TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ICEKAT Archive

View 2 posts and 263 comments by ICEKAT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Awareness is difficult for some my friend. They dont like to acknowledge truth.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 09:18 PM
-1

It does these guys are just conservative dicks.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 06:00 PM
-6

No. She isn't. She's saying insecure men are. And Miller is insecure about his height. On top of being a cruel little prick. As such he deserves mockery.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 05:59 PM
-7

That's not what that is.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 05:57 PM
-1

They constantly do?
/r/MensRights09/10/25 05:57 PM
-2

Holy fuck the insecurity here. My stepfather, my actual dad, not the biological waste that created me, dated a single mother. Best goddamn thing that happened to me and my sister. Then he gave us all 2 more sisters. Real men do real men shit. It isn't for the weak, though. This is not a men's rights issue. Its a weak ass issue.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 11:25 AM
1

Ecclesiastes 9:9-10 Numbers 31 Deuteronomy 20:14 Deuteronomy 22:28-29 Ephesians 5:23 This is casual searching. I could easily find more. The Bible does not have good treatment of women, and views them as property.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 02:55 PM
1

Where so what?
/r/MensRights01/07/25 09:54 PM
-1

Sure. Tell me what I am and am not. You clearly know me better than me. Go off king. You're clearly correct about the Bible too. And how buying and selling humans works. You also know how to save the world? Considering you know everything you might as well share.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 06:58 PM
0

Have you read the Bible? I'm a minister. I have. There are plenty of instances where women are bought, sold, taken as prizes. Literal property shit. But do tell me how the Bible is not bad to women. Go off.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 05:56 PM
1

You sure did. Good job.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 05:54 PM
1

This is a picture perfect false equivalence fallacy. Good job.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 05:01 PM
0

I did read myself. Glad you quit.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:24 PM
3

There are literal Bible verses about how to stone people to death for speaking gods name. And for being rude to your parents. And for having sex with the wrong person. Bruh.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:22 PM
0

Never said they're atheist, nor that there aren't Christians. You're putting words in some strawmouth. I said its not based on Christianity. Just because some of what Jesus said and what the left wants overlap doesn't make the basis Christian.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:16 PM
2

Lol a fair world is not derived from Christian tradition. That tradition who routinely stoned people to death for the crime of saying a name, and sold people into permanent slavery. The tradition of fully half the human population being property of the other half. The left is based in the greatest good for all. Not owning others.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:08 PM
2

Right. Its the non religious drinking the kool-aid. Sure thing. It absolutely is not. You're simply wrong.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:05 PM
4

Dumbass question. Have you read the Bible? Its pretty evident why feminists would hate a book all about women as property.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 08:06 PM
5

Lol. No it isn't.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 08:05 PM
1

Immediately lashing out with rage at anything that goes against your 'faith' yeah that don't sound like a cult.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 08:04 PM
4

For what? Defending his sovereign state? I agree the press gangs are terrible, and the draft should include women, but zelenskyys country was invaded by Russian aggressors, should he have just let the men be murdered? No defenses?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:24 PM
84

The women do nothing because they a)are afraid of the big strong military guys who jumped out of a black van and are able to fairly effortlessly carry a struggling big man, and what would happen to them(the women) if they interfered b) are indoctrinated into thinking all able-bodied men should go to war except the wealthy boys, and c) are likely mostly bystanders thinking "I'm glad that's not my man." There were two who tried and were pulled back by other women. Funny that, women claim to suppor…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 03:06 PM
308

A gang that presses you involuntarily into military service.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 03:01 PM
0

Who the hell cares?
/r/MensRights09/09/24 02:13 PM
2

Fuck does electing Kamala, the DA, have to do with this?
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:43 PM
2

No. She’s got 800 years plus life sentences. Eligible for parole in 350 years. Not 7.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:43 PM
20

Yes. They are. Of crimes against children, multiple times moreso
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:42 PM
2

Not important differences to them I would guess. The punishment for SA is damn near equivalent to rape in the UK, so altering the definition doesn't make much difference, legally speaking.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:33 PM
4

Precident. The law was established a long time ago as what it is. It is tough to change that now.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:56 AM
7

Sure colloquially we could and arguably should call it rape. But they're a news outlet. They cannot. They will be sued. Maybe the law in the Ukraine needs changed. But that's not the discussion here.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:09 AM
81

https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/rsa/rape-and-sexual-assault/what-is-rape-and-sexual-assault/
/r/MensRights07/05/24 10:12 PM
198

Except in Britain it isn't rape. Legally unfortunately they cannot use that word when it is done to boys or men unless a man did it to them.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 08:18 PM
17

Do 50% of women post nudes online? Hell no. Do a majority of women, who film themselves working out, in skimpy clothes, in a public gym, also post nudes for sale? Which btw is a very specific set of criteria. Yeah. That's likely. You are clearly the unhinged one here and it's showing.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 12:55 PM
2

It’s not zero sum. Like I said they sometimes harm men, they’re not opposed to that, but it’s not their main goal. They just want power. It’s relatively simple. White, middle-class, women who want more power in their hands, and if that means less for anyone else, so be it.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 08:02 PM
8

They do this for power. More power to women. Sure sometimes that means less power for men, but that’s ancillary to their goals most of the time.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 02:52 PM
2

What's with all the 'pretending' shit? It's equivalent to seeing a McDonald's on the way home, getting hungry and then having your partner give you a steak dinner. You ain't thinking of McDonalds at that point.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 06:07 PM
6

Bernardo
/r/MensRights30/06/23 01:20 PM
0

Nice false equivalence dickhead. You can't yell fire in a theatre without getting arrested. Because it might get people hurt. Some speech ain't free, and you know it. Same thing as telling someone directly to kill themselves. Especially if you know they are mentally ill. Good job on skipping past that part. Doesn't fit your macho dick narrative, eh?
/r/MensRights15/06/23 04:39 PM
1

And fuck you. Clearly you lack any kind of empathy, or understanding. Personal responsibility extends to her actions that caused this. You can't just choose to not be mentally ill, just like you can't choose to not have cancer.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 04:20 PM
4

Oh there it is. You're studying beginners psychology at college, eh? You think you know something because you read Jung. Who, by the way, is thought of as something of a quack to real psychologists. When you grow up, and look back on this in shame, I hope you truly understand why this is shameful. Why you are seen as weak, and nonsensical. Mostly though I just hope you grow up. And have the chance to look back on this in shame.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 12:58 AM
8

Oh fuck right off with that machismo bullshit. One can absolutely be driven to a great many things. Suicide not the least of which. One, in a poor mental state, can be caused to do nearly anything, and the driver should be treated as if they caused it. As they did.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 12:55 AM
1

Stop reading fox 'news'
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:24 PM
4

As they were before. Don't think the finess requirements were there just because.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 06:30 PM
1

Yessss little weakling.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:03 AM
-7

Yes, controlling her future. If he isn't child free she should behave as if he isn't.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 01:58 AM
-14

You are choosing not to get snipped, they choose not to fuck you. Your body is your choice.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 01:55 AM
3

Yes, that was the joke...
/r/MensRights21/11/21 10:50 PM
0

Necessary to be considered people.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 02:58 PM
8

Raise your eyebrows and simply state 'ad hominem? I guess you're got nothing else, then.' And then walk away.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:05 PM
2

Ah, I see. Troll. Well done.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 12:29 PM
21

He was raped. And you think that means he has obligations to a product of said rape. And you wonder why people call you disgusting.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 11:50 AM
5

Well said
/r/MensRights18/02/21 10:25 PM
22

Not to mention disempowering. You'd figure instead of making them terrified, they'd show them how to defend against the chance this happens. Like how they teach us to lock doors as kids.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 08:59 PM
154

To all the 'it's faked' comments, How does that make the situation better/more forgivable? If anything, the fact that entire crews of people thought this would be funny is so much worse.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 08:12 PM
28

I've been pulled over for walking. 3 times, in multiple cities. It's ridiculous that a male cannot walk around at night without being a suspect to... nothing.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 12:13 AM
-18

Consider, Half the time, on this sub, such things are posted to point out how 'cuck' some men have gotten.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 10:20 PM
88

Tough to read sarcasm. Tones are notoriously difficult in print, without being specifically pointed out.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 08:21 PM
4

Good. Maybe they'll learn.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 06:52 PM
2

This is the issue with this report. Was he 13 or was he 10?
/r/MensRights04/03/20 07:02 PM
189

Has been her whole career.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 04:25 PM
57

Why isn't he pushing charges? Because she has a vagina.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 03:21 PM
-1

This has literally nothing to do with feminism, nor men's rights. If you mock disabled people, as a public figure, you deserve to have your life ruined. It's rather simple. Not ruining a public figure who mocks the disabled tells the world that the disabled are less than us, they deserve mockery and derision. If we do not defend the weakest among us, we are no better than, in fact are worse to each other than, the animals we claim to be better than.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:17 PM
0

Yeah, no. When their entire job is about being a face of something, and they mock the disabled, they deserve to have their lives destroyed.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:48 PM
1

That might be true, but when does the bible stop Christians from making things that aren't Christian, into Christian things? Read what kabar said below. Protestant septs, and portions of American Catholics believe it is, hence it's Christian.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:31 PM
3

They're very very misinformed about their religion on a nearly daily basis, why would this be any different?
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:29 PM
-18

And Christian.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 11:34 PM
3

Lifescript. It's assumed.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:58 PM
2

I get the first one. Men do use aggressive body language, and being aware of it can help in certain social situations. Not just towards women though. The other two are so batshit crazy that it completely negates anything the first points out.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 07:29 PM
15

Not just modern per se. George Carlin said it, 'these are white, middle class, well-to-do, women. They could not give a shit about black womens problems, they don't care about Chinese women's problems, they're only concerned with their own reproductive freedoms, and their pocketbooks.'
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:41 PM
10

My point is, it's already socially unacceptable to 'be male'
/r/MensRights10/07/19 05:08 PM
11

Heard of 'toxic masculinity?'
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:18 PM
3

Almost like humans who are abused have a problem understanding abuse in their futures. Like it wasn't a gendered issue or something.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 05:42 PM
2

More are men than claim to be Muslim? Are the two exclusive now? Weren't 100% of them men? Is there any logic here?
/r/MensRights29/06/19 05:37 PM
-2

The fathers with daughters tend more often to be willing to demonize men.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:51 PM
-7

Unfortunately too often true.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 10:33 AM
6

When you're a feminist they let you do it.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:26 PM
22

FaLsE aCcUsAtIoNs ArE tOtAlLy RaRe ThOuGh!!),!!
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:28 PM
1

Firstly, this comment came first. Second nuance is a thing. Thirdly how am I saying the opposite here?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:00 AM
-5

He is because he raised them. He may not be their father, but he has raised them. Factually, as far as the kids are concerned that man is their dad. The blood father is just a stranger.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 07:54 PM
-3

Except he's pit his effort into raising them already. Yeah it's some shit to find out they aren't actually his, but he is responsible for them because he's their dad. Any loser can put sperm in a woman, it's a dad who raises the kids.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 07:53 PM
-12

I just mean, if he leaves, and they're young enough, what court in the world is going to give him custody? He's not the mother, which is strike 1 and 2 in most courts, and he's not biologically the father, which would somehow be strike 3 on him. Not on her. It's a garbage situation for him.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 04:04 PM
-23

He's possibly a victim here too, not being allowed to raise his own.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 04:02 PM
-37

I don't blame him for wanting out, but I get that it's not the kids fault. He IS their dad as far as they're concerned. Leave the bitch? Yeah, but abandon the kids? That's cold on them when they didn't do anything wrong EDIT: especially in the clutches of an obviously hugely selfish woman.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:07 PM
0

Could have just said support.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 01:51 PM
1

Love how they post her 'beforehand' pic like it's showing how she could look enticing. Just gross.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 12:13 AM
1

Oh. Yep. Yeah. Ya got me bud.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 06:42 PM
1

Ironic you calling anyone retarded, it's pretty clear someone cannot be 6 years old for a decade. That would be the starting point of the abuse.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 08:53 AM
3

Yeah... white knight.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 02:49 PM
1

Get a better woman. My wife and girlfriend both are accepting of my comments of hot women. Don't let that attitude slide like it's OK. Girls like that will never grow up if they keep getting treated like gold while being trash.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 11:28 PM
3

And yet if you try to discuss with feminists how this happens,somehow it will be framed as toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 04:40 PM
2

Good bot.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:29 PM
19

Plus luck. You're not likely to be a major hockey star being born in farmtown zimbabwe.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 07:36 PM
3

Still, with all the bitching about how oppressive catcalling is, and they want us to act like animals that literally only call?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 10:38 PM
2

I can see loch Lomond through your kilt there chap.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:02 PM
8

Feminism. Trying to abolish rude people by blaming men for rude people existing.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:11 PM
5

That's the real rape culture. Teach people that rape is an accepted thing despite all proof. Treat all sexual encounters as assault unless express enthusiastic consent is given before, during, after, and continually, until death. Make everything in courting so treacherous nobody wants to attempt the journey.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:36 PM
2

A clinical psychologist vs a life coach... yeah, that's equivalent. I'm also not saying her talk needs to be shut down. I'm pointing out that the concept that men are just dumb animals to be controlled is a teaching point. This is completely wrong in so many ways.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:51 PM
2

Seriously? Paraphrasing here but "men are producers, all they want out of life is to produce for women." Sure, cuz thats EVERYTHING a man could ask for... "but women can produce faster, more efficiently, and can do multiple things at once." so not only are men simply, but they suck at even that comparatively. Totally agreeable there right? /s This nut is calling men nothing better than production beasts, similar to dogs. Saying that men are simple little creatures that only think in "black and w…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:49 PM
8

Except that argument doesn't work when the same people using 'man splain' are trying, and succeeding at, getting terms like 'policeman', and 'man mare's turned into neutral terms like 'police officer', and 'human made'
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:04 PM
7

Unfortunately impossible in Britain. Only men can rape.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 02:33 PM
1

Thank you for your work.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:27 AM
6

You misspelled 'even if'
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:59 AM
2

I'll bring the doughnuts.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:24 PM
28

Joke or not, it's kinda true, the sub in the relationship is generally in control. I upvoted for truth, and comedy.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:33 PM
5

Whereas you may be right, perhaps they should have chosen someone who is not a convicted murderer/rapist to speak against perceived murderer/rapists. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:01 PM
2

Leave the obvious psycho, is my advice.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 04:50 PM
1

Not entirely true. I've had enough interactions with many hr departments. They tend to employ the same type person, someone who will pretend to be a friend, and the report everything, even that which is supposed to be anonymous, to department heads, or just supervisors. Seen a lot of people have to suffer because of it. Sometimes you get lucky, like I do, and you seem to have. But more often than not, you don't.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 11:21 AM
2

We already do. In fact we punish rape severely, and use it as threats against going to prison ie. 'I hope 'bubba' gets his hands on -criminal-' people somehow seem to forget that we already teach that rape is bad.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:42 AM
14

I would definitely die if Rhonda rousey hit me like that.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 03:40 PM
2

They are exactly the same thing. The person with more money can have people do whatever they want. Power is about being able to control others, and nothing does that like money.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 01:59 PM
3

Yup, that's the way to 'beat gender bias' be genderr biased.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 12:34 PM
1

about the only way. That or 'become female'
/r/MensRights29/10/16 04:15 AM
1

both of these won't save you if they want to ruin you.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 04:24 AM
1

wellp, thats my mistake then.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:07 PM
8

They seem to have chosen.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 01:16 PM
4

and if i'm not mistaken, is celebrated in doing so.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 01:15 PM
3

I am sorry this happened to your boy. PLEASE spread the story as best you can. Help protect the other boys who will put themselves in this position, and don't know any better. It has happened too many times.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:18 PM
1

This may be true, but was the man not still vilified by culture of public opinion? Also I never said he would be convicted, just that there is still that chance, and there is. Its the sad truth of today.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:50 PM
1

you are rather correct. This sort of garbage should be held up as proof that men and women are obviously not equal and therefore should be treated as different. but the feministas will be claiming women are better at men at all the positives and not worse at the negatives.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 11:47 PM
3

and what exactly would that do? even with recordings and affidavits the man is STILL going to be a public pariah, maybe even moreso as the recordings make him 'creepy', or 'perverted'. He may still even be convicted if the judge is at ALL sexist.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 11:39 PM
0

I don't believe the parents should have no say in the raising of the children, but that two people alone do not a healthy adult make.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:18 PM
1

The two parent thing mostly came about in the 80s. Previous to that grandparents, neighbours, and teachers had more freedom to actually teach children moral codes beyond that of only their parents. Thus far the two parent mode has raised a generation of special snowflakes who can barely get by on their own. If we went to a mode where there was a nurturer parent, a discipline parent and community of observant adults, with the authority, and willingness to report misdeeds to said parents, we've se…
/r/MensRights22/04/16 08:16 PM
-16

My only response is that a two parent family has demonstrably produced weak people. Community raising is the way to go.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:36 PM
7

bodies comittment sperm FTFY
/r/MensRights04/02/15 02:18 PM
2

'called to a fight in progress' There was no fight! there was an aggressive beating, but because they were women it's called an equal match?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:15 PM
5

I love intelligent people. :)
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:37 PM
3

I'm bringing back the cloak. Been wearing one for years now.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:45 PM
5

Check out /r/TumblrInAction
/r/MensRights22/04/14 02:06 PM
2

Kid's a douche. Why is this an example of mens rights? Maybe, if genders were reversed, a girl would get less punishment, but this is a shit way to show it.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 02:28 PM
3

in part, thanks to the WBC, too.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:06 PM
1

I agree with your assesment, but what I'm seeing is a disconnect between viewpoints. I see society as communist already. All these interconnected little groups where individuals can flow freely from one to another. Simple example, the groups are molecules, and individuals are electrons. Individuals decide which groups suit their needs best, and they flock to them and work, like bees, to accomplish tasks a single couldn't do alone. I see the larger society as a whole as a problematic view, and wh…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:55 PM
1

In what way does it not work? It evidently works! Its the system that has had the most affect on our progress in the last 200 years It works if you see the fact that it has been the model we've been using during our progression, as proof of its usefulness yes. But it has caused disparity between peoples on a massive scale. It doesn't progress humanity to horde things for one small group of people, and that small group getting the best of everything. The larger society is made of smaller groups, …
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:34 PM
13

I don't know why they need special everything just to study it.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 07:04 PM
1

Capitalism doesn't work, and humans naturally form small cohesive groups who help each other and push technology and group interests forward. You're right about the 'too big' being relevant. Partly why I dislike the idea of countries in general, unless they're the size of morocco or cuba or some such. I don't see tribalism, or communism as part of a hindrance to progress. I see bureaucracy as that hindrance, which only shows up after something becomes too big. I think sharing of technology betwe…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:50 PM
1

I have no idea what "The Venus Project" is, but I will research it. The thing is, moving forward in communes is possible. You can compete and grow, while maintaining a supported environment. All of the best workplaces operate on a communal ideal, and they push the technology forward. the only time issues arrive is when things get too big. Like we've both said, humanity can't comprehend large scale groups. Things need to be efficient, which includes paring of bad branches of the group and only al…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:19 PM
1

I'm pretty hippie minded. Hence my continued conversation here.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 06:02 PM
1

That's not even close to the same thing. You'd make godwin happy though. Also the fear of communism is ridiculous. As governments go it's just another phrase for assholes to gain power over people. Like capitalism. As a social structure within small groups of people I've seen it work, and work wonders. I'm guessing you're american. furthermore have a problem with the 'reds'. It might surprise you to know I hate all the communist dictatorships that have ever existed. I pretty much hate all forms …
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:14 PM
1

How are they not? being from a small group of people is how we live as it stands, and all we do is trade with other small groups for all the things we want.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:14 PM
0

Yes I am. Glad you noticed. Also communes. Thus commun-ism. Governing large amounts of people doesn't work. We as a species are still too immature, but I'm not getting into that.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:49 PM
1

Aye, it do.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:38 PM
2

no apology necessary, everyone has bias. mine is here. I challenge it constantly.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:25 PM
1

Never said I liked PC bullshit. I think it's fucking stupid, after a point.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:24 PM
2

It's incompatible in large scale, but it works on the microscale. Less than 30 people. It's been tried properly in large scale, but people just don't care about the faceless. Communism only works if you care about everyone involved.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:22 PM
11

Yes the leftist governments do censor shit, but I've seen a lot more from the right, in normal life, than the left. Leftists bitch and moan about "non-PC" bullshit, but they don't seem to censor it much. Might be my own bias though.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:56 PM
5

You do realize that communism is freedom, right? freedom from being governed by faceless nobodies. governmental communism is an oxymoron, and not something I believe in at all. How can you not believe that I exist? It's been what I've seen from right wing nuts all my life. Admittedly, leftist idiots are also at fault for censorship, but the biggest ones currently are shit like the church, and fox news. Right wing nuts.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:54 PM
0

This is a good point.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:19 PM
51

I agree with most of this, but I'm pretty damn liberal, almost to the point of communist. I don't appreciate being lumped with SJW thought police assholes. I've always believed that the restricted thought/speech came from the right wing nuts.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:58 PM
3

The system everywhere is fucked, and I play it when I can, cuz you can be damn sure it'll play me if it can. I have no issues with sluts, and the article makes no mention of her stances on men, so I can't just extrapolate from nothing. Don't lets be rabid haters of random people, but haters of a screwed system that got them their unfair privilege. Lets try to improve from that, possibly take away the ability to be a mooch, that she's gotten, because she owns a uterus.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:36 PM
6

Why should I hate her? What has she done to deserve it? The feminists I do hate, and I want the laws changed, but I don't hate someone taking every advantage they can get.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:28 PM
3

I'll agree that this is a ridiculous privilege, but I won't hate the mother for it, because it's the damned laws that made it easy for her to do it. Seriously, If I were given a house, and 1800 a month for nothing, I'd do the same. I'd probably be building a business on the side to eventually supplement the income, or make much more, whichever worked, but I wouldn't go out of my way to work for a living.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:58 PM
1

Yes, it is true that researching one could improve another, but my point is that there are far more beneficial causes to put time and effort towards. Regrowing foreskin seems almost wasteful compared to putting effort into regrowing ears, or fingertips, or repairing/regrowing scarred skin.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:03 PM
1

I appreciate that, to some, losing your foreskin is a very important issue. I realize it's genital mutilation, and that it's terrible. However. Can we not co-opt vital disease fighting research to help with the image of our penises? Maybe when this type of medical study is accepted everywhere, and has successfully beaten, or brought to an 80% survival rate, cancers, strokes, heart attacks, and other conditions, we could turn it to foreskin replacement. By that time, hopefully no one circumcises …
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:20 PM
1

Yeah, he does. But his income, as it were, is the kind of income that the ultrarich have, it's not official income or somesuch, I'm no accountant. Point is, his taxable income, and the income of those in his class, is less than the average server and would be of no benefit.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 08:23 PM
6

His wage is probably 0 or so. His worth is not wages.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:31 PM
6

I do like this Diana Davidson. Got her head on straight.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:13 PM
3

I was mostly using their own hyperbole of "equivalent to burqas", The entire discussion is past ridiculous, but it still is news.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:00 PM
3

Do they want prepubescent girls to wander around nude? Is that where they want this to go? What are they advocating for? The school wants the girls to have a little fucking dignity, and decorum. The SJW harpies want them to... what? Do as they please? These are CHILDREN. God how hard is it to fucking get?
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:50 PM
3

Not only is this an editorialized headline, it is extremely difficult to believe anything to do with politicians. Especially when the law is concerned.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:43 PM
1

Like I said, if it is accepted. It currently isn't for women, but is for men. It should be one way or the other.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 12:03 PM
1

I did not mean to imply you were fear mongering, apologies if it came across that way. I meant the fear mongering by the media and social structure. As for the dogs, the point is not if they acted that way, it is THAT they act that way. They don't seem as threatening, but they should, because they are, equally, in a different way. It should all be equal, as all interactions should be. The differences should be between body sizes not genders. If you're a bigger silhouette they you may seem more i…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 06:51 PM
8

It is a bit different for women because of the harpy-screech that "all random strangermen are gonna rape/murder you, and you're too weak to stop it." A random grab ass, if it is accepted by society, is no more threatening than a high five. I think the fear mongering is doing the most harm, especially because you can make statements like that in this kind of forum and be agreed with. The dog analogy is alright, but still skewed, as little dogs cause more damage being more aggressive.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 06:27 PM
1

I want to know what testosterone poisoning is.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 09:19 PM
4

The issue with these statements and the bias against men is, what do we do about it? in a place where speaking out against it gets you shouted down, and being ignored, or worse, told to "Man Up" about it. What do we do?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:06 PM
3

How do we frontpage this?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:19 PM
10

Why is this news? This should be filed under the "No shit" category. EVERYONE is judged on appearance. It's an evolutionary trait.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 08:33 PM
1

Contacting a lawyer, researching ways of being anon for a while. Finding areas where the idea would be accepted to start.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:27 PM
1

The only reasoning is legalities. I know what i can do in canada. I don't know what to do globally.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:57 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:38 PM
1

Fair enough, it apparently was not important to their cause. However I personally know of bra burning, literally, that did happen. It just got no media coverage. source: My mother in college. Anecdotal I know, but to say a thing never ever happened, is to know that it never happened, ever, for their cause, and it did. If it happened in my mothers college, it happened other places, I'd wager.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:26 PM
5

yes, but that's one statement of many, and the others are not so egalitarian. also, bra-burning never happened? Being that dismissive of something that was important to the movement speaks of someone who doesn't know what they are talking about.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:08 PM
8

I'm beginning to see this more and more, and am very scared. I'm learning japanese and swedish so I have choices when the empire collapses.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:55 PM
-2

Obviously rapists aren't, and there are a surprising amount of redneck assholes who actually believe that the type of dress is a reason for rape, but the rest of us, yeah, we are, but to the feminist dialogue, most people, and the law aren't. In any case, what do we do about the lunatics who are harpy-screeching, and derailing real education, and progress?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:45 PM
1

Best of luck. Lawyer up can't be said enough.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:41 PM
1

I'll look into starting one in ontario. I look forward to the hatemail.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:39 PM
3

You expected something called rapecrisis.org to be unbiased?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:47 PM
9

I was actually raised like this. It took me until I was 25, abused, and dropped the second my money wasn't good enough to unlearn many of these things. I still struggle with some issues caused from this kind of bullshit raising. Some of these are decent, but the entire idea is destructive to a male psyche.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:47 PM
4

Sickening
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:40 AM
1

like pulling over an african american (if you are a white cop in, lets say mississippi/georgia) because you just "had a feeling". doesn't make it not wrong though.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:27 AM
9

and if he was? it's a ridiculous excuse.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:27 AM
1

Yeah, however the confidence to do so isn't really there until mid twenties, for the most part.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:16 PM
5

Age of consent is not age of adulthood. Small distinction but its important in canada. still stupid though.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:43 PM
2

same, but in some places it gets pretty claustrophobic.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:39 PM
0

Yet they are the ones who profess to be a part of that enclave. You can't just have only the good parts of a label, if you wish to be labeled, you take on all of what it means.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:38 PM
1

You haven't had a very long relationship yet, have you? I wonder this because through all of mine, whether friend or more, you learn much about someone and their character 5 even 10 years into a relationship. On top of that is the fact that no one ever truly knows another. I know a lot about my ex, who was this type of woman, and can probably tell you, even years later, how she sees certain things, as I spent almost 10 years with her. In those years though, I 'knew' she'd never pull the 'I'll pu…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:46 PM
1

hmmm, i see.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:10 AM
1

If it's not legal it's inadmissible as evidence.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:15 AM
4

The problem with that, is that the driven women with good careers know they can win any legal battle, and will do this. It really doesn't matter the position of the woman in question, because if she is morally bereft enough, the man will suffer. There is really no easy solution.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:12 AM
2

Yeah the free breakfasts were wonderful. Even the fringe can do well, I was more referring to the focus on militancy.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:12 PM
1

indeed.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:53 PM
2

Wish i could upvote twice, and three times for the username
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:17 PM
1

Sad part is I see middle aged females sharing this with captions like "Lolz! So Tru"
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:14 PM
3

Pretty normal for activists though. Feminists have their SRS knobs, Black activists had (have?) the black panthers, Muslims have jihadists, etc.. There's always a lunatic fringe that makes life harder for the cause they're supposed to support, and everyone in general. It's kinda sad, but telling about humanity.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:24 AM
3

I went there and wound up upvoting most of the posts... maybe thats just me.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:05 PM
3

It's an unfortunate truth that's getting worked out of society.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:56 PM
3

right, forgot that detail. Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:29 PM
2

They have a government lobby, funded well from their movements. Which one is ours again?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:57 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:24 AM
2

fair.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:24 AM
3

This is so gods-be-damned stupid. How can we be progressive? Seriously, how? If we try the peaceful route, like speakers and education, we het torn apart. If we try the non-peaceful route we're monsters. What do we do? The Ghandi approach?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:30 PM
7

Thats part of the point, i think. They don't consider that to be 'Sex' So it therefore cannot be rape. No penetration by a penis.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:27 PM
5

Because a snow penis is pro-rape. Simple connection. Every artistic statue of the male form is now pro-rape, according to these feminists.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:24 PM
7

There are quite a few (purportedly) female submitters though.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:22 PM
3

This is funny as hell as a troll post, but otherwise useless and offensive. I suggest a removal of this post.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:08 PM
1

Indeed. I hope that the MRM can derail those annoying idiots through conversations with the rational feminists like OP.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:10 AM
1

As a societal thing, it's not a desirible position for anyone. As a social movement thing, if feminists are going to try to work some affirmative action into getting more women into respected positions, they should really do the same for their lower class counterparts. Sure, seeing a female firefighter is great, or female exec. But what about that female construction worker? Why doesn't she matter to the movement? The coal miner? In answer I point you to a man far smarter than I, George Carlin. …
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:08 AM
2

until he gets seen on a date with a woman. Then he's a liar, as well as a child molester.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:49 PM
1

I think the problem is not that feminists don't want men to do them, It's that they don't push for more women in those fields, like they advocate for more women in CEO positions.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:44 PM
1

The more of your comments I read, the more I like you. In any case I'd have to agree that it's cultural, and that in japan it's probably a concern, just not nearly as big a concern as here.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:42 PM
15

on and on that argument goes, women of all ages dressing in a provocative way, and then complaining when people (esp. men) notice. I'll never understand. When I work outdoors in just my shorts (or just sweatpants in the winter (what? i like the feel of snow on my back)) I expect notice and ridicule. It's part of being partly naked in north america.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:32 PM
1

both.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:29 PM
1

Obviously not. That would be childish and dumb. In fact that's why I used that term to define some people, the ones that are childish and dumb.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:43 PM
1

And you might be right. The feminism I lived definately was misandrist, but I'll hold out hope that the idea of equality isn't lost among feminists and we can find common ground. But thats just me trying to be a positive person in that respect, and I may be proven the fool.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:41 PM
1

You misunderstand what I mean by butthurt. Someone makes a mistake, say they lose their job, and it's their fault; they pay the consequence, such as being looked down upon and expected to get a new job, no matter the pay or social level, then bitch about misandry, thats butthurt. Contrary-wise being genuinely misongyst is also butthurt whining. Your statement is full of legitimate concerns, and your way of talking is fair, thus you obviously are neither, what I would call a real MRA, not just he…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:37 PM
0

^ observe what I mean.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:31 AM
1

You wrote because I am lazy. A fair point made. Also in regards to idiology, though it is my personal belief that feminism isn't misandric, but used for misandric purposes. Much like basic christian tenets are kind, it's the institutional churches that are (mostly) bad. I think that the basic idea is that MRA and Feminism, in their basest forms, are just a way of promoting opposing gender issues with the hope that equality is the outcome. As you said earlier, the new order feminism isn't siding …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:59 PM
-3

I appreciate that wall you put up. I'm far too lazy to go to such extremes. If i understand correctly, your statement is similar to mine, leaving out the point I make that there -are- trolls, and those with bad experiences, who should be ignored in favour of intelligent discourse. During my discussions in this sub I've seen a number. I like how you stylize me as white knight, however untrue your accusation. I'm being kind to a feminist who wants information, and attempting to be welcoming, as I …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:55 PM
-3

Depends on your reasoning really. Feminism as a whole isn't great, but it does have peoples rights in mind. Womens, for sure, but women are people. If we could reconcile the idiocies of the extreme sections of feminism and MRA we'd have bliss, yes? Sadly people are extremists. You are an individual, and I know not your causes, so I can't say if you're 'butthurt' or sensible, to be honest.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:04 PM
-24

Please understand that this sub has a lot of butthurt men, who have had bad experiences and now a bad outlook on feminism and women in general. These are our crazies, and we don't really support their hate-speech. The real MRAs are clear, and generally polite. We try to promote male issues, and provide a place for men to come for information and help. Thanks for asking, and glad you could bring your civil point of view.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:35 PM
2

hahahahaha
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:59 PM
3

My lord the politeness and respect in these posts is inspiring. This is why I'm in this sub. Thank you all.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:52 PM
1

because reading tone is ever so simple on the interwebs, right?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:41 AM
6

A fair point. Upon closer inspection (read i leaned closer to my monitor) The hands, style of shirt (wifebeater), eye, and brow, make me think male. However without actual confirmation from said person, We'll never know for sure.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:31 PM
-10

hmmm maybe. Seems like feminist propeganda to me, though. I've believed enough of it in the past.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:41 PM
3

So, why does the man in the picture need feminism?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:25 PM
2

This. It set my dad up pretty well for being stern with his claim.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 03:17 AM
8

whoa... thats just not right.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:50 PM
0

Any news report that has him as an "alleged" rapist.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:57 AM
2

Just as bad, yes. Worse, I'd say no.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:13 PM
2

it is valid, but lest we forget, men get raped too. Don't demean something that is hugely traumatising to all people, both physically, mentally and emotionally. I'd argue that the worst one can do to someone is rape them.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:48 PM
1

Therefore all men should already be in jail for rape. If that is all the proof needed, then it's just been proven that we've all raped dozens of women. By the time we're in our teens, no less. And, hey, as an added bonus, there are plenty of witnesses that can say they've seen men in proximity to women every day! Huzzah!
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:43 PM
1

Or if they look up his name in the interwebs.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:40 PM
2

Single Example - Priests
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:11 AM
10

This is some of the most ridiculus shit I've seen. Bitching that neutality and equality are undermining the 16 days of women campaign, and blatantly stating that men can't be sympathetic, and helpful, to the cause of a hurt woman. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:31 PM
4

Evidence is writing is evidence. Get as much as you can written and dated.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:52 PM
1

heres one to the opposite
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:15 AM
1

Until women stop assuming that all men are (by default) rapists, men will avoid putting themselves in an arena which opens them up to false accusations. s'not just women. I've know MR kinda guys who think that. The mindset behind why they think that way kinda scares me.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:44 PM
0

I'm wondering about logistics.... How did you have sex that drunk? I can barely pee, when that drunk, let alone get hard. You understand that you made a decision to have the sex, and are bothered because you were impared and she made crap judgement. Time to work out your friend issues then. Get her to replay what happened, see if you can get friends to witness, and make sure to let her know that you don't want anything like that Ever again. Even when drunk as a skunk. We all make mistakes, We ha…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:14 PM
1

And while we're at it, explain than men need men to properly complain to. A forum for the pain, if you will, and that those "Venting Men" aren't representative, just like the feminist movement wants people to believe the "Raving Women" aren't representative of their cause. The problem with this is calm discourse seldom gets things done, whereas passionate and driven people, The likes of "Ranting Women" and "Venting Men" do get things done, Which is why politics is full of bawling babies... They …
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:02 PM
0

you can if that side has someone watching it.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:58 PM
1

Thankfully I have no need to worry about that. Should all the way.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:06 PM
2

You must be in a nice bubble then, because I personally know some of those extremists. Though I'm gald to say it's in a declining amount.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:43 PM
1

Why is this downvoted, it's funny as crap.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:38 PM
0

You are both awesome people. Glad you are digging through the mire of those like OThomson for the intelligent posts.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:26 PM
1

And should!
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:18 PM
22

If he did commit rape, I hope they not only expel him, but he burns and twists in the wind of justice. possibly followed with years behind bars. That being said, making a regrettable drunken decision on the part of either, or both, parties shouldn't be considered rape. It degrades real rape victims. Which this sounds like. In that case, the woman should be made to twist for bringing false accusations upon this man, libel and slander charges, and so forth. The amount of fear these administrators …
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:58 PM
3

being over 30 is cool straightens bowtie
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:52 PM
1

Oh, and thanks. I do try to be civil, especially on important things. and I'd like to add my thanks for the civility used in this thread, from those such as sibqm_lmvm.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:19 AM
1

The consequence of frusteration doesn't necissarily exist. It doesn't in me, nor in any of the men I personally know, who have had it. As for 'may' and 'almost as likely' These points are the same with quite a number of things while raising children. As a parent it is your task to decide how the child should grow, and under which cirumstances. If, as in my case, you believe somethings good output to outweigh the possible bad, you are under obligation as a parent to make sure it gets done. Much l…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 11:17 AM
4

I've been through this site quite in depth. I've see 3, at most, cases of male privilege, it does happen. However this blog is a huge whine fest about things that both genders face written with just the right slant to make it seem like men are not having to deal with this. It's preposterous.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:54 PM
1

It's your decision to make, and I fully support your choice, as I said, I agree in that way. Aesthetics shouldn't be a part of the deciding process.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:08 PM
-3

I've argued with my Fiancee, and past women, to have it done to my sons, should I have any. The argument you bring is sound, and I'll agree semantics wise, however I know how boys in general are, and I know my own habits. Mingle the two and foreskin will be a problem for any sons of mine. I know of many men who have had to have it removed in later years who were much more traumatized than I can ever claim to be. I don't remember it, It never hurt me, and in fact, I've benefitted from not needing…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:23 PM
2

Agreed. Even restraining them properly would be cause for an assult charge.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:44 PM
2

Didn't think of that angle. Mostly because I despise CS as a beaurocracy run by theives. Money to your children? I'm all for, however, too often is CS misappropriated.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:40 PM
2

One expression of sin which is seen throughout Scripture and human history is the pervasive male domination of and violence against women. According to Scripture, Violence against women is not sinful. His ultimate act of liberation was his sinless life, substitutionary death, and victorious resurrection, which set his people free from slavery to sin and death. Since his people are still enslaved, and commit sin, and die, obviously it's not working. In short ex_nihilo is right, but those are quic…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:31 PM
9

Counsellor at a school? Are you serious? That is not going to do him any good if that school is anything like the ones I know about. Those counsellors can't deal with something like this, and will probably try to blame-shift. I suggest, lacking dad, he find a mens shelter type deal, something with males who can understand and help, and call them. Find a Mens health website, or anything else. Call, e-mail, and generally communicate with them as much as he can. That being said, one can't snap over…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:06 PM
3

first, Rat* race. Second, PartTimeBadman has it right. Dangerous women get the children because they are the mother. That is all. For some reason, the courts don't take much else into consideration. Personally I'd rather see the rights of the child taken, over the rights of the mother, but even THAT has little credence in court. it is disgusting.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:54 PM
1

no one said "poor white man." Have we had the same horrible treatment as everyone else? no. I never said we did. Just that we were profiled, like everyone else is. Which we are... it's pretty simple really. My statement is that we should all stand for -non profiling in general-, which you seem to have overlooked in your knee-jerk reaction to my first line. Cheers though for being our Saviour. As white men, we definately need one. /s
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:08 PM
-1

If the man "doesn't react fast enough" it is considered rape by a whole lot more than just feminists. No, that's pretty much just feminists. If there were a defined time, or term, instead of "fast enough" (which for some ungodly reason, that amount of ambiguity is admissable) then we'd have a wider array of agreements. I've been in that situation, Half-asleep at the time, having just been woken by my Then fiancee. Being groggy I couldn't understand being woken for sex, and then being pushed away…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 01:02 PM
1

As much as this is a joke, It is true that white males get profiled just as bad as everybody else, but it's acceptable because a)they get certain benefits because of being white males, and b)the profiling from backwards white men from past generations makes it ok to disrupt the current generation. I think the more proper form of statement would be for white males to stand up, and say "I'm sick of profiling in general." It harms/hampers everyone.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:52 PM
1

I wear a giant blue cloak, and chainmaille shirts, does that count?
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:30 PM
5

Yep. As rare as a barbed wire tattoo. Wonderful how such distinguishing marks are enough.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:19 PM
12

More restraint than I would have shown. Kudos.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:14 PM
2

an obvious statement, but still, it's not only in the UK this happens. a damn shame.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter