TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hotbbqwing Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by Hotbbqwing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Great source, Russian state media and a conservative think tank.
/r/MGTOW05/08/19 08:21 PM
1

That’s not at all applicable to the situation we are talking about. Athletes competing in a tennis competition aren’t wage employees. The fine is coming out of her prize money, which I guarantee she signed a contract allowing the tournament to do.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 03:48 PM
1

Wait what? Did you read the quote I put? Saying a person who drank can legally consent?
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 06:34 PM
0

I’m sorry but you are an idiot. DIRECTLY FROM WHAT YOU LINKED. “Does this language in California’s rape law mean that every person who has consumed any alcohol (or used any drug) cannot legally consent to sex? The answer to that question is no. The law states that the victim must have been “prevented from resisting” the sexual activity or is “unconscious of the nature of the act.” So, a person who voluntarily drinks alcohol but has not consumed enough to impair his or her ability to consent can …
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 06:28 PM
1

Do you have a single example or source of either of those points? Because both of those are just completely false.
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 06:22 PM
2

You keep on saying things with no sources. A women under the influence in California can consent, as long as she Isn’t incapacitated to the point of being unable to understand what is going on, That’s what it says in the nice quote from the LAW I gave you, would you like me to quote it again? I’m not interpreting it anyway, I’m literally just repeating what the actual law is. Can you provide a single example of someone being charged with rape after a girl says she was unable to consent because s…
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 06:16 PM
2

I’m quoting the yes means yes law. Posters made by SJW schools don’t mean shit, the law is what matters. If you have an actual legal rebuttal to me quoting the law you are referring to go ahead.
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 05:59 PM
2

That article doesn’t actually quote anything. Basically you just linked a blog of a person screaming the same BS as you without using any actual sources. Here is the ACTUAL law. “The complainant was incapacitated due to the influence of drugs, alcohol, or medication, so that the complainant could not understand the fact, nature, or extent of the sexual activity.” Incapacitation requires way more than one drink, literally no court has ever interpreted it as anything else.
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 05:34 PM
1

Dude you have literally no idea what you are talking about. People can’t consent when they are incapacitated, not when they are intoxicated, even in California. You got banned because you are running your mouth on a subject you know nothing about.
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 02:56 PM
17

Nobody forced GM to take the bailout. They voluntarily took it so they didn’t go bankrupt, the government can attach conditions to things they give to companies.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:32 PM
0

Sure they can’t find hard statistics of unreported rape, but they can use statistically methods to estimate how many cases of rape there are that aren’t reported to the police by using surveys. You are never found innocent in the justice system. The government can’t imprison you until you are found guilty, but it would be retarded to say that everyone who isn’t found guilty is innocent. Yes the government should treat them as if they are not guilty, but when it comes to talking about stuff in th…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:21 PM
2

He said he went to a private college, he doesn’t have due process rights.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:31 PM
2

When you plead guilty you are convicted of a crime.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 10:46 PM
10

You are just completely making up bullshit. It’s a scientific fact women have a desire to have sex. It is expressed in different ways than men, but to say women don’t have a biological desire to have sex is not at all based in science and is a pretty fucking retarded thing to say if you have spent even a minute actually around women.
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 04:47 PM
14

Dude this is just false. Women have a biological desire to have sex after puberty.
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 04:32 PM
1

He will be paying child support. When your wife gets pregnant, you are the “assumed father”. Unless you can find the poor shmuck who got her pregnant, you will be paying for it because the government doesn’t want to.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:08 PM
2

Female lawyers are hit or miss. Sometimes they are sympathetic to women, sometime they want nothing more than to destroy another woman. It’s similar to how female judges are actually harder on women in sentencing.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 09:59 PM
4

Sorry, but these actresses were adults. If they were really bothered by what Weinstein was doing, they should have confronted his as a team.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:33 PM
0

Cool, my comment was referring to the western front where no women were on the front line. I know women fought on the eastern front in limited numbers, but the next battlefield isn’t about the eastern front.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:25 PM
31

Cool, the game is about the Western Front. And women in the French resistance very rarely participated in any combat; they were limited to intelligence and support roles.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:01 PM
-26

Literally no women were on the front lines.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 02:45 PM
4

These stories aren’t the same, they have differences
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 09:07 PM
10

No the story is different
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 09:07 PM
1

Sexual assault is defined as unwanted sexual contact. If he didn’t receive consent beforehand, he literally committed unwanted sexual contact. It’s hilarious watching you try to tip toe around what happened.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:27 PM
1

Just because she excepted the policy doesn’t make her not a victim. She wrote about how she was groped. That’s sexual assault. Trudeau himself said women must be believed, so that makes him someone who commits sexual assault.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:16 PM
1

He didn’t say we should investigate all claims, he said we should believe them. That’s a massive difference. You don’t have to completely believe someone to investigate.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:06 PM
2

I’m pro choice, but if you are pro-life because you feel that a fetus is a human life it doesn’t make sense to allow abortion in the case of rape or incest, because it is still a human life.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:44 PM
27

A lawsuit against Nike or the NFL would not work at all. The only person liable is the person who defamed him.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 05:40 PM
2

People can’t “bring criminal suits”, only the government can file criminal charges against people. The government usually only does this if they think they can win. All people can do is file police reports and cooperate, they can’t make anything happen in the criminal court system. Judging by the fact an HR “investigation” cleared you, which are extremely biased and basically just serve to cover the company’s ass, the police would probably laugh her out of station.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:33 PM
1

Less than 1000 women can absolutely be “science”. Do some research about sample size, 1000 people depending on how big of a total group you are trying to get data on can be VERY accurate.
/r/MGTOW03/07/18 05:33 AM
12

Who knows, girls are crazy. She could be fearful of child support in the chance you gain custody. Also, if she is planning on leaving definitely go to court. Parents can’t just separate their kids from the other parents, that’s also parental alienation. Most of the time family court screws over men, but you don’t have anything to lose and plenty to gain.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 12:59 AM
16

If she keeps on dodging don’t keep it out of court. Judges don’t look kindly on parental alienation, you could potentially win custody with her paying child support if she makes more. Don’t listen to her family, they have her best interest in mind, not yours. You should also talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 12:52 AM
12

I hope you didn’t sign the birth certificate.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 12:49 AM
8

It’s basically makes it so it’s impossible to be innocent. If her story is straight, you’re guilty of rape. If her story is full of holes, you must have raped her to make her memory so bad, you’re guilty of rape.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 12:43 AM
6

http://fortune.com/2015/12/08/donald-trump-bill-gates-internet/ Too bad he literally proposed doing basically the same thing.
/r/MGTOW21/06/18 03:06 PM
1

People spending money in their public lives has very little do to with government spending. Unless you are arguing women in charge of the government is causing higher spending.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:01 PM
1

Find a single developed country that doesn’t consider groping of sexual areas and unwanted kissing as sexual assault.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:52 PM
3

In 99% of the developed world this is a crime, although something of this severity usually isn’t going to be prosecuted. Mexico is crime ridden right now especially with sex crimes, so I’m not sure what happens there is relevant for determine what sexual assault.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:36 PM
4

It is literally sexual assault. Sexual assault is defined by sexual touching that is unwanted
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:26 PM
2

It’s literally impossible to request asylum at a Consulate. You have to be inside the US, it says so on the government resource I linked. Refugee status ISN’T asylum, and has a super long backlog making that impossible for actual protection from violence. Port of entry is relevant because it’s the ONLY place someone can request asylum, and they aren’t accepting requests right now.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:57 PM
2

Canada has more migrants per capita than the US, but don’t let that get in the way of your narrative. The majority of illegal immigrants claiming asylum aren’t from Mexico, they are from Central America which is currently a very violent and dangerous place that they are trying to get out of.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:57 PM
1

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.elitedaily.com/p/is-seeking-asylum-legal-trumps-new-zero-tolerance-policy-is-making-it-harder-9507088/amp You are basically 100% wrong. It’s impossible to request asylum outside the United States, it would’ve requesting refugee status which has a 5 year backlog. Its currently basically impossible to request asylum at a port of entry on the border, they just tell people to go …
/r/MensRights20/06/18 01:53 PM
5

What you are describing isn’t what people are talking about at all right now. The Trump administration is prosecuting families who illegally cross to claim asylum, in the past the U.S. hasn’t doesn’t so. That has nothing to do with anchor babies.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:51 AM
41

Dude people need to be responsible for their actions, she is a grown ass woman don’t infantilize her.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:48 AM
7

You are being willfully ignorant if you don’t think women have things to gain out of a false accusation. One of the primary motives for false accusations are using it as an alibi, aka “I wasn’t cheating on you he raped me” or “i wasn’t breaking curfew i was raped”. If you had read the article you posted it talks about that. And btw, that article is absolutely idiotic in arguing that people who face false accusations don’t face severe consequences. Even if you don’t go to jail, your entire reputa…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:01 PM
3

Not true. Emotional pain is something people sue for all the time. The hard part is proving someone lied.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:46 PM
1

“They found Britton guilty of second-degree sexual abuse, a misdemeanor” He was convicted of a sexual crime, the argument was over what classification level.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:08 PM
0

Nobody has ever been registered as a sex offender without being convicted of a crime. I’ll buy you gold if you can prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:56 PM
1

"Pressing charges" has no legal meaning either. All people can do is file a police report and then cooperate with the investigation. There is no legal way to "press charges".
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:21 PM
1

Only DA’s can file charges, nobody else can.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:35 AM
2

Yes I definitely agree with you that a ton people over reach. Most people don’t even have good enough credit scores to get a good enough rate to make investing worth it.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 12:30 AM
2

It has nothing to do with the value of what you buy. It has to do with the cost of the loan vs the benefit of being able to invest the money, the idea behind it is the same behind every type of loan. And the car still loses value when you buy it outright.
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 11:28 PM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.quora.com/Why-do-the-wealthy-take-out-mortgages-instead-of-paying-cash/amp By not spending all of the money up front, you can invest it. The higher returns outweigh the cost of a loan. Their is a reason why a lot of billionaires still have mortgages.
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 11:10 PM
2

Mathematically it makes more sense to have a car loan as long as the interest payment is under the interest you would get from investing it.
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 10:43 PM
1

2-8% are proven false. All of those studies leave out the massive chunk of reports that aren’t even investigated.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:28 PM
3

Not guilty doesn’t mean more likely innocent. A court finding someone not guilty doesn’t say anything about if the court thinks they are innocent or not. The legal system doesn’t focus on finding people innocent or not, it tries to find them guilty. Not guilty means it hasn’t been proven beyond a reasonable doubt(>99%) that it happened. There can be a 98% chance someone is guilty but in modern legal systems a jury would supposed to find them innocent.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter