TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hour-University5631 Archive

View 0 posts and 68 comments by Hour-University5631 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Subjectivity is what the angry/bitter men of the black pill get wrong. I mean, you're not really blackpilled then because the majority of blackpilled would disagree with that. I perfectly understand the point you're making but as I said before (which you keep ignoring) you have to quantify what percentage of men are attractive. You keep saying that attraction has a subjective component, but that doesn't address the issue I raised at all. The fundamental is this (I'm kind of losing hope tbh to tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 10:55 PM
2

Well I am black pill. So that should make sense then. Right, indeed so you don't really disagree with the point the commenter made. I’m not ignoring anything I’ve made my point, you disagree and can’t be convinced so I’m done. 🤷🏽‍♀️ No, you haven't even addressed the point I made because you sidestepped it (or perhaps didn't even understand it). In fact, I didn't disagree with any of content of your claims at all. My original point is that one has to concede that only a minority of men are in ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 04:05 PM
1

I don't think you understand the point here. Subjectivity isn't the issue here. The point is what percentage of men are considered attractive by a significant chunk of the female population. If you say that it's not a minority, then your point of men being "angry and controlling" doesn't make sense. The 10% of men I find attractive won’t be the exact same as another woman, or another woman, or any women. There may be overlap, but it’s not the same % The question is about what is the overlap. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:47 AM
2

Most men in the US don’t have money or status, let alone BOTH which is needed to pull women much younger than them. But the general point isn't about most men, it's about most women: the attractiveness of most women fade inevitably after a certain age and as a result they are no longer able to attract men they're after, which according to your own reasoning are rare. Those men have options and will always prefer younger women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 10:26 PM
2

Ok, so what's the range? Because if you can't concede that attractive men are a minority, your point doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 10:22 PM
3

You calling it revenge fantasy isn't going to make it true lol. Women's appearance deteriorate a lot after a certain age and men are primarily attracted to a woman's looks. If they don't want to to fuck you anymore they won't want you, it's very simple. Now I don't agree that there is a specific age for (I know a few attractive 30-something years old but most of them definitely aren't). Men have a slightly wider window and they (some) can use money, status and height to still find younger women …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 08:50 AM
3

Christianity took hold of all of the west and countries rooted in Christianity did not allow women in power. Lol, what kind of nonsensical point is that? Do you know that the Western world is not the entire world. Women throughout the entire history of the world never created a revolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 08:40 AM
13

Hmm do you understand that defeats the very point you're trying to defend? If different women have a non-overlapping preferences in general, then obviously most men meet the criteria of most women. This is mathematically in contradiction with what you said. For your statements to make sense, you have to concede that women standards on average are met by a minority of men only. Otherwise, nothing you said make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/22 08:34 AM
1

Thinking about you don't need luck, but a book on biology would you benefit you more lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 08:44 PM
1

Ah yes thanks, I forgot that every dictionary in the world reports wanting Sex in the definition of shallow. It's hilarious how PPD women just make up stuff to suit their nonsensical narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 08:35 PM
1

This doesn't prove that it is cultural Then we disagree. You conveniently ignored my entire point to fit your narrative. I said that this only proves that culture is a factor. You still have to show that biological and genetic factors do no play a role at all (and good luck with that lol).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 08:34 PM
1

Lol, this is just stuff women make up to make themselves better. Never in my life, I've ever seen a guy complaining about a girl taking initiative.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 05:03 AM
0

It is shallow. According to what logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 05:00 AM
1

You can say it all you want, but it's not biological is cultural. What evidence is there to make this claim? Hence we wouldn't have seen changes in women's behavior with the change in culture. This doesn't prove that it is cultural, but merely that culture is a (arguably small) factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 04:58 AM
1

We shame them for high body count. We call them sluts if they act as if they love sex. According to women themselves here, this is not the factor driving them away from casual sex. They claim that it is because they find causal sex meaningless and unpleasant, that they need a connection to enjoy sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 04:57 AM
1

No it's just body shaming aimed at men, so completely socially acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 08:33 AM
2

I know this is Reddit so "spend a night" means something sexual Sorry, I don't where you live but I'm pretty sure that almost everywhere in the world spending the night means having sex. Also, it's very weird to me that you're saying that physical attraction is different from sexual attraction. Because for the majority of people, it's definitely not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 11:03 PM
2

Body type on men include things like height and bone structure, which are genetically determined. So by virtue of only a minority of body types are considered attractive. However, within that minority there is probably a considerable amount of variability in what women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 10:59 PM
1

Romance never really existed to be honest. Women have always seen men as means to an end (as protectors and providers). Modern dating just enhanced that 1000%.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 10:57 PM
1

Almost everything aimed at women is about “how to fit into that itty bitty bikini” “get your dream bod Except it's not. The general advice seems to be not be fat, but even that seems to receive a lot of pushbacj.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 10:55 PM
1

Where exactly did I say this? Can you quote it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 11:18 AM
0

Eh, not always. Sure, but most of the times it's the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 12:21 AM
2

People that aren’t traditionally good looking know they can’t get a traditionally attractive person so they’ll say things like “most hot people have shitty personalities, etc”. Where I exactly did I mention something even remotely closed to that? Are you sure you're replying to the right person? Because your comment doesn't make any sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 12:20 AM
0

I disagree. I don't think they aren't good at telling what they like. They are more likely to not want to appear superficial and thus mask away their dating requirements. They want to fit into the idealistic conception of romance where "just" traits triumph over the actually desirable ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 11:33 PM
1

I have yet to meet the stereotypical muscular, tall type that I would choose to spend more than a night with If you're willing to sleep with him for one night, it means you find him sexually attractive no? In fact, in general women's physical requirement for short term encounters is much higher than for long term partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 11:29 PM
0

As I said that makes no sense. At best, you can argue that you're showing the inconsistency of this sub (and even then it wouldn't be clear). But you can't prove your own opinion using posts about this sub. Even if one gives statistical importance to the content here, you still have to deal with sample size and bias selection. With dating problem. That also includes the subreddit, which is why I used it as proof. This sub constitutes a minority of people, you cannot use the posts here as evidenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:21 AM
1

would not like to be forcibly exposed to it. But no one forces to have casual sex. Also about reality TV shows, you just proved my point: there are plenty of people who enjoy them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:18 AM
1

Except you're not criticising this sub lol? Your title literally makes a general statement about men. Also that still doesn't make any sense whatsoever. If I say the sun is hot, you can't use a post on this sub to prove otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:12 AM
1

You think PPD posts are evidence? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:06 AM
1

They thought just dating hot guys with big dicks = happy relationship. Why shouldn't they want hot guys with big dicks?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 12:05 AM
1

The pleasure gap and gender violence gap is the evidence that proves it. Except you haven't shown that this is the case. Also this is not semantics. It's literally talking about completely different sexual dynamics. Casual sex is a completely different game than prostitution. Looks don’t indicate skill, but it’s still more enjoyable with attractive people You literally contradicted yourself there. Again, they can pay for it so they’re not deprived. It seems that you keep missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 11:54 PM
1

Except that one's totally untrue since the likelihood goes down with higher income. Source? Assuming this is true (which it may be), my guess is that this is because of more security systems. But a person with a Rolex is 100% more likely to be robbed of his watch then someone with a $10 watch. The point still stands though: whatever inconveniences rich people have, it will never outweigh the benefits they get with their money. Arguing otherwise is very stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 11:51 PM
0

Sex work is sex. Men have that option I mean ok, but it is not casual sex. That's the topic at hand. We are discussing casual sex, not prostitution (and women also have that option). That women have the privilege of being bombarded by men who don’t care about their safety or enjoyment? Privilege is men being free of harassment and being more likely to enjoy sex No the privilege is being able to get casual sex, but it seems that you're getting upset because you don't enjoy it. Many women enjoy ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 07:55 PM
2

I thought we were talking about casual sex not prostitution. Anyway, that still doesn't address the point I made.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:09 PM
2

I’m pointing out why women in general dislike casual sex (or only go for the best looking guys). A single anecdote doesn’t change that. I mean that's fine, but I literally quoted her comment because I was arguing about her specific situation. She should’ve picked more good-looking guys Is there any evidence that looks are correlated with higher orgasm rate? Also, I'm not sure why you have assumed that she didn't. Also casual sex is mostly a privilege for women and a minority of men anyway. Ugly …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 05:56 PM
3

Sure, that doesn't change my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 04:52 PM
1

The orgasm gap doesn't prove anything. What would be useful would the amount of pleasure men and women get during sex. Anyway, the point here is different: why are you repeatedly engaging in casual sex if you don't like it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 04:39 PM
1

It's not about wanting to be white. You said "I'm so glad I'm not white", suggesting the life of a white person is much worse than a non white person. Not just that, you literally used the beyond ridiculous statement that white people have it worse because their babies are worth more on the open market which is fucked up. Your entire point can be summarised by the analogy: "rich people have it worse because they're more likely to be robbed".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 04:38 PM
7

Because men here are likely not in women’s (of this sub) proximity. Hmm, so the men on this sub aren't near the women on this sub. But how is that even remotely related to my point? I'm saying that being approached for a date online and being approached offline is the same. You still get attention from the opposite sex. I really don't see how your point engages with that idea at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 03:02 PM
6

Because men here are likely in women here’s proximity. I'm not even sure what this sentence mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:43 PM
8

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:39 PM
8

It's not, we are talking about women being approached and getting attention from the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:37 PM
5

All the violent racist guys want you. WTF? Do you have even a shred of evidence for this claim? You’re the most likely victim for serial killers. Again, what evidence is there to sustain this claim? Let's assume it is true though. The chances of you being the victim of a serial killer are less than you being hit by a truck tomorrow. You’re viewed as smaller and weaker than all other women. What the fuck are you talking about? That stereotype might be true for Asian women (who on average are actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:36 PM
2

I am so glad I’m not white. Do you really think this little "problem" outweigh all the other benefits of being white lol?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:16 PM
6

Casual sex never made me cum, ever. You seem to have engaged in a lot of casual sex to make that claim. So clearly, you found it appealing to do it many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:15 PM
5

Yeah it's free, but it's garbage. There are plenty of women who enjoy casual sex and sleeping around, so clearly it's not "garbage".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:10 PM
27

Men here do not pay attention to average woman, Just setup an online account on Tinder or Bumble and you'll be flooded with attention, I'm willing to bet my life on it. Average women still get a thousand times more attention than average men. You might not like that attention and people expressing interest in your body, but that's a completely different topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:08 PM
2

Was a typo. I mean most aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 11:05 AM
5

The problem is that most men are aren't attractive to women regardless of age. There is only a small minority of men women feel genuinely attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 01:52 AM
1

It's from his Treatise of Human Nature. Isn't that what you were butchering to get all this in the first place? No where in there you'll find what you wrote. I'm willing to bet my life on it because I've read that book multiple times. What page of the book can you find something even remotely close that? The fact you quoted his entire book is hilarious, yet another proof that you haven't read shit. Point being that we can get close enough to establish causation on a practical level. We can't tel…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 12:39 AM
1

What Hume is saying is that causation might be impossible to establish on an absolute level, given the limitations in our perception Sorry, but where the fuck did you pull that out from? You literally made that up (don't tell me you went on Wikipedia to skim through his philosophy). Can you quote where Hume says this? You tried to say that "causation is correlation", lol! Because it is. Let me repeat that for you: there is no distinction between causations and correlations. That doesn't mean tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 08:51 PM
1

The whole issue is that correlation can't be assumed to indicate cause. You just didn't understand what you read. Lol, yeah sure. You clearly haven't even read any of Hume's work (please don't pretend that you did). The contention is that there is nothing in the world to establish a difference between causation and correlation. What we establish as causations are merely correlations. You can take any claims about causation and ultimately you will have to reduce it to correlations. In other words…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 07:16 PM
1

Hmm, no. That's not even relevant. Because the claim is that causation is correlation. As I said, David Hume made this point hundreds of years ago. I really recommend reading on his work on causality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 06:53 PM
2

I mean clearly that incentive isn't there since otherwise we wouldn't see the situation as it is in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 05:39 PM
1

No? Even one of the greatest philosopher in Western history argued that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 05:38 PM
1

As a statistician, I am very surprised to hear you say that scientists and empiricists agree with Hume. Most physicists, biologists, chemists, etc.. are reductionists and materialists. In the "hard sciences" the common view of science is that of Hume and the empiricists. However, most scientists are completely unaware of more subtle interpretations of induction and even philosophy as a whole (even the philosophy of the very subjects they study). From what I gather, the Bayesian approach is mostl…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 01:36 PM
0

While Hume indeed argued that causation is simply perfect correlation, it is not well accepted today. I would very much disagree with this statement. Accepted amongst who? Philosophers? Because I would argue that pretty much every empiricist (thus pretty much every scientist) would agree. Amongst philosophers, there are some alternative interpretations of the problem of induction (e.g. using Bayesian probabilities) but no philosopher today would argue that Hume's view has been debunked by exampl…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:54 AM
0

I agree partially, but I think the problem is that for most people having a fulfilled sexual and romantic is key to their happiness. It's very hard to ignore that urge and instinct
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 02:56 AM
4

Kanye West is one of the greatest rappers of all time, that helps quite a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 02:50 AM
10

I mean this isn't a mystery lol, not sure why it took you so long to figure it out. Most women would absolutely despise being a below average guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 02:48 AM
2

I think women on the whole need to make more efforts in their romantic relationships with men. Why is flirting, woo-ing, thoughtful comments, compliments and gifts a female only luxury? Men deserve to feel loved, wanted and adored too. Yeah, but why should women partake in that when they don't have to? Flirting, taking initiative, risking rejection and compliments all require effort. Why should women do all of that when they have no incentive?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 02:45 AM
2

Yes, indeed. But possible ≠ probable. Anything is possible, but you shouldn't shape your life around possibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 02:42 AM
3

if your partner cheated on you in the past, would that not make you feel insecure in the future if you chose to stay with them? I can agree to that, but that's because in that scenario you're extrapolating from a single data point. But if you had concrete evidence (as we do about promiscuity), then no I very much disagree. if i’m unsure of the security of my spot within my relationship compared to other potential people, is that not referred to as “insecurity”? Well, first of all. I think if you…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 12:26 AM
1

i’m not sure science has gone so far as to establish causation. Causation is always strong correlation (Hume would argue this certainly). Not just that, for all practical purposes it doesn't matter. If I go to a neighbourhood where there is a high crime rate, I'm going to be more careful no matter the reasoning because there is a higher likelyhood of me being attacked. That same logic applies in this context. even still, isn’t that still insecurity? when people are insecure in their relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:49 PM
12

but sometimes it is insecurity. if your reason for not wanting a high n count woman is because you’re scared to be compared to past partners or you’re afraid she’ll cheat, that’s insecurity. you’re literally lacking security in what your bring and in the strength of your relationship. Promiscuity is literally shown to be linked to cheating by studies. You're not being insecure if you think a high n count women will cheat on you, you're being smart and attentive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:37 PM
6

Because, while women like to virtue signal and try to convey that care about men being insecure and vulnerable, deep down they're simply not attracted. They hold men to completely and unreasonablly different standards to their female equivalent. Also when women are insecure, the blame is always on men (e.g. Talking about beaty standards, being non-assertive, etc...), but when men are insecure... Well it's their fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:25 PM
6

He cheated perpetually, lied and stole perpetually and ground my self worth into dust So you generalised all men based on that? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:19 PM
1

You have no basis to call anyone ugly; you can't even see them. I agree. It's like women on this sub make claims men having a shitty personality with zero evidence to rely on. We did have a picture thread a while back and the women, at least, looked great.) That's called selection bias. Of course, the ugly women are less likely to post picture of themselves. It's a very common way of dismissing a woman's opinions to call her ugly I think people should definitely not take the experience of women …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter