TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hookton Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by Hookton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Yep.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:53 PM
31

It's two separate definitions - it only means old/uneducated in Scottish dialect. They've just formatted it weirdly so it looks like one definition. That said, is it bollocks seen as condescending. This is just some arsehole with a chip on their shoulder; I've never known anyone get offended by "wifey". It's a bit twee and cutesy, but so is "hubby".
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:54 PM
1

You may be able to argue that and still call it sexual assault. I’ve heard rumors of assistants (nurses, etc.) saying that the doctors will sometimes nurse erections during the circumcision. The problem here is that you'd need to prove the practitioner is doing that for their own sexual enjoyment - which would be almost impossible to do unless they admitted it. Just because something involves the genitals does not make it inherently sexual. If an infant had to have a medically necessary procedur…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 12:21 PM
1

Where are you from? I'm guessing the legal terms vary. Again, not defending the practice, just quibbling the definition for clarity's sake.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 03:26 PM
0

I would argue that to be sexual assault, there inherently needs to be a sexual gratification component (on the part of the perpetrator), which I don't believe would be present in the vast majority of circumcisions. I think it's more accurate to label it physical or medical assault - not that that's any less serious, it's just a case of getting the terminology right.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:40 PM
10

Same. For me, it's just something that happened. No pregnancy, no STDs, no injuries except a few bruises and it's not like I was a virgin. I was more pissed that they stole my stuff. Do I expect other people to react the same way I did? Course not. But I don't tell them how to react, and I expect the same courtesy. To me it really is just that thing that happened, and it's in the past.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 04:10 AM
16

This just makes me fucking sad. How heartless can you be.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 06:47 AM
2

Jesus fucking wept. He had more patience than I would have. LPT: if you hit someone, they can hit back. I can go with the "Don't hit women" thing cos yeah, men are hella physically stronger. Whether you're male or female, physical conflict is a last resort imo, but if a guy starts it then I have sympathy for the woman cos she's so overpowered - just a regular guy can take down a very strong woman easily. But if she starts throwing punches, she deserves everything she gets.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/19 09:09 AM
3

Almost everyone. Top of my head, in my life I've known one person who didn't pay it
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/19 05:21 AM
4

Jesus fucking Christ, these people really want to make themselves victims. I've had regretful drunken sex and I've been raped and trust me, them two are not the same.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:27 AM
41

I mean, it used to make sense decades ago, when men were the breadwinners like 99% of the time and women stayed home. But the whole thing with feminism is to move AWAY from that relationship dynamic. You can't pick and choose which areas you want equality in, it's all or nothing.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 07:43 AM
-8

I don't get the hypocrisy. Like, I prefer taller blokes, I probably wouldn't date a guy shorter than me. And I'm fully aware that I'm too fat for some people to find attractive - cool, we'll be mates instead. Everyone has preferences, but it goes both ways.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/18 09:04 AM
8

It's an unnecessary medical procedure practised on tiny kids. Any surgical procedure, imo, should only be performed when there is a medical reason to do so, or the person undergoing the operation chooses to do so with full knowledge/understanding of the outcome.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 01:40 PM
9

Her first question was 'Is it my fault?' She hasn't gone mental on him or dumped him for what he said - she's gone looking for neutral advice about whether she should be upset, whether she's in the wrong, etc. She's not ranting OMFG MY BF SAID HE WANTS TO FUCK MY BF AND ALL I SAID IS I WANT TO FUCK BRAD PITT HOW UNFAIR IS THAT. She's asking for outside perspectives.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 01:52 PM
3

And her first question was 'Is it my fault?' She hasn't gone mental on him or dumped him for what he said - she's gone looking for neutral advice about whether she should be upset, whether she's in the wrong, etc. She's not ranting OMFG MY BF SAID HE WANTS TO FUCK MY BF AND ALL I SAID IS I WANT TO FUCK BRAD PITT HOW UNFAIR IS THAT. She's asking for outside perspectives.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 01:51 PM
9

And my thoughts are that both of them need to communicate more and seeing the guy lash out with something intentionally hurtful instead of talking with the girl and asking what she meant means it's the dude's fault for me personally.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 12:47 PM
13

But there's no cheating happening, or even any real intent to cheat.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 12:30 PM
15

But when talking about a celebrity in this way, all you're saying is that you fancy them. 'I'd fuck him' is just another way of saying 'I fancy him'. I can joke with my husband that hey, I would totally fuck Benedict Cumberbatch purely because it's so unlikely - it's obvious that it is a joke. If I met the guy in reality then of course I wouldn't fuck him because hello, I'm married. The absurdity of the whole situation is what makes it amusing. 'I would fuck Johnny Depp in a heartbeat.' 'I swear…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 11:46 PM
11

Course I did, hun.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 11:37 PM
10

Hmkay.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 11:16 PM
20

No, they didn't. 'I want to fuck Brad Pitt and I will if I get chance.' 'Well I want to fuck Emma Stone, and I will if I get chance.' Or 'Your mate John is so fit, I wish I could fuck him.' 'Yeah well I want to fuck your mate Jane.' Either of those would be them saying substantively the same thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 11:03 PM
9

Except we're talking hyperbole and hypotheticals. If she had gone and fucked Brad Pitt, I wouldn't be here defending her - to me, that's just as much a betrayal as fucking her boss, or his friend, or Emma fucking Watson for that matter. Cheating is cheating, whoever it is. But again, we're talking hypotheticals, and it's a lot more hurtful to think of your partner fancying someone close to them than it is to think of them fancying a celebrity - whether or not they intend to act on it, given the …
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 11:00 PM
13

So you're agreeing with me when I say they're totally different? Because that's my whole point. That OP's 'I wish I could shag Brad Pitt' is a whole different kettle of fish to her BF's 'I wish I could shag your best friend'.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 10:42 PM
22

One is pure physical attraction/admiration and the other has a whole lot more emotional stuff to it? Can you honestly not differentiate between 'Damn, Chris Evans is looking FINE in that costume, mm mm' and 'God, my boss is GORGEOUS, I wish I could get my hands on him'?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 10:26 PM
17

Sure. Care to explain how?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 10:19 PM
558

There's a world of difference between crushing on a celebrity and crushing on someone you interact with on a regular basis. I know a couple of actresses my husband fancies and it doesn't bother me at all - we'll joke about it together. If he came out and told me one of his co-workers or the barmaid at his local was hot, I'd feel hella different. That's not unusual, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 08:34 PM
10

We do it jokingly. 'That movie was fucking awesome and love, I'm sorry, but after seeing x in that outfit, he's on my list.' We do it about book characters and stuff too! 'I bet she knows her way round a bedroom. On the list!'
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 08:28 PM
6

You see it more as an adjective or adverb, almost synonymous with flirtatious - 'a coquettish smile' etc.
/r/MGTOW13/10/17 08:13 PM
11

I was raped. I didn't enjoy it, but it didn't devastate me either; it could seem that I didn't mind since I brushed it off as something that happened. But it was forcible, physical rape nonetheless.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/17 11:34 AM
2

I think this is a totally fine approach, though if the person you're talking to shows they know their stuff, you should adjust accordingly. In this case, she does a lot of the work on her car herself - not a mechanic but been tinkering with cars for 30+ years. She tried to explain as much to him but he didn't want to hear it. Again, though, it was nothing to do with her being a woman, that's just the way he is.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:13 PM
6

A friend of mine got offended that my neighbour talked down to her about cars because she's a woman. I was like yeah, no, he's like that with everyone...
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:59 AM
4

Oh wow, that is some crazy shit. Why have they not done away with it now we know it's bollocks?? ffs.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:08 PM
2

Surely that's a religious reasoning? Whereas in the US it seems to be... Aesthetic? Tradition?
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:38 PM
10

Is there anywhere except the US where circumcision is the standard for non-religious reasons? I just don't get why people persist in it when its so pointless. I know a couple of people who were circumcised in their teens for medical reasons, but that's it afaik.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 12:54 PM
1

I've said it before and it wasn't popular, but imo if there's inequality and you want equality, you don't make it worse for the ones who are better off; you make it better for the ones who are worse off. If that doesn't work for whatever reason, find a middle ground. Men's rights, or black rights, or whatever the fuck else rights shouldn't be about making it worse for the 'other side', they should be about making it better for you. If I can grab butts, you should be able to grab butts. If you as…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:43 AM
1

The militant outliers are always heard loudest, but they are few. Most people are pretty reasonable. You seem the same thing with BLM right now. The normal people who just want to support rights for black people are totally overshadowed by the very vocal nutjobs. I support women's rights and I support men's rights. But women's rights, or feminism, has been corrupted to mean 'women = best'. We need both women's and men's rights because different difficulties apply to each group. Hey, why not just…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 06:46 PM
1

I'll go with Merriam-Webster and the OED. Equality, not superiority.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:24 PM
1

Wasn't exactly hiding it, told you a while ago I'm in the UK.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:43 AM
1

Right, I get you. Like I said, wasn't sure. So mandatory drafting for women too, then. Or for anyone male or female with no dependents.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:41 AM
1

...voting is your right to have a say in the running of your country. From what I've just read up on, in order for a man to vote he must submit to the possibility of being drafted. Yes?
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:27 AM
1

Mate, I think I'm done with this one. If one group has it good and the other has it shit, and you want them equal, work on making stuff better for the group with the shit situation. Across the board.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:25 AM
1

Yeah, that would make it fair. That would be better than the current system. Even better to do away with the idiotic idea that you need to be willing to die for your country to have a say in running it. For everyone.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:22 AM
1

You have no idea how much I hate faux-feminists. I was raised by one. Women's rights did good in the past, men's rights need to do it now.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:17 AM
1

Sure, a new term would be good. Equality, human rights. That's what we're striving for. In some cultures, I would argue that feminism is still applicable as a term since women really are treated as lesser beings. But in western society, let's just go with equal rights.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:04 AM
1

It's difficult to look critically at the damage feminism has done to the economy in terms of wages stagnating and an oversaturated workforce because so many other factors have had an impact. I definitely agree it had some effect; it would be interesting to look into the details of it. Again, though, I'm coming from a UK perspective, where a lot more young men were lost in the wars. A lot of women HAD to work during the wars because there simply weren't enough people otherwise; how comparable is …
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:09 AM
1

I don't think most people go into divorce, especially with children involved, for frivolous reasons; I think most would try to work the relationship out, but if its untenable, then it's better to be able to leave. I don't think the woman should automatically get half; things like who earned what wage, who had more assets before the marriage, any inheritance on either side, division of custody of children etc etc should all be taken into account, and atm men are being screwed. So what we need to …
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:24 AM
1

I'll be honest, I didn't know about the draft being a requirement to vote; I'm in the UK, and that's not a thing here afaik. I guess our countries' evolving gender rights have gone significantly differently, probably in no small part due to the world wars - we lost such a large proportion of our young men that there was a bigger impact. That being said, I disagree with the draft being necessary to vote for men and not women. But instead of saying women should have to sign up too or forfeit the r…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 08:32 AM
1

Of course they were. Anyone who has ever fought for the rights of women is a feminist. The problem is that it's run its course and is now no longer needed but people cling to it as a movement. What we need is a new movement. We need to fight for both men's rights and for women's rights, together, not as enemies.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 08:22 AM
1

Why should women ever have wanted or needed to demand commitment with sex? You speak of the family unit breaking down, and I agree that's true; but it's not necessarily a bad thing to be able to opt out of an unhappy marriage. A marriage forced due to an unwanted young pregnancy with no birth control or abortion rights and huge stigma attached that turns abusive is one that either party should be able to check out of. You get some chick pregnant now? She can hit you for child support, sure (and …
/r/MensRights01/06/17 08:16 AM
2

I can see I'm not going to convince you. Sorry if I've offended you. Believe it or not, I'm here reading because I'm interested in men's rights and equality.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:21 PM
2

It's not that it needs to be explained better; it's that the whole core concept has been corrupted by angry, brainwashed idiots. That's why I say we need a better term. There was a place for feminism in western culture in the past. There is a place for feminism in other parts of the world even now. But people have pushed past the fight for equality, which I what it was meant to be, and want it to mean 'girlz rool boyz drool'. That was never the core idea. We need a new name.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:15 PM
-2

No, new feminism is cancer. True feminism, such as idk giving women the vote is good. That's what's at it's root. But it's been taken over by people who've completely warped it to 'women are better'. We need a return to true feminism (and I still believe there is a place for that in some cultures), or a new term that reflects its sentiments better and leave the third-wavers to their 'feminism'.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:12 PM
12

It's like a black guy hating all white people not for any current issues but because 'my family were slaves'. I'm sad that was the case, but just because my great-granddaddy was a cunt to your great-granddaddy doesn't mean I'm going to the same. Current 'feminism' smacks of revenge against a whole group of people who never personally had anything to do with your hardships. Hate the man who treats you like you're lesser than him. Hate him because he's a bad person, not because he's a man. I loath…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:08 PM
1

Hm, sorry, I misspoke - when I said 'we' I meant 'women', not 'people'. My point was that while we, as women, have gained our equality in most western cultures, many women have been conditioned to see men as an enemy and some are pushing for further 'rights', which means the balance has swayed in the opposite direction - to where men are more prejudiced against than women in many situations. Women had to fight for equality after many many years of being treated as lessers. But once relative equa…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:58 PM
4

Yes, absolutely! Humanist is perfect.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:14 PM
15

True feminism is. This kind of shite is about superiority. 'Feminism' as a concept has been corrupted by arseholes so much that the term needs to change. Let them be feminists; we'll get a new name and search for EQUALITY. The world was (and still is, in some cultures) very unfair to women. That sucks. But in most western cultures, we have gained equality and people won't stop pushing back so it's gone the opposite way in a lot of respects. It's almost like a revenge thing, women being taught th…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:47 PM
5

Our local does it decently, I reckon. There's a room for 'men, urinals only' and a room with stalls for 'everyone'.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 05:11 PM
1

Definitely. I mean, just from your comment multiple people know of a service they never knew of before. They likely won't ever need that knowledge, but you never know! It's hard to google (well, physically easy but emotionally hard!) 'Where can I safely get rid of my newborn unwanted baby?' or create a post asking for similar information - but if you have heard of these schemes before, finding a local drop-off point would be doable. Like you said, in the age of the internet, the information is o…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 06:51 AM
3

See, part of the problem is that people don't know about this - like the person who replied to you. People bring up the argument of poor education in cases like this and there really is some merit to it. The fact that she tried aborting the baby by drugs, alcohol, etc rather than looking into legitimate options suggests she didn't know what options were available, or that she was under too much social pressure and maybe didn't realise these things can be done discreetly. Murdering the baby sugge…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 06:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter