TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hristix Archive

View 0 posts and 71 comments by Hristix on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Honestly, OP, you should sit down and have a conversation with your supervisor. Tell her, straight up, why you don't agree that you should be written up about it. Don't be mean about it. Don't even demand that the write-up be taken off. Just tell her that the past is the past and you're interested in the future. Ask if they would rather choose the side of fear and dread over the side of social harmony. Eventually this will all come to a head: Men won't be allowed within a hundred yards plus our …
/r/MensRights07/02/11 06:00 AM
0

Statutory rape laws exist for a reason. It would be child's play for a 30 year old with a car and a house and a little bit of money to go pick up children and bribe them into sex. Statutory rape laws do NOT exist to keep 18 year olds from having sex with 17.99999 year olds, even if that's what it ends up being about half the time.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 11:45 PM
2

Oh, I agree. If someone else can do x job better than me and don't need a degree to effectively do their job and have the responsibilities the job entails, that's what capitalism is all about! It's just that there are many fast food workers that want to keep the responsibility and knowledge of a fry cook while raking in $100k a year. They want to achieve this by bitching about how unfair it is that they don't get $100k a year for making fries, and how physics PhDs don't know shit.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 06:12 AM
2

I say a lot of things aren't about just men's rights. I see a lot of shit on here that's like, "Got fired from my job for jacking off in my open cubicle. If I were a woman they wouldn't have been able to see what I was doing. This is sexist, help" Men's rights is about when the court says, "You're a man and you were alone with this girl for thirty seconds. That's beyond a shadow of a doubt that you tried to rape her, so you go to jail." while vehemently denying that a woman did anything wrong in…
/r/MensRights03/02/11 06:10 AM
2

But they don't. The rules are mostly stbale.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 05:57 AM
2

This affects women as well. Congrats Ms. Badspeller, you didn't spell that word correctly but you still win! Sounds rather condescending to me.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 05:57 AM
-6

For certain things I understand the need for equality. Legislatures, for example. There are simply so many more qualified men than qualified women that the job is much more likely to hire a woman. I see nothing wrong with hiring a woman in this situation, especially in areas of important decision making..you wouldn't want them passing a law to keep all menstruating women in the basement, would you? However, things like spelling bees do NOT need equality. A spelling bee is simply based on how wel…
/r/MensRights02/02/11 07:38 PM
-5

This is taking equality too far. By the same line of thinking, midgets should play in the NBA, parapalegics should be able to be lifeguards, and we should let blind people be assigned to general infantry squads.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 07:34 PM
-4

Rights, but not men's rights. It's about the rights of everyone. This manifestation is literally the tip of the discrimination iceberg. Everyone loves to cry discrimination when the numbers aren't exactly equal all around.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 07:31 PM
-5

It's a social issue. This happens all the time with other things, like jobs. If 90% of a company is white people will cry racism, even if no black people applied to the company. Hence affirmative action. If a bunch of people from Princeton work at the same company obviously they're discriminating against everyone else, even if no one else applied! Basically people like to think that there's something unfair/unjust going on when the numbers are skewed. Like how sports are racist because football …
/r/MensRights02/02/11 07:31 PM
4

Not a men's rights issue. The issue is crazy people thinking that everyone is equal in everything, therefore any discrepancy means that there is intentional discrimination going on. If a person wants to win a spelling bee, they'll study for it and have a better chance. It's just that guys tend to be more competitive in academics.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 02:42 PM
3

Women molest children too, especially school boys in high school. Which are still children in the eyes of the law. How about the rule applying to people rather than just one sex? I don't have a problem with the rule, just that it's one sided.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 02:39 PM
1

Duh, honest people wouldn't do that. Honest people don't necessarily need to be kept honest. The saying is kind of a joke within itself. It should read, that it keeps borderline people honest. It's a big jump from opening an unlocked car door and stealing an iPod to throwing a brick through the window and grabbing everything of value in the car. I always lock my car and don't leave valuables in sight for that reason. Not necessarily because I'm afraid that hardened criminals are going to come lo…
/r/MensRights02/02/11 02:38 PM
1

You don't seem to understand the concept of intent and reasonable care. In my situation, I did not intend to harm you because I didn't know you were in my house. I took reasonable care in that the knives were in the kitchen and not just laying in the floor or scattered about. My liability for you stabbing yourself is essentially zero. In this man's situation, he did not intend to impregnate the woman, and took reasonable care to not do so. You know..by not having sex with her. Considering that a…
/r/MensRights02/02/11 05:00 AM
1

No, paperwork won't change human behavior. But it'll keep people honest. Locks on your door won't keep determined thieves out, but it will keep honest people honest. The whole point of it is to give some real legal meaning to, "No honey, I don't want kids at this point in my life" instead of people getting pissed off at the man for not 'being responsible' when the birth control failed or was sabotaged..even if the woman was adamant about not wanting kids in the first place!
/r/MensRights02/02/11 04:50 AM
2

The man did not consciously or willingly participate in the conception. It would be like you going to my kitchen and stabbing yourself then claiming that I stabbed you. After all, if I didn't have a knife in my kitchen, you wouldn't have been stabbed, right? You can try to argue all day that I played a role in your stabbing, but so did the manufacturer of the car that made the car you drove over in, so did the person that built my house, so did the locksmith that made the shitty lock that allowe…
/r/MensRights02/02/11 12:23 AM
5

Child support payments irk me. They provide a financial incentive to get pregnant, the magnitude of which is proportional to the earning power of the other parent. Earn little and there's no real incentive for the other parent to poke holes in the condoms or otherwise make conception a real possibility. Earn a lot and the incentive is there. I'm trying to keep this gender neutral as technically it can involve either parent, but the system is pretty heavily biased against men to begin with. Not m…
/r/MensRights02/02/11 12:16 AM
2

So, how would you propose to deal with this? Currently the burden of evidence is 'well the husband was alone with the kid and could have raped her, and she saw a psychologist that specializes in getting people to say they've been raped, so obviously the husband raped her.' I don't think that's very fair for the legal system. At the same time I don't think it's very fair for some kid to get raped and then be told there's nothing they can do about it because there's no evidence. This is a hard que…
/r/MensRights26/01/11 05:45 AM
2

A lot of damage. Pretty much reverse psychotherapy. Psycho-rape.
/r/MensRights26/01/11 05:44 AM
1

It's a societal issue. I mean you could just as easily paint the mother as a sexual predator.
/r/MensRights26/01/11 05:43 AM
3

It CAN happen, believe it or not. Emotionally traumatic memories are often remembered in decent detail and for a very long time. People don't usually suddenly remember it, though, it's more likely to have been something that was with them for all of their lives. Especially if it was a particularly bad memory. There are kids that absolutely cannot escape their bad memories.
/r/MensRights25/01/11 07:26 PM
0

Actually, troll, the jury is still out on whether repressed memories are real or are just a production of the subconscious when the person is expected to produce some kind of memory. I don't remember the name but there was an experiment a long time ago where some people were told about something that happened to them a while back (say, a night out drinking) and they remembered it just from suggestion. Of course, it hadn't happened but it didn't stop them from talking out of their asses about it.…
/r/MensRights25/01/11 07:24 PM
12

This isn't about Men's Rights. This is about a societal problem that affects both sexes. Men disproportionately since we're the brutal rapists and all but the heart of the matter starts 40 years ago or so. When sexual abuse became a 'thing' in the public eye, people looked back and thought, "Could my baby have been abused?" Of course they were rushed to psychologists who refused to let them leave until they said they had been abused. Or shown thoughts of a sexual nature, or were curious about th…
/r/MensRights25/01/11 07:21 PM
4

If they overuse it enough they'll HAVE to hire sex offenders, because EVERYONE will be a sex offender. Sex offender status, to me, has gone from something being instantly reprehensible to something that I'd have to read about in each case to make that determination. It is now lost from its original cause. It's like calling everyone that has injured someone a murderer.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:27 AM
2

Satire site, duh. Look at this other link. http://www.theladiesmonthly.com/2011/01/lose-25-pounds-in-one-day/
/r/MensRights12/01/11 01:04 AM
1

The issue with the word rape is that it, like any other word in the English language, evolves as the society evolves. This can be bad because the word is just as bad as it was ten years ago, only it is more used now. Basically we need to have a set definition of rape, set by the courts, and enforced. AKA, no one gets tried for rape because they smacked the waitresses ass. Also, no one gets tried for rape because they had sex with a seventeen year old. Both cases should fall under DIFFERENT laws …
/r/MensRights09/01/11 08:47 PM
1

You know, one of the things that fucks people up the most mentally about being raped is the fact that their body is willing to go along with it. They might fight it with everything they have and yet still show signs of physical arousal and they might even feel some physical pleasure from the act. It tears people in two. They feel that they wanted it, or that their body is a traitor, etc, etc, instead of remembering that it is actually a physical response to a stimulus. A woman can certainly rape…
/r/MensRights09/01/11 08:47 AM
3

No one person can 'fix things.' It takes the combined effort of a lot of people on both sides of the topic to fix things. If there had been no white people to sympathize with the blacks during the movement to abolish slavery and the movement for equal rights, neither would have succeeded. There are plenty of men that sympathize with women's rights. Not many women sympathize with men's rights. In fact, not that many men sympathize with men's rights. I don't think there will be any major changes i…
/r/MensRights11/11/10 12:29 AM
1

Liberace sued and won when someone slandered him by saying that he was gay. You can still nail someone for slander if they bring private statements to light in the public domain. As in, "This congressmen likes to be pissed on by manly Italian women! Here is proof!"
/r/MensRights16/10/10 05:59 PM
4

False reporting would be if he dropped his daughter off, didn't take pictures, but the school told the police he did. This is probably retaliation for criticizing the school. It's quite a bit deeper than false reporting. If I report you for child neglect and you report me for something in retaliation and then threaten to charge me if I keep rocking the proverbial boat, that's blackmail/extortion/etc. Both of which are a worse crime than taking pictures of people in a public place.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 06:10 PM
3

Agree. Rape should be one of those words that make people stop and think. If the poster was actually forced into a sexual situation by the school system, against his will, then he was raped. If not, then he was not raped.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 06:07 PM
1

Truth is not an ultimate defense against slander. People have been sued for slander for telling the truth if that truth was aimed to damage someone's reputation.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 06:05 PM
1

Look, I've apologized like 10 times for accidently genderifying my statement. Now people are just grasping for straws here. Should I cut my balls off too? What will make you people happy?
/r/MensRights14/10/10 06:19 PM
2

It's not right that we get the blame, not right one bit. I'm kind of torn on the subject, honestly. It really is socially accepted in most places to try to get people drunk so you can raise your chances of getting in bed with them. Lots of ugly guys and ugly chicks have gotten laid because of that. This isn't necessarily rape in itself. The rape part comes when they're barely conscious, barely able to speak, and you're trying to have sex with them. That's rape, no doubt. They can't fight back, t…
/r/MensRights13/10/10 07:23 PM
2

I dunno where you live, but my friends houses and the bars I frequent aren't covered from six different angles inside and out by CCTV cameras. I do agree that people should talk openly about sex if they're considering doing it, but it can kill the mood. That's far too much to ask of most people.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:00 PM
-5

You'd probably feel pretty violated if I slipped you a drug to make you more trusting and likely to comply with my wishes, and then asked you to do things you wouldn't normally do. Thanks for your car man, remember, you said YES so that's all that matters, I'm off to Mexico.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 02:59 PM
1

"Hey officer, this boy and I got drunk together last night and had sex. He RAPED me." That isn't a huge problem? Having to spend thousands of dollars to defend yourself only to end up in jail because someone said the r-word? We can either prosecute all of them, or prosecute none of them. Otherwise it's going to be about the guy getting a rape charge.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 02:54 PM
0

Sorry for using male/female. I didn't mean to imply that only us males do it. I didn't mean to do that, I apologize profusely. What we should seek to prevent is a shift in the balance of power. When negotiating sex, two people should be at similar power levels. One shouldn't be significantly less impaired (due to drugs or alcohol) than the other. One shouldn't be in a 'position of power' (as in, power over their lives, like a teacher, manager, etc) over the other. There is no easy way to handle …
/r/MensRights13/10/10 04:05 AM
1

You know, I can almost see where this is coming from. To most people, rape is forcing someone to have sex with you, using some kind of threat. Imagine if you were alone with a girl you barely knew, trying to get into her pants by being suave, and she lets you. Then you find out she only did it because she was terrified that you were going to rape her. Then you end up with a rape charge because she was scared that you might use force if she said no. To you, you were just hoping to get lucky. To h…
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:32 AM
-5

Depends on the way the children are depicted in the magazine. If they're scantly clad and in sexual poses, yes. If they're dressed moderately, then probably not. But you never know, there's no black-and-white rules when it comes to what is considered lewd. There are things we know are lewd, and there are things we know aren't lewd, and there's a lot of gray area in between. It'll be up to the jury to decide, most likely. Obviously if you're getting your jollies off to it or proclaiming that you'…
/r/MensRights09/10/10 02:56 PM
-5

Holy shit guys. There's no leeway on this. 'Sexykids' is the name of the goddamn group, and it implies both 'sexy' and 'children' which is the very definition of 'lascivious' photographs of the kind that prosecutors very much like to see as evidence for when they're trying to put you away for child pornography. Someone get the fucking party van in here.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 02:39 PM
1

I've seen it being done before in person. I job shadowed in a hospital once and got to watch it on a monitor. It was quite a bit faster than that, the baby wasn't awake, and there wasn't that much blood. Frankly, it's not that different from other minor surgical procedures.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 05:55 PM
1

I'm through arguing with you. If you want proof that female circumcision is MUCH worse than male circumcision, go look at some pictures or read some accounts of it. They don't read like, "Small bits were removed and I'm only slightly different than other women." the read like, "Most of my vagina was hacked off today. I'll never feel anything down there again except for pain, and if I ever have a kid, I might die because my opening is way too small now, so the baby will have to tear its way out."…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 05:52 PM
2

Like I said, I personally don't care about my 'status.' In a perfect world, it would be up to the person. In the real world, it's up to their parents. Why is it like that, you ask? Because parents have to make the decision as to what they think is best for their children. If you asked a kid if they wanted his tonsils removed and told him all the details, they'd refuse..because all they can really understand is that there would be pain and recovery involved. So the parents are the one to give the…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 07:17 AM
2

If I could choose, right now, to have myself cut/uncut at birth, I would still choose cut. I think it looks better, is less of a hassle to deal with, and I'm at a slightly lower risk for some STDs. But either way, I'm still a fully functional man, so my feelings on it aren't particularly strong.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 07:00 AM
2

1) Stop being such a pariah. I'm a man and I'm fully aware that the choice to circumcise me was made by both my parents. That's right, a man and a woman. They made the decision to have me circumcised. I wasn't mutilated or gravely harmed by it. The jury is still out on whether or not there are many negative effects from it. I assure you, my sex life is normal, I get just the right amount of pleasure out of it, etc, etc. I don't regret it, but do wish I had the decision. I put no more ire towards…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 06:58 AM
1

1) Men are as guilty as women in the circumcision debate. Stop turning this into sexism. 2) Your parents never actually squealed with delight when you got part of your penis chopped off. To them it was probably just something you had done to your babies. Most parents don't know shit about it. 3) There are a lot of proposed ideas about why circumcision came about. One of them is to limit sexual pleasure and/or masturbation. No doctor in his right mind would ever say that today. Now, it's all abou…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 09:33 PM
2

1) That's pretty debatable. I'm a man and I certainly think cut looks prettier than uncut. Not saying I'd have my kid circumcised because of it, but it's just my view. A lot of guys think the same way. So do a lot of girls, I guess, but honestly how a penis looks isn't very important to most girls I've known. 2) That's exactly it. Your parents were thrilled to see you squirm in agony as the doctor hacked a slice of your penis off. Your screams just barely overpowered their squeals of delight. Yo…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 07:06 PM
-1

You cannot possibly equivocate male circumcision with female circumcision. 1) You weren't circumcised because your parents/ancestors wanted you to be extra-pleasing to your wife. 2) You weren't circumcised because your parents/ancestors wanted you to be married off (without your consent) to the highest bidder with the most power. 3) You weren't circumcised because your parents/ancestors didn't want you to derive ANY pleasure from sex, and in fact, wanted to make it inconvenient and painful for y…
/r/MensRights27/08/10 05:49 PM
5

I can't wait to see the commercials. "Are you..less of a man? Were your genitals MUTILATED at birth? Would you like to be NORMAL and ADEQUATE again? Ask your doctor if foreskin restoration surgery is right for you. Because there still is some hope, you might be able to be a complete man yet, instead of the worthless piece of shit that you are."
/r/MensRights27/08/10 04:29 AM
1

I'm contesting the 'losing sensitiity in the remaining sensitive area' part. I have NO problem with getting pleasure from sex or with getting satisfied. I have a hard time believing that I'm missing out on the worlds of pleasure that everyone has spoke of. And if I AM missing out on it, I'm kind of glad, because I like to last longer than five minutes.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 01:54 AM
1

Yeah, I can understand that. However, since there's no significant difference in lasting power between cut and uncut guys, there must not be a difference in sensitivity. The sex response can only take so much stimulation before blast off.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 01:16 AM
1

Nope, it's pretty dry. I've seen both cut and uncut penises, it's really not a stretch (no pun intended) to imagine what I would look like uncut.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 01:06 AM
1

There are neurological mechanisms in place to recover from what the body sees as damage. Since there's a very strong reproductive disadvantage to penile denervation (namely, lack of ejaculation), there's probably a mechanism in place to regenerate nerves that are attached to the sexual centers of the brain. Either more nerves could grow in the penis itself or the nerves there could be attached to more nerves in the brain, meaning relative sensitivity would be similar.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 01:05 AM
1

I understand that, but perhaps there's some compensation for the lack of foreskin.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 12:37 AM
1

"I don't think length of sex is the barometer of how good it is and I know women who have told me the same thought YMMV." Quality not quantity, I agree, but I'm about average in terms of endurance. My female partners almost always get off and I soon follow. If I were much more sensitive, I might not be able to last as long without putting a lot of effort into it. As for the other points, most of them are pretty much the same. However, I can safely say that my penis has not been damaged by not ha…
/r/MensRights19/08/10 12:28 AM
1

If being cut or uncut truly changed the male pleasure of sex, it would have an effect on how long you last. Has anyone done a study to see how many nerves are in the head of a circumcised penis compared to an uncircumcised penis?
/r/MensRights19/08/10 12:20 AM
2

"personal tragedy" I, for all intents and purposes, wasn't there. I have no memory and perceive no negative effects from it. A tragedy requires both memory and negative effects. "fucking outraged' I'm indifferent on it. If I were married to someone that wanted to do it to our kids, I'd let them. If they were against it, so be it. I'm not going to raise my kids to get their undies in a knot over something that has very little bearing over their lives what so ever.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 03:25 AM
2

I tend to agree. I'm COMPLETELY open to debate and have no hard feelings about changing my opinions on things. If someone came up to me at the bar and wanted to bring actual intelligent debate about this or any other topic, I'd listen. That being said, I tend to upvote INTELLIGENT arguments and downvote DUMB arguments, regardless of what viewpoint they take.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 03:22 AM
0

There were many 'religious' practices that were also for good hygene and health. Like not eating pigs because they were fucking disgusting. They weren't just random orders from 'God' but they actually conveyed some kind of benefit. Circumcision was one of these. How, you ask? Imagine how hard it would be to take care of your dick if you were in the desert and barely had enough water to drink, let alone shower. Female genitals tend to be mostly closed, but male genitals tend to be slightly open a…
/r/MensRights18/08/10 03:21 AM
1

You're correct on both counts. My penis is already sensitive enough. If anything, I would prefer it to be LESS sensitive so that I could please my female partners that much more. My penis isn't usually out dragging against tree branches or rocks. My penis is usually tucked safely inside my underwear and has yet to be damaged from lack of foreskin.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 03:14 AM
7

I had my tonsils removed when I was a kid as well. Given the current state of affairs in the mid 80s, tonsillectomies were very common. Today they aren't nearly as common as the tonsils are known to confer some immunological benefit and removing them isn't necessary, but I still don't feel mutilated. I didn't have the mental facilities when I was four to decide if I should go through surgery or not, so my parents decided for me.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 03:10 AM
1

I don't know. Most of the atheists I know are circumcised. They're probably more likely to speak out about circumcisions because they're used to speaking out on unpopular or controversial topics.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 11:03 PM
8

I refuse to be victimized because I was circumcised. Every time this comes up on Reddit and Fark, it's an anti-circumcision shitstorm. And every time, there's a ton of guys that are sad because they were cut. Alright, what did you actually lose in it? Does the foreskin have any actual use to you? Do you need therapy? Do you feel like less of a man? Let me tell you that you lost practically nothing, you do not need therapy unless you're mentally fucked up, and you certainly are not any less of a …
/r/MensRights17/08/10 10:30 PM
2

See, the man is always expected to 'man up' and do the right thing. Even if he owns the place, he will be asked to leave after any kind of domestic incident. Whether this be actual verifiable violence in which EITHER partner is abused, or a perceived threat against either partner, or even the fear of violence by either partner. This is if they live together, regardless of who is on the lease or deed.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 02:46 AM
3

I know where the misconception comes from. The misconception comes from another misconception: Boys want sex and girls do not. Also, remember that sex with someone under 18 when you yourself are over 18 is statutory rape, since they cannot give consent. Some states have four-year type laws. So, what we have here, is someone saying that it's perfectly fine for a woman to rape a boy. However, it is NOT fine for a man to rape a girl. We can't have it both ways. Your move, justice system. EDIT: That…
/r/MensRights11/08/10 09:27 PM
3

There must be a balance between religious freedom of the kids and the parental responsibilities. On one hand, it's unethical to try to make someone believe in a religion or to drag them against their will to church. On the other hand, he can't just leave his daughter sitting at home..that would look awesome to child protective services and likely end in his arrest. The mother wants to use this against him. She wants him to give up everything and make being with his daughter as excruciating as po…
/r/MensRights11/08/10 04:57 PM
11

The parents probably coached the kid to do it. Likely, the whole thing was a setup. Step 1: Hear camp guide coming. Step 2: Take dick out. Step 3: Camp guide see's your dick and leaves. Step 4: File sexual abuse claim and lawyer up. Realize that there's no way in hell the camp wants a drawn out court battle to weasel their way out of a false sexual abuse claim. Step 5: Profit!
/r/MensRights05/08/10 07:03 PM
16

Getting a lawyer is all you can really do at this point. If you don't get a lawyer or don't show up to court, chances are you'll be on the sex offender list and get thrown in federal prison for a few years. It's literally illegal to see someone underage naked or engaging in sexual activity, pursuant to various child abuse laws. So now that you've broken the law, the only thing you can do is challenge it. Challenging the law is a difficult process, so you'll likely just end up a hundred grand in …
/r/MensRights05/08/10 06:57 PM
3

This does not bode well for people that like to walk in parks. From the article, it says it'll only be for playgrounds. But big parks often have playgrounds. Am I going to be arrested for taking pictures of the scenery in a public park, a half mile away from the nearest playground?
/r/MensRights02/08/10 07:30 PM
3

"How schools deal with ADD/Hyperactive boys. Younger kids need to get out and burn off excess energy. In the earlier grades, two recesses I think is still a good idea." But but but we have shitty math scores here in the United States. That combined total of an hour of recess could better be used drilling math into their heads, in addition to the other two hours a day they spend getting math drilled into their heads! If they keep failing, we'll just have to move to 16 hour school days instead of …
/r/MensRights06/07/10 12:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter