TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hyperlingual Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by Hyperlingual on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

For now yeah. However men have to register for the system that would pull names for conscription in times of war once they're 18. You're not automatically added to it but it's still illegal not to sign up and you have to do so to be able to vote.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 10:35 PM
2

Not at all. First of all the song according to Taylor herself is a parody of the image that the media had placed on her. It's supposed to be exaggerated and unrealistic and ridiculous, not glorified. Second, even if it were just a story in a song rather than a self-referential satire, it doesn't automatically mean it's glorifying domestic violence. It's obvious to everyone who watches it that this character is meant to be portrayed as crazy, malicious, horrible. The content of the music video an…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:11 AM
1

Other comments said they cant access it either. Tried logging in and it says I have to "contact my university's librarian". And since I can't be bothered to do that, so I'll just have to take your word on what the study says. Very interesting though.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 02:49 AM
4

http://m.cjb.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/09/17/0093854815605540.full.pdf Yes, I know that this is the link, but you can't access it unless you pay for it or have alternative access through a university. I do but haven't bothered since it hasn't always worked. they're attempting to suggest that it is because they are girls... not that girls get more sentencing, but that girls are less capable of handling traumatic experiences as boys and therefore act out more while in confinement Is that how …
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:58 PM
8

Just from reading the article I don't find any problems, but I can't read the research. If any of you have access to SAGE, the publication is linked in this article itself. Just note that the title can be confusing. You should read it as meaning "When looking at less serious offenses, girls are incarcerated longer in the juvenile justice system", and not "When looking at all offenses, girls are incarcerated longer in general even for less serious crimes." Just clarifying because I mistakenly rea…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:36 PM
6

Stockholm Syndrome? Do you even dictionary? Figurative language is a thing, you know. Or should I go with the assumption that you can't handle that? If so, let me know and I'll adjust it to your grade level.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:27 AM
8

Women sometimes get vaginal rejuvenation surgery When they're old enough to make that decision themselves. And that's why you're getting downvoted, and why circumcision is fucked up. In b4 "hurr durr if you peel it back and wash it properly it doesn't smellz!!!" You're literally defending your uncut cock by saying the extra work to keep it clean and unstinky isn't that big of a deal. LOL. Repeating a rational argument but adding "hurr durr" and misspellings to diminish their other persons point?…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:19 AM
25

And definitely do it when they're infants! Don't bother waiting 'til they're eighteen. It's important to have aesthetically pleasing genitals at the age of practically-0.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:40 AM
–

is it true that circumsised males don't get smegma? Well yes, but uncircumcised males don't necessarily get it either. Why is it that circumcised males think that smegma is like some rampant infection amongst males who aren't cut? Unless you don't shower for days at a time and cant spare 30 seconds to clean your own penis, you'll never have that problem. No cutting needed. If anyone has that problem, smegma will probably be the least of his concerns.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:32 AM
15

This is getting off topic and I don't meant to diminish the issue, but I suggest keeping your hair short in a way that complements a balding head. Ex: Jason Statham. When I think of people I know who can manage that type of hair style, I tend to think "ex-marine" rather than "random balding dude".
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:53 AM
0

I understood what he meant. Calling something by name that doesn't apply to it is still retarded, especially when he comments it in every. last. post. even when it isn't relevant to the topic at hand.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:02 PM
2

You really should read the rest of this thread. Someone legit said that the consent age should be variable by region and not strictly defined Are you referring to this? Not one specific number. Ideally I would want system of close-in-age rules, up to the age that any specific region chooses for themselves based on their local culture, without criminalization of willing sex between minors of the same age. That would seem like the best choice. If so, you're still talking to the same person. I comm…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:56 PM
2

Your argument is sadly flawed because you seem unwilling to accept that this girl may actually have been raped or at least unable to competently consent to what was happening. I didn't start out arguing about this case I was arguing about your ridiculous standards for 18 being the only acceptable age, and everything younger than that being rape and everyone being unable to decide for themselves whether they want to do it. I haven't claimed that the girl wasn't raped. I actually don't find this a…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:07 PM
4

Playing doctor literally refers to exploring each other's genitals. The pretend roles of doctor-patient are where the act gets its name, but the phrase is used for any genital exploration between minors, whether they're actually pretending to be a doctor or not. I fail to see how sexual assault is a double standard. Let's review. Minors have sex Because they're minors, they can't consent. Because they can't consent, it was rape. Because it was rape, the boys should be sent to juvey and the girl …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:52 PM
6

You do realize Playing Doctor is a euphemism, right? Regardless, there are kids who have actually been charged with sexual assault for doing this, using your same mentality. Children shouldn't be having sex, with anyone. Terrific. We're on the same page. Did you not read the part where I said exactly this? And I quote: Yes, children should be waiting until [they're] old enough to understand what they're doing and make a rational decision on it The thing is that they will do it anyway. The proble…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:44 PM
1

stop defending the practice of pressuring males into such sexist losing arrangements. Right. I disagree with you on a definition of the word, thus I'm defending chivalry? Splendid. Where have I seen that before? Maybe feminists who, when talking about what is and isn't rape, immediately call someone a rape apologist? If you find a person using the word to describe current day events, it is only used in reference to men's alleged social obligation to treat women better than women treat men. Perio…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:39 PM
11

If the government and law can trust you to pick a national leader, it's good enough to trust you to at least try to make an informed decision about sex. Apart from the fact that, 18 is not universal for voting: is driving a car not a bigger responsibility than having sex? People start that at 14-16 in many parts of the world. You can't just lift consent laws and just hope that everyone stays calm. And you have to drag it out to extremes? Of course not. Removing age of consent won't fix anything.…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:29 PM
1

It's still what the term refers to when you look up chivalry. It's literally the first 10 definitions that will show up in any dictionary. The concept becoming obsolete does not make those definitions irrelevant. Those bigoted assumptions came from the actual historical system of chivalry in the first place anyway. There are plenty of other terms to choose from. Gynocentrism. Traditionalism. Whatever you want to call it.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:11 PM
6

I know many people who at the age of 16 were mature enough and smart enough to understand sex and its consequences to decide whether they want to do it. I also know many people at the age of 23 who I'd personally would've considered way too stupid to do it. 18 isn't some magic age where people are suddenly mature enough to handle it. Hell, it isn't even the legal age in the majority of the world, or even in the USA, and that's not even counting all the places that have close-in-age exceptions. 1…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:52 PM
10

Are you gonna say that in every single post? I really doubt Hong Kong is all that greatly affected by a medieval European code of conduct for knighthood.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:00 PM
4

I've always seen it as the differences between the ideologies are (usually) about different methods of reaching the goal, rather than the goal itself. Awesome post and comments. I wish there were more people like you on both sides of the debate. :)
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:54 AM
4

I think people will perceive it as "The fedora neckbeards were purged from reddit"
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:58 PM
1

I don't see it happening. The rules are just a formality. Rule breaking subs are always around, the only time Reddit does anything to change it is if it hurts their advertisers because of bad publicity. If we posed that threat, we would've been gone long ago. [Edit: typo]
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:36 PM
25

When done incorrectly it can disfigure the genitals, leave scars, etc. Even when done "correctly", a danish article revealed that male circumcision increases the risk of negative sexual traits like delayed orgasm and leaving their partner with a bad experience, The circumcised man develops a thin layer of hard skin on his penis head, which decreases the sensitivity. This means that in order to reach an orgasm, he needs to work harder at it, and that can lead to a painful experience for the woman…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:29 PM
4

Wow. A public domestic dispute where the group of guys don't immediately rush to beat the shit out of the man involved? Germany sounds like an alright place.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:42 AM
3

No one says "this chick is crazy and abusive, I guess I'll marry her". Everyone starts out their marriage thinking that the person they chose to spend their life with would never be so horrid as to do something like this, and then guess what. It still happens. There's just no way to know, and there's no reason to marry in this day and age. For men it's only a liability with little to no benefit.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:16 PM
1

I know this is late, so this thread is basically dead, but what does being banned look like? I tried going to /r/offmychest today, I was actually thinking about posting only to find that I can't make a post or even comment. It's a shame because I kind of need it. I've never even once posted there.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 06:36 PM
3

Then they raped eachother you say? Once again, under your logic without all hypocrisy, the man couldn't've been able to consent either. Why is she not a rapist as well then?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:59 PM
-2

I think the former is much more plausible than the latter. It doesn't warrant throwing the burden of proof on the accused, but Australia has had one of the highest rape rates out of comparable developed countries.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:18 PM
3

"PIV is always rape, ok?". Also check out the comments.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 12:35 AM
2

Just answering from my own perspective, as a reader who hasn't read the comments much recently, I wouldn't say all women are misandrist. I'd definitely say a good portion of feminists are, and that women naturally tend toward hypergamy, but that doesn't mean they necessarily hate men. Just as well: women don't have too much empathy for men and boys or their issues. -Though I guess that can be said for society as a whole. The MRM has a wide demographic with no one single ideology or way of thinki…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:31 PM
6

Not really. A percent that happens to be a decimal isn't exactly the same as a percent represented as a decimal. I thought the same doing the math using 1/0.005 at first until I remembered that 100% is equal to 1.0, So 0.005% would be .00005. Meaning they're saying it's 1 in every 20,000.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:53 AM
38

household chores, like cooking, cleaning and laundry. Well there's your answer. Guess who did the lawnmowing, weed-whacking and -pulling, shoveling, raking, tree branch cutting, and the construction and maintainence in my household growing up. Sure as hell wasn't my mother and sister who had the privilege of choosing to stay inside and cook the dinner in the nice air conditioned house, with all the appliances that make the activities take no effort. My father did all that, and dragged me out the…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:35 AM
3

Plenty of women find uncut penises attractive. If not, then let the child can choose that for himself when he's old enough. Besides, you can make yourself hygienic by showering and washing your damn genitals. If you really need to cut off a part of your penis to keep it clean, you're already an unhygienic person to begin with.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:49 PM
6

I personally apply that, my future children won't get any part of their body tampered with without legitimate medical concerns until they're aware enough to make their own decisions, whether that be about piercings or circumcision, same thing. Also, I don't think there's always a wide consensus on that issue. I once saw a picture on HONY of an infant with pierced ears and there was an equally large argument both for and against, with most people in the end settling on "who cares as long as the c…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:56 AM
9

I say buy a digital recorder to carry around in your jacket pocket at work. Other than that, I think the way you handled it is perfect. "Thanks for your opinion" or even just "Okay then." I'd personally make sure to have an indifferent tone to subtly convey the tone I'd have: "Your opinion wasn't asked for." [Edit: Here's the map concerning audio recording if you live stateside. If you're in a yellow state, then you're able to legally freely record a conversation that you are participating in wi…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:50 AM
3

There was no way I just read that...
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:46 AM
15

Imagine this applied with other contracts elsewhere: "It doesn't matter that he signed the contract that allowed both boxers to legally fight. It was signed under duress, that being that if he didn't sign it, he wouldn't be allowed to compete. Now charge that other boxer with assault this instant!"
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:15 AM
5

Can anyone give me a time stamp where she disagrees Karen specifically? Or is it the whole video? [Edit, nevermind, found it. 21:30 if anyone's curious. Though that's horrible misrepresentation of what Karen said.]
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:10 AM
2

Everyone knows that the best way to convince people of your position about an issue (in this case, anti-racism) is by alienating and antagonizing the huge amount of people who are already on your side and want to help you, enough to go to an anti-racism event. That'll turn out well, I'm sure. Personally I'm fine with seeing this. More people too see how ridiculous this attitude has gotten.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 08:16 PM
1

We can’t say for sure why problems are increasing, but there are many factors that could contribute. Apart from the issues facing young boys, who constructed such a comparative study that doesn't pinpoint where the stress is coming from? It seems like common sense to me that you should try to get some basic insight into the subjects perception of their academic life, home life, sexualized images, etc along with measuring how stressed they are. That just sounds like intentionally half-assed resea…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 01:36 AM
4

It's always incredibly tragic when civilians are affected, sure, but the men who are conscripted to fit in these wars are just as "innocent." The majority of soldiers were drafted in WW1, included in the fact that many of them were just sent to fight meaninglessly (without the ideological and personal drive that most modern wars have). Even today, many people who serve in their military are simply people who need to fulfill a mandatory service requirement that forces them to, even if it's not a …
/r/MensRights19/04/15 12:39 AM
23

Yeah, it's strange to me they wouldn't put the most iconic picture of shellshock (that I know of)
/r/MensRights18/04/15 05:52 PM
–

Not exactly. They're two different things, although somewhat associated. You're right that "Shell Shock" isn't used today, but the modern medical term is CSR (Combat Stress Reaction). It's a more intense, immediate, and brief reaction, with the most common symptoms being the thousand yard stare, inability to think and disconnection from one's surroundings, etc. It's something you will only really experience at the battlefield or combat scene. PTSD is long term, and it's the background stress and…
/r/MensRights18/04/15 05:41 PM
–

In the same article where they say this This sea change has come as women have also moved to fill 52 percent of management, professional and related positions in the country, according to BMO. they're still allowed to say this in the very next sentence Moving up the ranks has made women the primary breadwinners in 40 percent of U.S. households yet they only earn 78 cents for every dollar when compared with men, according to the study. Even if that wage statistic were true, then that just shatter…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:34 PM
9

Yep, now inanimate, non-conscious, non-sentient objects can be raped. Time to throw out your sex dolls and fleshlights also, since they can't consent either.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:47 PM
2

Part of this is based on misrepresentation of the characters' facial structure. Look particularly at this picture you'll notice that while the female character at the far right has a far different facial structure, it can be still be draw to look like it's the same with respect to the others when drawing the line, and ignoring relative neck length, cheek bone definition, and slope of the face. They do the same with the girl from Brave and the girl to her right (as well as smaller details on the …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:34 PM
5

It isn't a double standard. MRAs reacted negatively to that ad because it was an issue that had never been perceived as gendered before, unlike breast cancer.No one in the world ever thought "I won't get tested for heart issues because I'm a women" so of course it came off as a clear attempt to divide the pubic awareness based on gender, just as had happened with water shortage in Africa, war, and domestic abuse. By the way, there are many people who reacted negatively to the reactions in the sa…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 02:40 PM
2

Bo did it better
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:24 PM
2

Of course. I never expected MRAs and MGTOWs to be free of purely misogynistic people, but if a misandrist mentality is shared around, especially on tumblr, the excuses come out to justify it or play it down. I couldn't imagine MRAs here being so tolerant in the communities I frequent. Maybe I'm wrong though, most of my recent exposure is through here and a select few youtube channels.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:04 PM
3

I’m here to tell you: you’re right. I am just some c--t who’s mad that I can’t get a man. Strange. I thought we were the single losers, and their stereotype was that they're all lesbians. Anyway, if this is what passes for satirical wit, then I really feel for the future generations when instead of The Onion they have this passive-aggressive nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:59 AM
5

The only person I can trust and rely on is ME. You can do that without being sexist. I still have yet to see even one man, fucked over by divorce/custody procedures, female>male rape, false accusations, violence by proxy, who would be saying "fuck all women", even the MGTOW folk who actively choose that lifestyle.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:44 AM
8

surely it’s a good thing to be born a man? How did it get through editing with a declarative sentence ending in a question mark? That's not discrediting her arguments at all, but I think it IS evidence that this babbling rant belongs on a blogpost or a forum, not a newspaper/news-site. But it fails to point out that according to the same study, women were three times as likely to be victims of serious violence, such as being choked, sexually assaulted, beaten or threatened with a deadly weapon. …
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:15 AM
2

I show why your claim that children are treated like the mentally ill who are deemed dangerous was wrong, yet you act like you never said kids were treated differently than the mentally ill. Once again, just changing labels where they don't fit. "Mentally ill" isn't the standard we compare all this to here, "incapable of consenting" is, and that's the quality that they might share. That's all that's necessary to argue non-consent. If anything, the comparison I made was "Drunk people = children",…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 01:53 AM
2

No. They're just incapable of consenting because of their intoxication. Why are you so eager to change labels? And yes, children can be tried as adults for crimes. So what? Sounds like an appeal to law. I don't necessarily agree they should be tried for crimes they weren't able to understand either. you bring it into the discussion as if I do. Not to mention those kids aren't ever being tried for having sex. They're being tried for having sex with a minor. It's almost always boys who are tried i…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:59 PM
2

only people I can think that we as a community deam unable to consent to sex and unable to consent to committing crimes. Children. Also if I'm not mistaken there was a case in the UK recently concerning a Muslim man who's no legally permitted to have sex with his wife because her mental age is that of a child, and she had no knowledge of the fact that she could reject intercourse and didn't even know how she had been getting pregnant. So yes, people who do not understand the act nor the implicat…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:24 PM
1

There seems to be some confusion on what I intended to say. I never said men need a victim complex. I just said that the application of the law should be equal, but not where the law should draw the line. Even when I was discussing intoxication legally negating consent, I didn't imply "it's a shame men can't accuse women of rape for otherwise enthusiastic drunk sex", but rather "it's a shame that, with this idea of consent, they're both legally non-consenting but the law only functions in favor …
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:17 PM
0

What? The crime of driving while intoxicated (much less killing someone because of that intoxication) has nothing to do with consent in the first place so it's useless to try to shovel consent in that situation, but even so, how'd you get that interpretation from what I said? Let me make your analogy intellectually honest: Imagine a car crash involving two drunk people. Should they get held accountable? Of course they should. Should one be held more accountable simply for being male? No, of cour…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:29 PM
-2

I honestly don't see the "intoxicated = non-consenting" to be a big issue. It makes sense. I'm not saying it's entirely right: it's horrible for any couple that, like normal people do, may have sex after having some wine or returning home from a party. It places a criminal label on entirely harmless behavior. But that's just where you draw the line on consent which is a different issue. The gender comes in when it's not applied fairly, and that's the real issue. I don't think it's about "when do…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 01:08 PM
3

Well as I said, I don't think the ideology is inherently sexist on it it's own. Before I explain I feel like it's important to define my terms to avoid ambiguity. First I'm using "sexism" without the tacked on addition of "sexism=prejudice+power". Second I'm going to discuss feminism here as it exists in academia, not simply the layman's conception of it as simply "the idea that men and women should be equal". The latter is what MRAs want as well, but the former comes with a lot theoretical bagg…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:47 PM
–

No. The ideology is wrong, and because of that it may result in sexist actions, but it's not inherently sexist.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:29 AM
7

Pretty much nothing. They'll only be for people in relationships and condoms will still be the most important kind of contraception. Call me naive, but I feel like most people having sex are in a relationship simply through the logistics of it. Besides, why not both? Condoms break, you know. The biggest benefit will be for couples where the female can't take birth pills for health reasons. The biggest benefit is that the man has control to make sure nothing happens on his side and that he has th…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 01:47 PM
2

My family's from a culture (Dominican) where it wasn't done anyway, nor have I ever though to do so for any reason. As for how it started, here's the wiki article and section about the origins of male circumcision. There's no consensus on how it started. It has been variously proposed that it began as a religious sacrifice, as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood, as a form of sympathetic magic to ensure virility or fertility, as a means of enhancing sexual pleasure, as an a…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:47 PM
1

Any chance you can provide an English translation? I don't speak Malay yet
/r/MensRights10/03/15 05:25 AM
5

You caught us! We went directly to twitch to hate on... who again? Seriously though, what's this all about and who's Kaceytron?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:59 PM
12

It depends. For one thing, a surprising amount of men have been receptive to my thoughts, so it's not even that it's men in general. I'm in college as well and my thoughts on it are that for people in our age group, a lot of it has to do with the type of ideology that's so prevalent in our society and education at this point. Their moral values are going to come before their "best interests", and from their perspective the MRM is equivalent to white supremacy. They see it as a reactionary anti-w…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:57 AM
–

Detention? There's no reason for that. Ask them exactly what rule you broke. I'd definitely fight it if I were you, just to make the statement. Also, since it sounds like you're in highschool, it only gets much worse in college, especially in the humanities.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:34 AM
2

This crisis disproportionately affects women Bullshit. Water availability is not a gendered problem. The gendered difference you see just happens to be their way to cope with their shitty situation. I'm glad they're offering a solution, but this just shows the lack of empathy towards males, and wanting to portray everything as a female problem (the "women are the primary victims of war" mindset).
/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:19 PM
1

I only have my family to compare it to, but my brother and I had the same rules as my sister, my sister was just monitored more harshly. I wouldn't call this possessive. My mother was just as strict with my sister as my father was. The reason wasn't possessiveness, but relative protectiveness. They already assumed that their sons wouldn't ever get abused or mistreated when they're on their own with others, but as for my sister they're in a culture that constantly spouts out the same rape and dom…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:31 PM
11

It feels like picking the low-hanging fruit, but If you take into account that women are less safe With 79% percent of all murder victims being male? Right... less likely to be victims of domestic violence in general. Well yes. Studies range from 30% to 73% of women initiating the physical violence, with the median being 43%. That being said, these are threats of violence from strangers, not from intimate partners, which men are much more likely to be victims of.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:58 AM
7

Well that's the main reason why it keeps being brought up. It's the biggest example of legal gender discrimination we have in the USA. Other than toplessness laws, try to find a law that explicitly disadvantages women in relation to men, and you won't find anything in writing. But other than that, while we haven't had conscription since the Vietnam War, 40 years isn't that long of an amount of time. (19 years between WW2 and Vietnam, 23 years between WW1 and US involvement in WW2, and 48 years b…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 06:43 AM
3

<not practicing basic facial hygiene for a month> That's an incredibly disparaging way to put it. Hell, you get people thrown into a frenzy whenever you even hint at women shaving their whatever being "basic hygiene"
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:58 AM
16

In June, it was discovered that hundreds of users on the anonymous messageboard 4chan were posing as black women on Twitter and Tumblr in an attempt to misdirect and embarrass the online social justice community. And what does it say about tumblr feminists that they ate it up? Gamergate’s trajectory, though, went from underground rumblings to national news story to fringe hate group in about a month. What? I'm still seeing articles constantly about it. Just because you SJW types lose awareness o…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:14 AM
1

Would you have? Honest question. Personally I'd rather not get stabbed by a naked man for interrupting his sex-addict relapse.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:17 PM
8

Isn't this the same as gynocentrism?
/r/MensRights22/02/15 08:03 AM
7

which means every 2 minutes a crime against someone you love takes place. They're not even trying to hide those emotional-appeal phrases. I don't know 99.99% percent of those people getting raped. So no. That crime probably only occur to someone I know (much less "love") maybe once in a lifetime. I know I'm being a sour grape about this, but I think it's fair game if it's brought up right after the statistics. What's even more disturbing is that 68% of these crimes are unreported, and 98% of rap…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 04:06 AM
2

Stop! I can't handle it! Triggers trigger me!
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:04 PM
13

These guys are certainly to blame. Even if the man WERE a rapist, they're still to blame for taking it into their hands to do such a thing. Besides, this mentality of being a volunteer army for any woman as soon as there's a threat existed long before feminism. As for the woman, she's to blame too. If someone were to call SWAT threat on you and you ended up shot for holding a TV remote or mutilated by a stun grenade, you can make a case for the police being innocent (unlike this story where they…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:17 PM
–

Archives are always better,, if you can find them: http://archive.today/PIBOb Anyway, now that I've done that work, time to rage No, but what I’m saying is how do we not know that this wasn’t the other way around? Why is she the aggressor and not the victim? She already admitted she did it. If she wants to rely on what-ifs, she needs to say so. Why does the male in this situation get a pass for what he did? He's a goddamn 8-year old boy. Believe me, I'm all for legally changing the age ranges an…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:27 AM
10

I'm not Japanese, but I can read it to an extent (still a learner, so anyone is welcome to expand on or correct what I'm saying). So I'm still digging on their website and twitter, but so far it looks like people are twisting the situation for some sort of bias or somethings getting lost in translations, as often happens when westerners try to analyze Japanese culture. I see nothing about men's rights so far yet, no "anti-matriarchy" rhetoric, or even marxist rhetoric. Just anti-Valentine's Day …
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:41 AM
2

Then again, the only places I'm finding these pictures are on TumblrInAction and anti-feminist blogs, so I don't know how relevant this really is.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:15 AM
2

Hmm. Well, let's see. Men are more likely to suffer police brutality, more likely to be arrested in any domestic despite who started it or did more damage to the other person. Oh, and the majority of feminists are extreme anti-firearms leftists, and even if they weren't there's nothing that's legally stopping them from arming themselves in whatever way they choose. Right... Forget that. I'm aboard the "let's be more strict on police conduct" train, but this is just meaningless emotional rhetoric…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:12 AM
2

What they'd suggest is that it's racism of it's own. Ex: "Asian women prefer white men because white is seen as better". Which personally, I don't know if either is true. I don't honestly care, and I see it as mostly a non-problem regardless. What's most bullshit is how it relates to perception of men (rather than a race issue), the portrayal of this as a male-to-female act. I've seen plenty of the reverse going on with my own male hispanic friends and myself, and the white women with what you c…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 05:22 AM
2

I'd say the end of the world is pretty damn attractive then.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:33 PM
6

Lack of information. The feeling of normality and responsibility to get married (because society or family says you should). The fact that a the girlfriend wants to, and you THINK you can trust her. Wanting to have children. I'm unmarried, but that's what I perceive it as. My girlfriend has made it clear she wants to get married but understands and accepts my reasons not to, but I'll still feel guilt of depriving her of that experience. My family expects me to be the only one of my siblings to g…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 06:54 PM
–

To be fair, look at that cover. The ratings say a lot, but it was basically asking for it. If I were that author, I would've chosen a different publisher.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:33 AM
10

Some people blame the fact that people (even MRAs) just prefer to listen to women, so the men will still get ignored regardless. That is a problem, but what I think it really is that you can try to automatically write off any male MRA as a conservative misogynist reactionary, and people will end up believing it without even listening to what they have to say, because suddenly that MRA is the enemy. On the otherhand, when the amazing Karen Straughan gives a talk about men's human rights or anti-f…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 10:12 PM
3

And people actually check those things? This is the first I'm heating of it, I figured something like that would be a fringe site.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:43 PM
7

I'm pretty sure it's not exactly the feminist women. I've had several women at my university talking about how horribly misogynistic it is and how they'd never way to see it.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 03:37 PM
1

I agree... kind of. Like others have mentioned and it's important to find out why the posts are made, and more often than not I find myself agreeing with the point being made. "A man would get a life sentence for this, but a woman doesn't" or something like that That being said, I've seen discussions like this take place (not here usually, but elsewhere), and people come up with elaborate pseudo-intellectual societal explanations that really don't have much evidence beyond their own mind. This t…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 06:52 AM
3

I don't think he's arguing that women's issues should be discussed here. This post is addressing a type of cognitive bias that assumes that isolated incidents are representative of the whole.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 06:40 AM
1

Not to mention restricted or revoked voting rights.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:35 PM
2

The idea that we need any ideology-based perspective in any scientific just shows their scientific illiteracy of anything beyond gender studies.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:02 AM
6

Well let's see. The only citation is a google docs link. No way to see the data itself or verify its accuracy. It seems to be a heavily altered version THIS , the r/MensRights poll from over two years ago. While only 69% of MRA's were atheist or agnostic, that tumblr version represents it as being 94%. At worst it's a propaganda piece attempting to be legitimate. At best it's heavily outdated that I cannot find. I personally think it's the former, considering the political part. 84% strong conse…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:44 AM
1

The smarter choice would be to choose neither. Besides, all of your opinions don't need to align with the party's opinions. Don't they call that group-think.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:32 AM
2

True. Then again I'm not one to argue on campus anymore. It's not very brave but I'd rather not have that type of attention on me for the next year. Just out of curiosity, what field was she lecturing about specifically?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:39 AM
1

I'd argue the rape statistics aren't nearly as high as she believes it to be. Same with the amount of convicted rapists being too low. The only data I've seen to support the "only 3% of rapists serve any jail time will make the assumption that all alleged rapists, even when only accused, acquitted, not-reported etc, are in-fact rapists. And they're not even shy about it But I'd be careful discussing that. After I merely suggesting this, my own sister looked at me as if I was an misogynistic rapi…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:25 AM
1

I'd even say to be wary of phones. For most people these days a phone has so much sensitive information on it. You don't want to it to be broken or stolen in such an event. Of course though, always use a phone when it's available: my recording app is one of the pinned apps just in case of emergencies. Your self-preservation comes first. That being said, it's still worth investing in a recorder for longer dedicated memory, better quality, and the fact that it isn't as personally valuable to you.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 05:11 AM
3

1) Correct. 2) By mainstream media? Honestly not as much. I feel like anyone with a big enough influence and a negativity towards our ideas just tries to ignore us. I feel the problem is more about people's opinions in general, and without a doubt we're portrayed as all straight white male women-beating misogynists by the way most people see us. Then again, I don't consistently watch many mainstream news sources anyway, I suppose. 3) You're going to get different responses from people even withi…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:05 AM
5

Wow. Personally I would've just given you a high-five. By the way, I highly suggest carrying an audio recorder or something with you when wearing it in case of anything. Anyway, where can I get a shirt like that?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 06:45 AM
0

I would give this video a second look. The parents faces clearly become distressed after the video. Maybe they just wanted a baby girl, but hey, it's Sarah Silverman. We know her views on this already.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:35 PM
6

I really have to wonder how people somehow support trafficking through porn. Who pays for porn these days? Seriously, you can see just about anything for free. All of the other studies are bullshit. As for the marriage rates, I just see it as "It doesn't matter what these men want or what would make them happy. They need marriage." Screw that. Until our Western countries have a child birth deficiency that's ten times worse than that of Japan or Taiwan, no one needs marriage anyway.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:42 AM
4

It's hard to be sympathetic when that cover... oh boy, that cover.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 07:00 AM
2

Okay I don't get it so maybe you can explain: What does the author mean by "abnormal"?
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:49 AM
1

The issue is that the comic portrays a false narrative. No one arguing this is ignorant to what constitute's raping someone, what the issue is whether something is legally rape that people generally ask in a situation such as the one in this comic, and that definition that people want to instill is still much more ambiguous, and thus much more open to abuse and misinterpretation. The comic itself is reasonable I suppose, but the argument that it's meant to take a part is still "propaganda"
/r/MensRights30/01/15 04:22 AM
7

Time for every man to buy an audio recorder.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:41 PM
3

I really understand what you're trying to do, but the reason you're getting an accusation of "co-opting" is an important reason why we don't need a clearly defined or unified stance of gay rights. It's the same reason the MRM needs to tread carefully on political topics, because we have (and will still need) supporters who happen to liberal, conservative, libertarian, etc,. Fighting for gay marriage and carrying that flag is only a dilution of our message and purpose for being here. Consider the…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 11:51 PM
1

I've always thought we should avoid having children in almost form of protest, regardless of the topic. No one knows who they are or what the world is actually like until they're 15, at a minimum, and even then they're still figuring their thoughts out. Funny enough, the people who'd enjoy this video would call out the use child "protesters" in any anti-abortion rally.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:35 AM
0

Correction: Just to use the kids as political posters. Teach your kids right from wrong, but they should not be part of a protest for whatever reason. Partly because protests can become violent, but mostly because it should be considered immoral to use your kid's participation in a protest as strong emotional appeal for your political affiliation.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter