TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ICantReadThis Archive

View 9 posts and 202 comments by ICantReadThis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I mean, is this even denied? The man put everything up on front street and all things considered, I think his terms are pretty fair. I mean, it's only denied if his solicitor is a financially irresponsible and physically unattractive hag.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/21 10:33 AM
36

Fun exercise: In every single one of these cases, look for the follow-up where they reveal the false accuser's name. She could go to prison and we still won't ever get her name. Ruins a man's life and to this day the only name we know of in this incident is of the guy who did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:25 PM
27

Actually read though. I quote: Were you unable to agree to have sex (unconscious, drug, mentally disabled)? Was it obvious (or did the other person know) that you were unable to agree? Conversely: Were you forced to have sex, with violence or threats Did you want to have sex WRONG QUESTION Did you consent to have sex (did you voluntarily agree or allow it to take place) Did the other person know you were having sex against your will Yeah no, this chart is just fine.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 07:43 PM
188

sigh The sad thing is, you know full well that if the shooter was found to be a man, we'd hear no end of why this is another example as to why all women have every right to fear all men.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 01:32 AM
5

re: the decline in marriage With the spread of communication, internet, more and more young men are aware that picking badly can result in being financially raped for the rest of your fucking life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCCUCVAosJU&t=51m54s
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:51 PM
2

No, I think what /u/Ted8367 meant by "Really?" was "Fucking seriously? All that information and you somehow still put the onus on fixing everything to the guy who was already too busy working all day to make ends meet?" To which I might add, "dipshit thinking like yours is why the problems /u/girlwriteswhat presented exist. No, responsibility is on the person whose job was to manage the domocile. In a world where that job is augmented by no end of technological improvements." I work a full-time …
/r/MensRights17/01/18 11:14 PM
1

Don't forget to add a space after each asterisk, or reddit won't count 'em as bullet points. less likely to be stopped when stopped, less likely to be arrested when arrested, less likely to be charged when charged, more likely to be charged with lesser offences when charged, less likely to be prosecuted when prosecuted, more likely to be offered favorable plea deals when prosecuted, more likely to have lesser charges included for consideration when prosecuted, half as likely to be convicted when…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:23 PM
2

Maybe StorkKing meant it in the Kirby sense... Kirby's usual method of obtaining these abilities is by inhaling various enemies and copying their powers (hence the name, "Copy Ability").
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:20 AM
2

Don't forget ignorance + empathy. Plenty of men simply don't know about the 14% (women who are explicitly feminist) and 52% (women who are explicitly not feminist) numbers. If they did, they'd be less likely to hop in after realizing that feminism is not the popular view. Feminism preys hardcore on base empathy, which, beyond the ShoeOnHead theory, is probably a driving force behind more than a couple white knights. That's part of why your channel's so dangerous to them. It debunks the hell out …
/r/MensRights24/10/17 06:24 PM
2

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:48 PM
5

the dude ... username is girlwriteswhat; posts videos on Youtube
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:30 PM
2

One thing I did learn about tech fields is that in the grand-ass majority of cases, someone with a shred of technical knowledge isn't reading your resume. As such, your skills need to match, point for point, what's on the listing. Maybe re-order them so it doesn't look like a copy-paste job, but anything short of 100% might as well be 0%.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:53 PM
1

The last shot fired in the American Civil war was on June 22, 1865. The Reconstruction_Amendments began almost immediately afterwards (13th was ratified in 1865, 15th in 1870), ending in the 15th ammendment, which protected the rights of all men to vote, regardless of "race, color, or previous condition of servitude". Adding an amendment to the constitution isn't a trivial process. It requires way more cooperation throughout the government to pass its way up to inclusion in the core tenets of ou…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 05:07 PM
1

Is there a term for this? Like, specifically for the fact that feminists tend to hold onto disproven, faulty, or outright fradulent studies this strongly? The Deluth Model, the Wage Gap, the 1-in-4 statistic... it goes on and on. Surely at some point there has to be a term for that? I don't think I've seen this sort thing so badly beyond vaxxers.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 02:17 AM
1

Well, that and they stonewalled attempts to get to the findings for four years.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 11:41 PM
1

Well, fuck. I thought I'd done exactly that. Deleted.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:56 AM
3

I mean it's perfectly believable that everyone was high and he took advantage of that. It's also perfectly believable that everyone was high and they had sex while they were high.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 06:34 PM
11

What? Nooooo. I think it's perfectly believable that a black man in the 70s starting in the mid-60s drugged and raped a whole buncha white women for decades and got away with it.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 05:26 AM
2

Concurrent research. Chances are they were working on this before vaselgel came into prominence, and even then, there's more money to be made on a pill than a once-a-decade injection. That said, vasalgel looks to start off with an absurd windfall at the start from millions of men who didn't have options of that level previously.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 01:43 AM
1

Woah, I was not aware of this. Seriously. That makes me way more likely to check the film out now. I feel like that sub got radicalized similarly to how the "tea party" did.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 05:08 AM
5

Right, only the person who made "women's ones" was trying to make men's ones shortly thereafter.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:56 PM
3

The article starts with a bullshit statement: Young girls may be discarding their princess wands for superhero capes this Halloween, but not so in the canine world. It links to an article that showing how, overall, superhero costumes have beaten out princess costumes in sales this Halloween by 0.33%. The last princess film released by Disney was Frozen in 2013. There's been at least a dozen superhero movies released since then (go ahead 'n count 'em). Yeah, no shit superhero costumes have gotten…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:06 AM
1

Gotcha, gotcha. FWIW, btw, agreed with her twice She's on da Youtubes.
/r/PussyPass27/09/16 02:02 AM
4

I'm not reading any of that shit, it disassembles my world view with fact 'n reason.
/r/PussyPass26/09/16 06:04 PM
1

TERFs, of course, being a level of transphobia that I don't think I've ever seen outside of feminism.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 08:17 AM
2

I've tried a few times, but I could never get into TRP. To each their own, however.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 08:57 AM
3

That page is practically its own sub for me at this point.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:58 AM
2

You recall correctly, señorita (audio only, it seems): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqE4uk8qSEI He opens with the term "inaugural" SFUAMB links are in the description Posted October 2015 So this is, more than likely, their first speaker.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 11:59 PM
15

I had heard that he "abused" her. I didn't realize the "abuse" was "not doing anything for her after he came". The national response to the story was pretty fucking disgusting, with the actual context of the story.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:41 PM
15

This entire thing is super shitty. Guys love to feel useful, but nobody likes to feel used. Fuck people who do this.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 05:48 PM
2

Implication that men aren't useful for anything but chores Extra bit about how men might be violent monsters "The audacity to think that men might do the same thing we're describing here!" Whole article kinda seems like bait?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:10 PM
1

Oh dear God why didn't I ever think of that
/r/MensRights06/07/16 09:45 PM
10

SIDS is a magical free infanticide card.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:03 PM
19

Men are the majority participants in any activity that's high in risk. In the majority of cases, a woman responsible for a murder will hire or manipulate someone else into performing the deed. Tonya Harding got 3 men involved to break Nancy's knees and never spent a day in prison for it. That same lack of aversion to risk is what also makes men 90-99% of firefighters 'n police offiers, however.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:01 PM
3

This environment breeds a male subculture that while annoying at times certainly is harmless. Mostly because the environment is ridiculously volatile. Every time you're asked, "why aren't there more women programmers", just ask them, "how many women do you that want a job that requires all of your mental faculties on-point 40-80 hours a week and will either burn your out in half a decade or cease to fucking exist on a gentle breeze?". No joke, I had a friend who got shit-canned from 38 Studios a…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 05:04 AM
3

In case anyone missed this on the first go-around. And here's a condensed version.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:53 PM
14

Being condescending is gender-neutral. Turning any level of contrarian discourse, even something heavily backed by research, into a gendered "problem"? That doesn't exist outside of feminism.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:24 AM
4

Combat is not an equal opportunity situation for men and women Nope, it's an equal obligation. Talk about a stereotype.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:15 AM
14

The sad thing is, David Jaffe has no idea how misguided he is on this one. It's the unfortunate bit about a feminist lens: it warps otherwise-innocuous events. Take another look at those photos, and imagine the tuxes are closed. You know, how they'll be for the rest of the evening, and in every other prom photo for that night. Now what do you see? Every single guy is wearing the exact same tuxedo design. Take another look. Every single dress the girls have on is unique. Not a single one has the …
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:54 AM
2

Police say the girlfriend was under the influence of alcohol during the crash. Isn't that instantly a murder charge?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:40 AM
-3

I have few hundreds more quotes ... IMGUr link with 8 quotes. Total. Three are re-used from OP image. Two image links and we're not even at a dozen quotes yet. I would recommend a pastebin with at least a few dozen quotes, perhaps?
/r/MensRights20/04/16 10:20 PM
2

1) as one commenter noted, it's not necessarily the case that men and women pose an equal risk to others in the context of stranger violence. Testosterone, though it is not correlated with aggression, is correlated with decreased risk aversion. Crime is a high risk behavior. "As is firefighting, policework, and dealing with hazardous materials." Or something to that effect. I'd love to see a vid covering the implications of lowered risk-aversion in-depth. I just realized that, although you've pr…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 07:40 PM
1

Keep in mind, this is in Singapore. As bad as the states (which you might not be from, admittedly) are with the CDC, FBI, and general laws on this, Singapore could very well be further separated on this one.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:55 AM
1

Does anyone have the transcripts form that? All I hear is, "While he wasn't exactly polite" or some such. I'd like to see what actually got said and admitted into evidence.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:38 AM
6

Much like I view racists and other types of biggots: If she was a hiring manager or in any position of authority, yeah, she should be shit-canned or at least moved out of that position. I really don't think that's valid here. That said, she is a receptionist at a physical therapy clinic. There would probably be an immediate magnifying lens under her appointment scheduling habits. If they looked unnecessarily slanted against men, it might put her in a really bad light, which might not have made i…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:10 AM
8

I really hate to phrase it this way, but Burger King 'n Wendy's do tend to advertise around-the-clock just how much better than McDonald's they are, because their performance in the space isn't anywhere near as solid. Doing this thing repeatedly kinda reeks of an inferiority complex.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:36 PM
6

Fat-positivity is basically a few groups that took some semi-feminist stances and stretched them to the point of unrecognizability. Thankfully, the meshes really well with feminism, as shit like HAES works really hard to spout nonsense that wouldn't make it 2 feet into any medical/biological curriculum. I'd toss a bump to the 'ole fatlogic sub, but we all know how they treat sub-linking. Kinda wish they had a shitlord sub exemption.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:41 AM
-2

Ain't no trans motherfucker growing stubble. That shit be straight-waxed. When did this sub become TumblrInAction?
/r/MensRights12/04/16 05:38 AM
11

Wait, is that like, a racist cunt? Or like, a racist cunt? Context is really important here.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:00 AM
4

Word. Never mind, it feels like, without the occasional story like this, the sub gets a lot of repetition. I'm not just talking similar themes; a lot of times the same "pussypass" or "man wronged by the system" news stories come up, and many times without even getting updates.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 07:44 AM
8

"drop through the floor"? That probably wouldn't happen. A noticeable drop in applications if that was applied across the country? In this country, it could happen. In India, it will definitely happen; women account for over half of medical students but less than a quarter of medical practitioners: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/More-women-study-medicine-but-few-practise/articleshow/50525799.cms
/r/MensRights23/03/16 06:51 PM
27

Ironic, given that laws making homosexuality illegal (as in, existence-wise, as oppressive as oppression gets) were first and foremost, sodomy laws. And wait what the fuck, aren't there still some states with anti-sodomy laws?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:01 PM
2

No love for the Pleb?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:31 AM
33

Wow, these are some amazing mental gymnastics being performed to try to remove presumption of innocence. On the Cosby front of this, I find it pretty fucking amazing that people will believe, without a shred of evidence, that a black man raped several white women in the 70s and got away with it. Bill Cosby wasn't that rich back then...
/r/MensRights24/01/16 02:14 AM
2

So let's just say for a moment that she falsely accuses someone else...
/r/MensRights15/01/16 12:27 AM
1

And herein lies the price of forcing men into self-preservation. I can bet that Vasalgel will substantially increase the number of men that will enter a committed relationship, and an absurd drop in the number of men that will enter a forced relationship.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:11 AM
1

That's not fair, though. Using the correct definition of rape (forced sex without consent) rather than the feminist definition (penetration by a male that's done without consent or merely regretted afterwards) will leave you with a far higher percentage of male miners than male rapists.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 06:31 AM
4

sigh. Men. Black men. Kind of like how black men were treated.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 06:38 AM
1

Now now, we shouldn't assume that just because HAES intersects with feminism, that rad-feminism implies a HAES attitude. Heck, that level of shitlord cross-pollination isn't even particularly apparent here.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:52 AM
18

The sad thing is, the logic doesn't even work with known data. Everyone remembers the 2012 Aurora theatre shooting. What few people remember is that while there was one insane shooter, there were 3 men who didn't hesitate to die for their lived ones. Theatre contained 400 people. Assuming that none of them were women, that's in 1 133 men who are willing to die to protect a loved one. (1 in ~66 if half/half). "But the shooter killed a lot more than 3 people". Sure, but that's not one shooter per …
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:15 PM
145

For the sake of context (and apologies for simplifying this): She was found guilty of raping a 10 year old boy on October 23rd. Her name was revealed on the 12th of November. That's nearly 3 weeks. Not 3 weeks after accusation. Not 3 weeks during trial. 3 weeks after being convicted, her name was released. Dat male privilege... Also, I know it's in the headline, but re-instating: this is in New Zealand. Most of us aren't ozzieskiwis, so it's probably important for anyone from there to chime in o…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:50 PM
2

I think this is the commercial she's talking about.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:34 AM
0

I can't get past her pluralization issues with woman/women
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:20 AM
21

Shouldn't be as bad given that filming is done. It basically just needs to be cut up into a final film.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:44 AM
2

DAMN. DAMN. DAYUUUM..
/r/MensRights31/10/15 09:42 AM
1

Maaaan, this is what happens when I can't read things.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:15 AM
6

Seriously? Ronda's fights are so quick they're on GIF hosting services. Not having time to watch her fights is like not having time to catch up on *I Can't Understand What My Husband Is Saying. Here's a few nice starters: VS Bethe Correia VS Cat Zingano *This is a real show title
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:04 AM
5

In case anyone's curious, Melody Hensley is the inception of the "triggered" meme.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:17 AM
84

"The only time anyone ever tells a guy to be a man, is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest." Holy shit. Quote of the year.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:50 AM
7

Admittedly, different writers. Also admittedly, the paper has an editor-in-chief. They signed off on this bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 09:07 AM
1

Oddly enough, that's sort of the key issue. Climate change is real. For those who are arguing against it, they're actually arguing over whether we're causing/perpetuating it. The wage gap is real. For those arguing against it, the actual core issue is whether it's a result of discrimination or people's personal choices. Full disclosure: On the former point, I strongly believe we are. On the latter point, I'm pretty sure the grand-ass, overhwelming majority of it can be attributed to the latter c…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:43 AM
27

For what it's worth, the wage gap is a perpetuating myth; it's easy to believe, especially when few people make any attempt to contest it.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:43 AM
0

Remember the good 'ole days, when people could just disagree with one another? Ironically, most of the acute negative stigma about TRP comes from... feminists. They'd call the MRM 'n the overall M-o-S human trash piles even without using TRP as an associative scapegoat. Why, exactly, do we dignify their assertions in the first place?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:12 AM
24

Awesome. Can we get the "Dear Colleague Letter" revoked now?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 05:48 AM
2

Agreement on that last point. Sorry, that probably didn't come through in text.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:40 PM
-1

Men are human. Saying silly shit like that, no wonder feminists hate the movement.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:20 AM
2

He was spamming Voat pretty hard during the brief exodus event. You know, before anyone could "downvoat". (You need to spend some time contributing on the site before you can downvote anyone)
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:47 AM
4

Apparently this sub downvotes people for being together with shitty folks. To OP: You should probably invest in at least one hidden camera for your bedroom, for specifically this type of issue. It sucks, and it's shitty that you have to deal with this, but it's the most reliable way to dispute that type of charge quickly.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 10:47 AM
3

where they have been overturned in court "in the interest of the child or mother" ... where they have been overturned in court in the interest of the state's finances Sorry, had to FTFY ;-D
/r/MensRights01/09/15 04:18 AM
2

What the chart shows is that "when there is a workplace fatality, women are disproportionately murdered compared to men." Is it also really a question of whether women are disproportinately murdered or whether men disproportionately die of all other causes? Again, it's a percentage of deaths, not a number of deaths per person work hours. If you remove all other causes of death, 67 women were murdered in the workplace in 2013, vs. 341 men. It's amazing how a chart can turn 1/5th the rate of being…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:18 PM
2

I do admit, I tend to downvote the occasional article that shows up in this sub that feels incredibly slanted, and starts feeling like the exact type of shitty agenda-think that disillusioned me from feminism in the first place. Even that chart, as some people have pointed out, I think I could've done a little better in by normalizing s'more by accounting for hours worked (e.g. the 57%/43% number). It's kind of like how you have a 7:1 chance of dying in a motorcycle vs. a car, unless you normali…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:23 PM
9

Awesome example of the Man Monster Myth. e.g. a cornerstone of feminist theory. The belief that "while not all men are monsters, all monsters are men". It'll use the Dark Knight shooting as an example of the 1-in-a-million instance of a mass murderer and completely ignore the 1-in-133 (in that theatre alone) instance of men who jumped directly into the line of fire to save their loved ones. In feminist theory, heroes don't exist, and men only serve to an embodiment of all that's wrong with socie…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:21 PM
3

I would seriously love to see a graph that normalized those numbers against one another, instead of comparing the 7% of workplace deaths that women are subject to to the 93% that men are. EDIT: Never mind, here you go.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:18 AM
5

Jesus, Karen, it's pretty obvious that Phil Hartman's wife was hopped up pretty bad on patriarchy. I once saw a patriarchy addict punch right through a glass window. Fist was dark red; you could see bone. The guy didn't even flinch. That new designer patriarchy the Russians are peddling is powerful shit, and we need to get it off our streets.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:29 PM
12

Nudes of woman posted audience apologizes Nudes of man posted man apologizes
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:15 AM
2

"Does that mean that if a female rape victim is wet, it's not rape?" In case she pauses on it, follow up with, "**OF COURSE IT'S STILL RAPE". I'm also amazed that she can determine whether a man's arousal magically counts as consent, having never had a penis.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:39 AM
14

Arguing for quotas. Like, the one thing people repeatedly say these initiatives won't result in. That's just fucking amazing. Welcome to the height of entitlement.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:47 AM
1

I would totally sacrifice multiple years off my life for the 'perfect body'. No question. I'm not sure why the article uses this as their discretionary point; there is no ,am, even in morbid obesity, that's more than 5 "sacrificed" years from an "ideal" body, and most are 1-3. "Ideal" is usually using Hollywood depcitions as a comparison point, and the "Tyler Durden" looks is basically a really low body fat percentage mixed with a minimal spattering of gym time. The former is way harder than the…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:58 AM
4

Alimony law here is in desperate, scary need of reform. Something like this would never even come up in discussion, and I have a feeling they have an incredibly different setup over there to warrant this even coming up. That's a place where dowry fraud is a real and active problem. Realistically, I assume this law's in place because a lot of divorces are happening as a direct result of cheating, their suicide rates for recently-divorced men are skyrocketting (it's 10:1 here), the resulting payme…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:49 AM
4

Never mind that the exact same arguments are used for some forms of FGM.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 11:54 AM
3

Men account for about 80-85%, depending on the country, and about 95% of those that "sleep rough" (that is, not on a bed), which generally accounts for unsheltered.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 03:06 AM
1

They're already halfway there with the whole Fallon Fox fiasco.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 07:31 PM
1

I did my best.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:39 AM
9

Assuming they make it.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:20 AM
70

Preferably, with a bit less JPEG.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:46 AM
2

Next week: because I'm certain my ex left to go rape some woman due to him liking porn.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:36 AM
3

Haven't gotten a chance to watch, but if I may make a point about rampage killers: It's not a cultural problem. If it was a cultural problem, it would be regular occurrence. There's roughly one a year since the 80s. There's 2 million men born every one of those years. It's not normal. If you were to spread apart the killings, time-wise, you'd no longer have a "mass murderer", you'd have a serial killer. And at that point, do their motives matter? No, because they're sociopathic. Basically, if a …
/r/MensRights03/08/15 02:15 AM
19

Fucking thank you. The last thing we need is for the MRM to dive directly into this tumblr feminism offendatron nonsense.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:18 AM
1

"And if you look, unfortunately, at a lot of the activists who do this, the people who make the complaints, the journalists, the media figures who are doing this... Very often, they are older. Very often, the are single. Very often, they are taking out, you know, their frustrations in their own personal lives on brands that are aimed at 22-year-old girls who are much closer to the sort of body shapes that we see in the windows." #!/usr/sbin/REKT
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:42 PM
12

That suicide rates triple post-divorce and accounts for the majority of deaths for males 30-50, flat-out, full-stop, probably tells you everything you need to know.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:27 AM
1

The numbers? They've shown up here before, and most of it is probably on ye ole wiki. The "dialogue" I just scribbled up.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:36 AM
12

"So why are you into Men's Rights?" "Welp, mostly 'cause if I don't give a shit about men, nobody else will". "Explain?" "So, a few numbers: For every woman that successfully commits suicide, [1] 3.5 to 4 guys do. I'll get back to this number shortly. Roughly half of marriages end in divorce. Guys pay about 97 to 99% of alimony. The leading cause of no-fault divorce is "dissatisfaction". Once a divorce happens, remember that suicide ratio? Well, [2] add 6 guys to it. So yeah, TEN to ONE. So, we …
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:29 AM
2

If we are going to have equal opportunity, then we also have to have equal obligation DING DING DING DING DING
/r/MensRights27/07/15 10:09 AM
5

Male feminists driving female MRAs to drink is slowly becoming a trope. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAF2UmyXe-4
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:41 AM
5

Use Archive links. Don't make it profitable for them to publish this nonsense.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:37 AM
1

If you've never spent a day scrolling through the user page for girlwriteswhat, my friend, you are in for a treat.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:56 AM
-1

Karen probably struck a chord with some of them, so they're here now. It's fine. We'll disagree on many things, as is to be expected. This place isn't supposed to be a hugbox, AFAIK.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:09 PM
7

To be specific, I'm sure you meant, "harsher penalties for guilty parties" and not "lowering the burden of proof to absurd levels".
/r/MensRights25/07/15 05:18 AM
1

Hey, To specify things, this article doesn't seem to account for hours worked or total experience. Given that men are significantly likelier to continue working after starting a family, and work substantially more overtime (sometimes paid, sometimes unpaid), it's not enough just to put jobs next to one another like this. Normalize for at least these two factors, and maybe we can talk.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 04:44 AM
1

But what the fuck is this? TRP leaking into the MR sub?
/r/MensRights25/07/15 02:27 AM
17

"Katie has two mommies!" is generally considered an easier norm because there's an innate assumption that mothers are the optimal parent. And yeah, most "anti-gay" laws were actually "anti-sodomy" or effectively, "anti-gay men" laws. Hell, sodomy, as a term, and sodomite, as a pejorative, stems directly from the bible parable of Sodom and Gomorrah, a town filled with evil gay men that was nuked from heavenly orbit. A gay guy has the same amount of zero protection against rape if they end up in p…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 12:38 AM
4

Holy shit, I didn't realize the "toxic masculinity" myth was commonly known that far back. Jesus H. Christ, so feminists blaming sociopathic rampage killers on all boys goes that far back?
/r/MensRights22/07/15 09:07 PM
4

"misogyny is on the rise" Translation: The definition of "misogyny" is being broadened to astronomical heights
/r/MensRights21/07/15 04:17 AM
11

My province has an explicit tax on purchasing any brass that makes you work... harder... okay I've got nothin'. Fixed.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:45 AM
47

Okay, brass tacks? There are fewer women in tech because tech jobs are fucking shitty. They're thankless, feature excessive hours (often w/ no overtime pay), minimal human interaction, and are incredibly risky (your job might not exist in a year). The only reason guys tend to be drawn to these jobs more often is because they're often focused problem-solving jobs. How many people do you know get really into a programming gig due to the promise of what that software will actually accomplish on rel…
/r/MensRights20/07/15 04:32 AM
2

Galbrush Principle example of the year.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 12:03 PM
7

Holy fuck, our military is in for a goddamn shitstorm if this is how they treat officers like Germano. We don't need the weaker fucking standards that the military is being pushed towards, we need stronger fucking women. Rather than make an example out of Kate Germano, they should have made her the fucking example of how training should be handled.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 11:27 AM
5

There's probably something rooted in evolutionary psychology for this (e.g. its effect on birth rates), which could be why it's rooted into so many religions (there's even a lot of it in traditional Bhuddist regions). I wonder if /u/girlwriteswhat's ever looked into it.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:14 PM
3

What I'd love to see is an infographic that starts with the urban myth and proceeds to update itself with the correct information in a few different ways. So it starts with: "A woman gets paid 77 cents for every dollar a man makes working the same job" First thing is that latter part isn't true, so we fix it one of two ways: "A woman gets paid 77 cents for every dollar a man makes working the same job working completely different jobs under different levels of experience and hours worked" And th…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:02 PM
2

Feminist "definition": Guys being condescending in explaining a concept to a woman, regardless of her credentials on the matter. (e.g. trying to explain to a female developer about a programming concept like she's 5 years old) Actual usage: Term used to trivially dismiss a guy trying to make any argument whatsoever, regardless of any evidence or research he has on-hand to back that argument. It's a really useful tool for the modern feminism movement.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:32 PM
18

"'I'm egalitarian', and if feminism was actually about equality, you really wouldn't have a problem with this statement." EDIT: JESUS FUCK, this guy's actually trying to fucking legitimize donglegate. I'm done. I'm fucking done. I could not be done faster.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:21 PM
2

Holy shit, 3?! I could pass with a large Olympic weight tied around my back.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:56 AM
1

They did a poll here a while back. Karen Straughan accounts for a non-trivial percentage of introductions to the movement.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:50 AM
1

Do they have a gender breakdown for that?
/r/MensRights12/07/15 07:15 AM
3

I fucking love Tommy Sotomayor, though man, there's sooo much I can't follow him on. edit: And oh man, did he deliver on that entire concept in this video.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 06:02 PM
18

That it's rare, sure. That it was okay in the past, not so much. Wife-beating was punishable by lashing, and the very last incident of judicially-assigned lashings was to a wife-beater: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_corporal_punishment#United_States In the United States judicial flogging was last used in 1952 in Delaware when a wife beater got 20 lashes.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 10:59 AM
2

I was actually thinking about Rodriguez, who started on 6 grand and a school bus. =D
/r/MensRights01/07/15 10:19 AM
7

Spielberg got his start by walking into an empty office at a movie studio and waiting 'til someone who didn't realize he didn't work there got him a pitch chance, risking a pretty blatant trespassing charge if this didn't work out for him. Kevin Smith started his directing career by borrowing $28,000 in credit cards and hoping someone would pick up his film at its public showing. Guys don't magically end up in the director's chair. It's a frighteningly shitty and risky job with metric tons of fa…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:05 AM
22

Holy fuck that could not be more eerily spot on.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:35 AM
2

Holy fucking shit, do they have an option that's not radfem insanity?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:49 AM
21

As more women become disillusioned with feminism, you're going to see an increasingly narrowing scope of the remaining (increasingly radical) diehards discussing things like this. These dipshits aren't representative of women's views. Not even half of women.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:25 AM
3

I like the part of atheism that seems adverse to political power for religious organizations. I don't like the part that equates all follows with extremists. Simultaneously, I like the part of feminism that's advocacy for women and removing inequalities that they face. The part that attempts to attain a monopoly on equality while simultaneously pushing for extreme tribalism between the sexes can go fuck right off.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:37 AM
1

If you're ever wondering why AVFM tends to include the percentage of people who "sleep rough", this is exactly why. When you hear "The homeless are 70% men, 30% women", it might not sound *so bad, but once you factor in, "well the homeless folk you see sleeping on the sidewalk are roughly 95% men, 5% women", you get a disturbingly different picture. * I'm more than a little curious to see how much of the wage gap can be accounted for in terms of men's propensity toward jobs that do not have a si…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:35 AM
18

In all honesty, we really need to reform alimony so that the payout is fucking zero if: It's a no-fault divorce The lower-income partner initiated it or: It's a fault divorce, for say, adultery The lower-income partner is responsible You'd end the grand-ass majority of this nonsense. I wonder how many women would end a marriage due to "dissatisfaction" if they knew they'd be financially on their own. There'd still be scary factors (no-fault divorce becoming fault divorce thanks to false accusati…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:21 AM
9

"Misandry doesn't real, here's some lawsuit information"
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:04 AM
12

Probably more consistently (e.g. less likely to "fall off) and for longer periods of time. The real reason they charge men more is because they can. No mens groups to lose their mind over it. Why do you think men pay more for insurance? Sure, because it's legal, but do you really think it would stay legal if men's advocacy movements had any traction?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 06:54 PM
2

Is the creepy bug-eyed feminist "stare" gonna become a thing?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:36 AM
2

Too many syllables in "feminist"; it doesn't flow well. The example stream was pretty good though.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:45 PM
4

Guys? GUYS. They covered this concept.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:25 PM
22

Misrepresenting or lying about MRAs without actually talking to any? Say it ain't so! It'd kinda sad that I haven't been here very long and I'm this jaded.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:57 PM
4

Seriously, this is not, "woman who framed man for rape", it's "piece of human garbage (who happens to be male) beats the fuck out of child that he raped until she helps frame man for rape". Aurelias Marshall will hopefully never see the light of day in normal society again for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 02:34 AM
10

Actually, legally, even if you are one yourself, it's still a sex offence. The law is fucking broken. The entire point to these laws is to prevent child molestation. Child. Child (n.) A pre-pubescent person. That's sort of the basis of this being the worst-of-the-worst crime. Children are inherently devoid of any sexual growth or maturity, on top of being too young to understand what's going on in these situations. And the mental damage is pretty extensive in most cases. Now, with an adolescent,…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:00 AM
16

Ironically, he didn't even hit her. He did about the only thing he could that didn't involve a physical strike and could be done quickly; holding her down would have resulted in people restraining him while she immediately got back to hitting him. This is probably not the first time he's had to deal with this situation.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 06:22 AM
3

And this is why any MRA is typically going to carry at least one form of recording device on them. BECAUSE THEY WILL BE LIED OUT. IN PUBLIC. A LOT.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 08:47 AM
1

"Please list any laws, any single one, that places men at an advantage compared to women. Go ahead. I'll wait." The nice thing about privilege as a marker is that it's ridiculously nebulous. Laws are nice, direct, written down, and incredibly inconvenient for the feminist mindset.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:32 PM
28

And maybe not limit it to unmarried couples?
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:39 AM
15

And it makes sense for them to be. Remember, most "anti-gay" laws were effectively "anti-gay men" laws (anti-sodomy laws and the like).
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:39 AM
13

Yes, they can.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 05:06 AM
17

Indeed they do. Even without abortion or adoption, legal parental surrender is 100% available to women. In fact, I really wish more women knew they had this legal right.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 05:05 AM
16

Rather than respond with an unsubstantiated "it's never been okay for a man to beat his wife", a more in-depth bit of info on that: The common punishment to a man beating his wife, at a time when divorce was difficult to attain, was a good 'ole fashioned whip lashing. This is a punishment that's so harsh that it fell out of use because those in charge of administering it didn't want to do it anymore. In fact, the very last legal flogging in this country was administered to a wife beater. As a qu…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 09:57 AM
1

So much easier that he blocked out his eyes! Oh man so easy! On the flipside, women preaching "kill all men" rather than just, "I don't like short guys", they have to completely block out their identity too, right? Right?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:00 AM
1

It's cool. I'd rather get a fair clarification than have it continue to dwindle into misinterpreted anger. =)
/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:35 AM
36

Keep note. In the situation where a woman gets the same shitty deal that most divorced men have to deal with every day, /r/mensrights sides with... the woman. Makes you wonder who's actually focused on equality in treatment. Hint: It's not the fauxminists.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:00 AM
1

giving men excuses to hate women You give *men reasons to not hate men, and break the man-monster-myth. That's probably the real reason feminists hate you. * AND women! Gasp!
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 12:16 PM
1

So first off, if anyone wants actual viable context for this, scroll all the way to the last paragraph. I think from there you can scroll back up and start reading the rest.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:03 PM
14

I'm not a big fan of that particular sub, but Jesus FUCK, woman, you need to put that text on Youtube. That was amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 05:21 PM
8

No one outside of Protein world would have the fortitude to play that side of the joke.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:53 PM
2

To paraphrase Dave Chappelle, if that's enough for her to cut off a friendship, she'd tear my brown ass to pieces. I'm all about tossing out racial slurs in casual conversation, regardless of whether they are applicable to the target in question (and usually explicitly because they are not).
/r/MensRights10/05/15 02:03 PM
1

Okay, I'm pretty fucking left-leaning. I don't give a fuck what their reason, anyone having issues with a bi-racial pairing is *fucking racist. Full stop. ^^<sup>*Further</sup> ^^<sup>explanation:</sup> ^^<sup>The</sup> ^^<sup>more</sup> ^^<sup>left-leaning</sup> ^^<sup>people</sup> ^^<sup>who</sup> ^^<sup>have</sup> ^^<sup>issues</sup> ^^<sup>with</sup> ^^<sup>bi-racial</sup> ^^<sup>pairings</sup> ^^<sup>usually</sup> ^^<sup>do</sup> ^^<sup>it</sup> ^^<sup>because</sup> ^^<sup>their</sup> ^^<su…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:12 AM
2

one chick who majored in cultural studies and identifies hard as a feminist defriended me on facebook because she found our relationship "disgusting" (lol?) Assuming you're not black, that is the most astounding example of horseshoe theory I've seen thus far. e.g. that's so hardcore far left it's hardcore far right.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:42 AM
7

I am going to start referring to myself as a feminist ally to men's rights. This is seriously appreciated, but please be aware that it's a very quick path to get "kicked out of the sisterhood". See: Christina Hoff Sommers Personally, I identify as egalitarian. I effectively see feminism and the MRM as women's and men's advocacy groups, respectively, and can get behind both as far as that's concerned. I don't expect either camp to be truly about equality, but again, appreciate those in either tha…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:44 AM
4

and Wyatt's side of the story is that Vince was abusive and left her destitute while he went out and grew his business Sure, fair enough. Let's see if Dale has any listed abusive events between him and his loved ones in the past two decades. Let's also take a look at whose children have made life choices that typically stem from long-term abuse. Wyatt's oldest child, 36-year-old Emily, is a drug addict, prostitute, and convicted burglar currently serving time in prison. Huh. Fancy that.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:37 AM
30

While the position he was in was no doubt unfair to her choices in the matter, this wouldn't be a fucking problem if full paternal surrender was on the table. The guy isn't fucking dumb. Her "going it alone" becomes her "going it with his subsidization" if she falls on hard times and the state traces paternity to him. Why do you think he's so focused on her being partnered up?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:37 AM
0

The gender norms elasticity that feminism tries to promote, I find really cool. It's their problems with anyone "adhering" to gender norms that really bugs me. Everything from their attacks on Lego's "Friends line" (which tripled their female customer base, resulting in total consumer growth for them) to horrifyingly sexist terms like, "toxic masculinity", I could do without.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:49 PM
1

I'm with you on this one, in so much as the entire fucking point of using the phrase, "gender is a social construct", would be to refute feminist theory. This is not that. I thought we were gonna get something like the story of David Reimer, covering bullshit feminist theories about gendered norms being "arbitrary", but instead we got this silly nonsense.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:37 PM
1

Their growth 'n adaptivity will be slower, but they can still improve. See: women's weightlifting divisions in the olympics. If they improve at half the rate, that still beats the fuck out of none of the rate. And given that the "main four" weightlifting exercises (squat, deadlift, OHP, bench) increase bone mass, they really should.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:25 AM
7

You know Karen Straughan, e.g. /u/girlwriteswhat? It's a group she co-founded with two other girls with a similar anti-feminism policy.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:22 AM
1

gave them seven weeks of intense strength training That's seven weeks of recovery. Recovery time is ridiculously important in strength training. Testosterone is already a significant booster in muscle production. If those guys had years of even casual strength training beforehand (as many do in high school), yeah, the girls are going to lose, no doubt. Long-term functional strength training for women should be pushed towards in society. It increases bone mass, which last time I checked, is kind …
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:28 AM
100

*sigh*. Please allow me to clarify this point. *FUCKING SIGH* "'The realities of combat aren’t going to change based on gender,' he said." Which brings us to (emphasis mine)... "But one particularly demanding upper-body strength test is climbing a 25-foot rope with a backpack full of gear. A candidate who cannot crawl to the top fails the test." Let's clarify this point further. That, up there, is a functional fucking test. It's not there to see if you're rawr strong, it's there to see if you ca…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:39 PM
16

Think about the sensation you get on your penis now. Now cut that in half. Now imagine that could be done without any visible surgery. Heck, imagine they could do it in the womb. Would you be okay with this? If you were born that way, you wouldn't realize there was anything done, or that you were losing anything. The one "nice" thing is that you can be thankful because you don't have a comparison point. Many boys don't realize they're color-blind for years, and get by just fine without being cap…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:59 AM
1

"Are Awarded" Fuck right off. Degrees aren't awarded, they're fucking explicitly sought after and earned. 12% of CS degrees are women because 12% of women start and finish their degree in CS.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:21 PM
5

Holy fuckbuckets this isn't satire?! I kept waiting, the entire time for the satirical flip, given how ridiculous that shit was. I mean, did they write their entire article off the back of half a dozen bumper stickers?
/r/MensRights03/04/15 12:40 AM
2

I know a lot about eating healthy and exercise First of all, thanks for getting back to me. I don't know if this will at all be useful, but given your signifier about being a boxer: I'm sure you know all about eating healthy as an athlete. Please, take my advice as someone who knows pretty well about eating healthy as a sedentary individual. I've only seen a glimpse as to what boxers do for simple-ass warm-ups, and it's an order of magnitude more than what us pedestrians do to get through the da…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:43 PM
3

Weight Watchers. Go to the website. Add the app to your phone. The online version is only $20/month. It seriously works, and they made the website version for guys (because apparently we like tracking numbers but don't like attending support groups). It's basically simplified calorie counting, but if you like playing video-games, it's effectively min-maxing your food. Once you get the hang of losing weight at a slow, steady pace and tracking your intake, you can switch to something like myfitnes…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 11:33 AM
111

Is it just me, or is this exactly how feminsits treat men's shelters, and how "kill all men" tumblr/twitter-ettes respond to criticism of misandry?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:29 AM
1

Fuck all that, TWO GHOSTBUSTERS MOVIES. EVERYONE WINS. Unless it's garbage. Here's hoping threy're not.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:19 AM
6

So feminists are trying to prove two points here: That rape has an incidence rate of between 20%-25% of the female population in higher learning institutions over a 4 year period. Consequently, rape is *not pathological in nature in the majority of cases. Now, if both of these things were true, we would be living in a rape culture, and that would be ridiculously frightening. 25% rape occurrence in a 4 year period is effectively a 100% rape incidence over a **woman's lifetime and a rate that look…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:29 AM
2

I keep forgetting that regardless of what radfems tell me, there's not really all that much interplay between KiA and MR.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:18 AM
13

This is probably the most ironic thing I ever post, given my username: https://archive.today/M4NEk
/r/MensRights28/03/15 01:59 AM
1

Again, recovering feminist male, didn't know Erin Pizzey or her research existed... Personally, I think he should take every step to walk away from that type of scenario. Notice I didn't say "should have", because I don't know what the circumstances were. If she followed him around (this happens) or blocked his exits (this also happens), the empathy I'd have for her side would evaporate. That said, you guys are right, nobody should be physically striking anyone in a relationship between two adul…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 09:55 PM
7

Full disclosure: I'm still recovering from the feminist kook aide, and I still have many of those prejudices. I think if someone has the athletic capability of the top 1% of society, they should bear that responsibility in mind in any violent confrontation. Simultaneously, I'm in 100% fucking agreement with Whoopie, and it's more than a little disgusting how much she had to talk over preemptive backlash like that.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:17 PM
3

Keep in mind, most of 'em are folks who were lured in with, "it's about equality, honest". The 15% female identification rate is not something most know about, let alone all the other funny stats we did see. - Recovering male feminist
/r/MensRights21/03/15 02:31 AM
6

LIFETIME? "Abusive mate movie of the week" Lifetime?! This should be tagged "Fucking Progress".
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:37 AM
5

It was here about a week ago; it shows up periodically. I gotta wonder how many reports we'll eventually start to see as more guys equip themselves with hidden cams for their own safety.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:15 AM
1

You know what would be nice? If this was actually just the progression they were making after, "Men are Monsters". But I'm guessing the latter's so well-entrenched, they can focus on new narratives.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:22 AM
29

Oh they do. They just go straight to, "you can't be sexist without power". Fauxiology (sociology does NOT hold that belief or hypothesis for sexism/racism) has some amazingly shitty rules. I'm left-leaning and Christian. I'm so used to seeing how far the crazy pole goes on the latter that my mind is regularly blown when I see how far into crazy town the former gets. Not being white, as far as I can gather, also makes it even clearer just how fucking retarded "privilege" and "power" arguments go,…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 10:04 AM
10

Why do you think I started reading this sub? Someone lies to your face about a group, and the first thing you wonder is what else they're lying to you about.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:34 PM
72

I've been here for like a month, and what I can't believe is that anyone with an MR organization does interviews without their own recorder present. Holy shit, does anyone look into MRMs without trying to write a hit piece?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:42 AM
1

I guess "taken seriously" is incredibly contextual. In many cases arguments are taken at face value that shouldn't be, and in many cases points won't get across in as wide a breadth. Certain female executives may have more trouble convincing members of the board of their point than male counterparts, and the same may also go for politicians (depending on the subject matter. Again, contextual). However, female activists are often taken at their word, and many female interviewers (Barbara Walters …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:11 AM
3

Given how depressing finding out about most of facts in this sub are, people like you probably keep more than a few folks sane. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:37 AM
6

The latter. I'm pretty sure the former is bordering on being a real life trope. It doesn't end at Catholics, and much like law enforcement, the problem isn't the people that do it; it's that they don't go to fucking jail, post-haste, when they do. So keep in mind, I've only really had the man-monster-myth shattered for me in the last month or so, so I wasn't really ready to find out it was a myth like, fucking everywhere. I mean, kee-rist: Men are the "grand majority" of rapists, mostly because …
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:32 PM
2

In a world without the internet, you just assume that shit sucks. On the one hand, the internet clears up that you're not alone in this. Hell, the idea that women are standing up for this is an insane revaluation. On the other hand, you find out that the problems run deeper than you could've ever imagined. You come here because marriage laws suck. You stay realizing that it really doesn't end there. Heck, it barely begins.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:25 AM
25

Jesus H. Christ, does this rabbit hole have a bottom?
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:22 AM
4

*Ephebophile. Aside from that, I agree.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 03:20 AM
2

TERF is a degree of transsexual hatred that does not exist outside of feminist circles. It's why non-TERF radfems are so adamant about protecting transwomen to the point where the threshold of "transphobia" is a mis-used pronoun; they don't want any of that mud soiling their name.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:54 PM
2

You, sir and/or maddam. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:37 PM
23

Feminist: A person who can easily turn non-gendered issues into gendered problems, where only one gender is ever at fault. (guess which one)
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:36 PM
0

I'm not gonna assume for even a moment that I have this down pact, but they may be more similar than you'd think at first glance. As one might expect, this gets a bit graphic. FGM - Removal of clitoris MGM - Removal of penis tip A sufferer of FGM still has the g spot. MGM sufferers still have the shaft. About the only reason the latter is better off than the former is because the sexual organ is external, and as such, easier for a partner to deal with. Anyone who's aware of proper fingering tech…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:31 AM
1

What's a little scary is the legislative reaction to those findings: predominant aggressor policy. It adds a lot of factors that don't exist in any other assault inquiry that has a frightening tendency to implicate the man on arrival of the police to any such dispute. Brought the statistics right back in line with the expectation afterwards. Meaning, whereas some guys were just taking assault and not involving the police, now those same individuals were getting arrested. I brought up Erin Pizzey…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:26 PM
1

Sorry you got DV'ed, I always prefer to engage and discuss rather than try to hide away an opinion (so far what it's worth, have an upvote). It's obligatory because most articles about DV usually directly pruport it to be a gendered issue. e.g. that it's something men must fix as a societal problem. Erin Pizzey started the world's first battered women's shelter, and through dealing with the first wave of entrees, realized that domestic violence isn't a gendered issue. That is, it happens at surp…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:26 AM
2

I guess this is obligatory? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey
/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:59 AM
23

It has a violent sequence facing Lara off against a man who was clearly presented as a probable rapIST (and definitely a murderer). There was never any chance of him actually trying to rape Lara due to how messy it would have been to deal with fail states. However, the entire purpose of him being presented that way was to make him an easy villain for Lara to kill. In a game where Lara is being presented in her "pre-dual-berettas" days, the entire point to the sequence was that she was going to h…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter