TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HowardB Archive

View 21 posts and 278 comments by HowardB on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
102

HowardB/r/MensRights07/08/12 02:47 PM
78

HowardB/r/MensRights06/06/12 04:27 AM
39

HowardB/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:56 AM
38

HowardB/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:36 AM
31

HowardB/r/MensRights01/02/12 12:41 AM
31

HowardB/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:19 PM
26

HowardB/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:23 AM
23

HowardB/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:12 PM
17

HowardB/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:27 AM
14

Legal RightsHowardB/r/MensRights16/08/15 03:51 AM
13

HowardB/r/MensRights28/02/12 01:28 PM
12

HowardB/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:19 AM
12

HowardB/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:03 AM
9

HowardB/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:17 PM
6

HowardB/r/MensRights13/03/12 01:14 AM
5

HowardB/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:04 AM
4

HowardB/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:11 PM
3

HowardB/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:25 PM
3

HowardB/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:08 PM
1

HowardB/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:22 AM
0

HowardB/r/MensRights09/02/14 12:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

TOWN HALL MEETING SENATOR MADIGAN - FAMILY LAW REFORM Senator John Madigan has started a series of meetings around Australia It has now been 12 years since a comprehensive review of the Family Law system occurred. The current family law system is crumbling under a weight of impossible constraints placed on the judicial system and is fast nearing a complete meltdown. Enormous harm is being done to Australian families, and of most concern, to Australian children. This is the first in a series of p…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 04:19 AM
2

Senator John Madigan has started a series of meetings around Australia It has now been 12 years since a comprehensive review of the Family Law system occurred. The current family law system is crumbling under a weight of impossible constraints placed on the judicial system and is fast nearing a complete meltdown. Enormous harm is being done to Australian families, and of most concern, to Australian children. This is the first in a series of public meetings to put the Family Court back on the pub…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 03:52 AM
2

Feminism has nothing to do with the proposition that women should be considered whole and complete members of the body politic, though it has enjoyed great success marketing itself that way. A useful definition is this: “Feminism is the words ‘I Want!’ in the mouths of three or more women, provided they’re the right kind of women.” Feminism must therefore accommodate wildly incompatible propositions — e.g., (1) Women unquestionably belong alongside men in Marine units fighting pitched battles in…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 12:57 AM
4

Brilliant "...pseudo-science absolving women of violent impulses, delivered on demand to interest groups by the same tiny, incestuous coterie of ideologically sympathetic professionals, is routinely applied in training police, family law judges, social workers and women's shelter personnel. A lazy, politically correct media dutifully spreads the party line by reporting uncritically on bogus selection-biased "studies" by non-accredited stakeholders, who extrapolate to the general population data …
/r/MensRights30/07/13 08:50 AM
1

from the article [Gender Bias Study of the Court System in Massachusetts (1989) reprinted in 24 New. Eng. L. Rev. 745 and cited in Cynthia A. McNeely: Lagging Behind the Times: Parenthood, Custody and Gender Bias in the Family Court, 25 Florida State University Law Review 891 (Summer 1998)]. A proper interpretation of the data revealed the following analysis: Mothers get primary residential custody 93.4% of the time in divorces. Fathers in divorce get primary residential custody only 2.5% of the…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 12:52 PM
1

That you defend yourself in this puerile way shows that you have been nailed in a self-revelatory rant of an unhinged howler monkey. What a fascinating insight into the diseased "mind" of a lawyer You really are no good at this 'logic' thing, are you? Just another banal run-of-the-mill family lawyer scum and filth. Can you gambol and caper a bit more for us? I find your monkeyshines amusing. Else toddle off.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:59 PM
1

sorry the facts disagree with your mythology. Bohica69, what is your hand doing on your crotch there?
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:35 PM
1

WTF!!! another insane lawyer spruiking ‘it's the law ... it must be right’. Are you drunk? Are you certifiably insane? Have you been doing some amateur pharmacology? Seriously, I have never seen so much stupid condensed into so few comments. I hate lawyer parasites and still worse the fucking clueless idiots that troll the divorce topics in Mensrights. Is your family life so bad that you find it a better option to come here and be humiliated?
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:40 AM
1

and, of course, a significant percentage of that wealth to lawyers and their sycophants.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:48 AM
1

unless you're female... then you're coerced, under duress or whatever abuse excuse they care to invoke. You are a dishonest clown, an ignoramus and a cockhead. Got all that?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:20 AM
1

Not sure who you are dealing with, but in my experience courts bend over backwards to maximize parental involvement from both sides. LOL. Family Court finds only 5% of fathers fit to share in the parenting of their own children after divorce. It is a legal scam for a parasitic lawyer class who produce nothing to plunder the life savings of working families by holding their children to false allegation ransom. The politicians go along with this racket for the massive revenue it generates from chi…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 01:48 AM
0

Thanks. I am asking because my brother in CT proposed to his girlfriend born in FL. They will live in CT. She requested the marriage to be in FL. Alarm bells. She has already been married & divorced there. The veto of alimony reform in FL exposed the insane permanent alimony laws there. She is now willing to agree to a pre-nup. She has nothing. He is rich (relatively). The next question is if he doesn't get married is he still liable to alimony under CLM? I also found this site Common Law Marria…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 11:31 PM
0

Which States can contract CLM?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:40 PM
1

Does the date/time Sun, April 14, 11am – 12pm refer to London or NY time. How does one link to the actual discussion. There is nothing on http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/ Thanks
/r/MensRights13/04/13 02:25 PM
1

link to the Honorable Judge Watkins performance. Link in article disappeared
/r/MensRights13/04/13 01:18 PM
1

imho it would hurt their profits. If there were consequences for lying in family court business would drop off significantly. In fact in Australia when s1117AB was introduced in 2006 specifying mandatory cost penalties for knowingly false allegations divorce litigation dropped 22%. The chief justice then wrote to the Attorney General asking that s117AB be repealed - supposedly because women were afraid to disclose family violence. Sure enough in 2012 the radical feminist controlled Gillard gover…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:14 PM
1

GAL - court appointed hearsay witness for the mother. Only purpose is to prolong the proceedings to maximize profit.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:41 PM
1

They can still get you with palimony
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:38 PM
1

Gillard unilaterally rolled back shared parenting reform and introduced the American VAWA into Australia, known as "The National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women and THEIR Children [but not men"]. Family violence is whatever the accuser thinks it is. It is rape to find a woman attractive without her written permission. She is trying to introduce anti-discrimination legislation - affirmative-action "positive discrimination excluded - which makes any any form of social interaction in the work…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:50 AM
5

We need to find a concise way to label this accurately. Call it what it is - the Violence Against Families Act
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:05 AM
0

The House may vote on VAWA tomorrow, it was debated today Join the "tweet up" going on right now against the so-called Violence Against Women Act on Twitter. Go here and click retweet: https://twitter.com/EagleForumPAC/no-more-feministpork For 30 years, the feminists have been pretending that their goal is to abolish all sex discrimination, eliminating all gender differences no matter how reasonable. When it comes to domestic violence, however, feminist dogma preaches that there is an innate gen…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:05 AM
2

I'll make it simple. She was defending her own appointment of a misogynist by accusing the accuser of being a misogynist. This is leftist diversion talk before you find her fucking your cat in the laundry. Don't be fooled. There is no-one more sexist than the Australian PM.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:33 AM
2

I'd like to agree with you but "I deal only with boys" does not diminish the risk. Add "gay" to the allegation and see what happens
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:06 AM
3

His personal blog cites a PhD in "Why heterosexual men don't wear condoms" FFS.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:42 PM
1

When the government implements a legal presumption of equal shared parenting after separation then I'll consider marriage. As it stands, you're taking a 50/50 gamble of losing your house, kids and future income based entirely on her happiness. Family law incentivises divorce - 80% of divorces are initiated by women with children because they are guaranteed of getting the children & therefore control of everything. It is a legal scam of a privileged lawyer class who produce nothing, these modern …
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:32 PM
4

"In the process of reversing custody "Justice" Lori B. Jackson ruled that although the mother, Ms. Kirk, was drunk, hysterical and abusive, she still showed good parenting instincts unlike Lt. Col. Kirk who, although sober, acted just as irrationally by video taping the abusive episode instead of trying to calm down a drunk, raging, violent Borderline. " Judge Jackson has gagged the videotape from public view
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:32 AM
1

When the law fails to provide justice people inevitably are forced to take matters into their own hands.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:49 PM
1

prenups mean nothing when children are involved
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:47 PM
4

and the other 3% (women) don't pay
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:09 AM
1

Let's put things into perspective $300K funding for Men's Sheds $100M for Gillard's "National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women [but not men] & homelessness" - aka the Australian VAWA. Co-opting the Association? Ms Gillard appointed her live-in hairdresser boytoy Tim Mathieson as the Men's Health ambassador. No qualifications or experience necessary
/r/MensRights25/08/12 06:58 AM
2

thanks for this post I have been discussing this issue online with an Australian Emily's List Senator Anne Urquhart in advance of her government introducing an Australian VAWA to be known as "The National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children [but not men]" The propaganda being promoted is an Australian Human Rights factoid that "Domestic violence is the single biggest cause of homelessness in Australia". This supposedly justifies a $100M to protect "victim" women. But Senator…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:07 PM
1

“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” -- Frederick Douglass, August 4, 1857.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:42 AM
5

from the cited article "If [judge] Watkins does not want to be questioned about paying his HOA dues, all he needs to do is pay them on time. He has lived in the home for a decade or more, he should know when they are due. If people are late on child support, Watkins has been known to throw some in jail. Is this a double standard? I gave him multiple times to tell his side. He chose to attack me in a letter. I left it alone. Then he brought me into the issue in a voicemail to Smith. He falsely ac…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:27 AM
2

It seems better than trying to get a majority vote in both Houses of Parliament to remove a judge with full pension & lifelong entitlements.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:12 AM
35

This video is truly disturbing; it has gone viral for a reason. The volume of the screaming rant from the judge clipped my speakers as he admits being too angry to hear the case but refuses to recuse himself. The self-represented 60yo pastor is then mocked, repeatedly told to shut up when silent, cost orders are manufactured against him without being given opportunity to present his evidence or be heard, & then he is sent for criminal prosecution with recommendation for jail time. The judge fals…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 02:49 PM
4

Australian Parliament Rolls Back Children's Rights to Their Dad Shared Parenting in Australia dead
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:24 PM
4

a lot of religious and conservative movements in Australia with a lot of clout that really lambasted the PM over this move. Who?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:16 PM
1

Katie Holmes is obviously more well equipped to be a parent in this case. I respectfully disagree. The mother is asking for sole custody. In my view anyone that seeks to totally remove a fit and loving father from her child's life is not "the more well equipped parent". Cruise might be strange but he is more than likely a good enough parent. I'm sure Suri thinks so.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:14 AM
1

interesting comment. thanks
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:13 AM
1

Seriously, family law sucks because of clients, not because of the courts. QED, you congenital fuckwit - "Most decent lawyers will have nothing to do it"
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:59 AM
1

Thought the same thing...in the melanoma capital of far North Australia they're not going to be happy. Methinks a few protest letters to the Uni Chancellor & board might result in a vacancy in the School of Arts and Social Sciences. Apparently McLellan is not even qualified.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 11:59 PM
3

"Negangard [the Prosecutor] argued that Brewington's blog entries crossed the line, going from political speech - protected by the U.S. Constitution - to lies and "fighting words." After Brewington posted the Humphrey's home address [already widely available on the County website] on his website, the family was placed in fear. They at one point reviewed the security of their home, warned their children of Brewington's allegations, and had police escorts. "All James Humphrey did was ask Dan Brewi…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:51 AM
2

Try to settle before trial. Use a professional mediator. Try to get consent for a staggered parenting plan, that is, accept less than what you want but include provisions to increase the number of nights in the future without having to return to court. 4 of 14 nights, increase to 5 when child reaches X years, then 7 nights in three years...
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:25 AM
1

But why is the media so inclined to cover up? How often is it described as "personal problems".
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:20 AM
2

clearly the judge thought the kid undead because mom's don't lie in family court.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:18 AM
1

"Rule Number 1 of legal proceedings--never represent yourself" While I agree it is preferable to have legal representation, if only for the professional bullet shield, in family law for many people it simply becomes economically impossible. One of the most successful strategies is to seize the child and inflame and prolong the case for as long as possible for the purpose of forcing the other party into emotional and/or financial submission. When the money runs out either one goes it alone or has…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:11 AM
5

“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” -- Frederick Douglass, August 4, 1857.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:19 AM
4

Radical Feminism & greedy lawyers have moulded Family Law into an instrument of terror; a legally unimpeachable parent can be arrested for seeing his own children without government authorization. He can be charged with domestic violence or child abuse, without evidence that he has committed either crime. He can be hauled before a judge for not paying child support without proof that he actually owes it. He can even be arrested for not paying an attorney or psychotherapist whom he has not hired.…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:59 AM
1

Everyone is guilty of rape under Swedish "eye rape" law unless they couple are in a deep, meaningful relationship, in which case, it's domestic violence. The Swedish laws differentiate among three categories of rape and, unusually, invoking the concept of “unlawful coercion.” - this includes pleading [for] sex There is a category identified as “severe rape,” which involves a high degree of violence and which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison for the perpetrator; another known as “…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 02:45 AM
2

Julian Assange’s Political Honeytrap "How do I know they are fabricated? Anyone familiar with the politics of the feminist rape industry can immediately spot the setup...His first accuser is a professional feminist. “While a research assistant at a local university she had not only been the protégée of a militant feminist -academic, but held the post of ‘campus sexual equity officer’,” according to the Daily Mail. “Fighting male discrimination in all forms…was her forte.” Along with the other ac…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 03:31 PM
1

Relevant inside_the_mind_of_feminism
/r/MensRights30/06/12 12:50 PM
1

Relevant Australia – the new Saudi Arabia of radical feminism The article identifies the Emily's List women of the ALP responsible for the development of "The National Council's Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children" as the government's social policy for men: to abolish the institutional source of male privilege — the patriarchal family - and criminalise its main rivals: fathers. Remove “Pro-contact” emphasis in court for fathers and their children emphasis on permanently endi…
/r/MensRights27/06/12 03:45 PM
10

Relevant Family court judgement Prantage & Prantage [2010] FamCA 1198 Accusations of parental alienation - Interim orders to try and resume relationship of mother and children This judgement raises argument about parent alienation but also parental rejection by children. It canvasses the latest thinking of social scientists and enlightened orders for the children to enjoy the benefits of their entitlements as set out in s 60B of the Family Law Act. "If this fails, the Court has lost its chance t…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:14 PM
3

Fathers requested sole custody in 38/700 (5.4%) of cases, granted in 26 cases = 26/700 or 3.7% of cases [that is 3.7% of mothers lit a crack pipe in court]
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:05 AM
1

no. The only cases I've seen in which the husband is ordered to pay costs is if he self-represents - it's bad for business and must be discouraged.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 05:50 AM
2

A woman says "abuse" and she gets legal aid.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 05:48 AM
2

Most average people, men and women alike, have little idea what the leading lights of feminism actually think or stand for. To make it easy for you, here, therefore are some quotes from those that spearhead today's feminist thinking - the same people in some cases that advise government on social policy and family law. Marriage is slavery for women, it is to be abolished. Furthermore, marriage evolved from rape. Children tie down women and restrict their freedom, they should instead be raised by…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:25 PM
2

The GREAT SHARED PARENTING SWINDLE The industry of kiddy - profiteering marches on in the UK: The only changes coming are the slogans used After years of delays, Committees, Family Justice Reviews etc etc the Government plans to amend Section 1 of the Children Act 1989 by inserting a couple of little prompts. The changes to the Act will be along the lines of that parenting should be "shared" - and that children should have a "meaningful relationship" with both parents. And that's it. No definiti…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:57 AM
1

I hope I am wrong but cannot be sure Ms Kay is accurate on this one. According to the Father's groups directly connected to the proposed reform in the UK RealFathers4justice says "The industry of kiddy - profiteering marches on in the UK: The only changes coming are the slogans used After years of delays, Committees, Family Justice Reviews etc etc the Government plans to amend Section 1 of the Children Act 1989 by inserting a couple of little prompts. The changes to the Act will be along the lin…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 09:46 AM
0

You've missed the point. Try reading the article before commenting
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:43 PM
1

UBC Professor of sociology, Edward Kruk, has written extensively on the desperate need for children to maintain bonds with both parents after their separation. His findings show that a child's needs cannot be met by a single parent, however loving. A child must spend at least 40% of his time with a parent to establish and maintain a beneficial attachment. With respect 70:30, 80:20 is not shared parenting
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:39 PM
6

Just substitute feminist Gillard for feminist Obama in the story. The Life of Julia (Gillard) ad - with the glaring omission of a father for her child is an insidious attack on the institution of the family, and endorsement of bureaugamy (married to State welfare) - clearly targets single women, especially those with children. And for a good political reason. There are 10 million more single women than single men in the United States. More than a quarter of the voting population, they are the gr…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:17 PM
1

Maria Sharapova in the final won only 38 points. That works out as a tidy $30,263 a point. That would double with the endorsements, sponsorship, etc.... I wouldn't mind equal pay
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:12 PM
1

Related article The mother has accused the father of sexually abusing their daughter. This appears to be based on the say so of a clairvoyant who predicted it would happen. This is the Magistrate Tom Altobelli's reasons for judgement Gaylard & Cain [2012] FMCAfam 501 "...sexual abuse concern arose from alleged masturbatory behaviour by 3yo, a rash and the father's use of the word “sexy” in describing his daughter's clothing".... no contact for 2 years Although the judge found the father did not …
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:55 PM
1

Yes, we're all entitled to your opinion and passive aggressive condescending indignation like the 29 yo OWS-superannuated community college arts grad home attic-dwelling softcock that you are. Perhaps you can recommend your own therapist
/r/MensRights10/06/12 06:20 AM
0

Shut up you arseclown. The GALP government is the most treacherous, incompetent, unprincipled, hopeless at communicating and persuading even on worthy reforms, timorous, clumsy, error prone, aimless, wasted, the most scandal ridden since Khemlani, gauche, undisciplined, and a complete disgrace, pox, herpes and syphillis on the body politic ever not to be elected. I could put up with with them trying to change the weather with tax but when they unilaterally enact legislation that stops me being a…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 02:43 PM
-1

FFS, the misnamed Australia subreddit is the haven of the last 28 people supporting the greens/alp - really anyone who still supports these bottom feeders should be rounded up and put in re-education camps. Can a few readers please go there and vote up this article to prevent it disappearing into oblivion. It is important that the public be aware of what is happening if there is to be any hope of the next government fixing these terrible feminist laws
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:30 AM
0

And it doesn’t stop at family court. The agenda of the radical feminist government is to incorporate these subjective definitions of family violence, rape, child abuse, that effectively eviscerate the presumption of innocence, into all the State legislatures as part of the National Plan to reduce violence against women [but not men”. There will be Federal domestic violence registries, prohibiting travel, restricting employment, board membership, election to political office, … in an orgy of liti…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:19 AM
5

Unilateral Family Violence Amendments underhandedly end Shared Parenting in Australia. Let's be clear about what Ms “affirmative-action” Roxon means in her op-ed. Family violence has been so widely redefined that is non-violence and subjective, that is, one has to disprove what the accuser thinks. If she says that being called a naughty word, raising your voice, causing ‘annoyance’ or ‘emotional distress,’ [e.g. becoming unemployed or poor] or just not doing what she wants makes her afraid then …
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:16 AM
0

Something about the homicide rate against women increased by a factor of 22 since the implementation of VAWA. One argument is that the best (or only) defence against a corrupted justice system is to kill to accuser.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 12:23 AM
2

The Family law (family violence) amendments to end shared parenting have just been enacted today. These repeal the protections against parental alienation and penalties for false allegations supposedly to encourage unknown "victims" of DV to come forth. The reality is the shared parenting reform caused divorce litigation (profit) to drop 22%. This "reform" is the correction by a multibillion dollar divorce-DV-child protection industry. The judgement is an advertisement for business.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 09:05 AM
3

This is the Magistrate Tom Altobelli's reasons for judgement Gaylard & Cain [2012] FMCAfam 501 ...sexual abuse concern arose from 3yo’s alleged masturbatory behaviour, a rash and the father's use of the word “sexy” in describing his daughter's clothing.... no contact for 2 years
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:57 AM
13

FM Tom Altobelli, ordered the dad's contact to be restricted to letters and birthday cards. Why? The Mother had the delusional belief that he was a child sex abuser. The judge's letter cannot be opened until the children turn 14. They are now 11yo & 6yo girl. I'll go out on a limb here and suggest the Mother's delusional fear would have been immediately cured by the judge by threatening to give sole custody to the father. And how can be in the best interest of the child to isolate them with a nu…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:29 AM
15

The Senate voted against the Motion to Proceed to discussion of this terrible bill. The yea's required three-fifths of the full Senate, normally 60 votes. Note that the Bill sponsor Harry Reid voted NO as a procedural maneuver to reserve himself the right to bring the bill to the floor again.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 11:40 AM
24

The misnamed "Paycheck Fairness Act" based on contrived figuresis another costly item on the feminists’ wish lists that would allow the federal government to artificially inflate salaries for jobs traditionally held by women, while freezing wages for jobs traditionally performed by men and empowering women to sue their employers to enforce these controlled wages. It is a “job killing, trial attorney bonanza.” that would encourage employers to view female applicants as instigators of lawsuits ins…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 04:31 AM
1

My last letter was one sentence long, merely pointing out that an MP was claiming a presumption of innocence after his government made changes to domestic violence laws removing any such presumption from fathers accused of DV. Well done, I'm inspired to write to my local rag. My member is an Emily Lister directly responsible for the underhanded & unilateral roll back of shared parenting and the implementation of the Australian VAWA. Let's see her explain that to the male voters. And the Minister…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:42 AM
1

link blocked "The owner of this website (www.comicbooktherapy.com) does not allow hotlinking to that resource (/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/wow-nerd-south-park-580.jpg). (Ref. 1011)"
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:17 AM
1

Maybe society would value a father's involvement with his own children if taxpayers realised what it costs them to subsidise single parent families. Dr Steven Baskerville in his article How our tax dollars subsidize family breakup quantifies a minimum $112 billion annual taxpayer cost from high rates of divorce and unmarried childbearing. It identifies national, state and local costs which account for more than $1 trillion in the last decade thrown away on massive welfare increases, the mass cri…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:11 AM
1

That bloody useless Governor's skull is filled with smashed arseholes! to use a lovely piece of Australian vernacular.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:11 PM
1

Not all men are or remain optimistic - Killer facts about male suicide "IF 4,000 women a year died from custody related suicide there would be an uproar but desperate men taking desperate measures are simply ignored...Even when men kill themselves with the express purpose of political protest, even when they do it in the most visible, attention-grabbing way possible, even when they leave a note expressly laying out why they did what they did, feminist/vested interests do everything they can to s…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:52 PM
3

Totally. The father is on parole, effectively controlled by the hope that the mother or the Court will see reason at the next hearing and reward his good behaviour with more time with his kids - if he can save up enough money, after child support, alimony, etc to try again. This is the reason the judiciary & bar & feminists so fiercely resist the presumption of equal shared care after separation. This reduces litigated divorce almost immediately by 50% and stops repeat business. Forcing dads to …
/r/MensRights24/05/12 09:38 AM
3

The State of NH has a Parliamentary Redress of Grievances Committee. It is now hearing complaints against this judge and other family court judges with power to impeach them. Complainants are coming out of the woodwork. One such person is the bailiff in one family court who says he's seen “widespread corruption” among family court judges. We are confronted with the same family court corruption here in Australia but without an equivalent of the Grievances Committee. However, there is hope. A huma…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:28 AM
3

Dr. David Vandenberg lost his daughter to a corrupt and possibly illegal family court almost three years ago. Although never adjudicated to be unfit or lacking as a parent, his daughter was taken from him and it took him 2 1/2 years to get even minimal visitation with her. All that has cost him some $150,000. The outrageous story of how all that came to pass appears in this video interview of Dr. Vandenberg (YouTube, 5/8/12) The mother simply made allegations of child abuse in an ex-parte hearin…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:27 AM
2

Female voters are the majority outnumbering males by the millions. 70% of unmarried females vote left. They vote for welfare protection & social justice [wealth redistribution] which the Democrats promise. When women marry they tend to switch to conservative by a 40 point spread. Hence, the anti-family feminists have democrat support to push through their legislative agenda to "protect" women by criminalising, impoverishing & disenfranchising men from marriage & family. They create more single w…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:58 AM
2

It gives me great schadenfreude to know we give leftarded professional feminist victimologists the shits, AB. Hugs & etc
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:42 AM
1

Are you seriously arguing that it is "extremely difficult" for a women to get a protection order?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:30 AM
1

Dr Kruk's article is well worth reading. Contrary to perceptions propagated by anti-father groups and certain members of the news media, equal parenting between high-conflict parents tends to produce better child outcomes than sole custody and even reduces the amount of conflict over time. The current system of custody decisions encourages conflict by rewarding the more "hostile" parent - mother - with sole custody. Most acrimonious parents can successfully learn to minimize conflict when motiva…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:48 PM
2

Sex worker allegations lead to judge Mark Griffin's resignation
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:23 PM
1

mmph… lips, don’t unpurse….mmmmph… bwahahahahahahahahahaha…… Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Italy .... I must have missed a sarc tag?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:06 PM
-1

It's more than amusing, the faeces throwing shrieking harpy mouthing asinine comments is a blatantly self-serving liar. He's also a lawyer but I repeat myself.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:53 PM
-4

France has officially gone down the toilet. They've always liked big government, massive welfare and economic protectionism, but they’re going further even though the results are clear to see. All the clever enterprising ones learnt English and got out years ago. I wonder how long the average German worker is going to put up with supporting the life styles choices of the rest of Europe.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:21 PM
1

Agreed. The parenting plan should have provision for special days,... Mother's day, Father's day, child's birthday, Christmas,... If you file a contempt of court application for denying Mother's day it will not go well for you. Further, you will likely want Father's day if it occurs in her time and it will at some stage. Make a reasonable proposal to amend the current agreement by consent to include special days. You don't get makeup time. Every weekend for a 2yo is not bad. You will not likely …
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:44 AM
4

Lyrics: ...And the family courts? Don't even them started When the process is over men are nothin’ but a wallet When his pockets are empty they stack him on a prison shelf Only option left in his mind? Fuckin’ kill himself Suicide rates overflow among men But they ain't the right gender so they garner no attention Only thing you'll hear is bout some deadbeat dad Vanished from the world money left on his tab The majority of the homeless got a dick But you wouldn't know According to the media men …
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:00 PM
2

The two primary ways women achieve wealth are divorce and inheritance
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:08 AM
2

Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:03 AM
1

Yes, but why do they want mothers to get custody of the children? The custodial parent gets the house, a larger proportion of assets, the father's future income and the kids. Children are the levers by which one forces social change. Remove the paternal influence and children become social putty in the hands of institutional bureaucrats of government sponsored daycare & collectivised child rearing, and the educational social engineers of all sorts for whom kids serve as so much grist for the mil…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:00 AM
3

The publicity itself is a win
/r/MensRights11/05/12 10:07 AM
1

I don't see 5 of 14 nights as a victory. IMHO the Barristocracy won - government of the people, by the lawyers, for the lawyers. 5 of 14 nights + half school holidays (35%) does not allow one to share in the parenting of children. Any real possibility of mediating out of court settlements is defeated, parents are forced to fight in court to try to get real shared parenting and then further litigation is required to get more parenting time. Parents are trapped in the system for years while having…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:48 AM
1

A presumption of equal shared parenting of children after separation
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:45 AM
5

Definitely add Australia - the new Saudi Arabia of radical feminism
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:19 AM
1

Stephen Baskerville wrote a persuasive article on the issue of a Men's voting bloc "Which Party Will Win the Parents' Vote?" "With some 20 million “non-custodial” parents having lost their children to divorce and separation, this issue of child custody laws touches virtually every family in America. Many are African-Americans and other minorities who generally vote either Democratic or not at all. ... no political party can forever ignore a voting bloc this massive. The roughly 20 million childl…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:04 PM
1

Which MPs in Australia? They would be brave or stupid given the current feminist domination of the Australian parliament.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:48 PM
2

children from a fatherless home are: 5 times more likely to commit suicide. 32 times more likely to run away. 20 times more likely to have behavioral disorders. 14 times more likely to commit rape 9 times more likely to drop out of high school. 10 times more likely to abuse chemical substances. 9 times more likely to end up in a state-operated institution. 20 times more like to end up in prison.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 02:06 AM
1

It's more than a "travesty" of justice it's a legal scam. Family lawyers are like robber barons or a parasitic class of indolent peerage who produce nothing but plunder the life savings of working families by holding their children to false allegation ransom. These allegations are adjudicated by judges - elected by brethren lawyers to protect their business - who are themselves so crooked that the family court is hardly more than a system of organised crime hiding behind the euphemism of "in the…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:35 AM
1

Numerous recent studies are showing trend that many women are in fact receiving much higher pay than similarly situated men. And, as Warren Farrell once said, "If women get paid less than men why would anyone hire a man?" Please go to Debate Club page below and give a thumbs up to Christina Hoff Sommers, Penny Nance, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, and Sabrina Schaeffer presenting the argument against the misnamed "Paycheck Fairness Act". We need to win this debate and stop another harmful piece of gende…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:06 AM
4

The Paycheck Fairness Act looks like common sense, but instead of helping women it will hurt all workers. The legislation, built on 30 years of spurious advocacy research, will impose unnecessary and onerous requirements on employers.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:04 AM
1

Two German doctors have been ordered to pay child support to a woman whom they artificially inseminated with her husband's sperm. Twins were born as a result of the procedure, but it was all done without the husband's knowledge.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:08 PM
1

In my view we need to organise & coordinate a callout group to counter the inevitable ambush & down vote into oblivion on the misnamed /australia subreddit. It seems the last 30% that can't see past their dreadlocks habituate it and anyone who disagrees with their feminist dear leader nuttery must be “rabid right wing and misogynist ”. Really anyone who still supports these bottom feeders should be rounded up and put in re-education camps.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:55 AM
1

On the other hand if 80% of the population supports shared parenting of children after separation then Abbott should be shouting from the rooftops that the ALP have unilaterally & underhandedly legislated to make this impossible. Further it is not certain the conservatives will control the upper house.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:51 AM
2

I've been getting feedback from some shadow ministers & parliamentary secretaries that they are very well aware of the family law sabotage. Some have hinted, others said review. Nevertheless hard to trust without a policy commitment. Libs were in government for 30 years of family court persecution. And Family law-DV-child protection is a multi-billion dollar. Maybe not politically smart to publicly tell them their profit is going to be halved. Learn from the Mining backlash. To original poster. …
/r/MensRights01/05/12 01:12 PM
3

Every conservative male leader in the Western world supposedly has a female vote problem - Abbott, Cameron, Bush, Romney.... Let's face it 70% of unmarried women vote left. They vote for the party that offers the most welfare handouts & "social justice" (wealth redistribution) However, the obliteration of the ALP in the QLD state election presages a virtual conservative dictatorship in the next Federal parliament for a generation. Abbott should not have to worry about buying feminist votes with …
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:45 PM
1

And an oldie but a goodie comment "This is why you skip the legal process once accused and kill the accuser straight away" Baskerville for Nobel prize.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 06:28 AM
8

The "misogynist" label - last defence of the indefensible
/r/MensRights01/05/12 06:21 AM
2

Let's be accurate...call it the "Violence Against Families Act" or the "Feminist Full Employment Bill" VAWA - aka the National DV Plan in Australia - a hateful ideology, fraudulent social engineering, and outrageous lies
/r/MensRights01/05/12 03:55 AM
5

The Swedish state TV & Radio review board have banned it from ever being broadcasted again. That's high recommendation
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:20 AM
2

WAVE - Women Against VAWA Excesses have recently published a series of articles pointing out the problems of this legislation http://womenagainstvawa.org/the-violence-against-women-act-ignores-half-the-problem-2/
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:10 AM
2

Sir Les Shorten They're laughing even in London and the Huffington Post is smirking,too He has turned from contender to laughing stock in less than a week. Labor’s best and brightest. Kind of like being the cleanest whore in Bangkok.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:14 AM
1

Thank Your Senators for Voting Against VAWA "The Senate just voted 68:31 to reauthorize the so-called Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) through 2016, with all of the no votes coming from Republican men. Originally passed in 1994, VAWA is feminist pork that has already squandered over one billion dollars each year on programs that have done little or no good for real victims of domestic violence. Instead, the funds been allocated on a highly political basis to fill feminist coffers and to lobby f…
/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:09 AM
2

Thank Your Senators for Voting Against VAWA "The Senate just voted 68:31 to reauthorize the so-called Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) through 2016. Originally passed in 1994, VAWA is feminist pork that has already squandered over one billion dollars each year on programs that have done little or no good for real victims of domestic violence. Instead, the funds been allocated on a highly political basis to fill feminist coffers and to lobby for feminist objectives and laws. Although every spend…
/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:01 AM
2

It's actually a lot more serious than the stupidity suggests. The MP, who was bribed with the Speakership to switch sides in a hung parliament, is caught in PM Gillard's own IR laws which remove the presumption of innocence in sexual harassment charges. The AG and government don't seem to know their own laws. AG Nicola - affirmative action - Roxon: "We cannot live in a world - we might as well have no legal system if we just say as soon as the allegation is made, that then it's proven true". Sma…
/r/MensRights28/04/12 04:03 AM
1

Larry Pickering cartoon Tim is the PM's gay boyfriend. The speaker of the House of Representatives of Australia is charged with sexual harassment - making “unwelcome sexual advances” and "sexual comments" - to force a relationship with his gay employee.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 03:43 AM
2

The equal shared parenting battle is being fought on a state by state basis. We lose this then they can get away with it next in your state. If a public official who plainly gives not a tinker's ‘damn’ about fathers and their relationships with their children is confronted then the next shill might not be so forthcoming. We pick an MP like Limmer who has made himself vulnerable by clearly sticking his neck out for vested interests and failing to do the right thing about family law. We focus all …
/r/MensRights28/04/12 02:17 AM
5

VAWA a hateful ideology, fraudulent social engineering, and outrageous lies. One learns to assume that whatever the bill is named is the exact opposite of what's in it. It should be called the Violence Against Families Act or the Feminist Fulltime Employment Bill.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 07:02 AM
3

Minnesota’s Equal Parenting legislation that passed the state House of Representatives 80-53 last week has effectively been killed by one man, Senator Warren Limmer. This shill for the family law industry is blocking the bill being presented to the Senate for a vote. This is the 13th consecutive year such dodgy tactics have been used. Shared parenting will not happen while this man is in office. It is beyond disgraceful for Warren Limmer to block a vote on this legislation which 80% of the publi…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:33 AM
1

Feminist extremists are not content with destroying American culture they are exporting VAWA around the world. The Australian VAWA - aka the National DV Plan - a hateful ideology, fraudulent social engineering, and outrageous lies No Man Can Expect Justice In Family Court An iron triangle of lawyers, judges, and women's groups have fashioned the divorce-dv laws into instruments of terror to disenfranchise, criminalise and pauperise men. They have declared to women: If you file for divorce, we wi…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:58 AM
1

IS this some sort of troll fantasy?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:06 AM
2

relevent: Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies Logical fallacies are often sneakily used by politicians and the media to fool people. Don't be fooled! This website has been designed to help you identify and call out dodgy logic wherever it may raise its ugly, incoherent head.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 02:57 PM
0

You can stick your head in the idealistic sand but their actions speak much louder than your words, bro.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 02:41 PM
-1

And what if it's true you condescending prick. And what if an affirmative-action lesbian Senator openly married to a transman & her status of women compatriot controlled the Senate inquiry that recommended shared parenting reform should be rollbacked, made a finding of fact that women never make false allegations and protection orders are not used for advantage. That the justice system should be trashed to protect women, that the presumption of innocence for men and protections from perjury are …
/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:44 AM
-1

Only a minute percentage of gays actually want to get married. It's more about browbeating their fellow citizens, who they assume are stupid and uncultured. Well hands off our culture, arseholes.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:14 PM
3

I disagree. How can a person's attitudes, personal biases, leadership be completely independent of their life choices and therefore not influence subsequent actions. This is just human nature in my view. It is also evident in this PM's legislative actions that she is likely aggrieved by men and supposed patriarchal oppression. How likely is it Gillard would survive the personal scrutiny Americans subject their presidential candidates to?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:12 PM
0

Oh fuckoff you totalitarian weenie. It is entirely ironic that gays seek to assert their right to identity by erasing a millennia-held element of cultural identity that applies to straight people. Hey celebrate culture, but not YOUR culture. And if you are an Australian you would know that gays here already have all the rights of a married couple - barrels of ink are pissed off arguing over the semantics of wearing a wedding ring while real fathers are suiciding over losing their children to fal…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:50 PM
-4

shacked up with a male "hairdresser" - gay charade, in the closet, etc... and atheism is part of Marxism for Christsake's. Australia's a Christian nation why do you find it offensive to point this out. I am sick and tired of being bullied by small vested interest groups over matters that shouldn't even rate on the radar of life. Gay marriage. I can't even believe this is a serious ‘issue’. It is not homophobic to oppose it. The raison d’etre of marriage is procreation and birth. Secondly, marria…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:29 PM
3

What respect are you even aware of the legislative "reform" this PM is inflicting on Australian men? I refer the underhanded and unilateral repeal of shared parenting reform, the introduction of American VAWA gender laws, the implementation of CEDAW as official social policy, 20-40% "wage gap" increases to predominantly female social workers, government funded daycare & collectivised child rearing facilities anticipating the re-engineering of "patriachal" family, billions allocated to pursuing t…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:47 PM
1

Have you even read the links? Clearly, removing the financial incentives for divorce, namely, that she does not automatically keep the kids with house, assets, benefits and a check every month but has to get a job means more families would be more inclined to stay together. Whether it is a direct mathematical half proportionality is irrelevant. For those that don't a presumption of equal shared care means their is a good possibility that the parents will be able mediate a consented parenting arr…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:30 PM
1

It's Orwellian for the chief justice to openly write to the AG asking that people be allowed to lie in court. Twelve months later the law is amended to repeal protections and penalties against knowingly false allegations - litigated divorce (profit) had dropped 22%. Is this in the best interests of the child or lawyers?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 12:20 PM
1

I respectfully suggest that the savings from halving the litigated divorce rate, thereby keeping families together, is itself sufficient to justify implementing a presumption of equal shared care. Further much of the harm done to children occurs during the prolonged and inflamed "winner take all" process of litigated divorce itself. This harm is compounded by losing the benefit of a fit and loving parent which in turn opens the Pandora's box of personal and social pathologies directly associated…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 12:02 PM
3

I am having trouble with accessing the link article however from other sources I believe that the Bill was the result of 13 years work by Molly Olson, a volunteer lobbyist and founder of the Center for Parental Responsibility. The chief author of the Bill is Rep. Peggy Scott, R-Andover. Unsurprisingly, the opposition comes from a family lawyer Michael Dittberner. Divorce and custody are the cash cow of the judiciary, constituting some 35-50% of civil litigation,[43] and also bring employment and…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 09:42 AM
-4

I bring facts to the table, you bring your opinions. If you've got nothing more I'll leave it there.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:45 AM
1

Is anyone else having problems with the link?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:33 AM
2

50% in three years in countries implementing a presumption of equal shared care.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:33 AM
2

"any suggestion that virtual visitation is acceptable as parent/child contact is yet another frank attempt to separate fathers from their children. That's because the overwhelming majority of non-custodial parents are fathers – about 83% at last count. It's a response to the increased ability of fathers to stop move-aways. The very concept that a father can parent via social media is so obviously flawed as to need no further comment. Viewing and talking to them on Skype is just not good enough. …
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:29 AM
2

It is a fallacy that shared parenting will cost more. In fact shared parenting would reduce litigated divorce by half and save taxpayers an estimated $56BN/yr in all the costs associated with single parent families. A study by Institute for American Values found divorce and single parent childrearing cost taxpayers at least $112 billion each year or more than $1 trillion over the last decade. This estimate includes the costs to federal, state, and local government of the justice (19.3) & health …
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:20 AM
1

Excellent riposte, I'll flog that … although perhaps a more accurate description of the change is from the best interest of the lawyers to the best interests of everyone else.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:06 AM
-12

We have a childless, unmarried, atheist, 1970's radical feminist Marxist Prime Minister shacked up with a homosexual hairdresser, appointed to be a Men's ambassador, heading a feminist-gay dominated government dependent on openly gay Green extremist for power. These ideologues are pursuing a massive irreversible "equality" social engineering agenda knowing this is their only chance before being massacred at the next election. Australia - the new Saudi Arabia of radical feminism
/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:01 AM
1

Stern is the wannabe socialist dear leader Presumably the number of visits correlate with Presidential influence "He supported Barack Obama's presidential candidacy with SEIU spending approximately $60.7 million to help elect Obama to the White House, deploying some 100,000 pro-Obama volunteers during the campaign. Stern went on to become an immensely influential advisor to the Obama administration. As of October 30, 2009, Stern had visited the White House 22 times since Obama's inauguration -- …
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:51 AM
1

Rubbish. You made a foolish and inflammatory statement which was appropriately challenged "most feminists believe that both men and women should be able to choose whether to stay home with the kids" mmph… lips, don’t unpurse….mmmmph… bwahahahahahahahahahaha…… But do keep making shit up though, perhaps you'll be offered a job in NOW.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:44 AM
1

In fact Steinem had a change of heart late in life - a lonely, childless, loveless life she then realised family was important.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:06 AM
1

What about the politicians who rely on "experts" for legislation and public policy?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:57 AM
1

The radical feminists in the 1970's advocated for equal shared care of children after divorce. However, most women wanted to keep their children and the policy was quickly changed. Children has since become the political pawns for all sorts of preferential treatment, unearned compensation and legislative reverse discriminations ... for the children.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:42 PM
1

seriously, your citing huffingpost as evidence?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:27 PM
1

Imho you are correct in asserting feminism by careerism does feed the tax monster but the ideology now goes far beyond this as the defining cause.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:25 PM
1

Bullshit...Are you medicated, because it doesn't seem to be working. you self flagellating lunatic
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:07 PM
1

There are so many such incidents I think we have to stop assuming that the laws are being abused but rather they doing precisely what they were designed to do, that is, to increase political power & litigation profit for lawyers who fund re-election. As Ayn Rand, wrote in “Atlas Shrugged” "Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them broken. We're after power and we mean it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is …
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:28 AM
2

Why is it ridiculous? The Qld state ALP had 28% in the polls (1% more than the federal ALP now has) before losing 40 seats in the election. That decimation left the state ALP only 8 seats in Parliament which is less than the number required to qualify as a political party status. Personally, I hope the feminist-gay dominated affirmative-action ALP is wiped out.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:31 AM
2

imho when debunking the "wage gap" myth it is important to emphasize that it is not an issue of equal pay for equal work - such overt discrimination has been illegal for 40 years - but equal pay for "comparable" work. In short, people who choose flexible work hours in safe, air-conditioned offices with maternity leave want equal pay to those who work full time in dangerous occupations exposed to the elements. They want equality the easy way. Feminists seek equal (or more) pay for LESS HOURS AT E…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 03:13 AM
5

Greens Senator & spokesperson for the Status of Women, Lee Rhiannon "The gender gap in retirement is stark. The Australian Human Rights Commission quotes statistics showing that the average super payout for women is a third that of men, at $37,000 compared to $110,000. "Part-time work, caring responsibilities and lower pay all contribute to the superannuation inequities between men and women. "Women live longer than men yet have less super in their pocket. A government review of superannuation p…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:24 AM
1

PM Julia Gillard, a childless, unmarried, atheist, 1970's radical feminist, underhandedly and unilaterally rolled back shared parenting reform, is implementing an Australian VAWA, trashed the justice system with gender laws, recommended 19-40% pay increases for predominately female social workers in anticipation of institutional child care and collectivised child rearing as women are forced into the workforce - at the expense of men. The Emily's list feminist dominated Australian government is p…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:02 AM
1

ME Bar Counsel Recommends Discipline for ADA Mary N. Kellett Maine State Bar has recommended that Assistant District Attorney Mary N. Kellett be disciplined for 9 counts of legal and ethical misconduct in her prosecution of Vladek Filler, a clearly innocent father accused by his ex-wife during custody proceedings of sexually abusing their daughter. Despite the complete absence of evidence against him, ADA Mary Kellett not only prosecuted Filler, but violated numerous ethical codes, to get a conv…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:19 AM
2

She should be incarcerated & bankrupted - like her victims
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:14 AM
1

consider the "kids for cash" scandal which rocked Luzerne County, Penn., in 2009. For ten years, the Mid Atlantic Youth Service Corporation, which specializes in private prisons for juvenile offenders, paid two judges to jail youths and send them to private prison facilities. The judges, who made over $2.6 million in the scam, had more than 5,000 kids come through their courtrooms and sent many of them to prison for petty crimes such as stealing DVDs from Wal-Mart and trespassing in vacant build…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:57 AM
3

As Ayn Rand wrote in “Atlas Shrugged” "Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against…. We're after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you'd better get wise to it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, o…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:50 AM
4

One wonders if Gov. Walker, facing recall, is pandering to the feminists for the single women's vote.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:40 PM
1

No, I disagree with your dad's lawyer - who will likely screw him when the time comes, namely, in the court waiting rooms. The police involvement will be construed as conflict regardless of whether charges were laid or not. This and the fact that she claims to afraid is sufficient for the anti-father biased family judge to believe her. No further evidence required.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:19 AM
11

ABC News did an interesting sting operation on paternity fraud. They wanted to see how people would react on learning that a pregnant woman was lying to her boyfriend about his paternity. So ABC hired three actors, Eliza to play the “pregnant” girlfriend, Emma to play her friend and confidante and John to play the ex-boyfriend who thinks he's the dad but isn't. The actors repeatedly played out the "what will I do" scenario intentionally allowing patrons to overhear and presenting them opportunit…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:45 AM
1

Baskerville is the hero of men's rights. His writings should be nominated for the Noble Prize. Articles
/r/MensRights08/04/12 03:03 AM
1

Second wives are also being screwed by their new husband's financial shakedown. These are, and should be, some of the most vocal against a divorce-child support racket that is hardly more than a system of organised crime.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 02:35 AM
2

The latest feminist nonsense in Australia is that the government, that is, us the taxpayers, should subsidise single mothers with retirement funds. They claim that child caring at home is a job, or they are otherwise disadvantaged from obtaining one, for which they are entitled to superannuation or 501K plan
/r/MensRights08/04/12 02:29 AM
4

"The left is content to let this problem [fatherlessness] persist because 70 percent of unmarried women voted for Barack Obama for president. They vote for the party that offers the richer subsidies ... By a colossal 40+ point spread, unmarried women voted for Barack Obama by 70-to-29 percent." - Phyllis Schafley http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2008/nov08/08-11-21.html reference http://www.gqrr.com/index.php?ID=2282
/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:35 AM
6

and the results of pandering to single mothers 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. Seventy-two percent of juvenile murderers and 60 percent of rapists come from single-mother homes. Seventy percent of teenage births, dropouts, suicides, runaways, juvenile delinquents, and child murderers involve children raised by single mothers. Girls raised without fathers are more sexually promiscuous and more likely to end up di…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:49 AM
5

some excellent comments on the article worth repeating here "The GOP has a culture problem, not a women problem. Women that are married break just over 50% for them. Somehow women stopped being embarrassed and ashamed of having children on their own, and because doing that is hard work they prefer candidates that will transfer money from others to help lighten their load. You know what else would lighten their load? being responsible and finding a committed partner to share it with. single women…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:48 AM
30

Wrongfully convicted of rape and incarcerated for 17 years, a man owes the state $111,000 in child support for the time he spent behind bars. Inevitably the State will return him to jail for the child support debt he couldn't pay because the State had falsely imprisoned him. This is the insanity of the Bradley amendment just passed into law in Australia as the "Other Measures" of Gillard's family law "reform". God help us.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:56 PM
1

Flood's misrepresentation of data to exclude men in effect infantilizes women. They only exist as victims, not as masters of their fate or even possible abusers. Women, in this conceptual world, can never hope to empower themselves, except through the largesse of of the government. Women deserve better than that. It is time for a better approach that protects families and acknowledges reality rather than living in a world of of dangerous stereotypes.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:49 PM
1

The White Ribbon organisation published a document which used erroneous ‘facts and statistics’ to downplay, diminish and report incorrectly about male victims of violence in order to highlight the tragedy of female victims of violence. It is the ideological propaganda precursor to introducing an Australian VAWA known as "The National Plan to reduce violence against women and their children" This is a response to those mistakes: Full response.pdf Men’s Health Australia (MHA) believes that violenc…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 10:44 AM
1

This hideously deformed perspective was conceived in the petri-dish of a women-worshipful ideology, implanted at university in the mind of a justice surrogate and delivered in a courtroom" Presumably this refers to "Gender Studies" - the Klu Klux Klan of radical feminism. Such "Hate group" activism and recruitment to activism should not be the responsibility of universities to promote and certainly should not be paid for by us, the taxpayer. "gender studies" should compete for private funding li…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 01:06 AM
-1

The feminist Left's tactic has been to clothe their radical policy innovations, such as the Carbon Tax, the underhanded repeal of shared parenting and implementing an Australian VAWA, as "for our children". The shameless repetition of this dogma by the childless Gillard has been sickening, using children as leverage to attack family, and now she claims we're sexist.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 09:32 AM
1

help always come back to "social constructs"; code for the feminist dream of an androgynous society. If we're all feminised there won't be any discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 09:04 AM
4

Thanks for your response, although I must respectfully disagree. Plato might have understood the principles of democracy two thousand years ago but the mechanics to properly implement those principles as real participatory democracy are only now manifesting. The Swiss & Iceland model gives citizens the right to call a referendum via a petition to modify the constitution and/or veto a law adopted by the elected legislature, allows initiatives, usually put forward by 100,000 members of the general…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:59 AM
1

I seem to recall reading somewhere that the first women's libber's sought equal shared care of children after separation. This was rejected by majority of mothers who wanted to keep their children. Hence the policy back flip to increase numbers.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:30 AM
-1

No special rights for people lack rational thought. bye, buy feminism
/r/MensRights02/04/12 06:16 AM
1

the internet provides the interactive means to real democracy. It provides us with the information & scrutinising ability to take the decision making from behind the closed doors of the traditional controlling hegemonies. Population size is irrelevant
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:22 AM
2

Swiss style direct participatory democracy must be the future. Ability to submit & veto legislation by people's petition/referendum. Only way to stop the massive political power of multi-billion dollar conglomerates like the Divorce-DV industry.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:07 AM
5

twice selected never elected She stabbed the elected first term PM in the back to take his job - supposedly after he lost direction: code for he hesitated at the feminist pork. Gillard then lost the popular vote at the next election but no party had enough seats to form government. She bribed the independents & Green extremists for power and then set about a legislative agenda diametrically opposite to what she campaigned on. Australians (men in particular) absolutely loathe her. Trying to excus…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:56 AM
6

Don't play the sexist card here Strumpetincinerator. Gillard is a pathological lying, mendacious, untruthful, deluding, dissembling, fabricated, faked, fudged, paltering, prevaricating, BS'ing, shared parenting repealing, gender laws persecutor, unmarried, childless, atheist, Marxist,1970's radical feminist SEXIST bitch. She and her Emily's List cronies underhandedly and unilaterally rolled back the weak shared parenting reform of 2006 and is now attempting to introduce gender laws in an Austral…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:38 AM
1

Thanks CheapCheepChirp for that link. The Birds "a certain forum has suffered the same fate as many of those before it, which those of you who are veterans in the MRM have noted many times. It starts off pretty cutting edge, then gets bigger, then the women show up, then it blows to bits as everyone starts getting banned because they have to start watching their mouth, or they get shamed by the women into making the MRM about what "women" want it to be" Insightful stuff and Funny cuz its true. I…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 01:42 AM
1

Most people are beginning to understand that feminism is not about gender equality, but about affirmative action [reverse discrimination] for girls and women, at boys' and men's and family's expense
/r/MensRights02/04/12 12:33 AM
0

The assessor's, the family courts, are embarrassingly anti-father biased as evidenced by their finding only 17% of fathers are fit to share in the parenting of their own children after separation. No reasonable person can accept this as impartial or rational Anyone who has had the misfortune to be involved with child protection or welfare knows that male persecution is the norm ... and it's not due to poor funding
/r/MensRights01/04/12 08:24 AM
0

1 80% of the population supports shared parenting of children after separation. The Gillard government did not have the guts to say outright that it was rolling back the shared parenting reform. Instead they underhandedly and unilaterally sabotaged the legislation by fiddling with definitions and primary statutory considerations to leave the facade of shared parenting but making it effectively impossible to obtain in court unless the mother agrees - in which case the parents wouldn't be in famil…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 08:12 AM
0

Of course it's feminist pork. 70% of single/divorced women vote for welfare protection and social justice [wealth redistribution] of the Big Sister party. Shared parenting reduces their powerbase. The family violence (sole custody) amendments and the Australian VAWA - known as "The National Plan to reduce violence against women and their children" - are deliberate social engineering policies to decimate traditional conservative voting middle class family and transfer that patriarchal wealth thro…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 06:38 AM
2

What is unreasonable? How does one disprove what the accuser thinks? Expanding the definition of family violence to be non-violence and making it subjective, or whatever the accuser thinks it is, effectively removes the presumption of innocence for men. In addition the statutory protections & disincentives for false allegations have been repealed to permit perjury in family court. In short the family violence (sole custody) amendments trash the justice system to make it impossible for fathers to…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 06:10 AM
1

Men's Health Australia issued a response to the erroneous ‘facts and statistics’ provided by the chief architect of the Australian VAWA known as "The National Plan to reduce Violence Against Women and their Children" http://www.menshealthaustralia.net/content/what-about-the-men-white-ribbon-men-and-violence-a-response.html
/r/MensRights01/04/12 04:31 AM
1

fair enough, I usually do try to differentiate equalitists or social feminism from radical/extremist/gender feminism but it can become confusing and is cumbersome. What name do you suggest?
/r/MensRights01/04/12 04:12 AM
1

Regardless of the article's literary merit it is an effort to raise society awareness of and thereby resistance to the feminist ideology that men are innately abusive and women their victims. Such lies are being used to undermine the fundamental principles of the justice system, namely, the presumption of innocence and protections from false allegations, as outdated and that the burden of proof in crimes that are committed against women should be reversed. In short the American VAWA is being exp…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 03:52 AM
3

please explain - too tired & drunk & hetero
/r/MensRights31/03/12 04:03 AM
2

With these misandrist antifamily laws a woman pretty much has to light up a crack pipe in a court room to not get the kids, the house, half the assets and a check every month. That's why the great majority of divorces are initiated by women: it's a wealth transfer from men to women. And the children pay the price: generation after generation of fatherless children is the direct cause of many of our social ills. We need a rebuttable presumption of equal shared parenting of children after separati…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:58 AM
4

It is not just pride but more likely the financial rewards involved. The way the family court system has been rigged by feminists to protect "victims" a women only has to make an allegation that she is "fearful" of .... to legally seize her partner's house, assets, children & future income. Any objections are silenced under threat of incarceration with a protection order that can be obtained exparte in a three minute hearing and there are no evidence requirements or penalties for false allegatio…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:48 PM
13

A father is suing the State for false arrest and possibly malicious prosecution after it was found the State prosecutor had set up her own child protection organization, called "Children's Justice and Advocacy Centre", and funded a "dodgy" forensic investigator to manufacture allegations of child abuse into criminal charges to increase her prosecutions. Although the criminal charges against Dad were dropped almost a year ago, he still doesn't get to see either his daughter or his infant son abou…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:57 AM
2

It's not just the underhanded and unilaterally rollback of shared parenting reform that causes men to hate Gillard it is that this is part of her radical feminist/gay dominated government agenda to abolish gender difference by re-engineering its institutional source — the patriarchal family - and to criminalise & disempower its main rivals: fathers. This idiot childless woman is using the 1970's CEDAW treaty as a social engineering vehicle to effect "gender-fair budgets", "gender-balanced" legis…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 10:35 AM
2

IF 4,000 women a year died there would be an uproar but desperate men taking desperate measures are simply ignored "We need a new movement to declare that men are an endangered species. I am devastated by the figure of four thousand men killing themselves a year. I am horrified by our Prime Minister declaring that he wishes to declare war against feckless men ignoring the fact that most of them have been disenfranchised by their partners with the connivance of the feminised statutory bodies. Fin…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:22 AM
1

never elected twice selected as PM
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:24 AM
2

Subjective marking is the reason I did maths - the answer is either right or wrong
/r/MensRights27/03/12 02:18 AM
1

Medicare is what we call the government funded health insurance. All taxpayers pay a 2% levy to cover all citizens. It's been going on so long (35yrs) we don't really know where the money goes. Many of us also take out private health insurance Our politicians view the resistance to Obamacare as one of those uniquely American eccentricity's.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:16 AM
2

"one area of the gender sphere has suspiciously been left out when self-proclaimed equalitists have re-engineered our society with the aim to rule out every gender discriminating law or rule, be it written or unwritten. Namely laws on fathers rights with regard to their children" the reason for thinking that the feminist movement is too extremist ... they publicly spoke favourably towards diminishing the human rights of men only. The ideology of assuming a man innocent until proven guilty is out…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 04:33 AM
1

Redefined Domestic Violence includes non-violence such emotional & psychological abuse. This is subjective or whatever the accuser thinks it is. Fear does not have to be reasonable. One cannot disprove what another person claims to think and there goes the first principle of Western jurisprudence, namely, the presumption of innocence. Remove penalties for false allegations to completely trash the justice system and you get VAWA
/r/MensRights24/03/12 02:07 AM
3

Refer to it as the Violence Against Families Act
/r/MensRights24/03/12 01:55 AM
1

If I take a course I want a job not some victimhood bitch justifying failure
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:46 PM
1

Right, judges are elected by their brethren lawyers to protect their business interests. The last thing the judiciary will allow is for an unrepresented litigant to show their worth is exorbitantly overpriced
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:42 PM
0

I liked one comment: VAWA should be renamed the Violence Against Families Act
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:08 PM
2

Saying that people who oppose same sex marriage are homophobic is also bigoted. In my view the argument presented is that radical feminism is using gays & marriage "equality" as part of its agenda to abolish gender difference by transforming its institutional source — the patriarchal family.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:19 AM
1

I am no fan of OLO but it does have numbers & influence. Politicians read it and publish on it. Opposing gay marriage is not gay hate. Neither am I persuaded that gay marriage is Men's Right Lesbians are much more interested in gay marriage, while those blokes who support it, do so for its political symbolism. And the topic of fatherlessness should not be allowed to be hijacked as a gay issue. Thus camouflaged, the feminist champions of other people's children make an end-run around more visible…
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:13 AM
1

Saying that people who oppose same sex marriage are homophobic is also bigoted.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:59 AM
0

It is very difficult to get anything related to family law and Men's Rights in the mainstream. OLO rejected the Kyle Lovett articles on the introduction of VAWA type gender laws into Australia. Even though the article is not the best it is a highly public platform from which to work in the comments.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:50 PM
-1

Seriously, are you twelve? Any possibility of an objective factual-based assessment of the issues being discussed or that they might be interrelated to an underlying agenda other than your bald statement "vile shit" Sorry if thinking disagrees with your mythology.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 11:06 AM
-1

Some people are beginning to realise it is part of the agenda of this radical feminist/gay dominated government: to abolish gender difference by transforming its institutional source — the patriarchal family. Militant streams of the Gay Rights movement have combined to take this agenda one step farther. The problem is not just sexism but heterosexism, and the solution is to dismantle not just the patriarchal family but the heterosexual family as such. “Destroy the family, you destroy society” I.…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:34 AM
0

Agreed, however in the current Australian political environment it is impractical to separate these issues. The issue of "gay marriage" is saturating Australian media although it effects about 1% of the population. Further gays in Australia already have all the rights of marriage except the name itself. This current debate over semantics - civil union or marriage - will not end the battle for lifestyle acceptance but likely move it to the next stage, namely, children for married gay couples and …
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:26 AM
1

Correct the Family Violence (sole custody) amendments & National Neuter Plan was conceived with Rudd at the helm. Presumably in collaboration with the Greens who are even more extreme. I noticed in the leadership challenge Rudd was parading his family around to highlight the childless, unmarried Gillard. One wonders if losing direction meant hesitation in the feminist agenda. From a political perspective unmarried/divorced women vote 9:1 for the welfare protection & social justice [wealth redist…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:37 AM
8

Fathers Rights advocate, Warwick Marsh. has penned a piece on fatherlessness for OLO, the largest non MSM site in Australia, and as usual is getting attacked big time for declaring truth. The radfems, sole custody mamas, maternal supremacists & their legal sycophants are running amok in a feminist dominated Australian government and exporting their strategies internationally. Please come to his aid and send in a supporting comment: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=13374
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:25 AM
1

feminism liberates men too ...mmph… lips, don’t unpurse….mmmmph… bwahahahahahahahahahaha……
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:46 AM
3

and second nominators for Stephen Baskerville, Warren Farrell, Phyllis Schlafly? Read on Eagle forum SPLC says anti-feminism is hate... blog named because it panned the movie 'The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo' as “hate porn for feminists”. Seems like a fair description of the movie to me. The distinguished Vanderbilt professor Carol Swain explains that the SPLC suffers from "mission creep" and targets an ever-expanding list of conservatives in an effort to justify its existence to its left-wing s…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:26 AM
1

if you mean women should be careful about dressing and acting like tarts in certain places, I have to say I agree. Common sense is the victim of nazi feminism
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:11 AM
1

Erick, I appreciate your work, been wanting to contact you The Punch, a leftist blog directly connected to the Oz Labor Government, has been orchestrating a rather overt propaganda campaign to discredit Men's Rights. This coincided with the Government's family law amendments to sabotage shared parenting reform and again as it manufactures support for the National DV Plan - feminist pork for women's votes & the lawyers union. I have trouble loading the Punch presumably because of the large number…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:27 AM
2

Uncle Tom called David Penberthy In a relationship with Australian Minister for feminism Kate Ellis. Has to end badly.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:52 AM
2

Minnesota’s shared parenting legislation, which implements a presumption that each parent receive at least 45.1% of physical custody of a child on divorce, has the support of the judicial committee. Family lawyers have introduced a last minute "costs estimate" appendum to sink the Bill. The reality is that shared parenting reduces litigated divorce (profit) by 50%. Lawyers - who produce nothing - oppose their loss of privilege to legally plunder the life savings of working families while holding…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 01:22 AM
1

"IF YOU TOLERATE THIS, THEN YOUR CHILDREN WILL BE NEXT. We are practising a zero tolerance approach to those organisations which either practice or fund gender hatred and discrimination. We have become so conditioned to accept the unacceptable, that the demonisation of men and boys has become the norm. Consider for a moment the outrage if the appalling abuse and bile spat at F4J this week on Mumsnet, (men, boys and women included) were reversed? Consider the viciousness of the personal attacks. …
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:13 AM
3

I've been following this UK campaign by Fathers4Justice on facebook from Australia. It really is quite a courageous attack/counter-attack on the radfems, sole custody mamas, maternal supremacists and their legal sycophants as men fight for family law reform in the UK. They are also exposing the case details on the internet of a family law firm allegedly engineering the worst child alienation case in the UK. I don't know how they can under the British secrecy laws but worthy of support in my view…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:07 AM
2

"Since warnings about the Klan are no longer bringing in the direct-mail contributions, they tried to make immigration restrictionists their new cash cow. When that fizzled, they hitched a ride on the gay-marriage gravy train and labeled as “hate groups” those who support traditional marriage. Now, piggybacking on the two minutes’ hate against Limbaugh, they’ve found a new arena of hate groups, comparable to neo-Nazis and the skinheads: the “manosphere” of misogynist web sites all that “poverty”…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:57 PM
3

You left out the fact that men lose their children [and house, assets & future income] in 90% of custody disputes. This likely contributes significantly to the higher male suicide rate.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:28 AM
7

I just read this article and to my shock found SAVE {Stop Abusive Stop Abusive and Violent Environments) on the SPLC "Hate Group" List. I'm in Australia but still know of & respect SAVE: a non-profit victim-advocacy organization working for evidence-based solutions to domestic violence. "We work to support all victims of intimate partner violence". Clearly the SPLC list is a publicity fraud and agenda driven. Time for some letters to their funding providers.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:05 AM
17

But how can the SPLC - a law centre - not have a vested interest in undermining men's rights? How convenient for them to declare Men's Rights a "hate group" for everyone to ignore us. The family law-domestic violence-child welfare industry is dependent on plundering the life savings of working fathers families. This legal scam costs taxpayers $112BN/yr. Mens Rights are promoting shared parenting legislations that reduce litigated divorce income by 50%. Divorce/DV is the civil litigation cashcow …
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:41 AM
2

"This is what the corrupt Family Law system is leading to in our country. Very sad indeed... Family Law needs a root and branch overhaul." - George Christensen MP of Australia. Needs our support. http://www.facebook.com/georgechristensen78/posts/310201299033740?ref=notif&notif_t=share_reply
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:24 AM
2

Heart-wrenching! Judicial lips might be dripping with "in the best interests of the child" but the corrupt Family Court-DV industry have learned to monetize the misery of innocents. Society can no longer afford this legal scam costing taxpayers $112BN/yr or more than a trillion dollars over a decade in America - an economy stimulus lost to lawyer lifestyle. The Australian government's family violence (sole custody) amendments to the Family Law Act & National DV Plan to channel further $billions …
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:23 AM
1

Powerful testimony from five young and courageous children detailing their experiences in the anti-father biased Family Courts
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:22 AM
4

The problem is that Child Protection is itself protected in its own children's court with "specialist" judges - an incestuous & profitable relationship. It is ridiculous that the supervised contact could be up to 12 months while the laptop HD is examined. If mum gets fed up with supervising nonsense (or complains) child protection can legally remove the child into foster care.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:14 AM
11

Another example of the extreme & unaccountable power hiding behind the euphemism "in the best interests of the child" - clearly it isn't. Standard procedure is to publicly humiliate the father with supervised contact - beef up their stats, make it look like they're doing something, the more abuse they "protect" children from the more funding they get. They can't prove it so the definitions and laws are fiddled so they don't have to prove it. Secret courts, non-reporting to "protect" children and…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 06:32 AM
2

Beware the 8th of March. IWD serves to advance radical feminism in the form of promoting pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, anti-family legislation, and CEDAW - the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (not men) - which implements affirmative action (reverse discrimination) programs, employment & education female quotas, government babysitting services, and government wage control, commonly camouflaged as "pay equity" or "comparable worth" - 41% pa…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:12 PM
1

The conservatives are beginning to realise the massive costs - economic, social and political - associated with the radical feminist dream of a fully androgynous, equality oppressive, working but unworkable Marxist society.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:46 AM
1

Men can't pay child support if incarcerated and or made unemployable with criminal records
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:22 AM
1

With reference to the post-apartheid Truth Commissions in South Africa - "Witnesses who were identified as victims of gross human rights violations (DV) were invited to give statements about their experiences, and some were selected for public hearings. Perpetrators of violence could also give testimony and request amnesty from both civil and criminal prosecution." Basically if they don't have evidence for a conviction in criminal court alleged abusers are tried in the court of public opinion. S…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:18 AM
2

In 2008 VAWA was conservatively estimated to cost taxpayers $112Bn/yr or more than a trillion dollars over the last decade. What's a few more billion? http://www.wnd.com/2008/04/62594/
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:02 AM
1

In addition, given the clear link between women's reproductive rights and their ability to live free from violence... taxpayers should be forced to pay for contraception and abortion. What link shows women having babies is abuse - and by corollary should be stopped? Feminists seem to have disproved the theory of evolution.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 02:46 AM
3

tl;dr: I am upset. Anything which hurts my feelings hurts my son. My ex-husband is not allowed to have another side of the story and not allowed to comment in any way about any general topic which might make me upset. And he is a bad father because he has not seen his son while being watched by sexist, vindictive "monitors" so his opinion doesn't matter. agree. I'm using my child as a custody weapon and everyone else does it. To expose the legal gravytrain on facebook is (justifiable) contempt a…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:51 AM
1

LOL, fuck me dead...
/r/MensRights29/02/12 07:08 AM
1

oops, I thought clicking the pic was the hyperlink to the article. Thanks for adding the link
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:14 PM
1

A woman who claimed that her boyfriend had died of medical problems pleaded no contest to involuntary manslaughter for smothering him with a pillow during a fight, a killing her attorney portrayed as the act of a domestic violence "victim". Initially she got away with it. Secret informer led to charge of murder which was plea bargained to 6 months home detention - she keeps the house We can't even get a Protection Order against a woman. How did this "victim" overpower & suffocate the batterer? H…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 01:29 PM
2

I'm nominating you for the just vacated Assistant treasurer position. The Norwegians saved $80M by ending government funding to "gender studies". These departments often nurture the gender discrimination they purport to redress.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 08:32 AM
10

Cornell professors have published a thorough analysis and discussion of 20 years of data. It is a systematic demolition of most of the studies that sustain the science wing of the gender-bias movement . Nevertheless, the evidence has been ignored by feminist groups who aggressively promote their own agenda through government lobbying and a mystifying number of conferences, retreats, and summits. The resultant misplaced focus on gender discrimination is now the law of the land with $$billions cha…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:20 PM
2

"Divorced fathers have no rights, only responsibilities. Divorced mothers have no responsibilities, only rights. Fathers who fail to pay child support, even when they can't pay, may spend more time in jail than a cocaine dealer... No one but career stakeholders favour keeping this "Family Law" status quo". Equal Shared Parenting Now! Sign the Fathers4Equality "Stength in Numbers" Register now! Its free and nothing is required of you, but every person who signs helps us send a loud message to Can…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 12:08 PM
1

I disagree. There are numerous studies which show a child does better in all the key indicators of wellbeing if he or she has meaningful relationship with both biological parents. "UK social science researcher Rebecca O’Neill makes this observation: “The weight of evidence indicates that the traditional family based upon a married father and mother is still the best environment for raising children, and it forms the soundest basis for the wider society. For many mothers, fathers and children, th…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 12:05 PM
1

I point out to readers that there are at least 7 trolls infesting the Fathers4Equality reddit site. No matter what article is posted there are 7 downvotes before it is read. Clearly Fathers4Equality are considered a threat to the radical feminization of Australia. We are a test case before implementing the same strategies in other countries. Need help.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:21 AM
0

The statistics are selectively biased to create a problem of women being discriminated against in employment which justifies implementing gender quotas, affirmative action (reverse discrimination), equal pay, massive government funding for communist style 12hr daycare and collectivised child rearing. CEDAW is masquerading here as "The National Plan to Reduce Family Violence Against Women and their children". DV redefined to be anything the (female) accuser says it is, is the preferred social eng…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:15 AM
1

FFS. Have you read the websites? How do you know that menshealth Australia are not affiliated with or do not contribute to Fathers4Equality. It's more like you wrote it while suffering from chronic menstrual cramps. And brainfart try clicking the hyperlinks embedded in the article or the contextual hyperlinks and or the comments
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:01 AM
0

Dude? men don't get government funding unlike the useful "academic" idiots who get paid to research the writing on the walls of women's toilets. She says they "offer rich material" about "gendered space". http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/academic-toilet-paper-opens-doors-on-dunny-business/story-fn7x8me2-1226266180601
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:33 AM
0

Try reading the linked ABS report itself, buddy?? In criminal sentencing, men are on average receiving 5 times the length of time a woman does for the same crime… 90% of workplace deaths are men… the average age of retirement for women is 48, for men is 57, this despite the fact that men, on average die younger than women by 7 years… on average, men work up to 25% more time at work, yet there is only an average wage disparity of 17% between the ATMWE and ATFWE… more men work in l…ower paid jobs …
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:30 AM
2

The F4E article contains context, background facts information relevant to fathers, commentary & link to the original article. I would much prefer to read this relating how Australian government agencies are being co-opted into the radical feminist controlled government agenda promoting the National Plan to neuter men
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:03 AM
2

It is a textbook example of attempting to use the court system to destroy the kid's relationship with their father. If you are dealing with these issues you may want to ask your judge to take ‘judicial notice’ of this ruling. The case involves a wealthy couple where the father had resources available to see the suit through to completion. While most fathers are unable to afford this type of litigation the opinion and timeline provide excellent insights on both the mother's behaviour and court's …
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:13 PM
2

Another Adele Horror propaganda piece written while suffering from chronic menstrual cramps. It shows once and for all that feminists lie as easy as they pass gas. The fathead needs a serious whipping on the town square for being the imbecile she always has been The underlying purpose is to whip up frenzy against the myth of the evil male and the need for massive government action ($$$The National Plan) against him. Gina Rhinehart taking over the Fairfax Pravda seems the only way to hose out thi…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 02:08 AM
0

The ALP is dependent on female votes. 70% of unmarried/divorced women vote for the welfare protection & social justice (wealth redistribution) of the Big Brother Party. The multi-billion dollar judicial-domestic violence industry is one of the ALP's biggest lobbyist donor's. Rudd initiated the Plan with the forward "It's our(men's) fault". He was knifed by the radical feminist Gillard who claimed he had "lost direction". This might possibly be interpreted that he had reservations about the Plan.…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:47 AM
1

It shows just how much a legal scam the family court is. Their mouthpiece former judge Chisholm was commissioned by the feminist-controlled Australian Government to write a report which recommended the removal of the fundamental principles of Western jurisprudence, namely, the presumption of innocence and protection from false allegations. This is supposed to "protect" children by encouraging "victims" too afraid to make allegations to come forth. And as further encouragement for these poor unkn…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 01:31 AM
1

Yes, the isolation and education/indoctrination of children. Get'em while they're young. Isolate kids from the protector Father by biasing the divorce laws to sole maternal custody. Addict mum & child to welfare dependence for generational Left votes & power. Remove Christian morality from school curriculum. All references to God erased as discrimination. $Billions to gender studies academics & otherwise unemployable sociologists to write useful propaganda justifying the destruction of the hated…
/r/MensRights02/02/12 01:43 AM
1

I would like to share this article with fathers4equality at http://www.reddit.com/r/fathers4equality/ Does anyone know how to do this?
/r/MensRights02/02/12 01:34 AM
2

Gillard's radical feminist government has allocated $80M to this National Plan and promoted its sponser Tanya Plibersek to Cabinet. The Minister for "Status for Women (feminism)" Kate Ellis announced the plan in a speech made just before the Christmas break on 13 December 2011 at http://www.kateellis.fahcsia.gov.au/speeches/Pages/parity_mag_13dec11.aspx Australia will soon have "special" domestic violence courts for domestic violence which is redefined to be whatever the accuser says it is, anon…
/r/MensRights02/02/12 01:32 AM
5

This is why the FLAW system needs desperate reform starting with a presumption of equal shared care after separation. She is alleged to have first tried to poison her husband by putting liquid nicotine into his Snapple drink. When that failed, her lover bludgeoned him to death with a shovel. She is alleged to have sent text messages and even updated her husband's Facebook page to make it appear that he had walked out on his family. After her lover confessed, she tried to deceive him into not imp…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 12:42 AM
1

Hear, Hear !!! http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s320x320/407454_280770545320101_156832574380566_817597_974697544_n.jpg
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:26 AM
39

Likely explains why litigated divorce drops 55% within 3 years in countries that have implemented a presumption of equal shared care of children after divorce.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:44 PM
1

An excellent discussion of this McIntosh study in progress on Family Law Web Guide "SECOND LETTER to Attorney-General Re; Dr Jennifer McIntosh and Dr John Bowlby (With SPCA Support)" ay http://www.familylawwebguide.com.au/forum/pg/topicview/misc/7318/index.php&keep_session=926628773
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:05 PM
1

What was particularly disturbing about this case was the fact that the biological father, the best protection the children have, was removed simply by unsubstantiated and unproven allegations. Further the father was aware that his children were at risk from a mentally unstable mother but the child “protective” services ignored his pleas to investigate and refused to disclose the children's address. It's not good enough. Many fathers are in the same boat of not knowing where their kids live or wh…
/r/MensRights25/01/12 01:02 PM
1

Thanks, just learning the lingo
/r/MensRights20/01/12 12:53 PM
1

WTF. Onlineopinion refused to publish Kyle Lovett's well researched and referenced Men's rights article detailing the Australian government's "National Plan to neuter men" and they publish this penis dribble. http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/socially-acceptable-bigotry-men-are-human-too/comment-page-1/#comment-84296
/r/MensRights18/01/12 11:20 AM
1

your generalisation is nonsense. it's not the person in the fight it's the fight in the person. Giving the woman state muscle and offering her the house, kids and future income as a prize is nonsense to reducing (alleged) family violence.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 11:06 AM
9

Men have learnt a Titanic lesson, namely, VAWA and family court
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:31 AM
1

The real story is published as Langmeil & Grange (No. 4) [2011] FamCA 605 (3 August 2011) on Austlii at http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FamCA/2011/605.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=%22Families%20SA%22 The Mother was court ordered into psychiatric counselling after accusing everything male of sexually abusing the children, including the paternal grandparents, the father, the supervisor, the dog... As part of the delusion she installed security cameras indoors. Appeals to Fu…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 01:32 AM
1

This Punch propaganda is testing the water for the Australian radical feminist Government's $80M National Plan against Domestic Violence. Shared parenting was outlawed last year, $2BN allocated to the feminist cause of childcare and the justice system trashed, that is, men are presumed guilty and protections from perjury repealed. This is next stage in the evolution to an androgynous, gay-trans inclusive, equality oppressive, fully working but unworkable Marxist society. Anyone who objects to th…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 11:15 AM
1

Readers please note that there is a concerted effort in the comments inside the article, including sociology peers, to expose, defund and remove the self-confessed liar hiding behind naivety from acedeme. Flood is clearly scared and is responding personally. Please comment to expunge a real live feminist man.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 03:29 AM
1

Flood has a long history of serial dishonesty in the name of advocacy, exploiting “victim” women and profiting from the misery & hatred he creates in the misandry industry. Propaganda from his personal blog infiltrated the Australian Senate Report to repeal shared parenting, namely, at 3.179 "we accept the findings of Dr Flood that false allegations in Family Court are rare" - yeah right, even Flood panicked at this nonsense exposure. It was pointed out to the Senate that Flood's self-authored W…
/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:18 PM
1

No, the family law industry treats her research as their meal ticket
/r/MensRights02/01/12 06:53 AM
1

More agenda tripe masquerading as "research". Really, McIntosh is an embarrassment to anyone with a sociology degree and casts aspersion on the integrity of academic research. Her previous research "A Cautionary Tale..." manufactured contraindications from an infinitesimal sample size of 30 odd couples that prohibited shared care in the marriage relationship. Further McIntosh attempted to invent scientific validity with her pseudo-science of “linear regression modelling”. This is no more than st…
/r/MensRights02/01/12 06:50 AM
1

A former gender studies masters student at LSE London is suing the uni for £50,000 for sex discrimination. Tom Martin claims the lecturers ignored male issues and cites breach of contract, misleading advertising, misrepresentation, and breach of the Gender Equality Duty Act His case is set for 14 Feb 2012. Tom Martin has a couple of websites with more info. http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23983895-former-student-sues-lse-over-its-gender-bias-against-men.do
/r/MensRights27/12/11 01:31 PM
1

The Punch is leftist propaganda. They have published numerous articles pre-emptively supporting the Gillard radical feminist government policy announcements. In this case an $80M national plan for a war on men... er, I mean "domestic violence" - conveniently redefined to be anything the female accuser says it is. This comes weeks after Gillard effectively repealed the shared parenting laws under guise of "family violence" amendments. The outrage caused the AG to be sacked. Only for a more radica…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 10:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter