TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Huitzil37 Archive

View 1 post and 580 comments by Huitzil37 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why would you need my permission? If I didn't want people to read it I would not have posted it. Save it and quote it wherever you want.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 06:06 PM
19

A false rape accusation is a great way to get out of many problems as long as you're a psychopath.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 09:35 PM
5

The principle of "open justice" is a foundational principle in all jurisdictions based on English common law, of which Australia is one. The Family Law Act only applies a very narrow exception to recorded witness testimony. It does not conceal the names of the accuser or accused.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 05:00 AM
2

The general population has a fundamental right to view court proceedings.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 04:20 AM
9

Not compatible with fair and open trials, unfortunately. The public must be able to view the court proceedings and court proceedings cannot really work by hiding the defendant's identity.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 04:23 PM
30

Section 43 of Australia's forensic procedures law prohibits the publication of a suspect's identifying information until they are formally charged with the crime, and it takes a couple days to file the paperwork.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 01:49 PM
11

Sexism says that women have no agency and are only victims. Feminism is the same thing as sexism, feminists think they have an exclusive and infinite claim on victimhood, and they don't want women or a woman to be held responsible for anything. They expect that men should always know what women are thinking and feeling and always devote their efforts to guessing what would make women more comfortable, without the woman ever communicating her desires. Communicating your desires means taking respo…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 03:45 PM
15

There is no other ideology in the entire world that gets to take credit for everyone who wants something. Your belief system is a belief system. All of us have heard "feminism is just a desire for gender equality!" and we notice what feminists say and do and we don't believe you. Feminism is a specific set of beliefs and views and analytical framework about gender equality, that says that gender inequality is caused by agentic men threatening imperiled women due to misogynist hatred of women and…
/r/MensRights19/06/26 02:43 AM
15

But feminism is a set of specific beliefs about the world, and those beliefs are wrong.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 11:40 PM
14

Also "financial crime = women shouldn't be punished."
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/26 12:00 PM
1

Before agriculture was invented tribes of about 150 people just killed each other all the time. Also infant mortality was 25% and only half of people reached adulthood.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/06/26 08:32 PM
-1

You live in a time of plenty and security that would have been unimaginable during Marx's time, which was itself a time of incredible plenty compared to even fifty years before, and literally all of it is due to market economics.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/06/26 07:07 PM
-2

It's not "people with different views than me." It's Communists. Communism is a specific set of beliefs that has traits we can look at in the material world, and see what they are. Communism is literally always incorrect, and Communists do not understand "wrong" the way fish do not understand "wet." They don't understand, no matter how much you tell them, that you are talking about if something is correct or incorrect. It is not a coincidence that every single time Communism was tried it turned …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 09:14 PM
1

I know you're upset, but it's not my fault the only thing you need to do to make anti-communist propaganda is open any history book about the 20th century and read what's inside it.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 08:48 PM
0

Communists do not understand "wrong" the way fish do not understand "wet." It is incredible how they can not only be incorrect about everything, but never understand that someone is telling them they are wrong about something. The opinions of Communists have no value.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 02:32 AM
3

They hold literally all of the political and social power of feminism, are the heads of every feminist organization, and are the authors of all feminist theory. I am not talking about "a few powerless radicals." I am talking about the entirety of mainstream feminism. The entirety of mainstream feminism is deeply and hatefully sexist and just doesn't take responsibility for it. Feminists have actively and knowingly suppressed research showing that men suffer domestic violence at the same rate as …
/r/MensRights06/06/26 04:38 AM
5

Feminism is the same as sexism. It believes all the things sexism believes. It has all of the same biases as sexism.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 04:29 AM
3

It's a good thing I didn't mention the red pill. All aspects of feminism are sexist because feminism is the same thing as sexism, is isomorphic to sexism, and has absolute continuity with sexism.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 04:21 AM
1

Feminism is incompatible with men's rights because feminism is a specific ideology with specific beliefs, and those beliefs are incorrect and are hateful towards men. Feminists say that "oh, feminism just means wanting equality," but that isn't true. It's a lie they tell themselves to avoid taking responsibility for what they say and do. Feminism is a set of factual beliefs about the world that are all wrong and are all deeply sexist, beliefs like "rape culture exists" and "the Duluth model was …
/r/MensRights06/06/26 03:54 AM
16

To be a good feminist, you have to undermine and devalue every decision a woman makes.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 08:15 PM
9

Now apply this logic to black people.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:18 PM
91

"Being loved and treated kindly by men" is, uh rather famously not what's going on in those books.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/26 07:07 PM
49

"Why do you try to defend yourself when I attack you? Pretty sus if you ask me."
/r/MensRights21/05/26 12:16 PM
1

You said everything said by a sexist or racist was a delusion and not an opinion. You said that you should be the one who decides what is sexist or racist because it is easy to determine that.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 01:07 AM
1

Let me put it to you this way. Every single person ever ever ever who says "it is good and obvious to see who is evil and who is good, I don't need to worry about how I find out who is who" has turned out to be enabling monstrous abuse. Every time! Every single one! It is always true and is never not true! Every person who thinks it is easy and obvious to sort the Good Righteous people from the Evil Hateful people ends up being horribly abusive! Every single time without one single exception! Ev…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 12:42 AM
1

So you think people are delusional for not agreeing with you about racism or sexism. Are you confident you know every single fact in the world? If we took Isaac Newton through a time machine, would he become delusional right when he stepped out?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/26 11:24 PM
-1

Are you under the impression that "opinion" means something is sacred and beyond reproach?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/26 04:38 PM
5

This is the classic "those people aren't real feminists" argument. Why shouldn't I believe that they represent the mainstream sentiment, when they obviously do? There are Republicans who don't like Trump but I'm not gonna pretend they're the mainstream opinion. Why should I believe that you represent the "real" or "true" version of that thing? From where I'm sitting, progressivism is a morally and intellectually bankrupt ideology that coasts by entirely by changing the definitions of words to in…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/26 02:03 PM
2

Yeah, and who decides who is and isn't a racist? You? Child abuse is endemic in black American communities; white kids don't get "just in case beatings." Is it racist to notice that or is it racist to tell people not to notice it? By today's standards, nearly every person in history was a racist homophobe. Was nearly every person in history delusional? About everything? Do you understand that "opinion" is a value-neutral term and that it is possible for opinions to be bad? There are racist opini…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/26 01:51 PM
-5

No, it doesn't make sense for any sane person. "I get to define what opinions are not actually opinions and people aren't allowed to hold them" is someone trying to cheat past the part where they have to convince people of things. What counts as "hatred" and not "opinion" is not an objective standard. It's just your opinion on what counts as what. When hate doesn't count as an opinion, and you get to decide what hate is, you're saying that people are not allowed to disagree with you.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/26 10:21 PM
23

Also this is bullshit. "Opinions I don't like aren't opinions, and people aren't allowed to have them. I have the right to dictate what opinions people are allowed to have because I get to change the definitions of words so they make my opinions good and other people evil."
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/26 08:58 PM
1

This seems mathematically implausible.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 08:28 PM
1

1: Women do not make collective decisions. The ideology that is named "feminism" is oppressing men by systemically lying and concealing evidence about their victimization, denying them resources for victima, passing laws to harm them, and spreading malicious lies about them to make women more afraid. 2: Neither. We live in a society where both men and women enforce gender conformity. Gender roles maximize women's safety at the cost of their agency and maximize men's agency at the cost of their s…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 12:17 PM
16

We don't have this standard for literally any other crime.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 11:24 AM
5

You get downvoted because it isn't true. "We are the only ones who care about people" is a lie the left tell themselves to justify how gleefully cruel they are. Feminism is core to the modern left. Feminism is absolutely inassailable on the left. Most of the left literally cannot comprehend the idea of challenging feminism on anything. And feminists are absurdly vile and hateful sexists. Their rhetoric is indistinguishable from the Klan. They hate men. They hate men more than anything. Their hat…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:19 PM
8

It's not that he pissed off women in particular. That's the whole point. Women were more likely to support him being killed, even though there was absolutely nothing gendered about his behavior.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 04:03 PM
16

Women were more censorious of people who agreed with them than men were of people who disagreed with them. The gender gap in politics is extremely bad, is 100% due to feminism, and because the political left cannot even envision a challenge to feminism, this problem will never get better and only get worse.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 04:01 PM
6

Good men won't always be able to protect you from bad men! I guess you'll have to take responsibility for your own well-being like a fucking adult!
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:37 AM
6

"Imagine being part of a gender that kills, kidnaps, abuses, manipulates, tortures..." Okay! Now do "race." Oh, wait, that would obviously be completely insane, you say?
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:22 AM
2

A declining economy doesn't lead to lower birthrates. Wealth leads to low birth rates. Every previous generation who was way worse off than you had way more kids than this one. Also, are you telling me that somebody told you "oh, those hateful sexist feminists are just a few powerless radicals, they don't matter, everyone just pays too much attention to them" and you fucking fell for it? Everywhere feminism exists there is a political gender gap among young people, and it is entirely due to femi…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:19 AM
2

No. There is no Platonic realm of forms that ideas spring from. There is no such thing as a progressivism molecule or progressivism radiation. An ideology literally only exists in its practitioners. They claim that they are definitionally good and they claim that if you want to believe in good things you have to be a member. And they are always lying and they are always expecting you to fall for it. I don't have to be a progressive to believe in equal rights, because progressivism is an ideology…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/26 12:50 AM
2

I gave you the clearest example with the best support of how a problem can be fundamental to an ideology. When you ask me not to judge an ideology by its practitioners, what is left to judge it by, and why should I do that? An ideology does not exist outside of its practitioners. I cannot trust "progressivism," I can only trust progressives. Why should I do that? Why are you asking me to keep falling for it?
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/26 12:05 PM
0

No. The problem with communism is not keeping bad people away from power. The problem is that the world does not work like Marx thinks it does, and when Communism crashes up against reality, it has to start killing and oppressing people to avoid admitting there is no such thing as "class consciousness." Every single communist state ever without one single exception has become a murderous police state in exactly the same way by exactly the same means for exactly the same reason. If you predict "t…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/26 02:58 AM
1

Progressivism is defined by the behavior of progressives, and communism is defined by the behavior of communists. Both of these ideological movements are deeply and fatally flawed down to their roots, and "REAL communism has never been tried" is just an excuse to stop us from noticing the behavior of communists. It is not a coincidence that every time communism has been tried it became a murderous and oppressive police state, it's inevitable due to the fact that communism absolutely collapses wh…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/26 02:43 PM
7

They seem to have very progressive views. These are the views held by progressives, and regardless of what it claims to be, the movement that is named "progressivism" is morally and intellectually bankrupt and its only agenda is to be cruel while bragging about how compassionate it is. "Systems of power" and "oppression dynamics" are thought-terminating cliches for progressives to defend their utter hypocrisy. They never actually make any sense in context. They don't have any principles, and any…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/26 12:09 PM
24

This reminds me of a similar claim by a German news channel that claimed to have found multiple Telegram groups that were open to the public for people to talk about all the women they raped and post pictures of themselves doing it, and that they were only kicked out after they went too long without posting pics of their own. And... no. No you didn't. I don't need to look that up to know you did not find a searchable, publicly accessible chat service where millions of men worldwide are posting p…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/26 04:55 PM
8

Feminist research has such an extensive history of knowing and malicious lies in service of its agenda there has to be absolutely extraordinary evidence to even make it worth considering.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:21 AM
20

I think that it's such a small and marginalized market that if you're a dishonest abusive piece of shit there's just better places to ply your trade.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 03:18 AM
10

You will never get enough buy-in to make this noticeable. This is like random communists calling for a "general strike."
/r/MensRights09/04/26 01:19 AM
0

You are right, I misread a number. 1/3rd is in the cities, not 2/3rds. I still find it nonsensical that only 10% of your data comes from the largest cities, since those are the places where they have the best record keeping and departmental communication. If 15% of the population lives there, I would expect bare minimum 40% of the numbers to be from there. The larger cities are better at keeping records, better at communicating their statistics, and the government is paying more attention to the…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 11:51 PM
0

Okay? That has nothing to do with the problems I pointed out.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 08:03 PM
9

This is omitting way too much data to be trustworthy. It counts only convictions and cases officially given a Final Report status -- i get that those are the most clear-cut categories, I get not counting things that never resolved, but without cases that went to trial and resulted in acquittal or "final report true" status ("the event happened but this person wasn't the one who did it") we are missing out on really necessary proportions. Lest we think this is attempting to skew the numbers again…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 02:05 PM
94

"This is discriminatory, but it isn't unfair because I hate men."
/r/MensRights07/04/26 01:37 PM
28

Because feminism says it is. Any time you discuss any of these things with a feminist, the only response they have is "But feminism is for gender equality." It's not an observation, they don't conclude feminism is for gender equality by looking at it. They just repeat the claim feminism made. To them, feminism is definitionally good.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:41 AM
9

Whether I was a libertarian, communist, nazi, or fucking spaceman doesn't change the fact that what you are saying is false. It's not a matter of opinion. You made statements about the material world that is made of atoms and we can see they're not true. Altman's position is not that he explicitly wants all non-rich people to die because the meaning of the word "explicit" is that he said that actually and literally said those actual exact words actually and he did not. Something being explicit m…
/r/MensRights05/04/26 02:27 PM
10

No he doesn't. That is not true and it is obviously not true because it makes no fucking sense and you don't know what the word "explicitly" means. You believe it is true because you hate him so much and you don't understand that doesn't make all negative things true about him.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 01:06 PM
1

Men are facing a crisis of longevity. This is bad because it harms women!
/r/MensRights05/04/26 12:57 PM
15

The fact that you hate someone does not mean all negative things are true of that person. The fact that you really, really hate someone still does not mean all negative things are true of that person. It is more important for a statement to be true than it is to be mean.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 12:41 PM
83

Feminism hates autistic men. Feminism seeks to maximize women's social power and minimize their accountability in every situation. The primary way in which women exert this sort of social power without accountability is creating the expectation that their needs must be met without them ever having to communicate their desires. Feminists demand, constantly, that men must be able to know what they want and give it to them without communicating it, because expecting a woman to have to communicate l…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 02:03 AM
8

What staggers me is how bad pro-abortion people are at cognitive empathy towards their enemies. Being anti-abortion is a very simple position, anti-abortion people will constantly tell you why they are anti-abortion, and pro-abortion people literally cannot repeat that simple statement back to them. People are anti-abortion because they believe abortion is murder. They actually and literally believe that abortion is murder. They do not hate women. They are not secretly accomplishing something el…
/r/MensRights04/04/26 04:50 PM
25

Because all the trauma that comes with accusing someone doesn't matter when you're lying. If you're a liar, the media circus is just free narcissistic supply.if you're extorting someone or just out to hurt them, you want maximum possible exposure.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 02:16 AM
20

On TikTok you can just say shit and everyone believes you. It's an audience more credulous than Facebook. Also on TikTok, accusing random people of horrible crimes is just a fun activity for your pals. Remember that TikTok psychic who accused that professor in Idaho of murder based on literally nothing?
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:00 PM
3

We need subsidies on leather harnesses and floggers! Confiscate all copies of Resident Evil 8 to alleviate demand on our dom production capacity!
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 04:35 PM
3

The dom shortage is a national crisis that demands government intervention.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 04:16 PM
3

It's amazing how many feminist arguments break down when you think about anything for like two seconds. Every sexually dimorphic species on the planet Earth is overwhelmingly heterosexual regardless of intelligence or ability to coordinate. Lower intelligence animals aren't capable of homosexuality, just bad aim. Nature has concocted a wide and diverse and horrifying array of ways for animals to have heterosexual sex and to have the entire purpose of their lives be heterosexual sex. Any sexually…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/26 07:40 PM
2

South Korea has the widest male-female political gap in the world by a very wide margin. Feminists insist this is just because South Korean men are all evil bad misogynists and could not possibly have anything to do with feminism's behavior.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 01:49 AM
2

All the arguments about "no because I'm not an animal I can control myself" are stupid. Obviously you aren't. And obviously some small percentage is. Will that small percentage become slightly larger? I don't think so, but the reason isn't "men can control themselves." Because the population of men who can't control themselves can't control themselves. Like almost all crime it's caused by low intelligence and terrible impulse control. Consensual sex doesn't replace assault becaise assault is not…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:26 AM
-1

Really? What is that difference?
/r/MensRights27/02/26 08:13 PM
-4

No, this is stupid. This is cope, justifying the emotional urge to just be an asshole and feel righteous about it. If you stoop to feminism's level, you will not only lose, you will deserve to. Feminism is able to get away with everything it does because it is sexism and has absolute continuity with sexism, and benefits from all of the biases that create sexism. It's not possible to replicate that in an attempt to beat sexism. You'll just be cruel to people for no reason to no end. Every person …
/r/MensRights27/02/26 02:45 PM
9

If the only thing you're saying is "it has its own flaws too" without anything specific or actionable then yes, you are concern trolling, that's what that means. Dude explained it for you pretty well. Nobody said all male advocates have good intentions and should never be criticized. So go criticize the ones who don't, instead of vaguely asserting that it Just Happens Too Much.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 02:40 PM
18

They can't. They don't have the ability. Disney executives did not tell their writers and directors to alienate men and boys. The creatives did it on their own, because they wanted to and lived in a culture where that was a morally good thing to do. They cannot turn that off. It is not a plan they can abandon. It's not something they can go "my bad" about. They believe that the only way to be a morally virtuous human being is to hate men and take art away from men, and they cannot possibly be sw…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 11:46 PM
26

Fun fact! There is no evidence the "husband stitch" ever existed, and it was never taught anywhere. Feminists made it up.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 12:35 PM
66

"A portion of its members" "widely classified as misandrist" "were described as" This is how they phrase things to be as exculpatory as possible. The page goes out of its way to avoid associating the negative traits with the movement that has negative traits. Meanwhile, MGTOW (which has way less ideological coherence and political motivation) is confidently described as misogynist without any qualifiers.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 03:11 PM
10

Misandry kills, misogyny hurts feelings. Men are the overwhelming majority of murder victims. Sexism cares so little about men's lives, it sees men die and says their feelings are being hurt, then it sees women's feelings being hurt and says this is as serious as being killed.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 02:37 AM
22

That's Zagreus and Maegara from Hades. Since when is he a minor or an MRA?
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/26 08:34 PM
14

This dude is batshit. The way he blames a 12 year old for seducing her, and then insists the kid knew she was an adult and pretended she wasn't in order to exploit her... that's not how it works and doesn't make any sense! Why would a 12 year old pretend his girlfriend is younger than she is, he'd brag about it!
/r/MensRights01/02/26 10:40 AM
6

This is on the edge of being word salad. I'm not sure you understood any of the things you're responding to. I sure as hell can't figure out how it's supposed to be a response.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 05:14 AM
17

"The red pill" and MRAs are not the same thing, though they're in the same vaguely related cluster of "people who are not feminists." The big thing that you have to deal with, that most feminists can't, is separating things that feminism says with things that are objective universal truth. MRAs are not for misogyny. We think it is not separate from misandry. We believe that a bunch of things feminism says about the world are incorrect. Feminism is sexism, says what sexism says, and believes what…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:23 AM
29

"It's all black men until it's no black men." Look at that, an obviously bigoted statement!
/r/EverydayMisandry06/01/26 05:46 AM
1

Half of the T are men.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 12:38 PM
10

They don't even have the right to say you're making it about yourself. They made it about you when they insulted you. The only reason people say "not all men" is because hating men is acceptable. If they said it about any other group of people, the response would be "Fuck you, you despicable racist / sexist."
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:35 AM
2

Incongruencies are a natural part of everyone's thought, and it's not a psyop.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 11:08 PM
11

Patience and empathy cannot protect you from Might Recontextualize All That Patience And Empathy As Abuse And Betray You Because Of It Disorder. A lot of people can be terrible, and a lot of people without BPD can betray you. I find that risk too high from everyone, but empirically speaking, most people don't. But they are within their rights to try and avoid it. People with BPD are way more likely to engage in this behavior and people have the right to try and avoid it. No, they aren't monsters…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 02:30 PM
20

Getting romantically involved with someone who has BPD is catastrophically dangerous. It is a disorder that is defined by behavior, and BPD is "Extremely Likely To Abuse, Betray, Lie About, And Falsely Accuse You Disorder." That's what it is and don't try to bullshit me otherwise. The disorder is defined by the behavior they engage in. If a man becomes involved with a woman who has BPD, he is completely defenseless. Progressive social norms give people with BPD superpowers like Superman gets fro…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 01:23 PM
2

How well has teaching abstinence worked for literally the entirety of human history?
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:45 PM
36

Also the whole "deny IPV stats" thing she ignored because it was inconvenient.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/12/25 03:31 AM
2

Right. But those teenagers very strongly disagree and are doing what is in their power to circumvent your rules.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 09:04 PM
29

The odds of being struck by lightning each year are 1 in 1.2 million. The male population of Ontario age 15-30 is about 1.5 million. If you live in Ontario, the odds that your son was one of the five specific hockey players falsely accused of rape in one single high-profile absolutely incontrovertible incident are higher than that.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/12/25 07:48 PM
10

You may think that, but their hormones strongly disagree on that point.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 12:41 PM
12

Whi are the trans people being rounded up?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/25 11:07 PM
14

Feminism is not the idea of equality. Feminism is a set of specific beliefs about the world and those beliefs are wrong and hateful. When people hate feminism they are hating a specific ideology with specific beliefs about the world, and that specific ideology hates men. The ideology named "feminism" does a lot of things to harm men, the most obvious of which is probably "intentionally falsifying information about how men are victims of domestic violence and going out of their way to destroy any…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 02:29 AM
46

Yeah, harassment and suicide-baiting happen over ships and are by overwhelming majority committed by women. It is not even a little bit close. The most toxic fans are young progressive women, and the toxicity of a fandom is directly proportional to how much its audience overlaps with the category "young progressive woman." This person literally thinks that bad things are by definition done by men. And the fact that she thinks "ships" are a problem independent of "people getting harassed over shi…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 02:55 PM
3

Everyone believes they have good intentions. Even the evil ones. Especially them.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 05:01 PM
2

Feminist theory is sexist because it sees men as agents and women as victims, and is obsessed with enlisting men's agency to make women safer. Sexism sees men and women in exactly the same way and is obsessed with exactly the same thing. All of its demands are based in how sexism sees the world: men are threatening and disposable agents, women are precious and incapable victims. Women are safer than men, women have always been safer than men, sexism exists to keep women safer than men. One of th…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 12:40 PM
4

"That's not REAL feminism" is about as credible as "that wasn't REAL communism." Every leader of every feminist organization hates men. Feminist theory is deeply sexist. Feminism endlessly demands that men "call out" and "stand up to" sexist behavior no matter how small, yet feminists never stand up to the sexists among them. They've never tried to discredit the Duluth model, or unseat Mary Koss, or fight to count male victims of rape. When feminists are in the news lying, other feminists never …
/r/MensRights12/12/25 12:29 PM
10

...yes?
/r/MensRights12/12/25 02:10 AM
25

It really couldn't. Like it is not even a little bit close. Feminists tend to confuse which is worse between "calls for an ideology to be discredited" and "calls for mass violence against an entire gender."
/r/MensRights11/12/25 10:43 PM
1

Okay. Let's assume that for the first time ever in human history, that didn't mean "we should blame men more, shame them, and collectively punish them." Do we need to have "honest conversations" with black people about how to stop them from committing crimes?
/r/MensRights09/12/25 09:08 PM
1

How do you think "it's racist to suggest black people be punished and restricted because they are more often convicted of crimes" might be relevant to the subject of the thread?
/r/MensRights09/12/25 08:16 PM
1

You're allowed to read my post btw. You had no points at all that were not already addressed by it. You did not read the post, you skimmed it for a few key phrases and then got mad.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 07:57 PM
1

You're right! It IS incredibly racist to say that because black people are more often convicted of crimes, they bear more guilt and should have less rights! I WONDER HOW THAT MIGHT BE RELEVANT TO THE SUBJECT OF THIS THREAD! E: also it is extremely well known that feminists actively suppress information about female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 06:57 PM
8

So let's ignore for a moment how your thesis is probably false because feminists actively destroy information about sexual offenses by women. Most sexual violence in the US is committed by black people. In fact, the disproportionate rate at which men commit crimes is about the same as the disproportionate rate black people commit crimes. Every single thing you say about how men are dangerous and men are blameworthy and men bear collective guilt applies way more to black men. If you look at Europ…
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:44 AM
1

Misogyny is bad, but it is something that has traits we can observe. All of sexism, all of it, one hundred percent of it, is aimed at making women safer. The thing that defines one hundred percent of sexism is women not being killed. There are not two separate unrelated sexisms, there is just the one. And what sexism believes is that men are too safe and should be made less safe, and women aren't safe enough and should be made more safe. Sexism always thinks men are too safe and women aren't saf…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/25 03:20 AM
1

Yes, and you can find a cause of mortality that white people suffer from more, and demand it be addressed. It has to exist just by the law of averages. Why should we do that? Why should we respect that demand? Why should we believe they are two separate sets of issues? Feminists believe that and are wrong. Sexism is sexism. It is a complete system of biases and beliefs about men and women, which cannot be separated. The claim that they are separate is how feminism ensures they can deny aid to me…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/25 04:19 PM
3

Okay, let's assume it's accurate. There's plenty of reasons it might not be, but let's assume. So? Is there a reason to care about this other than "it is the category where women die more and women's lives are inherently more valuable?"
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 11:11 PM
6

The reason that a higher percentage of female murder victims were killed by a partner is not because women face a unique peril from intimate partners that warrants our attention. It's because men are so much more likely to be murdered by strangers. When men and women are about equally likely to be murdered by a partner, but men are way more likely to be murdered by a stranger, then the percentage of male victims murdered by a partner will be lower. Because of all the men murdered by strangers. F…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 10:45 PM
4

No it isn't. "Femicide" is like if you were to say it was a more severe crime to kill white people, and demand that the government do something to combat whiteicide. You only say that, it only makes sense to you, because you consider their lives more inherently valuable and more worthy of protection. Feminists cry "femicide" because they believe gender equity is when 0% of murder victims are women and 100% are men. They demanded the government combat "femicide" when 07% of murder victims were wo…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 09:45 PM
3

But misogyny doesn't kill women. It doesn't do that. Misogyny does not respect women, it infantilizes women, it greatly restricts their freedom and agency, all for the purpose of keeping them safe.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 09:05 PM
8

Well like I said, I don't speak German and did not have access to that information, thank you. My searches for English-language sources all turned up articles dated 11 months ago, or feminists making blog posts quoting one of those sources posted 11 months ago. I still find it incredibly suspect that there is supposedly a group of 70k people recording themselves committing felonies that allow anyone to join without being checked to see if they are a member of law enforcement, but my observation …
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 07:57 PM
12

Misogyny hurts women's feelings, which feminists claim is like being killed. Misandry kills men, which feminists claim is just hurt feelings. If misogyny killed, women wouldn't have been safer than men everywhere at every point in time.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 06:26 PM
20

Googling the 70k group chat thing provided results about about a German TV station turning up Telegram groups of "up to" 70k people sharing advice and videos of raping women. But I find it extremely suspect for a lot of reasons. Almost nothing is in English. That's not inherently suspect but it is frustrating, and a bit odd that no more work was done to translate it. The investigation was by a TV network, not law enforcement. No law enforcement was involved. There have been no follow-ups -- nobo…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 06:00 PM
5

Right, she insulted and alienated men. But she didn't offer women anything either. She didn't trade men away for women, she traded men away for nothing.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 12:38 AM
32

Kamala didn't even offer that. She offered nothing to anyone. Watching the Kamala Harris campaign was like watching a bus crash into a wall at 3 miles per hour.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 04:43 AM
-2

And in Uganda, that is a higher percentage of men than in the West, because it is a fad in Uganda. In the West, the hit rate is 30%, and there is more resistance to the idea of paternity testing. The article itself describes men going to get paternity tests for bullshit nonsensical reasons like "the child is misbehaving." There is no universe in which 98% of people who are suspicious of their partners are right about it, people's emotions aren't that accurate.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 12:51 AM
0

Your dick would be so chafed it'd burst into flames!
/r/MensRights28/11/25 12:47 AM
-29

98% of tests say the child isn't the father's? I call complete bullshit on that. It isn't mathematically plausible. We expect the rate of paternity tests that disprove paternity to be high, because people don't get a paternity test without cause to be suspicious, and the rate at which they disprove paternity is around 30%. 30% of people who have good reason to suspect paternity fraud are right. Uganda is a far more conservative Christian country than the US. Paternity testing is a fad, causing m…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 08:20 PM
13

It's that it's not true. Feminism says a great many things that are not true, and when you say they are not true, feminism says "why do you love oppressing women?"
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 08:01 PM
1

The word "fascism" no longer has a referent. Your opinion is literally meaningless, as that sequence of symbols no longer corresponds to a meaning.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 12:59 AM
12

Yes. It is like if we had a special word for the death of a white person, because white people's lives are worth more. Men get murdered way, way more, and feminists do not care. Feminists believe that gender equality means 100% of murder victims are men and 0% are women. Of all the women who are killed, a higher percentage of them are killed by their partners. This is because men are so much more likely to be murdered that intimate partner killings are a much smaller percentage of their deaths.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 04:06 AM
46

Any time a feminist talks about male violence, add the word "black" in front of every "male/men." Black men are also men, so if the statement they made were true, it would be just as valid if they specify black men. But it's obviously insane and hateful.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/11/25 04:56 PM
1

I want gay married couples to have AK-47s to defend their marijuana crops. I have a special loathing for Communism. Marx was wrong about literally everything and Communists lack the capacity to understand that people disagree with them because their beliefs about how and why things happen are incorrect.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:09 AM
3

When someone says they were attacked and the attackers wrote something on them, I feel like that's a real good indicator they're lying. They add the writing so they can say it's proof that the Bad People They Hate did it to them for ideological reasons, but people don't actually do that. See also: Tawana Brawley and Ashley Todd.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 03:04 PM
9

"We" as a collective spend so much time telling men to open up and be vulnerable, and zero seconds telling women to respect men who do. Feminism loves to mock and denigrate the thoughts of men without ever checking if they are true. Yeah, we're afraid of looking weak, and the reason we are afraid of looking weak is that we can see what women do to us when we look weak. You're not going to convince us to not be afraid of it without changing the thing we are correctly afraid of.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 01:55 PM
12

There is not a single form of violence that women are more likely to experience than men. Rape and domestic abuse are gender-symmetrical and every other firm of violence is overwhelmingly more likely to happen to men. You just thought "buy those men aren't being targeted for being men, women are targeted for being women," and that is misandry. If 93% of murder victims are men and 07% are women, men are being killed for being men, period, no wiggle room. But misandry is when you think that men be…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 12:20 PM
3

Just fucking say what it is!
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 11:50 PM
6

"Got in trouble with the courts" is the least helpful, least specific answer possible. What court? Where? About what matter? I did look it up, but you were so vague, all I got were pages about a different court case where Reddit was the plaintiff.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 10:45 PM
7

Okay, imagine I asked you that question because I did not already know what you were talking about, and I needed you to explain it to me like someone who did not already know what you were talking about.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 09:17 PM
5

Okay, so what's happening with Reddit?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 08:21 PM
7

When was the last time you heard someone talk about a "good woman?"
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/25 03:52 PM
1

When adults have a conversation, they talk about specific things referred to by the meanings of those words, they don't just go back and forth shouting random things that make them upset.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 11:16 PM
0

No it isn't, also, what does that have to do with anything? Are you just saying things that make you upset?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:19 PM
-9

And does any of that change the objectively verifiable fact that people much poorer than you had much bigger families, both in the past and today?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:57 PM
-3

Everything you said is wrong. You are far richer than people who had way more children than you. Families of ten lived in houses smaller than yours less than a century ago. People who worked 12-14 hours a day starting from age 10 and were one bad harvest from starving to death, and had way more children than us. Norway has the most generous social programs a socialist could ask for, and their fertility rate is among the lowest in the world.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:16 PM
6

...are you stupid? Are you a stupid person? Did you literally just see the concept of wealth mentioned and disengage all thought? The ways in which every population of people ever in world history have become richer are widely varied and took place in a wide variety of circumstances and environments. Whatever your pet political issue is that you blame for falling fertility, there are plenty of cases where that clearly wasn't present. Unless your pet political issue is that you hate the entire co…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:53 PM
13

Declining fertility has absolutely nothing to do with any political issue you think it does no matter what that issue is. Populations that get richer have less children, this relationship has been observed literally everywhere.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:23 PM
2

Women are no more or less shallow than men. They just have different ways of lying about it.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 11:22 PM
-2

Link the article instead of screenshotting the headline.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/10/25 12:29 PM
26

Every plane restroom is women-only when a woman is inside it. Plane restrooms are single-occupancy.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/10/25 12:10 PM
1

Censorship is wrong when they do it and it's wrong when you want to do it too.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/10/25 05:35 PM
1

If there are comments like these that get a lot of likes, fucking show those instead of comments with one upvote. One person being insane does not matter. Twitter feminists love to find one insane person with like five followers and blame all men for the things that guy says. Feminists love saying "Well, this statement isn't true, but it doesn't matter because i know plenty of people believe thst kind of thing so you can't notice how I lied!" It isn't valid when they do it and isn't valid when y…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/10/25 01:49 PM
3

Reddit comments with no upvotes are meaningless. You just found one insane person, which doesn't matter. If it was getting hundreds of upvotes, that would indicate some significant number of people endorsed it. But it isn't.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/25 09:56 PM
1

Feminists say the study is inconsequential, because that study says that there is gender symmetry in rape over the past 12 months, but spans of time that go on longer show more women being victimized than men. Papers like this that ask people about their experiences rely on people's memories to get information, and the longer it's been, the less reliable that memory is. People forget things, even things that should be too important to forget. The generally agreed upon standards for surveys is th…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/25 12:36 PM
6

"I see a number written down, and I decide it's too high! I don't know what the number means or why it is that way, but numbers that are too high offend me and I am certain that it's an evil misdeed from people I already hate. This proves that everything I believe is right, because the number is too high." Usually you see this with people getting upset that an amount of money is too high, but "too many people" is still a close second. You keep catching "environmentalists" talking about how the p…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/09/25 08:08 PM
1

Yes? I do? How is that even a question?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/09/25 04:51 PM
1

Different women are different people.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/09/25 10:48 AM
2

I just did? What do you not understand?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/09/25 03:10 AM
12

Here's the thing that always floors me. Feminists always dismiss that paper with "Oh, that's only for the most recent 12 months, lifetime numbers are much higher for women!" Ignore the fact that every single person who is not currently looking at that exact paper knows that only recent results are reliable and lifetime numbers only tell you how much people remember things. Ignore the fact that every single person who is not currently looking at that exact paper knows the most recent numbers are …
/r/EverydayMisandry26/09/25 12:26 AM
30

Australia's government explicitly refuses to acknowledge the gender symmetry in domestic violence because it would "let men escape responsibility for domestic violence."
/r/MensRights18/09/25 11:57 AM
28

I'm sorry ma'am, but we can't train literally every person in the entire world not to be predatory. I regret to inform you that you are going to have to take more than zero responsibility for your safety, just like an adult would.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/25 07:48 AM
34

I mean, to be fair, this tattoo is also going to greatly limit her participation in society. Any word tattooed on your forehead/hairline marks you as a crazy person.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/25 07:42 AM
32

I didn't say it was? At all? Not even anything close? The feminist said that if men had these problems they would be cured. Prostate cancer is a problem men have that isn't cured. This shows she's wrong.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/25 12:00 AM
72

That's why we have a cure for prostate cancer! Oh wait, the other thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/25 07:23 PM
1

Feminism was never a fight for equal rights. Feminism started with the "second wave," who retroactively claimed the suffragists the way Mormonism claimed Christianity. The "second wave" onward was all about women's safety and comfort, justifying all of its demands by appealing to women's safety and comfort, hating men for how threatening they are to women and demanding society change because of how it imperiled women. Women have been safer than men for every second of human history on every squa…
/r/MensRights17/09/25 11:38 AM
3

KDPH is not the same as KPDH. KPDH is correct because it is the acronym for the show. Those four letters are the first letter of each word in the name, which is what an acronym is. AoT is short for Attack on Titan. NGE is short for Neon Genesis Evangelion. "KDPH" is spelled wrong. It should be spelled "KPDH." You spelled it wrong every time you used it and you didn't seem to realize it was spelled wrong even when I told you directly it was spelled wrong and I feel like I am going insane.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/25 03:54 PM
3

You say "KDPH" in the title and it says "KDPH" every time in the article. The movie is "K-Pop Demon Hunters."
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/25 03:21 AM
2

How do you misspell the acronym every single time?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/09/25 06:43 PM
1

No, Communists believe no one should own production and money should not exist. Ownership of the "means of production" should be communal, thus it is called Communism. Communists believe that literally owning property is an act of theft from the proletariat and Libertarians believe the right to property to be the most fundamental component of self-determination. Communism and Libertarianism are completely and fundamentally incompatible.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 12:41 AM
1

No. What matters is reality. Every single feminist with the slightest bit of institutional power hates men. Every time feminists pass a law, it is driven by their hatred of men. Every leader of every feminist organization hates men. Any time someone attempts to fight sexism that harms men, everyone who tries ro stop them will be a feminist and none of the people who defend them will be feminist. In fact the only time we ever see the mythical feminist who doesn't hate men in public is when they a…
/r/MensRights05/09/25 08:34 PM
1

They are completely contradictory because they have totally different beliefs about reality and how things work. An ideology does not mean "wants good things." Your ideology is not just "I want good things." It is a set of beliefs about what is happening in the world, why it is happening, and what will happen if you act on it. Libertarians believe that every person has the inherent right to pursue their self-interest because they are the only ones who know what it is and believe in individual so…
/r/MensRights05/09/25 01:10 PM
4

I know you say that feminists who hate men are fake feminists. I don't believe you. There are more of them and they have more power. "The definition of feminism" doesn't matter. What matters is what they do.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 06:27 PM
7

No. It's like being a Communist and Libertarian at the same time. They have totally contradictory worldviews.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 06:25 PM
-1

The Marvels wasn't great, but it wasn't terrible enough to warrant being the biggest bomb ever made. Like... it fixes the problems with Captain Marvel as a character! The Captain Marvel movie was so afraid to say or show anything negative about Carol that it didn't even have a conflict. The whole conflict of The Marvels is explicitly Carol's fault as a direct result of when she flew off in a burst of Girl Power to smash Space Patriarchy and destroyed an entire civilization. The premise of the mo…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 12:39 AM
18

Women call out misandry all the time. They just get kicked out of feminism the moment they do. Cassie Jaye and Karen Straughan are the biggest examples.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/08/25 11:40 PM
48

If anyone hated any other group of people as much as feminists hate men, they would be institutionalized. It would be incomprehensible to write this premise as anything but a cartoonish dystopia if it was about anyone other than men.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/25 12:11 AM
8

Feminism is the #1 opponent of men's rights and it isn't even close. You cannot justify feminism as not hating or hurting men after the "man vs bear" bullshit. I'm not gonna hear it. You can't talk about a men's mental health crisis without talking about the powerful, extensive social movement that despises us. You literally cannot fight sexism without fighting feminism because -- as I already said at length -- feminism is sexism and has absolute continuity with sexism. And if you don't think th…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 06:23 PM
11

Feminists say that men created misogyny constantly. Feminists talk about misogyny as hatred of women constantly. I have never in my life seen a feminist accuse someone or misogyny who did not specify that person hated women. Feminists never ever stop talking about how patriarchy harms women and is made to harm women and was made by men to harm women. Feminism has a "broad consensus" that sexism can harm men. The only way it can conceptualize this is by saying sexism harms men by making them so t…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 05:02 PM
9

I know that. And you know that. But they don't. And this is about showing them. There is no amount of "look at what feminism says and does" that will cause these people to stop saying "but feminism is for equality." You have to pick apart the terms to try and get them to address the assumptions they don't even know they're making.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 04:20 PM
20

And feminists say "that's not real feminism, real feminism is about equality, if you're against sexism you have to be a feminist." This is why that's not true.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 01:58 PM
1

Women are safer than men and have been safer than men for every single second of human history on every square inch of the planet. Rape is gender-symmetrical, domestic violence is gender-symmetrical, and every other form of harm a human can visit on a human happens way more often to men. You live in a society that is so obsessed with women's safety and so callous to men's safety that you see women's feelings being hurt and say it's killing them, and see men dying and it's just their feelings bei…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 12:28 PM
4

Misandry is when you hate men so much and feel so little empathy for their suffering that you can look at a mountain of men's corpses and still say shit like "Misandry only hurts men's feelings."
/r/MensRights08/08/25 03:25 AM
17

Yeah, and the one that gets you death threats is the one where you talk about male victims, and the people threatening you are feminists. These people cannot imagine that they might have power. They cannot allow themselves to notice they're in charge. The dynamic she refers to does not happen, but she confidently imagined it because feminist statements have no referent.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/25 08:54 PM
1

1: There are way more than 1 misandry kink subs. 2: The primary audience for misogyny kink is and will always be women. Subs outnumber doms. There have always been more women who want to be degraded than men who want to degrade them (and more men who want to be degraded than women who want to degrade them).
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/25 11:39 PM
10

Name any other demographic that you'd be okay with treating this way. Name any other group of people you'd be okay with declaring are so dangerous they can't be around others.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 11:22 AM
0

Point 1 is irrelevant. Most people aren't thieves but you still lock your car. The people who are there to cause harm can affect a lot of people, and we should be able to protect ourselves from harm. Point 2 is what matters. There is no circumstance in which dressing up as a woman to get into a women's bathroom allows you to do more harm than not doing that. There's not a DNA scanner on a bathroom door, anyone can always walk in. Anyone who wants to harm a woman in a bathroom can either walk in …
/r/MensRights24/06/25 12:42 PM
44

Fuck no. Her mom was threatening to beat her and demanding she tell this story, no kid could grasp what was going on or the true consequences and no kid could be expected to go against that. Also the "age of reason" is the age at which it is even possible to commit a crime, not the age at which everything is your fault and you can't be coerced.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 01:07 AM
1

I personally can't relax when ANYONE is around. I have schizoid personality disorder. Any emotional vulnerability in front of anyone will lead to me being betrayed and harmed and thus any demand for vulnerability is an attack. I'm just really good at hiding it by looking at and emulating others, and I'm relaying what I observe. I observe men are uncomfortable when women are around because they are acutely aware of how everything they do leads to being evil. You're doing that "few powerless radic…
/r/MensRights12/06/25 05:22 AM
1

Lucky for you. Really -- it's good to have that and you're lucky to. But feminism actively seeks to destroy any place where men are that women aren't. This is nor a secret, they say this proudly: any place that does not have women in it is evil and sexist and is members should be ashamed. Once you have a woman in a group, you cannot relax. Everything has to be about her and her comfort. Any comment or action that you find innocuous could be offensive or threatening to her, and that makes you evi…
/r/MensRights12/06/25 02:24 AM
3

feminist opinions of MRAs have no referent. they do not observe anything in reality before drawing a conclusion; they just come up with the most contemptible, dismissible person they can. feminists say "oh those aren't REAL feminists" when we describe the concerted work of feminist institutions over decades to enshrine hatred of men into law, then they demand we be held responsible for their fucking imaginations.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 10:38 AM
10

Feminists have to stop hating men. Feminist hatred of men destroys anywhere they can go to be with other men and relentlessly polices their public existence. It tells them that attempting to ask a woman out is tantamount to attempted rape, then shames them for not having a sexual partner. Every time and every way in which a man can feel good about something, feminism actively seeks to destroy it, and the social power of feminism is unchecked. So no, there's nothing feasible that can be done abou…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 01:21 AM
69

"Everyone has a right to use Reddit free of harassment. Well, unless the harassment is for the right reason."
/r/MensRights09/06/25 03:56 AM
6

Wow, the difference between a billionaire and a millionaire is about a billion dollars, that's very true! You know what's a way bigger number than that, though? 200 billion. That's the difference between the net worth of Mark Zuckerberg and every member of Trump's cabinet combined, now that the Last Of Us fungus piloting Musk's body got fired. More billionaires supported Harris than Trump.. Zuckerberg and Bezos both have openly hated Trump over his first term and through the Biden administration…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 10:38 PM
5

how can you possibly look at Trump and say he's for "the rich getting richer" for one the tariffs fucked over everyone who has money, which the rich have a lot of. the market instability and uncertainty created with his stupid unresearched tariff announcements hurt anybody who had investments in international trade. rich people were not helped by this! for two, rich people fucking despise Donald Trump! until Elon Musk's brain got eaten by Internet Cordyceps, his highest-profile business ally was…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 08:39 PM
63

They can say this all they want. They can do all the research they like. It won't work. Men aren't rejecting you because you haven't put up ads in video games. Men are rejecting you because you openly and vitriolically hate men. You will not get their votes unless you can show them you've stopped hating men.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 09:11 PM
25

378 years based on the testimony of one person with no physical evidence? And no circumstantial evidence? And no corroborating testimony? What the fuck were this guy's defense attorneys doing? The only evidence for his conviction was a supposed confession over the phone, except it was a bad quality recording of a conversation in Nepalese and mistranslated for the jury. And they didn't even go "Hey, that's not what that guy said." How the fuck did this guy's habeas corpus hearing take 7 years? Ho…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:07 PM
14

Yes, obviously? Transphobes do not believe being transgender is a real thing, and believe that trans people are all their AGAB. Transphobes believe that trans women are really men. Transphobes hate trans women because they hate men and think men are threatening and predatory. Look at what TERFs actually say. They hate men, they openly despise men. Hatred for men oozes out of everything they say. Trans women are threatening, perverted men who endanger women. Trans women are an attack on Real Wome…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 01:49 PM
22

You've correctly identified that sexism against men and sexism against women are not different things. Good. And you correctly identify how men are ar more risk while women are unfairly constrained to minimize their risk. I believe you when you say you're sincere in this. Then you say that this is what true feminism is and why we should cooperate with feminism. Why should I believe you? From where we're sitting, hateful sexists control all of the power of the movement that is named "feminism" an…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:18 AM
2

You can just look up that Harris lost every demographic, dude. It's not a secret. You can also, like, look up criticism of White Fragility, I'm not making it up. John McWhorter talked in The Atlantic and an interview on NPR about what a racist mess it was and how omnipresent it was in Democratic circles; Taibbi goes into more detail about embracing everything white supremacists believe. Are you somehow under the impression I'm a Trump supporter or something? Because I'm obviously not. I don't th…
/r/MensRights03/05/25 11:03 PM
2

a one upvote post is not worthy of comment. even if the person making said post is delusional because she thinks she can easily pull a greater than 100% annual return on investment with basically no preparation and it's so obvious she doesn't even need to think of a plan. this says nothing about "women" as a whole since this is only a couple of women, one of whom is obviously delusional, come on. generalizing people for their gender instead of looking at overall trends is asinine and generalizin…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/25 02:40 PM
3

Not being able to convince people to vote for you is the defining characteristic of a bad candidate, and both Hillary and Kamala were very, very bad at convincing people to vote for them. "They were the most qualified candidates ever!" was a thing Democrats kept asserting, as if that would make it true. Hillary Clinton didn't win multiple elected offices. She won a single office, Senator from New York, and held it as an incumbent one more time. Both of those elections were essentially unlosable …
/r/MensRights02/05/25 06:31 PM
2

Old systems of values are not worse for women and don't hate women and feminism's error isn't that it went for equality but didn't ease up. The entire purpose of sexism is to keep women safe. Women's safety is the implicit goal of every sexist policy, even sharia law. Women must wear the burqua because to see their bodies will drive lascivious men into a frenzy -- Sharia advocates literally cite women wearing revealing clothing as proof the West hates women. They must always be accompanied by a …
/r/MensRights02/05/25 01:43 PM
9

It's not JUST blaming men! It's not even JUST blaming white people, either. (Those are huge, though). It's also running terrible candidates that refuse to give people reasons to vote for them. Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris were absolute black holes of charisma who didn't have, like, any history of winning elections. The messages of their campaigns were "I should be President so make me President and we will have an America where I am President of it." Kamala also claimed democracy was at sta…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 12:53 PM
6

Well, they kept getting caught trying to racially allocate medical care, which is really bad. It was actually a huge impediment to the rollout of the Covid vaccine in places like California, where people were not administering the vaccine because they'd been told to save it for black people and they ended up going bad (they didn't last long once you took them out of the box). And they keep getting caught discriminating in employment. There's a critical nationwide shortage of air traffic controll…
/r/MensRights01/05/25 11:18 PM
13

No, the Democratic party has fully embraced racism. It just claims it doesn't count as racism when they do it. They back an absolutely deranged ideology that is named "social justice" that despises men and despises white people, and when called to defend its many flaws, just accuse people of being racist for noticing it. "White Fragility,' a book every proper Democrat needed to have on their coffee table, extols a worldview that believes every single thing white nationalism believes and adds "ra…
/r/MensRights01/05/25 10:15 PM
13

Democrats have been saying they need to "reach out" to the people they usually hate and scorn for a while now. And the people saying it are often sincere. But the Democrats, as a party, aren't capable of it. They aren't capable of listening to men or being more empathetic to men, because if you want to do those things, you get kicked out of the coalition by someone who uses it to claim you're a sexist. The Democratic party's embrace of racism and sexism is a train with no brakes, because its int…
/r/MensRights01/05/25 08:21 PM
2

"I don't react to men saying that women are violent the same way men do when I say men are violent. That's why I say they're just trying to attack and harm women by tricking me into having empathy for men. Men don't think that calling men violent is an attempt to attack and harm women like I do, they just say things to be evil. I know this because I have no empathy for men, so whatever I imagine into their heads is true."
/r/EverydayMisandry01/05/25 01:37 PM
-1

don't do the thing where you look at someone suffering and make it about someone else. we hate when feminists do it and it's just as bad when you do it. the other woman here is a hateful foaming-at-the-mouth psycho. any human being she interacts with, man or woman, is going to be worse off for the experience.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/04/25 01:49 AM
1

When feminists talk about men, they do not consult reality at all. Their statements have no referent. They imagine the most permissive and privileged thing, and confidently state it is true despite never having observed it.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/25 11:28 PM
2

Half of your points aren't true (no, defense contractors don't bribe legislators to start wars, we can see what happens and that's not it; free market healthcare is cheap everywhere else and America has a unique system combining the worst of capitalism and socialism with none of the benefits). The other half are things not particular to capitalism. All of them betray a profound ignorance of what you're talking about. Communists love to point out everything bad that happens in capitalism as if th…
/r/MensRights15/04/25 12:37 PM
8

Feminists say things about men and what men experience and what people think about men without ever looking at men for even a fraction of a second. All of their opinions on how men fit into society refer exclusively to their own imaginations. They don't think that deadbeat dads are excused and given sympathy for "not being ready to be a parent" because they have ever seen it -- they haven't -- but because that's what the most permissive and patriarchal thing they can imagine is, so they confiden…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/25 12:26 AM
9

this is yandere fetish stuff and doesn't belong here, there's at least a 70% chance it was made by and for men
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 10:38 AM
14

It's incredible how consistently these people can say "Actually, your suffering is your fault for being such a bad person" about men they know nothing about. I'd ask "Whatever happened to 'when you hurt somebody, you don't get to tell them you didn't'?" but nobody who said that ever meant it.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/04/25 01:45 AM
1

"Would you rather leave your 3 year old daughter alone in the woods with a bear, or a black man?"
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/25 10:24 PM
3

It's not, because the post you're replying to specifies men are 5 times as likely to be killed. Mexican feminists were protesting "femicide" when the ratio was 93 to 7. Demanding we address "femicide" is like having a special term for the murder of a white person. It only makes sense if you think men's lives are inherently worth less; to feminists, any woman dying is proof men hate women and the only "fair" society is one where crimes only happen to men.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/25 03:33 PM
1

No, you don't get to act like shit that's completely made up and nonsensical is still relevant because you think your enemies would believe it anyway. No they wouldn't. There is not a single feminist upon this Earth who would want to eat lead to give her unborn children lead poisoning. That's not what any human being thinks.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/25 03:01 AM
3

this is so aggressively nonsensical there's zero chance it's sincere
/r/EverydayMisandry27/03/25 04:10 PM
-1

Yeah, and they're wrong. The mindset you had of people having harmful thoughts is wrong. You can try to edit and spin it like this is just about holding them to their own standards, but you know it wasn't.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 05:29 PM
-1

No you're not, you made it very clear in your post that the thoughts they have are harmful, and that's wrong. Also, their standards are awful and insane.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 03:53 PM
-4

Nope. They're completely in the right on this one. Fantasy isn't reality and someone's taste in art isn't a moral factor. The part that makes CP bad is the fact that a child was harmed to produce it, not the fact that it's disgusting -- drawings aren't children and can't be harmed. The idea that somehow fiction will encourage people to do things in real life is oppressively authoritarian, has no basis in reality, and is contradicted by reality. Feminists use the same logic when they say men are …
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 02:13 PM
5

The kinds of blue collar jobs that you need to go to training for have great pay and very strong unions. Plumbers and electricians and welders make bank.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:00 AM
5

Boko Haram's kidnapping was gender-based! They were catching children for the crime of getting a Western education. For years when they found children getting a Western education, they would murder all of the boys and let the girls go. They murdered all the boys, and then let the girls go. They murdered the male children and did nothing to the female children. I cannot stress this enough. They murdered thousands of children for the crime of receiving a Western education while being male, and did…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:10 AM
6

Adults modify their behavior to react to their situation and ensure their own safety and goals. Fuck, dude, do you not notice how astonishingly selfish it is to expect that everyone in the entire world bend over for you so that you never have to modify your behavior?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/25 03:30 AM
14

"We're trying to educate you" Yeah, except you're wrong and also a shitty teacher. So much of left-leaning analysis and viewpoints just... cannot accommodate the idea that someone might know what you are saying and still not believe you, much less the idea they might be wrong about something.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/03/25 10:23 PM
19

Women are not more likely to be victims of assault. Men are overwhelmingly more likely to be victims of assault. It is not close. Women are not the majority of rape victims. Rape victimization is 50/50. I said that and you didn't even remember that I said it. Because sexism has so much power over you, it won't let you remember it, not even long enough to say you don't believe it. Men are raped as often as women, primarily BY women, but feminists changed the name of it to "made to penetrate" so t…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:42 AM
19

You have to really, really think nothing of women to believe they have had no input into society in all of human history, that they just sat there like perfect and absolute victims. Sexism is a system made by men and women that is participated in by men and women. You can't see it because feminism is sexism, it is the same thing as sexism, and has absolute continuity with sexism. Sexism says that only men are agents and only women are victims. Sexism says men act and women are acted upon. Histor…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:04 PM
10

Rape is gender-symmetrical, domestic abuse is gender symmetrical, and every other bad thing a human being can do to another human being happens overwhelmingly more often to men. The way sexism works, the purpose of its entire existence, is to maximize women's safety at the cost of their agency and to maximize men's agency at the cost of their safety. One of the ways it does this is with biased perceptions that are obsessed with women's safety and pathologically callous to men. Sexism looks at wo…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:49 PM
1

the name of the character in the art
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/25 10:41 PM
1

don't slander la+ darknesss like this
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/25 07:42 PM
4

the amount by which men are more violent than women is the same as the amount by which black people are more violent than white people. if you think this is proof that men are dangerous, you have to think black people are more dangerous. If you think this is proof black people are harmed and oppressed, you have to think it's proof that men are harmed and oppressed. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 07:41 PM
0

That the amount of bots or shills isn't zero doesn't mean it is a significant amount. Everyone wants to believe opinion is being agentically shaped by a sinister plot, and some people want to believe that they're so smart and savvy they can agentically shape mass opinion. But it's never worked. Calling opinions "propaganda" and "psyop" are just cope, an excuse why it isn't your fault people don't agree with you, because an agentic plot robbed you. But cope is all it is. Either the opinion the sh…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 01:42 AM
-1

This is a conspiracy fantasy.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 03:26 AM
17

Feminists don't refer to reality when they say things. Making things up about people is exactly as valid as observing things in reality. Their analysis of men is always based purely in imagination anyway, they imagine a bad thing for men to do, imagine the worst reason to do it, and confidently state that men are doing that thing for that reason. At no part of the process do they look to see if what they say is true. To feminists, making things up is just as valid as learning them in reality.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/02/25 03:24 AM
2

They believe empathy is a scarce resource and that women have to hoard all of it.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/02/25 11:36 AM
2

In the Marie Adler case, no rapist was identified. Nobody was accused. She said herself she dreamed the whole thing up (due to a very fucked up and abusive childhood that left her doubting her own sense of reality). The rape was later connected to a serial rapist in another state, who was tried and convicted, There is no point in time where this rapist was accused of rape and was "living like an [average] person and getting away with it." This case also has nothing to do with a man being accused…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/02/25 12:34 PM
1

Veronika appears to have said she consented at the time, told friends she consented, abd continued to be friendly with the officer afterwards. (They apparently kept talking about movies afterwards). Charging her with wiretapping is obviously stupid and the police are, surprise surprise, corrupt and incompetent. But the unnamed officer who raped her A: was discharged from the military and B: was never charged with rape because she did not press charges against him. This does not support the claim…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/02/25 02:20 AM
2

I need more to go on than just a first name if you want me to be able to explain them. But also, even if they happened exactly the way you say they do, saying that those are proof that false rape accusations don't harm men is like using 50 Cent as proof that getting shot doesn't kill people. 50 Cent got shot nine times and survived and made a hugely successful career as a rapper, rapping about how he got shot nine times! But getting shot is still a very, very large risk of death, even if it does…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/25 02:15 PM
5

Saying this is proof that false rape accusations don't harm men is like using 50 Cent as proof that getting shot doesn't kill people.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/25 10:42 PM
2

You can't use that as a reason. It's unfalsifiable, it lives in your head. "Sure, nobody supported that, but they COULD have!" is not a valuable contribution.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/25 12:30 PM
9

Posting heavily downvoted comments is stupid and pointless. You're not showing a societal acceptance of a view, you're showing that at least one insane person exists, which we already knew.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/25 09:05 PM
13

Personally, I know it is intentionally absurd and meant to make a statement. It's just the statement is wrong and doesn't make any sense if you think about it. It's just like people saying "guns have more rights than women in this country." It has the emotional register of some Powerful Statement For Women, but try to break down any actual semantic content of the words and it falls apart.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:01 PM
2

yeah it's not like this means anything. Trump is incapable of respecting anyone other than himself. hell, nothing he says means anything anyway. the man can't tell the truth, he can't even lie, those require knowing and caring what the truth is. plus the pussy is among the least grabbable areas of the human body. that part didn't even make sense.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/25 12:59 PM
1

The fact that the suffix "-bro" universally means "person you should despise" tells you all you need to know about how our society hates men.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 04:35 PM
9

The rate at which men commit more crimes than women is the same as the rate at which black people commit more crimes than white people. Everything that proves men are evil threatening criminals proves black people are evil threatening criminals. Everything about the justice system that proves black people are a hated and persecuted underclass proves men are a hated and persecuted underclass. If a woman is more afraid of a white man than a bear, then she should be just as afraid of a black woman.…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 04:29 PM
5

The truth isn't always in the middle. MRAs and feminists have two different models of what sexism is and how sexism works. But one of those models is wrong. If you believe that wrong model, you're going to be unable to predict what happens, believe hateful things, and make the problem worse. I am not going to say it never happens since there are idiots in every group that can't kick people out, but I very seldom see MRAs with any kind of status or recognition say that we have to only work on sex…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 02:28 PM
7

I sort of agree? Like, it is his right to not get involved, and it's hypocritical and self-contradictory for feminists to decry this as not what a "real man" would do when at every other time they claim this is what all men do. But if you're in a relationship with someone, and they're there, and they get involved, now you're involved. At the very least to the point that you need to talk to her about it. Even if your position is "I think this is a bad idea and if you want to risk it then fine but…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 02:18 PM
2

on the one hand LeftWingMaleAdvocates is determined to look at things through a perceptive framework that is always wrong on the other, fuck, at least they're trying most of the time
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 02:15 PM
20

Feminist analysis does not refer to reality. They haven't seen that last panel happen, it doesn't occur to them that they would need to. Truth is derived from feminist first principles, not from observation.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 12:32 AM
2

Feminist theory about men is unique: it is an attempt to explain someone's behavior without ever talking to them, looking at their behavior, or attempting to think about what they want or how they see the world. Feminist statements about how reactionary men are have no referent. They're not based in observable reality. These people could not provide one single detail about what they think men want to undo about feminism; they don't even understand why that's a question they need to answer.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/12/24 03:06 AM
3

I have a long post on Tubr about the difference between "the idea of gender equality" and "the movement that is named 'feminism'." That covers most of it. The rest of it is feminists' utter refusal to entertain the possibility that there might be something wrong with feminism. Feminism is always definitionally good, and anything bad is Not Real Feminism. Once something is claimed as Not Real Feminism, then we're just supposed to ignore it, and never ask why it happened or how to stop it. Feminis…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:24 AM
31

I think the more direct analogy is Emmett Till.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/12/24 07:00 PM
4

The reason some women find death preferable to rape is exactly and literally the same reason Muslims and Indians kill their wives and daughters after they've been raped. It's sexism. Sexism says that because women are victims, nothing they offer is more valuable than sexual purity and without it they are ruined. Sexism says women are so utterly fragile and incapable they can't ever recover from anything. Sexism says rape is worse than death. Sexism has always said that. Third World men kill fema…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 10:13 PM
-8

Keeping trans women out of women's bathrooms is such a waste of time. Let's put aside for a moment the question of "are trans women real women." Why do you think that trans women in the women's room pose a threat to cis women? If these dastardly predators are going to plan and strike at a woman when she's vulnerable in the bathroom, a bathroom bill won't stop that! There's not an armed guard posted outside checking ID, an actual predator can walk in anyway. Are you afraid trans people are so unc…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:04 PM
-31

Google Gemini is not a person, cannot have a conversation, does not hold opinions, and does not have a worldview or model of reality. It is not a person. It is not a humanlike robot. It is a text generator that uses extensive training data to predict what words are likely to appear next to other words.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 09:39 PM
15

If it's "fringe," how come it was passed into law? If "real" feminism doesn't agree, why has "real" feminism never done anything about it?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 06:24 AM
5

Somebody's thirstposting?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 12:54 PM
3

today we're going to learn the difference between "one," "all," and "at least one." also, the only people saying "men can't control themselves around women with skirts" are feminists
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 02:54 AM
5

How is "why did the things you predicted would happen fail to happen and why should I believe that prediction again" a stupid or bad faith question? I mean, we've just seen the Democratic strategy of "accuse people of being evil when they notice the bad things they do" isn't working, maybe try another track.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/11/24 05:56 PM
-4

If Trump was a fascist why didn't he do the fascist things you warned us about last time? We remember how you told us he was "openly white supremacist" and to brace for a wave of hate crimes, how he was going to arrest his opponents and destroy the free press. He didn't do that. We remember the last time you said he was a fascist and we remember you being wrong. Trump is going to be a very bad president because he's incompetent, can't control his emotions, and only cares about winning pissing ma…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/11/24 05:07 PM
3

I'm a liberal when conservatives use it as an insult and a liberal when communists use it as an insult. I want gay married couples to defend their marijuana farms with AK-47s.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:04 AM
5

(comment too long) What we see is feminism lying about things and other feminists not correcting them. There is no female wage gap, First World women are the safest any group of human beings has ever been in history, we do not live in a rape culture, and the criminal justice system takes prosecution of crimes against women more seriously than that of crimes against men. All of those things are great news for women, aren't they? But feminism doesn't say that. Feminism says all of those lies are t…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:42 PM
5

"Male" is a gender you are born into. "Feminist" is a belief system you chose to adopt. I don’t support the likes of Mary Koss or, I don’t know, JK Rowling at all. What power do I have to do something to stop them? Well, none. Exactly! You, and people like you, have no power to stop her. But feminism, as we can see, DOES have power. Feminism is one of the most influential ideologies in the First World. Most of our governments have offices for the specific and explicit purpose of advancing femini…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:42 PM
5

It's not about "the media portraying" feminism as man-hatred. It's noticing what feminists with institutional power say and do. Feminists are very eager to talk about the "rich discussion" within feminism that appears to take place in secret, and how "real feminism" is for equality while the man-haters are "fake feminists." Why should I believe you when you say you have the Real Feminism? Non-sexists hold zero percent of the institutional power of feminism and sexists hold one hundred percent of…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 02:52 PM
9

yeah this entire setup reads to me as being about why the idea is completely wrong. otherwise it wouldn't be a dystopian thriller drama.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:46 PM
11

Point one: "Would you be okay with anyone else accepting that there's only a 'vocal minority of misogynists in any other movement or community? Or would you demand that movement or community devote all its efforts to kicking the misogynists out and making it clear they're not welcome? "Feminism has explained very clearly that if you don't fight against and 'call out' sexism any time you see it, you are a sexist. Feminism also spends no time or effort to 'call out' misandrists in its own movement…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/24 12:30 PM
22

The club, which bills itself as Lincolnshire's largest live music venue, posted a statement on its official Instagram page to say their entry procedure had fallen "far short of our venue entry policy, which requires all attendees to be treated equally and be subject to the same entry requirements". Here and elsewhere, they act like it was some kind of accident, slip-up, or miscommunication. But it wasn't. An accident would have been, like, barring people at the door because the bouncer didn't kn…
/r/MensRights30/09/24 10:11 PM
7

I mean, I don't think she's a troll, I think she's insane, and the idea she's pretending to be a feminist to make feminism look bad is absurd wishful thinking. But I still don't know if I'd blame feminism for her. She's a type of wacko we see all the time, feminist or not, who loves to threaten people with the "dark web" and calls people "kiddo." That's not particular to feminism, that's a type of crazy that exists in the general population. Every online community has some number of members with…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:24 PM
9

"Not all men" is like "not all black people." Nobody says "not all black people are criminals!" because they don't legitimize that kind of hatred and stereotyping. They don't validate or tiptoe around their feelings. Any situation in which you would use "not all men" is a situation you should instead be saying "go fuck yourself, sexist."
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:42 AM
20

Statements that have no referent. This is based on nothing but her hatred of men. Nothing about this makes the slightest bit of sense if you think about it for a moment.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/24 11:30 PM
4

Appealing to the dictionary definition when it contradicts what we see with our own personal fucking eyeballs is asinine. But going "crypto isn't a scam, you just need to keep trying" blows that the fuck away.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 11:11 AM
15

Why do you say those feminists "aren't real feminists?" They control all of the organizational and institutional power of feminism. They're not just the loudest on their own, they're the most listened-to and have the most legitimacy. People get "kicked out" of feminism by having enough other feminists denounce and reject them; nobody ever got excommunicated from feminism for hating men too much and get excommunicated from feminism for not hating men enough all the time. Why should we consider yo…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:15 PM
4

Go tell your feminist friends that you think women's fear of rape and male violence is grotesquely overinflated in comparison to reality, and that women are much safer than men. They will no longer be your friends. Every single feminist who comes by here has a justification of what feminism is "really about" that does not match what feminism does in reality and is utterly unfalsifiable and utterly irrelevant. But you know that what you're talking about isn't "the real feminism" because you know …
/r/MensRights04/09/24 03:26 AM
3

What? You are going to have to be a lot more specific.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 02:33 AM
3

Go tell the feminists you know that you don't think patriarchy endangers women, that women are not and have never been in more danger than men, and sexism arises from an excess of concern with women's safety and not a lack of it. They will be extremely hostile to this and say you hate women and wish to harm women. You can say "no all feminism is is the belief in a patriarchal social order" but we can see what you talk about and every bit of feminist theory and feminist influence and feminist act…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 02:32 AM
2

Feminism is wrong. it's incorrect. the foundational assumptions it is built on -- that to be a woman is to be unsafe, men are threatening and women are victims, that bad things happen more to women because men do not care enough about women's safety-- are the beliefs of sexism and the opposite of the truth. It doesn't matter if they truly in their heart of hearts want equality. They're completely wrong about everything and anything they do is destructive. The only "positive" things feminism can …
/r/MensRights04/09/24 02:20 AM
4

Because the evils of feminism all spring from the same thing. Feminism didn't become evil because its members "lost their way" and started to hate men. Feminism is incorrect. Feminism believes all of the things sexism believes. The most important core beliefs of feminism, that to be a woman is to be endangered and that sexism is inflicted on women by men to harm women and that society doesn't care for the well-being of women, are the exact opposite of the truth. They're working off a model of th…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:02 PM
2

Imagine someone came our and said "It's tragic that so many women are killed in traffic accidents! We need to focus on how traffic accidents are biased against women, and form a plan to protect women from traffic accidents." They start writing papers and spreading advertising about how car crashes target women and are an expression of society's hate for women and any solution must acknowledge men's culpability in killing women in traffic accidents. And when you say "that's absurd, traffic deaths…
/r/MensRights14/08/24 05:09 PM
6

We live in a society that can only see men as threatening and disposable victimizers and women as precious and incapable victims. This isn't a custom-engineered, optimized value system, it's a system of perceptual biases. Victims of same-sex abuse among women require there to be women who are victimizers, and sexism's worldview cannot fathom that. Given the choice between valuing the safety and well-being of an individual woman, or upholding the idea that women are precious because they are all …
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:10 PM
0

Try to weasel your way out of it; your argument was you wanted to force an abortion so you could get out of paying Nobody said that? Nobody said anything like that? You didn't even mistake that, you just made it up.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 02:36 AM
2

What the fuck does this have to do with murdering babies? Do you think that not paying the mother a certain amount of money is tantamount to child murder? If so, why aren't poor mothers murderers for having babies without the right amount of money, or mothers of babies whose fathers died? Can you not hear yourself? This is depraved. "Keep your dick in your pants if she has no income." Like every other child support advocate, the moment you're pushed even a little bit, you reveal every single arg…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 11:42 AM
2

Oh, so it's for the child, you say. So why is the father the one paying? If the child needs money, wouldn't we just have the government give it to the parents directly? If the child needs money, why not have Bill Gates on the hook for it? If we decide children are entitled to a certain amount of money such that we have to force others to bring them to this standard, why are poor women allowed to have children? Why are women allowed to have children if the father dies? It takes money to own a boa…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 11:12 PM
5

There is absolutely nothing else that works like this, legally. You fucked her, she's pregnant, both of you might have fucked up. You aren't the only one with agency here. As an adult with reproductive rights, she can decide to keep the pregnancy or abort the pregnancy; she can choose whether she wants to be a parent. The man should have a similar choice whether he wants to be a parent. If he doesn't want to be, and won't provide financial support, that's a factor that the woman can take into ac…
/r/MensRights04/08/24 11:58 AM
8

no, and it's Hillary Clinton's fault she had the out of touch party leadership buying into the line that it's "her turn" for so long that they've completely failed to cultivate / build up any new talent whatsoever, because charismatic younger figures in the Democratic Party would be a threat to her getting "her turn." remember that Obama was an upstart outsider and 2008 was supposed to be "her turn" until he showed up with his actual charisma and leadership and ability to win elections. Hillary'…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 12:04 PM
1

The study is a lie. The "studies" that "proved" that the Super Bowl caused a surge of domestic violence were lies, and you saw the debunking of it in 1993, and they just kept telling the lie. "Footie causes domestic abuse" is the same lie told by the same people for the same reason. They are lying. Their study is not trustworthy. Their data is falsified. They were not subject to peer review.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/24 03:57 AM
1

But this would not cause different rates of abuse when the team loses vs. wins, which is always part of the feminist myth.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/24 03:39 AM
1

I know this was about the Super Bowl and not football/soccer. I said it was "the version of this myth about the Super Bowl." But the Super Bowl myth is identical in form and content and purpose to the football myth. And the Super Bowl myth was debunked in 1993, and feminists still repeat it to this day, because it's the kind of story feminists tell regardless of truth and the kind of story feminists will distort or fabricate evidence to prove. Since we have an example of a very very very similar…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 12:33 PM
2

The version of this myth about the Super Bowl was made up. It specifically keeps getting passed around with bad-faith misinterpretations of statistics because it is emotionally satisfying to believe. I am not going to buy it when someone repeats the same myth swapped for a different sport. Either people are telling the same emotionally satisfying lie they have before by the same means they did before for the same reason they did before, or human nature in the UK is somehow different from that in…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/24 11:51 AM
6

the 38% stat is also completely made up and the 80% stat is completely made up because a moment of thought about it is all it takes to realize it's utterly nonsensical and "tampons have arsenic and lead" is meaningless, the measured presence of heavy metals wasn't more significant than in any other organic material on Earth. lettuce has more arsenic in it. it's misandry because it's a bunch of lies and bullshit being spoken with absolute righteous confidence, because it says that men are bad and…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/24 01:53 AM
1

Yes. There is no coherent world-model behind GPT's text. It will spit out nonsensical "facts" because that "fact" is made up of types of words generally associated with each other, but not in that specific configuration. Google Gemini is particularly notable for this. When you do a search, and you get the AI summary of results, it's common for the summary to be completely wrong and not match anything the search results say, because a text generator cannot determine which parts of a page are "the…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:25 PM
3

It would suggest that sentences that fit that general shape are dominant. Like, feminist ideas are overwhelmingly dominant on the Internet, but this isn't proof of that.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:56 PM
5

Google Gemini is a text generator. It does not have morals. It does not have opinions. It does not have thoughts. It is a predictive model of what words are likely to come next to what other words. Nothing It "says" has any meaning.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 05:55 AM
1

It's shitty but don't write off a decade-long friendship one day after an emotional outburst. Give it a day or so to cool off and then talk to her like an adult about it.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:00 PM
49

when the fuck do men brag about how easy it is to kill women? feminism doesn't look at reality before making a judgment, everything is based in their imaginations. it would be threatening if men bragged about being able to kill women, therefore, men must brag about being able to kill women. also the rate of sexual assault in women's prison is actually higher than that in men's prison, but there's much less women in prison so the absolute number is lower. last I checked, the highest rate of sexua…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/24 04:53 PM
18

the suicide rate is double the homicide rate, and the rate of accidental injuries dwarfs both of them empirically speaking, the most dangerous thing to a woman is herself; she's far more likely to kill herself than be killed by a man and far more likely to injure herself accidentally than be injured by a man the only way "men are the most dangerous thing to women" is if you construct your definitions such that "men" is the only possible answer you will accept
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 04:58 PM
10

Why do you think subatomic particles don't exist? The atom was named because it was thought to be an indivisible unit, but that was wrong, and it's built out of subatomic components.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 07:14 PM
11

"plenty of misogynistic subs call for murder, r[ape], abuse, enslavement..." N...no? No they don't? Not even the sexual fetish ones?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/24 01:09 PM
4

One: You say the vile sexists aren't "real feminists." Why should we believe you? The sexists hold all of the power of the feminist movement and feminist organizations, and the "real feminists" hold none of the power. "Real" feminists are either completely unwilling or completely incapable of stopping horrible sexists from using the power of the political movement named "feminism" to make the world a worse place. Why should we continue to regard "feminism" as a pure and wonderful thing in abstra…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 04:22 AM
21

These arguments blow my mind, because you cannot have thought about it at all. What the fuck does this person think gamete meiosis is for?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/24 04:05 AM
2

Why do you see the man v bear thing as a personal attack? Why does the man v bear thing make you feel unsafe? I am honestly trying to see your logic here, but it always seems irrationally zero sum. I want you to imagine something, okay? Imagine that the question posed was slightly different: "Would you rather be stuck in the woods with a bear, or a black man?" If black men got mad at that, would you be confused as to why they were mad, would you be confused as to why they considered it a persona…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:39 PM
3

How is it a huge stretch to lay this at the feet of feminists when it was a feminist movement and project from top to bottom? Feminists made this a cause and feminists universally said that this was, specifically, proof that girls were uniquely targeted and proof girls were uniquely threatened. It cannot get clearer. There was not one feminist who mentioned the mountain of corpses. There was never a realization within feminism the mountain of corpses existed. They saw 274 kidnapped girls and car…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 11:07 AM
4

Finish reading the post you replied to if you wonder where I'm getting "feminists don't care about men" from.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 01:57 AM
8

It's not "mansplaining" to explain the differences in our worldviews. You then go "How can you accuse me of bias, when I look at history the only thing I see is what my bias tells me should be there!" History is full of women being disenfranchised and excluded. It's also full of men being brutally killed. Because, as I said when I explained the differences in our worldviews and you ignored, sexism is about maximizing women's safety at the cost of agency. Safety and agency are not the same thing.…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 12:10 AM
12

The most important aspect of men's rights is the whole "men are the disposable gender and nobody cares about us being victimized or killed if there's a woman who feels afraid anywhere nearby." I appreciate the attempt at candor but feminism vs the MHRM is not about "cares more about women" vs "cares more about men" and it's not a gap you can bridge by caring more about individual issues for men. They're incompatible worldviews, they have different ideas of what is happening and how to fix it. As…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 09:51 PM
59

When it fucking says it's a kink, don't go "oh no it doesn't seem like roleplay!" I will bet money more than half of the users of that sub are male, like more than half of the Gorean femsub stuff is women.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/24 12:33 PM
7

You need to actually be ready for him to be vulnerable. A lot of the time, people will say "men should know it's okay to open up and be vulnerable" and then react with disgust and contempt when they do, because they never put thought into what a vulnerable man might say and are surprised when it's something they don't approve of. If that's happened to him before, then he's going to be very wary of any attempt to get him to open up. I have schizoid personality disorder, so I don't know how much t…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 11:10 AM
2

Yes, and it has been superseded. It is no longer legal for women to rape boys. But you aren't allowed to prosecute people for breaking laws that didn't exist yet when they did the crime. The protection against prosecution for ex post facto laws is a vital protection for all of us. Don't be like feminists who see someone protected by a legal right and go "But he deserves to be punished, so we should tear down that protection so we can get him!" A world where people can be convicted of breaking la…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 04:33 PM
4

no, it's much easier when they say they'd rather be with the bear ask them if they'd rather be in the woods with a bear, or a black man
/r/MensRights22/05/24 03:47 PM
7

Don't get caught up in the same mistake feminists make. There's 3 million female teachers in the US, even if the rate at which they abuse students is extremely low, there's still going to be enough examples of it that you'll constantly hear about them.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:20 PM
1

I agree: if a woman has VHS distortion effects around her face, she is likely some sort of monsteroid.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 08:51 PM
1

What the fuck are you talking about? Did you click the link? Dante, as Tony Redgrave, wakes up in a woman's bed who demands sexual favors from him. It's not ambiguous.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:21 PM
9

Complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:55 AM
1

Conservative dress is not a level of protection. "A skimpy outfit" is not actually a risk factor for assault. Women are adults and adults need to be able to take responsibility for their own safety, women cannot expect the world to alter itself for their comfort. Women shouldn't get blackout drunk in unfamiliar areas around strangers because that's a really bad idea no matter who you are. But "a skimpy outfit" has nothing to do with it. Why would that increase your risk of assault? It doesn't ma…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 11:18 PM
14

You're assuming the bear isn't hostile but the man is. If you know how to act around a bear, you can avoid pissing it off. But that's not trivial knowledge for most people. A grizzly prefers to be left alone, but it's idea of what "left alone" means isn't the most intuitive thing because you don't know what its territory is and don't know what it considers threatening. Like "don't run" or "don't make eye contact" are not trivial for a layperson to know. You can't manage a person in the same way,…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:11 PM
1

Result 1: reports of pornography not significantly impacting anything. Result 2: Report of exposure to pornography causing boredom with that piece of pornography, then spins into feminist ideology poisoning about how exposure to pornography causes men to be less sympathetic to victimized women. Ideology poison. Worthless. Result 3: measured harms from pornography exposure as "distorted beliefs" including explicitly the idea that sex is anything but "life-dimension impacting love" and holds appro…
/r/MensRights21/04/24 07:20 PM
2

If someone is struggling with their attraction to women (or to men, come to think of it) do you think this needs treatment? Do you think we all need to confer about how to treat people struggling with sexual attraction and how deep a societal issue it is and how it needs to be acknowledged more?
/r/MensRights20/04/24 07:52 PM
3

Are those people real and not made up. Most accounts of porn addiction are made up by religious conservatives and feminists. Are those people reporting it because they've been shamed into thinking it is inherently shameful. If so, then the solution is not to "help their addiction" it is to free them from shame. The people reporting their experiences with porn addiction do not sound anything like people with, say, a gambling addiction; they sound exactly like male feminists who think they have to…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 05:46 PM
4

Again: How many of these self reported porn addictions are both A: not made up and B: actually someone whose life is impacted by their porn usage to an extent it would be considered an addiction no matter what the stimulus, as opposed to a person who is ashamed of using porn and has been convinced that any usage of porn constitutes "addiction"? People act like "oh, of course, this is settled, everyone knows this" and it's really, really not. It is a lie repeated so often by religious conservativ…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:31 PM
2

And is there proof of this that does not come from a religious conservative think tank or a feminist "dude, trust me on this" assertion?
/r/MensRights20/04/24 03:52 PM
5

If "literally anything can be addictive" why should we care about porn in particular as opposed to anything else? There's Canadians out there "addicted" to hockey. How many of these "porn addicts" who want to stop and can't A: are real and not just made up by feminists or religious conservatives, and B: are actually reacting to addiction-type behavior they exhibit such as sacrificing other relationships and spending excessive time and money on the addiction instead of just being shamed into thin…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:16 PM
-3

No they can't, because "porn addiction" isn't real. It's made up bullshit by sexual conservatives who are disgusted that other people like what they don't.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 12:43 PM
1

oh my God I did not realize drinking out of a pitcher could be so threatening
/r/MensRights17/04/24 02:54 AM
8

OP is a complete fucking idiot. Literally just watch the show. There's no gender politics going on here, you've just bent over backwards to try and be offended. Lucy's brother isn't some loser gamer, he's withdrawn and nebbish and oh yeah an important character. There's a good reason that things happen other than "men are bad" and you literally would have to watch two fucking minutes to see that. That jealous guy is not her friend, he's her cousin. When the main character's cousin confesses his …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 02:45 AM
4

It doesn't MATTER if most feminists want equality. The way they see gender issues and the way they seek equality are wrong. They do not understand the problems they try to fix, they do not correctly identify what problems there are, and they resist any attempt to solve problems because it's outside of their worldview. A practitioner of homeopathic medicine will never be able to cure your disease, no matter how sincere their desire to help, because what they're doing doesn't work. They don't unde…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 04:31 PM
6

Sexism is not a scale with men on one end and women on the other and you try to get the line right in the middle by being more sexist to men to reduce it against women. And feminism is not just the belief women should be free of sexism, it's a whole set of ideas about what sexism is and how it works. And all of those ideas are wrong. Sexism is a system of beliefs and biases everyone participates in. Sexism is not about men hating women and deciding to hurt women, sexism is about maximizing women…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:39 AM
1

I don't think you can be a feminist and an MRA at the same time, and it'd important to know why. Feminism is not just the idea that women shouldn't be subject to sexism. It's an entire worldview and system of beliefs about what sexism is, how it works, and how to change it -- and those beliefs are wrong. It doesn't matter if you are for women's emancipation if you don't know what that is and don't know how to attain it. Feminism is not "reverse sexism," it is the normal kind. Because sexism is n…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:15 PM
9

Every single feminist who says "misandry isn't real" immediately goes on to reveal they mean "misandry is real but it's good that it happens."
/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:38 PM
1

There are ways to define "patriarchy" where it is a real thing. Sometimes you see it defined as the system of sexism and people's efforts to maintain it by punishing anyone who deviates from the sex-assigned narrative. And that's a real thing that exists. That's the motte. The motte-and-bailey fallacy/argument is when you have multiple definitions for the same term and strategically equivocate between them. The motte is the definition you use on defense, the one that's a completely uncontroversi…
/r/MensRights09/03/24 01:45 PM
3

There is no "balance" between feminism and men's rights. There's not a dial you adjust that days "feminism" on one side and "men's rights" on the other. They are two different and mutually exclusive worldviews about gender dynamics and discrimination. And the worldview of feminism is the worldview of sexism and is wrong. There is no right you take away from men to make women feel safer. Feminism is sexism, and sexism demands women always be afraid and feel helpless and that men have to enlist th…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:43 PM
19

yeah he was a monumental asshole nobody could stand, and the accusations were when everyone said "wait, I'm NOT the only one who hates him?"
/r/MensRights08/01/24 01:23 AM
1

The thing you are talking about, not reporting information if it is privileged, is priest-penitent privilege. That is the definition of the thing you are talking about. That is the "loophole" you claim allows this. When the other clergy are the problem, that's not covered by the privilege, so the thing you made this thread about is not relevant. The law you are talking about and claiming is a loophole does not apply and is not allowing them to get away with rape.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 12:09 AM
0

Clergy are exempt from reporting ANY information, if that information is given to them by a congregant, in their capacity as spiritual advisor, with the understanding that (as with Confession) the information is between them and God. It's called Priest-Penitent Privelige and it's the same thing as spousal privilege, attorney-client privilege, and doctor-patient confidentiality. These are relationships where the only way they can do their job is if you are one hundred percent honest with them, so…
/r/MensRights03/01/24 11:31 PM
2

Question is nearly impossible to answer without data that nobody has and nobody can get. How many rape accusations don't get reported to police but are reported to other people or college boards or the like? How many times is it due to the victim seeing no point in lodging a formal complaint because the perpetrator is more popular and powerful than her, how many times is it a malicious act used to hurt someone or get out of trouble, and how many times is the victim sincere but mistaken about wha…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 04:12 PM
5

Like all other aspects of the broader social justice movement, the social environment of feminism gives psychopaths superpowers like Superman gets from the Earth's yellow sun. Psychopaths turn everything into social power games and are the best at social power games. Feminist epistemology ensures that everything will be a social power game by basically saying "you're not allowed to wonder if someone's being manipulative with the expression of their emotions, and you can't check what they say aga…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:46 PM
3

"You don't get to punish someone for a crime until you actually know that person did it. You never get to skip the part where you figure out if the person did it."
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:43 PM
8

They want you to open up about your innermost feelings, and for those innermost feelings to be exactly what they want you to have. Feminists have an idea of what a good and correct man is, and they want you to "reveal" you're exactly what they wanted already and your problems are poetic sadboy things and sometimes you're afraid that patriarchy makes you too alienated from your feminine side. The idea that a man could reveal his feelings, and those feelings won't be flattering and ideologically a…
/r/MensRights27/07/23 07:55 PM
1

In case some insane person decides you're a threat, you can defend yourself.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 11:10 PM
2

a bunch of the responses here are stupid and don't get it. yelling at someone for their instinctive reactions is stupid when they're trying to fix them. linking a bunch of data about the suffering of men doesn't help because knowing that in an academic sense doesn't help visceral feelings. let me try and help. humans are naturally predispositioned to certain cognitive biases, and notably, when we perceive some people as an "outgroup," a distinct group to which we do not belong and do not have th…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 02:01 PM
0

You have given me a reason why you are upset, not a reason why this is legally actionable and different from the usual amount of backstabbing on social media.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 01:08 AM
-9

Any social media site already allows people to anonymously post defamatory content to impact others' relationships.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 11:26 PM
-17

how does that make the slightest bit of sense?
/r/MensRights19/03/23 10:17 PM
-31

what the fuck are you talking about. how does it break the rules? how does it violate ToS? what makes this actionable in a way gossip isn't?
/r/MensRights19/03/23 09:58 PM
39

ChatGPT is not a person. ChatGPT has no opinion and no worldview and answers questions based on a graph of what words are likely to appear next to what other words, without any knowledge of what the words mean. ChatGPT is not a hypocrite because ChatGPT has no beliefs. ChatGPT doesn't "know" anything. It sticks words together to mimic how people do it. When ChatGPT refuses to answer a question, it is because the developers programmed it to refuse to answer that question, due to their ideological…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:59 PM
0

Everyone who wants to torture someone is always just as certain as you are that their victims deserve to get tortured, so you don't get to torture people even when you are very, very certain they deserve to be tortured.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 03:46 AM
5

You said we shouldn't spend money on them. All the money we spend on them is the various people we pay and supplies we buy to keep them in jail.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 07:38 PM
6

if you don't spend money on them they walk out of jail since you're not paying anyone to keep them there
/r/MensRights03/03/23 07:35 PM
4

you never ever get to take away someone's right to die. that's definitionally torture.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 07:35 PM
-6

I cannot side with anyone who gives something a cutesy insulting name like "Onlycunts." It's idiotic and childish. It shows you dedicate way too much thought to something while pretending it's beneath you. r/jnbt is wrong, but that doesn't mean you're right.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 11:52 PM
3

If they're only a vocal minority, why do they command literally all of the social and political power of feminism? Mary Koss is the CDC's chief advisor on rape, she is the one saying "it is literally impossible for men to be raped, never devote any resources to male rape in any way." Is she a "powerless radical?" What can we learn by observing that every single person who supports this women who despises and harms men is a feminist, and feminists have never been outraged about or tried to unseat…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:44 AM
7

Every single feminist says they are really for equality. Every single one. When you actually get them to articulate their views, one of two things happens Either A: they reveal they believe insane things about how evil men are and how men are conspiring against women and all men's lives are better than women and men are safer than women and bad things don't happen to men and men are hyperagentic and women are hypoagentic, so the only action needed for "actual equality" is to punish men more. Or …
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:34 AM
2

For one, casting doubt on the whole post, no Hitler did not make intelligent decisions. It's hard to know anything about WWII and not know that. He was a self-destructive wacko riding a wave of blind fervor in an ideology that preferred action for the sake of action because thinking was for pussies. He got incredibly lucky early in the war which led him to believe he was invincible, committing him even more to his lunacy. He didn't enrich Germany at the cost of others, he didn't enrich himself a…
/r/MensRights09/04/22 11:19 AM
6

I don't care about your gender or race or religion. I care if you're an idiot or not. I care if you can make intelligent decisions as a member of a governing body. Any time you declare that there's some other criteria that comes first before "ability to make intelligent decisions" then you're ruling out the people who are actually good at the job, and those people are already pretty fucking rare. Any representative you pick for their gender is someone you did NOT pick for their ability to not be…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:19 AM
360

Her whole argument is based on the intent behind the person saying it, while also ignoring the intent behind the person saying it.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 01:03 AM
4

0: Sexism is a set of beliefs, roles, and expectations for women and men, enforced by women and men. It is not a matter of "one sex is powerful and punishes the other". It is an extensive system binding everyone with the participation of everyone. 1: Because the male gender role, in all of the history of human civilization, is "the one who has it worse, has less support and sympathy and more responsibilities, but is capable of earning greatness and respect." The purpose of sexism is to keep wome…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 03:57 AM
6

"Everyone knows that women are pro choice" is false. Half of pro-lifers are women. Abortion is not an issue where all women are on one side and it's only men opposing them.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 12:28 PM
3

Her body, her choice, her responsibility. Nobody should ever be able to force her to carry a pregnancy she doesn't want. And she shouldn't be able to force a man to pay for a child he doesn't want.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 12:26 PM
2

...You downvoted it?
/r/MensRights14/07/20 06:57 PM
7

There is no way this is real. That's just hentai terminology and hentai scenes. e: and every single comment was 5m ago.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 11:24 AM
1

You're just ignoring every point I made to restate the premise. Did you seriously not read what I posted? Look at the Middle East and Africa - the men there are dying en masse. The women have greatly restricted freedom instead of being killed en masse. That is how sexism works to keep women safe at the cost of their freedom and agency. Look at what Boko Haram does to girls, and look at what it does to boys. Viagra is exempt from taxation because it is a prescription drug. I specifically said exa…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 11:26 AM
2

So 1 and 2 have been covered by other replies (also what the fuck your formatting is fine in mobile and utterly butchered on desktop) so I'll go through the rest. There's a thing you need to understand to really get what these questions were pointing toward. It's not intuitive to feminists, but once you accept it, everything makes sense. You start to be able to predict what sexism makes people do, instead of having to come up with after the fact justifications. Sexism is something that is made t…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 11:53 AM
9

Did you read my post? I am not generalizing based on "a handful I see online." The fundamental underlying belief structure of feminism is sexism, and it leads you to be sexist while thinking it is equality. Let's skip to the part where you actually reveal your beliefs instead of just saying you are for equality. Who is raped more often? Men, women, or it's about equal? Who is more often the victim of domestic abuse? Men, women, or it's about equal? Who is more often the victim of violence in gen…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:02 AM
11

Feminism isn't just the idea of equality, any more than communism is the idea of fairness. Feminism is a specific set of beliefs and perceptions about how to identify inequality and how to address it. Those beliefs are distorted by feminism's complete acceptance of sexist bias. When you act through the worldview of feminism, you will make the problem worse while believing you made it better. The problem is not just "THOSE feminists," although we should point out that THOSE feminists have access …
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:06 AM
28

I think men have it worse because men's issues involve dying en masse and nobody noticing. I also believe "who has it worse" doesn't matter. Sexism is not a dial that is too far towards "MEAN TO WOMEN" or "MEAN TO MEN" that you "balance" by pushing the other way or only focusing on who has it worse. Sexism is sexism. It is a pervasive system of biases, perceptions, and beliefs about men and women, participated in by men and women. It is not the creation of anyone and inflicted on anyone else. Ev…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:57 AM
1

Joe promises he will add another entry to the list of failed female VP candidates. It's like the DNC is trying to lose by anointing him.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 12:56 AM
5

You believe in "rape culture" (rape of women is seen as the most horrific crime someone can commit, it drives people to absolute bloodthirsty, while rape of men is a punchline, but you believe things people say to try badly to prevent rapes are proof that they support rape) and "objectification" (an idea driven by the conviction that women are so incredibly fragile and men are so incredibly threatening that for a woman to be observed in a sexual context harms and threatens her), but you can't re…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:31 AM
3

It is! Sexism is made to make women safe and valued, in a very patronizing and infantilizing way. It's not a good system. It is good to get rid of it. But if you think "I don't like this, therefore it was made to harm me by people who hate me, and instead people should be trying to make me safe and valued", you're never going to understand anything about the problem and will only make it worse. Conflating "trying to keep me safe in a bad way" with "trying to hurt me because they hate me" and the…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:19 AM
14

Not all Communists are created equal, either. But they have things in common in their ideology and worldview that make all of them wrong. I don't have to listen to every new Communist say that they are different because they never are. The problem with feminism is not "some of them hate men." The problem with feminism is that the fundamental way they look at and interpret the world is wrong. Feminism reaches factually incorrect conclusions Every feminist, including you, believes a bunch of thing…
/r/MensRights15/03/20 11:15 PM
9

I am going to repost a reply I made to someone else who asked this question, about whether feminism and men's rights can coexist. Feminism is detrimental to society as a whole and feminism and men's rights cannot coexist. There is a very costly mistake that a lot of people make: if you have identified an injustice in society, the solution is "do the same injustice but the opposite way" until it somehow "balances out". This does not work, and it obviously does not work. You don't solve an injusti…
/r/MensRights15/03/20 10:59 PM
2

Feminism is misandry in practice. That's what we're trying to tell you. Just like Communists can't disown dystopian police states as "not real Communism", you can't disown misandry as "not real feminism". Every feminist leader is a misandrist. Every feminist organization, every feminist who has political power and influence because of the fact they are a feminist, is a misandrist. Misandrist myths and lies are spread widely by feminism and are not opposed by feminism. Feminists come in here, say…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:50 PM
1

Communism defines itself as leading to a workers' paradise, not a dystopian police state. Communists say all of those dystopian police states weren't real Communism. But we can notice the pattern and refuse to play their definition game. Feminism defines itself as seeking equality, not hating men. Feminists say that all the man-hating done in their name, with their power and support, isn't real feminism. But we can notice the pattern and refuse to play their definition game.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 09:49 AM
1

Right, and all those murderous dystopian police states weren't REAL Communism, because REAL Communism is by definition good! This is bullshit and you know it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:56 AM
0

You are gloating over the suffering of another person, a person whose political views you DO NOT KNOW, because of her gender. No amount of smugness and no amount of posturing will change that fact. You want to change an unfair system that chews people up, but you are happy to see this unfair system chew someone up because of her gender. This is not how someone who cares about equality behaves. Someone who cares about equality does not gloat over the suffering of the innocent because they think i…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:47 AM
0

Wishing suffering on people because of their gender is evil. Gloating over people's suffering because of their gender is evil. Acknowledging that someone did not do anything to deserve suffering, but wishing it upon them anyway for tactical reasons, is evil. These things are evil when feminists do them, and evil when non-feminists do them. It is the same logic they use when they say that men should suffer as a penance for women's fear of rape.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:36 AM
2

I think to metaphorically cleave my head off, you'd have to engage with some actual ideas, instead of just vomiting out intellectual posturing that reads like it came out of a forum signature in 2004. And to engage with actual ideas, you'd have to have some understanding of what was happening around you, some referent to the semantic content of the words being used. Still not seeing a difference between you and GPT-2, much less the difference between you and a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 04:07 AM
1

Are you a GPT-2 bot trained on a corpus of insufferable smugness?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:55 AM
1

You want her to suffer because you think people of your gender suffered at the hands of people of her gender. And the difference between you and a feminist is... what, exactly?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:51 AM
-6

You want her to suffer, not because of anything she did, but because she shares a gender with people you hate. The fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:45 AM
6

it doesnt change the fact.. one year is one year .. the year in link is 2012 ,how do you know maybe there are much more female victims than men in 2013! one year is not important Do you... do you not know how statistics like this work, or are you being deliberately obtuse? Crime statistics aren't a random fucking integer. It's not like in 2012 there is parity, and then in 2013 three times as many women as men are raped. That isn't how trends work.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 03:08 PM
8

Okay. Let's pretend that it isn't universally accepted that lifetime recall numbers are worthless because of how inaccurate they are, how people recontextualize their memories to fit dominant narratives, and the decrease in reported cases of male victimization perfectly matches the decrease in reported cases of victimization in males who were one hundred percent confirmed to have been sexually assaulted as children. Let's pretend that the lifetime recall numbers are accurate. The most recent yea…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:10 PM
14

People do use "fuckboy" to express contempt. It is an accurate listing of how the word is used.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 01:49 AM
1

We want an end to sexism and sexist bias in how society is arranged. We want an end to feminism because feminism does not oppose sexism, it utterly embraces every single bias and goal and perception of sexism. "We should see women as victims who are threatened by men, and enlist the agency of men in order to make women safe and comfortable!" is the core belief of feminism and the core belief of sexism. You do not understand the problem of sexism, you will never understand the problem through a f…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 05:03 PM
10

A lot of trans men -- more than anyone would expect anyway -- become MRAs because the difference in how people treat them when they present as female vs when they present as male is incredibly stark. Of course you have a place.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 01:19 AM
24

It was always the complete reverse.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 05:27 PM
3

wouldn’t you agree that feminism as a concept is as fluid and kaleidoscopic as the person who wields it? just as men’s rights activism can be? somebody can claim that they are acting in the name of an idea (religion, political belief, etc) and do something awful no matter the actual core beliefs of that ideology. Yes, they can. But the core beliefs of the ideology of feminism are sexist. The problem in feminism is not "some people take it too far". The problem is not "some fringe radicals". The …
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:41 AM
27

Feminism is detrimental to society as a whole and feminism and men's rights cannot coexist. The framing of that question shows you are making a very costly mistake that a lot of people make: if you have identified an injustice in society, the solution is "do the same injustice but the opposite way" until it somehow "balances out". This does not work, and it obviously does not work. You don't solve an injustice by trying to line up some imaginary Prejudice Point values. You solve it by changing t…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:14 PM
1

This doesn't mean that the solution is "let's make the problem worse". Engaging in the same injustice you want to fight is both morally wrong and tactically idiotic.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:27 PM
8

The solution to injustice and/or prejudice is not "the same injustice flipped around". That's not how it works. You don't solve people treating the male gender as a morally damning quality by treating the female gender as a morally damning quality. You solve it by getting rid of the idea that gender is morally relevant.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:39 AM
19

Whether or not it happened, "if you deny my accusations you are guilty of defamation" is the worst possible legal precedent to have. Even if every word she said was true, upholding her defamation claim would be horrific and dystopian.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 07:22 PM
2

Because a male author, or a professional author, would have been externally barred by the publishers regardless of how much their book appealed to their audience. That's the entire issue. People were not allowed to acknowledge that anyone wanted a narrative like 50SoG, because it went against feminist orthodoxy. 50SoG (well, its predecessor, Master of the Universe) could only get in because it was written by a woman, AND written by an amateur, so there was already a grassroots fandom for it befo…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 04:44 PM
2

50 Shades of Grey was written by a bad writer. It's terribly written. It's not just a bad portrayal of BDSM, it's a shitty nonsensically-portrayed plot with absolutely insufferable characters. It's pretty much universally agreed to be a terribly written story. Gender absolutely had something to do with 50SoG's success, and its success would not have been possible without the author's gender. 50SoG is a terrible story that is terribly written, but it meets a demand that the market has that publis…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 01:45 PM
12

Male feminists are awful and it's easy to see why. A feminist environment is utterly steeped in the hatred of men. Men receive constant hostility, degradation, and blame. There are only two kinds of men who will stay in such an environment: men who think they have no other choice, and men who think they can use it to benefit themselves.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 04:05 PM
13

The problem is all feminists. Feminism is not the abstract idea of being nice to women or the abstract idea of equality. Feminism is an ideology, it is a specific set of beliefs and filters to interpret the world with. Those beliefs are wrong, and are contradicted by reality. When you adopt those beliefs, and look at the world through those filters, the conclusions you come to are completely wrong. When you act on those conclusions, you make things worse, and make people suffer. Feminism is sexi…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 01:32 PM
38

Not even GenderCritical, who are all TERFy as shit. You would think they'd go after it to maintain the fiction that TERFs aren't "real feminists".
/r/MensRights01/10/19 03:44 AM
3

Feminism is not the abstract idea of women being equal. It is a specific ideology with a specific worldview underlied by specific fundamental assumptions. Those assumptions, and that worldview, are wrong. They are the opposite of reality. Acting on this ideology only makes problems worse and spreads suffering, because the ideology of feminism has everything backwards. Feminists always say "oh, those aren't real feminists, I have the Secret True Feminism". All of them say it, no matter what they …
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:35 PM
1

Everything about this is terrible. Especially the fact that it's Monopoly, which is still a dogshit game.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:51 PM
5

Bullies are invincible. You cannot stop them. Everyone loves bullies, and teachers, parents, principals, and legal authorities will always come down in support of the bully. That's how bullying works. Everyone who was ever bullied knows this. Teaching your children lessons that are true and useful is your job as a parent, even when those lessons force you to admit things you would rather not admit.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 06:04 AM
1

The result of your experiment is already in, and it's "every single person who does shit like this and calls it a 'social experiment' is an asshole who should be bludgeoned with a kayak."
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:08 PM
5

Counterpoint: No, that's obviously wrong and obviously stupid.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:01 PM
1

If two people wanna throw hands, let them throw hands. That isn't the problem. They can like throwing hands, CNC, or all manner of apparently-abusive shit, as long as they're safe and have explicitly negotiated boundaries. If someone's ignoring or refusing boundaries, then that's a Fucking Problem even if all they are doing is plain vanilla sex.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:41 PM
1

The MHRM is anti-SJW but not alt-right. His philosophy has nothing to do with men's rights. He doesn't have the right to override your consent, without prior negotiation. If this is an issue of carelessness, or being uneducated about safe practices, then fix that by learning about safe practices together and explicitly negotiating your boundaries. If he refuses to use a safe word for ideological reasons? Fucking run. Run and don't look back.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:46 AM
2

In what fucking universe does it make sense to say that using a safe word will get him #MeToo'd? Always, always have a safe word. Even if you don't want to use one, have one. No matter how much either of you likes the idea of "working without a net", you need a safe word because you don't know what all could come up and you need an emergency stop lever. If someone wants to do CNC without a safe word, they're fucking dangerous. They're asking you to walk around a worksite without goggles or a hel…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:34 AM
4

The same thing that's wrong with demanding that black and brown stripes be added to the rainbow flag of an LGBT movement that was already fighting for the rights of black and brown LGBT people. It's a demand for a display of submission, a demand to stop fighting for the cause and start subdividing the cause based on Oppression Olympics. Cut your bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 12:13 PM
16

Trans men's rights are men's rights, but to demand we focus on trans rights instead of men's rights is nothing but a bad-faith "gotcha". Which you knew, because you posted five variations of this thread.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 10:09 AM
3

Did you accidentally leave out the bit where he threatened you?
/r/MensRights12/06/19 10:29 PM
9

It's pretty dishonest to hold up a post at -48 as an outrage. When someone on here posts "all women are whores", they get downvoted to oblivion, but a feminist holds up the post as proof of how evil MRAs are... you can see how dishonest that is, right?
/r/MensRights11/04/19 03:02 AM
1

Do you have any evidence that someone deliberately bled all over themselves in a marathon, that is not an obvious troll?
/r/MensRights10/04/19 12:04 AM
2

Then cite those people instead of something that is made up. Also, people have shit themselves at marathons and kept running, period blood tells us nothing new.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:48 PM
11

"This trolling/satire proves how crazy my enemies really are because of how much I want to believe it" is never acceptable. Not from them, not from you.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:05 PM
2

Then they should have cut 5-10 minutes from elsewhere in the movie to make space for Fury and Danvers's relationship to actually work before they go through the actual adversity. I know time is limited. I know movie making is a set of tradeoffs that the director must make decisions about. I am saying that the director made some of those decisions incorrectly.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 08:27 PM
2

You could just boil that down to time constraints, making a story into a film usually necessitates comprimising it to an extent. I am not saying that they adapted out some scene from the original comic where she talked to Sam Jackson. I am saying that this story, they story they told with their movie had Sam Jackson and Brie Larson trust each other far too quickly, and that this story needed five to ten minutes of the two of them getting to know each other, in a way that had more meaning and imp…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:30 PM
8

It was all right but not great. It did have a feminism problem but not the one you'd think: the climax is supposed to be her overcoming all the people who told her she'd never amount to anything, ignoring the haters, finally allowing herself to be confident... but none of those things had ever actually been her problem in the movie. Almost all her screen time has people respecting her. But if you are a feminist, you think all you have to do is show a woman, and you'll be portraying her as downtr…
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:32 PM
10

That is not what those words mean.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:00 PM
5

Dude. The characters in this show need to utter sentences that human beings might say, in a manner a human being might say them, before we get to the point where we worry about their awful gender politics.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:13 PM
7

This is a bad review. First, what the fuck is with mentioning the director's race as a salient point? Second, SJ is among the least of the show's problems! How about the fact that almost every line delivery is stilted and wooden, the lines themselves are totally unnatural, the setup wants to be campy but the show won't provide it, and the cinematography is nauseating to look at.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 01:24 PM
2

You have no idea what is happening and you can't tell your own preferences apart from objective morality.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:55 AM
2

Yes, because there is an objective scale of species progress we can compare milestones with.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:39 AM
2

"I'm gonna go troll those men's rights incels! How will I do this? By embodying all of the attitudes they claim harm men, that will show them those attitudes aren't real!" Also, seriously, are you stuck in 1998? "Hur hur, anime, fat nerd!" Your insults aren't even good. You're running an ancient script because you don't care about what you're doing enough to even look around you. What is your through-line here? Is it just to be obnoxious? What was your endgame?
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:57 PM
4

Your trolling is seriously awful. You've got no idea what you are trying to convey, and you refuse to put any thought or effort into it, so you can only appeal to stereotypes that people who know nothing and have never had a thought in their lives would be able to recognize. I don't know what your goal was but you're humiliating this persona you've created.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:18 PM
5

The entire continent of South America are basement dwelling neckbeards? Your "real man" trolling is laughably inept. Go back to your feminist pals and try again.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:34 PM
3

Life isn't fucking Dragon Ball Z, you unbelievable dipshit. Men are not Goku and women are not Yamcha and you don't just no sell people who have a lower power level than you. Someone who is weaker than you can still hurt you when you aren't able to fight her back to stop her from doing that.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 06:18 PM
12

That's all information she had available to her. If she chooses to start shit with someone who can hurt her, it is not the responsibility of men to bail her out of her bad decisions. She made her choice. Her physical weakness should not be an inexhaustible license to hurt people with no repercussions.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 03:11 AM
2

This is worse. This is, allegedly, a political party telling less people to vote for them.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 01:04 PM
8

Literally the most obvious low-effort unbelievable fake that could be made.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:34 AM
45

And? This is the definition of selection bias. Men who have no reason to doubt paternity don't take the test.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 01:21 PM
1

Okay, the bot strips quotes out of posts before it "reads" them, that's good to know.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:35 PM
1

You... Are you even sapient? It is literally right there. It was on your screen when you went to post this. it's a good point. No it isn't. It fails on every level. Are you a Markov chain bot with the "smug" set to .99? Or are you a person who is so deeply, soul-crushingly stupid they think accusing anyone who ever disagrees with them of being a "leftist" is a withering put-down?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:55 PM
1

You said the point of the cartoon fails on every level. When I repeated the exact same point as the cartoon, you said it was not a bad point, not seeming to realize I was restating the point of the cartoon. You understand nothing but your own smugness. You constantly humiliate yourself with your totally unwarranted arrogance, but you're too addicted to sniffing your own self-righteous farts to ever look and see if any of your thoughts match reality. For the love of God just stop talking, and lea…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:27 PM
5

The way that one refutes it is by showing contradictions, like this one. You don't understand what anyone is saying, and as such cannot explain why they are wrong. You just assert that you have "refuted" it despite not knowing what that word means.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 10:41 AM
11

I mean, it's a good point. Feminists shriek accusations of transphobia in order to attain power, then turn around and expect an obsessive worship of their genitalia. You can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:41 AM
8

but the fact that anyone would take this at face value says a lot about the current environment of political discourse and man-hating. NO. Nobody ever gets to use this argument, ever. When you are tricked by an outrageous lie, the only thing it proves is your willingness to believe outrageous lies. When a feminist sees an obvious, transparent, outrageous lie about the MHRM, they don't believe it because the MHRM really hates women and that makes it plausible -- they believe it because they want …
/r/MensRights22/07/18 01:58 PM
26

And the selection of a meme font. And the use of a pussy hat, which is a shibboleth among anti-feminists and forgotten by feminists. And the use of the "Democrats: Change that Matters" logo to frame it as a statement coming from the Democratic party, when the statement is aimed at the Democratic party. And the fact that it makes no sense to spread this message as a meme to begin with, as it's only actionable by the segment of the population who is running for office. And the fact that the action…
/r/MensRights22/07/18 12:13 PM
85

This is very, very, very obviously a fake image made by 4chan.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 10:54 AM
1

None of those things happened. The definition of "SJW" is not "anyone who disagrees with anything you have ever said".
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:29 AM
3

Whoever is reading this to you should explain what "refuted" means. Refuting involves logical contradiction. You nitpicked phrasing in a way that showed you didn't even understand your own argument.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:45 AM
3

Why are you on Reddit, a text-based communication platform, if you are illiterate and can't form a coherent thought?
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:30 AM
3

"Infinitesimally low" were your words, which every person can see right there. There is no significant difference between "We should not believe a woman became pregnant from rape because women do not become pregnant from rape" and "We should not believe a woman became pregnant from rape because the odds of a woman becoming pregnant from rape are infinitesimally low". They are the same argument. Your argument was stupid, you do not know how to apply statistics, you talk like a smug forum user fro…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:22 AM
4

The thread looks like a fake to bait people into saying scornworthy things, by a feminist who doesn't understand the MHRM. So you, in the name of not making men's rights look bad, declare confidently and at great length that women don't get pregnant from rape. Way to go. You sure did beat the feminist trolling attempt, you genius.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 11:07 PM
69

LateStageCapitalism are Communist psychopaths who take joy in the suffering of those weaker than them. You'll note their content hits the front page all the time and there's no hand-wringing about it at all.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:02 PM
2

What a story, Mark!
/r/MensRights01/05/18 11:56 AM
5

We know what they claim. We don't believe them.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:29 AM
2

"I was an accessory to sexual assault, this proves that all those men who weren't there and weren't aware of it need to 'do better' by giving my ideology more power. I can't be responsible! It's the fault of my entire gender!" The malice of feminists is always proof that we need to give more power to feminism.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 04:17 PM
24

And, if those children were girls, then that decision being made by the highest levels of theater command would be a moral outrage that people cared about.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 04:13 PM
50

We'd have done it if we knew they were diddling little girls. Our failure to do so would be a moral outrage that people cared about. Because women's lives are worth something. Men's are not. Males are a resource to be expended.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:13 PM
11

No, stop it. Don't make ideological bingo cards. Not even when you are certain you are right and your opponents are wrong. Never, ever make ideological bingo cards.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:17 PM
6

Because... Um... Trump, I guess? Nobody really knows what the goal is or what they are protesting. This is why I hate these protests, both this one and the "women's march" earlier in the year. There are a lot of things going on right now that warrant protesting. A lot of shit is being fucked and needs to be brought to people's attention. These protestors don't know or care about any of it; they just want everyone to be paying attention to them and are throwing a temper tantrum that we're talking…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:04 PM
5

Video games, maybe. Tabletop games, the culture warriors have completely conquered them and are now in the "hunt down and execute lingering pockets of resistance" phase.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 09:02 PM
2

Those aren't opposed at all. Emotional reasoning informs how you make decisions: it's when you act as though your feelings are facts about the world outside of you and two things that make you feel the same are the same. Ego preservation is how you make decisions, choosing things and believing things that best maintain your mental narrative of what kind of person you are. They aren't exclusive options, they feed each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 06:35 PM
5

You've never seen a feminist acknowledge you as a female MRA, and promptly go back to saying and believing that MRAs are exclusively male the moment you left their field of vision? Because it's the same kinda deal.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:20 PM
7

No, they are not behaviorally and psychologically identical. Luckily, "men and women are identical" and "TRP is right" aren't our only choices. Men and women are alike in that they are both irrational, selfish, make decisions based primarily on emotion and ego preservation, rationalize those decisions after the fact, and value perceived status over whatever it's supposed to be acting as a proxy for. TRP says these behaviors are failings of women, or primarily of women, and that's why it's wrong.…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:14 PM
8

People have the right to express themselves. The right to express themselves doesn't mean the right to be accepted or lauded. When I say the Red Pill is wrong because it's sexist, I don't mean "they are Bad because they say mean things about women", I mean "their beliefs are factually inaccurate because they apply gender to nongendered behavior and selectively notice information so that it reinforces what they already wanted to believe about gender." I've long maintained that The Red Pill is wha…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 02:58 PM
7

I think the entire concept of a "manosphere" is ridiculous. The only unifying factor the manosphere has is the belief that men have needs. Society is so gynocentric it believes that thinking men have needs is enough to make people allies in a fringe movement, but their perception isn't accurate.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 02:49 PM
16

When someone says "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind", it is harder to take them as sincere if they only say it just after gouging out someone's eye.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:18 PM
4

The only thing it is necessary for is ensuring we become as terrible and destructive as they are. Their "intensity" tells them to never think about the consequences of their actions and to never think about if what they are saying is true. Feminism makes the world a shittier place to be because feminists feel so strongly that they are right, and feel so strongly that they must win at all costs, that they have completely lost the ability to see the damage they cause. If MRAs believe the same thin…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 04:29 PM
7

"This isn't a debate, it's a war, and we need to do whatever it takes to win." Why are feminists and SJWs such terrible people and why does everything they do make life that much less worth tolerating? Because they believe this. This thing, exactly.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:39 AM
1

Men on average might be more logical than women on average. But since all people on average are incredibly illogical, making decisions based entirely on emotional reasoning and ego-preservation, the difference in average logic cannot be that large and probably shouldn't be something to hang your hat on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 05:06 AM
0

No, it is not right that she be criminally charged. She should be fired, because the fact that she's a bigot made her bad at her job. But criminalizing speech, no matter how abhorrent, is never ever ever acceptable.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 01:12 AM
1

Okay... a simple "wrong" would've done just fine.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 11:44 PM
5

You just said we don't need laws because people don't need to know what they can do that is or is not acceptable, and "common sense should suffice". This was just after you said that killing people in order to get things that you want was acceptable, and that the law was not worthy of respect because it told you not to kill people to get what you want. The things that you are saying are cartoonishly evil.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:11 PM
6

People who don't care about what the law says, when the law says to do something contrary to their emotional impulses, cause the law to be meaningless. The only people who fear primitive retribution are those who fear that someone else who has the power to hurt them will decide that hurting them is good. That group is "every living person". Your whole post is bonkers.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:05 PM
6

Her actions are not correct. They may be understandable, but they are not correct. Allowing people to do this destroys the justice system and indeed the entire concept of justice. It is understandable because people feel that emotional impulse to visit infinite punishment on "bad people" -- but the whole purpose of having a justice system is to stop people from doing that. I think that a man would have been given a light sentence in the same circumstance, because the identity of the victim is wa…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 07:54 PM
2

"I need money in order to do this specifically enumerated action" is not the same thing as fetishizing victimhood, even if you do not believe the money was used to do that action.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 04:48 PM
9

Oh yeah, go neoreactionary. Hey guys! Frustrated in how men's issues are ignored? Why don't we all go back to the system that depends entirely on male disposability! We won't get any more support from feminism, but at least we'll be trying to hurt men just like they are!"
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:26 PM
1

Feminists think that hurting men helps women, but when it comes to a choice, they always seem to choose "hurt more men" over "help more women". (By which I mean, when feminists use the political and social power of feminism as a movement to accomplish goals; you can't say that kind of thing about every person who says the words "I am a feminist")
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:24 PM
2

The logic by which there is still a victim can be defended, but that doesn't extend to saying that therefore someone must be punished. There are plenty of accidents that have victims, but nobody should be punished for. She lied about her age in order to have sex. Okay. And you think that she is still hurt by this. The whole reason having sex with underage people is bad is because they make bad decisions that can potentially hurt themselves, so that checks out. But that doesn't mean he did anythi…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:53 PM
1

Because ignorance is impossible to disprove? If ignorance of the law was an excuse, that incentivizes ignorance. Even if you say "it's impossible for people to not know that things like murder and rape are illegal", you still made it impossible for regulatory agencies to work, because the entities they regulate just have to avoid knowing about regulations.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:50 PM
1

The question at some point is - you know murder is illegal. You go to a shooting range. You shoot a target. Turns out, someone tied someone up behind the target, you can't see them or know they are there, and you now shot them to death. You watched the retsupurae of Hopkins FBI too, huh?
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:47 PM
3

I doubt it. Cops look after their own, because the ones they have to rely on are other cops, and their opponents are not cops. The opponents of attorneys are other attorneys.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 05:12 AM
1

It's kind of shocking how many ways feminist selfishness can manifest itself. Feminists are selfish. The more feminist, the more selfish. The high-profile feminists, who have access to the political power of feminism and can use it to get what they want, are so selfish they live exclusively in a world of their own emotions. "How it makes me feel" is the only trait anything has. Feminists decided that men having something and women not having something made them feel bad, therefore, people were h…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:45 PM
3

This sub has been brigaded with fuckers like you for years, asking pointless questions like "should we team up with feminists or fight them?". Enough already. OP is not saying "should we team up with feminists". OP is saying "Feminism is the enemy, but that doesn't make it cool to shit up everything while arguing with feminists."
/r/MensRights03/08/15 12:44 PM
1

That was my hope for both The Patriarchy and Gynocentrism (well, that and then discarding the terms from reasoned conversation)... I think Gynocentrism is too broad a term, and that breaking it down will be helpful in understanding the world. Gynocentrism is not analagous to The Patriarchy (and shouldn't be capitalized as it is not a proper noun). The idea of gynocentrism is not that all of society is structured to enforce this at every turn and it is the defining overarching rule of how things …
/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:32 PM
1

Why do you have to make gynocentrism a perceptive bias in order to claim the US is gynocentric? I mean, as long as you aren't engaging in sophistry like "you can't claim things have traits because not every single aspect of that thing exhibits that trait," you can make a clear argument for the US being gynocentric. The US government has multiple organizational branches devoted exclusively to the well being of exclusively women and none to the well-being of exclusively men; multiple laws devoted …
/r/MensRights28/07/15 12:16 PM
1

Toward that end, I don't think the specifics of any one person's definition of Gynocentric really has all that much to do with gender, so much as which thoughts they've been exposed to. It's mostly about inferential distance. This doesn't make sense to me. Inferential distance appears to be about why ideas that seem obvious to some people don't seem obvious to others, but an idea itself is not "about" inferential distances. You seem determined to explain the concept of 'gynocentric' as a percept…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:42 PM
3

Do you have issues you feel have an obvious "male perspective" and an obvious "female perspective"? If you do, and can share them / explain how to predict these things I can do more searches... as it is I feel like the above is basically me trying to make up a hypothesis rather than checking someone else's... that being said I'm starting to feel like Gynocentrism makes about as much sense as The Patriarchy :p I think you're going at it from the wrong angle. Womena re not exalted above men in eve…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:53 PM
1

The women are wonderful effect is how they get away with this without being told "Shut the fuck up, your feelings aren't my problem."
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:34 AM
4

Feminists fear us and derive psychological satisfaction from discriminating against us. So long as their fear remains, they will never "Feel Safe." which is why they're getting crazier and crazier with their bullshit. Thiiiiiiiiiis. Feminists absolutely refuse to take responsibility for their own emotions. Instead, they both assume that their emotions are men's responsibility to take care of, and think that their emotions measure some objective reality instead of existing only inside them. This …
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:59 AM
19

Bush had a pretty high intelligence. The problem was, the only thing he ever used that intelligence for was rationalizing why the thing he already wanted to do was in fact the smart thing to do.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:58 AM
1

Places that loosen their gun control laws see immediate and drastic reductions in violent crime, with no change in the underlying populace. I would love to see some data on this.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:36 AM
1

Oh no, she felt a sense of obligation to someone else, driving her to do something she would prefer not to! Welcome to every single second of every single day of my entire life.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 06:51 AM
0

the places with the most crime also tend to be the places where the Democratic Party has held one-party rule for the longest and gun control laws are the strictest... the parts of the US where citizens may easily keep and bear arms in public are FAR safer than the places where guns are generally prohibited. Don't go jumping to conclusions about this. Saying "this shows democrats are criminals / gun control increases crime!" is just as much a leap as "black people committing crime proves they are…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 06:48 AM
22

If you shake my hand, better count your fingers.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:11 PM
1

Basically, when you go to Japan, the polarity of what is gay and what is straight is completely reversed. To Japanese audiences, those guys are... well, they aren't NORMAL, they have fantasy-universe costume designs, but there's nothing 'off' about it. Whereas a character like Marcus Fenix, someone who we would all agree is ultra-masculine, Japan sees and thinks "This dude is so gay he shits rainbows."
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:10 AM
1

Hey. HEY. Are you shit-talking the Ultimate Life-Form?
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:05 AM
6

Okay, whew. Everything's cool! Stand down, everybody! He was talking about The Final Frontier!
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:35 AM
3

You think that Star Trek 6 is the worst Trek film? Seriously? Out. Get out of my America.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:08 AM
2

Except that this conversation began by talking about WRA as a term for people who advocate for women without being feminists and without doing the things feminists do. "We should use the term 'WRA' for people who advocate for women without being terrible like feminists are." "'WRA' is bullshit, because feminists are terrible!"
/r/MensRights24/04/15 11:17 PM
0

No, you don't imply that at all. If we all accept that feminism's wrong when it claims that all men's problems will be solved by solving women's problems, we should accept the converse is also wrong. Does the existence of animal shelters imply there are no homeless humans in need of shelter?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:12 PM
1

Why would the TGS care about Calgary Expo's conduct? Why is Calgary Expo even on their radar, and why would they take sides in a political conflict when they could NOT take sides and get everyone's money because they are the god damn Tokyo Game Show?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:10 PM
4

We don't have to always focus on only the worst thing in the world. We don't yell at people for running animal shelters because they could be running homeless shelters. There is no problem with advocating for women even in areas where men have it worse, so long as the problem is different. The problem is when you advocate for women by lying about how bad they have it and prevent people from advocating for men.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:03 PM
1

I'm going to have to disagree here, and cite Slate Star Codex twice All of the research int he area is hopelessly biased and chances are that everyone does multiple studies and only publishes the ones that find what they wanted to find to begin with. The most sensible conclusion to draw from this is that there is no significant bias one way or the other and any finding of bias is statistical noise, not that the one study that confirms what you wanted to be confirmed is right and the rest are wro…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:27 PM
1

a bridezilla doesn't have to have scales and radioactive breath. I think we can all agree what a letdown it was when we realized this.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:05 PM
7

That person's values won't be common enough to dictate what everyone is doing, though, regardless of what gender or ethnicity or sexuality or other-identity-category they have. Some people have principles. Those people are very notable for being exceptions. People, as a rule, do what they can get away with.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 06:46 AM
6

People do what they can get away with. Women can get away with not having empathy for men, much much much more than men can get away with not having empathy for women.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:46 AM
11

A great many people say that not only is there no female privilege, but anyone suggesting there is is morally depraved and should be annihilated.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 11:18 AM
1

What's yours is mine. What's mine is mine, too. If you shake my hand, better count your fingers.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:21 PM
2

This can't be accurate, because Oprah exists. Or is Judge Judy just at the top of the list because Oprahs money has transcended countable values?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:55 PM
1

Try responding to what people say instead of solely dealing in emotional connotation next time. You'll seem less batshit insane.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:30 AM
1

"Some proof your facts are incorrect"? What facts? You're all over the map, spewing out negative-affect words but with no coherent argument or central thesis beyond "down with things that make me upset".
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:54 AM
1

Okay. Empathy is the ability to envision the mental state of other people dissimilar to oneself. (Extremists in general are very bad at this, which I believe is why the 'horseshoe theory' effect is observed -- the behavior at both ends of the political spectrum is caused by being so bad at empathy you no longer understand that other people think differently than yourself). Anarchists are very bad at empathy because anarchy requires the belief that if everyone just cooperated, we wouldn't need go…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:25 AM
1

So the only options are, either Republicans and Democrats are the same, or they bow to your demand to fully disclose "everything that is happening the government", a standard which cannot be met because you will always say there is some evil cover-up. You can't envision aaaaaaaaaaaaany possibilities other than those two things.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:13 AM
2

It has at least some level of functionality. It is not perfect -- some of its most famous advocates say it's "the worst system, except for all of the others" -- but it isn't a complete unmitigated disaster on every conceivable level. Saying that because capitalism or representative democracy has failings, anarchism is off the hook for being a complete shitshow is almost the definition of being wronger than wrong. Even the neoreactionaries, who literally and not figuratively argue for a return to…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:26 PM
5

Here's the thing about responses like this. They sound good and are emotionally satisfying to think of that the feminists are trying to trick us and manipulate us, but I don't think it is defensible. No movement as large as feminism can tell a lie to anyone else that it does not first tell to itself. They don't say that feminism helps men to trick you. They say it because they believe it, and they believe it because they haven't thought about it and just assume "Since helping people is good, and…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:14 PM
0

Anarchism is and always has been and always will be pure idiocy. It requires such a fundamental, gobsmacking lack of empathy it's hilarious, you have to nto only be unable to think LIKE people dissimilar to you, you have to be unable to realize those people even exist. Every single anarchist proposal totally disintegrates the moment it is introduced to someone who doesn't think exactly like the anarchist making the proposal, which is part of the reason they spend so much time tearing each other …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:09 PM
3

No, but they've always been anarchists, which means they don't occupy the real world, make demands based entirely on their emotional impulses without ever putting any consideration into them, blamed all the negative things in the world on a malicious conspiracy so preposterous in scope it would make David Icke say "Okay you guys need to start taking some lithium", thought they were God's gift to everything, had a total and comprehensive inability to imagine anyone not thinking like them, and spe…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:49 PM
0

That's not proof. That's just you spewing negative-affect words out of your noise hole.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:40 PM
2

I don't think /r/anarchism needed to be "taken over" by SRS. That is like saying London was "taken over" by the British.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:38 PM
-2

It's like saying "I'm a Communist, but I don't want to kill 30 million people" when in the past hundreds of other Communists have said exactly that and then it turned out when you applied the slightest pressure they were perfectly fine with killing 30 million people.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:37 AM
1

We have reached an agreement on what feminism is, and would say that we are anti-feminist, because feminism is terrible for [insert very long list of reasons]. But people who would ask that question -- almost always, people who intend to use "anti-feminist" as an attempt to shame others into agreeing with them -- would not agree with us, with each other, or with themselves at different times about what "feminism" is, so their accusation is incoherent.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:28 PM
1

But it isn't just as accurate.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 01:49 PM
1

And what I am saying is that the part about "the man she knew was morally upstanding and has her continuing admiration" is worthless to anyone, because the only information it imparts is telling us what Keisha Knight wants to believe; it doesn't tell us anything about what is true. Lemme break it down this way: If she had said "Well, I never saw anything happening, but Bill was a total dick and I hated him so this seems like exactly the kind of thing he's capable of," would you find it convincin…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 01:46 PM
1

This is just as much "my side is right because of my feelings" as the people saying that because he is accused, he must be guilty. "That's not the man I know" means nothing, because her assessment of the "man she knows" is based on what she wants to see and what she wants to believe, not what is true about Cosby. People have what they want to believe, and discard information that contradicts it. While "he hasn't been tried yet much less convicted" is true and relevant, "that doesn't sound like t…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 09:27 PM
3

Anarchism is one of the dumbest political ideas there is; fortunately, since the people who advocate for it are anarchists, we are at no risk of their policies ever being implemented. Do you think governments came from outer fucking space to enslave humanity? Our ancestors had anarchy. All of them said "this fucking blows" and got together and made governments.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:49 AM
2

Any time you see someone saying "You have good points but you have to abandon the label," it's usually because that person and their ideological allies have smeared that label as being evil but have now realized they cannot actually defend any of their accusations on a rational level.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:35 AM
2

It is not necessary that they get together and do it, just that the heard of each other.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 04:52 AM
1

Dude. If I had the barest excuse that I 'should' be wearing a lab coat and carrying around a bubbling beaker full of Science, I would wear nothing else.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:24 AM
1

Appealing to Wikipedia or a dictionary definition for feminism is meaningless, and I can show you why. If Wikipedia, or a published dictionary, defined "Feminism" as "A collection of morally and intellectually bankrupt movements and ideologies who claim to advance the cause of equal treatment for women while actually doing everything in their power to promote fear and eternal victimhood in women and directly or indirectly harm men", how would you respond? How would feminists respond? Would you a…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:49 PM
1

To be fair though, a great many of the injustices we see against women in the 'uncivilized world' are perpetrated in comparable amounts toward men as well, we just don't care about it. Like, 40% of acid attack victims are male. And Boko Haram, the group who I think you are referring to when you say "trying to prevent an entire gender from receiving education through threats and acts of violence", is FAR more threatening and violent to boys trying to receive an education -- it captures the girls …
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:43 PM
0

Jesus christ your own source calls out your own fucking bullshit. From the point "Programmed gender identity is irreversible" states that performing surgery to change "boys into girls" or vice versa never works and that the person's life is damaged for it. How fucking stupid are you? Seriously. How fucking stupid. I want you to quantify it into a fucking number so I can calibrate my scale of total gobsmacking ignorance. How the fuck are you responding to my posts if you don't know how to read, y…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:49 PM
1

While I do admit the second quote you highlight did not outline what I was saying clearly I was in no way suggesting that people can "develop animal brains". What I was stating is that if you firmly fucking believe that people born into a male body can be born with a "female spirit" or develop a "female brain" yet deny the idea that a person can be born into a human body can be born with an "animal spirit" or develop an "animal-like brain" makes you a hypocrite and clearly a biggot. Nobody said …
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:53 PM
1

Something tells me a nerve has been hit and you're backpedaling pretty hard right now. That 'something' is the fact that you very much wish this was true, and so will see whatever you need to to make you believe it is true. I haven't backpedaled at all. I'm going to need sources that states that there are no biological processes by which an infant brain becomes the brain of an animal because we do have different parts of the brain commonly referred to as the "reptilian" and "mammalian" brain. Th…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:56 PM
1

There is no biological process by which an infant human brain becomes the brain of an animal. There is a process by which an infant human brain becomes a gendered male or female brain, it happens after birth, and is triggered by hormonal exposure. On very rare occasions, the process happens the wrong way. DID is a delusion -- if it exists at all (we aren't sure it's not entirely iatrogenic, caused by therapists who believe it exists). It's a psychological condition. It is not a neurological cond…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:58 AM
1

We don't give people with schizophrenia medication in order to punish them or hurt them or condemn them. We give them medication in order to help them live like normal people despite having an illness. They have an illness, we treat it. That's not disrespecting their rights. If we just locked them up in padded rooms forever to make them go away and leave them screaming in the dark, that would be disrespect. But we don't actually do that (well, most of us). Transgender people have an illness too.…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:06 PM
6

Most of them are working towards the same goal as us from the opposite direction and working together would benefit everyone more. No. No, they are not. Feminism actively opposes men's rights at every turn and has a very long history of enshrining misandry into law. Most feminists are not out-and-out raving psychotics like the most visible extreme, but feminists believe in an ideology that says men are to blame for all bad things, men should be punished when women are unhappy, women are valuable…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 12:52 AM
0

Surgery isn't mutilation. Just because something is gross doesn't make it condemnable.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 12:45 AM
1

So are we supposed to be talking about what it says about discourse in general, or what it says about the behavior pattern of feminists? I mean, it's a very good and well-reasoned piece, but like a lot of Scott's writing that touches on subjects of gender or "social justice" it's long and meanders through several different areas.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:46 AM
0

The real question is why is it in the interests of the rich and powerful masters of society to boost feminism? No it's not. The real question is never, ever, ever, ever, under any circumstance, "how/why are the rich and powerful masters of society manipulating us into doing this?" That is paranoid delusion. The rich and powerful are subject to the same human frailties as the rest of us, being powerful does not make them better cooperators or better at keeping secrets or better at prioritizing lo…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:21 AM
5

Long story short: if you want to be a moralising prick, make sure you are of unimpeachable moral character. Personally I'm the worlds most boring man who goes out of his way to help people, even I don't shove that in the face of others. Anyone who wants to be a moralizing prick won't be of unimpeachable moral character. The need to be a moralizing prick is the same need that drives people to do awful, abusive things: the need to have power over people with no sense of responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:13 AM
3

Feminism is not capable of telling the difference. How many feminist arguments have you seen that boil down to "This thing happened that upsets me! This proves the world hates me and is out to destroy me! The only thing that would be fair to me is if I could ensure nothing that upsets me would ever be done by anyone!"
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:10 AM
12

It is just your perception. People like to say the feminism is lashing out in its death throes, it knows it is losing power, etc. But it's not true... well, it is, but not in the way they think. Feminism is an ideology defined by victimhood; its adherents are unable to see that they have any power or influence because they are eternal, perfect, precious and virtuous victims. No matter how much power they accumulate, and they have steadily accumulated power since they came into existence, they wi…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 04:05 AM
11

Every time feminists do something bigoted or destructive, others say "This isn't really feminism! Actual feminism is good!" This is the only action these alleged "real" feminists take. They don't stop the destruction caused by "not real" feminists. They don't oppose it, speak out against it, or try to undo it. They don't support things that actually fight for real equality. The only thing that they do is say "But that's not real feminism!", over and over again.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:07 PM
2

I don't think there's any inherent difference biologically, and people in general are bad at knowing what their own thoughts actually are. But it's also true that the behavior will be more obvious in women simply because they are far more often allowed to get away with it, and all kinds of people will do what they can get away with. Men may be just as bad at knowing what they are thinking, but are less likely to aggressively make it someone else's problem and responsibility, because they can't g…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:29 AM
0

The death threats are real, or at least some of them are, because everyone on the Internet with any notability whatsoever gets death threats.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:28 PM
3

So, was Anton Chekov an anti-gun activist? And maybe it's turned around in recent years, but when I was paying attention, SVU was anything but "predictable". Because the stories were so goddamned insane and leapt from plot thread to plot thread like a bunny on crystal meth, you had basically no idea what the episode was going to be about even 2/3rds of the way in. The "SVU Game" was very simple: 5 minutes before the end of the episode, try to remember how the episode started, and how that event …
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:52 PM
6

How is her gender not relevant to her experiences and observations of how gender affects her?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:45 PM
1

By this standard, the American Democrats are the right, and the Republicans are the left. Since the Republicans are about destroying government, and the Democrats are about supporting it. These aren't the definitions anyone else uses.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 11:04 PM
3

Censorship is a "people who value self-image more strongly than truth" trait. These people are found with equal frequency on the right and left.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:10 AM
1

Wasn't there a documentary on him and his home/family life? Yeah, I just looked for it, it's called "The Most Hated Family In America". That... doesn't really leave open the possibility it's an act.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 06:05 AM
3

Studies have shown that women have more of an in-group bias based on gender, but studies have also shown that as people gain wealth and power -- even fake wealth and power -- they have less empathy for the people below them. "Most women in power don't give a shit about women below them either" is probably accurate.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 02:03 PM
1

That level of support doesn't get them everywhere, it just convinces them they should stick with it. The level where the only real failure condition is giving up, because you're not really playing for any sort of high stakes, unfunny women will hear "you go girl" and keep going, unfunny men will hear deafening silence and give up. Unfunny women won't make it any further than that level, but are less willing to leave it. At higher levels, yeah, women face opposition, due to the overvisibility of …
/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:26 PM
3

So, they are only funny because they tell the same kinds of jokes men do... Wouldn't that make them "funny jokes", the kind of jokes told by successful comedians, and not "men's jokes"? The fact that lots of mid-level stand-up circuit female comedians aren't funny and just trot out the same old tired shit about periods and tampons and men being dumb isn't because women are less funny. It's because unfunny women are more likely to be told they are funny and should pursue a career in comedy than u…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:56 PM
5

I am pretty sure that ZQ herself (much earlier) publically compared infidelity to rape because you're violating the consent of the partner being cheated on. I'm not 100% sure, though.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:20 PM
3

It's the difference between an ex of mine, who'd write chapters upon chapters of High Fantasy when she felt creative, but refused to do proofing because she deemed it the reader's responsibility to figure out what she meant... Whooooooooa whoa whoa. Let's back this train up here. You cannot just leave a comment like that hanging.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:42 AM
46

I like how the guy uses an image macro from a South Park episode that explicitly mocked the exact thing he is saying.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:19 AM
2

Here's the phrase I've been repeating every time this comes up: "Anti-feminists are not ignorant of what you say 'real feminism' is. We do not believe you."
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:03 AM
1

Liberal, in that I think many areas need regulatory intervention to "work" optimally. I also think feminism and marxism are devouring liberalism from within, and corrupting every potential good thing that could come from the left, by being ideologies that are emotionally satisfying to adhere to and to condemn others for not adhering to, having principles that are so easily applied and consistent that answers can be arrived at before hearing the relevant questions, and being wrong one hundred per…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:03 AM
2

This reminds me of a political cartoon I saw, posted on Lassiez' Faire (the Something Awful forum that became the source of Tumblr SJWs, long story), that compared the relationship between corporations and the American people to an abusive spouse. They were offended all up and down because this comparison "trivializes domestic violence." And I am like, "You people literally advocate armed, lethal rebellion in order to destroy the current relationship between corporations and America. How is comp…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 12:00 AM
2

Are you trying to evade the question by insultingly implying that men cannot face sexism that favors women, or are you trying to evade the question by changing the subject?
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:51 AM
1

Do you think that the only people who affect culture are those with positions of formal power and responsibility? Have all women been powerless to affect their environments and their communities' views until the year 1970? Because that requires all women who have ever lived up until the 1970s to be completely pathetic, powerless victim-children, uninterested in and incapable of having an effect on their environments, across ALL cultures and ALL levels of technology. Do you believe all women are …
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:27 AM
5

If women "affect the image of a 'real man'", then why did you instantly assign blame to men and omit women's culpability?
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:26 AM
5

You instantly and automatically assign blame for men's problems to men. You blame "patriarchy", which tells me that you blame men for women's problems, as well. The idea that women, or people in general, may be responsible for determining and perpetuating our cultural norms just flies by without your notice. You believe men to be threatening and blameworthy, and women to not be blameworthy. When you see an event that has happened, you assume that a man is to be blamed. You didn't even realize yo…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:30 AM
2

It's never been about who "news organizations" focus on. It's never been about the loudest, most extreme voices taking focus and obscuring "reasonable" feminists. The extreme, man-hating feminists have all of the power in the feminist movement, they have always had this power, everything that is done by feminism is done by and in accordance with the ideology of these people, and the only thing "moderate feminists" ever, have ever, or will ever do is claim that the actions of these people do not …
/r/MensRights16/07/14 02:17 AM
0

A layer of harassment that men don't deal with, as in they don't have to deal with the exact and specific forms that women do? Yes. A level of harassment for which men experience no counterpart? Absolutely not and if you think there is you are so firmly in the grip of your own confirmation bias it might as well be full-blown delusion. You point out as examples of your mistreatment at the hands of males: being followed, being called names, being cursed at, being made to feel uncomfortable. A man …
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:08 AM
2

And why is "having someone comment on you on the street" the form of victimization we are supposed to care the most about now? What makes it more important and more severe, other than the fact that it's a thing you see as men inflicting victimhood on women? I know you weren't talking about this specific form of verbal street harassment before, you were talking about things that make women feel threatened or uncomfortable. But when I brought up that there's no reason to only look at men doing thi…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:36 AM
0

However, it is true that most women I know, including myself, have had experiences of being harassed, followed, threatened, groped, etc, by men. Don't you think there's value in bringing awareness to that? No. By even framing it in this way, you are casting guilt on men. You are explicitly highlighting one particular gendering of an act, and leaving implied that because it happens, therefore, something Should Be Done. How many women that you know have been harassed or threatened by other women? …
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:44 AM
3

"Even Napoleon had his water park." -- Walt Disney, probably
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:26 PM
6

It's kind of like a "motte and bailey doctrine", only the use of the broad and narrow definitions is a bit different. Still, when they are on "offense", they have one definition of feminism; when on "defense", they have another, much more narrow one. I guess the primary difference is that the "bailey" doesn't imply a lie so much as it's structured in a way to shame the most people, and the "motte" isn't any more true, it's just structured to minimize responsibility.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:09 AM
9

Are we talking about where to focus efforts to reform society now? Because we weren't. We were talking about your fear. You are afraid. You are INCREDIBLY afraid of being murdered for being a woman, and you demand men take action to alleviate your emotion of fear. It was pointed out to you that men have much greater reason to be afraid than you. Men are at much greater risk than you. Period. That is an objective fact. And yet, you are FAR more afraid than any of them are. If we were to reform so…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:29 AM
15

and even if you were victims of more nonsexual physical violence its still mainly men who are the aggressors for attacks on men or women Does it make the male victims any less dead?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:12 AM
5

There could theoretically be an agreement that bad things are happening to men and women that need to stop. Feminists would always insist women had it worse, and demand their problems be addressed first, and claim that dealing with women's problems exclusively would also solve men's problems, but, they could agree, both make taht statement. That wouldn't mean anything. There's more to an ideology than just "wanting good things". Every ideology wants good things. You don't get credit from that, a…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:55 AM
7

Women gaining rights is not, necessarily, men losing rights. Women gaining rights due to feminism is men losing rights because this is what feminist ideology and feminist analysis invariably create. Because whenever they look at a problem, they wee it as precious and fragile victims (women) being harmed by threatening agents (men), and respond to that paradigm. Feminism sees women hurt in domestic violence. Because feminism cannot see men as victims or women as agents, it only sees the half of d…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:53 AM
16

First wave feminism wasn't really that great: there's been a myth constructed after the fact where they were heroically crusading against the evil men who wanted to keep them oppressed. In reality, the people they most needed to convince were other women: women did not want the vote because they believed the same rules would apply to them as men, and they would be subject to the draft. They were not too keen on being shot in the face. Suffragettes demanded the right of the vote without the recip…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:59 PM
11

Saying "Feminism is wanting equality" is so broad as to be meaningless. That's like saying, Communism wants fairness, so there are a lot of different types of Communists, and business owners who increase their employees' wages are Communists too. I said "feminism is an ideology and a way of looking at the world," and I meant it. Yes, there are a lot of differnt types of feminism, but the differences aren't as pronounced as feminists claim when trying to use that as an excuse, they don't oppose e…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:54 PM
10

There's more to it than just "they both have some legitemate complaints, they should team up." Feminism is an ideology. It is, and has, a specific set of tools and lenses for looking at the world in order to arrive at conclusions. And those tools and lenses produce the wrong answer one hundred percent of the time. Feminist ideology is so absolutely, fundamentally based in a core concept that is completely untrue -- that anything bad faced by women or a woman is due to the hatred and devaluation …
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:07 PM
2

It probably would have been fine if you put it in quotation marks.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:01 PM
1

I think Elliot Rogers was more influenced by the extreme, hyper anti-feminist, Red Pill-type wing of MRM than by any reasonable and thoughtful examination of gendered issues which men face. The guy not only WASN'T an MRA, he actually stated he hated MRAs. And I think that if you want to avoid becoming gender's equivalent of neo-Nazis, you need to start explicitly disavowing the misogynist fuckheads that influenced this kid. If the Red Pill crowd's narrative is right, if feminism is nothing more …
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:56 PM
1

If men are not permitted to defend themselves, then in what sense is it okay for women to attack men because they can defend themselves? Life isn't fucking Dragonball, there's not one single number judging your fighting ability and you can't just no-sell any attack made by someone with a smaller number. The main method by which being stronger protects you in a fight is by giving you the ability to take the other person out first and prevent them from hurting you after that. If you cannot fight b…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:59 PM
1

It's about the time every OTHER crime rate plummeted, too. I don't think it's even something particular to rape. The best theory I heard is that it's 23 or so years after we stopped putting lead in gasoline and paint: lead poisoning causes reduced impulse control, which is correlated to criminality (most crimes are really bad decisions made on impulse), and 93 was about when the generation of kids with way, way less exposure to lead poisoning came of age. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con…
/r/MensRights20/05/14 05:24 PM
1

They've done more than just piss off Reddit. They also had a major hand in rotting away Occupy Wall Street from the initial surge of populist anger to another pointless identity circlejerk. Don't underestimate the ability of people to effect change when those people can both A: make other people feel shame and B: cannot feel shame themselves.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:08 AM
2

I never get the grey "no data available" areas on maps like these. Like, okay, if you are doing a map that shows averages, tendencies, and trends based on collected data in some specific field, then it's understandable to not have data from everywhere, if nobody there collected that data. But this is just the current status of a law. Laws are supposed to be public knowledge, otherwise they are kind of pointless. Each of those greyed-out areas is an area where everyone living there knows or can f…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:48 AM
4

I don't even have to go off on a bit train of "oh, so this means it's okay to destroy lives if you can use that life as a continual hostage" -- I just have to say that people get framed for other crimes, and the real culprits sometimes come forward, they are not immunized from prosecution to incentivize them to come forward. And yet, they do it anyway. If someone is going to say "Well, I would confess my lie that destroyed another person's life, but I don't want to face any consequences for it, …
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:36 AM
9

If you confess to other crimes, you still are charged with them. Your confession is a mitigating factor in your favor, so you will most likely serve a lesser sentence, but you still committed a crime and society therefore still needs justice from you. It's not like a false accuser who recants before conviction is a case of "no harm no foul", if there's already bee a public accusation and trial, he might as well kill himself anyway, he's been destroyed.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:55 AM
2

You just met a person who says and does everything you ever wanted in a realtionship, but subscribes to an ideology that says you are a terrible oppressive person. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS MORE LIKELY: You have met your perfect partner and these qualities shine through much faster than it normally takes to ghet to know the "real" person. You have met a person who is making a deliberate effort to appear to be your perfect partner before you get to know the "real" her.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:41 AM
7

You cant make this shit up...you really cant. Clearly you can, because she just did.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 04:34 AM
5

So they SHOW UP prepared for a standoff. They did not receive any information during this standoff. I don't mean, like, doing research. I mean, while this event was happening, they were not observing the things that were happening around them and made no effort to assess the situation. They thought they were in a siege situation with a dangerous crazy person, and they performed no recon, they obtained no tactical information, they learned nothing. Because if they had made the effort to get any i…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 06:26 PM
2

Yeah, and the Japanese court system's 99% conviction rate is a sign that said court system is horrifyingly broken on a very fundamental level. I wouldn't brag about 93% conviction. 93% conviction means something is very wrong here. That said, I don't think it actually IS a 93% conviction rate. I think that number is probably counting all findings of guilty -- including those where the defendant pleads guilty, ie a plea bargain -- as "convictions", when that's not what it means.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:25 AM
8

I think it's pretty safe to say these are bad cops. Look at the response level. Look how much force they brought to bear. There was nobody in this house -- the threat level they were facing was as low as it could possibly be! But they closed down the street and the school for hours and mobilized a god damn army. To combat a threat level of zero. This could mean they are violent, which makes them bad cops for obvious reasons. If they aren't violent, then they're still "bad cops", because they're …
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:14 AM
0

That doesn't make any sense at all. If government is a monopoly on violence, wouldn't more government be better capability to enforce that monopoly and thus be less violence? It's not as if you say "Government is a monopoly on violence, so our government will be one guy in a cardboard box and thus nobody else can be violent" that will actually stop anything.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 05:51 PM
10

As much as I hate the modern American police force and think that it is rotten and corrupt to the core, this SC ruling is not evidence of how bad the police are. It sounds bad, it sounds like carte blanche to be irresponsible, but the fact of the matter is that if the police DID have a legal obligation to protect citizens, then they would be able to be sued for every crime that occurred because that would be a breach of their duty to protect people from crime. This would make it impossible for e…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 08:58 PM
9

Dylan Farrow recounted a vivid and disturbing story about her victimization. Because it is upsetting, therefore, it is true, and anyone who disagrees supports and condones those actions they claim did not happen. Never mind that, if you were to be asked to come up with the hypothetical scenario most likely to result in false memories of sexual abuse, Dylan Farrow's situation would be #2 on the list right behind "has a therapist who believes in recovered memory therapy right in the middle of the …
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:54 PM
1

Comparatively, yeah, in that it's not like if you throw a quarter at a dorm you hit a false accuser. But it's more common than lots of things we consider to be "too common". And the argument that it's rare because "it's too dangerous, nobody would be that crazy" is fallacious, because college students aren't exactly rational actors.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:50 AM
1

Because college students are known for their emotional stability, sound judgment, and lack of impulsive actions, right?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:37 AM
3

He didn't say "ugh no ew stop" because he was trying to get into the 19-year-old's pants. That quotation came at the end of a long, long string of communication in which the officer, posing as the 19 year old, continuously pressured the guy into doing the 14 year old as a prerequisite to doing "her". As the appellate court noted, every time he tried to steer away from the subject the officer brought it back and kept pestering him to get the "sister" involved. Like, you know the article had mroe …
/r/MensRights10/11/13 11:59 PM
3

Uh, I'm actually pretty leftist, and I think most of the concepts espoused by modern "movement" conservatism are just as discredited as feminist dogma. You don't have to be Marxist to be leftist. Marxism is just a gussied-up excuse for looking at the world like an eight year old, where everything is black and white and people who do thinks you don't like are always bad and only motivated by being bad, and everyone you like is good all the time, and there's no complexity and no grey and no reason…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:53 PM
10

Then why was the case overturned and dismissed by the appellate court as a clear case of entrapment?
/r/MensRights10/11/13 01:52 PM
13

He appears to have said "yeah sure whatever" to having sex with a 14 year old at the constant insistence of the 19 year old who he was actually trying to bang. This seems like pretty much the definition of entrapment, and the judges agreed. "the law does not tolerate government action to provoke a law-abiding citizen to commit a crime in order to prosecute him or her with that crime".
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:36 AM
3

"Some arms"? Marxist "there are Oppressors who have all power who are bad people and The Oppressed who have no power and are Good People but the Bad People only want to hurt them, everyone is one of these two and there is no nuance" sentiment is the absolute core of feminism.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:20 AM
0

The post that started this subthread was you responding to Stratisphear saying, quote, "We're not talking about handing out a warrant without a cause. We're talking about holding judges personally accountable for any mistake (even one not made by them)." You responded to this with "Why am I accountable for my actions(even mistakes), but judges and cops should not be allowed? You did not directly claim the judge should be held accountable for the mistakes of others -- you merely refused to acknow…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:30 AM
-1

Except that lawyers and doctors aren't "held responsible" for the mistakes of other people and are not "held responsible" for a presumed mistake any time something bad happens. Only if they, personally, commit negligent action are they held responsible. Holding this judge accountable for the execution of this warrant is like suing a doctor for malpractice every time a patient dies.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:40 PM
4

...Bridesmaids wouldn't fail the Bechdel test. The Bechdel test isn't "at no point do two women talk about a man," it's "at some point two women talk about not-a-man." Conversations about nuclear missiles under shopping malls, tacos, puppies, Las Vegas, and pooping in the sink all count. Making that list reminds me I need to see Bridesmaids again.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:41 PM
3

Hi, I'm an MRA, I admit being such in mixed company, I'm not afraid to say "I hate feminism" or go on at length about how it is a morally and intellectually bankrupt ideology based in precepts that are provably false and hurts almost everyone to privilege white upper middle class cisgender academic selfish and paranoid women. Stop being a fucking douchebag and claiming Sharou's arguments are "feminist drivel" because you didn't read or understand them.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:35 PM
-1

Doctors, lawyers, and nurses are all accountable for their own actions. Holding judges responsible for the results of warrants makes them accountable for other people's actions, that they have no reasonable control over.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:20 PM
47

Ever notice how feminists seem to think everything that agrees with their ideology is great and brilliant and insightful and everything that disagrees with it is poorly made, sloppy, and unsupported? Even ignoring any issues of ideology, this is a fucking terrible costume. It is lazy, it is wordy, it required almost no effort from the creator and takes way too much effort on behalf of the viewer to "get". There's no wit or insight, there's not even anything passing for wit. It's just "I dislike …
/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:10 PM
1

Given the amount of feminist lies and feminist bullshit he either regurgitates himself or allows others to claim without challenging in any way (he's talked on multiple occasions about how horrible it is women get paid 70 cents ont he dollar for the same work as men; why don't you pull some interns off Hannity duty and fact-check taht shit?), I don't think he's tired of any sort of men-blaming. He's, at most, tired of excuses for this certain subject, but does not object to the theme or basic as…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:03 PM
5

Women get off because feminists have made a concerted effort to pass laws and to pressure law enforcement organizations ensuring that men are blamed for women's actions. "Primary aggressor" laws were made by feminists, not anyone else, and they dictate that men should be arrested when they report domestic abuse because the woman is always the poor defenseless victim and if she hit him it must have been to defend herself. You don't get to do that, you don't get to have your ideology pass a law fa…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 12:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter