the replication of fat cells "to prevent weight gain". Fat cells don't reproduce, they just increase in si…
/r/MensRights18/07/09 05:44 PM
-5

I'm pretty sure the argument is that circumcision increases sexual pleasure. Namely by making the nerves on the head of the penis easily accessible. Circumcision doesn't chop off the head of your penis.
/r/MensRights18/07/09 03:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter