TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HotHotFingers Archive

View 9 posts and 107 comments by HotHotFingers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

#IBelieveHim
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:38 PM
2

I know people who have type 2 diabetes, and joke about it while stuffing their faces with copious amounts of sugary, unhealthy, foods. If that's not a psychological disorder I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:07 PM
2

I think a lot of that comes from the fact that (in the west) Women are much more able to take on 'Masculine' traits, actions, and dress than Men are anyway, so if someone makes a full transition, it's not as hard for people to accept. Really interesting write up from the UK Teachers union here. https://www.teachers.org.uk/files/stereotypes-stop.pdf "Crucially, staff felt that boys found it much more difficult to admit to liking anything that was traditionally thought of as ‘girly’. “I asked some…
/r/MensRights22/07/18 08:28 PM
1

"These transgender guys found the truth was more complex." So, "No" then?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 08:16 PM
5

It's racism, plain and simple, white people circumcise boys, so that's A-OK, only brown people circumcise women, so that's alien and unusual and dangerous and definitely wrong.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 08:12 PM
2

Yet there are still crazy feminist organisations* in the UK putting out things like this: We are aware that there are myths and stereotypes surrounding the offence of rape. Examples of such myths include: [...] victims cry rape when they regret having sex or want revenge; *Oh wait, that's from the UK Crown Prosecution Service "Policy for Prosecuting Cases of Rape"
/r/MensRights08/07/18 10:49 PM
3

Even so, the current situation is that what they are doing is perfectly legal; and as long as they believe that what happened to them was 'for their own good', they will continue to perpetuate it.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 10:43 PM
9

The people who are 'Pro Circumcision' on here are almost certainly victims of MGM. Surely you can understand why the victims are trying to convince themselves that what has happened to them was perfectly normal and non-abusive. It's classic behaviour for victims of sexual abuse. We should be supporting these people, and treating them with compassion not telling them they can't be part of this community.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:12 PM
1

As a Brit living in the US, I like the idea of a Tea Offenders List for people who make bad tea.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 10:14 PM
1

I don't think it works if you discount "did you want to" "Against your will" means "You didn't want to" .. so "Did you want to" must be established for the other person to know whether or not you wanted to...
/r/MensRights19/04/18 01:58 AM
5

"If you are a women in immediate danger please call 999" is actually worse, it's ridiculously over-specific, what benefit does putting 'a woman' have in that sentence other than to dissuade men from asking for help?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:44 PM
2

Fair point, if I call someone a cunt I won't be offended if they punch me in the head. I'll just be sore.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:33 PM
1

I did not need him to style, cut or trim the rest of her hair, Anyone who's even watched someone have their hair cut knows that's not a sensible request. If you haven't this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec0kGW0zL7I shows that with an undercut bob. Notice how all the hair is pinned up all the way before making the undercut, a barber simply doesn't need to know how to do that, that's a classic hairdressing technique. She's basically belittling the skill of hairdressers by assuming someone…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:13 PM
1

SWEETIE Reeeeing intensifies
/r/MensRights09/04/18 05:59 PM
8

They make it sound like 2 equal arguments. On the one hand we shouldn't take a knife to the genitalia of infants; but on the other hand, we REALLY want to.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:58 PM
2

shouldn't be hard, I'll just copy /wiki/science and /wiki/engineering and rename them :) </snark> Yeah, there is a page request for wiki/men_in_science so there's a good justification to start there.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 12:08 PM
2

She's a mod on /r/incel
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:55 PM
1

NEVER QUESTION THE AUTHORITY OF YOUR FEMALE ARIAN SUPERIORS.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:53 PM
2

The labour party used to be the workers rights party, and did a lot of good for this country. The previous few election cycles they basically just matched the Conservatives policy-for-policy, making them completely redundant. The last election cycle they pretended to make a huge shift to the left to attract younger voters... but have yet to vote against any important legislation proposed by the government. They're not a cancer, cancers grow, they're more like a frostbitten finger. Their motto sh…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:51 PM
2

If we didn't discriminate against males this shortlist wouldn't exist, and this wouldn't be a problem. Equality of opportunity benefits everyone.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:46 PM
1

is selling the same product to women for 20% less legal in the UK? Technically. it's charging men more for it that is illegal; it would be awesome if someone recorded them doing so, but I'm not near one of their bars so I can't. Most of the attention on social media is about 'Women don't all like pink" and all media outlets are ignoring teh fact that they're promotion is illegal.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:31 PM
1

Holy shit it's a real thing.. http://www.brunel.ac.uk/study/postgraduate/Comedy-Studies-PhD..well, as real as any degree with 'Studies' in the title but how do you get a PhD in comedy and still believe you can make objective statements about what is and isn't funny?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:41 PM
7

Yes, doing that would be illegal in the UK, yet to see if and how they actually follow through with this offer.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:05 PM
6

I'm not sure I'd notice... women are free to dress and act like stereotypical men with no repercussions. The social stigma that gets attached to biological men doing the opposite is significantly worse.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:36 PM
4

It's a 'Direct competitor' in the same way the girl selling shitty lemonade on the street corner is a direct competitor to Pepsi.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:42 PM
13

The two are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:45 PM
1

Yeah, even more so with single-parents, who are more likely to be female; having said that, the statistics on abuse are more telling. The murder numbers are so small that they're barely statistically significant.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:47 PM
-2

the double standard. Sometimes men are given suspended sentences, so an example of a woman being given a suspended sentence doesn't prove there's a double standard.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:05 PM
-2

I really don't get these "Imagine if...." posts; how does a woman being treated leniently affect mens' rights? If men NEVER got suspended sentences and women always did, I'd see it was a very important problem; but anecdotal evidence like this doesn't really add anything. e.g. Here's a case of a man convicted of domestic abuse being given a suspended sentence And another, where the woman was stabbed and one more where she suffered a broken cheekbone It's much more interesting that, in the UK, th…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:46 PM
1

In many civilised countries, the primary carer gets payments from the other parent.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:42 PM
-1

Supporting the child is a legal obligation, supporting the partner is not necessarily.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 11:02 AM
7

You don't HAVE to support a non-working partner, but it's, like, the implication..
/r/MensRights18/02/18 03:01 AM
1

I interpreted it as "It is terrible, but there are worse things" not "It's not terrible"
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:30 PM
12

Edited: I take it back. Sack her for being a hypocrite; no integrity at all..
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:30 PM
33

Yes it's a sign of a double-standard, but people who are calling for her to be fired are missing the point. The point is, there is nothing wrong with two consenting adults being in a room together in whatever clothes they want. And there's nothing wrong with admiring a particularly attractive member of the opposite sex. I just wish people would stop being so concerned about what consenting adults do with each other. Edit: I take it back, she just scored a 10/10 for hypocrisy. Here she is discuss…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:16 PM
2

It's not necessary or even desirable for everyone to have the same rights. Agree, not everyone gets the same rights or responsibilities; criminals, children, and people with diminished capacity can have their rights taken away, and/or are not held responsible for their actions. However, I do think that men and women should have the same rights and responsibilities, don't you?
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:51 PM
4

I'm not arguing for or against it, but it is a fact that Women are not allowed to serve on the front line combat roles. And they cannot do that solely because of their gender. The fact is it probably only affects a handful of women who would be ready, willing and able to serve. I'm genuinely just asking out of interest.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:31 PM
4

Just thought of one, so I'll start! There are some military arms that do not allow women to serve in front line combat roles, even if they are equally willing and able.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:00 PM
1

Women never lie about rape, and it's official CPS policy that any suggestions to the contrary are simply a myth. https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/cps-policy-prosecuting-cases-rape Section 5
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:07 PM
2

Same here, stepped into a ring as a hot-headed 5'11 16 year old with a 5"2 woman, twice my age. I didn't hit her once, and I came out with a bloody nose when I got frustrated and stepped right into her heel..
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:26 PM
1

TIL why it's called a Rota...
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:28 PM
4

Gentlemxn, time to apply for this position.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:51 PM
2

I think you posted this on the wrong sub..
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:49 PM
2

"We gave him the loan, but then he got a loan from a different provider and paid ours off, so we got jealous and reported him for robbery"
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:42 PM
1

Sometimes the only evidence is on the accuser's phone, e.g. in one case the key evidence was the accuser messaging her friends about the alleged assault.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:00 PM
1

It is unreasonable to doubt the testimony of a rape victim unless you have evidence that they are lying.. that's the official policy of the Crown Prosecution Service..
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:56 PM
3

In case it's not obvious... Shelf stackers work hours that they choose. They work at a local shop with good public transport links, and work, mostly, during the day. They take things from a storage area in the back of the store, and put them on shelves. If they're lucky, they get to sit in front of a checkout all day, doing something that literally any member of the public can do on self-checkout tills. Warehouse workers are in a regional distribution centre they have to drive to, work 4-on-4-of…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:44 AM
2

Then watch all the part-time shelf-stackers at their local shop apply for 48 hour night shift jobs at a regional distribution center 50 miles away.....
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:40 AM
2

There is a refuse/trash collection company, where the (mostly) men who collect the bins are paid significantly less than the (mostly) women in the accounts and sales department. The men should all get a graduate wage because.. equality..? Shelf stacking is a less skilled job than picking and packing in a warehouse; not much less skilled, but less skilled nonetheless.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:33 AM
2

That's the first word that came into my mind when I heard about the case. If they can prove that women are discriminated against when applying for the higher paid jobs, then I will support them. I.e. if as many women apply for warehouse jobs as apply for shelf-stacking jobs; but fewer are hired, they may have a case to answer.. Of course that's not the case!
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:31 AM
2

I think both sides can learn a lot from her points. "It's not a competition" is a great take-away message.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:23 AM
3

"...Yes, Steve is a customer of ours, and we did agree to give him a loan, and willingly handed over the money when he asked for it, but afterwards we felt like we'd been robbed"
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:17 AM
1

Did they look at tips? I bet the women get about the same if they're taken into account.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:11 AM
1

Did that really happen? I thought it was an onion.com article..
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:08 AM
2

Don't forget the dragon..
/r/MensRights05/02/18 10:44 AM
2

No problem at all, even if it wasn't supposed to be fantasy. Whilst there's little evidence that women regularly made up large parts of regular armies, It looks like a bunch of villagers defending against a superior professional army. No doubt it would be all-hands to the front in that sort of situation. Plenty of evidence of women being involved in such battles; especially amongst the celts. It looks like they've been pushed back to their baggage train, and are surrounded, so even if the women …
/r/MensRights05/02/18 10:42 AM
3

How is this related to Mens' Rights?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 09:22 PM
3

The full Bill can be read online The relevant effects are of— (a) making B dependent on, or subordinate to, A, (b) isolating B from friends, relatives or other sources of support, (c) controlling, regulating or monitoring B’s day-to-day activities, (d) depriving B of, or restricting B’s, freedom of action, 10 (e) frightening, humiliating, degrading or punishing B. I'm sure we all know lots of men who are 'victims' of most of these at some point
/r/MensRights02/02/18 11:47 PM
1

moving her car while she was asleep That's a bit brutal even for a Scot, lock him up and throw away the key.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 11:38 PM
1

This is good, but bittersweet. Emphasis mine: "senior prosecutors in England and Wales are currently assessing all live rape and serious sexual assault cases to check they are satisfied that disclosure obligations have been met.' In other words, it doesn't affect the men who've been convicted where evidence may have been withheld.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 11:22 AM
5

I was thinking more like Demolition Man: "Can't we just do it the old fashioned way?"
/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:58 AM
1

It's not a contract, it's more like a notarized statement. But as others have said, the statement is only true at the exact time it is made.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:58 AM
2

I was thinking the same, there must be some evidence in one of the other cases.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:53 AM
10

This is a unique case, he was imprisoned on an 'indeterminate sentence' with a minimum tariff of 8 years. And whilst that meant he could theoretically be released after 8 years, the way the system was working when he was imprisoned, meant he would probably never be released. So, he was not given a lenient sentence. However, The system was reformed, because it was being abused to keep people locked up for relatively minor offenses; of course they can't retrospectively alter his sentence just beca…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 11:59 PM
1

I imagine it depends on the feminist. 'True' feminists support equal rights and equal opportunity, some want the system rigged in their favour to overcome some perceived systemic bias.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:06 AM
2

Agreed, but for this point, even without the disparity, cherry picking murderers (the apex of violent people) gives you no information about the rest
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:05 AM
3

Just seems to be a specific class of cherry-picking.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:45 AM
1

To be honest, "Apex" works for both; it just depends on how you label the graph! Men are more heavily represented at the apex of the Corporate Employment pyramid. Men are more heavily represented at the apex of the 'violent offenders' pyramid. Neither allow us to make a broad statement about men in general
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:44 AM
1

"Base" would be a reasonable antonym. E.g. the base of a pyramid vs the apex
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:38 AM
1

Same argument for murder, because more men commit murder, men are all more violent. The fact that 0.0003% of men are murderers compared to 0.0001% of women is not statistically significant.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:37 AM
3

was given a congratulatory pat on More like "A police spokesmen warned about the dangers of vigilante activity"
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:34 AM
1

They're a legal reform campaign group. Show me an area of UK law where women have fewer rights than men and I'll agree that they should be campaigning to change it. I can't think of any off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 12:32 AM
1

So, if I see men giving a woman what I deem to be 'uninvited attention' I should go and give her my attention without being invited? Clear as crystal.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:30 AM
2

The same guy posted this on twitter. He's clearly on a different planet. This is the day-to-day business of a major tech company. By publishing that memo, dude wasn't just holding onto shitty ideas. He was commiting violence. People felt afraid. People had to take days off. People feared for their safety.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:13 AM
1

Here's my thoughts. If a company has no discrepancy between the number of women in the Top quartile of workers, and those in the bottom quartile; the results will not be skewed by the above effect. As such, if we see a lot of companies where they have as many men in the bottom quartile as they do in the top quartile, but have a massive pay disparity, I am wrong. Luckily, I'm not wrong. The gaping white triangle in the bottom right of the graph shows exactly the opposite, as a company's gender di…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:35 PM
2

equality of opportunity Nail on head.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 03:10 PM
1

You could do exactly the same comment, with a white middle class female in the left, and anyone from the third world on the right. If we say "People in the third world have a lot more problems than you so your problems don't matter" we get shot down immediately.. but "Woman have a lot more problems than you so your problems don't matter" is apparently fine...
/r/MensRights05/01/18 03:04 PM
2

reeeeing intesifies
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:16 PM
1

Exactly, he touched her and walked away, she hit him while he was on the floor; natural justice is served. It's a non-issue.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:14 PM
1

topless meant he would touch her without permission. and she thought that being touched without her permission meant she could beat him round the head... they're both assholes.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 02:46 PM
1

She barely touched him, no-one was harmed , it's not an anything issue.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 02:28 PM
1

We really need to bring back the phrase "So what?" As per Steve Hughes
/r/MensRights02/01/18 02:14 PM
1

"Part time pay gap is 35%" "For part-time employees separately, women are paid more per hour, on average than men," http://www.equalpayportal.co.uk/statistics/ I was going to go into a detailed point-by-point criticism.. but stopped there because the rest is meaningless waffle... sorry for not being more insightful
/r/MensRights02/01/18 11:07 AM
3

If the court order is the only way to recognise your rights to the child, I think it should be seen as a natural part of the becoming a parent, in the UK it's done at the same time as registering the birth with a simple check box on the form.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:49 AM
2

I'm not in the US, but look up "voluntary paternity acknowledgement" I think it varies from state to state, but I believe gives you some of the same rights and responsibilities as a married father.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:46 AM
8

I have some experience of 'child safety' in schools; but if you read between the lines, a lot of the guidance boils down to not putting yourself in the position where you can be accused of something that you can't disprove. Before the #LookAtMeToo movement, male teachers were already on the receiving end of some vicious witch hunts, so it seems to be sounds advice for people in positions with high risk of false accusation.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:38 AM
12

"How about we don't cut parts off the babies unless we really need to?" is pretty edgy.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 01:37 AM
30

Reported "It directs hate against a race, religion, gender, or orientation"
/r/MensRights30/12/17 01:00 AM
4

Ethics and legality aside, discriminating against the customers with the most money doesn't seem like a sound business practice.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 09:56 PM
3

"They can't be making it up, because if they were making it up we wouldn't have described them as a victim" Circular reasoning at its finest. Which leads directly to "We know she was raped, and there was only one man there so it's an open and shut case."
/r/MensRights24/12/17 08:20 PM
10

I know I post this every time, but it is official UK government policy that women crying rape because of regret or for revenge is a myth (Section 5) ... so maybe that might be a good place to start. We are aware that there are myths and stereotypes surrounding the offence of rape. Examples of such myths include:[...] victims cry rape when they regret having sex or want revenge;
/r/MensRights24/12/17 05:35 PM
1

Well, at least there is some hope for the human race, they seem to have poor survival instincts.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 11:00 PM
2

By January 27th, Men will have suffered as many fatalities in the workplace as women will suffer all year.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 04:31 AM
50

It's so scary how close to the wire this case was. If the police had stuck to their story then the guy would almost certainly be locked up for 10 years +
/r/MensRights23/12/17 04:22 AM
2

"More fairly" .. is that like 'Women's equality'?
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:16 AM
0

Because the victim will inform them of any witnesses to the specific crime that the accused is being prosecuted for.. what's so hard to understand? Unless other victims were witnesses to a specific crime, their testimony is not relevant
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:34 AM
–

If they were witnesses, they'll be called as witnesses.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:11 PM
-16

Is that number 0?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:09 PM
-2

I think the judge should be allowed to decide to make the defendants name public; there are some cases when that helps secure a conviction. But the presumption should be that the defendant remains anonymous unless there is a good reason not to.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:27 PM
1

Section 5.5 of the CPS Policy on Prosecuting cases of rape...
/r/MensRights18/12/17 02:02 PM
1

Imagine how the prosecutor feels knowing he was 1 day away from locking up an innocent young man for a decade or more. He's right to be furious
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:50 PM
12

Also depends on the different measurement of 'Homeless,' There's a difference between 'Street homeless' and 'technically homeless' ... a lot of women in women's shelters are technically homeless, for instance.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:15 PM
5

Yeah but women TOTALLY outrank men in the "Getting paid less to do less demanding jobs" pie chart.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:13 PM
1

Punitive damages can be awarded; although it will be more of a token than a life-changing amount.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:42 AM
1

Yeah, I noticed that on the BBC; it almost reads like they're saying a rapist went free because the police mis-handled evidence. Rather than the police intentionally withholding evidence.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:39 AM
3

Probably includes all messages sent and recieved on multiple platforms. e.g. if you include spam email that's not hard to believe.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:22 AM
38

The data goes something like. After surveying women, the survey tells us that of 1000 women who claim to have been raped, only 310 bothered to report it to the police. Of those 310 reports, only 57 lead to someone being arrested. Of those 57 arrests, there is only enough evidence to report 11 to prosecutors. Of those 11. ONLY 7 will be proven in a court of law to actually be rapists. The fake interpretation basically assumes that in all 1000 cases, a rape was actually perpetrate; EVEN in the cas…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter