~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | Democrats in the US spend 20 million dollars on a project to convince men to vote for themI do think the Democrats have had a logical fallacy operating in their approach for years. Women have been significantly behind men in a lot of ways, and it wasn't wrong to focus on that. It was a logical fallacy to think that supporting men where men need support somehow runs counter to supporting women. But I stand by my comments on not using the worst of a group to pretend that's everyone's view. I can give you people very influential in conservative politics who believe what I'd stated earli… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/25 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Democrats in the US spend 20 million dollars on a project to convince men to vote for themYeah, all for the second amendment. I've got a glock, ruger, and shotgun at home. I was referring to things like due process, which the founders felt pretty strongly about (I'm sure you know that though. Conservatives care a lot about the constitution and the founders). Glad you mentioned free speech. That's another one that the Trump administration is toying with. It's pretty clear in the constitution that it applies to all people (and past supreme court decisions confirm this), but the Trump a… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/25 08:38 PM |
| -9 | Democrats in the US spend 20 million dollars on a project to convince men to vote for themIf I chose the worst of the Republican party and painted with such broad a stroke, I'd say that Republicans don't want women to vote, be able to get a divorce. Let's be reasonable instead of just being inflammatory. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/25 05:20 AM |
| -3 | Democrats in the US spend 20 million dollars on a project to convince men to vote for themI'll vote for the one that's more least likely to take constitutional rights away. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/25 05:13 AM |
| 1 | Men need to be heard: his take on why the election will be determined by the male vote.If you like the 1st amendment, you probably shouldn't be too happy with Trumps request to shoot peaceful protestors in the legs. If you like the 2nd amendment, you probably shouldn't be too happy with how quick Trump was to say that we should take people's guns first and ask questions later. If you like the constitution, you probably shouldn't be too happy with Trump saying that sometimes you have to suspend the constitution. If you like a representative democracy in general, you probably should… | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 11:48 PM |
| 1 | Men need to be heard: his take on why the election will be determined by the male vote.If you don't like the Constitution, yes that's right. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 06:03 PM |
| 3 | Men need to be heard: his take on why the election will be determined by the male vote.Better to lose an election than lose a democracy. Republicans can win the next election with a respectable candidate. Lose the democracy, and well, that's not something you get back by rolling out of bed one day in November and casting a vote. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 01:15 PM |
| -5 | Men need to be heard: his take on why the election will be determined by the male vote.Men should vote to preserve the rule of law that our founding fathers set up hundreds of years ago. Donald Trump doesn't give a shit about the rule of law or the Constitution. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 04:41 AM |
| 3 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernWell, I know Donald Trump cares more about himself than democracy. Fuck him, and fuck you too for trying to muddy there waters. This is not difficult. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/24 06:12 PM |
| 7 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernYou gotta be shitting me. Have you seen Trump try to answer any question at all recently? Man couldn't find the ocean if he was swimming in it. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/24 03:42 AM |
| 21 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernAs a man who cares about the constitution and not fucking up what the founders started, I can easily say that while Harris may not appreciate all the difficulties that men encounter, Donald Trump only cares about himself. Fuck Trump and his democracy hating lackeys. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/24 03:41 AM |
| 1 | Hating Men Is Now The Democrats' Campaign Strategy.Nearly all of the people who testified during the Jan 6 hearings were Republicans. The judges who said Trump's claims of election fraud were Republicans. I get that you don't like and probably even hate the left, but these are not lies from the left, they are truths from your own side. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/24 03:22 PM |
| 1 | Hating Men Is Now The Democrats' Campaign Strategy.I think there are pockets within the democratic party that very much match what you're saying, but I believe they are a vocal minority. In the same way you can find absolute psychos on the right, you can find total crazies on the left. If we're just talking about men's rights and not broader issues, then I feel pretty firm that the best strategy is to build a coalition with subgroups from both parties that draw in what these subgroups care about and the crazy extremes can be mostly ignored. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/24 03:18 PM |
| 18 | Hating Men Is Now The Democrats' Campaign Strategy.Agreed. As someone who grew up very conservative and voted R until not too long ago, it's maddening that I can't support the conservative issues I care about unless I also support the fucktards in charge of the Republican party. I vote democrat now, but I still hold many conservative views and principles. I own many guns, but would be fine with better background checks. I think it's absurd that we pay more on the interest on our debt than on our national defense and I think we need to tackle spe… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/24 01:50 AM |
| -9 | Hating Men Is Now The Democrats' Campaign Strategy.Trying to overturn a free and fair election screams authoritarian louder than anything I've seen Harris even accused of. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/24 01:43 AM |
| 5 | Are there any left-leaning pro-male online personalities?Someone's eye said it, but Professor G (Professor at NYU business school) is amazing, and very pro male. Listen to 10-15 minutes of this and you won't be able to stop yourself from listening to the rest: https://youtu.be/4qpqmyfxDj4?si=NAF2a15Yog3N7Tih | /r/MensRights | 05/08/24 03:04 AM |
| 1 | What do you think is the biggest issue men are facing right now?I'm with you on the education bit. IMO, society will progress the fastest when we aren't wasting the talents of our population. For the same reason that I think countries that discourage (or prevent) women from being educated, I think that ignoring declining numbers of men getting degrees and advanced degrees is a major mistake that has ugly personal as well as societal implications. As for their intentions- I think it's unrealistic to expect that people here all have the same opinions across th… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/22 06:43 PM |
| 17 | help, father threatening to hit momGo to https://www.thehotline.org/ This is for domestic violence situations. They are qualified to help. Our guesses at what to do will not be as good as their experience. Trust them for advice, not us. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/22 06:40 AM |
| 0 | My body my choice: Except when unwanted complications arise or it’s a man’s body.Nah, op is right. The post says pregnancy. The argument from pro-lifers is that conception = life. Not sperm = life. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/22 03:16 PM |
| 1 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "societies that send men off to die in war against their will does not equal societies that could potentially send men off to die against their will but haven't in 50 years Send. Present tense. Not sent. Not could possible send. Send. What you've proven today is that you're so committed to winning an argument that you're willing to forget the basics of English language. Send. I'm feeling generous today, so I could do one of two things. If you give me your address, I could either send you a book o… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/22 06:06 PM |
| 1 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "You are willfully ignoring the core argument in hopes of a technical victory. That's what's most interesting. You can say. Registering for a draft is not conscription. But let's say that it was. Let's say that forced conscription is still ongoing. It wouldn't matter for the core of the argument, which is that no one is being sent against their will since the 70s. That is the falsehood in the argument I have been attacking since the beginning, but you seem intent in dodging. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/22 05:22 PM |
| 1 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "What's your point? My point is that Men still have to register for the draft when they turn 18 in the United States. Yeah, you are right, registration for the draft is still a thing. My point is explicitly about what the op said. The argument from the op says talks about CURRENTLY sending people off to die against their will and CURRENT conscription. I'm calling out that this isn't true and hasn't been for a long time. My point is that once corrected, the OP's argument or statement is a lot weak… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 07:28 PM |
| 2 | A “””wonderfully productive conversation with a perfectly sane individual.”””This is a really good point I hadn't considered before. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 07:24 PM |
| 1 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "But I'm talking about the ops statement. It's all I've ever been talking about. Your attempt to get me to pivot to an argument in not making is another bullshit arguing tactic. It's pretty weak. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 06:43 PM |
| -1 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "No, you are pretending to correct me but continually dodge the fact that the op states societies that send their men off to die against their will. This is a present tense statement, but it is not happening. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 11:29 AM |
| -1 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "Ah yes, backyard squabbles. I'm sure vets of recent military action who took enemy fire in guerrilla style urban warfare and who had to contend with roadside IEDs and deployment after deployment would call such activities "backyard squabbles." It's a nice arguing technique, though, minimize anything that doesn't support your argument. Do it all you like. My point still stands, the OP's statement is PRESENT TENSE, and PRESENTLY, we do not do what the OP says. It's a shitty argument, there are a l… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 10:41 AM |
| -1 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "Look. This is really simple. The op is present tense. The argument tries to gain strength from an extreme that doesn't currently exist. It is not true that America, at least, does what the op suggests. If you want to water the argument down to what America does do (forced registration) as you seem to want to do, that's fine, but it's not what is being argued here and it's far weaker as a result. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 08:52 AM |
| -5 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "Well it is one that no longer forces military involvement. That seems pretty critical to the two sentence argument presented by the OP, both of which center on conscription. Am I taking crazy pills? How is it that people can't just let a bad argument go? Why does it have to be that even poor arguments are supported with all sorts of twists and mental gymnastics? This is a bad argument, who cares? Does it nullify each and every claim men's rights makes? No. So why are people so vehement in defend… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 08:26 AM |
| -10 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "Do you think societies that send men off to die in war against their will | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 07:57 AM |
| -5 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "The federal government reserves the right to enact a forced conscription, but look closely at the quote in the OP. Do you think societies that send men off to die in war against their will | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 07:57 AM |
| -16 | "if men could get pregnant, we would have abortion clinics everywhere "Mmm... forced conscription ended in the 70's in the US.... We have a volunteer force now. Edit: downvote if you can't handle facts. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 06:48 AM |
| 1 | why do so many mothers kill their children?Do they say that? Who says that? Sounds like a straw man. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/22 02:04 AM |
| -2 | Conservative site calls women not being subject to draft a “major win”True. He also forgot to mention that Russians are now somehow the good guys, that it's cool to ignore science during a pandemic/cause hysteria over vaccines, and presidents can change the paths of hurricanes with sharpies in order to protect their ego. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/21 07:32 PM |
| 3 | Many men, when they understand the advantages that modern society gives women, secretly wish that they were born women.Fuck no. No thanks. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/21 10:25 PM |
| 3 | Dad Bod now in the dictionary. Not Mom Bod though.I don't think many here understand descriptive vs prescriptive language usage or how dictionaries view such and issue. This is not done veiled sexist attack on men. Dad bod is a trek that has gained wide enough use to merit an entry. I've never even heard of mom bod. These people aren't saying what's okay to use, they are heading what IS used and defining it. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/21 08:02 PM |
| 19 | Introducing our BRAND NEW International Men's Day Leaflet Pack. These leaflets are free to copy, print, and modify. (Link to the full pack in the comments)This is not a zero sum game. We can fight for better outcomes for men and women. But first, people must recognize where disparities exist. I'm critical of men's rights on a regular basis for feeling like it has to tear down women to build up men, your post is in a similar vein. Nowhere in here is an argument that women suffer no injustice or that they are all better off in all situations than men, so please don't pretend like that is the argument that's being made. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/21 10:11 PM |
| 0 | Woman fights the Patriarchy by becoming a corporate wage slave, then realizes 70 work weeks aren't all they're cracked up to be. Subsequently blames the Patriarchy.But a correct one. What does the guy get who arrogantly ascribed an argument the author wasn't making in order to mock them and look cool for his internet buddies so he could get fake internet points? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/21 02:05 PM |
| 0 | Woman fights the Patriarchy by becoming a corporate wage slave, then realizes 70 work weeks aren't all they're cracked up to be. Subsequently blames the Patriarchy.OPs claim/characterization is incorrect. Don't heap on me arguments in not making. Focus, friends. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/21 07:14 AM |
| -2 | Woman fights the Patriarchy by becoming a corporate wage slave, then realizes 70 work weeks aren't all they're cracked up to be. Subsequently blames the Patriarchy.I'm sure we could hug it out. Anyway, the point the author is making is that she always thought that success in the workplace was equivalent to achieving everything feminism said was success. But here she is, very successful (and has worked hard for it) and she doesn't feel like she has succeeded in making gains from a feminist standpoint. She just feels like a tired worker. By stating that she believes many sexual assault victims don't find justice, she is suggesting that achieving success in t… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/21 10:31 PM |
| -6 | Woman fights the Patriarchy by becoming a corporate wage slave, then realizes 70 work weeks aren't all they're cracked up to be. Subsequently blames the Patriarchy.Lol. Sure, you're not angry. We're all convinced. ;) | /r/MensRights | 26/09/21 10:12 PM |
| -17 | Woman fights the Patriarchy by becoming a corporate wage slave, then realizes 70 work weeks aren't all they're cracked up to be. Subsequently blames the Patriarchy.Lol. Who put your dick in a meat grinder? Calm down. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/21 10:07 PM |
| -17 | Woman fights the Patriarchy by becoming a corporate wage slave, then realizes 70 work weeks aren't all they're cracked up to be. Subsequently blames the Patriarchy.I retract my former request for you to read the article and update it with a request for you to work on your reading comprehension. Good luck. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/21 10:02 PM |
| -27 | Woman fights the Patriarchy by becoming a corporate wage slave, then realizes 70 work weeks aren't all they're cracked up to be. Subsequently blames the Patriarchy.Yeah, you 100% did not read the article. You're not even close. Instead, you read the headline, filled in the gaps with your own stereotyped expectations, and then came up with a clever little quip. Please don't be like the rest of Reddit. Just read the article. Edit: downvote if you also struggle with reading articles. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/21 08:22 PM |
| 2 | Teenage boys more at risk from vaccines than CovidGasp | /r/MensRights | 10/09/21 07:45 PM |
| 1 | I watched Black Widow and it’s a great example of how feminism in movies has destroyed the male imageYou also seemed to reach for that insult bucket really easily, which means you know your argument is shit. So thanks for helping me feel better about your garbage opinion. Lol. This must mean your opinion is shit, then, since you are insulting? Look, when I can find the script online or when the final scene is posted on YouTube, I'll give you a play by play breakdown. But your fantasy land goggles are going to be tough to break through, so my expectations are low. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/21 09:16 PM |
| 1 | I watched Black Widow and it’s a great example of how feminism in movies has destroyed the male imageWhy the fuck does she need to manipulate him? He works for her. Dude, while your level of mental gymnastics is impressive, it's absurd enough to be embarrassing. Just stop. It's fine and totally defensible to feel like the movie downplays men in order to play up women. But the hill you're going to die on is that she is always derisive to this guy and any hint otherwise is some master class of manipulation? That's just fucking stupid. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/21 05:49 PM |
| 4 | I watched Black Widow and it’s a great example of how feminism in movies has destroyed the male imagediffering opinions than you Only to be mocked, even if slightly, at every appearance and shown zero thanks for such dedication and friendship. What I'm saying is that this is not factually correct. You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts. I can not be of the opinion that the main character was Elvis Presley. That's not how opinions/facts work. Edit: here is a still from a moment between the two in the last scene. Total mockery on her face, right? No warmth or kindness at … | /r/MensRights | 11/07/21 09:15 AM |
| 4 | I watched Black Widow and it’s a great example of how feminism in movies has destroyed the male imageDid you fall asleep? Last scene was her showing gratitude and acknowledging friendship. Man, people around here are super motivated to see things a certain way. Also, a great moment between Stranger things dude when he sang her favorite song. Like I can understand some complaints, but this is some straw man level omissions. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/21 04:38 AM |
| 1 | I just saw “The Red Pill” documentary. It opened my eyes. I have decided I will not marry, I shall focus on getting successful, adopting a child or two and getting me a dog as my best friend. What do you all think?A reasonable rule. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/21 05:41 AM |
| 1 | I just saw “The Red Pill” documentary. It opened my eyes. I have decided I will not marry, I shall focus on getting successful, adopting a child or two and getting me a dog as my best friend. What do you all think?Seems ridiculous. Want to always play video games is the same as any other hobby. The partner has to know if pay of who you are and what you do. If they are not okay with that before marriage, don't marry them. She with rice like cheating, having kids, etc. Yeah some will have issues come up, but it's not like it can't be mitigated. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/21 03:23 PM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I don't keep forgetting. I'm trying to qualify, and you refuse to understand it. When I listed it, I listed it as a component of what people would generally understand as a part of the definition of toxic masculinity. I have said multiple times (but you also refuse to acknowledge) that not all violence from men would be considered toxic violence. I pointed it out explicitly and pointed out your use of the undistributed middle term. But yeah, we keep repeating ourselves. I don't think most people… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 04:49 PM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Enlighten me, great one. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 04:14 AM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.The majority of violence definitely does come from "toxic masculinity." Men are presumed violent, either because of the poisonous nature of "male-dominated" society, or inherent traits. Extreme feminists believe this- no doubt. And if that is exclusively who this is written to, then I don't have a problem with it. My problem is painting with too broad a stroke. With the majority of violence coming from toxic masculinity (your words), then people would have pretty negative views on the military r… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 03:42 AM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I'm concerned that what we're seeing in this moment is more than that - that there is instead a growing undercurrent of suspicion that is placing men beyond reach of affirmation by the community, though not beyond reach of censure and ridicule. I don't disagree. There are loud voices on the extreme feminist side that a lot of people acquiesce to. My concern is that posts like these do more harm to the men's rights movements than they do good. Apologies if I've beat this horse to death with you (… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 03:23 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Can you point me to a widely-accepted definition that is drastically different from this? Here is from Wikipedia: The concept of toxic masculinity is used in academic and media discussions of masculinity to refer to certain cultural norms that are associated with harm to society and to men themselves. Traditional stereotypes of men as socially dominant, along with related traits such as misogyny and homophobia, can be considered "toxic" due in part to their promotion of violence, including sexua… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 03:17 AM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I don't think the violence in the Lord of the Flies is an example of toxic masculinity"? It fits perfectly. It's male. It's violence. It's egos. It's power. It mirrors the tribal, propensely male-dominated, violence near the start of human history. Would a Lord of the Flies with girls really be written the same way? Toxic masculinity could include violence, but it doesn't follow that all male violence would be from toxic masculinity. That would be the fallacy of the undistributed middle term. It… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 02:28 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Anyway- thanks for keeping it civil. My discussion with you has been ten times more productive than with most on this thread. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 02:11 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.It's a very short jump from there to seeing it as traits that all men have naturally/biologically I'd be a bit surprised. I think most people have positive male role-models in their life (maybe I'm just fortunate in my experiences) to know that men, just like women, run the gamut from assholes to saints. The closest thing I could find to a discussion on if LOTF was about toxic masculinity was this thread on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/books/comments/8x1kzk/thoughts_on_the_message_of_lord_of… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 02:10 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I think they would be easier if everyone stopped using what has become an irredeemably divisive and negative term. The term is hot and all over the place, for sure. But I think it is far far far to extreme to assume that toxic masculinity means that men will all just kill each other if left alone, which is what this op is trying to say the island anecdote disproves. That's the problem I have with it. I think pretty much no one (except the extreme feminists) have this view-so to pretend like we c… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 01:44 AM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Are you saying a propensity for violence is not an issue of "toxic masculinity" despite including it in your "common" definition? I think the common definition would include a propensity to violence when it comes to defending masculinity or ego or sexuality, sure. So you disagree that this is what most people would mean in taking about toxic masculinity? I don't think either of us have done surveys, so it's based on our experience, what conversations we've been a part of, etc. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 01:34 AM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Then you also don't believe that " willing[ness] to violently defend one's pride " is an example of toxic masculinity, yeah? Make up your mind. Well I am having a tough time being civil for sure. I'll be honest. You seem like a dick. But to the quote above, I am stating what I believe the common definition of toxic masculinity is. What is that so hard to grasp? Does this story provide one small counter to the idea that men are violent and dangerous, a mainstream feminist idea, or not? This story… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 01:11 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Says the man in an echo chamber who can't grasp a conversation about common definitions.... | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 01:05 AM |
| 0 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Ah. See I definitely do not have that as what I currently understand TM to be. I think conversations like this would be 1000x easier if there were some good surveys on what didn't groups understood by the term. The radical feminists are obvious, bit I think they are a small group and talking to them will get us nowhere. The average person is who I am more interested in, and I would be willing to bet that their definition is not as cause/effect as yours. I think the average person would define TM… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 01:02 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.A fully extreme definition that YOU agree with — "willing[ness] to violently defend one's pride." You can ignore that as much as you want but I will just keep bringing it up! Yeah, I agree that this is what people mean when they say toxic masculinity. I also agree that what people mean when they say "Allah" is the god Muslims believe in. Just because I accept a definition so that I can have a functional conversation about it, doesn't mean that I accept or believe the narrative about it. The prob… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 12:51 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.https://www.cnet.com/news/study-wikipedia-as-accurate-as-britannica/ | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 12:40 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.For someone who babbles like an idiot you're very arrogant. You seem to take things very personally. I think I've been pretty civil. Is the violence in the Lord of the Flies an example of toxic masculinity or not (YOU listed this type of violence as an example, not a "radical feminist")? Is this story a counter to that? These are the only relevant questions. I don't think the violence in the Lord of the Flies is an example of toxic masculinity. And I don't think most people think that the Lord o… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 12:38 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Yeah, but I think you are misinterpreting my comments. To be fair, I think most people replying to me are. I am giving some kind of opposition and many immediately put me in a box as though I am in the enemy camp and try to interpret my words from there. My point is simply that a post like this from the op only disproves toxic masculinity IF toxic masculinity means that all men are toxic. I don't think that's what the average person understands this term to mean. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 12:34 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Careful on the accusations on comprehension. For this entire time, I have been discussing how people use the term. The only definition that a post like this makes sense for are for extremists who hold the position that "all men are toxic" or "all masculinity is toxic." But for those with anything less than a fully extreme definition of the phrase, showing an instance where men didn't kill each other is going to be indicative of nothing. I've referenced Wikipedia to show that a more mainstream de… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 12:29 AM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Let me put it this way. If I go talk to some of my friends, and I say: "Did you know that they justice system strongly favors women in custody battles, even when the woman has destabilizing behaviors like drug use and the man does not?" I can have a very productive conversation and convince them that there are inequality issues that detrimentally affect men. If I go to me friend's and say "Did you know that a group of men were stranded on an island for a year and didn't all kill each other? And … | /r/MensRights | 06/04/21 12:18 AM |
| 0 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I'm discussing the ways on which the phrase is used. In discussing the ways in which the phrase is used, I used the phase. The op then criticizes that I use the phrase. But ironically, the op uses the phrase in discussing the way in which the phrase is used... which is exactly what I was doing. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 11:56 PM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.You're making me point for me. Radical feminists may believe that all men are toxic, but the term means something different to the average person. So a post like this is simply refuting a small group of people and is not very precise in it's use of language. Are we to suppose that all posts on this subreddit should be interpreted from the perspective of arguing against radical feminists? That would be foolish. No one is going to convince them of anything. But you can convince the average person … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 11:54 PM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I think it boils down to this- what does toxic masculinity mean (as understood by the average person)? -All men are toxic? -All masculinity is toxic? -Some behaviors that are culturally accepted as "masculine" are toxic? Which would you say there term means to most people? | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 11:25 PM |
| 0 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Careful now! You just used the phrase! You just said it! By your own logic that is... problematic. OR were you using the phrase in discussion of the phrase? And perhaps to discuss it's meaning, how I'm using it, how you're using it? | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 11:16 PM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.There's no inconsistency here. One is a cultural stereotype associated with men. The other is how the same behavior looks in women. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 09:13 PM |
| 3 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Ever seen a cat fight over a boy or one girl calling another girl a slut? Sure women would. People who think Lord of the Flies = toxic masculinity are first of all are in the minority and also the ones who confuse correlation and causation. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 09:04 PM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.My point is that is misconstruing what toxic masculinity means to most people. But even if we like just at the parallel to Lord of the Flies, many people view it ,as I did) as a comment on the savagery innate in humans and that rears its head when society collapses. Don't take my word for it. Read through this post on r/books. You'll see that most view it like I do and those that view Lord of the Flies as being about toxic masculinity specifically are in the minority. https://www.reddit.com/r/bo… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 08:37 PM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I like this take a lot, and I think it's the correct way to talk about things. Women have some very toxic behavior that society also expects (back-biting, gossiping, undermining, passive aggressive behavior, etc.) But this point your making (which once again- I like) is not the point that the op is making. The op is trying to use an anecdote to disprove a non-existent argument that all men are toxic. The argument goes like- "look at all these men getting along. They couldn't do that if it's true… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 07:56 PM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Who expected it? | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 07:49 PM |
| 5 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.The older generation, yeah, bit I don't think that's the audience here, which is why the arguments tend less toward things like traditional gender roles and more towards portraying radical feminists as the norm and the villain to fight against. Which is why there are so many straw man arguments that pop up. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 07:48 PM |
| 7 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I very much believe that there are issues for men that need to be addressed, from custody to health, etc. So I'm happy to remain part of the community. But sometimes the arguments put forth here are only make sense if someone adopts an extreme view (all feminists are evil, the public thinks that all men are toxic, etc.) and they won't be taken seriously but anyone in the mainstream, which I think hurts the movement overall by only appealing to a small minority. Posts like this are feel good for … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 07:41 PM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.It is a stereotypical masculine trait, and in being stereotypical shows that people don't equate masculinity with toxicity, just some parts of what society views as cultural masculinity. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 07:30 PM |
| 1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.You didn't, but it's the point I'm making that everyone seems to be missing. People are saying against points in not making. I never said women can't also be toxic or homophobic or anything else, yet everyone is acting like I said that. So I'm trying to get back to the core of my argument and see if people follow. Using a case study of men surviving in an island as a general refutation against toxic masculinity only works if the idea behind toxic masculinity is that all men are toxic or that mas… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 07:29 PM |
| 0 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Here's my question to you. Does the term toxic masculinity mean "all men are toxic"? | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 05:56 PM |
| 4 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Somehow, in people's mind, if one thing is associated with one sex that means that the other sex can't exhibit it at all? Like if I said "women tend to be nurturing. Not all women are, but as a whole this is a tendency among women," would your say. "Men can be nurturing so nice try." Like is homophobia some thing that they're is only 100 of and if men have it women can't? Of course not. Women can be and many are homophobic. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 05:27 PM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Yeah, that's why I said "without good evidence." Society believes it, but that doesn't make that belief true. The distinction I'm making is for society (on average) understands the term. And the point I'm making is that the term does not mean that all men are toxic or that masculinity itself is toxic. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 05:21 PM |
| 0 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.What part? I specifically spoke to your concern here (that women do it to). | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 05:11 PM |
| 2 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Yeah, I addressed this in another comment. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 05:09 PM |
| -1 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.Culture has a lot of components. I could have used rap songs, playground taunts, or the military as other examples and I don't think it would affect my point at all. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 05:04 PM |
| 7 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.It's like being upset that someone used the word tooth fairy or Santa clause Yeah, um these words actually do have meaning, even if the person is not real. Go tell a kid that you know Santa Clause and they'll know what you're talking about. Toxic masculinity is not a thing, in any way shape or form. Therefore, it stands to reason that we shouldn't even use such terms in actually conversation. You just be unhappy about this post then, which refers to toxic masculinity in the original op. Or... do… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 05:02 PM |
| 0 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I'm blown away by your power at reason and argumentation. But for real, if you don't want to look like a fool in an argument, you should know how terms are used and by whom. Radical feminists definitely will use toxic masculinity to mean all men are toxic (which I allude to in my post, did you read it?). But outside of that group it means something else. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxic_masculinity | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 04:44 PM |
| -4 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I think society as a whole would probably think (without good evidence) that mostly men do, yeah. Think of the times in shows when someone called someone else a f*g or was violent against a homosexual. Was it a boy perpetrating it or a girl? I would bet that if you did a survey of times that language/behavior is used in media, probably 80% of the time it's men/boys. What is the percentage in real life? I'd bet it moves closer to even, but I don't know how much. Now movies aren't real life. But t… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 04:37 PM |
| -24 | Lord of all Lies. One if the oldest tales of toxic masculinity debunked. Boys stuck on a deserted island for over year do not descend into violence. In fact cooperation and organization saved them.I think posts like this show that many here don't have a solid understanding of what toxic masculinity means (or they are happy to build straw man arguments). Toxic masculinity doesn't mean that all men are toxic or that even masculinity itself is toxic. It means that some cultural traits associated with men are toxic (e.g. locker room jokes, homophobia, willing to violently defend ones pride). Other masculine traits are not viewed as toxic (hard work, willingness to put others first, providing … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/21 04:26 PM |
| 10 | Woman who blackmailed ex by threatening false rape accusations is jailedCapital punishment is a can of worms and is too complex for a simple reddit reply, but you know what is not too simple for a reddit reply? Condemning the Implication that someone should be dragged behind a shed and slaughtered in an extrajudicial killing for a false rape accusation. That's an easy one. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/21 01:19 AM |
| 23 | Woman who blackmailed ex by threatening false rape accusations is jailedThis type of comment is not productive and reflects very poorly on MRAs. Talk to whomever you need to in order to get your anger under control. Murder is not a proportionate response, as terrible as false accusations are. Pull yourself together. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/21 10:42 PM |
| 1 | Paris city hall fined for putting too many women in senior roles (69%)I think there are very different reasons why I am downvoted here. That's fine, it doesn't bother me. As for feminism, I think it's a mistake to see it as a monolith. I think many who claim to be feminists are not steeped in the feminist teachings of third wave feminists and couldn't even name one. Colloquially, I think many who say they are feminists or sympathize with feminists simply desire to be egalitarianists and recognize where things stood for women 40 years ago and still see the effects.… | /r/MensRights | 21/12/20 05:28 AM |
| 6 | Just goes to show how wrong feminist conclusions are because they always start with a conclusion first e.g. a low resolution theory like patriarchy/ toxic masculinity & THEN look for evidence. Other famous examples are iPhone is misogyny/sexist, buildings being penis shaped due to toxic masculinityNot what I'd argue. I would instead say that the feminism pendulum had swung into the absurd in some areas and they have a lot of blind spots. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/20 03:14 PM |
| 12 | Just goes to show how wrong feminist conclusions are because they always start with a conclusion first e.g. a low resolution theory like patriarchy/ toxic masculinity & THEN look for evidence. Other famous examples are iPhone is misogyny/sexist, buildings being penis shaped due to toxic masculinityYeah, definitely looks like working backwards from a conclusion it to justify a conclusion. The claim is absurd. Men in comics only experience anger or hate? Compassion and empathy are everywhere is comic book storylines. Cap with Bucky, Xavier with Magneto and with humanity in general, Superman saving people left and right. It's so easy to find up with counter arguments. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/20 02:56 PM |
| -2 | Paris city hall fined for putting too many women in senior roles (69%)You literally know nothing about me or my position. It's the same thing as u/keenin455. You hear one thing and think you know exactly who you're talking to. You put people in buckets based on a glance and are full of judgement, no willingness to discuss anything. You know who else does this shit? Extreme feminists. That's my point. It blows my mind how alike you act. Honestly, you should be embarrassed, but just like extreme feminists (again), you'll just bury your head in the sand and insist th… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/20 01:14 PM |
| -10 | Paris city hall fined for putting too many women in senior roles (69%)Lol at thinking people calling you out as being an asshole is tone policing. You are just like the people you hate. Extreme feminist jump at the chance to claim claim foul, "you're being sexist! Don't oppress me!" Someone calls you out for being an asshole and you jump to claim foul "don't tone police me!" Honestly, both ends of the spectrum disgust me. There are rabid MRAs and rabid feminists. They both hate each other and they are so laughably alike. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/20 04:08 AM |
| -35 | Paris city hall fined for putting too many women in senior roles (69%)While grinding straight, white men and boys into the floor. Your problem is you see anyone not holding your exact view as all the enemy and all the same. Here's a guy trying to explain his position and the position of some others like him, and you immediately group him in with the worst of the worst that you've ever seen. Honestly that's pretty stupid. Also, your a complete ass about it, which is unnecessary. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/20 12:21 AM |
| 9 | Sadly this isnt a troll we can ignore: she has 90 awards; is a professor, multiple book and paper author, advises governments & organisations on sexual assault & created first ever national study on rape, invented term "date rape", invented 1 in 4 rape stat... this is not a fringe figure.Pretty sad. A lot of people reason backwards from their conclusion. That's exactly what this sounds like to me. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/20 07:33 AM |
| 1 | Heavily downvoted on Feminism subreddit just for saying women can rape men too. And then feminist say that they are empathetic towards male rapes too. Lmao bullshit. They fucking hate it when they realize they are not the only victims around.Teachers with students is a good example. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 06:44 PM |
| 1 | Why do feminists and SJW use buzzwords so much?I didn't use it I don't know why you would have to make this point. My comments were "in this thread" and "people." No accusation was leveled at you specifically, though you seem to react like it. On your second point, I agree regarding moral judgement attached to labels. It's a virtue signaling and also induces comradery or is a claim to belonging in an in-group, especially if that in-group shares a core ideological belief. My comment on the hypocrisy is that terms like SJW are in the same camp… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 03:51 AM |
| 1 | Why do feminists and SJW use buzzwords so much?Nah, commenting more in general about using pejoratives to catagorize others. I agree completely with your answers. Unfortunately, I think people often aren't objective in realizing things are general tactics and not hyperlocalized to their ideological enemies. Same thing happens all the time in politics. The right, the left, they always see the hypocrisy in the other, rarely their own. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 01:20 AM |
| -2 | Why do feminists and SJW use buzzwords so much?Yeah, there is always a continuum. Neo Nazi, Feminazi. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 01:05 AM |
| -1 | Why do feminists and SJW use buzzwords so much?I think these are general tactics used by lots of different ideological groups. It's an in-group/out-group technique that buckets people into predetermined, predefined boxes and speeds up and eases the process of judgement. Your point in hypocrisy is an interesting one. I mean, here we are in a thread talking about people using negative buzz words while using terms like SJW. Everyone sees that... right? Right? | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 12:52 AM |
| 3 | Male Body PositivityVery much agree | /r/MensRights | 17/11/20 04:28 AM |
| 2 | Male Body PositivityDoes beauty only mean sex? Sentiments like this one are talking about a different type of beauty and a different type of worth. You can think your mother is a beautiful, strong woman without any qualifications of physical intimacy. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/20 04:24 AM |
| -1 | Male Body PositivityThis thread is a train wreck. Good effort, though op. I think the upvotes show this is a positive message even if there are some super pessimistic asshole detractors in here that refuse to see things in a positive light. | /r/MensRights | 16/11/20 11:39 PM |
| 0 | The whole cliché in TV shows, movies, and other forms of fiction about females being physically able to play in male's sport games, but not being able to because of sexist reasons needs to stop!themes in them that are about real life. Sure, I don't know many that don't have applicable themes. My perspective is simply this: fiction is fiction and for the most part is wildly void of lots of aspects of the norm. Also, when it comes to men's rights, overpowered illustrations of women is like 100 on my list of concerns. Parental rights, custody battles, men's services for the poor or underprivileged, abusive relationships, are all serious serious issues. I don't know. Not trying to be dismi… | /r/MensRights | 20/10/20 09:55 PM |
| -2 | The whole cliché in TV shows, movies, and other forms of fiction about females being physically able to play in male's sport games, but not being able to because of sexist reasons needs to stop!Yeah, I hate to say this but most movies are about something extraordinary and not the norm. I mean, we have a cyrogenically frozen genetically alerted man from WWII running around with a gama radiated monster who can't be killed with bullets saving the world from aliens with special rocks from outer space. Or there is Michael Jordan playing basketball with cartoons. Or there was that basketball playing dog. If realism and the norm is what you're looking for, best not to to the movies at all. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/20 08:50 PM |
| 27 | Nature, world's most respected journal, joins the bigotry bandwagon: "Women are most affected by pandemics — lessons from past outbreaks"Fuck women A bit broad. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/20 09:22 PM |
| 5 | What did ruth bator ginsburg do in her career for feminists and how did it affect men?If it was anything then like it is now, that's not surprising. How many people pay cash for a house? Almost no one. The bank decides if you are worthy, buys the property, you make payments, but you are still considered a home owner/land owner in common parlance. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/20 06:18 AM |
| 5 | It would be cool if the conversation about BLM included the higher risk of false rape accusationsWhy don't you care? | /r/MensRights | 04/09/20 07:49 PM |
| 3 | It’s official — Katie Hill has learned absolutely nothing after being forced to resign from Congress after sleeping with a stafferYeah, it's the sort of non-apology apology that these type of people try to pull. Classic politician. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/20 03:40 AM |
| 6 | It’s official — Katie Hill has learned absolutely nothing after being forced to resign from Congress after sleeping with a stafferIt's like all of those idiots who have to insist that the pandemic has been handled well. "It's just the flu!" they've been saying as the death toll mounts. Rule number one of egotistical assholes: never admit you're wrong. Edit: apparently this is controversial? WTF? | /r/MensRights | 24/08/20 02:59 AM |
| 9 | Can you even imaging the oppression women face? Near daily compliments!What does this have to do with men's rights? | /r/MensRights | 16/08/20 06:34 PM |
| 1 | Two teenage boys drown helping to save a little girl. Is this that toxic masculinity I keep hearing about?It's a straw man. Act like what people mean when they say tissue masculinity is that masculinity itself is toxic. It doesn't matter if that's not what people actually mean by it. By pretending that's what they mean, it makes the pretend argument (a straw man) easier to knock down. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/20 04:44 AM |
| 470 | The Harsh truth about Will and JadaShame on Jada. That shit is unconscionable. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/20 03:25 PM |
| 1 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menLol. Stop by again next time you want to get schooled for advancing a stupid argument. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/20 01:33 AM |
| 0 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menNah, logical fallacies don't hold water. That's the problem. When you twist language to make something work that doesn't work, it's disingenuous. I mean, would you say that we should call the police on anyone under 18 because they are child predators? Of course not. You'd be a total baffoon to suggest so. Like off your rocker stupid to suggest so. Yet here we are. Don't argue in bad faith- don't get called out for it. It's pretty simple. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/20 01:30 AM |
| 1 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menAh, so I was right then, in saying that the op was painting with broad strokes? Who, then, is the asshole? | /r/MensRights | 07/08/20 01:01 AM |
| 3 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menI get the position that women collectively have a responsibility to correct behavior that leads to injustice and inequality. But do you think that it is the case that all women are predators? | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 11:37 PM |
| 0 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menThat's a total false equivocation. When the op contrasted nurturing with predators, they were clearly not taking about predators in the hierarchy of the animal kingdom. That's some shitty logic. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 09:22 PM |
| 4 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menI'm sorry you've had no good women in your life. It doesn't mean there aren't any. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 08:51 PM |
| 1 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menYou just come off as really unreasonable and really really angry. It doesn't bother me if you despise me. It does surprise me that some, including you, can't have civil conversations and assume volumes about other people with little to no evidence. Life is going to be a string of never ending injustices and conversation and relationships that will be tough to navigate. Take a breath. Ask a question. Be measured. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 08:50 PM |
| 1 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menTell me. Is your mom a predator? Was your grandma a predator? What are you doing about these predators in your life? | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 08:44 PM |
| 1 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menHow would we make things equitable if women are predators? My entire point, which is apparently very offensive to several people, is that I think it's pretty unreasonable to paint all women as predators. That's the type of shit that extreme feminists pull on men. It's reactionary and simply not true. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 08:36 PM |
| 0 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menMan. The number of assumptions you have to make to get to this conclusion is just mind boggling. Also, that's some unbelievably quick to anger issues you've got here. Like, maybe have a discussion? Maybe you don't know someone's position from just one comment? | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 08:33 PM |
| 1 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menLike family courts have ruled that collectively women are predators? | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 08:25 PM |
| 18 | I guess we aren’t suffering either. When shit hits the fan for everyone no one wants to care about us menThat's some awfully large brushes you're working with there. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/20 08:03 PM |
| 6 | The actual post is disgusting, but the comments make me feel physically ill. If you look at the comments, I would like to remind you that men are often criticised for being sexist.The comments on the post are toxic af. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/20 04:42 PM |
| 3 | The actual post is disgusting, but the comments make me feel physically ill. If you look at the comments, I would like to remind you that men are often criticised for being sexist.Ha ha ha. Oh man. See, when u/joflin asked: "What do you mean it can't?" it was pretty damn clear that they were probing, just as you had asked, but you continued to ask for probing. But now I get it as I infer from your comments on dick sucking and phag babies that you were asking fora different type of probing. There are subreddits for those types of requests, but I don't think this is one of them. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/20 04:10 PM |
| 5 | The actual post is disgusting, but the comments make me feel physically ill. If you look at the comments, I would like to remind you that men are often criticised for being sexist.I love that you say they should probe more right after they literally asked for clarification. You are clearly running away from this conversation because you have no answer. Are you embarrassed? You should be. You look like a fool. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/20 07:20 AM |
| 2 | Someone I know shared this on social media. People think these are the most serious problems men face in today's world (:Well did you give them some to add to their list? | /r/MensRights | 04/07/20 05:30 PM |
| 6 | Google's Father's Day art todayHere's the mothers day art for those interested. https://www.google.com/doodles/mothers-day-2020-may-31 And I agree, by the way. It's frustrating when there are so many legitimate things to feel upset about that this sub often devolves into the things that people hate most about feminism: constantly looking to interpret things as an attack on their gender. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/20 06:26 AM |
| 1 | 97% of people killed by police are men AND TGEY HAVE TO MAKE IT ABOUT THEM!I don't think this passes the smell test. The general rule you're promoting here, that no small interest group should speak out for their own interests, would mean that a lot of small groups would never have a voice at all, which goes directly against what the founding fathers wanted for this nation- the protection of small groups from large ones, or something James Madison referred to as "the tyranny of the majority." | /r/MensRights | 16/06/20 03:55 PM |
| -2 | 97% of people killed by police are men AND TGEY HAVE TO MAKE IT ABOUT THEM!So is the logic here that if a group isn't the majority of those that suffer, that it is wrong to highlight them? Let's say that there is an advocacey group that focuses on the abuse of handicap kids in foster homes. Would focusing on them be inherently wrong since handicap foster kids are in the minority when it comes to abused children? Would it suggest that only handicap foster kids matter or that they matter more than non-handicap kids? | /r/MensRights | 16/06/20 03:39 PM |
| 1 | Once again SJWs have changed the rules of consent - it used to be that consent required affirmative enthusiastic participation. NOW it's changed to "Well, if you ain't agin it, yer FER it". This just shows they'll say literally anything to get their way.I'm talking about Fox. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/20 11:32 PM |
| 1 | Once again SJWs have changed the rules of consent - it used to be that consent required affirmative enthusiastic participation. NOW it's changed to "Well, if you ain't agin it, yer FER it". This just shows they'll say literally anything to get their way.Also, I should say that I have seen very biased and untrue or disingenuous articles out of the whole gamut, from NYT to Fox. If there are inconsistencies or strong biases that reduce the factual quality of a piece, I'm always happy to have those pointed out. That goes for all sources. I currently have subscriptions to WSJ and NYT for balance (asking with my local paper) and I think this has been a decent approach so far. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/20 08:06 PM |
| 1 | Once again SJWs have changed the rules of consent - it used to be that consent required affirmative enthusiastic participation. NOW it's changed to "Well, if you ain't agin it, yer FER it". This just shows they'll say literally anything to get their way.This wanders into poisoning the well territory. I'm all for multiple news stories-it's part of the reason I'm in Reddit. But I don't assume all Fox articles are biased just as I don't assume all NYT articles are biased. This particular article is pretty straight forward with no real editorial component. It's: what are people saying/demanding when they use this term, and shows a pretty broad spectrum. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/20 07:49 PM |
| 1 | Once again SJWs have changed the rules of consent - it used to be that consent required affirmative enthusiastic participation. NOW it's changed to "Well, if you ain't agin it, yer FER it". This just shows they'll say literally anything to get their way.To be clear, I am not advocating for anything other than being informed as to what people are proposing (as opposed to just listening to how the taking heads portray it.) Here is a decent write up from the times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/08/us/what-does-defund-police-mean.html | /r/MensRights | 09/06/20 07:33 PM |
| 1 | Once again SJWs have changed the rules of consent - it used to be that consent required affirmative enthusiastic participation. NOW it's changed to "Well, if you ain't agin it, yer FER it". This just shows they'll say literally anything to get their way.No, it absolutely matters what we understand. Otherwise, how does anyone know what they are arguing for it against? Or what is actually being proposed vs how something is portrayed by different sides. I, for one, am not for being my opinion off of a knew jerk reaction or obviously incomplete information. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/20 06:35 PM |
| 2 | Once again SJWs have changed the rules of consent - it used to be that consent required affirmative enthusiastic participation. NOW it's changed to "Well, if you ain't agin it, yer FER it". This just shows they'll say literally anything to get their way.Agreed. I think the meaning behind "silence = consent" is more along the lines of "all that is required for evil to win is for good men to do nothing." I think there is more nuance to the discussion that such a basic sign isn't capturing (what sign can?), but consent of sexual intercourse is a difference in kind. This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Different types of activities require different types of consent. Some types of activities require legal documentation (e.g. a gym membership con… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/20 06:29 PM |
| 1 | Once again SJWs have changed the rules of consent - it used to be that consent required affirmative enthusiastic participation. NOW it's changed to "Well, if you ain't agin it, yer FER it". This just shows they'll say literally anything to get their way.I don't think you understand the defund proposal. While there are some who use it to mean abolish, that's not what is being discussed by most at a policy level. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/20 06:03 PM |
| 11 | I'm so sick of hearing everyone talk about how wrong it is that the police disproportionately target black people while refusing to talk about the fact that police disproportionately target men.I think we can all agree that police brutality has gone way too far and is almost never punished and has to stop. People getting run over by cars, horses, killed in police custody when not resisting, etc. has to be stopped. This is the easiest thing in the world to unite behind and should 100% be not controversial. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/20 11:07 PM |
| 0 | This is 100% proof that male privilege doesn’t exist. If anything, women are “privileged” because everyone believes their rape/assault claims. On the other hand, If a man is assaulted by a women, he is seen as weak. No one takes domestic abuse claims seriously if they are made by a man.I am 100% okay with the direction you're going here: Anecdotes are powerful in giving a face to statistics and are effective in connecting with people. My original argument still stands in that anecdotes themselves don't prove or disprove alledged patterns. Pointing this out should not expose me to baseless attacks. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/20 05:40 AM |
| 0 | This is 100% proof that male privilege doesn’t exist. If anything, women are “privileged” because everyone believes their rape/assault claims. On the other hand, If a man is assaulted by a women, he is seen as weak. No one takes domestic abuse claims seriously if they are made by a man.There is a massive difference between the two. That is the concept at the bedrock of statistics. Let's say, for example, that I find a story of a man raping a woman, going to court, and getting away with it. These stories certainly exist with all of the billions of people in the earth. Would this story 100% prove male privilege? No, absolutely not. An anecdote doesn't prove a generalization. If someone could statistically show a recurrent pattern and compare it to different outcomes for a differ… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/20 05:15 AM |
| 1 | This is 100% proof that male privilege doesn’t exist. If anything, women are “privileged” because everyone believes their rape/assault claims. On the other hand, If a man is assaulted by a women, he is seen as weak. No one takes domestic abuse claims seriously if they are made by a man.You're giving it a story that only the truly unsympathetic/heartless would ignore or dismiss outright. I'm reading the post headline. "This 100% proves that male privilege doesn't exist" is exactly as I had characterized it: an anecdote trying to disprove a generalization. This is really basic logic. You can try to reframe or mischaracterize my comment all you want, but it comes down to this- finding an example of something terrible happening to a man doesn't disprove the claim of male privilege… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/20 05:07 AM |
| 2 | This is 100% proof that male privilege doesn’t exist. If anything, women are “privileged” because everyone believes their rape/assault claims. On the other hand, If a man is assaulted by a women, he is seen as weak. No one takes domestic abuse claims seriously if they are made by a man.Sorry friend. I don't mean to be rude. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/20 03:14 AM |
| -4 | This is 100% proof that male privilege doesn’t exist. If anything, women are “privileged” because everyone believes their rape/assault claims. On the other hand, If a man is assaulted by a women, he is seen as weak. No one takes domestic abuse claims seriously if they are made by a man.The logic of this sub drives me insane sometimes. How can one incident of anything disprove a generalization? What the flying fuck. Posts like those previous (the recent one that blew up about suicides, death at work, death in combat, etc, are far more illustrative of ideas of male vs female privilege. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/20 03:11 AM |
| 5 | TrueRipping of comedians for karma? | /r/MensRights | 26/05/20 03:50 PM |
| 1 | Remember this the next time a woman calls you male.Kinda begs the question. The argument is centered on whether the use of the word is normal or if there is a different significance attached (via context it whatever). | /r/MensRights | 28/04/20 06:43 PM |
| 4 | NYT’s In-Depth Investigation Of The Allegations Against Biden Reveals That He’s A DemocratWhat does this have to do with men's rights? Better suited to r/politicalhumor. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/20 12:14 AM |
| 9 | Why Hollywood keeps releasing movies with woman beating up man. And it's so stupid.Have you watched action movies? They are nearly all 1 v 10 and not believable. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/20 11:16 PM |
| 2 | Adele just got Brendan Frasered.Washyournose has some good points. I attributed a common position of this sub to him and I shouldn't have. I could go point by point and say where I think Washyournose makes a valid point (e.g I didn't give him credit for some of his position) and where I think he has no ground to stand on (being happy that this is happening to Adelle while also not agreeing that is a good thing), but the over reaction was just wow. So I called it out and moved on. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 08:03 PM |
| 5 | Adele just got Brendan Frasered.You seem angry. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 05:44 PM |
| 7 | Adele just got Brendan Frasered.I couldn't agree more, especially on the us vs them mindset that gets fostered. I think it takes what could be good (organization) and polarizes people from having any moderate opinion, which I think in some situations can be incredibly counter productive. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 05:43 PM |
| 7 | Adele just got Brendan Frasered.Thanks. I've found that there is a wide spectrum of perspectives and opinions in this sub. I find men are on the short end of the stick in a bunch of ways: custody battles, government funding for cancers, etc. and that some women's issues are consistently portrayed without nuance (pay discrimination), but I also absolutely believe that there are many areas where women also get the short end of the stick and I personally believe that both groups should be working toward equality. It's tough to te… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 05:40 PM |
| 10 | Adele just got Brendan Frasered.This is massively hypocritical. On the one hand, the mantra on this sub is "Feminists don't want equality." And then a post like this shows up and instead of a reaction being "Wow, that doesn't look very equal," posters like you say "Yeah! Finally it's happening to them!" in the same way that women say "Yeah! Finally it's happening to men!" when there is inequality that shifts to favor them. So a follow-up question. Do you think that it's 100% fine for feminists to want to push for and celebrate… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 04:28 PM |
| 4 | Adele just got Brendan Frasered.Welcome to the feminist mentality. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 04:10 PM |
| 4 | Adele just got Brendan Frasered.This logic feels like feminist logic to me. "For years there have been no women on the board of directors of large businesses, so now we need to fight to have as many all women board of directors as we can!" One of the main critiques of this sub is that Feminists aren't actually interested in equality. It looks like you aren't either, so what makes you better than them? | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 04:05 PM |
| 13 | Adele just got Brendan Frasered.How is this different from women being excited about having an all-women board of directors for a company? I have seen many comments about how women don't actually want equality, they want revenge or over representation as a ridiculous attempt to even a historical score. Your comment feels the same to me. It's about "x happens to this gender all the time, so it has to start going the other way around so that they get it and that's fine by me." | /r/MensRights | 07/04/20 04:00 PM |
| 2 | A tweet outlining feminist dishonesty.Some do. I think they are like most other groups, they want advantages they never had before while keeping hold of the advantages they previously had. That's human nature. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/20 06:08 AM |
| 7 | A tweet outlining feminist dishonesty.The honesty of the OP? I agree. I guess your point may be that people would be updating the honesty and not the action? Could be. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 05:29 PM |
| -9 | A tweet outlining feminist dishonesty.The critique was not directed to you but to the upvoters. I think you adequately portrayed your actions and the consequences in your original post. We all do things that are in the heat of the moment that probably aren't wise and are seen differently with cooler heads. But those who upvote you are not wrapped in the heat of conflict at the moment, thus my comment on it not being a good look. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 04:56 PM |
| 7 | A tweet outlining feminist dishonesty.The double standard, framing, and justifications are serious problems that most feminists can't see. I've argued with some that an all female board of directors isn't something to celebrate. The argument is that there are plenty of all male boards, and I say, yes. Neither are equal. Neither should be celebrated at face value. But there is always this feeling I get that it's evening the score, which is not what feminists profess. It's an interesting argument to have. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 04:52 PM |
| -13 | A tweet outlining feminist dishonesty.Are you being upvoted for admitting to trying to organize a violent confrontation? Not a good look, Reddit. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/20 04:48 PM |
| 3 | Isn't it extremely sexist and paranoid to consider all men to be violent towards women and compare them to guns?All men to be violent? I'd say you're reaching, but that would imply that you were within reach. The post does not say all men are violent toward women. Please, let's be accurate with our critiques. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/20 05:56 AM |
| 10 | Feminist propaganda has successfully created several new concepts (wage gap, #metoo, mansplaining etc). MRAs, although they often have the truth on their side, haven't managed to create one single "buzzword"?Good bot | /r/MensRights | 03/03/20 08:03 PM |
| -15 | Feminist propaganda has successfully created several new concepts (wage gap, #metoo, mansplaining etc). MRAs, although they often have the truth on their side, haven't managed to create one single "buzzword"?Explains the Alt right's fascination with Pepe | /r/MensRights | 03/03/20 08:02 PM |
| 2 | Martin Shrekli vs Elizabeth HolmesWtf? Elizabeth Holmes hasn't even had her trial yet. It's scheduled for this middle of this year. Not apples to apples. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/20 09:02 PM |
| 32 | Buzzfeed.This is as bad as the publication that had a post about objectifying women then posting about men's bulges at the olympics. Edit: Cosmo is the correct answer. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/20 05:23 PM |
| 2 | Bernie Sanders says voters are more concerned with a candidate's positions than their gender or racial identityIt's not that the right won't turn on Trump, it's that right now, Trump's base is energized enough and loyal enough to him, that anyone that dissents from Trump is in danger of getting primaried. There have been many in the Republican party who say that Trump does not conform to conservative standards (family values, fiscal conservatism, etc.), but they basically only say this if they are planning on retiring already. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/20 11:24 PM |
| 3 | Statistical chart: "For every 100 girls/women" compared to boys. Great material for use in forums! Link to source in comments.Great resource. Should be stickied. Would be awesome as a dynamic resource with hyperlinks. | /r/MensRights | 26/12/19 04:30 AM |
| 1 | Piece of shit girl.I think that's one of the unspoken purposes of this sub, though. I see a lot less of calls to organize and make a difference and a lot more rage baiting, as you put it. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/19 08:33 PM |
| 6 | Can’t have it both waysI love this every time it comes up. One of my favs. I aint even mad its a repost. | /r/MensRights | 07/10/19 02:59 AM |
| 3 | Because you claimed it's about equalityWell said | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 04:27 PM |
| 1 | More Women Are Paying Alimony In Divorce Settlements & THEY ARE PISSED!!!!Holy shit, this is almost a verbatim response from the leaked Chinese handbook on social media disinformation techniques. /u/poopsicle88 is trying to deflect and distract. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 02/10/19 06:40 PM |
| 1 | More Women Are Paying Alimony In Divorce Settlements & THEY ARE PISSED!!!!I'm not going to talk to you, and no one else reading this thread should either. There's lots of evidence that /u/poopsicle88 is a Chinese national that is here just to stir shit up and distract from more important geopolitical issues. Anyone reading this shouldn't trust him. He will lie to you. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 01/10/19 11:15 PM |
| -2 | More Women Are Paying Alimony In Divorce Settlements & THEY ARE PISSED!!!!After years of providing links and virtually never getting any acknowledgement that I was correct, forget you. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 01/10/19 02:17 PM |
| -16 | More Women Are Paying Alimony In Divorce Settlements & THEY ARE PISSED!!!!It's well known that people who don't provide support for their arguments are fucking liars. There's lots of studies about it- all easily Googled. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 01/10/19 04:23 AM |
| -4 | More Women Are Paying Alimony In Divorce Settlements & THEY ARE PISSED!!!!Why would it have to be law and order to provide evidence of a claim? The internet is full of idiots making claims. Backing up a claim with evidence is just part of having a good conversation. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 01/10/19 04:21 AM |
| 99 | Found at my work. Could you imagine if the roles were reversed? Blatantly unfair for men to have to go to the 2nd floor just to use washroom.I can almost guarantee it. If this is in the US, this is against code. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/19 05:02 AM |
| 2 | Not all instances of gender inequality are equally concerning. An emphasis on women's underrepresentation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math roles (STEM) has not been matched by a similar concern about men's underrepresentation in Healthcare, Early Education, and Domestic roles (HEED).There's a good conversation over on r/science on this. Check out some of the to comments. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/19 02:42 PM |
| 1 | This is what happens when an MRA politely asks a feminist who claims that feminism is about "the full equality of men and women" to prove that she does, indeed, subscribe to that definition.Questions for OP: What do you mean by full equality? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 07:09 AM |
| 0 | This is what happens when an MRA politely asks a feminist who claims that feminism is about "the full equality of men and women" to prove that she does, indeed, subscribe to that definition.I don't think many here are here to persuade feminists. It'd be nice, though, if there were more good faith efforts at something like that. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 07:03 AM |
| 1 | Entirely Accurate RepresentationsData ftw. Thank you for something sourced and high level. | /r/MensRights | 29/08/19 04:05 AM |
| 1 | OP is considered an asshole for granting his two kids the same amount of moneyThe post is labeled NAH (No A-holes Here). | /r/MensRights | 26/08/19 04:56 AM |
| 0 | This is the kind of normalised hate we are dealing withWhenever the first response to something radical/extreme is "well technically not ALLLL of them are like this" is always the most watered-down pathetic excuse of a defense that exists. When I point out that there are many schools of thought in feminism and you say that making that point is a watered-down pathetic excuse of a defense, then yes, you are painting ALL feminists a certain way. It's an implicit argument you're making by not being willing to admit that there is a difference between rad… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/19 06:55 PM |
| 0 | This is the kind of normalised hate we are dealing withHow many self described feminists have you met in real life? I think you need to get out more. I am speaking from experience when I say that not all feminists want to murder male babies. I mean, come on, how stupid do you have to be to believe that all feminists are like this one? Really stupid. And how unreasonable do you have to be to dig your heals in when challenged on whether ALL feminists are like this one? Pretty fucking unreasonable. Like I said earlier. You and her are practically cut f… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/19 05:59 PM |
| 0 | This is the kind of normalised hate we are dealing withWow wow wow. Your reading comprehension suuuucks. Please show me where I am having any problems calling radical feminists out on their bullshit. In fact, I have called this one out several times in this thread alone. I realize that the only way for you to feel good about your argument is to pretend like I'm arguing something other than what I am. That's pretty weak. But if it's what you have to do to make yourself feel better, then whatever, I guess. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/19 05:48 PM |
| 0 | This is the kind of normalised hate we are dealing withWrong. What's fucking twisted is feeling like one can brazenly paint with broad strokes and capture people that exist in a continuum of thoughts and beliefs as though they all want to murder male babies. That type of thinking is not only lazy and flawed, it is disgusting. It's the type of thinking that justified murdering tens of thousands during the crusades, during ethnic cleansing in Africa, and during the Holocaust. This woman that is the subject of the post is fucking ridiculous, but you ar… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/19 05:34 PM |
| 0 | This is the kind of normalised hate we are dealing withBzzz. Try again. Questioning why a self-described radical person's views should be painted as normal is not excusing the radical view. The view espoused by this radical feminist is abhorrent. What I'm calling into question is whether it is normal. I'm surprised you'd confuse the two. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/19 07:28 AM |
| -5 | Big guys offer help to anyone who is scared to walk around in the campus. Much toxic such masculinity!Hmmm... sounds a lot like what you're doing here to all feminists. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/19 06:41 AM |
| 2 | Feminist facepalm.One of the most reasonable comments I've read on this forum in a while. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/19 01:55 AM |
| -16 | This is the kind of normalised hate we are dealing withI'd love to see some evidence showing that the view espoused by this self proclaimed radical feminist is held by a majority of feminists. I highly doubt any exists. I don't have hard numbers or any study, but just anecdotally, in interactions with feminists or even simply by looking at post proportions, this view is almost definitely in the minority, and not just a simple minority, but an extremely slim minority. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/19 07:54 AM |
| 1 | California Gov. Gavin Newsom: Mass Shootings Caused By Toxic Masculinityhttps://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/white-nationalism-fueled-violence-rise-fbi-slow-call-it-domestic-n1039206 | /r/MensRights | 14/08/19 06:19 AM |
| 132 | This is the kind of normalised hate we are dealing withNormalized hate? How normal? This person identifies as a radical feminist. I think by definition that is not normal. Sounds like a stretch. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/19 06:11 AM |
| 1 | California Gov. Gavin Newsom: Mass Shootings Caused By Toxic MasculinityCertainly, but in the US, white supremacy in particular and terrorism related to white supremacy has been on the rise. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/19 03:17 AM |
| 1 | California Gov. Gavin Newsom: Mass Shootings Caused By Toxic MasculinityViolent white nationalism appears to be. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/19 12:16 PM |
| 1 | California Gov. Gavin Newsom: Mass Shootings Caused By Toxic MasculinityIronically, the argument of toxic masculinity *is* saying that it's people who kill people. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/19 06:07 AM |
| 1 | Too rightI don't know for these play out, but I would hope that they get charged with trespassing and being in possession of a fake government ID. After all, if an underage kid tries to buy alcohol with a fake ID, that is what they would get slapped with. | /r/MensRights | 04/07/19 03:40 AM |
| 1 | Too rightThat's the point. The ones who ignore all the laws and rules and have poorly developed frontal lobes are insane (or at least stupid enough to be roughly the same as insane). So we are supposed to reason with insane kids? And we expect that to work? That doesn't make any sense. The kid is responsible for breaking the law. The club is responsible for adhering to the law, but the club goer can't depend on kids to follow the law or the club to be competent. | /r/MensRights | 04/07/19 03:18 AM |
| 1 | Too rightI agree with this for the most part. Kids do stupid shit. They are willing to break laws by trespassing, drinking, etc. The whole point is that they are stupid and don't understand the consequences of their actions. Asking them to consider the downstream effect of their decision to go into a club is foolish. The whole reason why there are ages behind smoking, drinking, sex, etc. is because kids' ability to understand the outcomes of these things are limited. | /r/MensRights | 04/07/19 12:13 AM |
| 1 | Too rightPart of the idea of age of consent is people understanding the consequences of their actions. That's the whole point. Acting like kids will suddenly get it, when their brain isn't fully developed, is kinda stupid. I don't think the twitter op understands why there is an age of consent in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 04/07/19 12:09 AM |
| 8 | I still like He-Man.You're not alone. I have regular arguments with people on this sub for shitty posts/comments. It's really disappointing because there are serious underlying issues regarding men's rights but what gets posted, generally, are anecdotes that get painted as the rule or straw man arguments, or hateful comments disguised as being supportive of men. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/19 09:31 PM |
| 34 | Publishing and spreading the disrespect of men isn’t very appropriateTIL you can only learn things about yourself if you are harming others and that it is a worthwhile sacrifice to make. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/19 06:30 PM |
| 1 | Right, so breast cancer is our fucking fault now too.I agree. What I'm not sure if is what percentage is manufactured rage vs virtue signaling vs confirmation bias vs something else. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 11:05 PM |
| 15 | Right, so breast cancer is our fucking fault now too.I don't think this is an attack on men. I think that what it's pointing out is that risk factors are more broad than you think. Brest cancer is not necessarily handed down by the person that has breasts. It's inheritable from both parents, so knowing your family history on your father's side is just as important as on your mothers side. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 04:17 AM |
| 5 | Woman steals sign saying it restricts woman's rights.Don't steal signs. Don't driver over other protesters. Follow the law. It's easy. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/19 04:07 AM |
| 0 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.I love love love love love that you keep proving my point. At first you say: it's not evidence. I say yes it is. Then you say, it's not rock solid evidence. I say, that's fine, but it's evidence, then you launch into a long explanation of refutable evidence vs non-refutable evidence, which is basically exactly what I said in an earlier comment, so what the hell are you arguing for? Why do you keep stating what I had previously said as though you are proving me wrong on something? | /r/MensRights | 19/06/19 09:00 PM |
| 1 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.he thinks his word alone is evidence Better get yer eyes checked my friend. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 07:25 AM |
| 31 | My mom posted this on her WhatsApp status. It made me feel proud.This especially captures well a working dad where the mom is a stay at home mom. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 07:20 AM |
| 1 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.Let me ask you something. Have you heard of corroborating evidence? Have you heard of supporting evidence? Have you heard of overwhelming evidence? Why would anyone need corroborating evidence if, by definition, evidence proved something absolutely? Why would there ever be a need for supporting evidence? What significance would overwhelming evidence mean if any evidence at all proved something absolutely. There is a fundamental misunderstanding here, and apparently no pointing to dictionaries or… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 07:09 AM |
| 1 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.And while it can be offered as evidence Interesting, so it is evidence you say but not absolute proof? Thanks for agreeing with me. Feel free to read through my constant back and forths with people who can't figure this out. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 07:01 AM |
| 1 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.Funny, because I'm backing up my claim with EVIDENCE. Here is EVIDENCE that eye witness testimony is EVIDENCE: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3502 Are you unwilling to accept EVIDENCE in proving what EVIDENCE is? | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 06:56 AM |
| 0 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.Eye witness = evidence. I have provided several sources (e.g. evidence) that illustrates this. You only have your denials. No evidence. This is evidence that you are not arguing in good faith or are stupid. Is it proof positive of either? No. You could be drunk and so temporarily stupid. Did this example help clear things up, or do you need a night to sleep it off? Edit: apologies. I thought you were the same person I had been arguing with. Feel free to read through my comment chains and see all… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 06:48 AM |
| 0 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.Please define for me what evidence is and please use a reputable source (US Code will do, I provided the link earlier). You are confusing evidence with proof positive. Have you ever heard someone say "Well there's evidence that supports it and there's evidence that doesn't"? It's not my fault that neither of you understands what evidence is. "ground for belief" "an outward sign" "an indication." Once again, this does not mean proof positive. I've given you explanations, legal definitions, non-le… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 05:53 AM |
| 0 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.The argument was what comprises evidence. Eye witness evidence is 100% evidence. Does that mean it is irrefutable evidence? That it is proof positive? No. But it is evidence. I mean, I would say, "what do you want me to do, cite the US code?" but I already did. How thick do you have to be? How ignorant do you have to be not to accept that? It's literally written in black ink, codified into the judicial system. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 05:37 AM |
| 1 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.Lol. Quick! Run away when you're losing but claim victory! First, you were proven wrong about what evidence is, which I proved to you via the US legal system. Then, I provide corroborating evidence from the World Freaking Economic Forum, and you wave it away as "blindly believing"anything that corresponds to my belief system. You reject evidence, and you can't even be convinced of what evidence is!!! You wish me good luck in court but won't accept legal definitions! If irony were a poison, you'd… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 04:21 AM |
| 1 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.You claimed that first hand reports were not evidence, and I showed that they were. Now you move the goal post to it not being rock solid evidence, so I'll take that to mean that you admit you were wrong and are changing your position. Thanks for that. If you would have said you would have liked to have seen additional info to corroborate, I don't know that I would have disagreed. There's corroborating evidence elsewhere. The world Economic Forum puts India in the bottom 25% of nations for women… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 01:39 AM |
| -1 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.I'll phone the justice system. They'll be very shocked to learn that testimony from eye witnesses can't be used as evidence. Hold on to your britches, this is going have serious legal ramifications. Oh, also: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3502 | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 01:00 AM |
| -2 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.First hand | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 12:50 AM |
| -4 | Delhi woman throws acid on Boyfriend for refusing to marry her.Your evidence is not welcome here. We only allow talking points that support our worldview. Please find some way to express this same idea but with men being the victim. Then you'll gain acceptance. Perhaps say "women are a step above slaves, but also men are a step below slaves and have no rights anymore in a society like India that is clearly controlled by endless bias towards women." Submitting a link or screenshot, like this one, that shows one instance of something happen and that doesn't… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/19 12:32 AM |
| 1 | Is consent to sex consent to reproduce? | A key legal right that women have but which is explicitly denied to men by our current laws100% agree | /r/MensRights | 15/06/19 02:56 PM |
| 2 | Imagine being this deluded...I'm sorry. I do not make a general practice of speaking to North Korean agents. Please stop messaging me. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/19 08:35 PM |
| 2 | Imagine being this deluded...It has nothing to do with academia. It has everything to do with how arguing works. This is pretty basic stuff. Make an assertion, support that assertion. Let's try a thought experiment if that wasn't the case, though. Hey everyone, good news. I have identified that /u/penguinscollectcups is a North Korean plant in this subreddit whose job is to get Americans caught up in domestic issues and ignore missile development! Luckily, since I am not required to support any claim I make, this claim can … | /r/MensRights | 14/06/19 08:30 PM |
| 2 | Imagine being this deluded...Your claim is your job to support. Sorry that's how it works. You can be angry about it if you want to be immature, though. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/19 07:52 PM |
| 2 | Imagine being this deluded...Source? | /r/MensRights | 14/06/19 07:32 PM |
| 9 | Is consent to sex consent to reproduce? | A key legal right that women have but which is explicitly denied to men by our current lawsVery well written. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/19 04:01 PM |
| 3 | 9/11 first responders dying of cancer get support cut. Occurs to me as MRA that if was women dying they'd get help they need in seconds. Feminists response to the heroism? "Celebrating these heroic men is SEXIST". Link is video of Stewart testimony/Feminist article linked in subTime to see what the GOP controlled Senate will do. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/19 03:03 AM |
| 4 | Imagine being this deluded...What does the discrepancy look like for a straight 4 year cycle comparison? | /r/MensRights | 12/06/19 05:48 PM |
| 56 | Faced with the prospect of reproductive Rights equal to men feminists suddenly decide that forcing someone to pay for a kid they never wanted is slavery. But only for women.Super valid point. I have talked with several feminists and the idea that one person can terminate a pregnancy while the other (man) doesn't want to is a tough point for them to reconcile with the idea of men having financial responsibilities if the man never wanted the child. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 12:16 AM |
| 8 | What vice has to say about our subThey got it at least partially right. I don't think this sub has tried to hide its anti-sjw/feminisim. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/19 05:04 AM |
| 1 | 'Fat Sex Therapist' compares fitness trainers to Nazis, children's dieting to sexual assault. We have a obesity problem and this is what college offers."This is what university has to offer is universal." I would actually say your argument is backwards. The statement is clearly universal, it's you who is reading it as the more reasonable version it should be, i.e. that that's what this University offers or that's what is being offered at some universities. | /r/MensRights | 12/05/19 03:46 AM |
| 0 | How on earth is it fine to be sexist to men, but not to support a president? The double standards are so blatant.Lol, whatever you say comrade. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/19 04:48 PM |
| 0 | How on earth is it fine to be sexist to men, but not to support a president? The double standards are so blatant.So when I quote the heads of intelligence agencies to prove that the heads of intelligence agencies believe Russia interfered with the US election, you see that irrefutable proof as a "talking point?" Looks like Russian trolls have infiltrated men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/19 01:59 PM |
| 0 | How on earth is it fine to be sexist to men, but not to support a president? The double standards are so blatant.Let's see, we have: Trump Jr admitting to meeting with Russians hoping for outside influence from a hostile foreign power Maria Butina (Russian) pleading guilty to being acting as a foreign agent in infiltrating NRA and political circles An, oh yeah, ALL INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES DECLARING THAT RUSSIA DID INDEED INTERFERE WITH THE ELECTIONS So you're telling me, that when Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, says, “Russia conducted an unprecedented influence campaign to interfere in the… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/19 12:11 AM |
| 0 | How on earth is it fine to be sexist to men, but not to support a president? The double standards are so blatant.Wait, you think that Barr is trying to pin something on Trump? You mean the same Barr that essentially campaigned for the job that Trump *appointed* him to by saying that a sitting president couldn't be indicted? That Barr? Your history is seriously misinformed. Barr is there to protect Trump. | /r/MensRights | 11/05/19 12:03 AM |
| 0 | 'Fat Sex Therapist' compares fitness trainers to Nazis, children's dieting to sexual assault. We have a obesity problem and this is what college offers.Lol. I love these universal statements. "This is what college offers." Yeah! Screw higher education! All universities are the devil! The DEVIL! This sub has a serious problem with acting like a minority represents the majority and setting up straw man arguments based on it. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/19 12:20 AM |
| 1 | Colorado school shooting -- Boy takes a bullet for classmates, showing once again just how toxic masculinity is.Is the argument that all men are toxic? | /r/MensRights | 09/05/19 02:23 PM |
| -1 | How on earth is it fine to be sexist to men, but not to support a president? The double standards are so blatant.Pretty sure I said zero things about people wearing MAGA hats. But Trump's problem is not that he is just an asshole. It's that he's happy being an asshole at the expense of other people, be they contractors, tax payers, or those who believe in the separation of powers. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/19 06:09 AM |
| 4 | 2019 Psychology class questions, what IS macho behavior? 🤔No, this is a bunch of people commenting on an area they know nothing about. Macho or machismo is a pattern of behavior that focuses on pride and the inability to show weakness or lose face. It's well documented in Mexican culture and leads to a slew of problems, both in relationships and beyond. Anyone in here have a degree in psychology? | /r/MensRights | 08/05/19 04:57 AM |
| 10 | How on earth is it fine to be sexist to men, but not to support a president? The double standards are so blatant.Sexism is not ok. But also, the president is an asshole only looking out for himself. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/19 04:16 AM |
| 1 | Why I got banned from /r/thefairersex. Reddit needs to do more to combat these incredibly toxic communities.Only chance is a bit strong. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/19 06:41 PM |
| 3 | Feminists want to mutitlate men's brains, according to this tweet.I would be surprised if they weren't in the super minority. Like less than 3% of feminists. Maybe less than that. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/19 02:29 AM |
| 3 | Feminists want to mutitlate men's brains, according to this tweet.Who is the "they" we are talking about? Are we supposed to believe that all feminists or even the majority of them believe this? | /r/MensRights | 30/04/19 01:37 AM |
| 2 | Adult woman casually admits to stealing $400+ from her fatherMuch of this subreddit seems to be dedicated to "look at this horrible women." Any anecdote of a woman doing something bad is posted with the justification of "if the roles were reversed" used as a justification. The problem is that all of these are anecdotes. You can find instances of women doing terrible things and getting off without jail time. But (not that anyone around here looks for it), you can also find instances of men doing terrible things and getting off without jail time. The prob… | /r/MensRights | 29/04/19 06:32 AM |
| 2 | Source??? Where the fuck is the source for these stats?Agreed, definition is critical, and these government reporting systems are not designed for granularity. The 2.2% would be far more believable during the 18-35 range which encompasses highschool and college, but I would imagine much less likely as the years roll on. | /r/MensRights | 29/04/19 12:13 AM |
| 1 | Source??? Where the fuck is the source for these stats?Your numbers from GSS are yearly. Quote says lifetime. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/19 09:50 PM |
| 3 | It’s as if dad’s are just as important as moms.Why is this on men's rights? | /r/MensRights | 27/04/19 06:23 PM |
| 1 | Female Guard takes one look at a gun and books out the back, the Male Bouncer does his job. Looks like the wage gap in this specific instance is very justified!Lol. I love the tactic of just declaring victory regardless of what happened in an argument. Thanks for proving that all rich people are assholes and that Elvis is still alive. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/19 03:23 AM |
| 3 | Female Guard takes one look at a gun and books out the back, the Male Bouncer does his job. Looks like the wage gap in this specific instance is very justified!TIL that the school guard that hid during the Florida school shooting was a woman. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/19 09:15 PM |
| 10 | MEETING THE ENEMY A feminist comes to terms with the Men's Rights movement | Cassie Jaye | TEDxMarinGreat speech! | /r/MensRights | 13/04/19 07:44 PM |
| 1 | this lady kills her kids, and then decides to blame the dad for not being there.I was about to ask you the same question. Person A: women get away with murder! Person B (me): not this one. She got life in prison Person C (you): I can't believe your suggesting that she should have gotten away with it! | /r/MensRights | 01/04/19 09:57 PM |
| 2 | this lady kills her kids, and then decides to blame the dad for not being there.How is stating that the woman got life in prison suggesting that she should not have gotten life in prison? If someone states a fact: it's raining outside- does that mean that they are suggesting that it should not be raining outside? | /r/MensRights | 01/04/19 09:45 PM |
| 1 | this lady kills her kids, and then decides to blame the dad for not being there.Why would you even suggest such a thing? That's disgusting. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/19 06:49 PM |
| 1 | this lady kills her kids, and then decides to blame the dad for not being there.and why not, it works. ... This woman was sentenced to life in prison. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/19 02:06 PM |
| 1 | The feminist belief that women are superior to men in almost every way is incompatible with the other feminist belief that women have been completely dominated, victimized, and oppressed by men for all of human history.What percentage of feminists believe women are superior? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/19 02:54 AM |
| 4 | The hard truth about privilegeYou're right that breast cancer has more deaths. But does 25% more deaths merit 134% more funding? | /r/MensRights | 25/03/19 09:02 AM |
| 63 | The hard truth about privilegeLet me cherry pick two events and set them opposite to one another to suggest that these two events prove my broad generalizations. Can't we stick to more defensible and actionable information? Here's a good example: Despite the fact that prostate cancer and breast cancer kill roughly equal amounts of people, the US government spends $545M on breast cancer research and only $233M on prostate cancer (source:https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/budget/fact-book/data/research-funding). You can donate… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/19 05:11 PM |
| 5 | Know your worth, gentlemenWisdom | /r/MensRights | 18/03/19 02:51 PM |
| 1 | Feminist Uses NZ Terrorist Attack Which Killed Mostly Males To...er...Vilify MalesLol, cherry picking my opinion to make yourself feel better. My point stands. It's not my fault you were not aware enough of the thread you were in to easily put 2 and 2 together, and it's your bad that you misread group as sex and you have no legitimate responses to my criticisms. You were wrong and you can't admit it. You asked for a citation and I pointed out that you were staring one in the face. You are in the very thread you were asking for evidence of. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/19 04:34 PM |
| 2 | Feminist Uses NZ Terrorist Attack Which Killed Mostly Males To...er...Vilify MalesThe original post I was replying to literally said group. Feminists = group. I don't need to reach at all. You, however, could benefit from calmng down a bit and reading before you go on the attack. You don't do men's rights groups any favors by looking like a perpetually angry incel. It's a perception we're trying to get away from. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/19 03:56 PM |
| 2 | Feminist Uses NZ Terrorist Attack Which Killed Mostly Males To...er...Vilify MalesThe Twitter post that at the top, the topic of this op, has a person called Pigman who says: "Wow. Exploiting the slaughter of (mostly) males to colony the make sex. You feminists are SUCH a class act!" I'm other words, the thing that got everyone so riled up here was a person who is using one example of a feminist to paint an entire group negatively. "You feminists are SUCH a class act!" | /r/MensRights | 17/03/19 03:30 PM |
| 1 | Feminist Uses NZ Terrorist Attack Which Killed Mostly Males To...er...Vilify MalesYou're literally in one of them right now. The comment to this tweet takes the action of one individual (this woman) and then use it to paint an entire group negatively. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/19 03:04 PM |
| -35 | Feminist Uses NZ Terrorist Attack Which Killed Mostly Males To...er...Vilify MalesOof. That's most of this subreddit. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/19 02:56 PM |
| 1 | Man sues abortion clinic for aborting his child without his consentYes, please provide an example. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/19 05:32 PM |
| 5 | Captain Marvel Faces Boycott Backlash Over Brie Larson’s ‘Man-Hating’My position has always been that there are very legitimate complaints from the men's rights movement. Equality in child custody is non-existent. Government funding for men's health pales in comparison to female health, even when you control for things like mortality rates of disease and prevalence of the disease. There are dozens of other areas as well. My gripe with this subbreddit is that it's usually just a bitch-fest against feminism and many posts are straw man posts where they mis-represen… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/19 05:51 AM |
| -8 | Captain Marvel Faces Boycott Backlash Over Brie Larson’s ‘Man-Hating’I don't expect it to be easy. A lot of things that are right but are not socially acceptable at the time are not easy. Civil rights, women's suffrage, etc. Men shouldn't expect it to be easy, and just being bitter that things aren't fair is going to do very little, yet that is 99% of what goes on around here. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/19 05:32 AM |
| 2 | Man sues abortion clinic for aborting his child without his consentLet's say that the fetus is a being. If she is not being forced to carry the child and she cannot kill another being, tell me what option she has? | /r/MensRights | 10/03/19 05:29 AM |
| 5 | Man sues abortion clinic for aborting his child without his consentI mean, this is at the core of the debate regarding abortion. If your position is that a fetus is a being, then yes, she would be forced to have the baby. Might as well stay consistent with your argument if you're going to make it. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/19 12:40 AM |
| -22 | Captain Marvel Faces Boycott Backlash Over Brie Larson’s ‘Man-Hating’Why put effort into fighting for something you say you believe in when you can just be an whinny prick and make shit posts? I'm pretty sure that the satisfaction that comes from complaining is more valuable to most of the commentors in this sub than making actual change. In other words, I think they pay a lot of lip service and that's all that they're interested in. Also, the logic used in this subreddit can get pretty shitty. Google hasn't made a doodle for men, therefore Google hates men! - … | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 11:44 PM |
| -28 | Captain Marvel Faces Boycott Backlash Over Brie Larson’s ‘Man-Hating’So is your critique that the movie isn't very good or that the boycott is working...? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 11:40 PM |
| 12 | Man sues abortion clinic for aborting his child without his consentIs it illegal? What is the law regarding father's consent? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 11:29 PM |
| -22 | Google Hates MenLow quality shit post | /r/MensRights | 09/03/19 08:45 PM |
| 1 | Prepare for it: If the Captain Marvel movie doesn't do as well as expected, they're going to blame it on misogyny.Actually, I think it is to distinguish from normal liberals. See, the idea is that there is an influential ruling class of liberals with an agenda who have a lot of social power and we should all be afraid of them. It sounds like you are buying into this narrative, and yet you call it an oxymoron.... So, are you a true believer? Or is there nothing to worry about? | /r/MensRights | 23/02/19 08:51 AM |
| 0 | Prepare for it: If the Captain Marvel movie doesn't do as well as expected, they're going to blame it on misogyny.An interesting lens you're looking through. Do you worry that there is a secret feminist agenda pushed by liberal elites coming to brain wash the next generation? Gasp. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/19 01:38 AM |
| -2 | Prepare for it: If the Captain Marvel movie doesn't do as well as expected, they're going to blame it on misogyny.Looks like an entertaining movie. We'll see if this gives hints as to Thanos' downfall. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/19 02:08 PM |
| 2 | Weren’t they protesting for this a while ago?It's tough to tell around these parts sometimes. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/19 07:07 PM |
| 3 | Weren’t they protesting for this a while ago?I doubt that for many it's that strategic. People are naturally self serving. Whenever someone says they didn't do well on a test just because they were stressed or tired or they say they didn't get a job because the hiring manager was playing favorites with someone else or they say that it was okay that they stole some supplies from work because they have put in a lot of overtime-these are all self serving biasses and most people exhibit them to some degree. It doesn't make them right, it's jus… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/19 10:30 AM |
| 18 | Weren’t they protesting for this a while ago?Not matriarchy, but gaining advantages. In areas where women are less advantaged, feminists want equality, but in areas where they have an advantage, they want to maintain those advantages. I see it more as a maximization of advantages than a pursuit of gender specific rule. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/19 03:53 AM |
| 4 | And that, lads, is how I got banned from r/FeminismHmm. Bans should be based off of offenses and not positions. I've never been a fan of subreddits that can ban people based off of not having a shared view. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/19 08:43 PM |
| 2 | And that, lads, is how I got banned from r/FeminismAh, I see. Same page. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/19 08:28 PM |
| 73 | And that, lads, is how I got banned from r/FeminismI like the comment. If we could have more of that mentality all around, I think society would be better for it. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/19 08:23 PM |
| 5 | And that, lads, is how I got banned from r/FeminismWhich is well deserved criticism. How stupid would it be for Men's Rights to do they same thing? | /r/MensRights | 06/01/19 08:18 PM |
| 8 | And that, lads, is how I got banned from r/FeminismWorthy of being banned? No. Possibly lying about what got you banned. Maybe. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/19 08:08 PM |
| 6 | And that, lads, is how I got banned from r/FeminismFrustrating how much straying from or questioning the narrative gets you downvoted in here. It's not a good look. Makes this place seem like an aggressive echo chamber or group think factory. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/19 08:06 PM |
| 2 | And that, lads, is how I got banned from r/FeminismI don't know the rules there, but calling someone bigoted and racist is very different from the comment posted as the op here. I personally wouldn't ban someone for it, but they are clearly not the same in their tone, approach, or effect. I haven't searched through all of the comments, but maybe it was the straw that broke the camel's back? Dunno. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/19 08:03 PM |
| -1 | And that, lads, is how I got banned from r/FeminismAre you sure that is why you are banned? Because it is not your most recent comment in that thread. This one was: I am sorry you do not understand. It seems your comment gets rather bigot. If that matters to you, I am black. You are just proving how racist you are. You are only repeating what many others think and have clearly convinced you of. Try thinking with your head a little more. Goodbye and thank you for your time | /r/MensRights | 06/01/19 06:15 PM |
| -9 | Ben shapiro lays it outDon't expect many of these people championing facts and logic to appreciate your argument. They only like facts and logic when it agrees with their already accepted beliefs. Fact. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/18 05:27 AM |
| 3 | Madlad establishes ground rulesOne of my favorites. It's been posted several times, and usually, I find that shit annoying. But I love this one too much to care. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/18 05:33 AM |
| 1 | My feminist friend says that everybody on this sub is a misogynistic sexistNah, he just wants us to hate feminists, maybe? | /r/MensRights | 25/11/18 11:59 PM |
| 7 | My feminist friend says that everybody on this sub is a misogynistic sexistHow would you suggest countering accusations like this? | /r/MensRights | 25/11/18 11:58 PM |
| 2 | Im actually so sick of seeing this sorta stuffYou've got to be more limber than a warmed up gymnast with this kind of stretch. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/18 05:39 AM |
| 2 | I’m honestly losing faith in humanity...I am also losing faith in humanity, but ironically, it's not for the same reason you are. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/18 03:14 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!I would push back a bit on the "before we get to work." I mean, it's not like us calling out their hypocrisy will vanquish these extreme feminists. If we have to deal with them before we get started, we'll never get out of the "dealing with them" phase. I get your point on having to battle them, but maybe (if I could have my way), it would be like 20% playing defense against extreme feminists and 80% pursuing the agenda of accelerating men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 11:18 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!I definitely could be wrong. I mean, I haven't conducted any surveys or anything, (and to be honest, that's what you'd have to do to know.) But I don't think that worrying about what others think is a bad thing. I mean, if the purpose is to cause change and if causing change means convincing others that there is a real problem with equality today (where men are at a disadvantage) then we are very much talking about what others think. Occupational hazard, maybe. I work in marketing where the poin… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 01:24 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!Oh, sorry, didn't see it. I think this thread is an example, which is why this conversation started in the first place. A positive message that I think the general public could agree with is: if the sexes are truly equal, then men sacrificing themselves for women shouldn't be an expectation. This title of this post, on the other hand is centered on mocking a feminist position of all men being evil and good for nothing. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 01:01 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!Where I have i seen what happening? | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 12:55 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!I never asked you to ignore feminists. And I am educating people. When new people come to this sub, I want them to see the positive message of men's rights and to jump on that train instead of seeing mostly feminism hate and being turned off. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 12:51 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!I think this is where our miscommunication is happening. In my opinion, we are extremely unlikely to convince a hard core feminist that men's rights deserve attention. However, I believe that a meaningful improvement to men's rights lies in convincing the general public that there are issues that need to be addressed, not in winning over any feminists. I believe that an effective message to the general public is one that focuses on equality rather than being a message that defines itself by bein… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 12:41 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!I see that having a reasonable conversation is very difficult for you. I also see that you can't help but attack others in trying to make a point. Putting the two together helps me see why the concept of arguing based on the merits of a position should be enough without a constant contrast to another position is difficult for you to accept. If we pulled MLK Jr's speaches, what percentage do you think could be characterized as anti KKK vs being pro equal rights? Are feminists today worse than the… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 12:24 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!Spamming eh? Interesting word to use for someone who wants this sub to be about men's rights (which happens to be the title of the subreddit) instead of simply being anti-feminist. If you can't see the difference, well I don't know what to say. BTW, this is me trying to fix the ideology. As I pointed out to another user, taking a topic that could have been about men's rights and making it be about anti feminism didn't add any strength to the men's rights argument, it just changes the focus. I ca… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 12:06 PM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!The title of this post: "No, no, men are evil, I swear" is meant to be a mimicking a feminist who is trying to maintain the idea that men are evil in the face of evidence that they are not. That is the disconnect for me- the fact that the content of the post had nothing to do with feminism, but the title makes feminism the focal point. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 11:43 AM |
| 1 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!Sorry, you lost me at "caused by feminism." Let me get this straight, you believe that expecting a man to sacrifice himself for a woman is caused by feminism? So if I found texts from the early 1900's or the 1800's or the 1700's that talked about men putting themselves in danger's way to save a woman... you would argue that feminism was the root cause ...? All the way back in the 1700's? I think it's pretty obvious that these are hold over values from a previous era and that feminism is as far f… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 04:08 AM |
| 2 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!Oh I agree that a double standard pushed by (or allowed by) feminism is at the root of many things that men have to fight for, but I disagree that the juxtaposition against feminism is required in order to get to equality. I mean the message "Fathers deserve equal custody" can stand on its own and isn't strengthened by "and damn those toxic, hypocritical feminists" appended at the end or as the focal point in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 12:46 AM |
| 5 | Saw this outside my work. As a man who's been in an abusive relationship it was really nice to see this.I love it! I read a bit on their website and I saw several places that included men as the victims. Awesome to see. At the same time, I saw some resources this group used that are out-dated or borrowed from organizations that don't recognize/acknowledged abuse aimed at men. Progress but room for improvement. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 08:37 PM |
| 7 | No, no! Men are evil! I swear!At some point this thread will have to be renamed "We Hate Feminists," since most posts can't seem to get away from a fixation on it. I mean, rather than focus on men's issues here like how men shouldn't be expected to sacrifice their lives for women, this post is framed as a bitter reaction to feminism. It's like feminism is the evil ex we can't get away from and can't stop thinking about. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 08:32 PM |
| 18 | Sticking it to the patriarchy by... being a dick to strangers?Some people don't realize they've become what they hate. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 03:24 AM |
| 2 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.I'd love to simply correct you, but now I'm interested. Please tell me more about what I believe. Quick, run to my post history to see what you can piece together to make some cogent argument, since you sure as hell can't from my two posts in this thread. I won't assume your position. Is it too much to ask for others not to make one jerk assumptions about my position? I guess so. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 11:50 PM |
| 2 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.I'm afraid you've completely missed my point entirely. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 10:56 PM |
| 9 | We need to make it clear that the Tallahassee yoga shooter was NOT an MRA, and that his beliefs are NOT in line with ours.The irony here is that people in this subbreddit want to make sure that people don't equate extreme mens rights activists with the mens right movement overall, yet are happy to take an extreme feminist and claim all feminists are toxic, want men to die, etc etc etc. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/18 06:40 PM |
| 1 | As usual, woman who accused Kavanaugh of raping her admits they never even metGet your r/D partisan bullshit out of mensrights Thank you for serving as yet another example of how Democrats are actually just anti-male. Bahahaha. Double standards much? | /r/MensRights | 03/11/18 11:32 PM |
| 2 | As usual, woman who accused Kavanaugh of raping her admits they never even metAnd possible that you are. And me. And pretty much anyone else in the world. What's your point? | /r/MensRights | 03/11/18 11:28 PM |
| 2 | The wikipedia page on gender quality is heavily biased towards women problems.Article listed above says 90% are men. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/18 03:11 PM |
| 2 | Anonymous Claim: Cory Booker Sexually Assaulted Me and why it won’t matter to the #metoo movementI'll take "a creative writer tries their hand at false accusations and defamation if character" for 400. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/18 04:34 PM |
| 17 | Oh how the tables have turnedThis is gold. 🏆🤣 | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 10:01 PM |
| 2 | We're better than feminists and that is why we should always be vigilant to not fall into extremismWhat attempts has Reddit made to try to ban this subreddit? | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 06:48 PM |
| 3 | Even 9 year old boys aren't safe from false #MeToo accusations from predatory post-wall femalesI read Black Boy by that author. It was a fantastic book. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 06:34 PM |
| 11 | While he was a POW for 5.5 years, his wife cheated with multiple men. She got full custody, the house, other assets, and 43% of his retirement.It would be tough not to be as bitter as hell after that. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 07:16 AM |
| 1 | For Any Male Feminists Who May Lurk HereLol, did you just delete your comment that said this same thing^ because you didn't want people to read all the replies to it? I hope /u/pathfinder24, /u/shitarokozu, and /u/sawses see this. I mean, it's pretty pathetic. The only thing I'm doing is pointing out that it's a bit absurd to assume that all feminists can be characterized by the views of any extreme one. If that is just incomprehensible for you, then I don't know what to say. Maybe... enjoy a long career as a Walmart shelf stocker? | /r/MensRights | 13/10/18 01:07 AM |
| 1 | For Any Male Feminists Who May Lurk HereThanks for proving me right, lol. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 08:25 PM |
| 15 | For Any Male Feminists Who May Lurk HereLol. Nah, but I get that characterizing someone as the enemy is an easy way to dismiss them, so if me asking for some info on how many feminists are as toxic as this one is too challenging to your world view, then you can go ahead and categorize me however makes you feel better. The truth is that society doesn't need people like the woman. The truth is also LIKELY that most feminists don't hold this view. Logic is hard. Keep working at it. You get there. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 08:22 PM |
| 14 | For Any Male Feminists Who May Lurk HereNah. Imma go with not cool. This painting with broad brush strokes about extreme examples of any population is pretty stupid. I mean, some Republicans are demonstrably neo Nazis. Should we conclude that all Republicans are psychos bent in bringing about the end of all non-aryan races? That'd be a pretty stupid conclusion to draw. If, however, the majority of the group were neo nazi motherfuckers, then yeah, broad generalizations actually capture the majority. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 08:00 PM |
| 10 | For Any Male Feminists Who May Lurk Here... | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 07:42 PM |
| 16 | For Any Male Feminists Who May Lurk HereAny citation to point to? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 07:27 PM |
| 20 | For Any Male Feminists Who May Lurk HereWhat percentage of feminists believe this? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 07:13 PM |
| -9 | Actress Rose McGowan - who triggered Harvey Weinstein's downfall - now claims the #MeToo movement is 'all bull****' and a 'lie to make lily-livered Hollywood types feel better'. OP: So there you go it was all marketing and hype by the feminist movement!Welp, there you have it. Proof that no woman has ever been raped. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/18 02:55 AM |
| 2 | TIL that according to academic literature, false allegations of rape, while relatively rare, are at least five times as common as false accusations of other types of crimeYour reason is not welcome here. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/18 01:43 PM |
| 5 | Solidarity Feminism: pranksters rewrote Mein Kampf to use intersectional language and submitted it to a feminist journal. It was accepted and published.Thanks. Helps me understand current political leaders. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/18 01:31 PM |
| 1 | So true.I think the problem is more complex than you are thinking it is. If you are underwater on your home, selling it can be very difficult. Let's say you have a home worth 400k, but the market only values it at 350,000. Let's say you got a job offer a few hours away that has a slight pay increase for you- 5k a year. Moving to be closer by would be a smart thing to do, but you can't sell your house for more than 350k. That means that in order to try to take a better job for you and your middle class f… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 10:11 PM |
| 1 | So true.It seems to me like you are taking the position that might go something like this: "Democrats support big government" "big government is the problem" therefore "don't support government intervention" and that you see this bill as such an intervention. Is that right? | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 09:29 PM |
| 1 | So true.At the core is supply and demand. With less housing on the market, middle income people get priced out of homes they would normally be able to afford and they have to settle for something less. This means that the people in the market for these lesser homes (or even apartments) is a bigger group of people, which means that in this lower segment of housing prices will also go up (as they have been) making it harder for low income people to afford what they would normally be able to afford. I beli… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 05:27 PM |
| 1 | So true.Typed Collins, but the info is from Warren's site. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 04:28 PM |
| 1 | So true.Looking for a specific completely misses the point, in my opinion. The point I'm making is that we have this weird idea that each party has to be the exact opposite of the other. How stupid is that? I can't want to protect our borders and also think that laws favor corporations too much? I can't simultaneously believe that affirmative action is a bad thing and that climate change is real? Anyone who doesn't fall along party lines on everything gets pilloried as a fake democrat or a republican in… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 07:25 AM |
| 2 | "Agony of being 50/50 mother" response articleI'd love to see how the average feminist responds to this. Is it just the unreasonable and more aggressive ones who stick their heads in the sand? I may venture over to find out. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 06:37 AM |
| 1 | So true.I don't think you have to look too hard. Senator Collins is pushing pro-home construction policies: " the bill would build or rehabilitate more than 3 million units over the next decade and fully close the current gap between housing demand and supply, create 1.5 million new jobs at its peak impact, bring down rents for lower-income and middle-class families by 10%." Honestly, I think this sub is pretty blatantly right wing when I see no reason for it to be. Yes feminists are almost universall… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 06:31 AM |
| 2 | So true.I don't know how widely you read or pay attention to the left, but if you think that they're only talking about sexual abuse, it must not be too widely. Yes, that is what dominates, but I've seen discussions on everything from Kavanaugh's signalling of overturning Roe v Wade to his broadcasting of protecting a president from indictments to his lying about the legal drinking age and his behavior regarding it while under oath. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 06:23 AM |
| 1 | So true.The first rule of Mens Rights is you do not ask questions. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 06:19 AM |
| 2 | Imagine if this was done with a girlYeah, I don't think you actually read my comments at all. | /r/MensRights | 16/09/18 11:45 PM |
| 2 | Imagine if this was done with a girlYou are definitely right. They are two different circumstances and two different victim profiles/pools. | /r/MensRights | 16/09/18 04:58 PM |
| 3 | Imagine if this was done with a girlI think that you're right. The point is, though, that when it comes to abused children, it's girls who are overlooked. This subreddit likes to beat the drum on under-reported men's issues (suicide, homelessness, etc), and most of the time the subreddit is right to do so. But in this thread we have a mismatch of the rhythm and the facts (which is what set off this comment chain). Pointing out that 36% of the trafficked children are are male means that the relatively un-highlighted majority are fe… | /r/MensRights | 16/09/18 07:20 AM |
| 2 | Imagine if this was done with a girlThe original point was that the stereotype is boys being abused, not girls. | /r/MensRights | 16/09/18 04:53 AM |
| 1 | Every time a men commits suicide going through a divorce it’s an example of #ToxicFemininity Let’s never forget their storiesThere are categories where men are severely overlooked (custody battles, suicide, fetus rights, some areas of education, funding for prostate cancer vs breast cancer). Every once in a while there is an awesome post on here regarding updated statistics, what other countries are doing, etc. These are great for conversations I have with family and friends because most people don't know these stats and simply think men are privileged in all areas, which we're clearly not. I try to have conversations… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/18 04:21 AM |
| 1 | Every time a men commits suicide going through a divorce it’s an example of #ToxicFemininity Let’s never forget their storiesThe qualifier of every is absurd. Every time a man comits suicide during a divorce it's because of toxic feminity? Every time? There aren't any times that the suicide is because of finances or because of depression that may have let to the divorce or any one of a thousand other reasons? Ridiculous feminists deal in broad sweeping generalizations that they apply across the board. "All men are monsters," "all men are predators," etc. Not only is that obviously false, but there isn't a shred of evi… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/18 12:01 AM |
| 4 | Every time a men commits suicide going through a divorce it’s an example of #ToxicFemininity Let’s never forget their storiesSometimes I think the point of this subreddit is to see if we can be as shitty and unreasonable as in-your-face feminists. | /r/MensRights | 29/08/18 04:56 AM |
| 7 | Misandry in Action: 'Feminist' Lana 'Aborts Baby Because It's A Boy' And Is Surprised By BacklashThis girl is not right in the head. I hope to god people don't take her seriously. Her reasoning for the abortion was not wanting to bring another monster in the world, then later says that she recognizes people are a product of their environment. Ok, then- you're a parent, give the proper environment. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/18 01:11 AM |
| 10 | Not just hatred of whites: NY Times editor Sarah Jeong also expressed extreme hatred toward men and boysI watched a few defenses of her, including reading what the NYT wrote, and I have to say that I completely disagree with them, and this is from someone who has been leaning liberal lately. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/18 12:53 AM |
| 0 | #1 on YouTube trending. Good to see some male representation in mainstream mediaMan you motherfuckers are whiners. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/18 02:46 AM |
| 26 | Lmk if it’s already been postedNah, I don't think so. It's just obvious that this individual argument from this women is stupid. Trying to extrapolate that as a proof that all of the feminism movement is bullshit is a bridge too far. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/18 07:26 PM |
| 1 | Active Job Posting Discriminating Against MenPretty blatant. If I had the qualifications to be a developer, I'd definitely apply. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/18 03:19 AM |
| 3 | Cambridge teacher wears 'feminist fashion' to work. If a straight white man showed up like this, he would absolutely be fired for sexual harassment. Double standards.I don't know that "my body my choice" means you can do anything you want with your body.... I'm not sure she understands the idea behind the phrase..... | /r/MensRights | 17/06/18 05:48 PM |
| 1 | Cambridge teacher wears 'feminist fashion' to work. If a straight white man showed up like this, he would absolutely be fired for sexual harassment. Double standards.Thank you for the some info confirming identity/position. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/18 05:46 PM |
| -1 | How come there's a Women's restroom but no Men's restroom?Source? How do we know that there isn't a men's room just to to the right? Where I work, the men's room is more than 100 ft from the women's room in order for the building to have symmetry. Seems stupid to me, but I'm not a designer. I guess what I'm saying is that many people on this sub seem super ready to jump to conclusions. I see it too frequently for my taste. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/18 03:08 PM |
| 15 | Two women murder young male "because it was something they'd always wanted to try doing". As usual, news reports keep it off the front page, and bury it in sub sections. Imagine the reporting if the genders were reversed?Shh... don't destroy the narrative. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/18 04:17 AM |
| 1 | PrivilegeWhile I haven't heard the story, I could agree with everything else you said (though it would be based on my own anecdotes/recollection). | /r/MensRights | 27/01/18 07:07 AM |
| 1 | PrivilegeI live in a large city and see homeless women all the time. They definitely do not get immediate attention. That being said, it is far more common to see homeless men than homeless women, so I'm not disputing the stated statistic. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/18 03:58 AM |
| 7 | Yes, I think women in the USA are oppressed...NOT! #WomensMarch2018Look back on recent posts and you'll see that the most up-voted comment is usually either a comment that is trying to pull the sub back from vitriol or one that is promoting vitriol in ignorance. The risk you talk about is a full blown tug of war here, from my experience. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/18 09:43 AM |
| 2 | UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty.Sounds reasonable. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/17 12:19 AM |
| 6 | How Feminists Harm Women & GirlsSo does men's rights = anti feminism? Can we not just champion causes of men's rights or do we have to be like the feminists that most here hate, who have to tear down the other side in order to advance their agenda? Just seems a bit hypocritical. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/17 05:09 AM |
| 1 | Feminists Are Not Even Hiding The Hate Anymore: If you're a woman and are currently pregnant with a baby boy... do us all a favor an take a trip to planned parenthoodThat's pretty ugly, but I think ascribing this to "feminists" in general is a bit disingenuous. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/17 09:13 PM |
| 0 | France's Macron unveils plan to curb violence against women. Proposals include criminalizing street harassment and allowing victims of rape and sexual assault to make their complaints online, on demand” bus stops, where women only can stop a bus anywhere at night so they can get home safely.Which part of this are we supposed to be upset about? The bus part? | /r/MensRights | 25/11/17 11:42 PM |
| 5 | Tapper BTFO Feminist Principle Of 'It's Better That 100 Innocent Men Be Wrongly Convicted Than One Guilty Man Go Free.'Tapper has principles. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/17 07:27 PM |
| -1 | Feminist page on Facebook made a post that I thought might be appreciated here.I'm curious to know how you see /u/kittens_in_panties comment about there being different feminist groups with different opinions and objectives as somehow being an attempt to absolve any wrong doing by any feminist group ever. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/17 05:57 PM |
| 0 | Can someone please tell this guy to check his old white male privilege? He seems a bit smug about it.Fucking thank you. This place has gone down-hill. Many threads are nothing but shit-posting and drumming up outrage. If it makes people feel better, great, but no one should think it convinces anyone who didn't already hold this position. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/17 03:24 PM |
| 2 | 'Male privilege is...'Pretty ridiculous. This girl obviously struggles with the concept of male privilege. Male privilege does not equal anything that is different about how men and women operate in society. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/17 01:08 AM |
| -2 | Dont forget men are the ones shielding women with their bodiesWhat are we twelve? I'm sorry, it's just that sarcasm is easy to pull off, but its also easy to ignore. It just makes legitimate arguments sound like they're coming from sniveling/unreasonable people. Custody issues, government funding for diseases, or even the percentage of male police officers are serious issues. Want these issues projected through the voice of a bitter 14 year old? Be my guest, I guess. Just don't expect any real movement to happen as a result. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/17 12:50 AM |
| 1 | Dont forget men are the ones shielding women with their bodiesYou had me until the "but yeah men are evil" line. Some people struggle with non-mutually exclusive concepts, though, I guess? | /r/MensRights | 05/10/17 11:36 PM |
| 0 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementYou do realize that most of the words we're speaking weren't invented in American... right? Or... is this news to you? Yikes. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/17 02:23 AM |
| 1 | No such thing as innocent until proven guilty: University student, 21, accused of rape is banned from classes for a whole year while he awaits trialThis was a crappy story. It says that the court had the same restrictions as the university, meaning that his bail was restrictive and wouldn't allow him to go to school. Usually that's only the case when there is a serious risk of something. What where the details of the case such that the felt like him being on campus wasn't even a possibility? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/17 12:39 AM |
| 1 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementNo, I wanted the original usage of the term. I'll save you the research. Job equity was first used in a court case in Canada and referred to under-represented populations. Equity, in the legal sense, means the same as equality. It has nothing to do with wealth, value, assets, or ownership. You can't import a meaning from another field and falsely attribute it to your opponent simply because it makes your position look better. That's just bad arguing. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/17 12:32 AM |
| 2 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementThere are probably some guys who get the brunt of a few hostile women's rage, but I'm willing to bet those are outliers. I've spent six years at universities between my undergrad and graduate work spread across four different higher ed institutions and never saw anything noticeably hostile. In the same way that it's ridiculous for any woman to cast men as overpowering and maniacally dominating, we should take care to not paint with too broad of strokes or we commit the same errors. Child custody… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 10:32 AM |
| 2 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementIt's very likely that women have more scholarships than men (I've never researched the numbers on the balance), but there definitely are male only scholarships, some for just general academic aid and some aimed at getting men into fields where they are under-represented. One example is the Make a Difference scholarship offered by the University of North Carolina. "You must be majoring in special education to be eligible for this award. Preference shall be given to male students." Edit: a qualifi… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 09:28 AM |
| 3 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementWell, feel free to post the source for you etymology. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 07:42 AM |
| 3 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementYou think that someone borrowed a word from the finance world in order to convey a meaning of ownership rights in a social context? I mean, it's a cute theory in that it connects two dots that feel good being connected, but it's utter bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 06:46 AM |
| 3 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementAs true in politics as it is in the media, smh. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 06:17 AM |
| 2 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementIs/was there an affirmative action plan for women to get into college? If so, does it still exist? Is it field specific? | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 06:16 AM |
| 2 | Silicon Valley's men are embracing 'men's rights' as pushback against gender equality movementYou can't be serious. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/17 06:13 AM |
| -4 | Suicide rate for teen girls hits 40 year highNo, we have yet to compare the number of females committing suicide a year to a grander scheme of things, like grains of sand in the sea. /s | /r/MensRights | 17/09/17 11:53 PM |
| 1 | My local shopping mall replaced the men's restroom with another women's restroom. Men now have to hike to a separate building behind the mall.If this were in the US, it would be illegal, so I doubt this. There is a specific distance that men and women's bathrooms have to be from one another and having them be in separate buildings is absolutely illegal (once again this is for US building code). So unless this is in another country with different regulations, I'm going to call B.S. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/17 05:14 AM |
| 2 | The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond | Scientists with actual research experience in sex differences agree the memo is scientifically accurate; Feminists & SJWs are wildly wrong, yet againDo you have evidence of a DDOs attack? | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 01:50 AM |
| 1 | The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond | Scientists with actual research experience in sex differences agree the memo is scientifically accurate; Feminists & SJWs are wildly wrong, yet againShhh.... you'll spoil a budding conspiracy. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 01:50 AM |
| 3 | "To me, Dunkirk felt like an excuse for men to celebrate maleness—which apparently they don't get to do enough" | Whining feminist asks why director Nolan didn't make a movie about women in World War II instead.It's a gut argument. I doubt data would back it up. I mean, sure- you have women that are terrible actors that just get a role because of their looks (Megan Fox), but this isn't limited to women only. Arnold Schwarzenegger's entire career was built off of looks and it's not uncommon to have MMA fighters (men and women) in a role simply because of their following and their fighting skill (GSP, Gina Carano, Randy Couture). I'd be interested in just raw numbers. How many prominent female roles vs h… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/17 08:58 PM |
| 1 | "To me, Dunkirk felt like an excuse for men to celebrate maleness—which apparently they don't get to do enough" | Whining feminist asks why director Nolan didn't make a movie about women in World War II instead.This comment is baffling. I hope she doesn't see everything through the lens of men vs women, that'd be a pretty dimensionless world. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/17 08:47 PM |
| 1 | Even Google...Citizen Cope would beg to differ | /r/MensRights | 26/07/17 08:59 AM |
| 3 | Trump's smile compliment and the media reaction to it have people rethinking women in the workforceDonald Trump is a shitty person and has done and said some remarkably shitty things. I wouldn't put this as one of them. Seems pretty innocent. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/17 05:22 AM |
| 3 | College student whose false rape claim got two football players removed from school now faces two years in prisonIf someone is found beyond a reasonable doubt to have lied about being raped, I think two years may be light. Their victims' lives can be impacted in innumerable ways. Registered sex offender, have to move, kicked out of school, harm to reputation, affects future dating life, etc etc etc. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/17 10:41 PM |
| 1 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.What does "reports" mean in this context? | /r/MensRights | 07/06/17 06:46 PM |
| 1 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.This is a good point, and better than the original. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/17 12:37 AM |
| 1 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.Looks like more women (or less men) are getting degrees since I studied this. However, 136-100 isn't 1/3. 36 is one third bigger than 100, but the fraction would be 136/236, which is 57 percent. That's a 14 point spread, so something else is at play. Anyway, interesting to see the change in numbers. | /r/MensRights | 04/06/17 01:47 AM |
| 0 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.While there's a difference in undergrad enrollment, last time I checked, more men went to grad school than women. Either way, it's not a 2/3 to 1/3 split. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 06:27 AM |
| 10 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityGreat quote. Goes for attitudes towards immigrants, other nations, etc. Fair bet it goes for some people in this community as well. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 03:06 AM |
| 10 | Sadistic gang who carved 'paedo' in a man's leg with a machete during a WEEK-long campaign of torture after wrongly thinking he was a sex offender are jailed for 78 yearsA good reason the courts exist. Too many hot headed people who think they know everything. Like me. Didn't even read the article and I'm already passing judgement. Irony. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/17 08:19 AM |
| 13 | Every man should be aware of how much unearned hate is directed at his gender.That idea is too nuanced for many, whether you're talking about left vs right, men vs women, or ninja turtles vs power rangers. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 07:14 AM |
| -8 | How boys are welcomed into this world - America vs. Japan, France, Germany etc.For all the effort to argue for fairness, this subreddit isn't always interested in being fair. Too bad, because it just makes it a mirror of femenists who this subreddit correctly identifies as not being interested in fairness either. I gave you an upvote to pull you out of the negative because if we ignore our own bias in pointing out others', then we're going to be doing nothing as a society but going in circles. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/17 09:42 PM |
| 1 | This double standard infuriates meThis doesn't upset me as much as other issues (custody). Women generally feel their natural faces aren't beautiful enough and put makeup on but don't expect men to do the same. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/17 06:10 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter