HughJass62 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Ignoring the fact that men are more likely to be hospitalised or die from viral respiratory illnesses (e.g. flus and COVID), the writes a puff piece for extra leave just for women because of their possible maladies. tl:dr. Yawning is contagious lol	/r/MensRights	30/06/21 08:46 AM
0	QUESTION Okay, I think you've misinterpreted the article. Unequal access to education and technology: 86% of high school graduates have never heard of a female scientist, and 81% of a female engineer! Women choose technical faculties less often - only 36% of female students study at technical universities, and 15% of women choose IT faculties. If new technologies are our future, then it definitely doesn't have a woman's face. This does even mention Marie Curie, not even indirectly. It conveys that most P…	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 11:25 AM
-17	After reading CRT... Thanks for playing, but try again some other time. CRT comes from legal studies in the 70s and 80s.	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 11:02 AM
0	QUESTION You got some sauce for those?	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 10:07 AM
-8	QUESTION Women have access to opportunities. Not in practice. On paper in a lot of areas, women have access to the same opportunities, but this is not the reality. It's the same as unfair dismissal laws. You know you got fired because you pissed off your boss, but they obviously can't fire you because they don't like you, so they find a bullshit excuse to do it anyway. On paper, it's illegal. In practice, it happens anyway. Because i guess they won't study on STEM without their entire social circle and t…	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 09:27 AM
-41	After reading CRT... This is more accurate, but still a bit overly critical. It mostly argues that systems and structures as they are oppress groups, and that not actively trying to address the oppression when you are in a position to do so is enabling that oppression. It does not imply maliciousness or inherent racism for simply existing, that would be just stupid. Nobody is attacking you for simply existing. They are attacking the system that allows you any unfair advantage or disadvantage.	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 09:09 AM
-24	After reading CRT... That is definitely not what it argues at all.	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 08:43 AM
-14	QUESTION Not really. 3rd-wave ideology is mostly focussed on drawing attention to issues around social equity, reclaiming terms, reproductive rights, that sort of thing. There's a focus on disproportionate violence and discrimination against women and campaigning for social autonomy to be the same as men. Rather than saying "I'm a woman, so I'm a victim", it's more like "I'm a person, so I should have the same access to opportunities as any other person." Something that distinguishes 3rd-wave from 2nd-wa…	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 08:23 AM
-1	Ignoring the fact that men are more likely to be hospitalised or die from viral respiratory illnesses (e.g. flus and COVID), the writes a puff piece for extra leave just for women because of their possible maladies. Don't you think that could have to do with men on average being far-less likely to seek help in a crisis? Men are more likely to ignore an injury to the point of worsening it, more likely to feel shame for seeking help, and more likely to suffer acute mental illness that goes unchecked. Homelessness as a demographic is a bit of an outlier to measure something like trends in respiratory illness deaths, especially when the article has nothing to do with deaths from these illnesses. It's about ex…	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 08:04 AM
-27	Ignoring the fact that men are more likely to be hospitalised or die from viral respiratory illnesses (e.g. flus and COVID), the writes a puff piece for extra leave just for women because of their possible maladies. That might have something to do with how women generally are more restricted in job opportunities and roles. More women went jobless during the pandemic, so more women ended up staying home. If women had the same access to the job market with the same opportunities and protections, they'd have the same likelihood of exposure.	/r/MensRights	24/06/21 11:23 AM