TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hyacinthvx Archive

View 1 post and 40 comments by Hyacinthvx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Hyacinthvx/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 07:25 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

In most of europe at least, those laws apply fully if it’s proven that the victim was attacked BECAUSE he was a man, or because they were white. It’s simply hard to prove just as it’s hard to prove a black person was attacked for being black. I probably worded it wrong, what I meant is in most countries violent misandry is not really socially acknowledged as a thing, which it should.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 08:08 PM
-6

Bullshit. First of all, hate crimes are still hate crimes when someone targets a straight person for being straight, a white person for being white and so on. It should apply to men too although in most countries it unfortunately doesn’t. Take for example lgbt hate crimes. Statistically, queer people are in general at a much higher risk of being victims of violent crimes than straight people. They are more likely to get bullied, assaulted, beaten, tortured (conversion therapy is by definition a …
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:57 AM
57

It’s called rape. She raped a child. Not “slept with”, not “seduced”, not “had sexual intercourse with”, she raped a child. She is a rapist.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 07:04 PM
54

Every time something awful happens or could happen women and children are at the centre of the discussion. When a large number of women goes through something bad it’s a tragedy, an emergency that must immediately be stopped (preferably by men). When a large number of men goes through something bad it’s a statistic, like during war.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 04:00 PM
-45

That’s creepy as fuck. If we want to be taken seriously maybe don’t act like apes
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:58 PM
6

I’m not Indian but I think those kinds of dynamics are why gynocentric societies try so hard to shame/push men into marrying, or tie their value as men and boys to whether they can attract and satisfy women and girls. They know there’s nothing good in it for males, they know males will always get the short end of the stick and have to do all of the heavy lifting all of the time, in fact, they know males would be better off by themselves and looking after their own well-being. The moment men, esp…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:47 AM
1

Queer men are men. Admitting that a group of men has it objectively harder than women, on the basis of them being men, directly goes against their mental hierarchy, their justification for misandry.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 11:03 PM
5

Hot take, although it shouldn’t be: if a certain group of people gets less rights/more duties, they should pay less taxes. Why does a man, who is forced to give up the best years of his life to the government, have to pay the same amount of taxes as a woman who gets to do whatever she pleases with her time? Why does he have more duties but not more benefits? Why does she get the same rights without all the burdens and expectations attached to them? In a lot of countries men don’t even have the r…
/r/MensRights07/07/26 07:38 PM
1

I mean, in “the feminine mystique” she also railed against “feminine” men (anyone who was not a heterosexual masculine provider committed in marriage to a woman) so I would hope her views eventually changed
/r/MensRights06/07/26 10:49 PM
28

Your first issue was looking at Candace Owens for moral guidance
/r/MensRights05/07/26 05:11 PM
0

Just admit you’re wrong. There would be more dignity to it.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 10:15 AM
3

Quote to me the phrase where I argued men don’t vote in favour of wars. Quote to me the phrase where I blamed women for the existence of war. I said women shouldn’t get a vote in issues that are exclusive to men, such as the draft, just like a ton of feminists think men shouldn’t get a vote on abortion.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 01:06 PM
10

You really think wars would happen if 50% of the human population stopped supporting them? Or if it was socially accepted for every man who didn’t vote in favour to avoid the draft? Einstein said that if even 10% of men refused to go to war, the government couldn’t jail them all and would be forced to stop. Besides, getting pregnant is a choice in the vast majority of cases, being born a male isn’t.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:08 AM
13

It’s wrong that they get a say about it in the first place. Most men in the west might not be opposed to abortion, but how often do you hear women parroting “no uterus no opinion”?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:27 AM
10

If they let you believe all that bullshit they lie to you all the time and you don’t even realise it. I’m wasting my time with you
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:27 AM
19

You don’t have an opinion, you’re objectively incorrect and making accusations. It won’t change your mind because you’ve already decided what you want to believe regardless of facts and a big part of your social life probably revolves around other dishonest, uninformed folks with no intention to change. If I gave you examples of any issue which affects specifically men, you’d blame it on men.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:17 AM
33

I would argue but you’re in bad faith
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:08 AM
57

Twain didn’t even say anything against women, she literally just said males shouldn’t be treated as less valuable than females and the folks preaching about “equality” got pissed Because of both personal laziness and medical issues, I am a physically weak man. Weaker than most women I know. This, according to feminists, should entitle me to more protection, empathy and compassion than the average woman and man. But of course, since moral coherence isn’t their goal, it doesn’t, it’s the opposite:…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 09:18 PM
1

If murdering blonde people was part of a religion, would laws against murder be anti-religious?
/r/MensRights18/06/26 02:18 PM
28

“My invisible sky wizard says we have to sexually mutilate toddlers. You are discriminating against my religion and my freedom by not allowing me to forcefully mutilate non consenting children”. - people every single time a ban gets suggested
/r/MensRights16/06/26 06:46 PM
2

Gay men, homosexual men specifically, are and have been one of the most brutally, violently oppressed groups in human history. This is an objective facts. Only a minority of gay men live in countries where male homosexuality is not illegal, even less live in societies where it is usually kind of accepted, even less live in societies where they have most of the rights that straight people do. This is specific to queer men, it is statistically proven that most people, including most homophobes, ac…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 06:41 PM
2

I’d rather be expected to make sandwiches and be kind than be forced by law to fight and lose limbs and get tortured to death in war. But that’s just me I guess. I’d also rather be expected to act “nurturing” toward my partner (it’s not even like men don’t have to do that too) than be expected to be a meat shield for them.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 10:09 AM
5

Sexist women can literally say “all men are at fault/responsible for x” but the same people who support that will project that sexist mentality onto men when men call out SOME women
/r/MensRights11/06/26 04:16 PM
1

I mean, you just have to look at how many people think it’s a problem if a transgender woman uses the women’s bathroom, when they couldn’t give less of a shit if a trans man, or a cisgender woman for that matter, uses the men’s bathroom. Biological males’ bodies are inherently seen as dirtier and threatening, male sexuality is in generally treated as less “pure”. It’s a big part of why lesbians are so much more accepted than gay men
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:47 AM
1

Same thing with circumcision. Performing cosmetic surgery on a boy without his consent (and in some cultures without anaesthesia) is fine, so what if it’s his body? So what if it removes so much sensitivity and pleasure that it’s considered a cure for premature ejaculation? So what if he won’t be able to pleasure himself without lube anymore? Women like how it looks and that’s all that matters. It’s actually disgusting. Expecting a woman to carry a baby for 9 months is wrong, but forcing a man t…
/r/MensRights03/06/26 09:36 AM
5

I’d say most feminists don’t really pretend they want to abolish all gender norms in general. Most of them are quite open about the fact that they only want to abolish gender-based rules/duties/expectations when it would benefit women and girls to do so. For example, the norm that men should protect women and women should expect their men to protect them is advantageous to women at the expense of men, so not only are they fine with it, they actively demonise attempts to level that out. Think abo…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:42 PM
1

That’s usually what happens when you deny problems exist just because they don’t affect you personally, as dozens of millions of men are being sent to slaughter in the eastern world and hundreds of millions forced through military service
/r/MensRights02/06/26 10:37 AM
8

There’s a historical reason why pride month is in June (stonewall). Men’s mental health month is just in june because yes. I think it should be in november like in some parts of europe
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:50 PM
6

In Germany at least, all boys and men will be forced through a medical exam for the military starting from late 2026-early 2027. These “assessment exams” are extremely intrusive and they usually force you to strip, refusing them is a crime. Countries that already have the draft all have mandatory medical exams as well.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 02:08 PM
8

Yeah. Most self-ascribed feminists I’ve talked to (my friend group is quite evenly split between guys and girls) don’t even know it’s a thing. That’s how much they care about equality, they don’t even know societal problems exist until they affect women.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 02:01 PM
7

I live in Italy and it’s a huge thing here where our current government tried a few times in the past to reintroduce it and is now using the current wars as an excuse to push for it. Most of our major politicians and candidates support it, including our current PM (a woman). It was technically abolished in 2005, which is recent but not as recent as Germany for example, which had it until 2011, and men still get automatically registered as eligible for the military there. I’ve read a few articles…
/r/MensRights30/05/26 01:55 PM
13

“In the eu” means “in the eu”, not “in every single European country”. Google is free, if you’re ignorant and “can’t think of a country that does that” it’s your problem. Just off the top of my head, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Greece, Turkey, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway. Germany wants to reintroduce it, so do Italy and Spain.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 01:41 PM
17

In the United States, as well as in many European countries, men can only vote if they register in the Army at 18, or in the EU if they go through mandatory military service for a year or two depending on the country. If they don’t, besides not being able to vote, they will also spend time in prison, lose the right to get a driver’s license or go to university, lose the right to be employed in a government job, and sometimes lose the right to a passport. You know what that means? Men don’t have …
/r/MensRights30/05/26 09:21 AM
13

I’ve given up on trying to reason with them. I’ve actually had to break off a few friendships over them making it clear that they don’t give a shit if I get drafted (my country wants to reintroduce that), or that my mother was abusive, or if a woman assaults me. I’m not a hateful person and I don’t wanna deal with this. “Thankfully” I’m not heterosexual so technically I could find a guy to love but I don’t know about that either, I pretty much just want to be left alone
/r/MensRights28/05/26 07:01 PM
21

Look, if they think fixing issues which affect men is not their responsibility that’s fine, it’s their right. They should at least stop being hypocrites and stop pretending to care about equality, though. “Equality” doesn’t mean “fuck you, got mine”, if they only care about issues that women face they’re not for equality
/r/MensRights28/05/26 05:40 PM
18

Oh they care. They avoid or dismiss any information which would disrupt their worldview. If you have a feminist friend, which I do, try to politely initiate a conversation about issues which affect men. See how fast she either pretends not to hear, twists the conversation back onto women’s problems, blames it on men, or actively justifies those discriminations. Reminds you of the narcissist’s prayer: it didn’t happen, and if it did it wasn’t that bad, and if it was it wasn’t my fault, and if it …
/r/MensRights23/05/26 11:21 AM
2

Take your time and don’t become hateful towards yourself or others. Let it happen and eventually you will get back on your feet. If it takes a lot, let it. The longer it takes the fullest your healing will be, usually.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 10:03 PM
1

That’s the type of behaviour you’d expect from a frustrated 11 year old. Laugh at their emotional dysfunction and keep living your life, being what these women are is enough of a punishment for their actions. They hate themselves.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 09:00 PM
1

Economically and socially I’m far left and one of the reasons why I feel like a renegade when it comes to traditional politics is that the left, while in theory more humane and focused on equality and dignity, seems to either ignore or justify the institutionalisation of issues that affect males specifically. It’s a similar approach to the “Narcissist’s prayer”: it didn’t happen, and if it did it wasn’t that bad, and if it was it wasn’t my fault, and if it was you deserved it, and so on.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 04:09 PM
1

Where is that rule written…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 10:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter