TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HossMcDank Archive

View 4 posts and 682 comments by HossMcDank on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Holy shit that straw man you set up could tower over Chicago. Who the fuck is advocating sharia law in any country where this sub is relevant? To answer the OP, no one has to care about anything they don’t want to. Empathy is a valued trait in our society, however, at least ideally.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 11:27 PM
1

Not sure if that's fair. There are actually good Christians who call out the bad ones, same with Muslims. The same is not true for feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 02:53 PM
3

Yeah, in the same way that Fox News is fair and balanced... If feminists don't want to be associated with misandry (an "if" the size of Russia), then they should stop constantly engaging in it and/or turning a blind eye to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 02:52 PM
2

*crickets*
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 05:33 PM
2

Curious, then, how misandrists such as yourself ignore areas where men are disadvantaged (child custody/divorce settlements being the most obvious) but expect all the sympathy in the world for "issues" like manspreading and boobs in video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 05:33 PM
0

The problem here is that you're discussing what feminism is supposed to be in theory, rather than what it is in practice. Finding a feminist who isn't either a misandrist, or completely ok with the ones who are, is like a blindfolded hunt for a four-leaf clover. In other words, the "good" ones are so rare, and/or so silent that they don't merit even a mention. They have yet to come up with any legitimate, feasible solutions to rape or harassment (no, "teaching men not to rape" is not a fucking s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/19 07:26 PM
2

The point of the analogy is that equating having hundreds of options, that you personally refuse to consider, with having few if any is brazenly insulting to the latter group. The experiences of men and women in this area are worlds apart, and pretending otherwise is the height of absurdity. Your refusal to see any of those options as viable is on you. It's also worth wondering if women consider most men unattractive because they can pick from so many that there's no reason to settle for less, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:20 PM
2

I sincerely doubt that, and if it's true then they should stop being egotistical little shits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:20 PM
2

They have their good and bad points. I went to an all male high school and had the best years of my life there, and the lack of cliquishness and sense of fraternity among us was the primary reason. More than a third of our graduating class showed up to our 5 year reunion. That being said, as a result we were left completely clueless on interacting with women -- essentially entering college as 14-year-olds in this area. I'm not sure if the benefits outweigh the costs or vice versa, but it certain…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 08:01 AM
2

No, they aren't -- and it's well beyond absurd to behave as if it is the same for men and women. An anonymous 3/10 obese girl has roughly the same number of options, and receives the same attention, as a 10/10 male celebrity. Countless Tinder experiments have proven this. The fact that this is upvoted does a good job of proving OP's point about how far gone some women are as to how advantaged they are in this arena. It would be like men denying that they are advantaged in tasks of physical stren…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 07:50 AM
2

TIL men don't get STDs. Not to mention that women are the only ones who can opt out of pregnancy, whereas men are subject to the woman's decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 07:47 AM
2

Well sure, we can't understand it in the sense that we don't experience it -- but to compare it to having few to no options (whether one is attracted to them or not) is solipsism itself on women's part, and to us seems much like a rich kid whining that his 3rd filet mignon of the week was overcooked. Attempting to equate having hundreds of options with few (if any) is a fool's errand, and rightly so.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 07:46 AM
3

This isn't true at all, and is just a failure to see the vast distinctions between genders in this area. Men never consider attention to be negative (except for homophobes who receive attention from gay guys).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 07:44 AM
2

I suppose they want to be treated "like women" in the same way that women who complain about social norms that disadvantage them want to be treated "like men". Of course, this is a thought-terminating cliche that pretends gender roles are not only inherent, but unchangeable. That being said, this is one of those things like men's physical advantage that will never change due to biology, so there's not much that complaining about it can do outside of venting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 09:13 AM
4

It's worth pointing out that the people who concern troll the most about toxic masculinity and men not showing their feelings are the same ones who love using terms like "male tears", "poor menz" and "found the incel" against men who do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 09:10 AM
5

These both seem like wild straw men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 06:11 PM
1

The majority of women don't identify as feminists, but it's true that a far smaller percentage of men care about problems facing their gender. I suspect there are a few reasons for this: Social shaming that men aren't allowed to complain, and should just "man up" Men are raised to prioritize women's well-being over their own Propaganda by feminists that men's problems either don't exist, or that we deserve them for being evil Politicians' and the media's unwavering support for the latter group -…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 06:07 PM
4

I've never seen anyone outside of deranged "incel" psychopaths argue that sex is a need or that anyone is entitled to it -- this is usually a strawman, and certainly is in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 06:18 AM
0

The idea that either gender, as a whole, cares about problems facing men is ludicrous. To be fair, most people don't care about female-centric problems unless prompted, but they generally don't show the same callous disregard or outright malevolence toward them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 06:15 AM
5

Let's be real -- anyone who regularly posts on reddit is a social misfit to an extent. Gender war, political and religious/otherwise ideological subreddits amplify this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 06:11 AM
2

This is one of those problems that no one has a feasible solution to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 06:10 AM
1

Virtually all internet-centric groups, such as the nebulous "manosphere", are comprised of people who are not in the top 20% demographic. This, of course, is due to the fact that attractive, confident and sociable people need not spend much time on Internet forums for interaction or peer approval. The guys you mention are roughly equivalent to overweight women who say shit like "real women have curves" or berate men for not being attracted to (or at least overlooking) obesity. It's understandabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/19 06:07 AM
1

Or we could just not consider people inferior based on arbitrary characteristics. Most of us figured that out in the '60s.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 06:02 PM
1

Giving examples is not implicating anything. When that example is a comparison, it is. Oh, only men can be debilitatingly injured or dying? Stop being deliberately obtuse. As for the context of the OP, that clearly was a joke, not shaming. Ah the good old "joke's on them I was only pretending" schtick, never seen that one before.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 06:01 PM
1

Everyone is inferior in something. That's why, for example, you don't let a person without appropriate education at certain positions. Nice dodge, you literally implied that women as a group are not equal to men by the same standard that children are not equal to adults. Certain double standards benefit everyone. Yes, being debilitatingly injured or dying is really beneficial to men...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 04:20 AM
1

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 04:19 AM
5

So women are inferior according to you? It’s funny how double standards are only “not bad” in the eyes of those they benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 11:28 PM
0

Have you ever thought beyond surface value about something?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 11:27 PM
3

The only way to fight male disposability is to refuse to adhere to the accompanying expectations — much like the suffragettes didn’t give a fuck what they were told.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 11:26 PM
2

Because men have drastically higher sex drives than women. I wouldn't really call this the "dating market" though, because it's just fucking. The dating market is skewed in women's favor, of course, but to a far smaller degree than the sex market, i.e. 70-30 vs. 99-1.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 06:33 AM
2

I don’t necessarily believe or disbelieve that, but it doesn’t matter. Rights are not a competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 07:48 PM
9

It depends on what part we're talking about. PUA is just sort of a natural male phenomenon, since we're the ones who have to learn seduction skills one way or another. MGTOW is the same kind of guys who would be Tumblr feminists if they were women, i.e. just looking for a group that shares their bigotry and bitterness. Incels are a combination of mental illnesses playing off of each other, and the rise of apps like Tinder where a small percentage of men have all the success. The MRM is a respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 07:22 AM
1

They also make far more (potentially fatal) sacrifices to help others, especially women, but the “women are superior” crowd enjoys leaving that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/19 09:14 PM
1

It's pretty well known that women can easily get away with harassment -- but I don't see how that suggests that women are more likely to engage in it, which I would be extremely surprised if it were true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/19 05:45 PM
1

You sure showed me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 05:30 PM
1

I never said it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 07:33 AM
1

r/gendercritical Wow, nothing to see here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 07:32 AM
0

I'm curious -- are you male or female?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:39 PM
1

we can reduce male violence by putting more supervision over it and using media and changing culture and teaching young men to control themselves etc This is all vague and meaningless. We already do teach them that violence is wrong, self-control, etc. and have tons of supervision -- the US has the highest prison population in the world and one of the strongest and largest police forces. you seem like one of those who truly believe men are degenerate by nature, Men are objectively more violent b…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:38 PM
1

men are killed by other men because most of the times they put themselves in the position of danger Hmm, sounds like victim blaming to me. But it's ok when it's against teh evil menz, right? women are mostly going their own way when they are attacked and killed by other men or they are victims of domestic violence. Google "women are wonderful effect". reduce male violence, both sexes will benefit, end of the story Well unless you have a way to siphon testosterone out of men from birth, there's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:56 PM
1

You have some points, but there's something inescapable: Suppose that half the population became addicted to crack at age 13, and the other half developed the world's supply of crack. Now technically, the first population can (and should) keep their craving in check. But it will always be influencing both their conscious and unconscious minds -- and there will always be a large subset of those unable or unwilling to control themselves, which gives the second population an inevitable amount of po…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:49 PM
0

Being sex-starved will make them funnel even more, since beta dorks think that's how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:46 PM
7

It doesn't need to be a conspiracy -- get a collection of people who almost universally revile men to work together and the outcome will be the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:43 PM
1

It shouldn't be difficult to figure out, even for you. I'm not sure how much more I can simplify it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 06:22 PM
1

men are the majority of victims??name the problem! oh its done to men by other men. Right, because if I get murdered by another man I'll be so much less dead. Oh wait... Seriously, the "but it's other men" is the absolute stupidest talking point ever devised and anyone using it should be thoroughly embarrassed. Male socialization is completely different than how we women get socialized. Is it really though? I'm sure there are some distinctions, but I also think it's wildly exaggerated by blank-s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 06:19 PM
1

Wow, that's some biting and original material bro! What's next, gonna call me a "Nazi"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 06:12 PM
1

Well considering that men are the majority of victims of violent crime, and all you can do is derail the discussion when you back yourself into a corner, I don't think there's any getting through to you. All I'll say is that your resentment of half the population is taking a psychological toll on you whether you know it or not, and the sooner you relieve yourself of this undue burden the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:36 AM
1

Wasn't me, but sorry about your first world problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:24 AM
2

sure a huge fucking majority of men are not gay and will not grope men, but a huge fucking majority of them are straight and will do some sort of sexual molestation to women. As I just told you on another post, you can't just blurt out asinine bullshit and expect it to be taken seriously. on the other hand, you are a man and you are not way weaker than him, This guy had half a foot on me and could have easily crushed me. Helped when he cornered me in the bathroom, too. you cant have horrible fla…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:22 AM
2

Just saying this doesn't make it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:21 AM
1

This may be the most inane straw man I have ever seen. I stand corrected.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 07:21 AM
2

Your invalidation is very problematic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 10:02 PM
1

Can't. It's like how I can't relate to a period, and women can't relate to being hit in the nuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 10:00 PM
1

I edited it within 10 seconds of posting from “see the difference” to “understand the difference” which does not change the context (I just like the word understand better) Hence why I said "it appears", to make room for error. and it was edited hours before you replied. I hate liars. Both are timestamped at 8 hours ago. Btw considering that you still haven’t acknowledged my original question, I maintain you still don’t understand. How many times do I have to tell you the same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:59 PM
2

Usually they just go with "incel".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:56 PM
1

What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:55 PM
1

Nobody says that they are. Yes, feminists do. All the goddamn time. But if every discussion about sexual assault goes in the #NotAllMen direction then you can tell that men are fragile af. They cannot even handle any criticism about their gender without taking it personally. Because bigots like you constantly smear all men as rapists, or potentially so. It's the same reason why black people protest being broadly painted as criminals, and Muslims reject being called terrorists. To be called fragi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:54 PM
5

You can't just dismiss a comprehensive study by saying "hey look at this other stuff!" The study posted above you controlled for all other factors, and found a colossal difference. You just posted a difference in average sentencing. This is "wage gap" logic, which I'm sure you believe in as well. Also, the fact that you posted one anecdote about two different judges and expected to prove a point with it is revealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:50 PM
1

"It's been proven time and time again that chickens shit rainbows." That's not how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:46 PM
1

r/stormfrontorsjw is a good one too. Each titular group is composed of the same type of person: pathetic failures who need to pass the blame for their shortcomings onto others, and who take their self-loathing out on the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:44 PM
2

There is no point, hence my mockery of your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:42 PM
1

It appears that, after I replied, you edited your post to include another "understand the difference" that entirely changes the context of your post. That is rather disingenuous. But people with a modicum of emotional intelligence can quite easily figure out why bigots like feminists and the "alt right" are pathologically obsessed with violent crime statistics -- their aim is to spread fear and hate toward specific groups, push a political agenda, and then hide behind "just stating facts".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:41 PM
1

This may be the most inane straw man I have ever seen. You should be embarrassed for posting it. The contention that "feminists want equality" (which they already have, and in some cases more) is no more valid than the contention that Fox News is "fair and balanced", North Korea is a "Democratic Republic", Islam is a "religion of peace" and that the Nazis were socialists. Simply because somebody says they are about something doesn't mean that they are, particularly when their behavior entirely c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 09:33 PM
1

While I resent the OP's blatant bigotry, she isn't totally wrong about this -- the vast majority of us can't relate to the idea, since women's advances toward men are almost never received negatively. The closest we get is gay-male-on-straight-male-assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 01:28 PM
1

There's no difference between the two, aside from the fact that the group you hate is one of those which is "politically correct" to hate. Whether or not your statistics are accurate, given the brazen double standards (propagated by hate-mongers such as yourself) of sexual assault applied to men vs. women, is another story -- but largely an irrelevant one. Nevertheless, one need not believe that a group is inferior "by nature" to be a bigot. If one believes the inferiority of a group can be attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 12:45 PM
1

Are you aware of the existence of weapons?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:59 AM
2

Having experienced this, I have yet to become a deranged homophobe. Dare I touch on the irony of using a slur while pretending to be "woke"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:58 AM
1

I (a man) got groped by another guy multiple times. Was it unpleasant? Sure, but I moved on and don't hold a childish grudge against gay men as a result -- because the huge fucking majority are not like him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:55 AM
2

Ok, I’m not an “all men are potential rapists” bellringer by any stretch, but come on, I think it’s a lot more than 10%. This reminds me of when someone says "I'm not racist but" and proceeds to post "despite being 13%" memes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:54 AM
2

Boys are icky
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:52 AM
0

It's time to call out the Emperor for being naked. We need to stop pretending that these non-misandrist, equality-desiring feminists actually exist to any significant degree. Just like with the "alt right" (read: neo-Nazis without the balls to call themselves what they are), there are next to no "very fine people" in this movement, since they either agree with the anti-male rhetoric are too cowardly to dissent from it. There is negligible difference between feminist propaganda about men and whit…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:50 AM
1

I don't have any way of knowing if that's true. I'm a man who was repeatedly sexually assaulted by another man, yet you don't see me turning into some frothing homophobic psychopath like feminists do towards men. Why is this? Because I'm not so consumed by bitterness, and/or outright stupid, as to project the experiences with one piece of shit onto an entire group. What's the point of this thread, exactly? Suppose every woman has been sexually assaulted -- what do we do with this information? Li…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:41 AM
1

I'm not sure that's what he was getting at. But I would absolutely contend that a fetus (calling it a child is begging the question) would be better off not being born than forced to live with parents who cannot or will not take proper care of it. Only a small fraction of unfit parents give their children up for adoption.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:22 AM
1

Dave Chappelle has never been a "politically correct" kind of guy. See the well-known "whore's uniform" skit, or trans-related jokes. That being said, I (despite being firmly pro-choice) disagree with him on both counts. For one, a person's genitalia has no bearing on the veracity of their argument. Abortion should be a legal right because a fetus is only a human life in the sense that a tumor is. The "potential life" argument falls rather flat when one realizes that the same can be said of sper…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 10:03 AM
0

I don't know, but the idea has a very alarming amount of support among feminists/misandrists (excuse the redundancy). For some reason, it is considered sexist to be attracted to women on solely a sexual level, which is really just a way of smearing male sexuality in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/19 03:21 AM
1

The idea that any male sexual desire is anti-woman ("objectification" being the thought-terminating cliche of choice among feminists and their beta nerd sycophants) has become exceedingly and disturbingly mainstream. But in actuality, I'm not sure porn can be hateful toward women -- the reason I say this is that even in genres that involve abuse and degradation, being sexually aroused by something is *not* the same thing as intellectually supporting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/19 03:19 AM
2

Spot on. I'm not sure why, for many women, stating this obvious fact is taken as an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 05:13 PM
1

So the fact that certain ethnic minorities commit crimes at overwhelmingly higher rates than other groups is what exactly? Racism? Facts are racism? No, but as I said it's not hard to read between the lines to see what the poster is usually implying. And pointing out that men commit the vast majority of crimes in society is also 'muh sexism' because statistics are hateful or something. See above. Of course, women are grateful if they are helped by the police/firefighter etc etc but that doesn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 05:12 PM
1

I'm not sure if that's true, but I'd say most guys don't know much about women's preferences, aside from the obvious. But I'd say there are far more women who prefer a high n-count to those who prefer virgins (or close to it).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 05:10 PM
1

(in other words, men who are unethical naturally already have other attributes that make them able to have lots of sex, say being attractive or otherwise valuable, and their "assholeness" is merely a separate consequence of that value) Nailed it, this is what all the self-proclaimed "nice guys" don't get and just think "women like assholes for being assholes, waaaaah".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 05:08 PM
3

got into and stayed in a relationship for months with a man I didn’t find attractive, didn’t like, didn’t respect, and was embarrassed to be seen with, simply for easy access to daily sex. Something seems a bit off about this -- you could go find sex easily and daily by just asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 08:54 AM
1

What percentage of guys that you knew would you have fucked if they straight-up asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 08:51 AM
5

First 80% of men and 15% of women (like me) have what’s called spontaneous sexual desire. Do you not realize how colossal that difference is? We’re just often shamed into silence for simply being ourselves. Tell that to gay men and the centuries of violent discrimination they have faced -- doesn't stop them from getting around.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 08:50 AM
2

Women usually say this is a myth. I'm not sure if many women actually believe this. I mean let's be real, every woman knows very clearly the power they hold over men as a result of the latter's massive sex drives. For those who do believe that, ask them what percentage of men could come up to them, say "wanna fuck" and get laid on the spot. It seems like a desperate "girl power" belief, or something that those who believe men and women are indistinguishable outside of their genitalia convince th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 08:47 AM
3

Men have more testosterone (somewhere in the magnitude of 17-35 times that of women), plus -- or, perhaps, in correlation with -- the fact that women can reproduce only every nine months while men can impregnate women almost constantly. The idea that men and women have equal sex drives is as mind-bogglingly ludicrous as the idea that men and women are equal in terms of physical strength or propensity for violence. The fact that people unironically believe it would be funny if it didn't say somet…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 08:44 AM
4

You realize the system of men dying as military, police, and firefighter sacrifices is because of systems set up by other men, right? Men have set up this system (patriarchy) that harms them as well. This is the most ridiculous talking point, yet I see it over and over again. If I get fatally shot in a war, I really, really don't give a flying fuck what the gender of the person who "set up the system" was. This is why critical theory flops -- they treat groups like "men" as a collective hive min…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/19 07:43 AM
3

It takes a certain kind of person to routinely post on gender war forums -- this place didn't make them that way, being that way brought them here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/19 07:37 AM
2

I was referring to the motive of people like OP singling out the bad things men do. Pretty sure all those dead soldiers didn't think they were going to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 09:05 PM
2

Men also buy and sell girls for sex. Protection, my ass. Subjugation is more like it. Again, I don't deny that men commit the vast majority of crimes. It's just glaringly obvious how misandrists/feminists (but I repeat myself) never mention the good things men have done and still do in greater proportion to women. Statistics aren’t hate rhetoric. Do you have any idea how many white supremacist clowns have told me this exact same thing, word for word? People can reasonably read between the lines …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 07:53 PM
1

Sorry you didn't get asked to prom, but that ain't our fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 03:18 AM
20

Here we have another instance of feminists using white supremacist-style rhetoric, just to demonize men instead of black people. You can find countless "alt right" (read: neo-Nazi) subs that are obsessed with non-white crime rates where posts indistinguishable from these can be found. This seems to happen constantly among feminists, and yet I'm always told this group advocates for equality. There's a reason r/menkampf and r/stormfrontorsjw exist. Please spare me the Not All Feminists Are Like Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 03:13 AM
1

If you really think an obscure subreddit full of men who think about nothing but gender relations is representative of the male population, I don't know what to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 10:33 PM
3

When exactly in this debate did I say that ugly men have more options? I didn't say you did. I said that ugly women didn’t get a free pass or a meal ticket. And that ugly women get treated with disdain. It’s impossible to “coast by” as an ugly woman, and I’m glad we agree on that point. Not to the extent of more attractive women, but compared to men their options are limitless. And I dunno, being pumped and dumped isn’t exactly a fantastic advantage. It's huge compared to having nothing at all a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 10:33 PM
2

You keep flipping between men in general and men on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 10:05 PM
8

1) Women's sexuality is less repressed than before 2) They get caught more often, and people are noticing the obvious hypocrisy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 10:04 PM
2

Why did you dodge that question? I didn't. You said ugly women have way more options, but options for what? Sex is the obvious one, but dating as well. All of the hundreds of Tinder matches won't refuse to do any more than fuck. One of the main things people say is that women can just find a man to provide for them, thus the woman’s life is easy. My point is that ugly women do not get that free pass, that female meal ticket that TRP resents so much. Indeed, TRPers and especially incels take it w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 08:00 AM
3

The idea that men wanting sex entails them seeing women as inhuman is perhaps the most bizarre idea to come out of 3rd wave feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 07:58 AM
2

I'm aware of that, but I don't see what that has to do with anything. We weren't discussing trans people/TERFs.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 04:56 PM
1

Who said anything about marrying? But (individual) men have a much wider scope of women they find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 07:08 AM
1

The career/hobbies one isn't necessarily true.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 07:07 AM
1

Please tell me this isn't an iteration of NAFALT
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 07:06 AM
1

I mean ugly women still have waaaaay more options than any non-famous male.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/19 05:39 PM
2

The 2nd one isn't necessarily the case, but the rest are true.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/19 05:37 PM
1

In a word, no. I was shocked while reading the large amount of online comments from men who say they would commit rape if they could completely get away with it r/thathappened
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/19 05:31 PM
1

Well at least you're the first person I've ever encountered who is consistent in this regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/19 05:29 PM
7

It's like how feminists think men congratulate each other for raping women and do things like catcalling to "exert power" or some shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/19 05:28 PM
25

This is the total opposite of reality. Man cheats ----> man gets blamed Woman cheats ----> man gets blamed
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/19 05:28 PM
1

One where someone else has a form of power over you, and you have to trust that they will not abuse it. But at least women have legal recourse against violent men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 02:09 AM
1

Still analogous nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 09:27 PM
1

A 5 I'd say. That's usually what I get when I ask, with some 4s and 6s thrown in there.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 09:24 PM
2

"What's it to you if white people are hypervigilant and cautious around strange black people?" You now have your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 09:23 PM
1

Maybe, who knows
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 05:01 AM
2

Gay and bi men don't tend to aggressively hit on many people My ass
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:29 AM
2

Having been on the receiving end (except the impregnating part, but with the morning after pill and legal abortion that's largely irrelevant) of such a situation, it's mainly something I just laugh about. So I think it comes down more to how men and women view sex than anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:28 AM
8

For men it would apply more when getting married, since divorce/family courts are so lopsided in women's favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:26 AM
3

I mainly agree with the quote about gay men vs. straight men, but "getting no attention" fits as well. However, over the years I have come to the conclusion that a large percentage of the women who "complain" about male attention are in fact bragging in a socially accepted way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:25 AM
1

Part of it could be that they feel they need something about them to be more appealing, or need it to get ahead since they don't have the money/connections.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 08:32 PM
0

This is a really strange and overly complicated way of interpreting this. Men do the chasing because women have what they want. It's not because we "like" it, or "created" it or anything, it's just the dynamic. Much like how it's potential employees who go job hunting, not vice versa. The drug user/dealer analogy another poster made is also accurate. Go and ask the women who relentlessly pursued a guy - and she will get as much rejection as the man who has and it probably stings just as much as …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 10:08 PM
1

To be clear, which countries are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 05:14 PM
3

I hate to break it to you but this is hopelessly naive. You will have a hard time finding men of any age who consider, say, women in their 40s more attractive than women in their late teens/early 20s. The ones who do are generally fetishists.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:40 PM
3

As long as you don’t actually try to fuck her, yes. There’s nothing wrong with “sexualizing” anyone — provided that you keep it to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:32 PM
1

Are they actually used or just symbolic?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:22 PM
1

Does it really happen more in those cultures, or is it that the men are allowed to get away with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 06:22 PM
6

I mean it's just basic reasoning that people who get showered with hundreds of options without making any effort (women) have it easier than the ones who have to approach and get shot down repeatedly (men). It's like how not having periods being easier than having periods goes without saying and needs no evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 06:07 AM
1

I don't know why rape has to be assigned this weird special status among crimes where it can't simply be callous selfishness on the part of the person doing it. My suspicion is because feminists don't want to accept that, in all likelihood, rape will always exist and have convinced themselves of the patently absurd notion that our culture somehow encourages men to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 04:41 AM
1

No one can actually point out anything wrong with it. It would be awesome actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/19 09:31 AM
1

There are two reasons for this that generally manifest themselves in different types of people: 1) The intrinsic difficulty in understanding an entirely different perspective from one's own 2) The social message that men and women are, aside from their anatomy and physical structure, interchangeable I would undoubtedly say that the first explanation is the most common.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 08:00 AM
4

Because the "assholes get laid" concept, while somewhat valid, is an oversimplification. Assholes are sure of themselves, and thus aren't nearly as bothered by the prospect of rejection -- not to mention the intrinsic appeal of self-confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 07:56 AM
1

Allows how many partners will allow whom to have? This makes no sense. If you're talking about how many they'll allow men to have, then apparently men allow women to have fewer partners. Women can have virtually as many partners as they want. They choose to have as many as they do. Do you really think that men, who have made our world what it is, allow anything? No, hence my above point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 07:38 AM
1

That's not prudish, or if it is, the studies show men are just as prudish. That number indicates how many partners women allow them to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 03:10 AM
2

I agree with a lot of this, but calling it "systemic oppression" is just the same kind of self-pitying, agency-denying snowflakery that feminists engage in.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 09:33 AM
1

Right, this is why Danny Devito was hired to star in Magic Mike.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/19 01:26 PM
1

That’s because they can afford to be, since they have many more options.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 01:00 PM
4

Gay men have approximately the same standards for men as straight men do for women, so no, it isn't due to anything about men's appearance -- the disparity comes from evolutionary pressures for women to be more selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 07:28 PM
1

In a society where we consider gender equality to be a given, there is no valid argument for holding men and women to a different standard of moral culpability. If you want the rights of an adult, you need to accept the same accountability. I do, however, have to admit to not seeing them as the same thing in real life situations until I think about it later. For example, the other week a girl started grinding on/making out with me without asking or even speaking to me first. No one there (myself…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 06:36 AM
1

My point that you don't have a point? No, it's actually entirely accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 08:12 AM
1

Yes. Ironically enough, he pretends to be a feminist on social media. If you've ever talked to the guy for 5 seconds IRL you'd know that he's completely full of shit and just doing it to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 08:08 AM
2

This is one of those meaningless and entirely irrelevant platitudes that people copy+paste when they have nothing of substance to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 08:07 AM
1

I'm 26 right now. If a girl my age had more than three or four one night stands it wouldn't be a deal breaker, but all else equal I'd take the girl who hadn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 05:42 AM
2

No shit. So what? There would probably be more female rapists if they had the same sex drive as men or couldn't get sex at the snap of their fingers. But even then, testosterone leads to more aggressive behavior -- which has good and bad outcomes. You just conveniently ignore the good ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 05:39 AM
4

"Anyone I disagree with is an incel" wow that didn't take long. I guess "nazi" got old huh? Aspire to be more than a walking cliche.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 05:38 AM
9

This is the oldest, stalest shaming tactic in the book. Surprised you didn't throw a penis size "joke" in there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:18 PM
6

Pretty much, yes. Sexist bigots of both genders flock to these subs like moths to a flame, because they confirm their "my sex good, their sex bad" worldview. It takes a certain kind of person to spend significant amounts of time thinking about something that isn't particularly interesting to begin with. It's why feminism, despite originally having entirely just causes (and still having some today), became a sugar-coated hate movement -- because it attracts women with an axe to grind. The MRM fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:17 PM
4

I wonder how guys would feel about this if gay guys did this on the regular to drunk straight dudes. You wanna bet they'd be a whole lot more upset? What would happen is that everyone would ridicule the "straight" guys who were involved as being closet gays. It is always interesting how it's only men who are accused of being immoral when having sex with an intoxicated person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 08:19 AM
3

Yes. I'm not sure if I can put it into words, but having had a significant number of one-night stands is one of the least appealing things I can think of in a woman. To me, it shows a lack of commitment and real ability to form real emotional connections.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:45 AM
2

Sorry you didn't get asked to prom.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:43 AM
2

Non-argument. I'm beginning to smell a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:43 AM
2

Oh dude, this has been fun. You must really have a lot going on in life, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 08:19 PM
2

What the hell are you talking about? Are you referring to my post in another completely unrelated sub where I mention my childhood friend's IQ (that is higher than mine)? It says a lot when you have to downvote and stalk me because you lost the debate. That's one of the most pathetic things I've ever seen. I'm sorry you didn't get asked to prom, but that's not my fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 07:27 AM
1

Men have statistically more chance of danger from MEN of course. Men are the danger element, and you just admitted it. Right, if another man stabs me to death I guess I'll just shrug it off because at least the person killing me has a dick, right? That's some A+ logic right there. Weak argument, bad faith. No, it's perfectly valid, hence why you can't refute it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 03:07 AM
1

You realize that: 1) Men statistically have more to fear from other men than women do 2) This is the exact same logic racists use to justify their contempt of black people. ...right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 06:39 PM
5

Please. You were clearly trying to hint at the user to whom you replied that her non-fear of men is unjustified.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 05:17 AM
5

I have to say that despite some bad experiences, I dont have any fear of men and I find it very hard to relate with this concept that being a woman means you're often afraid or uncomfortable because men are big and intimidating. Because the women who engage in these kinds of thoughts were already looking for a reason to take out their self-loathing on men, and feminism rolled around to give such women an opportunity to do so under the guise of a "social justice" movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 05:13 AM
4

I have. I'm a man who was stalked and continually sexually assaulted by another man. Should I consider all gay men to be evil until they prove otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 05:12 AM
3

No, it's still the same imbecilic, brazenly misandrist, self-aggrandizing, thought-terminating cliche it was to begin with. A few reasons: Men are more of a danger to one another than we are to women, by a huge margin. Should we be constantly petrified of each other? I guess gay men would be better off dying alone then, since they could always bump into another Jeffrey Dahmer. If you want to take the small percentage of men who harm women and paint the entire group as one to be feared, you can d…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 05:09 AM
1

Undoubtedly. I'd go further and say they're the answer to the most extreme branch of contemporary feminism found on Tumblr, r/gendercritical, etc. Some of the outright woman-hating lunacy posted on MGTOW forums makes incels look tame.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 10:13 AM
2

The problem is that women in general cannot control the behavior of psychotic misandrists (otherwise known as "feminists") any more than men can control the very small minority of us that become rapists, harassers, etc. No one can reasonably be held responsible for policing others with whom they share largely superficial demographic characteristics. Reddit (not unlike the internet in general) is full of deeply insecure, embittered individuals who project their self-loathing onto the opposite sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 10:05 AM
1

The left side of the culture war is a backlash against men, white people, or any other group deemed as an "oppressor". Thus, anything that paints them as being something other than "the bad guy" is instantaneously spit out. It's much like how the same people who denounce the bigotry and anti-science of Christianity will engage in the most deranged apologetics for Islam, which propagates such offenses at a far greater level.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 09:09 AM
1

This isn't the same as food though, you need food to survive. Whether or not food is needed to survive is irrelevant. That's a red herring. Having more self control and being selective doesn't mean yoir drive is lower. That is precisely what it means. I don't know how this could be any more self-evident. I agree that if you're really horny your standards drop to fulfil it, but I also think that the risk of sex is so much greater for women That may have been true in the 1950s, but today all the o…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 09:05 AM
4

As is repeated every time we have this discussion, just about every response to a behavior is a reward. Women decide when men get sex because men have drastically higher sex drives than women. They might not consciously think they are "rewarding" someone with sex, but everything people do in response to an action taken by someone else is a reward of sorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 09:00 AM
1

Maybe you should take that up with the person you're quoting. If they reply, I'd be glad to. "Easier" is relative because people all have different goals. No, it is not relative when we are talking about one specific task. It is easier for me to get food than a kid in rural Ethiopia. It doesn't matter if one of us wants food more than the other, it's just an objective fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 04:22 AM
1

It's in opposition of your suggestion that women should lower their standards. Except it doesn't counter anything I said. They can choose to lower their standards in order to take advantage of said opportunities, or not. But they still have them. What was the point of arguing that if you were just pointing out your envy? To counter the nonsensical claim that "it doesn't make it easier".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 03:40 AM
1

You asked where you'd get attention, and I told you. Now you're moving the goalposts. No one claimed that attractive and ugly women get an equal amount of attention, that would be ludicrous. But you still get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 03:38 AM
1

I don't see what I said that opposed that. But person 1 will still be envious of person 2's endless options, which are of course a result of person 1's greatly larger appetite.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 10:49 PM
1

Because it's a fallible argument. Not if you stick to the relevant part of the analogy rather than red herrings. People don't simply eat because they would die otherwise, since humans can go some time before they die of starvation. They eat because they're hungry. It's a matter of having a perception of sexual intercourse that is not universal. Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 10:40 PM
1

Christ if you think you need sex like food Wow I sure called that, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 10:00 PM
1

Whenever people tell me that, I give them the same challenge: Have a man and woman of equal attractiveness go out and ask strangers for sex. If they get a roughly equal number of "yes" answers, then I'll believe their claim. Thus far, no one has done it. I always get some jumbled mess of mental gymnastics, but instead I use Occam's razor -- particularly when it is backed up by science.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 09:21 PM
2

Person 1: "I have nothing to eat, I'm so hungry!" Person 2: "I know, I have a hundred people offering me free food but none of them are filet mignon, it's not any easier for me." This is what you sound like to men. Please spare me "but you need food to survive blah blah blah".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 09:19 PM
1

Open Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 08:26 PM
2

Because men, as a result of testosterone, have drastically higher sex drives than women. The fact that this is even a point of contention is absolutely laughable, on par with the round vs. flat Earth "debate" (though at least the latter is much more difficult to see for yourself). Anyone who disagrees is free to go ask random women for sex and see how far they get. Men are more likely to orgasm precisely because they are hornier -- I'd have a much easier time doing so while fucking Kate Upton th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 07:38 PM
4

Then perhaps they should lower their standards, as men are constantly told to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 07:34 PM
2

Her ability to get casual sex from uggos doesn't make it "easier", though. Because she's not going to. We're talking about ability, not desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 07:34 PM
2

Except they only want to abolish the parts of "the patriarchy" that disadvantage women. That's why they celebrate women overtaking men in college admissions, come up with shit like the Tender Years Doctrine, send death threats to people who start shelters for male domestic violence victims and riot at conferences regarding male suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 05:10 AM
2

Ugly men are usually associated with this because their advances are far more likely to be seen as harassment. There was an SNL skit about this. I've found it to almost universally be the "bro"/meathead types who engage in this behavior regardless of attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:22 PM
5

I think that men see advice from women about being respectful to women and they think that it means to be subservient to women. More often than not, it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:19 PM
9

Why would they protest any issue that primarily effects men? Black people want equality too, does that mean that black activist should focus their energy on equal representation on issues that are focused on Asian people? Then they should: 1) Stop lying about helping men 2) Stop getting in the way of people who want to help men 3) Stop spreading hate and/or fear propaganda about men, like you're doing Alimony is a poor example. there is no law that states that only men must pay alimony. There's …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:16 PM
1

He's a reformed WoW-playing nerd who I'd peg at about a 7/10. He just tries endlessly, over and over again and doesn't care about rejection. He also started selling ecstasy. It's important to remember, though, that men cannot be trusted to be honest about their partner counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 08:07 PM
2

Because they can. Men would do the exact same thing if they could. Possibly, as some guy might get violently pissed about it, but you're also in danger every time you walk out your front door. I don't date the type of women who expect me to pay, or ask out women I don't know. Ethically yes, legally no.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 08:05 PM
3

Because they behave in a way typically associated with men, i.e. fucking numerous strangers. Obviously this would be different in a world without slut shaming -- but in such a world "sluts" would not exist, and thus could not be considered anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 08:03 PM
2

Well I mean, in the vast majority of cases that's true. How many 30+ virgins do you know are above average looking?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 07:02 PM
1

At what age did you start feeling you could consent to sex with (a) a girl your age (b) a much older girl, e.g. in her 20s? And do you think you would regret it later on? 16 or so. I would have probably regretted it since I was religious back then. Currently, based on what you know of yourself and the men around you, do you think the age of consent (for boys) is too high/low? It is what it should be for both genders, but there needs to be some leniency -- a 19 year old and a 17 year old having s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 06:19 PM
1

r/asktrp
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 06:16 PM
1

Let's think about it this way: You have two people looking for something to eat. One would rather go without food than eat anything other than filet mignon, despite having a dozen people a week offer them food. The other is a morbidly obese person who would eat day-old bologna off the floor and stuffs their face with everything in sight. No rational observer would come to the conclusion that they are both as hungry as each other. The reality is that if women had the same sex drive as men, they w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 06:14 PM
2

Most of the guys I’ve dated can get sex when they want it. For some it is “almost too easy.” In fact, I often feel like the men I’ve dated have an easier time getting laid than I do. Lol, no the fuck they can't and not even remotely on the same level as women. Unless their n-counts are well into the hundreds, they (or you) are full of shit. I don’t think desire and predicted pleasure are closely correlated. Predicted pleasure has more to do with whether the man gives her what she needs. For me, …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 08:29 AM
4

My ex had over 200 matches on tinder and he was pretty picky Again, having that many matches means he is in the top 5% of men. When you have that many options, you can be picky. Few men can. It would be easier for men to obtain sex if you dropped the double standard, dumbass Right, men are the only ones who slut shame. And I didn't just prove why that doesn't have any effect. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 08:24 AM
2

I think on average, women have lower sex drives. However, I’ve had a higher sex drive than many, if not most, men I’ve dated. As I said to another user, I have my doubts that your sex drive is really higher than theirs. Of course when someone is in a relationship with someone they're very much attracted to, they're going to be hornier -- I'd have a much higher sex drive around Kaley Cuoco than Melissa McCarthy. Let's put it to the test -- if you were single, what percentage of men could come up …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 07:53 AM
4

I find a lot of men attractive, as evidenced by my hundreds of matches on apps. Each match means “yeah I’d do him.” The fact that you get "hundreds of matches" to begin with indicates the vast difference between men and women's sex drives. But yes I agree partly. However I think slut shaming is a huge reason for pickiness. Regarding slut shaming, there are two reasons why this does not hold up: 1) The primary reason for the "stud/slut" double standard is precisely because it's so easy for women …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 07:45 AM
9

Women don't necessarily have lower sex drives - I'm a woman and I have a higher sex drive than my male partner. Assuming this is true (men are experts at hiding how much sex we want, otherwise women would never associate with us again), it's interesting that whenever this comes up, women who claim to have equal or higher sex drives always refer to their partner rather than some other man. Why might this be? Here's why: I'm betting that if you weren't with him, you would reject the overwhelming s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 05:36 AM
2

She DOES lose power in said situation; though unlike puritanical types I do not believe she’s lost anything moral.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 06:41 PM
17

They have higher standards and are harder to arouse because they have lower sex drives and find fewer men attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 06:39 PM
5

For the same reason an employer “gives” a job to an employee, even though the relationship is mutually beneficial — one person is in a position of power while the other is seeking permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 06:38 PM
7

Really? Do you really not get how having hundreds of options is more advantageous than having almost none? How being constantly showered with attention and free stuff is easier than having to pursue through rejection while simultaneously developing confidence? Some things are just self-evident, just like men not having periods being an advantage does not need substantiation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 10:40 AM
2

What's to change about a view that is self-evident? This is as controversial as saying rain makes things wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 08:45 AM
1

I don't. The vast majority of men don't -- it's just that the ones who do are repeat offenders, i.e. they do it over and over again to different women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 08:06 AM
0

Depends on the time in their life, attractiveness and what you mean by "get". I'd say an average 20-30 something woman can fuck 60% of the guys they want, but when you exclude gay men and men in relationships the number is probably around 80%. I'd say the original figure declines 10% for every decade -- obviously an 80 year old woman can't fuck almost any guy. To have an LTR with I'd say it's closer to 25-30%. Admittedly I can't back these figures up with hard data, and I am a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 08:02 AM
1

Because they're the male equivalent of Tumblr feminists: sexist bigots using a movement as a vehicle to spread hate for the opposite gender. There are some legitimate issues they address, but it's just buried under piles of confirmation bias, double standards and straight up hate-mongering. From the MGTOW commentary I've read over the years, they might actually be worse than incels. It's also bizarre how guys who claim to be "going their own way" from women never seem to talk about anything else…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 04:39 AM
1

People also disagree with the existence of evolution, the Holocaust and climate change. Makes about as much sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 04:26 AM
1

Men really aren't the "gatekeepers of commitment", it just seems that way because it's far less lopsided than sex (60-40 in women's favor vs. 99-1).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 06:44 PM
1

"Boys are icky" That's literally it. That's all that contemporary feminism is, just dressed up in pseudo-academic jargon.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 06:15 PM
2

Yes, but it's different than what seems to happen with women -- I still feel sexually attracted, but I cannot in good conscience give in to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 07:10 AM
1

Okay, so? That doesn't make much a difference in day to day life, you don't know whether a man is going to hurt you or protect you (if they're a stranger) until it happens. You could apply this to any group, including those that it is far less politically correct to hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 06:33 AM
1

Great argument. I pity you for your all-consuming rage against half the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 05:23 AM
5

I have to say, I'm glad she is much more honest than the average feminist who tends to veil their bigotry in some pseudo-academic gibberish about "power dynamics" or whatnot.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:07 AM
1

So if you were violently attacked by another woman, you'd be entirely ok with that because they're of the same gender as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:06 AM
2

Well surely you will acknowledge that men have been overwhelmingly the ones to sacrifice their lives for others, especially women, right? Or are you simply still bitter about not being asked to prom?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:05 AM
0

This is just total gibberish attempting to give intellectual credibility to a "boys are icky" worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:03 AM
0

This sounds eerily like when feminists imply that all men are sexual predators, except with the genders reversed and a different wrongdoing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:02 AM
9

I don't consider myself part of the "manosphere", but this is easily explainable by the fact that men are naturally more violent and have far higher sex drives. Even if you were an absolutely abysmal moral shitbag, there's no incentive to hold a sex slave when you can go out and find a guy to fuck any day, any time with no effort. But that aside, it's still brazenly obvious that men are more violent by a colossal margin. This has remained unchanged all throughout history and is true in the vast …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 09:58 AM
1

So do bisexuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 04:20 AM
1

You realize you just did exactly what you accused him of in the same sentence, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 08:02 AM
1

What makes you think you're so attractive, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 08:00 AM
1

So if I go walk outside and ask random women for sex, I'll get it from most of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 07:23 AM
1

Men would have sex with almost any woman if there were no consequences. That's his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 07:22 AM
1

...so then how are you "straight"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 07:19 AM
1

Because men have drastically higher sex drives than women. I don't know why we can admit that men are physically stronger than women by a large margin, but the aforementioned obvious fact gets such a bad reaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 07:18 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 06:02 PM
6

but I would also appreciate if men could handle No and Go Away better. I would be curious to see, if in a world described by the OP, women were better, worse or the same at handling such a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 05:44 AM
1

This is pretty much foolproof. Men would be living in a literal heaven on earth and women wouldn't have #metoo problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 05:42 AM
1

That was a pretty recent revelation for most people. Curious, though, that despite that he's still a frontrunner for POTUS amongst those who would categorize such a thing as "rape culture", to which they claim to be staunchly opposed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 12:54 AM
1

When women want to be approached. Since men would love being approached anytime, anywhere the guys who are dumb enough to believe that "women want sex as much as men" will behave as they would want women to behave toward them, not knowing that they are likely as repulsive to the women they approach as a gay man is to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 05:22 AM
1

Cool. You only showed me examples from a particular group of people typically hated by most of American society. Want a cookie? I think calling them "typically hated" is a pretty big stretch, especially when they have the full-fledged support of one major political party and the former POTUS and VP identified as one, as did the candidate who won the popular vote in 2016. It does. Profound retort.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 04:33 AM
1

Because you were talking about women criticizing men less than men criticizing women, and gave examples (i.e. the "soy boy" meme). I then gave you counterexamples. It is irrelevant whether or not a majority of women use these specific insults, and your attempted "gotcha" about the majority of rapists being men was just bizarre.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/19 04:37 PM
1

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 10:50 PM
1

My dad was a basic tradcon, the kind of guy who would bash feminism in one breath yet treat women like infallible princesses in another. Fortunately he's started to wise up. My mom started out as a moderate feminist and moved rightward over the years. I pretty much always saw feminism as a glorified hate movement, and everything I've seen over the last quarter century has further solidified that view.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 01:43 AM
1

"Nothing ever works differently than how I think it should work in theory" -- you. But I'm glad you at least admit to your hypocrisy. It doesn't matter that #notallwomen are feminists. The people saying these things are predominantly women. This is like asking for an example of Trump supporters using "cuck" or "libtard" when they lose an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 08:51 PM
4

The "stud vs. slut" dilemma. I share the viewpoint that no one should be judged for their sexual history as long as they are single and all encounters were consensual. That being said, at no point will I (on a base level) see a man who has fucked 20 women and a woman who has fucked 20 men as the same. The man involved has persevered through countless rejections and most likely made significant improvements to himself, whereas the woman just has to choose 20 of the hundreds of guys showering her …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 10:28 AM
1

I'm generally much more sympathetic to the MRA side of gender issues and agree that male sexuality is unreasonably demonized, but this is an exception. I don't see this at all as "punishing male sexuality", but rather an obligation towards one's children and not something to be shouldered by the taxpayers. *Someone* has to pay for the child, and expecting everyone else to pitch in for your choice will just lead to more unsupported children being born. The same applies to those who demand taxpaye…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 08:47 AM
1

that being the case, wishful thinking? My life would be leagues easier if women didn’t want sex. How?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 08:38 PM
3

I'd say it's about even. With #2, you're neglecting that these same women will resort to "lol male tearz fragile masculinity lol" when men do exactly that. Also women seem to be the ones most often using "small dick" and "incel/virgin" when they lose an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 07:19 PM
3

That too.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 07:16 PM
1

Except in some cases, such as this one, the exceptions are so rare that they might as well not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 07:15 PM
8

Wanting something less =/= disliking something
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 07:49 AM
2

Who?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 06:41 AM
11

Women have higher n counts because men have higher sex drives and thus women can basically get laid on demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 06:15 AM
5

That's not what he said. He said they do not have anywhere near the sex drive men do, which is objectively true. Otherwise his attitude wouldn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 06:14 AM
1

I don't know anyone who claims this. If they do, it's probably because women have far lower sex drives than men. But "lower" and "zero" are two *very* different things. For those who will inevitably argue against the obvious, no, women do not "want sex as much as men". If you disagree, have yourself and a female friend go ask random members of the opposite gender for sex and see if you find the same number of partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 05:38 AM
1

Oh, a "not all" argument. Better go home now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 08:07 PM
1

Any politician who advocated for fixing problems on the basis that they adversely effect men would have their career destroyed in minutes. Even the Republicans would distance themselves from such an "extremist".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 08:04 PM
1

I know a black guy who's rich. Therefore white privilege doesn't exist, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 08:02 PM
1

It's true, just that I wouldn't say men are any different. Our society is much more willing to call out men taking advantage of sexism in their favor as compared to women, so it's not taken so much as a given.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:59 AM
1

Girl probably, since I'm not a "masculine" guy and thus would probably not make my son the coolest guy around.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:55 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 04:24 AM
2

I replied with something similar on another comment, but we should stop pretending these "good feminists who just want equality" exist in any significant numbers. Not one of them ever steps out to contradict the feminists from whom we actually see and hear, so either they silently agree with them or are too cowardly to voice their dissent. Either way, they're a shit person.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 03:44 AM
1

Then feminists should stop lying and claiming otherwise, and constantly trying to undermine/harm men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 03:38 AM
1

Feminism has, I'd argue, increased misogyny because a lot of guys aren't smart enough to distinguish between feminists and women in general and thus project their (justified) contempt for a misandrist hate cult onto women in general, which loses them the moral high ground. Also, the trend of demanding we believe all rape accusations no matter what makes it harder for real victims with real evidence to be believed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 03:37 AM
1

I'd say about 50-60% of MRAs are misogynists whereas 80-90% of feminists are misandrists. So they both suck, but it's not on the same level, and MRAs have more valid points (though some are stupid).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 03:34 AM
1

At one point I would have replied "but there are of course some good ones out there". I no longer agree with that. If you identify with the *modern day* feminist movement you are either a misandrist or choose to turn a blind eye to such people, which is not much of an improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 03:33 AM
2

People who think the opposite sex is that much more privileged than they are (not in a specific area, but overall) are severely immature and myopic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 10:35 PM
1

That raises an interesting point: one would then assume that gay men and lesbians would have a nearly identical number of sex partners. Do you believe this to be the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:49 AM
1

Not when the other man has a weapon, which is often the case (Jeffrey Dahmer for example). I didn't say I understand the female perspective. But ask yourself: would you really bang the majority of men who came up to you and said "let's have sex" if violence didn't exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:44 AM
2

Yes, you are talking in circles. You are saying they have lower sex drives because sex is easy to obtain, which is because they have lower sex drives, to which you would say...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 08:03 PM
0

There's really no difference, but depending where you live gay men have a huge social stigma that can escalate to violence. Not to mention the far higher likelihood of contracting AIDS. The only difference between the two is size, and even then if a gay man wants to rape/kill another man he'll likely bring a weapon.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 08:02 PM
1

You are talking in circles. They can get it anytime BECAUSE they have lower sex drives. Was that really not an obvious conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:20 PM
1

No, as my post details how we’re different.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:18 PM
1

This circular logic makes absolutely no sense. The reason men are desperate is because women have lower sex drives, at least when it comes to strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 06:56 PM
1

It's not that women don't like sex but because most women just have easy access to sex that they aren't desperate for it. They have easy access to it because men have far higher sex drives.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 04:37 AM
3

No offense, but the fact that this is even a debate is a serious indictment of our collective intellect. If this were true, you could send a man and woman of equal attractiveness around to straight-up ask random members of the opposite gender for sex, and they would come away with roughly the same number of "yes" answers. Does anyone legitimately think this is the case or even remotely close to it? The typical refutation to this is that women are shamed for having random sex. That would make sen…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 04:35 AM
1

I agree, it just seems that way because it's less lopsided than sex (60-40 vs. 99-1).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 04:31 AM
1

I indulge in cocaine every now and then. Only did MDMA once and it didn't really work because of my medication.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 04:30 AM
2

No. But this hardly sounds like "harassment". I actually did get harassed (and assaulted, repeatedly) by another man, and will still treat all such claims with reasonable skepticism. I do have to admit that I am instinctively more likely to believe men who claim to be assaulted, for the reason that there's much less social gain and more embarrassment in our current culture. But nevertheless I will not just believe any old claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/19 06:19 AM
1

That describes basically everything feminists ever post.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/19 12:51 AM
2

...and this is why the left loses elections.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 08:01 AM
4

It's weird how they'll fly into a rage when even someone as mild as Jordan Peterson becomes popular, when the alternative is "fuck you you privileged piece of shit." They learned absolutely nothing from 2016 and I'm convinced that they never will.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 07:58 AM
2

I think a few things have to do with it: Men are naturally more violent, so it makes sense that they would also be so toward themselves. Women have a larger support system and aren't anywhere near as stigmatized for showing negative emotions or told to "man up". Women have inherent social value just for being women. It's harder (though far from impossible) to get *that* down on yourself when you have legions of guys kissing your ass and telling you how great you are. It's much easier for men to …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 06:08 AM
3

I have a hard time believing any of them are here on an obscure gender war subreddit on a Friday night.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/19 06:01 AM
6

Women act far more entitled than men. You hear about male entitlement so much more often for few reasons but mostly because feminism is so ubiquitous and male entitlement frightens the shit out of women. You hear about it more because anyone talking about entitled women would lose their career in an instant.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 06:19 PM
5

r/mensrights and r/braincels are in no way even remotely comparable. The former is about issues that adversely affect men with a not insignificant number of woman-haters using these issues as a cover. The latter is a psychotic, violence-promoting hate cult that has nothing redeemable whatsoever. The other three are somewhere in between, with 2X being the least objectionable and GC being the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 09:36 AM
6

I don't know if they're much less inclined to do so, as many men won't admit to having any gender-based advantages (though some of yours are straight up false). Most people are too insecure to admit that in some cases they have it easier since it's ego damaging. Let's be real, if you're using this forum in a first world country you are at least in the top 1% of the most privileged people in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 07:34 AM
2

You keep posting these cryptic messages to me and I don't know why.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 04:31 AM
4

"Math iz 4 loozerz"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 04:31 AM
2

Would she fuck him? If so, you are correct, they are not an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 11:20 PM
4

The problem is that by "men", you mean less than 5% (and that's being extremely generous) of men per woman. When we refer to "women", we're talking about 75% of them or so, 90%+ if we keep it to women under 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 11:19 PM
14

This is exactly what the OP does with men, behaving as if the top 10% of men's experience is true for the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 11:17 PM
2

I don't even know where to begin with this. Women get used. I mean men lie to them. We string them along, and quite deliberately, by hinting that the "relationship" is going somewhere. And women will lie and string men along to make them do anything she wants as long as they think they can get sex. Guys sometimes string women along for years while they think they are building a relationship with the guy. This is what the whole "friendzone" concept is with men. It's basically the same thing. Men …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 11:14 PM
1

So...she's not undateable, she has ridiculous standards. Poor baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 11:03 PM
1

I'm not saying they shouldn't. But the idea that any significant percentage of women is undateable is ridiculous. The average 5/10 girl still has hundreds of guys who would crawl through broken glass for a hug, so long as she downloads Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 06:20 PM
0

Ask these "undateable" women if they've ever been approached. If they answer "yes", they aren't undateable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 06:10 PM
0

Why do you men treat all women like a fucking monolith? ...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 06:09 PM
3

First of all, the reason behind the stud/slut paradox isn't that it's harder for men, but that the current dating scene is set up as with men as the initiator and women as the defender. An army that breaks into a fortress regularly is an effective army and a fortress that is broken into often is a bad fortress, but that only matters when you think of women as defenders against men when it comes to sex. Huh? You said it's not that it's harder for men and then explained why it's harder for men as …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 06:02 PM
0

Again, you are assuming that just because you are a man-hating bigot, who claims that the comparatively small % that can't take no for an answer consists of almost all men, that every other woman shares the view of you and your buddy up there. It's like how racists love to say "oh everyone knows that x group is just naturally shitty" because it makes them feel secure. The fact that you think mean words on the internet are indicative of anything kind of proves my point that you're just out to fee…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 07:16 AM
1

Yes, it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 06:25 AM
1

What a coincidence, I didn't say that either. You did. We all say that "no" or "I'm not interested" isnt enough to get the message across to most dudes. Because it's not. No self-awareness at all, but nice attempt at saving face. You are the one smearing the majority of the male population, which differs from most of the other responses. Pot, meet kettle I'm not the one going on hate-mongering tirades about half the population. But I also would never contend that my personal views can be extrapo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 05:39 AM
3

If you're enough of a Chad to have sex before you turn 18 I seriously doubt you won't be able to do so after.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 04:33 AM
2

This is a good question. My childhood best friend's grandmother died about a year ago and within six months his grandfather had a new girlfriend. This seriously disturbed his mother and I can certainly see why. I think different people feel love to different extents. The "clingy/stalker" personality feels it the most strongly whereas the "player/slut" barely feels it at all. Additionally each instance of love is not as strong as every other. It amazes me how many people can just throw someone aw…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 04:29 AM
-1

No, every woman in this thread does not say that nearly all men are evil perverts. You're projecting your own bigotry onto them. Either way, a certain type of person finds their way to becoming a regular on a gender war board.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 03:30 AM
1

No, obviously I'm not. You really like to hear yourself talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 03:30 AM
3

If they were in danger from women, we'd never hear the end of it. When men get harmed by women it's considered hilarious by the media and people in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 07:17 PM
1

Your flair says purple, yet you went on an unhinged rant about teh evil menz. Your true colors (no pun intended) are showing through.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 07:14 PM
1

As any woman will tell you, most men who cold approach will not take a simple "no" as an answer. One woman online with an agenda speaks for half the population. Yeah sure, I buy that. It seems you haven't grown out of your "boys are icky" phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 07:13 PM
3

A certain kind of person ends up spending significant amounts of time on Internet forums, and it's not the kind that gets a lot of socialization. This goes double for people on gender related subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 07:03 PM
1

Sure. Pure honesty is overrated and will get you nowhere in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:49 PM
1

I love how you're pretending to be purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:47 PM
-2

90% of us do, but as with most bigots you extrapolate the minority to the entire group.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:43 PM
-1

This could possibly be because men are told (by women) to be persistent and keep fighting, and not just because we're evil pieces of shit. Also, who cares if you sound like a bitch? Queue the hoards of men chiming in with the 'i got a no once and took it perfectly well.' that's great, but it's not the norm for young attractive women. And here we have another misandrist who focuses in on a small % of men who are assholes and pretends it's all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:40 PM
-1

We do, you just focus on the tiny minority who don't in order to justify your bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:39 PM
3

We are hardwired to avoid being in a position of vulnerability. Approaching a woman puts her in a position of power over you, whereas the dog can merely be disregarded as an animal acting on instinct and if it's below a certain size wouldn't be all that hard to fight off.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:30 PM
2

You can't really "use" men for sex, since we want it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 05:31 PM
1

This is sarcasm, since this is the same reasoning feminists use to explain why women don't seek high paying jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 05:30 PM
0

It's not quite the same thing -- being rich isn't intrinsic to you. Being sexually attractive is. Also, there's no reward to other people wanting your money, whereas when people want to fuck you, you get sex. But on this thought experiment, the scenario you mention is clearly preferable to being poor and having people mock your financial situation, clothes, home, job and avoid being around you. We'd all take being rich over being poor any day of the week and it is certainly understandable why po…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 08:29 AM
0

Correct. So?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:35 AM
0

and understand what feminism has been literally screeching for a hundred years. To deaf ears. Women are people too. And they aren't men with tits. Ironic, considering feminists have been the ones telling us that women are men with tits.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:31 AM
8

"Just magically become gay"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:29 AM
28

Women have about 1/20th of the testosterone men do, which is the primary driving hormone of sex drive. A world where you're constantly looked at to be fucked would be amazing because you have the ones looking wrapped around your finger and can make them do whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/19 06:29 AM
3

But men are pressured into not seeking custody by rigid gender roles, right? The fact that they don't seek it is simply because they are socialized not to, plus they know they can't win because women are favored. Or does that only work for when women are underrepresented/make less money? Nevertheless, what you said is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 11:50 PM
1

Here you go
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 11:48 PM
2

No
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 11:47 PM
4

Do you date giant straw men as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 05:05 PM
1

You're a woman saying men's standards are too high?? No words.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 04:43 PM
1

I don't know why so many bloopers are desperate to die on this hill of "women have it as hard as men with sex/dating" when it's so obviously false. I think they just can't admit that men have anything more difficult because it bruises their ego and victim complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 04:30 PM
1

We agree, but not every man and woman is "average". There are women with facial deformities, etc. out there you know. Lizzie Velasquez, generally regarded as the ugliest woman currently living, is married.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 06:49 AM
6

Because it's based on a few key presuppositions that are in no way even remotely true -- Erroneous assumption #1: Men and women are attracted to an equal percentage of the opposite sex. Erroneous assumption #2: Men and women are both required to put in the same amount of effort to obtain a partner. Erroneous assumption #3: Men and women have equally strong sex drives.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 06:43 AM
1

Your link doesn't say what you claim. This has to be a troll account, I mean holy shit you're a walking parody.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 03:49 AM
2

It's like how back in the day Mitt Romney was going to enslave women and take away black people's right to vote. When you control the narrative for decades, even the slightest deviation is a shock.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 03:21 AM
1

Der Fuhrer Trump told the FBI not to hear them out Liar. But of course you SJWs never let reality get in the way of a good victim narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 03:20 AM
1

That's the one. This was 8 years ago and I still remember how disturbed I was seeing these reactions from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 07:38 AM
1

If the genders were reversed, do you think a group of male hosts or an entirely male audience would have this same "group mentality" and laugh at a woman who had her tits cut off for requesting a divorce? Do you think even one person would do that, let alone just about every single one? There are two possible explanations for this, IMO: One is the caricature we have painted of men over the last several decades as evil brutes who terrorize women, and we thus assume that anything bad done to a man…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 07:30 AM
2

This reminds me of that show where a woman castrated her husband for asking for a divorce and the entire female panel and audience absolutely loved it. I think a lot of women have been so conditioned to see men as evil that they think any harm brought upon them is "just desserts".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 06:02 PM
1

Except there's no proof Roethlisberger did anything wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 05:59 PM
2

One must exercise a certain amount of caution in general -- every single person you meet could potentially murder you. But in order to actually enjoy our lives, we have to take risks and assign a base amount of trust in others. The first time you went to a friend's house, you technically didn't know if they were going to be another Jeffrey Dahmer, but you did it anyways. Yet we still lock our doors and look over our shoulders while walking at night. There is a catch, however: if you substituted …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:58 PM
2

Not just a red flag, deal breaker. She said, light flirting is pretty much how many women need to behave in the man world in order to get ahead. She said, that this is not anything to worry about or that it leads to anything. The only women who say this are the ones who can't get ahead on merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 07:37 AM
1

My ass
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 05:34 AM
2

I mean it is bullshit that only one gender has to put in any real effort. However life isn’t fair and you have to work around it even if you try to change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 05:32 AM
1

Not really. It’s just that alpha types approach a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 05:30 AM
2

Sure, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 05:29 AM
2

The only real case you could make for it being women is the much higher likelihood of facing serious violence from a partner, but that still doesn't happen to the vast majority of women. ​ Let's be real -- men are the ones who *have to* get confidence, approach, get shot down over and over, improve themselves dramatically and be making significant progress in life. Also, men don't have nearly as many backup options if things go south because women are attracted to a very small percentage of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 02:35 AM
1

There are no guys who "don't want for female attention" unless they are asexual or homosexual, and even then will take it positively.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 05:54 AM
3

I'm male and I've been told to smile more by both men and women, strangers and acquaintances. I have better things to do than incessantly whine about this 0th world problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 05:53 AM
1

Guys who say that are just coping with not feeling wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 05:51 AM
1

YAAAAAAS KWEEN SLAY oof I literally can't even y'all
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 05:50 AM
1

Maybe if you have chlamydia.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 05:48 AM
1

Guys don't think like this. At all. This is pretty much just an excuse women use to avoid approaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/19 05:47 AM
0

Popular feminism is not man hating Yeah, it really is. Why you think some women on your Facebook are "feminism" is really odd and you would probably be better just asking them. Did you ever consider that they identify as feminists? Or is this just a regurgitation of NAFALT?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 05:55 PM
1

I'd say pop feminism is at least based on a historic movement that actually had a purpose, whereas MGTOW isn't. The closest analogy is the lesbian separatists who are even crazier than MGTOWs. Also, IME only 80% of feminists are misandrists whereas 99% of MGTOWs are misogynists. So they're a bit worse, but not all that much and the psychology behind each is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 05:52 PM
1

Well, there's also the fact that no matter what the sexual status of a male, female-on-male rape is generally taken less seriously than jaywalking.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 12:19 PM
2

Because a virgin man who reported being raped by a woman would be taken with the utmost seriousness...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 06:22 AM
1

I think very few people feel "love" as it's generally defined -- how many people marry the so-called love of their life, subsequently divorce them and then forget about them in a year or two? I remember when my friend's grandmother died, and his grandfather had a new girlfriend six months later. But women initiate most divorces and seem to move on much more quickly, likely because they still have a ton of options.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 06:44 AM
11

Not to mention guns.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 03:46 AM
52

Contrary to feminist belief, we cannot walk through dangerous parts of town at 2am whenever we want without facing consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 11:55 PM
2

Men who dislike male feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 04:49 AM
4

what is with this weird dated view of what feminists look like? idk about where you live but a huge chunk feminist women in their 20s on the coasts are like skinny hot rich girls. this isn't the 90s lol Because I could count on one hand (with fingers to spare) the number I've met who don't resemble this description, and many more who do. I have a very hard time believing that you know a significant number of bombshells who use terms like "problematic" and "mansplaining" unironically. Rich I can …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 04:47 AM
4

i think male feminists get outted as creeps because they're more likely to deal with feminist women who will publicly call a man out. But aren't they supposed to be "woke" and respectful of women? Why does there not seem to be much consistency there? and masculine? maybe not. but you don't need high masculinity to be attractive to women. The two are very strongly correlated. some of the guys i know who kill it with girls the most are like fey hipster dudes with liberal arts degrees who know thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 04:25 AM
2

Some few feminists don't want to spend any time on male issues, but most are actively or passively supportive of them. There is nothing even remotely resembling evidence of this, and plenty to the contrary. So I'm gonna have to say "no" to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 03:51 AM
7

Oh wow, the definition "argument", nobody has ever pulled that shit before! Wow, I'm sold! The definition doesn't mean shit when at least 80% of feminists are simply anti-male bigots who want a positive label. Women already objectively have more rights than men, and of course feminists are fine with this. It's funny how feminists reject the dictionary definition of sexism yet use the dictionary definition to erase their real world actions. And of course you throw in the obligatory "disagreeing w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 03:46 AM
2

Nobody likes a brown-noser.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 03:44 AM
5

Well there's the obvious trend of male feminists routinely being outed as creeps. Plus you pretty much never see attractive, masculine guys bemoaning their own gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 03:43 AM
6

I think you're overthinking it -- we dislike them because the vast majority are traitorous, brown-nosing little weasels who think shitting on their own gender will make them look virtuous. It's not a coincidence that prominent male feminists keep getting outed as sexual predators over and over again. There's a reason why it's incredibly uncommon (if existent at all) for attractive, sexually successful men to go on tirades about how their own gender sucks and women are made of sugar and spice -- …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 03:40 AM
0

I'm not...I'm talking about misandrists specifically.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:50 AM
5

We don't think that, we just call out the fact that they are lying when they claim to be anything but a man-hating cult, at least in the western world.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 01:38 AM
1

Every time some soy-guzzling hipster or purple-haired man-hater writes a hit piece on us, it always has to include that word. I'm not talking about in real life necessarily.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:19 AM
1

That's because women are willing to organize in their interests whereas men tear each other down for a chance at getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 10:23 AM
8

Pretty cringe-worthy, and obviously would not be tolerated if any other group was the target, but I worry that the backlash is going to give the creators exactly what they wanted -- much like with the NFL protests. It probably won't be as good for Gillette as it was for Nike though, as people were more evenly divided on the kneeling (or if anything, in favor of it) whereas Gillette's target audience is men with enough testosterone to grow facial hair. Maybe they're looking to cash in on men who …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 09:26 AM
1

Just because they can doesn't mean they would want to. And of course not every woman can do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 07:28 AM
1

In the same way men used to manipulate women with financial security, yes. When one party has something the other wants, and cannot obtain without them, it requires a level of restraint not to abuse that power.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 03:58 AM
1

I'd have to see an example of what you're referring to. Women don't have to work as they can become sugar babies, but most of the time they aren't satisfied with such a lifestyle
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/19 03:55 AM
1

I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:53 PM
1

"In history" pertains to all history throughout the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:29 PM
1

We’re talking about America specifically. No we aren't, you just think the whole world revolves around you. Many other countries are mentioned ITT and the OP said nothing about America. You literally used America as an example of your point and when it was proven to be inaccurate, you flip and try to downplay your own “evidence.” Unreal. Because you started discussing America and my counterpoint referred to your post. Is this a joke?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:19 PM
1

He's referring to the past, obviously, when military service was required of men whenever the government demanded it. Men who avoided it went to jail and -- wait for it -- as a result were not able to vote. This is what I was saying about being intentionally obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 11:18 PM
1

No one said you needed to serve in the military to vote, so your post was a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 10:23 PM
2

America is the only place that has ever existed, I forgot.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 10:21 PM
1

Good job being deliberately obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 09:45 PM
2

Compared to the entirety of human history, that's infinitesimally small.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 09:44 PM
9

Why would I "feel bad" about it? The percentage of history where the average man had rights and the average woman didn't was so much smaller than the period where no one had rights besides royalty that women don't merit that much extra consideration. There are advantages to being male. However, to deny that there are a comparable number of advantages for women is just being ridiculous. Men don't get the same stereotyping and scrutiny that women do in many male-dominated fields, but we also don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 06:10 AM
10

or we take neither Exactly. Taking the extreme outliers to define the norm is absurd. It would be like saying men are more intelligent on average because they are significantly more likely to win Nobel prizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 09:59 PM
33

Men are desperate for pussy and will completely throw away any self-respect to obtain it, this isn't news.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 08:34 PM
6

Yeah, let's take what .00001% of men do and say it totally overrides the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 08:33 PM
1

Now, this can - in certain cases - work in the woman's favour. For instance, if a divorced mother wants more time with her kids, she's likely to get it. However, it can also work against the woman as judges who are more inclined to accept traditional gender roles are also less inclined to support female plaintiffs in workplace discrimination cases. This is such a strange paragraph. You say it doesn't prove that they get an advantage in family court, then you go on to admit that it does and then …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 07:11 PM
2

You can cherry pick statistics in any way you want. Here's proof that women are favored in family court: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180419141541.htm Women are preferred in STEM by a 2:1 margin: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/112/17/5360.full.pdf Women favor their own gender more than mens do theirs: https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women.aspx Women have a better quality of life than men in more countries than the reverse: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/community…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/18 11:04 PM
0

Her whole post was just baseless, regurgitated talking points.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/18 10:59 PM
1

Almost none of this is true. Don't believe everything Tumblr tells you to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/18 10:58 PM
0

Is this actually happening, or is it just the tiny number of MGTOWs making a lot of noise as they tend to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 11:09 PM
5

Yes, there is. The burden of proof is a basic logical concept that has been around for centuries. Why people think the justice system pulled it out of their ass continues to perplex me. If you believe everything posted on Facebook automatically, yikes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 11:05 PM
2

Which is unfortunately how politics works in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 11:03 PM
3

To be believed in a debate situation, not to be believed socially as the victim of a crime. I really wonder where people get this idea that rules of logic go out the window when it's not a formal debate. I guess that's why people believe in Bigfoot, UFOs and all kinds of crap much crazier than this. For honest example... The issue with this anecdote is 1) that she did not accuse anyone specific of having their car broken into who could have their lives adversely affected and 2) it's someone you …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 11:01 PM
3

The logical concept? Who is applying like philosophical debate rules to this? Logic doesn't go out the window when it's not a formal debate. I mean even if you are talking about it as some concept outside of the courtroom, have you ever seen anyone berated for "proof" if they like claim they were mugged or punched, etc? I've never seen anyone "berated for 'proof'" if they were raped either. But if someone says "that guy over there mugged me" I'm not going to automatically believe it and start a …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 10:58 PM
3

So did I. Then the midterms came and I logged off again. The internet used to be a way to escape the real world -- now it's the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 09:14 PM
3

The alleged victim never has the burden of proof, the state does. We're not just talking about trials here. The logical concept of the burden of proof falls on the person making the claim. But nevertheless in the USA the accused is not automatically believed in trials -- which, to many people, is accusing them of lying. This is somewhat unique to sex crime cases. Law enforcement for example, does not typically immediately treat people reporting other types of crimes as default suspect. Yet this …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 09:10 PM
9

This. I guarantee most of the conservatives who defended Kavanaugh’s innocence believe Bill Clinton is guilty (and vice versa).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 08:33 PM
6

Yes, it is. That’s a basic logical concept: the burden of proof is on the one making the claim. This has been established for centuries if not longer. People do in fact wait for evidence (or, as you call it, “immediately assume they are lying”) before believing that the accused is guilty. The difference is that no one has a frothing meltdown when someone doesn’t automatically want to start a lynch mob based on a mere accusation of robbery.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 08:31 PM
4

“bUt ThIs IsN’t A tRiAl” —how to know somebody has no idea how the burden of proof actually works
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 08:27 PM
2

I’ve noticed that a lot of people consider not automatically believing every accusation to be “assum[ing] lying”. But in hard RP/incel circles you can probably see the real thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 08:26 PM
10

When a certain correlation is seen over and over again scientifically, including when trans men are injected with testosterone, it becomes a causation. Those advertisements exist because of men’s massive sex drive, not vice versa. It’s not some giant brainwashing conspiracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 01:08 PM
21

I’m gonna need some proof of that, because there’s plenty of data that supports the strong correlation between testosterone levels and sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 01:01 PM
14

Again that would require chemical castration, since free will isn’t a real thing — certainly not to the point where you can rid yourself of base cravings.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 12:54 PM
13

Like it or not, market principles apply to humans as well. Any woman has a far, far higher value than any man and can thus select from the top rung. If you had 1000 people offering you filet mignon a day, how often would you eat out of the dumpster? The latter would never even cross your mind because it holds no value to you. The only way to change this would to be injecting women with testosterone or chemically castrate men. I don't see either signing up for that anytime soon, so you'll have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 12:03 PM
9

It's not a delusion so much as a fantasy. You know how we dreamed as kids that we'd become rich and famous and the people who were mean to us would suddenly wish they would have been kinder and would come groveling at our feet? Men love the idea of having the power over women for a change instead of being your dancing monkey so they'll convince themselves that it's real.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 04:05 AM
2

Been saying this for years. Every guy dreams of being the one with all the power and turning the tables, but it's all a fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 03:58 AM
6

This is just the male version of Schrodinger's rapist. Pretty plain sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 03:46 AM
1

The reason women may not seem horny is because they have access to the hottest guys around 24/7. And why do you think that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 03:38 AM
1

They can be more selective for a reason...doesn't take a genius to figure out what that reason is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 03:38 AM
3

Which are difficult to find, let alone clean ones that you know aren't victims of human trafficking. Plus it costs money and most women would never date a guy who went to one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 12:07 AM
3

I'm not saying everyone's parents unconditionally love them, just that if somebody does it's going to be them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 12:03 AM
23

I think what you're noticing is a combination of two things: 1) Women on average have significantly more options than men. 2) The illusion of unconditional love from anyone but family. As for point 1, there's more incentive for men to stay in a relationship than women if they're both unsatisfied. A woman who isn't obese, elderly or a disheveled drug addict knows that she can leave and still be showered with attention. An average-looking, middle class man knows that he'll have to endure a lot of …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 04:00 AM
1

I think he's both.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 03:37 AM
5

Yes, let's talk about how fragile men are from our safe spaces, so long as we have trigger warnings to prevent microaggressions from giving us PTSD.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 03:37 AM
1

I find it amusing that the same people who scream the loudest about body shaming accuse their opponents of having small penises or call them neckbeards.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 12:55 AM
1

It's just men's way of pretending women will lose their power over us, or even that it will reverse. A coping mechanism of sorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 01:41 AM
1

Most of the virgin shaming I see comes from the people who shout the loudest about slut shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 06:16 AM
1

It's a bad thing and can lead to serious self-esteem damage. There's nothing immoral at all about having a high number of sex partners, though you can't complain if a man isn't attracted to that. The common argument is that it's easier for women to get sex, which is obviously true, but doing something that's easy isn't wrong. Interestingly, this gets way more attention than men who are shamed for having too *few* sex partners. Feminists love to call their opponents virgins while being the ones t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 06:15 AM
3

A large number of feminists will not even admit that a thing called misandry exists (despite the vast majority of them being guilty of it). The 3rd wave ideology must adhere to the "men oppress women" dynamic, because otherwise the whole thing falls apart when they realize that women in the 21st century have agency and that men are not a collective hivemind that work together in the interests of all men. Thus, the idea that women don't, for example, like emotional men must somehow be traced back…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 12:54 AM
1

They don't want to lose their jobs. Plus some have been conditioned from day one to see women as infallible and have no sense of self-respect, thinking that being a doormat is what women find appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 09:23 PM
1

Reprogram men to have some self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 09:23 PM
1

Women don't usually say 'pull your dick out and wave it in my face!' They should start
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 10:39 AM
8

Well that was a not-so-humblebrag.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 10:37 PM
1

I love how feminists think they can read minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 09:46 PM
1

Yes but you see women can't be entitled because entitlement requires social power and women are oppressed so blah blah blah
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 09:44 PM
2

Nobody disagrees with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 06:41 AM
1

That's a troll sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 11:09 AM
6

And of course you're one of those anti-white, anti-male people or at the very least sympathetic to them. There's no other way you could straw man me like that. What a shocker. "Fact" doesn't mean what you think it means. I'm not going to keep posting endless examples so you can say "that doesn't count" every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/18 12:39 AM
7

Can you provide a few examples of that anti white anti male rhetoric? You're kidding right? No seriously... You can't be serious... I’ve never heard that. Can you provide an example? Wow that was easy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 10:39 PM
1

Either.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 09:41 PM
4

The majority of women will tell you that 95%+ of men repulse them. This is usually followed by "men don't take care of their appearance", yet gay men seem to like us just fine. Women just have far lower sex drives.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 08:48 PM
2

How many women do you suppose have never had anyone interested in them?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 08:46 PM
2

Rude to waiters/cleaning staff, 3rd wave feminist, homophobic, spoiled brat, and worst of all being mean to animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 08:14 PM
6

The regressive left has become infatuated with the idea of never changing their own behavior because "bad people should stop being bad" like reality is a Dora the Explorer episode. This can be seen via your examples and most prominently in the fact that they've doubled down on the anti-white, anti-male lunacy that lost them the easiest election imaginable in 2016. Of course they'll be the first ones to say that criticizing Islam makes Muslims go become terrorists, but logic is a patriarchal cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 08:11 PM
2

Find where the local stoners hang out. One will have a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/18 07:00 AM
3

Not really. Men are no more or less horny than before, it's just that women don't need to give as much sex because they are more self-sufficient than men and unlike past generations don't need men for stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 11:17 PM
1

Yeah, we pretty much are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 11:16 PM
1

Women that are superior to me in any way, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 11:16 PM
2

They can, there's just no point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 11:15 PM
1

Simple -- millennial women make more money and are more educated than their male counterparts. Thus they don't need to give sex to get stability, so the total amount of sex decreases. Your numbers are a little shaky though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 11:13 PM
3

People tend to believe in things that make them feel warm and fuzzy inside (hence the popularity of religion).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 09:19 AM
10

1) Women are making more money than men among the younger generation, so they don't need to. 2) Internet and video games raised a generation of men, now they don't have the courage to approach or the skills to do so successfully. 3) Fear of being accused of harassment/rape and having one's reputation ruined.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/18 08:19 AM
1

Absolutely. But anything that could happen is a "legitimate" fear. A life lived afraid of any possible scenario will be a wasted one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 11:51 PM
2

If all the risk and social judgement were gone, women would have far more casual sex. It's not a hard wired thing. Gay men have been far more shamed than women, yet they certainly have no problem with casual sex. Compare their rates of hooking up to those of lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 04:38 AM
1

Wow this is spectacular. Thanks!
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:04 PM
1

This is very true, but I'm not sure if it's a way of atoning so much as a facade they put up to make women drop their shields around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/18 08:03 PM
9

Your inability to comprehend it =/= an improper use of one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/18 12:37 AM
7

This is akin to asking "if structural racism exists how are there rich black people"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 11:52 PM
8

Perfect, thanks!
/r/MensRights11/11/18 11:47 PM
7

Because the people in the movement keep lying about it and saying otherwise. Though it does focus mostly on men -- berating and demonizing them, though. It's a pretty safe bet that anyone using the term "dudes" is one of the above people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 11:07 PM
3

I doubt many male feminists believe that feminism helps them. From what I can tell they are usually guys raised by a single mother with a grudge against men, or 20-somethings who have never had a girlfriend/sex and thing being a spineless punching bad is appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 11:05 PM
1

Neutral leaning red here. A fetus is as much a human as a tumor — both have human DNA, yet are not humans that can survive on their own. At the point where a fetus is viable outside the mother’s body is a tougher deal and will likely never be resolved as it’s a matter of opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 12:20 AM
1

Rarely =/= never
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/18 08:00 AM
2

Both have their pluses and minuses. Notice how rarely anyone says their own sex has it easier? I used to think it was women, but realized I have my own blinders on and it's impossible to objectively assess -- someone might value a specific male advantage over a specific female one (or vice versa). People who think it's dramatically easier to be the opposite sex are usually just immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 05:49 AM
2

People like to feel sorry for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/18 02:14 AM
16

The general idea is that women are a "victim" group and men are an "oppressor" group, which according to those touting this narrative means that men need to walk on pins and needles while women can be as misandrist and hateful as they want. This comes from Marxist theory of the proletarian struggle against the bourgeoise -- in this case, women being the former and men the latter. That being said, doing so will make you a mirror image of feminists who push the "every man is a potential rapist" na…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/18 05:36 AM
1

C
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/18 05:32 AM
0

Your definition of feminism is rather strange. The advent of birth control is a technological achievement that has nothing to do with any social movement. Also, you seem to think that feminism has freed men from traditional roles. While they may no longer have to be the sole earner, women's preferences have not changed all that much. Furthermore, treating women like delicate flowers is an integral part of 3rd wave feminism, no matter how much they pretend to hate it. They're always moaning about…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/18 04:38 AM
2

how come a pussy grabber is president even though a woman won the popular vote Because, as most of us learned in 3rd grade, the popular vote does not determine who is president. 95% of rapists aren't prosecuted A woman saying a man raped her =/= the man actually raping her. Rape is hard to prove, and anyone who wants to undermine the burden of proof is human garbage. women are more likely to be poor Men are three times more likely to be homeless, and also do not have the option to marry out of p…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 12:48 AM
3

Could be that they accuse us of having small ones whenever they lose an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 10:38 PM
15

the grey areas Like when she says "yes" but her eyes are facing a 30 degree angle and thus wasn't really, *really consenting? Or when passing a woman on the street is attempted assault? Sorry but I ain't clicking Jezebel. They literally celebrate domestic violence against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 08:48 AM
1

but telling a woman she's a "man" a compliment? I have never, not once, heard of this being the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/18 11:04 AM
2

lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 04:23 AM
1

Perhaps that's because you are doing a terrible job of making your point. I’ve never met men IRL who believe most of the shit that regularly gets said around here. Political correctness and other social mores often forbid people from stating the obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 03:30 AM
1

I just don’t know why women are told they’re lucky for getting something men wouldn’t want given to them. We probably would if homophobia weren't so ingrained in masculinity. Also most men forget that they are as if not less appealing to the majority of women than another man is to them and believe something as stupid as of "women want sex as much as men".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 03:24 AM
1

When I was in Honduras I noticed that women there have a completely different attitude to male attention than in the US. Maybe they haven't had the conditioning to dislike/fear men in general that has been prevalent in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 03:14 AM
5

It's called the "women are wonderful effect".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 03:12 AM
2

You really think men would have a problem with this? Insert gay men for women and you'd have a better analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 03:07 AM
1

Yeah I'd try to get out of the situation if we were alone but after the fact I wouldn't pretend that I didn't appreciate it to some extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 02:55 AM
1

Compared to starving Ethiopian kids with nothing to eat? I absolutely am.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 02:44 AM
1

I mean that's still pretty frequent I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 12:23 AM
2

0th world problems
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 12:18 AM
6

That's not an argument. Let's be real, it's easier for a woman of any age to get sex than a man of any age by a mile.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 07:27 AM
3

Again, the fact that you think all of those are the same thing (you forgot to add "incels") shows that you have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 11:29 PM
1

Pretty much. Reminds me of Atheism+.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 10:04 PM
3

Because you guys think anything that isn't 3rd wave feminism is "MRAish".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 10:02 PM
4

I'm not going to keep walking you in circles. Take a step back and read this again.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 08:32 AM
6

Not sure how I can make this clearer: accusations are not evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 07:58 AM
5

So let's recap. There have been several women that have accused him of just grabbing them the pussy, then Trump comes along and brags about doing exactly that and claims that they let him do it. He said they let him do so because he's famous. Accusations are just accusations, though I haven't looked into them personally because he had already lost my vote long before then. How is he supposed to know which ones want it? The ones that, as he said, let him do it. That's simply a mental defense mech…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 07:45 AM
3

He supported the Patriot Act, a clear violation of the 4th amendment. Either he doesn't know the constitution very well at all or is willing to ignore it to serve his partisan interests. But with regards to the recent investigation, you are correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 03:33 AM
16

Do people think "MRA" stands for "anything remotely related to gender from a specific man's perspective"?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 03:32 AM
17

So since Barack Obama was president, I guess black people never face discrimination now right? Guess what: we're not all rich and well-established enough to get out that easy. It's only because people like you helped the Republicans to a massive victory in the Senate that he's being confirmed. Every Democrat is voting against him solely out of partisanship. Trump is an admitted rapist "They let you do it". Jesus, stop making me defend him. It feels dirty.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 03:30 AM
1

I don't think many of us think we "should" or that it's "wrong" not to, unless they're religious. But the idea of being a woman's first AND only can be quite appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 07:26 AM
4

Basically. There's a certain amount of risk that comes with doing anything in life. Aside from secretly recording all sexual encounters there's no real way to avoid this besides staying a virgin. Do you have any better ideas? -This is clearly satire however it does depict an interesting parallel to what women have been constantly told to prevent being raped, which then tends to put blame on the victim when it does happen. Kind of like how telling people to lock their door and avoid dark alleyway…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 07:23 AM
7

I find it interesting that I've seen no gender bias at all on who supports Kavanaugh vs. Ford. Goes to show that every day fewer and fewer women are falling for the identity politics sham.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:48 AM
1

I've been pointing out that the whole "media promotes rape culture" paranoia is reminiscent of the freakout about music and video games causing mass shootings in the 90s.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 09:20 AM
2

Bulldog definitely wouldn't last. But Niles was never abusive nor did he commit any serious violations of privacy. Part of what stalking is is continued attention after being told to stop, which he didn't do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/18 09:18 AM
2

If you're an old guy approaching college chicks, something tells me you have a thick skin.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 05:57 AM
6

Her mouth said no, her-ass-meant yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 05:56 AM
1

If it's any consolation, given the way you've presented yourself, you couldn't pay me to spend 10 minutes with you let alone sleep with you. First of all, do they really think we're that stupid (that us young women would really date them, sleep with them, flirt back, etc)? Yes. If it didn't work, they'd probably have stopped trying by now. Second of all, I don't care how much money they have. I come from a Buddhist family who taught me money isn't everything. There are plenty other ways to be ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 05:55 AM
2

Lol no way. Can you even imagine asking the reverse?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/18 05:09 AM
1

Where are you pulling this from? I've never met a woman like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 11:04 PM
1

Well of course, but your post implied that her verbally rejecting him would lead him to become violent, but non-verbally would not. If a guy is scummy enough to assault/rape her, he's going to do it no matter what she says or does.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 10:28 AM
1

So what's stopping him from doing that if she gives the non-verbal cues?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 09:53 AM
2

men can easily defend themselves against other men than women can defend themselves against men. You are making the ridiculous assumption that all men are of equal size and strength. Not to mention weapons coming into the picture. The pregnancy risk is moot?? You think women can't get pregnant even when contracptives are around?? Again, in civilized nations where abortion is legal, they don't have to be pregnant. the condom breaks The condom breaks and the man will be paying for the next 18 year…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 09:15 AM
1

People go to extremes and binary thinking when it comes to comparisons such as these. Since sex is far less important to women than men, people will assume that it's not important at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 08:22 AM
1

Except for pregnancy, gay men face all of those risks (and more with regard to STDs). Even then, if you live in a country where abortion is legal and contraceptives are easily accessible, the pregnancy risk is moot. Doesn't stop them from getting it on all the damn time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/18 08:18 AM
3

"We need to teach men not to rape"/Schroedinger's rapist "1 in 4" and assorted myths that demonize men as predators. Pulling fire alarms and sending death threats when men's issues are discussed. Having a shit fit when people point out that no, not all men are bad in the face of their bigoted generalizations and stereotypes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/18 06:14 AM
3

The difference is that moderate Muslims routinely distance themselves from and call out the extremists of their own volition, rather than allowing them to speak and behave completely unopposed and half-heartedly repeating "Not All Muslims Are Like That" to the people who criticize the extremists.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/18 06:14 AM
1

Only if I were a hot chick, and especially if I kept my same knowledge of maledom. Note- If you're a man with an average face you cannot be reborn as an attractive woman. Damn. Well in that case I'd stay male.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/18 05:53 AM
1

I think most every man knows that deep down, but it's too painful to acknowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/18 08:55 AM
15

No, but this question is a straw man.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/18 07:05 AM
1

Well they have, but it's because they were defending themselves against a violent or potentially violent male. /misandrist "logic"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/18 06:47 AM
21

You need to step out of the "women are wonderful" bubble and realize that they, just like their male counterparts, are capable of doing the wrong thing, mislabeling people, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/18 06:37 AM
0

The newspaper shows that because it gains sympathy. No one really gives a shit when men are victimized, but showing women being harmed is the easiest emotional bait there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 09:15 PM
1

Said random man could easily be carrying a weapon (and for most violent crimes, they are) which is no more a threat to either gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 09:13 PM
0

If you lay her out, you'll go to jail. If you tried something and she cut your dick off, people would just laugh it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 09:11 PM
0

You could substitute any demographic for "men" and it would remain true, and also be considered bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 09:10 PM
1

For the same reason that, pre-1960, men were ok with themselves being in the workforce but not women: everyone wants to increase their leverage. Men's social power came (and to an extent still comes) from money, women's comes from sex. But another point comes up: the majority of men who engage in casual sex would not have a LTR with a prostitute. Most likely, this stems from the whole "slut" stigma combined with the societal attitude toward prostitutes themselves (of course I imagine there's a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/18 08:52 PM
2

In one sense, it's an overwhelmingly male behavior, so it could be considered masculine in that respect. However, contrary to feminist propaganda, the vast majority of men will not only never engage in it but severely reproach any man who does.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/18 04:16 AM
5

We can empathize on shared human experience. But there are a lot of things that set us apart: not just things that we haven't experienced, but things that we cannot experience. As you mentioned, men can't empathize with the idea of "too much" sexual attention. To most of us it sounds like spoiled brat whining. We've been fed the ludicrous idea that women and men are interchangeable, including wanting sex as much as we do, so we'd just assume that all attention is endlessly wonderful for them lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/18 04:56 AM
1

Not even by this guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/18 12:05 AM
2

OP is mostly full of shit, but this is absolutely true. I suspect this is due to the cultural norm of violence against men being a form of comedy rather than some loathing for the penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/18 09:02 AM
2

Eating anything/wanting to have sex with anyone is not higher sex drive, it's desperation. Same thing. There's a reason there are plenty of desperate men out there and virtually no desperate women. As a man if he'd rather go without sex or fuck a woman who isn't 10/10 perfect across the board and he'll die of laughter. Women can be turned on just as much, if not more than typical guy, if they are with attractive enough guy (Chad). Just because most guys don't cut it, doesn't mean sex drive is lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 02:59 AM
1

Yeah but I think this could be said about every demographic. Most people want the easiest road through life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 02:13 AM
2

I love it and it's helped society by fewer unwanted kids being born and neglected. Purple. Male. They probably would.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 02:10 AM
2

That's exactly what it proves. None of that stuff seems to stop gay men. If someone will eat anything, and another will only eat filet mignon from a Michelin star restaurant, the first is clearly hungrier.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/18 11:46 PM
2

That's one of the clearest facts in the world, on par with men being taller than women. Every study on the subject confirms that, and it's readily obvious from how each gender behaves. There's a reason men can't just ask women to fuck them and get it the same way gay men can, and transmen can confirm the effects of the added testosterone on their sex drives.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/18 10:24 PM
1

What's wrong with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/18 01:59 AM
1

This doesn't answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/18 05:34 AM
1

Lol maybe your interior decorator would hate this...the rest of us would consider this heaven on Earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/18 05:32 AM
8

Men's Libbers can only help men in a feminist-approved manner, like encouraging men to cry more. And then be mocked for their male tears and fragile masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 06:51 PM
4

It's still in the early phases. Just a few years ago nobody could tell you what an MRA was, and most probably still couldn't. Personally I think we need a movement that is concerned with both genders, but that's probably a pipe dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 08:53 AM
1

It would still plummet, it just wouldn't go away. The perpetrators are disproportionately male by a wide margin (as far as we know) since men have far higher sex drives and are naturally more aggressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 12:30 AM
2

Would it really? We make it pretty obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 12:27 AM
1

From what I'm told though, the violent men are the ones who the women have previously rejected rather than predatory strangers. I don't know if it's true but if so then most of the assailants were the ugly guy asking for her number at one point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 12:26 AM
2

Social conditioning Social conditions don't just pop out of nowhere. It comes from our natural predispositions to certain acts. Men know that if they don't approach, they'll die sexless and alone. The male is the one who puts on a show for the female in the vast majority of species. Just like how women more often choose to stay at home with kids: it may be reinforced by society, but it wouldn't be had they not been the ones choosing to do so all throughout history (and among other species). For …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/18 04:01 AM
2

You missed the entire point of the post. They don't need to approach, they are approached enough times and have enough options to select from to satisfy their very high sexual appetites without ever having to "approach". And why do you think that is? Why are men more motivated to approach? And this is just assuming that women don't "approach" as much as men. Women do approach men for casual sex, all the time, at clubs, bars, events, social media, etc. It's just more subtle and not as apparent as…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/18 02:00 AM
5

Women are just as interested in casual sex as men are, but they can afford to be more selective/discreet about their needs because males are typically the ones who are expected to approach and proposition women first. Most young single women have multiple guys courting them for casual sex at a time. If they were just as interested, then they would be approaching as much as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 09:44 AM
1

Eventually as demand outweighs the supply, the permanent supply chain seems lower than it actually is over a period of time. Do women actually want it yes, or has apparent supply shortened over time due to demand? So why does the demand outweigh supply? Better yet, why are men the demand and women the supply? Because women want less sex. It doesn’t stop men from doing to homes of other men because they ARE BOTH MEN. You can’t compare those statistics because a woman going home with a man is dist…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:41 AM
3

I don’t think they want it less as much as they’re more choosy with potential partners. How many guys out there do you think Are after anything with two legs? Take that against the women who have four guys clamoring for her attention (since she’s got both legs) This is because women want it less. and the fact that a woman going to a strangers house has ended up bad for the woman far more often than any of us are willing to admit The same has happened to gay men. Doesn't stop them from getting it…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:24 AM
5

The slut shaming explanation forgets one important point: gay men. They have been ostracized, shamed, beaten and even killed for centuries. The stigma they have dealt with eclipses that of women who are deemed sluts (something to which I'm opposed). Yet they're fucking each other like nobody's business and always have been, despite the increased risk of AIDS. There's the claim that women are more physically vulnerable to men than other men are, but the existence of guns and knives negates that p…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:19 AM
10

A lot of men will beat the piss out of a guy who defends himself against a woman. If you think they won't police each other for sexual assault you have bought into too much 3WF propaganda. Men have assaulted and even killed other men based on mere allegations. I've found women to be much more apt to defend each other. Seriously, I saw a talk show where a woman cut off a man's dick for asking for a divorce and the entire panel and audience were laughing and cheering her on.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 09:02 AM
2

A lot of feminists go apeshit when you argue against generalizations of men by saying "not all".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 06:58 AM
1

Risk and self-sacrifice are generally male traits. You can see this from their career choices. The only time these traits apply more to women are with regard to their children. Plus, men have 20x the testosterone of women which is directly correlated with sex drive. This explains why men find a much wider range of women attractive than vice versa (something like 70% vs. 1%), and makes sense from an evolutionary perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 09:03 AM
9

Sane people. Doubt it? Have a man and woman of equal attractiveness ask strangers of the opposite gender for sex and see what the results are. Also, survey gay men and lesbians to see how much sex they have. I guarantee it won't even be close. Finally, ask trans men about the massive difference in sex drive after being injected with testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 08:50 AM
1

Great contributions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 06:45 AM
1

I'm not into pills per-se but if 1 girl is good, 2 are even better. Personally it's not my thing, but I get why others like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 10:16 PM
1

Great retort.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 07:11 PM
2

If you're talking about the Schwartz and Blumstein study, it doesn't say that. In fact, it says that 47% of lesbian couples have sex once a month or less -- meaning that most have sex more than once a month.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 10:49 PM
1

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 10:04 PM
4

Men have 20x the testosterone of women, which vastly increases their sex drive. FTM transsexuals have vouched for this many times. Thus, according to polls I've seen a given man would sleep with 70% of women whereas a given woman would sleep with 1% of men at most. It's the same reason that I, a male, could go find a guy to fuck waaaay easier than a girl to fuck, despite gay/bi men being under 10% of the male population and straight/bi women being over 95% of the female population. I don't get h…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 09:50 PM
1

Plenty of men will throw another one under the bus for a chance at getting laid. That's largely where the term "white knight" comes from. IME women will side with each another over a man in just about any given circumstance unless it's a guy they know well. So as usual both genders suck, just in different ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 09:36 PM
2

Not sure about morally wrong but disrespectful? Yes, this is independent of gender so spare me the "ugh men are so entitled" BS. When you're old enough to own a house, serve in the military and vote in elections you are old enough to communicate your feelings like an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 09:30 PM
5

Sounds awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 06:22 AM
3

Only if you measure accomplishment solely on money. Police, firefighters and emergency personnel are predominantly men and contribute much more to society than some Wall Street crook.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 08:05 AM
5

Most women aren't accomplishing anything either, you're just focusing on the top whatever % as well. If women are more beautiful, why do they wear makeup and men do not? Also, more sociable and likable is *highly* debatable, as are the rest of your unsubstantiated claims. It intrigues me how the feminists who decry "the wage gap" openly celebrate women earning more than men. Could this possibly be due to the restructuring of schools in the 90s to benefit girls over boys and affirmative action pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 07:25 AM
0

B-b-but you can't objectify men because prejudice + potato. Seriously though, most people don't know what objectification is. A guy who randomly grabs a woman's ass at a club is objectifying her by violating her personal autonomy. Men fapping to porn that is created with the consent of the woman in it is not. Someone can't willingly objectify themselves because objects by definition cannot make decisions. By this standard, you "objectify" the barista when you ask them for coffee. I mean they're …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 04:57 AM
2

Probably. That, and divorced/unhappily married folks. I don't think many people who are happy with their lives spend significant amounts of time decrying how the patriarchy is training men to be rapists or how the (((globalists))) are pushing huwite genocide. These trains of thought are designed to appeal to the undesired misfits of society. Q2: Probably, but "moderate" is relative. What would be a moderate in the USA (such as Obama or the Clintons) would be the fringe right in most of Europe. Q…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 12:57 AM
1

Are those guys entirely straight? Doubt it, but neither am I.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 08:09 AM
1

How many women have you actually been with though? That first picture made me literally lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 02:21 AM
1

I would say that feminist men generally look like (or at least dress like) this or that. As if that improves their case? Lol Feminism goes hand in hand with liberal and progressive attitudes, which go hand in hand with creative, fun and outgoing personalities. I find them to be the least fun people on the planet along with fundamentalist Christians, as both are impossible not to offend and berate you for the slightest thing. All of the traits you mention go hand in hand with emotion dominating y…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 11:17 PM
1

Basically every male feminist I know looks like this or this and has had one or two partners at most. If you want to bang or date the female equivalent of those men, slap on that shirt. Every sexually successful man I know has a low opinion of SJW bullshit, if they think about it at all. High value men don't put up with being nagged about how their mansplaining perpetuates rape culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 10:10 PM
1

Troll detected
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 04:25 AM
1

Wow so you're literally saying women are property? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 04:23 AM
1

Uh oh, this sounds like victim blaming to me. Why don't you just tell men to stop being bad huh?? So much rape culture omg I literally can't even /s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 04:22 AM
9

"Any place with a muslim in it is a potential terrorist attack"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 04:15 AM
3

We’re actually not living in the most progressive society given that the vast majority of our governing body is male. There have been plenty of other cultures where women have had more prominent positions. Tell more women to join the government then. And do you seriously think that's the only sign of a progressive society?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 04:14 AM
1

Dunno, they cray. But I don't understand what in your post is specific to them that doesn't apply to other men. If anything, they're the least likely to make advances.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 05:26 AM
1

Robert Rodriguez
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 07:58 AM
0

Non-argument
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 06:33 PM
2

Do you not know the difference between "lower" and "nonexistent"? Cats weigh less than wolves. That doesn't mean cats don't weigh anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 09:42 AM
3

I didn't say she doesn't want to. I said the idea that she wants to 6-10x less than a man is reasonable given reality. There's a reason men would fuck about 70% of women (and/or men) whereas for women it's less than 1%, or so they tell me. Just watch the "asking 100 guys for sex vs 100 girls" videos, or compare the n count of the average gay man to the average lesbian.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 08:58 AM
3

TRPers are the mirror image of white knights; they both value women's approval above their own dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 08:33 AM
2

Are we just that weak and commanded by our gonads or something? Yup. It's not hard to figure out why so many women have no respect for men nowadays. Why would they?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 08:04 AM
4

Slavery worked for just as long.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 08:01 AM
1

Why is that not a valid response?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 07:55 AM
2

That sounds like an accurate number to me. Hence why as a man, I could find a guy to fuck much easier than a girl to fuck, even though gay/bi men are less than 10% of the male population whereas straight/bi women are over 95% of the female population. Plus, look at the feedback of transmen who have gone through hormone therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/18 07:54 AM
6

That's the problem with so-called equality based movements that are centered around one gender: they only care about getting the privileges of the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:26 AM
1

I always hear that women aren't as interested in sex as men are, but I've had a higher sex drive than every guy I've dated. As a man, I would have a vastly easier time going out and finding a male sex partner than a female one, despite gay/bi men being less than 10% of the male population and straight/bi women being over 95% of the female population. There's also the vastly disproportionate number of strip clubs, prostitutes, sleazy restaurants and porn that appeals to men. For that matter, ask …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:22 AM
1

Brad? Every one I've met is a D&D nerd or a beer-bellied gun enthusiast.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 05:04 AM
2

In real life it seems to be the other way around. I saw a story of a woman who castrated her bf for cheating on her and nearly everyone was posting "lol you go girl" style comments. Can you imagine the reverse happening anywhere outside, say, Sudan? Hell if a man so much as yelled at her, he'd be accused of being insensitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 03:28 AM
0

It's a lazy thought-terminating cliche. I've never met a single person of either gender who believes they are entitled to sex (of course, given the "incels", they clearly exist).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 07:56 AM
2

Men don't understand that a given woman has no interest in 99%+ of men. Women don't understand that men being attracted to them is not seeing them as an object.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 09:00 AM
6

I think we (men) have a pretty good idea how many options women have, but then they tell us that they really don't have that many.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 08:56 AM
2

I have never encountered a collection of feminists who do not engage in rampant censorship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/18 06:34 AM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/18 10:16 PM
1

Touché
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/18 05:20 PM
9

And this is the greatest feeling ever that men will never understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/18 08:50 AM
8

None of the what you said is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/18 07:32 AM
3

Specific ones, yes. I like as many women as I do men really, though there's more women I'm sexually attracted to. TRP is an extremely small fraction of men but among them, I'd say they prioritize sex over all else.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/18 04:12 AM
5

If a man had his arm or leg cut off, you'd never find a talk show and its entire audience laughing about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/18 12:18 AM
4

No. Men have somewhere between 12-17x the sex drive of women, but lower =/= zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/18 12:14 AM
1

Giving a shit about people with a different skin color thans yours =/= "dislike for white people as a whole." What a ridiculous strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 10:19 PM
1

Don't forget "entitlement", that's the creme de la creme.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/18 10:16 PM
3

Not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/18 07:45 AM
5

No one should be required in the military, and the US should not go to war in Syria or anywhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/18 07:05 AM
1

Men and women have told me that dozens of times before, and I'm a guy. Why do some women think things only ever happen to them? This is a petty whinge to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 06:03 AM
1

3rd wave misandrist feminism is in its death throes. Dictionary definition feminism, though largely abandoned by the movement itself, has cemented its ideals forever. I consider both of these trends to be good. MeToo will keep the movement alive a bit longer, but I consider it a net good.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/18 08:33 AM
2

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/18 08:29 AM
1

I always figured this was the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/18 08:12 AM
1

I am skeptical of the accuracy of these numbers for both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 06:41 AM
1

Yes, they do. Bi women seem more common than bi men, but I'm not sure how much of this is natural vs. social conditioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/18 06:37 AM
1

This is a depressing thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/18 06:59 AM
6

As for the critique of male virgins I see online in feminist spaces, it’s very rarely the core of the criticism. This is their go-to insult when someone disagrees with them, alongside "small penis".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 09:36 AM
5

Found Ken Ham's reddit account.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 10:55 AM
2

Because men find roughly 65-65% of the female population fuckable, whereas women are sexually repulsed by 95-99% of men. The average man is as appealing to the average woman as he is to you. This is because, due to increased testosterone and potential reproductive frequency, men have 12-14 times the sex drive of women. Sex positivity is a good thing and slut shaming should die, but feminists who tell you that women "are just as horny as men" are contradicting themselves. Think I'm wrong? If I as…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 06:08 AM
6

Neither is an excuse to pass the buck.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 08:02 PM
8

Because the culpability is placed on the man either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 07:39 PM
3

I see this all over the internet too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 07:15 AM
2

I think #19 (flubal) is pretty cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 05:39 AM
10

All 31 of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 05:34 AM
46

It's funny how this specific scenario is the reversal of the stud/slut double standard. Man cheats on woman: "Horrible bastard, chop off his dick!" Woman cheats on man: "Sorry bro but maybe you weren't giving her enough affection"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 05:33 AM
4

Male privilege in action /s
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 10:46 PM
1

Well they do have debates on whether men should be genocided or reduced to 10% of the population. When you pick the looniest part of each group, you'll find these people. Obviously men struggle more to life without sex since they have far higher sex drives. But sounds like you've fallen victim to the "women are wonderful effect".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 08:25 PM
1

So what about "shit quality" females?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 04:02 AM
2

The problem with ideologies like feminism, marxism, libertarianism, etc. is that you can put 5 of their proponents in a room together and none of them will agree. Ideas > ideologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 12:00 AM
6

They often use the argument you cite, but at the same time they refer to sexually successful men as "dudebros" who objectify women. Mostly they only tolerate self-flaggelating sycophants (who have a lot in common with "nice guys"), and "tolerate" is the extent of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 11:56 PM
2

I think there's something to the idea, but the term is clearly used in an incendiary manner to get a certain response more often than not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 12:44 AM
1

Are women really disconnected with most men experiences? Do things really just happen to women? Yes. Her comment was either trolling or the product of someone who's never left their church. It would be like men telling women that periods aren't that bad and they should just deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/18 11:38 PM
2

If men followed that "advice" the only people alive in 50 years would be Tom Brady's kids. I'm calling troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/18 11:35 PM
4

Looking at the average wife beater on the news, they're usually thuggish types.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/18 06:46 AM
1

Pretty much. Much like how MGTOW is full of overcompensating white knights.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 12:12 AM
1

That describes reddit in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 12:11 AM
3

And yet, getting laid is massively easier as a gay man than a straight man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 11:15 AM
4

Gay men aren't solely attracted to one another, and this stereotype doesn't hold much water.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 10:42 AM
6

This fails to explain gay men being as horny as any other.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 08:54 AM
0

In terms of relationships it's about the same. Sex, on the other hand, absolutely. It's not even in the same galaxy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 08:24 AM
13

Sounds like you fell into this trap
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 08:23 AM
3

Well it's certainly not true, and also it's a slap in the face to guys who have the courage and patience to regularly approach women and deal with actual rejection. Having nothing happen is not remotely comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 07:30 AM
1

Perhaps that was unfair, sorry. The part about not approaching = rejection just rubbed me the wrong way.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 07:20 AM
2

You seem to be conflating the existence of a trait, with the justifiability of a trait. Men who think they can have dozens of partners but his partner must be a virgin also exist in reality. Doesn't make them good people. They, like you, are selfish and entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 07:07 AM
4

We're brought up with the message that women are pure, sweet arbiters of morality and that everything wrong in the world is our fault. When we find out that that isn't the case, some guys take it to the other extreme because they lack nuance.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 06:59 AM
3

You imply you are entitled to have men make all the effort because you're female, and berate them as losers and weak if they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 06:55 AM
2

Your username is starting to make a lot of sense given your "world revolves around me" selfish attitude
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 06:41 AM
1

But men owe her everything on a silver platter because vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 05:56 AM
4

What if a man wants a woman who is bold, assertive and really wants him? He's shit out of luck unless he's a 10/10. Why are you entitled to not have to take any risks or make any effort, simply because of your genitalia?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 05:55 AM
1

For as much as certain people go on and on about men's entitlement, the idea that a woman not being approached is the same as rejection is a prime example.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/17 05:52 AM
1

What you posted is an exact mirror of the patriarchy idea, and has the same motivation. In a chaotic world full of evil and unpredictable events, people try to find a way to connect it and believe it is all orchestrated by one entity. This applies to “the illuminati”, “the Jews”, “the white man”, “the infidels”, etc. It’s not a coincidence that this theme emerges and pervades all cultures. "The women" is the same schtick.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 11:52 PM
1

Potato, po-tah-to
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 03:23 AM
1

Or get rejected and/or ghosted endlessly
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 06:01 AM
2

Social constructs are a social construct
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 08:16 AM
2

Are you the riddler or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 08:38 AM
1

You know how society shames people on welfare when they buy unhealthy food, and when they buy healthy food? It applies here. People society deems of low value are supposed to just sit and rot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 08:36 AM
1

Religion Value judgments based on (actual) partner counts for men Women have less power over men when prostitutes come into play In most cases, sex workers are abused and exploited by their pimps
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 08:34 AM
5

"What men type on redpill forums" =/= "What men say IRL"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 08:32 AM
1

They don't. What people DO hate are the ones who are the equivalent of "nice guys" bitching about how the world doesn't conform to how they think it should work. And the ones who think "fat shaming" is something like homophobia or racism? Fuck right off.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:27 AM
1

[citation needed] "No males" huh? Including my best friend who went to jail for a year on an accusation that was later proven false? I agree that MRAs overblow it as an epidemic, but this is a load of BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 11:10 AM
2

Nope. Understandable, maybe, but never to be condoned. Replace "women" with "black people" or "jews" and I doubt you'd even need to ask this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 05:36 AM
1

Basically. Internet forums themselves attract a certain type of person, and this subculture takes the worst elements of it. Don't buy into the hysteria about video game "harassment" though, it's not any more valid than TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 05:35 AM
1

Who said anything about "force"? This section is so full of straw men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 12:17 PM
1

Not really, since in the age of birth control there's no valid reason to shame women for sex. Something being easy to obtain does not make it morally wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 11:59 AM
1

I just don't want a woman that has a high partner count. Call it a stereotype, but most women I know who sleep around a lot either have serious personal issues or are dumb and unambitious. Also, it's just kinda gross to think about.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:23 PM
3

It was a self-mocking joke
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:14 PM
1

AFAIK that's the whole reason they exist
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:13 PM
3

Took the words straight out of my mouth
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:13 PM
5

To feel smugly superior to everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:12 PM
1

Uh...how about no?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 10:36 AM
1

The first is an obvious result of the fact that most men lie about their partner count. Avg. number of partners is 7 for men and 4 for women. Not sure if I buy the Pareto Principle as it would apply to this situation, but it's pretty binary for men: either you have 20+ partners or you only get sex in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 08:42 AM
2

AWALT, AMALT, don't hamster. No. If you say something stupid, such as revealing that you can't distinguish between social classes, it will be pointed out. Feminists are hysterical lunatics, remarkably successful lunatics in recent times though Can't argue there. Again, they weren't protecting them from gangs of marauding women, they're protecting them from gangs of marauding men, while getting in some fun raping and pillaging in on other tribe's women while they're at it. Women don't rape, pilla…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 04:53 AM
6

Your first paragraph fails entirely to make a distinction between men in power and average men. Feminists do this on purpose so they can blame every man for the 1% in power. The fact is that women were not fighting in wars until recently, and the men who voluntarily did so were protecting their women and children whether you like it or not. Same with the police force. The fact that they're protecting women from violent men proves my fucking point. The second paragraph is a result of religion tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 04:33 AM
7

Men have also been 99% of the people who died protecting women and children in the military, police force, firefighting, etc. Men are the majority of doctors who save lives and develop treatments for diseases. Men died in the thousands to save women on sinking ships. Not to mention, you know, being the minds behind the vast majority of inventions. So "heartless" my ass. When's the last time a talk show and audience full of men laughed at and mocked a woman whose husband mutilated her for asking …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 06:47 AM
3

No more than women were entitled to protection in the first place. i.e. never
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 06:43 AM
2

Men just don't care anymore. We've had the care beaten out of us by harsh and misled words, and neglect, and misandry. You answered your own question. Besides, if women want to join combat roles in the military, I think they can handle a guy jacking off. As for me I'd probably mock the creep, but I'm not risking my physical safety for no real reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 06:43 AM
3

It's still part of male duty and honor to protect those of his group from unreasonable attacks, especially if they're weaker than he is [citation needed] If it's his family then yeah, but random women and weaker men? That's some bullshit, no one is entitled to the protection of someone just because they're bigger than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 06:38 AM
1

No worries man, I probably could've been more clear
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 05:48 AM
1

My idea was that the first woman you try to please is your mother, and if she pushes these kinds of views on you, that's how you'll act.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 05:36 AM
1

Ok gotcha
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 04:26 AM
1

Fair point, though tradcons agree with that last part. Even Joe Rogan does.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 03:21 AM
5

Some people use the word "socialist" incorrectly as well, doesn't mean it's not a real thing A white knight is someone who kisses any woman's ass just because she's a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 03:12 AM
1

And? Some angry dorks online are not equivalent to cultural norms
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 03:11 AM
1

Scare any crows with that straw man?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 03:10 AM
1

I agree that some certainly can. One of those things you're either extremely gifted at or unable to do at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 02:47 AM
1

Culture manipulates people by default
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 02:30 AM
2

Nothing you said is true. People defend women simply because they are women all the fucking time, and it is incredibly obvious when they are doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 02:28 AM
1

No I'm not. They're two sides of the same coin: treat women like princesses to be a good person. Male feminists think this makes them "progressive" and "virtuous" while the others think it's "masculine" and "chivalrous". Another comment mentioned that it's similar to anti porn Christians vs feminists. Their motives are completely different but it's the same thing in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 02:26 AM
0

Straw man What I mean is that men are manipulated from a young age, at least in the circles my OP was about, to give women special treatment simply because of their gender. This takes the form of making them think it's "manly" and "superior" to do so. Men aren't good at manipulating women, so historically they've just used brute force to get preferential treatment. White knights also don't respect women, they infantilize them. If your father and brother do so out of love rather than "she's a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 02:15 AM
2

Have you ever read "The Manipulated Man"? Talks a bit out of this. It's easy to emotionally blackmail men into being your servant if you make them feel powerful and "manly" for doing so. That it becomes a display of "status" proves what a bunch of simps most men are and is pretty funny actually. It comes from two things: trying to please your mother as a child, and attempts to curry the favor of women for dating/sex. A lot of this does come from the view of women as pure and innocent. No other "…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 01:58 AM
1

Men are very easily manipulated, much as they pretend to be macho hardasses
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 01:52 AM
1

AFAIK white knighting is just sucking up to women for no other reason than the fact that they are women. This falls under that category
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 12:33 AM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 01:09 AM
1

It's funny how the same ones saying "men don't talk like that!" are the same ones that think men are rapists by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:26 AM
7

That's only because most female-oriented subreddits have North Korea style censorship.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:23 AM
1

This isn't true. You're acting like the good ones are outliers, which is the same excuse used to generalize all men as sexual predators.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:22 AM
1

They're literally no better then the Tumblrinas and probably with the same motivations and blindness to their own hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:20 AM
6

"How dare you take a woman's partner count into consideration! But ew I'd never date a male virgin you entitled sexist prick"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 03:38 PM
1

50 of all women? I picked 50% accounting for the entire population, yes. That's of course if she came up and asked "wanna fuck?" which is an exceptionally rare thing to happen (hmm, wonder why...), not that 50% of women are worth the effort and skill to obtain sex from for most guys. I have a very hard time fathoming how so many men seem to think this is a good way to get sex. While I can't say I've heard a man actually say that IRL, if they have, maybe it's because they bought into the "women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 06:06 AM
0

No, you created that impression in your own brain. Solid feces and diarrhea are both shit. One is noticeably more unpleasant than the other, but they're both in the same category.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 04:52 AM
1

Trump insults women, they yell at him. Trump compliments women, they yell at him. For fuck's sake, the guy killed people in Syria, thinks climate science is a scam and moved backward on what feeble progress on healthcare Obama attempted, but this (along with the Russia conspiracy) is all they talk about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 02:24 AM
1

You have somewhat of a point, but it's obvious that men and women are not interchangeable sexually, and your post is an example. I'd rather have sex with maybe 75% of women than masturbate. You feel the opposite. There's a reason that women don't generally want to fuck random strangers. The orgasming part is certainly a factor, but that doesn't explain why women would get outright offended if a man asked them for sex straight-up. Having asked women about this, most say that they find fewer than …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 02:13 AM
1

He didn't say it was exactly in between. I don't get why people have to think two things are equally wrong for them to both be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 02:05 AM
3

The answer is really, really obvious. I don't know how this is debatable. 1) Have a man and woman of the same level of attractiveness go into a bar and ask everyone of the opposite sex if they will fuck them. 2) Compare the promiscuity of gay men vs. lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/17 11:55 AM
1

Because women are human beings you entitled misogynist! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 07:21 AM
4

MGTOW logic: Claim to live your life disregarding women, then proceed to sit online talking about nothing else but women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 07:06 AM
2

Your viewpoint is based in theory and an ideal world, rather than how things happen IRL when accounting for human error or malice. For example, there are actual socialists in the world. However, we recognize that someone on Fox News who calls everyone they don't agree with a socialist is using the term incorrectly. Why do you think women are incapable of doing this with the word "creep"? The answer is probably the "women are wonderful effect". Of course MRAs/TRPers are mistaken when they argue t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/17 05:23 AM
3

I don't think they do. Go on some of the female-oriented subreddits and show a negative emotion, then prepare to get swarms of users berating you with charges of "entitlement".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/17 04:55 AM
8

Have a 7/10 man and 7/10 woman walk into a bar, go up to every member of the opposite gender and say "have sex with me." If you get the same result, your assertion might have some merit. Alternatively, look at the sexual promiscuity of gay men vs lesbians. Again, if they're the same, you might be onto something.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/17 06:57 AM
2

So basically what they're saying is that women aren't attracted to unattractive men. Why does there need to be an ideology surrounding this?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/17 10:12 AM
1

You really lap up whatever kool-aid your cult gives you in that invisible knapsack of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/17 10:10 AM
1

You're just arguing for the sake of arguing now.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/17 05:24 AM
1

So we shouldn't question a SCOTUS decision even when it makes no sense? Have a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_abrogated_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/17 05:06 AM
1

So I'm asked what I think of it, I give my answer, and you all have a fit. I don't like things that violate the constitution, and even if it didn't I'd still be against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/17 04:16 AM
1

Have fun believing whatever you're told because muh authoritah
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/17 03:08 AM
1

link All that says is "we're going to disregard the 13th amendment because we feel like it". Supreme court decisions have been overturned many before. 100 years later, this one is worth a look especially since there's no actual reasoning behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/17 01:56 AM
1

Considering it blatantly violates the 13th Amendment, it's about time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 06:45 AM
2

I've heard the reverse come from women more often. We all think we're special and can't really understand the mind of the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 03:33 AM
2

They're statistical outliers. There's a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 11:35 PM
3

The fact that men have higher libidos than women has been repeatedly proven scientifically. Not only that, but it's incredibly obvious from any observation of the real world whatsoever. I don't get why this has become an un-PC controversial thing to say, as if people think it makes women inferior or whatever. The same chemical (testosterone) that makes men more horny also makes them more aggressive, hence why men commit more crimes. We don't have to be the same to be treated equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 11:33 PM
7

I'm as anti-SJW/3WF as you can get, but TRP seems to be the mirror image of them in terms of making up weird theories about the opposite sex to demonize them. See OP for a prime example.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 11:28 PM
6

As one can see from OP, TRP is largely based on anecdotes, mental masturbation and unproven hypotheses. When you make things up and tell women how bad they are and presume to speak for them, you're really no better than a feminist telling men about how they think rape is totally cool and that they think they're entitled to a hot girl for being nice. Not to mention that, like feminists, any criticism is met with "it's everyone else's fault". What a coincidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 11:25 PM
1

1) Many good looking people are conceited. 2) Assholes tend to be confident and not fear rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 09:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter