TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Howard_Roark7 Archive

View 1 posts and 25 comments by Howard_Roark7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Howard_Roark7/r/MensRights31/10/16 06:28 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh, completely agree with you. Or it's looked at like this super foreign belief that is just too idealistic or horrible to happen, which is a bunch of crap.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 06:48 PM
2

Oh! I was talking to the kind of rapey scene in the beginning of the book. In general tho, I completely agree with you and recommend people read Fountainhead first. It's my favorite book. Atlas Shrugged on the other hand pushed mw ideologically to where I am today. It's really sad how much she is demonized because her ideas and concepts (at least in some ways) are correct.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:09 PM
1

Im a hypocrite, give me a break
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:57 AM
1

Im a hypocrite, give me a break
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:57 AM
2

Sexist pig. That concept is absurd. It should only be based on demographics
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:13 PM
18

Its actually the opposite of victim-less. In this case there were 3 potential victims, but instead she got called on her bullshit and is paying for her crime against her victims.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:41 PM
9

Except for the fact that men taking estrogen is shown to be really harmful and can lead to a bunch of different conditions or cancers. It's really bad for men to take estrogen. All worth it tho so the guy doesn't have morning wood.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:33 PM
2

I honestly don't know what the procedure is, but I'm sure that in this case, it's along the lines of, "we have never received those documents" or "we take a zero tolerance policy"
/r/MensRights14/12/17 02:12 AM
1

I mean, it's not bad logic. If a parent isn't given visitation rights, it's a good assumption that it's for good reason,but in this case, the reason for not giving visitation rights is really horrible and has really fucked up the situation.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 02:02 AM
13

I think I heard in another thread that because his visitation rights were removed, the child wasn't going to be put under his care. The problem also is that the reason he had his visitation rights removed is because he didn't believe that his child was dying and the judge sided with the mother.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:35 AM
15

What do you think boys are to them other than future men
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:41 PM
4

Look at the hashtags
/r/MensRights25/11/17 05:02 AM
13

It's not only the right that's for this.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 02:47 PM
43

What a dangerous perspective to have. If you believe that an entire gender can do nothing so heinous, then you are going to have a pretty horrible epidemic on your hand as all the mentally unstable of roughly 50% are then completely unchecked. This mother had something extremely wrong with her to do what she did. Could you imagine if all mothers who had these thoughts or whatever they were to have free reign?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:16 PM
1

Agreed. I know a lot of women that would refuse to go to this store out of principle. They're shooting themselves in their food
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:48 PM
5

I dont think she understands what the word "Statistically" means.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 09:31 PM
2

One person is still worse than a group
/r/MensRights13/08/16 10:39 PM
7

No kidding, but again, it's better than a one man jury
/r/MensRights13/08/16 09:42 PM
3

True, but it's better than a one man jury
/r/MensRights13/08/16 08:16 PM
5

No doubt. There's no way anyone can be truly unbiased, but the whole point of a jury is to lessen the bias. It's apart of due process.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 07:29 PM
222

Unprejudiced justice Having no jury is literally allowing for prejudiced justice to happen. The irony is bother hilarious and terrible
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:03 PM
1

No, but that could be why they fight so hard to keep this male boogieman in everyone's mind
/r/MensRights02/08/16 11:05 AM
2

I'm not sure I would say personal failures. More like defend privilege or bias towards them.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 12:39 AM
3

They do ignore the facts. Its just like the patriarchy, no substance, but it's a boogieman to fight against.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 12:07 AM
3

Not that I agree with their logic, but they don't consider population to be the only factor in a minority. They say that a minority has more to do with the discrimination and who is "in charge" than it actually has to do with pop. It's insane all around because technically you are right. Men are the almost overwhelming minority in college and the gap is getting larger.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 03:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter