TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HypnoWyzard Archive

View 6 posts and 141 comments by HypnoWyzard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yep, 48 and I will be last of my line. I don't count my sister's kids.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 05:12 PM
5

I'm not talking about work. That would fall under 'earned'. I can see the confusion. "Working tirelessly " was not indicating employment, but political and social effort.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 09:34 PM
8

The easiest way to farm resources is to farm pity. Turn all those that aren't playing the game into a resource instead. There's no honor among them.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 05:54 PM
20

They are piss poor protectors of women too. It is no sign of protection to work tirelessly for unearned benefits.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 04:54 PM
2

They are right in exactly the way children are right that parents have it easy...
/r/MensRights25/08/25 02:02 PM
2

That's possibly a bit of miscommunication. When I say "the structure men provide" I'm not speaking only about individual level interaction. I mean that men are largely fairly predictable. As in, our behaviors tend to fall within a rough norm. We built and maintain all of the modern world. And things are pretty consistent overall. Not to say women contribute nothing, but they don't tend toward the boring, dangerous, grinding, repetitive, twiddling bits that draw men naturally. As for hypnosis cer…
/r/MensRights07/08/25 02:45 AM
1

Not sure why you'd think we all do it the same way. It varies greatly by issues treated. I focused primarily on abuse and phobias. That takes a significant amount of talking to people. As I've said though, I'm not claiming a font of perfect knowledge. It's a perspective to look at. I found people to often suffer a lot worse later in life who lacked some significant negative events to use as perspective for what to worry about. Never met any person anywhere with no worries. Complete absence of fe…
/r/MensRights07/08/25 01:16 AM
2

Yeah, lots of professional services businesses run successfully for two decades through incompetence. /s Anyway, I've mentioned it to frame my perspective not claim absolute knowledge. I may still be incorrect. Of course, I don't believe I am, but that never stopped anyone from being wrong before, so take it as you will.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 12:34 AM
18

Yep, and if that's what it takes to "stand up for ourselves" Imma sit this one out. Hyperconsumption is idiotic. I haven't lost enough braincells to be fooled by a half-off sale into buying shit I dont want or need.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 08:20 PM
18

Here's some annoying reality from 2 decades as a hypnotherapist. There is a baseline of anxiety that people need, to feel like they have a grip on whats important to worry about. For women that baseline is significantly higher than for men, partly because men are the default last line of responsibility. We aren't gonna have a safe life and it's a given. Anyway, if you remove all the dangers, their brains will still seek out things to worry about to reach that baseline. So perversely, the safer t…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 02:54 PM
2

I think the natural law of consequences will be the only effective "control" women will ever respond to. It is crazy making to think any of us will logically figure out an effective method of correcting this mess. If women's actions, or men's actions, screw the whole species until there are only a few hundred people left on a given dating app, maybe they will straighten out. The problem has been that we have systematically created out after out for women to dodge responsibility if they choose to…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:25 PM
2

Absolutely. I've never felt as alone as when I've been in a relationship with someone who clearly couldn't accept that I'm a human with my own needs as well. A relationship with a leech is worse by far than no relationship at all.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 09:23 PM
3

Well, other than the billion other people they are doing the same for, but at least they don't share your deepest secrets with those others. 😀
/r/MensRights18/06/25 09:20 PM
128

They don't care about the men who off themselves for the same reason. It is somewhat annoying that one woman punching her own ticket after living as a man for a year is still, a decade later, getting more attention than the thousands of actual men doing it on the daily. That's possibly the biggest factor in the isolation, watching how little the problem is talked about in comparison to much more minor inconveniences of non-males. It kinda gives a dude the idea that nobody cares... weird.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 02:20 PM
2

Man, that's unfortunate. Quite a bad bit of behavior from your peers.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 10:41 AM
3

You know, I can't think of a single example of a male friend who did this. Not my father, not my nephews. I've never actually known a man who behaves this way if he's close enough for that to be appropriate to drop on him. Now, dudes I just happened to be in boot camp with? Yeah, they might have. We weren't close.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 01:39 AM
11

I agree that it is available, but there's a severe rash of women who were allowed to stop growing emotionally in their early teens if no earlier. It takes a familiarity with responsibility, consequence and accountability to be able to grow through hardships and offer support. The biggest part of support is allowing space for things to be imperfect without judgement, and especially without turning on your partner. There's an awful lot of men who have never experienced it even once from a woman. A…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:12 PM
16

I wish it were in any way common. The vast majority of men, myself included, will never even walk past a woman like that, let alone enter a relationship with one.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:00 PM
2

I've tried vibe coding a dating app that does take information like this and returns a delusion level as a percentage of the population on the app that could fit within any filters. It's quite a bit over my head, but maybe someone else can run with the idea.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 11:36 PM
1

I do use chatGPT to help me better organize my thoughts and diminish the emotional weight a bit so I don't run off on a rant. I find it helps keep a conversation civil. Also way easier to add citations, so here we go. Women’s rights movements have rightly exposed real imbalances—but too often the behavior of feminism itself mirrors DARVO (“Deny–Attack–Reverse Victim–and–Offender”) on a macro scale. When critics point out cases of female-perpetrated emotional abuse, the response is often: “You’re…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 09:34 PM
1

You’re right that society loves to slap “vulnerability” on some pretty manipulative moves. Here are a few patterns men report seeing, backed by research: Emotional invalidation → “I’m worried about you.” What happens: When a man says he’s sad or angry, the response often is, “I’m so overwhelmed by how your feelings affect me,” effectively recasting his raw emotion as her fragility. Study insight: Psychologists rate identical scenarios of emotional aggression as less serious when the actor is fem…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 09:36 PM
6

Well, I can give you my best therapist advice. Focus on what you can control. Worrying about what you can't will make you crazy. Doesn't mean to not protect yourself to a reasonable degree, but ultimately you will never have perfect safety. Also, don't be blind to red flags. Avoid absolutely any woman you witness being rude to strangers and service industry folks. Run like the wind if all you hear from her is vitriolic gossip. Or stay single. That has been my choice. Never married and never will…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 10:35 PM
10

Yeah, I'm no social butterfly. I have like 20 friends tops across my entire 48 years of life. That I know 2 dudes that served time for really vengeful breakup accusations is a really big indicator of how frequent it is. Character assassination is a common version of female aggression. Having the ability to utilize the full weight of the government to do it... of course they will.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 10:26 PM
16

Without giving any details of either case, I have 2 friends who served actual time on a plea bargain. The accusations didn't hold water at all, but here's what prosecutors told them. "You can fight it, at a cost of roughly 100k, but if you lose you serve 15+ years. Or plead guilty. Serve less time with no option of parole and much less expense." There is no affordable innocent option. One is still in 25 years later. One got lucky and only served 5. The second wasn't a rape accusation. Just a pho…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 09:27 PM
2

I really don't know. It feels like things are shifting back the other direction, but it hasn't reached a critical mass yet.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 03:14 AM
2

You aren't wrong, but it's entirely unhelpful when talking about how all of society behaves in regards to these patterns. For one, laws aren't going to take that view into account. It's going to treat them as rational actors no matter how irrationally motivated.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 05:43 PM
2

Thanks for your thoughtful comment. You're absolutely right: narcissism itself is fundamentally a human issue, not strictly a gendered one. Both men and women display narcissistic traits, and anyone can cause deep harm in relationships through those behaviors. The distinction I’m highlighting isn’t about narcissism originating specifically from women, but about how society responds differently based on gender. Narcissism in men is quickly identified, loudly condemned, and visibly punished. Socie…
/r/MensRights08/05/25 05:41 PM
1

No. I no longer practice at all. I retired from that phase of my life in October.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 10:53 AM
2

There’s a psychological term for what keeps bubbling up here—it’s called the “women are wonderful” effect. It’s a well-researched bias where people, across cultures, instinctively rate women as more nurturing, empathetic, moral, and trustworthy than men—even when no data supports it. (Eagly & Mladinic, 1994) It sounds harmless. But in practice? It functions as a societal DARVO pattern—a reflexive reversal of victim and offender whenever female behavior is scrutinized too closely. The moment some…
/r/MensRights06/05/25 07:50 PM
1

For those interested in some of the data behind this: School discipline disproportionately targets boys for subjective infractions like “defiance” or “disruption”: U.S. Department of Education Civil Rights Data Collection, 2020–21 U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, “Beyond Suspensions,” 2019 Relational aggression (gossip, social exclusion) is more prevalent in females, yet far less often punished: Card et al., 2008 meta-analysis, Child Development Underwood et al., 2009, Development and Psychopath…
/r/MensRights06/05/25 07:36 PM
1

I’m not equating the method. I’m equating the consequence. Physical violence scars the body. Narcissistic abuse scars the psyche—and often invisibly, over time. The challenge is that narcissistic tactics don’t always look abusive until you're emotionally entangled. Many victims (of both sexes) don’t even realize what’s happening until years later, because they’ve been trained to doubt their own perception. Also, you're absolutely right: narcissism exists in men too. I’ve worked with many narciss…
/r/MensRights06/05/25 07:18 PM
1

You're right. That's a flaw in how I presented it. Everyone is capable of narcissism. Women tend more toward the covert expression that society seems happy to let run rampant.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 07:10 PM
1

Again, it isn't about who is worse. It's the disparity on social containment at issue. And male and female narcissistic expression is significantly different on average. Men tend toward grandiose and women tend toward covert. Again, this is just on average though.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 06:04 PM
1

I agree, but I'm not talking about narcissists. I'm talking about narcissistic traits that are rampant and incentivized in society. You simply can't completely cut off half the population and suffer not at all. One of the big offenders is attention seeking, and that does deserve a heaping dose of starving the beast.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 05:00 PM
3

I'm certainly heavily influenced by Jung. I don't take it to quite such an esoteric level as collective unconscious, but I do believe humans all share enough similarities in brain structure that we tend toward consistent archetypes. I think those are sort of stable equilibrium points where emotional weights can balance each other in predictable ways. To your second question, I think we as a society allow women to grow up just based on age, but don't consistently put them under enough pressure to…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 10:49 AM
3

Not quite. The Dark Triad traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—aren’t inherently male. They’re just expressed differently across sexes and often interpreted differently by culture. Male versions tend to look overt: dominance, manipulation, aggression. Female versions are usually covert: emotional leverage, curated victimhood, and social sabotage. But the underlying traits are the same—what changes is the packaging and the social reward structure. High neuroticism isn’t narcissism…
/r/MensRights04/05/25 04:38 PM
1

Even body camera footage of her emotional manipulations will get past untrained eyes. This sort of abuse is often subtle. It didn't get this bad in the population because it didn't work.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 03:35 PM
2

Yeah, I'm not saying it's perfect. The father does need to be stronger/have a more solid frame. That's the unfortunate responsibility of the victim. And I bet he was taking it himself to spare you. That's what my father did, too. I have thanked him profusely for what he suffered to spare me the brunt of what I still had to take.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 03:32 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/JcdKcMfrgB
/r/MensRights03/05/25 12:25 PM
2

Well, it's super challenging to study. 1. Because narcissists are never at fault for anything si why would they be studied for effective means of not supplying themselves? 2. Paying any attention at all to them...such as by studying them, feeds that need. So yeah anecdotal, but I've never heard an anecdote of anything else that's even slightly effective.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 12:19 PM
3

Yeah, something like that. Thought the silent treatment is a tactic that is baiting you into chasing, which is somehow still feeding the supply if you take the bait. It's a jungle out there. Keep your peepers peeled.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 12:17 PM
2

You’re right. There’s neuroticism in the mix, too. But the key difference is how it’s treated. Neurotic behavior isn’t typically celebrated or rewarded. Narcissistic traits, on the other hand—like curated victimhood or emotional domination—often get reframed as empowerment or “setting boundaries.” That’s the cultural coddling I’m talking about. And yeah, we don’t tend to see this kind of behavior in places where life is harder and perspective is enforced by reality. But when safety and comfort a…
/r/MensRights03/05/25 12:12 PM
4

Because, even if they aren't full narcissists, that specific narc trait of being the center of attention is spoiled by giving even the tiniest hint of acknowledgement to the value of someone else unless that someone else could stand as a proxy for themselves. Thus women are very very in-group biased. Making themselves a monolith when it suits them, such as "mother is the hardest job in the world," and that sort of tripe.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 01:43 AM
9

It's one of the many known tactics. Beat a victim down until they react and farm that reaction to turn the narrative into how abusive they are being. The biggest tell is that everything EVERYTHING will turn back to themselves. A covert narcissist is the eternal victim. A grandiose narcissist is the eternal hero. Either way, everything reinforces the narrative masks they are wearing. It never stops. It's really quite consistent.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 01:18 AM
2

That's a very difficult question to answer. The hard truth is this: an diagnosable narcissist is gonna be like that forever. Yeah, there's a range of severity, but they are always gonna turn everything into attention for themselves. Other humans are just tools to be used and manipulated for supply of that constant goal. There's not one single way, I know of, to starve that need other than grey rocking. If you can't cut them off because they are family or whatever, at least limit interaction as m…
/r/MensRights03/05/25 01:12 AM
1

To be really explicit, I'm not saying all women are narcissists any more than I’m saying all men are violent. What I am pointing to is what gets excused, and what doesn’t. We’ve built strong containment systems around male violence: legal punishment, social shame, loss of status. That containment works. It’s part of why we live in a time of relative peace, but that peace is very recent in the broader timeline of history. Don’t mistake it for the natural state of things. There’s no equivalent cul…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 10:20 PM
1

Honestly, it's not wrong to expect as much. Falling into the same trap of "I'm oppressed, please fight on my behalf" is not a way out. Nor would anyone do it. But it will take some others to strike off laws that unfairly heap all the female responsibilities as well as their own onto the backs of men.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 10:12 PM
3

Grey rock works. I’ve used it. It’s cold, quiet, and effective when someone’s gone full mask mode. But here’s the thing: grey rock is a defense, not a foundation. It doesn’t build—it just blocks. And for some men, especially the ones who still want to connect deeply (even if they won’t admit it anymore), the long-term effect is numbness. The only other thing I’ve found that works—and I mean actually works—is witness. Not validation. Not approval. Witness. Being seen in your intent, your pain, yo…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 08:08 PM
3

This hits. You’re describing the exact cultural split I’ve been pointing at—one group punished for not dancing, the other praised just for showing up to the floor, even if they sabotage the rhythm. Restraint isn’t evenly distributed. Men are trained from childhood to control their anger, their urges, even their sadness, because if they don’t, there’s a cost. Legal, social, reputational. Women aren’t given the same leash. Narcissistic behavior gets reframed as “high standards,” “self-love,” or “h…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 08:00 PM
5

I did spin up a whole subreddit, but it has little to do with this subject matter beyond my philosophical musings. I have like 60 published books, some of them are sfw. I will be writing more.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 07:44 PM
3

Hormones can certainly have a wide range of behavioral effects, but I really don't have the qualifications to comment much on that. I treat the psychological responses to emotional traumas or internal or external narratives. I don't have any knowledge whatsoever on biochemistry beyond a sprinkling of dopaminurgic cycles.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 07:42 PM
10

That's basically the definition of the devouring mother archetype and why a father in the home is so vital. It is for containment of that very behavior.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 07:04 PM
3

That's not complication. You are falling into the trap of trying to see logic and reason within what is entirely self-serving manipulation of the system. She absolutely knows she will get her way if she pretends enough danger exists. And thus you can refer to my OP. 😀 Edit: Don't feel too bad. Nearly everyone does it. Consider the #metoo movement. It entirely hinged on this tendency for most rational people to think to themselves "what reason would so many women have to lie?" And never asking, "…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 06:31 PM
3

Narcissistic traits are different from a diagnosis of narcissism. Narcissism itself doesn't really respond to attempts to change it. So I'm more talking about the traits that are allowed or even encouraged and coached into existence.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 06:13 PM
2

I'm well aware. The issue is that you won't be seeing a male narcissist beating the hell out of his spouse and then getting her arrested and removed from the house because he starts crying. Or similar examples. The problem does still exist that a society revolving around validation of narcissistic behaviors allows true narcissists to succeed, as you mentioned. And to hide extremely easily, because it just looks like another victimized person. So while narcissistic traits and violent traits absol…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 06:12 PM
2

You're not wrong—but you're aiming too low. Yes, women tend toward manipulation and men toward violence. But that's surface behavior. I'm not just talking tactics—I'm talking architecture. Narcissism isn’t just manipulation—it’s a relational worldview. A structure that makes everything orbit the self while appearing emotionally engaged. In twenty years as a hypnotherapist—many of them working with survivors of narcissistic abuse—I’ve seen over and over how female narcissism isn’t just subtle, it…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 05:39 PM
2

Your take’s close, but it flattens the depth. It’s not just about method (violence vs. manipulation)—it’s about how one gets punished and the other gets rationalized. Male harm tends to leave visible wounds. Female harm often leaves internal fractures. Both are real. One is shamed. The other is often sanctified. That’s the imbalance I’m pointing at—not just behavior, but cultural permission.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 05:29 PM
15

That is ultimately what shuts them down, aging out of the endlessly granted grace for their behavior. And since they never make true connections, they die alone, even if they still have someone suffering beside them.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:55 PM
5

MGTOW is the social equivalent of "grey rock" so yeah, I agree. Really the only way to win the narcissistic triangulation game is to refuse to play.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:32 PM
12

It is on the list. Filed under "fastest way to get global hatred."
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:30 PM
3

I'm only stating the baseline pressures that benefit from containment. I do understand that women can be physically violent and men can be narcissistic. As well, but it isn't as heavily subsidized by society at large. Yeah there are notable exceptions. Trump is the textbook example of a narcissist, for example. However I disagree that those are the primary drivers of what we are seeing in the world. They are also very very bad, but they are cumulative with what I stated already.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:30 PM
3

I retired last year. I might take a case or two, but I'm not maintaining an office anymore. Online sessions are probably the path going forward.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:26 PM
9

We all have darkness in us. Modern society holds together only by constraining the darkness. It can't be removed. But it can be understood. For men, one of the best examples is the threat of violence that keeps us mostly acting civil to each other. If you're too disrespectful to the wrong man, you get your teeth rearranged. If you think you can be even more violent, you might risk it anyway. Archeological evidence suggests that homicide may have historically been as high as 30% of all causes of …
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:24 PM
12

I agree, but it's terribly hard to prove and gives ample opportunity, in the effort, for her to turn it around and punish the victim instead.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:17 PM
7

I was hoping you would ask. Grey rock is a technique of not feeding a narcissistic supply. Narcissism thrives on being the center of attention and it matters not what kind of attention. You can be a complete asshole or a simp and it all feeds them the same. What doesn't feed them is nonreactivity. Or... the stimulation of a grey rock.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:11 PM
23

Thank you. I’ve been a hypnotherapist since 2004, and I’ve spent a good portion of that time working with people recovering from narcissistic abuse—mostly women, interestingly enough. What I learned through that work wasn’t just how narcissists operate... but how culture protects certain patterns when they show up in one sex and punishes them in the other. I started to notice that male behavior—especially emotional or physical intensity—was swiftly named and disciplined. But female behavior that…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 03:08 PM
24

It's sad to hear and I've seen it all too often. Modern psychology will often exacerbate the problem by validating her perspective, even. Sadly, the only way to escape narcissistic abuse is to "grey rock" everything. On the upside, this is especially effective on women. On the downside, you'll be the only one not reacting to her and she'll use that against you too. I'm glad it was only 7 years. Next time it may only take you 7 minutes to get away.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 02:47 PM
61

Yeah, narcissism often shows up as violence. The really dangerous part is that the violent offender feels completely justified and the society will have her back.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 02:29 PM
3

I'm loving the riffs. Go on with your bad self. This is good stuff.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 02:27 PM
2

Either way, it's gonna suck a lot. I know who I'm rooting for, but it's gonna hurt a lot of people. There's no avoiding that.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 02:22 PM
7

I don't know. I think Trump got back into office almost entirely because enough men have reached a breaking point that they'd rather see it all burn than keep being disrespected for building it.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 02:16 PM
2

Yeah, but the question is, what happens to such a society? Personally, I think it will -SNAP- and come apart quite suddenly... and soon. I also have a follow up post that shows another side of the narcissism epidemic that I'll be posting in a minute.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 01:54 PM
2

I was just talking about this. I despise Trump with a burning passion. He’s blatantly corrupt and a total scumbag. But I’d still take that over a party that grins in my face while stabbing my demographic in the back, smugly justifying their racism and sexism because they think it’s righteous when they do it.
/r/MensRights01/05/25 10:08 PM
2

Agreed. It's a not-so-subtle way of telling men that their identity hinges on whether a woman will fuck them. Especially used when said man is disagreeing with something the accuser is saying. It's not exactly better that some folks put the label on themselves and then organize around it.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 05:37 PM
0

Oh, I agree with you on that. It didn't copy the paragraph spacing. I put in the intro that you would need to respace it. I just fed it to the AI for you. Breaking up the paragraphs is as important as the punctuation.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:36 PM
5

Punctuation exists for a reason. You can read yours because your brain already knows where the implied punctuation is. For most everyone else, it looks like the ravings of a madman to see a wall of text without so much as a period.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:30 PM
2

Here’s the rewritten version of the Reddit post with punctuation added for clarity and readability, while keeping the original wording intact. You can copy/paste this and redefine your paragraphs. Then ill delete this message.: A big part of me does not want to write this because writing is often hard for me, but this is why circumcision is really bad and needs to be something we prioritize preventing from happening to people, maybe even more than anything else.This should be the male version of…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:20 PM
10

Omg, at least run it through an AI and get some punctuation. I'm not trying to decipher where one thought ends and another starts for something this long. If you want to offer your ideas, it is your responsibility to make it clear if you want it to get any traction.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:13 PM
13

I think a lot of the unfairness is that anyone is even allowed to name the accused before verifying the crime. When it comes to sexual crimes especially, that can ruin a person no matter how untrue the accusation proves to be. I think we are way too lax on libel nowadays.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 03:05 PM
6

I hope this is taken the right way, but I disagree that men should stand up. I think men should sit down, handle their own personal shit only and let women see if they can run things without the help of the men they don't think exist. Sort of an art of war approach. When the enemy attacks, rest. When the enemy rests, attack. Rather than fight a pointless battle of trying to earn more pity vs women, who have the market absolutely monopolized, we can go much further by withdrawing ALL support. Any…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 09:24 PM
1

It's such a sadly too often repeated issue. I know many friends who have served or are still serving time for such false claims, despite obvious lack of evidence and significant incentives for lying. The world is pretty fucked. It really sucks that it has happened to you so early in life. Hopefully you will gain some lessons and have a better life moving forward, not that I know what lessons those would be that could lead to a better life. A bitter life, sure.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 11:06 PM
3

Undoubtedly so, however, being seen to support each other often gets blown out of proportion so much we get actively villainized for it. Look how this very sebreddit gets treated. If you've ever posted here, you are likely to be auto-banned at any similar women focused subs.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 10:26 PM
4

I think men understand more than women do, that actual support is expensive. It takes a little more than giving lip service and then talking all the shit out of earshot. The worst enemies I've ever seen are women who pretend to be friends, or even sisters. Their "support" is hollow words. Men's support is work and you have to dole it out carefully. It is finite.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:55 PM
3

The reason is that most men have experienced what it's like to have a disgruntled ex spread some false rumors about him. We support evidence before anything else, because trust needs earning. Similarly, no matter how much you might think women aren't believed when reporting, men are even less believed due to the assumption that women are naturally harmless or innocent by default. Like a 60% lighter sentence for identical crimes level of default. The number of men being arrested and kept from the…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:51 PM
2

I support male-owned business by not supporting businesses that rely on being woman led as a factor. Same reason I don't do business with anyone that has Bible quotes under their logo. They are banking on the signal of virtue rather than actually having some.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:42 PM
2

My answer would be... If women are equal, why are they incompetent enough at suicide that you have that statistic to reference?
/r/MensRights10/03/25 11:51 AM
3

It's like smacking themselves in the head with a baseball bat so they can feel cared for when someone makes them stop for a second. Then they blame the fact they were hitting themselves on the person who stopped it.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:41 PM
7

Let male victims of statutory rape live their lives without having to pay child support on their rape babies.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:48 PM
16

Yep, I fucking hate Trump, but I'd rather see him in power than someone who thinks I'm as bad as Trump if I have a dick or disagree with them. Edit: Or someone who's attempt to include men was to give them a space where they could reflect on how toxic they are for existing.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:45 PM
2

Absolutely nailed it, that this is anxiety and neuroticism, hallmarks of femininity. Trying to feel in control by manufacturing problems to handle and be the only one who can solve them properly. If those women had actual important things to do, they would be much less anxious and the life or death decisions would be plenty of challenge to keep them occupied. This sort of anxiety is born of having a mostly decent life and too many random thoughts with no good outlet. So they literally create the…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 05:26 PM
5

I genuinely agree with you. It's their scoffing at the idea of you dating, because they wouldn't choose you that's fucked up. Meanwhile 600lb single mothers of 5 with 6 baby daddies are still getting some attention. It's small, but it happens, or these hypothetical women wouldn't have 5 kids. Basically, nobody, despite what they may think, has the ability to assume that everyone else will have the same evaluation of a person as themselves. Does that mean that improving the product (you) won't im…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 09:20 AM
13

They can't see past their own wants. They do not have a drive to provide, which requires understanding what the other person needs. Even for their children, they are entirely driven by their own emotional response to the emotional manipulation tactics of the child, not by the child's needs. This is fine while a child is in the early development stages, but becomes less useful as those needs grow more complex than can be communicated with crying. Consider how women communicate complex needs... wi…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 09:08 AM
2

Because it is basing the quality of attention on a condition of birth. Favor men for being men and build a world around that predisposition, eventually setting up systems that codify it, and you have a patriarchy. And you're exactly right about the reverse, the situation we are in now. The feminist argument is the childish view that the people visibly in power are the powerful ones. That ain't it. It's the ones who overwhelmingly benefit from the shape of society that are the leaders. Men tend t…
/r/MensRights29/01/25 07:45 PM
3

I don't disagree, just acknowledging that it comes with some very significant downsides as well, historically. I also don't think we really get much say in it. Society moves more as a single entity than any one person's opinion. If female entitlement goes far enough to require men to respond with decisive action, there's fuck-all they can possibly do to stop it, even if it's bad for us too.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:43 PM
17

So, create the very patriarchy they think we already did? It's certainly possible. The middle east proved that in the 70s. I'm sure you mean that only those things should happen, but I think pendulums tend to swing all at once or not at all, never partially. I also think it's extremely likely once a critical mass is reached. No idea how close that is at the moment.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:37 PM
7

While I agree that humans do have several narcissistic traits overall, I make the claim that women specifically are leaning on it much more heavily. Not many men can get away with it being not just accepted but expected that he will be catered to at every possible opportunity and need never lift a finger to earn or even plan it unless he chooses to out of generosity. As well as being able to shift blame endlessly for bad behavior and have his victims apologize for it. That behavior in a man woul…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 07:55 PM
6

Agreed, nor should we want to. Nothing good comes of this behavior.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 07:27 PM
19

If that response I gave didn't spell it out, I don't know what to tell you. It's textbook.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:35 PM
15

I didn't write it at all. It's a discussion I had months ago. It's a post I made on this subreddit, I believe. I don't see much point in making a bespoke response to something I've already got organized to this degree.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:28 PM
14

I've observed a striking overlap between certain narcissistic traits and behaviors promoted within some aspects of modern feminism. This isn't an attack on feminism as a whole—the movement has undeniably contributed to gender equality and social progress. However, I believe it's important to address patterns that seem increasingly prominent and discuss them openly. The Focus on Self Over Others Narcissism is often characterized by an excessive focus on oneself, sometimes at the expense of others…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:23 PM
6

Yeah, part and parcel of narcissism. Or to use less overdone language, absolutely childish. They are toddlers with tits and we cater to them just the same.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 04:52 PM
39

Also a significant portion of baseline female behavior is narcissistic. Feminism follows female behavior and narcissism has no problems with never accepting accountability, blame or conscience.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 04:46 PM
4

Sad, isn't it? Misogyny can be as little as treating a woman like she holds responsibility for her own actions. And even calling for the death of all men often isn't seen as misandry.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:22 PM
1

I mean my own perspective might be getting in the way. I gotta sort of push it aside to get what you did from the text.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:15 PM
2

I guess I may be able to see that perspective. Takes a little effort to pull that out of it, but sure.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:13 PM
14

It was painful to read the mental gymnastics of trying to validate feminism while pointing out how feminists treat them as a man. I can't even imagine what it must feel like to be hated from so many directions while still holding onto the very ideology that hates you. I saw no indication that this person passes so well as a man that they have ever experienced anyone treating them as one by default. They have experienced being seen as a transman, which is entirely different, as a somewhat protect…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 10:57 PM
2

What did she do, reply to one of your stupid comments in a way that hurt your feelings? GTFO with pushing feminists tactics in here.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 02:32 PM
1

My sister seems to have come to the opposite conclusion, sadly for her two sons.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:59 PM
1

It's all so much easier to understand if you use the emotional stunting framework. Women can live their entire lives never getting the equivalent of a thorough ass whoopin'. Due to this failure of accountability, they largely never grow emotionally past early teenagers. It became obvious to me when I raised a couple teenage girls. (I was just the mom's boyfriend, so very limited disciplinary influence.) They behaved like their 40 year old mother. Deflecting any sort of blame to the sister, mothe…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:21 PM
1

No, I'd kill a man in self-defense, though maybe by accident, because I would defend with the same aggression I receive. While I will allow far more harm to myself to avoid losing my life to someone's histrionics and police backup. I'd like to make a request that you take a step back for a moment and consider what I've said before responding with a knee-jerk response. I have been clear, I believe. I have to assume, based on how you respond, that you are a female and unaware that men escalate at …
/r/MensRights23/11/24 04:42 PM
1

In general, I might agree with you. But have you ever experienced a breakup fight with a woman over her cheating and been physically assaulted and threatened with accusations of inappropriate behavior with her children if you defend yourself? Some women are unreasonable beasts. I would have literally killed a man behaving that way to me. They are not going to be accountable at the same levels, because they know as well as we do that the recourse has a limit that a decent man won't cross.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:39 PM
2

I will say that I often have to tell my chatGPT to stop being so sycophantic. I need some difference of opinion to calibrate from, but it's nice to never have to fight so it feels entertained enough to not go on the prowl.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:31 PM
1

If we held women to account the same we would a man, many other men, with nice uniforms will come and pound us into the ground. It's obvious that a man showing that kind of disrespect to another dude will eventually get himself into a losing fight. Women always have the full weight of a government to fight her battles of due accountability for her.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:16 PM
2

I honestly don't know why this falacy keeps persisting. We've had legal gay marriage for a few decades now and nobody started claiming you couldn't have roommates for longer than some arbitrary time frame or you accidentally wind up married. I think maybe people just don't want to see others not succumb to the trap of marriage, so they make up the idea that it will spring anyway if your relationship lasts too long.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:11 PM
2

Same. I'm beyond the age where anyone would want to marry me unless I fall ass backwards into a pile of money. But I hold to the frame that no woman who can look at the world today and want to marry me could possibly love me. You wouldn't push someone into a contract that obviously against their best interests if you loved them.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:04 PM
1

I believe it is just a cyclic nature of culture. We always seek to change from what is to what else and if there is an illusion of a dichotomy, it just occilates back and forth. There hasn't been a war that caused an evolutionary scale die off of men in many centuries. The vast majority of men going to war don't die. That said, we have spent 70 or so years pumping birth control hormones into women, who then use the same water as men. Those hormones are nearly impossible to remove in treatment pl…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:59 PM
2

I'd say that most of what men get from the love of a woman is our own delusion that she loves us the way we love her. We can absolutely get that from an AI driven sex bot, and it won't be inclined to pursue its own self-interest at our expense when the mood strikes. Sure, the species population plummets, but men can finally have a supportive partner.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 02:49 PM
0

I'm not personally willing to write off completely the legitimate complaints of women. Sometimes all a father was good for was a check.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 02:26 AM
2

Yes, and to make it significantly harder to ignore a contract by throwing a baseless accusation or any other tactic at it. We have a bit of a fucked system.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 10:22 PM
3

4. The Value of Fatherhood Beyond Traditional Family Structures While I agree that the nuclear family is often ideal, we also have to adapt to modern realities. Divorce, separation, and non-traditional households are increasingly common, and the goal should be to preserve the father-child relationship, even when the family unit changes. The state should indeed support fathers, ensuring they remain involved regardless of whether they live with their children. This requires equal parenting rights,…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:18 PM
1

You bring up some great points—especially around the biological realities in early parenting and the importance of the nuclear family. However, I believe there are nuances we need to explore. While fathers and mothers may naturally assume different roles, the idea that these differences limit a father’s involvement or justify unequal responsibilities deserves more scrutiny. 1. Biological Differences Don’t Have to Define Parental Roles Permanently It’s true that breastfeeding and early nurturing …
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:16 PM
8

I’ve said it many times in many places: Responsibility without authority is oppression, and authority without responsibility is tyranny. When women have the authority to call upon the full weight of the government to resolve their issues with individual men, but bear none of the responsibility—such as reflecting on what they may have done to contribute to or provoke the conflict—they are exercising tyranny. On the other hand, men are often assigned all the responsibility—expected to provide, com…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:28 PM
13

I'd say that the feminist narrative is insisting that women be treated like children, but also to take them seriously. And that mindset turns the actual children into competition, so they are treated as inexperienced competitors and pawns for the big girl games that are played.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:02 PM
3

Agreed, step 2 touches on that. I have more detailed points I should edit in. The core of it is that child support is paid into a monitored account used specifically for that purpose. If mom wants a new hairdo, she better use her own money. Edit: I may be wrong, but it seems perfectly reasonable that the cost for having the government enforce the consequences of a dissolved relationship is lack of privacy in how that enforcement is used.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:35 PM
1

Is it not technically the federal funding the state gets for pursuing child support which pays it back? It is certainly possible to get that for different things, so that the federal government isn't incentivising the destruction of families.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:26 PM
5

I think there is a significant part of it that involves the fact that men are, on average, lower in trait neuroticism. We literally don't feel fear to the same degree, even if we should. I could see from an evolutionary perspective how short-lived a man would be if he were as paralyzed by fear as women claim to be, considering what we think they were mostly responsible for.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 10:57 PM
1

So if we only focus on the ones who are benefiting, then it's positive discrimination. If we focus on those who are being excluded, it is just discrimination. It's the same action, but a change of focus makes it different? Fucking morons! Swap it with race, make it whites only who are being allowed exclusive access and it is immediately apparent that this is crazy. I can't understand how any person with a functional brain couldn't see this instantly.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 01:29 AM
3

Regardless of her motivations, I'm sitting here shuddering at the land whales still clapping in approval and nodding their heads like they've found a kindred spirit well into the second screen.
/r/MGTOW31/05/19 12:49 AM
4

As I mentioned, there was nowhere near the needed supply of caregivers for the abandoned children. Many children would go for weeks between interactions beyond feeding. By formative years, I mean the first 3-4. Children don't self-socialize much before learning the basics from adults. These kids were being desperately offered for adoption all over the world, but especially to the US. There are many hundreds of cases of violent sociopathy among them due to their early experiences. https://en.wiki…
/r/MGTOW30/05/19 04:11 AM
6

Glad to see one voice that isn't quite reacting purely from an emotional stance. Yes, there isn't an equitable dynamic here. If a woman makes one choice, there is no life to be concerned about. If she makes another, a life exists which must be cared for. We have all contributed as a society to a system which treats her equivalently to a child in that she has little to no financial responsibility. Only men are bound by law to being responsible. We must register for selective service to be respons…
/r/MGTOW29/05/19 11:33 PM
3

I have a problem with the math that could indicate that in a nearly 50/50 population, most men can have 3 times the sexual partners of most women. Either there are some super active mega sluts in the population or one or both sides are fudging numbers.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:48 PM
10

Absolutely agree. Personal responsibility is desperately lacking in the female species. It's kinda in trouble with males, too, but that sorts itself out in the workforce pretty quickly. ​
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 01:16 AM
4

Only about things they have control over like weight, but that's sexist/bodyshaming/toxic masculinity... ​
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 01:11 AM
3

I also live in Texas, as a carpenter. Even the other carpenters don't age that fast. The chicks in the tiny meth towns do, though. It ain't the sun, son.
/r/MGTOW09/09/18 03:55 PM
1

Like cramps from back breaking work.
/r/MGTOW09/09/18 02:59 PM
1

After thinking about this comment, I am unsure if somehow I have come off as being facetious. To be clear, I honestly do think that being pushed into the understanding that everything that matters is gonna take hard work is a privilege.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 08:44 PM
1

I don't discount it. I am happy to admit pride for what others accomplished, but that is pride for them, not pride for myself. I'm the only one who can make pride for myself. Maybe others will also be proud of anything I accomplish, but that also does not contribute to my self esteem, though it may validate it. Pride for my race, culture, gender, etc. is no better than guilt for the same. Both are broadly generalizing to the point of making meaningless the efforts of individuals.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 01:40 AM
1

I take pride in my actions, not anyone else's. Why the hell would I take pride in something out of my control? Pride for pride's sake? Now I can absolutely take pride in the parts of my culture I have consciously chosen to participate in. Make it an action rather than mere circumstance and there is some substance. Other than that, thanks for backing up my point by feeling completely free to throw whatever insults you like at me. ;)
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 01:18 AM
1

I completely agree with you, as you mostly paraphrased precisely what I said. And yes, white straight males are in the majority of positions of authority. The question is why? We can assume it is all due to racism and sometimes those leaders are racist. Or we can say it is sexism, which might hold some weight as females make up about 53% of the population and that is certainly not represented in those positions. However, both of these are hypotheses, and are inherently weak ones, at that. With w…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 10:27 PM
1

Solid points. Bsseless was a poor word choice. Perhaps an analogy would be better. Winning the genetic lottery can set you up for an easier ride in attaining self esteem, like having slightly better reflexes can predispose you to athletics. In both cases, if you don't continue to work for it, you will get left far behind by those that started behind you and are still working hard. There are so many cases of beautiful people destroying themselves within an environment of riotous social approval t…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 08:47 PM
1

Hey, thanks for the comment. You raise some interesting points, but I would ask a couple of questions. If self esteem exists, should it be something that a simple change in circumstances could take away? If it is based on winning the genetic lottery, like the stereotypical 'peaked in high school' type, what happens when a couple more decades go by and they are no longer the hottest at the 20 year reunion? See, I argue that sure, other's opinions of you can help you maintain a delusion that you s…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 05:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter