TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Human_Jed Archive

View 0 posts and 181 comments by Human_Jed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Corpulent
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 11:46 PM
2

You can read my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 10:40 PM
6

Whatever you’re trying to say doesn’t really relate to my comment. If you’re looking for a man to argue with, please find someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 10:38 PM
4

And? I’m really not sure what point you’re trying to make. If it’s more of the gender war garbage you typically spew, please just keep it to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 10:19 PM
11

This isn’t really accurate. Men actually very commonly express positive sentiments about overweight women. A pretty substantial number of men actually prefer a little extra weight. However, overtly obese women at the extreme end of that scale, no. Similarly, decent looking 5’6” guys can still get some positive attention. 4’11” dudes aren’t going to be getting those same reactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 06:56 PM
1

Please refer to my prior comment, good sir.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:51 AM
1

Sounds like you can’t read, frankly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:48 AM
1

Google what? That’s your reply? Google it? How about taking a high school level biology class.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:35 AM
1

A “need” as dictated by human biology. Did you graduate from the University of TikTok?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:34 AM
1

“On what they have to show”? What does this even mean? Grammatical nonsense. I was drawing a distinction between the concepts of sex and pet ownership on the basis of biology, which is fairly relevant to the topic of sex. If you bothered to stay awake during biology class, you’d have noticed that there wasn’t a lot of talk about pets. Jesus Christ, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:31 AM
0

I didn’t say that’s the only reason people have sex. Sex is fun, but that fun is dictated by biological programming that says “do cool stuff with your dick/vag”, and reproduction is a common outcome. Those biologically driven behaviors that result in reproduction are then selected for. Do you think you have genitalia by random chance? Like I get you can do what you want with them, but they are literally reproductive organs, that’s why we have them. Jesus Christ. There is something deeply wrong w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:22 AM

Because their standards are being set by the dudes that will bang them out of convenience, and social media programming. It’s a really unfortunate intersection of male and female behavior, and it's being commodified to both men and women's detriment, but we're all too internet-addicted to understand how it's hurting us.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:04 AM

Social media distorting their perception of reality. They are being unknowingly commodified, or they don’t care because they perceive that it currently benefits them. Unfortunately, some of these viewpoints are not great for humans in general, and I think it takes a special kind of ignorance to think that you can neglect the needs of ~40-50% of a generational population without negatively impacting the remainder. I make that statement in general, not about men or women specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 03:59 AM
-2

Sex is a behavior driven by the instinct to reproduce. Butt sex is unlikely to result in a child, so many people don’t have the biological urge to gay it up. Some do, and that’s fine too, and they are unlikely to pass on their genetic traits. Some of you guys will bend over backwards to deny that sex and reproduction represents an exceedingly normal behavior among humans and other animals. It’s almost puritanical in a weird way. Get off TikTok and take a biology class, for Christ sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 03:25 AM
2

For one person that might be true. For another it might not. People are different, and the strength of instinctual urges will vary from person to person. In general, being that it’s how we reproduce, human biology is going to encourage people to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 03:21 AM
-1

Pets or sex? She made a comment, I responded to it. Sex is a biological imperative. Pretending that literally hundreds of thousands of years of biological development doesn’t apply to you as a resulting organism is wild. Without that biology, there would be no “need” to be discussed here, so this is very much related to the OP. Some of you guys obviously slept through biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 03:02 AM
0

Moving the goal posts? I was responding to a comment, and drawing a distinction between the referenced “pets” and “sex”. Do you have genetic code that tells you to have pets?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 02:59 AM
-1

You do not have a biological imperative to have pets.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 01:15 AM
2

Doesn’t sound like it, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 04:35 AM
2

There aren’t a lot of people out there who are going to want to show up for someone who is overtly hostile and devoid of empathy. You talk about empathy like you’re giving it in exchange for something... Based on your comment, I don’t realistically think you know what empathy is, or why it’s important.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 04:24 AM
1

I have, and I think it’s very obviously because you have some underlying mental health issues that you obviously aren’t adequately addressing. Well-adjusted people do not talk this way. I don’t care if someone else said something similar, you get to speak for yourself. It’s your choice to dehumanize others.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 04:09 AM
2

The reason some relationships suck is because people, like you, refuse to muster up even the most basic level of empathy for other people, in particular those with male genitalia in this case. Instead, you are prioritizing overt contempt. It’s going to be extremely difficult for someone who chooses to view people this way to have a healthy romantic relationship with anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 04:07 AM
1

How about you talk to a therapist? Maybe call men useless pets some more, because that’s totally something well adjusted and completely not bitter women do. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 03:59 AM
2

Do you think your behavior is a good example of how human beings should act? I believe you called men “pets”? There’s clearly some sort of underlying personality disorder at play here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 03:53 AM
3

You think men want to be in relationships with women who disrespectfully characterize them as useless “pets”? Sounds like you have nothing to offer. Pass. I’d 100% rather jerk off and talk to chatGPT 10/10 times than deal with that toxic headache.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 03:48 AM

You cited a bunch of stuff that you did not understand the conclusion of, and then some opinion junk. Don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:52 AM
-2

Given that’s not actually what I said, do you hear yourself? Can you read? (Nope!) You very obviously don’t actually care about the issue of sexual assault beyond your ability to try to use it to troll online.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:44 AM
-1

Blame or fault isn’t going to protect you from being murdered or raped if that’s the situation you find yourself in. If that’s not your preferred outcome, then you have a responsibility to yourself to attempt to mitigate these potentialities, just like everyone else. I know how you hate personal responsibility, but that’s the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:25 AM

I’m just identifying you as a foul toad person who doesn’t actually care about the things you pretend to care about. You make a game about calling people rapists or whatever, but there are people (women) that I care about who have been actual victims of sexual assault, and I don’t think they’d think it’s quite as amusing as you seem to. This subject is obviously a hobby to you, but it’s real life for many people. Ever have to interact with someone who’s just been raped? I have. I also have a cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:18 AM
-1

Keep rolling those dice and that’s exactly what you’ll accomplish. Casually throwing around accusations like that is wrong, and cheapens the issue for real victims of sexual assault who are taken less seriously in the presence of casually frivolous accusations. You claim to care about women, so put your money where your mouth is, or don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:16 AM
-1

I think that’s a strong statement to make for the sake of trolling men online. Casually labeling someone a rapist or pedophile, when you don’t know that to be true, could be considered libel. You throw this stuff around like it’s no big deal, and it can literally ruin someone’s life. It’s extremely morally dubious behavior on your part. But hey, as long as you get to exert your grief on perfect strangers, I guess it’s ok. Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:52 AM

Because you obviously have something wrong you that has allowed you to become an incredible toxic and prejudiced person. It’s an extremely strong indication you’d be a poor quality partner. It’s safe to assume that some of the pathologically toxic behaviors you constantly put on display here are present in your family life as well, and your husband and son are likely worse off for it. Congrats! 👍 I’m guessing this has at least something to do with why you currently spend your time rage-commentin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:10 AM

She’s a moron. She comments on almost every single comment in every thread, apparently. I actually haven’t yet found a single thread in this post that she hasn’t commented on. I’m not sure she has anything better to do. You should read some of her other comments, they’re generally awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 12:58 AM

There is something deeply wrong with you that you can’t help but make comments like this. Maybe low key accusing people of being rapists is fun for you or something, I dunno, but it’s so extremely creepy. Dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 12:51 AM
0

Again, be a better person.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 11:24 PM

It’s terrible behavior to identify you as a bigot? Ok. Cool. More comments about men? You could make fun of handicapped kids or minorities maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:43 PM
3

Please see my post history on the topic for direct quotes, thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:42 PM
4

You’re obviously not familiar with all of the comments made here. I think when someone widely and recurrently describes men as losers or whatever, you can reasonably wonder what prejudices are driving those comments. Unfortunately, many (not all) women here are highly prejudiced against men, and it shows with the thrum of disrespect present in these threads. I’d say the same thing about many men here who do the same. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect that people be able to talk about gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:41 PM
3

I’m not familiar with that comment, and wouldn’t agree or disagree with it, because I have no idea. However I understand why someone would say shitty things about your marriage in response to some of the things you commonly say about men. If you’re gonna figuratively slap someone in the face, they probably won’t want to be your friend afterwards. Social skills are a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:36 PM

That’s very plainly not what that comment says. Is it fun to just make things up? Do you find lying to be a useful tool? You’re either dishonest, or can’t read, and neither of those things is a compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:31 PM
9

And yet you’re the only one saying that here… Are you sure all these judgments you think other people are making aren’t actually just yours? You seem to project a WHOLE lot onto people. I don’t think you understand other people or yourself very well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:17 PM

No, my evidence that you’re misandrist is the constant stream of gendered insults in your comments. I’ve already specified some of these comments to you. You wanna pretend like it’s fine and good to act like that? Great, that’s your issue, not mine. Lemme tell you what you’ll never get in response to that sort of constant commentary: actual dialogue. You’re just as bad as the toxic red pill men you complain about. Opposite side of the same coin.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:11 PM
-1

I’d start with a dictionary and pursuing a functional basic understanding of English words.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:02 PM
0

Yeah, that’s very literally not at all the same thing at all. Learn to read, angry toxic lady,
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 09:53 PM
13

Stop choosing shitty men and then complaining that they don’t treat you well. Makes you look impotent and helpless. Victimhood isn’t as good of a look as you think it is. If it’s important to you that you be treated well and that’s not what you’re finding, then correctively refine your criteria. Lots of people out there who will mistreat you, men and women, and they aren’t going to openly identify themselves to you. It’s your responsibility to identify them if you want to avoid them, and nobody …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 09:36 PM
-1

I’ve never had been insulted for being in a relationship by some manosphere guy. I have been insulted for simply being a man by women in this sub. There are a few good ones, but most of you need to get off social media and take a breath. Let’s normalize expecting women here to act like adults, instead of petulant children with anger issues and diapers full of bitterness. 😢😢😢
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 09:20 PM
1

Any more comments about men you’d like to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 09:17 PM

Might as well delve into make-believe pseudo-science then, I guess. /s Your original comment was just you complaining about wokeness and that we made kids wear masks. No specificity of years, no granularity on the issue. Then you went on to misunderstand a bunch of sources you tried to cite. 😢
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:23 PM
0

You’re so obviously miserable and terminally online. Like go outside or something. Ranting and raving at men online, but yeah, you’re totally happy. 🙄 Obviously miserable person is miserable. The most transparent thing in the world. Maybe tell us what your IQ is again, or how many degrees you have, while you angrily rant about how happy you are. Edited for fun. 🤷‍♂️ Stay tuned for smooth brain reply below. 😢
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:20 PM
0

You bring abuse up with some thinly disguised perverse glee, like you’re happy about it or something. It’s kinda creepy. Maybe you find victim hood more gratifying than you find abuse horrifying, I dunno, talk to a therapist about it, not my problem thankfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:18 PM

Again treating Covid like it was always the same or followed a straight line. You don’t understand the disease process or presentation. Arguing about 2022 like it was the same as 2020 is dumb. Mortality rates plummeted spring 2022. I know because I was there, and you weren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 07:39 PM
7

It sounds like you’re the one who has fetishized abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 07:34 PM
-2

*Definitely NOT happily married.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 07:34 PM
0

Don’t answer this question, this person is just a shit slinger.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 07:33 PM
5

Sometimes, but usually I don’t read your posts because they are all similarly hateful and angry. I never see you engage in good faith or with anything but chronic disrespect towards men. I’m sure you have many legitimate gripes for the way you are treated as a black woman, and I’m sorry you have those experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:26 PM
-1

Wasn’t commenting on that and I didn’t read those posts. Talk to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:19 PM
3

I wasn’t talking about you. Though, you’re like top 3 of the most bitter hateful women here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:17 PM

So you seem completely awful. Congrats, you’ve clearly demonstrated why you’re being labeled the way you are. Is someone actually supposed to have a positive response to comments like these?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 05:34 PM
2

This particularly hateful reply is probably exactly the sort of thing that is leading to you being labeled a misandrist. If you honestly can’t see your own behavior here, then you’re pretty unaware of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 05:29 PM
4

I can’t really comment on your behavior, I’m just saying that people don’t identify others as misandrists for the things you’ve mentioned, so you’re coming across as disingenuous and very uncritical/unaware of yourself. My guess is you’re kind of an a-hole to the men here, like many of the other ladies in this sub, and they don’t like it, which should surprise exactly no one. How about just being nicer to people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 05:19 PM
3

Wow, that’s a load. I highly doubt you’re being very truthful about what issue people are having with you. Nobody is calling you a misandrist for “advocating for women’s equality” or “being a happily married feminist” unless you’re being a huge a-hole about it (as many women here are).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 05:04 PM
1

“Anti-woke” was the gateway. Now here we are, finally arrived at the concluding destination: “overtly stupid” Congrats on your journey. Is “anti-woke” the same as “illiterate”?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 09:55 PM
1

And your information is actually wrong, because you don’t seem to be able to critically evaluate the stuff you’re finding online. There is no medical basis for your argument, it’s complete nonsense. Regardless of whether they ultimately die, kids absolutely spread Covid, and masks work to prevent the spread of Covid for anyone with lungs and mucous membranes, regardless of age. Do you think that kids have magical immune systems that prevent them from shedding the COV19 virus? During the initial …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 07:24 PM
1

This all just comes across as very uninformed, or at least you misunderstanding what you are reading online.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 03:10 AM
1

Her extremely bizarre viewpoints are disconnected from reality in such a way that makes me think this person actually has some sort of ASD or other legit cognitive impairment. This isn’t actually intended as an insult, it’s just an observation that they seem to be regularly confused by pretty basic features of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 09:05 PM
1

Healthcare worker here. Congrats, you are spreading misinformation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 01:32 AM
6

Extremely ungrounded bullshit in yet another one of your completely imbecilic post. I’m not really sure the right move is to cater to women who lack the maturity and impulse control to manage their own feelings as a parent. Kids are your responsibility as a parent regardless of your feelings in a given moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 12:58 AM

I’d like to pursue some accountability for you being unable to stay on topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 05:30 AM
-1

Whataboutism. Cool deflection, but I’m talking about the ladies here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 02:15 AM
0

That’s nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 01:23 AM
1

Also the fairy god mother, benevolent queen/princess characters. I see no mention of those extremely common tropes, I’m guessing because it’s inconvenient to the literary victim narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:50 PM
0

Yeah, real solid argument there. 👎
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:42 PM
1

Yeah, I didn’t say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:14 PM
-1

No, it isn’t, it’s just highly ironic in this instance. Thanks for the downvotes, miss poopy diaper.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:13 PM
0

Well, you have a brain capable of developing critical thinking skills, so I’m not sure why you need a crystal ball. Like anything else, where you work, where you live, what you eat, etc., women need to be giving better consideration towards who they have sex and reproduce with if they want to avoid negative outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:06 PM
2

Then you’re either insulated from current western culture in some way, or are oblivious to the social messaging being directed at you as a member of a gender group. These are decades old tropes at this point. I was aware of this crap as a teenager 20 years ago, exposed to it regularly growing up at home and school, and it shows up daily in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:01 PM
2

You’re a woman, you’re told about how villainously violent and sexually aggressive men are, and how strong of a righteous protagonist you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 10:55 PM
2

99% of villains too, so what’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 10:54 PM
-1

Great, hundreds of years. So you have no actual current context to base this argument on? Super.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 10:48 PM
0

How about gay men? Are rates of physical abuse between gay men vs gay women comparable? I’m not sure stress and poor mental health is a great excuse for abuse, regardless of your sexual orientation or diagnoses. Maybe we should apply this same logic specifically to male perpetrators of abuse to really drive home the absurdity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 10:45 PM
-2

Yeah, because those women chose bad mates who didn’t support their children. It’s these women’s practical responsibility to try to make better choices for themselves and their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 10:35 PM
5

The difference is that we haven’t been told our whole lives overt lies about how great male nature is. The behavior of modern women wildly contrasts with the way women have generally been characterized for as long as I can remember (emotionally intelligent, egalitarian, benevolent, etc), but women widely still expect to enjoy the perks of these positive characterizations. Sorry ladies, you’re a bunch of trashbag humans like the rest of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 10:30 PM
0

Grace and empathy to justify domestic violence among lesbian couples? As far as I’m concerned, it’s poor form to try to justify physical abuse, regardless of the background of the participants. If they had to fight so hard for relationships that are so important and have such a heavy social implications, then why are lesbians just as likely as straight women to initiate divorce and end the relationship? I thought it was men’s fault? Honestly, at this point it just looks like many women aren’t so…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 10:16 PM
1

This is bizarre. Yes, let’s pretend casual suggestions to take drugs in order to ignore one of our most basic fundamental biological imperatives is at all a positive thing. Similarly, maybe we can start prescribing Ozempic to people who are starving to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 10:01 PM
-1

All I see is someone who doesn’t understand the irony of their response.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:20 PM
-1

His comment was about women being difficult to deal with because they frequently complain about everything, and you respond by complaining. Top quality irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:06 PM
-1

You heard it here guys, sexual assault against men isn’t important because it happens more to women. If that bothers you, you’re being an “oversensitive twit”. This person obviously has a very grounded world view (/s).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:10 PM
2

Glad to see you know my motives 🙄, though not sure you’ve ever come across as genuinely interested in the topic so much as flinging shit at men. You’re certainly not the first person to project low self-esteem issues onto the opposite sex without considering why that may not be a super positive thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 09:27 PM
1

Do you think you give off the impression that you’re interested in earnestly discuss the topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 08:25 PM
0

Your ungrounded viewpoints do not represent reality, but they do represent a hostile gender bias. I don’t care how ugly you think you are, you’re going to have a hard time being uglier than the foul things you spout off about here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 07:10 PM
1

“Men started it“ seems pretty representative of your viewpoints, so I’m guessing an “actual response” wouldn’t be materially different in content.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 07:07 PM
1

So because you perceive men’s generalizations to have a more negative impact, your generalizations are somehow more valid and acceptable? Great.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 07:05 PM
1

I’m mostly mad that woman haven’t been legally forced to have sex with or marry us. I thought that’s what we were doing here, fellas? At least that’s what I hear we’re up to based on about 1/3rd of the comments made by women here. I just want to be clear, I’m exclusively here for the legally mandated sexual slavery of women for the sake of my own male gratification, obviously because I’m a short incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 06:45 PM
1

I don’t necessarily always find retributive justice to be very just, but congrats on rooting your views of gender issues in reactivity. It should be exactly 0% surprising that men do not respect your viewpoints, because people don’t like being casually shat on by specifically bitter women. Sorry you’re “ugly”, sorry you’ve had some bad experiences. I would still suggest you make an effort to treat others better, rather than lean into sexism to validate whatever grief you’re carrying around.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 06:40 PM
1

Is “more often” enough to generalize to an entire gender? You are doing a great job of feeding right into other people’s point that women don’t like being generalizing about, and react defensively when they encounter it, but you’re more than eager to make some really foul generalizations about men. I’d have more respect for your viewpoint if it wasn’t firmly grounded in sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 06:33 PM
2

Less modern medical capabilities = patriarchy? I’ve only bartered a woman for a cow like 3 times, hardly ever really.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 07:39 PM
0

I’m not sure what to say that I haven’t already. You sound like you have some social issues to work out.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:05 AM
1

You need to get off the internet and go outside. Yes, times are tough online, but some of you guys are your own worst enemies. Develop some social skills, don’t be a slob, and actually put yourself in proximity to woman. Doomscrolling dating apps and complaining about it on Reddit is not going to help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 07:55 AM
1

I didn’t say mediocre, I said average. Average isn’t bad unless you’re on a dating app, and that’s more of a recent development. Manage your weight/health, develop decent social skills, establish regular contact with women (preferably in-person), and things will probably happen for ya unless you have some other hurdle. That’s my experience anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 07:30 AM
7

This is just my opinion, but it’s more and more the case as I get older. I’m generally average looking, I’ve dated a lot of women, and some of my least favorites were the most physically attractive. Honestly, I’ve grown averse to many stereotypically “pretty” women anymore, because they often seem to come with an entitled attitude (especially on dating apps) that I simply hate being around. I don’t typically pursue these women for sex or anything else. Attraction is a yes or no question for me, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 11:36 PM
1

I don’t feed my dog muffins, you shouldn’t either.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 09:20 PM
3

I’m not sure I’d go along with the idea that TikTok is primarily a great dissemination tool for professional information. There is certainly some good content (depending on where you live in the algorithm), but the way those platforms are monetized largely facilitates cheap rapid-fire content and echo chambers. Putting someone in an algorithmic spiral about how terrible (x people) are, or how validated they should feel about some brand of socially dysfunctional behaviors, isn’t a super positive …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 06:07 PM
2

“Public to the world” That was historically the case for most online communication, especially before “social media”. There was more anonymity, but historically very little privacy outside email, and then instant messaging applications. Publicly accessible communication is hardly a distinguishing feature of social media as we know it. If Reddit is social media, then so were web forums, then so was IRC. Was IRC social media? At a certain point I think the term as you are using it is a little too …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:13 PM
4

Same. I’ve been with at least a few women who have asked me to treat them violently/roughly in bed. Seemed to accompany issues with parent figures and relationships/attachment. Hard pass. This isn’t even new. Lifetime TV was more or less driven by rape/abuse fantasies. So many women are chronically enthralled by media about domestic violent crime. They all soaked their pants for the 50 Shades of Grey BDSM bullshit. It’s pretty creepy IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:14 PM
0

That’s fine if that’s the definition you want to work with, but it neglects the fact that there are meaningful and fundamental differences in content and engagement style between Facebook,Instagram,TikTok vs Reddit and web forums. With your definition you can argue that almost the whole internet is social media, because it’s there for everyone to publicly see. I think it’s important to draw a distinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:09 PM
2

I guess you could technically call it social media, but it doesn’t have a ton in common with instagram, Facebook, TikTok, etc. Reddit is just a concentrated collection of web forums, a concept that has been around far longer than typical social media sites. Aside from modern quality of life features, Reddit is not vastly different from web forums/irc that predate Facebook by ~2 decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:48 PM
2

And yet that has little to do with the topic of his comment, which was that someone chose to make derogatory claims about his sexuality in response to a rejection. Women (rightly) make a big deal about guys acting poorly in response to rejection, but your chosen response is pretty crass here where the pronouns are reversed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:00 PM
2

I fail to understand why it would possibly matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 07:20 PM
3

That's real nice
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:43 PM
3

Where it swings is 50% of the population not having empathy for you and actively working against your interests because you've entirely alienated them through disregard and mistreatment. You could probably say that this is what many women are doing now as a product of some historic mistreatment of women. I don't think that either of these conditions are exactly desirable for general human well being. People are social animals with social needs, and nothing good will come from ignoring or weaponi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:25 PM
1

Dumbest shit of all time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:10 PM

The average guy is a turd on a log. Have you seen these losers? Modern women are literally QUEENS who deserved 10/10 guys with 10” cocks and 10-figure net worth. Honestly, if you aren’t that, just give up because you’re literally trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 03:17 AM

Don’t listen her, lady-hormones make go crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:03 AM

This is a very substantial comment. Can you go into more detail about your attractiveness level?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 01:43 AM

I’m not counting these as dates until you’re literally pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 01:03 AM

Yeah, we’re all out here with our lady-profiles scamming each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 12:50 AM

None of this changes until you make different decisions about what you do and what you tell yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 09:29 PM

The social skills you develop will help you date assuming you aren’t learning maladaptive strategies from your friends. Some of your friends will also have girlfriends and get married, and this will expand your network. Currently you’re looking for excuses to not make an effort, and that isn’t helping you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 09:08 PM
1

What matters is the quality of your social skills, not how sexually experienced you are. You become a victim of bullying and biases when you project your insecurity about these issues and present yourself as a vulnerable target. Again, the solution is to improve your social SKILLS. Like any other skill, you improve with practice, and you need social opportunities to practice those skills. School, classes, clubs, work, etc. Yes it’s uncomfortable, but nothing will change just complaining online, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 07:50 PM
5

Honestly, this is an extremely socially awkward take. If you’re looking for reasons for people to look down on you, you’re going to find them, and people will like you less because of that sort of bitterness. It will also likely drive away potential partners. Despite what you think, people frequently engage in platonic interactions without considering someone else’s sex life. It just doesn’t matter in most situations. Go talk to some people and practice some better quality social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 07:40 PM

These same comments could apply equally to women. Doesn’t specifically mention violence of any particular kind. Could be emotionally violent acts, false accusations of abuse or assault, family court stuff, financial stuff, plain old physical violence, etc. Violence against men is not worth being concerned about? I’ve personally been subject to physical violence more frequently by women than men. There’s a pretty disgusting permissiveness to female on male violence that your viewpoint only facili…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:42 AM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 05:47 AM
2

No, I don’t have a video for you because you’re apparently incapable of using a search engine or reading a study. 🙄 Great post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 05:37 AM

K
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:12 AM

I like how women’s behavior is apparently men’s fault. This is such a weak explanation unless your argument is that women frequently lack the ability to think for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:05 AM
6

Oh shut up. You’re trying to make sense of something, but reading a study is too difficult, so you need it in the form of a video? Are you incapable of searching YouTube/TT? Women reliably choose from a restrictively narrow slice of their total options, then complain and blame everyone else when they can’t identify a suitable match. Boo hoo, truly. Is it really that hard to cope without framing everything around victimhood? Nobody is doing this to you, you’re doing it to yourself, you’re just no…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:12 AM
5

There are multiple research studies about people’s preferences and matching behavior on dating apps. This isn’t even a question anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:01 AM

I assure you, I’m not offended, I just think this line of reasoning and willfully misunderstanding people is exceptionally stupid. I’m not talking about dating, I’m talking about this Scarlet Letter game you are playing with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:13 PM

I think you conflate the common sentiment that normal non-violent men not wanting to be labeled violent rapists as meaning they want you to be ok being raped vs killed. The hypothetical makes some pretty insulting implications about men in general, that I’m sure you’re capable of understanding, and men are entitled to their own feelings about it that aren’t necessarily about you. If we’re being completely honest, many men probably wouldn’t want to walk by you (a strange woman) on a hiking path e…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:06 PM
1

You’re the one making light of interactions with dangerous wild animals, so give it a rest with your crocodile tear bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:07 PM
2

Not really. If anything, I get off on people eating the consequences of their own willful stupidity. Better than getting off on casual sexism and prejudice, I’d say. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:31 PM
1

Right, they’re saying go walk down a path where they will encounter a bear so they can thumb their nose at men in a fantasy that they would never follow through with in reality. I’m not offended, because it’s dumb as hell and just makes me think the women trying to make the fantasized point lack intelligence. The delusions that some of you guys try to operate under are just amazing to behold. I’d love for it to become a trend though. We’d have some real top quality bear maulings.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:57 PM
6

This is like saying it’s safer to drive your car at the bottom of the ocean because there are fewer car accidents. Yeah, no shit. I live in an area with bear. If people did not consistently and urgently give bear wide berth, you’d sure as hell have some negative run ins with bear. By “negative run in” I mean you’d be missing your limbs and face. Bear are generally scavengers, but they are just as likely to rip you apart over a bag of garbage if they aren’t scared. Highly variable behavior by per…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 10:26 PM
9

You are clearly inexperienced (observation not insult). Trust is a skill. You learn, with experience, how to understand people, and to identify those in which your trust is a good investment. You cannot make someone who is untrustworthy magically trustworthy by barring them from recreation. That’s not how cheating works, and it’s just not how people work. Yes, a cheater will unintentionally show you signs that indicate they are a cheater.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:52 PM
13

Do you think the only place people cheat or drink alcohol is at the beach? People cheat all the time, you’re not going to prevent it by barring someone from going to the beach. You prevent it by learning to screen cheaters, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:43 PM
11

The way you prevent it from occurring is not getting into or staying in a relationship with someone you can’t trust to go on vacation with friends. If you are staying in relationships with people you can’t trust, you are the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:35 PM

Are you having trouble with context? Here’s context: people don’t like being treated with sexual prejudice. You’d think women would be able to understand the concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 09:45 AM

It’s “dumping” when “some men” (being sexually/physically violent) is casually generalized into “men”. This is real simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 09:41 AM

I think you understand what I’ve said. I’m not going to debate with you about why prejudice and discrimination are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 09:24 AM

There is a huge difference between talking about sexual assault as a realistic concern, and generalizing that behavior to half of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 09:15 AM

Not exactly, you’ve phrased those items in a very specific way. No, I do not see why it is unacceptable to request that someone (women) not unfairly characterize people (men) as being a violent sex offenders based solely on their sex. Why is it so important to you to casually dump on men?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 09:02 AM

Seems like there is a very explicit “concrete request” for consideration: Stop casually characterizing half of the human race as violent rapists. It’s wrong, morally and factually.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:58 AM
3

Honestly, you should probably be reimbursing men for the life force they expend listening to any of the vapid brain-thoughts you decide to poop out of your mouth on whatever dates you manage to arrange. I imagine with great confidence that someone who holds opinions like this is exceptionally taxing to be around without feeling like you’re having a stroke secondary to exposure to the medically frightening levels of stupidity demonstrated here. Breathtaking, truly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:12 PM

It’s certainly your life to do with what you please, it just seems sad to me. I meet a lot of chronically single people through work, and most of them are more and more unhappy the older they get, women are no exception. The people who are older, single (usually widowed), and not unhappy, are parents. People aren’t meant to be alone, despite what is popular on TikTok among people young enough to not know any better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 08:13 PM

Listen, I think she’s extremely deluded, but you’re just as delusional. You guys seriously need to get off the internet and talk to actual humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 07:50 PM

It’s hyperbole, and I’m using it to illustrate a point. The point is that you are clearly interacting with the wrong men, and you should probably question why. Your refusal to do that means you’ll continue interacting with men that don’t actually serve your interests. Blame tends to be a poor solution to most problems, so blaming men probably isn’t going to solve this problem for you. I’m just going to point out that you’re the one talking about being perma-single because you’re not meeting anyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 07:30 PM

Widen your net to accept “trash”? lol, I mean it sounds like “trash” is what you’re getting currently. Refusing to learn and utilize different strategies is 100% a recipe for failure. There are realistically lots of good quality men out there that you could be compatible with in a relationship, most of them just aren’t rich and 7 feet tall. You’ll never get to be with any of them because the paradox of choice weaponized against you by the apps means you filter them out before you’ve gotten to kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 06:49 PM

This is a big projection. I’ve never advocated for being in a bad relationship. I’ve suggested that women who are after stable adult relationships widen their nets to find better quality partners, and not be so flippant about being long term single given the negative social implications. One of the problems I see here it’s a very transactional view of relationships on your part. If your focus is always “what can you do for me”, you are going to have a much harder time understanding people, and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 06:17 PM

Very egocentric perspective to assume that women are giving men what they want. Online dating is very much a hellscape for most men, they are absolutely not getting what they want. To make that assumption demonstrates a complete ignorance of what the dating process generally looks like for men. Women are giving a very small subset of certain men what they want (sex), and those men aren’t reciprocating with more serious interest. So instead of adjusting their standards to increase their chances o…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 05:54 PM

And with that I go back to my initial comment. Being a “spoiled princess” making minimum wage is not a positive thing, and most good quality men do not and will not want someone like that. How exactly did you earn it? You didn’t, you’re just pathologically entitled and low-key taking advantage of someone. In this case it sounds like you’re afforded the role of “spoiled princess” as a result of your boyfriend’s current and likely temporary desperation having never had a girlfriend before. He live…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 07:50 AM
1

My comment was about your focus on gifts and materialism, and then the inexperience of your boyfriend leaving both of you with no real ability to establish baseline expectations for the relationship once he’s done trying to impress you. Yes, my comment was negative, because the implications of those details are negative. If you don’t want to understand that, that’s your choice. There are some men who regressively enjoy financially disadvantaged women, because it gives them control. However, most…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 07:22 PM
1

It makes a lot of sense that he’s never had a girlfriend before, and that was actually my initial assumption after you said that he drove 1.5hrs with flowers for your mom. A guy who has never had a girlfriend before would absolutely drop $300 to impress a girl if he has it to spend, especially his first new girlfriend. It doesn’t mean he doesn’t like you or is using you just for sex. He probably does like you, he’s also highly inexperienced and probably doesn’t yet understand the real life impli…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 10:41 PM
1

I think you’ll find that despite your assumption that he enjoys being a bank account for his minimum wage girlfriend, he probably doesn’t. He isn’t going to say that because he is trying to impress you likely hoping that it’s not a long term dynamic. The fact is that he will not always be trying to impress you, and expecting this dynamic to carry you into a long-term situation is pretty unrealistic. Unless you’re both ultra traditional/conservative, and I’m guessing that’s not the case since you…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 10:00 PM
1

Dude, get real, I’m not mad, I’m just pointing out that you seem to value this man because he gives you stuff. You listed that as pretty much the only reason you like this guy, and then said “he ticks all the boxes”. But you bought him groceries? Can he not go to the grocery himself? Maybe he’d prefer that to having groceries and leftovers sit unrefrigerated in his car on his 1.5hr drive home. This relationship will not last, he will get tired of being treated like something that exists primaril…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 09:24 PM
1

Your whole post is about what he does for you and what he buys for you, like he’s some sort of servant. But you sent him home with leftovers, so I guess that’s ok? Honestly, it’s gross. Bluntly, this “relationship” will fail and you’re going to end up single again (likely soon), because no non-desperate (adult) is going to maintain this level of effort much further than an initial courting stage. He’s probably hoping you’ll demonstrate some care or actual reciprocity, but it quickly becomes clea…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 07:55 PM

You’re being intentionally dense to hone in on some very uncertain projection of raw future worldwide population. As I and others have clearly said, almost every developed country is currently below replacement fertility rate, and those rates are steadily decreasing. This is a very plainly stated fact. Populations are being propped up by immigration, which carries some pretty significant economic liability. This isn’t even something you can argue against, it’s the current reality. It’s a real te…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 02:10 PM

You’re mostly wrong. Overall population is increasing for now, but you have to look at where those increases are happening. You only really still see reproductive population growth in developing and impoverished countries. Populations in developed nations are being temporarily propped up via immigration. Fertility rates in most developed countries are below replacement (2.1) with very few exceptions. The last time the US was anywhere near replacement rate was around 2008, and it sits at 1.7 now.…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 06:50 AM

I read what you posted. You make these wide swinging generalizations about why men are so scary (muscles, hormones, traditionalism), like that supports some completely absurd assertion about men being abusive (<100%, but “a lot” of men). You can bring up that men are physically stronger on average, I just fail to understand the relevance to the likelihood of abuse. Nobody is forcing you to date physically strong men, or men predisposed to physical abuse. Violent behavior also isn’t generally som…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 10:25 AM

Me!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 08:28 AM

Do you think it makes you look less bitter to call someone a low value man? It’s transparent brain dead scripting. Try having an original thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 06:59 AM

Testosterone and muscles don’t make someone an abuser. That assertion is basically a pronoun reversed, and far more violent version of the sexist idea that women are chronically irrational because of hormones and menstruation. Let’s make an effort to evolve our thinking beyond the 1950s era here. What political power do most men have? The same as you, very little. The fact that the oligarchy is has historically been male dominated does not in any way help men not among the oligarchy. The oligarc…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 06:43 AM

That’s a “clever” way of trying to make it seem like most men are abusive, without actually wording it as such because you know it’s an assertion that can’t actually be defended. What’s “quite a lot”? 3? 3%? 3/4? Do you have a source? You want a shitty job punching the clock? Great! Go get one and be exploited by an employer if you want. However, also feel free to stop blaming men for your choice to do so. This whole idea that men are widely abusive is just a weak boogeyman to lean on in order t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 06:10 AM
1

Egalitarianism is a focus of liberal feminism. Your foul viewpoint is called radical feminism. A common theme among modern pop-feminists is not understanding or being able to acknowledge that feminism is not a monolith. Pretty dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 12:49 AM
2

There are multiple brands of feminism, most of which historically being focused on egalitarianism rather than female supremacy. You’re basically talking about radical feminism. Talking about feminism like a monolith just makes you look ignorant. I’m guessing you’re primarily informed by social media. You have a foul personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 12:19 AM

I’m 41yo. If I could go back to any age, it would be 30yo. My romantic life was probably most active and satisfying between ages 30-35. Even now it’s more active than it was at age 25. Don’t squander your time, because it goes away and you don’t get it back. You can learn social skills, but you need regular practice. I used to be painfully shy and severely introverted, but I can basically talk to anyone now primarily as a product of my job (healthcare). I’m still an introvert, but you wouldn’t k…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 12:38 AM

I am a dude who is a nurse. I came into my current career with the “women the fairer sex” belief that I was raised with. However, I have never seen people be so absolutely foul to each other as I have over the last 8yrs working primarily with women. Doesn’t matter the clinical setting, if there are concentrated groups of women, with rare exception, you can bet they are viciously chewing on someone for their own amusement. My most recent job I had a lot of concerns about one person in particular …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 09:59 PM
1

They might not need to, but they still do. China currently operates one of the most popular social media apps in the US. Gloss over that if you want. Expect the QAnon bs to ramp up again next year as well, like it usually does in proximity to elections. Like, do you guys not understand that Roe V Wade would still be intact without some of this junk coming into play in 2016?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 01:31 AM
1

I don’t know that it has to be proven to every user on Reddit in order to be discussed. Demographic collapse is certainly real enough that’s it’s a current day focus of basically every developed country in Asia, and it’s not because they’re sad that their dudes aren’t getting laid or whatever theory is used to wave that fact away. The birth rate in South Korea is 0.78!!! almost 2x the rate of deaths compared to births. The geopolitical angle is also not just something OP just made up. I’m guessi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 07:41 PM
5

So you misunderstood then, got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:54 PM
5

I can! Can you? Here’s a hint. What is your post in response to? What does the OP actually say? You’re a generally combative redditor, so I’m not building my expectations too much here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:50 PM
4

Take a guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:44 PM
7

Instead of any sort of thoughtful response, you misrepresent (or misunderstand) his assertion and then end it with a jab. Is that good faith? Your other comments in this thread really aren’t any better.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:37 PM
5

And perhaps you should argue in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:20 PM
1

Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but I don’t think that’s a great analogy. Ascribing intent to evolution (that has no intent) is not the same as ascribing intent to foreign governments or social media companies (that do actually have human actors with intent). The information to prove the assertion exists, just not on Reddit as it’s intentionally hidden away by social media companies and foreign governments.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:16 PM
2

You seem to be misunderstanding the OP, who describes these issues being “inflamed” by Russian/Chinese natl interests rather than “caused” by them. Those are two very different meanings. You seem to be fixated identifying/refuting single-factor explanations to complex multi-factor problems. I’m guessing it’s unintentional, I’m just identifying where the topic you’re discussing diverges from the topic discussed by the OP and broader discussion. You’re basically having a different conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:51 PM
4

The macroeconomic implications are pretty wild. It blows my mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:32 PM
3

So doesn’t that make the inputs into those tech systems relevant as opposed to far fetched?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:12 PM
3

I think this a really excellent take on the destructive force of capitalism, but I’m not sure how it refutes the OPs suggestion. Those magazines and media messages have been around for a long time, while some of the issues being discussed have gotten acutely worse only recently. Multiple things can be true at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 03:10 PM
5

Multiple things can be true at the same time. We are not talking about monoliths, so why apply that style of logic? (“It’s not those things, it’s this one thing!”) It’s a mental shortcut by people who can’t conceptualize complex topics. Makes things easy to understand, but the derived understanding is severely fractional at best, and ungrounded as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 02:58 PM
1

Unnecessary for what? Monolithic explanations? These are nuanced and complicated topics related to a variety of social inputs/outputs. Social media as a set of systems provides an overwhelmingly massive number of outputs, shouldn’t the variety of inputs into those systems be considered relevant? Saying “this stuff isn’t relevant” is just as logically invalid as saying “only this stuff is relevant”. It’s complicated, but that means that falling back on mental shortcuts like monolithic thinking is…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 02:51 PM
5

The problems we are facing that are starting to affect the western economies are the same sorts of problems that the East has been grappling with for a while now, low birth rates in particular. Fact is that given our economic structures, more individualistic societies, and more democratic leanings, these demographic problems are going to hurt us more than they’re currently hurting them, and they absolutely know it. Look at Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea for a (not quite apples:apples) preview. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 02:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter