| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -4 | A woman falsely accused a man of rape, then has the audacity to write a book about it.Oh, you're one of those people that picks apart things sentence by sentence instead to try to argue with every little thing instead of engaging the big picture. Toodles, to you, sir. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/22 01:53 AM |
| -2 | A woman falsely accused a man of rape, then has the audacity to write a book about it.We can't know what all went through this woman's head You're right, this clearly reads like I'm psychic. Of course Broadwater is a victim. Nobody's arguing that he isn't. Let me ask you a question... she didn't pick him out of a line-up and they still went forward with prosecuting him. Who's at fault for that, her or the police? Can you not fathom in even the slightest how a traumatized person could come to believe the police when they tell them that they've found the person who traumatized them… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/22 01:23 AM |
| -6 | A woman falsely accused a man of rape, then has the audacity to write a book about it.You're absolutely right but this is MensRights and you're not going to convince anyone who spends even a remotely average amount of time here that this isn't a case of a woman --I'm sorry, a "bimbo"-- falsely crying rape and sending a man to jail because of some vendetta against the patriarchy. Just look around at the other comments. Nobody here wants to actually face reality. They want to bask in the glow of a hundred parrots repeating their delusion that men are oppressed by a society that is … | /r/MensRights | 22/02/22 11:49 PM |
| 1 | 50/50Oh I just jumped right in the middle here without reading anything leading up to this. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 07:27 PM |
| 1 | 50/50Bye. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 06:02 PM |
| 2 | 50/50It's a subset of egalitarianism. For example, one could believe that men and women deserve equal rights but that gay people do not deserve equal rights to straight people, or that mentally handicapped people do not deserve the same rights as not handicapped people. Believing that genders are equal doesn't mean believing that everyone is equal. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 05:51 PM |
| 2 | 50/50I see being retarded is your shtick. Carry on. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 05:42 PM |
| 1 | 50/50You're confused. feminism is no longer about equality is the claim. But the definition of feminism is about being equal. Just because people who call themselves feminists don't believe in equality, doesn't mean that the term has changed. It simply means that people use the wrong word. Much like "irony" is synonymous with sarcasm, but people often use it wrong, thinking it means an unlucky coincidence. If you call somebody a feminist, and they don't believe in equality between the genders, then y… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 05:39 PM |
| -5 | 50/50From your link. protect a universal generalization from counterexamples by changing the definition I never changed the definition of anything. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 04:11 PM |
| 4 | 50/50Fair enough, I disagree, but understand where you are coming from. We will just agree to disagree. People like this are not feminists, imo. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 04:04 PM |
| 4 | 50/50No, I will not get the fuck out, son. Why should I? I believe in men's rights. I also believe in women's rights. These aren't mutually exclusive ideas. The article posted is hilarious and ironic because of their cognitive dissonance, nobody's debating that. But I take umbrage with misandrists being used as the default example for feminists when they are not even the same thing. Unfortunately, in this digital age of anonymity and empowerment, misandrists, much like many of the most radical believ… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 03:57 PM |
| 3 | 50/50That's not how it works. You're not a follower of an ideology if you don't actually practice that ideology. These are FINOs (Feminists In Name Only). | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 03:50 PM |
| -5 | 50/50Feminism by definition is about equality. It has never changed. If you believe women are superior, you are not a feminist, you are a misandrist. Just because you mislabel yourself, doesn't change the definition of the word. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 03:48 PM |
| -5 | 50/50feminism is no longer about equality Feminism has always been and will always be about equality. What you meant to say is that many self-proclaimed feminists are actually misandrists. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 03:11 PM |
| 1 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.Language is always changing. If it wasn't, words like irregardless wouldn't be acceptable now (and in the dictionary too, sadly). Just because a book says "this is how it is" doesn't make it necessarily how it is. While dresses are made with women in mind, that doesn't mean that we must call them "women's dresses". We just call them dresses and the expectation is that 9 times out of 10, we understand that the person wearing it will be a woman. Besides, if the word "woman" is already in your defi… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/14 01:36 AM |
| 1 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.You know what? Even if we can't agree on this, I really respect that you didn't just lash out at me for saying you were being condescending. And on that topic, if I have in any way acted condescending as well (I try not to, but sometimes I fail), I apologize too. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/14 08:53 PM |
| 1 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.Here's the difference between the two of us here. I believe that words have meaning. Sorry, I won't be bothering to discuss this with you since you feel the need to be condescending rather than actually discuss things. Bye. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/14 01:57 PM |
| 1 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.There's a rule now? ROFL Okay. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/14 01:56 PM |
| 1 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.No, they're not. Exactly. They are designed with a generic female body type in mind, but they are not designed for women as in "only women can wear these, only women will wear these, and we must stress when we refer to them that these are not simply dresses, but women's dresses." anymore than you would refer to dildos as "women's dildos" simply because they were designed with women in mind and the expectation that 999 times out of 1000 it's going to be women using them. My mother is short, stout… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/14 12:11 PM |
| 1 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.So now you're saying that a woman who has had a double masectomy shouldn't wear a dress because dresses were designed specifically with boobs in mind, and if you don't have them, the dress won't fit. ...and yet, Eddie Izzard, a man with no boobs, fits comfortably into dresses, so either you're wrong that they're made with boobs in mind, or he has his dresses tailored to fit him, in which case THEY STILL SHOULDN'T BE FUCKING REFERRED TO AS WOMEN'S DRESSES WHEN TALKING TO HIM ABOUT THEM. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/14 12:02 PM |
| 0 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.Perhaps the occasional really fat person dress could fit a man or woman interchangeably. Otherwise, men and women are shaped very differently. And yet, Eddie Izzard is able to fit in dresses comfortably. So either he can just go out and buy a dress off the rack that fits him, in which case you are wrong, or his dresses are tailored specifically for him, in which case you are wrong. Either way, you are wrong. Get over it. He wears dresses, not women's dresses. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/14 01:23 AM |
| 0 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.So does your father, but that doesn't make him a woman (in the literal sense). | /r/MensRights | 23/04/14 10:23 PM |
| 10 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.Tailored, literally. Anything tailored literally isn't made for an entire gender, it's made for a single individual. We're not talking about going into a shop and having someone take our measurements and then coming back a week or so later to pick up the perfectly form-fitting item, because if we were, then your comment wouldn't hold any water since his dresses were tailored for him, and thus are not women's dresses. Therefore, the only way your comment could (potentially) hold water is for us t… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/14 05:59 PM |
| 13 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.Dresses aren't "tailored toward the female body" because women have all different sizes and shapes, just as do men. They are simply marketed toward women because that's the largest demographic for people who will buy them. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/14 04:50 PM |
| 15 | Gender Shaming - How to change the world one shrug at a time.Maybe he needs the turban to conceal the dark lord. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/14 04:46 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter