TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HovisTMM Archive

View 2 posts and 119 comments by HovisTMM on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK7l55ZOVIc Relevant explanation.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 07:16 PM
1

Stop shilling your shitty, cringey youtube channel on this sub.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 07:09 PM
5

No mistake, you committed assault.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 10:52 AM
21

https://menssheds.org.uk/ Same kinda thing, but with a focus on building positive male relationships through a shared hobby or skill. I think it's meant to foster mentorship but the one in my city was all 60+
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:38 AM
9

The title is woefully misleading. Meghan Markle didnt split up the royal family, Harry had wanted out for a while. The press' insistence on being cunts and denying royals any shred of privacy is obviously a sore spot for Harry, and given the actions of british newspapers when it came to Markle I cant blame him for taking it as the final straw. Obviously there's no evidence of the following, but there is a persistent rumour that the royals' shielding of Andrew from scrutiny wrt Epstein is what dr…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 06:18 AM
2

Not actually from Voltaire, it's from Kevin Strom, an Australian neo nazi. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom
/r/MensRights20/09/20 10:14 AM
54

If they were informed in 1995, and the change was to bring them into parity with men, what possible case could they have had?
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:28 PM
10

The film's plot isnt even necessarily the thing that makes it paedo bait, the cinematography is. You can show these acts without having close ups of 11 year old privates. You can demonstrate the loss of innocence without having an 11 year old character attempt to seduce a security guard. You can communicate these themes and morals without lowering the bar this far. This film is the CP version of "watch your fucking language".
/r/MensRights14/09/20 06:37 AM
11

Draft dodging is not only justified, its morally correct. The draft is just a nice way of saying "you will join our slave army, if you resist in any way you will be punished."
/r/MensRights13/09/20 08:48 PM
-1

Except there is no evidence that this is a 'forced' transition. At that age transition is practically dress up, puberty blockers don't come into play for a good few years yet, so no long term physical decisions to make yet. I'll be honest, I'm finding it hard to trust a source with such a blatant bias. I can offer just as biased a source (Vox) which states that the kid identifies repeatedly as female. Edit: Scratch the idea that they're equally biased - the Vox article is vastly superior and goe…
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:32 AM
7

pretty concisely explained 5 years ago First and foremost, the MRM is a victim support group. When you have a large proportion of men directly hurt in a way feminism rugsweeps, it's easy to see where the animosity comes from. As for just how bad our movement is - compare how we view Elliot Rodger to how radfems view Valerie Solanas. You will always have a nutter or two in every group, especially when that group is aimed at reducing suffering.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 10:25 AM
31

Isnt that note from the mods? Feels like a tongue in cheek way of calling out the censorship.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:56 PM
6

https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caso_Rhuan According to wikipedia, they are still awaiting trial.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:24 PM
2

What support are you talking about? Two women on FB?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 04:15 AM
1

I've edited the comment with a link.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 02:43 PM
1

You are nothing but a troll. You argued it might not be real, but as soon as I proved it you dismissed the issue anyway. You're nothing but a pathetic patsy for a rapist and I hope you feel some shame about that.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 02:36 PM
1

It took some digging but here is the archive link for the deleted blogpost: https://web.archive.org/web/20110107031303/http://www.rooshv.com/when-no-means-yes Roosh is a rapist.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 02:28 PM
0

Are you saying the blogpost they've included is fake?
/r/MensRights01/04/20 02:08 PM
-1

I'm specifically telling you to ignore the trash journalism and read his blogpost on there. He deleted it so I can't like to it directly.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 02:00 PM
-1

Unfortunately the daily mail appear to be the only ones who ran a story on it but it was a blogpost I remembered reading, not his book. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3439840/amp/Return-Kings-founder-Daryush-Roosh-Valizadeh-admits-considered-rape-deleted-post.html Ignore the trash article, the blogpost itself is posted in full as an image. You don't pin a girl down with force so you can penetrate her. That's rape.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 01:42 PM
-3

If you understand that feminists have a few nutters that drive a lot of hate - that arent called out by their community - then you need to understand that MRAs have the same problem. RooshV still gets posted on the sub positively. The man describes raping a woman in his book (e. Blogpost) Mods have a role in this. Ban submissions from the most egregious examples. Of course, there are plenty of bollocks thrown this way by idiots. Youd think intactivism would be mainstream feminism if that didnt o…
/r/MensRights01/04/20 03:25 AM
1

If you spend any amount of time on this sub you'd realise that's not a wholly accurate statement.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:29 AM
1

Oops, thought you were replying to me not the other guy.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 06:40 PM
1

I mean, that last sentence is unequivocally rape.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:13 PM
0

Sure, but I doubt you'd ever be able to secure a conviction on it. How about instead of trying to find edge cases in order to refute the idea, think about it this way: If your daughter was the one going through this, would you feel the same? What about if it were your son and a girl lied about being on the pill and got knocked up. 18 years of child support because he 'consented'?
/r/MensRights15/03/20 04:53 PM
14

The sex was not consensual, though. The consent was invalidated by the deception. I would like to see the law amended to treat this as a separate crime to rape though. Rape via deception or whatever term they want to use. It's not quite as heinous as proceeding to rape when there is a clear lack of consent, but it's still vile and should be punished.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 10:55 AM
-3

Obvious, obvious fiction. Mods, can you please remove this embarrassment?
/r/MensRights26/11/19 03:45 AM
25

Amber guyger wasnt convicted of manslaughter though, she was convicted of murder.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 05:08 PM
1

Zoe Quinn has absolutely lied in the past, but that does not mean that this specifically is a lie.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:52 PM
6

You cannot complain about false accusations on the principle of presumption of innocence whilst also presuming that Quinn is lying. ZQ is in general a garbage person but it would be just as irresponsible to immediately call her a false accuser as it would to immediately accuse him of being an abuser based on one accusation. These issues should not be played out in the public sphere.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 04:48 PM
6

Go watch American Circumcision on netflix.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 04:40 PM
1

Why are SO many people in this thread not getting that this is satirical? It's a sarcastic response to idiots who think only "legitimate" rapes cant cause pregnancy.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:20 PM
1

You sound loud a 12 year old fedora kid.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 07:20 AM
0

Did you feel that your comment would be well recieved here? Even on this sub calling someone a tranny and deliberately misgendering a trans person is cringe as fuck.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 01:08 PM
2

Natalie sympathises heavily with leftist politics and is only centrist insofar as she's a bourgeoisie socialite at heart.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 01:04 PM
1

Yeah, that joke is definitely sexist. It's the entire basis of the joke.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 08:56 PM
10

A standing defensive army can be maintained without a draft. As for the argument that in times of war less people volunteer I'd encourage you to look at the records of army enrollment at the outbreak of WW2. Even pragmatism doesn't justify the draft.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 05:44 PM
3

Gender critical is only a recently popularised term, though. There are plenty of TERFs, transphobes and the like on other subs.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:19 PM
4

I cant disagree with that final sentence to be honest, but it doesnt need to be gendered. Visitation is incredibly important to a prisoners state of mind, and distance will inevitably play a role in the frequency of these visits. I actually think that it is an important factor to be taken into account for men and women for every sentence given. Jailing somebody is the forcible kidnapping and detention of a person, and is not a punishment to be dispensed lightly. I dont want to say that rural pri…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:50 PM
5

Up to 6 months pregnant, yes. This option should be available on an equal timeline.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 09:15 PM
-2

Yeah, but some shitty comic edit that barely gets the point across and looks petty isn't fighting for social change, it's a shitpost.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:09 AM
0

Should be tagged as shitpost rather than social issues tbh
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:06 AM
-1

Not really. I post honkler shit myself, memes are just memes. My point was that this is supposed be a more serious subreddit. At least tag it as humour.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:45 PM
-10

Would you mind not posting honkler? It's an edgy meme, we dont need that shit.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:25 PM
1

Why? The rule is clearly defined and for a clear and prescient reason. Please state the case against the rule rather than waving your gadsden around.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 02:05 PM
7

Just stop posting links, this isn't difficult.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 10:49 AM
6

Most men that find out they know a rapist very quickly no longer know a rapist. Rapists are almost universally despised by men, other than other rapists.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:40 AM
3

Then I encourage to talk to people from groups like the bloodstained men, or to make a post in this sub asking for conversations with people who do feel that way. This sub does not lack for those people.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:02 PM
5

Please dont. I'm anti-circumcision but I dont want people to be shut out because they disagree. If you feel comfortable with your circumcision then that's brilliant. Genuinely. I am glad you got through it unscathed. If you care about engaging with mens issues though, you are going to be talking to a lot of men who have suffered immensely due to their circumcision. A lot of people are going to take "I'm fine with mine" as "you should be too", which I assume is not your actual point.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:37 AM
2

When did I mention mental health?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:14 AM
2

That's a reasonable enough argument but it wasnt mentioned in his note / this article. I wouldn't be surprised if that was the reason though.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:10 AM
3

But that wasnt the case here - he suffered from erectile dysfunction too.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:05 AM
24

From the story it looks like the circumcision caused an immense amount of pain and ge found intactivist material while suffering. As an addendum, I dont really understand why you think the circumcision would have been easier on him as a child seeing as it was botched.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 05:06 PM
4

Couldn't find a better link, but this article helps explain that the gender violence law specifically only helps women, so if the roles were reversed the woman literally couldn't be tried by the gendered violence court because the "victim" is a man. https://cafebabel.com/en/article/spain-gender-violence-what-about-abused-men-5ae00
/r/MensRights11/04/19 06:38 AM
0

Cut the high horse bullshit. Its lazy comedy and the only point it makes is "lol feminists are dumb". Its been done before. It's not liberal fascism to want this subreddit improved by removing signposts, especially ones that make us look like idiots.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:56 AM
9

FFS Mods, can we please ban Titania posts? Too many morons fall for it. Never mind that this has nothing to do with mens rights.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:16 PM
6

I mean, you can believe the accuser on your own prerogative, the issue is how you treat the accused until they are proven guilty. If that post was true, unfortunately I doubt there'll be any evidence available this long after the fact to get any kind of conviction.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:21 AM
13

I saw that Facebook post but I have no idea if that's a real screen or anything - I haven't seen it reported anywhere, even in MRM-friendly media.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:12 AM
47

Her actions are heinous, but did I just miss the bit where she actually slept with these men, or has that been reported somewhere? From what I've heard, it was drugging+robbing men who thought they would be having sex I.e. she didnt rape anyone? Still dont understand how people justify it. Her response was that "Male rappers brag about far worse things they did to survive than what I talked about" which is utter bollocks.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 07:03 AM
1

This. Always disappointed to see people here wishing for some academic which says "men are trash" fired. They are allowed that opinion, so long as they treat their make students fairly.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 12:07 AM
2

This is a sub for activism, not boomer memes.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:21 AM
1

I am firmly in the camp that this is not a false accusation, otherwise, I would agree with you.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:51 PM
1

This mentality is troubling. Just because men don't receive enough sympathy doesn't mean we gave to stop being sympathetic to women. He deserved what he got.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:48 PM
0

He was an abusive rapist and she cut off his genitals. I have little sympathy for him and little moral ground to judge Lorena on. He is only a victim in the sense that his behaviour caught up with him. If it had been your wife, mother, daughter etc in this situation instead of a stranger, would you feel any sympathy for him? So yes, she did that and he was a cunt. Both if those things are true.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:46 PM
145

That comment is 2 1/2 years old. Notch is less aggressive now.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 10:32 PM
-9

Both of those things are true.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 08:12 PM
3

Isn't this from titania McGrath? AKA Godfrey Elwick, notorious troll?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 07:07 PM
1

2.5-4 hrs a day of commuting currently.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:58 PM
2

The media coverage is a case of female accountability being mysteriously vacant, especially headlines that label him 'speedboat killer', but the legal case is pretty solid. He was negligent of his duty of care to a passenger of his vessel when he let them drunkenly cause their own death.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:06 PM
0

Nothing wrong with farting in front of people. It's still impolite.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:36 PM
1

An instinctive glance is a faux pas that it is not unreasonable to apologise for, and for the woman to brush off. Justifying ogling people in the street is a whole other thing.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:40 PM
1

Please tell me this is satire.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:38 PM
2

I don't think her gender is the cause of her applying the law as it stands, it's the law.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:47 PM
44

Damages* damn. This is fraud and the fact that the courts have ruled that he is STILL required to pay child support is reprehensible. The fact the the Lady Justice has the breathtaking arrogance to say HE is acting immorally is infuriating.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 01:17 AM
3

Most likely your local subreddit. Reddit isn't the best for this.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 12:53 PM
2

Absolutely. Extenuating circumstance is not special treatment - if the truth of the matter is that she was assaulted in that house and in fear for her life, then surely that puts her guilt into reasonable doubt?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:36 AM
5

It's not true to say that there is no evidence In her favour - the CCTV footage that allegedly shows him grabbing her by the neck and shoving her is something that needs to be considered.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 06:54 AM
2

This. Duty to flee does not account in the case of self defence of a third party - you are not responsible for the third-party's actions.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:04 PM
2

I've read both if those this week and the impartiality of it is disturbing. Both cases have done merit, and I hope the appeals find the truth of the matter, yet I can't help but think that the BBC would not treat the subject so openly if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:02 PM
19

Men have the same protections. Sexual assault plaintiffs are granted anonymity.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:06 PM
4

I wasn't knocking it. Just saying, don't get your hopes up.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 08:44 AM
5

This happened in the UK a few years ago, all that happened was women's rates went up.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:53 AM
2

Glad I could help.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:58 PM
15

Look at this place as one that deals with men's disadvantages, sometimes intersectionally but mostly as a generalised group because we feel the issues that affect men primarily are routinely ignored. Issues that affect men exclusively are practically scorned. Take Intactivism, for example. It's a fairly large part of this board but it gets very, very little media attention despite being an open goal argument-wise for any human rights activist. The issue we see when fighting for it is that being …
/r/MensRights01/01/19 10:32 AM
3

I didn't doubt you, I was just saying it hadn't happened to me. In fairness I haven't posted on that sub so maybe I just am unaware of the ban. That is downright disgusting. If a user of MR gets raped, that sub is completely off limits. Despicable.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:25 PM
1

I'm not banned and I've posted on here several times.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:11 PM
0

No, there are two different numbers for men and women, they've only shown the one for women.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 08:30 PM
-4

64% of 20% is 12.8% What is the breakdown of men killed by the same category and is it more than 12.8% of all murders?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 08:03 PM
5

Again, I agree with you, but that's not the way the conversation is going to go. A total ban is the end goal but people shut their ears to that. Compare this to veganism - does anyone take them seriously when they call for a total ban on meat? Or do they listen to the ones who call for animal welfare rules and slowly change the culture? Cultural progress is a march, not a sprint. I want the same end result as you, I'm just thinking in pragmatic terms as to how we can accomplish it.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:45 PM
1361

We get a lot of shitposts and generic "look at this SJW being an idiot" but this sub still has a vast amount of genuine information and activism.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:26 PM
6

I agree that with your point, but she's committed to fighting against all MGM specifically because she went through this experience. We can't say the same of mothers whose child had no immediate complications. Her story is a powerful tool for opening the conversation up to those who think it is perfectly normal. Once they see the danger, they can start to question the entire practice.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:20 PM
12

Not exactly. I'm saying that it should only be available to willing adults or to children when medically necessary, and should have much stricter safeguards in place. I call for a total ban on it being performed by people who are not medical professionals. I would also like to see this procedure require reporting of botches. I encourage you to watch this film, you may find it informative.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:49 AM
2

Just what we need in the biggest men's rights group online: pointless articles spread to gain karma and mock idiots.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 09:55 PM
2

Uk =/= continental europe
/r/MensRights30/11/18 04:51 PM
8

Even r/ukpolitics which usually hates MRA stuff is generally positive on this situation. Good news.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 11:05 AM
3

Consider it "easing it in". Congratulate the participants and tell them you are enthusiastic about next year and mention various topics they could address. Be constructive.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:09 PM
5

Why?
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:07 PM
2

"Both suspects have been released" Im sorry but does a slaveowner not present a danger to the community?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 05:37 PM
2

Where did i mention infant phimosis?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 07:27 PM
3

Not as simple as banning it - require a medical diagnosis which would require circumcision (e.g. phimosis) and require that the procedure be conducted by an appropriately qualified medical professional, for anyobe under 18. At 18 you are a free adult and can do as you wish.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:08 PM
24

There are four categories of FGM, the first (amd most common) is a nick across the clitoris, less damage than MGM. They get progressively more intrusive from there but the majority of FGM is actually less invasive than MGM.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 03:28 PM
5

In this specific case, it's worth noting that the judge mentioned her ability in his remarks.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 06:18 PM
58

I'm sure many of you have seen them, but for those interested please check out TL;DR's videos on her case. Very informative and rightly picks apart the "she's a good surgeon" defense. The compassionate sentence handed down by judge Ian Pringle QC was unduly lenient. I complained to the relevant office about this and despite the promise that all of these complaints are responded to, mine wasn't. Abhorrent anarcho-tyranny at work.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 12:11 PM
10

If you'd like to see the current state of the reddir culture war, one person commented "We live in a male-dominated society" and was given a snarky retort by someone, presumably a feminist, who in turn was BTFOd by everyone who responded.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 09:31 AM
7

I hate this line of argument because it legitimises polygraphs more than it discredits them. The argument is that she could have tricked the test, rather than the test being worthless to begin with. All it takes is proving that she didn't coach anyone and suddenly that polygraph is now undeniable in public opinion.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:05 AM
2

Stop sharing Candace Owens. She is a shameful opportunists and will flip on a dime so long as she gets to keep it.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:22 PM
-4

Incorrect. You could read the article instead of just the headline and notice that the decline in divorce rates is calculated on married couples only. Marriage rates have fallen too, but that is separate to this statistic. What we are seeing is less peole getting married and then getting divorced, not just a blanket fall in divorces.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:16 PM
4

I'm glad that all but one commenter on the article was in favour of this. If ToI readership is in favour then it looks like the movement has a wide reach.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 02:16 PM
1

The censorship is the real issue, not the jokes
/r/MensRights06/07/18 10:38 AM
1

The outrage is the stance they take, not the home itself.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:55 AM
6

Being sensitive to comedy gets you nowhere. Look at the feminists. They aren't irrelevant to most people because they are stupid, but because they get mocked and can't take it. You think the civil rights movement gave a shit about jokes? Get smart, get serious. That means you don't respond to every slight. You focus your message.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 09:19 PM
6

Yes, you absolutely can. Humour is an amazing cathartic tool. In bisexual and the Orlando shooting really shook me up because the media dudnt care that this was a homophobic attack and refused to call it an Islamic terror attack at the time, simply referring to it as a mass shooting. This was an existential threat to me and others and the real problem was just swept under the right to for the narrative. I even asked for a minutes silence at work. What got me out of that funk and seeing some 4cha…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:26 PM
18

No. Either everything is ok for comedy, or nothing is.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:17 PM
6

I hope that this is due to increased willingness to report and not from an actual increase.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 07:19 PM
5

Trad arguments are pretty unnecessary in an MRA sub. We don't want trad gender roles pretty much universally
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:01 PM
1

If they wanted a gender neutral policy then surely banning skirts and allowing shorts makes way more sense?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 07:45 AM
2

What an amazing display of empathy and understanding.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 09:13 AM
3

That is actually hilarious though
/r/MensRights27/05/16 05:36 PM
7

I would help, but im already a member and council candidate for another party - helping another party like this would invalidate my membership.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter