TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ILOVEBOPIT Archive

View 0 posts and 190 comments by ILOVEBOPIT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Men who commit crimes are a problem, women who are like women are victimized more than men are a problem. As a woman you are less likely to be killed than you would be if you were a man. The problem is also some women who commit violent crimes as well. “Men commit more violent crime than women” while true is not a reason to falsely claim “women are victimized more than men.”
/r/MensRights17/06/24 07:03 PM
3

The problem is acting like you have more to fear because you are a woman, when men are more likely to be victims of murder and assault. Like 8x more likely to be murdered. And that’s true in nearly every single country.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:20 PM
4

She would have said so, no chance she passes up that opportunity
/r/MensRights30/05/24 03:34 PM
1

Not just an emergency, a lot of women will look to a man to help with any issue— kill this bug, read this map, fix my car… things that men aren’t inherently better at but some women have made themselves helpless to do. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with asking men for help except when it’s coming from women who say they’ll pick the bear. Or women who think a world without men would be better and ignore all the difficult labor-intensive jobs done almost exclusively by men that women wouldn…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 03:17 PM
1

I guess this is what people do when they’re too scared to go outside lol
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:34 PM
1

Touch grass agoraphobe
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:23 PM
2

How is this being defensive? Why do you think it’s better to not ask for help if you’re being mauled by a bear? Your post history makes me think you’re autistic so I’m not defensive or bent out of shape about it, I just think you don’t know how people work.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:10 PM
2

What is this comment even meant to mean? Also I think anyone being attacked by a bear would scream for whoever is there to save them, even if it’s a psycho. Was this supposed to be a slam?
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:04 PM
2

Well I might ask if they went camping in the woods and kept all their food right next to the camp site. Is that too much victim blaming?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 09:25 PM
12

If they actually got stuck with a bear they’d be screaming for a man to save them. Given the actual choice of being stuck with a man, a bear, or a man and a bear, they would all pick the man and the bear if they’re not trying to score oppression points or extremely deluded.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:38 PM
2

The US has always been better than Canada. I say this as an American with one Canadian parent who has spent a lot of time there. Canadians (and Europeans) largely grew up with little brother syndrome compared to the US and got sick of it when they got older and now just grasp at literally anything to claim they’re better than the US, even the way they write the date and the size of their paper.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:23 PM
77

Also they don’t understand that it’s an acting nomination and doesn’t have anything to do with the message of the film. It’s equivalent to saying no white person should get nominated for a role in 12 Years a Slave. Also is basically saying that women should get special treatment, which I’m not surprised might be what they thought the message of the movie was.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:07 PM
4

Maybe they should look at men ~24-38, the percent would surely be higher. Most 18-22 year olds shouldn’t be having kids.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:39 PM
2

Kids are better off with no dad than a dad who’s a criminal living in the home. Even if it’s “just” drug dealing, having a child in a drug dealer’s home is not going to be beneficial to the child.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:37 PM
11

6pm what the actual fuck? Lots of people don’t even get home from work at that time. Not to mention, more people on the streets is good for women. You want more bystanders, people don’t get randomly attacked in a crowd. That’s why late night is dangerous, you’re all alone. She’d make 7pm as dangerous as 2am, all it takes is one creep to break curfew (which is obviously incredibly easy, there’s nothing keeping you inside). Why would rapists obey it? There are so many things wrong and ridiculous h…
/r/MensRights18/11/23 07:28 PM
66

As if people don’t constantly shame Leo DiCaprio for dating younger women.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 07:18 PM
15

It is extremely unlikely (to the point that it’s essentially incorrect to state) that the true proportion is higher. People who are more likely to be raising another man’s child are more likely to take a paternity test, meaning a lot of tests taken will be negative. Most people don’t take them because they don’t need to, there’s no question.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:05 PM
1

Here’s the honey: “That sucks you feel the need to wear makeup when you don’t want to. Fortunately, men don’t care and often can’t tell if you’re wearing it, why don’t you discuss this with the women who do care?”
/r/MensRights27/10/23 11:51 AM
2

Same with lip filler. Was just in a conversation this week where a bunch of girls were talking about going to spend $120 to get either a lip curl or lip filler. Girls who’d never considered it were convinced in literally minutes by the other girls to go do it. One girl said to her friend “don’t you need to make your car payment?” and her friend says “it’s only a hundred dollars, let me see if I got paid yet this week.” Every guy was incredulous that the girls are doing this when no guy cares abo…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 11:46 AM
23

Saw an Icelander post something like this on Instagram, encouraging all “women and non-binary people” in Iceland to take the day off “both paid and unpaid” “for the whole day.” Imagine if men did this. Most of the police, EMS, and doctors would be gone. Which demonstrates the opposite of their intention, showing that men work the most important jobs and if women all took the day off it makes far less of an impact than if men did. No one is saying women’s jobs aren’t important or women aren’t imp…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:48 PM
11

This is so simple-minded. It’s not like women are offered a 50k job and a 100k job and they take the 50k. Is that actually what you think is happening? Do you have any common sense? This statement severely lacks basic intelligence and knowledge of the topic. Fields that pay more usually require more training, more schooling, more difficult training/schooling, or are undesirable jobs (dangerous, dirty, bad work hours, lots of manual labor, etc.) Women generally choose jobs that require less schoo…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:44 PM
2

Yeah ask women how much they think about astrology, something that literally is not real.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:49 PM
4

Holy fuck. The comments are way worse than I thought they’d be. Literally everyone except for this linked comment thinks he’s an asshole for doing something with only boys. In their mind he cannot do that. Why is it his responsibility to mentor girls as well? Why must he do it for everyone if he is doing it for anyone? Why can’t someone else do it for the girls? This guy has to do everything? The boys are not allowed to have a place without girls? Then they’re attacking the skills he’s teaching …
/r/MensRights18/09/23 12:09 AM
5

…come on this is really not a proper mindset. Don’t automatically believe anyone, but don’t believe none of them.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:42 PM
8

You could really just leave it at calling it football because Americans are far more likely to watch that than soccer.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:19 PM
1

You really did not. You just said women were barred from being rulers, which contradicts what some people here said. I said outside of the purpose of that argument of which was more, what does it matter which was more in the past?
/r/MensRights11/08/23 04:44 AM
3

Okay but outside the purposes of the argument of who ruled more, what does it matter?
/r/MensRights10/08/23 03:05 PM
3

If she’s telling everybody at work there’s a chance her husband already knows and might not care.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:29 AM
4

The queen was not allowed to be a leader cause she was a woman Not disagreeing with this but… what does it matter? Also, you really should to be analyzing length and importance of reigns. Number of kings vs number of queens is silly as many rulers only last weeks to months. Whereas Elizabeth was just queen for arguably the 70 most important years of history to date.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:19 AM
8

The “her” is about the article’s author, genius, not you.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:00 PM
3

I might say home structure was built by women but most of society was still conceptualized and developed by men. Men made the laws and did the governing and constructed the buildings and laid out the towns and cities and performed nearly every occupation… women were certainly important partners to many of the men who did it and I don’t want to say women are useless or had no role. But those are just the things that men did.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 08:08 AM
7

A lot of these people are only famous because they are women, not because of what they’ve done. You neglected Marie Curie and Rosalind Franklin who would have actually been good picks. But imagine being asked to make a list of important men in history. You’d never be able to stop. Important and well-known women in history? Very easy to make a list because it’s so short. Is that women’s fault? Not completely. But lamenting that the world is built by men is odd considering how much worse the world…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 02:18 AM
1

Requiring nice clothing is not antiquated. Nor are collars. Personally I don’t think it’s discriminatory at all. They want both men and women to dress nicely. Men and women wear different clothes. Requiring women to wear collars would be weird. Requiring men to wear a dress would be weird.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:53 PM
6

These places where women and girls cannot wearing revealing clothing, you’re saying men/boys are allowed to wear or are wearing revealing clothing? If not, this isn’t discrimination. And I highly doubt they are, guys for some reason rarely feel the need to show more skin. Not saying women are being like slutty or anything but modesty is a very common policy and is equally applied in most places imo.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:40 PM
23

In my school, there was a rule about how short shorts could be and how wide shoulder straps had to be. The girls constantly bitched about how annoying it was for them and the boys could wear whatever they wanted. I guess they didn’t realize the dress code was universal, no targeting or discrimination against them. Sorry that boys just wear less revealing clothes?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:36 PM
2

The women’s club at my grad school (which is 80% women already, but for some reason still needs a women’s club [by the way, there’s no men’s club because none of the men care about doing stupid bullshit]) sent out emails about some speaker they were having. The talk was about the “gender pay gap,” or maybe it said wage gap, in our field (optometry). It was just on zoom so I attended. The “gap” this woman talked to them about, by her own admission, is literally 2.7%. A 2.7% difference between mal…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 12:09 AM
5

Not to mention that women will be significantly weirded out by the fact that the guy went through all that just to be a couple inches taller.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 02:12 PM
3

I’d agree if evidence didn’t point toward boys being disadvantaged in school by the education system, starting with women teachers in elementary school, who are highly likely to be leftist/feminist, who give preference to girls. https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/2020-update-for-every-100-girls-part-i/ this is a link everyone here should bookmark
/r/MensRights05/02/23 04:39 PM
27

Also, men’s aggression in pushing for promotions, leadership positions, higher salaries… Also grades meaning nothing in the real world. Certainly not after your first job.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 04:53 AM
1

Because .1% of the population ends up pervading so many areas of the rest of our lives, that’s why it comes up a lot. Seeing pronouns everywhere and being forced to put mine in my email signature. Women in my locker room. Kids at drag shows. Men in women’s sports. Being told it’s bigoted to say “pregnant women” and similar things that assume gender. Acting like it’s normal that we have a pregnant man emoji. Are all of those things a big deal? No, not all. But all of these things injected into ou…
/r/MensRights03/01/23 02:52 AM
2

It’s because being trans has nothing to do with sexuality, and LGB does. They’re separate concepts with different interests and goals and lives. If a trans person is LGB then they don’t need the T to be in there anyway to be included in it.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:18 AM
10

Drop the T was great. It really advanced the idea of LGB people not all confirming to woke-ism and rejecting radical trans ideology. But that destroys leftist narratives so we can’t have that.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:22 PM
9

That sub is my favorite thing because of the name and the fact that they allow any content having to do with xy chromosome people in order to not be transphobic. And if the sub were created with that name, now rather than ~10-15 years ago, they’d surely be banned for transphobia. But yes in order to somehow not be transphobic, content from/about xy people is all over the xx sub. One time I went there and literally 18 of the top 25 posts were selfies from trans (xy) people. Any comments not showe…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 04:30 PM
24

Maybe just the gross guys you’ve had sex with. Make yourself more desirable and you’ll find better partners. Although I get the impression that you’ve switched to women and we can all form our own assumptions as to why. Imagine admitting you’ve only had sex with trash lol
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:36 AM
27

The fact that this is your description of sex is pathetic. But I love your assumption that the man she would have to have sex with is gross, because I agree, no respectable man would.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:14 AM
6

It’s talking about DNA testing, clearly it’s about African ancestry.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 07:56 PM
24

We don’t really refer to white people living in Africa as having African ancestry.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 02:17 PM
1

Oh well if you just mean the ones who hate men, sure. I took it as meaning all women because that’s what many of them say about all men.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 02:54 PM
4

I’ve never thought of these as being feminine
/r/MensRights21/12/22 11:49 AM
3

I have just as much distaste for this sentiment too
/r/MensRights21/12/22 11:47 AM
28

The worst of those slogans is “the future is female.” I guess they really want a future without us? I guess there’s no future for me? And they want me not to succeed? As if men, while responsible for many bad things in the world, aren’t also responsible for the vast majority of great things in the world? It’s not something that makes me depressed, I fortunately don’t have any issues with my mental health, but I have extreme distaste toward those who say this phrase without care for how it makes …
/r/MensRights21/12/22 01:01 AM
34

Because she doesn’t like males
/r/MensRights12/12/22 09:10 PM
29

50% of people who take paternity tests (selection bias). If you’re taking a paternity test it’s because you’re not sure. Most people don’t take them because they know.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 04:46 PM
2

Men and women both have more empathy for women than men. It’s well-studied. Men are seen as expendable.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:52 AM
3

Men are more likely to be killed partially because killing them removes someone who would actually be threatening to you in a situation (if I’m going to commit a crime, a man is more likely to stop me than a woman, so I’ll kill him first), and because people have less empathy for men.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:12 AM
3

Just because it doesn’t make sense to you doesn’t mean it’s not true. Look at statistics, men make up 79% of homicide victims in the US, and globally. You are less likely to be a random victim of violence as a woman. Just because someone is a man doesn’t mean they’re going to survive a gunshot. Guns just kill you regardless. Because being the victim makes people feel like they’re right and someone else is the bad guy. When you’re the victim, problems aren’t your fault, and you get to blame thing…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:47 AM
3

You are still in less danger as a woman, so acting like you are less safe because you are a woman is at best ridiculous and at worst a desire to feel like a victim, because it’s not something that’s grounded in reality. Nobody gets killed by a man’s bear hands. They get killed by weapons. Which are going to kill me just as much as they’ll kill a woman.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:30 AM
3

Men actually have more reason to be afraid, they’re more likely to be attacked and murdered. Not that it’s a competition, but it does bother me when women say they have to be careful or they can’t go out late because they’re a woman.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:00 AM
4

No I didn’t say anything like that. But your sentiment seems to be that since men committing the crime, women are the real victims. And men shouldn’t complain about being victims of violence since it’s man-on-man crime. That’s really the only way I can interpret your initial comment. Also this point about location has nothing to do with my initial comment so I have no idea why you brought that up. It’s not about how you act around certain people. It’s your opinion about groups who commit violenc…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 11:28 PM
3

What do you mean about location?
/r/MensRights05/12/22 11:14 PM
7

I always wonder if people who say this have the same opinion about other groups disproportionately prone to committing violence
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:40 PM
0

Right, men and women don’t have to like the same things. That’s the whole point of us being different. If I like a woman who likes something (like wearing heels, putting on makeup, or being penetrated), I don’t also have to like that thing. Anyone making that conclusion really lacks a proper analysis of social interactions and interests. Seems almost like one of those cultural Marxism type things where the person just wants to tear down the foundations of what you are used to because they think …
/r/MensRights12/11/22 06:08 PM
1

“Wishes she was a killer” then
/r/MensRights11/11/22 05:00 PM
8

Lmao in what way are you being censored? No one deleted your comments, you’re completely free to keep saying this stuff.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:34 PM
2

Nobody can cater to others’ irrational feelings. It’s literally impossible. People can have an irrational fear of anything, it’s not anyone else’s responsibility to accommodate that because you can’t. Your irrational feelings are something you have to deal with. Expecting others to change their behavior to accommodate you is irrational. Feeling unsafe whenever a man is around you is irrational.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 03:11 AM
2

That would still lead to them being the same price though. Meaning the mens product goes up in price.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 12:13 AM
7

It does seem to give exemptions for products whose material costs are different. Couldn’t they all just use this reason to still charge more for something pink? Also how is anyone supposed to prove a product is marketed/intended toward a certain gender unless it explicitly says that? I don’t think being pink is enough of a legal argument to say “this is for women,” plenty of mens clothes are pink.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:59 PM
47

On the death reports thing, nothing bugs me more than “11 people were killed, and 3 of them were women!” And the other 8 were just nothing, I guess. Actually a disgusting thing to say.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 04:03 PM
25

That’s honestly just how low their opinion of men is: Boyfriend won’t have sex without consent “Sounds like a rapist”
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:47 AM
4

Also, women are more than 50% of voters. If all women wanted abortion legal, it would be, no matter what men wanted. The act like men are the entire problem, and if men stopped making laws (that women elected them to make) all their problems would go away. They just ignore the fact that women voters and lawmakers also disagree with them in significant numbers. It crumbles their argument.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:11 PM
0

Perhaps women shouldn’t “bitch” about laws either considering they comprise a greater portion of the electorate than men do. Politicians do more of the bidding of women than men. Also if you google “federal resources for women” and then “federal resources for men” I think you’ll find some big differences. What makes you think more money is spent on men’s issues when all of these exist without counterparts for men?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:21 PM
7

Hooters waitress is a specifically appearance-based job. That is different.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:48 AM
43

“Not only are men with golden penis syndrome more likely to treat their dates badly, but they may also be less likely to put effort into their physical appearance, he said.” Literally what is bad about this? If you don’t like the way they look, don’t date them? Also imagine criticizing women for not putting on makeup. They’d rip you apart as a misogynist.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 01:06 PM
17

bussy week So maybe men can get this too?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 11:20 PM
21

Severe symptoms are not normal. That would be considered a medical condition requiring treatment. That is not common to all women and does not merit every woman working 85% the amount of men for presumably equal pay and status.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 11:11 PM
3

Slightly more than half of people becoming MDs and DOs these days are women. Pharmacists 63% women, optometrists 71%. Incoming dentists and podiatrists are only about 25-35% women but are vastly outnumbered by the rest.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 11:55 PM
1

Dude, you have some objectively poor arguments that are easy to deconstruct. I’m on your side but if you bring up these arguments to anyone else they will rip you apart and you won’t have a good response. I don’t want other MRAs going out saying what you’re saying because the retorts are easy, I came up with them immediately after reading your comments. I’m not teaching you how to be good or compliant, I’m telling you some of your arguments are poor or ill-defended. Don’t act like I’m a feminist…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 04:35 AM
1

>What about them? Your statistic about divorced couples doesn't account for them. >the 'separation' is treated exactly the same as if they were getting a divorce Not in your statistics >No he doesn't 'get her pregnant.' She gets herself pregnant. All he does is have sex with her. EOS. Semantics, I don't care how you word it either way. >If women’s partial responsibility for pregnancy does not obligate them to support a fetus, then men’s partial responsibility for pregnancy does not obligate them…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 11:01 PM
2

What about relationships that did not begin as marriages? A guy gets a girl pregnant and doesn’t raise the kid. Also at the risk of sounding like a feminist, just because the wife initiated divorce that doesn’t mean it’s unjustified. How many of those initiated divorces are because the dad actually sucks as a husband or as a dad?
/r/MensRights18/04/22 11:22 AM
1

All of this is great info and I agree, but a lot of kids are fatherless because the dad walked out too. Not really fair or accurate to blame it all on moms kicking out dads, although that certainly does happen.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:43 AM
14

Everyone will, because they’re easier to overpower and outrun. Especially now that they’re lowering fitness standards for them. Blatantly worsening aspects of society for forced diversity. This is why people are opposed to it. Not long before there are forced promotions of these less competent officers into higher up positions, and they’ll get them because it’ll take them off the street. Completely unfair.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 04:32 PM
21

The laugh makes it make less sense, if it was staged he would have acted angry from the start. Also wouldn’t have been crying during break being consoled by Denzel Washington and Tyler Perry.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:13 PM
16

Ayanna Presley tweeted support for Smith and later deleted it Some other blue check mark black woman tweeted “anyone who thinks this is fake doesn’t know black people” which isn’t necessarily supporting it but I found that to be super racist lol
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:08 PM
1

If there is a quota, yes. That’s the whole point of what this discussion is, strange you aren’t following that but that’s definitely why all your responses express confusion. Go through the conversation again and you might understand it better.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 04:12 AM
6

Honestly difficult to tell if she is just low IQ or trying to push an agenda despite knowing her data comparisons are bad
/r/MensRights20/01/22 12:48 AM
1

Right, both things are just a jerk move. But only one of them has a sexist term attributed to it. Hmmm
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:28 PM
1

Right. If it’s not sometimes it’s always or never.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:41 PM
2

“Scrotes don’t live in a society where they’re routinely dehumanized” God, the irony. They’re certainly trying to make it that way.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:20 AM
1

Yeah wasn’t worried about it just feel like people weren’t understanding what I’m saying because I think most people here would agree with me. Anyway yeah I agree, the loss of meritocracy is going to destroy this country. It will objectively make everything worse.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:58 PM
10

I see that mentioned every time someone mentions the high IQ portion. It strengthens the point and it’s well-known.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:32 AM
12

What “male only category” is any aspiring female gamer restricted from? Does not exist. They have every opportunity men have. Every male gamer gets harassed and shit talked as well, ask any guy what it was like playing COD growing up, you get some vile insults thrown at you. Guys are just better at brushing it off, every guy I know went through that and turned out fine. People shit talking you is not an excuse for being worse when most people can get over it.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:24 AM
1

Oh yeah I agree there. Not sure why I got downvoted one my comment though, it’s also just like believing women are “underrepresented” in engineering because there’s a low percentage of them, but who cares? I don’t think representation needs to be corrected artificially.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 11:52 PM
1

Not sure what you mean
/r/MensRights24/12/21 09:09 PM
0

I could agree they’ve been underrepresented but not see that as something that’s a problem (at least not anymore) or that needs to change. The right number is whatever number there is right now since no one’s being barred or discriminated from entry.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 04:11 PM
29

It seems to always be reporting the amount of women who die, as if the rest are just some default nothing person. Atlanta spa shootings earlier this year were reported everywhere as “8 murdered, and 6 of them were women!” As if that makes it worse, as if it would be better if none of them had been women. Because then it’s like no one got killed at all, right?
/r/MensRights21/12/21 02:18 AM
5

I could have a good laugh at this if the person intended it lightheartedly and genuinely has positive opinions about both men and women. I just have a problem if it comes from a place of genuine negativity toward men. Since we don’t know, eh, I’ll forget about it. But you’re right, even as a lighthearted joke this could never be made in the reverse scenario.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 10:19 PM
55

No no no, she didn’t walk into him, HE walked into HER! So rude of him!
/r/MensRights10/12/21 10:43 PM
45

She’s also the one who made the ultimatum, I’m wearing this or going home. Then he said I guess you’re going home. I don’t get why she’s complaining about being uncomfortable alone in an Uber or something? I assume she got there in an Uber and was planning on going home in one too, so what’s the problem there? Just something to complain about.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 12:37 PM
12

To be fair as boys 20 years ago we would sing the opposite at my school. But the paradigm has had an interesting shift the in last 20 years. Back then, when kids had the “are boys better than girls” discussion, boys saying it felt it was true, and girls seemed to also think, deep down, boys are better than girls, but they were indignant about it and would argue the opposite. Both were proud of who they were and advocated for their own gender. Now when girls say they are better, the dynamic pushe…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 10:30 PM
3

Do you think men or women are more likely to be randomly assaulted or murdered when walking around late at night?
/r/MensRights15/11/21 12:25 AM
6

Some people would rather join a lifting club more focused on camaraderie with other men than athletic ability. Lifting ability is irrelevant in this post, the guy is talking about gym bro culture and you are changing the subject.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:12 PM
1

To be fair, women were historically marginalized in the past. But that’s certainly not the case in the western world anymore, in many ways it’s become the opposite, and this historical context has no effect on boys of today. And using it as an excuse for any negative attitude or concrete measure against males is destroying them. The historical context doesn’t justify anything, certainly not what has been enacted in modern times. So now that I think about it, I’m not sure why I brought it up. If …
/r/MensRights12/11/21 05:18 PM
85

You could try asking them “How do you think it makes someone feel to repeatedly hear others saying they should be killed, and it’s publicly acceptable to say that? It makes them pretty sad, to say the least.” Boys growing up hearing this don’t know all this historical context and it’s not relevant to them, but what is relevant to them is people around them thinking they are worthless or evil. And it’s damaging to their mental health.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 03:35 AM
1

Then it affects men just as much?
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:41 PM
8

In what way, specifically? Physically, by someone having sex with them? Financially? Emotionally? You are being extremely vague.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:00 PM
3

I think those little things matter a lot for trained professionals at the top of their game versus an untrained person is so different from a pro the difference in weight will usually matter less than skill and training. But it’s all pretty irrelevant to all of us who recognize men are stronger than women on average, we’re literally under a parent comment saying how much these women pros are irrelevant to that discussion lol
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:00 PM
6

The point is these women shut down someone’s experience because he’s a man. Rereading their comments I actually do believe they’re saying to him essentially shut up and/or get over it. They’re saying he can’t make that request without for some reason talking about women.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 04:52 PM
5

Yeah people see that as punching up so it’s fair game to them.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 03:31 PM
8

Because that’s not the point of this post
/r/MensRights16/10/21 03:30 PM
21

Yeah the logic here is ridiculous Something bad happens to a man, he’s like this sucks Same bad thing happens to a woman, she’s like this sucks and it happened to me because I’m a woman Man says that happened to me to, it’s not just happening to women Woman says now you know what it feels like to be a woman —The women even deny it’s true that it happens to men, they concede that it happens to men but somehow it’s still a “women’s experience” that this bad thing happens to them. It’s such brainwa…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 03:27 PM
9

Mary Baker Eddy started her own religion and it still exists today in large numbers and it fucking sucks
/r/MensRights12/10/21 11:40 PM
3

If you want to go by the metric or number of victims of attacks, you will lose handily. Men are far more likely to be assaulted and murdered than women. The attacks on women are just different, usually of a sexual nature, but far less common. You’ll see people preaching against violence toward women in Mexico where men are 9x more likely to be murdered. It’s not even close. Every asymmetry like the one you state is not evidence of a patriarchy or life being harder for women. I can list a hundred…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:42 PM
1

Right, as if it said “stop skinny women” or something.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:07 AM
2

Well you know what they say about assumptions.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 11:24 PM
2

My comment is about avoiding awkward or annoying questions. People will definitely ask awkward or annoying questions if the husband takes the wife’s last name because nobody does that. You’re being obtuse.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 11:16 PM
2

Where did I say the children would take the husband’s last name? I specifically worded my comment such that it does not say that so I wouldn’t get a response like yours. But you didn’t catch it.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 11:12 PM
7

If the wife doesn’t take the husbands last name, not everyone in the family will have the same last name. Leads to awkward scenarios and questions you’d probably rather not deal with your whole life. You don’t need one, I’m not sure why you phrased it that way, that’s just what would happen.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 10:31 PM
15

Basically every situation where it would be annoying to have a different last name than your kids. Plus everyone will think you’re divorced.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 08:55 PM
8

One time I off handedly said “I follow a subreddit for men’s rights and-“ and I was cut off by my girl friends bursting out laughing and saying “men’s rights??”
/r/MensRights21/09/21 11:58 PM
4

When has anyone ever said that a woman accusing a man should lose her job?
/r/MensRights17/09/21 02:56 PM
19

Yeah other instances of the pedestal are news stories that say “x number of people died, and y of them were women” when y is like a quarter of x. Okay and the other 75% of people… are just nothing? Are just some nondescript default person? The obvious implication is that when women die, it’s worse.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 04:10 PM
54

They said it about the global pandemic 🤷🏼‍♂️ where more men objectively died
/r/MensRights19/07/21 11:39 AM
2

Lmao at the inability to think of 2 drunk people both wanting to hook up with each other
/r/MensRights09/07/21 05:55 PM
6

“She’s a nobody” is moving the goalposts because your initial request asked for specific examples, not well-known community leaders or anything
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:44 PM
6

You’re moving the goalposts and pulling a no true Scotsman. He found you someone and you say no no that’s not a feminist…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 04:23 PM
4

I just made another comment saying the spending asymmetry isn’t my issue, it’s the hosts saying mothers love their children more because they carried them in the womb. As if a father could never love their child as much.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:44 PM
6

Yeah I don’t really care about that number being asymmetric, it’s for a number of factors, like you say that dads don’t care/men tend to be more satisfied being simplistic. Plus anyone without a dad will probably spend extra on their mom and 0 on their dad which makes it more lopsided. The hosts’ sexist reasoning was just awful
/r/MensRights19/06/21 08:29 PM
15

Meanwhile I heard on the radio yesterday that Americans on average spend like $29 less on their dad for Father’s Day than their mom for Mother’s Day, and the hosts said that’s fine because women carry the children during pregnancy so women must love their children more (???)
/r/MensRights19/06/21 05:23 PM
4

That’s irrelevant to your last comment, women aren’t restricted from joining the golf course.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 09:57 PM
3

What does that have to do with OP?
/r/MensRights18/06/21 05:56 PM
7

Well I’m not supposed to walk behind her, or approach her, they say, and the only other option is cross the street or just fucking stand still. I walk faster than most women. There is nothing wrong with passing them. Never said this is a nightmares, I’m pointing out how ridiculous this guide is. It’s probably made by someone who doesn’t ever go out at night and doesn’t live in a city.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:41 PM
7

Yeah spreading actual information like this will do much more to make women feel safe than this guide, which even when perfectly followed by every man ever would only make women feel safe for an extra 5 seconds on the sidewalk. If they have this mindset they’ll still be scared every time they’re alone at night and get home saying thank god I wasn’t attacked. It’s a bandaid over the problems that are fear mongering + acting like potential victims taking any steps to make themselves safer (ie don’…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:36 PM
9

Crossing the street and (then having to cross back, presumably) every time you’re walking near a woman is absolutely ridiculous. What if... oh fuck there’s a woman on the other side of the street! I’ll just ...?? Maybe I’ll stand in the middle of the road to keep them safer. Or I’ll keep crossing through traffic all night to spare someone 5 seconds of feeling uncomfortable at my existence. No, I just walk past them. Boom, done, over with, and other person realizes they had nothing to worry about…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 03:29 PM
11

Apparently the person who wrote the research paper is so inept that when they googled the phrase, 163 million results came up, and somehow they thought that meant 163 million people had searched that phrase. How are these people researchers? How are they getting degrees? What has academia become?
/r/MensRights30/04/21 06:10 PM
3

It’s not an advice sub but you’ll certainly get better advice here than most other subs on Reddit. Check out a recent post in /r/dataisbeautiful for how much /r/amitheasshole skews toward favoring women in the situation.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:16 PM
4

Yeah I don’t really have an issue with this being a plot point or even a joke in a movie, I’m pretty laid back and anything goes, the problem I have is that if they reversed the situation it’s suddenly not okay and we’d hear all about it.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 02:25 PM
2

I haven’t seen a single thing about the men, but I’ve seen Instagram posts with photos of large text names of the 6 women. And I guess we can just forget the men who died, they don’t matter.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:26 PM
6

Who knows why a psycho picks a certain spot, there could be a million reasons, and he killed men too. Regardless, no one should be acting like women dying is worse.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:22 PM
10

Everyone, man or woman, is equally helpless against a shooter unless they also have a gun, in which case man/woman still doesn’t matter.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:20 PM
4

By this logic we should start bringing to light the fact that white people are killed by black people at far greater rates than the reverse, and black peoples’ murders should get no attention because the majority of them are at the hands of other black people, and because they disproportionately commit more violent crime.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:19 PM
33

They’d rather bring down the number of women killed by 10 than decrease the number of men killed by 100, the way they talk about it.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 05:06 PM
2

This is a contender for worst comment I’ve ever read
/r/MensRights18/03/21 05:04 PM
22

That’s a little like the news about the recent shooting in Atlanta. “8 people shot, but 6 of them were women!” As if that makes it worse, and it would be better if men had died instead?
/r/MensRights18/03/21 05:00 PM
11

The men get a bonus every day? 🤔
/r/MensRights11/03/21 05:42 PM
1

Idk, other than the top 1 comment, the top 15 are all people saying NTA. I didn’t read the rest of what they said but I didn’t see one person call him an asshole. I completely agree with the sentiment of your post, I’m just not seeing it in the one you linked (aside from one other comment agreeing women have to work harder than men).
/r/MensRights07/03/21 04:56 AM
11

Someone at my school just started a club to talk about women’s issues, primarily the gender wage gap, when my school is 80% women. The main studies they look at for wage gap don’t even differentiate part time vs full time work, it’s a joke.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 05:24 PM
10

3 is such bullshit. You can’t say individuals aren’t the problem, the system is, but expect individual men to make all these changes. When you say so many disparaging things about men, you can’t say “well not you, or you, or you, just everyone like you.” No, you’re talking about me, stop acting like there is some boogeyman we all have to fight.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 05:23 PM
13

Kind of off topic but honestly I would kind of saying there is a growing theft culture in the US, and it’s really gross. The idea that stealing from businesses is perfectly fine because they can afford it or they have insurance... I heard a lot of that this past year. Rape culture though, no. Nobody argues for rape. No one has tried to legalize rape.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 01:37 AM
7

“Women have so much empathy that they struggle being surgeons” god I don’t even know where to begin with this. First, do you have a source for that? It seems pretty sexist against men and women, actually. Women won’t be good surgeons because they “care about people too much🥺,” (oh no, soooo toxic) men will be better surgeons because they won’t care about people too much 😇 (actually a toxic opinion). Not to mention, I think this was you just trying to say the least offensive thing you could about…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 09:08 PM
50

My school (in the medical field) recently made a push for racial equality in line with statistics in the US (they want 13% black enrollment, which wouldn’t even happen if we accepted every single black applicant) yet they completely ignore the fact that we are 80% women and ~40% white. I don’t personally care about the 80 or 40 %s but I’m not the one who claims to be pushing for equality.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 10:22 PM
5

I think it’s likely that there is a perception in Asian countries that if you want to work hard and make money to create a good life for yourself, the best place to do that is in America. So those who want to do that come here. Of course it’s also a place where you can mooch off the system once you’re in, and people do, but hyperlazy people probably will never even make the effort to move here. Plus people who are poor to begin with don’t have the money to do it.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 03:54 PM
2

It’s nice being a guy amongst a bunch of women a lot of the time. At my job I went to a few different offices in our company with all majority women, they were grateful to have a man around because of the whole “too many women” thing. As long as you’re a pretty normal guy and they’re pretty normal gals, they’ll love you. All the guys I worked with were pretty popular for that reason.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 05:05 PM
1

I also copy/pasted that to post it here lol. How can that comment even be real? Written by a man too.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 11:53 PM
1

San Francisco is possibly the most expensive area to live in the country. Anyone trying to live there while making minimum wage is making a very poor decision. I wish I could afford to live in a lot of places but I can’t because I don’t make enough money. That’s how the world works, you have to move.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 10:39 PM
0

What are all the expenses then? If 2 people working 100 hours a week can’t afford food and shelter they have to move somewhere cheaper. Definitely not saying they aren’t hard workers, but that scenario doesn’t really add up.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 09:03 PM
2

Not sure why you’re being downvoted, these are good takes. I totally agree on the car thing. I currently live in a city and I hate not having a car. I feel like I have absolutely no freedom. There’s really no personal advantage to using public transportation over a car and I feel bad for people who believe all the anti-car stuff. There’s so much you can’t do without a car and I feel bad lots of people have to miss out on that.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 08:55 PM
-3

If they had too many children they can’t afford, probably.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 08:27 PM
2

Lmao sadly haven’t seen the movie but thanks for helping me appreciate it
/r/MensRights25/11/20 03:49 AM
3

Why what? I don’t know what you’re asking if my last comment didn’t clarify it. Unless you’re trolling me or being intentionally obtuse.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 01:51 AM
2

If you’re asking why we call them male models and not just models it’s because the majority of models are women, and that’s historically been the case, and public exposure to models is primarily the female ones. So it’s a differentiator based on asymmetry.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 01:39 AM
10

Or male model
/r/MensRights24/11/20 08:50 PM
6

Men don’t really dominate medicine anymore. More than half of MD students are women, ~70+% of optometry students are women, 60+% pharmacy, 70+% PA, 90+% NP. In a few decades these fields will all be 70% women. If any of them aren’t already an even split of practitioners they’re rapidly approaching it.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 10:18 PM
4

I think incarceration should also be a punishment.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 10:05 PM
2

Again, whether or not a 13 year old is okay with it or consents to it is not the bar. Again, psychological effects on young, developing brains. I don’t get how that’s so hard to understand unless you yourself are a minor.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:55 PM
2

Do 5 year olds feel like a victim when they are molested? Often not, because they don’t realize what’s happening. That doesn’t make it okay and that’s not the bar for whether or not something is allowed. There is a reason we have laws against this stuff and if you aren’t against it there is a lot you don’t understand about manipulation and psychological effects on young developing brains.
/r/MensRights15/11/20 04:18 PM
13

Source on large scale misogyny in the west? Or evidence thereof?
/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:57 PM
2

Yeah as a guy I never put both earphones in late at night either, it’s just common sense.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 02:53 PM
27

Yeah this is definitely a description from their own moderators and it’s an anti rad-fem sub. Mods just set it to private themselves. Makes much more sense than Reddit calling out radical feminism or calling for its prosecution.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 01:54 AM
10

These are the people who want everyone else to pay for the education because their field is not at all lucrative because it’s not useful.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 04:50 PM
3

I’m not a huge fan of the title either. I get the intention but I feel like it was a little misleading if you don’t read the article/comments.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 03:49 PM
7

Then people shouldn’t use terms that can be construed that way. It just fuels discrimination. And where is the term toxic femininity? Not ALL women are toxic but some are!! It’s just stupid and feeds cycles of hatred among groups. Plus, when a guy actually is toxic, it just places the blame on the fact that he’s a man, which IMO resolves him of any actual responsibility. So even when “accurately” describing an individual man it still sucks as a term.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 03:15 PM
28

The only way to win is not to play Remember when someone made that monopoly type game where women start the game with more money to combat wage gaps or something? I still can’t imagine why anyone would want to play that. Men will just lose and women will only win because they’re women, I’m sure that’s satisfying. Sounds like a great game.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 10:39 PM
3

It’s huge in organic chemistry which is a necessary prerequisite to do anything medical. I wonder if it’s sort of an upbringing thing causing the discrepancy. Maybe because males are more inclined to play video games, or maybe they play with blocks and lego more and that helps? It would be an interesting research topic.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 05:41 AM
10

Yeah I’m not sure what level school/paper this is (probably high school since OP said teacher) but the lack of citations is not doing it any favors. OP just kind of makes statements with nothing to back them up so it’s easy for the teacher to just disagree. Throwing in some credible sources with quotations will really help.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 09:22 PM
6

I heard they each are paid $5000 to appear, and all cases involve $5k or less. So each party makes money unless one is ordered to pay the other $5k, in which case they earn $0 and the other earns $10k.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 02:41 PM
2

Yeah I would think the 7/11 would be a giveaway that it’s a joke. You’d never see that in an actual kids book like that.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 03:54 AM
22

There’s some good but there’s also a few “now you can’t see feminists don’t support men.” These really are just words, let’s see some action to support men. This post is still blaming men for perpetuating social stigma against male rape victims. “Men don’t report because of toxic masculinity.”
/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:36 PM
153

I’m torn on this. They say men are less likely to report because of toxic masculinity and social stigma, then they define toxic masculinity as men being portrayed as always looking for sex. They’re right that men don’t report because of social stigma, but in a way it almost seems blaming the male victims for being so “toxicly masculine” that they don’t report. I don’t think that’s the intent but it sort of comes across that way. Even if they’re using toxic masculinity as a term to define negativ…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:33 PM
13

$250k is definitely not “I don’t care about others” rich. Doctors and plenty of other good people make that. Now, making that much and not paying child support? Piece of shit.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 09:47 PM
18

Right, and his response was great. He listed ten asymmetries and her stupid ass thought that listing one would nullify what he said. But he wasn’t arguing it’s a matriarchy, he was arguing that asymmetries don’t prove anything, patriarchy or matriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 01:20 PM
3

The only context that makes this reasonable is if her next sentence was “just kidding I lied”
/r/MensRights12/02/20 04:08 AM
15

Apple news recommended me an article on how women are disproportionately affected by climate change. Why? Because in Africa men now have to walk farther to get supplies, so far that women can’t come with them (or it takes so long that women have to stay home for the family) and that creates more work for the women. So the women staying home while the men work harder affects women more. Got it.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 04:03 AM
11

Lower skills, lower revenue. It’s tied.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:23 PM
6

Typically boxers don’t, they’re looser. Boxer briefs will tighten and show your bulge.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 09:04 PM
5

Not biased, just stating what I believed to be true (I did use the phrase “I believe.”) And I own up to being misinformed.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:40 AM
2

Thanks for the response. Surprised to hear that. Not disagreeing but why might I be hearing that med students aren’t going into primary care? Am I just reading lies or is there some explanation?
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:38 AM
34

I agree with your comment until the last part. Very few medical students are going into primary care now because it doesn’t pay enough, especially not to offset their debt. The majority are specializing and I believe going into surgery.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:11 PM
2

Exactly, which is why I don’t think it’s a bad thing some schools have skewed percentages. There’s no way you get 80% of one gender due to bias in selecting applicants, it’s applicant pool because that’s what that gender is interested in. So this extreme push to even it out is very frustrating to say the least.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:56 AM
2

To be fair, this really doesn’t say much. Lots of schools have significant gender disparities (mine is 80% female, but we’re very small) due to programs they offer. Looking at national averages is the important number, specific school numbers aren’t nearly as relevant. Otherwise I could find a school where men outnumber women and say women need more representation in Canadian universities when they outnumber men anyway.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:27 AM
5

Good point that he clearly doesn't mention that it's women doing these things to men. Seems that only men can see that when there are inequalities that are negative toward men, it's because of society and culture, not because one group is actively trying to repress the other.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 04:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter