TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HumbleFlea Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by HumbleFlea on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Awesome, thanks for the clarification!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 03:49 PM
2

Of the two conservative positions I’d say 1950s style traditional gender roles are on the same level of bad as the intersectional insanity we’ve been experiencing for the last decade or so. The extreme right position is much, much worse than either of them, without question. Although, who’s to say what the future would look like if intersectionality progressed unopposed? It could end up looking just as terrible as a fascist or “handmaid’s tale” hellscape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 02:53 PM
1

Well written. I agree with a lot of it, and like your other comments in this thread. My question is why this sub? You seem pretty non-leftist. What do you believe is the way forward if not socialism? I’ve always described my position as being against state/vanguard communism, but for the kind of true/utopian end of history communism you talk about Marx envisioning. I don’t see it as returning to our natural state, but rather a kind of psychosocial technology we’d be inventing to better ourselves…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 01:35 PM
5

I think conservatives in general are just as bad as feminists, but specifically “for men” feminists are much worse. Feminists want to have their cake and eat it too. They want special treatment based on gender and they want the freedom to live however they want. More mainstream conservatives want to take away the second part. They think women should be pressured to fulfill certain roles and responsibilities in return for having special status as women. They can have their cake but they can’t eat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 01:04 PM
3

I’ll always have a soft spot for his legendary takedown of Channel 4’s Kathy Newman, but outside of that he’s been a pretty big disappointment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 12:34 PM
0

And anti sexism is anti sexism. Misandry isn’t real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/25 03:54 PM
-1

If by “acknowledge white supremacy“ you mean racism disguised as anti racism then no, of course not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/25 03:46 PM
2

It’s always more complicated than a lazy appeal to identity, that’s the point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/25 03:43 PM
1

Yes and the idea that the earth is flat -comes- from the observation that the ground is flat. I didnt say it was the only objective truth that matters, I said it was the only objective truth that matters -here-, as in the conversation I was having with someone about whether we should frame things in emotionally manipulative ways to push identity politics. My statement might’ve been hyperbolic and oversimplified, but that was by design as I was highlighting that his use of objective truth was, at…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/25 02:10 PM
1

The how is not objective. That’s part of my point here is that when it comes to sociopolitical theory we’re at best talking soft science riddled with biases. The only objective truths here are borderline tautologies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/25 12:51 PM
1

If seeing something like that makes you emotional you can understand why similar things about other identities might make others emotional. Creating an environment where we needlessly provoke each other breeds anger, resentment and hatred. The inevitable result is division. Coexistence being extremely difficult doesn’t make it any less important. Becoming racist to fight racism seems like an altogether self-defeating proposition. If that’s meek or dumb then color me both.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 10:45 PM
2

Better, but I’d argue feminist women do that to all men. Here is how I look at it: if this thing feminists do (let’s call it ‘x’) affects one demo more than others, then by uniting and fighting every instance of x we disproportionately help that one demo. It’s the same reason why we should help ALL poor people rather than focus on certain demos who have higher poverty per capita. By helping poor people in general we, by default, help more of those demos who are more affected per capita, precisel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 09:17 PM
0

It is objective truth that black men commit more violent crime than other demos. Would a thread titled “how black men make white women feel unsafe” be helpful or harmful? If you find yourself quoting intersectional talking points to argue that there is a difference you’re objectively on the wrong side of this debate. The only objective truth that matters here is that we should all do our best for each other regardless of identity. Treating people differently based on their position on an oppress…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 09:07 PM
2

I dunno I see perspectives like this as creating division as well. All demos have bad actors that use whatever they can to break others down and build themselves up. Even “good people” get sucked into mud slinging sometimes. In my opinion, we have to get away from “(gender) (race) (sexuality) does x to (gender) (race) (sexuality)”. That kind of identitarian lens is exactly how we got into this mess in the first place. I’d much rather see stuff like this framed as “feminism/MAGA treats (identity)…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 06:38 PM
17

I’m not sure why race should be excluded. Intersectional feminism discriminates against males, whites, heteros, cis etc etc. Why pull punches against a toxic ideology?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 07:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter