TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hoopaboi Archive

View 0 posts and 135 comments by Hoopaboi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Where in the comments are people blaming women as a whole for these policies existing?
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:35 PM
2

ABC Pediatrics in North Carolina accidentally let it slip, that the doctors there see an uncut penis as “unsightly and offensive” Woah do you have a source on this? Total mask off moment there
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:17 PM
1

Good bait
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:06 PM
8

Traditional gender roles can be both misandrist and misogynist at the same time. It's nothing new
/r/MensRights17/09/25 04:48 PM
5

You have got to be trolling at this point. If so, you got me really good so congrats. I'll just leave this: there is no country in the world where women are also enslaved for combat like men if combat slavery is active in that country (except for Israel, but women still serve shorter terms)
/r/MensRights17/06/25 11:19 AM
4

It's almost like you've stopped reading after the first paragraph of my comment lmao Also by "using men as a resource" I meant male specific ways this happens. Not "people are seen as just another employee", but "men specifically are seen as sacrificial pawns in war" The equivalent might be women being seen as resources for producing children Huge sophistry on your part.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 04:08 AM
11

It is perhaps less accurate to say they're literally "man hating", but rather "using men as a resource" However, society more than welcomes defining "hatred" of women (misogyny) as any sort of negative social or legal policy affecting them. For example, I doubt claims of "belong in the kitchen" or "can't drive" are literal hatred, but they're still called "misogynist" Ergo, for parity, I don't see the issue calling combat slavery or other misandrist policies and beliefs "man hating" even if they…
/r/MensRights16/06/25 11:26 PM
0

the number of sexless men is higher than ever before, social media and dating apps have expanded reach and options for the everday woman. of course dating apps have everything to do with it. Correlation does not equal causation. back then a girl had a certain amount of dudes to choose from her social circle or night life. now its thousands and thousands all over the country An unequal dynamic that causes women's standards to rise would only exist if some factor affects one sex only. In the case …
/r/MensRights30/05/25 01:25 AM
1

I don't think the existence of dating apps is the issue. Keep in mind throughout history 80% of women reproduced, but the number of men that did so was much lower. And it's not due to war because throughout most of history war deaths were minuscule compared to everything else. Dating apps are just reflecting the reality of dating as a man that's remained constant since time immemorial. It was always harder for men because of sex drive differences driving up women's value. You can see how this pl…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:34 PM
2

but not on the scale of fat people The sheer scale is only smaller because fatness is an issue that negatively affects both sexes, while shortness' negative social effects only affects men You need to equalize for gender. You also if ignored that fat acceptance is primarily a female movement. Look at the biggest advocates. There's no massive hate movement against short men either My main point of the reply was to point out that there are no body positive movements specific for men, but there are…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 10:17 AM
1

I never accused you of saying "all women"; but your comment did imply that you claimed I was saying "all women", which is what my response addressed. Reading comprehension moment So I take it you agree my example of posting a similar comment like yours (not all men) on TwoX under a post talking about SA is totally fine?
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:05 PM
5

This isn't about women as a whole. This is specifically about the ones who have an issue with men having hobbies; I am describing their thought process. You interpreting it as all women is your problem. Imagine this was a post about SA in the TwoX sub, and this reply refers to "them"; attempting to describe the psychology of r*pists. If I commented what you did, but replaced "women" with "men", would that be a reasonable response? Is my "not all men" appropriate? Or is it only appropriate when y…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:05 AM
2

Privileges that all women have based on gender, because any woman is considered fertile by default. Infertile women should have no special protection compared to men. Agreed, but I don't see how fertile women should get these privileges. Just because gynocentrism emerged due to human nature does not mean it is socially desirable or necessary in the modern age Of course, eliminating it is next to impossible since the biological incentives are still there. Unless the above paragraph is what you me…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 06:05 PM
1

An artificial womb with artificial eggs, on the other hand, will fundamentally change the rules, and women's monopoly on childbearing will be undermined. There are no alternatives to women in the world in childbearing now. I didn't ask if artificial wombs would change anything, my bad for not clarifying. I asked how abolishing privileges for women who are not fertile (infertile, over 40 years old) changes anything with regard to male disposability before artificial wombs. In addition, which priv…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:14 PM
1

Before artificial wombs, the issue of abolishing privileges for women who are not fertile (infertile, over 40 years old) must be raised. How would this solve the fundamental issue, which is biological? In addition, artificial wombs are likely to come after artificial sperm. You need to create an egg and a womb, but for the former you only need to create a sperm cell.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 12:05 PM
1

Even most MRAs here will deem most men's issues as "men aren't allowed to be masculine anymore :(" When the real issue (biological expendability) has existed since time immemorial. I'm tired of these normies claiming things were better for men in the past.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 11:00 PM
2

Realistically artificial sperm would be far easier to produce than an artificial womb, which would also require an artificial egg. Artificial sperm would make the problem worse. The tech that would do the most to address male expandability would be genetic engineering humans to produce more women than men. Men become inherently scarcer, thus raising their value and making them less expendable. Sex robots also don't solve the male expendability problem, which is again, rooted in biology.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:55 PM
2

Finally, a post that actually hits the core of the issue, which is biological male disposability. I think the issue must be solved with biology as well. There is no social or political system that can solve it. The value of men must be raised by reducing the amount of men that are born, which would be done via genetic editing. Rather than 1:1 female to male ratio, there may be something like 4:1. In such a society, even though women are still the reproductive bottleneck due to the mechanism of r…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:51 PM
8

A better example OP could use would be "women's body image issues", or the prevalence of anorexia Imagine saying "women are doing it to themselves, it's not men's responsibility" or even worse, saying "they deserve it" It would never fly, and they'd quickly point out how they're just "pointing out structures in society, not forcing men to find certain women attractive" Also note that "femcel" support movements do exist. Look no further than the fat acceptance movement. There's no "short acceptan…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:58 PM
198

That's because making money = able to support them It's only bad when it doesn't benefit them
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:54 PM
1

I'm not homophobic. Facts are facts. The average gay man has 60-70 partners according to the stats. The average straight man has between 4-8 in a lifetime.** **https://journals.lww.com/jaids/abstract/2012/05010/a\_comparison\_of\_sexual\_behavior\_patterns\_among\_men.13.aspx I never claimed you were homophobic and I never denied that gay men are more promiscuous (nothing wrong with that either) My claim was that there is more stigma against gay men and their promiscuity than female promiscuity.…
/r/MensRights11/05/25 10:55 AM
1

That said, the comparison breaks down because women still face a lot of stigma if they engage in frequent casual sex, especially with multiple partners If you listen to any homophobic person talk about gay people they will 99% of the time zero in on the men and how promiscuous they are. There is a whole lot more stigma for gay men to be promiscuous than women. That kind of behavior would be a dealbreaker for me if I were considering dating a woman. I know I would not be able to forget it or feel…
/r/MensRights11/05/25 01:21 AM
1

It sounds like a difficult life if you're looking to date. Not really difficult if you're just looking for sex. This just proves that when sex drives are equalized (if women's were brought up to men's) this is what straight interactions would look like. In addition, I can't imagine it'd be too hard to find a long term relationship in this environment either. Gays are less picky than straights because there's no overvaluation because as they're all men, the sex drives are the same so one side isn…
/r/MensRights10/05/25 09:39 AM
-1

Yea I highly doubt these claims. Unless this sub has a large population of top 10% men
/r/MensRights08/05/25 03:18 PM
2

Women, ime, love sex just as much but want to have sex with the same man No. They have lower T. Observe same sex male relationships. They still have way more sex than straight ones.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 03:04 PM
1

Thank you for being consistent at least
/r/MensRights26/03/25 01:16 PM
2

I use this term on occasion when someone says something cruel and abusive because men often measure their self worth based on their size So by that logic would you find it acceptable if someone said "small tit" or "loose pussy" energy or some other factor women are insecure about to cruel women?
/r/MensRights26/03/25 12:37 AM
2

Social darwinism leans more toward things like opposing social security net, opposing social welfare You can believe in those things and still be against social darwinism as there can be other justifications against it. For example, that market efficiency would benefit people as a whole more if all the money used for those services were not taxed away.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 10:58 PM
4

Women have no problem taking care of children that arent theirs the idea that as a man your masulinity is determined by weather not not the child you are taking care of is yours is also just a manifestation of toxic masculinity Ok I know this is sarcasm but there's a really easy response to this argument. Imagine there's a law passed that if a man cheats on a woman he's married to and has a child with another woman, then the wan he's married to is also legally obligated to support that child. Is…
/r/MensRights12/01/25 07:08 PM
2

You are cherrypicking. The worst case of "objectification" for men is being enslaved for war and being seen as a mere weapon to defend a country Men are enslaved and killed by their objectification
/r/MensRights11/01/25 03:06 AM
1

You could say the same thing for ordering a meal at a restaurant. Do you see the waiter as an object for your food? Ridiculous I made a post about this on another sub recently and it didn't go well lol
/r/MensRights11/01/25 03:04 AM
3

You literally addressed none of their points. So do you agree that male only combat slavery is androcide or not?
/r/MensRights28/12/24 03:56 PM
8

On the other hand, most killing of females are not due to robberies or the same type of violent assaults that kills most men; females are murdered in higher rates for stuff related to their position as a mother, daughter, wife Wut. This is just selective reasoning. I'm assuming you're talking about abuse. Why do you assume that if a woman dies from abuse from a male partner that they were targeted because they're a woman?
/r/MensRights28/12/24 03:54 PM
1

Not an argument Glad to see you agree with me
/r/MensRights24/11/24 07:15 PM
1

But wouldn't you agree it'd solve the issue? It's a simple question of supply and demand. Or is it the gene editing part you have an issue with?
/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:19 AM
6

Who posted what you pasted into ChatGPT? It sounds delusional for women to complain about dating apps. Everything on there (and the dating world in general) is better for them than for men (at least in terms of attention from the opposite sex).
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:38 AM
1

Literally everything. Age gaps don't magically stop being creepy at some arbitrary age. Frankly, I'm shocked how many people are offended at (but have no reply to) such a universal societal norm. So what's your argument then? I'm not asking about what society's ethics are, I'm asking about your ethics. Why is it "creepy"? It sounds like you're conflating arbitrary legal thresholds with morality. Surely you don't think it's "morally wrong" and "creepy" for someone on their 18th birthday to have s…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:33 AM
1

Nope. The discussion was about looks when I wrote it in a comment and someone else responded with their experience having a certain look. In addition, their looks were relevant to what was being discussed, which was age (they looked a certain age and were judged for it). Everything about their reply to me was related to convo.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:29 AM
1

I think this issue (and a good chunk of mens rights issues actually) is due to the difference in sex drives between women and men causing a greater "demand" for women than there is supply. So I don't think it's just straight misandry causing this, but rather a surplus of men and a shortage of women. Obviously, when there is increased demand for something the price rises as well, hence women get to be pickier with men. It's the same with mens rights issues like combat slavery or being seen as dis…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:27 AM
12

Does the fact that men are judged by their looks too (oftentimes much harsher than women) surprise you that much?
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:48 PM
8

What does 18 have to do with creepiness? What does age gap alone have to do with creepiness? 18 matters because that's where I draw my moral line of consent. Hence anyone younger than that would be morally wrong to start a relationship with, ergo you'd be "creepy" by virtue of committing a moral wrong under my ethical system. It's considered much weirder when the older person is a woman. Not at all. Where are the articles being written about "creepy older women" preying on young men? The most po…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:47 PM
50

Why is it creepy if they're over 18? And no, they're only saying this when it pertains to men, because male sexuality is denigrated and seen as inherently predatory. It's the same reason why homophobes almost always attack gay men first.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:22 PM
342

The view of "old = creepy" for men is just vilifying less attractive men for being sexual in any capacity (obviously both sexes lose attractiveness as they age). It's no different than the "old women = crone/witch/hag" stereotype. Except only one is being challenged because of the women are wonderful effect.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:59 AM
2

Show the studies then The other guy showed no studies about hybristophilia
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 09:56 AM
2

That's not evidence It was also universally believed that certain races were inferior a century or so ago, that does make it true
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 08:11 AM
1

So you're saying you have no evidence? Typical of black pillers
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 08:09 AM
1

I'm asking for stats, not a news case
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 12:14 AM
2

Do you have stats to back this up? You're just throwing out claims and numbers with no backing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 10:52 PM
2

There’s not a lot of good peer-reviewed literature on the subject, but experts generally agree that hybristophilla is more common in women than men None of your articles presented even include expert consensus on hybristophilla in women. You only cited one stating why some women may develop it. Even if we have expert consensus, the fact there is no peer-reviewed research on it renders it insufficient evidence. That's the lowest form of evidence on the pyramid. Give more evidence than "experts sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 10:51 PM
2

But neither is proof that men only want abusive women, or than women only want abusive men. It's merely evidence that there's mentally ill people of both sexes. There's also a good argument to be made that they don't really want those criminals, but just enjoy fantasizing about them. Just see all the stalker romance for both sexes. Bodice ripper novels for women, and yandere manga for men, but I doubt most people want to be abused.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 10:43 PM
8

Clear case of self defense from you. Should not have gone to jail at all. Officer should be the one in jail
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 10:39 PM
2

Where did OP state that this was an expectation they had for women? You're stating things OP never even mentioned; their criticism was against marriage as a whole, which includes both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 10:27 PM
63

Is there also a setting to measure how much paid work the woman is doing?
/r/MensRights18/05/23 05:07 PM
1

Still no source, thank you for conceding
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:48 PM
0

Still no source Thank you for conceding
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:41 PM
0

Ok, no source Claim dismissed
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:31 PM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights13/05/23 09:51 PM
2

My point was how are males discriminated in education? Literal gender diversity quotas set by universities and affirmative action
/r/MensRights01/05/23 01:43 AM
1

It can be both The prime tune that TERFs screech is that transwomen are all big bad evil men that want to invade women's spaces and spread their muh-soggy-knees However, this would only be lobbed at transwomen, which are a type of women Acknowledging this is still better than the classic leftoid crow of it only being misogyny
/r/MensRights30/04/23 12:42 AM
1

to the point where fathers who want to receive benefits for their children need to get permission from the mother Which part of the law says that? I live in Canada so I'd like to know
/r/MensRights30/04/23 12:33 AM
7

Also, even if it didn't have all of these issues, it's still a survey at the end of the day. There's a reason why the law doesn't just take your word that an alleged perp is guilty
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:34 PM
0

Although I am glad you're finding help in this subreddit, I don't see how this has anything to do with mens rights, especially when it was the boyfriend who took the video as well. Attentions seekers or just your generic "bad person" are everywhere, and this doesn't seem like it was motivated by ideology
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:19 AM
16

Although this might be true for a portion of people, I think another portion just does it through guilt by association X thing is associated with MRAs (and MRAs are evil) so therefore X thing is also bad
/r/MensRights25/04/23 02:13 AM
-11

Lol, classic "correlation = causation" fallacy from them They see a stat and automatically form their own biases
/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:37 PM
2

*deimonic
/r/MensRights18/04/23 07:24 PM
2

Congrats! R u looking just to lose weight or gain muscle as well?
/r/MensRights16/04/23 11:31 PM
22

Absolutely I had a Ukrainian friend of mine (male) who supported the draft in Ukraine because it was "defending the country" So I hit him with the "ok, so in countries with declining birth rates, is it fine to 'draft' women for childbirth?" Cue radio silence Funnily enough, the draft has no chance of affecting him because he's a Canadian citizen lol
/r/MensRights16/04/23 11:21 PM
5

Just goes to show that your average rightoid cares just as much about men as your average leftoid
/r/MensRights16/04/23 11:10 PM
1

Unfortunately, it seems the video was "male feminists against female misandrist" only that the misandrists were rightoids
/r/MensRights12/04/23 09:09 PM
5

Ok so you bite the bullet it would be fine to jail all black people because they commit more crime on average in the US? This has to be a troll lmfao
/r/MensRights30/03/23 11:33 PM
2

Doesn't seem like a men's issue. Plus, no one prosecutes
/r/MensRights13/03/23 11:54 PM
3

Gross
/r/MensRights13/03/23 11:52 PM
4

Iceland? Mutilation of men is banned there
/r/MensRights13/03/23 09:47 PM
1

Can we stop it with the "woman commits crimes" posts? I don't see how this has anything to do with men's rights unless the case has very obvious gender bias other than "lol the woman got away or got a slap on the wrist".
/r/MensRights29/12/22 10:45 PM
2

This is on par with most crimes in kids cartoons though. Love potions in Harry Potter (which would be date rape irl) the thousands of slapstick comedy shows where characters casually make and throw around bombs, or straight up kill each other and come back to life (basically every episode of Tom and Jerry features assault with a weapons and attempted murder) Unless you're also willing to cast the same judgement on these shows, you have no reason to judge turning red differently. You're making a …
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:20 PM
2

clear example of sexism to have songs popularizing women's sexual needs, such as WAP (Wet Ass Pussy,) yet at the same time have them arguing in the UK that even the act of men looking at a woman to long may soon criminalized as sexual harassment via staring in the UK. Those are not comparable at all. A more apt comparison would be comparing rap songs celebrating male sexuality. And there are plenty of those. 90% of rap songs are about "bitches and hoes".
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:30 PM
5

Gonna play a bit of devil's avocado here (disclaimer, I disagree with the notion that Asian women are fetishized, so don't crucify me) They would take the concept of race as an "object", and in this case, they're accusing men of dating Asian women because of their race and the stereotypes associated with it (exotic, submissive, etc), so you could "fetishize" a group of people for their race. Also, they would argue that preferences != fetishization, and that your stats prove nothing because the t…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 12:47 PM
14

The most common defense for using it would be "it just means when you try to explain things to someone who knows more than you" to which you can then ask, then why call it "mansplaining"? They'll usually respond something in the vein of "lol because men do it more". The best argument you can shoot back with would be: "If the argument is that 'group that does more action x means that x should be prefixed with group name', then it logically follows that committing crime should be called 'blacking'…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 12:30 PM
0

But if we want to talk reality, it absolutely takes effect, leaves a mark, and speaks about an individual. High n-count is the antithesis to a quality, long-term, monogamous relationship Show me a study
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 07:25 PM
0

Unironically it doesn't though. The main issue here is that she has a history of cheating and pathological lying. The bodies are irrelevant.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 06:57 PM
1

Why are you treating women as a collective? Imagine this post but it's someone saying "I'll never treat men as my equal" painting all men as using Andrew Tate's talking points. In fact, this has been done before multiple times on feminist subreddits when they mock "not all men". You're becoming the thing you hate the most!
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 09:45 PM
2

This has "rich people are oppressed because they're taxed more" energy
/r/MensRights25/11/22 10:13 PM
1

Do you also think black crime rates are high because of "gangster culture" rather than socioeconomic circumstances? If not, why? What differentiates their situation from men?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:48 PM
2

How do they actually prove this happens because they're women? Like if that was the case, I'm sure those statistics would be included in hate crimes. But they're not. So they have as much room to claim this is happening "because they're women" as much as MRAs have room to claim men get murdered more because they're men.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:41 PM
6

Considering less than a quarter are reported at all Wait, how did you get that number? 1 in 5 Oh. FFS that was a survey. If we all trusted surveys then we'd have to agree most convicted criminals are actually innocent (when surveyed, they say they're innocent) and that most men have 14+ inch cocks.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 08:49 PM
2

So from Merriam Webster: "social organization marked by the supremacy of the father in the clan or family, the legal dependence of wives and children, and the reckoning of descent and inheritance in the male line" I don't understand how you get: first demand of men is that they disregard their emotions From that definition. Can you please elaborate? Also, I can give the example that women are more likely to win custody battles for children, so we have two counteracting points: taking the father'…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 02:05 AM
2

What's your definition of patriarchy and what's your evidence it exists in the US?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 11:13 PM
13

homosexual men meanwhile are viewed as feminine There's actually a strange logic I've noted among many misandrists. Apparently when a man is being insulted for his femininity that is misogyny, but when a woman is insulted for their masculinity (ie "butch") that is... also misogyny. Usually they'll use some "women are overall more oppressed thus we can make this claim" but that's pretty much impossible to prove.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 10:51 PM
14

Toxic masculinity obviously. There are more male leaders so any discrimination against men must be men's collective fault. /s of course
/r/MensRights19/11/22 10:46 PM
9

Wait, so the men who haven't fought in a war also don't get rights? This is just assigning group guilt, no different than people on the other side of the ideological aisle.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 05:33 PM
1

Hold on, none of that was an answer to my arguments. Do you think it's justified for countries with hate speech laws to not prosecute women who post "kill all men" but prosecute men who post "kill all women"?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 01:37 AM
2

What's your argument for male "domination" and why does possessing such "domination" justify hateful statements against this group? I'm sure you'd agree Jews "dominate" Israel and black people "dominate" Nigeria in terms of power, does that suddenly make it ok to go full Nazi if I'm white and I post my Nazi shit while living in such countries? If that's still not ok, why? I'd be a minority in such a country in that case.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 08:47 PM
4

That was a survey. There is no reliable way to determine the crime actually happened.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/22 12:34 PM
-7

Do you really think Holmes would advocate for her own life sentence and execution? Especially after her little "woe is me" pity party she threw?
/r/MensRights14/11/22 12:42 AM
-22

I would give her a life sentence (I would be fine with execution as well) but that isn't the point being discussed. The argument is that the law is being sexist, which I point out that it's not when looking at the scope and number of crimes. No doubt some people died because of Holmes but the law doesn't work that way. Unless they can prove someone died, then there's no manslaughter charge(s).
/r/MensRights14/11/22 12:08 AM
-42

To be fair Madoff committed eleven counts while Holmes committed 4. Madoff also ran his scheme for 20 years and committed $50+ billion in fraud whereas Theranos (Holmes' scam company) had a total valuation of $9 billion at its highest point. Don't cry sexism when you don't have all the details.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 11:29 PM
3

It should be important to keep in mind that misogynist terror attack != Incel terrorist attack. In the case of Tres Genco, it would've been an incel attack, but if it was someone who wanted to target women for "destroying western society reeeee!" or some other reason, It wouldn't make sense to say it was an incel attack even if they were literally involuntarily celibate unless you're just describing the shooter e.g "black, white, male, female" attack referring to a descriptor of the attacker rat…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 11:30 AM
3

Any sub is a bit of an echo chamber but from what I've seen, moderators rarely remove posts here and I see frequent disagreeing comments from other subs here (albeit with lots of downvotes). I'm not sure about the ban rate but from the other two points I would assume it's low. For a sub more focussed on a specific politics for a specific group, there is surprisingly a lack of echo chamber.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 11:23 AM
7

Following the logic "if group has members that commit terrorism and has members that advocate for sex slavery = ok to insult" then it logically follows that any anti-islam slur is acceptable. "Towelhead" or "haji" are all acceptable according to this logic. I would imagine it's based on the likelihood of advocating for these things, in that case, it's likely Islam outpaces incels by a wide margin. But no, they're most definitely a protected class under their system for some reason.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 11:19 AM
16

To be fair the "hivemind" species are not "run" by the queen. The queen essentially functions as a reproductive organ for the hivemind "organism".
/r/MensRights11/11/22 06:06 PM
1

Is there evidence that men get arrested for dropping their baby off and women don't? Is it written into law? I have never seen that anywhere in the law. Keep in mind pointing out individual cases where men were arrested does not count. Don't do the same things you accuse feminists of doing.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:51 AM
1

Are you referring to safe haven laws? From what I've read, those are genderless. Unless I'm missing something here.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:51 PM
5

I don't see why that matters. Is a door to door gun salesman (active participant) (the people answering the door are passive participants), responsible if one of their customers does a mass shooting? What differentiates a mass shooter buying a gun from childbirth such that the gun manufacturer is not responsible for the shooting but the man is responsible for the childbirth? Without the gun there would be no shooting.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:58 PM
3

What do you mean by "active participant" and what differentiates a mass shooter buying a gun from childbirth such that the gun manufacturer is not responsible for the shooting but the man is responsible for the childbirth? Without the gun there would be no shooting.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:23 PM
9

Because she has the ability to terminate the pregnancy. The man does not.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:19 PM
4

Should gun manufacturers pay the families of victims of mass shooters? No gun means no shooting. What about the mass shooters parents? No sex means no mass shooter. "But the chance someone buying a gun is a mass shooter is lower than pregnancy!" So if a man uses a method of contraception that has the same chance of pregnancy as a mass shooting used by a bought gun and gets the women pregnant, then he's not responsible?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:18 PM
10

The burden of childbirth is imposed by biology, not by the state. Why does women bearing the cost of childbirth mean that men ought to pay? If I'm born with atrophied muscles, I bear a greater burden of movement than other people. Do I now have a right to people's money?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:40 PM
3

I think it's ironic.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:30 PM
3

"Women ☕"
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:25 PM
1

This is not comparable. Not all Japanese receive reparations. A Japanese person immigrating from Japan today or just your average Japanese American does not get reparations. Only the ones interned got them. This is not to mention it was specifically Japanese, not all easy Asians mind you. Similarly, not every Jew in Germany gets reparations. Only Holocaust victims get them, and you don't have to be a Jew to get those, you just have to prove you were a victim. See the similarities here? INDIVIDUA…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 02:25 AM
2

They worded it very poorly but I don't think that's what they were saying. They're having an issue with expecting a woman to behave like that in this day and age, not with women who choose to be like that. It feels like you didn't state that either, and were just describing your friends' situations, but that was probably the impression they got from your post.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/22 11:33 PM
3

I don't think anyone denies that though lol. It's a pretty widespread opinion. Especially where there's a good chunk of ppl that think rapists should be executed.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:40 PM
1

Is she though? Is one person saying misandristic things to blame for the behaviors of large organizations? You might as well put the misogynistic statements of a few politicians as evidence for any negative change in law that affects women. I have yet to see proof that Koss has actually influenced the FBI and CDC. I suspect I won't be getting any.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:09 AM
2

If you're going to reduce everyone down to their biology as justification for slavery (conscription is slavery) to protect and serve a country then women don't get to escape either. Producing children is also quite important during population crises (plague, slowing birthrate, etc). And a country will be weakened if there is a population crisis. So under your system, women should be forced to produce children during population crises. There should be more than enough sperm from sperm banks (whic…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 01:52 AM
0

in my opinion the wage gap is real You unironically believe the "wage gap" is due to sexism?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:49 PM
4

The mother was probably most effected by her sons lynching. The dad probably would be effected "Men killed, women most affected" Do you know which sub you're in? Is this a joke?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:34 PM
-8

Honestly MRAs should focus more on explicit laws like MGM, selective service, or diversity quotas. Once you get into the suicide deaths, alimony, workplace deaths, etc you start becoming no different than the feminists you despise who complain about the wage gap. Disparate outcomes != Discrimination
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:30 PM
-4

So you agree the wage gap is real too? And you agree that work is a bad deal for women? Disparate outcomes != discrimination
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:27 PM
-9

I've done the same. It honestly seems like the "divorce gap" is the wage gap of MRAs.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:25 PM
-11

I see this claim a lot, but are there any actual explicit laws that state a woman should get more from a divorce? (Referring to the US) Just because women win more from a divorce on average does not mean there is a misandrist bias. Women also make less money on average, so it's entirely possible there's just aspects women possess more or less than men that caused this imbalance rather than sexism. Let's not fall into the trap of "disparate outcomes = sexism".
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:21 PM
1

To be fair, The Power actually feels much less misandrist if you actually read it. You would expect a book by a misandrist to make the world a paradise if all women suddenly gained electric powers. But no, we get countless scenes of women being terrible; no different than men. There is one kinda cringe depiction of a "4chan manosphete alt-righter" that feels kinda cheap and easily outdated, but otherwise, it is fairly nuanced.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:44 PM
11

That's all I wanted to hear, thank you. I just wanted to test you for double standards. I agree with you only partially. There are too many posts here that are just personal anecdote of either a woman doing a bad thing, a comment section where there's majority support of a woman doing a bad thing, or a singular case of preferential treatment for a woman which they can't even prove was due to sexism. It reminds me of feminists who do the same thing: cry sexism whenever a man does a bad thing or t…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:04 PM
21

Answer the question. Just curious, if the roles were reversed here and it was a woman making the same complaints on a Reddit post, would you also say there's "not enough info" and that it's "one sided" or would you agree the husband is in the wrong?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:39 PM
1

/s Right?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:09 PM
14

You get a little information, one-sided and you jump to so many conclusions. Just curious, if the roles were reversed here and it was a woman making the same complaints on a Reddit post, would you also say there's "not enough info" and that it's "one sided" or would you agree the husband is in the wrong?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:06 PM
17

What trait differentiates men from women such that it's moral to alert the authorities to enslave and kill men but not women for leaving the kids under your ethical system?
/r/MensRights23/10/22 10:09 PM
64

Do you think someone deserves to be enslaved (conscription is slavery) and die for doing that? If a woman disappears after you have kids with her, is it justified to alert authorities which you know will enslave and kill her as revenge?
/r/MensRights23/10/22 05:11 PM
3

100% regarding the definitions. Here's what I found, feel free to make alterations and copy/paste to people as a quick response: The original study OP is referencing ask a series of questions used in this study https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y (see 2.2.4.2. Sexual objectification (SO) in the footer of the incel study), which presents a 1-5 scale of how much the answerer agrees or disagree. Here are some examples questions "an attractive women should expect to be approa…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:30 PM
0

I would like OP to also note that their definition of "sexual objectification" is also extremely flawed. The original study OP is referencing ask a series of questions used in this study https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y (see 2.2.4.2. Sexual objectification (SO) in the footer of the incel study), which presents a 1-5 scale of how much the answerer agrees or disagree. Here are some examples questions "an attractive women should expect to be approached by men and learn ho…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:28 PM
1

Police probably deal with more "sketchy stuff" since part of their job is arresting criminals. Are they also victims? Just because our job is dangerous does not make you a victim.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:34 PM
1

Is this from experience and anecdote, or is there a study?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 10:18 PM
1

I personally think less attractive people of all genders get discriminated against Do you think men or women get discriminated more for their looks? And for whichever one you think is the case, how do you know this? I personally rely on statistics and studies, and I have not seen convincing evidence for either side.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 09:38 PM
1

Internalised misogyny is a hatred for one’s own gender, but toxic masculinity stems from hatred for women. Men are shamed for possessing feminine traits/ dressing like a woman bc to be a woman is undesirable in their eyes I would like to hear their opinion on women being shamed/called butch for possessing masculine traits. I'm going to guess that's still misogyny to them. So men being shamed for being feminine = misogyny Women being shamed for being masculine = misogyny
/r/MensRights01/10/22 07:27 PM
1

Ok, so I haven't seen anyone here actually answer your argument sufficiently, so I will take a shot at it. The main claim from this subreddit is that men have it harder in sex and relationships. However according to them, women have it easier in sex. Of course, this doesn't matter if you put a value on sex at 0, but it's going to be the case that within both sexes, there's going to be some that put a value on sex above 0. So by this metric, assuming "ease of access" is graded on a binary scale o…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:57 PM
5

How do I respond to people who claim that this is the result of the patriarchy, and that if we got rid of the grand unifying theory of the patriarchy, this would go away too? I'm usually at a loss when they make these arguments other than just asking for evidence. From my experience they'll usually do a "lol it's because of the expectation of men as the provider and women as the housewife, the same system actually hurts both of us" it sounds like a "both sides" argument and idk how to respond.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter