| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Guys, are you afraid of walking alone at night?It's also worth nothing men are far more likely to be the victims of sexual or physical violence at the hands of strangers while women are more likely to be victims of people they know. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 01:29 AM |
| 1 | Guys, are you afraid of walking alone at night?Carrying a gun and travelling with friends helps, but to be completely honest if I'm walking alone in a bad part of town, even with my gun, I definitely don't feel safe. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 01:26 AM |
| 1 | Gender Symmetry Research: Women are as violent as men. Women sexually abuse men and engage in domestic violence at the same rate as men.The only study on male campus rape has been funded showed 1 in 7 men are raped, which is higher than the rate of female victimization. Do you have a link for this? I would love to read the whole study, it sounds interesting. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/14 05:16 PM |
| 7 | Don't do this. Seen in a NYC Library bathroom.95% of us are really pushing for 95% the same things as 95% of feminists. What world are you living in? | /r/MensRights | 03/05/14 12:25 AM |
| 1 | This is NOT who we are, and this is NOT Okay.I think people expect a certain seriousness for an activist group That's my whole point, who decides what constitutes the name of an activist group? Is it simply because they have the word "against" in the title? What happened to satire? I don't know these people and I don't care to; whether or not their posts were meant as jokes, they are a joke to me. Anybody who honestly believes that filth are ridiculous, and far beyond the help of logic and reason. =) For Orphan Black, you really have to be… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/13 09:31 AM |
| 0 | This is NOT who we are, and this is NOT Okay.You're an idiot troll. Go away. What a cogent argument, I wouldn't expect anything less.... Yes, she would have the same ball control, moves, and knowledge but couldn't keep up with the physicality. So if a male had the same ball control, moves, and knowledge, but couldn't keep up with other males physically you would say he was at the same skill level? You haven't ever played sports have you? How about addressing the actual points I'm making instead of resorting to ad hominem attacks? It's unbe… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/13 09:19 AM |
| 1 | This is NOT who we are, and this is NOT Okay.facebook pages have an actual purpose. Yeah.... the purpose the creator defines. I could go start a page right now called White Men against Asian Babies and just post rap lyrics all day. It would be strange for them to post cat gifs too. Any more strange than a facebook page for a Spongebob character who appeared in a single episode that posts unrelated memes all the time? https://www.facebook.com/Smittyisnumberone Any body can make a fb page and have it be about what ever their heart desires. I… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/13 12:39 AM |
| -1 | This is NOT who we are, and this is NOT Okay.Skill n. the ability to do something well; expertise. If she had the same skill level she'd be able to perform the ability at the same level as someone of equal skill level. That's just simple semantics. They aren't built as strong as fast as us men? You make no sense. If two runners (male or female) have vastly different top speeds you wouldn't say they are at the same skill level. A bodybuilder (male or female) who can lift more weight than me is clearly not at the same skill level as me. So g… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/13 12:33 AM |
| -3 | This is NOT who we are, and this is NOT Okay.I'm not trying to troll, but how does one reconcile these two statements? I never said they could compete against men physically. Their skill and knowledge of the game is the same as men. While I acknowledge they probably have the same knowledge of the game; if they had the same skill why wouldn't they be able to compete with men? | /r/MensRights | 05/12/13 05:31 AM |
| -11 | This is NOT who we are, and this is NOT Okay.First off this can only be interpreted as humorous. Do you honestly think the person who posted that believes bad oral sex is the cause of all divorce? Come on.... Second, who the hell put you in charge of deciding what a Facebook page should or shouldn't be about. It's a fucking facebook page!! | /r/MensRights | 05/12/13 05:13 AM |
| 1 | People in monogamous relationships are 'more likely to have intelligent children': males are more likely to care for their offspring and want to protect them, and this leads to more intelligent, well nurtured children.It was a study based on the evolutionary traits of monkeys and how they behaved in respect to monogamy. This is the only thing in the article remotely close to what OP is asserting: "Caring fathers make this easier by helping out with young with long childhoods and this may explain how large brains could evolve in humans." | /r/MensRights | 30/07/13 10:44 AM |
| 1 | People in monogamous relationships are 'more likely to have intelligent children': males are more likely to care for their offspring and want to protect them, and this leads to more intelligent, well nurtured children.First off nothing was proven, the results of this study suggest a theory for why monogamy evolved in primates. It has literally nothing to do with families needing a MAN to act like a MAN and a FATHER. haha | /r/MensRights | 30/07/13 10:40 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter