TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Houdiniman111 Archive

View 0 posts and 261 comments by Houdiniman111 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Incel is literally an acronym for “involuntarily celibate” Not quite. It's a portmanteau, the merging of parts of two words to make a new one. An acronym is when you use the first letter of each word to make a word (like Laugh Out Loud). Also note that those are both different from an initialism, which is when you take the first letter of words but just say them out (Federal Bureau of Investigation).
/r/MensRights11/05/23 01:56 PM
10

I'll clarify that "Majority" usually means "Simple majority" which would be >50% (so half +1). Super majority is anything higher, which is often 2/3 but sometimes just a bit more. There are also 55%, 60%, and 75% supermajorities.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 09:17 PM
15

Diversity hiring is discrimination. By its very nature you're choosing someone over another because of characteristics other than how well they'd do the job.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:51 PM
76

70k INR monthly would be 840k INR yearly which, at current conversion rates, is ~10.6k USD. 35 Lakh -> 3.5 million INR -> ~44k USD. So this man earns more than four times his wife here.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 12:55 PM
3

Well they deleted their account but I'll respond anyway. Well the most logical explanation is men are less likely to report. Lots of reasons for that, but I think most of those are caused by other men and patriarchal standards which I think need to go away. I think men should report and that they should be taken as seriously as a woman and have their day in court like everyone else. I think the reason men are less likely to report is because of the Duluth Model, a standard used across police for…
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:38 PM
3

scrote noun A worthless obnoxious person; a gobshite or toerag. Abbreviation for scrotum
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:29 PM
10

Total is 81 million people. 43 of that 81 is 53%, so women were 53% of people who experienced domestic abuse. In 2019 the total male population was 159 million and female population was 165 million, totaling 324 million. Again taking a look at the percentage, women are (165/324) 51% of the population. They make up a slight majority of the US population and also make up the slight majority of the people who have experienced domestic abuse (53% vs 51%). That 2% nominal difference is frankly tiny. …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 01:02 PM
11

Jeebus. They even acknowledge that there's a different, two sided way of measuring things but that equality didn't suit their purposes...
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:41 PM
2

Fucking over men seems to have a new word. Its called equity. And they're well aware of that. The link at the end of the ad is citi .com/GenderEquity
/r/MensRights30/05/22 03:45 PM
8

It has nothing to do with either blackmail or rape. It's all about being cheated on.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:06 AM
14

They're mistaken. NTR is the acronym for the japanese term "Netorare", which literally translated as "cuckold". Per KnowYourMeme's page on it: In typical NTR stories, the heroine will be introduced as having a close relationship with- or love interest for the male protagonist. The story will then show the aforementioned heroine being intimate with another man.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 01:27 AM
34

I feel like women are a better team than men. This has been proven already. Men have an out group bias (they prefer women) and women have an in group bias (they prefer women).
/r/MensRights03/01/22 01:58 PM
17

feminism is a legitimate desire for equal status and opportunity for humans Then why is it not called egalitarianism or humanism? As a movement "for all humans" it fails on its face right from the start.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 04:02 PM
6

Right. She wants to run free? Can't very well do that when worrying about kids.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 03:11 PM
5

That salary is far from the norm. You're falling prey to the Apex Fallacy. Most places never have salaries that high no matter your education and even in places where that occurs you're effectively never getting that much for that little experience.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:14 PM
1

No. It's still there
/r/MensRights21/11/21 02:35 PM
1

When I tapped on the notification to look at which comment it was, I had LESS than 10 upvotes - meaning I got downvoted. Not necessarily. Reddit does vote fuzzing. It's possible you did get 10 upvotes and then the fuzzing showed you less than that.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 06:24 PM
6

Thanks. Makes sense. That's a pretty intense difference.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:34 PM
29

The 2019 Census puts the sex ratio of those 65 and older at 80.1 males per 100 females, that's 44.5% male and 55.5% female. 43.5% of those with a breakthrough case of COVID-19 cases resulting in hospitalization or death comprise 55.5% of the population. I'd like to see what the gap is but I just woke up so I'm not sure how to combine those numbers in the right way.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:17 PM
5

Since I was having issues accessing an archived version, here's a copy/paste of the contents with some formatting (No text changes. The typos and all caps parts are in the original): There’s a meme doing the rounds at the moment that has brought an incredible amount of internalised misogyny to the forefront. In a bid for equality, it laments that “lazy women” should stop using men as “poverty eradication plans”. [Image] Text reads: I find it very abusive to put pressure on men to provide us with…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:21 PM
13

My cause is equality. If someone verifying that you believe in equality is enough to no longer believe in equality then you never believed in it in the first place. Feminism is seen as the enemy in this sub because Feminism has done nothing for men's rights except actively fight against it. You said "the concept has been bastardized in recent years". How recent is recent years? The Duluth model is from the 80s and is used to exclusively paint men as the perpetrator of domestic violence and women…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:02 AM
12

You took issue with the fact that they called you an egalitarian instead of a feminist. That's why we're having this conversation.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 12:23 AM
15

We can go back and forth about definitions all day. egalitarianism a belief in human equality especially with respect to social, political, and economic affairs By calling yourself feminist do you mean to exclude things such as race? But let's get back to the topic at hand. If feminism = egalitarianism and you are a feminist, then you advocate for men's issues? Do you subscribe to the "Believe all women" way of doing things, wherein men are guilty until proven innocent?
/r/MensRights21/08/21 12:11 AM
17

If you actually care about equality you are an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 11:56 PM
1

Can't speak to the whole world but the 2019 US Census (no 2020 results yet) puts it at 49.2% and 50.8% for male and female. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=0100000US&tid=ACSDP1Y2019.DP05
/r/MensRights30/06/21 08:57 PM
9

Making $10k?
/r/MensRights09/05/21 08:00 PM
58

Lucky for her, she's had decades to poison them against him.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 02:09 AM
7

I can't tell if you're joking or ignorant.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 07:19 PM
3

It's not yet but the commenter I originally replied to wants it to be.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 12:01 AM
9

I agree, which is why I'm against affirmative action which is just "payback" racism. Likewise, I'm against having alimony being flipped.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 11:03 PM
5

I would never argue that because it's not.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 10:55 PM
1

Let me guess, you're in favor of "reverse" racism?
/r/MensRights17/04/21 10:25 PM
4

This sub was created on March 19th 2008. It's almost time for its 13 year anniversary. Ninja edit: It's in the sidebar
/r/MensRights16/03/21 01:59 PM
1

It should also be noted that the difference between a 4 and 5 is largely just bragging rights as a 4 is good enough and a 5 is the highest possible grade.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 02:32 PM
3

Germany is closer to the Nordic countries than the Netherlands.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:53 AM
1

What is 2x? /r/TwoXChromosomes
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:50 AM
2

To expand on the other comment, it's based on how HTML/XML denotes the end of a section. If you want to have a paragraph you write it like this: <p> This is your paragraph's text </p> The / in front makes it an closing tag. So it was </sarcasm> then /sarcasm and then simply /s. Putting a /s is meant to denote that you were previously sarcastic (and if stuff follows then it is not sarcastic.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 10:51 PM
20

Correction: This should apply to anyone.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 06:18 PM
2

Well, my skill as am artist is certainly sketchy.
/r/MensRights05/09/20 03:56 AM
5

Really? They were? You mean to say that people of other demographics were[n't] racist?
/r/MensRights12/07/20 02:00 PM
14

It'll probably take longer than that. If the guy isn't aware of the law or thinks it won't happen to them then it won't stop them.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:17 PM
4

Did the post advocate voting for them? Sure doesn't seem like it to me.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 12:07 AM
5

Who cares? No one should. When someone makes a good argument you shouldn't ignore it because of the source.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 06:17 PM
1

Do we know if they're be prescriptive or descriptive?
/r/MensRights14/06/20 10:49 PM
-5

One person being crazy doesn't preclude someone else also being crazy.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 03:59 PM
1

That's a good point I considered but I don't have a statistic for that so I didn't include it.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 03:11 AM
22

For reference, here's the one for people shot to death by police by race. This does not account for the numbers of each there are in total though. EDIT: If we average the values across 2017-2019 (not 2020 because it's incomplete) Deaths White 408.67 Black 222.33 Hispanic 161.67 According to the 2018 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates the populations for those categories are as follows: Number % White 236,173,020 85.02% Black 41,617,764 14.98% Total 277,790,784 100% NOTE: I did not includ…
/r/MensRights03/06/20 01:23 AM
11

The difference being that her decisions can't be used as case law to affect the outcomes of other cases. Her decisions still matter for the people who have come to the show though.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:31 PM
22

If you want to play in the mud, sure.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 06:27 PM
12

It's a shame. Pixiv is better in every way if you care about seeing a creator's art.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 06:24 PM
5

It's more than that. If you wiped out all men, the human race would go extinct. That's just how biology works. Wonder if she hates her dad.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 02:01 PM
1

What percentage of your income is commissions?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:45 PM
1

My bad. I replied to the wrong person. That would explain your confusion.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:44 PM
1

Well that wasn't a good way to start the day.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:13 PM
0

the lesser of two evils. Vote third party and you won't be dealing with the lesser of two evils
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/19 03:55 PM
6

Then I've never heard of these places and have no idea where to look for them.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/19 04:35 PM
25

Man, I'm not strapped for cash but I wouldn't even pay $5 for a plate of spaghetti.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/19 03:27 PM
78

I was thinking the same thing. Six years and it seems like nothing has changed. In fact, I think things have gotten even more extreme since then. Where's the breaking point? At what point will men at large wise up to what's being done?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 01:02 PM
2

It's a raw deal, isn't it? I avoided doing it for as long as I could. However, my academic scholarship to my local uni required I do so. I really want nothing to do with what the government, especially not it's war efforts. There's a military base that hires many graduates my of the program I attended, so I'd probably have an easy time finding my job if I was willing to work for them, but I've gone out of my way to avoid jobs associated with them. Every passing year puts me slightly farther away…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:28 PM
26

Oh God.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 01:01 PM
33

And they won't learn if they never have their mistakes pointed out to them.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:26 AM
68

Grammar police are the pits. As a grammar policeman, nah. That's just hiding their inability to argue behind a front of pretending to know what they're talking about. EDIT: Clarity
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:06 AM
5

Sounds about right
/r/MensRights04/04/19 03:06 PM
75

Or! Or she could set up a date and ask him!
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:05 PM
-5

80%%% ... So 0.008%? A statistically insignificant amount? EDIT: Sure. Keep downvoting my confused commenting on their extra %s.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:24 PM
29

Either this means that women are to be included, or the draft will be ended.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/19 08:22 PM
12

Then why are you here?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:28 PM
43

Next up, water is wet.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/19 09:19 PM
7

Gotta be nice to the ladies, or you won't get a second date.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/19 06:11 PM
6

Could it be bc1qs8rkd3wl34zve9jr?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:15 PM
3

Skip right to the fourth date!
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:08 PM
3

You expect to be credited for holding doors open?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:32 PM
172

Some people are just that desperate.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/19 01:40 PM
25

TIL that ads are able to be posted on this sub.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:59 PM
1

So they fit in?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:54 AM
21

Don't you have phones?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:53 AM
6

123.5k now.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:51 AM
18

He was literally kicking a guy who was down, enough to break bones. That's nothing to be proud of.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:11 PM
3

Except that we're talking about pigments, in which case it is the opposite.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:26 AM
8

For the Ctrl+F crew, orignal, source, sauce.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/18 09:23 PM
1

Of course more of them would be females. There are far more female teachers. The question is a mater of ratio.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 03:44 PM
4

Facebook and Twitter posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names. As per the sidebar.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 03:36 AM
22

No need. They're not getting up.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/18 01:40 PM
21

This is a sub for Men Rights. Not for misogyny.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:42 AM
39

Then you get different crazies.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:07 PM
2

You're right that I think it should have zero weight. I believe that any two adults who commit the same crime deserve the same judgement.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/18 12:41 PM
3

Why should their punishment be determined in part by whether or not they had unprotected sex?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/18 02:14 AM
3

I had to sign up for SS to get my academic scholarship. I earned the scholarship through my grades but it was held ransom unless I would sign up to be eligible to get forced to go to war without any say. I avoided it for as long as I could but they forced my hand.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/18 12:21 PM
9

I was wondering what a fictional half-goat had to do with this.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:24 PM
2

https://tildes.net/, but that's invite only.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 01:54 PM
6

If they were vaporized, can you really say that they hit?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:03 PM
3

She's been alive for six thousand years? Impressive. Maybe we should be scared of her.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 10:36 PM
12

Can confirm. Source: Am American.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 02:50 AM
13

It's not a conspiracy. It's literally a crosspost.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/18 02:23 PM
6

And in which aspect.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 02:41 AM
1

And toxicity has nothing to do with masculinity.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:52 AM
13

You keep throwing tabula rasa. How in the world is that even related? Do you even know what tabula rasa refers to?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:37 PM
8

I think you mean: Jesus Christ! He's useless!
/r/MensRights25/07/18 12:51 AM
-1

That word? No.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/18 05:44 PM
87

Why else would she be doing this?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 03:44 AM
5

/r/LostRedditors
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:49 PM
9

Not only did they post a link to an article about it, it's an actual pussy pass denial, not just some "person, who happens to be a girl, gets denied".
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/18 01:57 AM
1

How many times has this been downloaded and uploaded? It's looking pretty fried.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:38 AM
21

No worries. It's only the 13th highest rated post on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:02 AM
3

Harrison Bergeron logic? That's what they're going with?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:57 AM
10

Dental hygienists do most of the work. Dentists make the decisions, diagnose problems, and do the major procedures (but most of the time they don't need to do any). So, when you visit your dentist, you'll be a lot more intimate with your dental hygienist.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:22 PM
12

I don't know. It's a hard call. Between it, Facebook, and Tumblr there's a lot of bad to go around.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:15 PM
8

That applies to every system.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:53 PM
18

/r/Menkampf
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:56 PM
3

I'm kind of tempted to PM their mods and ask to be banned. But then I wouldn't have the opportunity to do something in the sub itself and get banned that way.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:00 AM
6

Gleichstellungsbeauftragte I think Google translate does a pretty good job of translating that. Equal Opportunities Officer.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:31 PM
14

Left/Right vs Front/Back
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:46 PM
1

Not who you replied to, but I know the word because I'm really into AI. Anthropomorphism is pretty common when talking about AI. It's something to be very wary of.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 02:09 PM
2

There was a teacher back in my highschool (who I never had, thankfully) who would mark down your work if you said things like "mankind" instead of "humankind".
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:56 PM
2

No. We're just saying to be ready for the rage.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:54 PM
2

This is more extreme than the "It's okay to be white" posters, and those got a huge backlash. EDIT: Ah. I see you already made that comment into a reply to a reply to this.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:50 PM
3

Funny that you think that we're sexist and racist when we are literally pointing out the sexist and racist double standards.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:30 PM
5

You're not doing the same thing. That isn't taking skill into account whatsoever.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:23 PM
4

Janitors have more demanding jobs than CEOs That's just disingenuous. Physically demanding? Yeah. But more demanding?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:19 PM
4

But these group are off campus. They're not part of Harvard. Why do they get any say?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 01:19 PM
2

Great. Google is now so "progressive" that it's now both sexist and racist.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:06 PM
4

/r/NothingEverHappens
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:54 PM
14

I wish those kids the best of luck. They're going to need it, with a mother like that.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:56 PM
2

I subscribed to his channel. I'll definitely watch some when I get home.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:29 PM
3

Why have I never heard of Dr. Jordan B. Peterson before? Throughout the whole interview she kept trying to trip him up and misquote him but he never fell for it.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:21 PM
0

One source isn't really enough. If we believed things based on one source, then we would believe that women make 30% less money than men. It's just a possible hint at what may be real until the data is peer reviewed and can be replicated reliably.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 01:03 AM
1

I wasn't implying anything at first, but now... ( ͡☉⁄ ⁄ ͜⁄ ͜ʖ̫⁄ ⁄ ͡☉)
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/17 05:27 AM
1

Dang. That's mighty short. And are you feisty, as the Warrior part of your name would suggest?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/17 05:16 AM
6

Just how much does the username check out?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/17 04:54 AM
3

I don't like friends. They're coarse and rough and irritating and they get everywhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/17 04:52 AM
-4

One could argue that anything we humans create is a natural process because we are able to do it because of evolution. All creatures (and even non-creatures like viruses) seek to ensure the survival of their kind. In that sense, it could also be said that we help the animals we farm.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/17 02:07 AM
1

Why'd you post a screenshot of a reddit post?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/17 10:54 PM
1

Religion or heritage.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 08:35 PM
1

/r/ledootgeneration
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:16 PM
30

Of course that's the case. Men are the ones doing the killing. The women didn't choose for the man to die. /s
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:47 PM
1

ARE YOU ADVOCATING SEXISM??? REEEEEE /s
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:50 AM
1

I don't see the connection.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 02:54 PM
10

Nah. That might be the whole reason she got verified.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 02:52 PM
20

Plus you want to avoid the connotation of race.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 03:33 PM
10

I avoided doing this for as long as possible. It wasn't until I had to do so to get my academic scholarship payment that I ended up doing it.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:46 PM
1

One spouse gave up [their] career And the other gave up the opportunity to be with the children for all those hours.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:30 AM
1

Which is exactly the issue with programs to help out low-income people. (Which, when put that way, sounds really obvious)
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:25 AM
3

The post is calling out feminists, but ignoring the fact that even the Men's Rights Movement (i.e., this subreddit) does the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 12:01 PM
15

It may very well be, but leaving out important facts changes the perception of reality that the audience gets from those stats. In other words, a lie of omission.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 02:30 AM
3

I look forward to the super-serious conversation about none pizza with left beef.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:20 AM
1

If we presume that that's actually what happened, so what? That's sexual harassment and some violence. The woman in the article on the right stabbed a guy. Is that not worse?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:47 PM
3

Unsurprisingly. It's basically just another church group for them.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:41 PM
9

You're not a former eagle scout, you're an eagle scout (unless it got revoked for some reason).
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:39 PM
15

Seriously. YourYou're going to get a bunch of teens out into the middle of nowhere for a week. What do you think is going to happen?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:37 PM
6

TLA = Three Letter Acronym (or Abbreviation). So TLA is a TLA.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 02:10 AM
5

Good ol TLAs.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:35 AM
49

But we don't know if it's a lie.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/17 08:52 PM
5

Two data points is not enough to determine a norm.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 06:02 PM
9

wemon Was that on purpose?
/r/MensRights02/10/17 05:56 PM
2

Huh. Username checks out.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:37 AM
43

Yes. I hoped that that was obvious.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:28 PM
116

Because everyone who posts here is a misogynistic, racist pig. EDIT: I would have hoped that you guys would be able to tell that I'm being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:13 PM
6

Does it matter whose tax dollars? They're tax dollars regardless.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 02:56 AM
-4

Not even all men do that. Don't expect women to do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/17 06:29 PM
2

No need to bet. Other users in this thread have already shown that.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 03:38 AM
3

Which just shows how much worse it is. The correction doesn't even have to be targeted at them.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 10:35 PM
4

... he had a Romney poster in his front yard (which I took down immediately after the funeral). Can someone explain to me why she cared so much about whether or not there was a poster for Romney?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/17 09:53 PM
6

FeelsBadMan
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/17 06:43 PM
9

Lots of subs about legitimate issues have issues like this. It's just easier to share memes and pictures than actual discussions.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:42 AM
4

Where I'm at, many bathrooms for larger private organizations for both sexes have diaper changing stations.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 12:35 PM
14

In other words, affirmative action sexism.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 03:49 AM
23

Yup. Still there. Someone else in this thread already did the work of finding it. Here is the page for men And here is the page for women
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:16 AM
5

I guess that we're too radical for them to comprehend, so they have to pigeonhole us.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:23 AM
30

You see, that's where you're wrong. Unisex means one sex, meaning that the bathroom is only meant for women. /s
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:11 AM
3

And yet he's baby-sitting if he goes anywhere with the kids without the mother around.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 05:18 PM
8

That's just sad, as that's what makes this happen in the first place. If they went and got help (which would be the opposite of "manning up"), then they probably wouldn't have committed suicide (not to say that it couldn't have happened, but it would certainly have helped prevent it).
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:17 AM
1

Reading this while listening to Breaking The Habit. Your comment didn't tell me anything I didn't already know, but it still hits hard.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:15 AM
108

and yet, you are still held to the decision.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 02:26 PM
6

How do you know that that's the "average", and not just a vocal minority.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 02:28 PM
24

Daniel Helldén, the city’s Green Party head of transportation, said the policy had nothing to do with the chaos. He instead suggests that there was a lack of gender equality in the snow clearing effort. ... Stockholm’s center-left government introduced a new “gender equal” approach to clearing the roads of snow last year. The policy states that sidewalks, public transport and bicycle lanes should be cleared before turning attention to the roads. The reason is that women are more likely to use si…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:00 PM
4

Okay /s
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:55 AM
2

That's a cool story. Hope more news sites become like new.com.au.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:31 AM
1

I only know(/recall) that because of another commentor from France in another thread on here a week or two ago.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:06 AM
2

And the courts too, right?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:44 PM
2

Unless I'm misinformed, isn't common to just stay in the same house and take care of your parents?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:29 PM
0

Die of cancer. Sicko. As bad as their comment is, you shouldn't be saying things like that.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:55 PM
1

Bitch looks like the kind of pathetic turd who would die without attention. Alas, this kerfuffle isn't going anywhere. Can we just agree to drop this?
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:48 AM
0

I'm calling you an idiot based on your actions. You're insulting how they look.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:29 AM
0

Yes. You're right. I'm saying that insulting them would make you an idiot.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:36 AM
0

I didn't insult your intellect. I said "don't be an idiot", not "you are an idiot". I'm classifying you by your actions in the same way one would classify a someone as a criminal because they have committed a crime.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:15 AM
1

I'm criticizing your words/actions, as I've been saying is fine, so no.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:06 AM
0

Criticizing their opinion is fine, but don't be an idiot and insult them. Nothing good comes from it.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:03 AM
-1

Attacking their words is fine, but insulting their opinion is dirty and unproductive.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:40 AM
-1

No need to attack the person.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 08:58 PM
1

Check the times. Yours was posted seven minutes prior.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:49 PM

The standard (although it varies) for statistical significance is 5%, so if it is indeed 9%, then it is statistically significant.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:13 PM
2

I know that feeling. The past year-ish has been really crazy, and things just get crazier as time passes.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:34 AM
16

So because you don't care about it, no one should? If you give up rights in one area, you set a precedence that it is fine and dandy to have them taken in others.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 02:41 PM
7

Definitions change over time. It's in how it's used. Gay used to mean happy. Now it means homosexual. Feminism used to mean female rights. Now it means female superiority.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 02:17 PM
1

Please fill me in. What about the people in this thread are psychos?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:20 PM
2

I'm going to kindly point out that you can see that information in the screenshot.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 01:36 AM
2

Yeah. That, and the fact that things like financial aid and scholarships are locked behind it too. Held off on signing away my life for as long as I could, but I'm not going to lose my academic scholarship over that possibility.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 01:31 AM
7

I bite my tongue about this subject very frequently.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 01:21 AM
2

Why'd they tag their post with "#mens rights"?
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:11 PM
2

Should be, yes, but that might not happen. It certainly won't since the mom (the legal guardian) isn't pressing charges.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:12 PM
4

Terminology does make a difference. If it didn't, there wouldn't be terms. You know what...? Not worth my time to correct you on that. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:40 AM
1

I'm not arguing. I'm correcting.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:24 AM
39

True equality for all would be egalitarian, not femminism
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:53 PM
8

Just so that he can then be kicked out of school for hitting girls.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:52 PM
15

Femminazis would disagree.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:51 PM
1

It'd be "Dear Women". "Dear White People" is referencing all of white people, not just one person.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:50 PM
1

Also of note is the fact that the lowest of the responses is the physical retribution.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:36 AM
1

you can make up a bogus email conversation if you really give a shit about convincing people of something.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:34 PM
1

Literally dozens!
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:28 PM
10

You really shouldn't be promoting that behavior.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:00 AM
16

If you could post that, that'd be really great. Until then it's just hearsay.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:41 AM
5

I think that it applies to their whole post.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 11:15 AM
11

This is gold, but this is all I have. EDIT: You know what? No. This is worth it. Take my first gold.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 01:59 AM
1

Yup. I'm a hater of modern feminists (because of the very bull crap we see people discussing in this thread) and 100% on board for egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:12 PM
5

Well yeah. It doesn't matter since it didn't hurt. And if it did hurt, then you need to suck it up and be a man. /s, in case it wasn't obvious.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:09 PM
2

And there's a very real possibility that they'll arrest him.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 12:42 AM
18

Woosh?
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:14 PM
11

Hoorah! Make the other people pay!
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:01 PM
54

Yup. Forcing discrimination in the opposite direction is still discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:54 PM
10

So you're telling me that they did research to prove a hypothesis, and when their hypothesis wasn't proven they decided to keep believing it anyway?
/r/MensRights26/03/17 01:55 PM
0

This, and saying that people should smile. If they want to smile, let them smile.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:15 PM
1

Sorry. Now I just lost all respect for you.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:10 AM
1

Don't read too much into it.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:08 AM
1

You're right. Bad wording on my part. My bad. Saying "the one with fewer numbers" would be more accurate.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:58 AM
1

And that's fine because they never once mentioned anything remotely close to that. They mentioned one gender without mentioning the other and they focused on the lesser one, nonetheless.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:47 AM
4

That's great information. However, they don't bother showing the whole picture, which is the point of the OP. "25% of the homeless people in Vancouver are women, 70% are men, and 5% identify as another" would be far more free of bias. The issue isn't with the statistic, or the fact that they offered some, but in the negligence to omit some.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:13 PM
2

Really? How? How does an intentional shifting of focus not have anything to do with the article?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:04 PM
5

Here are the statistic, focusing on people, that it gave: Sixty-one per cent of those identified in the count have been homeless for less than a year. Nearly a third of those living in shelters year-round are employed, according to the survey. Aboriginals (38 per cent), people who identify as LGBTQ2+ (13 per cent) and veterans (11 per cent) are over-represented in the homeless population. Women make up 23 per cent of the homeless population. Note that the only one that isn't referencing a minori…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:03 PM
2

I would sure hope so, with a title like Vancouver homelessness at record levels: 2016 count
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:46 PM
2

You're right that a statistic is a statistic and that the reader puts their own meaning onto something. However, that doesn't mean that this is free of bias. When you make a survey, you have to be conscious of the way you frame things, as it can greatly influence the answers you get. For surveys, these are called "leading questions". The statistic is not a question, but the same principle applies. The way you present information introduces a bias. In interview tips, you'll often see that they su…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:45 PM
6

Doesn't appear to be the same article, but seems to be citing the same information. In it, which is the closest I could get to finding the part found about the statistic in the picture. Note the difference in the preceding paragraph. Specifically, the picture says ... affordable housing and people on welfare can't afford to pay rent." compared to The count has identified a number of new trends that point to shifting demographics among the people who are currently homeless. in what you linked. Th…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:32 PM
4

What's this?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:27 PM
6

As per another reply of mine: I didn't say anything about the article. i was talking about the statistic. The point I'm making (about the point of the post) is that the statistic is that it focuses on the minority while ignoring the majority. Women being homeless is an issue, but (according to their own statistic), there are three times as many homeless men. We're not talking about 50% more (which would still be a decent margin), we're talking about 200% more. And yet it ignores that, instead ch…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:26 PM
4

I didn't say anything about the article. i was talking about the statistic. The point I'm making (about the point of the post) is that the statistic is that it focuses on the minority while ignoring the majority. Women being homeless is an issue, but (according to their own statistic), there are three times as many homeless men. We're not talking about 50% more (which would still be a decent margin), we're talking about 200% more. And yet it ignores that, instead choosing to focus on the women, …
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:25 PM
7

And did you? Maybe you can link it then.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 09:55 PM
12

The point is that it's trying to raise concern over 25% of homeless people being women while ignoring that, by the same statistic, 75% of homeless people are men. Yet, despite the homeless men outnumber the homeless women three to one, it focuses on the women, making it seem like that is the super majority of men isn't an issue.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 09:05 PM
1

Needs more Jpeg
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 09:42 PM
-3

You assume. I'm saying that he did not say that. He may have done that, but we don't know.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:55 PM
-1

No. I'm saying that he didn't say that.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:33 PM
0

He didn't say that either. Don't put words in his mouth. We can't know if he didn't say. That said, I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:26 PM
5

I think thay it's also interesting to note the size and shaoe of the outlines. They could have portrayed unsuccessful any number of ways, but they chose something similar to the fetal position.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:11 PM
2

But that's an absolute statement... This is an absolute statement...
/r/MensRights27/02/17 10:34 PM
21

And guess what, he fit right in with us.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:46 PM
3

If you truly believe in equality for both men and women, why choose to follow a belief with a name that clearly labels itself for one side? Why not go with egalitarianism, which has equality for everyone built into its name?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:07 AM
2

The point is that they say this about men. It's flipping it on its head to show how ridiculous it is. Looks like it worked.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:50 PM
21

To be fair, feminists aren't the only stupid people. Lots of regular people are too.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 02:58 AM
-5

Stupid Twits. FTFY. Twitter is a proper noun, so you need to capitalize Twits when referring to them. ^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:53 PM
13

The question is "Why?". Without that background knowledge, we have no right up get up in arms.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:52 PM
1

Hey man, we may never meet again but take comfort in knowing that there are people out there who do care. I know how bad it can get. Don't give in. I kept myself afloat by thinking about how much worse things would be if I didn't. It's not a good way to do it, but it helped me keep going.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 12:33 PM
3

You don't have to be following them to have their posts show up in your feed.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 12:39 AM
7

Oh no... That title...
/r/MensRights29/01/17 04:35 AM
2

Late? Maybe you should set your appointments earlier so that they arrive on time next time.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 05:49 PM
1

My out plan involves leaving the country as soon as I'm able. Can't draft me if I'm not a citizen.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:32 AM
2

I truly despise 3rd wave feminism. I'm all for egalitarianism, but 3rd wave feminism is not that at all.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:15 AM
2

Seriously? I'm jealous. Didn't get anything for signing away my right to choose to go to war.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:14 AM
1

Exactly this. Great summary.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:12 AM
2

You say that there is virtually zero chance of a draft, but I bet people right before a war thought that too. You can't predict the future.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:10 AM
1

Still the case. I had to sign just this past semester to keep my academic scholarship. Didn't find that that was the case until weeks after the semester started, and the late fees were piling up.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:06 AM
2

I avoided signing it for as long as I could. It wasn't until I needed to do so to keep my scholarship that I finally caved. I really hate the idea of being drafted into a war I don't support (which is basically every single one).
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:04 AM
1

You seem to have found yourself in the wrong sub, friendo.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:36 PM
2

We did it, Reddit!
/r/MensRights20/01/17 01:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter