TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hoogstens Archive

View 6 posts and 106 comments by Hoogstens on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nah, it's just a dirty social hack for socially awkward people.. it's really not that deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/20 01:38 AM
1

It's a sign for a public protest, not a diary entry. Imbecile.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/19 01:20 AM
0

There will be individual men in their 30s with high RMV. My point is that unless you have the time to sift through every single one of them to figure out their RMV it is generally good to avoid them. according to which figures? my point is you're making a lot of claims without any sources...so are you gonna share them or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/19 03:25 AM
9

There are too many reasons for being a single man in his 30s for this to be a valid point, unless you have some stats you can share with us?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/19 02:55 AM
9

Red pill lifestyle is basically traditional lifestyle interpreted by bitter loners. I'm sure my post will attract some hate, but you'd have to be seriously lost to take advice from a bunch of lost people who spend 24/7 talking about hypothetical relationships more than actually living them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 05:31 AM
3

it depends on her personality, number of sexual partners means absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 03:48 AM
7

It's true but women ain't doing it out of malice, the only reason it's an issue is bc youth is very important to a man. Women can be just as happy as a teenager in a relationship vs being in an aging couple so they don't feel like they've lost out on anything. Men on the other hand...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 01:48 PM
4

"nice guy" is a pointless, vague description. it's idiotic to use it to classify anything beyond the action of a person, you can do something nice but what does it really mean be a "nice guy"? It's used by people who are lazy or can't accurately describe what they mean --- depending on the context it can mean boring, meek, agreeable, sweet, unattractive etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 01:45 PM
1

i know it's unfair but sorry i don't feel sorry for chads, good luck with his case tho.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 12:54 AM
2

being a fireman is a job a woman can never do, and it's nothing to do with discrimination but pure biology. there are so many duties men perform in society that are completely under-appreciated. It's infuriating.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 12:48 AM
6

everybody knows when women complain about domestic abuse and catcalling it's talking about average or below average guys. their tolerance level goes up the more attractive/charismatic a guy is, and this is true for both genders. lets be real there are many things men don't tolerate with ugly/fat women as they would a victoria's secret model. yeah obviously nobody is going to admit this because 1) it's counterproductive 2) it's a cynical worldview which completely collapses the egalitarian goals …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/18 10:18 PM
14

beta bux is a woman using a man for his ability to provide a certain lifestyle she desires, nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/18 01:44 AM
1

yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/18 12:35 AM
1

exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 12:09 AM
1

of course but the topic of this conversation is Men's Right's? it's a bit of an irrelevant point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 12:07 AM
2

But to me being an anti-feminist does not necessarily make someone a Men’s Rights Activist. well you're wrong, since the source of these issues is feminist policies according to Men's Rights activists.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 12:04 AM
3

I think you can make the argument that it has gained traction based upon the fact the alt-right is quite mainstream these days (which indirectly champions men's rights). Individuals like Milo Yiannopolous injected MRA type of ideas into the public sphere, and being anti-feminist is the modern trend. It's quite ironic you've said that considering the supreme justice situation and the possibility of women's rights being rolled back 50 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 11:57 PM
12

The problem is most online MRA "activists" are just men angry about the status quo. I know because I've frequented these circles for the last decade. However with real MRA activists, make no mistake, they've made sacrifices. On the extreme end of the spectrum there's even been cases where one burned himself alive on the court steps to a trial.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 11:45 PM
1

1) when guys keep lamenting about chad taking their crushes, they're not talking about girls like you. 2) deep down guys know they have a huge blindspot for average girls with realistic expectations. 3) chad is a metaphor for every injustice they feel at whichever point, there's no real consistent definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 10:55 PM
3

i've only had relationships based on women liking my intelligence and career achievements (their words) but in all honestly they're the same reason all my relationships have failed. It was a mix of admiration and envy, especially the type of girls I dated were competitive and were always trying to get into an intellectual knife fight. I wish I went for more bimbos in my early twenties tbh. short answer: complimenting my intelligence/prospects
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 10:49 PM
2

to a degree I never would have in a two-parent unit this clearly implies she needs them more than the standard family. fact is they don't exist to fill the parental void left by your own decisions, they exist for favours.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 05:34 PM
3

There's always a deep sense of insecurity in these articles. I lean on my neighbors to a degree I never would have in a two-parent unit; my friends are family in deeper ways than they might otherwise have been. This part in particular just sounds really sad... friends are not replacements for family and her neighbours probably think of her as a needy and obnoxious lady next door.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 05:24 PM
44

The word misogyny is too overused, there aren't that many men who hate women purely based on their gender (aside from niche crowds like incels etc). Being unpleasant to women doesn't make one automatically "misogynistic", call it what it actually is..being an asshole. I doubt these guys treat weaker men and women any differently, it's called punching down. The only difference is power + domination doesn't give other men the tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 01:31 PM
9

because they claim that it's good for society not just women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 04:11 AM
50

But it especially applies to young white women, they want to be victims so bad they're categorising bad dates as sexual assault because their lives are so easy, they literally cannot find real grievances.
/r/MGTOW16/01/18 05:55 PM
9

And they totally deserved it. I have no sympathy for a group of useless virtue signalling assholes like Hollywood men.
/r/MGTOW16/01/18 05:03 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 07:16 PM
3

We are in very interesting times, the natural conclusion to this will be that men and women will end up segregated at the workplace. That should do wonders for women expecting to be treated specially because of their gender. Things will be judged purely on results instead of gender politics, oh feminist will regret this very much....
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 05:49 PM
3

Is it even sexual assault? Harassment? NO.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 03:06 PM
4

Louis CK asked and look where that got him.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 01:13 PM
2

I already stated in the OP that abuse of power is a wrong thing to do. Also you keep purposefully glossing over the fact that these women keep creating the environment where these situations emerge. Why? I don't believe the power of authority is inherently bad, nor are all men. We need to blame men if their behaviour lacks, not blame them for being in a situation they didn't even create.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 12:55 PM
2

I was using your analogy, I thought the "individual with a gun" meant criminal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 12:48 PM
7

You can simplify many social interactions in life to basically the act of coercion though. Many relationships in life are also imbalanced in various ways, but this doesn't make these men rapists and assaulters no more than it makes my boss a slave owner. I have a feeling all this comes down to mantra that women must never have a single unpleasant experience, or all hell breaks loose.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 12:47 PM
5

It's more accurate to say "I went to the criminals house and then was surprised they had a gun and asked for my wallet". In many of these cases (especially involving groupies) they stalk and follow these men even despite their so-called bad reputations, despite knowing the seediness of the music subculture etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 12:41 PM
3

You sound grateful to have seen any at all, so I"m not surprised. There are some funky looking vaginas out there though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 06:50 PM
–

Yes. I'd go as far as to say a life without self-confidence isn't worth living.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:18 AM
1

I think it's a valid form of classification. Being that red pillers are playing the part of a male who has casual sex — to them it's the truth every step of the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 08:37 PM
1

It's obvious there's no attraction, and it somehow became less and less as the marriage matures. Then it makes sense they don't want sex any more. It's not a form of punishment per se. For some women unlike yourself — their enjoyment probably has a higher threshold. I'm not well-informed on marriages and such, but my understanding is men tend to ignore their wives sexually during pregnancy or heavy bouts of stressful work. It's a unique female trait to become cold and distant for whatever reason…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 08:29 PM
1

I don't think it's just attractive "gamer girls", but both genders want to rebrand themselves as a person with nerdy qualities. Intelligence is fashionable. The obvious truth is that nerds are social outcasts, of which a (small) sub-group has high spatial and verbal intelligence, and therefore nerdy has become a desirable label. This involved removing somewhat embarrassing parts, like being socially maladjusted and awkward and the inability to make friends. It has simply been delegated to 'neckb…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/14 08:07 PM
2

So basically, long story short, when it comes to WHR and other "indicators of fertility", is it enough to basically have the indicators, or is it a matter of "the more extreme, the better"? It only increases your sex appeal to a certain point, some guys might be into extreme ratio between hips/waist, but then again some guys are also into furries. Btw, no matter how small their waist, I don't think RP dudes would date a chick with 60" hips.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 09:11 PM
13

The amount of time you spend repeating that women are people is bizarre and condescending. Stop implying people who face difficulties with dating are all misogynists.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 07:39 PM
15

I was expecting something new, but this is just another list preoccupied with with things men shouldn't do. Where's the actual advice? Google for details, as there's plenty of stuff out there that's better than what I can give you Oh nevermind.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 06:45 PM
-2

No, but that misogyny (to a certain degree) is attractive to women. It's not as black and white as saying women are attracted to assholes. Lastly, I think the 80/20 is another argument, but close to the truth as historically the majority of men died without descendants.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 12:10 AM
0

I'm talking about the fact that it works in terms of getting a hold of a woman in the first place. I think it's pointless to speculate whether their relationships failed because of red pill behaviour or otherwise, there is simply too little information to make that assumption. Also I think it's a cop-out to give all credit to the improvement aspect of RP. It certainly also depends on their behaviour. The combination of improvement and having clear objectives is what differentiates red pill from …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/14 11:50 PM
16

The reason they say "we're just a satire subreddit" is so they never have to argue why red pill beliefs are so wrong. This is a fact because they could keep their circle-jerking and at least create a high-brow related subreddit, but they won't. For those reasons I never took them seriously but mostly just trolled them whenever I feel like it (till I got banned recently).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/14 10:56 PM
12

So let me get this straight, you are annoyed at the fact he might be interested in other women even though you barely just hooked up for the first time. Personally I don’t get the impression you can withstand hookup culture. I'd suggest lowering your standards until the power imbalances are in your favour. If you expect 10/10 guys to commit or make you their primary consideration that’s just idiotic and the road to becoming another statistic of ‘alpha fux beta bux’. Why do I still care so much a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 08:32 PM
3

I don't think its so much about innocence but as I understand the alternative would be to admit that women are attracted to those with morally repugnant traits. Its just easier to throw social outcasts under the bus.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 11:25 PM
5

I can at least understand why many redpillers despise guys like that. But blue pillers? I find it bizarre they claim there's so much abuse against women in heterosexual relationships, and with the same breath say that all these guys are single and avoided because women sense that their abused qualities are apparent and hence explains their deserved lack of romance. Makes a lot of sense though right? Who are these guys making women so miserable if the world operates on such perfectly just heurist…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 10:49 PM
8

rationalize that nice guys in fact are overt manipulative hidden agenda pieces of shit and the jerk is just confident and forward. It's the other way around, jerks are insecure manipulative emotionally broken men. And they get the girl. It's alright, not everything has to be fair or not offensive. Life is complex and shit. I think this is the most honest thing ever said in this sub. It's absolutely amazing bluepillers spend so much time pointing fingers at 'guys who pretend to be nice but are ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 10:03 PM
5

I think your narcissism might have something do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/14 01:37 PM
3

I assume people who judge sluts know deep down it's not really a number they're unsatisfied with. The only number relevant is where N is less than their own, and what they're really obscuring is that N > 0 is enough for "slut". It's an issue with the whole entire transformation that occurs when women have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 08:58 PM
0

It's not always that their issues permeate into their dating. Sometimes personal issues arise from the effect that people lag behind in developing social skills in the first place. I appreciate your apology though. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 08:40 PM
0

You mean like what you did here?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 11:22 AM
13

Because they don't want to be lonely forever. That's a serious prospect for many young men. I'm not sure what you mean by desperate, the guy in op never even kissed a woman before. How can people in desperate situations like that not become desperate anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 01:10 AM
7

Consider yourself lucky. They only make it easier for women who make the effort to be sweet and attending. For example, from my friends point of view my 18yo fiance is a golden angel, while I just expect that kind of treatment. It makes me feel sorry for most guys.
/r/RedPillWomen13/02/14 11:35 PM
10

To repeat, red pill and this guy are not hinting at the same thing. I think it's pretty clear this guy is telling him women are so beyond his purview that he should not even consider pulling women until he's 40. That's an outrage. Do you think visiting sex workers ought to damage someone's psyche? I'm saying I could certainly see that kind of thing happening. I don't understand why it's so difficult for people to understand the implications of being ignored, rejected or perhaps even ridiculed fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 11:08 PM
15

I still find it depressing though. I still don't see any decent alternatives (from the so-called blue pill crowd). It's pretty patently obvious the only thing that matters in modern society is to facilitate the happiness and comfort of women. Lonely nerds are treated like lepers in the 1500s.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 10:50 PM
6

Self-improvement is common sense but what's different about red pill is that their advice is much more explicit and hence more useful. They give the exact tools and strategies needed, for example, being in a good position financially and physically does give men a better chance. But until they are ready to take action it doesn't mean anything. Whereas this "advice" basically says wait till you're 40 and until some desperate woman pursues them. For gods sake, suggesting offensive measures like pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/14 10:33 PM
2

I do not think that his stated opinions are wrong necessarily, but that it is simply not red pill advice. Red pill theory does not merit that women can wave away their slutty pasts by staying celibate. It's one of the main pillars that you do not pay for what other guys had younger, tighter, hotter. That's all.
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/13 08:34 PM
2

Men who will commit to only virgins are an edge case, while most men (except doormats) will not commit to a slut. I'm not making some claims on morality, just that women who have casual sex are considered low quality and frankly, unmarriageable.
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/13 08:21 PM
8

This is not red pill advice. There's nothing special about staying celibate with a past like that. And it's impossible to verify whether a girl stayed celibate for x period anyway. Once you have a large sexual number you can say goodbye to finding a man that values self-respect and virtue. I don't think it's fair to mislead her to thinking celibacy helps, since no guy will pay for what other guys had "younger, tighter, hotter". It's irrational.
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/13 07:32 PM
49

Too easy. /r/SRSMen
/r/TheRedPill07/07/13 02:11 AM
-4

What a creepy sentiment. You are not entitled to sex.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 01:40 PM
11

To be honest it just sounds like he is depressed, and you are "trying to make him alpha" because you know none of those guys you're cheating with would ever give you commitment. It's very predictable. Yes, it's hopeless, you are not another teenager who's made a bad choice, a slut is who you are. Have fun while it lasts though, won't be too long.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 01:25 PM
6

Both.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 08:31 PM
2

nope, most ugly chicks are deluded people i have seen average guys get rejected by some really ugly chicks. they think they can get better because alphas have no problems fucking them on a one-night stand.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 08:06 PM
2

http://www.mgtowforums.com/forums/register.php Sorry, registration has been disabled by the administrator.
/r/MGTOW16/10/12 10:27 PM
15

This actually makes sense if you consider the premise that these men believe they're less at risk. And therefore have more sex recklessly, with false beliefs that circumcision allows them to have sex without consequences.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:45 AM
2

My goal is equality, not to get in some fucking pissing contest to see who's had it worse historically or get reparations for past wrongs. Yet, you decided to come into a men's oriented subreddit and derail this thread with irrelevant discussion about women's issues.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:58 PM
-5

I'm duly disgusted. Great job TwoXChromosomes (once again).
/r/MensRights03/06/12 07:26 PM
1

The problem is this tendency to ignore whether the man even wants this child. Also, they are only fuckbuddies, she has no reason to expect stability or support for her hypothetical child.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 07:23 PM
12

OP is quoting the article.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:27 AM
12

I have seen SRS members admitting in that thread to leaving 2X because it was too MRA friendly. They complain about the same thing when it comes /r/Feminism. So I do think their populations overlap.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:57 PM
9

Still, I'm almost certain the core members are definitely from 2XC. It's why SRS used to be advertised on 2XC, and still is to this day.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:21 PM
16

Thanks, I still haven't grasped English fully.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:49 PM
34

We are arguably the most misunderstood community on Reddit. So naturally, we are often prosecuted on here for our ideologies and ideas. A good example is that recently some SRS member used personal connections to the SLPC to brand all 35,235 of us as misogynists. And there are entire subreddits dedicated to propagating false information, in an effort to shut this place down. Read a bit more.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:35 PM
38

Also the social stigma for posting to /r/MensRights is strongest on 2XC. I honestly think places like SRS are made up of mostly 2XC feminists.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:54 PM
147

I like the fact that: I'm not called a misogynist for simply questioning the motives of women. I'm able to discuss men's issues without being laughed at. It guarantees I can speak without being prosecuted for bringing this up.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:43 PM
15

I agree with this policy, but CNN isn't some random blog. I doubt whether /r/MensRights links to them has a meaningful effect.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:34 PM
48

I'm pretty sure I said 'never' there.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 09:38 PM
139

It wasn't hard, she isn't that big, and it didn't hurt. She should never raise her hand against you.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 09:32 PM
20

Rape culture is a term or concept used to describe a culture in which rape and sexual violence are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media normalize, excuse, tolerate, or even condone sexual violence The definition itself is like a 180 degrees description of prevalent views on rape and sexual violence. Where do we see active endorsement of sexual violence? Rape culture is a myth invented by idiots. But let's be honest, feminists think having casual sex and regretting…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:05 PM
42

Those trolls didn't just slander. It was much more than trolling, it was attacking and bullying.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:08 AM
213

Well put. I really hope these trolls are brought to justice.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:55 AM
0

Isn't this what meta discussion is for? Let's not ruin the quality of discussion by encouraging irrelevant arguments in every thread. These members should be pointed towards the meta sub-reddit. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:00 PM
3

I've been lurking this board for close to 2 years now, and this phenomenon didn't occur much in the past. We are in the process of expanding, and so a lot of the newer members haven't really learnt much. I think the rules should be updated so that this doesn't derail discussions as much as it does now. And we can have the talk about this on Meta (as where this thread should be).
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:58 PM
11

There's nothing wrong with analysing over your own preferences. I just have a problem with feminists that only advocate sexual freedom for women, and then turn around to vilify and mock men that don't fit their template. Turn a woman down for being too slutty, or too many partners? You're a judgemental, misogynist prick. Turn a man down for being sexually inexperienced? LOL EW WHAT A LOSER HE PROBABLY HATES WOMAN.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:22 PM
8

No, I have a problem with the fact you think virginity is some sort of punishment.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:17 PM
9

It still doesn't make any sense to me because there are even serial killers and convicts that receive marriage proposals.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 09:29 PM
14

I in reality love virgins I don't understand. You use it as an insult, so clearly it's a negative condition in your perception.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:50 PM
49

For example, the idea that MR only exists because we're angered by our lack of success of women. This kind of thinking is very prevalent among feminists. And they use terms like "neckbeard virgin" frequently.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:20 PM
39

For once something going viral is beneficial to people.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:36 PM
5

:(
/r/MensRights24/11/10 09:44 PM
3

As a man circumcised at birth i don't really have a problem with it, but they didn't even ask your parents? That's a bit intrusive.
/r/MensRights15/11/10 11:59 PM
2

Your priorities are retarded, for lack of a better word. How do you expect anyone to sympathise with you when you could easily provide for your son? It's not his responsibility, and ofcourse it matters if he didn't want a kid. He didn't have a choice, you did. Count yourself lucky you have the means to support the child financially with your new husband. Enjoy your custody.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 05:20 PM
1

I stopped reading at "man up".
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:19 PM
1

You go.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:51 PM
5

so.....what does this post have to do with MR? You'd get more discussion going somewhere more female-centric e.g. twox.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 04:06 PM
3

wow, that's fucking terrifying.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 01:56 PM
0

It has medical benefits, what did you expect?
/r/MensRights20/09/10 08:02 AM
-1

I never said "all men", but most? I can't see why not, but people sure sure do love affirmation bias as evidenced by this thread. It is such a truly horrible thing, yet you can't publicly denounce it? I think you need to take a day off reddit, if you are so easily influenced by an online community.
/r/MensRights20/09/10 01:26 AM
-2

Don't think so, but you can legally pierce baby girls ears, so where's the outcry for a ban there? Just accept it's the parents right to make those decisions, just like it's however they discipline their children. You don't want your sons circumcised? Don't, but stay the fuck out of other people's business.
/r/MensRights19/09/10 03:24 PM
-1

Exactly, it's a personal preference. And I can't really imagine not being cut, though on the other side of things I must say their insecurity is breathtaking as evidenced by the downvotes. Hiding the fact by making a mountain out of a molehill for childrens rights. And my future sons will get circumcised too, and it's a painless process under narcosis when done properly. No matter how many rare stories of botched shady procedures reddit posts, it doesn't change the fact there's millions upon mil…
/r/MensRights19/09/10 03:10 PM
0

No?
/r/MensRights19/09/10 02:47 PM
-1

You do realise children don't have the legal ability to consent and thus is immediately deferred to their guardians/parents? According to that logic, no action could be taken even if it was for a medical reason! Let's be reasonable, what's next? Asking fetuses if they're okay with being aborted?I would argue circumcision more humane when it's done to babies, I myself don't even remember the pain. So what is exactly so cruel about it?
/r/MensRights19/09/10 02:32 PM
-8

I'm all for pro-choice, but this crusade against circumcision has to stop. It's not as vicious and cruel as it's being made out to be, well perhaps in third world countries, but the fault lies with lack of resources rather than the practice itself. It's about as painful process as cutting the umbilical cord, or tonsils out. I never knew foreskin or the lack of it was such a big issue before I came on reddit. I sincerely doubt redditors argue this vehemently when the issue is discussed in real li…
/r/MensRights19/09/10 09:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter