TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Humble_Wolverine_518 Archive

View 4 posts and 23 comments by Humble_Wolverine_518 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

But is she more child-like than the average guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 05:18 PM
1

I don't really care about proving that point, it's not very important.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 05:17 PM
1

A lot of the traits you listed aren’t visible or aren’t used by people as age cues at all. Immune system and fine motor skills are irrelevant, and things like hip width, lip thickness, or low body fat aren’t more common in children and aren't read as childlike in everyday judgments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 05:16 PM
1

You said this in another comment though. So clearly you were talking about mental attributes as well. You also mentioned it in your post. Stop moving the goalpost. I'm not moving the goalpost, though. Obviously I do think that women also at least sort of resemble kids more behaviourally, but that's way less important than the fact that they physically resemble children more. I also think that a lot of negative and childish traits have been wrongly associated with women just because they LOOK lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 05:06 PM
1

The two women on the right are no "closer physically" to the actual child on the left than Joe Rogan and Donald Trump are to the actor in Young Sheldon: Joe rogan and donald trump are tall and have the muscle mass, frames and voices of average men. The two women on the right have small frames, higher pitched voices, less muscle mass and are much shorter than Donald Trump And Joe Rogan, which makes them closer to the actor in Young Sheldon. You're essentially trying to argue that sexual dimorphis…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:59 PM
1

A 50yo woman probably has a small frame, lacks muscle mass, high pitched voice, narrow jaw, short stature and many more physical traits that are similar to that of a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:52 PM
1

All of these traits are behavioural, I said this was mainly because of PHYSICAL traits. People are a lot more lookist than you think, your examples are all behavioural because you can't deny the fact that women are a lot closer to children apperance wise than men, which is the biggest factor here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:50 PM
1

Women are very different from children both physically and behaviorally though. Women are bigger than children physically, have a different bone structure, different fat and muscle distribution, different facial features etc. I have never looked at an adult woman and though she was similiar to a child. Of course, I'm not saying women are indistinguishable from children. But compared to men, they still have higher pitched voices, smaller frames, less muscle mass, neotenous features, smaller jaws …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:48 PM
1

Yes technically but I'm making a causal claim here. The reason these traits are considered negative when women do them is not because it's women doing them per se, it's because society views these traits as negative no matter who possesses them. A lot of feminine traits are viewed as negative not because it's women doing them, but because they're already negative traits that have been wrongly associated with women. It's similar to the idea of toxic masculinity, traits such as aggression aren't v…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:41 PM
0

Not attracted to kids, and no I've never confused a woman with a kid, which doesn't matter, because I'm not saying that women and kids are indistinguishable, I'm just saying that women resemble children a lot more than men do. Even if you're tall, women still have higher pitched voices, neotenous features, smaller frames and lack of muscle mass which are all physical traits typically associated with children.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:37 PM
0

Neotenous features, high pitched voice, small frame and lack of physical strength. I'm not saying that you can't tell the difference between a kid and a woman, obviously you can they're not exactly the same, but women look a lot more like children compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:34 PM
1

This has almost nothing to do with behaviour, women very often have neotenous features which makes people associate them with children, even if they don't look exactly like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:32 PM
2

Oh my god, they don't look EXACTLY like children, but physically and biologically they're a lot closer to children than men. Women are on average shorter, weaker and have neotenous features.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:27 PM
1

"people don't take women seriously because they are women" ... then proceeds to say that women are indeed taken less seriously because they are women and how everything feminine is associated with something not serious. It's not that those traits are taken less seriously because women exhibit them, it's that those already unserious and negative traits are wrongly linked to women, which is different. And no, it's not "women and children" thing. While yes, children are not taken seriously, it's si…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:22 PM
-1

You still generally look and sound like a woman, a 5'10 woman is a lot closer to being a kid biologically than the average guy. I also think that since you're breaking gender norms that would negate any respect you'd gain from being tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:13 PM
2

I wouldn't reduce it to that. Feminine men generally give everyone the ick, including other men who often view them as inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:10 PM
2

Also a lot of the traits that people see as "feminine"(again I'm not saying that women necessarily possess these traits on large) are already viewed in a negative light.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:08 PM
-6

I guess I phrased that poorly, I meant that a large part of the reason people take women less seriously/hate them isn't because they're women per se, but because they physically resemble children.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:05 PM
1

Having a male partner adds a ton of demand, danger and stress to a woman's life, and that cost is one women are discussing in a different way all over the world atm. Wouldn't the same also be true for men, though? Or are you making the point that relationships generally unfairly burden women and the affection and "fulfillment" women receive from relationships is not enough to compensate for this? Also what does it mean that most women are passive?? It simply means that they don't have to do much…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 05:51 PM
2

Look, I'm sure a lot of these are true, but come on. Don't you think you're being a bit biased? Feminists do this a lot, where they interpret any behaviour a man expresses as somehow immoral or ultimately evil a priori(e.g. liking traits such as clear skin, hair, and no body hair somehow makes u a pedo, wanting a submissive nice caring wife means u wanna control her etc.), you wouldn't wanna be like them, would you?
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:05 PM
1

Women are more likely to be fulfilled *without* being in a relationship because being a woman is much less isolating. Most women are passive and the ones receiving the attention, this affirms their self-worth and makes them much less insecure about being alone and being worthless. People are also generally much colder to men which exacerbates this issue: In(https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5112287/) boys from the age of 12 showed more empathy for girls than they did for boys, and they co…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 11:08 PM
4

Yeah exactly, and I think that ties straight into what I was saying about agency and the double standard around male sexuality. Women don’t hate porn, prostitution, or strip clubs as concepts, they hate the men who consume them. Why? Because in our culture, male desire is seen as inherently cheap, gross, or desperate unless it’s validated by a woman choosing to receive it. When a guy watches porn or pays for OnlyFans, he’s expressing desire without her permission or approval. That triggers the n…
/r/MensRights05/07/25 09:24 PM
4

I get what you’re saying about purity culture and the double standard around “body count” -- that’s definitely real. But what I’m talking about isn’t about who’s allowed to have sex or rack up partners, it’s about how men are treated for expressing any kind of sexual desire at all. When a man approaches a woman to show interest, even politely, there’s often this cultural reflex to see it as creepy, desperate, or predatory just because he showed desire. The reaction isn’t “this guy handled it bad…
/r/MensRights05/07/25 09:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter